WEBVTT - Surveillance: International Relations With Haass

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz Jailey. We bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance an Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Let's bring it

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>down and proud about chief US economist and head of

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>markets three sixty North America down this Wednesday, we'll hear

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>from the President. We'll hear from Chaman Pal as well.

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>If you kind of have a preview of one, what

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>would you pick the chairman of the President? No, definitely,

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>I think on the fete side, this is about as

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>well telegraphed the meeting as we can get, so it

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>should be a pretty sleepy wait and see a meeting

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>so big. All eyes instead are on the President and

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>how he's going to try and pitch his really ambitious

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>plans on everything from infrastructure to taxes to climate. Dan,

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I love your your backdrop. You look like you're in

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the Endeavor space caps along your way to the stage

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.839
<v Speaker 1>this morning, Dan, I want to talk to you about

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea of we're retchinging up GDP expectations. Is GDP

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>catching up with the zeitgeist? Are we behind and we're

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to catch up with a boom economy? Now?

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I think of recent forecasts really are cashing up. You know,

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>we're calling for near double digit and so double digit

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>two two and then near double digit two three. Uh,

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a great looking a couple of months.

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>But as we're just saying earlier, the fett is pretty

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>much said they're going to look past that um and

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I think market should should understand that as well. The

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>real question is beyond the summer, after we get this

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>reopening driven boost, you know, how long is this going

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to sustain? And so. And there's also a question of

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the inflationary aspects that we see. Tom was talking about

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>how we're seeing copper searched the highest level since two

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven. We're seeing crop prices in the United States

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>sword to the highest in two thousand thirteen. How can

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we call this transitory? If this seems to have legs,

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>if people seem to be saying that they could see

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>prices continue to rise and at least not fall substantially

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.679
<v Speaker 1>from here. Yeah, I think that's the big question. Um.

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And definitely prices are going up. We saw really a

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>strong March inflation print at zero point three percent month

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a month or four UM. But is this all pricing

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>increases that are big one off driven by not just

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>reopening but all the supply ten issues. You know, we

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>we are hearing about semiconductor shortages of spreading beyond automobiles

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to all kinds of appliances that you know, is this

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna work itself out? Or is this actually going to

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>change what I think to be the key thing here,

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>which is expectations. Are people now going to start expecting

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>more higher prices and then perhaps demanding higher wages depoplacy

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the story on sound of the labor market to the

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>small wanting is in the airline situation, Tom, I just

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>want to bring up some of the airlines right now. Dutch.

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Your Luftanza over in Germany leading nicely, a i g.

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>The parent company of British Airways doing nicely as well.

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>This conversation to this morning about the EU Commission President

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>erslavon de Land speaking to the New York Times. Team

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>up US travelers going into Europe. Maybe that travel can

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>happen later this summer. She's just picking it up from

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>John Ferrell. John, you've been out on this and I

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>know we talked about Singapore, Hong Kong and other quarters

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>or bubbles whatever they call it. John, do you think

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it's feasible? I mean, you're the only one of us

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>three who's actually traveled. Well, I've got three things to

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>say about this. Matt Miller brought up one of them

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier this morning. Can Verse Slavon de Land actually made

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this decision for the EU? One too? Can we actually

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>have a system in place, some kind of vaccine passport

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>certificate system in place that every country understands. And three

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>look at the specific words Li Sir, that the EU

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>commission leader actually used. She was talking about vaccines that

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>were accepted in the EU but also accepted in the

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>United States. Now, first engineer that because as far as

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I understand, astra zeneca is not approved in the US.

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you've had an astra zeneca vaccine and you

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>live in Europe, can you travel to the US if

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be the agreement later this summer? Yeah?

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that the issue? Or is this just an issue

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>to try to prevent the Chinese vaccinations for being applicable

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to some of these travel guidelines. And then of course

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a question from a health perspective, and we're gonna

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>be getting that Daniel on. Just to wrap up with you,

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>one question a lot of people have is how much

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>can the US accelerate without the rest of the world

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>joining the feed here given a fact that we're seeing

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the acceleration in India and Brazil, some of the fastest

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>growing economies in the world, No, I think the acceleration

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be broader based. Certainly the US is

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>at the vanguard here, both in terms of vaccination kind

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of driven reopening hopes, uh and in terms of this

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>whole spending um. But one of our key messages has

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>been that Europe is not far behind in terms of vaccination.

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.239
<v Speaker 1>They're going to go through They're gonna they are, I believe,

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 1>working out their supply chain issue this on fascination distribution.

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So they're gonna see a nice um reopening. Taking back

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to in our forecasts starting in point when you two,

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we have your brointh after in the US, So it's

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be broader based um. And yeah, I think the

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>again the question is how much, however, is it's going

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to be sustained as beyond the sharp end of the

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>V shaped recovery. Um is are we gonna go back

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>to the same kind of decades long authentification trends we've

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>seen advanced economies prior to the pandemic? Or is this

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>really the start of something new? Down it's gonna catch up,

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna see it down on that bamp pant right now.

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Richard has joints President the Council on Foreign Relations. My

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>book of the summer last year and still hugely important,

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>if not more so now, The World A brief introduction

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>by the hardcover Hopefully you'll hit the head of the

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>smart mouth adolescent when you say, shut up and read this.

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>It is extremely important. The first hundred pages is truly classic.

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Highly highly recommend hosses The World, Richard hass I love

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>what you people have done as you look back at

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>our history and our concert of power in honor of

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>John Williamson in a more collegial Washington consensus. How do

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:23.679
<v Speaker 1>we get from Williamson's Washington Consensus to a more rigid

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>concert of power? Well, we can talk about it internationally.

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>This is simply my thinking that current international arrangements are

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>coming up short term and what we need to think

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of some ways of working with countries that are ideologically

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and politically and economically diverse from us, but we still

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>have to work together, whether it's on climate change, or

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>regulating cyberspace, or dealing with proliferation, you name it. Basically

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the defining challenges of this Europe and again right now

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a big gap between where we are and every

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>single one of these domains and where we need to be.

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I got a monograph from the mail Richard hass the

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>one Years of the Counsul and Foreign Relations. I'm going

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to read it cover to cover. It's actually really really

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting in the arch of a hundred years of the

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Council and Foreign Relations is our politics is every four years.

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>That's not the case in China. How do we do

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a concert of power when we've got a four year

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>time frame and President she has a many, many decade

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>time frame. Fair enough, each country has it's not just

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>its own system, as you say, but we have our

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>own strengths and weaknesses. China's weakness is that it's very

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>hard to challenge orthodoxy when their mistakes made such there

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>was with the one child policies such as there's been

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>with environmental policy. It's incredibly hard to correct those mistakes

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. China is committed in certain directions. We'll see

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>how it works out, but there's there's repression at home.

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Can they be that repressive at home and still introduce

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>new new ideas They're they're pushing out against the world,

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And the question is can they continue to benefit from

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>economic inter action at the same time they're alienating much

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of the world by their more assertive foreign policy. Yes, us,

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>we've got all our known mistakes are political weaknesses, are

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>political division, and I think there's real questions about whether

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>or how well we can perform over time. But taking

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a step back, the real question is whether the United

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>States and China can figure out a way to find

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>areas or pockets of cooperation against the backdrop of a

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>competitive relationship that does not actually become conflictual. Although people

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>are saying that the only way that the United States

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>can truly do this is if it gets some sort

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>of group of allies on board with it. In terms

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of how it counters China. Given your experience on your

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>tenure at the State Department, your knowledge of the key

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are at play here, how is Biden doing

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>with respect to unifying the allies, Well, it's gonna be tough.

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>One is, we've heard ourselves by not getting involved in

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>regional economic arrangements. That's an own goal, that's a major

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 1>source of potential leverage. But I think in general that

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the instinct that the all doction of this president is

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to work with allies Japan, South Korea, India. I think

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>we've heard ourselves with India by the slowness of our

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>response on vaccines. India is more fundamentally somewhat reluctant to

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>align itself against China. The Europeans, as you know, have

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of going their own way. Used to be China

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>with their with their own economic and financial arrangements. So

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the rhetoric has been better in some ways than the

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>reality of forging a common front against China. Richard, I'm

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>glad that you brought up India because I've been thinking

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot about this. Why hasn't the US gone more

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>aggressively into helping India Given the fact that the pace

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of vaccinations in the US has slowed, that the supply

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is pretty significant versus the population. How much has that

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>set back the United States? And what is the push

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>pull here in terms of why the US hasn't been

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive. Look, I've been railing on against this now

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 1>for for weeks. This administration quite honestly, has been more

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>America first, unchill essentially and its approach to vaccines than

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it ought to be. It makes no sense in terms

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of health because of the variance, and makes no health obviously,

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out, strategically, how do we bring into

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>your closer to us if we're not there for them

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>at a crisis. Just yesterday belatedly United States began to

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>move in that direction. But my guess is the administration

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>but legitimately wants to make sure that Americans are vaccinated,

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps more questionably, has been worried about being attacked

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>from the right over not taking care of Americans before

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it's helping the rest of the world, even though the

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>fundament the point is when we help the rest of

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the world, we help ourselves. Ambassador has quietly at the

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>end of your wonderful book The World, you have a

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>trench in phrase war within countries. Boy, does that ring home?

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Where there's Chad and the death of their presidency supposedly

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>on the front lines of their war with the Islamis extremists,

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>or the war within America as well. How do we

0:10:55.800 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>get out of our wars within countries? Tom, I don't

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>know the answer to that question, but I think the

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>answer to it will decide a lot of history. Take

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States, wait, for seventy five years, have been

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the principal architect and in some ways the general contractor

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of what organization in order have been in the world.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>But that's assumed that there was a sufficient degree of

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>consensus in the United States that we could do what

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we're doing in the world. If that consensus is no

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>longer there, if we don't have the bandwidth, the resources,

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the commonality of purpose to play that role in the world,

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>history is going to move in a very different direction.

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>And then something that the CFR has provide a great

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>leadership on, as of course attentions between Armenia and Turkey

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and Mr Biden providing decade long and multiple president leadership

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to state I believe the I don't want to get

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in trouble here, but state the obvious of nineteen fifteen.

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>What does President Biden in the Secretary of State signal

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 1>with this historic decision. Two things. One is that this

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>administration has placed human rights type consideration really high on

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the agenda, particularly compared to its predecessor. Second of all,

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a real sign just how far relations with Turkey

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>have deteriorated, and over over decades we were reluctant to

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>take this step. I was involved in these conversations myself

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>at the State Department and elsewhere, And what essentially now

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is people are saying this relationship isn't that valuable with

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>nan As a result, there is not a lot of downside.

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Just guess what, we've already got the downside, Richard, Just

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to sort of some up this around in the world

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in any days with Richard hases there is a question

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of which hotspot is the one we should be paying

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>attention to the most right now. Originally it was China,

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the US and the Biden administration was going to be

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the key test. That seems to have faded a bit.

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that wrong or is that sort of the focus

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>moved onward to another spot. Look, if you'd asked me

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that last week, I probably would have said something with

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Russian and Ukraine that seems to have come. I still

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>think China in the US, though strategically the biggest hot

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>spot There's any number of other places which could be problematic,

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>but the single biggest fault line in the world is

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the United States and China and possibly over Taiwan. And

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 1>the real question is can these two countries, the U.

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>S And China continue to finesse the disagreement that they

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>have successfully managed for forty years, but China seems to

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>be getting inpatient and can we continue to prevent this

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>from becoming a front page crisis. I don't know the

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>answer to that. One of the issues at the moment

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of phone policy, maybe the issue Richard House is gonna

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>catch up as always, He's gonna hear from your counsel

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>on form relations. President. What we try to do here

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>as surveillance is bringing you definitive authorities on whatever the

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>topic is his hand. We can do that with g G.

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Grandville Johns Hopkins out of biology at Indiana University, out

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>of chemistry at Memorial Sloan Cuttering in New York and

0:13:55.800 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>holding court on security and immunology at the Johns Hopkins University. Gigi,

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. You have done

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>tours of duty and Delhi. You've done tours of duty

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in India. Take us away from the sanitized media shots

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 1>to the reality of the horror we're seeing in India. Yes,

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I um, I mean it's really hard to describe and imagine. Um.

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, India has a lot more capability than

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people realize. And the fact

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that that their hospitals are so overwhelmed speaks to just

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>how many cases they have and how much of a

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian crisis is turning out to be. Tell us about

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the roads out of Delhi, the roads out of Mumbai.

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Certainly in my reading, it is an urban and rural

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>disaster outside of the big cities. What does India look

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>like in a horrific pandemic? So it's a lot there's

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of rural spots in India, um. And it's uh,

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the cities are are crowded, more crowded

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>than um. Well, I mean in New York you're used

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to but but most people in the US are not.

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And with every kind of traffic conveyance um that you know,

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>for elephants, donkeys, motorcycles, it's it's a busy spot. Um.

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's a lot of in the air

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>quality is probably not helping people at all either. Because

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that's always been a problem in world and in the

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in the city area. So um, yeah, it's it's not

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not good, and so it's really fantastic that the

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>US is offering to help. Hopefully they will get other

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>countries to contribute some humanitarian aid as well. The difference

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in the conversation that we're having around India and the

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world, including US and Europe this morning

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>could not be starker. We're talking about a humanitarian crisis

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in India and we're talking about what travel might look

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>like for people who want to go on vacation late

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to this summer between Europe and the United States. Dot

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to forgive me for having that conversation with you. Now

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to follow one from this one, what on Earth does

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>travel look like this summer? I think, Um, if you're vaccinated,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that you can be very confident that that

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you are are protected. But it's best to not try

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to try to not take your vaccine out for a spin.

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it would be really great to not have

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to use it to get infected. And so um, I

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>think you know, if you can, if you can manage

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to avoid the kind of crowds and exposures to people

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>who may be infected. That would be the best idea. Um,

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it's going to be different for

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>every family for what they what they do. But um,

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know, get vaccinated first and allow yourself time

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to build up immunity. Doctor. This interview with The New

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>York Times for the European Commission President vonder Land got

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>my attention for one reason. It was this line here.

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Because one thing is clear, all twenty seven member states

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>will accept unconditionally all those who are vaccinated with vaccines

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that are approved by the e M A. Doctor. There

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>are certain vaccines that have been approved in certain vaccines

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that have not been approved, And I just wonder a

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>week and to have some kind of hierarchy of vaccines

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty much well established in the next couple of months. Yes, Um,

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that's inevitable when you have multiple products. Um. But I think, uh,

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, for for US citizens, I think it's our

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.239
<v Speaker 1>US people who are getting vaccinated in the US. Um,

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be less of an issue internationally because

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the two the two vaccines that most people are getting,

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and now with the Johnson Johnson they they will be acceptable.

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Dr Gronville, forgive me for being a bit dr doom here.

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But is this an epidemiological nightmare setting up that we

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>have a certain level of vaccinations that's good but not great,

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>not critical mass around the world, and people are starting

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to travel internationally at a time when you've got pockets

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of just burgeoning virus basically asking for mutations, for more

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>variance and possibly even vaccine resistant strains. I mean, how

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>much of an issue does this become as we enter

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the traveling season. Well, I mean, given how bad things

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>have been over the last year, I'm not convinced that

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have stopped traveling or stopped doing

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the things that they were supposed to be doing. So

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>um I I um, I guess I'm I've been not

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>My optimism is rooted in the fact that I think

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>people have uh not been following all the things that

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>people have been telling to do. Anyway, But I mean,

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing magical about any of these variants. You need to, um,

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>we know how to stop your to stop getting it affected,

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you need to have a mask, you need to have

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>good air quality, try and do social distancing. That is all.

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>The vaccines are are an additional wonderful tool that will

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 1>protect you but um, we just you know, we need

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to to keep with all of the messages and travel

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>um is you know, I think it's it's something people

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>have been doing and hopefully people can do it safely

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and we can have more engineered controls so that, um,

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, air quality can be better and reduce transmission.

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>That said, do you think that there should be certain

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>travel bands in place, or that it's advisable for certain

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.239
<v Speaker 1>countries to say, well, travelers from India and Brazil are

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>our no goes for right now, or or things like that.

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>I think vaccination campaigns should be ramped up, even them

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>more than they are now. But because you're right, um,

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>every every time somebody is infected, it's an opportunity for

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a variant to emerge, and thankfully all of the variants

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>are covered right now by the vaccination. So um, we

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>just need to keep boosting that up and borrow some

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>trouble later when we might have to have a booster shot. Doctor.

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, it's gonna catch up. Come back soon, Dr Gronfell.

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>That John's hulking sensea for the health security Sadia Scara,

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you do the diet check and I'll disrupt it. Come on, okay,

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the data check. Yields are up, the real

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>yield negative zero point seven. Thank you. No one cares. Okay,

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>no one cares. There we go, there's your data check

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>on radio. And this morning all we care about is

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>getting Detroitsky. We've bet a lot of talk about, including

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>John and Lisa riveted by Gayski's bitcoin call. He is

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>with sky Bridge in their co chief investment officer, Troy.

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>The hedge funds are addicted to big technology. We've seen

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that through every cycle. I'm reading that hedge funds are

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>doing better. What is the linkage of alternative investments to

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>four or five big technology names. Yeah, you know, it's

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>actually interesting you bring that up, Tom, because there has

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:26.239
<v Speaker 1>been rotation, particularly back into Facebook and Amazon, less so Apple. Uh.

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Many hedge funds went long growth coming out of the

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and then focus and switched their focus to cyclical

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>recovery UM and now you see that moving back given

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that valuations have come down as much as they have,

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so certainly the dominance and the big five names will

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>be more important the next three months than they were

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the last four. But if you drill down to a

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>subsector within technology that we find very fascinating. We look

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>through the holdings of our underlying managers, we find that

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>semi conduct your equipment right now is particularly compelling because

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>valuations are semi connector equipment application um because valuations are

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>very reasonable, and those are both cyclical recovery stories and

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>secular growth stories. And plus there's a play on the

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>continued nationalization or divergence of the economy between the US

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and UH in China, because if you look at what

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>happened to Intel, which lost its lead for a manufacturing

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of very thin films and and and very high high

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>potency processors, you can't allow that to happen in semi

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>connector fabrication equipment. So when we drill down into tech,

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we think that's a pretty compelling space that hedge funds

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>are starting to rotate into right now. Troy, I'm doing

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>my best Tom Kane impression today, and usually when I

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>get the first question to a guest, they totally ignores

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>it and stance with something else with no follow up.

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to do that right now. But let's

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about bitcoin. Last time we spoke, you'd allowed that

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>to grow into the holdings of your portfolio. Can you

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>walk me through way you are now and what's driving

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>things for you? Yea. So at the peak coming into

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>this month, um was actually a little over fourteen percent,

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>so that's dropped back down to thirteen and age given

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the obviously correction we're going through right now. But you know,

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>as we spoke about last time, really there's three keys

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to our thesis. The first is, you know, hyper hyper

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>hyper hyper hyper use monetary policy. Hyper loose monetary policy

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>is what we did coming out of the crisis. Now

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we have five hypers in front of that. And m

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>TO growth has been growing around eighteen percent in the

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>US so far this year. The Fed will come up

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>with a out with updated date on Tuesday to see

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>how fast it grew in March. But given the continued

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>expansion their balance sheet, we don't see that going below

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>nominal GDP anytime soon. Obviously, the desire for every central

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 1>bank continue to UH to debase their currency in budget

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>deficits as far as the eye can see. So that's

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the macro case. It's hard to imagine a better macro

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.239
<v Speaker 1>environment for an alternative to fiat currencies. And then if

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>you look at the micro case, and you saw this

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this morning with JP Morgan's announcement several weeks ago, with

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley's announcement and obviously some of the institutional interests

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that started really in Q four. You know, we're going

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 1>through a very similar adoption story to what we did

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>with gold from really oh six to two thirteen, where

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the world went from you know, basically no gold to

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>one to two to maybe three percent gold over time.

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>And that that's very different this cycle than the last two. Um,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we expect that to continue. And then thirdly, you know,

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>you have the natural dynamics of the having cycle, right,

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think Mike talks about this well, Um, but

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>when you cut new supply in half, if you just

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>keep demand constant, prices are going higher. But when you

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>cut new supply and half and demand increases substantially, obviously

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>prices are going meaningfully higher. And so you know, we

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>still think we're in the middle end eas of this

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>poll market from bitcoint shock that wasn't meaningfully higher over

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the next three six nine months. UM, So we continue

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>to maintain the position size where it is. That's what

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to tell you about Detroit, the maintaining the

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 1>position size, just the perspective of the PM right now,

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>how constantrates it? Do you want that bet to be

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>within the wider portfolio? Your tolerance levels around the volatility?

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>How do you make those decisions? Yeah, so, so look

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>at and you have to look at near term correlation behavior,

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>longer term correlation behavior. It's very important to juxtapose it

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>against other assets in your portfolio. And so for instance,

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>if you had a nine percent of your portfolio and

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>go go growth, right, you know, high beta, mid cap

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>small cap tech names, it might make less sense to

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>have a thirteen fourteen percent position in bitcoin, who, in

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the majority of your portfolio, like US, is tied to

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the real economy, tied to distress, credit structure, credit more

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>market neutral multi strategy or equity exposures convert a bond

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>arbitrage which by definitions of multi or a market neutral strategy.

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, having a thirteen fourteen position percent position in

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin we think is appropriate at this stage of the

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>cycle because that will UH slightly elevate our volatility. We

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>expect volatility in the range of eight to twelve percent

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>this year versus UH four to eight, which is our

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>long term target. But we think that's one of the

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:57.719
<v Speaker 1>unique areas where you're getting paid for that volatility, right

0:24:57.760 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>if you think of the nastac right now, because the

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>asked that go up in the attendant fifteen percent this year,

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Yes it could, but you're going to experience more volatility

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>than he certainly had or two A balls though, I

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>should say, than the second quarter of last year. For instance.

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Queen Troy, you seem to be freezing up a little bit.

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I do want to get Perhaps we'll get you back

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to fantasy. We've lost he with some technical issues that well,

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>we'll get Troy back on another time. This is the

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>from seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Television each day from six to nine am

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud,

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course on the terminal. I'm

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg