WEBVTT - Tesla's Eye Popping Record

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Let's get to a story

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that definitely plays into I feel like something Ken Griffin

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>said at Citadel saying that the scientists of Maderna and

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>fires where they should be at the White House being

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>commended for how quickly they got vaccines together. This story

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>is talking about Messenger RNA. It's all the rage now.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>We all are talking about it. Investment venture money pouring

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>into the area and that includes one specific biotech startup

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>or a therapeutic So let's get into it with Rick Shine,

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>bloom Work News senior editor on the phone in New

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Jersey along with Business Week editor Joel Weber and our

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week Uh, I should say in our Bloomberg

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Interactor Broker studio right here in New York. So we

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>are all like, I feel like we're all like like

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>i'mate your scientists a little bit here armchair virologist slash

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>scientists at this point yet, Uh, well, you haven't heard

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>this part, which is that you know you've known about

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>m RNA, that that if you didn't know about it, um,

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you know about it now. But Angelica Levito's story in

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the current issue of the magazine UM is about perhaps

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the next frontier in RNA, which is that's a linear

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>little strand almost like a thread, if you will, and

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>scientists are now working on a way to bend it.

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And Rick Shin, who who helped edit the stories on Rick,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>why why is bending our RNA into a circle? Why

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>would you want to do that? So, hi, Joel, I

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>would definitely put myself in the category of arm tore virologists.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So um. Yeah. So this is basically a technique that

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>researchers at Stanford and then later M I. T. Came

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>up with two make RNA or a kind of our

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:23.119
<v Speaker 1>name that also give the message more durable, more stable

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>than what we think of as m RNA, which, as

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>you correctly put it is that like like a straight

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>little strand. So because uh, they're able to like now

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>transform this kind of strand into a circle, Uh, it

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>makes the the message lasts longer. And so whereas m

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>RNA works perfectly well for a vaccine, which has been

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>fantastic as we certainly know with moderna advisor vaccines, a circle,

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the hope is will be able to treat cancer and

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>other diseases because it will be able to just hers

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is longer in the body. Uh that's thee And this

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>um uh young company or a Therapeutics was founded based

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>on this research. It's very theoretical still, it's um, you know,

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing has really been proven. But uh but investors, are

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you excited enough to have put in a hundred million

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars which is not nothing? And so so uh orna,

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like it's kind of the story though

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of just like everybody's looking for exposure to like what

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>could be the next thing here. And obviously m RNA

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>has has potential to do a lot of things other

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>than just fight fight COVID. And this could be potentially

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>one of those uh things that it could could be

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>working against. So who who's behind ORNA? Who are the

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>who are the players there? So ARNA was created um

0:03:54.360 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>by a group from m I t uh uh the

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>uh let's see um it's um this guy um sorry

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Anderson. It was like a big deal in uh

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in rna uh technology. One of his researchers actually came

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>up with the kind of way that you do this,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>which is essentially cutting up the strand into little pieces

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and having it reformulate itself into a circle. So um

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>uh they met with some investors, they created a company. Uh,

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>this group MTM got behind it and uh and they're

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>they're they're often running. I mean they still have a

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>very very far road to go. There's other also, I

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>just want to say, there's other companies that are doing

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>this what we didn't really have space to get into

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it into the story, but there's a company called Laurent's Therapeutics.

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>It's also working on a very similar technology and they're

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>backed by flag Chip Pioneering, which is the venture firm

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that helped create modear not. So there's a lot going

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>on in this space. Is this that all being considered

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>something like Rick kind of a holy grail in terms

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of really changing how we deal with serious diseases cancer.

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Of course, um when it comes to we always talk

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>about disruption innovation, right, and it's we feel like medicine

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>to some extent and how we think about it and

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>treatment modalities that it's lagged a little bit. Could this

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>really be the game changer, that it really is a

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>very different form of treatment and much more effective, although

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>even though it'll take maybe a little while to get there.

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's certainly the big hope. And you know,

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>people who are former far more knowledgeable about those than

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I am, and we have much deeper pockets than I do.

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Are are really betting on this? So I would I would,

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would. I would say, we have to

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>see where we get. But you know, as I said,

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it's still early, early going. So when we when would

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we know best case scenario? Rick? Like, what's the timeline

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>for something like this? Because m R and A was

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 1>kicking around forever before it finally found its momentum. Is

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this something that's like, you know, a year or two

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll know what the results of this are. Is it

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>more like ten years? I think it's more like a

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>year or two because, um, you know, because there's so

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>much focused on this and there's so much momentum. I

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>mean that the whole story of the m R and

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>A vaccine was that there were terrific advances made, but

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, no one paid attention to it. They were

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>just kind of out there for you know, decades before

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>before I really sort of came to came into into

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 1>sharp focus. And so now it was so much money

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and so much expertise focusing on this, I think we

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>will go faster. Yeah, exactly. You do feel like that

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of money and attention being spent to it. Hey,

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Rick Shawn, thank you so much, Senior editor for Global

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Business News at Bloomberg News on the phone in New Jersey,

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of thanks to Joe Weber, Editor Bloomberg Business Sweek here

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in our Interactive Broker Studio. Be sure to check out

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>this story at Bloomberg dot com, business Week dot com

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and on the Bloomberg you're listening to Bloomberg Radio. This

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. All right,

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know, it's attracting a lot of money. Bloomberg

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence in fact expects e s G e T S

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to reach a trillion dollars E s G debt eleven

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>trillion by five. It's enticing and perhaps still a bit confusing.

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, tim, when it comes to UH investing

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in the E s G space, we're talking about environmental,

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>social and governments investing. And in a Saturday column, Andy

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Brown writes about this, Yeah, does it really have the

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>effect that people think it's having? He writes about someone

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>named Terreek Fancy was an evangelist for the idea that

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>capitalism can help save the planet from global warming. Andy

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Brown joins us now he's editorial director at Bloomberg New Economy.

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from New York City. Hey, Andy,

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>so what happened to to Rieke Fancy. I mean he

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>was he was all about s G for years at

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>black Rock. Indeed, he was he ran this at black

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Rock for two years. He was, as you say, absolutely

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>convinced the capitalism and capitalist markets could save the planet

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>from climate change. And after two years of the world's

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>largest asset manager, he came to the conclusion that this

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>was entirely illusory, and the idea that Wall Street is

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>part of a solution um rather than the problem, in

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>his view, simply delays real action. And he thinks that

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely necessary is the government to change the rules

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of the game and to impose a price on carbon emissions,

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:51.719
<v Speaker 1>thus forcing companies to take responsibility for their own polluting behavior. Well,

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.599
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea is right. I mean, there's got any

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>how many conversations do we have and you picked your

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>investment from They're happy to come on and talk about

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>their e s G funds and e s G space

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and everybody being all in. And what's interesting, though, is

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>he points out and as you write, you know, just

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>by saying we're not going to invest, let's say in

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>oil companies or or what have you, somebody else will

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>be very happy to pick up that and put their

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>money into that space. Exactly as he writes. He writes

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in a very in a very lively way, and he says,

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, losing ten percent of your shareholders is not

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>the same as losing ten percent of your customers. You

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>lose a customer, you've lost a customer, you lose and

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>investor you just go out and find another one. And

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 1>he makes the point actually that you know, these funds

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>advertise themselves as E s G funds don't actually put

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 1>anything new into the market. It's not like they invest

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:53.119
<v Speaker 1>in green projects and initiatives which otherwise wouldn't find funding. Basically,

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they take the universe of available assets and talk them

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>up into sort of smaller pieces with a kind of

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a we do. And it's like academic research shows that

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>are surprisingly small amount of the waiting off these funds

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is actually um, is actually green um. The rest is

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>more or less business as usual with the waiting towards

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>large cap companies. In fact, what Terek says, in fact

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is that you know it's designed really for for purposes

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of differency, and so yes, is this new thing. It's

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>an exciting new product, look for the planet and good

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>for your pocket book, you know, and that in fact,

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he said, contentially, it's just a mechanisms which

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>these fund managers got to learn fatter fees. So he

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>lays out the problem, but does does he allowed to solution? Andy, Well,

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't, And I asked him about that. He was

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>on my show the other day and I said, look,

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 1>you know you it's just what you've said. I mean,

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you lay out all the problems here, what's the solution then?

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>And actually what I also had he runs uh sustainable

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:06.479
<v Speaker 1>to thing for CalPERS that the Canadian billion dollars under management.

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And she said, look, you know it's not an either

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>role that you know, I it's an end and government

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>does have a role to play in civil society does,

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and investors do. And she actually gave a concrete example

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of how they combined really can change things. And the

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>example she gave with this activist hedge fund Engine number one,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>which replaced three directors of Excellent Mobile is backed by

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>backed by CalPERS because I didn't think the Excellent Mobile

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>was moving cost enough on a green transition. You know,

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because I have a lot of conversations with

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>folks to Andy and it's it's it can't be just

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I know net zero is the focus so much for

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of e s G at this point in

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of you know, if you create emissions, they're bounced

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>by absorbing basically an equivalent amount that's out in the atmosphere.

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But we really have to get to a way where

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we have alternatives that don't create anything bad for the

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere because it's rapidly going out of control. And unfortunately

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of transparency in this E s

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>G space right now, at least not for every every

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the letters, if you will. Um some of

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>them are easier than others. But we've really got to

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>think about it differently, especially when it comes to the environment. Yeah, exactly,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And that was the point that Anne was making. This

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is the role of the vital role of government regulators

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have to play, which is to force companies to um

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to to to publish their climate risks and opportunities so

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that investors can make real decisions about where they put

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>their money. But on the question of divestment, I also

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>had on the show no Quinn, the the CEO of HSBC,

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and you know, he made the point, it's a it's

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a very reasonable point that you know, divestment doesn't actually

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>do much good. That we're gonna be living with polluting

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>industries for a long time, whether we like it or not.

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>In the the trick is to work with them on

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>solutions rather than to completely cut them off. And actually

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I think pretty much everybody agreed on that point. So Andy,

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just in the last forty five seconds that we have

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>left with you. What are takeaways for investors and listeners

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>who are listening right now. Well, I think Tarry makes

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a good point. I mean, he's drawn attention to abuses

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 1>in a big, growing financial industry, which and describes as

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>being snake oil, sort of pretending that it's the answer

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>but not really. Um. But I think probably to Anne's point, um,

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>he overstates the case and that solutions in this in

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>this area really are going to require a coalition, everybody

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>pulling together, um and forcing change on companies from within.

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Smart conversation, and you're you're making me think, Okay, we've

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>got to get him on our air too, because we

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>talked so much about E S G UM And maybe

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the two of you can join us and we can

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>continue this conversation here on a Bloomberg radio. Andy, thank you,

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Andy Brown, editorial director at Bloomberg New Economy, on the

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>phone in New York City. We have these conversations. The

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>E S G space is exploding. Everybody wants to be involved,

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>but um, there's a lot more to be developed there

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>there is. And I wonder how backlash will or if

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it will will continue to grow. Yeah, And you know,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I think many people are calling for more transparency, and

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we've been watching shares of Tesla. They were up more

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>than four percent at their highs today, still up in

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>what is an overall down market, still up almost one percent,

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and they are higher Following some upbeat news over the weekend,

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Timmy electric car maker reported record third quarter deliveries that

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>easily beat the estimates that were out there. Thousand, three

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred cars were delivered worldwide in the third quarter, as

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Carol said, a record for the ev maker lad By

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>CEO Elon Musk. Joining us now is Dana Hole, technology

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>reporter at Bloomberg News. She joins us on the phone

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>from our San Francisco bureau. Danna, when these numbers came

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>by came out on Saturday, what was your action? Well,

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's interesting because so much of the game

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is about beating expectations, and so, you know, Bloomberg we

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>had estimates of around two thousand. Tesla itself send estimates

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to investors of two one and then they beat quite handily. Um,

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>which I actually wasn't surprised about. But I guess it

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>makes me question, like how good is everybody's models? But

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think the reason why it's important

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is because, you know, for so long, one of the

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>things that we've heard from you know, the bears or

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the short sellers is that there's got to be a

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>demand cliff. I mean, how many people really are there

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world who want to buy new Tesla cars?

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And with more electric vehicles coming onto the market, like,

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>at some point Tesla is going to hit this wall

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>where they're not going to be able to continue to grow.

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, not only did they grow, but they

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>grew in the face of this chip shortage and all

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>these logistical challenges, and they just did really well. I mean,

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>they're really close now to making you know, a quarter

0:15:57.720 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of a million cars a year, which is just something

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that no one ever thought was possible, you know, a

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>decade ago. So it bodes well for them going into

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the into the end of the year. Yeah, exactly. And

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting another story on the on the Blueberg talks

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>about that this time it's hard being short it lately

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>because it has had such a rally from it that

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>was hit back in March. I think it's up more

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>than Danna. You know, this company, you understand it, but

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you also see that it's becoming a marketplace that once

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>was kind of all you know, Ellen kind of had

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it all to himself when it came to EV specially

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>higher end uh evs. There's more coming into the market.

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think he can maintain or are you hearing

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>from folks who walk to this industry that he can

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>maintain it? You know, I think what's interesting is I

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>would like to kind of challenge everyone to reframe how

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they think about competition in the EV space, because it's

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>not really about evis battling each other for this tiny

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>slice of market share. It's really about evies growing their

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>share of the overall automotive pie and competing with the

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>ice vehicle. So I think that you know, you're going

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.959
<v Speaker 1>to see two things happen, Like, yes, there will be

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>more electric vehicles to choose from, but the goal really is,

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the next time you buy a car, will

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it be powered by gas or will it be powered

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>by an electric vehicle? If it's power and so we're

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>just gonna see electric vehicles continue to grow, and so

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>they're just gonna be It's like the piece of the

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>pie that everyone is fighting over is going to be

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>a bigger piece of the pie, if that makes sense. Well,

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, right, like how many different automakers do we

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>have today, right for combtion combustion engines, Right, so why

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>can't we have a bunch of very successful e V

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.959
<v Speaker 1>companies right? As more, because I know my next car

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping, Tim, I don't know about you, but I

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>hope it's an evy and just kind of planning on it.

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I do too. But here's the question, I don't know

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>where I'm gonna Well, I live in New York City,

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>so you know, it's hard to keep cars somewhere. Yeah,

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>where do I plug it in? And that's that's the question.

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>After we're not going to be allowed to buy a

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>gas powered car anyway, right, New York has joined California

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in banning the sale of the car. So it's it's

0:17:57.880 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of time to think ahead, like what is your

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>next car geting be? What kind of infrastructure do you

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>need to support it? Um so, so, so I think that,

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think and I think that Tesla does

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>have first mover advantage, and you know, China is a

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>big part of their growth, and so you know, it's

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>hard for those of those who live in the United

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>States to kind of always remember this, but they are

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>now producing a ton of Model threes and wise out

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of that factory in Shanghai, both for Chinese consumers but

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>also for export to Europe. And we just have to

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>remember that, like the big battle over EVS is, it's

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>really happening abroad as well as as well as here.

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what it's going to take though, to get

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it to a point where the vast were not even

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority, but the majority of cars that are purchased,

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the majority of new cars purchased our electric vehicles and

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>not ice vehicles. Yeah, I think a lot of it

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>really is just a consumer had it. I mean, I

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about this. You know, I have not flown

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>very much at all recently, but I did fly to

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the East Coast over the summer to visit friends and family,

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and like, at the airport, like I wanted the most

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:59.959
<v Speaker 1>fuel efficient car possible, and the only thing that they

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>had was a Toyota Prius, which is what I got.

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>But like, there was no way for me to rent

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a Model three or a Chevy Bolt or a Nissan

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Leaf at the airport. And if I could have, like

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that would have been a really cool way for me

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to like experience the car before actually considering whether to

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>own one. But it's still just not part of like

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>our culture, and people are just used to going to

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>gas stations and so making the leap to electric cars

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's just going to take a lot of consumer education.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's why Tesla has been successful because so many

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>owners basically serve as the facto brand ambassadors. Like, you know,

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>someone gets a car, they invite their brother or their

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 1>sister or their mom to take a ride, and then

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that's another person it's like, oh, wow, this is actually

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>really cool, and so you know, it's all like word

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of mouth and the experience of having your button the

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 1>seed and like going for a drive and realizing that

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, charging is not that big a deal and um,

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 1>but you know you just need to do that on

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a much wider basis that we have now. I will say,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing a lot more cars in and around the

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>New York metro area, and I agree with you that

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it used to be like the outlier. You'd meet somebody like, oh,

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>what's it like, And now it's like my friends, Oh yeah,

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>we have, and my husband's got one too, and everybody's

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of all buy in. Jill Webber just talking about

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>our friend. Our friend just got one too. But it's

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>like you have to live in the suburbs or I mean,

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>look that's yeah to plug in, or you know, pay

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money for New York City garage in

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>order to do that. Yeah, exactly, all right, they're working

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it out. Danni Hall always great when it comes to

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>all things Testla Bloomberg Technology reporter, joining us from our

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco burope. You know Carol, the classic children's book,

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>No Good, Very Bad day. Okay, Well, it's one of

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 1>those days for Facebook. I don't know if people have

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>logged into Facebook or attempted to use any of the

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Facebook family of services today, including What's App, Instagram, and

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of course Facebook Messenger, but there have been challenges as

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>those have been offline for much of the day today,

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>not to mention the other challenge that Facebook is dealing

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>with today, cleaning up the mess thanks to a whistleblower

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>who appeared last night on sixty Minutes and turned out

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>she had been for months providing not just lawmakers but

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>also the Wall Street Journal with internal documents about the

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>way that Facebook balances profits and balances moderating content lots

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and lots of internal documents. Let's get the latest on

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the company, the stock, the concerns. Kurt Wagner is Bloomberg

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>News tech reporter. He joins us on the phone in

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Kirk Uh, Kurt, it's nice to have you here. Um.

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>The selling that we're seeing in Facebook shares. Mind you,

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a risk off trade and big tech in particular

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>are really feeling the most pain today. But the trade

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>has to do. I would assume with some of the

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>news today, how do you see it? What are you hearing? Well?

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine that, Um, you know, this was a

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>blower interview from last night got a ton of attention. Um.

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>She is supposed to testify before the Senate subcommittee tomorrow

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>about kind of the harms that Facebook products might have

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>on children. And I do feel like that there's a

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of a common ground here between Democrats and the

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 1>public pians that didn't always exist. I think they've they've

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes both disliked Facebook, but for different reasons. And I

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like in this case, you know, rallying around Facebook

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is a safety issue for children has kind of given

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>them a little bit more um common ground, And so

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I imagine if you're someone who's investment in Facebook, you

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>have to look at this and say, Okay, well, maybe

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the most likely we've seen so far for

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>there to either be some type of regulation or new

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>law that could actually hurt the business. This is speculation

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point of course, but I would imagine that

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that's weighing on people's mind. Okay, but we've seen this

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>story play out before, whether it's Cambridge Analytic, the wake

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.959
<v Speaker 1>of January six, President Trump on the platform. I mean,

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the list goes on and on current when it comes

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook, and at the end of the day, uh,

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>small businesses around the world do find it a very

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>effective place to advertise because people go to these platforms,

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder if that changes in the wake of this,

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and as as as a result, investors have rewarded the company.

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to change, and I think

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that would change it would be if, uh,

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, Congress passes some type of data collection law

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>or some type of law around what can and should

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>be used in ad targeting. UM. I think for now,

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>if you are a small business, Facebook continues to be

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>arguably the best place to go and spend your money.

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's not going to change even if you know

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>there's public sentiment against Facebook. But again, I do think

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>something that any type of regulation or law around what

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Facebook data the company uses for ads, I think that's

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>where you could suddenly see a change because, um, that's

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 1>going to impact the ability of these businesses to get

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>their message out, right. I mean, I guess at some

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>point Kurt, my husband, I were talking a lot after

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the sixteen minutes pieces. You know, is what is Facebook?

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>What is it? Is it really a media company? Is it?

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, a social platform? You know, I'm thinking about

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>the whistleblower, a place where people are allowed to just

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of dump stuff. You know, what's the responsibility of

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Facebook for this? Is? You know, what's put on its platform?

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a lot of questions and I guess we

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>have to just figure out and we'll see what regulators

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimately decide it is and what it's responsible for. Right Yeah,

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think this is the ultimate challenge right

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>now with the Federal Trade Commission. You know, they are

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>basically they're doing Facebook to try and um break the

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>company up. You know, They're they're claiming Facebook was anti

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>competitive when it bought Instagram and when it bought WhatsApp.

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>But the biggest challenge I see in that lawsuit is

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that they're having a tough time themselves describing what Facebook is,

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're saying it's a monopoly and personal social networking.

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, that they don't include messaging in that,

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>they don't include necessarily video watching in that, right, I

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>think of how much of Facebook is now just scrolling

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>through watching videos similar to YouTube. So Facebook has gotten

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>so big a touch of so many areas that it

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 1>really has become hard to define and as a result,

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to regulate. Hey, the adages are they fixed?

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, real quickly? Five seconds? They're not fixed. That

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is about three minutes ago. They are not f Alright, alright,

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>we'll watch for the headline to say whether or not

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>they're fixed or still ongoing. Um. Kurt Wagner, thank you

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 1>so much. He's tech reporter here at Bloomberg and new

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>shares a Facebook still down, Tim five? Yeah, but you

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no, this is

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>not a toy. All right, please, I'll do the riding revels.

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. It's good question. Drive. This is

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the drive to the Clothes up on Bloomberg Radio. All right,

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>we are just under ten minutes away from the close

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of trading on this Monday, October four. We're seeing right

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>across the screen broad based declines on the DAO S

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>and P five, d NASDAK and the Russell two thousand.

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Joining us as Ed Rosenberg. We're driving to the Clothes

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>with him. He's head of e T F set American

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Century Investments, got two hundred forty billion dollars in assets

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>under management. He joins us on the phone from Chicago. Ed,

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>help us make sense of a day like today. What

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going through your mind right now? I mean, look,

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>there's so many things going on outside of the market

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that are driving the market. Do we have inflation? Right?

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>The debt ceiling keeps coming up, and Biden did a

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>speech earlier, right, So people are taking potentially taking risk

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>off the table and shifting money around into other places,

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>whether it's riskless less risky assets, or looking for ways

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of this market and maybe find different

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>spots to move money into. As we keep seeing this,

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's not like they're necessarily it's interesting that you

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>say that, right, shifting around, finding better opportunities at this

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>point is maybe the changing psychology within the market. Whether

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it's for a day, for a week, for a month,

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out. But what's interesting is I looked at

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>things like gold. We're not necessarily seeing a huge move

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.479
<v Speaker 1>into safe havens. I think that's the same case if

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at the dollar, at the same case for

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the treasury trade. It's not like we're getting the equal

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of trade that everybody's just running for the egg

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>a dork. That's not what we're seeing today. No, and

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing people, you know, obviously growth is the

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>story today, right. The growth stocks are the ones that

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>have been falling off the table. I mean even during

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the announcement we talked about I heard Apple, Facebook, um

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>all mentioned in Amazon, all coming down. But it's where's

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>the money going? Right? As people sell off, what are

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they looking to put it into. We've had these questions

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 1>come up even before this last week week and a

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 1>half where the market has been cycling. Where what do

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I do about inflation? Because it's been a story for

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a long time, and you would oil up today right

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>and pushing higher, and it's higher than it's been for

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a while, and so what does this all mean to

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the end consumer and what does it mean for the investor?

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think when we talk about inflation, you're seeing

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>people shifting more money into things like short duration bonds,

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>right which obviously when you report on the stock market,

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to see that money in there because

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not driving those prices. And I think people have

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>been looking for talking about this, but this market has

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.199
<v Speaker 1>given them a kickstart actually start putting into action what

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone's been talking about. And when you take a step

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>back and you think about the health of the American economy,

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>there aren't a lot of the signs that we're seeing

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.959
<v Speaker 1>right now that perhaps are spooking investors and spooking equity markets.

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Aren't they net net a pretty good thing about the

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>recovery globally and here in the US. Yeah, I mean,

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I think overall, I mean, if you think about what's

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>happening right through actually I'm just gonna go through the

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>entire pandemic. The market has been strong throughout except for

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously the beginning of it with March. And we've seen

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, unemployment coming down over time, and we've seen

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>rates while they haven't ticked up to the level that

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>people said they would. I mean earlier this year they

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>moved up, they came back down to around on the

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>ten uere and now it's back up to Those aren't

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>drastic moves. And overall, when you think of where inflation

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>could take us, it could take us much higher. It

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>feels like the economy is still healthy now. Granted, we

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>do some things out there right the debt feeling limit

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is one of them. Does America actually default on its bonds?

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>That is something that could happen, Although it never happened before,

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it's come up as a discussion point and all of

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a sudden the last hour it's always been saved. But

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>if that happens, that's a whole different story of what's

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>going to happen moving forward, as we talk about the

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>health of the economy and the health of everything tied

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to the US, from the dollar to its own bonds. No,

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that's I mean, you're talking about then global investors, countries

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>who plow a lot of money into US treasuries looking

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>at the US in a very different way. So much

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you know whether or not it's no longer the safe

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>haven that maybe everybody thought it was. Yes, exactly, and

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>then what does that mean does money come out? Does

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it come out? I mean there's been that money has

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>been going into from foreign investors for a while now,

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>not even just treasuries, but even our own real estate, right,

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it's office buildings or even residential properties. Money has

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>been moving in and what happened into all of it

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>if we default? That's really the big question is that

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing those fears actually reflected though in the

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>market right now? Because it seems to me like if

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the if if investors were really concerned about that, we'd

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>we'd see even steeper declines today. I think you're right.

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think, look, we've all lived through We've

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>seen political posturing out of Washington before, whether it's today's

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the debt ceiling, right, whether it's other things, and I

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>think to the market it's a lot of white noise,

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>but there is some reaction to it, right. Inflation is

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>something that's been talked about, and that's not quite political posturing.

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:43.719
<v Speaker 1>We've seen prices go up across the board in different commodities.

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>And I know you mentioned gold, but if you think

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of the cost of some other commodities, right, they have

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>risen steadily for a while now. The price of food

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>for the consumer has gone up, the price of gas

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>has gone up, So those things are real. And I

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>think as these markets start to get a little edgy

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and we keep hearing more noise, I think people are

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>looking for different places to put that money, whether it's

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>cash or quite frankly, other investments that they feel are

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>more safe haven. Does it matter to you? And just

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>speaking of commodities, the Bloomberg Commodity Spot Index rising to

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a record, so it's playing out certainly in this trade

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>just quickly, doesn't matter to you. I mean the S

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and P is down more than five from its early

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>September high, DABS down about four and a half percent

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>from its mid August high, than Nasdaq one hundred is

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>down almost eight percent from its early September high. Uh,

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>could there be more selling? Do you anticipate it? And

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>just got about thirty seconds left here, Yeah, I mean,

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there's always I think in this environment, we're

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>going to see a rocky road ahead and there's going

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to be more selling. We'll get a couple of days

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>like we did Friday, where there's some buying, but I

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to see a rocky road ahead. And

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>really I think the key going forward, it's going to

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>be volatility. Well, I was just gonna say, you take

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>me and set me up really well for the volatility.

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>The volatility index is up two points now at twenty

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>three and change, so we've definitely been seen ing um

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it up and down some big moves, so volatility is

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely on the rise. Ed Rosenberg always great to get

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts. Head of exchange traded Funds of American Century

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Investments two forty billion in assets under management, on the

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>phone from Chicago. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com,

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Search to Bloomberg Global News