WEBVTT - Who is the Finals MVP, Game 3 Adjustments, Lakers Coaching Latest

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome into NBA Pulse production of iHeart Rating in the NBA.

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Sarahustak, NBA analyst for the Yes Network, and today

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is Tuesday, June eleventh. From our extraordinary core group of

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>NBA journalists, were joined now by NBA dot Com Senior

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>writer Steve Ashburner. Ash, you've been on planes. I don't

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>know if you've been on trains, but you have been

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>covering this final series going from Boston. Now you're in

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Dallas getting set for Game three that will take place

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday at eight thirty pm Eastern on ABC. ASH

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Boston with this two oh series lead, they have been.

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>They were dominant in Game one and pretty much the

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>same there despite a little bit of a run towards

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the end by Dallas, but overall they have very much

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>looked like the better team right away. Let's get to it.

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of talk. We know about Boston,

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>how good they been in the regular season, what they've

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>done in rolling through the postseason, about the completeness of

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>their team. They are a complete team, but do it

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>on both ends of the floor. We're seeing it offensively,

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing it defensively, We're seeing it from multiple players,

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone contributing in a way that it's not just about

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>star power, it's about balance. So who is your MVP?

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I know we're only two games in, but Boston two

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>games away from closing this thing out. Who is your

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>MVP at this point of the finals?

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Hi, Sarah, you know it's it's not too soon

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 2>because this is a constant topic, whether it's a finals

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 2>MVP or a Larry Bird Eastern Conference Finals MVP, or

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 2>just over the course of the season, which is who

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 2>is the most valuable Celtic. It seems like it's a

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>big deal. There is, And maybe that's a byproduct of

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 2>a really deep, talented team, is that people want a

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>pecking order. And you know, Tata and Jason Tatum and

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Jaylen Brown have been together for so long. I mean

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>they are, in essence the pillars of that team, and

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 2>people have always measured one against the other. And so

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean even Jason Kidd just did that, and I

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>look at it. You know, sometimes the media tries to

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 2>be too clever by half. I'm the kind of guy

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 2>who looks at sort of the inner game and the

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 2>impact of a of a player more than just his stance.

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 2>And if I were casting a vote at this point,

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 2>I would vote for Drew Holliday. I think that in.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Both those games, as I was hoping, we maybe had

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>different answers.

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, maybe we should just for the dynamic here.

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 2>But you know, great mind stake alike. I just think

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 2>that you know, when you when you drill down and

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 2>you look at what they needed in any given moment.

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 2>In Game two, particularly, it was the scoring and Tatum

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 2>shooting was off again. Drew Holliday makes, you know, very

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 2>clutch baskets. He can bail out possessions. There was a

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 2>stretch in the third quarter where I wrote about it

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 2>on our site as the turning point of the game.

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Jason Kitty called the time out with about five minutes

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 2>left in the third quarter. His team had gone from

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 2>down two to down six, and then over the next

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 2>two minutes out of that timeout, Dallas went down from

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 2>down six to down twelve. And you know, Drew Holliday

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 2>scored two of the buckets during that stretch. He got

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 2>it on a break after Jaln Brown steel And then

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 2>to finish that stretch, Jason Tatum was doubled and sort

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 2>of in no man's land, and all of a sudden

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Drew Holliday cuts to the basket, Tatum shovels the ball

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 2>over and it's a layup, and Jason Kidd is calling

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>a second time out in a matter of two minutes,

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.119
<v Speaker 2>and it just seemed like the lead went to double digits.

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 2>That gave the Celtics control enough that they could weather

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 2>that fourth quarter run and still be five points up.

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>So Drew Holliday knows what it takes. He won with

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Milwaukee back in twenty twenty one. He's he's important at

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 2>both ends. I mean he started out, you know, on

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 2>well defensively, I mean they can put him on anybody, frankly.

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 2>So to me, he's my he's my MVP because he's

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 2>a role player, because he willingly sacrifices. He calls himself

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 2>a utility man. If you're if you're going to look

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 2>at the so called stars, I think Jaylen Brown probably

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>would would would win that award if he came down

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 2>to him and Tatum right now. But I really think

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 2>the criticism of Tatum has gotten rather silly. You know,

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 2>he's playing a well rounded game, he seems willing to sacrifice. Yes,

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 2>he's shooting has been very bad, but you know, Kobe

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 2>missed a lot of shots too. I'm not comparing him.

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying that a guy can can achieve a

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 2>lot even as he misses shots. And so I just

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 2>think the you know, there's still opportunity obviously in this thing.

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 2>The Celtics have to win too. It could go five

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 2>more games for Tatum to straighten out a shot. But yeah,

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 2>that's how I would rank them. I guess right now

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 2>is Holiday Brown. And you know you can't ignore a

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>guy that has the ball in his hands as much

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 2>as Tatum.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm one hundred percent with you on the rankings. And

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>I can't say enough about Drew Holliday. Have always been

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a huge fan of his, the disposition he brings to

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the floor, how he obviously competes not only defensively, but

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing it offensively. And you look at the fact

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in game two, twenty six points, eleven rebounds, had zero turnovers,

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>he was highly efficient from the field. I think there's

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>so many aspects of his game that he has impacted

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>why they're up to oh so, without a doubt he

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>at this point would get my vote. But to make

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a case to your point about

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Brown in Jason Tatum. A lot of what they're

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>doing is opening up the floor for teammates. You know

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that so much of the defense is predicated on trying

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to slow them down, in particular Jason Tatum, And I

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>agree with you on the Tatum dialogue and kind of

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>dissection of how he's been playing. Has shot then off. Absolutely,

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Is this a time when your best players and one

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that you think is all NBA should be on the

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest stage at their best. Yes. However, you look at

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Dallas has been double teaming him, you know, Jason Kidd

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and the coach is tossing doubles on him, blitzing him,

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the ball out of his hands. If

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't tell you just the respect they have for

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>what he can do offensively. And Jalen Brown his ability

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to get downhill, get to the front of the rim,

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>open up the floor. I think there's so many things

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that he obviously is contributing and orchestrating in why Boston

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is playing the way that they are and also defensively,

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>same type of deal. But I am with you at

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>this point. It'll be interesting to see how things play

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>out in this next game, Game three, and also just

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>as a series continues. But with that being said, there's

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>another piece to the starting lineup, ash that we know

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>has been hugely important, and we saw it in Game one.

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Kristaps Porzingis, after missing ten games in the postseason with

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a calf injury, made his return. He put on a

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>show quick. He has twenty points in twenty minutes in

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that game one. Game two comes away with twelve points.

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>He did play twenty three minutes, but it appeared that

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>he reaggravated his calf after the game. Joe Missoula, as

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you would anticipate, said he has zero concerns. He'll be fine.

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Kristap said something about the effective He'll die

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>on the court and they'll take a look at it.

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But he'll be playing in game three. But that is

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>still something and whether he is available to play he's

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>been coming off the bench or otherwise. A lot of it, too,

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is just how he looks, how he's moving when he

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is out there, if he is out there. So do

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you have any one perspective on his impact? But two

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>just an in general, if you have any updates or

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>information on how he will be and what the prognosis

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>looks like.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no updates you know, there was no media availability.

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>The teams weren't available to us yesterday. On a travel day,

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 2>we will head over there, you know, you go over

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 2>there this morning and then find out what the latest is.

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 2>And even that, I mean you're talking thirty hours until

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 2>the game, however long it is, and you know, a

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of healing can go on or therapy whatever. Now,

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 2>obviously the reason they kept them out as long as

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 2>they did is because it's a serious injury, that initial

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 2>CAF strain, and if this is an aggravation of that,

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 2>it could reset the clock. That would be sort of

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.599
<v Speaker 2>the worst case scenario for the Celtics if it's the

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing that he can get back to where

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 2>he was for the start of Game one, if not

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 2>by Wednesday night, maybe by Friday night. I mean, they

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 2>have a two game cushion right now, and if you

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 2>were going to air on the side of caution, you know,

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe you don't use him in Game three. They went

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 2>nine to one without him in the postseason while he

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 2>was out in the in the previous rounds. I mean,

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 2>the hand people talk about. You know, Boston had a

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 2>little bit of an easy road right as they missed

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Butler in the first round, Donovan Mitchell was hurt,

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 2>he got hurt for a couple of games in the second.

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Then it was Tyre's Halliburton well. Throughout a lot of that,

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Boston was playing without Christoppas presented, So if you want

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 2>to downgrade what they accomplished, you have to factor in

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 2>that they were missing a key part of their team,

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 2>and we saw in game one what a difference he

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 2>can make. He's particularly important against Dallas because of their

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 2>bigs and the ability to clock things up in the

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 2>in the paint. Certainly, Derek White had a nice block

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 2>at the rim late in game two of PJ. Washington,

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 2>But if you have Prezingas on the floor, he's a

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 2>natural rim protector, So that matter is there as well.

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>You look at Dallas's lob dunks way down from what

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 2>they're accustomed to winning with, and when they don't have

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 2>that going, when they don't have the corner threes, you know,

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 2>it makes a big difference in their office. So we'll see.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, these calf strains have become sort

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 2>of the the second most important or concerning injury because

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 2>we've seen we saw with Kevin Durant that the calf

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 2>strain led to the Achilles tear. That was the concern

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 2>with Giannis when he didn't participate at the very end

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 2>of the season and in the in the books first

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 2>round is that you know he had a calf strain

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 2>and they weren't going to risk the Achilles. So same

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.719
<v Speaker 2>thing with porzingis. I mean, if they think that it

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 2>could be a domino from calf to Achilles, I'd hate

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 2>to think we've seen the last of them. Obviously, the

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>rhetoric after game was that, like you said, he said

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 2>he would die on the court. Achilles doesn't kill you,

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 2>So I think could kill the Achilles, but it would

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 2>be okay, I guess if he's willing to take that chance.

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 2>But I'm sure they don't want to do it. And

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 2>if it's a different numerically, you know, being up to

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 2>zero versus being down oh two, So we'll see.

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's the question. And I think to the

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>point about that there's different injuries that playing through is

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing, pain tolerance is another thing, but actually putting

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>yourself in harm's way of a very severe injury that

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>not only can I pact you right now in this series,

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>but you think about even next season and just big

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>picture looking at it. I'm sure that's something that obviously

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>they will be taking into consideration. But you said it game,

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>this is a big game. This isn't a game that, yeah,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Boston is sitting here with a two to zero lead,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>but the tenor of those series shifts in the final

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>shifts very quickly if this becomes three to zero as

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>opposed to two to one in Dallas getting an opportunity

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to come back home. They have not shot the ball

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>well short of Luka Doncic and Dancic has had a

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of seemingly uncharacteristic turnovers. His numbers have looked good,

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>but overall he just needs help. And the guy that

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you anticipate, you hope, you expect to help him will

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>be Kyrie Irving a huge part of why they got here,

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and he has struggled and whether you want to look

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>at the history between him and the Boston Celtics organization

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and if any of that played a factor in the

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>environment in TD Garden, but it's it's been a tough

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>sledding for Kyrie. In Game one he had twelve points,

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve to twenty six. He was zero five from three.

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Game two, sixteen points, didn't hit a three point shot

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>as well, seven of eighteen from the field. You can

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.719
<v Speaker 1>probably say that about both teams though struggling from the

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>three point line. But it's looked at he has not

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>looked like himself. He has not looked like how he

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>has looked throughout the course of the postseason, in particular

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>for a player who has talked about a lot of

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>having been here, having done that, having that experience, needing

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to help the others along the way, what do you

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>think the biggest concern should be and has been about

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the play of Kyrie And how do you think that

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>changes here for Game three?

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'll tell you I want to almost cut him

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 2>a little slack because, you know, for everything we heard

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 2>about Luca and Kyrie being the best offensive backcourt in

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 2>NBA history, right now they're making Boston look like it

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 2>has the best defensive backcourt in NBA history with Holliday

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 2>and Derek White. Now, those guys did finish on the

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 2>second team All Defensive Honors, and they could have been

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 2>first team. You know, the way voters voter could have

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 2>easily flipped that makes a difference. But yeah, I mean

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 2>this is this is Kyrie's time he has said it essentially,

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 2>and it makes total sense. They would not be here

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 2>without the symbiosis of Kyrie and Luca and how they

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 2>learned to play off each other, and how what a

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of us thought was going to be a battle

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 2>for the ball and a my turn year turn situation

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 2>has become much more cooperative and room for each Luca

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 2>being willing to indulge Kyrie's hot streaks and get the

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 2>most out of those guys. They wouldn't be here now

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 2>if that wasn't the formula, and if that's not going

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 2>to be the formula now, they're not going to win

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 2>a championship or even extended, you know, to six or

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 2>seven games. Kyrie, I thought for sure, would bounce back

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 2>better in Game two. He's he seems to have a

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 2>knack for not stacking up bad games. He can have one,

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>but then he's he's pretty much on point. Didn't happen.

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 2>He got a credit Boston's defense for that. I think

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 2>the switching coverage and everything else they're they're throwing at

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 2>those guys has has taken away some of what Kyrie does.

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 2>He's still a great finisher. He still can make plays

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 2>that that dazzle you. Know, creative shot maker, but he

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 2>hasn't hit a three pointer yet in the series, and

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 2>so you know the pressure is going to grow on him.

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Being home will help until it hurts, because at some

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 2>point the fans are going to get a little bit antsy.

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 2>If this becomes three games that Kyrie's off, it's going

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 2>to be off the hard to turn it around then

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 2>if Dallas obviously, if they go down three, nobody's won yet.

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 2>And while that is going to happen one of these years,

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't see this Dallas team as being the team

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 2>that's going to dig out of an O three hole.

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 2>So it puts so much pressure, so much attention on

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 2>the Wednesday night game.

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>With that being said, Ash, what are your predictions for

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the outcome of Game three.

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I actually think Dallas will win Game three. I think

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 2>they will get a bump from being home. I think

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Kyrie will play better. Uh you know, we saw we

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 2>saw Luca walking around pre game two like a mummy.

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean he had re wrapped, he had his torso wrapped.

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, if two days uh two off days by

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Wednesday night, that should help. There's only one day in

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 2>between Games three and four, so better to use the

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 2>rehab time now, and I think I think the role players,

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 2>guys like Derek Jones Jr. And And Derek Lively, Daniel Gafford,

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 2>those guys will be much more comfortable at home and

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 2>and two one series. I mean, it's it's so important,

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 2>you just you can't dig into that O three hole.

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>And I think the urgency for Dallas will will mean

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot. Now that said, I would expect if that

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 2>happens for Boston to Game four. Boston hasn't lost on

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 2>the road in these playoffs. Uh, They're able to handle

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 2>that stuff very very well well, and you know that

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 2>that might be enough if they come in that they

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 2>you go and expecting a split, they could they could

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 2>go for the sweep. But if they do that and

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 2>drag Dallas back to Boston for game five minutes three

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 2>to one, Like I said, I don't think this Manvericks

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 2>team is capable of flipping the script to that degree now,

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 2>not based on what we've seen so far.

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>As I'm with you, I would go with Dallas. I

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.479
<v Speaker 1>don't think this will be a sweep. I think they

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>end up getting this one, but I do think Boston

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>will ultimately close it out. However, I think this is

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be big games on the side of both

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie and Jason Tatum. I think those are two players

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>who historically, and you look at how they play, have

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>not stacked together as many games of shooting inefficiently and poorly.

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could even say that about Boston for

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>as much as we're talking about Dallas, and I do

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>believe this is going back home, especially some of the

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>complimentary players, role players, bench players coming in and being

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better. I do think that will happen,

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and shooting better and all that. Game two, Boston shot

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>just under twenty six percent from three. They're not a

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>team that ten to thirty nine from the three point line.

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I anticipate that will be better. But I do think

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that Dallas will ultimately find a way behind Luca and

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>behind Kyrie to pull off Game three. But I think

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>also you're going to see I think it's going to

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 1>be a tight one, and I think that's where it

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>goes back to us talking about closers and having closers

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and what Luca and Kyrie can do. I think we'll

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>see more of a closely played game and Dallas just

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>pulling it off at the end, being there at home.

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 1>But I do think this is where we've talked about.

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.959
<v Speaker 1>Tatum does so many things on the floor, and despite

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>not shooting the ball well, I think this is a

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>game that he will come back to knocking down shots

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in the way that we are accustomed to seeing him.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 2>It's a great point, serily, because I think the conventional

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 2>wisdom on this series going in was, you want, if

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Boston is going to win, they're gonna need a bigger

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 2>cushion late in games. If the game is close, then

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 2>you know you're gonna fear what Don't and Irving can do.

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 2>And while Game two got down to five, there wasn't

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 2>much time left at that point, it was just about

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 2>a minute.

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Don't as Dallas fans talking about that that push from

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>behind Jaylen Brown, Derek White on PJ. Washington But no,

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but I feel you, and I.

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 2>I think Boston has had enough of a lead that

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 2>they haven't had to worry so much about those late

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 2>game heroics, and just a closer game would bring out

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 2>the best I think in the Mavericks.

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think we may see that in Game three.

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Some other news, we've had some other news happening about

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>the NBA in regards to a team not still playing

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs. The Los Angeles Lakers were going to

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>get to their coaching search and the latest right after

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>this welcome back to NBA Cal Sarakustak joined by the

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>great Steve Ashburger and Ooh ash Oh Lakers trying to

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>put it together get a head coach. We've seen reports,

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>We've heard reports. This has been ongoing since their season

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>ended and they decided to part ways with Darvin Ham

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and the latest was that Danny Hurley was their guy.

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>They had been targeting him. He flew out to Los

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Angeles over the weekend and made a decision on Monday,

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and his decision was to stay at Yukon to go

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for that third straight national championship. He's built just an

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary legacy already, it feels like with the Huskies. But

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that leaves the Los Angeles Lakers back to the drawing

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>board and been some names that have still been out there.

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>We've heard about James Rego, We've of course heard a

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 1>lot about JJ Reddick, some others that they will bring in.

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>What's your What was your reaction I should say to

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Hurley deciding to stay at Yukon and more so on

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the side of rejecting the Lakers offer and what's next

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Lakers.

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was interesting, Sara, because I was on a

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 2>flight with a lot of NBA media people yesterday and

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 2>while there was a lot of sleeping going on, initially,

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 2>once somebody, i mean there was Wi Fi available, So

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 2>once somebody saw that news of Hurley's decision, all of

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, the laptops are coming out. People are firing up,

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, their ex app and and trying to figure

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 2>this out. And then of course a lot of chatter too,

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>because let's face it, there was skepticism about the whole

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 2>thing from the get go. The fact Adrian Wojnarowski who

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 2>broke that story of Hurley being a candidate and breaks

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of stories which are you know, very much legitimate,

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 2>but he has a particular relationship with the Hurley family.

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>He had written a book about Bobby and Danny Hurley's dad,

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, a renowned coach, high school coach out in Jersey,

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 2>And so it seemed like, wow, almost like an almost

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>like an inside job, and you wondered whether this was

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 2>and coming on the heels of Gino Arama getting a

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 2>contract extension, it seemed like maybe this is a little

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 2>bit of leverage for Danny Hurley to make sure he

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 2>gets the deal he's seeking from Yukon. So a lot

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 2>of skepticism, and yet I mean, the pieces all seemed

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 2>to have proven out that the Lakers did look at Hurley,

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 2>they interviewed Hurley, they apparently offered him a job. I mean,

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 2>if they hadn't, and this was that part was bogus.

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they would be out there right now saying no, no, no,

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 2>this is absurd. You know. So those pieces, all you know,

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 2>proved to be true. That doesn't mean that Danny Hurley

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 2>had genuine interest in going to Los Angeles. It could

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 2>mean that, like any of us might might you know,

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 2>if we had marketability, might try to do It's like,

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 2>oh wait, somebody might want to interview me for a job. Well,

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 2>I want to make sure my current employer knows that,

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 2>because it's a good way to get a raise. So

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 2>it could be you know, even that simple. I I

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 2>wasn't surprised when I heard the news he was staying

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 2>at Yukon. I guess, you know, to get to the

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to the bottom line, it just it seemed like it's

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 2>a tough job with the Lakers. I mean they change coaches.

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 2>They're not patient. They've got a roster that has you know,

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 2>serious issues, if not right now, but coming up because

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 2>of lebron James's future and you know where they're going

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 2>to backfill in terms of young talent and the whole

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Ronnie James potential pressure on that team. There's just there

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 2>are better situations that could open up in the next

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 2>few years that you know. Any Hurley, he's the only

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 2>young enough guy. He could wait and dip his towe

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 2>in the NBA waters a little bit down the road.

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see what happens now. I mean I heard

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 2>people making a case that this was a ploy of

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 2>some sort that benefits everybody. Right, Oh well, well woes

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 2>he has another scoop, Danny Hurley, you know, becomes this

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.719
<v Speaker 2>this coaching darling and ends up with you know, I

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 2>can't lose decision, you know, take seventy million dollars from

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers or get a better deal to stay where

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 2>you love and where you've won. And that the Lakers

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 2>somehow benefited by showing that they were really searching for

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 2>the best possible coach. You know, it wasn't just say well,

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 2>we're going to take lebron suggestion and hire JJ Reddick

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 2>without without considering other candidates. Now I look at that

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 2>and I say, well, yeah, but the message there is

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 2>that JJ Reddick is not your first pick then right,

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 2>he's at best your second choice. And is that a

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 2>good thing? But yeah, I guess that can be debated

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the the credibility that would be stole

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 2>upon upon Reddick that he uh, you know, he finished

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 2>second for a you know, a high profile job, and

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 2>there were other candidates as well, and it was a

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 2>real search. So I don't know that. That's a lot

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 2>of inside basketball management stuff. I think Reddick looks like

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be the Lakers next coach. Never say never,

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 2>but you know, eventually, all the parts will fall into place,

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 2>and we'll see a similar league in preseason and next season,

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 2>and we'll find out if if both these guys or

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 2>all these people made the right decisions.

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be interesting. That's that's what we come to

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you for. Ash is all the inside. You give us

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>all the inside, the NBA charter, all of those things.

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>So we'll have to circle back with you with all

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the good stuff, and uh wait to see what does happen.

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>The Lakers have said that they, as you would expect,

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>want to have a coach in place, a head coach

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in place by the draft, which is a little over

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. So you continue to monitor all those things

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and what is happening with the Finals as you continue

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to cover it and watching you and reading on NBA

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>TV and NBA dot com. And until then, Ash, enjoy

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>yourself in Dallas and we will talk with you soon.

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Sarah.

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>NBA Pulse with Sarahkustack is a production of the NBA

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and iHeartRadio. Please rate, review, and subscribe on the iHeartRadio

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>app or wherever you get your podcasts.