WEBVTT - Jealous much?

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you welcome to stuff you should know

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>from house Stuff Works dot com. Hey, and welcome to

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. With me as always is

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Charles W. Chuck Bryant, who better not be podcasting with

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>anybody else behind my back? Are you You didn't hear

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>about the Chuck and Chuck show? Who's the other Chuck?

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It's me? You're doing it with yourself, yes, but I

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>do your voice as me. That's fine. It's sort of weird.

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just obsessive, like theater acting, sort of fantasy league thing.

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Am I the the dummy in it? Like? Are you

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>just I'm Josso. Yeah, I figured I figured you did

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that in your underwear in the mirror every mornings. It's

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>really good and the numbers like we're rivaling our own

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>show now open people love it. I'm surprised that hasn't

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>overtaken it yet. Wait, it's that one. Oh I didn't

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>know that was you? What. There's probably people out there like,

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, I gotta hear this. Let's get to

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it showing enough of this riff raff crap enough, Okay, Chuck,

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>You're ready. October this month? Uh is National apple Jack Month,

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>National pickle Peppers Month, National Breast Cancer Aware this month.

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Did you notice the Delta Stewards and Stewardesses pink everywhere?

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I love it. It's National Mental Illness Awareness Month, National Lesbian,

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Gay and Bisexual History Month. And just so happens that

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this on Pride weekend, which makes sense. Um,

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it is National country Ham Month. Really, there's a lot

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of October is a big month that kind of overshadows

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Breast Cancer Awareness Month, Country Ham. It depends on the

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>country Ham. I would say, uh, And then I guess

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>most apropos to this podcast, which I wasn't aware of,

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think you were either. Um, It's National

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Domestic Violence Awareness Month. Really, yes, And I say it's

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a propos of this podcast because this is a podcast

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>on jealousy. Jealousy is one of the more widely recognized

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>triggers of domestic violence. Did you know that? Did not?

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>But it makes sense? Um. According to a two thousand

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>three alone I study um in relationships that were domestically violent,

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it was male on woman domestic violence, and there is

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>such thing as the other way around, um, women who

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>were abused. As long as it was attended by jealousy,

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it was perceived by the battered woman as um less

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 1>negative and that deserves but less negative than um non

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>jealous violence. Interesting. Yeah, um, which is it's very interesting,

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's really weird because it kind of goes it

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>speaks to our perception of jealousy. It's a it's a weird, undesirable,

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>unflattering emotion. Um. And yet it also shows we care

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in certain ways. Right, Clearly, domestic violence is far far

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>beyond any level of caring. But it's so it's it

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>can even spill over that far the idea that jealousy

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>equals caring, that it can it can reach violent levels.

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>That is one of the more messed up things I've

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>heard in a long time. And because as I can

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>hear the scenario of well, he was just jealous because

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to that guy at the bar, which

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>means he loves me, which is like, that's so messed up.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>It is very because I josh am of the belief.

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Before we get started, here's Chuck's oppinion rant. These are

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the two things that Chuck says about jealousy. This is

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>not backed up in any scientific way. I believe that

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>A there is no place in jealousy in any healthy relationship.

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>In the article, it says like jealousy can be good

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>as long as I don't agree B. Because of that,

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I think jealousy pops up when you when there are

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>trust issues should never be trust issues. When there is

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>an unhealthy dependence on one another should never be that.

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>And when one or both of the parties is really

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>really insecure with each other. I disagree. All right, then

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't disagree to like a polar opposite degree. Um,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but I do think I did agree with the article

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>where it says towards the end, the psychologist that was

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>um interviewed for this article suggests that a certain degree

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of what's called normal jealousy is healthy. UM. I don't

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's possible to have a relationship that doesn't have

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>some sort of trust issues you're looking at it. I

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have zero trust issues, zero jealousy, Emily, I've never had

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. That is fantastic for you. I am

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of the opinion, though, that jealousy in small measure to

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a certain degree is symptomatic of a healthy relationship. Really. Yeah,

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's get into it. Okay, you're ready. What

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>is jealousy Chuck? First of all, jealousy envy same thing.

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh No, not at all. They're in fact quite different

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>because envy, Josh is when you want something that you

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>do not have that someone else has, right, usually an

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>object near or whatever. The job, jobs, an object is

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>it if you write it down, if you draw a

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>picture of your job, it becomes an object. Whereas jealousy

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is a fear of losing something that you have to

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>someone else, like a job or an object. So you

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>want something that somebody else has an envy and jealousy

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you already have something, but you fear losing it. Yeah.

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And like you know, relationships are usually where you talk

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>about jealousy, So you basically fear that you're gonna lose

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>your mate to the dude at the bar. And jealousy,

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Chuck is an emotion. So let's talk briefly about emotions.

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>But they're um, primary emotions like fear, disgust, anger, joy, uh,

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and a couple others okay, um, And these are found

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in just about any animal with the brain, right, um.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And then there's secondary emotions that are self conscious emotions

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that include jealousy, right, jealousy, shame, guilt, embarrassment, pride, um.

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>You have to have a sense of yourself and awareness

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of yourself in relation to others to experience secondary emotions

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>like jealousy, because jealousy, you can't be jealous of anything

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>if there's not another person or another something. It takes

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>two to be jealous, right. Yeah. And Ralph Hopka, he's

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a professor of psychology at cal State Long Beach heap

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>I know, was interviewed for this article and he put

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>it really succinctly. He said, jealousy is an anticipatory emotion.

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>It seeks to prevent loss. That really sums it up

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>right there. But it also makes jealousy really really unusual

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>because think about it, like all relations or all um

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>emotions are reactionary. Really, there's like a stimuli or stimulus

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and it you react to it. You feel fear because

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of it, you feel joy because of it. Jealousy is

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the prospect of of experiencing something, so that makes it

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>an antecedent to other emotions like anger or fear, right

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes first. Yeah, Yeah, it's weird, it's unusual, and

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>what our emotions chuck if not motivators, right, Fear motivates

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you to like move away from the man coming at

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you with a knife. Joy motivates you to like do

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that again or break out in song? Right, Uh, and

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>then I guess jealousy motivates you to take measures to

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>prevent that loss. Interesting. Yeah, all right, this is gonna

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>be a fun one, alright, because rarely do we come

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>at it from different angles. Uh. Since we're talking about

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:02.559
<v Speaker 1>m V, do you want to talk about your penis? Uh? Sure,

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that's one of my favorite things talking about Uh. Freud.

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Sigmund Freud, the psychoanalyst UM came up with the concept

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of penis envy and I had a general idea of

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>what it was, and it wasn't very far off. But

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't until this article that I read what penis

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>MV is. It is defined the psychoanalytic concept in which

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a female envyes male characteristics or capabilities, especially the possession

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of a penis. Right, Yeah, what's that gonna do with jealousy?

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't, but it is interesting and I didn't realize

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't understand why this um was put into this either.

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the more feminist articles on the site. Yeah,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought so. Um. But in in this little sidebar,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>penis envy? Um. Basically what Freud came up with was

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that all women want to be men, and all of

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>their accomplishments and feats are the result of a sense

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of competition with men, or they're trying to make up

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>for their shortcoming of lacking a penis interesting. Obviously this

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>has been generally discarded, but pertinent to your your your

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>question of what it has to do with jealousy. Nothing,

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>because that's envy and we've already cleared the air between

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>what's envy and what's jealousy. I just thought it was

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>an interesting side it is. Can we talk about jealousy? Sure, Chuck, Uh.

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>There are there have been studies. It's kind of a

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult thing to study, um, because you know, you want

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to study if gender has an even to do with it,

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>if age has anything to do with it, if ethnicity

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>has any to do with it. And it's hard for

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>like age, because you'd have to interview someone at the

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>age of fourteen as an adolescent, and then again in

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>their thirties and then their fifties, and that's sort of

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a hard study to pull off. Yeah, the same person

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to interview. One of the reasons why it's

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>so hard is because, well, it's a longitudinal study, but

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with jealousy specifically, it's so um contextual, culturally contextual that

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>as the culture just expectations of what might make someone

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>jealous change as well. Sure that was the reason at

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>least given in this in this um, in this article,

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but other longitudinal studies have been carried out, and it

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>could considerably be carried out, but apparently no one's done

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it on jealousy, right, Yeah, but there have been some

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>really cool studies just about different aspects of jealousy and

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>they have found some pretty cool water cooler things that

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you can wow your buddies tomorrow. And the cubicles. Um.

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Women they've always thought have showed jealousy a little more

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>than men do. And we'll get into the emotional and

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>sexual jealousy in a minute. But one study revealed that

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>women when they're jealous tend to aim their ire more

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>often at the rival, whereas the male will aim the

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>ire at their partner a fisher. Interesting, yeah, great example

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of that's really great example, Um, what lies beneath fatal attraction?

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Glenn posts yeah, although she kind of came after the

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>family wholesale energy. Yeah. And then there's always the lorrain

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of Bobbitts who just fly in the face of that,

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and and the woman who run who ran over her

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>husband in Texas member with her daughter in the car. Right. Yeah.

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So I mean I'm gonna end up saying this, I

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>might as well say it. I think it's all very personal,

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Like it's hard to do a sweeping study of jealousy

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and say people say this and people do this because

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone's different. Yeah, and this other um, this supplemental study

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>from two I think that you came up with kind

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of underscores that it supports that idea, Chuck. I think

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>jealousy is far more personal than it's been treated in

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the past as well. Um, for the most part, it

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>was viewed as um, it was divided by gender, and

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>there are there are studies that support that that women

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>tend to be more jealous than men, right. Uh. And

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that's I guess you have to be very careful with

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>your wardening there, because it's really easy to uh skew

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that idea the wrong way. It doesn't mean that women

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>experience it's jealousy more than men. Necessarily. It just means

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that women display jealous characteristics more than men according to

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 1>these studies. Well, yeah, and they say that one reason

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.719
<v Speaker 1>might be that they're not more jealous, they just are

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>more open and honest with expressing that the men um.

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Since you brought that study though, it is pretty interesting.

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>They there's long been the belief that, uh, men are

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>more upset about sexual infidelity, women are more upset about

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 1>emotional infidelity. Actually that is true, but they always thought

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that it was evolutionary in its basis because men, ah,

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is pretty interesting. There's no way to for

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>men to have proven that they're the father of a child, right,

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So men were always very like guarded about sexual behavior. Well,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>they guard their mate because they my wife, my you know,

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Tuktok is pregnant, and I don't know if it was

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you know me, or if it was Ringo star over there.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's from caveman, and I don't know if Tuktok was.

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>But and women are more com admitted to raising a

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>family and having a partner, so like an emotional betrayal

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>would be you know, more devastating to them. But the

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>scientist at a Penn State said, well, what about the

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that there's men who are really upset about emotional

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 1>betrayal just like women are, Like, how do you explain that?

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>And they did some studies and they found that it's

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily evolutionary and nature right, No, it's uh. What

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they came up with was that it was much more

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>personal and specific. UM. Basically, what these two these two

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>researchers hypothesized was that UM, men tend to be more

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>sexually jealous and women tend to be more emotionally jealous

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>or jealous over emotional betrayal and sexual betrayal. UM because

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>men are more likely to detach from personal relationships as

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a defense mechanism. That was their hypothesis, And they carried

0:13:57.559 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 1>out the study and they found that their hypothesis was

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>really correct, that men who are detached from relationships, which

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>they theorize as a defense mechanism, are more likely to

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>report that they would be turned off or made jealous

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>by a sexual betrayal than an emotional betrayal. But what

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they found and what I think they were trying to

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>point out, was that their their hypothesis explains the why

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a population of men who are in securely committed

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>relationships who consistently report that an emotional betrayal is way

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>worse than a sexual betrayal. So it's they're saying, like,

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>there are there there is a division of jealousy by gender.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>But here's why it's not because you know, men can't

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>prove that that that's not their kid. That it's actually

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>much more personal than that. Did you know that? Men?

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>One of the most common reactions that a man has

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>when they first find out that their wife is pregnant

0:14:55.440 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is whose is it? Even in committed like awesome marriages,

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like a very common psychological reaction to think like

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that can't be mine? What? Yeah, where did you read this?

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I read it? That's it. I can't remember. Yeah, I

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>did so many sights I want to rag on right now. Alright,

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>chuck um Well quickly though about that study too. It

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>also points out that the person's history has a lot

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to do with it, So right, it's a defense. Yeah, Like,

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a jealous person at all, like I said,

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and I have no trust issues, but if I had

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>been cheated on a bunch of times, I might sure,

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and I throughout this podcast or I'm going to refer

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to nameless friends of mine, And I do know this

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one couple who the guy had a history of cheating

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and the girl had a history of cheating. They hooked up,

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>they got married, and they're both pretty jealous. Oh yeah,

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's and they've been mary happily married. It's

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>not like they're they're not a good couple, but they're

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>both just inherently jealous because they're both cheaters. Right. It's

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes back to that, um judge not less

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you be judged, or when you point a finger, there's

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>three pointing back at you. The concept that actually encountered

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the Yeah, the concept that if you have cheated, um,

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you are aware that people can do that to other peopure.

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>And on the same coin, if you've been cheated on,

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you're acutely aware that that can happen. And I think

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>both of those situations can lead to jealousy too. I

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's what that past state study was was saying that,

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>like you said, it's much more personal than of evolutionary

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>origin divided along gender. Right, Um, so, Chuck, let's let's um.

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>There have been other studies too that are some are hokey,

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>some deserve rim shots, some deserve sad hombones UM. But

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>apparently some studies have focused on jealousy as an individual

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>um emotion, not necessarily needing another person that it um

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is or it originates in the self right. And one

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of the things that they found was men who are

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>tall and women who are average height tend to be

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>less jealous than um men who are short or women

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>who are shorter or taller. And basically the point is

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is that they know everybody wants them well. And I

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>think beyond that, it goes back to what I was saying.

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the root of a lot of jealousy lies

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in the insecurities of a person. And you know, short

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>guys are often insecure. Okay, So if jealousy is an

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>insecurity we're breaking new ground here, are we. Yeah, it

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it, Okay, Jealousy is an insecurity insecurity based emotion, right,

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe so, Yes, And what we're finding is that

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it can be It can originate from the self feelings

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:48.959
<v Speaker 1>of insecurity based on appearance, um, height, attributes, what have you,

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>or it can be inflicted by another person e g.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Cheating or being cheated on, or doing anything to break

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>someone's trust right right, trust breaking dude, we get our

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>pH ds today, Chuck, Yes, Uh, should we talk about

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>adolescent jealousy for a little bit, Yeah, adolescent jealousy, Josh

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>is um kids are pretty jealous. Like, there's some of

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the more jealous creatures on earth. If you sit around

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and watch kids, there's two types. There's one that is

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>inherently wants to share a lot and it's very kind

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and giving. And there's one that doesn't want to share.

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>They want what you've got, They want your Lincoln logs,

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>they want to break your toys. And uh. Kids often

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>display this, and especially with siblings with sibling rivalry. But

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>they say rivalry whatever, and they say that's a really

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:47.719
<v Speaker 1>normal behavior though, and not to get too worked up

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>about it as a parent, and to kind of stay

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>out of it unless you know it gets violent and

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>let them figure it out on their own. But that

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>that makes you wonder, like our kids more jealous or

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>are they just more emotionally honest? Well, maybe have they?

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Have they not learned that you need to kind of

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>keep a lid on that kind of thing that or

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>not emotionally mature. It depends on how you look at it.

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Jealous either way, is that right? Were you did you

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>happen to be extremely lonely or extremely insecure. I think

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I was insecure in my high school relationship and that

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>made me really jealous. Oh yeah, yeah, okay, so check

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>that that's actually kind of normal to experience jealousy as

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>far as friendship, jealousy is an adolescent according to a

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>study that was produced in uh, well, not produced but

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>published instead in developmental psychology, right, and I basically found

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that kids who are insecure or lonely, or experience insecurity

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>or extreme loneliness tend to um be jealous of friendships. Right,

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So when they get into a friendship, they are jealous

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of their friends friends to the point where it can

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>erupt and physical aggressiveness or passive aggressiveness where they're, you know,

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>ignoring their friend and their friend has no idea. Why. Yeah,

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.679
<v Speaker 1>that's basically another way to put it. It's high school. Yeah,

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>like you know, and I was. I sort of became

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>friends with a popular crowd in about the tenth grade,

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and I never remember being jealous because I was just

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 1>so excited to be in the cool club. So I

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>was never jealous. I was just like, yeah, I like everybody,

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>and everybody likes me, and it's all great, but it

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>was the girlfriend that I was jealous of, but I

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>had reason to be. I think I think it's pretty

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>normal too. I think high school is how do you?

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>How do you ever make it through there? Don't know.

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I always feel so bad for kids that like take

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>their own lives in high school because it's just like

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>just just hung on a couple more years, you know,

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 1>gets so much better. Believe me, Yeah, we can message

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that out to our high school friends. If you're lonely

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and depressed out there on so much better. High school

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is really the anyone who who's high school was the

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>high point of their lives, they are the sad people

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in your past eventually exactly. Um so chuck uh. The

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>that study I was talking about in developmental psychology, it

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was pretty comprehensive. They interviewed ninth graders and asked them

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 1>about hypothetical situations and found, um, it was reinforced that

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>girls tend to be more jealous than guys. Um, which

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is something that I think psychology is having a lot

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of trouble like addressing because it's just such a m

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a misogynist finding girls are jealous. It's so cliche.

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>It's so the other word I'm trying to think of. Um,

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but it apparently is this open secret in psychological research

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>into jealousy, right, or again, like you're saying, or are

0:21:52.080 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>girls more emotionally Uh, what's the word? Um? Honest? Expressive? Honest? Yeah,

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>but when it comes down to a study, there's no distinction. Yeah,

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that's true. I mean it's open displays of jealousy that

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for, or at least honesty in whether or

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>not you'd be on jealous right. And I could see

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of high school boys not being in a

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>study like this, not wanting a cop to it. Yeah

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Yeah, Um, you're talking about types of jealousy.

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Adolescent jealousy is racked with sibling rivalry, right. Um, that's

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>just I was second fiddle to my um middle sister,

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>like my whole Still to this day, I'm like the

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>baby of the family. I'm like, oh, you know, I'm

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>going to be on TV next week and everybody's just

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>like whatever, So, Mandy, how are the kids? Uh you

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 1>know about my my handsomer, thinner, smarter, older brother. Yeah,

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>he and I correspond pretty regularly these days. He guys

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>writing each other, does that make you jealous? Does uh?

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>He he is was always better than at me school

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, better looking, and like I said, he's

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in better shape. But we were I was never jealous

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>of him because my parents were always really good about

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>just they didn't you know, Scott was good at this

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.239
<v Speaker 1>and you're you're good in other areas, and they were

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>good about building me up, and you're good at growing

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>facial hair. Yeah, exactly, Well, actually that is where I

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>beat him. Yeah, he's he's a little he's he can

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>grow a little goatee and a little stash, but he

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>struggles in the facial hair department. Good. Maybe he's jealous

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of my facial I bet he is. He would never

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>admit a chuck, but he is okay take it from me,

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>and he never rubbed it into That can make you jealous,

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess if he stuffs it in your face. But

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we just always got along really great. Yeah. And you

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>were saying did your parents stay out of it? Um? Yeah,

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean they stayed out of fights when we had him,

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and they definitely didn't say, Well, look at Scott's report

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>card compared to yours. He got a's and you've got bees. Yeah, Well,

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>who does that unless you're like a sadistic out there,

0:23:55.840 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy. Um. Yeah, my parents stayed out of mine

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and my sister's relationship to UM, And apparently that's the right,

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the that's the way to UM single handedly pretty much,

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's apparently the way to go according to some

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>uh child psychologists, like stay out of it, let them

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>handle it themselves, because um, not only are they learning

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>how to, but you might also actually like one more

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>than the other. And then you come through loud and

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>clear to the one when you unconsciously side with the other, right, UM.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>So apparently let your kids as long as they're not

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>beating the tar out of each other, you're all right. Right.

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So that was a sibling rivalry, which is also called

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>family jealousy. UM. And then I imagine there's other types

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>of family jealousy to like, um, apparent one parent being

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>jealous of the other because they're getting all the attention

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of the kids. But that exists, um. And then of

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>course there is well there's all sorts of complexes at

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 1>a pole electoral, just all sorts of crazy family dynamics

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>going on. I got older sister too. I never talked

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>about Michelle. I should mention that she's six years older,

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>so there was no there was no jealousy between like

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the sexes. We were all our own people. How how

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>how much older is your brother? It's three years in

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>six years, so three three and three romantic jealousy, Josh,

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you wanna talk about that? That's really the big one. Yes,

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>this is the one where apparently everyone else on the planet,

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>but you and Emily experienced this. I know plenty of

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 1>couples who aren't jealous of each other. Yeah really, yeah,

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is that news to you? Yeah, I've I've never ever

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>had a relationship that, like, didn't have some jealousy here.

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't a constant, it wasn't a thread, and it

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't debilitating by any means. Right, I've never I've never

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>been in a relationship that didn't have that didn't exhibit

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>some form of jealousy somehow. And I don't I don't

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>know that I would feel comfortable in one that doesn't.

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's over sharing. But that's how that's how. Well,

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you this. You go to a party

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 1>with you me, you split up, and you see her

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>over at the beer keg because you know the keggers

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>were good to see at this age just talking to

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>some guy. Would you immediately feel jealousy or just think

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>she's just talking to some guy? Um? Honestly, UM, I

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>would say that in that situation because I trust her,

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I would assume that she's talking to some guy. But

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I would eventually go over there if it like continued

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>or if she saw her talking later on or something

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like that, And UM, it wouldn't be for her. I

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be trying to intervene toward her. It would be like, hey, guy,

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>she's got a boyfriend kind of you know what I mean?

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>You want to go? I know her and I trust her, Um,

0:26:57.760 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know that guy, right, And I know

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know the guy and the guy doesn't

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.239
<v Speaker 1>know I exist or whatever, although knowing you me, he

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>does know I exist. So that just makes me more

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>app to go over and be like take a hike.

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>For all you know, he could be dropping a roofy

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>in her in her That's exactly right, And this is

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>why I think that there is it is healthy to

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>experience some form of jealousy, because if I was totally

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 1>not jealous, I wouldn't have gone over there. I wouldn't

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>have cared, and you know, I would have had my

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>back to my girlfriend, which whatever, I don't think that's

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. I guess that's me then no, No,

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing, Chuck, I guarantee you. I guarantee you.

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get listener mail supporting your view and

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>supporting my view. I don't think there's a right or

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong view. I think you should you know, when there's

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 1>an uncomfortable amount of jealousy in your relationship or a

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>bunch you know, you know, and if you're getting beat

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>up because your husband or boyfriend's jealous and you don't know,

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>go get help because you that's too much. Well, you

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>may not know if you're really jealous, though, because a

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of people might think, well, that's completely normal to

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>be abnormally jealous, right, Well, we're here to tell you.

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>And again this applies to women beating up. Man. If

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>you're getting beat up by your significant other out of

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>jealousy for any reason, really, that's not okay. That's that's wrong.

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Like no other people who also listen to this podcast

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>think that your relationship is wrong. Everybody out here thinks

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>that what's being done to you is wrong. It's a

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>good way to put it. Uh. They did find that

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>romantic jealousy is uh. Usually the first fight that a

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>couple will have is over some sort of romantic jealousy,

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>whereas later on in life it's all about money, money,

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and if you're if you're lucky, it's about money. As

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>long as you're not fighting about trash, who takes who

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>takes the trash out, you're fine. Really. Yeah, the once

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you start finding about the little stupid things, that's a

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>big problem, you think, so, and my experience, we should

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>start a relationship show people just like what we think

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>about things. All right, let's get back to the science,

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>shall we. Uh. There is work jealousy, of course, and

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that is a really ugly thing to have in the workplace.

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And that is obviously when people are buying for the

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>same jobs, are looking for the same promotion or the

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>same pay raise or the same whatever, and other people

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>are getting it and or a person gets that raise

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>over you, and it's just it's it's one of the

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>uglier types of jealousy that I've seen. It is And

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, what I think is cute? What's that? And

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>this is how I feel about you? If I'm ever

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>jealous of you. It falls much more into the sibling

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>rivalry than work jealousy. I thought you're can Sara romantic.

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I was about say, thank god, thank god. So what

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>more sibling rivals than work? Yeah? Well that's because we're

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we're peers, and we wish the best on each other.

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Like occasionally we'll get individual opportunities, not often, but sometimes,

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>like you write for HuffPo, occasionally. I didn't think you

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>cared about that. Well, no, that's what I'm saying. Well,

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what my point is is that we're real supportive

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of each other's Like I wrote for Cosmo last week,

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you wrote for HuffPo. You wrote for Cosmo. I should

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>be jealous because HuffPo Cosmo. No, no, no, you wrote

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>for Cosmo. Yeah. You didn't tell me this, What are

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you jealous? No? But I'm proud of you. You're supposed

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to tell I was kind of like, you know, Cosmo,

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to know about stress, and that's awesome. It's

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>like being mad at your boyfriend gives you pimples and stuff.

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome. Chuck, not as heady as hufbo. Hey, Well regardless, Chuck,

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm proud of you, so you sent me that link

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>after this, Okay, well when it publishes it well, and

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>pride is a self conscious emotion. Uh. And then Josh,

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:43.479
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about this kind of off and on. But

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>abnormal jealously is I think what they called it many things,

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>psychotic behavior, delusional, morbid. It's also referred to largely as

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>neurotic jealousy neurotic where it's a habitual, possibly unfounded or

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>at the very um detrimental to the relationship. Yeah, and

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they said it could be uh for a lot of reasons.

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Um insecurity of course, always back to that immaturity again

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and being a control freak, which I thought was kind

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of interesting. It can also be um the result like

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>we said, of having your trust broken, Chuck, or having

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:20.959
<v Speaker 1>feel like the trust was broken even when it hasn't happened. Right.

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think if you've broken someone's trust, you know it,

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>like to a debilitating degree, you know it, right, And

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a lot of help out there. Are you

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>people who if you've broken someone's trust and you don't

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>care to find out how to rebuild it, probably just

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>move along. But if you do care, then there's actual

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>like steps to rebuilding trust, and we actually did a

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:49.719
<v Speaker 1>little digging around and found something right. That's right. So UM,

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we found that I think anybody who says seven steps

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to rebuilding trust in like ten minutes, it's not going

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to happen. One of the things that we found in

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>our research was that if you're rebuilding trust broken trust,

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it's always going to take longer than you think it's

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>going to I would like triple what you think you

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>can't I I think even that would probably fall short.

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I think once you start thinking about how long it's

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>going to take, you've lost focus and you need to

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>refocus on rebuilding trust with the person. So the first

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that you have to do is tell your partner,

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it's your friend, your spouse, your UM, the love

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of your life, your co host on your podcast, your workmate,

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>whoever you broken trust with UM you you you want

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>them to know that you understand their feelings, that you're

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>wrong them right, and that you're sorry, and that you

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>feel totally cool with the fact that they hate you

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>right now and you're completely responsible. You have to own

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that completely, I would think totally. Because some people break

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>trust and they kind of try and put it back

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.479
<v Speaker 1>on you a little bit, which is a natural human emotion.

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I think to try and deflect blame, but it's always

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>better if you just keep it yourself. Well, you don't

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>want to heap it like you want. You want to

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation, and yeah, you want to accept responsibility

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>for what you did. Some of the things you don't

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.719
<v Speaker 1>want to do is withdraw, um, attack back like you

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>were saying, or offer excuses or explanations. You want to

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>do that and apologize, not attack back, but you want

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to offer an explanation and apologize in reverse order. After

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you've said, I understand that you're mad, and all of

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this might not take place in like a ten or

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minute conversation. This could take place over months, depending

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on how badly you've hurt the other person. Right, Um,

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, after you have said I know I've hurt you,

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and I take responsibility. Um, you want to apologize. You

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>want to explain your point of view. Basically, you want

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to say, this is why I did this, even if

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it's as wrong as because I'm a selfish piece jerk.

0:33:54.280 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Selfish jerk. Um, that's an explanation, right, It's how the

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>person understand why it happened, which I think is a

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>big part of it. Right, Yeah, I would want I

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>would just recommend stopping short of trying to defend your

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>actions though, because there's a difference. Right. Right, You're not

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>saying it was right, you're saying why you did it.

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Those two are separate, or why it's right is layered

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>on the explanation. Right. And you want to make promises,

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Actually you want to go out of your way to

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>make promises. You you don't want to say I make

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 1>no promises. This changes our relationship. You can't expect anything

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>from me. You make promises by saying this is you

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>know what you can expect of me in the future,

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and it can be Um. One of the examples that

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>was used in this was, um, if you if you

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>lie to your wife so you can go play golf

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>with your buddies on a Saturday morning, which is wow. Um,

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to promise to spend you know, every Saturday

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 1>for the next two months with your family, or you

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>could just a little maybe, or you could go to

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:00.839
<v Speaker 1>your wife to begin with and say, hey, I'm gonna

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.760
<v Speaker 1>play golf on Saturday, right, or even can I depending

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>on your relationship, but yeah, lying to your wife to

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>go play golf with your buddies. It's like a Bob

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Hope short from the fifties or Kevin James sitcom. Have

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you got anything else on trust there? Um? Well, yeah,

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to make promises. One of the things you

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.760
<v Speaker 1>want to do is not over exert yourself with promises.

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to make fantastic promises because the worst

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 1>thing you can do is not follow through on your promises,

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 1>and you just broken trust again, right, And you also

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>want to make promises that are not just agreeable to

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the person that you have who's trust you broken, but

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to yourself as well, because if you're like, well, for

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the love of God, I'm like, you know, I've lied

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>about playing golf with my buddies and now I have

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to go get some moon dust because I promised I would.

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna probably resent your partner. So you want to

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>come to a consensus about what's okay. Um, And then,

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 1>like we said, you want to keep promises, and then

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to kind of discuss how things are going. Um.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of steps to this, but again the

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>rule of them is, um, apologize or say you understand

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>why their feelings are hurt, and take responsibility apologize, explain,

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>make promises, follow through on the promises, and just keep

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>an open dialogue. Try to hustle the other person. Yeah,

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're a male right now and you're thinking all

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 1>those steps come on, that's called being in a relationship,

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>right and it does take a lot of work in

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of steps, and it does if you're gonna

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>be in a happy one, dude, that's what you gotta do.

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And you will know when it's worth it. Oh, sure

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you'll know or when to cut bait, So chuck, I

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>guess that's it. Oh well, no, no, we got I

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>got a few more things. We never finished on. Abnormal

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 1>jealousy actually, uh, because there's a switch that happens sometimes

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>between normal jealousy that leads to abnormal and dr Hoopka

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>says it's not always easy to spot and define when

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that happens, but you should be aware of it if

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you're in a relationship because it can't get really bad.

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>You know if when they throw acid on you, or hey,

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>someone to throw acid on you. Did that happen? Yeah,

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>there was a picture in the article. Yeah, really weird. Uh.

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>He says that a few things you can look for though,

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>if for abnormal jealousy is if, like, you go out

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>or something, you're given permission, or you just go out

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>with your friends and your mate is always calling to

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 1>check in on you. That's something that you should look for.

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Or if they're going through your telephone book or your

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 1>like text or your address book, that's probably abnormal jealousy too.

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.839
<v Speaker 1>It is. And I have other unnamed people I know

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:36.959
<v Speaker 1>it's a friend of mine. Who oh sure, the wife says,

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you can go out with your friends. Oh, no problem,

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm so cool. It's so cool. And then they get

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:45.439
<v Speaker 1>out in the whole entire timet texts in a couple

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of hours to the point where we just go why

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you even bother coming out? Man? That's supportive, that's supportive.

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>What should I say? That's awesome? No, but I mean, like,

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>why you even bother coming out? That's kind of I mean,

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I can't wait to meet your unnamed friends,

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>like you're unnamed friend number two. I don't think they

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 1>listen to the podcast. They don't know, so I feel

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty comfortable. Uh. And then one more two more things green, Yeah,

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the ancient Greeks, right, that's what did you recognize that?

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean recognize it turning green? Um because

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of bile. Remember the four humors we talked about happiness

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>audiobook that's hitt hint. Yeah, uh yeah. They think that

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 1>came from a build up of bile when you're jealous

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>or envious and would actually turn your skin greeny. Yellow

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>bible will turn your skin green. I think I think

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it would be green bile. Yeah, there's a but well

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 1>there isn't. There's yellow bile, black bile, blood, and flagm

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>were the four humors. I like black bile. We're we're

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>both black bile and a little bit of a blood.

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>We're both sanguine and melancholy. And can we talk about

0:38:56.600 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>animals real quick? Uh? Animals actually show jealousy, forms of jealousy.

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>They don't know, they don't chuck this if you read this.

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>A sense of fairness does not indicate jealousy. And what's more,

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the the animals may have envied the other animals treat

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 1>The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences did a

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>study where they tested dogs to give them treats when

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they would shake, you know, as a reward. Yeah, And

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>they saw that if another dog was getting a you know,

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a treat a piece of food afterwards, the other what

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that the dog that wasn't would eventually, after a

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of times, would be like, I'm not shaking right

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>until I get some uh some food. And they tested

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>that in monkeys, and they found that the monkeys got

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>jealous over the kind of treat, even jealous. The ones

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that got a cucumber were like, at first, oh, this

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is great, I get a cucumber for a treat, And

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>then they noticed that their buddy was getting a grape,

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>which tastes a lot better I cast to a monkey.

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>And the monkeys would actually just stop performing because they

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't get a treat as good as the other monkey.

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's weird. That came up when we were

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>doing research for our super Stuff Guide to the Economy

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>audio book. Oh that's right, I knew that sounded yeah, familiar.

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>It was that your key's at the emery down the street. Um. See,

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, Chuck is that's a sense of fairness.

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not the same thing as jealousy. And I don't

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>think that the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>has got it wrong. I think MPR did because sometimes

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>MPR and gets things wrong much has it pained me

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>to say it five times per podcast? We get something wrong?

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>So for podcasts for podcast uh, you know, you might

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>say jealous, Some say elephants get jealous. Elephants can remember.

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to tell with animals because you can't ask well. Currently,

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the prevailing scientific way of looking at it is animals

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have a sense of self enough to have to

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>experience secondary emotions like jealousy or shame or embarrassment. You

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>have to have a conscious sense of self. I think

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>animals do. But science is like, we'll prove it, and

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we haven't figured out how to prove it yet. So

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where we're standing. You ready, I see you've got

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a fine piece of listener mail right there. Yeah. Do

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you have anything else? Nope. So if you want to

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:10.280
<v Speaker 1>learn more about jealousy, trust all that kind of stuff,

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you can type jealousy or trust into the swing and

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>search bar at how Stuff works dot Com. Since I

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>said that, I think now nowadays it's time for listener man.

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>It is Josh. I'm gonna call this just one of

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>many polygamy emails. We got it blew up, it really did.

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:33.720
<v Speaker 1>We got something from we got one from lou Bega.

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Did you see you know? We got two emails from

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>lou Bega. And I wrote him back the first time

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>because he said, Hey, guys, I'm not pumping gas. I'm

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm slicing meat at a deli, just so you know.

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And I wrote him back and said slice at then

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:49.760
<v Speaker 1>lou And then he wrote back again and said about

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the Mormon one of the Polygamy podcast, Yes he was.

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>He was defining. Do you think I'm kind of leaning

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:58.959
<v Speaker 1>toward it, dude. I wrote him back today and said, listen,

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>if this is the real loup Ega of hit song fame,

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 1>they'n I'm gonna need photographic of it. That's what I

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>was thinking too, But I didn't have time to email him,

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So I'm glad you didn't want a picture of blue Bega.

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>You'd see see me on these That kind of makes

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>me jealous that I don't see see you on fanmail

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:16.240
<v Speaker 1>when it's lou Bega. It depends on who it is. Okay,

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll see seeing me on the rest, but especially if

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>you send in photo of it. What's funny is he's

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:22.839
<v Speaker 1>going to send a picture himself. You're gonna be like, wait,

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>what the hell, little lou Big it look like now

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember, he looks like what if he doesn't wear

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>po door? I wonder in the Delhi if he's like

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of turkey, a little bit of pumper nickel. No,

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 1>some rye, oh dear. So this one, like I said,

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we heard from a lot of um people from the

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints. A lot

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 1>of people said, it's really great, you got it right.

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people said he got it all wrong,

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>or they said we didn't distinguish that enough. I disagree.

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we said quite plainly that that most Mormons

0:42:56.920 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>don't do this, and that this is the fundamentalist Mormon,

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and like with a capital at fundamentalist Mormons. Well, and

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a distinction between the Church of Latter day Saints and Mornerism. Right,

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's what the distinction wants. Maybe we'll have a

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>whole another bath. This is from Susan. Hey, guys, have

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>said it before, I'll say it again. You guys are awesome.

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I just had a few clarifications about the Mormons concerning

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:22.240
<v Speaker 1>their practice of polygamy in your recent podcasts. I myself

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:24.360
<v Speaker 1>am a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Latter day Saints and a history buff on this topic

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>because a few of my ancestors were early members who

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>practice polygamy. Polygamy was not a blanket requirement for being

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a good member of the Church of Jesus Christ of

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Latter day Saints. It was only practiced by a small

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:41.439
<v Speaker 1>portion of the membership of the church, and was only

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.399
<v Speaker 1>done so at the discretion of the president of the church.

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't just decide to do it yourself unless you

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be excommunicated and or seriously disciplined. Uh. Those

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:53.479
<v Speaker 1>men who were asked to practice polygamy were mostly leaders

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of the church, and all parties were willing and gave

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>their consent to the marriages. You mentioned that after the

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:02.320
<v Speaker 1>church stopped practicing give me, they promised to excommunicate any

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 1>who continue to do so. But even when they advocated

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the practice, it was selectively practiced among the leaders of

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the church. I have to say, in this day and age,

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I would be hard pressed to find a good reason

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:14.839
<v Speaker 1>to practice polygamy, at least in the Western world. Back

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in the pioneer times of wagons and gas lamps, I

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>could see some benefits. My great great great great grandmother

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 1>who was a second wife. Uh said that not second

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>wife is in second of two active wives. I think

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what she means that in a lonely, dreary, dangerous

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:34.720
<v Speaker 1>part of the wilderness that she and the first wife

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>settled with their children and husband, it was comforting to

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:39.759
<v Speaker 1>have a close friend and neighbor who she knew would

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 1>help them any moment for any reason, and there were

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 1>no other neighbors around for hundreds of miles back in

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the day. As a member of LDS Faith, I appreciate

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 1>your respect in discussing the issues that are close to

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>my heart and in accurately representing facts that are so

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 1>often misreported and misconstrued. If you guys decided to do

0:44:57.800 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a podcast on the LDS, I would recommend you visit

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the church's official websites and access material there for clarification

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.879
<v Speaker 1>of practices and beliefs. So uh, and she said, I'll

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 1>give you any help you need to, because I got

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the nine one one nice before one one nice. That's

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Susan B. Thanks Susan B. That was very kind of

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you to take the time to write in and to

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 1>say we cheated it respectfully. We thought we did as

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:24.399
<v Speaker 1>opposed to some people who did not think we did.

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>We tried to totally aside from the Swinger intro anyway, UM,

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for that, Susan, and everybody who

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>wrote in with their opinion one way or the other.

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 1>That's very cool, Um, and thanks for the bit of

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>history and research Susan. We always appreciate that if you

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>have a story about your best country hand month, we

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 1>want to hear about it. Wrap it up in a podcast. No,

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>wrap it up in an email, right? Or I guess

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you could record a podcast on it and then email

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:01.399
<v Speaker 1>that to us. He could do, or a link, uh

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and send it to Chuck in Jerry and Me at

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff podcast at how stuff works dot com. For more

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics, visit how stuff

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. Want more how stuff works, check out

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:21.800
<v Speaker 1>our blogs on the house stuff works dot com home page.

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:27.280
<v Speaker 1>M brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 1>It's ready, are you