WEBVTT - Whoa, That ETF Got Big

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, crede trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I'm americall tunas Eric.

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>We were actually kind of stumped on what we're gonna

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>do on this episode, and then you pulled a proverbial

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>rabbit out of the hat, and I think it's a

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>great one. You want to tell us about your idea? Yeah,

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>So the idea was something that I've been tweeting. I

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have certain recurring tweets, and one of the ones that

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.599
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing a lot lately is this tweet where

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I say, on today's edition of I can't believe how

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>much an assets that E t F has now blah

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah this heat, you know. And because what

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>happens is in our team, we'll just drop tickers in

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and we'll look them up, and we'll be researching things

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and over and over and over. I'm like, that thing

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>has two billion, that thing has four billion, that thing

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>has five undred million. I just when I last time

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I checked on it, I was like, will probably just

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of live in this little corner here, you know,

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe it'll get like ten million a year. I just

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>am surprised at how big some of these non vanguardian

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>E t F s are getting ones that you just

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>rode off a little bit and you're like, what's going

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>on here? And then you're like, well, E t F

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>are taking in so much cash. I mean, I guess

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it has to go somewhere. It's not all going to Vanguard.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So I thought we would just look at some e

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 1>t F that we were you know, we looked at one,

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, one day, and we're just blown away about

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>how big they got and maybe we can talk about why.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And I thought the significance of this also was like,

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>here we are a year after really the pandemic started

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to take hold and markets bottomed out, and now a

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>year later, we're, you know, back in the ball market.

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Everything's up, and it it bears uh exploration of a

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>few things that might have some underbellies. So joining us

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on this episode not just Eric and Mean, we have

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Todd rosen Bluth, the head of E t F and

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund research at cf are, A Athanasios, Sara Fhagus

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>who's an E t F analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence, and

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Clear Balantine who's an E t F reporter with Bloomberg News.

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>They've all been regulars on the show before this time.

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>On Trilliance. Dude, I can't believe how big this et

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>F got. Todd, Claire Athanasios, welcome back to Trillions. Great

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to be with you. I had to be here. Yeah,

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having us. Hey, by the way, Joel, Yeah, Um,

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>do you know what today is? It's funny we have

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Todd on the show. It's timely. I would say, you know,

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>late March, what what's what's going on? This is this

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is the end of super Bet two. Okay, so this

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is the due date? So okay. A year ago when

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the Active non Transparent et F started to launch and

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>there was all that hype building up, It's like, oh,

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>here come these big fish to you, real price American

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Century Fidelity. Um. Todd and I started to have spats

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>both on panels and on Twitter about how big they

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>would get. So I said it over under at ten

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in the first year for what we call

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>answer active non transparents. He took the over so as

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the year went on it looks it looked pretty bad

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>early and it stayed bad. They have about a billion

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>so I had nine billion dollars to spare. The bet

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>was due April one, and he owes me a steak dinner. Unfortunately,

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>we would normally be physically there and we'd be going

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>out to dinner that night, and then I would tweet

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>pictures of the steak and him signing the bill and

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>all that. It would be. We have to postpone that though,

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But at least you could do it. You could do

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it on Zoom m I like Todd, I want to

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>hang out with them so we have a good time together.

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>You could hang out. It could be a Zoom steak dinner.

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Now that's the pressing. Yeah, that's weird pressing. We've got

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to do this in person. So, yes, I lost the bet.

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's put the numbers right. It's about one point five

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in total for these e t f s. Again,

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter, it's much less than ten billion dollars.

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>But I lost this bet. Active non transparent ets have

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>not delivered the assets we expected. They've been under the radar,

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's of course a good segment for this show

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>because there's things that are under the radar that are

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>actually gathering assets instead of these products. Okay, so Todd,

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.119
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you. What what What's one that's jumped

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>out at you? So my pick on this and is

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a wisdom Tree product. It's Wisdom Trees Emerging Market X

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>State Owned Enterprises et F. The ticker is x s

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>o E. It's got four point seven billion dollars in assets,

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>over three billion dollars of inflows in just the past year.

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>It's actually the second largest of Wisdom Trees ETF. You

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>know people probably in fact, I was on this show

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about currency head GTS, which is what wisdom Tree

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>has been synonymous for for over a decade. It's now

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the second largest, this XO s o E product. And

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>why because it's outperforming by having a governance slant on

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. It's outperforming I E m G, the Eye

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:12.679
<v Speaker 1>shares cheap emerging market product, Vanguard's Emerging market product vw

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>O by over three hundred basis points in the last

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>three years. And performance works. You know, the investors are

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>getting uh, a E s G oriented emerging market product

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>from wisdom Tree uh And and it's working out. But

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize how big it was. Four point seven

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars is much larger than I would have thought.

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Does that worry you No, I think it's a great sign.

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we we you know, we're seeing we can

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>have a different debate about E S G and the

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>viability of those products. But I think it's great that

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it's moved to emerging markets and with a single pillar

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the G in governance as opposed to something that's focused

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>on environmental which has certainly got more of the attention

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>as of late. You know what, I almost picked that

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>one at once have been on my radar. I looked

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>at a couple of months ago. I didn't realize it

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>got so big because I think it's right behind de Grow, right,

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it was always liked grow and that one

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>was the largest products. But it's funny we were thinking

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the same I looked at it. I didn't end up

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>choosing that one, but it definitely caught my eye. That

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to me is a perfect example time that might be

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 1>better than both of mine. That is a lot of money.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And also it's interesting two things on that one. Um

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Wisdom Tree has done. I thought a good job of

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>diversifying themselves out of that currency hedged craze that has

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>come and gone, and this is a great product and

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it also fits with their idea of like hey, I'm

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you this thing. I'm gonna take this thing out,

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, like take the yen out of Japan for

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 1>d x J. This is like taking the socialism out

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>of the the emerging markets. And at the rap On

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:42.679
<v Speaker 1>e M has always been well, a lot of these

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>h companies are stayed owned. They don't move that much.

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Um blah blah blah. We want more capitalism in there,

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and the E t F really I think does that well.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's a not just performance, but the the the

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>narrative and the solution it's providing is pretty solid too.

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So Joe, I need an independent ruling on this. It

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>sounded like Eric says my pick is better than his picks,

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and so the bet evens out. We just are going

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to split the check when we have a steak. Is

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>that right? Is that how you heard? I did not?

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I heard a fraction of that. Um. The other part

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I think was a little uh. It took a little

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>liberty with your listening skills there. But good pick. Nice try, Claire.

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring you in what what's your first pick?

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>So mine aren't in the billions like Todd's, but the

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>one that caught my eye most recently, um is Buzz,

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>which is the Van Neck vectors Social Sentiment ETF, and

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the one that made a lot of UM buzz

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>earlier this month when Dave Portnoy backed it UM. Looking

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>at our data, let me pull it up. They got

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>two d and eighty million dollars on its first day UM,

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>which is just pretty incredible UM for a day launched.

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Everything that I've been doing recently is comparing back to

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>those UM non transparent funds, because it's been a you know,

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>about one year since those launched UM. And I checked

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>this morning and the largest one of those act of

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>non transparent funds has two one million. That's the Fidelity

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>blue Chip Growth e t F. And and these are

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>huge names that you know, launched these strategies that we're

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be some of the biggest products this year,

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and yet you see this e t F backed by

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Dave Portnoy that gets more than than the best AUNT

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>did in a whole year, or about as well UM

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in just a single day. Yeah, I'll jump in here

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>on that. You're right. I said this would probably get

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>three million from the Portnoy effect. It completely past that.

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting. Buzz launched four or five years ago

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>and it got no interest. So somebody asked me the day, well,

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>what percentage of the assets do you think is because

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of port And I'm like, because we saw this before.

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>The buzz on its own was only able to get

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a tiny fraction of that volume and assets literally like

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>one percent of it, to be honest, um, And so

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it really I mean also having the fact that Portnoy

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is a day trader himself and on Twitter, it's so

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in line with his very being, and I think this

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is actually a a smart marketing move as opposed to

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>hiring say some celebrity who doesn't have anything to do

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>with investing. I think we'll see more of this, And

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>what fascinates me is the fact that you know, if

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you look under the hood of this E t F,

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not like you know, game stop in a MC

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>some of these like day Trader Darlin's um the top

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>holding is Apple and then Boeing. I mean, it's it's

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you wonder how much of this is people

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 1>looking at what's in the E t F versus just

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing Portnoy in jumping in. Yeah, this has nothing to

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>do with people looking at what's inside the t which

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>which gives me as much frustration as the fact that

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you said, this has more money than the largest of

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>these semi transparent ets. People are not looking inside it.

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.359
<v Speaker 1>But the good thing is they're owning higher quality blueshift

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>companies that will survive as opposed to riding the wave

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>of the latest meme praise, which I think is the

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>concern in general and in an interesting aspect of I

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>think this episode is like, how much of this is

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>just this raw enthusiasm? Um we have new phenomenons of

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the port Noise and the Cathy Woods of the world

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>who can really um personalize things, and and people are

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>investing in blind faith without actually recognizing what's inside the

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the e t f um Athanasios. Can we get your

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>first pick? Yeah, this one's going away from like p billennials.

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is a boomer pick. But all right,

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>so the ticker is t MFC. All right, Motley Full

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>one dread et F. Do you remember that newsletter Motley Full.

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's something like my parents would read,

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Like they get like a in the mail, like a

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>newsletter with like pictures and colors on it. All right,

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>so they want they have this really strong following, like

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a million followers that read this newsletter. And they picked

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>stocks and they say like, yeah, did it in investing

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>or income investing or whatnot. So they launched this et

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>F two years ago. I mean, it's not in the billions,

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's got four hundred million, which I think is

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>really impressive, um, because it just I don't know. I I

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>just think there's a stigma that like Motley Fools, a

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit more old school, and you look at it

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>right and at the surface, it's just like Apple Microsoft,

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 1>You're like, I'm paying fifty basis points for this, but

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it actually has been crushing the SMP five hundred since

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it launched by like and then I thought, maybe, well

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just house money. They maybe they put their own

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>money into it. But it's pretty steady flows coming in consistently. Um.

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is a pretty solid This is

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a good boomer pick because I don't think anyone would

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>have expected this product to be If I mentioned this ticker,

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you would have said fifty million tops just still probably

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.479
<v Speaker 1>an initial steed. I think four million is pretty impressive

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>for this product. And where the flow is coming from.

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to be newsletter followers. People that

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>are following this newsletter, they probably are still subscribed to

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>it and like either have an unsubscribed and they're still

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>getting it like that email. Um, but it's it's I

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like this would be like an I just picture

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>like an older investor who still gets their newsletter like

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>their dividend picks, and he said, yeah, I'll buy I'll

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>buy the Motley full et F. Why not you have

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a newsletter that could be his new strategy to to

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to track the boomers. Yeah, Like, I don't even think

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>these news I need to be honest, I don't even

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>think these guys were still publishing. To be honest, I

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>had to go digging really deep into the abyss to

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>find this one. Actually was you were going through the tickers.

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I was going through my brain of going, I don't

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>know what that one is, um, And then I think

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>this baron is there's need t F. That's Tide two

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>barons also like the barons before. Hold on, let me

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>look it up. Let's see. Okay, what do you think

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that has Todd? Don't look. I can't because I'm on

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>recording this with you, but I think it's it's certainly less.

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I would guess it has a hundred and fifty million.

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Look at you, man, hundred and thirty five million. Your

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>your e t F Jedi forces are are working well, alright, Eric,

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>round out our first round. What's your first pick? My

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>first pick is i'veall, which is one of the ones

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted out. This is uh the IVALL quadratic interest

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>rate Volatility and Inflation Hedge ETF. So let me read

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to you. This is the e t F dot com,

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>which has these nice little zagats descriptions of e t s.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's what it says. It attempts to protect against inflation

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>into hedge yield curve shifts and interest rate volatility using

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>tips and long options evalls. Over the counter options on

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>the US interest rate swap curve are described dada dada.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So I know from experience that complexity doesn't really sell

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>an ETFs and so and I met Nancy Davis a

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 1>couple of times, heard her pitch it. She's very smart,

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and I just thought, okay, this might appeal to a

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>certain kind of maybe really high end advisor or institutions.

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's got two point five billion and it's only

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>launched in May, is two years old. That is amazing

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to me. And it charges basis points that is really

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on the high set. That's probably top five most expensive

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>for E t F s. So it's complex, expensive and indie.

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>In a way, it reminds me of ARC, where I

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>was like, there's just so much going against this, and

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>so to have two point five billion, I would have

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>estimated million would be a success for this in two years.

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So it blew it away. And big reason it blew

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it away is that if you look at the performance,

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it's really good. It's got a nice steady rise. And

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so over the past two years since it came out,

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you the performance, So it is up since

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it came out. Now you'd be like, well, that's not

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that much, right, you know, the SMPS up more. True,

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>but this isn't really competing against the SMP. If you

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>look at the aggregate bond E t F it's up nine.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And here's what's amazing, i'vall if you want to talk

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>about the SMP, is about a sixth of the volatility.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>In other words, that is a very low, low, low vault,

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and that is hot and that's I think why it's

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>selling so well. Yeah, and I just to add to it,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>what it's doing is it's owning Schwab tips E t

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>F as its beta and then adding on using options

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to get extra income and be able

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to reduce the downside to it. So this is true

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>active management in the e t F rapper by using

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a core product and then amplifying on top of it,

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to you know these content. Nothing wrong with

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>ARC and the concentrated picks, but it's nothing like the

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>SMP five fundred. It's not starting with the SMP five

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and then pulling things out or adding to it. This

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is actually you know doing that. And to credit of

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Nancy because she's not doesn't have a team of wholesalers

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that's doing this. This is a true independent provider. Well,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because she pivoted from her hedge fund to

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>launch this, and we we also saw the first hedge

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>fund to convert itself into an um an e t F.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting to sort of think about how that

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>might impact things going forward. If more managers do this

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, I will say, the idea of a

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>fund that helps with inflation, I think we're going to

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>see more of those, I think with the success of this,

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and also that inflation is the new like scary word

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>out there, and so I think that's this is gonna

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>spark some not not copycats on this strategy exactly, but

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>e t s that are geared towards the inflation situation. Okay,

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>let's dude round to Todd. I'm gonna start with you again.

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>What's your second pick? Yeah, So I hesitate to offer

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>an I shares product because I shares an under the

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>radar probably doesn't seem like it makes sense. But i

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>q l T, which is the I Shares edge ms

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>c I International Quality Factor e t F has three

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in it um. That's nowhere near as big

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>as it is for the US version of of the factors.

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>But I've always thought of international investing being primarily done

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>with a blunt instrument of ms c I EFA or

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>m s c I emerging market based products at A

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>shares and Vanguard has and I didn't think anybody was

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 1>really doing factor rotation or factor exposure, especially something that

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Eric I'm sure is going to make fun of me

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>for picking another boring blue chip high quality e t

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>F that's out there because it owns it owns Roshan

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>nest Ley in totality an s A P. But you

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>know what it's beating i EFA and v e A

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>by more than three hundred basis points. So the quality

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>tilt is actually adding value pun unintended for what it is.

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't realize anybody was doing this. This is

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a three billion dollar et F I should has many

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollar ets, but I didn't think international factor

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>would have been among them. Listen, quality, large caps, that's

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it's on brand. I would expect nothing less. I'm happy

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you brought that, and I'd be honest, I am shocked

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it has that much. Usually anything international over the past

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of years hasn't done well because it's lagged. So

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea they can get that much into this is

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 1>is really amazing. I will say it's thirty basis points.

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>That's a nice advisory low fee for that strategy, and

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that has to help. I fell asleep halfway through that pick. No,

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a silod pick, uh. I think, you know,

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>because now there's a rotation more into international. I feel

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>like so instead of people maybe just going straight for IFA,

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a solid pick, you know, and quality might

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>work a little bit better. I think on on an

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>international scale like that, pointing out performs has been good,

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is actually a really it's a really good pick. Okay, clear,

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 1>let's give you the my quick what's what's your second pick?

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So also a bit of an underdog compared to the

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>billions there, but I think this is one of the

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>least boring e t F s UM. I've been looking

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>at at UFO, which is the Procure Space et f UM,

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's still pretty tiny. But I think what's really

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>notable about it is that since Cathy would announce that

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>she's going to be launching a space fund, she announced

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that back in mid January UM, the fund could come

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>out any day. Now UFO has more than tripled in assets,

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's still only at a hundred and thirty one million,

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it's been trading since April UM and

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>then just in the past what two months, it's uh,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's tripled. So I think it's a interesting sign

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of what may be to come for this fund and

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>for any other space funds. So this is interesting UFO.

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>What a gift it got. And Andrew Chaining has been

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 1>through a nasty situation with one of his old issuers,

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was I was happy for him to get

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this gift. Because UFO hadn't was kind of kind of

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>hanging around in oblivion and then boom this filing from ARC,

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>which just shows you the power of Kathy. I mean,

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>she's almost like Buffett at this point where she buys

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the stock or talks says the stocks in an interview

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>when it goes up, and it was just it's nice

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for Andrew. I think some of that money will stick,

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe a couple of leaves for hers, but she's actually

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>helping the whole category. I think we're going to actually

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 1>see this become a true investment category. I think spacets

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a little bit out there um from

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>an investment perspective, but I think people are going to

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>then look to see is there another option. Is there

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a a slightly cheaper or a slightly more index based

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>approach to it, or differentiation? And I think this will

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>be a chance for UFO to have an opportunity to

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>highlight what makes it different than the active management approach,

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>whereas right now it's it's way under the radars. As

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, Claire hath nasias Um, what other ETF has

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>surprised I almost want to guess I'll tell you, Okay,

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>let's'm gonna I'm gonna let you guess. Uh. I feel

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>like it's I feel like it's a first trust product.

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Am I right? No? I mean you're good, you know,

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>but I went I went a different a different route.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Knew that you were going to guess, and it was like, Eric, okay, okay,

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>one more try is it one? Is it something that's China? No? Okay,

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, thank you, go ahead over to Okay, pick

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I pick Bug the Global x Diverse Security TF Soccer. Yeah,

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>so let me tell you why. When you think about it,

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you like, oh wow, Thematic pick yeah, like it's got

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred million. This is why I think it's actually

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive because you mentioned Andrew Chain and he had

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>hacked first, right, and I think like Hack is like

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the first like quintessential Thematic ETF that came out, and

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>he had Cyber that came out. They together it was

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>those have got like over five billion. So it's almost

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>like now you can't get into the club. It's like

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>another cyber security ETF Like no, thanks, like it's fine,

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but Bug is coming. It's it undercut both Hack and Cyber.

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>It's been performing better than Hack and Cyber. It's more

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>concentrated than Hack and cyber Um, and it's able to

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>raise I think eight hundred million and take away some

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of the assets from from those guys. The reason where

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it's grown a little bit is because of all the

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>legal issues around Hack, people were leaving that funds, they

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>were going to cyber and they were dumping into things

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>like Bug. But it only launched in late two thousand nineteen,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's still pretty new. So and also I like

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Bug because I'm a big money black fan the movie

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and like Bug was like the character, So that's also

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>probably have the reason why I picked that picker. This

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>ETF was on my list. This was my alternating case. Uh,

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 1>somebody else picked it because for everything that you said,

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>But it actually has gathered almost all of the assets

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this year despite losing money this year. You don't usually

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>see that. Obviously, it did very well in in two

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twenty, but third mover advantage doesn't usually work

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>unless you know Global Acts is the is the leader

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in thematic ets for a reason. You know that they're

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>showing their their true colors here. I don't know anybody

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>who's ever feest up to saying that they're a big

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>fan of men in black. Um, So that's that's especially

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>like certain characters like like normally men and black gets

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>reference with the memory thing um or when you see

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's in like an all black suit, but like

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you like went to a whole another place. I wish

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Eric and I debate on movies all the time. I

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>liked the movie. I like the ray band, like the

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>whole thing back. I had the CD the soundtrack, so

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I was really into that movie when I was younger.

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 1>It's it's good. The first one is really I thought

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it was really good. I watched it with my Sunday. Yeah,

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 1>it's good. Alright. On that note, Eric, we're gonna give

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you the final words. What's your second pick? So I'll

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>go with one that's again. I just tweeted about this,

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.959
<v Speaker 1>which is soxel s o x L. This is the

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>direction three times semiconductors. If you had asked me how

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>much does this thing have, I'd say, well, okay, it's

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a it's not a it's not a sector, it's an industry.

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Semis are pretty popular. I'd be like, probably it has

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>four billion, and it just doesn't make any sense to me,

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>especially because if you look at the flows this year.

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, semiconductors are a fascinating space to me. They're

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>almost like the oil of our tech world. I mean,

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to have semis right there. Just it's such

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>an interesting space. But you get enough juice from the

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>regular one, so a do you really need leverage? But

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, Okay, maybe there's some people who need leverage.

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>But this year this has taken in more money than

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 1>any of the regular ones like SMH socks or XSD

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollars and flows. It charges basis points. And

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. It's not like it's gone on a tear.

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>It's been somewhat of a volatile ride, which is actually

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>bad for leverage. And I just wonder who these people are.

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And then if you look at the three X bear,

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it's got almost no assets. So I think a couple

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of things are going on here. I think generally traders

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>are just really bullish on semis, and I think they

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>use this as a proxy to play that kind of

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a balance. And I also think it's representative of the

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>retail crowd because there's a bunch of leverage ETFs that

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>are way bigger than I would ever imagine. T q

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>q Q is another one, although it wasn't a surprise

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>because I tracked this all the time, but that one

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>now has ten point seven billion dollars. So I do

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>think that some of the leverage ETFs are appealing to

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the retail trading crowd who likes fast. They don't want

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to wait around for SMH and a regular e t F.

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>They want the return and three times faster. But anyway,

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm shocked, And this is why the leverage GTF issuers

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>are in a good business. For the amount of assets

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they have. They make a lot of money because they

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>all charge then any five BIPs and they have a

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting almost like hardcore local fan base that

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>continues to lose their products, and they don't have fee pressures,

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 1>so it's just an interesting world to me. And anyway,

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I was just blown away. I would have thought this

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>was the value. The volume would have been high and

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>would have been among the higher e t F s

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.719
<v Speaker 1>given the trading crowd. But people are clearly holding onto

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>this if it's got over four billion in assets, and

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and that both has high reward but also high risk.

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>As you guys have talked about what these just power

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>tools in prior shows. Yeah, like I we would equate

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>them to a chainsaw. You know, they can do wonders,

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but you can also lose a hand if you don't

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>know what you're doing. So I know, I don't. I

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder if people you're right When I look at the

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>leverage ETFs, I want to see like thirty turn over

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a day, and this one's I don't know. Maybe, So

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you're right, there's probably be a a little more buying and

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>holding than there should be. These things should be traded,

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>not held. Eric, Can I just say that I'm shocked

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that you didn't pick Jets. I was positive that was

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>going to come. So it's a good question. The reason

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 1>that has more assets than I would have thought two

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>years ago. But I was on that e t F

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>like White on Rice, I tweeted about every day that

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>these are ones where I just forget about them for

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a while and they come up for some reason and

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm like wow. It's almost like ever go to a

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>friend's house and they have a kid or a dog

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, I cannot believe how big your kid

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is getting or your dog. It's like that, but Jets,

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I live with Jets. Jets is like in my household,

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>so I don't notice how big it's getting. You see,

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm saying? Like Arc two, same deal, I

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>live with it. I live I live with a kid

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and a dog that both do that, and I'm just like,

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, how much bigger to get? All right?

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>On that note, Todd Claire at the Nasios, thanks so

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us on Trailings again. Thanks for having us, Yes,

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having us. Thanks for listening to Trillions until

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>next time. You can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal,

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>like to listen. We'd love to hear from you. We're

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show, He's at Eric

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>fall Tunas. You can find Claire at CFB Underscore eighteen,

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Todd at Todd c f r A, and Athanacios at

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>t Sarah Vegas. As always, good luck spelling that this

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>episode of Trillions was produced by Magnus and Drison. Francesca

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Levy is the head of Bloomberg Podcast