WEBVTT - Fan Favorite: Will we ever Travel Faster than Light Speed?

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey, their podcast listeners. So we are re airing an

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>episode today, but it's for a great reason, I promise

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>you know. Will and I are working on this brand

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>new podcast that debuts next week. It's called Daniel and

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Jorge Explained the Universe. It is super fun, and we

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>commissioned it with the hopes that not only would get

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>people excited about space and all these big questions out there,

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>but also for all the budding scientists and and the

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>kids who listen with their parents, because you know, we

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to feed all those hungry minds. Anyway, Daniel and

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Jorge is a twice weekly chat show between a particle

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>physicist and a super smart cartoonist, and we hope you'll

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>tune in. But since that show isn't launching for another week,

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we thought you might want to hear our conversation with

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the Daniel of Daniel and Jorge Daniel Whites and I

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>hope you dig it. Guess what Mango? What's that? Will? So,

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>have you seen the last Jedi yet? I have. I

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>was going to ask you a question about it, but

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we have to keep this spoiler free here, so I'm

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>honestly kind of scared to say anything. Uh, do you

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>want to say it in pick ladin? No, No, I'm

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>just I'm too nervous. But I will say this, so

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it seems fair to say that light speed plays a

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>pretty big role in the Star Wars films. That's what

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to say. I mean, it's true. But well,

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, as I sat there in the theater, my

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>mind started wandering again. You know, not because it isn't

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a great movie. I really liked it, but I started

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking again about the idea of traveling at or beyond

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>light speed. And it's one of the age old questions,

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, will anything ever travel beyond light speed? Well

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a good thing. We have a brilliant author here

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>today is to answer some of the biggest questions about

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the universe, and only one of them is about Star Wars. Yeah,

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>but the book that he's written is called We Have

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>No Idea. But you're right, we should give him a

0:01:43.880 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>shot anyway, So let's dive in. Hey, their podcast listeners,

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Part Time Genius. I'm Will Pearson, and as

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>always I'm joined by my good friend Man gues Ticketer

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and the man on the other side of the soundproof glass.

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Sporting an impressive coral saken hair part. That's our friend

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and producer Tristan McNeil, who knew his hair could even

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>part like that. So that's not what we're here to

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 1>talk about, or is it maybe another episode? I don't

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's anyway. So I know you and I have

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>recently been talking about the fact that over the past

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>few years there have been all these big science events

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that have just gotten so much attention and people have

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>gotten really excited about. We had the discovery of the

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Higgs boson a few years ago. We had that big

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>eclipse that you and I and our families all traveled

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>out to see. There was um quantum teleportation and all

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 1>this excitement and confusion surrounding it, and so much more.

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>It's fun when events like these capture the world's attention.

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>But but sometimes these events and the science around them

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>can be very difficult to commune. Okay, but today we've

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>got to truly give the communicator and one of the

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>co authors of a book called We Have No Idea,

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Whites, and welcome to Part Time Genius. Hello, thank

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you very much for having me on now. Daniel, this

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting partnership for this book. You know,

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you're a particle physicist that you see Irvine doing a

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of your research over at CERN and and you've

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>partnered with a terrific cartoonist and Jorge cham And It's

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of fun getting to know you guys

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of months now. Jorge also has

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a PhD and robotics. So I have to ask, how

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>did you guys meet and then decide to take on

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a project like we have no idea? Well, we met

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>on Tinder first. Oh good, it's a great way to

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>get going, you know, like most modern couples that we

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>did meet on the internet. It was maybe ten years

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>ago now, and I was thinking about other ways we

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>could communicate physics to the general public because I felt

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like there's a lot of exciting questions we're asking with physics,

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>but we're not always doing a great job of expressing

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that excitement and the basic ideas to the general public.

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And I thought there was an opening there to communicate

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the stuff using cartoons. Actually, I saw a

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>really awesome technical comic put out by Google when they

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>put out their latest browser, the Chrome browser, and Scott

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>McCloud made a technical comic about the Chrome browser, and like,

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're not into writing browsers, you might not be

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>into reading comics about browsers. But they had a great

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>job of making this seem interesting, and I thought, wow,

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>if they can make browser development sound fun, and maybe

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>cartoons are a good way to show other things like physics.

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But I don't have any artistic skills myself, and so

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't draw these cartoons myself. Um, but of course

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I was aware of Jorge and his amazing work PhD comics.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's something of an internet celebrity in academia.

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Everybody knows him, and his comics are really captured the

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>restoration of research and academic life. Anyway, my wife suggested

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>she's also an academic and she's a big fan of his.

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>She said, why don't you email or him and asked

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 1>him to do it. And I thought, yeah, right, that's

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>just like emailing Brad Pitt and ask him about the movie.

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>That's that's pretty awesome. And the project that resulted from

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>that a few years later, obviously is is we have

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>no idea, so can you tell us a little bit

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 1>about the the idea behind this book? Yeah, I thought

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of great science communication that's happening,

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>but most of it was focused on what we do

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>know about the universe, all the amazing things that science

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>has learned, and it's important to show people what we

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>figured out. But I thought something was missing that. I

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>felt like people had a misunderstanding of how much we

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>knew about the universe. So we thought, let's instead write

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>a book showing people all the huge, the very basic

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>open questions of the universe, really simple stuff that we

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet figured out, stuff like how big is the universe?

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And how did it start? And how will it end.

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought there must be an appetite for people who

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>are really interested in this basic stuff and excited to

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>learn that we haven't yet figured it out. Because to me,

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>ignorance is an opportunity. It's a possibility of things you

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>could discover in the future. And when I was a kid,

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I was always excited about that possibility of exploring the

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>unknown and figuring out something new, discovering that the world

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>was different from the way we thought it might be

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and turned out to be completely counterintuitive, like the discoveries

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of quantum mechanics and relativity. I wanted to give people

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the sense that such discoveries, discoveries that that basic scale

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>might still be ahead of us, that there are still

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>really big basic questions that we haven't answered. So that

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>was the idea behind running this book. And can you

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>tell us just a little bit about you know, I

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>know you're a particle physicist, that's certain, but what does

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that mean exactly and what are you doing in the lab?

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's certain we collide protons together. We take the

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>protons and speed them up to nearly the speed of light,

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the particles inside the protons collide and turn

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>into balls of energy. Temporarily, they lose their form of

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>matter and turn into pure energy. And then that energy

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>has this amazing feature which it can turn into any

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of particle in the universe as long as there's

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>enough energy budget there. So if you've poured enough energy

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>into your collisions, you can make any kind of particle

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>there is, which means you can discover new kinds of

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>matter even if you didn't know it existed. So that's

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of awesome. It's a it's a way to explore

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the universe. And that's the thing that got me excited

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>about particle physics is exploring what the universe has made

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>out of how is it work at its smallest levels?

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>What is the organizational principle for this whole ridiculous, beautiful

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>universe we find ourselves in. And the fascinating thing about

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that is that it used to be the particle physics,

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>which looks at the very very small it's totally disconnected

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.239
<v Speaker 1>from cosmology, which looks at like the very big history

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.559
<v Speaker 1>of the universe the future of the universe. These days,

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>these two fields have kind of converged because we're asking

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of similar questions, Like one of the big

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>questions and cosmology is what is all the dark matter? Right?

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Where is all this missing invisible matter in the universe. Well,

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's certain what we're trying to do is make dark matter.

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to collide those particles together to make a

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>new kind of matter, and we might produce dark matter

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in the laboratory, giving this insight into what's happening at

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the very very big scale. I love that there's so

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>many fascinating things in that statement, and also so many

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>questions I have coming out of it. And I also

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>just love that like it starts with such a simple idea,

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like the joy of crashing things together. And creating all

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>these new things that it's stunning. But um, I know general,

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>crushing things together is a good way to start the

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>scientific experiment. Well Will was asking at the beginning of

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the episode about the Last Jedi. You don't want to

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 1>have said anyone with spoilers, but he talked about how

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light does come up in it, and

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>is it possible or will it be possible for anything

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to travel faster than light speed? So I just saw

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that movie and I was thinking about the same stuff

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>when I was watching it. I thought they did it

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>without spoilers. I thought they did a pretty good job

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of bringing some real physics into that situation. But your

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>question was will we ever travel faster than the speed

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of light? Um? Of all the things we don't know

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about the universe, this is one we're pretty sure. We

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>know that nothing can move through space faster than the

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>speed of light. Now I didn't answer your question directly.

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I changed it a little bit so I could be

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>more more definitive. That is, nothing can move through space

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>faster than the speed of light, So an object flying

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>through space can't ever go faster than lighthood. However, that's

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a really important copy moving through space because recently we

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>discovered in the last few decades that space is a

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>weird thing. Space can do things that we didn't understand.

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>If you think space is just like the emptiness in

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe, the backdrop on which everything happens, and then

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you need to get caught up with some modern of

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>physics because space does really weird things like bend and

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:08.479
<v Speaker 1>expand and ripple. So if your goal is not necessarily

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to move faster than light through space, but just to

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>get somewhere fast, like you want to go from you know,

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>your rebel base to wherever you need to go, and

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to not spend a million years getting there,

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>then instead of moving through space fast in the speed

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of light, you might want to just compress space itself. Right,

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so you can bring these two locations, which ostensibly are

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>very very far apart, if you can bring them closer

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>together by by shrinking space, by compressing space, then you

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>can get there rapidly without going faster than the speed

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of light. And that's the actual idea behind developing actual

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>work drives. So while you can't move through space fast

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>than the speed of light, we might actually technically be

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>able to eventually construct work drives that can get us

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to distant places faster than traveling through normal space. It's

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>just it's as simple as that manger. It really, that's

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>all there is to it. So I assume that we're

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty close to this whole space compression thing, like with

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the next five to ten years, we should be able

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to do this. Is that right, Daniel? I would not

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>invest in those companies, but you know there's a fascinating

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>transition there, right. Anytime, if something is just totally impossible,

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it's totally impossible. But now we've moved warp drives from

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>totally impossible to completely impractical and very very very difficult,

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>which means, yeah, in ten years it will probably just

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>be an half on your iPhone, right because now we

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>just handed it from physicists to engineers, and in current calculations,

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the energy to run a warp drive, even

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>go to like Alpha Centauri would require more energy than

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is contained in like the planet jup, all the massive

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>planet Jupiter. Okay, so fast, incredible quantities of energy we

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>can't even imagine. However, you know, it's it's it's just

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>become an efficiency problem. Now somebody can build a better one,

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and you can build a more effective one, right, And

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, for your listeners, nobody's actually constructed any sort

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of functioning warp drive. But theoretically it's not impossible to

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>compress space to travel places faster than light could. Um.

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I liked about in that movie. You know,

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't just go places instantly in the last They

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>don't just disappear from one place and appear somewhere else.

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>They have to get there. And even though they're moving

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>through hyperspace, right, there's still a speed they're moving through

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 1>hyperspace and a maximum this limitation there. And so that's

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>where the physics comes in, right, is in providing plot

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>points and the limitations. Well, I have a follow up

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>question to that in terms of headlines from earlier this

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>year that dealt with traveling through space, and I want

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about that. But before we do that,

0:12:53.640 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. Welcome back to Part Time Genius.

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>We're talking to Daniel Whites and one of the co

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>authors of We Have No Idea, this awesome book that

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>talks about all of the things in the universe, not

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>necessarily that we do know, but the many big questions

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that we don't know. And we're putting Daniel on the

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>spot today and asking him to answer every single big

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>question about the universe that seems reasonable to me. Think,

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think? So? Yeah, so, so before

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the break, I mentioned that I had another question that

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>related to headlines that we saw everywhere earlier this year.

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>There was a headline that said, first object teleported from Earth,

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and I have to be honest, Daniel, I struggled with

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the way the media was covering this event that happened,

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>this quantum teleportation, and I wanted to see if you

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>could talk to us a little bit about that and

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>does it relate to what we were talking about earlier,

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this idea of you know, being able to travel through

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>space at faster than the speed of Like, can you

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>just talk to us a little bit about this event

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and and how the media may have struggled a little

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>bit to communicate what actually happened in that experiment. Yeah.

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I read those headlines that I was pretty excited object

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>teleported into space. I thought, Wow, we're going to be

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>beaming up to space stations in the next few years, right,

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, the media totally failed to convaye that

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>accurately because no object was teleported into space. Um. Instead,

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>information was sent into space, and that's much less exciting

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's essentially just beaming a message. Right. So you can,

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we know already how to send information from one place

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to another. We have lots of techniques for that. Radio

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>laser or some of these things move at the speed

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of light. Right. Um. This was more interesting because it's

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>quantum teleportation. Right. It's a process by which quantum information,

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>like the state of an atom or a photon, can

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>be transmitted exactly from one location to another. Right. And

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it involves like entangling particles and using their quantum relationships

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to send that information. So it's a new way to

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>send information. But it's not telebrotation, right. It's not like

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>your concept where something disappears and it's reappeared somewhere else,

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>reassembled there. Um. And it's also does not move faster

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>than the speed of light. A lot of people think

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>quantum entanglement is a way around uh sending information is

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a way around the maximum speed limit for information. Unfortunately

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not. So this headline describes them, which would have

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>been exciting if it was accurate, but instead it was

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a cool technical achievement. They had transmitted information using this

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>new quantum technique further than anybody ever had, and they

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>sent it out into space, which nobody had done before.

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't break the speed limit of the universe.

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>It's still limited to the speed of light and doesn't

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>actually send anything anywhere than information. So it's sort of deflating,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think it gets to a larger point of

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>how this stuff happens, Like how do you do an

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting experiment and then some journalist writes it up as

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>if it's something different, as if it's something much more dramatic.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>You know. There's another example of that just a couple

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of days ago, when the Pentagon released all of its

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>footage from this UFO program, and of course they saw

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing there to indicates the presence of aliens on Earth.

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>But I've been watching the news and it's been everywhere.

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>All this stuff has been covered as if we're now

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>just discovered that the that the Pentagon has been talking

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to aliens, and the headlines headlines or things like summary

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of human encounters with um, you know, summary of human

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>encounters of the third kind, and it's all total misleading

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>click base. But I think that's one of the problems

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>with science journalism these days is that in the crowded

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>media community to have to sort of scream for attention, uh,

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>touting even modest research achievements as incredible events in human history.

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So unfortunately nothing was teleported into space. Otherwise I would

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>be in line because I'd like to get up there.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I do wish we had talked to you about the

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>whole alien thing, because we're we're actually recording this from

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a bunker right now, so it would have been useful information. Yeah, yeah,

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I wish you had quantum teleported that information to us

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>before a bunker. I would expect you guys to be

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>on a mountain top with flags and come talk to

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>us actually on the quantum teleportation before we move on

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to another topic. I mean, it is one of those things,

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>like you said, should have been a celebrated achievement because

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it is something that had been done in a way

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that had never been done before and at that distance.

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk to us a little bit about what

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the implications are if we are speaking about it accurately,

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of what this could mean for us. Well, it's an

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>improved way to send information. So quantum teleportation is just

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a copying of quantum information. Like electron spin or photon

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>state um that can be transmitted in principle exactly from

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>one location to another. And the cool thing about that

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is just sending information without noise over that information loss, right,

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And of course in a an actual practically built system,

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>there is always information loss because you can't isolate these

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>particles from their environment. But the hope is if we

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>perfect this kind of technology, you could send information with

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>less noise, with less information loss over longer distances. So

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's always good to have several technologies being developed in

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>order to send information. So this is another one that

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>could could in principle in the future give us information

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>transmission with less power and less less noise and less

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>data loss. So, Daniel, I know we've chat a little

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.239
<v Speaker 1>bit about dark matter in the in the past, and

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I just thought that conversation was so fascinating. But I

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>want you to share some of that with our listeners.

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just something that's out there, but it's

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.719
<v Speaker 1>actually something that's all around, is right. Can you talk

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about that. Yeah, this is one of

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 1>my favorite things about physics is when it reveals to

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>us that the world we thought we lived in is

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>actually totally different if you look at it using a

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>new tool or a new perspective. And that's what we've

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 1>discovered with dark matter. We've discovered that most of the

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>universe is not the kind of matter that you're familiar

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>with the kind of matter that makes up the chair

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you're sitting on, or either air you're breathing, or the

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>coffee you're sipping, or stars or gases or planets or dust.

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>That most of the universe, the matter in the universe

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is something else, something invisible, this thing called dark matter.

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And most people, if they hear about dark matter, they think, oh,

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's some weird kind of matter out there in space.

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 1>But the thing about dark matter is that it's it

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>has gravity, It attracts everything with mass to it, and

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it clusters a coalescence together indeed, into these big blobs.

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 1>And those big blobs line up perfectly with where normal

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>matter is, like galaxies and stars and gas and dust.

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Most of the dark matter and universe is distributed where

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the normal matter is because they attract each other gravitationally.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>And so what that means is that very likely we

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>are sitting in a soup of dark matter. Like can

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you imagine all the air in the room around you. Right,

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>that's the matter that we understand, but it's invisible, and

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you're cool with being surrounded by invisible matter most of

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the time. But you didn't realize is that there's also

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>five times as much matter in the form of dark

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>matter that you weren't even aware of, and it's here

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>with us. You hold out your hands and you close

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>them together. You're enclosing some dark matter. You're holding dark

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>matter in your hands. Now, you can't interact with dark

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>matter and call it dark, but really it should be

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>called invisible or in transible, intransible what's the word for

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>something you can't touch. It should be called an untouchable matter, right,

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>untouchable matter because you pass right through it. Right, you

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>can't feel it and it can't feel you. So it's

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>everywhere all around us, and I think most people don't

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>realize that. Every day when they go to school or

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>go to work, or get in their car, whatever, they're

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>moving through this invisible ocean of dark matter. Yeah, that's

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable to think about. So how do we know that

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>it's there? Or how did astrophysicists figure out that dark

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>matter was was out there? It's a great story how

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>dark matter was discovered. It's sort of a classic science

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>story where somebody was just dotting the eyes and crossing

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>the teas and saying, well, I think we understand how

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>this works. Let's just make sure and do some double checks.

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>And then those double checks revealed that something was very,

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>very wrong with our understanding of the universe. So the

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>double check was looking at how galaxies rotate. Um. You know,

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>galaxies are these big swarms of stars, and galaxies are spinning. Now,

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>if you imagine the galaxy spinning, you think of it

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>like a merry go round, Right, you might wonder, like,

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>why are the stars not getting thrown out into intergalactic space?

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>If you spin a merry go round and you put

0:21:57.920 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>ping pong balls on it, these ping pong balls will

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>fly out into space. So why are the stars not

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>flying out into space? The answer is is gravity in

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the galaxy that's holding those stars, that's keeping them from

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>getting thrown out into the universe. So then you can

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>do something cool, which is cross check your numbers. You

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>can say, if I know how fast the galaxy is spinning,

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 1>then I can calculate how much gravity I need to

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>hold the stars in place. But then I can add

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>up all the stars and ask is there enough gravity

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to hold those stars in place? So you add up

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>all the mass of the galaxy you can see, calculate

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the gravity from that, compare it to how fast things

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>are spinning. So they went they sent some grad student

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to double check these numbers and said, we think we

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>understand this, just go double check and the grad students

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>when made this measurements decades ago, and it turns out

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work like at all. I mean, the galaxies

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>were spinning way way too fast. There wasn't nearly enough

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>gravity in these galaxies to hold the stars in So

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>we didn't understand was there some gravity coming from an

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>invisible sort of stuff that we couldn't see. Why weren't

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the stars getting thrown out into space? Was there some

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>other force to gravity work differently than we imagined. So

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>there's something basically didn't understand, and people had to think

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>big about the kind of ideas that could explain it.

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Because this is not a small discrepancy. And one of

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>my favorite things about dark matter is we still know

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>very little about it. And the name of the theory

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>itself is sort of a description of the question, right like,

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't know why galaxies are spinning. We don't know

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>what's what's giving this extra gravity, so we just come

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>up with a theory dark meaning we can't see it,

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>matter meaning it gives gravity. So it's like dark matter

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>is the theory of some invisible gravity giving thing, right.

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just like, take the question what's the new invisible

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>source of gravity that explains this rotation and answer it with, well,

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe some invisible gravity giving thing, right, But instead, in

0:23:57.720 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>physics you just tend to give it a fancy name,

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>call it dark matter, because then it sounds more like

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>an answer. But the truth is, we don't really know

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>very much about dark matter. We know that it's there.

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>You seen it because it constans these galaxies to verta

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But we don't know what it is made out of. Particles,

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it made out of something else? What kind of

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>particles is it made out of? But we know very

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>little about dark runner, And I love hearing the way

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys talk about these sorts of discoveries or at

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>least an understanding that this must be in existence, that

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty thirty years ago, we had no idea

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to even question this kind of thing or even think

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>about this kind of thing. We thought we had a

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>general understanding of how the universe was structured in some way,

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and then as we learn more and more, the main

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that we're doing is exposing all of the many

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>things that we have no idea about. And I love

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the way you guys talk about that exactly, And to me,

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the excitement. You know, is that scientific come up?

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>It's right, the universe says you thought you understood something.

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>You guys are such idiots like and you know, we're

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>doing the best we can. But we continue as humans

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to make this mistake of over generalizing. We have a

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>bunch of examples from our experience and we say, maybe

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>everything works this way, right, we say, oh, life on

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Earth works this way. Maybe everything in the universe operates

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>under the same rules. But we continue to discover that

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>our experience is parochial, that it's just one slice of

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the kind of physics you could have. You know, the

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 1>life that we leave is sort of large on the

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>scale of like tiny particles, and it's sort of slow

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>on the scale of astronomical objects. So you know, before

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Newton and before Einstein, you might have thought, oh, we

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>have most of physics figured out, but then quantum mechanics

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>and relativity show us that actually we didn't understand anything

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>about the way the universe works at its lowest level.

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And this is a continuous process, right, And so another

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>point we want to make in this book is a

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>huge fraction in the universe is not understood, which means

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>not only that there are questions we've identified that we

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>need the answers to, like how did the universe begin?

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>And what is the universe made out of? But there

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>might be basic things that we think we understand that

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>will be revealed to be wrong in two hundred years.

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>People might look back at our understanding of physics and

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>laugh at us, right and say, those guys understood nothing.

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the case. I mean that means that that you know,

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>crazy revelations and new ways of looking at the universe

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 1>are ahead of us, and I hope they happen in

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>my lifetime. Well, I I think one of the things

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that was also encouraging to me to hear was how

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you said there's so much room for philosophy in this

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>not understanding the world, right, like that there's there's stuff

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then space to speculate and think and

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>think big I found that really poetic. Yeah. Well, one

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>of the fun things about science is that it's so

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>philosophically important, right Um. I love when people talk about,

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, is philosophy important? There is science the only

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>useful thing when you know, you need philosophy even to

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>understand why science is important. And there's this counterplay between

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>science and philosophy. There are things that you can test, right,

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>experiments we can do to measure things and understand things,

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and there are things we can't yet test. You know,

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we can't understand what's beyond the edge of our observable universe,

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>right Um, there's the universe is a certain age, it's

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>almost fourteen billion years old, and we can't see anything

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that's beyond a certain horizon because life just hasn't had

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>time to get to us yet. So what's beyond their

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>purely the realm of philosophy, because no science experiment can

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>tell you. It's just an invisible, impierceable veil beyond which

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 1>we cannot see, which means there's lots of room for

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>people to speculate, right, and speculation and wild ideas totally fun. Um.

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of room for that. But

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I also think it's important to draw a bright line

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>between the science and the philosophy because there are some

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>things that we can hand test. So one of my

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite examples is the multiverse. You hear this idea a lot,

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe our universe, it's part of a set of other

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 1>universes which are all weird and different, and that's a

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>fun idea, But in my view it falls squarely in

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the philosophy camp because we can never test it right.

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>These other universes by construction, being another universe means it's

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the place we can't interact with. You can't send a

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>probe there to discover it, you can't see its effects

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>on electrons, you can't do any sort of experiment to

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>interact with that universe, which means you could never prove

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>those other universes exist, which means it will forever be philosophy.

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't say that in any sort of negative sense. Right,

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>forever being philosophy means forever the speculation by theorists and philosophers,

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>which is wonderful, you know, smoke banan appeals and have

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. But it's important, I think, to

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>draw that line. Say, here are ideas we have, but

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that certainly not scientific proven. Yeah, I like some science

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>communicators sometimes fuzz that line a little bit more than

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm comfortable with. M I like that. We recently did

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>an episode on trash talking, and you just describe philosophers

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>as smoking banana peals and having a lot of fun.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like that. Maybe maybe we'll have them

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>on to be like, hey, so what do you think

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>about particle physicists? Now, I'm just kidding that that's terrific. Well,

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple of other big questions for you

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that you must answer before we let you go. But

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>before we do that, why don't we take a quick break.

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Part Time Genius. Now we are talking

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to Daniel Whites and co author of We Have No

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Idea This terrific, terrific book, and we have a couple

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of other big questions before we let him go. So, Daniel,

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I did want to talk a little bit more about

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>some of your work at CERN, and specifically about the

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>big discovery a few years ago of the Higgs boson,

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>something that we all knew we were looking for, and

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>until we found it, you know, obviously we couldn't get

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>too too excited about it. But can you talk a

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit about that process, one helping us understand the

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>significance of the Higgs boson, but two also just what

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like to be somewhere, you know, like where you're working,

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and when a discovery that you know you've been looking

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>for for so long is finally there. What that must

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like. I think the discovery the Higgs boson is

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>really an amazing feat in human intellectual history because it

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>proves the power of math and patterns. You know. The

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>origin of it is the fifty years ago a bunch

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of theorists, including a guy named Higgs. We're looking at

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>what we knew about particles, and it just couldn't really

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>make sense of it. You know, the mathematics were just

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of ugly. They didn't understand how can all these

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>particles fit together? And what why do some of these

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>particles have ass and some of these particles don't have mass.

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>It just didn't really make sense to them. It wasn't beautiful.

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And there's this interesting push in theoretical physics to say

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that the universe should be simple and our theory of

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it should be beautiful. There should be some elegance, some

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>symmetry to it, which is sort of fascinating, and I

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.239
<v Speaker 1>think a whole other topics we could explore. But this

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>desire for simplicity and elegance and beauty pushed them to think,

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is there another way we could look at these particles?

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And so this guy, Peter Higgs and several other people

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>came up with this theory. They said, you know what,

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>if you add one more particle to this mix, and

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that particle has this special property I'll tell you about

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in the moment, then everything just clicks together and it's

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>so much simpler and more beautiful. And so maybe this

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>is the way the universe works. So this is an

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>idea of something I had fifty years ago. And the

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>incredible thing is that he was right. You know, this

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>particle does exist, and it does do the things that

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>he suspected that it did. And it suggests that, you know,

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.479
<v Speaker 1>this desire for simplicity, this desire to see the universe

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and in an aesthetically simple and beautiful and elegant way,

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>might be a good way to look at things. Right

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that we the universe at its core is not a

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>messy jumble of rules, but a simple set of lessons

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>out of which emerge complex, fascinating phenomenon, right, like particles

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and ice cream and hamsters and podcasts and all that

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. You know, the idea that the universe

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>can be explained from a few small set of rules

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is very to me attractive philosophically, right, and the game

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>we're back into philosophy. And so the question is why

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>did this particle make things simpler? What about this particle

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>made our understanding of how the universe worked at its

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>smaller scale more simple, or more beautiful or more elegant. Well,

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the question they were trying to understand is why are

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>some particles have this pass and other particles don't. For example,

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the photon photon flies through space that has no mass,

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just energy moving at the speed of light. Other

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>particles like the z boson with the w boson, these

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>other particles are very similar to the photon, very similar

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:09.479
<v Speaker 1>properties and play similar rules, but they're really heavy. They

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of mass. So people who aren't trying

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to understand why is that um what controls what has

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>mass and what doesn't have mass? And before we answer that,

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to think about what is mass. If you

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>think about a particle, you're probably thinking about a tiny,

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:28.479
<v Speaker 1>little spinning ball of stuff. Right. And if we think

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>about a particle that has mass, probably envisioning it has

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>like a little serving of some stuff to it and

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what gives it mass, right, But in our theory

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case. In our theory, these particles are

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>all point particles. They're all tiny dots in space with

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>zero volume. So when we think about mass, actually we

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think about stuff or it's no room in the

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>particle for any stuff. It's not like something that has

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>mass has a bigger serving of universe stuff or or

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>more of its squeezed into a little space. They all

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have the zero volume. So instead of thinking about mass

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>as an amount of stuff, you need to think of

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of the way you think about electric charge.

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just like a label we put on points in space,

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>all right. You don't think about when you think about

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:17.919
<v Speaker 1>the electron. You don't think where is the negative charge

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of the electron? Is there room for the negative charge?

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Does it fit in there? Right? You just think, oh,

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.919
<v Speaker 1>electron has the negative charge. So you should think about

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>particles the same way. Some of them have this mass property,

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>other ones don't. And that's the question that we're trying

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to answer, and that's where the Higgs does. The Higgs

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>is this crazy idea. It says that maybe there's this

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:44.280
<v Speaker 1>field that fills the entire universe, literally, the whole universe

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>filled with this new kind of field called the Higgs field,

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a field like an electric field or a magnetic field,

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but now a new kind of field, a Higgs field.

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>And this field interacts with particles. In some particles it

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>makes it harder for them to speed up and slowed down,

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and other particles it ignores. So if the Higgs field

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.280
<v Speaker 1>interacts with your particle like the W the z boson

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that it makes it hard for that particle to speed

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>up and hard for it to slow down. That means

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>it has inertia, which is another way of saying it

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>has mass. So the idea is the mass of these

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>particles comes from the way they interact with this new

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>crazy field. And photons just don't interact with that field.

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>They fly right through without even noticing. That was the idea.

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>And if this field existed, it explained why some particles

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>got mass and some particles didn't get mass. And then

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the prediction of that field, it says, if that field exists,

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>then sometimes it would get excited, and in certain spots

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it would get excited enough to create out of the

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>vacuum this particle called the Higgs boson. So the Higgs

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>boson and the Higgs field are two different things, but

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:55.479
<v Speaker 1>one sort of proof of the existence of the other.

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:58.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we looked for at the Hadron collider.

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>We try to create enough localized energy using our collider

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>to create Higgs boson so we could spot it, which

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>would be proof of the existence of the Higgs field,

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>which would explain why particles have mass. So what was

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that experience like as it was discovered. I'm sure that

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>was just a huge celebration, huh. It was sort of

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>like running a marathon. Honestly, it's such a long process.

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>We've been looking for the Higgs for decades. When I

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>started in particle physics in about it was the top

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 1>priority for particle physics, and then we discovered it, you know,

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:35.279
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and twelve. And along the way there

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>were times we thought we might have hints of it,

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and times we thought we'll never see it, or you know,

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>will we even have the power to discover it um

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 1>But it sort of happened gradually. We started to see

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the hints, little bits of evidence here, a little bits

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of evidence there, started build up slowly, slowly, slowly, until

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>eventually we crossed the official threshold for having enough data

0:36:57.000 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to convince ourselves and decide say, yes, we say that

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we've discovered it. But it's sort of like when you

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>get to mile twenty two of your marathon. At that

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>point you're pretty sure you're gonna finish, you just sort

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of got to stumble across the finish line. There's no

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>like real moment there where we said, okay, we've discovered it.

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was a public announcement, but by that

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 1>point everybody inside the community had already been convinced that

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it was real. It was there, so it wasn't really

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:27.919
<v Speaker 1>like a It's not like some late night moment where

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the experiment concluded and we saw the results pop up

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>on the screen and nature tells us the answer. More

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of a low accumulation of results. And the other thing

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people don't recognize is this

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>was done by massive teams of people, or maybe ten

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>people were involved intimately in this process. So again, it's

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 1>not like you're maybe your romantic view of a physicist

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>or you know, grad student late at night alone in

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the lab seeing the answer for the first time and

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>having that experience of knowing something about the universe that

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>nobody else knows. Right, That's that's an exciting idea. It

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>was like meetings and discussions and long conversations and more

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>meetings and millions of power points slides and you know,

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to undermine the glamorous nature or particle

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>physics or anything, but you asked what was it like?

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>And you know it was a long slog. Yeah, it is.

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>It is funny because I think we do all imagine

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like, everybody, get in here. Jerry saw it. Jerry

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 1>pushed the big red button. Who discovered the Higgs boson? Yeah,

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the thing is that the Higgs is pretty rare.

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Even if you focus your particle beams and give them

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of energy, you're producing one every few seconds,

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.280
<v Speaker 1>whereas you have you know, billions of collisions and seconds.

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>So you have to sift through a lot of collisions,

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you have to do it for a long

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>time to accumulate enough examples that you statistically can say

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty sure it exists. So it's uh, it's a

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>long game. It's like, you know, you're putting a puzz

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of pieces together, and before you get the last piece in,

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you're pretty sure you knew what the puzzle looks like,

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know you still have to go through the

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 1>work of putting all the finding those little ledge pieces

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and filling in the sky and all those pieces. You know,

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I've heard you talk about those numbers of collisions and

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>numbers of experiments that you have to do. When you

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>say a lot, it's actually it's pretty mind blowing. Can

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:23.399
<v Speaker 1>you talk about what that is when you're doing these

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>experiments to find something that you know is pretty rare.

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:31.959
<v Speaker 1>What frequency of experiments are you doing? And then and

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and then how many of them? Right? So we're looking

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 1>for rare stuff. Most of the time when you collide

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to protons together, not much happens to protons come out. Occasionally,

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, one in a million or one in a

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>billion times something different will happen. So if you want

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot of examples of the rare stuff,

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got to sift through a huge number of examples

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of the boring stuff. So that's why we do as

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 1>many collisions as we can. So we do it every

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty five nanoseconds. So we have these huge detectors at

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>certain which are focused around this collision points, and then

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the accelerator runs through the heart of the detector and

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 1>it delivers two beams which cross right at that collision point.

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And the beams are not like let's shoot one particle

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>at one other particle. You shoot like a bunch of

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>particles like ten to the thirteen protons at another bunch

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.879
<v Speaker 1>tended of tending the thirteen protons and hope to get

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>some collisions. And then you have these bunches staggered through

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>your accelerator. Accelerators a big circle, so you imagine all

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>these little bunches zooming through the accelerator in perfect coincidence.

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>They overlap right at these collision points, and you get

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 1>these collisions every five nanoseconds, and every time there's a collision,

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we take this massive digital picture, and then we have

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>this enormous fire hose the data that pours out of

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the detector, and we have to somehow try to capture

0:40:57.200 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that and analyze it and simplify and reduce it so

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:01.839
<v Speaker 1>that we can oil it all down to answer an

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>actual physics question, like does this particle exist. To me,

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the fun parts. I'm sort of a

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:12.360
<v Speaker 1>statistics and data processing, machine learning kind of guy, data science,

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and so for me, it's a really fun puzzles how

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to drink from this massive fire hose of information and

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>answer very high level questions about the universe. It's pretty amazing.

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So so Mega, we've gotten a chance to talk about

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 1>traveling at light speed, quantum teleportation, the Higgs boson. I

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:31.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if achieve it. I still have a thousand

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 1>more questions I could ask. Yeah, I'm pretty sure we're

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to have you back on Daniel sometime, but

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I do hope that all of our listeners will check

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>out your awesome book that you and Jorge have worked

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>on together. We have no idea, but Daniel, thanks so

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us on Part Time Genius. Thank you

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 1>very much. A lot of fun guys, and I'd love

0:41:51.800 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to be back anytime. Remember thanks again for listening. Part

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Time Genius is a production of how stuff works and

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be possible without several brilliant people who do the

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>important things we couldn't even begin to understand. Tristan McNeil

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 1>does the editing thing. Noel Brown made the theme song

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and does the mixy mixy sound thing. Jerry Roland does

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the exact producer thing. Gave. Loesier is our lead researcher,

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>with support from the Research Army including Austin Thompson, Nolan

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Brown and Lucas Adams and Eve. Jeff Cook gets the

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>show to your ears. Good job, Eves. If you like

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 1>what you heard, we hope you'll subscribe, and if you

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>really really like what you've heard, maybe you could leave

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a good review for us. Did you forget James Jason

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 1>who