WEBVTT - Europe, Equities, And Bonds (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Big big day in Frankfurt, Germany.

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Tay and for Europe, uh, the ECB raising its benchmark

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>R fifty basis points. So no longer negative interest rates

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. That's big. Um boy, it's been a long

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>long time exactly. I'm looking at the euro here trading

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>up just a little bit. But let's dig into it

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. We can do that with me. Have

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a cousin Euro Area economists for Bloomberg Economics, Geneva Zerk

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>somewhere over there in Switzerland. Um, pretty cool, Mayva. Thanks

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. Busy, busy day for

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Christine Lagarde. What are your takeaways from what we've seen

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and heard so far this uh today in Europe? Kay? Thanks?

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's a big thing. Indeed, this fifty basis

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 1>points to bigger HIGs than we were expecting having plans

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>because the judge that their TPI, their transmission protection instrument,

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>was told enough to allow a bigger move to tame inflation,

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 1>which is again surprised on the web side in June

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>after they published their latest forecast. So the big focus

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>at the moment in the area and at East is

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>really on current inflation and trying to get handled on

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>this regnant place inflation pressures. Now the big question is

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>how good will be the anti fragmantation to these tp

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I uh, it's good that they've agreed on something, but

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of course it is all steel subject to really the

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>discretion of the governing counties or some parts of it,

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in particular as taking the fiscal sustainability of the government

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>or the country, the surf reign that would need to

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.559
<v Speaker 1>receive the support, and also deciding when to activate when

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the increasing spread on warm kids which would be subject

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to discrestion. And we are not sure how and when

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>they can be activated. And I would say that a

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>political crisis in Italy probably doesn't think figure on the

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>list of rational or rehaysms why they could activateing wait,

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>why we we always maybe it's like a NonStop constant

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>political crisis in Italy that should always figure into every

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>central bankers list. So, as Christine god said during the briefing,

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this is really to address unwarranted market fact notation that

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is not country specific, so some sort of his conversion mechanism, uh,

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>which he said that they already have a mechanism. They

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>already have a tool it's called OMT to adviss country

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>specific predomination is So that's really if it's a political

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>crisis in theory, it would be difficult for the governing

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>country to activate the tool. So we see how that happens.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 1>But they have defined the criteria. It's quite it's still

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a relative debate. As I said, a lot of discussion.

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>We would you know, um pretty GUPTO was just in

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>here talking about the possibility of another sovereign debt crisis

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>because of the blo out and spreads. I think we're

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>probably well, we're currently pretty pretty pretty safe in that respect,

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but we could get there. That's the trajectory. Is this

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>ECB equipped to deal with that kind of thing? It's

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it's one more tool than they didn't have before. It's

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>just much more difficult than it was when they first

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 1>launched to empty and when they first because at that

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>time it was easy for them to buy a lot

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.399
<v Speaker 1>of government debt because it was serving at the same

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>time the support like the monetary podity direction to increase

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in fation on the market fragmentation aspects. So it's much

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>more challenging now. It's good that they are in producing

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a new a new tool, but it will it will

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>still be subject to a lot of debates on the government.

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But they could have raised rates much. They could have

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>raised rates a long time ago. And I realized that,

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:02.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, the FED also out inflation to get

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead of it, and and so did um the Bank

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of England. You used to advise Her Majesty's Treasury there.

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Why why is the ECB, you know, the last to

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>raise Why why didn't they act sooner? They had a

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>different inflation problems. They still have a different inflation problem. Uh,

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>most of the inflation in et needs to due to

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>energy and food crisis, so out of their control to

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a large extent. It's also that actually we've seen a

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of stating in market conditions at the market rates

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>for your area, actually more so than in the US,

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>at least initially, um, just without changing the rates. So

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>they have already. There has been already a lot of

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>stating they didn't pace sooner because they had to exhibit

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the asset purchases. Um, they had to make sure actually

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they had the high schools in place. But it doesn't

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>mean that they are. They don't need to do as

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>much as the just said. All right, maybe thank you

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. May have a cousin euro

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Area economist for Bloomberg Economics. I want to bring our

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>good friend, Ed Price. He's a senior fellow, a former bidtish,

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.559
<v Speaker 1>a trade official, senior fellow at n y U. Lots

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>going on in Europe. We've been covering it all day.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Matt's been up since the before the crack of dawn.

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Lot's going on with the e c B. Let's start there.

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>ECB raising their benchmarks, connected all connected, fifty basis points um.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:36.679
<v Speaker 1>That's in the face of slowing European economic growth, energy crises.

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>There are so many cross currents for our friends over

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. I think that's right. And um, you know

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>what does the ECB want to do? It kind of

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to do two things. It wants to kill inflation

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and it wants to not kill the European economy. Right,

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>so if you if you say, well, look, you know,

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty is quite a lot. It's not enough if you

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>want to stop inflation. And again we talked about this

0:05:58.200 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but I don't know what you do, like

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>what is the answer to that? But fifty also can't

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>kill an economy, right, they they're just fifty basis points.

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>That's now, Let's remember they're very very low. There's still

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>below whatever our star it is, whatever you think it is,

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely more than fifty, right, it's definitely one fifty.

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would personally say there's no such thing

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>as our star because you've got that m just our

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>star the natural rate of interest right, So like yeah, right,

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>so like this is this is one of the more

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>voodoo aspects of economy. But it's basically whatever your guess is,

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably better equipped to make a guess than

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you or I at a level of level of interest

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>rates that is not enough to not high enough to

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>slow the economy, but not low enough to spur it forward.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So just neutral. Yeah, And you're like, you know, you're

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>doing things like searching for what the output gap is,

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and you've got your army of economists, and it's a guess.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'd go further than let's say it probably doesn't exist,

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>because if you want to look after financial markets, whatever

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>our star is, it's probably quite low. And then if

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to look after inflation get rid of that problem,

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it's probably higher. Um. So there's probably no such thing

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>as all start. I'm going to look at my Twitter

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>later to see what happens to me after saying that. Um. Right,

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>so here here in the States, fed trum of Powell

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>raises rates sevent five basis points. It's a New York, Kuai, California,

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really matter um vs VI those different states. But

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not the same thing in the East New York,

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Hawaii and California. I'll make a ton of money. Yes,

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>how about our good friend. Maybe maybe it matters to

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the states that take all of our money all of

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>our money. So let's bring that analogy to Europe and Italy.

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So talk to us about how, you know how what

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the what Christine the Guard has to balance when

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>she's in this rate moving scenario when you have different countries,

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>different economic development. So it's a really good point. So okay,

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>so borrowing costs You're right, in the US don't matter

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>as much as in the your area, and they don't

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>matter as much because the spread in the area between

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Tenia borring costs in Italy and Germany is

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>as we've said before, essentially an indicator of whether the

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Euro can exist. So the e CBS obviously sitting there thinking,

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to introduce a an X upper bound

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>for Italy, at which point it won't be able to

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>function as a government, won't be able to function as

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a state, and we'll have to leave the Euro Area

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>because that would be extremely bad. So, by the way,

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you've also got this threat that Russia is going to

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>cut off the gas, and you know, there's projections that

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Italy would have a five percent contraction and so on.

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think the CBS thinking about these really deep

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>structural currency related issues at the same time as in

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.599
<v Speaker 1>public and on the surface of things, talking in the

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>normal language of macroeconomics, and it's so tough to deal

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>with the gas issues at the same time as they're

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>dealing with their persistent lack of a government. Again, they've

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 1>had sixty seven governments and seventy five years. Is that

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the number? Good Lord it's nuts. So but that's just

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>how it is in Italy, and frankly, the ECB should

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>be prepared for that, um, you know, because it happens

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>so often. But it's a very difficult time to see

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>spreads widen, and I wonder how far the spread could

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>go before it causes, um, a sovereign debt crisis. The

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>last one we saw was pretty difficult. That took Mario

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>drag to get out of. He's kicking off this one.

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>He's kicking off this one. That's very good. You need

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that on a T shirt. Um, whatever, it doesn't take. Yeah,

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the problem is that we don't know.

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>But we don't know what that level is. We've been

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>obsessed for years as policy makers and economists with this

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>thing called the lower bound, which apparently zero. It's not

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>wink wink, but apparently zero. Right. Um, But then there's

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>there's obviously to your point, that there's this upper bound

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.239
<v Speaker 1>somewhere at which at which point sovereigns and and presumably

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>corporates and others are going to hit the wall. So

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. Um, could be three hundred, fifty, could

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be four hundred, It could be But then of course

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the only way to find out is to get there, right,

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>So do you really want to get there? No? And

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that and that's something that's that's my question is if

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we have another crisis, or maybe I say, when we

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>have another euro crisis, does that push the European Union

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>towards a breakup as it looked like was going to

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:21.599
<v Speaker 1>happen in two thousand eleven, or does it bring the

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>European Union closer together? Did they say enough of this?

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>You are to what paulse when he said about how

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the USA hands it, Let's do it like that and

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>federalize everything. I think we are. I think you're absolutely

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>right federalized. I think that right now we're in the

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>articles of confederation stage. If you're making the analogy with

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the US, and my money is on the European Union

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in your area becoming the same thing, getting serious, getting

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that German money into some sort of fiscal mechanism whatever

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it is. Um And by the way, there are a

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 1>lot of indicators that this is kind of happening due

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to external pressures anyway. I mean, we said last time

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I was on the Germans are rearming. That's incredible. So

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>my my suggestion to you is that within ten years

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>we'll see the United States of Europe de facto, if

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>not the jury, if they put together a bill of rights.

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>They got to be careful when writing the Second Amendment.

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You watch your punctuation, try and make yourself clear. What

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>do you mean, right, A well regulated militia, Right, I mean,

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>there's aspects of the Second Amendment that are pretty awesome.

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Come on, so maybe we should we should send them

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>over a suggested draft with a fewer commas, maybe real

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.599
<v Speaker 1>quicked the UK? I know it's hot over there. I

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>know the folks are you know, really dealing with that.

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>But just from an economic perspective, how are things in

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the UK these days? Well, I mean, if you if

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you look at some of the projections, three GDP growth

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>goes down to zero, so you guys know about finance,

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>zero is a bad number. So there's definitely some sort

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of head winds going on there. But look, I'm hopeful

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that there's going to be a period of structural reform

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>and that Britain will essentially do what it did in

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the eighties under Thatcher and go through some sort of

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 1>self inflicted shock but then come out, you know, past

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the curve ahead of the curve on globalization as a result.

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Um so we'll have to see. I don't know, but

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the headline is bad, but medium term good, alright, good stuff.

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, lots of news coming out of Europe. We've

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>been uh trying to stay on top of it today

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.599
<v Speaker 1>at Price senior fellow at n y U and a

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>former British trade of Fisher. We love getting his thoughts

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 1>on economics, particularly coming out of Europe, coming out of

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the UK and again today the e C B uh,

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, being a little bit surprised in the market

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>a little bit clearly with a fifty point increase in

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>their base borrowing rate uh FED coming up July. That's

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of where all eyes are now as we think

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.599
<v Speaker 1>about these markets and where rates are going visa v

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>this economy, this this Bloomberg. All right, we got rates rising.

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>We've had a brutal first half of the year across

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income specter spectrum, and that includes high yield.

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And we talked high yield. We talk Ken Monahan, co

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>director of high Yield at a munday US. He joins

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>us in our Bloomberg Interact a broker studio. Ken, thanks

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Declining corporate bond index first

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>half of the year. We've never seen that, have we.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's been a miserable, miserable year thus far

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>in ext income And it's not just how yield but

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>how you'll certainly take it on the chin. So uh,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 1>If from an equities perspective, and obviously Paul and I

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>have grown up kind of plain ventil equities, I would

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>say that's time to go in there and buy. I mean,

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 1>there is legit blood in the streets, to paraphrase possibly

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin Graham. Um, is that not the case for everybody else? Well?

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I I think it is, and it's gonna be at

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>some point. But I think right now what people are

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>concerned about is is the FED gonna tip us over

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 1>into a recession or we're gonna eke this through with

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>the maybe modest growth that probably is subpar. And I

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>think that that's the big question. If we go into recession,

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>people are concerned that spreads will back out further and

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>bond prizes will drop further. If we don't, then maybe

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it's an attractive by right now. All right, So if

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to dip bar tow in the high yield space,

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I still have a specter that I might have a

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.079
<v Speaker 1>recession sometimes in my investment outlook of the next couple

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of years. So does that suggests that I really try

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to just focus on the highest quality or do I

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>still try to reach for some better yield. You know,

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting if you look, Paul, at the beginning of

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this year, when people's major concern with rates duration was

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>driving the market, so double bees underperformed and single bees

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and triple c's outperformed. That shifted in May when it

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>became clear that the concerns about inflation were more significant

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Fed really had to get its act together.

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Then we started to see double bees fade and single

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>bees and triple c is underperformed. And that's where we

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are right now. Single bees are a little under the

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>double b sector. We would suggest you're probably pretty safe

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and most double bees right now. If you type in

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>D I S go and then UM, you click the

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>button historical charts instead of just the spaghetti of numbers

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that you see there UM number of distress bonds traded

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>distress issuers. We've spiked up again, not as high as

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we were in March of UM. But where are we going?

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Where are we going on? This chart. Well, I think

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>from our perspective, the good news is if we have

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a recession, it's likely to be a pretty mild one.

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>And and I'm not sure we're going to have a recession,

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>but you know, there are some out there suggesting that

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>defaults could hit ten percent by twenty four, which is

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>like a great financial crisis level. Correct. And I think

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a ridiculous number if you're looking at it from

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a bottom up basis, and you're looking at the individual

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>sectors and trying to figure out what's going to hit

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the fan. It's kind of hard to get to that

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of number when you do look at uh, look

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>at it from bottoms up and and and study the

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>individual sectors. What do you like? Well, I think you

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>know that there are sectors out there that are pretty safe.

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Cable is largely safe. We would suggest that you've got

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>sectors money, the healthcare sector is safe. Um, we would

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>suggest that much of telecom is pretty safe. And energy,

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>which has really been you know, a big bankruptcy candidate,

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and in previous years particularly, a lot of them got

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>pulled down in each twenty that's obviously got the winded.

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>It's back right now. Is a T T A high

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>yield spiritus at investment grade. Well I noticed the A T. Yeah, hard,

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's still investment grade. And they've been very

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>protective of that investment grade rating because they've got a

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of financing to do, because I know they took

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>their free cash flow down a couple of billion dollars

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>their outlook and I'm just I'm just reaching out to

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>some you know, bond and als saying how bad is this?

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Is this for A T T? But it certainly was unexpected.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the type of thing when you think about telecommon cable.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>They're good free cash flow stories until they're not because

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of operating leverage there right there is.

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think but I think we've been we've been

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking that they're going to maintain that investment grade rating.

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I gotta talk with my colleagues post todays, obviously, but

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that our our our thought with that would

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>remain the same. Yeah, boy, A T and T big

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>big news out of their stocks down a big. Ken Monahan,

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Ken Monahan's a co

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>director of High Yield for a Mundi US and like me,

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a former UH player at Solomon Brothers. Where you are

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Solomon Brothers alumni along with some other guy. Yeah, yeah,

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>is he's sitting right over there. I think he's sitting

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>right over there in the good seats. So we appreciate it.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's check in with Barry red Holt's post

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of Masters in Business, uh Chairman and chief investment Officer

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Red Holts Wealth Management. Barry, let's start with if you

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>don't mind Europe, we've kind of had a European focused today,

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the ECB, Mario draggy stepping down. Um, we've got you know,

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>gas coming back on or not so coming back on,

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of issues coming out of Europe today. As a

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>fund manager here in the US, how do you kind

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of put that into perspective? Well, I'm excited. I'm excited

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>about the euro parody and do some traveling overseas with

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a very strong dollar. That's that's pretty uh impressive. But look,

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, Europe is following the United States and they're

0:17:56.240 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>raising rates because we're raising rates. They have inflation of inflation.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a global economy. It's very challenging to treat one

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:12.199
<v Speaker 1>part of the developed world very differently from another. Uh.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we We've just finished a ten year

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>or twelve year period of US out performance versus Europe.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm waiting for that wheel, that cycle to change. So far,

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing no signs it's gonna happen anytime soon. UM.

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>As a US investor or, your clients, who are I

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>assume mostly investors with US, how much how important is

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it to follow you know, the latest new government in

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Italy or Rischi Sunac versus liz Trust and the UK

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>or UM, you know the Russian gas situation. How much

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>does it matter to to U S investors? Well, if

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to be an informed individual, it certainly doesn't

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>hurt to know what's going on in the con tent

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in the continent. But generally speaking, as an investor, all

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that stuff is noise and meaningless. You're buying broad assets,

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>so you have a diversified portfolio and you're really just

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.479
<v Speaker 1>not paying attention to the day to day stuff. How

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>many governments has Italy had and since World War Two?

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a full time job tracking Italian politics.

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So why does does any US based investor, other than

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a well rounded, wealth informed individual have to

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>track the specifics of what's happening there. It's it's not

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>crucial to them, all right. What I thought was interesting

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the earnings news flow today it was a

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>T and T stuck getting crushed. Now they Barry called

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>out some of their clients not paying their phone bill. Man,

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that says something about the consumer. I well, those kinds

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of things. We've seen some credit card delinquencies tick up.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it always starts in the worst of the

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>automobile loans. So like housing, there's subprime loans and there's

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>sub subprime loans. The differences. If you have the weakest credit,

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a car company is going to install literally a kill switch,

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and if you stop making payments, they shut the car

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and they go get it. They know exactly where it is.

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So around the edges we're seeing these things tick up.

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not significant yet. It's certainly not a weight oh nine.

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>But you pay attention to the ebbs and flows of

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>these because you want to know is the household in

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>good shape or are they dealing with financial pressures that

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>could affect consumer spending, corporate revenues and profits. And the

0:20:55.359 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>other question is, um how are companies deploying capital or

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>are they starting to put up barriers as well. We've

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 1>had a number of concerning uh job cut stories, starting

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>with the kind of Apple may cut jobs in some

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>units next year Scoop at the beginning of the week.

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:19.719
<v Speaker 1>But now we've got Um, Microsoft, Google, Lift, even Ford

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>plans to cut eight thousand jobs. I mean, I'm desperately

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to buy any car I see on the lot.

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Why are they cutting jobs now? So Ford is a

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>different case and the technology companies. Ford specifically said they're

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>going to reduce some headcount in order to be able

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to fund further expansion of their ev production and sales.

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.959
<v Speaker 1>So Ford is moving into the future as aggressively as

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they can. When you look at Google, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon,

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>go town the list six months ago, they were desperate

0:21:54.720 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to hire people, and arguably we're over hiring people. We're

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>basically anybody who could father a Mira and and had

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the qualifications was offered a job at a certain point.

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't take a whole lot of economic slowing for these

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>large corporations to look and say, all right, we're good

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>for now. Let's catch our breath, let's digest these these

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>new hires, get people integrated into their jobs, and see

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>if that solves the employee shortfall that everybody's been dealing

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with for the past couple of years. Alright, Baty all

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I know about the car businesses. Matt still waiting for

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Chevy Silverado. I think it's still stuck in Mexico. I

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's still stuck in Mexico. I can't get any

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>updates on this except the chips then, exactly exactly. It's

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>missing chips, that's all I know. And it's sitting on

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot outside the factory with like thousands and thousands

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of other trucks. And that's on a first name basis

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>with the CEO Afford. You'd think he could get this GM.

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to marry as well and Mark. I haven't

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>called them on this issue. I might have to call

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>him one half. All right, Barry, thanks so much for

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Barry rid Hilts, host of Masters in Business,

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>chairman and chief investment officer Ridholt's Wealth Management. Thanks for

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Miller three on False Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Radio