WEBVTT - Bed Bath and Beyond Drops, Better and Palantir Team Up

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power COLLI

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and Beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Emily jay I. Remember Wi Chang in San Francisco, and

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg Technology coming up. Ryan Cohen sells out.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Shares of bed Bath and Beyond are plunging after the

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>memestock idol sold his stake. Will explain why he did it.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.599
<v Speaker 1>And some of Silicon Valley's richest exaction investors are campaigning

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>against multi family housing coming to their neighborhood, including Mark Andreason. Yes,

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the investor who just gave controversial we Work founder Adam

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Newman a huge check to re envision well rental housing

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and last year was the most lavish on record for

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>executive chex by almost any measure. More than thirty public

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>company executives were paid a hundred million dollars according to

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Pay Index. We will dig in well, let's

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>get back to that bed Bath and Beyond stock, the

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>latest meme stock target sliding. Activist investor Ryan Cohen first

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>sparked this frenzy when his firm r C Ventures disclosed

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a nine percent stake back in March and called for

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a sale of the company shares have plunged now that

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Cohen has officially taken a steak to zero. I want

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Bloomberg's John Edwards for more on this. John,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>what sort of intel do we have on why Ryan

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Cohen sold out here? Well, we haven't heard from him

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>directly yet, but it looks like he's just lost patients

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.559
<v Speaker 1>with this, uh, this struggling retailer. You know, he came

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in uh you know back in the spring, uh in March,

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking that he could really affect a turnaround here. Uh,

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like he has lost patients with that

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and bailed out. You know. He uh, he made a

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of changes. You know, he brought in three independent directors.

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Then in June, um, you know, as that patients started

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>wearing thin, Uh, he uh sort of backed the outster

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of the CEO, Mark Tritton. Uh. And um, you know

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>they thought then, was that Cohen thought that, you know,

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Bed Bath and Beyond should sell it's uh, either sell

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it self entirely or sell it's bye bye baby unit,

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>which is doing better than the rest of the chain.

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>But it looks like he is just run out of patients,

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and bed Bath and Beyond is run out of time

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>with him at least welcome through the timeline because obviously

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the day there was this filing from our

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>c ventures they might sell then we learn, uh, they

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>have officially sold out. Is there any potential for regulatory scrutiny?

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.399
<v Speaker 1>He uh, you know, some uh, some shareholders have made

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>some noise about you know, filing complaint. It's about the

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>way that that Cohen has handled this, you know. He

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>uh again came into the stock with a lot of fanfare,

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and then uh, you know, there was that filing that

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>was made officially on on Tuesday, but disclosed yesterday that

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>they were thinking about getting out of their entire steak,

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and then of course the new filing that they have

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>indeed taking their steak down to zero. So a lot

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of these retail investors who piled into the stock are

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly upset with Cohen at this point, and some might

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>be looking to take action, but it's unclear if if

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>he's actually done anything you know wrong, per sect. All right,

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>we will keep following that blue bus. John Edwards, thank

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you for that update. Meantime, billionaires living in one of

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the wealthiest hip codes in the world are pushing back

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on plans for more housing. Top investors and executives from Apple, Facebook,

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Google and more. I want to stop all Fornia from

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>allowing businesses and multi family housing in Atherton. One of

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the most vocal is none other than Mark and Reason,

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Ellen here. He wrote about the pushback in Bloomberg

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, So talk to us about what's going on here.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>So there was just this interesting moment where public comment

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in the town of Atherton was put online and people

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>discovered that, um, you know, even though Mark and Reason

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>has been very vocal publicly about the need for states

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>like California to build more in order to fix its

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>housing shortage, turns out when people propose um changes in

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the town of Atherton that would allow for multi family housing,

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the neighbors get very upset. And Atherton is the richest

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>place in America, and that's why the people who are

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>upset tend to be some of the biggest names in

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>tex So. As you mentioned exacts and vcs. So let's

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>we actually have the letter from Mark and Reason. He

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>says he's writing to communicate his immense objection to the

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>creation of multifamily housing in Atherton. Please immediately remove all

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:09.119
<v Speaker 1>multi family housing. This is in all caps overlay zoning projects. Um,

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>they will massively decrease our home values and immensely increase

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the noise, pollution and traffic. And you referenced a blog

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 1>post that he wrote a couple of years ago that

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's time to build, uh, indicating you know it was

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it was you know, pretty big picture, not a lot

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of details about what he was saying, it was time

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>to build and how um. But this, of course on

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the back of a very big check he wrote to

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the controversial founder of We Work, Adam Newman, to re

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>envision housing. There's some irony. I think it's just the

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>classic Nimby mentality, which stands for, as you probably know,

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>not in my backyard. Of course we want housing, but

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>as soon as it's proposed an Atherton, which many people

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Atherton is just a strange town. It's extremely wealthy.

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>All the big names lived there, and they like it

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's private, it because it's really not dense, and um,

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're surrounded by other very rich neighbors and

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>so there's a strong um, well, of course we like housing,

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>but not you know, not where I live. Um. And

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just a very common attitude, and it's

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>funny to see it show up here. And it's not

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just Mark Andreason you know, a number of different folks

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>posting here. You you singled head to quote from Anthony Nodo,

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the CEO so FI, talking about how his family has

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>had to get private security because crime is on the rise.

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Can we substantiate that? No? I mean, I think it's

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just it's bringing up all these fears that people have

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>about increased housing, which honestly, in my opinion or you

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>tend to be fear around change like they like the

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>town the way it is. You know, one of the

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>quotes in the story is you know Atherton as we

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>know it will come to an end, and only you

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>are to blame for that speaking to the town council's

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>given that you reported so heavily on we Work and

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Adam Newman, what's your take on this? Andreason check. I

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>think that they want to send a really strong, a

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>little trollish signal saying like, hey, we're not afraid to

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>back founders who have had um you know a lot

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of bad press around some of their back their past examples,

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and that we really believe in kind of the iconoclastic,

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>brash person at the head of a company. Um, whether

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going to end up being a smart check or not,

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll see. You know, if you look at

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>we work, the people who really got screwed as investors

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>are the ones who came in later, not the ones

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>who wrote some the earliest checks. So Andrews and may

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>have actually made a pretty smart move here back in

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Newman early, but it all remains to be seen. We

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>shall see, maybe fought or for another very long podcast someday. Okay,

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Ellen Hwitt, thank you. The U s housing market is

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>quickly changing. Homes are more unaffordable than they've been in

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>forty years, and home sales have fallen for six month straight.

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>The home buyer Affordability Index is at its lowest point since,

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>which means, in theory, more than half of families can

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>get on the property ladder. Still, the online housing business

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>is growing, and better dot Com wants a leg up

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on that ladder, partnering with Palenteer to create a new

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>mortgage platform that will into leverage data to help borrowers

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>qualify for better loans. Here to discuss better CEO Vishall

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Guard Vishall, thank you so much for joining us. So

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>how will this marketplace work exactly? Well, thank you so much, Emily.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>We have thirty two major institutional investors that are on

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>our platform today that actively buy loans, and what this

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>will prolibrate them to do is to use far more

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>granular data to UH make loans to UH c r

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>A eligible loans, UH Low moderate income eligible loans, loans

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for homes with solar things that have traditionally been very

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>difficult for mortgage investors to provide discounts on or to

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>make more affordable. Yeah, we're heading into what could be

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a very prolonged economic downturn. We're already in it. You know,

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>this is never a good time for the housing market.

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think now is the right time to

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>launch this? I think affordability matters more than ever before.

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And we've got three trillion dollars of capital that's been

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 1>raised for e s G funds and most of it

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>never makes its way into the mortgage market. So by

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>creating Bloomberg for Loans effectively working with Palenteer, what we're

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to do is help families that

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>are in sectors that are favored by E s G

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>investors actively connect with those investors and effectively be able

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to lower their cost of home ownership. Now, what are

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that you think you're going to face in

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to build out a home mortgage business at a

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>time when the housing market is slumping, if not crashing.

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the demand for houses is down, but there's

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 1>still millions of homes being bought and sold every year

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in the United States today, and better dot Com has

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>grown fairly rapidly. We've grown from nothing to doing almost

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a hundred billion of mortgages UH this year and um

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>so while the market is down, we are still less

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>than one percent market share, and we hope that we

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>can continue to grow and by making housing more equitable,

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we can actually grow addressing one of the issues that

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>most homeowners face today. You've got a huge capital infusion

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>from soft Bank. Is this you putting that capital to work?

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>And how else should we see you putting the money

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to work? Yeah, we we did get a huge capital

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>infusion from soft Bank, and making homeownership more equitable while

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>driving our business is the most wonderful type of innovation

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.719
<v Speaker 1>that we can hope for. And so this is at

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 1>the cutting edge. By partnering with Palentteer what we were

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>going to do in five to ten years. We've been

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>able to leverage our soft bank capital to actually make

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>live this year. Now I have to ask you about this.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>The macro picture, of course, has been challenging for a

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies. In the last year, you've had layoffs,

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>laid off nine of the company, nine people you laid

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>off via Zoom than an additional three thousand. I know

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you've got a lot of heat for that. When you

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>look back on that, what would you have done differently?

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you think went wrong? I think we did

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that were very wrong. Um, I

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>should have handled the layoffs with more care and more empathy.

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>We were very lucky that because of the fact that

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we're a digital mortgage company and a digital home ownership platform,

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we were actually able to see the downturn in the

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>market that is evidence today and that you see many

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>many other mortgage originators laying off thousands of people. We

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 1>were able to see that as early as late last year,

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and so we've been able to get ahead of it.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>We've been able to downsize to a burn. We've taken

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>over a billion dollars in expense line items out of

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the company's cost structure, and we're using that savings to

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>now innovate and continue to serve customers. So what are

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you doing differently now to manage costs, to manage hiring,

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you've learned from those lessons and something

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>like that doesn't happen again. I think managing the up

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and down cycle of the cyclicality of the mortgage industry

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is something that's new to us, where again only a

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>six year old company, and there are companies in the

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>mortgage space that have been able to manage that far

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>superior to us. So what we're keeping our pulse on

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:57.079
<v Speaker 1>is uh customer demand, customer demands specifically for new products,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and legging into growing those new ducts, not at the

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 1>rate that we did in two thousand twenty, where we

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>grew almost but slowly, legging into customer demand, rather than

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>what in startup whend you get taught to do with

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>just a blitzcale. You're also being sued by one of

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 1>your former executives, Sarah Pierce, alleging you misled investors in

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the process of trying to go public Vias back. She's

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>also alleging retaliation. The SEC is now looking into this

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 1>what's your response to all of this. I think it's

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>very hard for me to comment on matters that are

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>an active litigation or subject of an SEC inquiry. All

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I can say is every day we wake up and

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>we find gratification in helping make homeownership cheaper, faster and

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>better for more and more American families. And the more

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we can keep on doing that, the better the world

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>will be. You're also trying to take the company public.

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I've leaves still Vias back and I know there's a

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>deadline coming up for that. Is that still the plan?

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know, especially given that this back market

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>has fizzled, how are you thinking about whether now is

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>really the right time. We're evaluating all of our opportunities,

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and again I can't comment publicly on it. All I

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>can say is that we remain committed to achieving greater

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>capitalization so that we can have the funding to serve

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>our customers, and we're open to all the different options

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>out there uh than enable us to continue to be

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>really well capitalized. So I'm curious for your thoughts on this.

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking a lot about the funding that Adam Newman,

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the founder of we Work, just received the biggest check

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>ever from Andres and Horowitz to you know, potentially revolutionize

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>residential real estate, or at least that's what Mark and

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Reason seems to be hoping for according to his blog post,

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of that funding? I am so

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>happy that the venture capital community and entrepreneurs are still

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>interested in revolutionizing the residential real estate market. Here we

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>have a forty trillion dollar industry where consumers still pay

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>six percent to buy or sell a home, where consumers

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>spend over ten percent of the value of their home

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>just transacting, where it takes sixty days to transact, and

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>so there are so many aspects of the residential real

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>estate market that need to be optimized and made work

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>for consumers rather than brokers or transactional intermediaries. And uh,

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>we really welcome the fact that there's going to be

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>more innovation and more capital and more innovation in the space,

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>even if it's going to Adam Newman, who at the

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>very least is a very controversial founder. Adam Newman is

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a controversial founder, but he did revolutionize the idea of

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>office space. Many of our offices are in we Work space.

0:15:55.200 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>And so while I can't speak to any and all

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of the opinions that are out there in the market

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>about him. We are delighted users of the product that

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>he helped create, and so if he can do the

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:15.479
<v Speaker 1>same for residential real estate, good luck. All right, Ballgard,

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Better, We'll be watching your marketplace and following

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this new partnership with Palenteer. Thank you for joining us.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Much more coming up right after this break, This is Bloomberg.

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Qualcom is taking another run at the market for server

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>chips in an effort to decrease its reliance on smartphones.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>The company taking customers for a product standing from last

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>year's purchase of the chip startup Nuvia This according to

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg sources. They also say Amazon's a WS is one

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest server chip buyers and has agreed to

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>take a look at what Qualcom has to offer. China

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>is lashing out at a fifty two billion dollar program

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>to expand American manufacturing of semiconductors and industry associations, as

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it contains elements that violate fair market principles and targets

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>China's own efforts to build a chipmaking industry. The legislation

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>prohibits companies that receive funding from expanding production of advanced

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>chips in China, and it's the biggest annual television deal

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>ever for a college sports conference. The Big Ten has

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>reached an agreement on a seven year contract with Fox, CBS,

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and NBC. According to The Wall Street Journal, this is

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>worth about seven and a half billion dollars. The price

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of college football broadcast rights has soared, and no one's

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>cashed in more than the Big Ten and the Southeastern Conference,

0:17:49.680 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>both of which are expanding to sixteen teams. Welcome back

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco. Incredible Health,

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a career marketplace for permanent healthcare workers, announced eighty million

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars in series be funding the company's valuation now one

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>point six five billion Unicorn status. This at a time

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>when the nursing shortage is still a huge problem in

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the United States, a recent report from McKenzie estimating the

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>US will be short at least two thousand registered nurses.

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in Dr emmon abo zid Now for more

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>on this year's the CEO and co founder of Incredible Health.

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Doctor obviously great to have you back here on the show.

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>You talked about the nursing short shortage right here earlier

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in the pandemic, what's that shortage like now? So the

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>big difference has happened in the last twelve months is

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that this is a this is a workforce that is overworked,

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>burnt out, and experiencing excessive streuss. Our most recent third

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>annual report on nurses in the US showed that one

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>third nurses are considering leaving the profession permanently by the

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. So how has the pandemic changed,

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially this industry for the longer term. I mean,

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are we expecting the impact of the pandemic to impact

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the availability of nurses for years to come? Absolutely? I

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>mean even before the pandemic, our demand for healthcare as

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>a country kept was increasing because our population is aging.

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But pandemics are certainly demand shocks on the system that

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>put more constraints on the more strain on the health

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>care system, and and the need for even more healthcare

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>workers to to fill that demand. The CDC just announced

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a huge overhaul of the agency, acknowledging mistakes they made

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic, acknowledging a need to be more nimble

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>and respond more quickly. What do you think went wrong there.

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was certainly some challenges with how the

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>CDC collaborated and and the way the community they communicated

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>with the public, which you know, they have some responsibility

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of of how intense and challenging COVID became

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and that you know, in effect had

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>affected the healthcare workforce as well. They were massively overworked.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh and hopefully with these changes when there,

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 1>when and if there is a future pandemic, uh, you know,

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it won't affect or decimate the work the healthcare workforce

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>as much as this last pandemic. To what are the

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>implications for the doctor in hospital marketplace? What are you

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing on your platform? Um? You know what what we're

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing is, you know, you know, we now work with

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>over six hundred hospitals and health systems across twenty five states,

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>including very large ones like Kaiser, Permanente and hc A

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Healthcare and academic medical centers as well like Johns Hopkins

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and Cedar Sinai and others. And uh, you know, every

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>single one of these hospital executives that we're working with

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is dealing with this problem. Uh. They are, uh, they

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>are tackling you know, shortages and and understaffing on on

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>all their nursing units. There's even thirty of the employers

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on our platform are now using US for new graduate nurses,

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>which was not the case before the pandemic. So this,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>this challenge is continuing to increase and labor expenses and

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>labor costs is negatively impacting hospital financials as well. How

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>do you hope Incredible Health will help bridge some of

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>these gaps? So you know, our our focus is on

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>ensuring that nurses are able to get the best permanent roles,

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but we also invest heavily in features and tools for

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>nurses that are completely free. We offer free continuing education

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for nurses, free salary estimators. We even have an advice

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>platform for nurses built into our apps, and we want

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to continue investing in that, including skill growth, educational scholarships,

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>relocation support in order to make sure that the Incredible

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Health is a place where nurses can manage their careers

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>instead of only the place where they find their permanent job. Meantime,

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the US is dealing with another some would call it

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a crisis, the ROVERSUS Way decision from the Supreme Court. Um,

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is this at all impacting your platform? And the workers

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>on your platform, especially those working in states where abortion

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is restricted. So it's not affecting the incredible health platform,

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>but that it does affect the nursing workforce in a

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of different ways. First, there's going to be an

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>increase in volume of patients because when you restrict you

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>know that that care, you know you're gonna have more

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>topic and more more life threatening pregnancies. Um. So that

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that increases the workload on the healthcare workers. Secondly, you know,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they have to consider the legal ramifications when they are

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>supporting and counseling patients, and so they have to be

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>very aware of their code of ethics as well as

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the legal regulations that they have to follow in their

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>state and in their hospital. Uh. And then finally, you

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 1>know it will continue. You know, the vaccine band mandates

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>were extremely um uh controversial, and so is Rob Wade,

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>even among healthcare workers. So that you'll have healthcare workers

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be on both sides of this

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>of this discussion, which creates more you know, angst than

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and the debate and discussion and intensity in the workplace.

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>So how are you expecting this to play out over

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the next several years? Where you know, this could potentially

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>happen in more states, you know, talking about a bottleneck

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially already. You know where are we three years from now?

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean we are. Every report we read, every projection

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>shows that the shortage of workers is projected to continue

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>unless we can do more to support this workforce and

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>grow this workforce. The one positive that came out of

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, and and you know the ce CE changes

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>even will be great, Wade. Is it put more emphasis

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>on the importance of the healthcare workforce and how we

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>need it to deliver care? All right? M on opposide,

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>incredible health CEO and co founder. Good to have you

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>back here on the show, Um, and appreciate all your

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>insights there. Meantime, tech stocks are staging a comeback, generally

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.959
<v Speaker 1>after a brutal start to the year. The NASTAC one

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred was down a month go. Now it sounds se

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>year to date. Joining me now, Miriam rivera co founder

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and CEO and managing director of OH Ventures, a seed

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>stage firm with two million dollars in assets under management. Um,

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>how cautious Miriam, would you say you are right now

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>in this investing environment? Well, I've been in Silicon Valley

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>since so, I've gone through many cycles here, and one

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>of the things that tends to happen is that there's

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit of overreaction oftentimes when we have uh these

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>big dips in the public stock markets as well as

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>UM financings that have kind of become so large and

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>have promoted growth at all costs, including profitability, and eventually

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the pendulum swings in the other direction, but it tends

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to swing too far. And that's what we're seeing now

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>as I understand it. Your firm actually made a record

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>number of investments in the last quarter twenty investment I

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>believe why is that, Well, we look at risk adjusted return,

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and while we have seen the risk go up the

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>and we account for that in terms of how we

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>make investment decisions and in our financial models that we

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 1>use to um power our process. What we see is

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of folks don't um They overreact to

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the news, They don't know where to actually um look

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>at increasing the risk in their models, and oftentimes that

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>generates uh re fear, just fear and makes people hold

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>back capital at a time when actually it's a good

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>time to be investing. Because many people are sitting on

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines and not sure how to price, and our

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>financial process really allows us to price at the seed

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>stage very well and to encompass that additional risk in

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>still trying to achieve the same technets probability weighted multiple

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>that we look for in each investment. Well, let's talk

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>about that pricing because it seems investors would be at

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>an advantage right now. You know, we're hearing about flat rounds,

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>down rounds. You know obviously that we're seeing layoffs, there's

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>talk of more laps. What's actually happening behind the scenes, um,

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, as these investments are continuing to be made.

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Those are many of the things that are actually happening

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>You've described very well. But a lot of that is

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>really happening at the later stages and venture where the

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pricing impact of what happens in the public capital markets

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>have a larger impact. What tends to happen UM in

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the earlier stages, such as seed, is that you don't

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>see such large fluctuations and valuations UM as you have

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 1>seen recently. Kind of towards the end of these cycles,

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>where people are doing growth at all costs, you tend

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to have higher pricing at the seed stage, but not

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>as much as at later stages, and so we do

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>see people doing more flat rounds um. We haven't seen

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of down rounds um yet in our portfolio,

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but I do think that that is not an uncommon

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>thing to happen. And these kind of holding the price

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>constant right now often does help entrepreneurs to get additional

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>capital so they can weather these cycles. And these cycles

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>tend to be, you know, less than a couple of

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>years for the most part, so as long as they're

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 1>well situated, it's not your price today, it's kind of

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>where you think you can be two years from now

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the metrics and outcomes that your investors

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to be looking for at that stage. That's

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>really important. Now. Very successful companies were founded during downturns.

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>The most recent downturn Airbnb, Slack, Instagram, Square, you go

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>back to the eighties, Microsoft was founded during a downturn.

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 1>How optimistic are you that you know one of these

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>world changing companies is being founded right now. Well, I'd

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>say that there are more of these world changing companies

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>being founded today than ever before, and across more technology

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>sectors than ever before. So I'm very optimistic. I am

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a very long term investor and believe that technology stocks

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>are a place where both individual investors and institutional investors

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>should be because the wave of technology that is occurring now.

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the market sizes that are possible on

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, there are five billion users on the Internet.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>When I first started UM in as counsel on an

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I p O for an Internet company, there were thirty

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>nine million users. So these markets are vast. They've never

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>been possible to access in this way before, and they're

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to be a dominant force in the

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>economy moving forward. So curious, Miriam, what your thoughts are

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>on Andrews and Harrows recently writing its biggest check ever

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to Adam Newman, obviously troversial founder of We Work. You know,

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of criticism of this. We also

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>spoke to a founder earlier in the show who praised UM.

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>The decision by UM Andrews and Horowitz, what's your take.

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm always of two minds. One is I believe that

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>people make mistakes, and I don't believe in canceling people.

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I also believe that we have really benefited UM as

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a technology sector from some of the work of we work. Before,

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>companies used to have fixed costs in terms of real

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>estate space, and now more and more companies have a

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>much more variable approach to what was really once a

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>very large part of their cost curve, so that these

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>kinds of innovations, UM, they do come with good and bad.

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember in your book you talked about um kind

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of the pro topia and the culture of venture, and

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>also entrepreneurship and Lolcan Valley, and I definitely have a

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of issues with that as well, but I also

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>recognize when innovation has really changed how work gets done

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and where it gets done. Mary mrivera Ventures co founder

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and CEO, appreciate you stopping by. Okay, Next up, the

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Ethere merch finally coming. We've got all the details. Next,

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloombird time now for our crypto report, and

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the merge. The core developers working on

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the software upgrade of the Ethere and blockchain have now

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>firmed up September as the likely official date. I want

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.959
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Bloomberg's Olga career for more on this. So, Olga,

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is this the last likely date? How likely is it

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it's actually gonna happen? On this date. I know there

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>has been a bunch of dates thrown around in the

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>past week or so. Last week we knew it would

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>happen probably in September, but now we know it's going

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to be probably September fifteenth. But this date could still

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>change because Ethereum developers are basically looking to see how

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>many computers are supporting the network. If the number of

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>these computers declines rapidly, they might pull forward the date.

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>So could still change. And what will change once the

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>merge happens. So basically what will change is the power

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>consumption of the Ethereum network. It will decline by more

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>than so. Today transactions from the network are ordered by

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>computers cold miners that take up a lot of energy,

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and after this upgrade, it's going to be done differently,

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in a much more energy efficient way. What are the

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>implications for other block chains. I think some of the

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>older block chains that still use minors, still use this

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>power hungry computers, might feel more pressure to switch to

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>something more environmentally friendly as well. But the fact is

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the newer block chains already use a

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of similar technologies to what Ethereum is moving to.

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>So um I think we'll see more investments into this

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>type of block chains. All right, well, uh, lots to

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to watch air. We will hone in on September.

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's ago Curry thank you nine figure paychecks, once a rarity,

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>are now proliferating, despite critics on Capitol Hill and beyond

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>as the US was still grappling with the pandemic and

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>new variants. One was in fact the most lavish year

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>on record for executive compensation by almost any measure, which

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>paid deals of more than a hundred million dollars in

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>value according to the Bloomberg Pay Index, and the pack

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is being led once again by Elon Musk. I want

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Bloomberg's Honors Melon for more on this.

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So Honors tell us who is getting these paychecks? Ellen

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and who else? It's Ellen, It's Tim Cook, It's the

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>CEO Subibvian and Lucid. You have a couple of finance

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>guys in there, Sprinkling, Brian Armstrong, a coin Base and um.

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>The list looks quite similar as it has in past years.

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a lot of men and most of them

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>tend to be white. There are a few women. This year.

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>There was one woman up there from Coti the Beauty.

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I remember the days when Steve Jobs paid

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>himself a dollar or something, but obviously I had a

0:33:56.120 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>ton of equity in Apple. How on accedented is this? Well,

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. I thought when I started covering executive pay

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago that you would almost we would

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 1>start to see more of a shift to the one

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar CEO, because you have a lot of CEOs out

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>there that are quite wealthy, especially with the ballmarket that

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>ran for so long. But instead it's almost been a

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>shift in the opposite direction. And a lot of that

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>really harks back to Elon Musk, who got the biggest

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 1>pay package that has ever been granted to a company executive,

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in which he would earn tens of billions of dollars

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 1>over the course of about a decade through a generous

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 1>grant of stock options with very audacious goals attached to them.

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>What many companies did was to say, this looks really interesting,

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and they went out and they constructed similar pay packages

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 1>for their CEOs. And that's what we're now seeing popping

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 1>up here. And they're across corporate America, not just in tech,

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 1>but also another another places too, and that's what's really

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>driving this trend. It's interesting to see some of the

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>names on this list. R J Scourge for example, the

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:09.439
<v Speaker 1>seeo of Rivian. I mean Rivian just got a car

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>on the road. Just how are companies justifying these numbers?

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>So I should caveat these figures with saying that this

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is the figures that we published today, is what these

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>pay packages were worth at the end of fiscale, when

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>as we know, equity markets look quite differently than they

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>do today. However, um we know that historically things have

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>have tend to pan out pretty well for company executives

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>or companies say with these packages, is that this is

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>what we need to motivate our top guy or gal.

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's most often a guy, and this is reflective

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of his or her skills and what other CEOs out

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 1>there get paid. So a lot of it has to

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>do really with what does the rest of the landscape

0:35:58.200 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>look like. And that's why you get these sort of

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>butterfly effects from Ellen gets a grant, then somebody else

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>gets a grant, and then all of a sudden you

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>have the domino effect. Whereas if you saw more a

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>dollar CEOs, especially high profile CEOs, just taken back and

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 1>not nothing more than I think you would see that

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>proliferate to to a different extent too. You just wrote

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>a piece that crossed about Ryan Cohen that he made

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight million dollars on the sale of his bed,

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 1>bath and beyond stake this week. Some people are not

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>happy about it. We were talking about the potential for

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>regulatory issues earlier. Um, you know, what do we know

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>about kind of the timeline, um and why he did this.

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't know so much about why he did it.

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>We know that he started acquiring the stake back in January,

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he held it for about seven months, and then he

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>he offloaded it this week, and it came on the

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.280
<v Speaker 1>heels of a bit of a rally in the stock

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>after it was disclosed earlier this week that he had

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in fact held onto the mistake for for that long

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 1>and that let's some talking twitter. Um, We're not really

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>sure about the motives, but we do know that an

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>quite a nice profit. All right, Well, I'm sure someone's

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>looking into that. Bloomberg Saunder's Melon, thank you as always

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:15.919
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. And that does it for this edition.

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology coming up tomorrow, we're gonna hear from Eric Fistria,

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Benchmark Capital, why he thinks Apple is skirting regulators busy

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 1>with Amazon and Facebook. This is Bloomberg