WEBVTT - Apple’s Big AI, Siri and Software Launch

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and ever Low in San Francisco.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up all eyes on apples

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 2>developer conferences. The Iphonemaker is set to unveil a revamped series.

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll be live from Kupertino plus in video and sk

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Heinez they partner up on next generation AI memory chips

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>with a multi year deal and SpaceX gets ready to

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>go public.

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:40.319
<v Speaker 3>Will discuss what to.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 2>Expect from this week's record breaking IPO. But at the

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 2>moment we turn our attention to what the markets are

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>up to and look a reprieve from the sell off

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 2>we saw on Friday.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Now we're having the best day in.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>About a month for the Nastak one hundred, but remember Friday,

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>we had the worst day in a year for this benchmark,

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 2>as technology just saw a real sell off, anxiety that

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe we'd run too far, too fast, particularly in the

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 2>world of hardware and chips. Well, today we've bounced back

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 2>on the socks. We're up six point four percent, but

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>that's just clawing back some of the losses we saw

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>on Friday. After its benchmark had its worst day since

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty. So maybe we get a little bit more

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 2>positive momentum, particularly as in videos been talking about and

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 2>as buying opportunity. But also we get intricate news. Look

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>at Intel that this is a report coming from the

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 2>information that maybe Google and others are turning to different

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 2>makers manufacturers of their chips, not just TSMC. Could we

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 2>get a big healthy order coming through from Google for

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 2>TVUS from Intel? We charge up twelve percent on that

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 2>particular reporting from the information. But look at what's happening

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>in terms of Apple. Look all eyes on what we're

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>going to get in terms of sery, what it's going

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 2>to signal to developers. We're currently up stealthily maybe fifteen

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 2>sixteen percent. Yeah, todate, it's the second best magnificent seven

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 2>performance throughout all of those stocks on the year, because

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 2>it even manages to do well when we've got anxiety

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 2>around AI.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about what.

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>We therefore could see in terms of a refueling on

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 2>this stock when they start to infuse AI a little

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 2>bit better. Bloomberg Apple, and of course Consumer Tech Managing

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 2>editor Mark German is alongside our own ed Ludlower adds

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 2>over in Kubatino, we're luckily to go into La for

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 2>our man of the moment. When it comes to all

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Apple reporting as well, Mark Gum and we start with you. Look,

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 2>you've been reporting intricately on what we're going to be

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 2>getting in terms of Siri.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Is it going to live up to the hype?

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 4>I think if you look at the features from AI

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 4>standpoint on Apple devices right now, you basically have two

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 4>subsets of features. You have Apple Intelligence, which are the

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 4>on device models, the cloud models, things like writing tools,

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 4>things like more advanced notifications, and then you have Siri.

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 4>I would say both of those buckets are subpar compared

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 4>to the competition. After today, you're going from subpar and

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 4>you're going to be upgrading to pretty adequate, right And

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 4>so I think this new Sery will be extremely effective

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 4>and enjoyable and useful for mass consumers. And I think

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 4>that will put a little bit of pressure and threat

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 4>on the chat gbts, the Geminis, the anthropics of the world.

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 4>But in terms of game changing innovation, whiz bang new

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 4>AI features, you're not going to see that. You're going

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 4>to see a breakthrough new Siri interface, A Serri app,

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 4>Serie evolving into a chatbot, Siri working really effectively for

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 4>the first time in fifteen years, using those underlying models

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 4>from Gemini. So I think overall, Apple has a very

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 4>positive story to tell on Siri. And then on the

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Apple Intelligence front, the non serie AI features, there's a

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 4>lot of good stuff, things for photo editing. You're also

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 4>going to see some improvements across iOS and new customizable

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 4>camera app. So I think a lot of nice refinements.

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 4>And then the last thing, I'll say, a lot of

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 4>people have been asking for major performance and quality improvements.

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 4>Stop throwing a thousand new features at us every year,

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 4>take a step back and make sure everything you've done

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 4>over the last ten years works well. And so they're

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 4>doing that this year as well.

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 5>The headline mark's going to be the standalone app right

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 5>where Siri goes from a place where you have a

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 5>feature a single voice command gives a single result to

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 5>a multi step task within an app that will follow

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 5>you from iOS to mac os, etc. Give us the

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 5>specifics that you've been reporting on how this revamp Seri

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 5>will work in practice.

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think more broadly, it's Siri moving

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 4>from a voice assistant where you can ask it questions

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 4>and get an answer to being an always on copilot

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 4>to help you get things done throughout your day. I

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 4>can say things like write an email to add about

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.919
<v Speaker 4>my upcoming schedule and bring over the notes that I've

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 4>taken about our meeting that I want to discuss at

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 4>our in person meeting, and also search the web for

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 4>more in depth details on potential TV wardrobes or specific

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 4>topic and throw that into the email as well summarize

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 4>those details. So multi step queries, pulling information from across

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 4>your own data and the web, and also using context

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 4>from what's on your screen, being able to work across

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 4>your applications, across first party third party apps and your services,

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 4>and it's going to be pretty broad in its functionality

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 4>using those Gemini models. The other thing they're doing is

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 4>they're launching a perplexity competitor chat GPT web search competitor.

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 4>So right now, when you ask things to Siri, if

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't know the answer, it'll throw you to Google Search,

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 4>or it'll throw you to a chat GPT search. Now

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:43.119
<v Speaker 4>they have an in house aipowered web search engine within Siri,

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 4>and so basically it's everything they've promised everything people have

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 4>asked for and a little bit more on top. So

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 4>I think this new sery, if it works, which I

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 4>think it will for the most part, is going to

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 4>be a success story for them.

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 5>My interact with Bloombo's Mark German are about to get

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 5>a whole more exciting. Digitally speaking, bluebos Mark German leads

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 5>our coverage of Apple and also consumer technology. Let's go deeper.

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 5>Let's ask what happens next with Caroline a millionacy president,

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 5>principle analyst with creative strategies, and let's start with the

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 5>idea that if we get this the standalone serie app

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 5>that Mark's reported on is whether it's it's as simple

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 5>as displacing an iOS user's use of Chatch, GPT or

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 5>claud as an app within their phone. You see that happening.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 6>I think it's all about the value that is pertinent

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 6>to me as a consumer, and so I think what

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 6>the app does, as Apple is so focused on devices,

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 6>allow me to take the experience I have with see

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 6>across the multiple devices that I have. And Apple is

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 6>quite unique because at the end of the day, they

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 6>are the manufacturer that has consumers that own so many

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 6>different devices. So they must be catering very carefully to that.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 6>I don't want to feel like I'm getting a different

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 6>experience depending on which Apple device I'm on. But I

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 6>do think that what Mark was saying about where Apple

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 6>intelligence is today also matters a lot for Apple. And

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 6>it's different than what Claude or chat GPT are doing

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 6>today because is it really embedded in the devices and

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 6>we need to remember what Apple sells is devices.

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 5>I wrote about that today in the Tech in depth

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 5>about this idea that whatever's going on with the smartphone market,

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 5>even if Apple absolutely nails this, it won't change the

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.559
<v Speaker 5>situation this year. Memory pricing is basically Android that's weighing

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 5>on the smartphone market anyway. But there is this idea

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 5>that the next phase of Siri follows me in the

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 5>installed device space, from my coos to my macOS. How

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 5>important is that?

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 6>It's very important because I think that is what is

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 6>going to be physically lock customers in. And I know

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 6>that there's always a bit of a cringe when we

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 6>say lock because when we think about regulators and so

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 6>we'll be interesting to see what happens to see her

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 6>in Europe as a point as a thought, but I

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 6>do think that having the ability to have my experience

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 6>carry across all my devices is what consumers at the

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 6>end of the day one, because that's the true value.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 5>The next phase of Siri also longer term, either does

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 5>or doesn't drive switches. So one thing that people keep

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 5>saying to me is there's a lack of education about

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 5>how an everyday person might use Siri anyway. You know,

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 5>they might be an Android user and say, okay, wow,

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 5>I like the look of Siri, but what do you

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 5>see out in the world.

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 6>I really struggle to think our AI as a as

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 6>a switcher mechanism because people are still lockingto an ecosystem,

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 6>and I think that if you're looking at the models

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 6>one week, one is ahead and the other one the

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 6>following week, it's pretty much parity, and it will boil

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 6>down to how does it show up within the device.

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 6>Apple has always been really careful of putting attention where

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 6>a mass market and consumer understanding. So Mark mentioned camera. Absolutely,

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 6>I'm expecting intelligence to continue to show up in a

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 6>way that makes the difference to a consumer of it

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 6>just wants to take a great picture. It's simple, but

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 6>it delivers versus trying to be too focus on the

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 6>productivity side of things and the enterprise.

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 5>Apple shares up two and a half percent in the

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 5>moment and are very close to overtaking Alphabet, the parent

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 5>of Google, is the best performing mag seven stock this year.

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 5>The company has been given sort of the benefit of

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 5>the doubt, been called AI adjacent, given a lot of

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 5>credit for not spending tens of billions of dollars on

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 5>develop AI. But from your perspective and creative strategies perspective,

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 5>how much pressure is there on Apple that Siri has

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 5>to be right this time around?

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 6>You know last year this time last year we were

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 6>talking about with consumers are not walking into a store

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 6>to asking for AI. I think it's still like that,

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 6>but consumers are already placing their preference in what chatbot agent,

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 6>whatever you want to call it, they use every day.

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 6>So there's definitely more pressure on Apple to deliver something

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 6>that is comparable to chat, ubt or cloud.

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 5>And in a year's time, you and I can sit

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 5>down again and ask whether a multi step task version

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 5>of Siri that has a agentic capability moves lead or

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 5>Caroline and mis and ac mil a AC principle. Analyst,

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 5>President of Creative strategies, has such grasp on what's happening

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 5>in consumer technology.

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Character she so does the perfect person to have out

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 2>with you and Cooper Tino. Meanwhile, we got so much

0:10:57.880 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 2>more to come on the show and in video it

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.719
<v Speaker 2>is back sk Heinex's next chapter. Two companies strike a

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 2>multi year deal to build the future of AI memory.

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 3>More on that next, more on what these.

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Markets are up to look Jensen warn himself saying, maybe

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 2>you should start buying the dip. Well, we're up two

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 2>and a half percent if people buy the Dipper, the.

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 3>NASA one hundred.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 2>We sort of hard the worst day in a year

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 2>on Friday today the best day in a month.

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 3>This is a prem bag tech in Video and sk Heinex.

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 2>They are partnering on next generation AI memory chips. They're

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 2>deepening ties, as is the South Korean chip maker really

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 2>is battling with Well Samsung in its home market in

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 2>this booming memory focus. Now the companies have signed a

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>multi year deal spanning chip design and manufacturing for more

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 2>prenom Vexine King, who covers all things semiconductors, joins us.

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 2>And it was just a few days ago that we

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 2>know that well Micron alongside Samsung and sk Heinix are

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be there for Verra Rubin, But what is

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 2>this deepening relationship with SKHINEX mean.

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 7>I mean from a technical perspective, the way that memory

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 7>interacts with these processes that in video makes is becoming

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 7>increasingly important. If you want performance to improve, then that interface,

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 7>that way that that information gets conveyed has to get

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 7>better at the rate at which the processor gets better.

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 7>So it makes sense that they'll start talking to each

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 7>other at an early point on the technical side of things.

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 7>And that's what we think is going on in terms

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 7>of the technology. There's also strategic moves and tactical moves

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 7>going on with the companies.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Tactical moves now, there's moves in the market more broadly

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the run up that we saw

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 2>after a sell off on Friday, but in particular I'm

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 2>looking at Intel today in now it seems as though

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 2>there's a reporting coming out of the information that maybe

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Intel could be a manufacturer of choice going forward for TPUs,

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 2>for alphabets, chips. How much are we seeing these companies

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 2>just having to rely on other manufacturing partners in TSMC, Yeah.

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.599
<v Speaker 7>I mean, as we reported last week, you'll remember de

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 7>Wi Wooh's story that TSMC is doing its best to

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 7>add as much capacity as it possibly can, but really

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 7>isn't keeping up with the booming demand on the leading edge.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 7>So of course, if you're Google, if you're anybody, you're

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.439
<v Speaker 7>you're looking at potential alternatives. Intel has said, hey, we're

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 7>going to be great again. We're going to have manufacturing

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 7>capacity for everybody. We haven't seen anybody actually commit to

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 7>using it yet, but clearly you're going to look at

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 7>Samsung and you're going to look at Intel as your

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 7>next best choices after TSMC. Those two companies really have

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 7>to step up. Intel has said, look, as this year

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 7>goes on, you'll start to see customers emerge. You'll start

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 7>to see that business pick up. So far, though, it's

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 7>really struggling.

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Take us back to Samsung, how much of it is

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 2>a headache? If it feels though Jensen is sort of

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 2>anointing sk Heinex in this way.

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, there are a couple of things. I mean, Samsung

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 7>is the largest memory chip maker, They've always dominated this market,

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 7>they have the largest capacity. But Skhynix was smart in

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 7>terms of their early shift towards focusing on this market

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 7>on AI basically related memory, and so therefore it make

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 7>sense for Jensen to kind of bat his eyelids at

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 7>SKA to get them to continue to sort of advance

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 7>the art and to force some song to respond to

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 7>that and to bring in that capacity. So for him,

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 7>having these guys competing with each other to sort of

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 7>keep him happy is a really good way to sort

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 7>of move the market forward and keep everybody focused on

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 7>the capabilities that his chips can bring.

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Batting his eyelids, You've always got the best terms of phrase,

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Ian King, Thank you so much. Meanwhile, let's stay in

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 2>South Korea. Intent to today's big number. It's more than

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and fifty billion dollars. That's how much market

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 2>value was actually wiped out from the Cosby over in

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 2>South Korea amid a brutal sell off. Investors already on

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 2>edge ahead of South Korea's Monday open, but the scale

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 2>of that sell off that we've just seen shocked many

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Cosby a plunge nearly nine percent within minutes. It triggered

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 2>circuit breakers. Volatility surged across the market all about after,

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 2>of course, Friday's tech route in the US and.

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 3>A forty two percent collapse in a triple.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Leverage career, etf fears of a deeper down term they

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>were spreading far. We'll return to that story in a moment.

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 2>But another story we're watching is Son might win freed.

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 2>He's taking his bed for freedom directly to the White House.

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember him, the FTX co founder formally applied

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 2>for a presidential pardon more than two years after being

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 2>convicted any multi billion dollar collapse of his crypto empire.

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 2>For more, Bloomberg's Aberbanni Morrison joins us. Now he's meant

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 2>to be in prison for a long time.

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 8>Yes, he was sentenced to twenty five years in prison.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 8>But over the past eighteen months or so, we've seen

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 8>him launch this pretty aggressive campaign to reshape his public

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 8>image and to get in the good graces of the president.

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 8>He's been using a social media platform interviews with conservative

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 8>media outlets to really push his arguments for why he

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 8>deserves clemency and say things that are favorable to the president.

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what therefore could be landing if a tool We've

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 2>heard any discussion around the White House administration that it

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 2>might be allowing SBF to do that, Well, it was

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 2>quite the opposite.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 8>The President said in an interview with The New Times

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.359
<v Speaker 8>in January that he had no plans to pardon SBF.

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 8>Yet SBF has a bitted an application anyway. And I

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 8>think a lot of people are getting inspiration from Trump's embrace.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Of his clemency authority.

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 8>So he's issued more than sixteen hundred grants of clemency

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 8>since the start of his second terms, and sixteen hundred

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 8>to thright. And many of those are white collar defendants

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 8>and figures in the crypto industry like Sam Bankman Freed.

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 3>And some of those are going.

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 8>Through the formal channels through the Department of Justice, but

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 8>others are going through less traditional channels, hiring lawyers and

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 8>lobbyists and consultants who have ties to Trump's inner circle

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 8>to try and get their cases heard and in front

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 8>of the White House. So what we're seeing with Sam,

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:49.479
<v Speaker 8>he's making these arguments, pointing out the sense of injustice

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 8>he feels, but also trying to remake his.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Public image a little bit.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 2>We'll see how this one rings out in the White

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 2>House today. We thank you very much, indeed, but he

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 2>makes Evbany Morrison on all things, Sam aguan Fried look

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Aside from FTX, let's look at what shares a Bitcoin

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 2>are up to at the moment. Because crypto has been

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 2>in the eye of the storm in terms of the

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 2>sell off look risk aversion pervaded it back at the

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 2>end of last week. There was also force selling pressure

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>that was perhaps being built by Michael Sailor, and of

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 2>course the fact that his own focus had perhaps been

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 2>to start selling bitcoin. Many had always thought that his DAT,

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 2>his digital asset treasury, would.

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Keep on buying bitcoin.

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 2>But they are back buying today and that's giving some

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 2>confidence back to the market. We're up three and a

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 2>half percent as we see strategy that artist formerly known

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 2>as MicroStrategy back buying. Now coming up, we'll discuss what

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 2>we expect from SpaceX is Astronomical IPO SLAD this week.

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 5>Techs Elon Musk wants to build the infrastructure for AI

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 5>in space and he's asking investors to help pay for

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 5>the rocket, satellite and now AI company wants to raise

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 5>around seventy five billion dollars in what will be the

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 5>largest IPO in history.

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 9>Spacexs are is probably our greatest commercial space company hands down.

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 10>It will enable the next iteration of what we want

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 10>to see as the space industry continues to grow.

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 5>This isn't just a space story anymore. After folding in

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Musk's AI startup Xai earlier this year, investors buying into

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX are also buying into the future potential of grock

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 5>AI models and Musk's vision for massive computing infrastructure. That

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 5>ambition comes with a hefty price tag. New filing shows

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX's AI business, as in XAI, lost nearly six billion

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 5>dollars last year and billions at the start of this

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 5>year as money poured into computing power and infrastructure to

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 5>compete with Open AI and Anthropic. Still, SpaceX has major advantages.

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 5>Starlink has become a powerful cash generator through its satellite

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 5>internet business, while the copani's launch operations continue to secure

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 5>billions in government and private contracts.

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 11>What people need to realize about this company is it's

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 11>the It isn't just a little bit of ahead of

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 11>the entire launch industry on planet Earth. It's orders of

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 11>magnitude ahead.

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 5>And now Wall Street once in Goldman, Sachs, Morgan, Stanley

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 5>and JP Morgan leading more than twenty banks working on

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 5>the offering, and Musk negotiated record low fees, But the

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 5>IPO also raises big questions like whether investors are comfortable

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 5>bedding not just on must original vision, but making humanity

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 5>a multiplanetary species and getting to Mars, but on a

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 5>future combining rockets, AI, and social media into one sprawling empire.

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 11>And so what we're buying is the next you know,

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 11>the global economy, you know, two doto and three dot

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 11>zero as we look at buying into into SpaceX.

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 5>If that happens, SpaceX could redefine what the modern public

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 5>company looks like on Earth and in space.

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's get more what to expect this week with Bloomberg's

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 2>IPA reporter Bailey Lipschualtz, who might already feel a bit

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 2>exhausted to be honest, And every Thursday is sort of

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 2>when we understand its technical kind of price. Fridays when

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 2>it's going to trade. Is there a sense of the

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 2>amount of demand for this right now?

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 9>We already reported on Friday it was oversubscribed. What that

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 9>really just means is they've already corralled more than seventy

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 9>five billion dollars of orders.

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 3>So kind of mixed feelings.

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 9>I talk to some people and they say, well, that's

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 9>obvious these Normally this is a deal, they kind of

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 9>comes together quite quickly. Skeptics are like, well, why isn't

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 9>it three or four times over subscribe already? That's where

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 9>a normal deal would be. You got to keep in mind,

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 9>it's a seventy five billion dollar deal. So the fact

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 9>that right now there's well north of seventy five billion

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 9>dollars of orders from institutions at least gives you some

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 9>sense of kind of what the next few days will

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 9>look like. Obviously, big IPO orders can come in in

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.239
<v Speaker 9>the final day's final hours, and that's totally separate, at

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 9>least according to our understanding of the retail component, which

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 9>we know bankers at least had been kind of setting

0:20:58.280 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 9>aside about thirty percent.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about what the decision was to fast track

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 2>for some NASA Russell not for the S and P

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 2>five hundred, and does.

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 3>That impact the level of demand in anyway? I think

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 3>it impacts the expectation.

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 9>The big thing we reported and kind of broke out

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 9>on Friday in the wake of that SMP news was

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 9>not only does this mean the timeframe will not be

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 9>truncated to six months versus twelve months as of now

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 9>the s and P five hundred is holding kind of

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 9>pat on the company needing to be net income positive.

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 9>What that really does mean is, at least according to

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 9>these sales side notes we've been able to get our

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 9>hands on, that's something that might not take place until

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 9>twenty twenty eight. So now you're talking about a similar

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 9>situation that we saw with Tesla, similar similar situation we

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 9>saw with Amazon and Uber, where this is a company

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 9>that fits into the Nasdaq one hundred but isn't eligible

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 9>for the s and P five hundred for quite some time.

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 9>And kind of those dynamics and what it means towards

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 9>either chasing ETFs or being kind of benchmark against the

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 9>SMP five hundred, which really is the only index that

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 9>truly matters to most people.

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Aly Lipschaltz, as I say, racing for this week. Meanwhile,

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 2>we want to bring you some other breaking news across

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg terminal and the moment. The leader of Israel

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 2>has been saying he's going to hold a press conference,

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 2>and here comes.

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Some other news out of it.

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 2>He's ready Prime Minister and Lettinyahu's saying that Israel is

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 2>holding fire in Iran for now, but he's told President Trump,

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>then Israel has a full right to self defense as

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 2>we currently speak. Look, Iran has ended its current strikes

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 2>against Israel, we understand according to FARS reporting after both

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 2>nations earlier traded attacks.

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 3>We'll keep you abreast of what's happening there.

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 2>But coming up, we return to tech and we're going

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to be speaking to Paul Hudson, a software developer and

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 2>creator of.

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 3>Hacking with Swift.

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 2>He's here in Coopertino with us as all eyes on WWDC.

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 2>The developers take on the Apple event, what this means

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 2>for Siri, what this means for foldable phones, what this

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 2>means for developers and for your use.

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Of this technology going forward. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.959
<v Speaker 12>With respect to the stock price, everybody should be very

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 12>excited they can now buy stock at a cheaper price.

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 12>And it's absolutely true that the future of AI is

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 12>very bright. It is completely it is a foregun conclusion

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 12>that AI will be infrastructure for the world.

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Jensen Wong, CEO of Nvidia, there welcome back to Bloomberg Tech,

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 2>and of course he was addressing the selloff that we've

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 2>seen into Asian trading this morning. He was over in

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Seaul but today the bounce back is real. Clearly, he says,

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 2>by the dip and the market listens, we're up two

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 2>point one percent, just off of our previous highs. But

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 2>then a's that one hundred having its best day in

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 2>over a month, but put that into context, and its

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 2>worst day in a year on Friday, the socks the

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 2>Semiconductor index, every single member is in the green today,

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 2>it's up six point five percent, but on Friday, and

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 2>it's worst sell off since the days of COVID since

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>March of twenty twenty. So clearly there is a bit

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 2>of a clawback, but not making up yet for Friday's anxiety.

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the anxiety.

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 2>What's pushing through the market, Semiconductor on AI, infrastructure, Marcus

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Primus round Vastellika joins us now and look, is this

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 2>just a typical bounce back after some.

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Fears and loathing built in on Friday?

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 13>I think there's a good portion of that. In today's trading,

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 13>I saw a lot of people talking about we were

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 13>really overdue for a pullback, especially in the semiconductor sector,

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 13>which has been so strong this year. I believe at

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 13>one point it had nearly doubled best year since nineteen

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 13>ninety nine, if I'm not wrong, so I think a

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 13>lot of people were really saying this kind of momentum

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 13>is really unsustainable. So it's not surprising to see a

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 13>pullback at least in the short term. The question, of course,

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 13>even with today's rebound, where do things go from here?

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 13>There continues to be a lot of optimism about AI

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 13>about to demand for semiconductors that we're going to see

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 13>there and I saw today we had a report out

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.479
<v Speaker 13>that Nvidia and Alphabet were considering using Intel as a

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 13>backup chip maker for their chips. Another very positive signal

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 13>at least for a single company, but one of the

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 13>ones that has really been one of the notable outperformers

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 13>this year.

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>It's notable that actually deals are still coming thick and fast.

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 2>We're also hearing of moves being made by Amazon and

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 2>deal thinking driving up Corning shares seven percent at one point,

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 2>and they've signed.

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 3>A multi billion dollar agreement.

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 2>To supply optical fiber cable connectivity solutions. That really this

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 2>is still a story of picks and shovels of ar

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure of the build.

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 13>Out right and absolutely, and I think most people agree

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 13>that there's just not enough supply on the market to

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 13>meet all of this demand, which is something that speaks

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 13>to the idea that we're going to continue seeing this

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 13>kind of growth and demand over a longer term period.

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 13>People are thinking that if you look at some of

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 13>the memory and storage companies, which are another real momentum

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 13>area of the market this year, they should continue to

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 13>see these kinds of tailwinds through twenty twenty seven. So

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 13>while there are some concerns about is growth going to

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 13>eventually decelerate, are we going to read some kind of

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 13>peak in terms of earnings or demand, there's at least

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 13>a lot of optimism that, at least for the remainder

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 13>of this year and next year, that trends remain pretty positive.

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.479
<v Speaker 2>Man, Plastelica, He's always telling us about those trends. We

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 2>appreciate you setting us right on today. Now let's get

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 2>back out to Koobertino because all eyes on Apple's Developer

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Day ED take it away.

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Apple's up two percent ahead of WWDC and WWDC

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 5>is the Developers conference. This is a conversation around software.

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.719
<v Speaker 5>Paul Hudson's a software developer also the founder and creator

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 5>of Hacking with swift, but basically is a place where

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 5>you train people to go and develop apps for the

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 5>Apple ecosystem. Simple as that. Let's start with this, does

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 5>Siri become a platform right to discuss?

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 14>Well, well, exactly, I'll take a commercial I needs so ideally,

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 14>what helps you today is ways us to expose so

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 14>much of our apps data directly to Siri. So Rana

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 14>saying oh hey, siriy do this behind the scenes for developers,

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 14>we provide data too Siri, and it's intelligently. Apple Intelligence

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 14>takes care of four of us and talks to users

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 14>and handles that integration together for us. That's the kind

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 14>of dream for today.

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully.

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.959
<v Speaker 5>The point from Apple's perspective is that Siri becomes genuinely useful.

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 14>Yes, I'll take that, Yes, even smarter.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 5>You know, it goes from a place where it is

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 5>a feature single voice prompt own mum, bone mum to

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 5>multi step tasks. When you're building applications for iOS mac os,

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 5>what are the factors and considerations around how good or

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 5>not Siri is actually right?

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 14>So right now, as you'll know, Seal will often say

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 14>I didn't understand that, or could you repeat that? Or

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 14>which bedroom lights do you mean, we kind of want

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 14>to bypass that and get to things that you just

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 14>care about. But there are fifty different ways users can

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 14>ask for the same thing. We don't want to worry

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 14>about that. That's kind of Apple's problem to figure out, and

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 14>so hopefully they can expose some great APIs today. We

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 14>feed with our data, feed with our code behind the scenes.

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 14>It ties into the natural language model, handles all the

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 14>Apple privacy stuff for us and will just work.

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 5>Privacy is interesting, right. The Bloomberg reporting is that it

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 5>is Google's Gemini. Yeah, in part, that is the model

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 5>underpinning this new iteration of sery. What are the considerations

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 5>around that for you in your community?

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 14>It's obviously critical for us. It's Apple's long standing branding

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 14>thing is privacy is Apple, and we all buy into

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 14>that too. We're all behind that one hundred percent of

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 14>the way. Last year's big announcement for AI from Apple

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 14>was on device fully private AI epic.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 3>We went wild for that.

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 14>So this year, can it be powered by Apple's private

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 14>cloud compute, which is genuinely research level breakthrough stuff for

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 14>handling private AI? Is it that or is it somewhere

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 14>in Google's headquarters at the google Plex. We're gonna find out.

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 5>So if you would prefer the former, the one hundred percent,

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 5>and why is that better for a developer?

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 14>It's not trust Google, but I definitely trust Apple. I see,

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 14>I definitely trust Apple to take care of users privacy first.

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 14>And for years we all believe in to the same thing.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 14>That's our first port of call. It'll be done by them, privately,

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 14>by them, owned by them, maybe Google's hardware, perhaps Google's Gemini,

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 14>but hosted by Apple would be the dream. We're going

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 14>to find out.

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 5>Reading the Bloomberg reporting that the thing that resonates with

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 5>me is that Siri is across os. So if I

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, we have a standalone Sirie app, that's one

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 5>of the headlines. But I start a project, right, not

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 5>just a single to us at a project on my iPhone.

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 5>It can carry over to the MacBook. Is that a

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 5>factor in when you are a developer for either iOS

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 5>or mac ows, So now you're more capable of going

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 5>across the suite.

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 14>So from a developer's perspective, nearly all the money is

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 14>still making iPhone apps interesting, and I think Apple would

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 14>rather see a wider spread. Maco West Watch ostvs Visions

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 14>as well, and so if they can blur those lines

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 14>even more, it'd be great. I mean, they have these

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 14>things like the Universal Control where your iPad and your

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 14>Mac control by the same mouse cursor. It's done something,

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 14>but we want to see more integration, tighter integration. Really

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 14>kind of only Apple can do this kind of thing.

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 14>You know, Pull, you're a software guy, I am through

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 14>and through it.

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 5>What do you make of John Turners, who is a

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 5>hardware guy historically?

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, yeah, he's already already a massive celebrity. People are

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.239
<v Speaker 14>lining up for their John Selby's already. But you mean

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 14>here in yeah now the last already. Yes, there was

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 14>a Student Challenge winners meeting John Turners and they were

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 14>all super psyche. They've had the John Turner's signatures and

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 14>the badgers and stuff, so he's already superstar. I think

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 14>it'd be swamp to do with more people. Look, Isy Hardware,

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 14>Yes is Apple hardware. Yes, they're a hardware company, but

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 14>they still firmly believe in the full stack. At the

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 14>positioning right.

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 5>Let's send with something a little fun. This will be

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 5>the year where we get the OS year iOS twenty seven.

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 5>Right at OS twenty seven, Yeah, is that helpful naming

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 5>for you.

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh for sure.

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it makes it much easier my perspective. You can

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 14>say you want to have OS twenty or whatever, and

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 14>it's fine. I do hope we're going to see a

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 14>mac OS name still, like you know Tahoe right now

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 14>or Big sur A similar as rumors it might go away.

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 14>Everyone enjoys that's fun. They have the crack marketing team Macaws,

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 14>Weed or whatever, right and so hopefully we'll see a

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 14>carry on.

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 5>I guess we'll find out Paul Hudson, software developer in

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 5>the Apple ecosystem, but also of course the creator and

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 5>founder of Hacking with Swift character.

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Great conversation as always.

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 2>And meanwhile, we're taking it up and back to San Francisco, ED.

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:27.719
<v Speaker 2>We've got kind Adventures coming on. They've just raised three

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty five million dollars in new funds. Where

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 2>are they spending in AI? Deep tech robotics? So much

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 2>more stick with us.

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 3>This is room beg tech. San Francisco's Kind Adventures.

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's raised three hundred and fifty five million dollars

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 2>in new funding, the latest deep tech robotics focused funds

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 2>That kindd was early into the AI market. Remember back

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty two, a two hundred million dollar fund

0:31:57.480 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 2>has now become a one billion dollar gross fair market

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 2>value as of June twenty twenty sixth. The fresh capital

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 2>now is coming as a firm's previous vintage has.

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Hit the top one percent of its class. Let's get

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 3>to San Francisco. Let's get to kind of venures.

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:13.959
<v Speaker 2>Managing partner and founder Steve Jang, congrat Steve. Like you

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 2>were an angel in Uber, you're still a man who

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 2>thinks about being very.

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Early in companies.

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 2>How is that going to look with this new raising

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 2>of funds?

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 3>How early do you have to be in this market environment?

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 10>Yes, and thanks for having me back on Bloomberg. Great

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 10>to see you. You know, early stage feels sometimes like

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 10>a dwindling breed in this day and age of huge

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 10>late stage pre IPO rounds. But we think it's absolutely

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 10>not only still important, but actually even more important in

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 10>this day and age of really fast growth and even

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 10>increased ceilings on valuations. And the reason why is that

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 10>at the early stage we're able to help accelerate these

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 10>companies and these founders through these new technology frontiers in

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 10>a way that later stage funds aren't really well equipped

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 10>for and so we want to continue to focus in

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 10>on the early stage and help help that transition for

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 10>companies from zero to one.

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Zero to one and now we get the ones, and

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 2>now we get the hundreds and the billions and the trillions.

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 2>When we're thinking of SpaceX, which is also an AI company,

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 2>when we think of what's coming in terms of anthropic

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and open AI, what does that mean for some of

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 2>your portfolio companies, particularly when we've got a Perplexity for example,

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 2>which immittedly at the beginning we were thinking was was

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 2>one of those sort of like frontier models, But how

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 2>are they thinking about this moment?

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 10>Sure, I think Perplexities transition is really telling of a

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 10>lot of other companies in the space, like Cursor. You

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 10>have frontier labs that are slowly moving into the application

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 10>layer of AI, but also dealing with the compute constraints

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 10>that they have today. I think on the demand side,

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 10>which we're seeing booming right now. Demand is far outstripping

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 10>supply on the data center and GPU compute side, and

0:33:57.480 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 10>you're seeing that in the stock market. You're seeing that

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 10>in all of the inference platforms out there like foul

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 10>and Base ten and modal that are seeing phenomenal growth.

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 10>What is happening is that agents, applications and agents, whether

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 10>they're embodied agents like robots or virtual agents like what

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 10>Perplexity computer offers, are driving this token demand from AI

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:23.320
<v Speaker 10>infrastructure today. And so in that way, people are finding

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 10>their layer, their focus. In perplexities case, they are building

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 10>out a harness that is multimodel agnostic models. And in

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 10>some cases you see a company like claud Anthropic with

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 10>Claud Code, which is building out a single model harness.

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 10>And so what you'll see is a battle and a

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 10>competition between who is providing the state of the art models,

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 10>who is providing the state of the art harnesses, and

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 10>then who is providing the most performant and productive agents,

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:54.720
<v Speaker 10>whether those are robots, a topic vehicles, or virtual agents

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 10>used by knowledge workers.

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 2>So we can see where the focus is going.

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Because we're only twenty twenty two and you went all

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 3>in on AI. You're continuing to do it this latest

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 3>round of funding. But it's interesting that I think of

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 3>you as having.

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Success from an IPO perspective, like from angel in Uber,

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 2>to exit from combat is to exit when we think

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 2>of Reddit and others, but also you've had success in

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 2>M and A. Is that still going to be a

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 2>playbook when we think of PLAAI for example, Yes.

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 10>I think what we're going to see over the next

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 10>years a year or so is that we're going to

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 10>have an IPO market with SpaceX and anthropic and open

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 10>AI and data breaks really open up. But what we're

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 10>also going to see is that a lot of these

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 10>public companies are going to be very inquisitive, right And obviously,

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 10>as an early stage investor, we want our companies to

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 10>go all the way, stay independent, be founder led, and

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 10>eventually go public as a platform globally. Now, what the

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 10>reality is is that there are a lot of companies

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 10>out there acquiring companies that will help them accelerate. So

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 10>a lot of the companies of the last cycle that

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 10>are publicly traded today need to catch up, need to

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 10>transform into the AI side as well, and so they'll

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 10>do that through acquisition. And so we're mindful of that

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 10>energy and dynamic happening, and obviously we continue to guide

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 10>our companies on both scenarios, but we want them to

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 10>go public.

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 2>You talk a lot about guiding and how you've been

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 2>doing that for a long time and a lot of

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 2>these big businesses is that what gets you in at

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the check level at the moment, because it feels with

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 2>these megafunds who are raising billions and then coming down

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 2>to want to pick out at the seed level too,

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 2>how do you manage to get in and keep the

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 2>hustle and the muscle.

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 10>Sure, you know, we think that early stage investing is

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 10>very different from all other stages as a group in

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 10>venture capital, and the reason why is that we're investing

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 10>in founders first, and we're investing in a product vision.

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 10>They may not even have a product det when we

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 10>actually invest, and so we're helping them with product development,

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 10>technology roadmap, building a team. All of these things are

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 10>about getting to that first customer, that first traction and revenue.

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 10>And so that's just a very different daily, weekly exercise

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 10>of advice and coaching and acceleration that I think a

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 10>more financed view. Later stage investors kind of get to

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 10>receive that and then take that and help accelerate their

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 10>growth from there. And so there's a nice symbiosis between

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 10>what we do in early stage and what a lot

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 10>of the industry is doing at the later stage.

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Steve, it's great to catch up congratulations on the new funds.

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 2>We're excited to see where you put them to work.

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 2>Kin Adventures managing partner and founder there. Now, let's talk

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 2>about the Milan based app, Giant Bending Spoons.

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 3>You likely have heard of it by now.

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 2>It's officially in marching towards a us IPO at the

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 2>parent company of digital applications like Vimeo, like we Transfer.

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 2>It's commanded a fourteen and a half billion dollar valuation

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty five.

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Now, according to its.

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Filing Monday, the company banked over twenty seven point five

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 2>million dollars in net income just for the first quarter.

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, we're going to go back to Copatino discussed

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:59.399
<v Speaker 2>with the co founders of Temo and Inclusive Planning app

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 2>explicitly Magtech.

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 5>Live at Apple Park Cooper Tino. It is Apple WDC,

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 5>and I still want to get more of the developer's

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:22.240
<v Speaker 5>perspective about what Apple being good AI means, about why

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 5>a revamped sery is important. We're going to speak to TMO.

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 5>In fact, we're going to speak to Melissa Ensori, CPO

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.720
<v Speaker 5>of Timo, one of the co founders, Ellen Larsan Olum,

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 5>co founder and CEO of Temo, also iPhone App of

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 5>the Year twenty twenty five. Great timing to have you

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 5>here with us. Start on the technology side, Helen, What

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 5>does it matter to the company that has the title

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:51.240
<v Speaker 5>of iPhone App of the Year twenty twenty five, whether

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 5>or not Siri is good, whether it's revamped as more

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 5>of a platform, how will it impact TEMO.

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 15>I think the way we always look at it is

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 15>that we really are super excited about what Apple will

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 15>be launching and announcing because that can help us support

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 15>our users in what we actually want and what we

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 15>basically really want to achieve our users is to take

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 15>this cognitive load out of planning, make it feel more effortless,

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 15>make it feel smart. And I believe that a lot

0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 15>of the updates that we are hoping to see could

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.240
<v Speaker 15>be able to sort of help us achieving that mission.

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 5>We can get into some of those very soon. Melissa,

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 5>Let's go over the bit basics of TEMO. What is

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 5>it for, who is it used by? And what I

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 5>guess is your core competence in building it out.

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 16>So like Visual Planning App, where we have built AI

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 16>into the product to support our users in making planning

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 16>more smart and make it more adjustable. To the daily

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 16>plans in real life.

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:50.760
<v Speaker 5>The way that we have reported about what's coming with Siri,

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 5>Helen is it goes from being single voice command with

0:39:55.880 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 5>a single response to multi step task, you know, kind

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 5>of similar to some of the things that the Temo

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 5>is already doing. Do you see that as being maybe

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 5>people use Syria instead of Temo or is there a

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:12.720
<v Speaker 5>kind of you talked a second ago about the traffic

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.240
<v Speaker 5>being driven to Temo. How do you see that happening?

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 15>I see that it's a very good like. What we

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 15>also really like about integrating a lot with Apple technologies

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 15>is that you can support the user sort of throughout

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:25.280
<v Speaker 15>the OS, so you don't necessarily have to go into

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 15>the app to get the support you need, but you

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 15>can actually maybe just speak to Siri, you can use shortcuts,

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 15>you can use a lot of the sort of entire

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.320
<v Speaker 15>OS to interact with your favorite products and your favorite apps.

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 15>And that's what we really believe is super strong about

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 15>building on the Apple technologies combining with what we also

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.399
<v Speaker 15>of course designed specifically for our user base.

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 5>Timo has a very interesting user base. Melissa, how involved

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 5>are Apple in that in the idea and talk a

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:55.240
<v Speaker 5>little bit as well. About within the community of users,

0:40:55.560 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 5>how the app is designed for various neurodiverse.

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 16>Its users, so how Apple is involved in like working

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:05.799
<v Speaker 16>with Apple.

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we love working with Apple.

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 16>I think Apple technology is also supporting a lot of

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 16>like accessibility features throughout the system and that we have

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 16>also used some of those in our app.

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, so I think.

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 15>What we also really like is Apple has a strong

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 15>fo focus on accessibility, and we really try to focus

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 15>on the more sort of invisible disabilities you can say,

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 15>or some of the things that it's not so clear that,

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 15>for example, you need more organization and structure because your

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 15>brain works in a different way that the norm, you

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 15>can say. So we also have added a lot of

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 15>visual support in our app so you can see like

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:44.359
<v Speaker 15>the time more tangible, like with timers and breaking down

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 15>subtasks so you can actually see what I'm doing, how

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 15>long time are we doing it? So just yeah, seeing

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 15>accessibility as something that is more than yeah, so it's

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 15>more like also the invisible.

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 5>Path of just really quick you iPhone appter the year

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:04.280
<v Speaker 5>twenty five, big pitch of the new phase of sery

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 5>is it follows you iOS to mac os. Does that

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 5>open things up for you.

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 3>It definitely does.

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 15>I think it's also very much about reaching the users

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 15>where they are, if it's on the phone.

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 3>If it's on your computer.

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 15>It's about getting the support you need throughout the day

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:20.879
<v Speaker 15>where you need it best. And I think Apple has

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 15>a super strong focus on that as well.

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:24.800
<v Speaker 3>So that's super exciting.

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 5>What do you want to hear most in this keynote?

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:30.880
<v Speaker 5>What is the thing that brings you here today? What

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 5>do you want to hear?

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 15>I think some like super excited about some announcements on

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 15>Apple Intelligence back to sort of we really believe there's

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 15>a strong opportunity there to make that sort of smart planning,

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 15>make it feel super effortless building this little personal assistant

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 15>basically that we want to build with Timo that just

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 15>understands everything about you and can support you in the

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:52.320
<v Speaker 15>best possible way.

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 5>Yea, Melissa Vertza, Sorry Assari, co founder CPO, Temo, Helen

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 5>Last and Nolam CEO the co founder Timo twenty twenty

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:03.720
<v Speaker 5>Fine iPhone after the year.

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Caroc had a great conversation ed doing such great work

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 2>over and Koubatino, We thank you and you've got a

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 2>long day ahead of you with Apple announcements. But that

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:15.200
<v Speaker 2>does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. And of

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 2>course all eyes are also on the SpaceX IPO. You

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 2>know that well and true for this week, which we

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:21.879
<v Speaker 2>learn is said to.

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Be quote well oversubscribed.

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Now that's according to sources who say the company plans

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 2>on closing IPO books this Wednesday.

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Post close.

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 2>We'll keep beating that drum until the IPO day. Of course,

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 2>it starts training on Friday, and keep you posted all

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 2>the latest as it prices out on Thursday. Now, don't

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 2>forget to check out our podcast. You can find it

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 2>on the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 2>and iHeart. Let's recheck back on these markets because we

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:49.280
<v Speaker 2>are seeing a by the dip mentality across the Nasdaq

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 2>one hundred across chips, in particular the socks bouncing back

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 2>after Friday's really ugly sell off. It was the worst

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:58.720
<v Speaker 2>day since March of twenty twenty for the SOX. Today

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:00.919
<v Speaker 2>we are back up six point eight percent. We're seeing

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 2>buying of the magnificent seven, Apple among them as they

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 2>have their WWDC. Then as that one hundred up two

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 2>percent from New York from Cubattino, there's a Bluebig Tech