WEBVTT - US Consumer Sentiment Drops to Seven Month Low 

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Coarclay, and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.240
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to join Sue, University of Michigan Surveys of

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Consumer Director. Let's talk about this umished data, Joanne, a

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 2>little bit weaker than expected on the surface.

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 3>What can you tell us?

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 4>So it came in a little bit weaker, It declined

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 4>from last month, but it was actually a very pervasive drop.

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 4>We sought across all demographic groups. Republicans, Independence, Democrats alike.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 4>All declined from last month and very much. So this

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 4>is a worry about inflation coming back in the year ahead.

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, speaking of that, I mean that one year inflation

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 5>expectation ticking up to four point three percent. That's one

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 5>hundred bass points higher than what was estimated and the

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 5>prior read that seems very significant.

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 6>Can you walk us through that?

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, So this is a huge jump. We very rarely

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 4>see such a huge one month jump in year ahead

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 4>inflation expectations. So overall consumers are just really worried about

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 4>the negative impacts of tariffs, and they're really expecting tariffs

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 4>to yield quite a bit of inflation in the year ahead.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing a little bit of movement on the long run.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 4>I think consumers are waiting to see how things unfold

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 4>before they really update their expectations over the long run.

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 2>And again, the emish current conditions came in at sixty

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.199
<v Speaker 2>eight point seven. Consensus was seventy three point seven. Last

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 2>period was seventy four. What's the again? Kind of a

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 2>big drop? Does that surprise you the magnitude of the drop.

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 4>The main reason for the dropping current conditions is that

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 4>buying conditions for durables really plunged this month. And the

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 4>main reason for that is that over the last couple

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 4>of months, a lot of consumers spot like you needed

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 4>to buy durables now to avoid price increases in the

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 4>future because economic policy like tariffs. However, with tariffs on

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 4>imminent the ones on China already implemented, people are kind

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 4>of getting concerned that it's already too late to avoid

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 4>those high prices for durable So that's why current conditions

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 4>really took a time.

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Very good joined Sue.

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much. Joined Sue.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 2>She's the Surveys of Consumers Director at the University of Michigan.

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Coarclay and Android

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 5>You got those jobs numbers today and the immediate reaction

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 5>in the market, in particular that you Mish sentiment which

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 5>is the weakest, and seven months inflation expectations moving one

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 5>hundred basis points higher for the next year. Joining us now,

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 5>Lindsay paeisga is a chief economist.

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 6>Over at Steefel.

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 5>Can we just talk about the U Mish numbers for

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 5>a second and the reaction within the market and that

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 5>big jump in inflation expectations.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 6>What do you make of that?

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 7>A concern for the market recognizing that inflation is likely

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 7>to prove much stickier in nature than the Fed had

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 7>previously anticipated. And this not only calls into question the

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 7>Fed's earlier decision to stop short of what we've long

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 7>argued should have been a much higher terminal level, but

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 7>it also calls into question now the Fed's ability for

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 7>further downside relief, and so you see the market responding

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 7>to that, with yields pushing higher this morning after this

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 7>morning's jobs report and the confidence report.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 2>So, lindsay, what did you take away from the jobs

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 2>report this morning?

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, it was somewhat disappointing on the headline, no doubt,

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 7>falling to a three month low in terms of that

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 7>monthly job creation number. But what we see is a

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 7>lot of that was likely weather related weakness. And when

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.119
<v Speaker 7>we look at the other components that strong upward momentum,

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.119
<v Speaker 7>a stronger than expected monthly jump in average hourly earnings,

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 7>the unemployment rate taking down to an oppressive four percent. Again,

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 7>this continues to set the stage, or set the tone

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 7>of tight ish labor market conditions, supporting the Fed's assessment,

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 7>as we saw in that January FOMC statement that Committee

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 7>members are moving away from concerns of emerging weakness on

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 7>the labor market side and conceding now that labor market

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 7>conditions are likely to remain not only stable but solid

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 7>going forward into twenty twenty five.

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 5>The risk, though, has to be the TEARFF question. I

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 5>forgot to turn on my mic. I love that I

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 5>knew that on a Friday, and you saw that in

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 5>you mish. Like both groups from both sides of the aisle,

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 5>are worried about inflation expectations related to tariffs, particularly when

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 5>it comes to say, durable goods and buying them now

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 5>rather than later. We also saw wages take up in

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 5>the jobs number. All of that is an inflationary spiral.

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 6>No, well, it can be. It depends.

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 7>Tariffs in and of themselves are not inflationary if we're

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 7>talking about a one time price increase, but they absolutely

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 7>can be inflationary if they result in this tit for

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:04.119
<v Speaker 7>tag retaliatory cycle that we saw during Trump's first term

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 7>back and forth with China. So again it's going to

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 7>depend on the scope and the intensity of these programs.

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 7>But also from an immigration standpoint, policies that further restrict

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 7>the labor supply in this country could exacerbate the already

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 7>present divide between labor demand and labor supply, and as

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 7>you mentioned, continue to put upward pressure on wages. At

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 7>the same time, the administration has talked about raining in

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 7>the size of government, reducing outlays, finding areas of waste

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 7>and inefficiencies which could more than offset some of those

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 7>inflationary pressures in the marketplace. So it remains a big

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 7>question mark, but it does appear that investors looking at

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 7>markets reaction, it does appear that investors are concerned about

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 7>the upside risks to inflation at this point.

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>So, putting all that together, Lindsey, what's your view of

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 2>the consumer right here?

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think the consumer is still very solid. The

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 7>consumer continues to prove very resilient in the fame of

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 7>a difficult environment, years of elevated prices, elevated borrowing costs,

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 7>the resumption now of student debt payments. That being said,

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 7>there are a lot of challenges facing consumers potentially further

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 7>higher prices or further increases in borrowing costs at this point,

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 7>but we also have to look at the fact that

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 7>consumers are incredibly savvy and with real growth in income

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 7>excuse me gaining momentum, as well as access to other

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 7>supplemental factors like four oh one k's hardship withdrawals credit cards,

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 7>it's clear that consumers still have a good amount of

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 7>spending and borrowing power left. But again, those challenges are

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 7>very real as we look further into the new year.

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 6>All right, Lindsay, thank you so much. Really appreciate it.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 5>Lindsay Pieza joining us chief economist over at Steefeld.

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App, Listen on demand wherever you

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 5>One stack we're watching today is Huntington Bank shares. Over

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 5>the last two days, they're up by about one percent.

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 5>They had an investor day yesterday where they laid out

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 5>their strategy for the next few years and where their

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.119
<v Speaker 5>growth opportunities are, and the market took it really well.

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 5>Zach Wasserman is chief financial officer at Huntington, a national bank,

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 5>and he joins us here in the studio. Thank you

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 5>so much for joining us. We appreciate this.

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>It's a pleasure to be with you.

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 5>So I think Huntington, and I think a company that

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 5>lends a lot to average people and small businesses and

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 5>sort of knows.

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 6>The economic roots.

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 5>But you guys are also trying to expand that and

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 5>become something different.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 6>Can you walk me through that?

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Sure? Yeah, you know the businesses.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 8>We've been performing exceptionally well recently, and one of the

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 8>reasons is because we're driving expansion both geographically and in

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 8>our commercial business, expanding in a number of special de

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 8>vertical areas and national business lines. Just this year, we've

0:07:55.600 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 8>launched into three new states, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas,

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 8>and we've also established eight new specialty verticals that are

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 8>national for example of funds financed vertical that's supporting private

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 8>equity clients, one that's focused on the mortgage ecosystem, and

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 8>other national commercial areas.

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about loan growth, what I do know

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 2>about the bank of business.

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 3>That's an important driver. So talk to usbout loan growth,

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 3>where it's coming from, where.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 2>You're seeing it, and is it kind of in line

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 2>with what you were expecting.

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 8>You know, we've actually had very strong loan growth of

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 8>the last two years. If you take us to back,

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 8>much of the industry has been in a pretty neutral position,

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 8>not actually growing. Huntington has grown outperformed that by about

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 8>ten percentage points. And for us, the growth is coming

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 8>from both our core business, which is consumer small business,

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 8>and then mid corporate typically private commercial clients, and then

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 8>also these new initiatives that I just mentioned before launching

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 8>into three new states, a number of specialty businesses.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 3>So we're seeing a nice breadth of growth.

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 8>Actually, one thing that's actually you know, a nice indication

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 8>of the economic strength as we're seeing strong demand from

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 8>small businesses from our regional banking business, typically in the

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 8>kind of smaller middle market client set. So it's a

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 8>it's been a healthy dynamic we've been.

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 6>Seeing before you were in this position.

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 5>You also was chief financially financial officer to Visa, and

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 5>I know that Huntington is trying to get into the

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 5>payments business in a particular way too. What's the what's

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 5>the market for that? And how do you guys play

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 5>and compete in that?

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 8>You know, the market for payments is incredibly broad, and

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 8>if you think, if you took a.

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 6>Step back to categorize it, actually like is that zell

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 6>or like what is that?

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 3>You know, it is so broad. The one that really

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 3>needs to to zoom into it.

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 8>You know, we have a number of card based payment products,

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 8>so think consumer cards, commercial cards, but also importantly treasury management,

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 8>and that's really the biggest driver right now we're seeing

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 8>in payments growth supporting commercial clients with the ability to

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 8>accept payments and then make payments in essentially every form

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 8>you can imagine, Alex, so big big growth driver there.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 8>One of the things that we've done recently is invest

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 8>to expand our merchant acquisition capability. Merchant acquiring is when

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 8>a company accepts payments electronically, and it's often the lynchpin

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 8>of their business. The lifeblood of the company is how

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 8>they accept payments. So we launched a merchant acquiring business

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 8>just in October and it's been going incredibly well. So,

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 8>you know, kind of almost every area there's growth in

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 8>payments for sure, but for US treasury management and commercial

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 8>payments in particular as a major growth driver.

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about your long portfolio, specifically your exposure to.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Office, yeah, real estate.

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 8>You know, office and commercial real estate generally for Huntington

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 8>is a very small exposure. Actually, typically for large regional banks,

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 8>the average commercial real estate within the loan portfolio might

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 8>be fifteen or twenty percent of the loan book. For US,

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 8>it's nine percent, so we're relatively smaller. In a office

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 8>is only one percent of that nine Give you a sense.

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 8>With that being said, you know what we're seeing in

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 8>that commercial real estate environment is this is gonna this

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 8>is gonna be a situation that plays out over multiple years. Thankfully,

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 8>we are seeing a fairly orderly process of refinancing and

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 8>generally seeing pretty sound ability for our commercial real estate

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 8>developers to maintain their financing and to successfully roll through maturities.

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 3>But it'll take a while to run through.

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 8>To give you a sense, something like twenty percent of

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 8>the portfolio matures any given year, so this will be

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 8>you know, on average, it will take five years to.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Really roll through.

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 8>So I think that's a kind of an industry dynamic

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing, which this is a dynamic that will play out.

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Over quite sometime.

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 5>What part of this encompasses any kind of M and

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 5>A versus organic I guess you know, for.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Us, we're focused on organic growth. You know, M and A.

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 8>It can be a tool for banks to grow, certainly,

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 8>we've seen m and A in the industry over time.

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 8>With that being said, it can also be distracting to

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 8>the progress that the companies making on organic growth. And

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 8>for us Alex we're seeing so much progress on our

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 8>organic growth initiatives, both acquiring customers but also importantly putting

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 8>more and more focus around the value added fee services

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 8>that come around that come to them, namely payments, wealth management,

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 8>and capital markets, and so, you know, just the customer acquisition.

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 8>We're seeing the success in those businesses. That's where our

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 8>focus is. To give you a sense in the fourth

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 8>quarter just that we just closed a ten percent year

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 8>over year revenue growth really driven by those organic strategies.

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 3>What's a typical corporate customer for you guys?

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 8>You know, often, Paul, they are middle market companies that

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 8>are private.

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 3>That's the most typical company, you know.

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 8>You know, the regional banks serve a really important niche

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 8>within the overall US economy because you know, the client

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 8>set that we are servicing are typically you know, focused

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 8>on their local market.

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 3>They want a bank with a.

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 8>Company that is deeply embedded in the community and knows

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 8>them personal, but importantly can bring down to them the

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 8>power of a large bank in terms of specialized capabilities.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 8>It's actually one of the reasons why we've been so

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 8>successful in these new geographic launches.

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 3>How about private credit? Is that a competitor to you? No,

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 3>It's funny.

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 8>We get this question all the time and the answer

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 8>generally is no. Okay, you know, private credit is looking

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 8>for the sort of you know, the kind of loans

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 8>that they finance are typically where there's more leverage, where

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 8>there's more yield to be had. Because of the risk,

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 8>that's not the core client for Huntington. And so we

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 8>actually were up on stage at our investor day yesterday

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 8>and our head of Commercial Business mentioned that only in

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 8>two cases last year across our entire business did we

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 8>see commercial borrowers actually go to a private credit facility

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 8>away from our own lending facility.

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, Zach, thank you so much. We appreciate that.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Zach Wasserman, chief financial office of Huntington National Bank located

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 2>in Columbus, Ohio, Miller Columbus, Ohio as well.

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 6>So he's still banks there even here.

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, he's a player.

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just this is old, this is a

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Miller account.

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 6>Okay, this is different. Gotcha.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarcklay and Android Auto

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 6>Right back to the market and what we're seeing right now.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 5>We saw the job's number coming a little bit of

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 5>a disappointment, but then we had revisions higher. So the

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 5>idea was that relatively neutral for the jobs world. Average

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 5>hourly earnings though beating expectations, and then we got you

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 5>missed around ten and that really jolted markets as well,

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 5>falling to the lowest and seven months. Also, the inflation

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 5>expectation for one year rose one hundred bases points.

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 6>It was a very big jump. We wanted to get.

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 5>More into all of this and sort of encapsulate what

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 5>is happening within the jobs market. Kate Dushane is CEO

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 5>of RGP joining us.

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 6>What was your biggest takeaway?

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think this job's report really a mixed bag.

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 9>We saw some numbers moving lawyer lower, as you said,

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 9>but also others getting revised higher. So I think it's

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 9>it's fairly neutral given the pressures from the LA wildfires

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 9>and some of the frigid weather that we've all endured

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 9>in January across the country, so we have to just

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 9>keep watching what's happening in the couple of months to come.

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 2>So, Kate, I guess one of the big issues is

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 2>what this might mean just from an overall labor market.

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 2>But my takeaway would be, I've got a market that

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 2>seems at four point one percent, it feels kind of

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 2>fully employed. I've got wages that are rising faster than inflation.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you see when you when when you

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 2>talk to your clients out there in terms of their

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 2>view of the labor market.

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I would still say this is a really strong

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 9>labor market. I think we have seen in our client

0:15:55.440 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 9>base employers or excuse me, employees staying put. So as

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 9>companies now are starting to increase some of their transformation

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 9>projects again, they're turning to other labor sources like outside

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 9>talent to supplement the teams that exist within their environments.

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 5>One of the biggest outside risks right now, like the

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 5>impact of terrorists, for example, the unknowns that we think

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 5>are coming.

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 6>How does it transmit into the jobs market.

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 9>Right Sorry about that. Unknowns make everyone nervous and that

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 9>can be a dampening effect on the labor market. But

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 9>there's also tremendous pent up demand in terms of innovation,

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 9>technology transformation, digital transformation that's happening in our client base.

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 9>There's a push around cost cutting and supply chain optimization.

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 9>Those pressures in a business don't go away. So we

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 9>have some countervailing I would say pressure is happening in

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 9>the marketplace that we see in our client base. I

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 9>would say, on the average, we are cautiously optimistic that

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 9>the environment for labor continues to improve throughout twenty twenty five.

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 9>But there are uncertainties related to Trump's trade policies and

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 9>immigration policies, and how they all play out and what

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 9>the timing is will certainly impact what is the ultimate outcome?

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Kate.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you mentioned immigration, and as this administration begins to

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 2>perhaps implement some changes, what kind of impact do you

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 2>think that could have. If there's in fact lower immigration,

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe even forced deportations, how do you think that will

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 2>be felt within the labor market.

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 9>Well, it'll certainly impact certain sectors of the labor market

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 9>in certain industries.

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 6>You know, our.

0:17:55.880 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 9>Business is primarily professional services. You are looking at professional

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:07.719
<v Speaker 9>and business services. Talent pools, and those, especially in this

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 9>hybrid environment, can often be delivered remotely, and we can

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 9>tap into labor pools that are global in nature. But

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 9>things like retail or construction or healthcare workers that have

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 9>to be on site. I think some of these immigration

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 9>policies will create supply and demand problems and put more

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 9>pressure there.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 6>What about Doge.

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 5>We just heard Scott Beson talking about Doge. If we

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 5>cut a boatload of government workers, doesn't that just lead

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 5>to so much supply in the labor market and just

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 5>really tick that unemployment rate higher.

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, it depends on the skill sets that are coming

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 9>out of that environment. So we need to learn a

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 9>lot more before I think we decide what the impact

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 9>will be. You know, typically about six percent of federal

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 9>workers retire or resign in a typical year. It's looking

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 9>like that could be much much higher given the activities

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 9>that we're listening to around Doze right now. But it's

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 9>really going to depend on what are the skill sets

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 9>coming into the marketplace and are they the kind of

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 9>skill sets that private industry is looking for to decide

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 9>what impact might.

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Come an old topic, but one I like revisiting is

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the whole hybrid work thing. What do you are you

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 2>seeing any trends evolving here or is it kind of

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 2>set in stone? Hybrid three four days? Is that kind

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 2>of the new normal now?

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 9>We really believe it is, and that's supported by a

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 9>recent Gallup poll that said hybrid has really landed in

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 9>the economy. Here, and we see that to be true

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 9>in our client service. I'd say the only industries where

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 9>that maybe is less true is in financial services, which

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 9>tends to want people on site. We saw that with

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 9>the JP Morgan announcement last month, and healthcare certainly has

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 9>been more on site than others. But otherwise, you know,

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 9>we think about seventy five percent of our clients are

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 9>solidly in the hybrid camp.

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 5>You have like twenty years of experience working with C

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 5>suites and helping them to manage transformation initiatives. So what's

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 5>your best guess on what happens with DEI.

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 6>So thank you.

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 9>I mean, we've certainly all been reading lots of headlines

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 9>about what's happening around DEE and I I think what's

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 9>getting lost is that businesses can deliver the best results

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 9>for their customers or clients when they can attract the

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 9>smartest and innovative talent from a wide range of backgrounds

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 9>and experiences.

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 6>And that's what we focus on.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 9>It's really about what are the skill sets and perspectives

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 9>you need for the best problem solving and fostering an

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 9>environment where employees can do their best work is how

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 9>businesses will compete and win and that's what we focus on.

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 9>It's really about problem solving and getting different perspectives.

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Is AI a do you think is a net positive

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 2>for employment or net negative? A lot of folks saying, Gee,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 2>it may take some jobs away from from individuals, but

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 2>then others say, no, it's just simply going to improve their.

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Potential. How do you think about it?

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I am more of an optimist that AI is

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 9>going to bring more productivity and I actually think more

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 9>engagement in the workforce. That, however, requires that people be

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 9>willing to upskill and I think reskill a little bit.

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 6>Certainly, there are.

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 9>Jobs that are very task oriented and repetitive task oriented

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 9>that could be very disrupted by AI. But moving into

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 9>more business analytics, project management, technology skills, coding skills, I

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 9>mean as long as workers are willing to engage in

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 9>some skill set acquisition, I think by and large, we

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 9>need AI to play a role as the digital worker

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 9>or we will not achieve the productivity goals that our

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 9>economy needs.

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 6>Kate, we really appreciate it.

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 5>I don't envy how difficult this time must be for

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 5>you your clients at Kate Dushane, CEO of r GP,

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 5>joining us from California.

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah