WEBVTT - #914 Packers Unscripted: Dominant D takes down Big D

0:00:06.910 --> 0:00:11.190
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted from Packers.com.

0:00:11.210 --> 0:00:14.410
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford, joined, as always, by my trusted colleague,

0:00:14.430 --> 0:00:17.450
<v Speaker 1>Wes Hodkowitz. We're coming to you here from the Pottawatomie

0:00:17.470 --> 0:00:23.230
<v Speaker 1>Sportsbook studio inside the walls of Lambeau Field to review, Wes,

0:00:23.450 --> 0:00:26.850
<v Speaker 1>a 23-13 Green Bay Packers Sunday night football victory over

0:00:26.890 --> 0:00:30.150
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys. And in the discussion of this game,

0:00:30.990 --> 0:00:36.659
<v Speaker 1>it must start with Green Bay's defense because Jonathan Gannon's

0:00:36.780 --> 0:00:40.300
<v Speaker 1>crew was nothing short of flying around out there.

0:00:40.380 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Flying around, hunting around, just persistent, tenacious, and it was

0:00:45.380 --> 0:00:47.979
<v Speaker 2>from the first whistle of the game until the very end.

0:00:48.450 --> 0:00:51.650
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, I almost want to turn this

0:00:51.670 --> 0:00:54.070
<v Speaker 2>question back to you because I talked about this in

0:00:54.090 --> 0:00:58.730
<v Speaker 2>Insider Inbox for Tuesday's column. Dom Capers had some great

0:00:58.790 --> 0:01:01.130
<v Speaker 2>defenses during my time here. I did not cover the

0:01:01.170 --> 0:01:05.210
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl 45 team. You did. Mike Pettin had a

0:01:05.650 --> 0:01:08.410
<v Speaker 2>fair amount of success here. I think you look at

0:01:08.450 --> 0:01:13.970
<v Speaker 2>what Jeff Halfley did the past two seasons, a very creative, flexible,

0:01:14.090 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 2>versatile defense that adjusted. In my time, I have never

0:01:18.740 --> 0:01:21.140
<v Speaker 2>seen this many free runners to a quarterback. And I'm

0:01:21.180 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 2>talking untouched here. It's not just, okay, there was a

0:01:24.260 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 2>running back to beat. There was a pass protector to beat.

0:01:27.140 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 2>There was a chip to beat. The way that Jonathan

0:01:30.060 --> 0:01:32.539
<v Speaker 2>Gannon has dialed this up, and it was when Edren

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Cooper was available, and now as we've seen when Edren

0:01:34.500 --> 0:01:38.490
<v Speaker 2>Cooper is not available, he's using his inside linebackers, his safeties,

0:01:39.190 --> 0:01:42.690
<v Speaker 2>all these guys together to generate this amount of pressure.

0:01:43.380 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 2>the thing I actually enjoyed the most is he has

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 2>these moments too, where he just spams blitzes. Yeah. In

0:01:50.540 --> 0:01:52.970
<v Speaker 2>the fourth quarter, there was a, just like with Evan

0:01:52.980 --> 0:01:55.610
<v Speaker 2>Williams a week earlier, there was a moment where he just,

0:01:55.890 --> 0:01:58.870
<v Speaker 2>just kept sending Javon Bullard over and over again. Who cares?

0:01:58.910 --> 0:02:02.390
<v Speaker 2>You know, like it is, he has stressed over and

0:02:02.430 --> 0:02:04.630
<v Speaker 2>over again. It is about players, not about the plays,

0:02:04.710 --> 0:02:08.380
<v Speaker 2>but his confidence and his players to fulfill his scheme

0:02:08.740 --> 0:02:10.820
<v Speaker 2>and to, to get to the quarterback, to generate pressure

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.430
<v Speaker 2>and ultimately generate takeaways is, I've just been blown away

0:02:14.470 --> 0:02:15.110
<v Speaker 2>by this so far.

0:02:15.350 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, my thought as the game was unfolding, particularly in

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the second half, and then after the game, you know,

0:02:22.220 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we have kind of that extended walk where we take

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.660
<v Speaker 1>the elevator down from the press box. There's a long

0:02:26.700 --> 0:02:30.150
<v Speaker 1>catwalk that all the media go along to get to

0:02:30.210 --> 0:02:32.870
<v Speaker 1>another stairway that then goes down to the locker rooms

0:02:32.910 --> 0:02:35.010
<v Speaker 1>in the press conference area for those who don't kind

0:02:35.030 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 1>of understand what our postgame routine is. And I'm walking

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.930
<v Speaker 1>along that catwalk after the game and trying to think

0:02:40.990 --> 0:02:44.109
<v Speaker 1>to myself if I could think of any game that

0:02:44.190 --> 0:02:51.010
<v Speaker 1>I had covered during which it felt that the Packers'

0:02:51.070 --> 0:02:55.230
<v Speaker 1>defense was this aggressive from start to finish. And I

0:02:55.290 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't think of one. And I went back and looked

0:02:59.860 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>at some of the film. The very first third down

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of the game for the Dallas Cowboys, Gannon put seven

0:03:05.740 --> 0:03:07.870
<v Speaker 1>guys up on the line of scrimmage. and he sent

0:03:07.950 --> 0:03:11.710
<v Speaker 1>all seven at the quarterback. Now, he didn't do that

0:03:11.750 --> 0:03:14.550
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the game, but that set the tone

0:03:14.690 --> 0:03:16.900
<v Speaker 1>for what Dak Prescott and the Cowboys were going to

0:03:16.940 --> 0:03:19.620
<v Speaker 1>have to be prepared for because then you look at

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of the second and third downs the

0:03:22.419 --> 0:03:24.820
<v Speaker 1>rest of the game, the Packers had either seven or

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.579
<v Speaker 1>eight guys up on the line of scrimmage, and sometimes

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>it was rushing four, sometimes it was rushing five. Sometimes

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it was rushing six and there was another play where

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:34.970
<v Speaker 1>he had seven on the line of scrimmage and he

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.450
<v Speaker 1>sent all seven again. But the point was on the

0:03:37.490 --> 0:03:40.970
<v Speaker 1>very first third down, he sent everything at Dak Prescott

0:03:41.030 --> 0:03:43.490
<v Speaker 1>and then the Cowboys had to be ready for anything

0:03:43.530 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and everything for the rest of the game. And as

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.380
<v Speaker 1>you said, then there are times where, you know, it's

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>like Gannon just keeps hitting the button of, okay, I'm

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>going to blitz this guy until they show that they're

0:03:52.700 --> 0:03:53.940
<v Speaker 1>going to block him or that they're going to do

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:58.170
<v Speaker 1>something about it. Um, the aggression defensively from start to

0:03:58.210 --> 0:04:02.790
<v Speaker 1>finish is, is what blew me away. And this was,

0:04:02.810 --> 0:04:06.790
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we talked about it all last week, CD lamb,

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>George Pickens, Jake Ferguson, you know, Dak Prescott and all

0:04:09.900 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of his accomplishments and 59 plus minutes into the game,

0:04:14.820 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they had seven points on the board. I mean, this was,

0:04:18.220 --> 0:04:23.409
<v Speaker 1>this was the most impressive defensive performance of the season

0:04:23.470 --> 0:04:26.620
<v Speaker 1>so far for the Packers. And, As I wrote an

0:04:26.660 --> 0:04:32.810
<v Speaker 1>insider inbox on Monday morning, every game that we see

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:37.330
<v Speaker 1>now seems to prove that the Thursday night defensive breakdown

0:04:37.390 --> 0:04:39.710
<v Speaker 1>against the Atlanta Falcons in the home opener at Lambeau

0:04:39.750 --> 0:04:43.310
<v Speaker 1>Field is the exception and not the rule with this defense.

0:04:43.370 --> 0:04:45.910
<v Speaker 1>Because other than that one game, and then of course

0:04:45.950 --> 0:04:48.770
<v Speaker 1>maybe the fourth quarter when the penalties and crazy stuff

0:04:48.790 --> 0:04:53.140
<v Speaker 1>happened in Minnesota, other than a couple of those types

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.740
<v Speaker 1>of blips on the radar... This defense has played really

0:04:56.779 --> 0:04:57.140
<v Speaker 1>good football.

0:04:57.300 --> 0:04:59.460
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it almost makes it a shame what happened against

0:04:59.550 --> 0:05:02.210
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta because I was looking this morning about statistics. I mean,

0:05:02.250 --> 0:05:05.409
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay has clawed themselves back up to the middle

0:05:05.430 --> 0:05:08.550
<v Speaker 2>of the pack and run defense despite that performance against B.

0:05:08.589 --> 0:05:11.370
<v Speaker 2>John Robinson and Brian Robinson. That was over 200 rushing

0:05:11.390 --> 0:05:13.470
<v Speaker 2>yards that they gave up that day. And yet, if

0:05:13.490 --> 0:05:16.299
<v Speaker 2>you take that away, you can't, using the old Dom Capers-ism.

0:05:16.510 --> 0:05:17.340
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they all count.

0:05:17.740 --> 0:05:20.250
<v Speaker 2>But the fact is that they rank so high in

0:05:20.260 --> 0:05:22.289
<v Speaker 2>all these different categories. The only thing where Green Bay's

0:05:22.330 --> 0:05:24.750
<v Speaker 2>defense is still trying to find its footing is situationally.

0:05:24.810 --> 0:05:27.730
<v Speaker 2>Red zone, third downs, that sort of thing. But for

0:05:27.750 --> 0:05:29.930
<v Speaker 2>the most part, what they did in this game to

0:05:30.290 --> 0:05:35.140
<v Speaker 2>keep Dak Prescott uncomfortable, Javante Williams, I think that was

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 2>a double-edged sort of proposition there. I think Dallas actually

0:05:41.540 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 2>started to do some good things with Williams midway through

0:05:44.580 --> 0:05:46.990
<v Speaker 2>that game. And then they completely abandoned the run at

0:05:47.050 --> 0:05:49.549
<v Speaker 2>that exact time. He scores the touchdown. I saw that statistic.

0:05:50.250 --> 0:05:52.930
<v Speaker 2>I think they threw 35 of the next 36 plays

0:05:53.450 --> 0:05:56.690
<v Speaker 2>after he had his rushing touchdown. So there's that to

0:05:56.750 --> 0:05:59.190
<v Speaker 2>factor into as well. But the fact is, is that

0:05:59.270 --> 0:06:01.690
<v Speaker 2>despite it only ever being really a two score game

0:06:01.710 --> 0:06:05.070
<v Speaker 2>from start to finish, it felt so much more spaced

0:06:05.250 --> 0:06:07.580
<v Speaker 2>than that. Yeah. And then you were talking about when

0:06:07.620 --> 0:06:10.420
<v Speaker 2>you're walking down, thinking about the game, how aggressive they were.

0:06:10.860 --> 0:06:13.100
<v Speaker 2>I was walking down thinking to myself, I've never seen

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.979
<v Speaker 2>a safety, let alone an all-pro safety like Xavier McKinney

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.820
<v Speaker 2>in a three-point stance operating out of a three-tech before.

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:21.990
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it was just the looks and things that

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:26.490
<v Speaker 2>they threw at the Dallas Cowboys front. When you engage

0:06:26.529 --> 0:06:30.529
<v Speaker 2>that many people individually early on, by the time you

0:06:30.570 --> 0:06:32.810
<v Speaker 2>got to the second, third, fourth quarter, you didn't know

0:06:32.890 --> 0:06:34.229
<v Speaker 2>where the pressure was coming from.

0:06:34.370 --> 0:06:38.380
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and From a statistical standpoint, so the Packers get

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.780
<v Speaker 1>two interceptions in this game, one from Evan Williams where

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.980
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of mugged up as a blitzer, and then

0:06:44.020 --> 0:06:46.740
<v Speaker 1>he drops and Prescott never sees him, and Williams makes

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:48.700
<v Speaker 1>a great break on the ball in the red zone,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>gets the pick that keeps some points off the board there.

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:56.580
<v Speaker 1>The other interception, rookie Brandon Cisse gets his first NFL interception.

0:06:56.670 --> 0:06:59.650
<v Speaker 1>CeeDee Lamp slips on his route, and Cisse makes the

0:06:59.690 --> 0:07:03.010
<v Speaker 1>catch on the slant pass. Dallas ends up 5 out

0:07:03.050 --> 0:07:08.010
<v Speaker 1>of 13 on third downs. And the Packers also stopped,

0:07:08.060 --> 0:07:11.420
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was two fourth-down plays in the game

0:07:11.460 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. But the biggest thing, really, when you go

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.460
<v Speaker 1>back to what we were talking about last week, was

0:07:16.540 --> 0:07:21.180
<v Speaker 1>minimizing the explosive plays. The Dallas Cowboys, for all of

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the high-poweredness of that offense, they had one completion in

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the game longer than 17 yards.

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:29.180
<v Speaker 2>Nuts.

0:07:29.260 --> 0:07:32.940
<v Speaker 1>Crazy. Which is crazy when you think about what Prescott

0:07:32.980 --> 0:07:36.730
<v Speaker 1>and company– normally do throughout the course of a contest.

0:07:36.770 --> 0:07:40.450
<v Speaker 1>And I'm with you. It was never more than a two-score,

0:07:40.910 --> 0:07:44.230
<v Speaker 1>technically never more than a two-possession lead for the Packers.

0:07:44.230 --> 0:07:48.210
<v Speaker 1>16 points was the biggest lead. But it felt way

0:07:48.250 --> 0:07:50.790
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable than that because it just didn't seem like

0:07:50.830 --> 0:07:52.950
<v Speaker 1>Dallas was ever really going to get anything going.

0:07:52.990 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I mean, when you look at this thing, Michael,

0:07:55.380 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 2>look at this. CeeDee Lamb was targeted 18 times. He

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:00.740
<v Speaker 2>had nine catches for 70 yards.

0:08:00.820 --> 0:08:03.780
<v Speaker 1>Lamb, Lamb and Pickens were targeted. I believe it was

0:08:03.780 --> 0:08:07.930
<v Speaker 1>29 of the 29 of the 54 passes. 29 of

0:08:07.950 --> 0:08:10.430
<v Speaker 1>them were to those two guys and they didn't, they,

0:08:10.490 --> 0:08:13.130
<v Speaker 1>they had one catch longer than 17 yards.

0:08:13.190 --> 0:08:16.010
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And, and I made this point inside our inbox

0:08:16.070 --> 0:08:18.230
<v Speaker 2>as well. Uh, you know, when you think about, okay,

0:08:18.250 --> 0:08:20.580
<v Speaker 2>you don't have Edger and Cooper, you still are without, uh,

0:08:20.620 --> 0:08:22.540
<v Speaker 2>Micah Parsons, whom we learned this is not going to

0:08:22.580 --> 0:08:24.300
<v Speaker 2>practice this week either. And then we're on the short

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 2>week next week with Carolina. So you never know what

0:08:26.740 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 2>happens there.

0:08:27.220 --> 0:08:27.620
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 2>But they've had to do this without some of their

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.359
<v Speaker 2>name brand pass rushers, but yet they're still finding a way.

0:08:33.380 --> 0:08:36.630
<v Speaker 2>You saw Isaiah McDuffie on blitzes. You saw Xavier McKinney,

0:08:36.650 --> 0:08:41.030
<v Speaker 2>as I talked about. Evan Williams, Javon Bullard, they're sending cornerbacks.

0:08:41.850 --> 0:08:44.410
<v Speaker 2>And then you also have moments like Cissé' s, which I

0:08:44.450 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 2>thought was really important for that guy at this point

0:08:47.150 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 2>of his career because, I mean, he's a strong-headed kid.

0:08:50.950 --> 0:08:54.130
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's mature beyond his years, but for him

0:08:54.170 --> 0:08:56.089
<v Speaker 2>to just do the right thing and be where you're

0:08:56.110 --> 0:08:57.650
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be and have the ball end up in

0:08:57.690 --> 0:09:00.250
<v Speaker 2>your hands and you make the play, that's what playing

0:09:00.309 --> 0:09:02.429
<v Speaker 2>cornerback is like in the National Football League. You're not

0:09:02.450 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 2>just going to get guys throwing things up to you.

0:09:04.270 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it's going to be a CD lamb falling down

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 2>and the ball being right in front of you. And

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay, to their credit, the one thing I think

0:09:11.059 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the Packers have done extremely well from week one to

0:09:14.059 --> 0:09:17.479
<v Speaker 2>today is when they've gotten takeaways, more often than not,

0:09:17.500 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 2>they've converted them into points. Not always touchdowns, but they've

0:09:20.179 --> 0:09:22.930
<v Speaker 2>converted them into points. That was the difference in the

0:09:22.970 --> 0:09:25.190
<v Speaker 2>first half, and having a 17-0 lead right out of

0:09:25.210 --> 0:09:27.859
<v Speaker 2>the gate, it made this game feel like it was 34-0.

0:09:28.030 --> 0:09:30.830
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if there was a turning point, so to speak,

0:09:30.870 --> 0:09:34.359
<v Speaker 1>in this game, it was right after Jordan Love throws

0:09:34.420 --> 0:09:38.819
<v Speaker 1>the interception. Fortunately, Matthew Golden touched the Winters, the linebacker,

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.300
<v Speaker 1>down there after he got up and ran it back

0:09:42.540 --> 0:09:45.230
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown, but he was ruled down And then

0:09:45.250 --> 0:09:47.620
<v Speaker 1>it was just a handful of snaps later that Evan

0:09:47.650 --> 0:09:50.300
<v Speaker 1>Williams gets the interception to keep the Cowboys off the board.

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.980
<v Speaker 1>The game is still 7-0 at that point. And then

0:09:54.020 --> 0:09:59.070
<v Speaker 1>when the Packers turn William's interception into a field goal

0:09:59.090 --> 0:10:02.670
<v Speaker 1>to make it 10-0, it was a two-possession game the

0:10:02.740 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>rest of the way. The Cowboys never had the ball

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.380
<v Speaker 1>back again, only down by one score from that point on.

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.100
<v Speaker 1>On the offensive side of the ball, lots of good

0:10:12.140 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and bad here.

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Not much in the middle.

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not much in the middle at all. Jordan Love

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:24.620
<v Speaker 1>was on the verge of an absolutely monster night. But unfortunately,

0:10:26.179 --> 0:10:29.110
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Golden had a couple of potential touchdowns go through

0:10:29.150 --> 0:10:32.670
<v Speaker 1>his hands. Christian Watson had a potential touchdown go through

0:10:32.710 --> 0:10:36.990
<v Speaker 1>his hands. But even all that said, the Packers were

0:10:37.150 --> 0:10:40.730
<v Speaker 1>nine of their first ten on third down, which has

0:10:40.770 --> 0:10:44.430
<v Speaker 1>been one of the sore spots offensively all season long,

0:10:44.470 --> 0:10:47.850
<v Speaker 1>has been the low conversion rate on third downs. but

0:10:47.870 --> 0:10:51.450
<v Speaker 1>they were converting on third downs. Dallas' defenses struggled. We

0:10:51.490 --> 0:10:55.830
<v Speaker 1>talked about that. They were bottom of the league third

0:10:55.850 --> 0:10:58.930
<v Speaker 1>down defense and giving up explosive plays and all that,

0:10:59.380 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Packers took advantage of that to a certain extent.

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.699
<v Speaker 1>Didn't take advantage of it as fully as they could

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>because of some of those plays that got away.

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:09.939
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it was funny. Okay, so I got the

0:11:10.500 --> 0:11:13.429
<v Speaker 2>Wes Hodkowitz glass half full type approach to life, and

0:11:13.490 --> 0:11:16.870
<v Speaker 2>obviously sometimes in the way I cover things. Here's, okay,

0:11:17.110 --> 0:11:20.250
<v Speaker 2>let's again start with the positives here. Matthew Golden, six

0:11:20.309 --> 0:11:23.470
<v Speaker 2>catches for 104 yards and a touchdown, 17.3 yards per catch.

0:11:24.170 --> 0:11:25.849
<v Speaker 2>Christian Watson, three catches for 64 yards, 21.3 yards per catch.

0:11:25.870 --> 0:11:33.689
<v Speaker 2>Those two guys together, 168 yards. receiving yards of Jordan

0:11:33.710 --> 0:11:37.870
<v Speaker 2>Love's 276 passing yards they were exceptional you have this

0:11:37.890 --> 0:11:40.270
<v Speaker 2>stretch now where both of these guys together 25 plus

0:11:40.309 --> 0:11:43.310
<v Speaker 2>catches 500 plus receiving yards each and I believe it's

0:11:43.350 --> 0:11:45.750
<v Speaker 2>three plus receiving touchdowns each that's never been that's never

0:11:45.809 --> 0:11:50.050
<v Speaker 2>happened before here And they could have had it even bigger,

0:11:50.450 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 2>even better in this game, right? So the first thing

0:11:54.179 --> 0:11:56.020
<v Speaker 2>is you have to get the drops corrected for sure.

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.359
<v Speaker 2>And you have to get them corrected because this offense

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.980
<v Speaker 2>is relying so heavily on Golden and Watson right now.

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Love is relying so heavily on those two guys

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 2>right now to move the football, to create points, to

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.710
<v Speaker 2>have big plays. But the way I also think about

0:12:09.750 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 2>it is, These guys have been absolutely extraordinary despite the drops.

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.820
<v Speaker 2>And my goodness, if you cut those by half right now,

0:12:18.380 --> 0:12:22.579
<v Speaker 2>we are talking about two all-pro caliber receivers here straight

0:12:22.620 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 2>out of the gate. Everything that we have had in

0:12:25.380 --> 0:12:27.500
<v Speaker 2>terms of the narrative and what we've talked about in

0:12:27.740 --> 0:12:31.660
<v Speaker 2>these podcasts, these stories, these yearbooks, all these type of things...

0:12:32.460 --> 0:12:36.190
<v Speaker 2>It's now right before our eyes. What these guys are doing,

0:12:36.530 --> 0:12:41.050
<v Speaker 2>how impactful they're being, and honestly, how well Christian Watson's

0:12:41.110 --> 0:12:43.709
<v Speaker 2>skill set lines up with Matthew Golden's skill set. And

0:12:43.730 --> 0:12:45.969
<v Speaker 2>when you don't have Jaden Reed, you needed those two

0:12:46.010 --> 0:12:48.630
<v Speaker 2>guys to be the big bucks in the room. And

0:12:48.650 --> 0:12:49.290
<v Speaker 2>they're doing it, man.

0:12:50.050 --> 0:12:51.810
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want to say a couple of things with

0:12:51.870 --> 0:12:55.010
<v Speaker 1>regard to the drops because I'm not one who likes

0:12:55.050 --> 0:12:59.170
<v Speaker 1>to make excuses for professional football players. And certainly the

0:12:59.250 --> 0:13:02.449
<v Speaker 1>first one to Matthew Golden, the deep ball over the shoulder,

0:13:02.870 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's right there. You know, Love puts it

0:13:05.250 --> 0:13:07.140
<v Speaker 1>right in the bread basket, as they say, and it

0:13:07.179 --> 0:13:11.020
<v Speaker 1>slips through his hands. That's a really tough one. But

0:13:11.660 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I also want to say that the back shoulder on

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the near side end zone, That would have been an

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:24.500
<v Speaker 1>absolutely spectacular catch. Now, he had it, and he actually

0:13:24.540 --> 0:13:27.780
<v Speaker 1>was bringing it into his body so close, and then somehow,

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the skin of the ball was

0:13:30.420 --> 0:13:31.420
<v Speaker 1>just a little slick or what.

0:13:31.460 --> 0:13:32.770
<v Speaker 2>He knocked it out of his hands. He knocked it

0:13:32.780 --> 0:13:33.449
<v Speaker 2>out of his own hands.

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.809
<v Speaker 1>And it was, that would have been a, yes, it

0:13:37.850 --> 0:13:39.950
<v Speaker 1>goes as a drop. I get that. But that would

0:13:39.990 --> 0:13:43.090
<v Speaker 1>have been a spectacular catch. That was not a routine

0:13:43.290 --> 0:13:46.420
<v Speaker 1>play by any means. And on the one to Christian

0:13:46.460 --> 0:13:49.170
<v Speaker 1>Watson in the end zone over the middle, I never

0:13:49.210 --> 0:13:51.030
<v Speaker 1>got a good look at the replay, but I had

0:13:51.390 --> 0:13:55.170
<v Speaker 1>multiple people in the live blog telling me that it

0:13:55.210 --> 0:13:59.580
<v Speaker 1>looked like there was just the slightest deflection by the

0:13:59.700 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboy defender. I can't remember exactly who it was,

0:14:02.660 --> 0:14:04.620
<v Speaker 1>but somebody who was right in front of Watson and

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball might've, you know, grazed the fingertip. Now it didn't,

0:14:09.020 --> 0:14:12.030
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't obvious. It didn't necessarily look that way, but

0:14:12.090 --> 0:14:15.030
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you Wes, And Christian Watson is the

0:14:15.070 --> 0:14:17.590
<v Speaker 1>last guy who's going to say, yeah, that ball was tipped.

0:14:17.630 --> 0:14:19.210
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't catch it. I mean, he's still going to

0:14:19.250 --> 0:14:22.690
<v Speaker 1>say he should catch it. But I don't care how

0:14:22.870 --> 0:14:25.330
<v Speaker 1>close that ball gets to you. If there's any sort

0:14:25.370 --> 0:14:28.090
<v Speaker 1>of deflection or change at all in the spin of

0:14:28.130 --> 0:14:31.230
<v Speaker 1>the ball or anything, that becomes hard to catch. That

0:14:31.270 --> 0:14:34.770
<v Speaker 1>is not easy. Now, we've seen them make those plays before.

0:14:35.010 --> 0:14:37.350
<v Speaker 1>Like I say, and those guys are going to say

0:14:37.530 --> 0:14:41.250
<v Speaker 1>they've got to make those plays. But to me, the

0:14:41.290 --> 0:14:43.690
<v Speaker 1>last two that I'm talking about here, those are not,

0:14:43.930 --> 0:14:48.860
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, garden variety dropped passes. They're not. Um, so,

0:14:50.060 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think in a lot of ways that this

0:14:52.740 --> 0:14:59.770
<v Speaker 1>is why there's, there's no reduction or questioning of the

0:14:59.870 --> 0:15:02.450
<v Speaker 1>confidence in these two guys and what they can do

0:15:02.530 --> 0:15:04.950
<v Speaker 1>just because of a pass here or there, you know,

0:15:04.990 --> 0:15:07.540
<v Speaker 1>gets away from them. So I just wanted to clarify

0:15:07.580 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that because everybody's throwing out, you know, the Packers lead

0:15:10.300 --> 0:15:11.820
<v Speaker 1>the league in drops and all this, and I'm not

0:15:11.860 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>going to argue the statistics. I get it. But when

0:15:14.740 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at some of these individual plays, I mean,

0:15:18.260 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a garden variety receiver doesn't even come close to making

0:15:22.540 --> 0:15:25.460
<v Speaker 1>that back shoulder catch that Matthew Golden almost made in

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.740
<v Speaker 1>the end zone. So I just want to keep, I

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.710
<v Speaker 1>just want people to keep that in perspective.

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And then also keep this in perspective too. If

0:15:31.570 --> 0:15:33.620
<v Speaker 2>the Packers right now, the pace that they're on, Jordan

0:15:33.660 --> 0:15:36.450
<v Speaker 2>Love's going to throw 640 passes right now on the

0:15:36.490 --> 0:15:39.970
<v Speaker 2>season with this trajectory, how often they've been throwing the ball. Again,

0:15:40.010 --> 0:15:42.070
<v Speaker 2>when you get targeted 13 times, you're not going to

0:15:42.090 --> 0:15:43.990
<v Speaker 2>catch every single one of them. I think what the

0:15:44.030 --> 0:15:46.730
<v Speaker 2>important thing was, was the conversation I know you talked about,

0:15:46.770 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people have mentioned it, conversation that Love

0:15:49.270 --> 0:15:52.100
<v Speaker 2>and Golden have, the confidence that they have between each other,

0:15:52.140 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 2>keep feeding me, keep doing that. What did that remind

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:55.820
<v Speaker 2>you of? I'll tell you what it reminded me of.

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.020
<v Speaker 2>Devontae Adams and the conversations he had with Aaron Rodgers

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.580
<v Speaker 2>many years ago. Keep giving me those chances. And I'm

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 2>going to make it right.

0:16:03.900 --> 0:16:07.359
<v Speaker 1>And eventually that relationship turned to Devontae Adams going to

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.150
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers saying, give me a better ball next time.

0:16:10.170 --> 0:16:12.450
<v Speaker 1>And I will make the catch because that's how their

0:16:12.510 --> 0:16:15.410
<v Speaker 1>relationship developed. And that may be what happens here as well.

0:16:15.470 --> 0:16:18.170
<v Speaker 2>But the one thing, and it was like, and I'm

0:16:18.250 --> 0:16:20.250
<v Speaker 2>glad you brought up the golden, the touchdown play, because

0:16:20.670 --> 0:16:22.090
<v Speaker 2>that was one where it was like, you just wanted

0:16:22.110 --> 0:16:23.870
<v Speaker 2>to see him to make it because that was going

0:16:23.930 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 2>to be played on ESPN. That was going to be

0:16:26.820 --> 0:16:28.380
<v Speaker 2>played on our highlight films.

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>That was going to be such a phenomenal touchdown because-

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.460
<v Speaker 1>He waited and waited and waited like you're supposed to

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so that the defender, that's why it's called a back

0:16:39.180 --> 0:16:41.940
<v Speaker 1>shoulder play, the defender doesn't know the ball is going

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.140
<v Speaker 1>to be whizzing past him. And you have to wait

0:16:44.220 --> 0:16:47.100
<v Speaker 1>until the last second to spin your body around and

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:48.780
<v Speaker 1>get your hands on it and make the catch. And

0:16:48.820 --> 0:16:52.990
<v Speaker 1>he did everything right and was so close. to securing

0:16:53.010 --> 0:16:54.690
<v Speaker 1>that catch in the corner of the end zone, and

0:16:54.730 --> 0:16:55.740
<v Speaker 1>then it just got away from you.

0:16:55.750 --> 0:16:57.710
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and those are the ones, again, that's going to

0:16:57.730 --> 0:16:59.750
<v Speaker 2>be a high-level difficulty to make them, but if you

0:16:59.770 --> 0:17:01.950
<v Speaker 2>can make them, that's what separates the really good receivers

0:17:01.970 --> 0:17:04.530
<v Speaker 2>from the superstars. And I'll just throw in there, too,

0:17:04.550 --> 0:17:06.890
<v Speaker 2>the ones you want to get back is the drop

0:17:06.950 --> 0:17:08.790
<v Speaker 2>on the slant, the drop on the ones where it's

0:17:09.190 --> 0:17:11.330
<v Speaker 2>in your hands, it's in the bucket. You have separation

0:17:11.369 --> 0:17:14.210
<v Speaker 2>from the receiver. You've earned the right to catch that

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 2>football clean based on how you've run your route, based

0:17:16.820 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 2>on the way that your God-given talents are associated. It's

0:17:19.940 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>when you're making those more competitive catches you've got to

0:17:21.619 --> 0:17:23.710
<v Speaker 2>look for. All that being said, I just want to

0:17:23.730 --> 0:17:26.330
<v Speaker 2>close on this point. And I had some Bears fans

0:17:26.369 --> 0:17:28.770
<v Speaker 2>for whatever reason, because they don't do anything else, I guess,

0:17:28.810 --> 0:17:30.869
<v Speaker 2>in their free time other than just find reasons to

0:17:30.990 --> 0:17:33.790
<v Speaker 2>talk about the Packers. But I had Bears fans in

0:17:33.810 --> 0:17:36.060
<v Speaker 2>my mentions talking about, you guys will always find excuses

0:17:36.100 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 2>for Jordan Love. Watch that game. Watch the condensed version

0:17:39.380 --> 0:17:41.940
<v Speaker 2>of the game. Watch the performance that Jordan Love had

0:17:41.980 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 2>in that. Do not do anything else. Do not look

0:17:44.060 --> 0:17:46.179
<v Speaker 2>at a box score. And then when it's over and

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.870
<v Speaker 2>you see a 74 passer rating... You will see why

0:17:49.900 --> 0:17:52.250
<v Speaker 2>I said this game was, he was so much better

0:17:52.290 --> 0:17:55.970
<v Speaker 2>in this game than the statistics would show. Wasn't perfect,

0:17:56.450 --> 0:17:57.630
<v Speaker 2>but he was spectacular.

0:17:57.710 --> 0:18:01.370
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, no doubt about it. He was darn good.

0:18:02.510 --> 0:18:05.429
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the pace that Jordan Love is on in

0:18:05.490 --> 0:18:08.050
<v Speaker 1>terms of how many pass attempts he could have here

0:18:08.090 --> 0:18:10.190
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the season, and a lot of

0:18:10.210 --> 0:18:13.850
<v Speaker 1>that is due to the continued struggles with the running game.

0:18:14.350 --> 0:18:17.540
<v Speaker 1>We talked about And I wrote about, to a rather

0:18:17.580 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>large extent, how this was supposed to be the game

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.580
<v Speaker 1>the Packers get their running game right because the Cowboys

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>were coming in with the worst-ranked run defense in the league.

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.260
<v Speaker 1>This is where you've got to establish something on the ground,

0:18:28.300 --> 0:18:31.510
<v Speaker 1>get it going. It didn't happen. The struggles are still there.

0:18:31.530 --> 0:18:39.890
<v Speaker 1>And whether it was Marshawn Lloyd or Caleb Johnson or whoever,

0:18:40.070 --> 0:18:42.889
<v Speaker 1>it didn't matter. There was no consistency at all with

0:18:42.970 --> 0:18:46.220
<v Speaker 1>regard to the running game. Will that change this week?

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.860
<v Speaker 1>We shall see. Josh Jacobs is going to be back

0:18:48.900 --> 0:18:52.379
<v Speaker 1>at practice on Wednesday. He's been removed from the commissioner's

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:57.070
<v Speaker 1>exempt list. Matt LaFleur not making any promises that Josh

0:18:57.090 --> 0:18:59.410
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs will be ready to play on Sunday in Detroit,

0:18:59.690 --> 0:19:02.369
<v Speaker 1>but certainly not ruling out that one good week of

0:19:02.410 --> 0:19:05.850
<v Speaker 1>practice that Jacobs could be ready to go and be

0:19:05.869 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>getting the ball against the Lions right away. So we'll

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.670
<v Speaker 1>see what unfolds there. And if the return of Josh

0:19:13.710 --> 0:19:16.830
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs can provide a boost to a struggling ground game.

0:19:16.910 --> 0:19:19.430
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the Packers certainly need it right now, right?

0:19:19.490 --> 0:19:21.330
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when you go into this game, I said

0:19:21.369 --> 0:19:23.700
<v Speaker 2>this too. I mean, Pierre Strong was the Packers' best

0:19:23.740 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 2>hand in the backfield in this matchup. And he did

0:19:26.220 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 2>some great things, pass catching, did have a drop too. But,

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, as Green Bay has been trying to find

0:19:31.420 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 2>ways to win on first and second down, they've had

0:19:33.300 --> 0:19:35.270
<v Speaker 2>to resort to some of the short game stuff, to

0:19:35.290 --> 0:19:37.649
<v Speaker 2>some of the flea flickers, some of the screens. And

0:19:37.690 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I thought Strong kind of helped out in that capacity.

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:43.419
<v Speaker 2>But the overall yards per carry, finding explosive runs, winning

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:45.550
<v Speaker 2>and getting four or five yards on first down, that

0:19:45.609 --> 0:19:49.070
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been there yet this season. The one thing, and

0:19:49.310 --> 0:19:50.860
<v Speaker 2>not to say I don't want to make any promises

0:19:50.900 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 2>for Sunday and what's going to happen, but where Josh

0:19:53.660 --> 0:19:55.260
<v Speaker 2>Jacobs is different from a lot of these other guys

0:19:55.300 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 2>in these ramp-ups, right? Kevin Zeitler had to come in,

0:19:57.859 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 2>he had to learn a playbook, and he's been doing

0:19:59.460 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 2>that for the last three weeks, was not in a

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.990
<v Speaker 2>training camp. Josh Jacobs was. He had a little bit

0:20:04.010 --> 0:20:06.350
<v Speaker 2>of a groin issue, but then work through that was

0:20:06.410 --> 0:20:08.970
<v Speaker 2>cleared by the end of it. He's had a month

0:20:08.990 --> 0:20:11.060
<v Speaker 2>and a month and a half now to still being

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:12.780
<v Speaker 2>able to work with the training staff, still able to

0:20:12.820 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 2>work with the strength and condition coaches, just has not

0:20:14.700 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 2>been able and been in the meetings, has not been

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.460
<v Speaker 2>able to go to practice, has not been able to

0:20:18.500 --> 0:20:21.750
<v Speaker 2>obviously play in the games. But there have been moments

0:20:21.790 --> 0:20:23.890
<v Speaker 2>in his career where Josh Jacobs hasn't practiced and yet

0:20:23.950 --> 0:20:25.630
<v Speaker 2>still played in the games due to injury. It happened

0:20:25.650 --> 0:20:27.450
<v Speaker 2>the past couple of years with the knee, some of

0:20:27.470 --> 0:20:30.219
<v Speaker 2>the other things. So Um, it's not a position that

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.300
<v Speaker 2>he hasn't been in before. Um, this is going to

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.050
<v Speaker 2>be a big litmus test. If he is out there

0:20:35.090 --> 0:20:37.709
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday, seeing what he's able to do in what

0:20:37.750 --> 0:20:40.710
<v Speaker 2>green Bay can build on, because I really truly believe

0:20:40.770 --> 0:20:43.050
<v Speaker 2>right now, if you can break just a couple big

0:20:43.150 --> 0:20:45.510
<v Speaker 2>runs and I'm not talking about a 60 yard touchdown,

0:20:45.630 --> 0:20:50.980
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about 15, 16, 22 yards to the sideline. Right. That,

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 2>I think, can be the confidence builder this whole offensive

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.530
<v Speaker 2>line needs, this offense needs, because in moderation, we saw

0:20:56.570 --> 0:21:01.670
<v Speaker 2>it against Chicago. What small, successful opportunities can turn into

0:21:01.730 --> 0:21:03.330
<v Speaker 2>and what that can mean for you if you can

0:21:03.369 --> 0:21:05.350
<v Speaker 2>have that kind of positive affirmation in your head.

0:21:05.530 --> 0:21:08.190
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think the other thing the Packers need

0:21:08.250 --> 0:21:10.780
<v Speaker 1>in terms of just getting this running game settled down

0:21:11.340 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is not every play is going to be blocked the greatest.

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:19.139
<v Speaker 1>There's not going to be huge holes, but whatever crease

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.500
<v Speaker 1>there is for a running back to find, it's just

0:21:22.619 --> 0:21:25.340
<v Speaker 1>getting the two or three yards that are there. And

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're seeing with the Packers running backs

0:21:27.700 --> 0:21:31.590
<v Speaker 1>too often is instead of just sticking the head down

0:21:31.609 --> 0:21:34.690
<v Speaker 1>and getting the two or three yards that are there,

0:21:35.090 --> 0:21:37.869
<v Speaker 1>they try to do something else and make something else happen.

0:21:38.010 --> 0:21:39.770
<v Speaker 1>And instead of a plus two or three, you end

0:21:39.830 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>up with a minus two or three. And then that

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.620
<v Speaker 1>difference of the four to six yards on a given

0:21:44.660 --> 0:21:47.429
<v Speaker 1>play is is what puts you behind the sticks and

0:21:47.470 --> 0:21:50.790
<v Speaker 1>changes everything for the play caller and all of that.

0:21:51.390 --> 0:21:54.710
<v Speaker 1>The negative runs, the minus twos and the minus threes

0:21:54.910 --> 0:21:57.670
<v Speaker 1>are the ones that have just added up to too much.

0:21:57.990 --> 0:22:04.260
<v Speaker 1>And hopefully Josh Jacobs can eliminate that because if those

0:22:04.300 --> 0:22:06.899
<v Speaker 1>minus twos and threes start turning into plus twos and threes,

0:22:06.980 --> 0:22:09.260
<v Speaker 1>even when they're not great plays, that's going to change

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>things for Matt LeFleur as the play caller.

0:22:10.940 --> 0:22:13.290
<v Speaker 2>And that's how you average 4.4 yards per carry in

0:22:13.310 --> 0:22:15.490
<v Speaker 2>the NFL. You're not always getting five yards a carry

0:22:15.590 --> 0:22:18.130
<v Speaker 2>every single time. Sometimes it is the ones and twos

0:22:18.170 --> 0:22:21.270
<v Speaker 2>and threes that get balanced out with the tens and

0:22:21.290 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 2>the explosive plays. So, yeah, it's a big moment here

0:22:24.580 --> 0:22:27.060
<v Speaker 2>for Green Bay. Curious to see exactly what the offensive

0:22:27.100 --> 0:22:28.859
<v Speaker 2>line looks like. This was the third straight game where

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:30.620
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay had the same starting five, but we do

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.430
<v Speaker 2>see Kevin Zeitler continue to ramp up. LaFleur was asked

0:22:33.470 --> 0:22:36.490
<v Speaker 2>about him again on Monday, mentioned that, yeah, he's getting closer,

0:22:36.510 --> 0:22:39.090
<v Speaker 2>he's feeling more comfortable in the scheme. Certainly that's a

0:22:39.150 --> 0:22:42.230
<v Speaker 2>Pro Bowl veteran that the Packers have in their back pocket,

0:22:42.330 --> 0:22:44.909
<v Speaker 2>in addition to the fact that Aaron Banks also is

0:22:44.930 --> 0:22:48.090
<v Speaker 2>getting healthier as well. LaFleur mentioning that he looked as

0:22:48.130 --> 0:22:50.030
<v Speaker 2>good as he's looked in a long time in practice

0:22:50.070 --> 0:22:53.150
<v Speaker 2>last week, dealing with both the knee injury and also

0:22:53.170 --> 0:22:53.450
<v Speaker 2>the toe.

0:22:53.590 --> 0:22:56.410
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. We will see what evolves there. One last thing

0:22:56.450 --> 0:22:57.820
<v Speaker 1>I want to touch on for this game, and I

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.570
<v Speaker 1>don't want to touch on it for very long, because...

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:05.010
<v Speaker 1>The issue is the penalties, and I've been saying for years,

0:23:05.630 --> 0:23:08.689
<v Speaker 1>just make the safety rules reviewable. Roughing the passer is

0:23:08.730 --> 0:23:11.270
<v Speaker 1>a safety rule. Make it reviewable. Get the call right.

0:23:11.430 --> 0:23:14.510
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying it for a decade now. You said

0:23:15.730 --> 0:23:18.850
<v Speaker 1>on your takeaway video what you thought about the penalties,

0:23:18.890 --> 0:23:21.590
<v Speaker 1>so check that out as well, folks. I want to

0:23:21.630 --> 0:23:24.820
<v Speaker 1>make one quick comment with regard to this taunting stuff, okay,

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.940
<v Speaker 1>because the Packers got burned twice in this game for taunting.

0:23:28.390 --> 0:23:30.810
<v Speaker 1>And I know Matthew Golden said he was just, he

0:23:30.850 --> 0:23:33.730
<v Speaker 1>was flexing to the crowd. The defender happened to be

0:23:33.820 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>between him and the crowd. So the referee, the official

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.820
<v Speaker 1>who was over there took that as like he was

0:23:40.859 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 1>taunting the guy that he just beat on the pass play.

0:23:44.100 --> 0:23:46.740
<v Speaker 1>Tough break. And I have no reason to doubt that

0:23:47.180 --> 0:23:50.420
<v Speaker 1>Golden was telling the truth there. But here's the thing

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that I would say, because we've, I mean, we've seen

0:23:53.740 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the segments on NFL Network. There are memos that have

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.830
<v Speaker 1>gone around. Teams have been told about all about this

0:23:59.910 --> 0:24:02.290
<v Speaker 1>taunting stuff and how the league wants to crack down

0:24:02.390 --> 0:24:05.369
<v Speaker 1>on it, that that the league wants there to be

0:24:05.410 --> 0:24:08.930
<v Speaker 1>a lot more sportsmanship being shown out there on the field.

0:24:09.540 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>So for me, my message would be, hey, if you

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:17.500
<v Speaker 1>want to celebrate. something, find a teammate and celebrate with

0:24:17.540 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>your teammate. Because if you're doing that, then it's not

0:24:20.700 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>about the opponent. You're not going to get flagged for

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:24.870
<v Speaker 1>any kind of a taunting. It's like when the guys

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:26.970
<v Speaker 1>get the takeaway and they all get together and run

0:24:27.010 --> 0:24:28.970
<v Speaker 1>down to the end zone. If you're going to celebrate,

0:24:29.030 --> 0:24:32.409
<v Speaker 1>do it with your teammates. Don't celebrate by yourself and

0:24:32.450 --> 0:24:35.169
<v Speaker 1>don't celebrate anywhere near an opponent. And then you don't

0:24:35.190 --> 0:24:38.170
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about this stuff. To me, that needs

0:24:38.230 --> 0:24:41.950
<v Speaker 1>to be the message because these types of penalties are

0:24:42.020 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>affecting the Not just the Packers, affecting a lot of

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:46.300
<v Speaker 1>games around the NFL right now.

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, force, I believe the incompletion on that play.

0:24:58.300 --> 0:25:00.010
<v Speaker 2>There also was a holding penalty on the play. So

0:25:00.030 --> 0:25:02.490
<v Speaker 2>it actually ended up just getting negated because of that.

0:25:02.770 --> 0:25:04.790
<v Speaker 1>Right. It ended up being the offsetting penalties and they

0:25:04.830 --> 0:25:07.850
<v Speaker 1>got another crack at the third down because of the offsetting.

0:25:07.970 --> 0:25:08.669
<v Speaker 2>Which they converted.

0:25:08.810 --> 0:25:08.970
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:09.010 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 2>So it's like, and now Green Bay was able to

0:25:10.380 --> 0:25:12.140
<v Speaker 2>eventually get the stop. But be that as it may,

0:25:12.380 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 2>this is the difficulty that you're faced with with the

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.939
<v Speaker 2>National Football League right now. Officials are not catching the

0:25:17.980 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>stuff that what I consider to be the old school,

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 2>like this is what a referee is there to do.

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.740
<v Speaker 2>You know, a defensive pass interference, a holding penalty, roughing

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.180
<v Speaker 2>the passer on Jordan Love. Packers down 6-0 in that

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 2>category right now. The stuff in which the game is

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.100
<v Speaker 2>being played, you're seeing officials having a harder and harder

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.570
<v Speaker 2>time trying to actually get that. What are they getting?

0:25:37.660 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Why are flags being thrown? Why are penalties up? because

0:25:41.500 --> 0:25:43.420
<v Speaker 2>it's all the obvious stuff that when they don't have

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.090
<v Speaker 2>to track the factual 11 guys on the field anymore,

0:25:46.510 --> 0:25:48.169
<v Speaker 2>and you have six guys that are all focused on

0:25:48.210 --> 0:25:52.450
<v Speaker 2>exactly where the ball is, that's getting flagged. Orin Deneye's

0:25:52.510 --> 0:25:54.810
<v Speaker 2>situation was, I think, right by the ref too. So

0:25:55.410 --> 0:25:57.530
<v Speaker 2>this is the challenge that teams are facing. And I

0:25:57.570 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 2>get it. It is an emotional game. You and I

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.660
<v Speaker 2>have been at joint practices. We hear what is said

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:07.859
<v Speaker 2>between these guys and how there is so much you know, machismo,

0:26:07.940 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 2>like just like ego, everything is involved in there because

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 2>you put yourself out there.

0:26:12.130 --> 0:26:15.390
<v Speaker 1>It's a high intensity environment all the time. And I don't,

0:26:15.510 --> 0:26:17.730
<v Speaker 1>I don't deny that at all. That is definitely part

0:26:17.770 --> 0:26:18.629
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on.

0:26:18.710 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>But someplace it comes back to discipline. And I'm not

0:26:23.300 --> 0:26:25.460
<v Speaker 2>saying you have to do the Barry Sanders, Jordy Nelson

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 2>thing of just literally going and handing the ref the

0:26:27.420 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 2>ball and going back to the huddle. Yeah. But you

0:26:30.020 --> 0:26:32.060
<v Speaker 2>got to contain it. Yeah. Because otherwise it's going to,

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:34.740
<v Speaker 2>like those type of penalties, it wipes out all the

0:26:34.780 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 2>good things you did.

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:35.859
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Golden made one heck of a play and was

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 2>able to extend that downfield on that catch. You know,

0:26:41.420 --> 0:26:44.230
<v Speaker 2>the Packers get that defensive stop. That's so hard. It's

0:26:44.250 --> 0:26:46.150
<v Speaker 2>so hard to play defense in the National Football League.

0:26:46.550 --> 0:26:50.190
<v Speaker 2>Ask Carl Brooks. Ask Evan Williams. Ask Lucas Van Ness,

0:26:50.390 --> 0:26:52.369
<v Speaker 2>I mean, about those calls and how difficult it is

0:26:52.390 --> 0:26:53.990
<v Speaker 2>to try to attack a quarterback in this league.

0:26:54.190 --> 0:26:54.370
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:54.490 --> 0:26:56.250
<v Speaker 2>In the instances where you do get the stops, where

0:26:56.290 --> 0:26:57.629
<v Speaker 2>you do get off the field, you got to stay there.

0:26:57.780 --> 0:27:01.629
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. We'll run a little bit behind, so we've got

0:27:01.650 --> 0:27:03.310
<v Speaker 1>to pay some bills right away here and hear a

0:27:03.430 --> 0:27:08.379
<v Speaker 1>quick word from our sponsors. Sirius XM NFL Radio delivers

0:27:08.470 --> 0:27:13.060
<v Speaker 1>hard-hitting analysis and up-to-the-minute NFL news that true football fanatics

0:27:13.340 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>need 24-7, 365. Did you know Lambeau Field is just

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>one of our state's many wonders? Start making unforgettable memories

0:27:21.660 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>on your next vacation. Discover the Apostle Islands and more

0:27:25.660 --> 0:27:31.710
<v Speaker 1>at TravelWisconsin.com slash wonders. Welcome back to Packers Unscripted. All right, Wes,

0:27:31.770 --> 0:27:35.530
<v Speaker 1>quick glance at the NFC North. Vikings and Lions were

0:27:35.630 --> 0:27:37.990
<v Speaker 1>off last week, so Minnesota still on top of the

0:27:38.010 --> 0:27:42.010
<v Speaker 1>division at 5-0. The Lions actually on the bottom of

0:27:42.030 --> 0:27:45.780
<v Speaker 1>the division at 3-2, having not played. The Bears beat

0:27:45.820 --> 0:27:50.700
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons and the Packers beat the Cowboys, so both

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the Packers and the Bears now tied for second place

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:59.210
<v Speaker 1>at 4-2 in the division. I think there's... There's a

0:27:59.230 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>lot to be said for the NFC North and the

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.939
<v Speaker 1>AFC North to be through week six. Not everybody has

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:09.780
<v Speaker 1>played six games, but to be through week six and

0:28:09.820 --> 0:28:13.619
<v Speaker 1>have everybody in your division above 500. Because when you

0:28:13.660 --> 0:28:16.859
<v Speaker 1>look at the NFC, the rest of the NFC, so

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.260
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the NFC North is above 500. The rest

0:28:20.300 --> 0:28:23.219
<v Speaker 1>of the NFC, only the first place team in the

0:28:23.300 --> 0:28:26.500
<v Speaker 1>other three divisions is above 500. Everybody else in those

0:28:26.540 --> 0:28:31.260
<v Speaker 1>divisions is is 500 or below. Some of this is

0:28:31.300 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>going to even out. Six games in, we've got a

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>long way to go here. But the way this has

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>evolved early on, I think we're seeing that the NFC

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>North is a pretty darn... competitive bunch because when NFC

0:28:45.860 --> 0:28:49.300
<v Speaker 1>North teams have gone outside the division, they've fared pretty well.

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.430
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't get what the hate has been on

0:28:51.450 --> 0:28:53.370
<v Speaker 2>the North in recent years. I understood it like when

0:28:53.650 --> 0:28:56.550
<v Speaker 2>Detroit really struggled, when Chicago went through some lean years

0:28:56.590 --> 0:28:58.620
<v Speaker 2>and Minnesota kind of was always in this weird bumpy

0:28:58.660 --> 0:29:01.190
<v Speaker 2>patch where They'd be super competitive one year and then

0:29:01.270 --> 0:29:04.010
<v Speaker 2>not another. That you'd have these teams that end up

0:29:04.070 --> 0:29:06.150
<v Speaker 2>losing double-digit games and then they just kind of people

0:29:06.190 --> 0:29:08.270
<v Speaker 2>forget about it. But the North has been so competitive

0:29:08.290 --> 0:29:10.790
<v Speaker 2>here the last few years, while a division like the

0:29:10.850 --> 0:29:13.730
<v Speaker 2>West has actually had teams like the Rams just randomly

0:29:13.790 --> 0:29:16.630
<v Speaker 2>one year were a 12-loss team. The Cardinals have struggled

0:29:16.670 --> 0:29:19.630
<v Speaker 2>for years now. But yet they still kind of get

0:29:19.830 --> 0:29:22.270
<v Speaker 2>that type of hype. But all that being said, as

0:29:22.310 --> 0:29:24.430
<v Speaker 2>it comes back to the actual X's and O's and

0:29:24.630 --> 0:29:26.830
<v Speaker 2>then us charting out a season to see, okay, what

0:29:26.890 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 2>is the path to the playoffs? Well, the fact that

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the West has fallen behind the way that they have,

0:29:32.100 --> 0:29:35.410
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the Rams are dealing with this number

0:29:35.430 --> 0:29:38.950
<v Speaker 2>of injuries now, Devontae Adams collected into that, it just

0:29:38.990 --> 0:29:40.780
<v Speaker 2>does show you pick up the ball. wins and see

0:29:40.820 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 2>what all happens at the end of the season because

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 2>now the Rams find themselves, not only are they in

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 2>a deep hole here trying to catch up to the 49ers,

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 2>they're now suddenly finding themselves in a deep hole in

0:29:48.780 --> 0:29:52.660
<v Speaker 2>the NFC and how hyper-competitive it's been for that seventh seed.

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.420
<v Speaker 2>You're needing double-digit wins or you're at least needing to

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.330
<v Speaker 2>not have eight losses and to really be able to

0:29:59.370 --> 0:30:00.090
<v Speaker 2>grab onto that.

0:30:00.230 --> 0:30:04.970
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's interesting what's evolving elsewhere because the Seattle Seahawks,

0:30:05.010 --> 0:30:09.430
<v Speaker 1>the defending Super Bowl champs, are 3-3. The 2026 Super Team,

0:30:09.450 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the LA Rams, are 2-4. And as you said, dealing

0:30:12.580 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>with a ton of injuries. The San Francisco 49ers are

0:30:14.900 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a ton of injuries too, and they're 6-0.

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>They are clearly the class of the NFC. I know

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:25.210
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings are still undefeated, but they have not played

0:30:25.230 --> 0:30:27.810
<v Speaker 1>the schedule that the San Francisco 49ers have. I give

0:30:27.830 --> 0:30:29.710
<v Speaker 1>the Niners a lot of credit for what they've done.

0:30:30.390 --> 0:30:33.090
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, and with some of this, who knows

0:30:33.130 --> 0:30:36.110
<v Speaker 1>where it's headed, right? Because that Atlanta Falcons team that

0:30:36.170 --> 0:30:38.820
<v Speaker 1>came into Lambeau Field on that Thursday and looked like

0:30:38.860 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>world beaters, suddenly they've hit the skids and they're two

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and four. They were, I mean, they played three quarters

0:30:45.060 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of absolutely terrible football against the Bears. And, you know,

0:30:48.660 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>they had a nice fourth quarter rally to make it

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:54.620
<v Speaker 1>interesting there. at the end where they, they had a chance, but,

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:57.700
<v Speaker 1>but man, they were at home. And I mean, the

0:30:57.740 --> 0:31:02.250
<v Speaker 1>place was 60% Chicago fans in, in the dome in Atlanta,

0:31:02.730 --> 0:31:05.709
<v Speaker 1>but they were at home and just was like, they

0:31:05.750 --> 0:31:07.830
<v Speaker 1>didn't even show up until the fourth quarter. So the

0:31:07.870 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Falcons are a hard team to figure out.

0:31:09.090 --> 0:31:10.970
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what the game plan was for the

0:31:11.030 --> 0:31:14.030
<v Speaker 2>Falcons in that one. Like, for example, here, like, cause

0:31:14.050 --> 0:31:15.830
<v Speaker 2>I was, I was, I watched clips of it and

0:31:15.850 --> 0:31:17.070
<v Speaker 2>I watched parts of the game, but then I went

0:31:17.090 --> 0:31:18.410
<v Speaker 2>back and look at the box square afterwards. So like,

0:31:18.430 --> 0:31:21.010
<v Speaker 2>get this, They go three and out on the first possession,

0:31:21.050 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 2>but Bijan Robinson had a six-yard carry on first down.

0:31:23.620 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Now they had a negative yardage play on second down,

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>but second series, Penix to Drake London, five yards, then

0:31:28.980 --> 0:31:32.820
<v Speaker 2>a negative yardage play on second down. Third series, Bijan Robinson,

0:31:33.060 --> 0:31:36.030
<v Speaker 2>nine-yard run to start things off. The fact that Bijan

0:31:36.090 --> 0:31:38.670
<v Speaker 2>Robinson in this game only touched the ball, well, he

0:31:38.830 --> 0:31:40.470
<v Speaker 2>had a couple catches. He only carried the ball nine

0:31:40.490 --> 0:31:43.450
<v Speaker 2>times for 61 yards. Brian Robinson was a complete non-factor.

0:31:43.870 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 2>They lost this game and fell behind. So I guess

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:48.180
<v Speaker 2>they felt like they needed to pass a little bit more,

0:31:48.220 --> 0:31:50.530
<v Speaker 2>but to finish with only 12 carries for 63 yards,

0:31:50.570 --> 0:31:52.550
<v Speaker 2>but average over five yards per carry and still get

0:31:52.590 --> 0:31:55.470
<v Speaker 2>walked out of the building like they did against the bears. Very,

0:31:55.610 --> 0:31:57.670
<v Speaker 2>very odd. And by the way, credit to Chicago though,

0:31:57.990 --> 0:32:01.310
<v Speaker 2>came out from the get go, did Ben Johnson ball,

0:32:01.570 --> 0:32:03.380
<v Speaker 2>put points on the board and use that leverage.

0:32:03.410 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>The bears got Caleb Williams back and they took, they

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.420
<v Speaker 1>took control of that game from the beginning. I mean,

0:32:07.460 --> 0:32:10.460
<v Speaker 1>Williams completed his first like 12 passes in a row and,

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and they were rolling on offense. But to your point

0:32:13.580 --> 0:32:16.420
<v Speaker 1>about the Falcons, I mean, It's one of those games

0:32:16.620 --> 0:32:20.660
<v Speaker 1>that just got away from them because at halftime, the

0:32:20.700 --> 0:32:22.980
<v Speaker 1>time of possession was like 22 minutes to eight minutes.

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>They only had the ball for eight minutes in the

0:32:24.660 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>first half. And then you're going into a second half

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>down by multiple scores and trying to figure out, okay,

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>how do we, it's not about the game plan anymore

0:32:31.340 --> 0:32:32.700
<v Speaker 1>at that point. It's like, how do you get back

0:32:32.740 --> 0:32:36.380
<v Speaker 1>into the game and give yourself a chance? So, but yeah,

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.010
<v Speaker 1>I mean this, this NFC North and here, you know,

0:32:39.110 --> 0:32:41.630
<v Speaker 1>on our next show, we're going to be previewing Packers

0:32:41.670 --> 0:32:43.450
<v Speaker 1>against the Lions. The Packers are four and two, the

0:32:43.510 --> 0:32:45.990
<v Speaker 1>Lions are three and two. They're going to go head

0:32:46.030 --> 0:32:49.700
<v Speaker 1>to head here. And, you know, while the Vikings are

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.580
<v Speaker 1>sitting at 5-0 and the Bears are at 4-2, I mean,

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>any loss in this division in the NFC North can

0:32:57.780 --> 0:33:03.590
<v Speaker 1>be really painful because this division... is so competitive and, uh,

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk about it on our next show, but man,

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:07.900
<v Speaker 1>Sunday at Ford field is going to be a, it's

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be a big clash.

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 2>And ask the bears this because it was those losses

0:33:11.230 --> 0:33:13.110
<v Speaker 2>in the division. Yes, they won the division with the

0:33:13.150 --> 0:33:15.690
<v Speaker 2>losing record. Um, but the fact was, is that that

0:33:15.710 --> 0:33:18.050
<v Speaker 2>hurt them then the standings, the seating for the playoffs. And,

0:33:18.690 --> 0:33:21.370
<v Speaker 2>and it just, it's tough, man. Like it is difficult

0:33:21.410 --> 0:33:23.250
<v Speaker 2>to work out of these holes. And, you know, I

0:33:23.250 --> 0:33:24.410
<v Speaker 2>think there was a lot of years. I don't think

0:33:24.450 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 2>it was so much in the building because Mike McCarthy

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 2>and especially Matt LaFleur, they, they made it quite clear.

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.170
<v Speaker 2>It's winning the North. It's running the North. but I

0:33:31.170 --> 0:33:32.700
<v Speaker 2>think in a lot of times fans just looked at

0:33:32.740 --> 0:33:34.580
<v Speaker 2>it as, okay, we are predestined to win the division.

0:33:34.620 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 2>So we're hosting. Is it just that we're going to

0:33:36.100 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 2>host in the wild card or are we going to

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 2>host in the divisional round? We should host in the

0:33:39.540 --> 0:33:42.100
<v Speaker 2>division around. We should have the buy. And then what

0:33:42.140 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 2>ends up happening is like, no, you start seeing how

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 2>difficult it is to actually claim those division titles. Um,

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:49.790
<v Speaker 2>especially when a division like the North has been as

0:33:49.830 --> 0:33:51.890
<v Speaker 2>competitive as it's been now for the past few years. Yeah.

0:33:52.050 --> 0:33:55.010
<v Speaker 1>And, uh, um, it's, and for the teams, you know,

0:33:55.210 --> 0:33:57.430
<v Speaker 1>whether it's when the year the Vikings rise up and

0:33:57.470 --> 0:33:59.250
<v Speaker 1>win the division or the bears rise up and win

0:33:59.270 --> 0:34:02.710
<v Speaker 1>the division, um, or the Lions do it, you know,

0:34:02.870 --> 0:34:06.230
<v Speaker 1>the same team doesn't win the NFC North in back-to-back

0:34:06.250 --> 0:34:10.730
<v Speaker 1>years very often. It's certainly not anymore. And, you know,

0:34:11.010 --> 0:34:12.730
<v Speaker 1>some of those streaks the Packers have had in the

0:34:12.770 --> 0:34:15.009
<v Speaker 1>past of those division titles, like you say, it sort

0:34:15.030 --> 0:34:17.910
<v Speaker 1>of gets fans thinking, okay, this is just what the

0:34:17.930 --> 0:34:19.750
<v Speaker 1>Packers are going to do. It's not like that in

0:34:19.770 --> 0:34:21.890
<v Speaker 1>the North anymore. It's super competitive.

0:34:21.910 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 2>And it's not like the Packers were just beating all these, like,

0:34:24.820 --> 0:34:27.549
<v Speaker 2>you know, jabroni teams. I mean, like Matthew Stafford was

0:34:27.590 --> 0:34:29.450
<v Speaker 2>a lot to deal with. The Chicago Bears, they had

0:34:29.469 --> 0:34:31.989
<v Speaker 2>to beat them to go to a Super Bowl, right?

0:34:32.469 --> 0:34:35.270
<v Speaker 2>In the year in which they won the North. Minnesota, again,

0:34:35.290 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 2>as I was saying, they've had years, the Kirk Cousin years,

0:34:37.700 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 2>where they were super competitive since Kevin O'Connell's been there.

0:34:39.940 --> 0:34:42.100
<v Speaker 2>They've been, you know, every single year, you know you're

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 2>going to have a tough out against them. Mike Zimmer

0:34:44.660 --> 0:34:46.819
<v Speaker 2>went to Minnesota because they wanted him to run his

0:34:46.860 --> 0:34:49.950
<v Speaker 2>defense against Aaron Rodgers. So, like, it's not easy to

0:34:50.010 --> 0:34:52.730
<v Speaker 2>do this thing. But the fact is, is Green Bay

0:34:52.750 --> 0:34:55.129
<v Speaker 2>at that time was just head and shoulders above everybody else.

0:34:55.190 --> 0:34:57.730
<v Speaker 2>And right now, in this Jordan Love era, they are

0:34:57.790 --> 0:35:00.030
<v Speaker 2>trying to establish themselves as that team once again.

0:35:00.090 --> 0:35:02.430
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no doubt about it. Well, with that, we'll call

0:35:02.469 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it a wrap on this edition of Packers Unscripted. Be

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>sure to follow all of our coverage of the team

0:35:07.140 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>all week long on Packers.com. For Wes, I'm Mike. Thank

0:35:10.620 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>you for tuning in.

0:35:11.260 --> 0:35:13.060
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you next time.