WEBVTT - Jameis Winston's Future with the Bucs & When to Expect Answer on Kendell Beckwith's Return | Bucs Insider Live, Nov. 6

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in to Buccaneers Inside a live presented by Miller

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like Casey Phillips and Scott Smith here and as always,

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be taking your questions, So if you're not

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>already watching on the Facebook page, make sure you head

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>over there, leave your comments underneath the video, and that's

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>where we'll be able to find those questions to answer

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>as we start letting people put those in yes, please,

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't have Yeah, yeah, that's that's fair. Uh so

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>for for your mind. When we were after the game,

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>coach announced Ryan Fitzpatrick would continue to be the quarterback

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>this next week. So, um, what do you feel like

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that says about the direction of this offense and the

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>team and what the coaches and everybody really see in

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick and what that could mean. Well, first of all,

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this team or any team ever wants

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to get into involved involved in a situation where you're

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>switching back and forth between quarterbacks. I know that Coach

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Cutter wasn't really all that thrilled about having to make

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback change that wasn't caused by a suspension in

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the middle of season. He said so in fact, but

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it was made easier by the fact that the team

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>has so much faith in their number two quarterback, because,

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>as he pointed out, a lot of teams are even

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>more reluctant to pull their their number one starter, their

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>number one on the season began because they don't really

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>trust their second guy, or they may be actively believe

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>he can't get it done and they don't have a

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>great option. We had the guy who came into the

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>weekend with the best passer rating in the NFL, So

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I gotta believe that the leash was going to be long. Um.

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I understand there's there's a lot of thought that needs

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>to be put into when and if you go back

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to James Winston and what his status is as a

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>potential franchise quarterback and throw on where it goes from here.

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>But you don't want to get involved in that going

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>back and forth because at that point, I mean, you

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like you have any solution at all. You

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>want to have one solution, and it can't help either

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>guy to keep going back and in and the optics

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of it aren't very good. So I I thought it

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>would have to take a pretty big meltdown, which we

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>don't expect obviously, from Ryan Fitzpatrick to make any sort

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of sudden switch, So it was no surprise to me

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that he made that announcement right away. And really, honestly,

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick was not the problem in that game. Yes,

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>he had one bad overthrow that led to an interception

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and that helped put the Bucks in a bad position,

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>but for the most part, he played about as well

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>as he's played for a good portion of the season,

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and he did lead us back into that game after

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>it looked all all but lost, right and overall, in

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>your mind, the defense and a coach talked about the

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>tackling the big issue. So, I mean, the defense has

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>struggled this year, but I didn't feel like tackling had

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be as glario an issue until that game.

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And I mean there, of course there were a few

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>mistackles along the way, but it felt like this game

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>in particular, So overall, how much do you feel like

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that is the issue that's been all season and which

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is more glaring this time or was it really this game?

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like that the bigger problems on defense

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>heading into this game, the games have gone very badly

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in that regard were more like mistakes mental mistakes, miscommunication,

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing, and young guys trying to figure

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it out. You know, I think this big tackling issue

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.399
<v Speaker 1>that reared its head in Carolina was hopefully a flukey thing.

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's been a massive problem for the Buccaneers.

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, some of it in coaches generally say this,

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>some of it. You do have to give some credit

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>to the other side. Some mistackles are created by great

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>plays and that's why those guys get drafted like that.

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.839
<v Speaker 1>And Carolina has completely remade their offense in the last

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of drafts with guys like obviously Christian McCaffrey, the

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>big one, and Curtis Samuel, who didn't play a ton

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>last year, but now he's getting involved in DJ more

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this year. And now they've got a lot of fast

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>guys that they get the ball moving laterally and in

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really creative ways. And and once you

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 1>get one or two of those creative plays working, then

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you start play calling off of those plays. So that's

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>why we see an end a round and then we

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>see your reverse. And just so I can get on

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a soapbox here for a moment that Curtis Samuel's touchdown

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>was not a double reverse. Even the guys who keep

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the stats at the game called made a point of

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>saying the play was a double reverse. An end around

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is when you hand it to a guy coming from

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>one side, like usually receiver, and he takes it and

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>goes around the other end a reverse, which is what

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>happened in Chris Samuel plays when you do that, but

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>then he flips into a guy coming back in the

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>other direction. For it to be a double reverse, it

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>would have been one more handoff and drives me crazy.

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>People call in runs reversus and I call versus double reverses.

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, off my soapbox now not really relevant to

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the discussion. I do think the tackling was hopefully a

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>flukey problem that we're not going to see become something

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that plagues us the rest of you. So looking at

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the other issues, I mean, still not creating turnovers, which

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that's also a flukey thing as well that we've talked

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>about that that's not as easy as it sounds, and someway,

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>some of it can be luck about where a ball

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is tipped and things like that. But I know the

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>defense has been emphasizing the saying that they need to

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>work on it more. Is that something that you feel

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>like is possible for them to I mean, Gerald spoke

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>about that issue that he feels like there's a chance

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>they could go on that run the way that they

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>did a couple of years ago. What do you think

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it will take for this defense to start creating some

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of those turnovers. You know, as far as fumbles go,

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>there is an art to it forcing fumbels that Lavonte David,

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, is very very good at. And I do

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>actually honestly see our guys, every single one of our

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>defenders trying to create fumbles when they're making tackles. I

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>think they're trying. I don't know if they're doing anything

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>wrong in that regard, you know, interceptions, As you say,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we just don't get very lucky with tip balls

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>or just overthrows. To give you an example, when Fits

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>overthrew Evans on that early play, it went right to

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>one of their safeties. Later in the game, there was

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a bad overthrow down the middle by Cam Newton, but

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>our safety didn't happen to be standing right where the

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>ball was overthrown too, And it wasn't a mistake. He

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't right there. You know, so some of that

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is luck, but when you get to essentially five straight

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>games without a turnover, um, there has to be something

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>more to it than just bad luck. And I gotta believe,

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, coach Duffner every week, because he's asked about

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>it every week, says, we are not coming down with

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the ball. We are creating some opportunities to get it,

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but we're not coming down with the ball. I think

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we need to create more opportunities. I'm not sure we're

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>creating that many certainly didn't see a lot in the

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Carolina game, but they have to make have to take

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>advantage of those opportunities when they get him in. According

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to both the coach and the players, it looks better

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>than that on the practice field, guys are doing a

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>good job of taking advantage of those opportunities and making

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>some turnovers and practice interceptions specifically, and uh, they just

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>don't understand why it's not translating to the field. Do

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you feel like this Redskins game could be the game

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that helps turn around that they just have so many injuries,

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>particularly on the offensive line, and that is this the

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>game where the defensive line therefore can get a lot

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of pressure which then makes Alex Smith have to make

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>some rush decisions, which can help on the turnover front. Theoretically. Yeah,

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean they have maybe up to four their five

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>offensive linemen out. They're signing guys off the street. I'm

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>sure they're you know, they sign a guy he's talented

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>enough to be in I can't think his name, but

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the one they signed yesterday, he's talent enough to have

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>been a starter in the league a lot, including I

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>think last year for Baltimore or somebody. So we're not

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about completely untalented players. But to have to try

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to put up to four new ones in and make

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it work seems nearly impossible. So on paper, yes, it

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like an awesome opportunity for us to get pressure,

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>which could lead to more turnovers. But we've said things

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>like that before. On paper, this looks like a great

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to stop this rookie quarterback. On paper, this and that,

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>so there's a reason to be optimistic about that, but

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it really has to be proven on the field. Um,

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we had a couple different Winston questions that I feel

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like we can kind of package all together. So Aaron

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>wants to know if you think jamis will get another

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>chance before the end of the season. And then we

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>also had a question asking if he is not the

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>answer long term, how do you what you know? We're

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>from there. So the idea of what all factors in

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>now to whether it's his contract and how long he's

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>with us and things that have of whether or not

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>he gets another chance, is it based solely on how

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick plays? What are some of the factors that could

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>play in here? And there's that's the million dollar question,

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>right or a lot more than a million dollars um

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>he Just in case anybody doesn't know that's asking these questions,

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>probably most of them do know. The Buccaneers did exercise

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>his fifth year option that you can do with a

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>first round draft pick. They had to make that decision

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>before this year, and they did so. He he's under

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>contract for next year at a certain number, which is

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty high number compared to his first four years,

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>but not necessarily what a great quarterback can get on

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the open market. And that's kind of a compromise and

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>how they worked those contracts for first round picks. Uh,

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the despite the fact we pick up the option, a

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>team does not actually have to keep that player in

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the fifty, you still can release that player assuming that

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>he's not injured. So there's it is guaranteed for injury.

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Um we have said apparently are our leaders have said

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that what's going to happen with the rest of his

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>contract is not going to factor into whether he plays

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>again this season. I know coach Cutter has said he

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>believes James Winston will get another chance and can succeed

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>as an NFL quarterback and be a really good one,

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But there's no timetable on that statement. So really that

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is one of the biggest issues that's going to play

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>out over the next couple of months of the season

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 1>and then right afterwards, because if you go in another direction, Uh,

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that's there's a lot of different variables there. You know,

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got essentially no quarterbacks in our contract heading into

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>next year if you were to go in another direction,

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 1>so you'd be looking for new answers I suppose, or

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>resigning somebody. But there's so much that goes into that

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that we're far away from knowing how that's going to play, right,

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 1>And I did see that. We just had someone asking

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>if Dirk had named a starting quarterback, and yes, he

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>did name Ryan Fitzpatrick the starter for this Sunday. But

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that's as far out ahead as he has, that's as

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>far as we're going to see him go. Right. I

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>do like that he's immediately saying so on Monday or

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>in this case, after the game on Sunday, right, you know,

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>making everybody wonder. Um. Aaron had asked, why is the

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>offense turning the ball over so much? Is it a

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 1>scheme issue or just a execution? No, I can't. Definitely

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's a scheme issue, because you know, we

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>have moved the ball really, really well. I think the

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>scheme and the play calling is working when they have

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>created turnovers or you know, committed turnovers. It's been in

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks it's been bad throws, simply bad throws, overthrows.

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Over the course of this whole time, it's been some

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of those flukey plays that you would expect both teams

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to get and we're not getting him. You know, like

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a ball hits off a helmet, goes straight in the

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>air and is intercepted. Stuff like that. But in the

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks it's been bad throws and in

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 1>a couple ocasions, bad decisions. I don't think that was

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the case with right Fitzpatrick on Sunday, his turnover was

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>his first turnover was an overthrow, and then he threw

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty well almost the game and then the last one.

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's when you're down to touch on with

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>what two minutes to go, and you got to score quickly,

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>so you take risk, you throw risk your passes and

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:19.599
<v Speaker 1>you normally would and that one didn't work out, the

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>go one down the field to fit. But I don't

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>think blames him for that one. Right Um. We had

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>David asking about our blitzeing, and that has been a

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>topic that I think, especially when Duffner was first named

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the defensive coordinator. He talked about how he wanted to

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be you know, his his defense. He wanted to be aggressive,

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and there was a big debate about okay, does that

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>mean right? And and how much blitzing. So I want

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to hear your thoughts on how much you have seen

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>us blitz maybe even before after Deffner and overall the

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>idea of how much has blitzeing been working. I didn't

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>really look at the numbers before we came down here

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on that topic. I would have I known we're going

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to get that question. I know that before under Mike Smith,

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we were blitzing a little less than league average, not

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot less than link average, but a little less.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>But we were also not blitzing successfully at all. Um

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>opposing quarterbacks were doing awesome when we blitzed. So, you know,

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the the issue of blitz or not blitz is too

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>part how much you do it and can you actually

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>succeed at it, Because if you're not doing all the blitz,

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you're just hurting yourself even more by doing so. And

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I know it's frustrating when you can't get to the

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback with your four down lineman. But if you're just

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>making matters worse by blitzing than doing it more often,

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't necessarily the answer. Uh. You know, our our sacks

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>on on Sunday, at least one of them involved a

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>blitz or Lavante David has told me before that sometimes

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>when he's in the backfield, it's not necessarily as a blitz.

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>It's a reaction to what they do with their running back.

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But it looks like a blitz us because it's another plant,

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we can it acts like a blitz. So

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Levante was involved with that sack. With Germ McCoy. So

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously that was some sort of blitz and I don't

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>know if they call Nassip Sack was Sack was on

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a blitz. But overall we didn't get a ton of

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>pressure on Kim in that game. But they also have

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a very They also had a very get the ball

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.599
<v Speaker 1>of his hand quick type offense and they're running the

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>ball so well. But it wasn't a game conducive to

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot of pressure on the quarterback. Right um,

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris wanted to know how much longer until we can

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>expect kindle Beck with back and game ready. You're gonna

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>find out either this week or next week period that's

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be an answer if he is going

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to play or not. It's he's gonna have to be

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>activated either this week or next week. So again, when

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>he was there began I think after week seven a

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>five week window and at some point in that five

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>weeks you could start him at practice and then it's

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a three week window from there. So we waited the

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>first two weeks. We waited as long as we possibly

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>could to get the full three weeks of him practicing,

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and when he came back to practice as is the

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 1>case with all guys in this situation. There's no guarantee

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that at the end of those three weeks he's going

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to start playing again. If it hasn't doesn't go well enough,

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>if it's not deemed that he's ready to play and

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a serious injury, then he will simply stay

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>on the reserve list for the rest of the year.

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So we don't know the answer yet. Um last week

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>he was sort of eased into it. We'll see this week.

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>If he's playing more than that would be a good sign.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Giving him a bigger piece of the practice pie, that

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>would be a good sign. And I would certainly probably

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>feel the same way. I'm guessing that that question, it

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>feels is that would really be helpful for this defense.

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>The loss of Kwan Alexander. We knew it was gonna

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>be tough. I think we're seeing on the field how

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>tough it is, how much it has affected us. And

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying kendle Beck with especially after it's been

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>so long since he's played, would be able to duplicate

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>what Quand did. But he is a guy that you

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>think he played it last year. We liked when he did.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>It would be a nice addition to that puzzle. All right, Well,

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna do it for us on this edition of

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers Insider Live presented by Miller Lite. Thanks to all

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of you for watching and joining the conversation. We'll be

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>back here next Tuesday, so make sure you're thinking about

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>all those questions the rest of this week for on Tuesday,

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:40.719
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see you then