WEBVTT - The Blue Wave Flipped Texas Scam

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>What are we recording? Yeah, yeah, yeah, what the episode started? Now,

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I was, I was, I was going to say something

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>something to do with Texas. But to be honest, you know, why,

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>why why do we do this? Why do we let ourselves,

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, get famous for for for saying a particular

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>bit and then just keep repeating it over and over again.

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Are we so creatively bankrupt that there's there's nothing else

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we can do but repeat our greatest hits in order

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to recapture some of the some of the the excitement

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that we felt as younger men. Anyway, my co hosts

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>on this episode, James Stout and me along, welcome to

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>it could happen here.

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Hi, rob It. I'm glad you're doing so well.

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>We're all doing great. James, You've just been having a

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>searing emotional experience at the border. Yeah mm hm. And

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone else is busy living in the United States, which

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.919
<v Speaker 1>is its own searing emotional experience.

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Man.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Today, today we're going to be talking about the both

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the most and least American state, Texas. Huzzah, Yeah, love you. Yeah,

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>who here has spent a lot of time in Texas. Garrison,

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you lived in the Dallas area, right.

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>A lot that I I've made my visit to Texas

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 2>over the years with you, even in the murder House.

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>You and I have quaffed many a shiner bock together,

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>James Many. Okay, I guess we'll move into the fucking episode.

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So uh, there was a There was a an email

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>sent out by Texas Democrats dot Org recently with the

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>title Texas moves from solid red to battleground. Sure, you know,

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>like clockwork. A lot of Democrats got very excited, and

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I made a couple of people made posts being like, hey,

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the same thing that happens every single election.

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>They are never right. Texas is never a battleground and

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 1>it always costs an insane amount of money. It is

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a con by DC political consultants to get your money

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>and pump it into something that will fill up their

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>coffers and not achieve anything of value for the state

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 1>of Texas or for the Democrats nationwide. And this makes

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>people very angry for two reasons. One, they tend to

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>interpret it as saying abandon Texas and the people there,

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>which is not the statement I was making or anyone

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>else was making. And number two, everyone kind of obsessively

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>starts pointing out like, look, look at how over the

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>last thirty years, you know, the things have narrowed in

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Texas and the proportion of like Democratic votes is raised.

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>This is winnable. We can do it. We can do it.

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk today about why anyone who talks

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to you about flipping Texas as a political goal that

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you should give money to is conning you, and not

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>only conning you, but making it actually more difficult for

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrats to win, both in Texas and nationwide. That's that's

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the premise of the episode, everybody.

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Here's here's how Bernie can still win. Though at the

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 4>very end we will give you.

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, We're gonna let you know he's got a shot. Look,

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>look if he if he is capable of putting another

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>three rounds of six point five into a dinner plate

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>sized target at one hundred and fifty yards, now that

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>was a that was anyway, he'd have to shoot a

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of people to make.

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 4>He's going to deploy bought a joy into a.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:54.119
<v Speaker 2>Name, absolutely not.

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Person. So I want to talk about this because I

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>find it, like I think people tend to interpret this.

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I've certainly gotten accused of like, oh, you're just kind

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of being like a nihilist. This is you're being you know,

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>just an anti electoralist. You're not being practical. There was

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a there was one particular guy who's like a local

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Democratic candidate who responded seven times to my tweet being

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>like with variations, and his obsession was like, if we

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>win Texas, it's impossible for the GOP to win national elections,

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>which is true. If theoretically the Democrats flipped Texas, the

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>GOP would have no chance at winning a federal election ever. Again.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and so simultaneous to this, right, if the Republican

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 3>there are more Republicans in California than there are basically

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 3>any other state in the Union, and if the Republicans

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 3>won California, they would they would win every election forever.

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, happen. Not going to happen. I mean,

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's one of those things. I am not saying

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Texas will never be a blue state. You know, that

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>is something that is possible, even likely, given enough time.

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>What I am saying, the argument that I'm making here,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'll provide you with evidence, is that number one,

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>focusing on these elections from the top down and when

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.559
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, we want to flip Texas. That's a top

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>down approach, right. You are not focusing on we want

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to fill up and win a bunch of different local elections.

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>We want to flip, you know, the state houses. We

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>want to flip a bunch of mayoralties and stuff. You

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>are saying, what matters is how Texas votes in the

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>national election. And if you were to get if you

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>were to kind of eke out a bear like in

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Georgia right where you get a narrow victory in the

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>federal election, that would be great for the Democratic Party.

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>One of my issues with it is that kind of

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>focusing obsessively on flipping Texas isn't focusing on the stuff

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that actually will help Texans, like Texans currently being targeted

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>by the state government, because flipping the state in a

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>federal election, but not taking the governor's seat, not taking

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the lieutenant governor seat, not like actually taking the state house,

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't improve life for people in Texas. I think the

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of the degree to which the federal government, Biden's administration,

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>has been unable to push back very effectively against kind

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of the shit that DeSantis has been

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>doing in Florida. You know, they have started to make

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>some attempts. Is evidence of this, and kind of more

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to the point, even if you don't agree with that, fundamentally,

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>these strategies that the Democratic Party has embraced in Texas

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>do not work. The Texas Democratic Party is incompetent. They

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>are bad at their job. They are worse. People bring

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>up Georgia a lot when I talk about flipping Texas,

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and folks are like, well, we flipped Georgia, And it's like, yeah,

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>because the state elected officials and candidates in George number one,

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the state party did a much better job of kind

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of harvesting is a weird way to phrase it, but

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of incubating talent to run for election in a number

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of local offices then the Texas Democratic Party has ever done.

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And that was a big part of what allowed them

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to be competitive and eventually to flip the state. There's

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like kind of dollar sign information on

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>how bad the state party in Texas is at this shit,

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and I guess I should go ahead and provide some

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of that now. So in the twenty twenty two election,

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the midterms famously an unusually good showing for the Democratic

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Party nationwide for a midterm election everywhere but Texas. O'Rourke

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>ran against Greg Abbott. He lost by eleven percent. This

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is kind of to contrast the election that got everyone

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>excited when he was running against Cruise. I think they

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>were like three percent apart. And again, the only reason

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>there was this kind of mistaken belief and excitement among

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>dims that O'Rourke, because he was so close to Cruz,

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>had a real shot of winning Texas. No, he got

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>kinda close to beating Cruz because Ted even Republicans hate

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz. No one is ever liked that man. His

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>own wife can barely stand to be in a room

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>with him. His political allies would turn the other cheek

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>if fucking somebody anyway, we shouldn't talk about political assassinations

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast. It wouldn't anger anybody though, right. Lindsay

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Graham has said that, like Lindsay Graham's like, what maybe

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the only good joke a Republican elected officials ever told

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>is that if you were to shoot Ted Cruz on

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the floor of Congress and the trial was held in Congress,

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like nobody would vote to convict the murderer anyway. So

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Beto lost quite badly to Greg Abbott and beyond that,

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>basically every statewide candidate that the Democrats ran lost in

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 1>that election. It was a bad election for the Democratic

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Party and people who pay attention to Texas politics and

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>actually like aren't just trying to like grift your donation money.

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 5>Know this.

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Joel Montfort, a Democratic consultant in North Texas said, quote,

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it's been one election after another where we ramp everybody

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>up and set these xpectations that we're going to finish

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in first and then we finish in second. I don't

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>see any indication that we can win at state wide

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>levels or won't continue to bleed house seats to the

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>other party.

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I love these to finish in second.

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 6>There is if there's like a podium on election libertarians. Yeah,

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 6>the text Democratic Party to take the l to like

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 6>giald Stein.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there were some kind of site. There were some

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>wins by Democrats in Texas. They managed to hold onto

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>two out of three seats congressional seats in the battleground

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 1>regions in South Texas, but they still lost one. They

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>did what they did, still lose one, and you know,

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the GOP had to spend a lot of money to

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>do that. But like one of the one of the

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>points is that so they they held onto two of

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>those seats, and they won a contested seat in the

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>suburbs of Dallas. Uh. And you know, like but basically

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in all of these areas, Uh, these were like super

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>narrow wins, like these the big successes, and they were

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>narrow wins in areas that Joe Biden had carried by

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>double digits two years ago. And Joe Biden is a

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>historically like that is part of some of them. Some

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of it will show you how bad the Texas Democratic

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Party is. Joe Biden is not a popular president, and

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he carried a lot of these areas

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>by more than the candidates who narrowly won in twenty

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty two could is not a great sign for the

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>way things are trending.

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, It's probably also worth pointing out that like those

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 2>southern Texas seats, like in the Rio Grande Valley, right, like, yeah,

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 2>those people are normally Democrats. Yeah, but you have guys

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 2>like Henry is it Quella Quala, Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 2>who is opposed to abortion rights are yeah yeah and

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 2>extremely hawkish on the border, and like yeah, yeah, what

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 2>do we gain by having like, yeah, blue team good,

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Like not really if this person's going to take away

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 2>your bodily autonomy and brutalize people for coming to this

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 2>country for one day about a life.

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's like a lot of the some of

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>these wins are kind of like marginal at best, given

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the compromises or just given the kind of Democrats who

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>can win it. It's like a Joe Manchin kind of situation. Yeah, exactly.

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>And more to the point, like it's not only is

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>this like evidence kind of that the Democrats strategy isn't

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't working. It's not simply that they tried something and

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it failed. They tried something and it was so expensive

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that it stopped them from trying things in other areas

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>where the money could have gone better. For example of

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 1>how fucking wasteful, particularly the Beto wort campaign was. Right,

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>he loses by eleven points to Greg Abbot. He raised

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven million dollars to lose by that much. A

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>few years earlier, Lupe Valdez ran against Greg Abbot. She

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>spent raised like two million dollars and lost by thirteen points,

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So seventy five million dollars may have bought Beto two percent.

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, like if you assume that national trends had

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with that gap closing by a tiny amount, Like.

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 3>With seventy five million dollars, I could take control of

0:11:57.840 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 3>a moderate at least is Texas City.

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah that is like, yeah, I could buy my chunk

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 2>of Texas specific Like you could purchase a large chunk

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 2>of Fort Worth with that much money. No, yeah, that's

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 2>how I'll go here at cools the own media.

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, to own fort Worth. Finally my dream completed.

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll be able to be I'm gonna buy those horse

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>statues that los kalitas. Finally be happy.

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's get blucifer as well. It's probably a good time

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>to pivot to ads that help us pay for a

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 2>piece of food.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Sure, yeah, you know, who isn't a waste of money

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>these fucking ads. So overall, we just talked about it.

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, Beto raised seventy seven million dollars. The gubernatorial

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>race cost in total something like one hundred and forty

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, which is a huge amount of money for

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>something that fails that badly and doesn't there's no evidence

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that Beto's campaign, like he was he's obviously good at fundraising, right,

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And there was kind of this belief among a lot

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of dims, an errant belief that this meant that he

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 1>would be good for down ballot races. Right, He's going

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to bring the entire because of how much attention he gets.

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>He's going to raise the entire Democratic Party up. The

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>poor showing of the Democratic Party in Texas in twenty

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty two suggests that that's not the case. And the

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>money like there are there are fights that could have

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>been won and probably weren't because the money wasn't being

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>invested in those fights. It was going to bettle. And

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna quote from an article by the Texas Tribune here.

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>This year, the party ran Rochelle Garza, a civil rights

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>lawyer with little political experience, against Attorney General Ken Paxton,

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>who was widely seen as the most vulnerable Republican incumbent.

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>But Garza struggled to raise money or gain traction in

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Auric's shadow and lost by ten percentage points against Paxton,

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>who has been indicted on felony security fraud charges and

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is being investigated by the FBI for abuse of office accusations.

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's what maybe she couldn't have won no matter

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>what you did. But one of the rules of politics

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in this country is that the money you spend at

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a big race, like a gubernatorial race, like a like

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a like a Senate or a congressional campaign at the

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>federal level, like a presidential campaign, goes less far per

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar than the money you spend in smaller local elections. Right,

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>ten million bucks going into that election might have done something,

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, as opposed to seventy five million going into

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Bedo O'Rourke and accomplishing very little. This has been not

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>just a problem in Texas in previous elections, throughout the

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump area and a little before in particular, this was

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a problem the DIMS had kind of from the middle

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Obama years until the last couple of like

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>really the last midterm at twenty eighteen is when it

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>started to turn around nationally, and the DIMS have learned

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot in other regions about like not spending stupid

0:14:53.200 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>amounts of money on hopeless contests, but not like comprehensively. Example,

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two, the second most expensive house race

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>was the fourteenth Congressional District of Georgia, where Marcus Flowers

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>raised sixteen million dollars and lost by thirty two points,

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>not a great return on the investment. And it was like,

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the reason why he raised so much money is because

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>he was running against Marjorie Taylor Green and nationally, DIMS

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>outside of Georgia wanted to put in money because they

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>hate her. And it's a trend that relies a lot

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>on social media on kind of the way in which

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like hardcore dims, the dims that do a lot of

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the small dollar donations think about politics where it's like

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Marjorie Taylor Green bad donate money to opponent, Well, her

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>opponent had no chance of winning in that district, Like

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>no amount of money would have flipped that, and you

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>just wasted sixteen million dollars that could have helped somewhere else.

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe that's an insane thing and it's not as

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>bad as it used if you want to look at

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like the like the kind of the dumbest it ever was.

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty, so Lindsay Graham's seat was up in

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina and Jamie Harrison ran against Lindsay Grant and

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>dims again because Lindsay Graham evil, you know, raised one

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty million dollars and he lost fight ten points.

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Amy McGrath lost to Mitch McConnell, who is another Like

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you can always get a shitload of money to fight

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell ninety four million dollars lost by twenty points

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>either of the like one hundred and thirty million, ninety

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>four million, that's two state legislators. You could have flipped,

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>or at least made progress on flipping, right, Like that

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>amount of money could potentially do that or at least

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>help set up, you know, get a couple of people

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>elected who have a chance at kind of broadening a

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>base of support and becoming you know, leaders in states

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that are currently like dominated by red legislators, Like there's

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a chance at least here.

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 3>And that like specifically the state legislature. Thing is this

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 3>has been a problem with the Democrats for fucking ages,

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 3>which is that they just yet like it is only

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 3>genuinely in the last years the Democrats are started giving

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 3>a ship about state legislatures, like and this is this

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 3>is one of the things from the Obama era, Like

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 3>one of the reasons everything sucks so much is that

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 3>the Democrats managed to lose, Like, oh god, I forget.

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 3>It was like they I think I think the total

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 3>they lost like a thousand seats. It was like yeah,

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>and and and you know, on the we were seeing

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 3>the product of this right like this like like Wisconsin

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 3>was sort of just a hell hole for the last decade.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Uh and you know, I mean like and these are

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 3>like Minnesota to like the like there are lots of

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 3>these states that like that, like not Minnesota or am

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 3>I talking about Michigan?

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Michigan.

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And there's a lot of these stats and you know,

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 3>like and both of these places were winnable right, like

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 3>like they're like the Democrats are winning there now, right,

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 3>but they just like fucking left, like you know, they

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 3>they they fucking left Flint to get poisoned by lead

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 3>because they just not like the only the only things

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 3>that the problem is there's there's no money for consultants

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 3>in in sort of like downbout like state and like

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 3>local races just just jack ship, right, and the Democrat

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.479
<v Speaker 3>the Democrat Party like is not run by sort of

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 3>like it's it's not a party in like an actual

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 3>real sense. It is a it is a collection of consultants,

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 3>and those consultants only care about senates about Senate races.

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes they care about house races, and they care specifically

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 3>they spend all of their fucking money in presidential races.

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 3>And you know, it's like again, and the Republicans don't

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 3>do that because they have a bunch of like people

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 3>they you know, because they have a bunch of like

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 3>part of their base, right is these like small and

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 3>mid scale capitalists in you know, in cities, in rural

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 3>areas who have like immediate concerns about like, you know,

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 3>there's like there there are specific workers who they want

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 3>like lives to be worse. And so because of that,

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 3>the Republican machine is like seize the entire fucking country.

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 3>And the Democrats have been sitting around like spending like

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 3>a trillion dollars on Wendy Davis losing by twenty points.

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And it's like you get these you get

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>these like cases where you know, you're looking at thirty

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>million being spent, you know, failing to uns seat Marjorie

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Green or somebody thirty three million something like that.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>But what you don't like, at the same time as

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>like that's happening, is all of these massive amounts of

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 1>money are being devoted to these, like to the races

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that get attention because there's famous names involved. You have,

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>like in twenty twenty I think it was you have

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>or no, it's twenty twenty two. You have the election

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>between Ted Budd, a Republican against the Democrat Sherry Beasley

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>in North Carolina where the Democratic Party decided not to

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>prioritize this election because it wasn't winnable, and then Bud

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>won up wound up winning by just four points. That's

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a seat you can flip with money. That's not an

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>unreasonable thing as opposed to again, the races where it

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>went to and people are losing by like thirty something

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>fucking percent. And if you want to know who a

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>serious candidate is, who is not just trying to do

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the sexy thing or not just trying to like again

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>flip the states so that we can win the federal election,

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but actually wants to help their state. And this is

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>again there's very nice things about Beto O'Rourke. I was

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in Texas during the ice storm. He did good work

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>during the ice storm, like actual community defense kind of

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I do have some respect for. He is

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>not and has never been a serious politician, and I

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>will tell you why he went from winning an election

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to losing a state election against Ted Cruz, to losing

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.199
<v Speaker 1>a presidential race to losing the governor seat. That is

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>so fucking scattershot. That is not building a base of power,

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>That is not building from the ground up and like

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 1>encouraging the growth of other personalities. You're just darting from

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 1>whatever the sexiest and most like pr driven race is.

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>That's not serious. I want to talk about what number one,

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party, the ship that like, as we've said,

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they're getting better. The National Party got a lot better

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>at this, particularly in twenty twenty two. It was less

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>stupid than the previous couple of elections had been.

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Really difficult to be more dumb than that. But you

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 3>know it is British British labor et cetera, et cetera.

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Labor actually is the big one. Oh my fuck.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk what has what has worked, and

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>what I think could work again. And to do that,

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about a guy named Howard Dean,

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>who here knows who Howard Dean was? Garrison simply yeah

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 5>Have you?

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Have you all heard the video of him screaming that

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>gotten like his career is before. Okay, well, James, would

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you load that up for us so we could play

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that in a second to the Deans. Coward, Jamie, pull

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it up. Howard. Howard Dean ran for president and was

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 1>He was the first national political candidate to use the

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>internet effectively to raise money in the in the history

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of US politics. He's kind of pre Obama. Worked out

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the strategies that Obama's people wound up

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>using to very successfully raise money for him. He was

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>really good at it. He was a reasonably intelligent candidate.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And then he gave the speech that we're about to

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>play for you, and it completely created his and ended

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>him as a as a candidate. You know, I always

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>says the thing about Dean.

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Dean is stunningly unlucky that he ran in the time

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 3>that he did, because the clip you're about to hear

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 3>is one thousand times less weird than anything DeSantis has

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 3>ever done. Like he he ran in it. I mean

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 3>there was there was dan Quayle, right, but like he

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 3>ran in an era where like the seriousness and like

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 3>non weirdness of politicians was so much higher.

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's in the chat so you can.

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Up. This is a good shit straight to that beautiful scream.

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 5>We're going to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona.

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 3>In North Dakota and New Mexico.

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>We're going to California and Texas and New York.

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 5>We're going to South Dakota and Oregon and Washington.

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 3>And Michigan, and then we're going to Washington, d C.

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 3>To take back in the White House.

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>That's it. That ended his career as a candidate. And

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.719
<v Speaker 1>like it's a little silly, but that doesn't that doesn't

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't be a twelve second news cycle today. But

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>after kind of failing out as a presidential candidate, he

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>became chairman of the DNC, the Democratic National Committee, and

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>he was a pretty good one. His kind of primary

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>strategic vision was what he called the fifty state strategy,

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>which is, don't focus just on swing states, never write

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a state off at unwinnable. Instead, spread the money that

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the DNC has around two campaign throughout the country everywhere,

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly to fund local dncs, so that they can start

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>building a stable of candidates that can attract voters and

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>eventually win local elections. It's not like an easy It's

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>not a sexy strategy because a lot of it is

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>focused on like the slow, kind of grueling fight to

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>build up a base of support and unfriendly terrain. But

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>it worked like really well. Actually in twenty or so states,

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>those that had voted solidly Republican in private previous recent

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>presidential races, Democratic candidates like won elections that had previously

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>like in the like gone against them like it had.

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Like.

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>There were about like twenty states where it the kind

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of slide to red was arrested and pushed back to blue.

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>These are Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska,

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah,

0:24:55.040 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia, and Wyoming. Special list of yeah, there we go.

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So basically, Deans strategy led to a net gain of

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine state House seats and a two percent increase

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of all seats in the states analyzed. They lost two,

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, state Senate seats net, but it worked great

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in the House and gained an attorney generalship, gained three

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>House seats, gained a Senate seat, and in fifteen of

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the twenty seats the Democratic nominees on increase in vote

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>share between two thousand and four and two thousand and eight,

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.719
<v Speaker 1>which was the years that so again not super sexy.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>These aren't like we flipped Texas suddenly, but it's like, oh,

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>we started to see real gains and like a lot

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of pretty red states. Now it didn't work everywhere. It

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was not particularly successful in a large chunk of the South,

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>like it did not arrest the slide into the red everywhere.

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:53.479
<v Speaker 1>But in a lot of the Midwest, particularly the states

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that were like the Hillary Clinton so called firewall that

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>went for Trump in twenty twenty, it was extremely effective.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And of course it got mixed immediately after Obama won election,

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is a big part of why in twenty

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>ten the dims lost disastrously. But like the basic idea

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of we should be putting money into local democratic parties

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in order to like number one, have like a big

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>part of winning any conflict, whether it's a war or

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>a political election, is having the resources available reserves to

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of opportunities that present themselves in the moment.

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>So you have a solidly read state house seat or

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>judge ship or something like that, or governorship or mayor mayoralty,

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and a candidate has a health scare or has a scandal,

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, they get caught fucking a thirteen year old

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>or something, and suddenly this seat that was solidly read

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is in play. And if you have no one who

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:56.239
<v Speaker 1>can like get votes, who can get voters excited, who

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>can run for that, well, then you're probably not gonna

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>win it. It's just going to like go to whoever

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the RNC you know, picks to pick up the seat next.

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>But if you've got someone waiting in the wings, they

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>have a chance at winning it. And a good example

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of this is what just happened in Jacksonville, Florida. Right

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you have DeSantis make go like lunge to the fucking

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>most fascist end of the right and pass this abortion

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>build that something like seventy five percent of the state

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like. And the Dims had a decent candidate there

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>that was able to run against the Republican mayor of

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville and win. And in that election, the dim spent

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>two million and the Republicans spent nine million. You were

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>not talking about the kind of resources expended that you're

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>seeing in some of these dumb races we're talking about.

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, like this is most of what I wanted

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to get into. Is just like you can win and

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you can improve things in Texas and you can build

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a base from which to actually change things electorally in

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>that state, but you can't do it by just like

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 1>focusing on whoever is at the top. Like it has

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to be smarter. It's not just about shoveling money into

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a pit.

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And like I think there's there's a couple of

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 3>things that wants to add. One was that like oh god, okay,

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 3>Like so Tim Kye, Yeah, Tim Kaine got put in

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 3>after they ran out Dean and Jesus, like Tim Kane

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 3>might be is a is like a once in a

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 3>generation terrible politician, like one of the worst, you know, but.

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Like like you would see ship like he is the Winston

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Churchill of making me bored.

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Like yeah, like like like you would see I mean,

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.239
<v Speaker 3>and this still happens, right, but like there are there

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 3>are seats that are winnable that the Dems like just

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 3>literally won't even bother finding people to run for because

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 3>they're just fucking too lazy and they don't give a shit.

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 3>And you know this this happens if this happens in

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 3>a fucking lot of races, and you know, and part

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 3>part of the other thing that that happens in this

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of period that like, you know, is the reason

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 3>why the top down is okay. So this is like

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 3>if if we're gonna actually do this sort of like

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 3>complicated electoralism, like this is why Bernie Sanders lost two

0:28:56.600 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 3>elections in a row, is that you can't actually like

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.959
<v Speaker 3>like actual sort of like substantive political change like doesn't

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 3>happen from the top down. It's it's like it happens

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 3>on bottom up organizing. And you know, the the democratic

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 3>waves in like the last two years were basically like

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 3>them eating actual social movements. It's you know, like they

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 3>it's it's them basically like they're there. There's a sort

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 3>of rejuvenated anti abortion movement that they just sort of consume. Right,

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 3>They've been doing a very very good job of sort

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 3>of like eating like whatever sort of queer rights like

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 3>movements exist alive. And they had kind of stopped doing

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 3>that for a while because they chose to just like

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 3>destroy occupy whether rather than like try to co opt it. Yea,

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I mean there were reasons for that, right,

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 3>but like part of part of the thing like if

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 3>if you if if you're a Democrat and you want

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 3>to actually like win Texas, you need to have like

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 3>actual you to have actual sort of social movements that

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Democrats can eventually take over and destroy

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 3>but in the time between they destroy them destroying them

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 3>and then and you know, like like in the brief

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 3>time while they both exist and are control by Democratic Party,

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 3>that's how you actually sort of like build the kinds

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 3>of the build the kinds of coalitions to build the

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 3>kinds of organization that win these races. And the Democratic

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Party has just no interest in doing that like almost

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 3>anywhere basically outside of Minnesota, where I don't know, those

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 3>in the Minnesota devs are fucking built different. I don't,

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't, I don't know, I don't. I don't have

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 3>another explanation for that, but like, yeah, it's I don't know,

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 3>it's it's.

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like one of the things that you have the

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to do at the local level is and this

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is you know, this is a big factor in like,

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>uh politics in Georgia. You've got people who are motivated

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>because of a specific political issue that Dems are strong on,

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like abortion, and you can you can get people registered,

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you can get people out organizing, you can get people

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>donating money, and more most important that you can get

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>people voting and voting in numbers that they haven't before

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and make if you're able to kind of harness that

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. But being able to harness that, again,

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>part of it is this is not sexy. This is

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>not something we can say this is going to flip

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a state in twenty twenty four. But putting in the

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>money and the resources to have people who are being

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>supported to go out and make attempts and to build

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>like a reputation and a base of support and networks

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in the state. Like, that's the non sexy thing that

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the number one the Republicans are really good at. If

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you're asking yourself looking at all these horrible anti trans bills,

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>anti gay bills, anti abortion bills, how do they do

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>this well? Because church is organized at the local level

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to build up the kind of support and the kind

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of human infrastructure that allowed them to take advantage of

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the kind of broader social trends that drove some of

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>those states more deeply read and that kind of like

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>made made it possible for them to do things that

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>ten years before people had said, like there's no way

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to make this happen. That can work on the left

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>side of things, but you have to have the groundwork

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in They started with like school boards. Yeah, they started.

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 4>They started with going after school boards, going after books.

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Then you get up base people riled up that you

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 4>can go after healthcare for miners, and you can go

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 4>after health care for adults. It was a very easy path,

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 4>and it started by like going to the most accessible

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 4>places to have public comment on issues, which was complaining

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 4>about books inside of school Yeah.

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah. And another thing I'd say about the church

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 3>thing is like the thing that you used to do

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 3>that for the Democrats was unions, but then they destroyed

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 3>them all. And but you know, but like you can

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 3>actually you can actually see what this looks like like

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 3>in the places where something like this. This is why

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 3>the state level Midwest Dems are so much further to

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 3>the left than the Dems everywhere else, because like the

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 3>people in Minnesota, the people in Wisconsin are like the

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 3>the only reason they're even so remotely in power is

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 3>because and you know, you're seeing this like at like

0:32:56.440 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 3>in Chicago too with Brandon Johnson, is that like these

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 3>those people are like functionally dependent on like that they're

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 3>on their teachers unions to exist as like a political coalision. Yeah,

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 3>and so you know, like like union organizing is a

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 3>is a like we're just like fucking just giving money

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 3>to a strike fund is even even if the thing

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 3>that you want to do is win elections, that is

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 3>a more effective way of winning of winning elections than

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 3>fucking giving money to Beto Auroric like a seventh time.

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and again when we the thing I want to

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>get across here is the right thing to do is

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>not say, and no one is suggesting this here, fuck Texas.

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>It can never be fixed. The right thing is saying,

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're focused on one famous guy running in Texas

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>or this like top level thing of flipping Texas, you

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>don't actually care all that much about the problems being

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>faced by people in Texas because that's not really going

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to fix them. Right, Beto's not going to win. And

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>even if Texas flips for an election, that doesn't mean

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the state legend your flips. It doesn't mean the governor flips.

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean that things get better for people doing

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>these kind of bottom up approaches. Number one will eventually

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>flip the fucking state. Right, there is a demographic trend happening.

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Part of how you flip the state, by the way,

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.839
<v Speaker 1>if you're actually responsible, is like proving that you can

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>make people's lives better. If you want to flip the state.

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>That's maybe more ethical than just being like, what if

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>we dump one hundred and seventy million dollars to try

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to make this guy who goes viral on YouTube or

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter sometimes look better? Right, maybe one of those is

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 1>more ethical than the other. Anyway. I don't want to

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>rant about electoralism anymore, but as a as a transplant

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>in Texan, I get frustrated by this, so I felt

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>like we had to say something.

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I also get frustrated by Better claiming to be punk,

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 2>which is the least punk thing in the fucking whether

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 2>that's a now repisode.

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>No, we have one. We have one elected leader who's

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>gotten anywhere close to being punk, and it was Bernie

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Sanders when he got into that cold book depository that

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:10.760
<v Speaker 1>November morning with a manliquor carcano rifle. Extremely punk.

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, cutting the feed here, it could.

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 5>Happen here as a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 5>more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 5>zonemedia dot com or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 5>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts, you can

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 5>find sources for It could happen here, updated monthly at

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 5>cool zonemedia dot com slash sources. Thanks for listening.