WEBVTT - What's the deal with subpoenas?

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production of My

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, and welcome to the podcast.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark, and there's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, and

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>there's Jerry Jerome Rowland over there, the Legal Eagles of podcasting.

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Who can I be Daryl Hannah? Yes, I call Barbara Hershey.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Who was it, oh, Legal Eagles?

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I know Deborah Winger? Yes, was Darryll Hannah even in

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that Now, yeah, she was the client of Deborah Winger.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>And you're not Redford? No, I always have to be

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>read for everybody's always like that. Guy's a regular Robert Redford.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>He'll play him in this scenario. Right, That's that's the

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.279
<v Speaker 1>street chatter. Yeah. Can I still be Barbara Hershey even

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>though she wasn't in the movie. Sure, I think I'm

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking of beaches. Oh well, that means I get to

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be Bette Midler? Right. I wonder how many pods save

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>America Seners we just lost who it just casually decided

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to give us a chance? I want to learn about subpoenas.

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Right before we get going, though, can we quickly thank

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the cities of Orlando and Greater Orlando and Florida in

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:18.559
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans and Greater Louisiana. Yes, for two fun live shows. Yeah,

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>those were a lot of fun. Um. Let's see. We

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>did Orlando on October nine, I think, and then the

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>tenth for New Orleans. Regardless, it was night back to

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>back to fund filled nights and they were just both

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>amazing shows. Yeah, and when this comes out, I think

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>New York will have been over. So thank you New York.

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, we we presume it's going to have

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>been a great time that three night run at the Bellhouse.

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>They're always great there. And that's it too. That's it

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>for us for the for the year, Chuck, So, I

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>mean thank you to everybody who came out to see

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>our shows this year. Yeah. Can we go ahead and

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>tease our our January scheduled? Should we not? I think

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we can't sure? All right, Well, well we're hoping to

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>be back at Sketch Fest again, and then what do

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we settle on? I don't know settling is the right

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>way to put it. The Seattle we're doing Seattle, we are, Yeah,

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and normally for a January swing we do Portland's Seattle

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Sketch Fest. Well, We've got the I Heart Radio Awards

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in there in Los Angeles, and we just you know,

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to go to that. Um no, sorry,

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the I Heart Podcast Awards. They don't care about us

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>at all at the radio Awards. Now. We can't even

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>get in that building, right exactly. So we said, okay, well,

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we gotta we gotta pull out one of our shows

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>because we're old men and we just can't spend that

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>much time on the road. So instead we're going to

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>take Portland's and put it with another town in the spring.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So don't worry, Portland, we will be out there maybe

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Cove. That's what that's the talk, that's the

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 1>chatter around town. But we have no dates confirmed yet.

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>But this just look for us again in the Pacific

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Northwest at the beginning of the year. It's a much

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>better way to put it. So do you want to

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about subpoenas? You got any other housekeeping to do?

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Um, subpoena's weird spelling. Well, yeah,

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>so I looked up the word, and subpoena is actually

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>two words. It means under penalty and it's typically the

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>first two words that were read in this rid of subpoena,

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>basically saying, under penalty of um blah blah blah. Yeah,

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:30.399
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking all I could think about was really

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>dirty dark stuff. Yeah, so I just let you fill

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in the blah blah blah. But anyway, under penalty of whatever,

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you need to do one of two things. Uh, And

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>there are two types of subpoenas that everybody, you know,

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody hears subpoena and you think, like Law and Order,

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe visions of Central Park run through your head because

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that's your only exposure to Central Park is from Law

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and Order, or you think of the US government, because

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this is going to be about congressional subpoenas,

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>because that's really the juiciest subpoena. Yeah, that's It's not

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>like it's new that Congress has just recently started issuing subpoenas.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>It's new in the conscious of America in this this age,

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>this generation. I mean, it's been going on for a while.

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But normally when people think subpoenas until like basically two thousand, seventeen,

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>sixteen eighteen, um, not necessarily in that order. Um, most

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>people thought of courtroom subpoenas, and that is you know,

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>typically the subpoena most people are ever going to come

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>up against in their lifetime. That's right. But you mentioned

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the two types. You want to break out your Latin

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>or shall I you take the first, I'll take the second. Okay,

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>The first one's easy. The first one is subpoena add

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>testify candem. Wow, did you see that? You just made

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a mouse appear and run out of the room. The

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>next one, so that I was so sorry. The first one,

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the one you just said, that means you gotta come

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>to court. You just nailed it. Yeah, it says that

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you to come and testify, and you might not be

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>um a party to the lawsuit like this is. It

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>can be a civil case or a criminal case. It's

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a big thing to point out, um, But basically it's

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>saying you have some information. You witnessed an act, um,

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you overheard a conversation the the defendant confess something to you.

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>We need you to come to court and tell your story.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's what that first subpoena is saying to do. Yeah,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and not necessarily court court, but it can be any

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of legal authority. Yeah, it could be a deposition,

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it could be an arbitration. Um. But typically it's the

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>authority of a court of law to basically say we're

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>going to levy a fine against you, or we're going

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>to arrest you and put you in jail if you

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>don't listen. That's that's used to um to kind of

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>enforce subpoenas. So the second one is the subpoena doocey's teacum, Hey, nice,

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you um. And that is basically saying, hey, you

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>have a document, you have of a hair sample, you

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of bodily fluids we want to get

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>our hands on. You have a compute yeah, or a

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>computer hard drive, um, you know something like that that

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>we want you to produce because we want to use

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it as evidence. And there's a really important point to

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>put here, Like a court is saying a court or

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>an official of the court or of the government is saying,

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we want you to do this because we have this

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit going on and you have something we need. But

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily the judge saying, and the judge is

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>signing off on it. It's really a lawyer or of

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for one side of the other saying, hey, I heard

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that this person has the secret tape and I need

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to get my hands on it, Judge, can you order

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this person to bring it to me so that I

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>can enter it into evidence. And then the judge says,

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>speak to my clerk, and then the clerk of the

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>usually the clerk of the judge who's handling that case. Um,

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>they say, talked to the hand. Yeah, and they'll generally

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>issue it on uh, unlike official court letter head and

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.799
<v Speaker 1>official documentation. It's not like the judges washing their hands

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of it necessarily. No, No, I'm sure like if they

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>do something egregiously wrong with the judge is gonna hear

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>about it and punish them, that's right. And then it

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>served um, usually in person, uh kind of you know,

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>hand it to you like on the TV shows and

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in the movies. Yeah, either by a sheriff's deputy or

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a process server. Yeah, but not always it it depends

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on if it's congressional um, or if it's you know,

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>civil regular josh mos stuff. Yeah. Well yeah for sure.

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think even if it is regular civil josh

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Mos stuff, you can still go higher the sheriff's department

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to serve papers, to serve a subpoena, Oh for sure.

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the congressional ones are not served by a sheriff. Oh,

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I see who do they use? I think it depends

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it could. I mean the way congressional subpoena's work is

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>all sort of dependent on the individual committee that's seeking subpoena,

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So they all have their own individual rules about like

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>whether you need a majority vote to even get a subpoena,

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>or whether the chair of that committee is you know,

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>has the power to h grant or request to subpoena. Right,

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I've read some of them know that it's a real

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>downer to get a subpoena, says some congressional committees used

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that mascot from the nineteen eight four Olympics, the Eagle

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to come issue your papers to you. I don't remember

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that one. You don't remember that eagle? Now? Was this

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>like a cartoon eagle from? Yeah? I mean all I can.

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't get past the Atlanta Olympics mascot. That's why

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't get back to nineteen eighty four? Was it?

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>What's it? Or who's it? I don't even know. It

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>was one of those two. What was that thing? I

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It was a last last minute thing. What

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>was the name it was? What's it? Or who's it

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>was it? Yes, yes, man, it was bad. I was

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>out of town. I fled. You didn't miss anything. But

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I do remember watching the opening uh whatever they're called,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the opening opening ceremonies, and seeing the stainless steel pickup

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>trucks driving around and just thinking, oh boy. Yeah. And

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I for those of you who are like, they've talked

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>about this before, yeah, we have, and we're still that

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>upset about it. We'll talk about it again in five

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>more years. We haven't forgotten. Yeah, stainless deel pickup trucks

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they haunt. I have dreams about those trucks. Yeah, if

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>they're just circling you playing striper at the loudest possible volume. Man. Okay,

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>So we've got different kinds of subpoenas, but both of

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>them apply to either courts of law or Congress. So

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>there's one big question that most people who get a

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>subpoena ask themselves the moment they're served the paper, and

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that is, can I ignore this? Do I have to

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>do this right? We get what happens to me if

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>I just pretend like I never got this, And that's

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>really tough to do. I was reading about process servers

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and Um, they people who are issuing the subpoena or

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the lawyer who's asking for the subpoena to say, they

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>want some sort of proof that says you got that paper,

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>so they have to. Um. There's like certain rules and

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>regulations to serve to serving somebody with a subpoena, so

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's really difficult to pretend like you're not, like you

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't get it, and a lot of people actually go

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to a tremendous amount of trouble to avoid being served

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>as subpoena. They will like move around, they will pretend

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not home. They won't let anyone else answer the

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>door because in some states you can leave it with

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a competent thirteen year old or eighteen year old. They'll

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>stick their hands in their ears and go la la la,

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>la la la. Right exactly, they'll do a lot of

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff to keep from being served. But that's actually it

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>will just delay being served in the long run, you

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>will still there's other remedies they can use. They can

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>mail it to your house certified mail, and if the

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>male person says this was dropped off made it to

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>their house, that's enough. Or if you can say I

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>took the numbers off my mailbox where you get to

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>do now, chump um. They can actually post an ad

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in the local legal organ the newspaper, and then that

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>will be considered serving you. So either way, you're going

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 1>to end up being considered to have received the subpoena eventually,

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and if you do, you probably shouldn't ignore it. Yeah,

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it says here in this article which most

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of this is from the House Stuff Works article about subpoena's,

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but it says, you know, it's a lot easier if

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you just go or produce the documents. But as we'll

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>cover here and a lot of this congressional oversight stuff,

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that is not the route that people take generally in government. Yeah,

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was kind of an oversight to

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>not say, like, but also, if somebody serves you with

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the subpoena, like go you don't necessarily have to hire

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer, but at least consult with one, like get

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>some legal advice, say this is what I got, you know,

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 1>what what should I do with this? Is this? You know, well,

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of questions that you should

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>have answered before you just act down a subpoena. Yeah,

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, when it comes to ignoring subpoena's. Uh.

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's what a lot of this will be about,

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>is um is what's going on with our government right

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>now and previously and what happens if you defy Congress

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And is there any accountability for that or can you

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 1>just sit on your hands say nope? But there have

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>been some very famous um cases in the past, you know,

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years or so where subpoenas have been ignored. Uh,

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>starting well, I'm not starting with but we can start

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>with Eric Holder, Attorney General for Barack Obama. Yeah, that

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>was a big one that was part of the operation, uh,

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the Fast and Furious scandal. Scandal. Yeah, it was definitely

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a scandal. It um It from what I remember, it

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>involved like secret gun sales or else. Some guns were

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>like led out into the community to be traced to

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>see who they went to, and one of them ended

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>up being used to murder an ice officer I believe. Well,

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General Eric Holder refused, under direction of Obama, to

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>answer that subpoena, and he became the first sitting cabinet

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>member to be voted in contempt of Congress. That right, Yeah,

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know you're like, oh, what happens in well,

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>three and a half years later, a judge ruled Um

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that he did not have the right to defy Congress.

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And by that time there was a new Congress, and

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it was a moodpoint. That's a really big big thing

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>to remember, is like a contempt of Congress vote where

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you are supposedly in trouble for ignoring a subpoena, only

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>lasts as long as that session of Congress, unless the

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>next session of Congress wants to pick it up. Yes,

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but then they have to hold another vote. And the

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>chances that that the that there has been a change

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in leadership potentially in that Congress is you know high

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>enough that if you if you make it through that Congress,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, going into recess, you're you're probably going

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to get away with it. And I mean that's par

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>for the course. It wasn't just Eric Holder who got

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>away with it. Um, Harriet Myers, who was a White

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>House counsel, the George W. Bush. There's like a mass

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>political firing of U S attorneys and Um yep, and

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>she and I think chief of staff at the time,

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Joshua Bolton were both held in contempt of Congress and man,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>if you look up, like you know, follow up reporting

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>on this stuff, it's like, you know, while it's going

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>on there like they could face fine jail time. Finally

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I found some follow up. There's like nothing nothing happened,

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely nothing happened. There's no legal ramifications, there were no

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>personal ramifications. There was nothing happened whatsoever to Harriet Myers

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>or Joshua Bolton or Eric Holder for just saying Congress,

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States Congress, go sit on it, which is

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>essentially what you're saying when you ignore a subpoenis yea.

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And because of this um you remember represented of darryl

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Issa probably by name, he was uh he was involved

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in trying to get Eric Holder, you know in the room,

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and he was so mad he sponsored or intro to

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>bill to strengthen subpoena enforcement power, and uh it died

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate. And before we, uh, I think we're

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>about to take a break. Before we do that, that

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we should mention that currently White House Counsel Don McGann

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>um has refused to testify or refused to uh answer

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>his subpoena under direct order of Trump and UM right

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>now he's being sued by the House and he he

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in particular provides a an unusual situation because at least

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>with Harriet Myers, or with Joshua Bolton or with Eric Holder,

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>when they were directed by the president at the time

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>not to um submit to that subpoena from Congress, they

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>were part of the president's staff. Don McGann was instructed

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>not to do not to cooperate with the subpoena after

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>he had already left civil service. He was no longer

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the executive branch. So that definitely makes it unusual.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But if you're sitting there and your head is popping

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and you're saying, how wait, how this is Congress, How

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>can the president just say just ignore that subpoena and

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>people get away with it. There's actually a lot of

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>case law that's been built over the centuries that kind

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of establishes that. And I say, Chuck, we take a

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>break and then we'll dive into that after this. So, Chuck,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>there's something about subpoenas, whether they're issued by Congress or

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>by a court of law. Um, when you get them

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people don't realize, uh, they're negotiable.

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>That's one really big reason to hire a lawyer is because, um,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>they it may be overly broad, it may be kind

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of a fishing expedition. It may put you at risk

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to come forward and give this testimony or to hand

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>over these documents. And if you'll if you hire a

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>lawyer and say, hey, these are the things I'm worried about,

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>they can go and argue to the judge like, hey,

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>how about we just limit this subpoena to these documents

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>rather than everything on my client's hard drive. Or it's

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>really a big hardship for my client to make it here, um,

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and the fifteen dollars a day that the court's paying

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>him for coming to testify isn't actually going to cover it,

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>So you know, can we can we negotiate a higher

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>fee or something like that. There's a lot of stuff

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that can be done. But this is a technic that's

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>also used with congressional um subpoenas too, where say like

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch will go, m I think that this

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is a little overly broad, but maybe we could give

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you this document. Will that satisfy you go Nope? Sometimes

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>they say yes, though, and part of that negotiation comes

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>out of the subpoena process. It's a response to it, um,

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But none of it would have any effect whatsoever if

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Congress didn't have any redress for um, for enforcing its subpoenas.

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>If somebody ignores it. Yeah, I mean, technically there are

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 1>fines in jail time sort of looming. But the more

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I read about this stuff, especially when it comes to

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Congressional oversight, the more it became clear that none of

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that stuff really happens. It's all just dangled out there

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 1>as a means to negotiate, uh something with each other

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>over a pretty long period of time usually for sure. Yeah,

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that Eric Holder thing was it was like four years

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>before he finally handed over the file um, and I

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>think Congress had already gone out of session, you said,

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And it was basically just the whole thing had died down,

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>which I think is basically the the stalling tactic that

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>people ignore subpoenas for like that's why they're doing it. Yeah.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>So technically, if you defy Congress, the committee that issued

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 1>that subpoena is going to vote to issue a citation,

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>a contempt citation, and then it's got to go to

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the full chamber to vote on it. And if that

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>goes through and it passes, which it has before. Then

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>there are three three basic ways that you can prosecute

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that charge, right, and each one is worth Yeah, pretty

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>much like this is. We would never give official legal advice,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>first of all, because we're not lawyers or even trained

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 1>as lawyers. But from what I can tell, there's just

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing happens to you if you ignore a congressional subpoena.

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>But most people respond to it because I feel like

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the further down the UM food chain you are, the

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>more likely Congress is to do something in retaliation to you. Yeah, well,

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>let's let's go through the three at least fine, if

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>for no other reason than pure folly. So if they

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>if they vote in in that contempt citation goes through UH.

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>It is then under the control of the executive branch.

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And you think, oh great the president or oh great

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the president. It's really neither is the Justice Department, which

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is part of the executive branch. It's up to them

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>to decide whether or not they're going to prosecute UH criminally,

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to say no, They're gonna say then

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk a lot about executive privilege coming up, but

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>they will usually cite that UM and decline to prosecute,

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>basically kind of saying, uh, you know what, we don't

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>get involved in this stuff, right. So so that is

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically when it comes to subpoenaing something from the White

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>House or the executive branche. Now, if the if if

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Congress is being ignored by say like the owner of

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Astros, they can go to the d o

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>J and say, Hey, the Houston Astros baseball team owners

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>ignoring a subpoena, We want you to go after the guy,

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and they'll go after the guy. It's when it's executive

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>privilege that's being cited that the d o J says,

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you know how, it's our jurisdiction to decide whether to

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>prosecute this stuff. We're going to decline to do that

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's our own people and we're just going to

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>consider this an internal executive branch. Matter Number two is uh,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the civil judgment, right, and that's when you need the

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>courts to basically enforce this. Go into court and saying

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>we need your help to enforce this civil suit against

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody who stiff this right, Like, you know how you

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>can go arrest somebody and put him in jail, can

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>you do that on our behalf basically, but this is

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>super slow, like turtle like slow. Yeah. But I think

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that, um, the thought that maybe somewhere

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years down the line, there's going to

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>be a judgment against you where you're going to have

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to pay a hundred thousand dollars to Congress or something

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>like that. There's been like twelve months in jail. Will

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>get you to to the table to negotiate, you know,

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>what documents they actually want or what testament money they want? Yes,

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.239
<v Speaker 1>just leverage, right. So the third one is something that

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>isn't used anymore. Really. It's called inherent contempt power was

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>last used in nineteen thirty five. And this is you know,

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of the jail thing. And while there

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is no capital jail, they do have a holding cell. Yeah,

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and like the sergeant at arms of the Senate or

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the House, depending on who's issuing the subpoena and who

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>voted to UM told you in contempt, an armed officer

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Congress will show up and say you're under arrest.

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Congress says you're under arrest. You have to come with me.

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Um or as has been kind of boom um bounced

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>around lately by UM Democrats in the House, replacing the

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>idea of jailing somebody, of arresting and jailing them with

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a much much stiff refined than people have traditionally faced,

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>something more on the order of I think between twenty

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>five thousand and two d and fifty thousand dollars I

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>think a day actually for for ignoring this kind of stuff,

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>which we guess that would get people moving if they

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>actually go through with that, Yeah, I would think. So

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>get him in the pocketbook, yeah, I mean that hard.

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>That's and it pluses the government too. So it's like, hey,

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you know these text credits you're getting, we're taking those

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>away in this text return that you were expecting. We're

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna hang on to that. Like that's this is where

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they could actually do something. Yeah, I think so. If

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not congressional subpoena, if it's just like we're talking

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>about a regular court subpoena, it all depends on what

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>jurisdiction you're in and the presiding judge that's on that case. Yes,

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>but again, because you can be arrested as a matter

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of routine course of of a court, UM, you really

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>should respond at least to a subpoena or else. You know,

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the chances of something happening to you from a court

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of law are much higher than Congress apparently. So, Um,

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>can we talk about case law? Yes, finally we got

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>all that boring stuff out of the way. Yeah, this

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>first one is kind of interesting. Um. And the way

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the judiciary works in this country is just super fascinating

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to me. The older I get, the more I read

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>about it. I'm not becoming illegal wonk by any means

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>illegal legal, But I get it, Like, you know, I

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>get it that people are super into this kind of thing.

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't realized you've gotten into the judiciary. Yeah, I

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 1>think it's pretty fascinating. What got you into it? Just

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>like news, following the news or something or yeah, and

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>just sort of reading about a case like in this

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>case from eighteen hundred, and then you know precedent and

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>what that means and when it when it shouldn't matter

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and should matter, like the one from eighteen hundred you're

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about US v. Cooper. Yeah, Thomas Cooper, who was

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>a scientist and an attorney and a thorn in the

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>side of President John Adams in a big way. Yeah.

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>So in I think, yeah, the US past the Sedition Act,

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>which said that it's illegal to criticize the US government. Unfortunately,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 1>when Thomas Jefferson came into office, he said, then we're

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna kind of do away with that and keep it

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>away forever as much as we can. Um. But there

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was a guy named Thomas Cooper, who, like you said,

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>was a thorn in the side of John Adams, and

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>he was arrested and prosecuted during a time when the

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Sedition Act was still in effect, and he he lost

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>his case. But the way that it relates to subpoenas

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and ignoring subpoenas, and specifically the executive branch ignoring subpoenas,

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is that all the way back in eighteen hundred, when

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the United States was just a couple of decades old,

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>this guy, Thomas Cooper, tried to subpoena John Adams to

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>come testify as part of this case. And the court said,

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>we don't really subpoena presidents. We decided, and that's that

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 1>a precedent for the rest of history. It basically said

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>presidents are accepted from the goings on in normal court stuff,

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>even when they're directly related to the case. They don't

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>have to come, right But that same case, he said,

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>but you can subpoena someone from Congress. That's a big

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>one too. That was a big one, Um Cooper. It

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out for Cooper, like you said, he was convicted.

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So none of that mattered except for establishing this president

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>President President, you got it in this case. You could

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>say it either way, I guess so. So that moves

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 1>us on to seven years later, um U s v.

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Burr Um. This is John Marshall. Chief Justice John Marshall

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>headed this one up and basically this had to deal

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 1>with President Thomas Jefferson UM saying, Hey, they want you

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to come to provide these documents. It was a doozy's teacum,

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>right do says dose two cease Dooce's teacum. And Jefferson

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 1>was like, hey, here are some of those documents that

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you want, and they're like but where the rest of him?

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>He was like, you know, I'm not gonna give you those,

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And I'm also not going to show up because you

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>know what, I gotta be presidenting. Yeah, I'm the executive

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>branch is too powerful and too or no, too important.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the only branch that's supposed to be open seven

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>three six, and I just can't get away, like I'm

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>my my work is too important to come be part

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of this, and that gets I think it's less and

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>less um able to prove these days. I think, yeah,

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>for sure, like you can take off a half a day, right,

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got a BlackBerry, you can definitely email, keep keep

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>tabs on work while you're gone. But yeah, so I

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>thought the same thing too that it does does not

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>hold water, but it does set a president for the president.

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Like you were saying to UM in those two cases

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>basically say together again, the president doesn't have to come

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>be part of this, and um, executive privileges is I

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>guess where this came from from this particular the case

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>where it's saying like, now the president doesn't have to

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>have anything to do with this and the president's documents

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>or the president's business and can't be subpoenaed because we're

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>going to call this executive privilege, right. And there are

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>five basically, uh five types generally of executive privilege that

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>have been used thus far. One is presidential communications. Number

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>two is the deliberative process. Number three is attorney client communications.

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Big one, uh fourth one is law enforcement investigations. And

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the fifth one is anything uh that's sensitive in terms

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of military or national security or diplomatic relations, that kind

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of thing. And that's the one in particular that UM

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>has been upheld over the years is the idea that UM,

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>like the there are secrets that the White House has

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that it just needs to be kept or else people

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to lose their lives or else, diplomatic ties

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to be upset, that kind of stuff, and

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>so those should be protected under executive privilege. But the

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of the stuff has been subject to scrutiny over

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the years, for sure, Yeah, because obviously an executive president

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to try and draw that privilege as broadly

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>as possible. Oh yeah, for sure. And that's that's especially

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>been the case ever since Nixon onward, at least, where

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>there's this idea called UM the unitary Executive theory, which

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is basically, like, you know, these are separate branches of government,

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and the executive branches in charge of everything to do

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>with The executive branch has none it's none of Congress's business,

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and the UM the executive is basically this extraordinarily powerful

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>single person, and that's been UM attempted to be invoked

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>improved time and time again in throwing off congressional oversight.

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And that seems to be kind of what we're in

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the midst of right now is a really big test

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of this unitary executive theory in saying, like, no, not

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>only just the president, but the your president staff, and

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in fact, the entire executive branch can ignore subpoenas from

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Congress because Congress doesn't have any authority over the executive branch.

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what we're witnessing right now. And

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, well, there really there's really just

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>one hand. The great value of having an executive like

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>almost a UM, well a unitary executive is that if

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you're a vested interest or a very powerful group um,

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you've only got one person to to change over to

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>your side, rather than five hundred of them, you know

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. So it's it's very dangerous. It also

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>very much flies in the face of the three branches

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of government and the checks and balances that each one

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to have over the other, because part of

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>part of Congress's role is what's called congressional oversight that

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>says we're responsible for making sure you're not getting out

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of control the president, the executive branch has veto power

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>saying Congress, you guys are nuts. This is this is

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>no law that should be passed. I'm going to say

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>no to this law. And then the judiciary has judicial review.

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>They get to say this law is unjust or this

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>UM executive agency's action is illegal. UM. And by doing this,

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>these three branches keep one another from getting too strong.

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And the unitary executive theory flies in the face of

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that and says, nope, the executive branch is more powerful

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>than all of them. The other two don't have checks

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>over them, and let's just see what happens from here.

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Should we talk about Watergate? Yeah, so everyone,

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>we should do a full episode on Watergate. I think

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I've said that before. I agree, but um, everyone knows

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>what happened there. President Nixon was involved in some hinky

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>activities and uh congressional committees. There was one special prosecutor

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in particular name Archibald Cox, who said, wait a minute,

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got these secret tapes you've been taping people in

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the Oval office. Turn them over. Here's a subpoena. We

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>demand that you turn that over. Along with some other stuff,

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and we want you to come here and testify as well.

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>And of course Nixon was like, I don't think that

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff's gonna happen. Um, here you go. Here's some of

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>these tapes. Just ignore all the parts where it seems

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>like it was heavily edited and sounds real funny because

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>someone who was just in the room was no longer

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>in the room, and there are non sequiturs all over

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the place. It's like that videotape of the guy who

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>got the high score in Donkey Kong. Right, yeah, you

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. Um, But executive privilege was what

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what he claimed he was protected by. So this went

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Supreme Court in nineteen seventy four with United

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>States v. Nixon, and Chief Justice Burger's opinion sided everything

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>from Justice Marshall's Marbury v. Madison to the one we

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 1>just talked about, United States v. Burr. And basically it's

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they're they're walking a fine line there with the judiciary

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>because they're saying, listen, the president needs to be confidential

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and protected when executing these duties, these constitutional duties, on

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, but on the other hand, uh, due

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>process of laws is an is an important thing, and

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're in charge of. So they kind of

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>ended up wanting to protect each of the branch's needs.

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>It seems like, yeah, and they I think they did

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a very good job. And the fact that it was unanimous, UM,

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Rehnquist was involved with some of the people involved,

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>so he um recused himself from voting, but it was

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>unanimous eight to zero vote saying no, you gotta hand

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the tapes over because we don't think that you're just

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to protect um, like intelligent secrets or military secrets

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>or diplomatic secrets. We think you're just basically using the

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>cover of executive privilege to cover your own behind and

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that does not supersede due process in a court of law,

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>which is going on over here with you know, the

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>trials of these guys who broke into the water Gate. Um,

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>so you gotta hand over the tapes, and in doing so, you,

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>like you said, he cited UM another case Marbury v. Madison,

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's a really really important case in here too,

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 1>which I think we should talk about starting now. Well,

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention another quick thing, um, before you

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>dive into Marbury. Another case US v. A. T. And T.

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>This just basically laid out that the courts are only

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>going to get involved if everyone really tried in good

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>faith to work it out beforehand. So like basically said,

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>we're the last stop here. Don't just go run into

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court or the courts in general to figure

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this stuff out for you, right, Although I think that

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution says that the Supreme Court are the ones

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>who are supposed to be running the show when it

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to like a high enough official. A case regarding

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a high enough official, Oh yeah, all all A T

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and T. The case said was you have to really

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>try to work it out amongst yourself before it even

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>gets to us. I got you, Okay, yeah, gosh, I see,

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I see what you're saying. Yep ye faith of course.

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So right, So in Marbury versus Madison, that one basically said, hey,

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>there's this one component here. Yes, the the um we've

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>established that the legislative branchs um Congress can issue subpoenas,

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and that the executive branch can exert executive privilege and

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>say no to some subpoenas under some cases. But um,

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>we're also going to say In US v. Nixon in

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy four that the court can say no, you're

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:37.359
<v Speaker 1>right to secrecy. Is is um overshadowed by a right

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to do process in most cases. But the one that

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>was that really says at the center of this is

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the judiciary and that the judiciary has a right to

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>decide cases where the legislative and executive branches are in dispute.

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Is this Marbury versus Madison case from I think eighteen

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>o four, and it was, from what I understand, a

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>master stroke of um legal eagleness by by Justice John Marshall. Yeah.

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So is along and short of that one that that

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of St James Madison he was trying to withhold

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the commission of William Marbury. Was that the case, Yeah,

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>because the outgoing Adams had packed the courts with friendly

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>judges and the commissions had not all been mailed out,

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:27.839
<v Speaker 1>and Madison was withholding some and they basically said, listen, man,

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't do this like it is your job. You

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>shall commission all the officers of the United States. It's

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>like right there in black and white, and you lose, right.

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So that was one part of it. But what Marshall

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>figured out and what made this a master stroke of

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>legal legalness is that the Um there was a something

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>called a a writ of mandamus, which basically says you

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>have to do this, which had been granted to the

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court in Um the like an act. In sev. Nine,

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Marshall said, so, yes, Um, Madison has to give this

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>over like this is just part of his duties, and

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>he's following a law that Congress made, so he's subject

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>to that law as a minister of the government. But

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, the rid of mandimous power that's

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court has been given were is unconstitutional. We're

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>not in a position to issue a rid of manimous

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 1>because under the Constitution we're not given that right. And

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>so in doing that, he established the Supreme Court as

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the interpreter of what law is constitutional and what isn't.

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.439
<v Speaker 1>And he did that by saying, this law that gives

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>us this amazing power is unconstitutional. So he did it

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>by taking power away from the Supreme Court. But in

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>doing so he gave the Supreme Court a tremendous um

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous advantage over the centuries in interpreting what law

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is constitutional and what isn't and placing itself as the

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:58.280
<v Speaker 1>arbiter of disputes between the legislative branch and the executive branch,

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>which is I mean, that's a lot of what the

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court decides is constitutionality and it's it all comes

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>from the A ten oh four case landmark legal legal.

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Should you take another break? Sure? Man? All right, we'll

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:13.800
<v Speaker 1>take another break and talk a little bit about a

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about Nixon and what some other presidents

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>have done when slapped with the saboena right after this,

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>so we all know what happened to Nixon. Um, but

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the Justice did rule that, hey, dude, you gotta comply

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>with this Deucey's tectum here and you gotta turn over

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>these tapes. So Nixon uh turned over tapes. He did,

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and it all worked out in the end. Everybody's like,

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>this is what you were protecting. This is fine, man,

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>state president for a couple more terms, and he did,

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and the world was a better place for it, that's right. Uh.

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Flash forward to uh to Bill Clinton. That was okay.

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:15.320
<v Speaker 1>So he said, hey, listen, man, what goes on and

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that was much better. What happens in the Oval office

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>stays in the oval office. Executive privilege. Um, they're like

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 1>even that stuff. And he said, well, you know it's

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it's executive privilege falls under executive privilege. So he said,

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I have executivemmunity, I have that privilege, and UM, neither

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 1>me nor my aids have to respond to these subpoenas.

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>And then he fell into line. Eventually new Gingrich got

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>him into line. Well, yeah, and and largely because of

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>US v. Nixon. UM, they said, you know what, you

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>can't stand by this broad executive privilege, stand behind this

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>wall that you've built. You're gonna have to comply. And

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>he did eventually, right, which is traditionally what happens, Like

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the Congress issues subpoenas, executive branch ignores it, the the

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Congress holds the executive branch in contempt, and the judiciary

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>comes in and almost always says, no, you're over exerting

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>your executive privilege to what they're saying, yeah, which you

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:26.280
<v Speaker 1>know that gives me hope because in the past president

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>has been set that due process wins out over executive

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>privilege kind of across the board, it seems like. But

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that that only holds um as long as two things

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>are upheld. One that UM, the Supreme Court is an

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>independent body, regardless of who appointed the judges. And then

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>two if the as long as the executive branch recognizes

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the authority of the Supreme Court. This is where we

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are starting. Like some people can see far enough along

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this horizon that hey, this path we're heading down right now,

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:08.919
<v Speaker 1>there's a point where we could reach where they could

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:12.839
<v Speaker 1>be there could be a Supreme Court decision that says, yes,

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 1>executive branch, you have to hand over these aids for testimony.

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>They have to come testify about um, you know, Russian

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>interference in the two thousand and sixteen election, or this

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 1>call between the president and the Ukrainian president UM. And

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch still says no. And that is the

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>point that everyone says, we have no idea what happens?

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Then we have no idea. Do you go arrest these

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the secretary of the Treasury. Do you go

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>arrest these cabinet members? This has never been done before,

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Like what remedy do you really have? And that's where

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that's where we are with testing out this unitary executive theory.

0:41:56.000 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>How far can you kick the um the kind of

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:03.760
<v Speaker 1>unwritten rules of the constitution, Well, there's lots of written

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:07.280
<v Speaker 1>rules with Constitution, but also like the the unwritten rules

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and procedures that kind of have have guided all of

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this for so long. What happens when those things just

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 1>stop being recognized as valid. What do you do? Well?

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because in the in the past, through

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>our history, and this is on both sides of the

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of the aisle, Democrats and Republicans have always, uh, not successfully,

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 1>but they've always tried to argue that courts should not

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 1>get in the subpoena battles and should not get involved

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>with uh this executive privilege claim, right, and in particular,

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump's latest um, Trump's legal counsel's latest position, which I

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think came out in September of this year, is it's

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a doozy. It basically takes And here's here's something we

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>need to remember here, Like this is not brand new

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>with Donald Trump, right, Like if you if you can't

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 1>stand Donald Trump, this is this is his White House.

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:07.360
<v Speaker 1>His administration is building on stuff that previous presidents have

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>built on both Democrats and Republicans alike. There has been

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 1>a real push basically since Nixon, to to instill as

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:19.280
<v Speaker 1>much power into the presidency and the executive branch as possible,

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and this is a an extreme version of that, but

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it's still kind of following the same path. But what

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they're what they're doing is more aggressive than what previous

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>administrations have done. And they're basically saying this, if you

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 1>subpoena us, uh, the executive branch, If you the Congress

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 1>subpoena one of our people, any of our people, for

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 1>any reason whatsoever, the President can say, no, do not

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>do not respond to that subpoena, do not go before Congress,

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 1>do not hand over those documents. I'm the president, I'm

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>ordering you to. Um. Congress can issue a rid of

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>contempt or find the person in contempt, but that's it.

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.480
<v Speaker 1>That's where it ends be Because the president can say, well,

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>this is an inter branch dispute between the legislative branch

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and the executive branch. And because the UM, the judiciary

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:13.720
<v Speaker 1>can't be drafted or shouldn't be drafted in to solve

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>these disputes. UM, that's all it will remain is an

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 1>inter branch dispute. And in the Supreme Court really has

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 1>no purview in deciding these cases. And when you have that,

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 1>then that means that the executive branch has been removed

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 1>from the oversight of law, it becomes above the law.

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>The law no longer applies to it. And so whatever

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the president wants to do, whatever the President directs his

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>or her agencies to do, is a de facto legal

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>just because the president and the executive branch are not

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>subject to the laws of the land, including rulings by

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the highest court in the United States. That's what the

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 1>latest argument is setting us up for. Yeah, I mean,

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this is what the Justice Department. There was a great article,

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 1>uh and the wh im Post by Harry Littman called

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department's outlandish and arrogant position on congressional subpoenas. Uh.

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 1>And this is from the article. It said, according to

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department, there is no constitutional or statutory basis

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for a congressional committee to try to enforce his subpoenas

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in the federal courts where the executive branch has decided

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:22.920
<v Speaker 1>not to do so. Right. So basically, yeah, they said no,

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and so they said no, and yeah, and all of

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:29.720
<v Speaker 1>this arose from an opinion, um, regarding Trump's tax returns,

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe. Yeah, that's sort of where the whole thing

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 1>got started. Yeah, where the Treasury Secretary Stephen Manuchian said no,

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:38.399
<v Speaker 1>we're not doing that, and Congress said, well, we're holding

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you in contempt. And then the Legal Office of Legal

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Counsel from the White House issued this opinion, and I

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 1>mean it's a doozy, but it's also saying like, what

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 1>are you guys gonna do? What can you do? And

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the that's the big question now well, and

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it makes you wonder what would have happened if darryl

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Isa's UH bill had gone through? That makes um subpoena's

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:02.919
<v Speaker 1>super enforceable because you know, we've seen it on again

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the aisle, where one UH one

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>political party will get mad and and vote something in

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that will come back to staying them later on on

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the hind end. It is. But also you also can't

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>help but wonder, like will like is our republicans um

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:30.320
<v Speaker 1>loyalty to Congress greater than the republicans loyalty to the

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:34.080
<v Speaker 1>executive branch? Like there's it's like you know, in any restaurant,

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 1>there's tension between the white staff and the kitchen staff,

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 1>but they're all working at the same restaurant. They're all

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to do the same thing. We just get high quality,

0:46:42.280 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 1>nourishing meals out to the patrons who are citizens like

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you and me. Right, but there's still tension. You're not

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:50.359
<v Speaker 1>you're not doing it fast enough for you. You burn

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 1>these fries or something like that. But we benefit from

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that tension. We the patrons of this restaurant that we

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>call America. Well, what what happen? End of the day.

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Every one just goes behind the restaurant and smokes a

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>joint by the dumpster. You know, maybe that would make

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>our our congress or o government work more efficiently, if

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 1>if the executive branch and the legislative branch and the

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:13.759
<v Speaker 1>judicial branch all got together and burned a doobie again

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:17.319
<v Speaker 1>there by the grease trap, right exactly. I don't even

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 1>remember what my analogy was was meant to. But we

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, but we um like that we are witnessing

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>some historical stuff right now that that is not normal

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>at all. I mean, like from Watergate stuff, and that

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:35.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even relating to impeachment proceedings. I'm just saying,

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 1>like this level of ignoring congressional subpoenas maybe unprecedented, and

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:44.920
<v Speaker 1>if not, then the closest historical precedent we have is

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the Watergate scandal. Yeah, but I think Congress is one

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 1>recourse to say that's fine, that's fine, molution, you just

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>ignore us. We're going over here as Congress and we

0:47:56.280 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 1>are altering this um. This our ability to a old

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:02.799
<v Speaker 1>people to say no, actually we can find you two

0:48:03.840 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars a day and we will do it. That that

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 1>could be the leverage that gets people to actually comply

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:13.760
<v Speaker 1>with these subpoenas. But we'll find out, because if Congress

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 1>has to actually pass a law to do that, the

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 1>president has veto power over that well. And there are

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>also all sorts of other things have nothing to do

0:48:21.320 --> 0:48:25.480
<v Speaker 1>with this that Congress uses this leverage and or negotiation

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:28.279
<v Speaker 1>tactics like hey, do you want us to push through

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:32.279
<v Speaker 1>some of these uh appointees or should we just keep

0:48:32.320 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 1>stalling forever? Um. All kinds of that stuff is on

0:48:35.560 --> 0:48:37.879
<v Speaker 1>the table. But when you have a president that comes

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 1>out in January and says, uh, you know what, I

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 1>don't mind stall all you want. I like the term

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>acting um because that gives me more leeway, then all

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, that's not leverage anymore. You got anything else? No,

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:53.359
<v Speaker 1>very curious to see what happens with this McGan case.

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Probably nothing, and too will it be the crumbling of

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:59.839
<v Speaker 1>our democracy? Who knows. We'll find out in a few years. Um,

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>if you want to know more about subpoenas, we'll just

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 1>go look it up. And if you get a subpoena yourself,

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>get a lawyer. Don't be stupid. Uh. And since I

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:09.680
<v Speaker 1>said don't be stupid, friends, it's time for a listener mail.

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna this is about Obama's um healthcare. I got

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of stuff about this. I didn't realize I

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>made a prediction. Okay, oh yeah, yeah, yeah, that's gonna

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:28.359
<v Speaker 1>have been sitting in the in the coffers, guys, about

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:30.280
<v Speaker 1>fifteen months ago, I started my journey through the stuff.

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:32.240
<v Speaker 1>You should know. Archives have been on a steady campaign

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 1>about twelve to sixteen episodes a week. That's healthy. Uh,

0:49:36.880 --> 0:49:38.759
<v Speaker 1>why I'm writing though? Ten years ago, Chuck made a

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:42.279
<v Speaker 1>bold prediction and the rumors, the myths and truths behind

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Obama's healthcare plan episodes? Did we do like four of those? Um? Wed, yeah,

0:49:49.040 --> 0:49:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we did for you're right, but this one

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>was specifically about that episode. Uh, Chuck, I said, call

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 1>me in ten years if there are no more private

0:49:57.640 --> 0:50:00.800
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies, because that was one of the big knox

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 1>on it. It's like, this is gonna do away with

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:07.399
<v Speaker 1>private insurance and I'll buy you a beer. Magic Um.

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Chuck legitimately said, I'm on record, and he extended the

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:14.360
<v Speaker 1>bet to anyone out there. Now that statement was more

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of a gentleman's bet than a legal promise. However, Uh,

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:20.719
<v Speaker 1>that is more binding in my opinion. Nonetheless, I would

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like to congratulate you, Chuck. I was getting worried there

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for a second on the expiration of that term and

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that promissory statement. That could have been a pretty pricey

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:32.479
<v Speaker 1>liability that things turned out differently. A million beers, Chuck,

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 1>every single one of our listeners would have written in

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:40.839
<v Speaker 1>and asked for it. That is from Jack Simmons. Nice going, Jack,

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the club. We're glad you've found us,

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and even more so that you like us, so we'll

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 1>do our best to keep it up for you and

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody else that emails a couple of months, although he's

0:50:49.960 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 1>probably forgotten about it. Sorry, that's right, he's moved on

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to Pod Save America. That's right. Uh, Well, if you

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:57.560
<v Speaker 1>want to get in touch with us like Jack did.

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:00.640
<v Speaker 1>You can go on to stuff I few Should Know

0:51:00.760 --> 0:51:03.239
<v Speaker 1>dot com check out our social links There. You can

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>also send us an email, wrap it up, spank it

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:08.240
<v Speaker 1>on the bottom, and send it off to Stuff podcast

0:51:08.360 --> 0:51:13.759
<v Speaker 1>at iHeart radio dot com. Stuff You Should Know is

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more

0:51:16.440 --> 0:51:18.879
<v Speaker 1>podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app.

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts are where ever you listen to your favorite shows.