WEBVTT - #539 Jason Flom with Cal Harris

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Married couple. Cal and Michelle Harris were living separate lives

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>under the same roof as their divorce proceedings began in

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one. When Michelle didn't return from work

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>one September night, it was assumed that she'd stayed with

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>friends or with her boyfriend, but when her van was

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>found at the edge of their property, the police focused

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>on her estranged husband, developing circumstantial evidence as well as

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>what appears to have been total fabrications, while dragging Cal

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Harris through four trials over the course of fifteen years.

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>This is wrongful Conviction. You're listening to Wrongful Conviction. You

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>can listen to this and all the Lava for Good

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>podcasts one week early and ad free by subscribing to

0:00:53.920 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Lava for Good Plus on Apple Podcasts. Welcome back to

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Ron with Conviction, where we're heading to Tioga County, New York,

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>where our guests today. Cal Harris worked for his family's

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>auto dealership business while raising his four kids until it

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>was all derailed, first by marital troubles, followed by the

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>disappearance of his estrange wife, Michelle. Cal I'm sorry you're

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>here because of what you've gone through, but I'm very

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>happy and honored to have you with us. Welcome, we

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>thank you, and to help him tell this story. We're

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>joined by two of his attorneys from Barquette Epstein, Aida

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>elyisen Ring and Bruce Barquette.

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having us.

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm very happy to be here.

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So Cal, We've got a lot of ground to cover.

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's rewind all the way back to where you grew up,

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the family, the auto business, and then of course we'll

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>turn to the tale of you and Michelle.

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 4>I grew up in the Binghamton area, about an hour

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 4>north of Scranton, Pennsylvania, and about an hour hours south

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 4>of Syracuse, New York. My father started the business back

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 4>in nineteen sixty seven with a small Ford dealership in Awego,

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 4>New York. And when my brothers and I were of

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 4>age and got in the family business, we grew. We

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 4>had eight dealerships in four different locations. We represented almost

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.399
<v Speaker 4>every major franchise, domestic in import. We had a very

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 4>good marketing system, we had a very good business plan,

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 4>and we grew exponentially.

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And when and how did you meet Michelle?

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, Michelle and I started dating in the late eighties,

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 4>got married in August of nineteen ninety. Built our home

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 4>in ninety two, and then our first child, Taylor, was

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 4>born in ninety four, and then the next year Kayla,

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 4>and then Jenna was born in ninety seven, and then

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 4>Tanner was born in ninety nine. Michelle is a great mother. Obviously,

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 4>having four young children was a big task for Michelle.

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 4>I was working a lot of hours at the family business,

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 4>so we had two part time nannies, and then we

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 4>had a handful of babysitters, so the kids were well

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 4>taken care. We lived on a very beautiful piece of

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 4>property and it was a small lake surrounded by two

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 4>hundred and fifty acres. We purchased it from Binghamton University

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 4>and it was a newdist camp for Binghamton University.

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 3>See I finally learned something new.

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Cal Yeah, that.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Was back in the sixties and the seventies. And then

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 4>when the newdiest thing kind of ran its course, it

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 4>sat empty for years and somebody on the board of

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 4>Binghamton University knew my dad and cut us a deal.

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 4>We don't live there anymore. I had to sell the

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 4>property to pay my legal bills. We'll never be able

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 4>to replace that property, but we had our own little

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 4>sanctuary out there, all kinds of woods and nature, and

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 4>I taught my kids how to water ski and wakeboard

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 4>on the lake behind the jet ski, and we fished

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 4>and it was a great run while it lasted.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And during the happier years for the Harris family. The

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>New York State Police, specifically Troops C that operated in

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the southern tier of the state, was while they were

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>experiencing discord, and that began what a detective named Harding

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>was interviewing with the CIA, and when he was asked

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>if he'd break the law for his country, Harding admitted

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to manipulating or fabricating evidence against folks that they believed

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 1>to be guilty. That kicked off a fourteen month investigation.

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 4>A special prosecutor get an investigation on Troop C, and

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 4>he uncovers forty instances of evidence tampering by Troop C.

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 4>In his conclusion, he says everyone at Troop C was

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 4>either directly involved or had firsthand knowledge on it, and

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 4>he said it was generational that they were passing on

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 4>this behavior to new recruits. And even after that report,

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 4>Sue Malby, the lead investigator on my case, gets caught

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 4>coercing a false confession out of a fifteen year old boy.

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 4>It sends that to prison, and the only reason that

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 4>boy gets out is because the adult male that committed

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 4>the crime confessed to it.

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And it appears that this pattern of misconduct was applied

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to Cal, whose once happy marriage by March of two

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one, had devolved, as these things sometimes do,

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>into divorce proceedings. Cal and Michelle, meanwhile, we're cope parenting

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and remained in the home together, but they were living

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>separate lives. Michelle began socializing more and eventually began working

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>at a bar called Lefties in an area known as

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the Valley.

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 4>So she's been going down to the Valley and hanging

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 4>out at these dive bars and she's partying pretty hard.

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 4>She knows what Lefties is, she knows they're dealing drugs

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 4>out of there. But she made it clear to me

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 4>that what she does outside the home is none of

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 4>my business. So the only people that know what's going

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 4>on in her life are the nanny barb there, Michelle's

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 4>sister in law, Shannon Taylor, and she also had a

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 4>friend named Nicki Burdick that was a friend that she

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 4>would go out with at night. And party with, and

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 4>she had a boyfriend at the time. Through the investigation,

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 4>she was also involved with apparently several other guys at

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 4>the same time. And I noticed from March two thousand

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 4>and one, when she starts to work there till September

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 4>of two thousand and one, things get really bad and

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 4>she's living a lifestyle that's not healthy for her, not

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 4>healthy for the kids. And she'd go to work, but

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 4>she wouldn't come home. She would always go out afterwards.

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes she'd go over to her boyfriend's house. Most of

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 4>the time she would go out and party and hang

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 4>out with these other guys that she's involved with. She

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 4>had been frequently not coming home until five or six

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 4>o'clock in the morning, and there were some mornings that

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 4>she was so hungover she couldn't even watch the kids

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 4>and barb theair than nanny had to come over and

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 4>take that responsibility.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>But despite the erratic lifestyle, by the summer of two

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one, tensions between Call and Michelle had died

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>down and it appeared that they were going to settle

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the divorce. Michelle had borrowed money from her boyfriend approachases

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a home, so things were looking up when all of

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a sudden they took a terrible turn.

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 2>So the chronology is September eleventh, she wakes up, the

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 2>events take place down in New York City. She works

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 2>that night at Lefties. Her boyfriend testified that she visited

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 2>him and left around eleven or eleven fifteen pm. Nobody

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 2>else saw her that we are certain of, other than

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>potentially whoever was at the foot of the driveway with

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 2>her the following morning.

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>A witness named Kevin Tubbs later came forward describing this

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>scenario and a man who may have been a guy

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>named Stacy Stewart.

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Stacy Stewart knew Michelle because they would frequent the bar Lefties,

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 2>and the degree to which they got to know each other,

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I think is up for some debate, but it's purported

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 2>to us by number of witnesses Stewart was interested in

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Michelle romantically. We have evidence that she was at the

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 2>foot of the driveway around roughly five o'clock in the

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 2>morning with somebody who matches Stacy Stewart's description to a

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 2>t and was driving the type of truck that Stacy

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Stewart owned.

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>But that wasn't known until after his first conviction. At

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>least not by the defense. So after this alleged sighting

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on the driveway on the morning of September twelfth, the

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>morning began as usual for Cal the kids. When Cal

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>noticed Michelle was out of the couch, he continued about

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>his routine getting the older kids ready for school, and

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a little after seven am, when he hadn't seen Michelle yet,

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>he called Barblayer for help with their youngest, Tanner, while

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone else was set to leave and start their day.

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 4>So I called Barb and I said, Michelle's not home yet.

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure what's going on. Can you help me

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 4>get the kids to school because someone's got to stay

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 4>home with Tanner. So she said, yep, I'm available. And

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 4>a few minutes after I called Barb, Barb, I call

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Michelle's cell phone, and because we live in a remote area,

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 4>our cell phone coverage cuts out in about a ten

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 4>mile radius around our house. And I didn't leave a

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 4>message because I just assumed, years and years of doing that,

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 4>that she was on her way home, she was within

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 4>that ten mile radius, so I don't leave a message.

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Years later, at the first trial, Barb Fayer testified that

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>she was the one who made that phone call, even

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>though that was impossible.

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 4>I called Barb and then four minutes later I called

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 4>Michelle's cell phone.

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>If you track where she was, she could not have

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 2>gotten to Cal's house in time to make the call.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And when Barb actually did arrive, she discovered Michelle's van

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the driveway.

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 4>Barb comes in through the garage and she walks into

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 4>the kitchen. It says to me, is Michelle here? And

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 4>I say no. She says, well, her van's at the

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 4>end of the driveway. It's unlocked. I looked in it

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 4>and she's not in there. And then I said, well,

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 4>are the keys in it? And she says yes. So

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 4>we hop in my truck and we go out to

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 4>the end of the driveway, and Barb's not upset. In fact,

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 4>we had some small conversation on the way out to

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 4>the end of the driveway, and Barb's saying things like, well,

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 4>maybe she's hungover at at friend's house.

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>After Cal drove off with the kids, Michelle's party friend,

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Nicki Burdick, called and according to Barb, there she explained

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to Nicky about Michelle's van.

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 2>There's a voice message from Burdick on Michelle's cell phone,

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 2>You're scaring me, Where are you? What's going on?

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 4>That kind of thing, And then Nicky calls Michelle's divorce attorney,

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 4>who in turn calls the state police, and that's when

0:10:52.000 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 4>the investigation starts. The lead investigator on this case was

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Sue Andrew's Mulvey of New York State Police Troops c.

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 4>As soon as my name came up, she immediately put

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 4>herself on as the lead investigator because for her this

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 4>was personal. And the reason it was personal was because

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 4>her father, John Andrews, used to work for me back

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 4>in the day in one of the dealerships and I

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 4>fired him and it was bad blood ever since.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 2>So you had the lead investigator's father having worked for

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Cal and being fired, and the lead prosecutor, Gerald Keene,

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.599
<v Speaker 2>his wife was part of the team representing Michelle in

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 2>the divorce.

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's the classic case of the small town everybody

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 4>it's related to somebody.

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 2>So her divorce lawyer turned his file over right away

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 2>to the state police and it didn't take much for

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the divorce lawyer, Nikki's there and I think the in

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 2>laws the tailors to assume that Cal had something to

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 2>do with this.

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, at that point, there was no body. In fact,

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>her body to this day has still never been found.

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So the investigators began searching her van, the house, the garage,

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to find something incriminating.

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 4>Steve Anderson, he's supposed to be the forensic expert. He

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:41.239
<v Speaker 4>immediately comes in and starts testing the sub millimeter stains.

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 4>There's like a dozen altogether sub millimeter stains in the

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 4>garage and in the kitchen as you come into the house.

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 2>The first thing that he did is he saw what

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 2>he thought was blood spattered on the wall in the garage.

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 2>It turned out that was non human dog's blood.

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Well there is the cookie or pasta sauce on the

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 3>ceiling as well. It's very disappointing that it turned out

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 3>out to be blood.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But Anderson eventually did find some human blood stains.

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 4>So he tests these stains, and the protocol that he's

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 4>supposed to follow is that when he comes down to

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 4>what he believes to be a crime scene, he's supposed

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 4>to observe and take notes, then photograph, and then he's

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 4>supposed to test with his cotton swab and his solution.

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 4>But that's not what he does in my house. He's

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 4>taking his cotton swab, which he admits one of the

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 4>stains he totally consumes as he's testing it, but he

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 4>doesn't take a photograph before he does it, so we

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 4>have to take his word for it. But the reality

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 4>is he's the one that's altering the stains, and then

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 4>he says it's me trying to clean up these sub

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 4>millimeter stains.

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So Anderson's missteps were eventually presented as evidence of some

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>alleged post murder cleanup effort, when in reality that blood

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>had likely been there for quite a while.

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 2>They said that the blood was red, therefore fresh, that

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 2>it had to be depositive within a few days. That

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>was two lies. One, the blood wasn't that color, and two,

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't matter what color it is, because the scientific

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 2>community agrees you can't age blood based upon its color.

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it turns brown very quickly, and sometimes it stays

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 2>red for an inordinate amount of time, and they haven't

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 2>been able to figure out the variables that would cause

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the blood to turn colors in some amount of time.

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that there was a known explanation for

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that blood spatter as well, and we're going to hear

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>more about that later. Now, without any known witnesses. The

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>police began interviewing family, friends and community members, not about

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>what you would expect them to ask about, which is

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>anything they may have seen regarding Michelle's disappearance, but instead

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they sort of narrow focused on Cal.

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that the way the police conducted their investigation

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 3>throughout the entire community, they led everyone to we think

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Cal did it.

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 4>I had friends of mine who didn't buy into the

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 4>state police narrative and questioned the state police, well, what

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 4>do you mean you know that Cal did it? And

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 4>when the state police wouldn't answer, you know how they knew,

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 4>then my friends were like, well then what are you doing?

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 3>Then they had random people and witnesses fill out FBI

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 3>profiles like does he ever get mad? Has he ever

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 3>done this? Has he ever done that? Day after day,

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 3>multiple witness interviews, the news, the chatter, the town talking.

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Another day goes by where her body isn't recovered, and

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 3>the zealousness with which they tried to investigate Cal, Like

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 3>that gets you in the entire community in the mindset

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 3>of let's get him. He's getting away with murder. Because

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 3>the police believed that.

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 2>There the babysitter who came over right away started to

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>create a diary documenting the things that were going on

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 2>at the house, thinking she was helping the police.

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 3>One of his former neighbor's friends says, let me rack

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 3>my brain. I do remember, and this is one of

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 3>my favorite little details. I do remember. He kept trying

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 3>to clean his glasses and the natural implication was that

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 3>there was blood spatter on them, and it's like Macbeth

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 3>trying to clean the blood off the hands. They interviewed

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 3>people in Canada, like, oh, he was on vacation in Canada.

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 3>We hear that the jet skier got into a verbal

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 3>dispute with him. They interviewed girlfriends from high school. I mean,

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 3>they turned his entire life upside down and found nothing.

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 3>But when you have all of these little, tiny pieces

0:16:55.680 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 3>of nothing burgers together and they've completely assassinated his character,

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 3>and in a.

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Case that is largely circumstantial, those elements become admissible, contrary

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to a case with direct evidence of guilt, in which

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the defense has a better idea of what the issues are.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>But in circumstantial cases, the state weaves a web from

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>these disparate elements that would normally be inadmissible but together

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and create an appearance of guilt and that can overwhelm

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a traditional defense. And by two thousand and five, sure enough,

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>cal was indicted. And it seems that the prosecution felt that

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>they had enough to do that, but the first two judges, well,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>they disagreed.

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 3>The first judge reviewed the grand jury minutes and the

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 3>transcripts and gave a heads up to the prosecutor and

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 3>to the defense attorney, I'm dismissing this case. It's insufficient.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 3>What does the prosecutor do? The next day he files

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 3>a formal motion to recuse the judge, stating that he's

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 3>given the appearance that he favors the defense, and ultimately

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 3>pits his oath of office against that of the judge,

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 3>as the judge claims, sort of requiring at that point

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 3>the judge to get off the case because of the

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 3>animosity and the claims that are made by the prosecutor.

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 3>So he did, and a new judge was assigned, and

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 3>that judge also dismissed the case, indicating that the previous

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 3>judge's decision stands and it's insufficient. So it got dismissed,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 3>and then they went on to represent the case and

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 3>put on more witnesses. In two thousand and seven, they

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 3>try the case in front of a jury pull frankly

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 3>that have been polluted by the police investigation, no Cal,

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 3>and have strong opinions about the case.

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately, the state's trial narrative was that Cal killed Michelle

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>sometime late on September eleventh, citing no signs of forced entry,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the alleged blood evidence, the looming divorce and custody proceedings,

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>as well as some circumstantial witness testimony, some of which

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>were just outright lies. Now, as we mentioned, the morning

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of Michelle's disappearance, Cal called Barb Thayer for help with

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the kids and then called Michelle, but didn't leave a voicemail.

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 2>So Keen, the prosecutor, in a deposition that we took

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 2>about four years ago, admitted that if Cal had placed

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the call at seven point fifteen, and had he been

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the killer, in other words, he knows he's calling a

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 2>dead person's phone, he would have left some contrived message

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 2>about I'm worried about you, where are you, why aren't

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 2>you home with the kids, something like that. And Keene

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 2>admitted if he made the call and didn't leave a message,

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 2>he couldn't have committed this crown because there's no way

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 2>he would have made the call and not left the

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 2>message had he did it. Once they realized that they

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 2>got there to say she got there in time to

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 2>have made the call, despite the fact that they had

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 2>asked her about this multiple times and she never said

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 2>she made the call, and in fact denied it, and

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 2>then got on the stand and testified that she had,

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 2>and it was clear that they had convinced her that

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 2>she had to say that otherwise the case against Cal

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 2>would kind of blow up in the first instance.

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>This is what pisses me off about circumstantial cases. Now

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about voicemails, the cell signal for a ten

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>mile radius Barb's location when Cal called. Instead of tackling

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>direct evidence of what happened to Michelle, the defense is

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>left scrambling trying to fight a ghost. Almost they're trying

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to defend against an image of guilt that the prosecutor

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is only just sort of peeling away the layers of

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>and revealing during the trial.

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 3>With circumstantial evidence, lay people go, oh, it's just a

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 3>circumstantial case, and there's a stigma associated with that word

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 3>that there's not much evidence. But they can be some

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 3>of the most falsely convincing cases because the government or

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 3>the prosecution is permitted to use otherwise impermissible, non relevant evidence,

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 3>often negative character evidence, and they stay to the court, Oh,

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 3>this is one of the little pieces of the puzzle

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 3>that we need to build up this case because it's circumstantial,

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 3>and the judge goes, well, i'll allow it. I'll give

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 3>them some leeway. And then it's every single rock that

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 3>builds this massive mound that you can't escape from.

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>When in reality it's nothing but an exhaustive climb straight

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>up bullshit mountain where you have to dispel this minutia

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>or discover the misconduct underlying it before it's too late.

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And this case has plenty more like Col's a legend motive.

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 2>If you look at the summations from the trials, you'll

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 2>see that they ascribe the mode of the cow. The

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 2>divorce case, there was a trial date set for November

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 2>of that year, and so they said he had to

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 2>kill her because he was about to go to trial

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 2>and all these fees were going to come do and

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 2>there was a thirty thousand dollars appraisal fee that he

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 2>was going to have to pay, and he was going

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 2>to have to pay his lawyers, and he was going

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 2>to lose everything, and that couldn't happen. That was all false,

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and I think knowingly false. The divorce case had just started.

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 2>There wasn't a single deposition taken, very little, if any

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 2>discovery had been traded. That was no more ready for

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 2>trial than I am ready to fly a jet. It

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 2>just wasn't ripe yet. And the worst part of that

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 2>whole fabricated motive was that the case had been resolved.

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 2>In the fourth trial, we had Cal's lawyer come on

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 2>and testify that Michelle had accepted the offer, that the

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.479
<v Speaker 2>case was resolved, and as I need to point it out,

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 2>she bought a house. This was done. And even Barbara

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Thayer and Burdick, who were adamant that Cal had done this,

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 2>admitted that by the summer of two thousand and one

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 2>things had calmed down. They weren't fighting at all, and

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Michelle had resolved that she was going to buy a

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 2>house in town and it's was over.

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>But without this context, at the first trial, the prosecution

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>had created an urgency for Cal to act that was unimpeached.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Then we move on to the blood evidence, if you

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.479
<v Speaker 1>can call it that, and as we mentioned, they had

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>said the blood was fresh because it was still red,

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>when not only was it not red, but color canton

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't indicate age. And then it got even more misleading.

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Henry Lee, who was their expert, famous from the OJ

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 2>case and several others. Keene asks him could this have

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 2>come from a cut on her finger? And Lee says,

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 2>of course it could have, but the jury will want

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>to see a cut in the finger, and they go

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 2>back and forth, laughing about the burden of proof.

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, the dark joke here is that there is nobody

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>so good luck with proving that this was from a

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>simple cut. But remember the prosecutor, Gerald Keene, his wife

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>was on Michelle's divorce team, and so Keene asked that

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>question about a cut finger, having seen the file from

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Michelle's divorce attorney.

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't tell Lee what he knows, which is that

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Michelle fell or if you believe her, was pushed by

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 2>cal into the snow, cut her hand a few months

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 2>before this and walked back in through the garage, which

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 2>is where the blood was. So he didn't ask that

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 2>question randomly, kind of speculating he knew that Michelle cut

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 2>her finger because his wife drew up the affid David

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 2>that Michelle filed in court, saying that she cut her hand.

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 3>And there's more. The prosecutor then goes on to profer

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 3>evidence from every single witness that ever knew Michelle. Did

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 3>you ever see her bleed?

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 3>Did you ever see her with a cut on her hand? No?

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Was she bleeding during the time of September of two

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 3>thousand and one. No, So he knew that she'd cut

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 3>her hand. He knew that her path to enter the

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 3>home was where the droplets were found, and he was

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 3>aware that there was a plausible explanation for it. He

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 3>hid that plausible explanation, and then he went a step

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 3>further and created opposite in culpatory information that he knew

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:21.959
<v Speaker 3>to be false.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But the jury was unaware of this context, so they

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>were left with the appearance that this blood was fresh

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and that it had been shed on the night Michelle disappeared.

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 3>They convict Cal within hours, and a witness comes forward

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 3>who hadn't really thought about the case, but then sees

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 3>the reports of the conviction and he reaches out to

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 3>Cal's defense attorney, who's now a judge, Joseph Colly, and

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 3>he says Hey, I didn't think it was Michelle that

0:25:55.800 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 3>I saw, because everyone said she disappeared. But I think

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 3>it was because it looked just like her, and it

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 3>was at the foot of that driveway, and it was

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 3>with an individual, but it wasn't Cal. And he describes him,

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 3>his height, his build, his hair color, he describes what

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 3>they're doing, he describes her vehicle, he describes his vehicle

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 3>model to a t.

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>So this was Kevin Tubbs describing what he claims to

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have seen around five am on September twelfth, Michelle standing

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with a man and his truck, matching the description of

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Stacy Stewart, who was believed to have been romantically interested

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in Michelle. So Cal's lawera filews what's called a three

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty motion presenting Kevin Tubbs as well as another person

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>who described a similar scene that morning.

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 3>The prosecution went furiously after both of them in a

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 3>three point thirty hearing, going as far as using sealed

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 3>documents to cross examine one of the witnesses who had

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 3>previously a case dismissed, but ultimately that conviction is overturned

0:26:58.240 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 3>after a three thirty hearing.

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.959
<v Speaker 4>I get out in November of two thousand and seven,

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 4>and then my next trial is two years later.

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 3>They retry the case in two thousand and nine and

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 3>he is new trial council should have seen it coming.

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 4>I tried this guy from Albany, Terry Kinlin. There were

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 4>certain things I wanted done in the second trial that

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 4>we didn't do in the first trial. Promised me he

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 4>was going to do him never did so.

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Even with two witnesses who claimed to have seen Michelle

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>with a man who was not cal and knowing how

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the circumstantial evidence came together, his attorney just simply didn't

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>effectively dismantle the building blocks of this circumstantial smoke screen,

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>some of which were provable lies.

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 4>And I testified in my second trial and Jerry Keene

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 4>doing his closing argument, he says as to the jury

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 4>that cal Harris wants you to believe that all these

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 4>witnesses came in here today and lied to you, and

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 4>that he's the only one telling the truth. And the

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 4>reality is that's exactly what happened. All the key witnesses

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.360
<v Speaker 4>were lying. But you know, there's nothing you can do

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 4>waiting for the jury's verdict that moment. I had to

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 4>go through that four times. I still have nightmares about

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 4>those moments, and I can't watch another crime show. They

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 4>always show the verdict. I can't watch it. I'm incarcerated

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 4>a month in two thousand and five, for six months

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 4>after my conviction in two thousand and seven, while the

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 4>three point thirty hearing was being processed. And then I'm

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 4>convicted again in two thousand and nine, and this time

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 4>I wind up going to the Auburn Correctional Facility. Every

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 4>time I was incarcerated and I'm sitting in my cell,

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 4>time comes to a complete stop. Every minute is an hour, right,

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 4>and you're ripped away from your kids and you're worried

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 4>about them. My first conviction in two thousand and seven,

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 4>Taylor would have been eleven, Kayla would have been ten,

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Jenna was eight, and Tanner was six. I think at

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 4>the time, and I'm the only parent they've got. My

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 4>kids were young and at that time in their life

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 4>is as a parent, it is the most joyful when

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 4>they're young and growing up and you do all these

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 4>fun things together and we couldn't. We couldn't do anything,

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 4>We couldn't plan anything. Every special moment when I wasn't

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 4>in prison, every birthday, every holiday, Christmas, whatever. We're sitting

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 4>around and I'm sick to my stomach right, I can't

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 4>enjoy moment. I'm trying to put up a good front

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 4>for my kids so that they can enjoy the moment.

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 4>But I'm sick to my stomach every single minute of

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 4>every day because I don't know what's going to happen.

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 4>It was torture for fifteen years having to live that way.

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But during that time, cal learned a great deal about

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the evidence rules that paved the way for circumstantial evidence cases,

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and it appears to have had roots in the prosecution

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of other bodyless murder cases.

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 4>In eighteen fifty, it was the first time that New

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:41.479
<v Speaker 4>York allowed a bodyless murder case. Prior that you couldn't

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 4>convict somebody in New York without a body. The mentality

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 4>was that they didn't want someone who was cunning enough

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 4>to dispose of the body to get away with that,

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 4>so they changed the rules of evidence. And one of

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 4>the things that one of my previous attorneys built, so

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:04.959
<v Speaker 4>Easton argued in the appeal, was the pendulum has swung

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.479
<v Speaker 4>too far in New York. It went from eighteen fifty

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 4>where you couldn't convict somebody unless you had a body

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 4>to the Cal Harris case now in two thousand and nine,

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 4>where you went too far. There's no evidence here, and of.

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Course it didn't hurt to have alternate suspects that upended

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the state's theory. Nevertheless, the conviction was overturned an insufficiency

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of evidence, making way for a third trial. And that's

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>when Cal hired Barquette Epstein.

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Remember now we got the case and had seen the

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 2>movie already, right, so we had two trial transcripts to

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 2>go off of, and Aida and I and Donna Eldea,

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 2>who tried the case with us. We talked about the

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 2>fact that you have all these facts and I'll put

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 2>that in quotes, facts that the prosecutor used to build

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 2>a circumstantial case. And then we said, we have to

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 2>challenge all of the ones that we know to be

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 2>false or that are challengeable. And the jury, when we

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 2>did that, are looking at you because they don't understand

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 2>why we arguing about who made a phone call or

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 2>why are we arguing about where certain things were the

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 2>divorce proceedings, Because they didn't understand how this is supposedly

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 2>all going to come together for the government. In neither

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 2>of the first two lawyers, frankly, because they didn't have

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 2>the preview that we had, so they just kind of

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 2>let that stuff go. For the most part, we had

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 2>to dig in and fight each one of those facts.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 2>So you could say that's not what happened. You can't

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 2>use that as a building block because it's false or

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 2>flawed in some way.

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So in addition to presenting the alternate suspect witnesses, they

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>exposed Barb Thayer's deceit as well as the alleged motive.

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And then there was the alleged freshness of the blood

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and alleged cleaning efforts, all supported by the state's quote

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>unquote expert Henry Lee.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 2>So we called up all these lawyers that had either

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 2>hired him or dealt with him, and pulled all these transcripts,

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and you realize that the guy is nothing more than

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 2>a really a whole. He would say anything for anybody.

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 2>And the end of the cross I had transcripts from

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 2>a trial he did in the Carolinas where his justification

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 2>for that theory was in opposite of what he was

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 2>saying about cal like literally, you couldn't held both opinions,

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 2>and so he essentially gave up and said you're right,

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and that was it. And it went so well with

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Henry Lee on the third trial they never brought him

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 2>back again.

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, a fourth trial was necessary. Despite dismantling the circumstantial

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>evidence and exposing them as conduct, the jury was hung,

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>so they considered waving a jury. But not all judges

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>are created equal.

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, for me, it was clear that a circumstantial

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 4>case like mine was too complicated for a jury, and

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 4>I just felt that I'm zero for three. What do

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 4>you do? It's worth a try.

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 3>It was a big risk. But we wanted to judge

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 3>who had conviction.

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 4>In balls balls.

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to say ball, I don't know why, I'm

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 3>like hiding words. We wanted to judge who had balls,

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 3>and we wanted to judge who was really smart. He

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 3>had both of those things. And we looked up decisions

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 3>he had issued in the past, and we did more.

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Than read his decisions. If you remember, I eate it.

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 2>We spoke to people who knew him. He had been

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 2>a defense attorney for a long time, tried about a

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 2>dozen murder cases, so he was experienced, and they said

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.399
<v Speaker 2>to us, he's going to do what he thinks is right.

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Trust us. If he thinks your guy's guilty, he's going

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 2>to go down. And we were in the back talking

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.439
<v Speaker 2>about jury selection and I eat it. Donna and I

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 2>looked at each other and I'm like, okay, let's do this.

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 2>And I literally went like this. I said, come out.

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 2>He's like, what do you What do you mean? I said,

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 2>you're it, judge. He says, what do you mean? I'm it?

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 2>So we're waiving a jury and he lost his temper.

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 2>What started yelling at me? You think because I was

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 2>a defense attorney, I'm going to quit your guy. I'll

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 2>tell you something. I'll convict him. Quicker just went off

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 2>on me. I'll be honest. He scared me enough. If

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I was there alone, i'd have backed off. I think

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 2>Aida was like, no, we can still do this, and

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Donna was, now, he's just blowing smoke. He'll be fine.

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 3>There have been so many judges that had said this

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 3>case was insufficient to go forward that we thought a

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 3>smart judge with balls will finally put this to rest.

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 2>He comes out and he says, there's one count in

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 2>the indictment, murdering the second degree. I'm the soul trial

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.800
<v Speaker 2>or fact in this case. I find the defendant not guilty.

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Bales exonerated, bangs his hand on the bench, and I

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 2>turned to my left to see Cal and Aida and Donna,

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 2>and by the time I turned back, he was gone.

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 3>And Cal turned to me and said, what just happened?

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Is it not guilty or guilty?

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 4>I couldn't even hear. I couldn't hear you.

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, head, but your kids heard it.

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, It's just like a ton of bricks come on

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 4>my shoulders. Finally, after fifteen years, we're able to look

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 4>at each other and know that we're going to be

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 4>a family, and we can start making plans going forward,

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 4>which we couldn't do for fifteen years.

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 2>His oldest son got in the cornel that day, May

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourth, twenty sixteen.

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 4>But the damage is done. We're all suffering in one

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:26.800
<v Speaker 4>form or another. It's never gonna go away, only because

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 4>this case has garnered so much attention and she's still missing.

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 4>You know, That's what keeps everybody watching, is that she's

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 4>still missing. And I'm getting death threats to this day.

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 4>I've been assaulted several times now since my acquittal. I

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 4>have to look over my shoulder every day I leave

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 4>the house.

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>All because a circumstantial case can be that falsely convincing. Meanwhile,

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the team held a May twenty twenty five press conference

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 1>where Cal and his children offered a one hundred thousand

0:36:55.880 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars reward for information that would lead to finding Michelle's remains.

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 2>We have a pretty good idea of what happened to her,

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:09.439
<v Speaker 2>at least who was involved, and there are people who

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 2>know what happened, and we're hoping that the money will

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 2>be the incentive that they need. Just for a moment,

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 2>imagine that we do this, that we find her. It

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 2>would be unbelievable. And we've looked. It's not that we

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 2>haven't been looking. I aid it was with me in

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen, this summer, digging up an outhouse with a

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 2>couple of investigators in a backo.

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 4>Oh boy.

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I used to be an editor at l magazine before

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 3>I decided to go to law school. I used to

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 3>get free loot, go to runway shows and there I

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 3>am surrounded by five retired detectives and Bruce and a

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 3>couple of shovels going through an outhouse.

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'd say it's arguably more meaningful work. So we're

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>going to go ahead and link ways to contact bark

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>at Epstein in the episode descript as any new information

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>could also help them in their next fight.

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 2>October twenty seventh, we have the federal Civil Rights trial,

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 2>and this is where the hunters have become the prey.

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:17.320
<v Speaker 2>The defendants are Gerald Keene, Steve Anderson, and Susan Mulvey

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 2>State police in the County of Tioga. We hope to

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:23.760
<v Speaker 2>put on a persuasive case not only is Cal obviously innocent,

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 2>but that what happened to him was fundamentally wrong, a

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.439
<v Speaker 2>violation of his constitutional rights, and they should be held

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 2>to account for that.

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And with that, we're going to go to closing arguments,

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>where first of all, I'm thanking you all from the

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>bottom of my heart for being here today and courageously

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>sharing this harrowing story. I don't know how else to

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>put it. And then I'm just going to kick back

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>in my chair and listen to anything else you feel

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is left to be said. So let's do it in

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>alphabetical order. Aida. Let's start with you, then Bruce, and

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>then Cal can take us off into the sunset.

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 3>It has been such an eye opening experience to see

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the level at which lawyers have to work it's a

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:16.399
<v Speaker 3>herculean task to actually exonerate somebody, especially when the prosecution

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 3>and the police make it personal. And we left no

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 3>single piece of paper unturned. And I remember seeing cal

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 3>angry during moments of the trial, and there's no question

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 3>to me who actually knows the evidence as opposed to

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 3>a lay person that watched forty eight hours that he's innocent,

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 3>and his anger and his bitterness and his love for

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 3>his kids and his grace and compassion while he was

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:52.319
<v Speaker 3>actually incarcerated is all a testament to that. So it's

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 3>been an incredible teaching moment. I'm very grateful that he

0:39:56.960 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 3>trusted us and that I got to participate in it,

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 3>not just for him, but for is four incredible, spectacular kids.

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:08.240
<v Speaker 2>We've been lucky enough to handle a number of cases

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 2>that involved wrongful convictions, and a product of that is

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 2>we get solicitations regularly from people who are in prison

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 2>saying that they're innocent. And one of the things that

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 2>you see is people who are innocent look at the

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 2>process as an obstacle. People who are guilty who are

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 2>looking for a way out look at the process as

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity. So you meet with somebody and they tell you,

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I didn't do it, and then they start talking to

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 2>you about all the evidentiary issues that come up. What

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:43.919
<v Speaker 2>was wrong the grand jury, this didn't happen, they didn't

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 2>do that right, the four persons didn't sign the indictment

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 2>and all this stuff. The people who are innocent are

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 2>a an open book, and b say, I don't give

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 2>a damn about the rules of evidence. They are obstructing me.

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:00.840
<v Speaker 2>They're screwing me. They're stopping me from proving that I

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 2>didn't commit this crime. And that was cal from the

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 2>moment I met him until this day. He's been an

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 2>open book and said, what do you want to know?

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:11.879
<v Speaker 2>Where do you want to look? Search my house, search

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 2>anything you want to do, any question you ask is

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 2>fine with me. And had no patience for the intricacies

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 2>of the courtroom and the rules of evidence. I think

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 2>he kind of touched on it here that he feels

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 2>screwed by them, and rightly so.

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:30.839
<v Speaker 4>And for me at this stage, I want justice. I

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 4>want Sue OVI and Steve Anderson and Jerry Keen held accountable.

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.359
<v Speaker 4>I want to see them in that courtroom. I want

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 4>to see them on the witness stand. I want them

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 4>to know what it feels like, I mean, they're never

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 4>going to go to prison. Well, they're never going to

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:49.839
<v Speaker 4>be held accountable. If we do win. If and there's

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 4>damages awarded, they're not going to have to pay. But

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 4>I want them to know what it feels like to

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:00.720
<v Speaker 4>be on the hot seat, whether we win we don't.

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm hoping that we're able to show the public what

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 4>they did behind the scenes. There's a lot of people

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 4>right now that have switched their opinion of me, and

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm hoping that more people will switch their opinion once

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 4>they see the evidence that we're going to present, and

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 4>I've already put it out there on my podcast episode three.

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:23.320
<v Speaker 4>You're gonna see most of the evidence that we're putting on.

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:25.719
<v Speaker 4>But then I know there's people out there they're never

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:28.919
<v Speaker 4>gonna believe anything. Even if we do find her, They'll

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 4>still think I'm guilty. But I want justice for me

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 4>and my kids, and that's all I can ask for

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:36.760
<v Speaker 4>at this point.

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to Wrongful Conviction. You can listen

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 1>to this and all the Lava for Good podcasts one

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 1>week early and ad free by subscribing to Lava for

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Good Plus on Apple Podcasts. I want to thank our

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.359
<v Speaker 1>production team Connor Hall and Kathleen Fink, as well as

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>my fellow executive producers Jeff Kempler, Kevin Wartis, and Jeff Clive.

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:02.399
<v Speaker 1>The music in this production was supplied by three time

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>OSCAR nominated composer Jay Ralph. Be sure to follow us

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 1>across all social media platforms at Lava for Good and

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>at Wrongful Conviction. You can also follow me on Instagram

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>at It's Jason Flamm. Wrongful Conviction is a production of

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Lava for Good Podcasts and association with Signal Company Number One.

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>We have worked hard to ensure that all facts reported

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in this show are accurate. The views and opinions expressed

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>by the individuals featured in this show are their own

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and do not necessarily reflect those of Lava for Good.