WEBVTT - Women in Tech (w/ Kara Swisher) 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Chelsea Clinton. And this season on in fact,

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we're celebrating Women's History Month. I'll be talking with trailblazing

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>women at the top of their fields about their personal journeys,

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>the progress women have made, and how far we still

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>have to go. Today, we're looking at women in the

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>tech industry with Kara Swisher, a fierce reporter who has

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>been decades chronicling the tech industry, its successes, its failures.

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>It's blind spots all well, being clear and blunt about

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>what she thinks the responsibilities of the industry and its

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>leaders are well here that by numbers alone, the tech

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>industry looks like and often is, a man's world. Women

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>hold roughly of leadership positions in tech companies, and the

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>percentage of women earning computer science degrees is about half

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of what it was. So we're arguably losing ground in

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the fight for an equitable future for women in the

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>tech industry. And then they're funding. Last year was a

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>record breaking year in terms of interricopital funding, and yet

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>women only led startups received just two percent of total

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>investment dollars, the lowest share since And when you look

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>at women teamed up with men, the percentage jumps to

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>fifteen point six percent. Still, that means that more than

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of funding went to all male teams, and

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of course numbers don't tell the full story. There's the

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>lived experience of being one of the few women in

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a male dominated field. The sexism, the man splaining, the exclusion,

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the harassment, the feeling and the knowledge that your ideas

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't being taken seriously, and the pressure of feeling like

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you're representing an entire gender. That said, there are certainly

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>bright spots female founders, investors, inventors, engineers, and CEOs, including

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Chard Dubai, the CEO of the Match Group, a dating

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and tech company, who will hear from later this season.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Kara Swisher has probably talked to more tech leaders, over

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>more time and more places than well anyone. She's been

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>described as the most feared and well liked journalist in

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley. Among her many accomplishments, she was a reporter

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>for The Washington Post in the Wall Street Journal, and

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>she co founded the tech news website Recode. She now

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>co hosts the podcast Pivot for Vox Media, and she

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>writes an opinion column and hosts the podcast Sway for

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times. So just before I ask any questions,

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.399
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to say thank you, thank you very much.

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And I hope since this is Women's History Month, we

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>could start with a little bit of your history. I

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think that many people listening may know that you

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't first start off as a kind of internet or

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>tech reporter. No, well, there wasn't the Internet. I'm old.

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't the Internet. Yeah, so can you talk about

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>like your first jobs in journalism, You're time at the

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post, and then how you the decision to take

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>this big leap into the future. Well, like I said,

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>digital wasn't really existing. There were obviously computers had been introduced,

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't widespread. It wasn't a consumer item really,

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>it was just starting to become one. I had an

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>Apple to see at college, and then there was the

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>iMac at some point, but I had I hadn't been

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>very technical at all, and I didn't have an office job.

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And where I started work, we didn't have typewriters. We

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>had these large computers. I can't remember the system, but

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it was not the most consumer friendly experienced the way

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it is today. Then I worked at the City Paper,

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, which is a free paper. And then I

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>got a job in the mail room at the Washington Post.

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And I had been a stringer at the Washington Post

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in college to from Georgetown and it got me into

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Columbia Journalism School. So it was sort of this weird

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>back and forth with the Post, but eventually I ended

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>up the Post as a reporter, and I covered retail

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>if you lived in which you did live in Washington.

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.839
<v Speaker 1>There was a half family track Auto Dark Drug. They

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>owned a beverage thing, and they were a very famous

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>retail family, and so I covered them and they were fighting,

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and I covered Heckender and Woodies and all these things

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that were just local retail essentially, but at the time

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it was under siege from a very technically literate company

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>called Walmart, which was eating everybody's lunch because they used

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>technology so definitely in terms of how to stock stores,

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and I was super interested in and I was like, oh,

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. And then I was going out with someone

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>who lived in the former Soviet Union and I communicated

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>over these Internet things and I was fascinated with it.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So that was your first experience with the internet, was

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>communicating with ding. Yeah, exactly, and it was very it

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was super hard to do. And then suddenly there was

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of commercial stuff and they were all in

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Washington because one of the hubs of the Internet was

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. There's May East and May West. If tech

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>people are so funny, and so May East was here.

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And then suddenly there were all these Internet connection companies.

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And when I was at the Post, I did a

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>fellowship at Duke University and I started downloading books onto

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the system, and I was fascinated with it, and I

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>messed it up once. Do you remember the first book

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you downloaded? Calvin and Hobbs Cartoon Collection because I wanted

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to see something visual, And the guy who was running

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the computer center, and I was mad at me because

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I did something wrong. They mucked up to say, you know,

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it would take time. Everybody couldn't be on at once.

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>It was sort of like having one single spicket. And

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I kept saying, I downloaded a book into my computer.

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>You believe that? And he's like, yeah, whatever, And I

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>was like, no, no, no, this is really a big deal.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And I kept sort of focusing on it, and I

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>kept being really interested in At the Washington Post, we

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>had a big cell phone, essentially a suitcase phone, but

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it was portable and you could take it with your car.

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm the only one who used it. Really, I felt

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>like I was. We had these things, these k pros,

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>these portable computers that we'd put couplers on a on

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a telephone and send stuff. And I was like, this

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>can't be the end of it. So I started to

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>get really more interested in that than the stories I

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.679
<v Speaker 1>was writing, and I kept talking about it, and David

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>Ignatious was my editor at the time who's now writes

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>about national security and other things. He was like, if

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>you're so interested, you should write about it. And I

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>was like, okay. And I there was a company called

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>A O L And that was the first commercial consumer

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>oriented company, and it was here in Washington because of

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the location close to May East. And I met Steve

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Case when he had a very small amount of people

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>and was riveted instantly. I understood that it was a shift,

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a major shift in communications, just like the printing press

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>or television or radio. And I had been a student

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of that, so it was like, Oh, this is going

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to change everything. And I was I think I saw

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it way before other people. And did you expect it

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to change your life too. Yes, I was totally interested

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in it. Being at the Washington Post, the big thing

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>was to cover politics, and I was like, I'm not

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>interested at all in politics, which was at Washington Post.

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>It was like, what do you mean we want to

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>give you this pollet. I was a good reporter, and

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>they wanted me to move there, and I was like,

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't be less interested. So I said, I'll cover this,

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and I started covering a o well. And then it

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>extended to Amazon, which was a very small company. Jeff

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>showed me around this sort of crappy little space and

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and then I met the Yahoo guys and Mark Andres

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and he was very young who created the browser. And

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>so I was riveted instantly because I think I understood

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>what it would do to media. I was particularly obsessed

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>with classified and about delivery and subscriptions and delivery of

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.559
<v Speaker 1>information and so so I had plenty to write about.

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>And I just I have not gotten tired of it since.

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And Karen, listening to you recite the founders that you met,

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>they're all men, Yes, indeed they were are Was that

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>something you were aware of at the time. It's just

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>like man after man generally white man after white man. Oh. Absolutely,

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>something I talked about a lot, and I talked about

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it for years, and I believe it has to do

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>with why we're having so many problems too. One time

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>someone said, what do you think the real reason it's

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>so much problematic around misinformation and safety? And this I said,

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>because the people who created the modern internet never felt

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>unsafe a day in their lives. They just weren't unsafe people.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And so if you don't feel, if you have a

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>lack of feeling about safety, you don't think about building

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it into a system. Right. I don't think it's cruel

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>or maleve one. It's just it's not the way they think.

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have sons and they don't feel unsafe.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>They don't in America. They don't have things coming at

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>them all the time. When they built these tools, they

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't think people would use them in a malevolent way necessarily,

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>But once it started happening, they needed to do something

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>about it, and Karat they still haven't. No, they haven't, no, no, no,

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want to get dragged into this. That's what

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to understand, is, you know, the the analogy

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I use is a city they've created a city and

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't care about the police. They don't want to

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>give you firewater, you know, everything, stop signs, everything that

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>makes a city, okay, like anything police, anything with standards,

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, we don't want to do that, but

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>we're taking all the rent via information via data. But

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're on your own. They don't want to

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>take responsibility and and they're also are unqualified to do so,

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>and I think they sense that. So I definitely was

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>struck by. It was me and a lot of men

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in a room essentially, and then the women that were there.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>There are some women technologist absolutely and very critical ones.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>There's several a Apple, for example, in other places that

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>were there in the early days, but they kind of

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 1>got flushed out. You know. It was an interesting thing

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to see. And often they were in positions of marketing.

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And as anyone who covers technos, if you're not in

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the tech part, you ain't no one, right, that's the part.

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>You have to be a techie to have power in

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>technology companies. That's always true in other companies for sure.

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back, stay with us, okay, I think

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>about these different data points whenever this conversation comes up

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>or admittedly when I catalyze it, which is that I

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>got my first computer from Santa And how old are you?

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I was seven? Okay, Santa Claus brought me a computer.

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>What was it? I was a commodore. What did you

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>do on it? What did you actually do on it?

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I played math games, basically interesting because I was nerdy,

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and all right, that felt like a great way to

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>be a nerd. And it was all though, that kind

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of weird pulsating green color. I remember when I got

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>my next computer. I think when I was twelve, and

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>there was color. Yeah, probably an apple, right, yep, I

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>just like, this is amazing. But in seven more than

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>a third of the computer science graduates in our country

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>were women. And then when I went to Stanford in

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties, it was still about a quarter. And

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>then when I became a parent seven half years ago,

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it was like, right, So we've seen this deterioration. And

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the deterioration also obscures the raw number challenge, because clearly

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the denominator has only grown from the mid nineteen eighties

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of computer science programs, and yet the percentage of women.

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you, why didn't you go into computers.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>If you were a math person, what happened? Yeah, I

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>think about that, characause I loved math. I was good

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>at math. I had parents who were excited that I

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>loved math, was good at man. My calculus teacher in

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>high school, Mrs Goldman, was a woman and was like

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>tough as nails but fair and made learning calculus fun.

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I always have been interested in math as a utility

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>for public health and medicine and biology, and so it

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>never even occurred to me like I didn't make an

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>affirmative choice to not go into computer science, although I

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>did make an affirmative choice to go to Stanford. I

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>did have this sense in the late night the font

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of many of these places, many of these companies were

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>all started so curious. I was like, what is happening

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in this place called Palo Alto, which from like d

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>C felt like this like very far away land. But

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you didn't do it. We were in exactly the right

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>place at the right time to move into that end,

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I know, And yet it didn't appeal to me. And

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>then I wonder was I hard coded in ways that

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>no pun intended like to still think that wasn't for me.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Something happens to girls. And this has

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>been studied a lot at a certain age and it's

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>probably just past ten years old. It's it's largely like

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>early early middle school, yes, where it's they suddenly move

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>away from it, and it's either because they don't feel

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>but they belong, or that they're pushed that way, or

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's a stigma for being a geek that is

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>way too much harder for women than men. But it's

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly apparent that something occurs. Now. Lots of women get through,

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 1>for sure, and a lot of a lot of those

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>women end up going into medicine or the sciences. You'll

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't find that as much in the sciences in

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>all the difference. I mean, I teach at the School

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of Public Health that Columbian have many, you know, women

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>colleagues who are epidemiologists, hardcore research scientists, economists, lots of everything,

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and so it's a really interesting thing. Is it then

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it's is it the atmosphere? Is it the you sort of?

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>It's everything I think, And you know, Maria Clawe, who

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>runs Harvey Mud, has a lot of interesting observations of

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>why that is. And one of the things she told

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>me once was that there's always one man who makes

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it impossible for a lot of people, one particular man

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>in a computer us. It just really denigrates and insults

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and it just creates a really bad atmosphere. And it

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>often not just women. It leaves out different people so

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that it tends to favor a certain kind of man.

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a piece once called the men and No

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Women of Facebook, and all I did was published their

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>pictures and say, hey, this guy does this, and they

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>got mad at me. I was like, I'm just putting

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that's your pictures of those people. And I did the

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.479
<v Speaker 1>same thing years later, which I found even more disturbing,

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>which was the men and no Women of Internet company

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>boards right Web two point o company boards. Now, in

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that case there's plenty of women qualified to go on boards,

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but still Twitter was a particular example of that, which

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>was they had ten men of the same type. It was,

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>it was the same type of person. And when I

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote this piece about them, I wrote, I think the

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>single best lead I've ever written, and I should have

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>retired right after which I said, on the board of Twitter,

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>which has three peters in a dick, there are no

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>women and half the usages by women and third of

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the usage by people of color. This kind of thing,

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and the CEO Di Costlo is very funny called man,

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>He's like, that's a really funny lead. I'm like, I know,

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I made a penis joke. But he's like, that's unfair,

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we have standards. Started with that we

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>have standards thing, And I'm like, you guys right now

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>are in a terrible position. So how is it that

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you found ten men of the same type. It's mathematically

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>impossible and I'm not even good at math to understand

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>why how that happens, and all of them can't be qualified,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and that you can't find qualified people. And so what

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I began to understand when I started to talk to

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tech people, they always use the word standards.

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>They never apply it to people like themselves. They only

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>apply it to women and people of color. The default

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is that people like themselves have already met the standards,

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever those standards are, whatever they are, And there are

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>certain standards, absolutely, but there are interesting new ideas around

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>blind hiring and all kinds of things, and it will

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see what happens after the pandemic. Because

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>people have been working at home, so it creates a

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>very different environment, and tech particularly has been pushing the

0:14:58.240 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>idea that you don't need to go in the office.

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that will be interesting to see what happens

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>when that takes hold over a long period of time.

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And how do you think work from home in the

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>tech industry has affected women or what have you observed?

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I mean, they can't

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>create these little bro fests. And I hate to use

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that term, I try not to, but it really is

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that if there's just no other way around it, you

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>create centers of comfort. Right, there's centers of comfort with

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>people you're comfortable with whether they're going to go on

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>ski trips or whatever they all do. But there's a

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>culture around it where people either belong or don't belong.

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And so if you don't have those things, how do

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you create linkage? Is I don't know. You really can't

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>grow it up on zoom. It can't be. It can't.

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can, or maybe they will, but

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it's harder. I think it'll be an interesting because it

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>will last in tech, It will certainly last. The people

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>will be remote, they'll be living elsewhere, they'll be creating

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>things in other communities and tech will lead the way

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>on that for sure. It's it's interesting, like reflecting on

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the challenge of creating those sort of bro hubs on Zoom,

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it would expose how purposeful those kind of

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>bro hubs often are. You can't pretend that it's just

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>like incidental that you all happened to converge around the

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>ping pong table or you all happen to have a

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>beer after work together. Yes, yeah, it'll be interesting to

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>see what happens, especially with remote work where people you know,

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Silom Valley people are moving out of

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Silm Valley right There really was a very tight culture there,

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and if it's not there from a social point of

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>view and a business point of view, you wonder how

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>things develop or how they fund things. That's where it

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>all starts. As far as I'm concerned, is that the

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>number of people that get funded women it's just dropped

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>again quite considerably. And there's money everywhere. There's money everywhere.

0:16:47.040 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>We're taking a quick break. Stay with us, since we've

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>talked so much about the dearth of women in tech.

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And while you very much are a journalist, you are

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the most recognizable women in the tech conversation.

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you have young or maybe even not so young

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>women who reach out to you for advice all the time.

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.959
<v Speaker 1>What questions do you get? One of the things they

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>seem to be asking is will I suffer if I

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>take a leap? I think a lot of especially a

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of women, tend to be nervous about changing because

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>they have a certain achievement somewhere and they don't want

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 1>to jump. The other thing they tend to do is

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>take what's offered them rather than what they want to do.

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Men are very much more directed. I want to do this,

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to do this. I often say where

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>would your ideal place to work? How would your workplace

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>look like? What do you want to spend your days,

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>your limited days on this planet doing? I always use

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>that word so they get a sense of, you know,

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>time as a chicken, and so I do find women

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>are I wouldn't say more risk averse, but there's something

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.719
<v Speaker 1>that they don't think they can I don't whether it's

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a sense of responsibility. Obviously. Family questions come up a

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>lot still with women. I mean the idea that we

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have universal childcare or universal treakare everything are agnomous.

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>State is not having universal paid leave or universal paid

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>early childhood education, and it's crazy. It's so bad for

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the economy, like all that stuff, And so I think

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>women are still carry the burden of that more than men,

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>very clearly, And that's no question. I think it's it's

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be interesting to see. I think the pandemics

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and the yield all kinds of interesting trends around the workplace,

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>how people operate with each other at home and where

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you work from and how the hours you work. And

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>I think some of it does favor more involvement by women.

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>More flexibility creates more ability to achieve. I think in

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways. Where do you think though will

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>be in a decade or whatever the way quantum of

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>time is in technology, I guess broadly, but also for women,

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think there will be more women in leadership position?

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Whether from a management perspective or a board perspective. And

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>if the answer is not, how do we try to

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>change that prognostication? Well, what's interesting is what's the technology

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be? Like what's happened is not what's going

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to happen. There's all this movement around cryptocurrency. Is quite

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of women involved in cryptocurrency, which is more men,

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>but a lot more women than you usually see some

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of them. So a lot more women than say like

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.439
<v Speaker 1>web two point now, yes, a dent there, but not

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but more for sure. There's a lot of

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>women in robotics, which I think is a big area,

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot more women like significantly not an AI though

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 1>for AI as man man man man man, which is

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>which is critically important. There's a lot more women involved in,

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the mechanical engineering stuff, which I think

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>will be interesting. Food is another area of food innovation.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>You might see climate change. There's all kinds of really

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting climate change companies, and I do run into more

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>women in those. I call it chimate change tech. But

0:19:56.320 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>there's whether it's carbon capture, food or water one of

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the two people that did the m RNA vaccine for

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>fives or a lot of women. And of course that's

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of stuff is going to focus in

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>on in the future, is health and stuff like that.

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I would hope that there's lots more opportunities

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>as it spreads out. That said, cars mostly men like

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>autonomous cars, and space. It's a guy thing, as you

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>know from Jeff Bezos is Rocket, but in the big

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>areas AI and autonomous transportation, men everywhere you look. And

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.959
<v Speaker 1>as technology moves from just tech only to every company

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>is a tech company. It's an opportunity, I would guess.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So the question is where does it go, who makes

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the investments, who gets funded? And so whether it's cryptocurrency

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>or a new media stuff or almost anything, it's hard

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>to find women leaders. Yes, and so Kara, is that

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a pipeline challenge? Is that an investment challenge? Is that

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a platform slash like amplification and challenge? And how do

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>we try to accelerate? It's an investment challenge because if

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't have women at the beginning, if they're not

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're not a founder, if you're not on the

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>cap table, that really is it. And then you have

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>some women who now have a lot of money, like

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Mackenzie Bezos or Melinda Gates. Melinda is making a ton

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of investments via her firm, which is called Pivotal Ventures

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in Women Backed Enterprises. She's specific and she feels like

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it's an economic opportunity for her, and it's not charity

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not trying to be you know, woke or whatever.

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>She's doing it because she thinks it's missed opportunity by

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of men. And she's investing a lot in

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the childcare economy, right she is. Why not because we

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>all need it, so hopefully for those of us that

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.959
<v Speaker 1>are our parents who have little girls with big dreams,

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we can try to at least insert that possibility. You

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>have girls, right, I do have a girl and two boys. Yeah,

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. I just had a daughter and she's too

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and she's so confident. And it's really interesting because these

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>boys and they're very confident of themselves and I she's

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>so confident, and I'm wondering. I'm sort of waiting for

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that moment where something happens, and I'm paying a lot

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of attention to it because I did see that moment

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>with my boys. They grew up in San Francisco. One

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of my kids loved the color pink, and he had

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a pink hat he work forever. Loved it, and then

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>he got a message somewhere that he shouldn't like pink.

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where it was, but he definitely started

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to get these gender things. And I was like, how

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>did that happen? It is what it is. And I

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like doing the whole feminist rain dance around it

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>running like that, but I was sort of riveted. And and

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and so when you have a girl, you have to

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>wonder what is her like. She's very mechanical, Like you

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>can tell she looks how things are made, and I'm like,

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>will she go that way or will she think she

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>should be in the soft you know what I mean?

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Not not? I don't know. Is it going to be

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting to say for sure? Well, Kara, the last question

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask is just also about like other

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>women covering tech, like how do you see your journalistic colleagues.

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you see challenges that younger women have covering tech

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>or they also able? Is the way you clearly have

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>been able to puncture through the bro like culture. There

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of probably more men covering tech than women,

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but some of the really top level ones are all women,

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Nicole pearl Roth who covers cyber technology, tailor

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence who covers internet culture. She's amazing, Yeah, and she

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>has certainly had to deal with some of the ugliest

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>parts of the Internet. Those assholes. It's interesting they never

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>come from at me. They come at her, and I

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>was always interested in that, Like, what do you think

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that's about? They're frightened of me and they don't feel

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like they're frightening, But I love them to come at me.

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Come will come on down. Boys, Let's see what happens

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in that fight. But also Jessica Lesson, she has the information,

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>which is great. She started her own company and she's

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>really does an amazing job. There's a lot of women

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in prominent roles in technology coverage. Zephanie Rule very great

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>business reporter, but covers a lot of tech. There's quite

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>a few, and they're in positions of authority and just

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>really killing it all over the place. That's great to hear.

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there one statistic or fact about women in tech

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that gives you hope to end on an optimistic note, No,

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. The numbers are down. I don't know what

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to say that. The numbers are down. Numbers are done.

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And so for anyone listening, what could we do to

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>then try to I guess, create that hope and to

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>try to change the numbers. You know, it has to

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>be a bigger thinking about diversity in general, not just women.

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It has to be people of color, age, different backgrounds,

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>including conservative and liberal, you know what I mean. Like,

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>there is definitely a monoculture there. And another thing I

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>always say is that they think it's a meritocracy. It's

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a mirror autocracy, and maybe that's not the best way

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>to build these things. The more voices that are involved

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in it, the better for all of us. Yeah, all

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of us, for all of us, because we're the ones

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that use them and this we're the ones affected by them.

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And then of course Congress has to act and do

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>something about it, legislate. Biden's made some good moves of

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>hiring people like Lena Cohn and some others, but they've

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>got it. Congress has aggregated its responsibility here so well.

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>And the tech companies continue to say they want to

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>be regulated, even though they clearly want to write their

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>own regulations. But it is time, I think, for for

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>government to take its responsibility and to govern in this way.

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's a good one. I am very heartened

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>by people like Senator Klovich R And Lena Cohn and

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>some other women who are at the forefront of this,

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>even Elizabeth Warren, who tends to lecture these guys on taxes.

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But the fact of the matter is the tax system

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is the one. They're just following the rules. Margaret Vestiger

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. But I think there's a lot of women

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in positions of power that are significantly important. So it's

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>really kind of interesting that a lot of women are

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>at the lead of this stuff and they're not being cowed.

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>They're not yeah, they're not taking their foot off the

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>off the pedal, no way, Karen, thank you so much

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>for everything, including your time today. Thank you, Chelsea. You

0:25:49.240 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>can find Kara Swisher on social media at Kara Swisher. Yeah.

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>In Fact is brought to you by I Heart Radio.

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>We are produced by a mighty group of women and

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>one amazing man, Erica Goodmanson, Mart Harr, Sarah Horowitz, Jessmine Molly,

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and Justin Wright, with help from Lindsay Hoffman, Barry Laurie,

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Joey Sukuban, Julie Supran, Mike Taylor, and Emily Young. Original

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>music is by Justin Wright. If you like this episode

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of In Fact, please make sure to subscribe so you

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>never miss an episode, and tell your family and friends

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to do the same. If you really want to help

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>us out, please leave a review on Apple podcasts,