WEBVTT - Micron's US Grant, Oracle Falls Most in a Year

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and Ed loved Love.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York.

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up a victory for Micron

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 3>as the company gets it's a weighted six billion dollar

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 3>grant from the US government.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>We discuss us, We break down the.

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Tech earnings with Oracle falling the most in a year

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 3>after posting lukewarm quarterly revenues, and we sit down with

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 3>the CEOs of Omnicon and Into Public to dissect the

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 3>deal creating the world's largest advertising company. But first we

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 3>check in on these markets. The key points contributor to

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 3>the upside on the Nasdaq, which does hold in the

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 3>green is up three point seven percent.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>It's all about Alphabet.

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Look, actually, we had that head of Quantum AI on

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 3>the show yesterday discuss saying the breakthroughs they're making in

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 3>quantum computing in the Willow chip and this really feeds

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 3>into a well virtuous cycle as to whether it's about

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 3>quantum AI and cloud All eyes on Alphabet move on

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 3>as someone to look at the drags to the downside

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 3>note of them in the chips name Space, but software

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>also we're looking at cloud and software, with Oracle off

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 3>by seven percent at one point, down as much as

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 3>ten percent as look, an eighty percent ramp up in

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 3>these shares so far this year, therefore, had a high

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 3>bar for its earnings, and look, the forecast didn't beat expectations.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Neither did the nine percent growth in revenue, even though

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 3>they did delivering cloud Infrastructure'm looking at TSMC, also, a

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 3>name that's up eighty percent so far this year. We're

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 3>down one point seven percent, even though they show that

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 3>November sales are ramping ever high and more than thirty percent.

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 3>We dig into that in a minute. Micron as well,

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 3>off by two point two percent. Although finally they get

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 3>certainty around that six billion dollar grant coming from the

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Chipsack coming from the US government to be able to

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 3>expand memory offering and manufacturing here in the United States.

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 3>It's a relief. Let's talk about it with Peter Elstrom

0:01:58.840 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 3>and Peter.

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm in to. This is a relief.

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 3>It was an overhang on the stock because we're worried

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 3>that maybe the Trump administration would deny it.

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's exactly right.

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 4>This is a program where the Biden administration has tried

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.239
<v Speaker 4>to rebuild the semiconductor industry in the United States. The

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Chips Act is one of the landmark programs that the

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 4>administration had, and they wanted to make sure that they

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 4>locked down this money because Trump personally had criticized these

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 4>agreements is so bad and the Republicans that even floated

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 4>the idea that maybe they try to repeal this even

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 4>though it was passed with bipartisan support. So the Commerce

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Department is trying to lock down these agreements now and

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 4>finalize the details as much as they can before there's

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 4>this transition in January. So Micron, the really big US

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 4>maker of memory chips, won this award more than six

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars. That's going to help them build out facilities

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 4>in Idaho and New York to very key states and

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 4>try to build up their ability to develop more advanced

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 4>memory chips, including these HBM memory chips that are used

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 4>with AI from Nvidia to be able to train AI models.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 3>The manufacturing king is of course TSMC, and they're just

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 3>showing how still that focus on AI is a living,

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 3>breathing thing. Even though we'd have perhaps been worried about

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 3>the buildout of data bass and more broadly slowing down.

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 4>That's right, TSMC sits in an unusual market in Taiwan.

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 4>Companies have to report their monthly sales, so we get

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 4>little drips and drabs of information throughout the quarter before

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 4>we get the final results. So these are mostly just

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 4>revenue that the company puts out there. But what we

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 4>did see from TSMC is that revenue is up more

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 4>than thirty percent. As you said, they are a bell

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 4>weather for AI because they make the most advanced chips

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 4>in the industry, including the chips that Nvidia uses to

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 4>be able to sell to the likes of Microsoft and

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 4>open Ai and Google. So it gives us an early

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 4>indication of how that demand is holding up. One of

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 4>the big questions overhanging the whole AI boom at this

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 4>point is whether companies are going to be able to

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 4>figure out whether there's a profitable way to deploy these models,

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 4>whether they can actually makes some money after investing really

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 4>tens of billions of dollars. At this point, TSMC is

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 4>getting a lot of that benefit right now. The question

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 4>is whether it's a long term trend that TSMC and

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 4>others are going to be able to benefit from or

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 4>whether there's some tapering that comes up if the profits

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 4>don't materialize pretty soon, what is the killer application?

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Putilstrom thanks so much breaking down chip makers. Meanwhile, let's

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 3>stick with Chinese president using pain saying that China has

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 3>full confidence in achieving its five percent economic growth target

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 3>this year. He also told international economic organizations gathered in

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 3>Beijing that China is willing to maintain and promote the

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 3>development of relations with the US.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:36.559
<v Speaker 2>Just take a listen.

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 6>I have repeatedly emphasized that human beings are a community.

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Of shared future.

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 6>We should treat each other's developments as an opportunity rather

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 6>than a challenge. We should see each other as partners

0:04:55.240 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 6>rather than rivals. Let's so leadarity, unity, cooperation, mutual benefits

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 6>and win win progress become the main theme of the times.

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 3>Locally, Chain and of course Micron and and Vidio have

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 3>been under pressure with rising tensions, for example, between the

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 3>US and China and what that means for some US

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 3>chip makers. Let's dig in to those tensions and indeed

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 3>edtagomic economic growth more broadly with Janet Munit. It's just

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 3>head of market analysis at RBC bruin Dolphin and interestingly.

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 2>You've been.

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't say full out positive, but leaning on some

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:34.119
<v Speaker 3>interest in Chinese names and Chinese economic stimulus that seems

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 3>to be being promised more forcefully.

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 7>Oh hi, Caroline, thanks for having me so. Primarily, our

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 7>strongest conviction is US stocks, particularly because of the US exceptionalism.

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 7>I think this thing is still going to trade into

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 7>the new year, and the fact that US companies are

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 7>just so much more profitable, so we still much creit

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 7>for US stars versus the rest of the world. However,

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 7>for Chinese stocks, I think, you know, sentiment has been

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 7>very depressed. I think, you know, investors are still doubtful

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 7>on the scale of the stimulus and whether it is

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 7>going to work, so it is not that much of

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 7>a consensus trade. I think this trade is having still

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 7>a lot of resistance, and we feel that sentiment has

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 7>been way too negative and you know, evaluations are very cheap.

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 7>There is a case to make that there could be

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 7>more stumulous coming and the fact that economic data is stabilizing,

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 7>so I think there's a case for investors to diversify

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 7>a bit into the Chinese stocks as well.

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Small overweight in Asia extra Pan on the back of that,

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 3>what of therefore, the daily deluge we get on ramping

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 3>up China US tensions. Yesterday it was about in video

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 3>being investigated by Chinese regulators. There's a longgoing narrative around

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Micron as well. How have you been trying to price

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 3>that in?

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 7>Well, I have to say it is very difficult to

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 7>price it. I do believe that institutional investors have somewhat

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 7>been more prepared this time, and you can see that

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 7>in some of the sell off in the trade exposed

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 7>stock for example European x UK stocks for instance. So

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 7>I think industrials I've already been making some adjustments and

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 7>thoughts on the trade tariff issue is very difficult to

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 7>press in, but I guess some of that is already

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 7>reflected in market and overall speaking our views that the

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 7>trade tariff's likely going to be.

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Added for TAT and negotiation tactics.

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 7>Doubtful that the full extent of the threat is going

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 7>to be fully implemented, although it is acknowledged.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>That some of that will be through.

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 7>So keeping out of that, but it's not necessarily a

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.119
<v Speaker 7>deturn to the ongoing rally in the US equity market

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 7>for example.

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so the likes of an Nvidia that has got

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 3>an enormous valuation continue to rally throughout twenty twenty four?

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Does that continue into twenty twenty five? Come we vindicate

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 3>these value which is the run up that we've seen

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 3>in stocks like an eight percent up on Oracle, an

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 3>eighty percent up on the list of depository notes of TSMC.

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, using gold out Nvidia there. I'm not going to

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 7>make a specific comment, but this is obviously a great stock,

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 7>huge profit margins, and still very strong guidance of the

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 7>black Well chip architecture. And I think, I mean, this

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 7>is a great company. Obviously investors have is dubbed on

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 7>the high valuation. I think it can the rally can

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 7>still go on given that you know, investors still like

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 7>strong quality growth. So I would feel that investors will

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 7>still be very much leaning on the semiconductor sector and

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 7>then tech in general, life chap in general. In the US,

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 7>I also feel that investors are more shifting and rotating

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 7>into more software related stocks instead of just the semi's hardware.

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 7>I think that makes sense because that there is likely

0:08:55.760 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 7>to be more commercialization potential and realization as aiimals for it,

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 7>from the infrastructure built out to the influencing and to

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 7>the applications.

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 3>Will have names like Palenta. Coming up in the show

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 3>a little bit later, Januinally, great to.

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Get your expertise.

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Head of market analysis at LBC brun Dolphin, thank you.

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Coming up.

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 3>C three AIS focused on General to AI. Well, the

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 3>products there are helping drive revenue, but at what cost?

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.719
<v Speaker 3>Company CEO Tom Siebel joins us next. Meanwhile, let's just

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 3>check it back in on alphabet, which we'd said had

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 3>been rallying almost four percent, having its best day on

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 3>one point since April twenty twenty four. Here's what Google

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Quantum AI founder Hartman Navin told us yesterday.

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>FENM computing, It's definitely not that field.

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 8>There's steady progress, and our new chips if you just

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 8>released a willow, will form the basis to start doing

0:09:48.280 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 8>useful computations that will enable or solve problems that humankind has.

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to another set of ownings for you. C

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 3>three AI raising its full year sales forecast. General to AI,

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 3>of course helping drive sales, but almost kind of cautioning

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 3>of the lack of profitability in some areas. Joining us

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 3>for more. C three AI CEO Tom Cebill, Look, your

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 3>shares are down a little bit, but boy, they've ramped

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 3>up sixty percent in less than a month. So a

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of optimism going into these numbers.

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 2>What drove you to raise the forecast?

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 9>Well, it was a it was a great quarter. If

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 9>the year to day it has been great. I think

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 9>our revenue growth year over your last quarter was twenty

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 9>nine percent, which is huge. I think most importantly we informed.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 9>We formed this massive strategic alliance with Microsoft, the largest

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 9>software company in the world, and all of Microsoft, as

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 9>there are salespeople worldwide, will be selling C three AIS

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 9>enterprise AI software solutions, you know, on their price list,

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 9>getting ported credit being compensated, and so we C three

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:07.239
<v Speaker 9>AI goes from order of one hundred salespeople in September

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 9>to order perhaps tens of thousands of salespeople in November.

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 9>So that is a very strong tailwind that builds extraordinary

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 9>well for C three AI.

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 3>That is this slight worry about the profitability, saying that

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 3>basically revenue, you're prioritizing growth rather than profitability.

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 2>What do you say to that.

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 9>Time In the short term, we're prioritizing growth. You know,

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 9>I have this huge enterprise sales engine in the in

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 9>the form of Microsoft that now we need to enable

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 9>and for really to not invest in that channel to

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 9>get thousands of people productive selling and servicing our product

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 9>and not invest in that is crazy goodness, Caroline. We

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 9>have three quarters of roughly three quarters of a billion

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 9>dollars cash in the bank. And what am I going

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 9>to do with that if not invest in growth, not

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 9>invest in market share, and not invest if not invest

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 9>in market leadership. And I assure you the cash flow

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 9>and profitability follows.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So how profitable, for example, would a deal like

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft the extension there be because you're obviously digging in

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 3>on that partnership. They help distribute your offerings. But how

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 3>much revenue do you have to give up for that?

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 5>You do?

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 9>Actually virtually one hundred percent of the revenue from the

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 9>C three AI sales a cruise to C three AI.

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 9>So it's you know, Microsoft gets the benefit of selling

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 9>their infrastructure and cloud services. C three gets the benefit

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 9>of selling the C three I applications. But uh, you know,

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 9>a very small portion.

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Of the revenue is given up.

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 9>And this is just a dramatic revenue accelerator. This is

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 9>the largest software company in the world and they have

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 9>chosen C three AI as their preferred enterprise AI solutions

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 9>provider Strategic partnerships just don't get bigger than this.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 3>They don't and Sertny Piper and the analysts over there

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 3>saying this potentially drives material upside. There are though, and

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 3>I hate to keep going back to some of the

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 3>flies in the ointment, but Key Bank just worrying about

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 3>the differentiation here, Tom of your AI offering. How do

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 3>you make clear your USP versus rivals out there?

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 9>There is one company on the planet Earth, Carolion, that

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 9>offers over one hundred turnkey enterprise AI applications for utilities,

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 9>for oil and gas, for defense, for intelligence, for pharmaceutical

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 9>Fortalit one company on the planet Earth, Okay that offers

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 9>these kinds of solutions, and that is our differentiation.

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 2>And federal strength.

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 3>You enlisted a lot there within defense and with ultimately

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 3>you've got a government focus in many ways that has

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 3>seen a lot of selling it to federal Will that

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 3>continue any issues about the administration coming on in twenty

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty five under Trump?

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 9>There are our business in the defense intelligence in federal

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 9>community has been very strong. I expect that to accelerate

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 9>in the Trump administration with people like elon getting involved.

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 9>I think their priorities if we listen to their conferences

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 9>and we go to, for example, the Reagan Defense Forum

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 9>that took place last week, there is one topic on

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 9>the agenda, and that is AI applications, AI applications, AI applications,

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 9>and then they also talk about cyber But this is

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 9>clearly going to be a huge priority for making government

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 9>more efficient okay making, and it is the future of

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 9>our defense and intelligence community. So this votes extraordinarily well

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 9>for the commercial software providers like C three AI, and

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 9>perhaps votes less well for the traditional kind of beltway

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 9>systems integrators. I think that the tide might be going

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 9>out for those guys.

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Tom Siebel ultimistic on CVAI. Of course, the CEO thanks

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 3>for joining yesterday. Let's stick with earnings and let's just

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 3>check out what's happening with Oracle, because it has been

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 3>on a tear of late, up eighty percent in terms

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 3>of share price this year, and therefore its optimism didn't

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 3>live up to well. The height was there, but the

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 3>numbers didn't quite meet that height. We're down seven percent

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 3>after we saw nine percent increase in revenue. There was

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 3>strong cloud infrastructure growth though Anna rag Grana breaks it

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 3>down from Blomberg Intelligence. It just wasn't enough, was it.

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 10>See they did beat on constant currency, So in the

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 10>reported there were slightly you know, slightly below, but that

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 10>was effics oriented. But at the same time, you know,

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 10>I think, as you mentioned, the expectations are really getting

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 10>high for some of these names, that the beat has

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 10>to be of a material enough, you know, rage we

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 10>think the demand is still there. It's a question is

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 10>whether the second half growth rate is going to be

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 10>in the high fifties.

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Or the low fifties.

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 10>But still that's a pretty impressive number.

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>All said and.

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Done, That fifty percent is a fifty two percent increasing

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 3>cloud infrastructure sales that you sort of reference.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>What about the rest of the business.

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 3>How is just cloud continuing to perform for them?

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 2>How is software sales going?

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, see, when you look at Oracle, before the Oracle

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 10>cloud infrastructure really push happened, this company was growing in

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 10>that four five six percent range. So when you look

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 10>at their SaaS business, so the cloud applications business that

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 10>grew about ten percent, which is generally in line with

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 10>what's happening with salesforce and workday workday slightly better than

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 10>that but that space has been under pressure over the

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 10>last twelve months. The real area of growth is cloud

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 10>infrastructure or because of AI workloads, and that's where bulk

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 10>of the interest lies at this point.

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Any mentioned around TikTok because they're a key client.

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 10>Yeah no, that wasn't really discussed, you know, on the call,

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 10>But we think if there is an impact next year.

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 10>First of all, that's not going to be immediate. It's

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 10>going to take some time. But because of the backlock

0:16:57.840 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 10>that they have, they should be able to offset that

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 10>for with that, you know, maybe a quarter or two

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 10>of some dent there, but you know, overall, we think

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 10>the backlog is there for that.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 3>And they mentioned new clients Meta in particular and increasing

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 3>focus on that particular area. Anyone else that we were

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 3>impressed by that they managed to snag that they're managing

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 3>to woo in with the fact that it is a

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 3>key offering now in cloud, whereas we've doubted it previously.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 10>So one of the things I would say is almost

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 10>all major clients out there, you know, whether that's Meta

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 10>or any other vendor, is going to go out and

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 10>try to tap into all cloud providers. I mean, unless

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 10>they have some adversisdial relationship just because there is there

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 10>isn't that much of capacity out there. In Oracle's case,

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 10>it's actually getting work from Microsoft right now because Microsoft

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 10>is fulfilling the needs or the workloads that are coming

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 10>from open Ai and it's subleasing to Oracle to get

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 10>some of that work done. So there is you know,

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 10>the entire space is going up. It's not just one

0:17:58.560 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 10>or two vendors.

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Anna Agrana on all things Oracle. We thank you of

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 3>newberga intelligence time now for talking out tech first up.

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 3>A door Dash funded study in Pennsylvania found that most

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.959
<v Speaker 3>of its gig workers preferred to remain independent contractors. This

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 3>after the company began offering extra payments instead of benefits

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 3>normally reserved for salaried employees. Class TikTok Shop comes to

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Europe after the in app shopping feature went live for

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 3>users in Spain. The roll out reflects TikTok's push to

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 3>seek out alternative markets in the face of potential US

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 3>shutout and the shares of food delivery firm and Talabat.

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 3>It lost ground after a two billion dollar IPO in Dubai,

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the girl's biggest initial public offering this year. This adds

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 3>to a slate of recent disappointing debuts of listings in

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East.

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, let's just talk geopolitics a little bit more.

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, because despite US and ally sanctions following Russia's invasion

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 3>of Ukraine, Moscow has continued its ability to procure American tech,

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 3>including chips from Intel analog Devices Ti Bloomberg reporting that

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 3>it's discovered that the supply chain path which Russia has

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 3>been able to secure those components, unknownst to the companies

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 3>making it has been pretty easy for Morelos Alberta Nadelli joins.

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 2>US and now it's an extraordinary deep dive.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Nolberto, just how easy is it to order these sorts

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 3>of pieces of equipment from Russia right now?

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 11>It's relatively simple if you think about the fact that

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 11>you know, it's been a few years now that the

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 11>war has been ongoing in Ukraine and the effort that

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 11>governments have put on to crack down on these practices.

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 11>There are websites within Russia where companies that are working

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 11>to produce missiles and other weapons.

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>They can see.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 11>The catalogs of companies like Texas Instruments on their own

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 11>websites or stocks available prices and details like that, and

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 11>then they're able to place order requests with Russian distributors,

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 11>and then the goods are ordered by intermediaries, they get

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 11>sent to third countries, other countries, and from there they

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 11>get to Russia. So overall, that's pretty simple, given the

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 11>fact that the war has been going on for years now.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Precisely, and the US government has time and time again

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 3>been warning these sorts of suppliers to crack.

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Down on this.

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 3>In fact, Shannon Thompson, the company's assistant general counsel that's

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 3>or Texas Instruments, said, I want to be very clear,

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 3>TI strongly opposes the use of our chips in Russian

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 3>military equipment.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 2>How are they able to stop this?

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 11>Well, that's a very good question from your questions for

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 11>the companies more than for me. I think companies are

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 11>trying to stop these practices from happening, and when issues

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 11>are flagged, they do intervene. There was, however, for example,

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 11>earlier this year, a Senate report that came out that

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 11>suggested that companies.

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Aren't doing enough. So they are.

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 11>Doing certain practices that would allow them to probably better

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 11>detect these types of transactions before they actually happen.

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So lots of the actions.

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 11>Happen later on in the sales process rather than early

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 11>on trying to identify bad actors and things like that.

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm Berta Nadelli. Extraordinary peace, Thank you for talking us

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 3>through it. Welcome back to BLUEBG Technology. I'm Karen Hyde

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 3>in New York. If we want to welcome our TV

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 3>and radio audiences worldwide now to bloom Meg Technology. Because

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Omnicom has announced that they'll be buying into Public Group

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 3>in a move that will create the world's largest advertising

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 3>company with an annual revenue more than twenty five billion dollars.

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Here to discuss in an exclusive interview, John Wren, Omnicon

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 3>CEO and Philip Klekowski into Public Group CEO.

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Gentlemen, Welcome, Thank you, erl, Thank you John. I'm sat

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 2>here on.

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 3>The Technology Show thinking about the technological disruption that has

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 3>happened to advertising. Is this response to that, is this

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 3>to take on alphabet meta and call that more of

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 3>that global revenue?

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, it is. Technology does play a role in this,

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>and both Philip and I have focused on that in

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>our conversations over the course of the last year. When

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you cut through quite a bit of what we're discussing

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.239
<v Speaker 1>if you look at our industry five years ago, ten

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago, the barrier to entry was very low. It

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was you just had to be a brilliant person right

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 1>with the great with a great idea. Now, in order

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to properly service clients in this new era, it's key

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>to have those very very bright, very talented people, but

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it's incumbent upon us to enable them with the best

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>tech in data that we possibly can for them to

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>garner the insights the information at scale so they can

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>react to the environment as they need. And we've each

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>been on that journey, I guess, as all of our

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Speaker 1>competitors have as well. From an Omnium point of view,

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we made great strides with the creation of omni and

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year when we acquired Flywheel the commerce

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>stature that we've been able to put together, and that

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>progresses and today we're working even beading all the generative

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 1>AI possibilities to create tools for our folks. Philip on

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the other side, can talk to it as well, because

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>he's had a very strong avenge. Sure.

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 12>I mean, I think to John's point, technology is playing

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 12>so much more important a role in our sector, and

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 12>that's because for our clients, the consumers they need to

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 12>reach expect a high degree of personalization and the messaging

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 12>they get, and a high degree of engagement in the

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 12>experiences we deliver. So to John's point, he brought Flywheel

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 12>into the family. It's a company that has this quite

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 12>distinctive ability to understand everything that's happening in the digital

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 12>retail ecosystem down to the individual transaction level. And then

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 12>for US, Axiom, as John said, is likely the largest

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 12>consumer database.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Outside of the walled gardens.

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 12>So if you put those two together, and if we

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 12>co invest in General of AI, we're very very strongly positioned,

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 12>we believe to help our clients navigate this tech enabled world.

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 2>How does it strip out costs?

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 3>You clearly identified opportunities for seven hundred and fifty million

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 3>dollars in annual cost savings, But the talent when it

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 3>comes to General to AI's expenses is how do you

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:40.959
<v Speaker 3>strip out those costs?

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think John's been really clear and I think

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 12>we are fully in agreement a year in that it's

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 12>about enabling the folks who interact with the clients, so

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 12>those brilliant people.

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Giving them more tools. There are ways in.

0:24:56.040 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 12>Which We're not going to invest more than once. We

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 12>are going to look at infrastructure that is perhaps legacy

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 12>infrastructure in businesses like ours, So there is a meaningful

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 12>opportunity there to put the money against the future.

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 3>John, some of the concern maybe being priced in at

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 3>the moment because as combined market capitalizations, they're now lower

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 3>than they were on Friday.

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 2>People trying to digest how this deal works.

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 3>City Bernstein's saying the potential for revenue disynergy, rival agencies,

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 3>stealing accounts, talent.

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 2>How do you make sure that people stay on board

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 2>with you?

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Sure, We've always always been the place for the best

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>talented people to come to. Naturally, there's churn in everybody's

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>business every year, fortunately or unfortunately. I've been through this

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>movie once before, but did it badly and didn't complete

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it ten years ago. This one is a bit more

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>thought a lot more thoughtful.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 3>You're referring to the public steal back at twenty fourteen.

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Clients who listen to us and see the capabilities that

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we've developed between us already, the power of what we're

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to continually bring to the marketplace,

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the changes and the focus and the single point of

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.199
<v Speaker 1>entry and investment that we're going to make to enable

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that talent to succeed. I'm not nearly as concerned as

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the nay sayers are looking for somebody to knock on

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>the deal that we may be challenged by the odd

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>clients or two. I suspect not, because I think the

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>offerings that we have and the response to those clients

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is at the core of what we've been discussing for

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the last year, and that's been first and foremost. So

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>we've been focused on what is this going to mean

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for our clients, What is this going to mean for

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>our talent? What is it going to mean for us

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>attracting talent going forward and enabling those people and most

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 1>very talented people want to work with and for the

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>very best and brightest and have available to them the

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>most state of the art tools, and that's what we'll

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>be provided. And progress is every day. I mean, I

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 1>haven't even focused in on what the advances that are

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>very familiar with sorrow about what was going on this

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>morning open and that has a positive impact used as

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a tool made available to our knowledge workers and so

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>others will try. Someone will succeed, but we'll wind up

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, with the very best

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>talent in the industry. I think, as we always have.

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 3>And Phillip, that talent wants to be enabled with the

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 3>latest and greatest tools. John was though, talking about how

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 3>the barriers for entry were very low and now they've

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 3>got higher, but general to AI makes the barrier to

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 3>entry for new upstarts incredibly low, do you not believe.

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 12>I'm not sure that I would agree with them, because ultimately,

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 12>what you have to have is connectivity to a very

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 12>very broad range of capabilities. And so I think that

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 12>if you're thinking about it in a very reductive sense

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 12>and you're saying, well, anybody can create a piece of content, sure,

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 12>but the reality is that unless that content is connected

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.679
<v Speaker 12>to a very sophisticated platform with a great deal of

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 12>technology and a lot of data, then fundamentally it's not

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 12>really very useful to the clients who need accountability, need outcomes,

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 12>and are very sophisticated themselves.

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 3>We are, of course, speaking with Philip Krakowski of Interpublic

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Group and John Wren of Omnikrom and John going back

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 3>to ultimately this pie that at the moment is being

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 3>redistributed among new players. It's not just meta and alphabet

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean byte dancers in their taking space Amazon as well.

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Do you think ultimately the agencies that four that become

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 3>three will own as much as the one trillion of

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the market that it does it today or will that

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 3>continue to erode?

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, many of these players have been competitives of ours

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>now for quite a while. I mean, so it's not new.

0:28:57.560 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Some of the tools, some of the capabilities that are

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>being created today, on one hand, would be very welcome

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and usable by smaller marketers, but larger marketers I refer

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to Felipa's talented mentioning a minute ago, are going to

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>have to be a bit. You have to bring brand

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>safety into considerations as you do this. You have to

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>bring in considerations do you have the right to use

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>your image and your voice my next commercial, even though

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it might be a perfect setting for what I'm trying

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish. So there are a lot of considerations. Europe

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is different than the US, Chinese is going to be

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>different than everybody else, So that competitive set has always

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>been out there. We with the resources that we have

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>defending ourselves in this environment have been very successful and

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we will continue to be successful, will be more successful

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>now this will be more focused and we will have

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>more resources to respond to things that change.

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:00.239
<v Speaker 3>Things that change are like a new administration Phllip And

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 3>everyone's been saying, what about the regulatory outlook? I mean,

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 3>if you are it's global jurisdictions here, how confident are

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 3>you that this deal actually gets through?

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 12>To John's point, it's been a long time in the making.

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 12>We've been very deliberate, So you can assume that you know,

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 12>we took advice as we were heading into this because

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 12>to your point, we're going to be looking at a

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 12>dozen or more jurisdictions in which this will need to

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 12>clear that hurdle, and we have a high degree of

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 12>confidence that that's something that we can achieve.

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Do you have a high degree of confidence judged in

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 3>your client in the macro perspective that they currently have.

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 3>How willing are people to commit to big campaigns in

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 3>this macro environment as we do have so much geopolitical uncertainty.

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Sure, clients still wake up in the morning. They're running

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>their businesses, and they're running their factories and have to

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>sell their products. Maybe the nature of what they're advertising

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>or the channel in which they're trying to reach their

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>customer change, but that's what we're best at and the

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>velocity of that change, and people will do different things

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to respond to the market approach differently. I think the

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>change the administration is probably a positive thing. I suspect

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the new administration is going to be more business friendly

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>than anyone's complained about the existing administration. So I'm not

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 1>anticipating and we've been well advised, but we have to

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>go through the process. But there are a lot of

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>competitors out there, so that won't be an issue in

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the final days. Now, the whole focus is on the

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>flexibility and the agility. Even though people who want to

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>tend to look at size and look at the negative

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>aspects of size, we see sizes empowering because it will

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>give us more resource. And what's key is to keep

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the agility and lead creativity to the talented people that

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.479
<v Speaker 1>we both have in our employee and responsible for us

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>both being here today, but enabling them with the best tools,

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge so they can go into the largest advertisers

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in the world and with great confidence tell them that

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it's always changing. Nothing yesterday doesn't exist anymore. It's what's tomorrow.

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But where the place to come.

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 3>To Thanks for coming to us today, John Man of Omnicom.

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I thank Philip Berkowski of Into Public Group. We appreciate it. Meanwhile,

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 3>of course today Blue Meg Television is having live coverage

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:33.479
<v Speaker 3>of an inaugural women Money and Power event. It's convening

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 3>influential women voice says in finance to discuss.

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 2>The future of business.

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Look, they've got to talk AI, they've got to talk

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 3>fintech in global finance.

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Just take a listen to what the panel is happening underway.

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Then when you.

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 13>Come to a data dwiffen selection of customers, and this

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 13>is something that is no border, we love for it

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 13>for all the insights that we can provide information about

0:32:56.800 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 13>the market that you know buyers and sell it from

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 13>different regions in the country, can be can can benefit

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 13>from it.

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 2>All of you have talked.

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 5>About this idea of kind of assessing risks and as

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 5>we were walking on stage, I heard, you know, folks

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 5>from deep Miving, we worry about everything the existential crisis

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 5>of AI. Whose values are encoded in these things, whether

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:17.479
<v Speaker 5>it's like misinformation at scale or whatever that might be.

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>What are the.

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 5>Risks of the scenarios that you all are describing, What

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 5>are the risks of having your AI look at a

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 5>contract and be like, seems good.

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 14>What there are great risk but can something what And

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 14>it's kind of not not that me say. They've been

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 14>discussed a lot about, right I think for me think

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 14>I keep thinking system.

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 2>There is an effect which apparently.

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 14>Now is uncontroversial, which is in fears from now twenty

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:52.719
<v Speaker 14>fifty AI will be the most intelligent being on on

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 14>on the planet. It's no doubt mosk of at nights yeah, yeah,

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 14>but by a factor of there's not even ten. Right,

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 14>So when you think about that, this is the first

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 14>time in ISS that's ever happened. All of a sudden

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 14>can be very scary, right, So in the risk associdity

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 14>there are a lot because all of a sudden we

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 14>can lose control all of a sudden in the in

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 14>the short term even we can delegate too much and

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 14>know and lose a sense of reality.

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 2>What's real? What's real?

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 14>And the contra is the contral done well or not?

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 14>But if you project in the in the long term,

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 14>it could be even bigger risks in that, right, So

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 14>it's about losing control. And so how do we put

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 14>some boundaries, How can we still make sure, we're control,

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 14>we're in charge, and I think.

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's a solution yet.

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 14>But there are probably two ways and needs to be

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 14>explored in parallel. So one is the usual way of

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 14>controls and boundaries. So now for example, which is you know,

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 14>quality ssurance, limitation of the level of delegation. For example,

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 14>if we now use AI for a contract, cause somebody

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 14>should review it, and of course it.

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 5>Should uman be a human should review A human should review.

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 14>It right in the short and maybe we get to

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.760
<v Speaker 14>a point where we'll have another reviewing it. It's already happening,

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.720
<v Speaker 14>you know, on applications, but that needs to happen.

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 2>And the other side is.

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 14>And we'll be more and more is heataches because as

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 14>sort of boy, you know, as the model gets very advanced,

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 14>you need to ingrain the rules so behavior in the

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 14>model itself. And that's why I think there's a lot

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.439
<v Speaker 14>of not all the discussion, but starting now about how

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 14>can you make it happen?

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, I think that's the main risk.

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 14>How do you maintain control without leveraging the power AI?

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 14>And it will fascinating in the next few years to

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 14>see what kind of solutions come in place.

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 5>I'm putting in terms of the deployment of you know,

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 5>digital solutions, in terms of people using their phones.

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>For all these things. One of the.

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 5>Realities I'm thinking about the Apple context. You know, to

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:52.800
<v Speaker 5>use AI on an iPhone, you have to have the

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 5>very latest, most expensive version of what is already a

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 5>very expensive smartphone. All of you kind of operating in

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 5>context where not all of your customers might have the

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 5>very latest, most expensive versions of things. How are you including,

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, the hundreds of millions of people who don't

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.320
<v Speaker 5>have access to spend twelve hundred dollars on a device

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:12.919
<v Speaker 5>to take advantage of some of the technology that we're

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 5>talking about.

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 15>I think it's very dependent on the community that you're

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 15>operating in and what we found. I think certainly when

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 15>you look at the African continent with products such as Empesa,

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 15>which is a product that provides access to financial services

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:36.359
<v Speaker 15>to people on the African continent, it works on the

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 15>most basic of mobile phones, and so anybody through the

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 15>use of mobile telephony can be able to you know,

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 15>transfer capital or whatever the case is. And in that case,

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 15>actually it just shows the extent to which FINTACH at

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 15>its most basic level has been able to actually you know,

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 15>hit through many many levels of industry that were actually

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 15>not even there because financial industry has not been very

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:04.399
<v Speaker 15>robust in many countries on the African continent, and so

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:06.720
<v Speaker 15>mobile money has ensured.

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>That you can leapfrog that.

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 15>But you know, so, so from that perspective, you can

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 15>use the most basic phones for some of the most

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 15>basic products that you can make available because in terms

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:23.919
<v Speaker 15>of sophistication, the level of sophistication in terms of technology

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:28.240
<v Speaker 15>is not the same everywhere, certainly where we oppor data access,

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 15>data access absolutely absolutely, so, you know, so we we

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 15>found it to still we're able to use it as

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 15>it's applicable across the African continent. In South Africa where

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 15>mobile telephony is very high and you have access to

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 15>a lot of more sophisticated phones there, you're able to

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 15>make access to a number of products with the use

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 15>of AI to consumers that are using whether it's our

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 15>e commerce platform or they're using any of our platforms,

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 15>our payments platforms are classifieds platforms.

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, to excess our products.

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 5>Michelle. When you know, you've talked a lot about focusing

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 5>on solving the needs of your SMPS entrepreneurs, what has

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 5>been like the weirdest problem that they have had in

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 5>trying to adapt to all of these many changes that

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 5>seem to be happening at light speed.

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely.

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 13>When we talk about SMBs, sometimes we're talking about company

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 13>with less than ten people already entrepreneurs.

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 2>They are multitask.

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 13>I think one of the challenge for us is first

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 13>to develop technologies and innovations and AI solutions.

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is targeting for what they need.

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 13>And that's why we have been working for over twenty

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 13>five years and we're very happy to have been, you know,

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:47.280
<v Speaker 13>supporting these.

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Can catch more bluebags, women, money.

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 3>And power evenom right here on Bloomberg Television and for

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 3>now we check in on these markets, says the NASDAK

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 3>tennds into the red. A key contributor to the downside

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 3>in the SMP, for example, has been Oracle of by

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 3>more than seven percent after it's forecast did not live

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 3>up to expectations. And in general we're seeing nine percent

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:09.799
<v Speaker 3>growth in revenue, not enough to vindicate the eighty percent

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 3>ramp up in the shares we've seen so far this year.

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Move on to other individual movers that we're seeing, notable

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 3>ones to the downside include Mongo dB off by thirteen percent,

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 3>shares declining significantly. Databased software company reporting pretty strong third

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 3>call results, but they also announce the departure of their

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 3>CFO and COO, Michael Gordon. Markets worrying about that despite

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.400
<v Speaker 3>the strong results. I'm looking at at microstrutuy off by

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 3>one and a half percent, Pallenteer up by seven ten

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 3>percent in a down market. This is we understand that

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe these names could be the ones next added to

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 3>the Nasdaq one hundred. So we keep a keen eye

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 3>on whose in and out of these benchmarks. But meanwhile,

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 3>coming up, we go to the private markets. V see

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 3>investing trends in cybersecurity sector and nu K Salam.

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 2>Is going to be joining us.

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 3>But in capital ventures this is Bloomberg technology. In the

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 3>first half of this year, Palo Alto Networks forty two

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 3>reported in one the four percent increase in ransomware victims

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 3>compared to the first half of twenty twenty three. Higher

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 3>level of activity observed last year was no fluke. This

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 3>makes cybersecurity a hot sector to invest in if you're

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 3>a venture capitalist.

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 2>We got one of them.

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Enrickie Salem, partner at being Capital Ventures and former CEO Simantec,

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 3>and we're all about this on VC Spotlight continued focus

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 3>on cyber Does ransomware make a keen interest for you?

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 16>Well, obviously it's one of the biggest attack vectors today

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:33.320
<v Speaker 16>and what we're seeing is no one's immune. You've basically

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 16>got small businesses, hospitals, governments. You saw recently that at

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 16>Starbucks the baristas couldn't access their schedules because of a

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 16>ransomware attack, and you're seeing it pretty prevalent across all industries.

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Today, affecting one in ten companies each year according to

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 3>JP Morgan.

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 2>What are the best ways of preventing this?

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 3>How is the technology changing to ensure that we're getting

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 3>one of a kind founders coming to the space.

0:40:57.480 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 16>Well, so we're always looking to find new solutions to

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 16>how do you prevent an attack from happening? And that's

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 16>the key is first try to prevent it, and what

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 16>that means is try to understand what is the activity

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 16>or behavior that a ransomware attack will do, which is

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 16>ultimately try to encrypt the data on your computer and

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 16>also exfiltrated. But the most important thing now is be

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 16>prepared to recover. How do you make sure that you

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:22.319
<v Speaker 16>can decrypt it successfully and get all your data back

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:24.879
<v Speaker 16>without having to pay the ransom, which is what they're

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 16>targeting to try to get you to do.

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Has that been some of the most fruitful areas allocating

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 3>right now?

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 2>There's also just cyber is just so prevalent.

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 3>More generally, we're worrying about supply chain threats as well.

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 3>Where else have you seen opportunities to be putting money

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:38.720
<v Speaker 3>to work?

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 16>Well, you talked about supply chain security. We saw the

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 16>major attack on solar winds which hit eighteen thousand companies,

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 16>and what we saw then was an executive order for

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 16>President Biden that said every company needs to take supply

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 16>chain security very seriously, and ultimately that gave rise to

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:00.919
<v Speaker 16>a whole new set of companies, companies like Stacklock, chain Guard,

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 16>and a number of others that are now actively providing

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 16>solutions to businesses to protect their supply chains.

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 3>We find you so interesting because of course you were

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 3>a CEO yourself. You're also appointed to President Barack Obama's

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:16.439
<v Speaker 3>Management Advisory Board. You understand how politics works at hand

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 3>in hand with leading businesses. How are you advising your

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 3>portfolio companies now? As we start to look towards the

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:22.879
<v Speaker 3>next administration in twenty twenty five.

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 16>Well, I think it's going to be an interesting opportunity

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 16>for a lot of companies. The biggest trend that we've

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 16>all been talking about is AI, and AI is going

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 16>to completely change how many of our businesses work. The

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 16>attackers we've talked about security, what we're seeing is they

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 16>can be so much more aggressive now on targeted phishing

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 16>attacks that are custom made to really get somebody to react.

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're seeing deep fakes.

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:47.320
<v Speaker 16>And so we're telling all our companies how do you

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 16>take advantage of AI? And then the new administration I

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:54.320
<v Speaker 16>think will give us opportunities to drive potentially consolidation M

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 16>and A. And we're hoping that the IPO market comes

0:42:57.360 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 16>back in twenty twenty five.

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 3>Riki Salem, have you back when an IPO market starts

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 3>to creak open partner capital ventures?

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 2>We thank you.

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about geopolitics a little bit more. Huawei suppliers

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 3>are facing more limitations this as a US lawmakers are

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 3>moving to restrict the Pentagon from doing business with companies

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 3>that sell chips and services to the Chinese company who

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 3>mergs Mike Sheppard joins US for now, for more, this

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 3>continues to be the narrative China US facilities dialing up.

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 3>From a tech perspective, already, it is pretty hard if

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.279
<v Speaker 3>you were supplying to Huawei, but not hard enough clearly.

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 17>Well, apparently not for lawmakers on Capitol Hill who want

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 17>to bar defense contractors from doing any sort of business

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 17>whatsoever with Huawei, which is a national champion in China,

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 17>but here in Washington it's considered an outcast and pariah.

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:46.880
<v Speaker 17>It's been subject to a growing list of US sanctions

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 17>and export controls that have limited American companies greatly from

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 17>doing business with Huawei already, and now we're seeing more

0:43:55.800 --> 0:44:00.120
<v Speaker 17>restrictions coming their way, this time through the Pentagon. This

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 17>is likely to become law. The provision is attached to

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:08.439
<v Speaker 17>must pass defense policy legislation that we will see action

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 17>on in coming weeks before lawmakers leave town for the holidays.

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 17>So this is something coming down the piking. Companies will

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 17>have to deal with it within a nine month span

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 17>that is when the provision actually takes effect, and there

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:24.399
<v Speaker 17>are very rare exemptions granted under the law that would

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 17>allow companies to continue to do business with Huawei and

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 17>the Pentagon at the same time.

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Mike Shepherd breaking it all down in the latest tit

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:34.799
<v Speaker 3>for tat tech trade tensions China US.

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate it.