WEBVTT - What is USENET?

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey Thearin,

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech are

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>you today? I thought we'd talked about something that's both

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>a throwback and it's still very much current, which is

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the networked communication system called us net. While I think

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>just about everyone is familiar with certain Internet related services,

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, like email or web browsing, maybe to a

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>lesser extent, things like FTP, that sort of thingt I

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>think depends on the person. Some of you may have

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>only heard or seen references to UNT, some of you

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>may never have heard of it at all, And of

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>course I think some of you are probably very familiar

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>with it. In fact, from what I understand you, SET

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is actually kind of experiencing some lot of a renaissance

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>among younger users like millennial and gen Z users. I

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>would not know. I'm gen X, so I'm out of

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the loop everywhere. We're not even included in those articles

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that are about all the different generations and how they

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>differ from each other. Gen X is always left out

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of that, so I don't know what's going on with

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>my own generation. But I'm getting off track. So usenet

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is older than the Web. When Tim berners Lee introduced

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the technology that would underlie the Worldwide Web in the

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>early nineties, Usenet had already been a thing for more

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>than a decade at that point. So our story begins

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in North Carolina, primarily at Duke University. You had a

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of graduate students at Duke named Jim Ellis and

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Tom Truscott, and they were experimenting. They were creating a protocol.

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And remember, a protocol is a set of rules, a

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>set of instructions that a computer follows, and the protocols

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>define how computers do certain tasks. They were working on

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one called Unix to Unix Copy Protocol or UUCP. Now,

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>you also had a student at the University of North

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Chapel Hill named Stephen Bellevian who would create software

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.399
<v Speaker 1>that would leverage this protocol and allow people to interface

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>with it. He would become very important in the creation

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of us neet. In fact, also he ended up writing

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>several articles about the history of us net that were

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>incredibly useful when I was putting this piece together. He

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>wrote them for a circleid dot com, so you can

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>go there and read. I think it's a nine part

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>series where he goes into detail, sometimes great technical detail,

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>which I will not be doing for this episode. I

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>think it goes beyond the scope of what I want

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>to do. Plus I'd be more likely to mess things

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>up than to save them correctly. Anyway, this protocol made

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it possible for different computers to exchange files and messages

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>if they were networked to one another. And by computers

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm really talking about like mainframes and mini computers at

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this point, primarily mini computers. Now, a mini computer is

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>not the same thing as a desktop or a laptop.

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Those would be micro computers. A mini computer was still

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:32.679
<v Speaker 1>a big old honkin computer system, like back in the seventies.

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>So a mainframe could potentially take up an entire room

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes even an entire floor of a building. That's

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>how big mainframe computers could be. A mini computer might

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>be as small quote unquote as the size of an

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:52.119
<v Speaker 1>entire desk or maybe a couple of refrigerators. These machines

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>often had pretty significant computing power for the time, but

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they were not nearly as powerful as mainframes, or did

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>they have the capacity to process as much information per

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>unit of time as a mainframe could. They were, however,

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>marginally not marginally, they were significantly less expensive than mainframes,

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>so they became a core component of computer science departments

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>of various you know, schools that were specifically centered around technology.

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>One of those mini computers was the PDP eleven from

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>DC and it could run the Unix operating system. So

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's lots of different opring systems out there.

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Unix is one of the big ones, often used in

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>things like like web servers and things of that nature.

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Unix and Linux, whereas you know, we're mostly familiar with

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>either Mac up Brain system or Windows, depending on the

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>type of machine you use. Anyway, the mini computer PDP

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>eleven was the sort of computer system that graduate students

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:02.799
<v Speaker 1>had access to. This this was before many computers would

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be powerful enough to do anything significant in the computing world.

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Like they were great for hobbyists. They had lots of

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>useful tasks, but they were extremely limited. They would not

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.119
<v Speaker 1>be useful in a research capacity for the most part.

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So the students also had access to dial up modems,

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>which at that time ran at a blistering three hundred

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>bps that stands for bits per second, so the three

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred bits per second is actually not blistering. That was

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>just a joke. Also, at this point, hardware displays were

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>really rare. Like computer minors, you just didn't really have

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 1>them in a lot of these systems. So for a

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of these mini computers, you would not get your

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>results displayed on a screen. Instead, it would print on

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>a sheet of paper. So you would make some code

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and then you would get a print out of results

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and that would be when you'd find out whether or

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>not your code was good. If it wasn't, it had

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to go back and fix it and then print out again.

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty wild stuff back in those days. Well,

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it gets even better than that. The original use net

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>network relied on acoustic coupler modems. So this is the

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of modem that, as the name implies, uses sound

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>acoustics to make connections between computers. So each computer would

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have a modem that would have a coupler, and the

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>coupler would hold a handset of a landline telephone, so

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 1>you would take the telephone out of its cradle. You

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>would put the telephone into the coupler the right way,

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>so that the microphones on one side, the speakers on

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the other. You would then dial the number of the

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>computer system that you were hoping to connect to, which

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>also would have a handset and a coupler, and then

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>your computer would make noises indicating either a zero or

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a one, so bits in other words, through the coupler,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and these noise would travel over the phone lines, just

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>as voice communication would if two people were just talking

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>on the phone. So the motive on the other end

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>would receive these noises and the coupler would convert them

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>into voltage signals that the computer would then interpret as

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>bits as zeros are wants, and you could have communication

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>between computers this way. Now, the reason why the students

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>went with this specific method wasn't because that's the only

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>technology they had access to. Instead, it was because they

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>were trying to get around some pretty tough regulatory hurdles.

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Back in those days, AT and T essentially had a

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>monopoly over phone communications within the United States, so this

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>approach helped sidestep some obstacles they would otherwise have faced

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>when trying to connect the systems together. Right because you're

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>doing a voice call rather than a data call, at

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>least as far as the telephone system is concerned. It's

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>just sending signals of sound across You're not using it

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>as a data connection per se. And so it was

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a way to kind of sidestep the very steep prices

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you would have to pay in order to have a

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>data connection. So, by the way, AT and T tried

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>desperately to fight that and to make it so that

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>they could still charge enormous amounts of money for those connections,

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately they lost that particular court battle. Anyway, Stephen

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Bellvan wrote software to create a sort of client, kind

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of like a web browser. It was a client that

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>would serve as the interface for use net and the

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>UUCP protocol, which I know, I just was repetitive. It's

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>like saying ATM machine. And also the computer systems and

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>modems were all doing the heavy lifting behind the scenes

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and stalling the software on different mini computers made it

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>possible to exchange information and files between these mini computers INI,

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not A and Y. In fact, there were not very

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>many computers connected to use net at all initially, so

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>they called it use net, which is short for Users Network.

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>The first three computers connected to the network were in

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Duke University Duke Medical School and the University of North

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Chapel Hill. Obviously it would grow from there. But

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to really sit down and explain what

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>use net is and a bit about how it's organized,

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to really get an understanding of what makes it special.

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you're at all familiar with Reddit, the description

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of use net is going to sound a little bit

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>familiar to you on a surface level. So the use

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>net network consists of discussion groups. These are called newsgroups.

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>These would be a lot like subreddits on Reddit. So

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>each newsgroup is dedicated to a specific subject or topic.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Users can read and at least in most cases post

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to newsgroups. There are limitations on that. I'll talk about

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that in a bit. And you can subscribe to specific

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>newsgroups so that you can keep up with the new

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's posted to them. At least you can do that. Now,

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not how it worked initially, because originally the client

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that Stephen Bellvan programmed was limited to updating the information

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>based on the last time you access the newsgroup according

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to the computer's logs, and it would give you all

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the updates, so you couldn't just jump around and grab

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>just the stuff you were interested in in the one

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>newsgroup that you were Let's say that you are just

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fascinated with Dudgeons and dragons, and that's the only

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>newsgroup you wanted to be part of, so that was

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>all you were focusing on. Well, with Bellevan's client, you

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>would get everything, not just that newsgroup. The reason for

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this is that Bellvan felt that usenet wouldn't get that

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>much traffic. He thought maybe it would generate an article

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>or two per day, people would write a piece for

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>use net, or maybe you would get two pieces in

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a day, and so it'd be a very small update

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>each day. So there's no reason to worry about it

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>because he was you know, at the time, we were

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about three computers, and again there were many computers.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>They were ones that you had to have access to

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>as a student to be able to even use in

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the first place, so by by definition, it was limited.

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Plus this is a you know, a newsgroup you would

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>only have access to if you had booked time with

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>that mini computer, which was a process. Right, you had

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to access it, and that required you to sign up,

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, sometimes you had a log book and

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>everything so that you could have access to it so

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that other students would know that at that time you

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>were accessing the computer system. Anyway, we're gonna take a

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>quick break. When we come back, I'll talk a little

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>bit more about some interesting comparison's contrasts with Reddit. Okay,

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 1>we're so. Reddit tends to be a place where users

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>share links to interesting stuff to a relevant subreddit reddit,

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and then conversation will flow from there. So a fairly

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>typical Reddit post might have a headline associated with a

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>news story, and you could click through and that will

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>actually take you to the news story itself, or you

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>can click into the messages and read the conversation around

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the news item. But I mean, you could just have

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a Reddit post that just is an original piece, a

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>user generated piece. Maybe it includes a photo or a

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>gift or something like that. But that's typically the way

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>reddits work, especially in the subreds I go to. Those

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>are almost always about sharing articles and links to interesting stuff. Well,

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>us neet was just originally limited to plain old text.

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>There was no Worldwide Web yet, so you couldn't hyperlink

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to a web page. Web pages didn't exist initially, you

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>couldn't upload a file to use net Folks did see

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that would be really useful if you could do that,

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>if you could create a way to upload and download

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>files to and from us net, but it would require

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit of work in order to make this possible.

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>As such, students started to work on a way to

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>allow for the uploading and downloading of binary files. So

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>binary refers to basic computer language. You know, it's zeros

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and ones. Those zeros and ones can represent anything, you know.

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>We're talking everything from software to orchestral symphonies to the

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>dancing baby gif that was all the rage on the

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>internet thanks to Ali mcbeil man. I'm dating myself with

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>this episode. So these smarty pants students came up with

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a way to encode binary data into text because that's

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>what us net could handle. It could handle text. So

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you would take your program. You would then have to

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.719
<v Speaker 1>convert your program into binary code. You would have to

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>convert the binary code into text and then upload that.

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Someone else could then grab that thread of posts and

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 1>then use a decoder to decode the text back into binary,

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and then finally convert the binary into whatever the original

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>file format was. So there are a lot of steps,

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but it would work. But there was a catch because

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>used that articles have a limit as to how much

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>data they can hold. So typically uploading a file means

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that the file is going to be split across multiple posts,

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and by multiple I mean potentially lots of posts, because

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to download something significantly large, like today,

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>if you were trying to download a high resolution video,

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you could be talking about thousands of posts that make

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>up this video. So part of the issue was that

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>early encoding methods would inflate the file size significantly, by

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>like forty percent, so the file would get even larger

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>because of the encoding method Now, fortunately, folks would come

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>up with alternatives and they would find ways to encode

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the binary into texts that would reduce that overhead. Also,

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind that when us net was a new thing,

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the folks who were using it were relying on those

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>dial up modems. They had really hefty limitations and how

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>much data they could download per second, so we weren't

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>typically talking about big files at least in the early

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>days of use net. Anyway, the support for binary files

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>meant that us neet would become a way to communicate

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>not just through text, but through files as well. This

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is as you might imagine that led to some issues

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with piracy, but well that's a matter for another episode,

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>so we're just going to move on and keep on

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about us net. So a fundamental feature of us

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>net is that it's not a centralized service. This is

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>another way we can contrast it with Reddit. While Reddit

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>has some surface level similarities to us net, beneath the

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>hood things are very different. So Reddit is essentially centralized.

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>It means that the service ultimately runs on servers that

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Reddit either owns or leases from, like a cloud competing

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>provider such as Amazon Web Services. But the point is

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the underlying foundation for Reddit is in a centralized group

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of servers. Centralized in this case doesn't necessarily mean geographically

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way. That's because networking gets all whibbly wobbly,

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>but it does mean that's in this definite, finite number

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of servers, and that is where Reddit lives. Use net,

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, is decentralized. Anyone could create a

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>use net server. You'd have to download the right software,

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but you could do it. So the way use networks

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is more like a peer to peer network. So let's

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>say you create a use net server. You connect your

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>server to the use net network at large, You indicate

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>which news groups in particular you want to prioritize on

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>your server, and your server will regularly ping other servers,

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the bigger nodes in use Net's network to look for

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>updates to those newsgroups and thus pull in new information

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>whenever there is new information, and then your users on

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>your server can access that. Now, let's say that your

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>users on your server create a newsgroup that gets a

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of popularity, and eventually other servers on the us

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>net network are interested in that newsgroup, so they start

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>pigging your server and they get updates on your user's

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>newsgroup and they serve it to their users. So the

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>whole network is decentralized and to an extent asynchronous. You

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>might access a newsgroup and read an article and some

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of the posts beneath it, and then you decide you

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>want to write your own response, So you create your

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>own response and you send it to post. Now that's

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>going to go to whatever server you're connected to through usnet,

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't automatically populate across every use net server

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that carries that newsgroup. That you have to wait for

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>them all to sort of synchronize, which means that they're

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a time where some versions of

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that news group are going to have your reply, some

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>versions are not, and it means that other people might reply.

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>They might even make the same point you made. If

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you're unlucky, they might make it better than you did,

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you just seem to be, you know, repeating

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what someone else said. But when you wrote your post,

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you had that that reply didn't exist, or at least

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you hadn't seen it yet because yours had not synchronized

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>with the most recent information. So it gets a little

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>bit like muddy when you're talking about, you know, what's

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>the latest information on us net. Well, it really depends

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>upon which server you're talking about and whether or not

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that was the point where new material was generated or

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>if in fact it's waiting to be propagated across the

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>entire network. Now. One benefit of this approach is that

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>us net is somewhat shielded against censorship and interference because

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no one to shut down it's distributed right now.

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean that an authority cannot try, and even

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in extreme cases, sometimes succeed to take stuff off us net.

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But it ain't easy. It is a pretty tough thing

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to do because there's not any one entity you can

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>go to like you can't. You could go to Reddit

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and demand Reddit remove something, which you may or may

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not work, depending on the nature of the thing, but

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't really do that with us net because again,

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not one single entity that controls use net. It's

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a hive mind. The structure of newsgroups actually follows hierarchies,

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and that is like large categorizations. Right today, you could

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>argue the most famous use net hierarchy is the ALT hierarchy,

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>which is funny because the ALT in this case stands

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>for alternative, specifically an alternative to the big seven newsgroup

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>hierarchies that are seen as the more establish but whatever,

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not how everything started. There were no seven hierarchies

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>when use net first started. In fact, in the beginning,

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>there were only three hierarchies of newsgroups, and all that

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>was posted should fall under one of the three, and

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it was adequate. So the three hierarchies were net, FA, FA,

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and mod mod, So all newsgroups started with one of

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>those designations. So you might have one that says like

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>net dot discussion that would be a newsgroup. The net

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>hierarchy was pretty much the catch all. It started as

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a hierarchy for newsgroups that were focusing on conversations about

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the network itself, but that rapidly expanded to non network topics,

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>so you would get people creating like net dot politics

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>or net dot jokes. The FA hierarchy was an acronym

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>for from arpinnet. It got started after a student at

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the University of California at Berkeley named Mark Horton joined

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 1>usenet in nineteen eighty and started to add material from

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>an arpinet mailing list to the network. Access to Arpinet

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>was really limited. It was very difficult to get access,

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>so what Horton was doing was kind of a service,

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 1>was providing other people the opportunity to read these mailing lists,

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>when otherwise they would not have any access to those

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>mailing lists. So arpinnet was sort of a predecessor to

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.479
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. It was the network where computer scientists and

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>engineers were developing the rules that would allow for Internet communication.

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>So some people say, like, it's the grandfather of the

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Internet if you think of it that way. I think

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>that's a little oversimplification, but it kind of gets the

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>idea across. So Horton's contributions would lead to a new

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>hierarchy dedicated to sharing information from Arbennet mailing lists, the

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>FA hierarchy, And originally that was a read only hierarchy,

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>so stuff that was posted to that newsgroup you could read,

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>but you could not contribute to it unless you were

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the authorized entities that could post from mailing

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>lists to that hierarchy. Then, as for the mod hierarchy,

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that was for newsgroups that needed to be a bit

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>more controlled and buttoned up, because it was pretty clear

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that as more students started to use Usenet, the tendency

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to do goofy stuff like contributing off topic posts to

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>a thread or intentionally trying to start flame wars on

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>use net. That's really where that got started. These things would,

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, derail conversations or sometimes completely pull focus from

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.239
<v Speaker 1>whatever the topic at discussion was supposed to be. So

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the mod hierarchy was moderated. That's what MOD stood for.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a moderated hierarchy. Every post under the mod

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>hierarchy would have to be approved by a moderator before

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>it was posted to. A newsgroup is often used for

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff like official news and official announcements, that kind of

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>stuff where you didn't want the Hoi poloi to start

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>mucking everything up and confusing the message. So those were

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>your three You had your NET, your FA, and your

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>MOD and things would carry along that way until we

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 1>would get to the mid eighties. I'll explain more, but

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>first let's take another quick break to thank our sponsors.

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're up to the mid eighties. So remember us

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>NET kind of got start in seventy nine, really got

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.959
<v Speaker 1>going in nineteen eighty. We get up to around nineteen

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>eighty six and into nineteen eighty seven, and a few

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>things happened that would shake things up for us NET

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in a really significant way. For one, graduate students Phil

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Lapsley of the University of California, Berkeley and Brian Cantor

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of University of California, San Diego wrote a Request for

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Comments or RFC in nineteen eighty six in which they

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>described the specification for a new set of rules called

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the Network News Transfer Protocol or in INTP. SO from

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy nine to nineteen eighty six, the primary way

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know, people were accessing use net was through

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>these time shared mini computer systems, So you didn't really

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>have access unless you had booked that time with the

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>mini computer, and as I said, that had really limited things.

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>NNTP made it more possible to access us net using

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a microcomputer a personal computer, because by the mid eighties

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>these were now a thing that were capable enough to

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to do something like that. So you would

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to access read and post to use neet

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>groups by connectting your mini computer to whatever use net

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>server you happened to be able to access. So NNTP

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>is what made that all possible, and that would greatly

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>extend the access for use net, which meant also that

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>volume the posts on us net would increase dramatically as

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a result. This then led to the Great Renaming, and

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.959
<v Speaker 1>yes that's what it's referenced as the Great Renaming. It

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>gets a bit dramatic, but as I mentioned earlier, Steve Bellevan,

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the guy who created the first use net client, imagine

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that us net would see maybe one to two new

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>articles posted there per day, but us net was generating

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>way more than that by the mid nineteen eighties, and

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the creation of n NTP would complicate matters because access

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to us net would grow substantially, and so it was

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>becoming a bit of a mess, right, You just had

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>these three hierarchies that were trying to handle everything, and

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the really the only differenterentiation between the hierarchies was that

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the net hierarchy was essentially the one where anyone could

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>post content. The FA or FAW hierarchy was the one

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that was just for posting content from mailing lists, and

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the mod was for moderated posts, and that was it.

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Everything had to fall into those, but it made it

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>really hard to organize and find stuff, like if you

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>were searching for something specific, it was hard to find. Now,

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the use net network is decentralized, as I mentioned, but

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Bellivan explained in those incredible posts that I talked

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>about on circleid dot com. They're well worth checking out.

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Some of the nodes in this network held more sway

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>than others. They saw more traffic, and so the administrators

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>for those use net servers had a bit more power

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>than someone who's running a server that gets very little

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 1>traffic at all. And those nodes, along with some of

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the folks who actually were responsible for building use net,

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>initially they became known as the backbone cabal. This became

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>like a long standing joke in usenet circles about whether

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>or not this cabal existed or didn't. But really, what

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>it just meant was that collectively they had the power

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to decide what would or would not get wide distribution

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>across all of use Net. So let's say that there's

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>some sort of extraordinary circumstance that comes up and these

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>administrators collectively decide that those newsgroups are bad news, like

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's dangerous or harmful or whatever you may think.

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And it would have to be extraordinary for this to happen,

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>but it could happen. So collectively they decide that they're

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>not going to propagate that newsgroup. Well, that would limit

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the circulation of that newsgroup. It wouldn't prevent it from existing.

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 1>It would still exist on whatever home server it was

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:58.479
<v Speaker 1>posted to. It just wouldn't propagate to other use Net servers,

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>or at least not the big ones, which means means

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it would limit the number of people who actually saw

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>and could interact with that post. So effectively, it could

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>be kind of like censoring that newsgroup. But again, this

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen that frequently. It's just it was possible because

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of the way usenet works. So this cabal debated and

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>discussed creating a new group of hierarchies that thet newsgroups

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>could inhabit to make things a little more manageable. This

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in itself became a very long and detailed debate because

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>there are so many different ways you can classify information.

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>If you don't believe me, ask a librarian, Ask a

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>librarian about things like taxonomies and finding out like how

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>do you determine where does a book belong in? What

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>category should you put any one book? It gets really

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>complicated and subjective, So, for example, how would you classify

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>video games? Should you put it in like recreation or hobbies?

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Or does it belong in technology or in business or

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in programming. It kind of depends upon the point of view,

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So some decisions would appear mostly arbitrary because when you

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>get down to it, they kind of were. So the

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>new big seven hierarchies that were created in this great

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>renaming were COMP for computer news, which is self explanatory,

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>REC for recreation, CIG for science sci, SoC for social sec,

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>TALK for general discussion, and MISK for miscellaneous. These were

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>not the only hierarchies, but these were the big ones,

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the ones that had the most newsgroups under them. Then

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you had alt which became the alternative hierarchy for newsgroups

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that didn't really fit into the other ones, or that

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>were not being accepted into the other hierarchies. At least initially,

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it was possible for a newsgroup to migrate to a

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>different hierarchy over enough time, but yeah, it was it

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>would make the organization a little wonky. So it again

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary circumstances. The Big Seven in the nineties would depending

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on whom you ask, would become the Big Eight because

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>there was a hierarchy called Humanities that joined the party

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that some people would say kind of belongs with the

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Big Seven. But honestly, there are hundreds of hierarchies. Some

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of them are also pretty big, like biz biz. That's

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a hierarchy dedicated to business newsgroups. It's a pretty happening

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>newsgroup or hierarchy, i should say. So there are lots

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of them out there. Some of them just get very

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>specific to things like education, that kind of stuff. And

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>so numerous use net groups formed. Some of them flourished,

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>some of them failed. Some would become the backbone to

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>future web content. IMDb dot Com famously started off as

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a use neet group before it became the Internet Movie database,

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure no one thought that it was going

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to grow into something that would later get scooped up

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>by Amazon when it was still part of a use

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>net group. And usnet is still going on strong today.

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>There are news groups that are dead, but that's because

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>they were focusing on topics that are themselves obsolete. Today

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>it would be very strange to find a lively discussion

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>about like five and a quarter inch disk drives. Who

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the heck is using them? Besides like very niche hobbyists,

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>use net is very different other types of Internet activity

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Use net does not track user behaviors, So

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that's one major difference between using us net versus the web.

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>When you're on the web, everyone wants to track you, right,

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>There's so many different ways to track user behaviors and

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>user web history, and that information becomes valuable. That is

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the currency of the Internet. That's what's being bought and

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>sold by data brokers. That's the stuff that is valuable

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>about you. You don't get to realize that value. You

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>are the product you are being bought and sold. And

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that's just the way it is when you're using the web.

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Use net though it doesn't track user behavior, so you

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe to whichever use net groups you want. The

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>use net server isn't paying attention to who is doing what,

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a lot more privacy in that regard

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>as to you know what you are actually consuming on

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>use net versus on the web. There are lots of

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>use net clients out there. There are a lot of

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>newsreaders out there that you can use. Some of them

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>are built into web browsers. There are also a lot

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of use net service providers out there, some of which

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>have subscriptions that you have to pay in order to

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>access them, but it means that you can access that

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>particular provider and get advantages that you would over say

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a smaller provider, like a really big provider will have

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>features that you won't find with smaller providers. One of

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the things that net servers have is a retention policy.

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>That's how long they will hold a file before deleting it.

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, if you find one that has a

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>retention policy of a thousand days or more, that's pretty good.

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I saw one that had more than five

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand days retention policy, and that means you'll have access

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to the most files that you can, because ultimately, as

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>time passes, they will get deleted off use net. So

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>depending on which provider you're using to connect to use net,

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you will have access to certain user generated content. If

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you're on a different provider, they might delete files more frequently,

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get access to them. There's also

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>like limitations to things like how much you can pull

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>down per month for some providers. Some of them offer

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>unlimited plans that kind of thing. So there's a lot

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.439
<v Speaker 1>of variety when it comes to the actual providers out there.

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's kind of the lowdown on us net.

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting to me is that, again I have read

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>things that suggested that millennials and Gen Z users are

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of migrating over to us net more and more,

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>which is news to me. I think that's really interesting,

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and especially since like I associate use net with an

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:36.280
<v Speaker 1>old method of accessing the Internet. And for the record,

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I had access to use net a little bit in

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 1>my youth and my college years and everything, but truth

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>be told, I kind of went from BBS's bulletin board systems,

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>which are you know, that's where you're logging into a

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>local computer or a single computer not a network, and

0:34:56.560 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you're getting you're posting and retrieving information to that compute,

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 1>and you're not networked into a larger system. I went

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:07.959
<v Speaker 1>from that to telnet, and from tel net I went

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to the World Wide Web. So I didn't use us

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>net that much when I was in college, which was

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in the early nineties, so this was mostly me learning

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 1>about it because I had only had limited access to usnet.

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I did hear about it quite a bit, like you

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>would always hear about the various alt news groups that

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>were catering to some rather varied interests. I will say,

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>but I never frequented them because I was more too

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 1>busy tell netting into chat rooms and chatting with people

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in other colleges just for the heck of it. So

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 1>that's it. That's our little overview of what us net is.

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I almost said was, but it really is still a thing.

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>I hope you are all well, and I will talk

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production.

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.