WEBVTT - We Are Being Choked by Regulatory Environment, Stefanski Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>P and L is brought to you by proper Cloth,

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a leader in men's custom shirts with proprietary smart sized

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>technology and top rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>has never been easier. Visit proper cloth dot com to

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>order your first custom shirt today. Welcome to the Bloomberg

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. Along with my

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we bring you the

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for you and your money,

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>whether you at the grocery store or the trading floor.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg P and L Podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and at Bloomberg dot com. A rising rate environment, what's

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that going to do to the real estate business to homeowners?

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's find out from Mark Stefanski. He's the chief executive

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of Third Federal Savings and Loan. Mark, thank you very

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Just start us off by

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>telling people a little bit about a Third Federal Savings

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and Loan. Okay, yeah, good morning, Thank you for having

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>me on the show. Uh yeah, My parents started Third

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Federal back in n My dad frantically invented the home

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>mortgage business, and so I'm second generation. We do business

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>in twenty three states. Now we have stores in Ohio

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and Florida. Uh. Yet we we do business in twenty

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>three states via the Internet and direct mail, and we

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>make more home mortgages than anyone else in the state

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of Ohio. We mark. We were talking earlier with our

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News colleague about some concerns among some congressmen that

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>there are insufficient opportunities to provide credit for small and

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>mid sized businesses. I'm wondering from your vantage point, you

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>have a really good view into Middle America, do you

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>feel that this is the case. Well, I do think

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that the regulatory environment is hampering uh those kinds of

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>loans and that kind of expansion in the economy. Uh Uh, well,

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just DoD frank in itself requires Uh let's say,

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>for a homeowner, if you own your own business, Uh,

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the ability to repay is a huge, huge issue because

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to show that you have uh W two's

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and you have to have tax returns to show your

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>income to prove that you can pay for for the mortgages.

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's ten percent of our business. And it's really

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>hard to get those people qualified because not everything is

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>always shown on in a W twoe form or on

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>their tax returns, and people who or their own businesses

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>are very very uh stuck right now and trying to

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>get home owns. And that's the middle class that's in

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Middle America that everyone's been saying, well, it has to grow,

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it has to grow, but specifically that Styman's the growth

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in in that particular area. Have you been able to

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're based in Ohio, as you said, I mean,

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>have you been able to make your concerns and these

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>challenges known to the officials that maybe could could affect

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>some kind of change. Well, uh, right now, No, it

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter because all those concerns fallen deaf ears. Uh yeah,

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>because that Frank has has taken over the industry. And

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>uh well, I think right now, I think everyone in

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the industry, and I think the general public is more

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>optimistic given given the new president and the the push

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>for a more of a are less emphasis on regulation.

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's going to be very helpful. But

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>but to to try to appeal to the regulatory body,

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>or to Congress, or to anybody, it's it's falls on

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>deaf or has fallen on deaf ears, especially in the

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>last eight years. Mark can you just sort of square

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>something for me, because there I just want to contrast

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about as far as credit conditions being

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>too tight with a lot of fears of excessive froth

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in other parts of the credit market. You've seen that

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in corporate credit and uh, just this week the Federal

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Reserve eyeballed commercial real estate as a potential new area

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>of froth. Do you think that that this is an

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>accurate description of the sort of bigger credit markets or

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think that these are just completely bifurcated markets

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point? Well, I think that regulators, regulators, um,

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't know what they don't know, so they're always

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>looking for the next next big thing to hit. And

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and I can't honestly say that one the regulatory environment

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>has guessed, they've guessed right. It's usually they do a

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>very good job of cleaning up the mess after something's happened.

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>And uh, that's that's you know, that's what's happening with

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Don Frank. Yet there's unintended consequences where you know, big

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>banks are basically the targets, but it's trickled down into

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>all the banking and all the mid science banks, all

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the small banks. They're being choked. We are being choked

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>by the regulatory environment. Uh. And it's to the detriment

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of the economy and detriment of people that once qualified

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>at the third Federal for example, in qualify because we

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>had a change our criteria based on the demand that

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing. Is the economy operating at a two g

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>d p or is it operating at slower than current expectations.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little slower um. However, I think

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it is better. We were very very stagnant there for

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I think there's optimism in the air.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the when the Fed moves on an interest rate,

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.799
<v Speaker 1>whether it be up or down, that gets people excited.

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think the anticipation of the Fed would like

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to see the Reserve raised interest rates three times this year.

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>You know they could, and I don't think it's going

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to have a dramatic effect then on the on the

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>market consumer. Really why is that? Well? I just think

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that psychologically people right now are in a real good place.

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>People are very optimistic. So when when the raises rates

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit against people more excited that they might

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>go up further. So you get more volume coming in

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>but frankly, I don't see how those those changes in

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>interest rates going dramatically, you know, affected the consumer demand

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>for for homes. I just don't think that it's going

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to move enough to put people that much out of

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the market. And think about it, when most of us

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>were growing up, interest rates of seven eight nine percent

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>were norm and I've been around long enough, I saw

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent um that was horrific, and and now down

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to four percent. People are complaining that the right so

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>might go up to four and a half or something

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>for a thirty or fixth rate mortgage. That's not so bad.

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Although you know, some people have said that in the

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in the wake of these incredibly low interest rates that

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we've had since two thousand and eight, uh, that housing

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>prices and commercial real estate prices have gotten away from themselves,

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and that as people, as the FED raises rates and

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>as borrowing costs rise, we're going to see a sort

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of deflation of these bubbles. From your experience so far,

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>do you observe a slowdown in demand or anything that

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>suggests that there is a weakening in the housing market now?

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think it's quite the opposite, because I

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of it, whether it be UM in

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>any sector of the economy tends to feel to be

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>feeled by UM UH perception UH and and consumer confidence.

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think the consumer confidence right now is pretty

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>darn good, as good as it's been in the last

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>eight to ten years. And I think that's going to

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>go a long way. And of course we'll find out

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in the next four years how good that optimism will

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>will hold. I want to thank you very much for

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>spending time with us. Mark Stefanski is the chief executive

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of Third Federal Savings and Loan and you know, Lisa

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that his parents, Ben and Jerome they started fifth third

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Federal Savings alone. They started in nineteen thirty eight with

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>just fifty dollars in initial capital. We've heard a lot

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of news overnight about President Trump's conversations with the Australian

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and Mexican UH leaders, and some of the language has been,

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of sort of incendiary, uh, to say the least.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Marty Shanker, who heads the

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Washington bureau for Bloomberg News, and Marty, I want to

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>start with, UH, what your take is on what we've

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>heard overnight, is the US removing itself from its longest

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>standing allies or is this just bluster? Well it would

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>appear so. Um, but Donald Trump tweeted just a little

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>while ago, you know, not to be concerned about his

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>tough talks with our closest allies, and you know, uh,

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And Tim O'Brien has an interesting viewpiece today in which,

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, this notion of Trump having this grand plan

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and all of us in journalism trying to figure out

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>just where everything fits. And he says, that's a fool's

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Errand this is coming from his gut. It's spontaneous. He

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>feels he's doing the things he said he would do

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>once he got elected. And he feels the US has

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>been just too nice to the rest of the world,

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>friends and foe alike. So he's going to do things

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>his way. Hey, Marty of fair disclosure? How long have we?

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I gotta say everything I learned. I

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 1>think I learned that your knee at the Wall Street

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Journal I'm not not and I was just twelve years old, right, Yeah,

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>well we were both in short pants. You know. It's

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>been a long trip, Yes, it has, um what in

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>your bones and your gut? All right? You talked about

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>the president's gut. You're a journalist through and through in

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>your gut, what what is going on and what needs

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can't do this on a regular basis

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in twy not well, that's my question. In other words,

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>something's got to give. Well, look there there, it's been

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>like two weeks he's been president. He does he had

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>very few members of his cabinet in place. That's being

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we just saw Rex Tillerson at the State Department,

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know he was he's basically keeping the council

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of his closest adviser Steve Vannon, uh and others. Um.

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And he hasn't had the benefit of, you know, real

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 1>time communication with people, with experienced people who are respected

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in their fields. And I think he has not been

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>able to And he's always said he likes to hear

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>dissident opinions, and by all accounts he's a great listener

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 1>in private. And so I think that things can very

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>easily be more moderate nature going forward. But I do

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>think his impulsiveness will never go away. And um, for

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>those of us who say to ourselves, this is going

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to slow down eventually, I think he got to guard

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>against that. I think that he that he has decided

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the way he wants to communicate, and in fact,

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the way he wants to express policy, and

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>he's going to continue to do that. What's the color

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're hearing from the Republican establishment in Congress and beyond, Well,

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>they are steadfastly behind him. Uh, you know, I don't know.

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I have stated privately that I think that his support

0:11:55.960 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>among the Republicans is razor thin um, and that he

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a tenuous relationship, but it is a solid one

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>um for for now. I think the immigration uh proposals

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that he had tested that relationship and the Republicans lined

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>up pretty solidly in favor of perhaps not the messaging

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>but the policy itself. So and and the majority of

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Americans support it too. So I think the Republicans are

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>going to stand by their president until such time as

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they themselves are threatened in terms of re election issues. Marty,

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>can you just give us a reality check? Some people

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>here the rhetoric of President Trump saying he's going to

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>invade uh Mexico in a conversation that the White House

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>now says was just a tough talk and a joke. Um,

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>at what point, just taking this to its extreme. At

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>what point does this lead to a real military altercation? Well,

0:12:57.679 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we're pretty far away from that. And I

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>think Donald Trump got a stark example of what military

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>confrontation means with the first death under his watch. And uh,

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, by all accounts, that is a very sobering

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>moment for anyone, and especially a president who ultimately is

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>responsible for all military activity. So I do think that

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these conversations, when they're put in print

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>for in text, look a lot more vitriolic and our

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>cast without context, without the nuance of actual conversation, and

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think people tend to overreact to that. Let's turn

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to our allies for just a second. Phone calls with

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister Turnbull in Australia. What's been your any details

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you can shed anything you can No, I mean, we

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>have not been able to stand up that communication. You know,

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that was broken by the Washington Post in great detail.

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>And you've got to assume someone who was privity to

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>those conversations decided to leak it because they were concerned

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>about it. Um. Just to be clear, it was a

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>conversation where President Trump allegedly said, uh that it was

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the worst conversation that he had all day and basically

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>threatened him with the refugee agreement that they had, that

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that the US previously came to with Australia, right and

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and and the Australian leader Turnbull later said, look, you

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>know he was dismayed about the league and that the

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>actually be the ending of that conversation was courteous, but

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>be that as it may. Donald Trump came out and said,

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't worry about my tough talk. He has

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>decided that he is keeping his promise. America comes first.

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>He was very upset about this immigration deal and he

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>was going to let turn Bill know, and he did.

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Got to affect businesses, yes, right, I mean you know

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you kind of I know, you stopped there on the

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>political side, but then you gotta turn your attention and say, okay,

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>so what are the effects here? Because you may be

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>able to run a government as you just described it,

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's very hard to run a business. No, it's

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>totally skill. And that's why this meeting with CEOs tomorrow

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>is kind of in my task about it critically important. Well,

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this is his business council. These the people he asked

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to advise him. On policy and everybody from Jamie Diamond

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to Jane Metti, and it's very it's going to be

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. The tenor of what that meeting is going

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to be. Will they come in and say, Mr President,

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you're wrong on immigration, you're wrong on trade, you're wrong

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on taxes, or are they going to sit with hands

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>folded and listen to Donald Trump say this is the

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>way it's going to be. Um And you know they're

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>from all parts of industry and banking and finance, so

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be interesting if they even have a

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>unified message to give him. Well if if they do,

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>or even if they don't, we're gonna be covering it.

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Marty Schanker, thank you very much, Senior Executive editor, Global

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Economics and Government for Bloomberg News. P and L is

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by proper Cloth, a leader in men's

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>custom shirts. At proper cloth dot com, ordering custom shirts

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>has never been easier. Create your custom shirt size by

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>answering ten easy questions, select from over five fabrics to

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>suit your personal taste. Shirts start from eighty five dollars

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and are delivered in just two weeks with proper Cloths

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>perfect fit guarantee. Remakes are completely free and expert staff

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>are standing by to help. For premium quality, perfect fitting shirts,

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>visit proper cloth dot com custom shirts made Smarter. I

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>want a story of innovation of how to look at

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the world today, makes sense of it, and then find

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>an investment uh that is somewhat reliable. I want to

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>bring in Paul more League, Global head of Market Economics

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>and Chief Economist for North America at BNP. Pariba, Paul,

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>where do you begin when you start with assessing your

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>economic outlook? Beginning with the facts has a pretty good

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>place to start. Where we've been and look at, you know,

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>basically where the surveys are telling us we might go next,

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and what the settings of policy are. So you know

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 1>the surveys currently look for the US look pretty perky. Well,

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>let's look can we just like piece of the part

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>just because I know tomorrow we're going to get the

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>big payroll report number that will help people at least

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the confirm or deny their trajectory projections. You know, compare

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>all that, but as an economist, just run through it.

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>For US, GDP is running at at what we got

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a print at one point nine the last quarter on

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>what are we running at now well, you know the

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Fed he's saying for Q one day lateist GDP

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>now forecast he's three point four. Okay, so we're three okay,

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's just say that Atlantage Fed GDP forecast three

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>point four for Q one for unemployment four points where

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>four point seven, and you know, we're pretty flat, maybe

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a downward trajectory for the unemployment rate

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 1>going forward. Um, you know, labor participation rate moves or

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>just I think I think it's going to be pretty

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>flat more or less. But you know that if even

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>if you've got growth of just two, that's above potential

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>because the leather force is increasing by say half a

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>point per year, productivity in the year to Q four

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>was only one percent, so maybe productive potential is one

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.719
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So if we're running at two or above,

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>unemployment should keep drifting down. Not very quickly because there

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>are far fewer people out there than they used to be,

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 1>but it should be drifting down, all right, and for

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>and for at least I know, you want to know

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>about inflation, because inflation is all about bonds. Yeah, I mean, well,

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I was just coming cost here. Well, yeah, I mean

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>beyond that. I mean, but I'm trying to look into

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the crystal ball. Nobody can predict the future. I'm wondering,

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like you're less confident than you've ever

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>been before with your predictions or do you think that

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>people are overreacting to some of the macroeconomic and the

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>political backdrop and that there is a very clear road ahead.

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I think people, you know, I think we've seen a

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>tendency for the markets just after the November elections to

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>one run off in one direction, and recently people are

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of extrapolating things in the other direction, because I

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>think the technical term is they're walking back their estimates

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>right here, driving with the rear view mirror. Maybe, but

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's difficult to come out with very firm

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>expectations about where we're going to go on trade and

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>physical and all these sort of things. So little spots

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of information that you get a very valuable because it's

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>all you've got, but there's a tendency to extrapolate them.

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I think. So. Do you think that people have over

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 1>inflated their expection expectations for inflation to your point, Pim, No,

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I think, you know, if you

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>look globally where we're going on a inflation inflation is

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>going up, and you see that in the producer price

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>index in China, for example, You've seen it in Europe,

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you see it here. We've got a unique labor costs

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>print just today of one point nine for the business sector,

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and the core measure of inflation that the FED likes

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is one point seven. So it's very likely to go up.

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, one thing I would say about the

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Fed statement yesterday was that previously they said we believe

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>inflation will rise, yesterday they said inflation will rise. So

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they sound more confident about their prediction of inflation. So

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>what does that What does that mean for investors? Does

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that mean their bonds are are a bad better? Three

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>rate hikes one rate, one rate hike a quarter. Well,

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, many people at the FED have

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>said two or three rate hikes this year, and I

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's reasonable. The market is pricing about chance of march.

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably too low, but I think the

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>market will probably pricing a bigger chance, particularly we get

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>strong pay rolls tomorrow, that probability he will go up.

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think the fade ideally would like to see

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>what exactly are the fiscal plans, what exactly will growth be,

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>And it won't get that to the second quarter. And

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that's why I'm a bit skeptical about March. Given this backdrop,

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is the one single best asset

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>class for this year. I'm not an asset allocator. I'm

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>just a humble economist. And so what's your biggest contrarian bet? Well,

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, the biggest contrarian bet is that

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see more more growth in the global

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>economy and probably more growth in the US economy over

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the next two years than people expect. And I think

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that's partly becost the momentum coming into this year is

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong globally, and you know, US manufacturing looks very

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>good despite the strong dollar, and we yet to see

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus. Thank you very much for joining us. Poor

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>mortem rely look forward to having you in the future.

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>He is the head of Market Economics and the chief

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>economists for Baten Pete Party Bop. Matt Levine Bloomberg View columnist.

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>He wrote a really terrific column talking about how, first

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of all, a lot of people dismissed President Trump's rhetoric

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>pre his election as simply talk and that he wouldn't

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>actually come through on that, and that now people are realizing, well,

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps they were mistaken. Um, first, can you just talk

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>about what you've observed about how the reaction has been

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>shockingly surprising when he's come through on a lot of

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 1>what he said. Yeah, there's like, there's two things going

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on here right. One is that people listen to what

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>he said and thought he didn't mean it. And so

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump talked about cracking down on trading immigration throughout the campaign.

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Those were his focuses, and people sort of assumed he

0:22:57.760 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>would turn out to be a conventional Republican president and

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.239
<v Speaker 1>interested in economic growth and tax cuts and deregulation and

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>things like that. And since the inauguration, it's been pretty

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>clear where his focus is, and it's exactly where he

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:10.719
<v Speaker 1>said it was. So I think some of the business

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>leaders who were expecting a very conventional, uh presidency are

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>getting this very unconventional, anti trade, anti immigration presidency. Well,

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>but why wouldn't potentially this end up being just as

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>good for them as they thought if he does go

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>ahead and follows through with cutting regulations and cutting taxes.

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why wouldn't this be a benefit. Well, one

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is that a lot of business groups were not

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>um so happy about the trade stuff. You know that

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>we live in a global economy and a lot of

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 1>American businesses are multi national companies, and so they're going

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>to lose that by the correctown and trade. But the

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>other thing that's happening is that, you know, even if

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>eventually we come through on the deregulation and tax cuts

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that businesses want, I think that they underestimated the risks

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>of just sort of the instability of the Trump presidency.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And you saw that with the executive order last weekend.

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>It's one thing to say we're gonna cut back on

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>or or even eliminate refugee programs, but what happened is

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>that they eliminated them while people with valid visas were

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>in the air. They told Green card holders that they

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>couldn't come back to the country, and then after a

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of weekend of controversy, some of that was was

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>walked back. And so what you have is this totally

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>um sort of whimsical policy making process where real people

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are getting caught up in these decision making, in these

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>decisions that don't really have much um UH process or

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>thought behind them. And I think what companies are realizing

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is that that affects them to write like the rule

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of law is pretty central to running a big multinational

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>company or running a big company in America, and you

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>need to have some predictability instability, And what they're seeing

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>here is an administration that is not really interested in

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>those norms and is willing to create a lot of instability. Well, Matt,

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>let me just push back a little bit here, because

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>if you read speeches that at the time candidate at

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump was crossing the country, I believe, in fact, there

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>was one in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania where he laid out very

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically what he planned to do if elected president. And

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine, I mean, I want to know who

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>are these people that are so surprised? First of all,

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>because if you've I mean, he's not. It's not as

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>if he's deviated during the campaign from you know, the

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>set program of whether it is trade policy, whether it

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is UH financial regulation, or you know variety of things. Um,

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>how do you respond to that? Well, first of all,

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I would disagree that he laid anything out specifically or clearly, right,

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have every policy position he took He

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>still he took out every policy position at some point

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>during the campaign. You know, right now there's pushback from

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the White House saying that the immigration order is not

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a Muslim ban. But of course during the campaign he

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>put out a press what he's saying, we'll have a

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Muslim ban. So it's not really clear what he said.

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>We're not in a court of law here. I mean,

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>this is not not you're not not parsing each things.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying that he's set out pretty clearly what

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.239
<v Speaker 1>his policies were going to look. I agree with that.

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>I think I think there is a constituency. And you know,

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>like the sort of leading light is Anthony Scaramucci, who's

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a Trump advisor, who sort of gave interview saying he's

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>going to make smart trade deals and and not have

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a Muslim ban, and and and do all these things

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that that are more conventional Republican policies. And I think

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 1>that some of the people in that sort of New

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>York financial circle heard that. But the other thing that

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is that even even leaving like policy disagreements aside,

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>what I think people are surprised by is the just

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of haphazard, uh nature of the Trump administration where

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of respect for process or for

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the rule of law, and that is what I think

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to become more concerning. You know, you have

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>companies that say, look, you know, trade is trade policy

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>is one thing we can disagree substantively. But having a

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>president who is going to attack companies that disagree with

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>him politically, either by tweets or by uh, you know,

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that the Justice Department hold up mergers of of

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 1>media companies he doesn't like, which is something he said

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that a little history well, right, right, I mean then

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be a little bit informed that this

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is something that there are many images of of even

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>executives tangling with the US government. Right, well, but this

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 1>is but I think that that Matt, you raise a

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>point that cass Sunstine of Harvard made as well, which

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is sort of there has to be the sense that

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the rule of law is a consistent and reliable way

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>of an application of law, and if it's sort of

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 1>arbitrarily crafted or targeted to target specific companies or specific issues,

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work. Yeah, I mean, you you what you

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>what you want is a sort of predictable, uh environment

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in which to operate, where you can kind of know

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that your investments will be respected and paid off. And

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what people are worried about right now.

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Great point and great column. Thank you very much, Matt Levine.

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Look forward to having you more in the future. He

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is a columnist for Bloomberg View. You can follow him

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt underscore Levine. His columns stability is

0:27:56.080 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>good for business. Trump's whims threaten it. Thanks for listening

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm out there on

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You can always

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio. P and L is

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by proper Cloth, a leader in men's

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>custom shirts, with proprietary smart sized technology and top rated

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>customer service. Ordering a custom shirt has never been easier.

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Visit proper cloth dot com to order your first custom

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>shirt today.