1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:06,080 Speaker 1: M This is Mesters in Business with Very Renaults on 2 00:00:06,240 --> 00:00:10,399 Speaker 1: Bluebird Radio. This week. On the podcast, I have an 3 00:00:10,400 --> 00:00:15,040 Speaker 1: extra special guest. Frank Kinnery has had an incredible career 4 00:00:15,560 --> 00:00:19,840 Speaker 1: at the Vanguard Group. He is currently the global head 5 00:00:19,840 --> 00:00:22,279 Speaker 1: of Private Equities, but he's been there for twenty three 6 00:00:22,360 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 1: years working on things like portfolio construction and investment strategy. 7 00:00:27,440 --> 00:00:32,320 Speaker 1: He is incredibly insightful and thoughtful person. He looks at 8 00:00:32,320 --> 00:00:36,760 Speaker 1: the world from a very unique perspective relative to hey. 9 00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:41,639 Speaker 1: He sits at at one of the largest investment managers 10 00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:44,400 Speaker 1: in the world. Of Anger Group runs you know, over 11 00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:48,919 Speaker 1: seven trillion dollars for thirty million clients, and so that 12 00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:54,760 Speaker 1: makes him the perfect person to speak to about portfolios, equities, bonds, 13 00:00:55,280 --> 00:00:59,640 Speaker 1: private equity. I found this conversation to be absolutely fascinating 14 00:01:00,120 --> 00:01:04,160 Speaker 1: and I think you will also so with no further ado, 15 00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:11,679 Speaker 1: my interview with Vanguard Groups Fran Kinnery. This is Mesters 16 00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:16,800 Speaker 1: in Business with Very Results on Bluebird Radio. This week. 17 00:01:17,240 --> 00:01:21,000 Speaker 1: Once again I have an extra special guest. His name 18 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:25,600 Speaker 1: is Fran Kinnery and he is Vanguard's global head of 19 00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:29,959 Speaker 1: Private Investments. Previously, he was principal in the Investment Strategy 20 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:34,240 Speaker 1: Group and Global Head of Portfolio Construction at the seven 21 00:01:34,319 --> 00:01:37,720 Speaker 1: trillion dollar Vanguard Group, where he has worked for twenty 22 00:01:37,760 --> 00:01:40,960 Speaker 1: three years. Uh He is one of the people who 23 00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:46,240 Speaker 1: helped create the concept of Advisor's Alpha, which focuses on 24 00:01:46,720 --> 00:01:50,680 Speaker 1: advice and behavioral counseling. Last year, he was named to 25 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:55,560 Speaker 1: head up Vanguard's private equity initiative. My firm, Rituals Wealth Management, 26 00:01:55,600 --> 00:01:59,240 Speaker 1: works with Vanguard. They're one of the biggest fund providers 27 00:01:59,280 --> 00:02:02,240 Speaker 1: that we operate with, and I have been privileged to 28 00:02:02,880 --> 00:02:07,200 Speaker 1: not only interview every CEO that Vanguard has ever had, 29 00:02:07,280 --> 00:02:10,360 Speaker 1: some multiple times, but a number of other people from 30 00:02:10,520 --> 00:02:15,560 Speaker 1: various departments research, stocks, bonds, etcetera, including Fran. This is 31 00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:18,760 Speaker 1: our our second conversation, and I just wanted to make 32 00:02:18,800 --> 00:02:23,160 Speaker 1: it clear and transparent that my firm has a relationship 33 00:02:23,200 --> 00:02:28,280 Speaker 1: with Vanguard. Fran Kinnery, Welcome back to Masters in Business. 34 00:02:28,280 --> 00:02:30,320 Speaker 1: Thanks Barry. It's great to be back on the show 35 00:02:30,360 --> 00:02:36,000 Speaker 1: with you. So you've been at Vanguard since, but clearly 36 00:02:36,320 --> 00:02:39,120 Speaker 1: this is a new role. Global head of Private Investments. 37 00:02:39,280 --> 00:02:44,079 Speaker 1: Tell us about how this new initiative came about and 38 00:02:44,320 --> 00:02:47,960 Speaker 1: you're rolling that. Yeah, I've been very lucky, very I've 39 00:02:47,960 --> 00:02:50,200 Speaker 1: been there as you said, twenty three years, and I've 40 00:02:50,200 --> 00:02:54,000 Speaker 1: had the great fortune to help Vanguard with three startups, 41 00:02:54,040 --> 00:02:58,720 Speaker 1: which you know, a firm that's been around since and 42 00:02:58,760 --> 00:03:01,919 Speaker 1: as large as we are too, who helped three startups 43 00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:05,000 Speaker 1: has just been great for me and I'm just very 44 00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:08,680 Speaker 1: humbled for that opportunity. I arrived in ninety seven. As 45 00:03:08,720 --> 00:03:11,520 Speaker 1: you mentioned that, my role was to help Vanguards start 46 00:03:11,639 --> 00:03:16,000 Speaker 1: its advice initiatives UM. My role was the head up 47 00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:21,320 Speaker 1: the investment and financial planning methodology for our advice UH launch. 48 00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:26,680 Speaker 1: Once that was up and running UM, in two thousand 49 00:03:26,760 --> 00:03:30,440 Speaker 1: and one, they asked me to help start up Vanguard's 50 00:03:30,480 --> 00:03:34,760 Speaker 1: investment Counseling and Research group and that was then rebranded 51 00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:38,960 Speaker 1: to the Investment Strategy Group. That team was really responsible 52 00:03:39,160 --> 00:03:45,560 Speaker 1: and my specific role asset class research, portfolio construction, financial planning, 53 00:03:45,600 --> 00:03:50,600 Speaker 1: wealth planning, investor behavior UM and then as you mentioned, 54 00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:54,320 Speaker 1: advisors out. So in that role I had covered the 55 00:03:54,360 --> 00:03:58,880 Speaker 1: asset classes and had written several research reports on private equity, 56 00:03:59,160 --> 00:04:01,520 Speaker 1: and so when the scene or leaders of Banguard decided 57 00:04:01,600 --> 00:04:04,800 Speaker 1: to go into private equity, I was just very lucky 58 00:04:04,800 --> 00:04:07,560 Speaker 1: and humbled that they selected me to lead the entry 59 00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:11,960 Speaker 1: to market. Quite interesting so let's talk a little bit 60 00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:16,600 Speaker 1: about the firm's history and philosophy. Uh. Jack Bogel was 61 00:04:16,720 --> 00:04:23,280 Speaker 1: notorious for wanting to keep things simple and inexpensive, so 62 00:04:23,400 --> 00:04:26,240 Speaker 1: much so he wasn't even thrilled with e t s, 63 00:04:26,279 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 1: which were potentially traded every day. How can you do 64 00:04:30,680 --> 00:04:34,919 Speaker 1: private equity in a way that's consistent with your founder's 65 00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:38,720 Speaker 1: core principles? Yeah, and and Barry, you and I know 66 00:04:38,800 --> 00:04:42,000 Speaker 1: each other, and and most people know Jack and I 67 00:04:42,080 --> 00:04:45,599 Speaker 1: had a pretty close relationship. You up until his passing 68 00:04:45,640 --> 00:04:48,040 Speaker 1: in two thousand and nineteen. I was very lucky to 69 00:04:48,120 --> 00:04:52,160 Speaker 1: stay very close to him. We would catch up for 70 00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:55,760 Speaker 1: lunch on a monthly basis. And I think, as you said, 71 00:04:55,800 --> 00:04:59,719 Speaker 1: he was mostly concerned with ets and what they trade, right, 72 00:04:59,760 --> 00:05:02,240 Speaker 1: because really an et F as an index fund, which 73 00:05:02,320 --> 00:05:06,840 Speaker 1: was certainly JACKO was a champion of indexing, but distributed 74 00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:11,839 Speaker 1: on an exchange rather than bought and sold directly at Vanguard, 75 00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:14,080 Speaker 1: And so certainly he would believe in all of the 76 00:05:14,120 --> 00:05:18,400 Speaker 1: attributes of ets, but he really was concerned would investors 77 00:05:18,520 --> 00:05:21,920 Speaker 1: use them properly? And so I would show him the data, 78 00:05:22,320 --> 00:05:26,800 Speaker 1: especially the Vanguard ets. These were building block portfolios that 79 00:05:26,839 --> 00:05:32,040 Speaker 1: were not traded. Certainly, there's five or six institutional products 80 00:05:32,120 --> 00:05:36,200 Speaker 1: that trade with high velocity, but they're mostly used by 81 00:05:36,279 --> 00:05:41,279 Speaker 1: institutional investors and more of a surrogate or replacement for 82 00:05:41,880 --> 00:05:45,000 Speaker 1: the overnight exposure. And so, but if you look at 83 00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:50,360 Speaker 1: the majority of ets, they have really good holding periods 84 00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:54,520 Speaker 1: and used correctly. We would say that private equity would 85 00:05:54,600 --> 00:05:59,040 Speaker 1: you know, had Jack been alive, would would embrace the offer. 86 00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:02,680 Speaker 1: A lot of people do not know that Vanguards started. 87 00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:07,280 Speaker 1: Jack started Vanguard as an actively managed shop, and so 88 00:06:07,320 --> 00:06:12,400 Speaker 1: what Jack really stood for was taking institutional, world class 89 00:06:12,480 --> 00:06:16,960 Speaker 1: investment offers down to main street investors and so private 90 00:06:16,960 --> 00:06:22,120 Speaker 1: equity and trying to democratize or bring private equity to 91 00:06:22,279 --> 00:06:25,240 Speaker 1: retail main street investors. I think he would be cheering 92 00:06:25,240 --> 00:06:27,400 Speaker 1: me on huh. Well, the one thing you don't have 93 00:06:27,480 --> 00:06:30,840 Speaker 1: to worry about with private equity is access trading. And 94 00:06:30,880 --> 00:06:35,159 Speaker 1: we'll talk about the liquidly premium or illiquidity premium in 95 00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:38,760 Speaker 1: a little bit, but let's talk about the concept of 96 00:06:38,839 --> 00:06:43,520 Speaker 1: Vanguard bringing private equity to retail investors. Tell us about 97 00:06:43,560 --> 00:06:47,000 Speaker 1: how this process is going. Yeah, so the process is 98 00:06:47,040 --> 00:06:51,400 Speaker 1: going very well, very We launched in February right before 99 00:06:51,720 --> 00:06:56,560 Speaker 1: you know, the COVID shutdowns in February. We decided to 100 00:06:56,720 --> 00:07:00,240 Speaker 1: stage this in very thoughtfully and very care fill a 101 00:07:00,400 --> 00:07:03,200 Speaker 1: meaning that we started. Vanguard has an O c I 102 00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:08,320 Speaker 1: O business, which is an institutional asset management business where 103 00:07:08,880 --> 00:07:11,920 Speaker 1: the endowment and foundation turns over the keys to us 104 00:07:11,960 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 1: to manage the portfolio. Private equity has been used in 105 00:07:16,320 --> 00:07:20,120 Speaker 1: some of the most sophisticated endowments and foundations and sovereign 106 00:07:20,200 --> 00:07:24,240 Speaker 1: wealth funds for thirty or forty years and has really 107 00:07:24,880 --> 00:07:28,520 Speaker 1: improved outcomes for those who have used private equity well. 108 00:07:29,080 --> 00:07:31,480 Speaker 1: So we started in our O c I O space 109 00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:35,640 Speaker 1: as I mentioned February. You may have seen the press 110 00:07:35,640 --> 00:07:37,800 Speaker 1: release or the audience may have seen the press release 111 00:07:37,840 --> 00:07:41,440 Speaker 1: in May. We then extended that to our ultra high 112 00:07:41,440 --> 00:07:45,560 Speaker 1: net worth retailed direct investors, and then later this year 113 00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 1: we will be expanding that further to our personal advice clients, 114 00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:54,440 Speaker 1: which is our retail advisory business UM at the qualified 115 00:07:54,520 --> 00:07:58,360 Speaker 1: level right there are still regulatory gates here, so our 116 00:07:58,400 --> 00:08:01,400 Speaker 1: offer right now will be at to qualify the QP 117 00:08:01,640 --> 00:08:06,280 Speaker 1: level and the accredited level UM In in short, it's 118 00:08:06,400 --> 00:08:10,040 Speaker 1: having a certain asset and wealth threshold to make it 119 00:08:10,080 --> 00:08:13,600 Speaker 1: through that gap. So I'm kind of fascinated by how 120 00:08:13,680 --> 00:08:18,680 Speaker 1: Vanguard does this on a regular basis. Something starts out 121 00:08:18,880 --> 00:08:23,200 Speaker 1: essentially with an institutional audience and eventually works its way 122 00:08:23,200 --> 00:08:26,680 Speaker 1: down a series of tears until it's at mom and 123 00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:32,560 Speaker 1: pop mainstream investors. So you did this with just about 124 00:08:32,559 --> 00:08:35,439 Speaker 1: everything else that Vanguard offers, but let's stick with private equity. 125 00:08:35,760 --> 00:08:40,839 Speaker 1: It starts out institutional, it goes to outsourced chief investment officers, 126 00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:47,320 Speaker 1: accredited investors, advised investors. Will this eventually make its way 127 00:08:47,440 --> 00:08:53,000 Speaker 1: down to mom and pop main street investors? That's our goal. Um, 128 00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:55,960 Speaker 1: if you read the original press released, Kim Buckley, who 129 00:08:56,000 --> 00:08:59,160 Speaker 1: is our CEO, and I have worked on this closely together. 130 00:08:59,679 --> 00:09:03,760 Speaker 1: Our all is to really bring this to main street investors. 131 00:09:04,440 --> 00:09:07,320 Speaker 1: But I want to be clear under the right conditions vary, 132 00:09:07,360 --> 00:09:10,120 Speaker 1: and with what I mean by that is, um, we 133 00:09:10,120 --> 00:09:12,720 Speaker 1: don't want to put private equity out there for retail 134 00:09:12,720 --> 00:09:16,480 Speaker 1: investors to just buy this direct, meaning that an investment 135 00:09:16,520 --> 00:09:18,960 Speaker 1: can come in and and and put fifty percent of 136 00:09:18,960 --> 00:09:22,280 Speaker 1: their assets. We believe it has a really strong place 137 00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:26,040 Speaker 1: where we are designing the portfolio. You know, I was 138 00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:29,840 Speaker 1: the head of portfolio construction for seventeen years here at Vanguard. 139 00:09:30,240 --> 00:09:32,760 Speaker 1: So whether we are doing it through our own advice 140 00:09:32,920 --> 00:09:35,320 Speaker 1: or we are saying that what the allocation will be 141 00:09:35,400 --> 00:09:38,679 Speaker 1: as part of a multi asset class portfolio and our 142 00:09:38,720 --> 00:09:42,479 Speaker 1: O c I O business or in our personal advisor business. 143 00:09:42,520 --> 00:09:46,720 Speaker 1: But then there's also embedded advice things like target retirement funds, 144 00:09:46,800 --> 00:09:50,520 Speaker 1: where you know, we actually set the asset allocations, we 145 00:09:50,600 --> 00:09:54,840 Speaker 1: rebalance it. Uh, these are long duration investors and we 146 00:09:54,880 --> 00:09:57,320 Speaker 1: think that that would be a very very prudent way 147 00:09:57,400 --> 00:10:00,760 Speaker 1: to bring private equity to main street investor ters. So 148 00:10:00,840 --> 00:10:04,120 Speaker 1: we're working on that. UM, we're going to keep working 149 00:10:04,120 --> 00:10:06,800 Speaker 1: on that, and that is our long term vision. What 150 00:10:06,880 --> 00:10:11,000 Speaker 1: does the timeline look like for this, because I imagine 151 00:10:11,559 --> 00:10:16,079 Speaker 1: this is a slow, gradual, iterative process that involves a 152 00:10:16,080 --> 00:10:19,080 Speaker 1: series of let's try this, we'll find out what the 153 00:10:19,120 --> 00:10:21,920 Speaker 1: bugs are. All right, let's fix that. Now we have 154 00:10:22,040 --> 00:10:25,040 Speaker 1: this issue we have to resolve. What does this timeline 155 00:10:25,080 --> 00:10:28,760 Speaker 1: look like over the next decade. Yeah, the timelines are, 156 00:10:28,800 --> 00:10:32,000 Speaker 1: as you mentioned, very difficult, um and tricky, But I 157 00:10:32,360 --> 00:10:35,680 Speaker 1: think you characterize that correctly. By us starting in the 158 00:10:35,720 --> 00:10:38,880 Speaker 1: O C I O space, you're talking about very large 159 00:10:38,960 --> 00:10:42,680 Speaker 1: endowments where the peer group has used private equity. Then 160 00:10:42,720 --> 00:10:45,200 Speaker 1: we go to the ultra high net worth five million 161 00:10:45,240 --> 00:10:50,520 Speaker 1: plus UM direct or advised, We're gonna learn a lot, 162 00:10:50,800 --> 00:10:54,320 Speaker 1: We're gonna fix a lot of things, UM, And at 163 00:10:54,360 --> 00:10:56,280 Speaker 1: the end of the day, you know, we are going 164 00:10:56,320 --> 00:10:58,400 Speaker 1: to put all of our efforts to bring us to 165 00:10:58,480 --> 00:11:01,360 Speaker 1: main street investors because we have you think, target retirement 166 00:11:01,400 --> 00:11:05,360 Speaker 1: funds UM could really benefit from private equity when you 167 00:11:05,360 --> 00:11:09,000 Speaker 1: look at the returns and the diversification and the duration 168 00:11:09,080 --> 00:11:13,360 Speaker 1: of these investors, you know, thirty to seventy year horizons. UM. 169 00:11:13,400 --> 00:11:16,520 Speaker 1: So we're going to do it very thoughtfully, very carefully, 170 00:11:16,559 --> 00:11:18,319 Speaker 1: and so I really don't have a timeline for you 171 00:11:18,480 --> 00:11:24,599 Speaker 1: very You spent seventeen years doing portfolio construction at Vanguard. 172 00:11:25,080 --> 00:11:30,040 Speaker 1: Where does private equity fit into an investor's portfolio? Yeah, 173 00:11:30,040 --> 00:11:33,520 Speaker 1: the way we're thinking about it very after extensive, as 174 00:11:33,559 --> 00:11:37,160 Speaker 1: you mentioned, seventeen years of research. We would think that 175 00:11:37,280 --> 00:11:41,400 Speaker 1: the private equity allocation comes out of your public equity allocation. 176 00:11:41,920 --> 00:11:44,520 Speaker 1: And sometimes it's just easy to use the numbers of 177 00:11:44,600 --> 00:11:49,480 Speaker 1: the maps. Let's say a client is sixty forty equity 178 00:11:49,880 --> 00:11:53,280 Speaker 1: fixed income. We would think that the allocation comes out 179 00:11:53,320 --> 00:11:56,520 Speaker 1: of that sixty component. So let's just use a number. 180 00:11:56,600 --> 00:11:59,760 Speaker 1: Let's just say thirty percent. An investor decides to be 181 00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:04,160 Speaker 1: thirty percent private equity, So instead of being sixty forty 182 00:12:04,280 --> 00:12:09,040 Speaker 1: stock bond, you know, the thirty on sixty would be eighteen, right, 183 00:12:09,080 --> 00:12:12,680 Speaker 1: So now they would be eighteen percent private equity and 184 00:12:12,920 --> 00:12:18,200 Speaker 1: forty two percent public equity maintaining their in bonds. And 185 00:12:18,200 --> 00:12:20,600 Speaker 1: when you look at that, so you're not really increasing 186 00:12:20,640 --> 00:12:23,960 Speaker 1: the risk budget of the portfolio. Um. In fact, you 187 00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:28,880 Speaker 1: actually have diversification because all of these operating private companies 188 00:12:28,920 --> 00:12:32,480 Speaker 1: are not in the public universe, the correlations are not 189 00:12:32,559 --> 00:12:36,760 Speaker 1: at one, and you have return enhancements. So um, you know, 190 00:12:36,840 --> 00:12:40,440 Speaker 1: it is a really viable, prudent asset class to add 191 00:12:40,520 --> 00:12:43,839 Speaker 1: into a portfolio if it's funded out of the right way, 192 00:12:44,360 --> 00:12:47,080 Speaker 1: and we would be funding this from public equity. My 193 00:12:47,160 --> 00:12:51,360 Speaker 1: reaction was because I immediately thought you were talking thirty thirty. 194 00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:56,520 Speaker 1: But what I misinterpreted you you meant of the sixty, 195 00:12:56,600 --> 00:13:01,559 Speaker 1: not of the overall. That's right, so stead of you 196 00:13:01,559 --> 00:13:07,240 Speaker 1: would be forty two public equity, eighteen private equity and 197 00:13:07,280 --> 00:13:10,679 Speaker 1: then still bonds. All right, So let's talk a little 198 00:13:10,679 --> 00:13:14,360 Speaker 1: bit about the various private equity firms you work with. 199 00:13:14,640 --> 00:13:18,400 Speaker 1: There are thousands of them. How did you begin the 200 00:13:18,440 --> 00:13:22,200 Speaker 1: process of narrowing it down to a handful of them 201 00:13:22,280 --> 00:13:25,360 Speaker 1: and what was the vetting process like? Yeah, so while 202 00:13:25,840 --> 00:13:29,360 Speaker 1: many investors may know Vanguard is indexing, we are actually 203 00:13:29,360 --> 00:13:31,680 Speaker 1: one of the largest UM and actually have one of 204 00:13:31,679 --> 00:13:35,920 Speaker 1: the most successful active management practices UM in in the 205 00:13:35,960 --> 00:13:40,040 Speaker 1: asset management space. I mentioned that we started Vanguard as 206 00:13:40,080 --> 00:13:43,240 Speaker 1: an actively managed firm, and so we have, you know, 207 00:13:43,480 --> 00:13:48,480 Speaker 1: our entire history of doing manager oversight and selection and search, 208 00:13:49,360 --> 00:13:52,400 Speaker 1: and so when you know, we we decided to go 209 00:13:52,480 --> 00:13:56,880 Speaker 1: into the space, the next step was canvassing the managers 210 00:13:57,200 --> 00:14:01,080 Speaker 1: who are world class and so we you know, we 211 00:14:01,080 --> 00:14:03,880 Speaker 1: we went through a process of you know, we have 212 00:14:03,920 --> 00:14:06,680 Speaker 1: a database and we started with narrative down to let's 213 00:14:06,640 --> 00:14:10,760 Speaker 1: say forty plus firms. We then had deep meetings with 214 00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:14,319 Speaker 1: about ten of those firms, and then we actually but 215 00:14:14,679 --> 00:14:17,920 Speaker 1: you know, did site visits on site and and then 216 00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:21,560 Speaker 1: had them visit us. With five firms, we we narrowed 217 00:14:21,560 --> 00:14:24,840 Speaker 1: that down to two um where we really spent another 218 00:14:25,040 --> 00:14:28,720 Speaker 1: extra deep dive and then we selected Harbor Best UM 219 00:14:28,760 --> 00:14:32,880 Speaker 1: as the final winner of the partnership to move forward with. 220 00:14:33,560 --> 00:14:37,320 Speaker 1: And so we had a long history of understanding what 221 00:14:37,600 --> 00:14:42,320 Speaker 1: works in active management are actively managed funds without performed 222 00:14:42,440 --> 00:14:46,400 Speaker 1: consistently their peers and access about performed the indexes they 223 00:14:46,440 --> 00:14:50,200 Speaker 1: track on the public side, and harbor Best performance has 224 00:14:50,240 --> 00:14:54,000 Speaker 1: continually to outperform the median and average private equity manager. 225 00:14:54,520 --> 00:14:57,239 Speaker 1: So you know, we we can do the due diligence 226 00:14:57,320 --> 00:15:00,600 Speaker 1: for our investors and that's that's a lot uh to 227 00:15:01,040 --> 00:15:03,800 Speaker 1: put forward for the average investor. And so we are 228 00:15:03,920 --> 00:15:06,440 Speaker 1: very comfortable that we have found a great partner in 229 00:15:06,520 --> 00:15:08,800 Speaker 1: harbor Vest. So I want to talk a little more 230 00:15:08,840 --> 00:15:12,240 Speaker 1: about harbor Vest in a moment. But first I should 231 00:15:12,240 --> 00:15:14,080 Speaker 1: have said this, and I admitted this, but let me 232 00:15:14,240 --> 00:15:19,160 Speaker 1: clarify this. Uh. It's more than thirty of the seven 233 00:15:19,680 --> 00:15:24,400 Speaker 1: something trillion dollars in assets are are actively managed, and 234 00:15:24,600 --> 00:15:31,280 Speaker 1: Vanguard's ability to identify managers who can be successful is 235 00:15:31,320 --> 00:15:35,040 Speaker 1: a core competency. Am I getting that right? And please 236 00:15:35,080 --> 00:15:39,320 Speaker 1: correct me on on my numbers in terms of and 237 00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:43,200 Speaker 1: seven trillion. I know those numbers move around a lot. Yeah, 238 00:15:43,200 --> 00:15:45,440 Speaker 1: that's right, Verry, And and size has never been a 239 00:15:45,480 --> 00:15:47,800 Speaker 1: goal for Vanguard, So I know people will look at 240 00:15:47,800 --> 00:15:50,040 Speaker 1: the seven trillion or the look at the one point 241 00:15:50,120 --> 00:15:54,320 Speaker 1: seven trillion. We have an active and that's what we have. UM, 242 00:15:54,360 --> 00:15:57,680 Speaker 1: we believe that our size is you know, first off, 243 00:15:57,720 --> 00:16:02,400 Speaker 1: we have thirty million investors, so not Vanguard's assets. Vanguard 244 00:16:02,480 --> 00:16:07,040 Speaker 1: is the steward of thirty million investors who have trusted 245 00:16:07,200 --> 00:16:09,760 Speaker 1: us with their assets because we have served them well. 246 00:16:10,640 --> 00:16:13,560 Speaker 1: We believe that the investment population is a very very 247 00:16:13,600 --> 00:16:18,400 Speaker 1: smart population. There's an incredible competition in the mutual fund space. 248 00:16:18,440 --> 00:16:21,800 Speaker 1: There's actually, I believe three times the amount of mutual 249 00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:25,320 Speaker 1: funds that there are individual stocks. So there's a lot 250 00:16:25,360 --> 00:16:27,440 Speaker 1: of choice out there. And I think our size and 251 00:16:27,440 --> 00:16:31,320 Speaker 1: our growth has come from serving investors very well on 252 00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:35,720 Speaker 1: investment performance and on client service, and so our size 253 00:16:35,800 --> 00:16:38,960 Speaker 1: is really a tribute to you know, serving them well. 254 00:16:39,320 --> 00:16:41,320 Speaker 1: But as you mentioned, we are one of the largest 255 00:16:41,360 --> 00:16:46,200 Speaker 1: active managers. We continuously are in the seventy five top 256 00:16:46,280 --> 00:16:49,840 Speaker 1: death style relative to the active peer groups across all 257 00:16:49,880 --> 00:16:53,560 Speaker 1: the asset classes, you know, so taxable, fixed income, tax 258 00:16:53,560 --> 00:16:57,320 Speaker 1: exem fixed income, and equity. And then lastly, it's it's 259 00:16:57,360 --> 00:16:59,560 Speaker 1: one thing to beat your peer group, but we actually 260 00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:01,840 Speaker 1: out for form the indexes that we track, So I 261 00:17:01,920 --> 00:17:05,720 Speaker 1: know this movement to indexing has been strong, it's probably 262 00:17:05,760 --> 00:17:09,960 Speaker 1: been warranted. UM and indexing should outperform the average manager, 263 00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:13,160 Speaker 1: but that loses sight of that not all managers are average. 264 00:17:13,520 --> 00:17:16,439 Speaker 1: If you can find talent and you deliver that at 265 00:17:16,440 --> 00:17:19,919 Speaker 1: a reasonable cost. The evidence would show that Vanguard's active 266 00:17:19,960 --> 00:17:24,000 Speaker 1: funds together have added about fifty basis points on top 267 00:17:24,040 --> 00:17:26,840 Speaker 1: of the indexes that they tracked, and that's very meaningful 268 00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:29,080 Speaker 1: if you can calm down that over thirty to forty 269 00:17:29,160 --> 00:17:32,040 Speaker 1: years UM. And so our investors have been very well 270 00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:36,280 Speaker 1: served with our active offer. So let's talk about harbor Vest. 271 00:17:36,359 --> 00:17:41,840 Speaker 1: Your your partner on this private equity for investors at Vanguard. 272 00:17:42,240 --> 00:17:45,600 Speaker 1: How did you land on them? And tell us what 273 00:17:45,720 --> 00:17:48,959 Speaker 1: they bring that is unique compared to some of the 274 00:17:49,000 --> 00:17:53,160 Speaker 1: people that might have come in second or third. Yeah, 275 00:17:53,200 --> 00:17:55,960 Speaker 1: I think it all starts with UM. You know how 276 00:17:56,000 --> 00:18:00,119 Speaker 1: we think about what matters in active management UM, And 277 00:18:00,160 --> 00:18:03,840 Speaker 1: that all starts with the firm and the people. Those 278 00:18:03,880 --> 00:18:07,919 Speaker 1: are the two critical components the firm. We want to 279 00:18:07,960 --> 00:18:12,040 Speaker 1: make sure that they are putting clients first. UM. And 280 00:18:12,080 --> 00:18:15,639 Speaker 1: I know that's the common terminology put clients first. But 281 00:18:16,080 --> 00:18:20,560 Speaker 1: all of our interactions with harbor Vests where basically, if 282 00:18:20,600 --> 00:18:24,880 Speaker 1: we treat our clients well, if we give them high outcomes. 283 00:18:25,200 --> 00:18:29,919 Speaker 1: Growth follows as opposed to growth being the mission. The 284 00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:33,359 Speaker 1: mission should be serving clients. Well, you know, the Simon 285 00:18:33,480 --> 00:18:36,479 Speaker 1: spent a quote of you know, leaders eat last, and 286 00:18:36,520 --> 00:18:39,400 Speaker 1: so we think about that that our asset owners at Vanguard, 287 00:18:39,840 --> 00:18:41,879 Speaker 1: and it became very clear to us that the asset 288 00:18:41,920 --> 00:18:45,920 Speaker 1: owners of Harbor vests the clients come first. The owners 289 00:18:46,160 --> 00:18:49,120 Speaker 1: eat last. They take the spoils that are left over 290 00:18:49,280 --> 00:18:52,560 Speaker 1: after the clients do well. And we heard that time 291 00:18:52,560 --> 00:18:56,840 Speaker 1: and time again. It shows and how their partnership is structured, 292 00:18:57,800 --> 00:19:00,920 Speaker 1: meaning that economics and we see this time and time 293 00:19:00,920 --> 00:19:04,639 Speaker 1: again when economics are very widely spread out throughout the 294 00:19:04,720 --> 00:19:08,879 Speaker 1: organization that attracts the top talent um. And this is 295 00:19:08,880 --> 00:19:12,840 Speaker 1: a talent in people business. So when ownership is public, 296 00:19:13,000 --> 00:19:18,320 Speaker 1: or ownership is controlled by let's say a few founding founders, um, 297 00:19:18,440 --> 00:19:22,639 Speaker 1: you may not get necessarily the talent when the economics 298 00:19:23,040 --> 00:19:28,000 Speaker 1: and the rewards are spread out much more democratically. And 299 00:19:28,040 --> 00:19:31,640 Speaker 1: so we found a firm that has post to forty 300 00:19:31,720 --> 00:19:35,919 Speaker 1: years of experience where a structure and alignment of client 301 00:19:36,080 --> 00:19:41,840 Speaker 1: first and the people and the culture. And then lastly 302 00:19:41,880 --> 00:19:44,119 Speaker 1: we look at performance and the performance has just been 303 00:19:44,240 --> 00:19:48,879 Speaker 1: outstanding relative to the medium and average private equity offer 304 00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:53,360 Speaker 1: quite interesting. Let's talk a little bit about the vanguard 305 00:19:53,520 --> 00:19:58,919 Speaker 1: approach to private equity, starting with returns. What sort of 306 00:19:58,920 --> 00:20:04,560 Speaker 1: returns this vanguard looking for from pe relative to you know, 307 00:20:04,640 --> 00:20:08,879 Speaker 1: playing vanilla stocks and bots. Yeah, our our return expectation, 308 00:20:08,920 --> 00:20:12,320 Speaker 1: again is all formed off of our deep research verry UM. 309 00:20:12,440 --> 00:20:14,680 Speaker 1: So if you were to look at the median private 310 00:20:14,720 --> 00:20:19,520 Speaker 1: equity firm relative to you know, let's say the public 311 00:20:19,640 --> 00:20:24,800 Speaker 1: markets in all world public markets, you get about average returns, right, 312 00:20:24,800 --> 00:20:26,920 Speaker 1: You're gonna get you know, returns on top of the market. 313 00:20:26,960 --> 00:20:31,400 Speaker 1: So it's all about manager selection. Um. But here you're 314 00:20:31,440 --> 00:20:34,880 Speaker 1: familiar with the quartile rankings of public managers where they're 315 00:20:34,960 --> 00:20:38,200 Speaker 1: quite wide, but in private equity they're they're almost two 316 00:20:38,400 --> 00:20:42,760 Speaker 1: x that meaning that the top quartile um has returns 317 00:20:43,080 --> 00:20:46,000 Speaker 1: somewhere in the high twenties, and the fourth quartile is 318 00:20:46,359 --> 00:20:50,000 Speaker 1: negative fourteen UM and then in around you know, quartile 319 00:20:50,040 --> 00:20:52,879 Speaker 1: three and two, it's it's right around uh, you know, 320 00:20:52,920 --> 00:20:57,520 Speaker 1: the average. So this is all about manager selection, and 321 00:20:57,680 --> 00:21:00,360 Speaker 1: if you were able to you don't have to be perfect, right, 322 00:21:00,359 --> 00:21:03,600 Speaker 1: So if you were to just throw darts um and 323 00:21:03,600 --> 00:21:07,640 Speaker 1: and get a manager in each quartile. So in each 324 00:21:07,680 --> 00:21:11,879 Speaker 1: quart tile, so you would say you have no skill, uh, 325 00:21:12,040 --> 00:21:14,040 Speaker 1: my team and I have done this work, you would 326 00:21:14,119 --> 00:21:16,159 Speaker 1: end up with a return that's about a hundred and 327 00:21:16,200 --> 00:21:21,280 Speaker 1: seventy basis points over public markets with zero skill. That's 328 00:21:21,480 --> 00:21:26,000 Speaker 1: probably the illiquidity premium all asset classes like on the 329 00:21:26,119 --> 00:21:29,040 Speaker 1: run off the run treasuries or e t s that 330 00:21:29,119 --> 00:21:32,800 Speaker 1: are the same basket of ets the more you know 331 00:21:33,280 --> 00:21:37,000 Speaker 1: traded they are. So the one seven is probably first off, 332 00:21:37,119 --> 00:21:39,560 Speaker 1: you know, a liquidity premium one seven if you have 333 00:21:39,640 --> 00:21:42,520 Speaker 1: no manager skill would be something that you would not 334 00:21:42,560 --> 00:21:45,280 Speaker 1: want to leave on the table. But if you even 335 00:21:45,280 --> 00:21:50,840 Speaker 1: have moderate skill, where you would select instead of the five, 336 00:21:51,320 --> 00:21:55,359 Speaker 1: but you were able to select out of quart tile one, 337 00:21:55,400 --> 00:22:00,760 Speaker 1: in two and out of quartile three and four, the 338 00:22:00,800 --> 00:22:06,000 Speaker 1: returns quickly approach four hundred basis points over public markets. 339 00:22:07,359 --> 00:22:09,680 Speaker 1: And then if you have higher skill. Again this you know, 340 00:22:09,720 --> 00:22:11,400 Speaker 1: I'm not saying this is easy, but if you're able 341 00:22:11,440 --> 00:22:17,399 Speaker 1: to select of your managers in the top quartile in 342 00:22:17,520 --> 00:22:23,359 Speaker 1: quartile two, in quartile three, and then ten percent in 343 00:22:23,440 --> 00:22:28,320 Speaker 1: quartile four, the returns are about seven hundred basis points 344 00:22:28,320 --> 00:22:32,960 Speaker 1: over harbor vests. Experience has been in around that range 345 00:22:33,040 --> 00:22:37,879 Speaker 1: seven to eight hundred basis points over public markets. Vanguard 346 00:22:37,920 --> 00:22:42,040 Speaker 1: being conservative, we we believe the illiquidity premium will drop. 347 00:22:42,320 --> 00:22:45,520 Speaker 1: It is averaged in the past about three hundred basis points, 348 00:22:46,119 --> 00:22:48,679 Speaker 1: but let's say it's half of that at one five 349 00:22:48,800 --> 00:22:52,560 Speaker 1: and close to that. No skill and of harbor vests 350 00:22:52,640 --> 00:22:55,040 Speaker 1: can do even half of what they have done in 351 00:22:55,080 --> 00:22:58,720 Speaker 1: the past and and are just able to get slightly 352 00:22:58,800 --> 00:23:03,439 Speaker 1: better than manager selection um. Our forward looking estimate is 353 00:23:03,440 --> 00:23:07,160 Speaker 1: our investors will get between three and four hundred basis points, 354 00:23:07,160 --> 00:23:11,720 Speaker 1: are three to four percent more then public equity, and 355 00:23:11,800 --> 00:23:14,520 Speaker 1: that's going to be very significant in this low return world. 356 00:23:15,280 --> 00:23:17,840 Speaker 1: Happen to listen just recently to interview with Jack Brennan, 357 00:23:18,560 --> 00:23:20,919 Speaker 1: and you talked about the sixty forty portfolio, and I 358 00:23:21,000 --> 00:23:24,480 Speaker 1: share your concerns in Jack's concerns like where are returns 359 00:23:24,480 --> 00:23:26,800 Speaker 1: going to come from? And so to be able to 360 00:23:26,840 --> 00:23:30,359 Speaker 1: add three or four percent over public equity and funded 361 00:23:30,400 --> 00:23:33,960 Speaker 1: from public equity, we think that that is extremely prudent 362 00:23:34,040 --> 00:23:38,240 Speaker 1: for investors to do so, no doubt, four hundred basis 363 00:23:38,280 --> 00:23:41,480 Speaker 1: points gets a lot of people's attention, but there are 364 00:23:41,520 --> 00:23:45,640 Speaker 1: a lot of other reasons to consider private equity. Let's 365 00:23:45,680 --> 00:23:50,240 Speaker 1: let's talk about correlation. How closely are the returns in 366 00:23:50,400 --> 00:23:55,400 Speaker 1: private equity correlated to what we see in the public markets. Yeah, 367 00:23:55,440 --> 00:23:58,080 Speaker 1: so the correlations and you would have to get this 368 00:23:58,119 --> 00:24:02,360 Speaker 1: twofold right because the carly aans um since a lot 369 00:24:02,359 --> 00:24:05,840 Speaker 1: of private equity doesn't mark, meaning they're not marked to market. 370 00:24:06,040 --> 00:24:10,320 Speaker 1: The public markets marked to market every single day, and 371 00:24:10,440 --> 00:24:15,119 Speaker 1: so um, you were if you were to mark to 372 00:24:15,200 --> 00:24:17,679 Speaker 1: market the assets like if you have him and and 373 00:24:17,800 --> 00:24:20,359 Speaker 1: Harborfest does this and the industry does this, So you 374 00:24:20,400 --> 00:24:24,399 Speaker 1: can create an algorithm or a beta to try to 375 00:24:24,440 --> 00:24:27,399 Speaker 1: get what your daily marks would be. And even if 376 00:24:27,400 --> 00:24:30,439 Speaker 1: you were to do that, you would see correlations below 377 00:24:30,600 --> 00:24:35,680 Speaker 1: one somewhere. Let's say you know point eight point eight five. Um, 378 00:24:35,720 --> 00:24:37,800 Speaker 1: But again you and I Berry have talked a lot 379 00:24:37,880 --> 00:24:40,639 Speaker 1: about behavioral finance and advisors out but was built on 380 00:24:40,640 --> 00:24:43,800 Speaker 1: behavioral finance. The fact that these do not mark and 381 00:24:43,840 --> 00:24:46,400 Speaker 1: the prices are stale, and one could say that this 382 00:24:46,480 --> 00:24:51,159 Speaker 1: is a fantom benefit, and I'm not disagreeing, But if 383 00:24:51,160 --> 00:24:53,800 Speaker 1: you were only to price the total stock market or 384 00:24:53,840 --> 00:24:56,800 Speaker 1: the SMP five hundred every six months on the lag, 385 00:24:57,000 --> 00:25:00,240 Speaker 1: I believe investors would do better because a lot times, 386 00:25:00,240 --> 00:25:06,080 Speaker 1: we're reacting each and every day, um to what happened yesterday, 387 00:25:06,160 --> 00:25:08,760 Speaker 1: and does that really matter when our horizon is twenty 388 00:25:09,320 --> 00:25:13,720 Speaker 1: forty years? So we believe that this will provide diversification 389 00:25:13,920 --> 00:25:17,640 Speaker 1: and behavioral benefits because of how private equity works, right. 390 00:25:17,720 --> 00:25:19,800 Speaker 1: The advantage of homes are that you don't get a 391 00:25:19,800 --> 00:25:23,399 Speaker 1: price every day, and we're recording this the day after 392 00:25:24,040 --> 00:25:26,160 Speaker 1: it looked like the markets we're gonna be off two 393 00:25:27,160 --> 00:25:29,480 Speaker 1: and on a day when the markets have bounced back 394 00:25:29,560 --> 00:25:34,000 Speaker 1: one percent. That sort of volatility can easily distract investors 395 00:25:34,840 --> 00:25:38,320 Speaker 1: from the long term. So let's stick with private equity 396 00:25:38,359 --> 00:25:44,240 Speaker 1: and long term. Given how expensive public stocks are and 397 00:25:44,320 --> 00:25:48,960 Speaker 1: by many measures we are at the upper range of valuations, 398 00:25:49,640 --> 00:25:55,360 Speaker 1: private equity multiples have followed along and PE is uh 399 00:25:55,960 --> 00:25:58,800 Speaker 1: about as pricey as as stocks are. More or less, 400 00:25:59,080 --> 00:26:02,520 Speaker 1: it's it's a rough estimate. What are the concerns about 401 00:26:02,560 --> 00:26:06,600 Speaker 1: private equity multiples being as pricey as they are today? Yeah? 402 00:26:06,600 --> 00:26:09,560 Speaker 1: I think you're set up there. Barry is correct. Public 403 00:26:09,560 --> 00:26:13,679 Speaker 1: equities are probably in their you know, top, and private 404 00:26:13,680 --> 00:26:18,199 Speaker 1: equity has followed um. But I also think that somewhat 405 00:26:18,240 --> 00:26:20,639 Speaker 1: misses the point we you know, we do not believe 406 00:26:20,720 --> 00:26:23,879 Speaker 1: markets have an expiration date. You would have said public 407 00:26:23,920 --> 00:26:27,280 Speaker 1: equity and private equity were overvalued. In they've found on 408 00:26:27,720 --> 00:26:30,920 Speaker 1: more than double UM. We have found that people that 409 00:26:31,000 --> 00:26:34,920 Speaker 1: market time markets UM. Really. A lot of people get 410 00:26:34,920 --> 00:26:37,280 Speaker 1: celebrated for calling the top and ninety nine, or they 411 00:26:37,280 --> 00:26:39,679 Speaker 1: get celebrated for calling the top and O seven. But 412 00:26:39,760 --> 00:26:41,680 Speaker 1: I'm looking at you know, I'm looking at charts of 413 00:26:41,760 --> 00:26:44,600 Speaker 1: my SMP five hundred at Vanguard and the private equities. 414 00:26:44,600 --> 00:26:46,960 Speaker 1: If you were the worst market time or ever and 415 00:26:47,040 --> 00:26:51,320 Speaker 1: you bought in March with two thousand UM, the harvardst 416 00:26:51,400 --> 00:26:54,480 Speaker 1: Fund for that vintage was up ten and a half percent, 417 00:26:55,200 --> 00:26:58,119 Speaker 1: and the US equity market over that time horizons up 418 00:26:58,160 --> 00:27:00,720 Speaker 1: three point six. So let's say like the ten to 419 00:27:00,800 --> 00:27:04,000 Speaker 1: fifteen year return off of that same thing. You know, 420 00:27:04,040 --> 00:27:07,640 Speaker 1: if you bought at the top of O sight UM. 421 00:27:07,680 --> 00:27:10,520 Speaker 1: You know, investors are I I think the connectrum here 422 00:27:10,640 --> 00:27:12,439 Speaker 1: is what do you do? You you take money off 423 00:27:12,480 --> 00:27:15,119 Speaker 1: the table and put it in sixth income instruments that 424 00:27:15,160 --> 00:27:18,080 Speaker 1: are yielding you know, somewhere below one and a half percent. 425 00:27:18,840 --> 00:27:23,000 Speaker 1: And so market timing has proven to be UM. You 426 00:27:23,160 --> 00:27:27,399 Speaker 1: probably more investors create more bear markets on their own 427 00:27:27,880 --> 00:27:32,919 Speaker 1: and opportunity costs by using simple metrics like valuations to 428 00:27:32,960 --> 00:27:35,280 Speaker 1: try to call the tops, and so we would advise 429 00:27:35,320 --> 00:27:38,399 Speaker 1: against that. The second thing I would say, Verry, we 430 00:27:38,440 --> 00:27:42,040 Speaker 1: also talked about this will be funded from public equity. 431 00:27:42,160 --> 00:27:46,080 Speaker 1: So if you are sixty forty, you're not really increasing 432 00:27:46,160 --> 00:27:49,320 Speaker 1: the value at risk or the risk budget of portfolio. 433 00:27:49,880 --> 00:27:52,960 Speaker 1: You would be moving that sixty down to forty two 434 00:27:53,280 --> 00:27:56,760 Speaker 1: and putting it in private equity at eighteen. And so 435 00:27:57,200 --> 00:27:59,919 Speaker 1: we would do that all day. Whether it's high valuation, 436 00:28:00,119 --> 00:28:03,520 Speaker 1: medium valuation, or low valuation, it makes a lot of 437 00:28:03,560 --> 00:28:07,320 Speaker 1: sense and you're locking in a longer term time horizon 438 00:28:07,400 --> 00:28:12,359 Speaker 1: for that portion of the portfolio. Have you considered other 439 00:28:12,440 --> 00:28:16,440 Speaker 1: types of private investments, things like venture capital or hedge 440 00:28:16,440 --> 00:28:20,680 Speaker 1: funds beyond private equity. Yeah, so maybe I could walk 441 00:28:20,680 --> 00:28:24,320 Speaker 1: through what is in this offer because it actually is 442 00:28:24,400 --> 00:28:28,760 Speaker 1: a very diversified offer that we have built for our investors. 443 00:28:29,400 --> 00:28:32,960 Speaker 1: Um you mentioned some of them. So this will have 444 00:28:33,200 --> 00:28:37,400 Speaker 1: diversification of stage, so it will have venture capital within 445 00:28:37,640 --> 00:28:42,080 Speaker 1: the harbor Best vanguard offering, the growth equity, and venture 446 00:28:42,120 --> 00:28:45,680 Speaker 1: capital growth equity as a later stage venture. Uh. This 447 00:28:45,800 --> 00:28:51,360 Speaker 1: portfolio will have somewhere around twenty to growth equity and 448 00:28:51,440 --> 00:28:54,920 Speaker 1: venture UM. It'll then the remainder of that will be 449 00:28:54,960 --> 00:28:58,800 Speaker 1: in buyouts, which are traditional leverage buyouts. Those are more 450 00:28:58,920 --> 00:29:03,040 Speaker 1: seasoned companies, more mature companies, So you do get a 451 00:29:03,120 --> 00:29:07,920 Speaker 1: lot of diversification of stage UM. You'll have geographic diversification 452 00:29:08,000 --> 00:29:10,600 Speaker 1: within here. So think of this as the total stock 453 00:29:10,720 --> 00:29:15,080 Speaker 1: market if you will, of private equity. It'll be globally diversified, 454 00:29:15,760 --> 00:29:18,480 Speaker 1: stage diversified like in the in the public markets we 455 00:29:18,560 --> 00:29:22,000 Speaker 1: use growth and value and large it's small. Uh, this 456 00:29:22,040 --> 00:29:25,960 Speaker 1: will be geographically diversified. It will have venture capital to 457 00:29:25,960 --> 00:29:31,320 Speaker 1: have buy out, it will have primary investments, secondary investments, UM, 458 00:29:31,360 --> 00:29:33,600 Speaker 1: and direct co invest So it is a real turn 459 00:29:33,720 --> 00:29:37,000 Speaker 1: key solution that at the end of the day it 460 00:29:37,040 --> 00:29:40,840 Speaker 1: will have you know, six to eight hundred operating companies. 461 00:29:41,560 --> 00:29:44,560 Speaker 1: And that would be hard for any investor that's let's 462 00:29:44,600 --> 00:29:49,400 Speaker 1: say under two billion dollars to try to replicate because 463 00:29:49,400 --> 00:29:53,719 Speaker 1: most of these managers are very specialized inside of hard vest, right, 464 00:29:53,760 --> 00:29:57,560 Speaker 1: so uh, what what makes a great venture capital manager 465 00:29:57,680 --> 00:30:01,440 Speaker 1: might be different than an Asian buy out manager. And 466 00:30:01,520 --> 00:30:05,440 Speaker 1: so this will have thirty to forty general partners inside 467 00:30:05,520 --> 00:30:11,360 Speaker 1: with seven operating companies, so very hard for any investor 468 00:30:11,440 --> 00:30:14,240 Speaker 1: under let's say two billion dollars to kind of replicate 469 00:30:14,320 --> 00:30:18,520 Speaker 1: this offer. So it is very well diversified. So that 470 00:30:18,720 --> 00:30:22,920 Speaker 1: number of companies under a variety of managers, under a 471 00:30:23,040 --> 00:30:26,600 Speaker 1: variety of sectors. It leads me to ask the question, 472 00:30:27,320 --> 00:30:30,440 Speaker 1: are you going to run into any capacity constraints if 473 00:30:30,480 --> 00:30:34,960 Speaker 1: you ramp this up? How big can this scale at Vanguard? 474 00:30:34,960 --> 00:30:38,800 Speaker 1: Can this be a trillion dollar line of business? Yeah? 475 00:30:38,800 --> 00:30:42,480 Speaker 1: I would say maybe address that two ways, one um 476 00:30:42,520 --> 00:30:45,120 Speaker 1: and maybe we'll get to the fees of private equity later. 477 00:30:45,160 --> 00:30:48,080 Speaker 1: But let me address that a little bit here. Harbor 478 00:30:48,160 --> 00:30:52,520 Speaker 1: Vests and the general partners that they work with are 479 00:30:52,680 --> 00:30:57,880 Speaker 1: mostly compensated on performance based fees UM. It's known as 480 00:30:57,960 --> 00:31:01,960 Speaker 1: carry in the private equity space, and so the economics 481 00:31:02,000 --> 00:31:06,400 Speaker 1: to them really start to accrue once they hit a 482 00:31:06,480 --> 00:31:09,880 Speaker 1: hurdle rate above eight per cent. The management fee that 483 00:31:09,920 --> 00:31:13,080 Speaker 1: they get pretty much just covers the operating costs of 484 00:31:13,120 --> 00:31:15,920 Speaker 1: what they do. So they do not want to give 485 00:31:15,960 --> 00:31:19,160 Speaker 1: away capacity that they do not believe they can source 486 00:31:19,560 --> 00:31:22,680 Speaker 1: without returns that are double digits and above double digits, 487 00:31:22,680 --> 00:31:25,160 Speaker 1: because that would not be good for their business. So 488 00:31:25,200 --> 00:31:29,000 Speaker 1: they watch capacity both at the general partner level and 489 00:31:29,080 --> 00:31:32,680 Speaker 1: at harbor best level. Uh. They they it's probably one 490 00:31:32,720 --> 00:31:35,160 Speaker 1: of the things they are you know, obviously since the 491 00:31:35,160 --> 00:31:37,320 Speaker 1: economics are tied to that, they're going to watch that 492 00:31:37,480 --> 00:31:40,680 Speaker 1: very closely. Um. So we have a runway with them, 493 00:31:40,720 --> 00:31:43,480 Speaker 1: and we think it's a you know, it's an intermediate runway. 494 00:31:44,160 --> 00:31:46,360 Speaker 1: But if we do well here and we are able 495 00:31:46,400 --> 00:31:49,800 Speaker 1: to democratize the sasset class um, I would say very 496 00:31:49,880 --> 00:31:55,680 Speaker 1: much like we started with one active manager, the Wellington's group, uh, 497 00:31:55,720 --> 00:31:58,880 Speaker 1: and now we have close to thirty active managers. So 498 00:31:58,920 --> 00:32:02,240 Speaker 1: we are continuing and will continue to think about do 499 00:32:02,280 --> 00:32:05,880 Speaker 1: we need manager too and then manager three? And we 500 00:32:05,920 --> 00:32:10,640 Speaker 1: feel we are very well equipped to source a second 501 00:32:10,720 --> 00:32:15,440 Speaker 1: and third manager when that time comes. But together harbor 502 00:32:15,480 --> 00:32:18,840 Speaker 1: Vest and Vanantgard are looking at capacity very closely. So 503 00:32:18,920 --> 00:32:22,560 Speaker 1: let's put some flesh on on those numbers, on those fees. 504 00:32:23,200 --> 00:32:26,560 Speaker 1: I'm assuming when you talk about, you know, just the 505 00:32:27,040 --> 00:32:31,560 Speaker 1: cost of of of administrative expenses on a fund, that's 506 00:32:31,600 --> 00:32:34,920 Speaker 1: gonna be some and private equity obviously much more expensive 507 00:32:35,440 --> 00:32:38,400 Speaker 1: than managing an e T F for or an index. 508 00:32:38,440 --> 00:32:41,240 Speaker 1: I'm gonna guess that's going to be about fifty basis points. 509 00:32:41,640 --> 00:32:44,880 Speaker 1: And then that eight percent uh, that's a pretty good 510 00:32:44,880 --> 00:32:50,720 Speaker 1: long term SMP five return number. Their fees are their 511 00:32:50,760 --> 00:32:53,520 Speaker 1: out performance over that eight percent? Am I getting that 512 00:32:53,600 --> 00:32:56,600 Speaker 1: more or less right? That's right. The carry does not 513 00:32:56,880 --> 00:33:00,600 Speaker 1: start to kick in until a return hurdle the percent, 514 00:33:01,360 --> 00:33:03,880 Speaker 1: And so that's why most private equity managers are shooting 515 00:33:03,960 --> 00:33:10,000 Speaker 1: for you know, fifteen to twenty gross returns and and 516 00:33:10,000 --> 00:33:12,160 Speaker 1: and the best ones have been able to do that. 517 00:33:12,640 --> 00:33:15,560 Speaker 1: And that's where the economics really lie. And so I 518 00:33:15,560 --> 00:33:18,160 Speaker 1: think it gets back to aligned interests. Right when most 519 00:33:18,200 --> 00:33:22,600 Speaker 1: of the feast sack is performance based and above some hurdle, 520 00:33:23,320 --> 00:33:27,120 Speaker 1: everyone is operating under the same incentives and so um 521 00:33:27,240 --> 00:33:29,680 Speaker 1: you know that that that makes private equity a very 522 00:33:29,720 --> 00:33:35,440 Speaker 1: aligned UH investment and asset class to client outcomes quite interesting. 523 00:33:35,760 --> 00:33:39,960 Speaker 1: You mentioned you want to be diversified globally in terms 524 00:33:40,000 --> 00:33:43,520 Speaker 1: of the investment. I'm assuming that that means everywhere around 525 00:33:43,560 --> 00:33:46,880 Speaker 1: the world. What about the investors? Is this the same? 526 00:33:47,720 --> 00:33:49,520 Speaker 1: Is this US only or is this going to be 527 00:33:49,600 --> 00:33:54,400 Speaker 1: open to global investors? So today we're starting in the US, 528 00:33:54,600 --> 00:33:59,280 Speaker 1: just like we're staging this out by clients segment and 529 00:33:59,480 --> 00:34:04,960 Speaker 1: working um you know where we are mostly working with 530 00:34:05,160 --> 00:34:10,080 Speaker 1: qualified investors and the regulation that's here. Eventually we will 531 00:34:10,320 --> 00:34:12,560 Speaker 1: you know, try to move this down market to main 532 00:34:12,640 --> 00:34:16,600 Speaker 1: street US investors, and eventually we are looking at how 533 00:34:16,640 --> 00:34:19,880 Speaker 1: we could utilize this in some of our um non 534 00:34:20,080 --> 00:34:23,359 Speaker 1: US offerings, whether it be single fund solutions or whether 535 00:34:23,400 --> 00:34:26,080 Speaker 1: it be in our advice outside of the US. But 536 00:34:26,400 --> 00:34:29,800 Speaker 1: again no timelines on that, but that is again probably 537 00:34:29,800 --> 00:34:32,960 Speaker 1: where we will be at some point in the future. Interesting, 538 00:34:33,080 --> 00:34:36,560 Speaker 1: and you had mentioned you were working with advisors on this. 539 00:34:37,280 --> 00:34:39,040 Speaker 1: What do you think the process is going to be 540 00:34:39,080 --> 00:34:43,560 Speaker 1: like before this reaches retail? Is this going to be 541 00:34:44,360 --> 00:34:46,399 Speaker 1: you know, a long process or do you think you're 542 00:34:46,400 --> 00:34:50,680 Speaker 1: going to get there sooner rather than than later. Um, 543 00:34:50,719 --> 00:34:52,759 Speaker 1: I mean our hope is to get there sooner rather 544 00:34:52,800 --> 00:34:55,840 Speaker 1: than later. You know, we talked earlier about a sixty 545 00:34:55,960 --> 00:34:58,920 Speaker 1: forty portfolio. I mean, I think the main street investor, 546 00:34:59,120 --> 00:35:02,719 Speaker 1: let's just take a school teacher and nurse, you know, 547 00:35:03,760 --> 00:35:08,120 Speaker 1: who is saving diligently for retirement. UM. I don't know 548 00:35:08,120 --> 00:35:09,879 Speaker 1: where the returns are going to come from. I mean, 549 00:35:10,280 --> 00:35:14,759 Speaker 1: most of the fixed income investments are below inflation, and 550 00:35:14,840 --> 00:35:18,360 Speaker 1: so you know, the sooner we can get private equity 551 00:35:18,520 --> 00:35:21,600 Speaker 1: into main street investors, and where we are the allocator 552 00:35:21,680 --> 00:35:23,879 Speaker 1: of it, and we do it in a thoughtful way. Um. 553 00:35:23,920 --> 00:35:27,279 Speaker 1: I think it will have long term compounding advantages for 554 00:35:27,400 --> 00:35:31,200 Speaker 1: these investors who needed the most, who are saving diligently, 555 00:35:31,360 --> 00:35:34,960 Speaker 1: doing the right thing, saving with a long duration and 556 00:35:35,040 --> 00:35:38,600 Speaker 1: just hoping to get real returns in retirement. There's no 557 00:35:38,680 --> 00:35:41,640 Speaker 1: real reason to save. Um. You know, saving is a 558 00:35:41,719 --> 00:35:45,439 Speaker 1: deferment of future consumption, and if you're saving and getting 559 00:35:45,480 --> 00:35:48,719 Speaker 1: a negative real return that that really isn't a trade 560 00:35:48,760 --> 00:35:51,640 Speaker 1: off that most people you know would welcome. And so 561 00:35:51,719 --> 00:35:54,520 Speaker 1: we're trying to make sure that we can generate real 562 00:35:54,640 --> 00:35:58,440 Speaker 1: returns for investors saving for retirement. So all of our 563 00:35:58,560 --> 00:36:00,879 Speaker 1: energies and efforts are on the send. I just don't 564 00:36:00,880 --> 00:36:04,440 Speaker 1: have a timeline, so let's stick with retirement. Is this 565 00:36:04,600 --> 00:36:09,560 Speaker 1: better suited for qualified tax DEFERD accounts for one case? 566 00:36:09,640 --> 00:36:15,600 Speaker 1: And on IRA's versus traditional portfolios? And how might this 567 00:36:15,800 --> 00:36:19,879 Speaker 1: fit into a target date fund? Yeah, I would say 568 00:36:19,920 --> 00:36:22,319 Speaker 1: both set of investors use it well. I know you 569 00:36:22,360 --> 00:36:24,560 Speaker 1: work with high net worth families, Barry, and I do 570 00:36:24,640 --> 00:36:26,680 Speaker 1: it well. I work with a lot of family offices 571 00:36:26,719 --> 00:36:29,880 Speaker 1: and high net worth taxable clients, and a lot of 572 00:36:29,960 --> 00:36:33,319 Speaker 1: clients think about after tax returns. UM. Not to get 573 00:36:33,360 --> 00:36:38,120 Speaker 1: too technical, but this is a good portfolio for tax 574 00:36:38,160 --> 00:36:41,719 Speaker 1: and wealth and estate planning. Uh. It follows a J curb, 575 00:36:41,800 --> 00:36:44,799 Speaker 1: which means it has some early year losses which are 576 00:36:44,920 --> 00:36:47,680 Speaker 1: valuable to high net worth families. And it's a great 577 00:36:47,760 --> 00:36:51,000 Speaker 1: estate planning because you can actually get assets out of 578 00:36:51,040 --> 00:36:54,759 Speaker 1: your estate at let's say X, and then fifteen years 579 00:36:54,800 --> 00:36:56,880 Speaker 1: later they come out hopefully at two to two and 580 00:36:56,880 --> 00:36:59,040 Speaker 1: a half times X. So we do see there is 581 00:36:59,080 --> 00:37:04,440 Speaker 1: a very very popular private equity strategy in you know, 582 00:37:04,520 --> 00:37:08,080 Speaker 1: some of our high it worth trusts and estate planning clients. 583 00:37:08,080 --> 00:37:10,080 Speaker 1: On the other end of the spectrum is just main 584 00:37:10,120 --> 00:37:13,520 Speaker 1: street investors who are saving in a target retirement funds 585 00:37:14,080 --> 00:37:16,840 Speaker 1: and then for target date funds which would be in 586 00:37:16,960 --> 00:37:21,440 Speaker 1: a defined contribution plan um where Vanguard would you know, 587 00:37:21,560 --> 00:37:26,080 Speaker 1: obviously do the multi asset class portfolio construction and the 588 00:37:26,120 --> 00:37:32,120 Speaker 1: allocation and the rebalancing um. And these are long duration investors. 589 00:37:32,760 --> 00:37:36,359 Speaker 1: Typically they have a thirty year investment horizon and then 590 00:37:36,400 --> 00:37:39,799 Speaker 1: maybe a fifty to sixty year life horizon. And the 591 00:37:39,800 --> 00:37:42,399 Speaker 1: other great thing about the rfs is we know exactly 592 00:37:42,719 --> 00:37:45,239 Speaker 1: when they're going to retire and when they're going to 593 00:37:45,400 --> 00:37:50,040 Speaker 1: shift from accumulation to decumulation and retirement income. So we 594 00:37:50,080 --> 00:37:54,239 Speaker 1: could have a private equity glide path um that that 595 00:37:54,280 --> 00:37:58,000 Speaker 1: we mentioned earlier. Let's say you have fift to private 596 00:37:58,040 --> 00:38:02,520 Speaker 1: equity when you're third of years away to retirement, and 597 00:38:02,560 --> 00:38:05,600 Speaker 1: we just stopped investing in that as you approach five 598 00:38:05,680 --> 00:38:09,040 Speaker 1: to ten years prior to retirements. So when you start 599 00:38:09,160 --> 00:38:13,120 Speaker 1: retirement income, private equity lands at zero O. So we 600 00:38:13,680 --> 00:38:17,400 Speaker 1: we see it as a perfect place um for both 601 00:38:17,600 --> 00:38:21,080 Speaker 1: ends of the spectrum and really for all investors who 602 00:38:21,120 --> 00:38:25,120 Speaker 1: are looking to have real returns. Quite interesting, So let's 603 00:38:25,160 --> 00:38:29,839 Speaker 1: talk a little bit about investor appetite. How strong is 604 00:38:30,360 --> 00:38:36,439 Speaker 1: the demand for this sort of investment from the public today. Yeah, 605 00:38:36,440 --> 00:38:39,000 Speaker 1: I have the investment demand for private equity both on 606 00:38:39,000 --> 00:38:42,480 Speaker 1: our launch, but private equity in general has been setting records. 607 00:38:42,920 --> 00:38:46,360 Speaker 1: You probably read in the in the press. Fundraising in 608 00:38:46,560 --> 00:38:49,359 Speaker 1: nineteen twenty and and so far in twenty one has 609 00:38:49,400 --> 00:38:52,920 Speaker 1: just been off the charts. One could argue at cyclical, 610 00:38:53,239 --> 00:38:55,760 Speaker 1: or others could argue at secular. I'm on the secular 611 00:38:55,800 --> 00:38:58,480 Speaker 1: side of this um. You know, we do see that 612 00:38:58,600 --> 00:39:03,880 Speaker 1: some investors are lead being the edge of you know, progressiveness, 613 00:39:04,000 --> 00:39:07,319 Speaker 1: and so you see the top endowments and foundations and 614 00:39:07,440 --> 00:39:10,320 Speaker 1: sovereign wealth funds have been in private equity since the 615 00:39:10,440 --> 00:39:14,600 Speaker 1: early ninety nineties. They've increased their allocations. I think this 616 00:39:14,760 --> 00:39:17,759 Speaker 1: is the rest of the market catching up Verry, so 617 00:39:17,880 --> 00:39:21,120 Speaker 1: the demand is quite strong. I I do not see 618 00:39:21,120 --> 00:39:24,040 Speaker 1: it as cyclical. We've been through three of the largest 619 00:39:24,080 --> 00:39:27,080 Speaker 1: bear markets in the market's history, when you look at 620 00:39:27,120 --> 00:39:29,719 Speaker 1: the Internet tech tech bubble, and then the a O 621 00:39:29,920 --> 00:39:33,440 Speaker 1: nine global financial crisis, and then the quick flip in COVID, 622 00:39:33,920 --> 00:39:37,440 Speaker 1: and yet you continue to see private equity grow. Uh. 623 00:39:37,560 --> 00:39:40,040 Speaker 1: So I believe this is structural, and I believe it's 624 00:39:40,080 --> 00:39:43,840 Speaker 1: because of the investment case, both on diversification and what 625 00:39:43,920 --> 00:39:47,279 Speaker 1: it can do to improve outcomes on performance. So I 626 00:39:47,320 --> 00:39:49,719 Speaker 1: do not see this as being cyclical. I would be 627 00:39:49,760 --> 00:39:52,400 Speaker 1: shocked if five and ten and fifteen years that private 628 00:39:52,400 --> 00:39:56,279 Speaker 1: equity is not larger than it is today. Interesting. So 629 00:39:56,320 --> 00:39:58,799 Speaker 1: there's a quote, and I think it's yours that that 630 00:39:58,920 --> 00:40:02,280 Speaker 1: I want to share. Quote. Restrictions on who can invest 631 00:40:02,320 --> 00:40:06,680 Speaker 1: in private equity should be based on investment horizon and 632 00:40:06,760 --> 00:40:12,480 Speaker 1: not income or wealth unquote. Discuss Yeah, So I think 633 00:40:12,520 --> 00:40:15,919 Speaker 1: the current regulatory has a lot of merit right now. 634 00:40:16,000 --> 00:40:19,280 Speaker 1: The gates to get into private equity are wealth and income, 635 00:40:19,719 --> 00:40:21,359 Speaker 1: and I think it does have merit, And I think 636 00:40:21,400 --> 00:40:24,399 Speaker 1: the regulators really do care about investors, and they care 637 00:40:24,480 --> 00:40:28,040 Speaker 1: deeply about investors, and they would argue that these investors 638 00:40:28,040 --> 00:40:31,360 Speaker 1: could afford h to lose assets when they have this 639 00:40:31,480 --> 00:40:34,399 Speaker 1: type of wealth and income threshold. But I would argue, 640 00:40:34,520 --> 00:40:36,560 Speaker 1: let's let's just say you take someone who is a 641 00:40:36,640 --> 00:40:38,960 Speaker 1: high spend or someone who's spending eight or nine percent 642 00:40:39,000 --> 00:40:41,879 Speaker 1: of their portfolio, whether it's just a high net worth 643 00:40:41,920 --> 00:40:45,000 Speaker 1: client or an entertainer or a sports figure, even if 644 00:40:45,000 --> 00:40:47,200 Speaker 1: they have ten million dollars and they're spending a lot 645 00:40:47,239 --> 00:40:49,920 Speaker 1: of money, I would not recommend private equity to that. 646 00:40:50,080 --> 00:40:53,439 Speaker 1: I mean, it is an ill liquid asset UM and 647 00:40:53,440 --> 00:40:57,040 Speaker 1: and so I really think it's it's much more appropriate 648 00:40:57,120 --> 00:41:00,160 Speaker 1: to think about what is the horizon of the investor or? 649 00:41:01,040 --> 00:41:06,160 Speaker 1: Um is the an asset being managed by a fiduciary. 650 00:41:06,280 --> 00:41:08,680 Speaker 1: Uh So you know what we talked about target retirement 651 00:41:08,719 --> 00:41:12,000 Speaker 1: funds or our advice at Vanguard, we are managing those 652 00:41:12,040 --> 00:41:16,000 Speaker 1: assets and we would rebalance those assets. So I think 653 00:41:16,040 --> 00:41:19,880 Speaker 1: when it is professionally managed and it meets the time 654 00:41:19,920 --> 00:41:25,600 Speaker 1: horizon and the investor is in accumulation or slight accumulation, 655 00:41:26,080 --> 00:41:29,000 Speaker 1: that's where I would put private equity. But if someone 656 00:41:29,040 --> 00:41:32,120 Speaker 1: walked in and they had, you know, fifteen million dollars 657 00:41:32,200 --> 00:41:34,319 Speaker 1: and making a million dollars in a year, but they 658 00:41:34,320 --> 00:41:36,879 Speaker 1: were spending two or three and you and I bury 659 00:41:36,920 --> 00:41:40,000 Speaker 1: no clients just like that, uh what they would qualify, 660 00:41:40,120 --> 00:41:42,120 Speaker 1: But I would not put private equity in their portfolio. 661 00:41:42,600 --> 00:41:47,000 Speaker 1: So I understand why wealth and income really around those 662 00:41:47,040 --> 00:41:49,200 Speaker 1: clients could afford to lose it. But if you take 663 00:41:49,239 --> 00:41:52,799 Speaker 1: a step back from that, um, I think time horizon, 664 00:41:53,800 --> 00:41:58,319 Speaker 1: whether you're the accumulation or decumulation, and whether it's professionally 665 00:41:58,360 --> 00:42:01,920 Speaker 1: managed by a multi asset class professional, would be the 666 00:42:02,040 --> 00:42:06,320 Speaker 1: real gates of prudence as opposed to just wealth and income. 667 00:42:06,880 --> 00:42:10,400 Speaker 1: That makes a lot of sense. The illequidly premium only 668 00:42:10,440 --> 00:42:13,920 Speaker 1: works if you don't need to tap into that capital 669 00:42:14,400 --> 00:42:18,239 Speaker 1: for that entire lock up period. Um. But I'm sure 670 00:42:18,280 --> 00:42:23,920 Speaker 1: there are pretty substantial penalties for getting out of a 671 00:42:23,960 --> 00:42:27,520 Speaker 1: private equity investment early. How do you manage that if 672 00:42:27,840 --> 00:42:32,800 Speaker 1: someone's circumstances change and they need the cash sooner versus 673 00:42:33,080 --> 00:42:37,200 Speaker 1: their original plans. Yeah, I think there there is a 674 00:42:37,320 --> 00:42:41,040 Speaker 1: secondary market barry that is growing and getting closer and 675 00:42:41,120 --> 00:42:44,480 Speaker 1: closer to fair market value. UM. I would say it's 676 00:42:44,520 --> 00:42:47,719 Speaker 1: like any other asset class we've seen, including ets. If 677 00:42:47,719 --> 00:42:51,319 Speaker 1: you're trying to sell out because the market is under 678 00:42:51,360 --> 00:42:55,440 Speaker 1: pressure or contagion, UH, you should expect a large discount 679 00:42:55,480 --> 00:42:57,640 Speaker 1: like we saw in O eight oh nine and during 680 00:42:57,640 --> 00:43:01,479 Speaker 1: in COVID. Even in high quality fixed income, you see 681 00:43:01,480 --> 00:43:06,319 Speaker 1: discounts under stress. However, if if your circumstances changed and 682 00:43:06,360 --> 00:43:08,000 Speaker 1: you just want to get out of private equity and 683 00:43:08,080 --> 00:43:11,320 Speaker 1: it's not in concasion, and you want to do it 684 00:43:11,360 --> 00:43:14,880 Speaker 1: at you know, over time, like in a quarterly or 685 00:43:14,960 --> 00:43:19,800 Speaker 1: semiannual a lot in the secondary market as accommodate windows 686 00:43:19,840 --> 00:43:22,600 Speaker 1: where you can sell your private equity back, and the 687 00:43:22,680 --> 00:43:26,440 Speaker 1: discounts are not that extreme, uh, if you're doing it 688 00:43:26,600 --> 00:43:32,040 Speaker 1: in the qualified times that the secondary market allows liquidity events. 689 00:43:32,080 --> 00:43:33,759 Speaker 1: So I would say it's you know, it's twofold. If 690 00:43:33,760 --> 00:43:36,800 Speaker 1: you're selling because of market concasion or in market stress, 691 00:43:37,280 --> 00:43:39,520 Speaker 1: expect a large discount like you would in most of 692 00:43:39,640 --> 00:43:42,800 Speaker 1: their asset classes. If you're doing it because of non 693 00:43:42,840 --> 00:43:45,640 Speaker 1: market related events and you do it in the windows 694 00:43:45,640 --> 00:43:48,200 Speaker 1: that are allowed, H, the discount will still be there. 695 00:43:48,239 --> 00:43:50,960 Speaker 1: I want to be very clear, UM, no different than 696 00:43:51,000 --> 00:43:54,280 Speaker 1: trying to sell me disciole bonds or corporate bonds. UM. 697 00:43:54,360 --> 00:43:57,360 Speaker 1: But but it would not be that detrimental. But it 698 00:43:57,520 --> 00:43:59,759 Speaker 1: is clear. We want investors to understand that they are 699 00:44:00,040 --> 00:44:03,120 Speaker 1: ring a long term investment and hopefully there's some circumstances 700 00:44:03,160 --> 00:44:06,080 Speaker 1: do not change that would warrant them selling it. So 701 00:44:06,200 --> 00:44:09,800 Speaker 1: that's one of the unique challenges of private equity versus 702 00:44:09,920 --> 00:44:12,359 Speaker 1: you know, playing vanilla stocks and bonds. What are other 703 00:44:12,520 --> 00:44:17,399 Speaker 1: challenges that are unique to this asset class. I think 704 00:44:17,400 --> 00:44:22,920 Speaker 1: the other challenges are manager selection and manager access. Most 705 00:44:22,960 --> 00:44:29,360 Speaker 1: of the top managers are filled over subscribed, and so 706 00:44:29,520 --> 00:44:32,160 Speaker 1: for you are or I Barry or even you know, 707 00:44:32,200 --> 00:44:34,920 Speaker 1: if you're on sit on a committee of an endowment, 708 00:44:35,440 --> 00:44:38,920 Speaker 1: if you're going to start private equity today, the list 709 00:44:39,080 --> 00:44:42,160 Speaker 1: of general partners that you will get access to is 710 00:44:42,160 --> 00:44:44,440 Speaker 1: probably a very small list, and it's probably maybe not 711 00:44:44,520 --> 00:44:47,200 Speaker 1: the top quartile list. And that gets back to why 712 00:44:47,239 --> 00:44:49,920 Speaker 1: we went with harbor Vest thirty eight years of doing 713 00:44:49,960 --> 00:44:55,000 Speaker 1: this UM and and by being an investor early and consistently, 714 00:44:55,960 --> 00:44:59,000 Speaker 1: access is granted to those who have been there first 715 00:44:59,080 --> 00:45:01,719 Speaker 1: and who have been there insistantly. So I think it 716 00:45:01,760 --> 00:45:04,200 Speaker 1: will be a challenge for someone who is entering private 717 00:45:04,239 --> 00:45:08,320 Speaker 1: equity today to get top quartile managers unless they're working 718 00:45:08,320 --> 00:45:11,239 Speaker 1: with someone like Vanguard or someone like a harbor Vest, 719 00:45:11,280 --> 00:45:14,360 Speaker 1: because access will not be there if you try to 720 00:45:14,440 --> 00:45:16,799 Speaker 1: just you know, do this on your own. And if 721 00:45:16,840 --> 00:45:20,880 Speaker 1: I recall correctly, Vanguard has something like thirty million clients. 722 00:45:21,360 --> 00:45:24,960 Speaker 1: Is that number about Riot? That is right? Yeah, that's right, Barry. 723 00:45:25,040 --> 00:45:26,319 Speaker 1: So you know a lot of times people look at 724 00:45:26,360 --> 00:45:28,680 Speaker 1: our size and a U M. But I would really 725 00:45:28,719 --> 00:45:31,400 Speaker 1: direct you know, the a U M is you know, 726 00:45:31,920 --> 00:45:36,640 Speaker 1: we are just the professional steward of thirty million investors. 727 00:45:36,640 --> 00:45:41,000 Speaker 1: It's their assets, They own the assets. We are managing 728 00:45:41,000 --> 00:45:44,560 Speaker 1: those assets on on the behalf of these investors thirty 729 00:45:44,560 --> 00:45:47,719 Speaker 1: million who have entrusted us to do well for them. 730 00:45:48,040 --> 00:45:54,000 Speaker 1: So clearly you have the expertise in terms of custodying 731 00:45:54,080 --> 00:45:58,360 Speaker 1: assets and reporting and doing the performance reporting as well. 732 00:45:58,880 --> 00:46:02,320 Speaker 1: But private equity seems like a unique set of I 733 00:46:02,360 --> 00:46:06,880 Speaker 1: don't want to say nightmares, but it's so complicated given 734 00:46:07,560 --> 00:46:10,879 Speaker 1: how money is not only placed but drawn down over 735 00:46:11,000 --> 00:46:15,759 Speaker 1: time time and investing um in funds as needed as 736 00:46:15,800 --> 00:46:20,239 Speaker 1: opportunities come along. What were some of the real complications 737 00:46:20,280 --> 00:46:25,399 Speaker 1: of setting up the back office of private equity when 738 00:46:25,400 --> 00:46:28,919 Speaker 1: you're working with Vanguard and Harbor Vest. Yeah, I'm glad 739 00:46:28,960 --> 00:46:30,520 Speaker 1: you asked that, Barry, because a lot of times the 740 00:46:30,520 --> 00:46:33,239 Speaker 1: focus is all on the investment and performance and the 741 00:46:33,239 --> 00:46:35,880 Speaker 1: diversification and the outcomes. But you are correct to the 742 00:46:35,920 --> 00:46:39,320 Speaker 1: client experience and how this works is not as simple 743 00:46:39,320 --> 00:46:42,879 Speaker 1: as buying an ep F for a mutual fund um. 744 00:46:42,560 --> 00:46:47,799 Speaker 1: And we spend a lot of time and technology dollars 745 00:46:48,320 --> 00:46:50,480 Speaker 1: um to make sure that this would you know, not 746 00:46:50,560 --> 00:46:53,120 Speaker 1: only would the investment experience be world class, but the 747 00:46:53,200 --> 00:46:56,200 Speaker 1: client experience would be world class. So we put a 748 00:46:56,239 --> 00:46:58,840 Speaker 1: lot of time and energy and effort to make sure 749 00:46:59,440 --> 00:47:04,040 Speaker 1: that the interface and how the capital calls work UM. 750 00:47:04,040 --> 00:47:10,000 Speaker 1: And how everything now being digital online really helps improve 751 00:47:10,120 --> 00:47:13,359 Speaker 1: the experience for clients. So not only do we we 752 00:47:13,440 --> 00:47:16,560 Speaker 1: believe we will have a world class investment experience, but 753 00:47:16,680 --> 00:47:20,319 Speaker 1: we believe we will have a world class client experience UM. 754 00:47:20,360 --> 00:47:22,479 Speaker 1: And I think it's again, why you know, thinking about 755 00:47:22,560 --> 00:47:26,000 Speaker 1: it more as an advised part of an advised multi 756 00:47:26,080 --> 00:47:29,520 Speaker 1: asset class where we are moving all of the money around, 757 00:47:30,080 --> 00:47:34,560 Speaker 1: whether it's rebalancing their capital calls, certainly self directed ultra 758 00:47:34,600 --> 00:47:36,719 Speaker 1: high net worth clients who are used to this, are 759 00:47:36,840 --> 00:47:39,400 Speaker 1: used to how this works. Um But I think in 760 00:47:39,400 --> 00:47:42,680 Speaker 1: an advised capacity, whether it's through our o C, i OH, 761 00:47:43,360 --> 00:47:47,279 Speaker 1: our personal advisor services, or maybe one day in a TRF, 762 00:47:47,840 --> 00:47:52,000 Speaker 1: we can alleviate a lot of that mechanical cash flow 763 00:47:52,680 --> 00:47:56,800 Speaker 1: capital call, moving it from public markets to private markets 764 00:47:56,880 --> 00:48:00,040 Speaker 1: and back. And I think that will only improve the 765 00:48:00,080 --> 00:48:02,480 Speaker 1: experience of clients. They won't don't see one nab A 766 00:48:02,640 --> 00:48:06,520 Speaker 1: one one turtle return of all their investments rolled up, 767 00:48:07,000 --> 00:48:09,319 Speaker 1: and I think the experience will be enhanced from that. 768 00:48:10,120 --> 00:48:12,719 Speaker 1: So I have a few questions left before I get 769 00:48:12,760 --> 00:48:18,120 Speaker 1: to my favorite questions, and let's stick with Vanguard. I 770 00:48:18,200 --> 00:48:23,200 Speaker 1: haven't heard many of your competitors looking into private equity 771 00:48:23,360 --> 00:48:27,719 Speaker 1: as an mass asset class for their investors. What is 772 00:48:27,760 --> 00:48:30,680 Speaker 1: it about Vanguard? What do you bring to the table 773 00:48:30,760 --> 00:48:34,080 Speaker 1: that makes you so uniquely suited to do this? You 774 00:48:34,480 --> 00:48:38,680 Speaker 1: seem to be the only large asset manager that's looking 775 00:48:38,719 --> 00:48:45,040 Speaker 1: to forget democratizing stocks. You're looking to democratize private equity. Yeah. 776 00:48:45,080 --> 00:48:47,560 Speaker 1: I think that's a student observation, Verry. I think it 777 00:48:47,600 --> 00:48:50,680 Speaker 1: gets back to our roots and our mission and why 778 00:48:50,760 --> 00:48:55,319 Speaker 1: Vanguard was founded. Um. No, indexing was around before we 779 00:48:55,400 --> 00:48:57,799 Speaker 1: started Vanguard. I mean, it was an institutional you know, 780 00:48:57,840 --> 00:49:01,759 Speaker 1: you know, Samsonite and well sparked go. So indexing was around, 781 00:49:02,200 --> 00:49:06,520 Speaker 1: active management around, and so Vanguard's whole purpose and mission 782 00:49:07,239 --> 00:49:12,239 Speaker 1: was to take you know, institutional investment offerings that have 783 00:49:12,360 --> 00:49:17,240 Speaker 1: served these large asset pools well down to main street, 784 00:49:17,320 --> 00:49:20,359 Speaker 1: mom and pop investors. So I think that's probably why 785 00:49:20,480 --> 00:49:24,920 Speaker 1: you see us trying to democratize or equal access this 786 00:49:25,480 --> 00:49:29,279 Speaker 1: too investors who need it the most. Obviously, sovereign wealth 787 00:49:29,320 --> 00:49:33,560 Speaker 1: funds and endowments have been very well served by private equity, 788 00:49:33,600 --> 00:49:36,839 Speaker 1: and they don't need Vanguard necessarily to do private equity. 789 00:49:36,920 --> 00:49:39,640 Speaker 1: And so our goal and our mission from our founding 790 00:49:40,200 --> 00:49:43,279 Speaker 1: was to make sure that the little person, and you know, 791 00:49:43,360 --> 00:49:46,319 Speaker 1: the mom and pop investor, the main street investor, was 792 00:49:46,360 --> 00:49:49,080 Speaker 1: on a level footing with the largest sovereign wealth funds 793 00:49:49,080 --> 00:49:51,920 Speaker 1: and the largest endowments and foundations. So I think this 794 00:49:52,040 --> 00:49:54,960 Speaker 1: plays right in our entire routs and our mission, in 795 00:49:55,040 --> 00:49:57,759 Speaker 1: our history. So I love this quote of yours on 796 00:49:57,840 --> 00:50:01,239 Speaker 1: this this basic concept quote. It took us thirty five 797 00:50:01,360 --> 00:50:04,440 Speaker 1: years to do this on indexing, twenty years to do 798 00:50:04,480 --> 00:50:07,200 Speaker 1: it on active funds. So maybe twenty years from now, 799 00:50:07,680 --> 00:50:11,400 Speaker 1: private equity and its access to world class managers for 800 00:50:11,520 --> 00:50:15,200 Speaker 1: the average investor will look very much like indexing did 801 00:50:15,840 --> 00:50:20,640 Speaker 1: over the course of nineteen seventy to Yeah, so I 802 00:50:20,680 --> 00:50:23,080 Speaker 1: think that's exactly right. That is our hope and that's 803 00:50:23,080 --> 00:50:27,799 Speaker 1: our aspiration. When I arrived at Vanguard in it's hard 804 00:50:27,840 --> 00:50:31,440 Speaker 1: to believe indexing assets were around eight percent of mutual 805 00:50:31,440 --> 00:50:36,160 Speaker 1: fund assets UM, and so it did take quite a while. Uh. 806 00:50:36,360 --> 00:50:38,759 Speaker 1: You may remember, you know, indexing was called on an 807 00:50:38,719 --> 00:50:42,640 Speaker 1: American UM. The advisor community did not want any part 808 00:50:42,680 --> 00:50:45,040 Speaker 1: of indexing because the value probably Let this gets back 809 00:50:45,040 --> 00:50:47,120 Speaker 1: to some of the work we've done on advisors alpha 810 00:50:47,640 --> 00:50:51,239 Speaker 1: the value proposition of most advisors where hired me and 811 00:50:51,239 --> 00:50:56,000 Speaker 1: I'll perform, you know, outperformed the index through tactical allocation 812 00:50:56,440 --> 00:51:00,680 Speaker 1: or managers selection. And so to see, uh, you know, 813 00:51:00,800 --> 00:51:04,600 Speaker 1: the diffusion of indexing over the last twenty years has 814 00:51:04,600 --> 00:51:08,239 Speaker 1: been amazing, and you know, we hope and we you know, 815 00:51:08,440 --> 00:51:10,839 Speaker 1: think that this would be the right thing to do, uh, 816 00:51:10,880 --> 00:51:14,200 Speaker 1: to try to follow that same template for private equity 817 00:51:14,239 --> 00:51:18,160 Speaker 1: for main street investors. So let's use that template and 818 00:51:18,160 --> 00:51:22,799 Speaker 1: and look forward ten or twenty years from now when 819 00:51:22,840 --> 00:51:29,400 Speaker 1: you're looking at the ensuing forty period, what would be 820 00:51:29,480 --> 00:51:33,359 Speaker 1: your measure of success for this project? What metrics are 821 00:51:33,400 --> 00:51:35,759 Speaker 1: you going to look at to be able to make 822 00:51:35,800 --> 00:51:39,560 Speaker 1: the determination? Hey, this was every bit as successful as 823 00:51:39,640 --> 00:51:45,799 Speaker 1: indexing and active management was in the earlier iterations of Vanguard. Yeah, 824 00:51:45,840 --> 00:51:48,280 Speaker 1: so I mentioned a couple of times. Growth and cash 825 00:51:48,320 --> 00:51:53,600 Speaker 1: flow has never been Vanguard's mission. We believe that growth 826 00:51:53,840 --> 00:51:58,600 Speaker 1: and cash flow is an outcome of serving investors well 827 00:51:58,680 --> 00:52:02,719 Speaker 1: and serving them prudently. So my success metrics would be 828 00:52:02,800 --> 00:52:06,080 Speaker 1: that the performance comes through somewhere like we indicated three 829 00:52:06,080 --> 00:52:10,719 Speaker 1: to four paces points over, it's provided diversification, and that 830 00:52:10,880 --> 00:52:14,200 Speaker 1: investors who need private equity the most, And I would 831 00:52:14,239 --> 00:52:17,160 Speaker 1: say that those are those who are saving for retirement, 832 00:52:17,360 --> 00:52:20,160 Speaker 1: those who do not have access to it now have 833 00:52:20,320 --> 00:52:23,640 Speaker 1: access to it. And if those things three things hold 834 00:52:24,320 --> 00:52:30,480 Speaker 1: good performance, good diversification, good client experience and access is granted, 835 00:52:31,320 --> 00:52:34,560 Speaker 1: we would we would expect our share of the private 836 00:52:34,560 --> 00:52:40,200 Speaker 1: equity market UH to look quite large. But again the 837 00:52:40,280 --> 00:52:42,720 Speaker 1: goal is not to have van Guard be a leader 838 00:52:42,719 --> 00:52:45,839 Speaker 1: in private equity or to build assets or to take 839 00:52:45,880 --> 00:52:48,160 Speaker 1: on growth. We think that would be an outcome of 840 00:52:48,160 --> 00:52:52,040 Speaker 1: in serving investors very very well, and investors typically vote 841 00:52:52,040 --> 00:52:53,759 Speaker 1: with their feet, and that's what we have seen. It's 842 00:52:53,760 --> 00:52:57,319 Speaker 1: a smart population and we think it's an outcome of 843 00:52:57,520 --> 00:53:01,360 Speaker 1: being served very well. Quite interesting. I know I only 844 00:53:01,400 --> 00:53:04,080 Speaker 1: have you for a limited amount of time, so let's 845 00:53:04,239 --> 00:53:07,719 Speaker 1: jump to our favorite questions that we ask all of 846 00:53:07,760 --> 00:53:12,000 Speaker 1: our guests, starting with, UH, tell us what you've been 847 00:53:12,040 --> 00:53:15,480 Speaker 1: streaming during this period of work from home? What are 848 00:53:15,480 --> 00:53:18,600 Speaker 1: you watching on Netflix or Amazon Prime? Or what podcasts 849 00:53:18,600 --> 00:53:23,080 Speaker 1: are keeping you entertained? Yes, I think kind of new 850 00:53:23,120 --> 00:53:26,400 Speaker 1: early on. My My brother is in internal medicine and 851 00:53:26,480 --> 00:53:28,320 Speaker 1: runs the I C You here at Penn, So I 852 00:53:28,400 --> 00:53:30,359 Speaker 1: kind of knew early on that this might play out 853 00:53:30,440 --> 00:53:34,480 Speaker 1: longer to stay from home than than most And so 854 00:53:34,560 --> 00:53:37,960 Speaker 1: I decided to revisit some of the all time classic 855 00:53:38,040 --> 00:53:40,280 Speaker 1: or at least, in my opinion, the all time classic 856 00:53:40,320 --> 00:53:43,959 Speaker 1: TV series for a second and in some instances a third. 857 00:53:43,960 --> 00:53:48,759 Speaker 1: But these are big time commitments, So things like Breaking Bad, Uh, 858 00:53:48,840 --> 00:53:52,600 Speaker 1: The Americans, and Homeland I have rewatched and I've enjoyed 859 00:53:52,640 --> 00:53:54,759 Speaker 1: every second. So I went back to at least what 860 00:53:54,800 --> 00:53:58,040 Speaker 1: I would call as some of the classics. But but 861 00:53:58,040 --> 00:54:00,080 Speaker 1: but as a big time commitment, and I thought I 862 00:54:00,080 --> 00:54:01,719 Speaker 1: would have the time to do that, and I'm glad 863 00:54:01,760 --> 00:54:05,040 Speaker 1: I did that. Quite interesting. Tell us about your early 864 00:54:05,080 --> 00:54:09,840 Speaker 1: mentors who helped shape your career. Yeah, I kind of 865 00:54:09,840 --> 00:54:13,360 Speaker 1: breaking into three stages of my career. Very first and 866 00:54:13,440 --> 00:54:17,080 Speaker 1: foremost are my parents and my grandparents. My grandparents were 867 00:54:17,160 --> 00:54:21,279 Speaker 1: very involved and my parents were very very selfless, I think, 868 00:54:21,320 --> 00:54:25,200 Speaker 1: give me unconditional love and support and just were amazing 869 00:54:25,280 --> 00:54:27,880 Speaker 1: role models. And I think that was the foundation of 870 00:54:27,920 --> 00:54:31,480 Speaker 1: all of my good luck that followed from that, and 871 00:54:31,520 --> 00:54:33,440 Speaker 1: if I moved from there, I would say my my 872 00:54:33,560 --> 00:54:37,480 Speaker 1: first experience outside of business school, I was hired by 873 00:54:37,680 --> 00:54:41,480 Speaker 1: Harold Katz and Cat's family office, which was run by 874 00:54:41,560 --> 00:54:45,640 Speaker 1: Terry gabrielle chief investment officer. This guy was a c 875 00:54:45,840 --> 00:54:48,880 Speaker 1: f A from like the seventies and um, you know, 876 00:54:48,920 --> 00:54:50,520 Speaker 1: told me right away a three years to get the 877 00:54:50,520 --> 00:54:52,040 Speaker 1: cf A. So I got the c f A at 878 00:54:52,040 --> 00:54:54,080 Speaker 1: a very young age and he taught me everything. I 879 00:54:54,200 --> 00:54:56,960 Speaker 1: you know, just sat at his hip and had a 880 00:54:56,960 --> 00:55:01,759 Speaker 1: world class experience on how to value companies, UM forensic 881 00:55:01,760 --> 00:55:04,600 Speaker 1: accounting and to be able to like just rip through 882 00:55:04,640 --> 00:55:06,920 Speaker 1: a company and figure out what it was worth. So 883 00:55:07,040 --> 00:55:10,120 Speaker 1: both Harold Katz and Terry Gabriel I think we're the 884 00:55:10,200 --> 00:55:13,160 Speaker 1: early part of my career. And if those two things 885 00:55:13,200 --> 00:55:16,279 Speaker 1: aren't lucky enough, at thirty two, I ended up at Vanguard, 886 00:55:16,360 --> 00:55:19,239 Speaker 1: and and uh, you know, just had such a luck 887 00:55:19,400 --> 00:55:23,200 Speaker 1: to be able to work with Jack Bogel closely. Um, 888 00:55:23,480 --> 00:55:26,440 Speaker 1: you know, Jack Brennan and I worked on many things together. 889 00:55:26,560 --> 00:55:30,360 Speaker 1: We're still in contact with him on a pretty regular basis. 890 00:55:30,360 --> 00:55:33,000 Speaker 1: And and and then Tim Buckley, who's our current CEO. 891 00:55:33,440 --> 00:55:35,360 Speaker 1: I've worked with him, you know, pretty much since I 892 00:55:35,480 --> 00:55:40,279 Speaker 1: landed at Vanguard. I couldn't find three more better mentors 893 00:55:40,320 --> 00:55:42,200 Speaker 1: if I tried, and the three of them, so I've 894 00:55:42,239 --> 00:55:45,000 Speaker 1: just been very blessed. Yeah, that's that's quite a murderous 895 00:55:45,120 --> 00:55:49,160 Speaker 1: row of of people to help guide your career. Uh, 896 00:55:49,280 --> 00:55:52,120 Speaker 1: let's talk about books. Tell us some of your favorites 897 00:55:52,280 --> 00:55:54,719 Speaker 1: and what are you reading right now? So some of 898 00:55:54,760 --> 00:55:57,480 Speaker 1: my favorites, and its fried back to my what I'm streaming. 899 00:55:57,560 --> 00:56:01,040 Speaker 1: I've read you know, probably a dozen times, would be 900 00:56:01,080 --> 00:56:05,320 Speaker 1: too by talib Fooled by Randomness is probably my favorite, 901 00:56:05,440 --> 00:56:09,399 Speaker 1: and the others Anti Fragile highly recommended for those who 902 00:56:09,440 --> 00:56:12,880 Speaker 1: have not read them. Uh. Then then Michael Lewis is 903 00:56:12,880 --> 00:56:16,799 Speaker 1: the undoing project. It's it's really about the special relationship 904 00:56:16,880 --> 00:56:19,360 Speaker 1: between condomen and diversity and all they've been able to 905 00:56:19,400 --> 00:56:24,000 Speaker 1: accomplish around human behavior. And I'll stick with you know, 906 00:56:24,040 --> 00:56:28,400 Speaker 1: Condomen and Diversity. Uh. Their book Judgment Under Uncertainty is 907 00:56:28,440 --> 00:56:31,520 Speaker 1: still one of the classics of all time as far 908 00:56:31,560 --> 00:56:35,279 Speaker 1: as currently, um, you know mostly what I read. You know, 909 00:56:35,320 --> 00:56:37,440 Speaker 1: it's just so much to stay on top of the 910 00:56:37,480 --> 00:56:41,160 Speaker 1: investment news and the news commentary. So I'm very grateful 911 00:56:41,320 --> 00:56:44,960 Speaker 1: for you, Barry, you doing an aggregation each night. I 912 00:56:45,040 --> 00:56:47,680 Speaker 1: look forward to, you know, getting your email, and you know, 913 00:56:47,719 --> 00:56:49,839 Speaker 1: there's so much news out there, So I would say 914 00:56:49,840 --> 00:56:52,120 Speaker 1: on a daily basis, I'm using some of the key 915 00:56:52,160 --> 00:56:56,560 Speaker 1: aggregators always use yours as first and foremost. So the 916 00:56:56,680 --> 00:56:59,080 Speaker 1: daily news stream is a lot, and I saved the 917 00:56:59,080 --> 00:57:01,239 Speaker 1: books for when I'm you know, have some downtime on 918 00:57:01,280 --> 00:57:05,520 Speaker 1: summer vacation over the holidays. Really interesting and thank you 919 00:57:05,600 --> 00:57:09,799 Speaker 1: for uh those kudos. What sort of advice would you 920 00:57:09,800 --> 00:57:12,960 Speaker 1: give to a recent college grad who was interested in 921 00:57:13,040 --> 00:57:18,000 Speaker 1: a career in either investment management or private equity, John 922 00:57:18,040 --> 00:57:20,360 Speaker 1: would I would tell him to go for it. I 923 00:57:20,440 --> 00:57:24,280 Speaker 1: see so many opportunities on the horizon in investment banking, 924 00:57:24,400 --> 00:57:26,960 Speaker 1: and private equity or you know what you do there 925 00:57:27,000 --> 00:57:30,600 Speaker 1: as a wealth advisor. I see all three being win 926 00:57:30,680 --> 00:57:34,080 Speaker 1: win win career opportunities. You know, it's a win first 927 00:57:34,120 --> 00:57:36,440 Speaker 1: and foremost for the clients that you serve, and I 928 00:57:36,520 --> 00:57:38,720 Speaker 1: think that makes you know, you feel really good about 929 00:57:38,720 --> 00:57:40,520 Speaker 1: what you're doing every day that you're actually putting your 930 00:57:40,560 --> 00:57:43,680 Speaker 1: clients first. But also personally, it's it's a profession that 931 00:57:43,720 --> 00:57:46,440 Speaker 1: if you do it well, the rewards would come to 932 00:57:46,480 --> 00:57:48,600 Speaker 1: you and your family, and that's you know, that's always 933 00:57:48,600 --> 00:57:51,320 Speaker 1: a good thing. And then lastly, it's a continuous learning. 934 00:57:51,400 --> 00:57:55,200 Speaker 1: Right The markets are always changing, uh you know you are. 935 00:57:55,600 --> 00:57:59,280 Speaker 1: The headlines change daily and weekly. So what I'm learning 936 00:57:59,320 --> 00:58:01,640 Speaker 1: in today is so much different than I did last 937 00:58:01,720 --> 00:58:04,520 Speaker 1: year and year before that. So to me, these are 938 00:58:04,600 --> 00:58:07,960 Speaker 1: not zero sum game activities, but these are positive sum 939 00:58:08,040 --> 00:58:11,439 Speaker 1: game activities. So I would highly recommend anyone thinking about 940 00:58:11,480 --> 00:58:14,880 Speaker 1: going into the investment for wealth planning world. And our 941 00:58:14,920 --> 00:58:17,560 Speaker 1: final question, what do you know about the world of 942 00:58:17,640 --> 00:58:20,960 Speaker 1: investing today? You wish you knew twenty five or so 943 00:58:21,120 --> 00:58:24,560 Speaker 1: years ago when you were first getting started in the nineties, 944 00:58:24,840 --> 00:58:28,560 Speaker 1: long before you ended up at Vanguard. Yeah, I wish 945 00:58:28,600 --> 00:58:31,280 Speaker 1: I knew today and had a better way to track 946 00:58:32,120 --> 00:58:36,160 Speaker 1: opportunity costs. Um. And what I mean by that, Barry 947 00:58:36,240 --> 00:58:39,760 Speaker 1: is you know, um, we we often only judge what 948 00:58:39,840 --> 00:58:43,800 Speaker 1: we did, yet we don't judge what we could have done. 949 00:58:44,600 --> 00:58:46,600 Speaker 1: And you know we mentioned as a couple of times. 950 00:58:46,800 --> 00:58:51,160 Speaker 1: I think more bear markets have been created by investors 951 00:58:51,320 --> 00:58:54,720 Speaker 1: own beliefs in what the future will look like than 952 00:58:54,760 --> 00:58:58,800 Speaker 1: actual bear markets themselves. And if we actually kept score 953 00:58:59,440 --> 00:59:03,160 Speaker 1: personally or individually of what we did versus what we 954 00:59:03,360 --> 00:59:05,800 Speaker 1: should have done, I think the gap is going to 955 00:59:05,960 --> 00:59:10,160 Speaker 1: really surprise people. Um. Also, the opportunity costs of of 956 00:59:10,160 --> 00:59:13,240 Speaker 1: of comfort. Right, Yeah, we're talking about where bonds are today. 957 00:59:13,320 --> 00:59:19,760 Speaker 1: Under no one wants to lose in COVID or in GFC, 958 00:59:20,440 --> 00:59:23,600 Speaker 1: but if you have a thirty year horizon, didn't matter 959 00:59:23,880 --> 00:59:26,200 Speaker 1: over that one or two years. So we pay a 960 00:59:26,280 --> 00:59:29,840 Speaker 1: huge opportunity cost for comfort if you have a thirty 961 00:59:29,880 --> 00:59:32,680 Speaker 1: year horizon or a twenty year horizon. I just would 962 00:59:32,720 --> 00:59:36,160 Speaker 1: ask everyone to examine the opportunity costs they are creating 963 00:59:36,160 --> 00:59:40,160 Speaker 1: for themselves for such comfort. Right. And you know, the 964 00:59:40,160 --> 00:59:43,200 Speaker 1: the equity risk premium has been about five basis points 965 00:59:43,200 --> 00:59:47,960 Speaker 1: over bonds probably likely to hold, if not be above that. 966 00:59:48,520 --> 00:59:51,480 Speaker 1: We've talked about private equity being three to four over that, 967 00:59:51,760 --> 00:59:55,000 Speaker 1: so maybe eight to ten over bonds and so yeah, 968 00:59:55,120 --> 00:59:59,120 Speaker 1: we are risk averse creatures. We hate loss, and I 969 00:59:59,120 --> 01:00:01,640 Speaker 1: think that's nap troll to hate loss and all the 970 01:00:01,720 --> 01:00:04,520 Speaker 1: loss a version. But just do it with eyes wide 971 01:00:04,560 --> 01:00:08,800 Speaker 1: open on what the opportunity cost you are creating for 972 01:00:08,880 --> 01:00:13,439 Speaker 1: the comfort of short term volatility. Huh makes sense, Fran, 973 01:00:13,720 --> 01:00:16,360 Speaker 1: This has really been very fascinating. Thank you for being 974 01:00:16,400 --> 01:00:20,000 Speaker 1: so generous with your time. We have been speaking with 975 01:00:20,040 --> 01:00:25,360 Speaker 1: Fran Kinary. He is Vanguard's global head of private Investments. 976 01:00:25,880 --> 01:00:29,040 Speaker 1: If you enjoy this conversation, well be sure and check 977 01:00:29,080 --> 01:00:32,160 Speaker 1: out any of our previous three hundred and fifties something 978 01:00:32,880 --> 01:00:37,480 Speaker 1: prior discussions. You can find those wherever you feed your podcast, 979 01:00:37,560 --> 01:00:42,240 Speaker 1: fix iTunes, Spotify, a cast, wherever. We love your comments, feedback, 980 01:00:42,280 --> 01:00:46,280 Speaker 1: end suggestions right to us at m IB podcast at 981 01:00:46,280 --> 01:00:50,320 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot net. What Fran was discussing the daily reading 982 01:00:50,320 --> 01:00:53,000 Speaker 1: list that goes out every day at seven am. You 983 01:00:53,040 --> 01:00:56,919 Speaker 1: can sign up for that uh at Ridoltz dot com. 984 01:00:57,000 --> 01:01:00,840 Speaker 1: Check out my weekly column on Bloomberg dot com slash Opinion. 985 01:01:01,360 --> 01:01:04,240 Speaker 1: Follow me on Twitter at rid Halts I would be 986 01:01:04,280 --> 01:01:06,920 Speaker 1: remiss if I did not thank the wonderful team that 987 01:01:06,960 --> 01:01:11,520 Speaker 1: helps put these conversations together each week. Maroufal is my 988 01:01:11,680 --> 01:01:17,280 Speaker 1: audio engineer. Harris Walt is my producer. This week, my 989 01:01:17,440 --> 01:01:21,680 Speaker 1: project manager is Tracy Walsh. Michael Batnick is my head 990 01:01:21,720 --> 01:01:25,560 Speaker 1: of research. I'm Barry Rich Halts. You've been listening to 991 01:01:25,680 --> 01:01:28,360 Speaker 1: master some in Business on Bloomberg Radio