1 00:00:02,040 --> 00:00:06,000 Speaker 1: This is Master's in Business with very rid Holds on 2 00:00:06,240 --> 00:00:07,320 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio. 3 00:00:09,039 --> 00:00:12,200 Speaker 2: This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest. 4 00:00:12,560 --> 00:00:18,280 Speaker 2: Juadmion publishes a fascinating macro advisory letter that is read 5 00:00:18,760 --> 00:00:23,759 Speaker 2: by many of the most well known and influential investors 6 00:00:25,239 --> 00:00:28,320 Speaker 2: on not just Wall Street, but around the world. He 7 00:00:28,600 --> 00:00:33,000 Speaker 2: brings a fascinating approach and a bit of a outlier 8 00:00:33,159 --> 00:00:36,839 Speaker 2: contrarian way of looking at the world that has allowed 9 00:00:36,920 --> 00:00:44,120 Speaker 2: him to identify specific changes in what's taking place in 10 00:00:44,159 --> 00:00:50,559 Speaker 2: the economy, in the markets, and essentially provide a helpful 11 00:00:50,600 --> 00:00:55,120 Speaker 2: sounding board to many of the world's best investors. I 12 00:00:55,240 --> 00:00:59,000 Speaker 2: found our conversation to be absolutely fascinating, and I think 13 00:00:59,040 --> 00:01:03,320 Speaker 2: you will also, so with no further ado stray reflections, 14 00:01:03,680 --> 00:01:06,280 Speaker 2: Jawad me on, Welcome to Bloomberg. 15 00:01:06,480 --> 00:01:07,400 Speaker 1: Pleasure being in Berry. 16 00:01:07,800 --> 00:01:12,680 Speaker 2: So you and I exchange emails one hundred years ago, 17 00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:16,080 Speaker 2: a long time ago, and you just surprised me by 18 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:20,440 Speaker 2: telling me I published your first published piece, which was 19 00:01:20,959 --> 00:01:25,480 Speaker 2: essentially your resignation ladder. Let's start with that. Tell us 20 00:01:25,480 --> 00:01:26,400 Speaker 2: a little bit about that. 21 00:01:27,319 --> 00:01:29,399 Speaker 1: So I've always had this admission to do my own thing, 22 00:01:29,959 --> 00:01:33,480 Speaker 1: and I had a very unconventional background I saw my 23 00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:35,080 Speaker 1: career as a bank donner, but fet in love with 24 00:01:35,160 --> 00:01:39,760 Speaker 1: markets and read all the right books to get inspired. 25 00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:41,840 Speaker 1: And I had this goal that I want to do 26 00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:44,640 Speaker 1: my own thing by the time turning thirty, and if 27 00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 1: I have a few years of savings, I'll quit and 28 00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:49,840 Speaker 1: start writing. As I started practicing writing online and I 29 00:01:49,880 --> 00:01:52,280 Speaker 1: looked up to you as the big picture of blog 30 00:01:52,800 --> 00:01:54,040 Speaker 1: and I reached out to you with some of my 31 00:01:54,160 --> 00:01:55,680 Speaker 1: work and you published then. 32 00:01:56,120 --> 00:01:58,280 Speaker 2: And by the way, for a young writer with not 33 00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:03,000 Speaker 2: a lot of experience, your stuff was very tight and strong. 34 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:04,919 Speaker 2: You have a good voice. 35 00:02:04,800 --> 00:02:07,960 Speaker 1: So you effectively published my work before I launched a Reflections. 36 00:02:07,960 --> 00:02:11,600 Speaker 1: And the last thing you published was my resignation letter, 37 00:02:11,639 --> 00:02:16,160 Speaker 1: which is really the sort of inspirational, flowing words about 38 00:02:16,440 --> 00:02:20,200 Speaker 1: why I'm leaving my job to unfold my personal legend 39 00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:23,800 Speaker 1: as I was thinking about at that time, inspired by 40 00:02:23,800 --> 00:02:24,320 Speaker 1: the Alchemist. 41 00:02:24,480 --> 00:02:27,400 Speaker 2: So let's talk a little bit about what Stray Reflections 42 00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:31,160 Speaker 2: is today and who your clients are. Tell us a 43 00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:32,400 Speaker 2: little bit about your research. 44 00:02:32,800 --> 00:02:36,120 Speaker 1: So so Reflections is a macro advisory and community that 45 00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:40,560 Speaker 1: works with portfolio managers CIOs around the world. They rely 46 00:02:40,639 --> 00:02:43,720 Speaker 1: on me to challenge their beliefs expand their knowledge to 47 00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:47,120 Speaker 1: help them think about the world differently, and I do 48 00:02:47,200 --> 00:02:52,079 Speaker 1: that through different ways. First, it's just my research, my writing, 49 00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:55,600 Speaker 1: and I'm allowed to be reflective. I don't publish daily 50 00:02:55,680 --> 00:02:58,560 Speaker 1: or weekly. I'm not reacting to events. I can be 51 00:02:58,720 --> 00:03:01,760 Speaker 1: deeply reflective about what's going on. So two three times 52 00:03:01,760 --> 00:03:03,880 Speaker 1: a month, I'll write about some topic or theme that's interesting. 53 00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:06,959 Speaker 1: We do that through online events, So I'll interview someone 54 00:03:06,960 --> 00:03:09,160 Speaker 1: from the community about a particular topic. I don't claim 55 00:03:09,160 --> 00:03:10,840 Speaker 1: to be an expert in everything, but if there's something 56 00:03:10,880 --> 00:03:13,760 Speaker 1: interesting happening in biotech or in China or fed policy 57 00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:16,960 Speaker 1: or AI, we'll have a salon, an online salon that 58 00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:19,720 Speaker 1: we sort of discuss ideas. And I think core part 59 00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:22,880 Speaker 1: is just yearround events. I'll travel to New York and London, 60 00:03:22,880 --> 00:03:25,239 Speaker 1: in Miami, in Hong Kong and Singapore, La San Francisco, 61 00:03:25,320 --> 00:03:28,239 Speaker 1: Dubai every six weeks and we'll do a dinner or 62 00:03:28,320 --> 00:03:32,000 Speaker 1: breakfast somewhere and we're all exchanging ideas. A core principle 63 00:03:32,080 --> 00:03:33,760 Speaker 1: is all of us as motter than any of us, 64 00:03:33,960 --> 00:03:36,160 Speaker 1: and I really lean into that, and so I learned 65 00:03:36,200 --> 00:03:38,920 Speaker 1: a lot from the community. And then the fourth element 66 00:03:38,920 --> 00:03:41,080 Speaker 1: would be like a slack group where every sort of 67 00:03:41,080 --> 00:03:43,800 Speaker 1: exchange ideas you know in real time, and the fifth 68 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:46,080 Speaker 1: and the most important element is just one on one conversations. 69 00:03:46,320 --> 00:03:49,360 Speaker 1: I'm a big believer in building strong relationships, and that's 70 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:53,920 Speaker 1: kind of what develops the research idea of Flywheel. Understanding 71 00:03:53,920 --> 00:03:56,040 Speaker 1: from people, what they're thinking, what they're concerned about. That 72 00:03:56,120 --> 00:03:58,240 Speaker 1: inspires me to like sort of focus on what I 73 00:03:58,240 --> 00:04:01,240 Speaker 1: need to write about, and in a nutshell, that's what 74 00:04:01,280 --> 00:04:01,839 Speaker 1: we do. 75 00:04:02,200 --> 00:04:05,880 Speaker 2: So we're going to get into specifics about secular bull 76 00:04:05,920 --> 00:04:11,920 Speaker 2: and bear markets, what causes the zeitgeist that leads to bubbles. 77 00:04:12,200 --> 00:04:14,800 Speaker 2: We'll talk about a bunch of really interesting things, what 78 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:18,599 Speaker 2: is and isn't reflected in market prices, and where the 79 00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:21,480 Speaker 2: hell is that pesky recession that we've been waiting for 80 00:04:21,480 --> 00:04:24,560 Speaker 2: for so long. But for now, I want to stay 81 00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:32,080 Speaker 2: with the fact that, unlike traditional strategists or macroeconomists, you 82 00:04:32,160 --> 00:04:37,359 Speaker 2: bring a very specific philosophical bends to the world of 83 00:04:38,279 --> 00:04:41,640 Speaker 2: strategy and analysis, which is something that I very much 84 00:04:41,680 --> 00:04:45,760 Speaker 2: relate to. What motivated that sort of approach to writing 85 00:04:45,800 --> 00:04:50,919 Speaker 2: about dry technical topics like the economy or the FED 86 00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 2: or AI. 87 00:04:52,760 --> 00:04:55,320 Speaker 1: I mean, some of the greatest writers have talents that 88 00:04:55,320 --> 00:04:58,160 Speaker 1: are very odd with their experiences. If you think about 89 00:04:59,160 --> 00:05:02,440 Speaker 1: you know, Hermin melv he couldn't stand life aboard his ship. 90 00:05:02,839 --> 00:05:06,480 Speaker 1: He wrote Moby dick. Ernest Hemingway spent time away from 91 00:05:06,480 --> 00:05:08,760 Speaker 1: the action in the Wars, but he became the greatest 92 00:05:08,760 --> 00:05:12,040 Speaker 1: wartime writer ever. You know. Jack Kerouac was famous pneumatic 93 00:05:12,400 --> 00:05:14,200 Speaker 1: that he wrote on the road at the home of 94 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:17,800 Speaker 1: his mother. Jane Austin remained single, but she became the 95 00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:22,040 Speaker 1: chronicle revered, chronicle of courtship, love and marriage. Emily Browntie, 96 00:05:22,360 --> 00:05:24,000 Speaker 1: you know, liked to keep in her own company. But 97 00:05:24,040 --> 00:05:27,360 Speaker 1: when she wrote Wuthering Heights, people thought that it's written 98 00:05:27,360 --> 00:05:29,679 Speaker 1: by a man because he painted such a visually, viciously 99 00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:32,719 Speaker 1: brutal world. And Emily Dickinson, you know, she liked being 100 00:05:32,720 --> 00:05:35,680 Speaker 1: by herself. In her poetry. She enveiled the secrets of 101 00:05:35,720 --> 00:05:38,880 Speaker 1: the universe. And so when I asked myself the question, 102 00:05:38,920 --> 00:05:41,839 Speaker 1: I might qualified to provide investment advice. But I realized 103 00:05:41,960 --> 00:05:46,800 Speaker 1: was in all these instances, they're distance from the subject 104 00:05:46,920 --> 00:05:49,520 Speaker 1: not undermine their credibility. It only allowed them to be 105 00:05:49,560 --> 00:05:51,920 Speaker 1: more curious and examine it in ways that perhaps others 106 00:05:51,960 --> 00:05:54,360 Speaker 1: wouldn't and so for the longest time, I actually thought 107 00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:57,520 Speaker 1: that my unconventional background. I wasn't, you know, an Ivy 108 00:05:57,560 --> 00:05:59,800 Speaker 1: League student, I didn't train at an interest bank. I 109 00:05:59,920 --> 00:06:02,080 Speaker 1: was and working for a hedgehront I started my career 110 00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:04,040 Speaker 1: as a bank teer. For the longest time, I thought 111 00:06:04,160 --> 00:06:07,279 Speaker 1: that unconventional and backgrounds are shortcoming. But what I realized 112 00:06:07,279 --> 00:06:09,480 Speaker 1: over the years of the help and encouragement of the community, 113 00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:12,000 Speaker 1: that's actually a core strength because I think view the 114 00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:15,120 Speaker 1: world differently from the back majority of Western born and freennalists. 115 00:06:15,360 --> 00:06:18,880 Speaker 2: It's funny that you say the phrase view the world differently. 116 00:06:19,440 --> 00:06:23,760 Speaker 2: There literally was just a Wall Street Journal article out 117 00:06:23,760 --> 00:06:28,200 Speaker 2: recently that said ninety percent of the investment bank economists 118 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:32,719 Speaker 2: all went to the same six graduate schools, which means 119 00:06:33,320 --> 00:06:35,719 Speaker 2: that as much as we'd like to think there's some 120 00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:40,360 Speaker 2: variation of thought, essentially it's the same factory cranking out 121 00:06:40,400 --> 00:06:43,280 Speaker 2: the same widgets. We can't be surprised that they all 122 00:06:43,320 --> 00:06:46,400 Speaker 2: more or less say the same thing. We'll talk about 123 00:06:46,480 --> 00:06:50,960 Speaker 2: the forever coming but never seem to get here recession. 124 00:06:52,520 --> 00:06:56,920 Speaker 2: But that seems to correlate very strongly that the same 125 00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:00,680 Speaker 2: group of people with the same background are going to 126 00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:04,520 Speaker 2: yield the same investment result is that more or less fair. 127 00:07:05,600 --> 00:07:06,560 Speaker 1: I can't speak to others. 128 00:07:06,680 --> 00:07:09,560 Speaker 2: I know, I that's very generous of you. 129 00:07:10,120 --> 00:07:15,040 Speaker 1: But it's certainly you. Look, when I launched the business, 130 00:07:15,480 --> 00:07:18,240 Speaker 1: I realized I'm not unique in what I do, because 131 00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:19,560 Speaker 1: there are lots of other people out there who are 132 00:07:19,560 --> 00:07:22,160 Speaker 1: writing opinions about the market. But I am unique in 133 00:07:22,200 --> 00:07:24,239 Speaker 1: who I am, And so I've made it a point 134 00:07:24,280 --> 00:07:27,000 Speaker 1: to always write from a personal space and really cultivate, 135 00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:31,400 Speaker 1: you know, the craft of writing and really examining markets objectively, 136 00:07:31,920 --> 00:07:36,120 Speaker 1: becoming very agnostic in my analysis as opposed to ideological, 137 00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:38,720 Speaker 1: and empirical, as opposed to dogmatic. So I don't care 138 00:07:38,720 --> 00:07:41,160 Speaker 1: to be consensus of countrary and bullish or bearish. I 139 00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:43,119 Speaker 1: just want to be independent and come to the truth. 140 00:07:43,360 --> 00:07:46,000 Speaker 2: So in a lot of your writings you cite loud 141 00:07:46,120 --> 00:07:52,679 Speaker 2: to Buddha, Confucius, Seneca. That's a broad assortment of influences. 142 00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:56,560 Speaker 2: What led you to that group of thinkers? And how 143 00:07:56,600 --> 00:08:01,720 Speaker 2: do the great philosophers affect how you think about market issues? 144 00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:05,280 Speaker 1: Look, I think life in markets are intertwined. You know, 145 00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:07,920 Speaker 1: the biggest risk in markets is ego. I would say 146 00:08:07,920 --> 00:08:10,240 Speaker 1: the biggest risk in life is ego. The biggest virtue 147 00:08:10,240 --> 00:08:13,680 Speaker 1: in markets and life is humility. I often say successful 148 00:08:13,680 --> 00:08:18,240 Speaker 1: investing is only possible with knowledge of oneself. And so 149 00:08:18,280 --> 00:08:20,640 Speaker 1: I think for me, when I started writing, it was 150 00:08:20,760 --> 00:08:23,600 Speaker 1: as much a process of self inquiry as it was 151 00:08:23,640 --> 00:08:26,000 Speaker 1: examining markets. And you start to see the overlap and 152 00:08:26,040 --> 00:08:29,120 Speaker 1: similarities and the biases and the common mistakes that keep 153 00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:32,760 Speaker 1: coming up. You just have to keep cultivating a better 154 00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:35,640 Speaker 1: version of yourself and keep working in progress. And I 155 00:08:35,679 --> 00:08:39,680 Speaker 1: feel like there's a lot to be said about ancient wisdom. 156 00:08:39,960 --> 00:08:43,040 Speaker 1: It's almost like everything's we've said before, but no one 157 00:08:43,120 --> 00:08:45,360 Speaker 1: was listening, so it's being reported again and said again. 158 00:08:45,720 --> 00:08:49,320 Speaker 1: So I benefit a lot from the virtues the wisdom 159 00:08:49,440 --> 00:08:53,680 Speaker 1: from ancient stages for its philosophers. I think it helps 160 00:08:53,720 --> 00:08:56,920 Speaker 1: me see the world clearly. You know. I believe the 161 00:08:56,960 --> 00:09:00,920 Speaker 1: more clarity we have internally, the more clarity we have 162 00:09:01,360 --> 00:09:05,640 Speaker 1: in seeing things, and so all that all those people 163 00:09:05,640 --> 00:09:07,760 Speaker 1: that you cite are helping me in terms of being 164 00:09:07,760 --> 00:09:10,440 Speaker 1: a better person, you know, being aware of my biases 165 00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:13,600 Speaker 1: and just yeah, being a much clearer thinker. 166 00:09:13,760 --> 00:09:17,880 Speaker 2: So let's talk about that ego and humility. All the 167 00:09:17,920 --> 00:09:22,720 Speaker 2: best investors recognize their own fallibility, the fact that nobody 168 00:09:22,720 --> 00:09:26,800 Speaker 2: bats a thousand, that we all frequently make mistakes. Ray 169 00:09:26,880 --> 00:09:32,480 Speaker 2: Dalyio's book Principles is essentially a treatise on go try something, 170 00:09:32,800 --> 00:09:37,080 Speaker 2: make a mistake, learn from that error incorporated into your process. 171 00:09:37,520 --> 00:09:41,640 Speaker 2: Try again. But even saying it out loud, it still 172 00:09:41,679 --> 00:09:45,520 Speaker 2: sounds fairly radical. Why can't we accept the fact that 173 00:09:46,040 --> 00:09:50,160 Speaker 2: investing is such a humbling art and requires humility of 174 00:09:50,200 --> 00:09:51,160 Speaker 2: its practitioners. 175 00:09:52,040 --> 00:09:54,920 Speaker 1: The way I think about it, Barie, is again from 176 00:09:54,920 --> 00:10:00,560 Speaker 1: a spiritual angle, all the profits made this particular prayer. 177 00:10:01,640 --> 00:10:04,280 Speaker 1: Oh God, show us things as they are, and so 178 00:10:04,400 --> 00:10:06,920 Speaker 1: for me, the objective is to see things as they are, 179 00:10:07,280 --> 00:10:09,000 Speaker 1: not so much as how I want it to be. 180 00:10:09,080 --> 00:10:11,120 Speaker 1: So I even watch myself when I use their words 181 00:10:11,160 --> 00:10:13,760 Speaker 1: like should the market should behave this way? I think 182 00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:16,280 Speaker 1: that hypocrisy. The market shouldn't behave one way or another. 183 00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:18,439 Speaker 1: It is what it is right. So I've got a 184 00:10:18,480 --> 00:10:20,319 Speaker 1: particular view, You've got your view, and then there's a 185 00:10:20,360 --> 00:10:22,720 Speaker 1: divine view or the market view. So how can you 186 00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:25,120 Speaker 1: get close to that truth? Only by shedding yourself, shedding 187 00:10:25,120 --> 00:10:28,840 Speaker 1: your ego, insisting that the market behave a particular way 188 00:10:29,320 --> 00:10:32,679 Speaker 1: and I'm okay to be curious, you know, And that's 189 00:10:33,160 --> 00:10:33,920 Speaker 1: a big difference. 190 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:40,520 Speaker 2: I always think of various strategist, economist, traders. Whoever. It's 191 00:10:40,679 --> 00:10:44,440 Speaker 2: like the I want to say John Saxony poem about 192 00:10:44,440 --> 00:10:48,240 Speaker 2: the six blind men describing the elephant. Everybody captures a 193 00:10:48,280 --> 00:10:51,600 Speaker 2: small aspect of it. Oh, this ropey thing is the tail, 194 00:10:51,679 --> 00:10:54,559 Speaker 2: and here are the tusts. But very few people manage 195 00:10:54,720 --> 00:10:59,240 Speaker 2: to see the entirety of the market because of their 196 00:10:59,360 --> 00:10:59,960 Speaker 2: vantage point. 197 00:11:00,720 --> 00:11:02,480 Speaker 1: And I think that's where the community comes in, right, 198 00:11:02,480 --> 00:11:04,640 Speaker 1: Because I don't claim to be a guru or a 199 00:11:04,679 --> 00:11:08,600 Speaker 1: market expert. I'm just genuinely curious, and I'm happy to 200 00:11:08,640 --> 00:11:11,760 Speaker 1: know and admit that I don't know everything. Frankly, that's 201 00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:14,040 Speaker 1: been one of the greatest liberalizations in my life. If 202 00:11:14,040 --> 00:11:15,960 Speaker 1: it's the fact I don't need to know everything, and 203 00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:18,400 Speaker 1: I don't know everything, and I can rely and trust 204 00:11:18,480 --> 00:11:21,440 Speaker 1: other people within the community. So I don't have a 205 00:11:21,440 --> 00:11:24,400 Speaker 1: particular strong opinion about a particular topic, I'll go look 206 00:11:24,400 --> 00:11:27,000 Speaker 1: at the expert and have a conversation with him or her, 207 00:11:27,440 --> 00:11:29,040 Speaker 1: and so I can lean on the community. Again, this 208 00:11:29,080 --> 00:11:31,280 Speaker 1: idea that all of us are smarter than any of us, 209 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:35,040 Speaker 1: and I don't have a particular ego that needs to 210 00:11:35,080 --> 00:11:38,240 Speaker 1: be presented and you know, articulated in a particular way. 211 00:11:38,320 --> 00:11:40,120 Speaker 1: I'm happy to just say I don't know when I 212 00:11:40,200 --> 00:11:41,600 Speaker 1: really don't know. Huh. 213 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:46,200 Speaker 2: Really interesting. Let's talk about something you published last August, 214 00:11:46,760 --> 00:11:50,880 Speaker 2: in the midst of the first double digit downturn for 215 00:11:50,920 --> 00:11:54,720 Speaker 2: both stocks and bonds in the same year in just 216 00:11:54,760 --> 00:12:00,000 Speaker 2: about forty years, you defined and discussed a secular ballmarkt 217 00:12:00,040 --> 00:12:04,000 Speaker 2: and that very much resonated with me. Before we go further, 218 00:12:04,320 --> 00:12:08,760 Speaker 2: let's just define it. What is a secular bull market? 219 00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:11,720 Speaker 1: So a secular bull market would be a period of 220 00:12:12,160 --> 00:12:15,760 Speaker 1: a long period of above average equity returns where you 221 00:12:15,800 --> 00:12:19,000 Speaker 1: have pullbacks but they're shorter in duration and magnitude than 222 00:12:19,000 --> 00:12:22,920 Speaker 1: otherwise expected, and the recoveries are quick, and you've got 223 00:12:23,160 --> 00:12:26,199 Speaker 1: rising risk appetite and valuations climb or expand. And a 224 00:12:26,280 --> 00:12:28,520 Speaker 1: secular baar market would be the vice versa, right, the 225 00:12:28,600 --> 00:12:33,280 Speaker 1: fact that you've got declining risk appetite, declines are prolonged deep, 226 00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:35,760 Speaker 1: and valuations mean revert. 227 00:12:36,760 --> 00:12:40,280 Speaker 2: So let's take a couple of examples. Tell us about 228 00:12:40,320 --> 00:12:44,160 Speaker 2: the post World War II secular bull market. How would 229 00:12:44,200 --> 00:12:46,679 Speaker 2: you define and characterize that period. 230 00:12:46,559 --> 00:12:49,360 Speaker 1: So by nineteen fifty, the SMER five hundred was stuck 231 00:12:49,400 --> 00:12:51,800 Speaker 1: at the twenty level on the index for about thirteen 232 00:12:51,880 --> 00:12:54,400 Speaker 1: fourteen years. And in nineteen fifty is when you finally 233 00:12:54,440 --> 00:12:57,880 Speaker 1: broke out. And between nineteen fifty to nineteen sixty eight, 234 00:12:57,960 --> 00:13:00,640 Speaker 1: which is this first secular bull period, you had a 235 00:13:00,640 --> 00:13:04,880 Speaker 1: gain of about four nine fifty percent. You had nineteen fifties, 236 00:13:04,920 --> 00:13:07,679 Speaker 1: which is the best decade for stocks ever. We forget, 237 00:13:08,320 --> 00:13:12,359 Speaker 1: but that's still That whole period actually had three recessions. 238 00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:15,240 Speaker 1: It had the Korean War, it had the Cuban missile crisis, 239 00:13:15,880 --> 00:13:19,959 Speaker 1: it had the race riots, It had three corrections of 240 00:13:20,000 --> 00:13:23,800 Speaker 1: over twenty percent. It had bonials that went from two 241 00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:26,680 Speaker 1: point two percent to nearly six percent, and yet equities 242 00:13:26,720 --> 00:13:29,319 Speaker 1: did well. That was a period of nineteen fifty to 243 00:13:29,400 --> 00:13:33,560 Speaker 1: nineteen sixty eight. The second and what's interesting by that period, 244 00:13:33,679 --> 00:13:36,560 Speaker 1: you know, is the fact that valuations actually peaked in 245 00:13:36,600 --> 00:13:41,000 Speaker 1: nineteen sixty one, yet the market peak in nineteen sixty eight, 246 00:13:41,400 --> 00:13:41,760 Speaker 1: So in. 247 00:13:41,679 --> 00:13:47,360 Speaker 2: Other words, despite falling multiples, the prices continue go high. 248 00:13:47,480 --> 00:13:52,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, so interesting valuations are EBB and flow. So the 249 00:13:52,120 --> 00:13:54,760 Speaker 1: peak and valuations in nineteen sixty one at twenty two 250 00:13:54,760 --> 00:13:57,800 Speaker 1: times multiple. But by nineteen sixty eight, even when the 251 00:13:57,840 --> 00:14:00,840 Speaker 1: index made it stop, the PE was trading at eighteen times. 252 00:14:01,320 --> 00:14:02,880 Speaker 1: And the reason that's important is because there's a lot 253 00:14:02,920 --> 00:14:05,559 Speaker 1: of talkbout valuation now and I feel like we may 254 00:14:05,559 --> 00:14:09,360 Speaker 1: have seen the valuations peak for this cycle in twenty 255 00:14:09,400 --> 00:14:12,599 Speaker 1: twenty one at twenty three times four PE, but that 256 00:14:12,640 --> 00:14:15,120 Speaker 1: doesn't mean necessarily the secular board market is over. So 257 00:14:15,120 --> 00:14:17,640 Speaker 1: this secular board market that we're in today began in 258 00:14:17,640 --> 00:14:21,200 Speaker 1: twenty thirteen when we finally broke about the fifteen hundred 259 00:14:21,280 --> 00:14:24,400 Speaker 1: level that was capping the index since two thousand, right, 260 00:14:24,480 --> 00:14:24,760 Speaker 1: So that. 261 00:14:24,760 --> 00:14:28,640 Speaker 2: Was a thirteen year secular bear market that had huge rallies, 262 00:14:28,720 --> 00:14:31,840 Speaker 2: huge selloffs, but you never got above that two thousand. 263 00:14:31,600 --> 00:14:34,280 Speaker 1: Peak, and the second board market began with a four 264 00:14:34,320 --> 00:14:38,520 Speaker 1: PE of thirteen. We rose to twenty three last October. 265 00:14:38,560 --> 00:14:40,960 Speaker 1: We bought them around fifteen in a bit, and we're 266 00:14:40,960 --> 00:14:43,440 Speaker 1: at eighteen now. So again, this is thirteen to twenty 267 00:14:43,480 --> 00:14:46,160 Speaker 1: three down to fifteen. We will not get to twenty 268 00:14:46,160 --> 00:14:48,760 Speaker 1: three in my opinion, But can we get to twenty one? Sure? 269 00:14:48,840 --> 00:14:50,080 Speaker 1: I think so. 270 00:14:49,760 --> 00:14:54,800 Speaker 2: So you mentioned the Korean War, you mentioned recessions, You 271 00:14:54,840 --> 00:14:58,520 Speaker 2: wrote about the JFK assassination, the Cuban missile crisis, A 272 00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:03,120 Speaker 2: lot of things happen. How do we contextualize an extraneous 273 00:15:03,160 --> 00:15:07,720 Speaker 2: event like the pandemic. Does it should say to us, hey, 274 00:15:07,760 --> 00:15:10,960 Speaker 2: this secular bull market is over. Or does it just 275 00:15:11,040 --> 00:15:13,960 Speaker 2: cause a wabble and we go back to the prior 276 00:15:14,040 --> 00:15:14,640 Speaker 2: trand So. 277 00:15:14,600 --> 00:15:17,400 Speaker 1: Every secular bill market usually has like this mid cycle crash. 278 00:15:17,680 --> 00:15:20,640 Speaker 2: Right. Seventy three seventy four was a bear market. Actually 279 00:15:20,640 --> 00:15:22,240 Speaker 2: it was in the middle of the bear market. You're 280 00:15:22,240 --> 00:15:23,120 Speaker 2: saying bull markets. 281 00:15:23,520 --> 00:15:26,040 Speaker 1: Even a secular bull market has like a mid cycle crash, right. So, 282 00:15:26,080 --> 00:15:28,520 Speaker 1: for example, in the nineteen fifty to ninety sixty eight 283 00:15:28,800 --> 00:15:31,360 Speaker 1: bull market, the mid cycle crash was the nineteen sixty 284 00:15:31,440 --> 00:15:34,720 Speaker 1: one Kennedy beer market. The market fell down thirty percent. 285 00:15:35,480 --> 00:15:37,760 Speaker 1: In the nineteen eighty two to two thousand market, you 286 00:15:37,800 --> 00:15:40,080 Speaker 1: had the mid cycle crash. In the eighty seven crash. 287 00:15:39,920 --> 00:15:42,600 Speaker 2: Had eighty seven, you had ninety seven, you had ninety eight. 288 00:15:42,680 --> 00:15:44,760 Speaker 2: There were a number of really substantis, but. 289 00:15:44,800 --> 00:15:48,200 Speaker 1: We have an event that really shocks in nusters, right, 290 00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:50,600 Speaker 1: just like eighty seven was very shocking, and the decline 291 00:15:50,800 --> 00:15:53,640 Speaker 1: in the Kennedy beer market was very shocking. Happened very quickly, 292 00:15:54,080 --> 00:15:55,720 Speaker 1: and the pandemic was something like that. It was a 293 00:15:55,760 --> 00:15:58,120 Speaker 1: mid cycle crash in the way I perceive it. And 294 00:15:58,200 --> 00:16:02,680 Speaker 1: so what's more important, I think, apart from this the 295 00:16:02,720 --> 00:16:05,600 Speaker 1: technical conversation we're having around the inde season, the breakouts, 296 00:16:06,080 --> 00:16:09,040 Speaker 1: the pandemic made a significant difference from a fundamental standpoint 297 00:16:10,120 --> 00:16:13,320 Speaker 1: because obviously fundamental underprintings to the secular bol market. You know, 298 00:16:13,680 --> 00:16:15,240 Speaker 1: number one is the fact that the house was not 299 00:16:15,320 --> 00:16:18,160 Speaker 1: in better financial conditions than they have been since you know, 300 00:16:18,280 --> 00:16:22,040 Speaker 1: the GFC. But number two is form a demographic standpoint, Right, 301 00:16:22,120 --> 00:16:25,360 Speaker 1: the millennials are now the largest generation in America, and 302 00:16:25,400 --> 00:16:27,720 Speaker 1: if you think about the nineteen eighty secular ble market, 303 00:16:28,120 --> 00:16:31,280 Speaker 1: ninety eighty one is when you had the baby Boomers 304 00:16:31,320 --> 00:16:35,320 Speaker 1: begin to turn thirty five, entering their peak earning years. 305 00:16:35,720 --> 00:16:38,560 Speaker 1: The millennials started doing that in twenty sixteen, and the 306 00:16:38,600 --> 00:16:42,720 Speaker 1: pandemic was important because after the pandemic, household well for 307 00:16:42,800 --> 00:16:46,320 Speaker 1: millennials increased. So if you compare it in prison dollars, 308 00:16:46,640 --> 00:16:49,960 Speaker 1: so when the boomer turned thirty five in ninety any one, 309 00:16:50,520 --> 00:16:53,520 Speaker 1: his net worth was around one hundred and thirty six 310 00:16:53,520 --> 00:16:56,400 Speaker 1: thousand dollars in comparable dollars today the millennials that won 311 00:16:56,440 --> 00:16:57,359 Speaker 1: twenty eight thousand. 312 00:16:57,120 --> 00:17:00,800 Speaker 2: Dollars so comparable on compromation, just base absolutely. 313 00:17:00,880 --> 00:17:03,320 Speaker 1: And what's more interesting is that the pandemic I think 314 00:17:03,360 --> 00:17:11,200 Speaker 1: created this psychological fear and anxiety about wanting financial safety 315 00:17:11,200 --> 00:17:15,640 Speaker 1: and securing your financial future. So you've seen more home 316 00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:19,480 Speaker 1: ownership interest and more stock participation because the pandemic was 317 00:17:19,520 --> 00:17:23,280 Speaker 1: like this visceral death experience, wake up call, then you 318 00:17:23,320 --> 00:17:25,560 Speaker 1: want to and money is a proxy for safety. So 319 00:17:25,600 --> 00:17:29,480 Speaker 1: you've seen this dynamic where millennials are increasingly taking participation 320 00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:32,400 Speaker 1: in financial markets, in home ownership, and so home ownership 321 00:17:32,400 --> 00:17:34,320 Speaker 1: has increased from thirty eight percent to forty six percent 322 00:17:34,359 --> 00:17:37,119 Speaker 1: for millennials over the last seven years, and that's going 323 00:17:37,119 --> 00:17:39,520 Speaker 1: to continue to increase. So they're entering the peak earning years, 324 00:17:39,560 --> 00:17:43,000 Speaker 1: and that I think that's demographic impulse is still underappreciated. 325 00:17:43,800 --> 00:17:48,640 Speaker 2: Interesting. Let's talk about that eighty to two thousand bull market. 326 00:17:49,080 --> 00:17:51,560 Speaker 2: Some people dated it nineteen eighty two. It depends if 327 00:17:51,560 --> 00:17:54,080 Speaker 2: you looking at the DOW or the SMP. How did 328 00:17:54,080 --> 00:17:56,679 Speaker 2: the SMP do over that twenty year period. 329 00:17:56,840 --> 00:17:59,119 Speaker 1: I think during that period we're probably up about seventeen 330 00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:00,640 Speaker 1: hundred percent, I believe, and again. 331 00:18:00,520 --> 00:18:03,480 Speaker 2: Seventeen percent because I know that Dow was about one 332 00:18:03,520 --> 00:18:05,359 Speaker 2: thousand percent. The SMP did even better. 333 00:18:05,440 --> 00:18:07,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, And I think what's interesting about that period is again, 334 00:18:07,840 --> 00:18:09,400 Speaker 1: you had the eighty seven crash, you had the ninety 335 00:18:09,480 --> 00:18:12,480 Speaker 1: ninety SNL crisis, you had the Gulf fur, the Latam crisis, 336 00:18:12,480 --> 00:18:15,359 Speaker 1: the Asian crisis, the Russian default, the bond blood but 337 00:18:15,560 --> 00:18:17,560 Speaker 1: you know blood path in ninety four, So you always 338 00:18:17,600 --> 00:18:19,399 Speaker 1: have these events. And you still had three cructionits of 339 00:18:19,400 --> 00:18:23,440 Speaker 1: about twenty percent. And so even the current secudable market 340 00:18:23,480 --> 00:18:25,200 Speaker 1: when you put it in context. The reason the context 341 00:18:25,200 --> 00:18:27,359 Speaker 1: is important is because we've been in the second boll market. 342 00:18:27,720 --> 00:18:30,359 Speaker 1: We're currently since twenty thirteen, the stocks up one hundred 343 00:18:30,359 --> 00:18:33,879 Speaker 1: and seventy five percent, So we lack the upside. We 344 00:18:33,920 --> 00:18:35,800 Speaker 1: haven't reached the sort of upside in terms of price, 345 00:18:36,240 --> 00:18:39,080 Speaker 1: and not even terms of duration. So the previous bull 346 00:18:39,080 --> 00:18:41,879 Speaker 1: markets were eighteen years long. We're like nine years in. 347 00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:43,600 Speaker 1: So it's two thirds of the way through, I would 348 00:18:43,640 --> 00:18:47,840 Speaker 1: probably say. And so what's interesting is we've raised hundred 349 00:18:47,840 --> 00:18:50,520 Speaker 1: and twenty five percent despite the US China trade war, 350 00:18:51,080 --> 00:18:54,760 Speaker 1: despite the pandemic, despite unacceptably high inflation, the energy crisis, 351 00:18:54,760 --> 00:18:59,199 Speaker 1: in your bank failures again despite all of that, and 352 00:18:59,240 --> 00:19:02,160 Speaker 1: I think we're going to continue to power ahead because 353 00:19:02,200 --> 00:19:05,359 Speaker 1: of structurally changes in the economy that again we're not 354 00:19:05,400 --> 00:19:06,680 Speaker 1: appreciating fully. 355 00:19:06,520 --> 00:19:13,120 Speaker 2: So what do people misunderstand about cyclical versus secular well markets? 356 00:19:13,160 --> 00:19:14,879 Speaker 2: And as long as we're talking about that, I have 357 00:19:14,920 --> 00:19:18,760 Speaker 2: to ask, what's the significance of the twenty percent measure 358 00:19:19,200 --> 00:19:23,240 Speaker 2: that the media seems to love for starting and finishing 359 00:19:23,280 --> 00:19:24,640 Speaker 2: bull and bear markets? 360 00:19:25,119 --> 00:19:29,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's interesting, right, So I think the twenty percent 361 00:19:29,240 --> 00:19:33,600 Speaker 1: measure there's nothing significant about it, but it's an interesting 362 00:19:33,640 --> 00:19:35,719 Speaker 1: study that you can do around it, right. So what 363 00:19:35,840 --> 00:19:39,320 Speaker 1: we looked was, let's segment the twenty percent decline between 364 00:19:39,359 --> 00:19:41,399 Speaker 1: a secular bull market and a secular bear market, and 365 00:19:41,440 --> 00:19:43,800 Speaker 1: what's the difference. What you realize is when you have 366 00:19:43,840 --> 00:19:47,040 Speaker 1: a twenty percent decline plus in a secular bull market, 367 00:19:47,320 --> 00:19:50,000 Speaker 1: the average decline is twenty seven percent and the recovery 368 00:19:50,000 --> 00:19:53,240 Speaker 1: to the highest nine months. In a secular bear market, 369 00:19:53,280 --> 00:19:55,800 Speaker 1: the average decline is forty three percent, wow, and the 370 00:19:56,359 --> 00:19:58,200 Speaker 1: recovery to the highest forty eight months. 371 00:19:58,440 --> 00:20:00,760 Speaker 2: Huge difference in both depth than duration. 372 00:20:00,920 --> 00:20:04,399 Speaker 1: So when people compare the current sort of bare cycle 373 00:20:04,440 --> 00:20:06,000 Speaker 1: to two thousand and one and two thousand and eight. 374 00:20:06,119 --> 00:20:08,560 Speaker 1: The reason I think that's flawed is because that was 375 00:20:08,600 --> 00:20:10,120 Speaker 1: in a secular bear market. 376 00:20:10,040 --> 00:20:14,240 Speaker 2: And nineteen percent, and so, in other words, you're implying 377 00:20:14,280 --> 00:20:18,920 Speaker 2: that the recovery to the pre twenty twenty two highs 378 00:20:19,320 --> 00:20:20,280 Speaker 2: is not that far off? 379 00:20:20,400 --> 00:20:21,200 Speaker 1: Is not that far off? 380 00:20:21,320 --> 00:20:25,680 Speaker 2: Huh? That's really intriguing. Zoom out a little bit. What 381 00:20:26,320 --> 00:20:32,280 Speaker 2: makes a secular bull market so strong, so perfasive, long lasting, 382 00:20:32,400 --> 00:20:33,119 Speaker 2: and resilient. 383 00:20:34,320 --> 00:20:37,000 Speaker 1: I think I mentioned the demographic impulse. I think it's 384 00:20:37,000 --> 00:20:40,320 Speaker 1: a significantly important one. I think the second is the 385 00:20:40,359 --> 00:20:43,600 Speaker 1: household finances, which is also related to why we somehow 386 00:20:44,040 --> 00:20:46,640 Speaker 1: skirted a recession so far, and the consumer spend. 387 00:20:46,480 --> 00:20:50,320 Speaker 2: Things all time highs. It's really robust. 388 00:20:50,560 --> 00:20:52,480 Speaker 1: You know. A question I'd like to ask is what 389 00:20:52,640 --> 00:20:55,919 Speaker 1: is happening that shouldn't be or what is not happening 390 00:20:55,920 --> 00:20:58,960 Speaker 1: that should be right? And given the sort of fat 391 00:20:58,960 --> 00:21:01,560 Speaker 1: tightening and all the information we've received, it's surprising to 392 00:21:01,560 --> 00:21:05,160 Speaker 1: see the markets hold up. Simple answer. Second level market, 393 00:21:07,119 --> 00:21:10,879 Speaker 1: it's significant to see the housing market bounce back. Simple answer, 394 00:21:11,040 --> 00:21:14,480 Speaker 1: demographics and why we aren't in a recession, you know, 395 00:21:14,600 --> 00:21:18,520 Speaker 1: simple answer, I would say that rate sensitivity in the 396 00:21:18,640 --> 00:21:21,879 Speaker 1: US economy is historically low. And what I mean by 397 00:21:21,920 --> 00:21:24,320 Speaker 1: that is post GFC, we had this beautifully leveraging that 398 00:21:24,359 --> 00:21:27,400 Speaker 1: Bridgeworder talked about, but post pandemic has gotten even better 399 00:21:27,400 --> 00:21:29,520 Speaker 1: because you have the boost to incomes and you have 400 00:21:29,560 --> 00:21:31,800 Speaker 1: the further dropped interest costs. So if you look at 401 00:21:31,840 --> 00:21:37,280 Speaker 1: household debt service to disposable income ration as below nineteen 402 00:21:37,280 --> 00:21:41,480 Speaker 1: eighty levels when the data series began, that's pretty significant. 403 00:21:41,480 --> 00:21:43,280 Speaker 1: So you can have a five percent fed funds rate 404 00:21:43,440 --> 00:21:45,840 Speaker 1: and the consumer is not stopping. At the same time, 405 00:21:46,160 --> 00:21:48,960 Speaker 1: if you look at corporates, they extended their maturities for 406 00:21:49,040 --> 00:21:52,000 Speaker 1: their liabilities from five years to seven years, their interst 407 00:21:52,080 --> 00:21:53,480 Speaker 1: costs as a share of debt is three and a 408 00:21:53,520 --> 00:21:56,480 Speaker 1: half percent, the lowes since nineteen fifty. And then you 409 00:21:56,520 --> 00:22:02,000 Speaker 1: look at the mortgage market, that's another, you know, phenomenal backdrop. 410 00:22:02,320 --> 00:22:04,720 Speaker 1: So the rate sensitivity to the US economy is historically low. 411 00:22:04,880 --> 00:22:06,640 Speaker 1: So the house is in a much better position today 412 00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:09,359 Speaker 1: than they ever were. The reason, despite global tightening, we 413 00:22:09,400 --> 00:22:11,359 Speaker 1: haven't seen a slowdown in sort of in a major 414 00:22:11,359 --> 00:22:14,800 Speaker 1: slowdown in consumer spending is partly because of the fact 415 00:22:14,840 --> 00:22:20,119 Speaker 1: that we had significant gains in savings, not just exis sittings, 416 00:22:20,119 --> 00:22:22,960 Speaker 1: but total saving because of hours worked. So checking about 417 00:22:22,960 --> 00:22:24,520 Speaker 1: this today, our fortune and dollars higher than they were 418 00:22:24,520 --> 00:22:28,280 Speaker 1: pre pandemic. We're underappreciating the amount of money still in 419 00:22:28,320 --> 00:22:30,840 Speaker 1: the system and what that means for demand. The demand 420 00:22:30,920 --> 00:22:32,879 Speaker 1: side of the economy because of the pandemic took a 421 00:22:33,040 --> 00:22:36,520 Speaker 1: massive upward shock that I still don't think you know 422 00:22:36,960 --> 00:22:38,560 Speaker 1: that we're fully getting our heads around. 423 00:22:39,320 --> 00:22:43,000 Speaker 2: Really really quite intriguing. Let's talk a little bit about 424 00:22:43,040 --> 00:22:49,160 Speaker 2: how markets for people. What is it that makes investors 425 00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:54,720 Speaker 2: so susceptible to being fooled? And why do investors seem 426 00:22:54,760 --> 00:22:58,520 Speaker 2: to love the bearish argument? Why is that so compelling? 427 00:22:59,520 --> 00:23:03,959 Speaker 2: What makes mister market so able to convince us of 428 00:23:04,000 --> 00:23:06,320 Speaker 2: one thing and then he goes off and does something else. 429 00:23:08,280 --> 00:23:12,920 Speaker 1: It's interesting. A question I've been asking is what if 430 00:23:12,960 --> 00:23:15,680 Speaker 1: the greatest trick the market ever pulled was convincing industrials 431 00:23:15,680 --> 00:23:17,680 Speaker 1: that were still in a bear market? Right? 432 00:23:17,720 --> 00:23:22,920 Speaker 2: A variation of the old Devil quote from I don't 433 00:23:22,960 --> 00:23:27,520 Speaker 2: know if that's New Testament old Testament, but so lots 434 00:23:27,520 --> 00:23:31,040 Speaker 2: of people are negative, lots of people are bearish. It's 435 00:23:31,160 --> 00:23:35,120 Speaker 2: not quite as bad as my recollection of twenty ten, 436 00:23:35,200 --> 00:23:40,199 Speaker 2: eleven twelve. But coming out of the financial crisis, people 437 00:23:40,480 --> 00:23:45,040 Speaker 2: stayed bearish despite the fifty six percent collapse in the SMP. 438 00:23:45,640 --> 00:23:48,560 Speaker 2: You would think that should be enough to say, Okay, 439 00:23:48,600 --> 00:23:52,760 Speaker 2: we got our bearish reset. Last year was pretty modest, 440 00:23:53,200 --> 00:23:58,320 Speaker 2: down nineteen percent. Yeah, bonds were down fifteen percent. But 441 00:23:59,040 --> 00:24:01,240 Speaker 2: everybody seems to think that's it, it's over. 442 00:24:02,880 --> 00:24:04,879 Speaker 1: It is a difficult business, though, ry right, if you 443 00:24:04,920 --> 00:24:08,520 Speaker 1: think about it, it seems so obvious now that we 444 00:24:08,560 --> 00:24:12,400 Speaker 1: should be owning Microsoft and Apple and Amazon and Google 445 00:24:12,480 --> 00:24:16,920 Speaker 1: and Facebook, and so obvious. But I would argue ten 446 00:24:17,000 --> 00:24:20,159 Speaker 1: years ago it wasn't so obvious. Ten years ago. You 447 00:24:20,240 --> 00:24:23,760 Speaker 1: had the top academics, economists, investors in America writing a 448 00:24:23,840 --> 00:24:26,640 Speaker 1: letter to the Fed in twenty ten saying, hey, stop 449 00:24:26,720 --> 00:24:29,840 Speaker 1: que you're going to create hyperinflation and debate the dollar. 450 00:24:30,400 --> 00:24:33,280 Speaker 1: In twenty eleven, you had the debt ceiling crisis, the 451 00:24:33,359 --> 00:24:36,040 Speaker 1: credit rating got downgraded, the dollars at a fifty year low, 452 00:24:36,600 --> 00:24:40,280 Speaker 1: so you did not have policy or political leadership that 453 00:24:40,320 --> 00:24:44,520 Speaker 1: was very inspiring. In twenty twelve, Facebook went public. The 454 00:24:44,600 --> 00:24:47,399 Speaker 1: IPO flopped, that's right, from thirty two dollars to like, 455 00:24:47,440 --> 00:24:50,640 Speaker 1: I think sixteen or eighteen dollars. In twenty fifteen, carled 456 00:24:50,800 --> 00:24:54,320 Speaker 1: Icons sold all his Netflix stick because it was too expensive. 457 00:24:55,040 --> 00:24:57,560 Speaker 1: Netflix was the best performing stock last decade. He sold 458 00:24:57,600 --> 00:25:00,439 Speaker 1: half his Apple stock in twenty fifteen. In twenty fifteen, 459 00:25:00,480 --> 00:25:03,040 Speaker 1: Bill Gurley at Benchmark were saying silicon values in a bubble. 460 00:25:04,359 --> 00:25:06,400 Speaker 1: So it's just interesting to do this exercise the fact 461 00:25:06,440 --> 00:25:08,879 Speaker 1: that it seems so obvious today, but it wasn't obvious 462 00:25:08,920 --> 00:25:10,840 Speaker 1: to hold on to these companies. It wasn't so obvious 463 00:25:10,880 --> 00:25:14,359 Speaker 1: that America will be the investment destination that's going to matter. 464 00:25:14,920 --> 00:25:17,959 Speaker 1: And so it's curious that I think we need to 465 00:25:17,960 --> 00:25:20,320 Speaker 1: just remind ourselves of this, the fact that it isn't 466 00:25:20,359 --> 00:25:23,639 Speaker 1: always easy, and what can we be missing, you know, 467 00:25:23,960 --> 00:25:27,000 Speaker 1: right now in the present. I always say my job 468 00:25:27,080 --> 00:25:29,240 Speaker 1: is not to predict the future. It's to see the 469 00:25:29,280 --> 00:25:30,680 Speaker 1: present clearly. 470 00:25:31,280 --> 00:25:34,240 Speaker 2: Which is much harder than it sounds. Let's talk a 471 00:25:34,280 --> 00:25:38,000 Speaker 2: little bit about something that people seem to have a 472 00:25:38,040 --> 00:25:43,840 Speaker 2: hard time recognizing, and that's each decade a theme emerges, 473 00:25:44,280 --> 00:25:48,320 Speaker 2: and yet this tends to come with some problems. 474 00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:50,439 Speaker 1: It's an opportunity if you think about it, because in 475 00:25:50,480 --> 00:25:53,639 Speaker 1: nineteen seventy. Like every decade, something happens, So in nineteen 476 00:25:53,680 --> 00:25:57,359 Speaker 1: seventy it was in the nineteen seventies it was the 477 00:25:57,440 --> 00:26:01,600 Speaker 1: nineteen seventy one breakdown of Beckenwoods, and that led to 478 00:26:01,800 --> 00:26:05,359 Speaker 1: inflation and the goldibul market. But nineteen eighty onwards, you 479 00:26:05,359 --> 00:26:08,600 Speaker 1: want to avoid gold. The zeitgeist of the nineteen eighties 480 00:26:08,680 --> 00:26:10,879 Speaker 1: was Japan's sticking over the world. So you want to 481 00:26:10,880 --> 00:26:13,480 Speaker 1: be long Japanese equities and Japanese real estate. It was 482 00:26:13,760 --> 00:26:16,520 Speaker 1: Japanese management techniques that were being passed around. They were 483 00:26:16,800 --> 00:26:19,359 Speaker 1: you have your children were learning Japanese. Japanese were the 484 00:26:19,440 --> 00:26:22,480 Speaker 1: villains in American movies. Japanese were buying real estate in 485 00:26:22,520 --> 00:26:25,400 Speaker 1: New York. But nineteen eighty nine onwards, that was a disaster. 486 00:26:25,920 --> 00:26:28,480 Speaker 1: The zycast of the nineteen nineties was the Internet. You 487 00:26:28,520 --> 00:26:31,679 Speaker 1: want to belong Nasdaq March two thousand onwards stopped working. 488 00:26:31,840 --> 00:26:34,399 Speaker 1: It's really interesting how they're literally a calendar decade. Barry. 489 00:26:35,080 --> 00:26:38,080 Speaker 1: The Zey Catches of two thousands was China's entrance into 490 00:26:38,080 --> 00:26:40,480 Speaker 1: the World Trade Organization in June two thousand and one. 491 00:26:41,000 --> 00:26:42,760 Speaker 1: So suddenly you can have the build out of the 492 00:26:42,800 --> 00:26:45,280 Speaker 1: world secondlargest economy. You will be long em and commodities. 493 00:26:46,480 --> 00:26:50,680 Speaker 1: The zeitgeist of the twenty tens was best articulated by 494 00:26:50,720 --> 00:26:53,520 Speaker 1: Mark Drisen in twenty eleven in a Wall Street Journal 495 00:26:53,600 --> 00:26:56,840 Speaker 1: article Software's hitting the world. So what you're seeing now 496 00:26:57,119 --> 00:26:59,960 Speaker 1: is the unraveling of that zeitgeist. So twenty twenty one 497 00:27:00,160 --> 00:27:01,840 Speaker 1: was the peak of that zeitgeist. It was all about 498 00:27:01,880 --> 00:27:06,320 Speaker 1: software and cloud. And the question is now the software 499 00:27:06,400 --> 00:27:10,760 Speaker 1: zitegeast is over. What's the zeitgeist for this decade? And 500 00:27:10,800 --> 00:27:12,960 Speaker 1: what we've been writing about in discussing in the community 501 00:27:13,320 --> 00:27:16,479 Speaker 1: is that we believe climate is a zeitgeist for this decade. 502 00:27:16,480 --> 00:27:17,720 Speaker 1: Now that climate change. 503 00:27:17,600 --> 00:27:20,680 Speaker 2: Just starting now, not peaking now, starting. 504 00:27:20,320 --> 00:27:22,560 Speaker 1: In starting in twenty three, So from the twenty twenty 505 00:27:22,600 --> 00:27:25,000 Speaker 1: to twenty thirty, just like software was from twenty ten 506 00:27:25,040 --> 00:27:28,240 Speaker 1: to twenty twenty, from twenty twenty to twenty thirty, the 507 00:27:28,320 --> 00:27:29,720 Speaker 1: zeitgeist is climate. 508 00:27:30,320 --> 00:27:33,400 Speaker 2: Is that an investible thesis? Is that something people can 509 00:27:33,440 --> 00:27:36,680 Speaker 2: put money into? Because when sure, you can look at 510 00:27:36,520 --> 00:27:39,919 Speaker 2: the low carbon funds and things, but are there a 511 00:27:39,960 --> 00:27:43,720 Speaker 2: way to say I want to participate in ems and 512 00:27:43,800 --> 00:27:47,639 Speaker 2: lithium and wind power and battery technology and all the 513 00:27:47,680 --> 00:27:50,080 Speaker 2: things that are going to drive the next decade. How 514 00:27:50,119 --> 00:27:52,080 Speaker 2: does an investor participate in that? 515 00:27:52,480 --> 00:27:57,760 Speaker 1: So the interesting thing with climate is there are multifaceted 516 00:27:57,800 --> 00:28:00,879 Speaker 1: ways to play different sectors, different communities from a bottoms 517 00:28:00,920 --> 00:28:04,680 Speaker 1: up standpoint as well. And again, now that it's become 518 00:28:04,680 --> 00:28:08,840 Speaker 1: a global economic and political priority, it's become a solution 519 00:28:09,119 --> 00:28:13,440 Speaker 1: for spending as opposed to a risk. You can see 520 00:28:13,800 --> 00:28:18,679 Speaker 1: higher capex this decade, so that benefits certain sectors. I 521 00:28:18,680 --> 00:28:22,199 Speaker 1: think the simplest expression would be the EV revolution In 522 00:28:22,240 --> 00:28:24,160 Speaker 1: many ways, I think the China EV I think BYD 523 00:28:24,280 --> 00:28:27,159 Speaker 1: would be a key asset to own this decade. I 524 00:28:27,160 --> 00:28:29,640 Speaker 1: think that could be the simplest expression of what goes on. 525 00:28:31,119 --> 00:28:34,040 Speaker 1: I think I don't believe you're in a commodity super cycle, 526 00:28:34,400 --> 00:28:37,159 Speaker 1: but I do believe certain commodities will win. And the 527 00:28:37,200 --> 00:28:40,400 Speaker 1: way to think about commodities is nicely as it relates 528 00:28:40,400 --> 00:28:43,440 Speaker 1: to the energy transition. But more specifically, it's not related 529 00:28:43,480 --> 00:28:46,560 Speaker 1: to China growth. It's related to China climate. What I 530 00:28:46,600 --> 00:28:50,040 Speaker 1: mean by that is that most likely no Western government 531 00:28:50,040 --> 00:28:53,400 Speaker 1: will meet their climate targets, the Chinese will meet their 532 00:28:53,400 --> 00:28:56,320 Speaker 1: climate targets because for them it's an existential issue. Air 533 00:28:56,320 --> 00:28:59,440 Speaker 1: pollution is a crisis what's the point of common prosperity 534 00:28:59,440 --> 00:29:02,680 Speaker 1: if you're going to get sick. And so China's old 535 00:29:02,720 --> 00:29:06,320 Speaker 1: growth model was one in which they increase production capacity 536 00:29:06,360 --> 00:29:07,720 Speaker 1: in a lot of base metals because they want to 537 00:29:07,720 --> 00:29:11,320 Speaker 1: create employment. That no longer makes sense. So for example, 538 00:29:11,800 --> 00:29:15,520 Speaker 1: you know, China became two thirds of the global aluminum market. 539 00:29:16,000 --> 00:29:19,800 Speaker 1: They're going to start to reduce capacity within that to 540 00:29:20,080 --> 00:29:22,920 Speaker 1: reduce emissions because they're importing our materials to produce that. 541 00:29:23,200 --> 00:29:26,520 Speaker 1: So they're probably emitting sixteen to seventeen ton carbon proton 542 00:29:26,840 --> 00:29:29,720 Speaker 1: compared to what let's say someone like Alcoa is doing, 543 00:29:29,920 --> 00:29:32,280 Speaker 1: you know, two or three. And so you're going to 544 00:29:32,280 --> 00:29:36,720 Speaker 1: see China rationalize its industry. It's capacity in certain key 545 00:29:36,720 --> 00:29:39,880 Speaker 1: based metals aluminum and steel amongst them. And I think 546 00:29:40,000 --> 00:29:42,160 Speaker 1: you want to monitor what they're doing on their climate 547 00:29:42,200 --> 00:29:45,880 Speaker 1: front to understand which commodity is to be long not 548 00:29:46,760 --> 00:29:50,200 Speaker 1: across the board, and so certain commodities will do well 549 00:29:50,240 --> 00:29:52,000 Speaker 1: as part of the energy transition. I think China ev 550 00:29:52,160 --> 00:29:55,200 Speaker 1: story works. You know a lot of it is just retrofitting, 551 00:29:55,320 --> 00:29:58,640 Speaker 1: and you know, you know, like buildings, and you know 552 00:29:58,840 --> 00:30:02,040 Speaker 1: the role ACS play in emissions and read retrofiting that 553 00:30:02,440 --> 00:30:04,280 Speaker 1: and there's a lot of companies sitting in Japan and 554 00:30:04,360 --> 00:30:06,640 Speaker 1: Korea and Taiwan that are mid gap engineering names that 555 00:30:06,680 --> 00:30:09,480 Speaker 1: sort of benefit from that. You know, higher capacks like 556 00:30:09,520 --> 00:30:12,120 Speaker 1: I mentioned, you know who benefits from that, and so 557 00:30:12,120 --> 00:30:14,600 Speaker 1: what you'd realize as you look deeper and deeper into this, 558 00:30:14,960 --> 00:30:17,280 Speaker 1: it's not so much a US centric story. It's so 559 00:30:17,360 --> 00:30:19,880 Speaker 1: much more global story. So you could argue you can 560 00:30:19,920 --> 00:30:22,800 Speaker 1: see non US markets begin to upperform. 561 00:30:22,760 --> 00:30:27,080 Speaker 2: And that's already happened the past eighteen months. Developed xus 562 00:30:27,400 --> 00:30:30,800 Speaker 2: has done better than the US markets have done going 563 00:30:30,880 --> 00:30:33,200 Speaker 2: back to let's call at the end of twenty one. 564 00:30:33,360 --> 00:30:37,320 Speaker 2: So that's following what a ten or fourteen year period 565 00:30:37,400 --> 00:30:41,959 Speaker 2: of US outperformance, So not unexpected. Let me throw a 566 00:30:42,120 --> 00:30:46,360 Speaker 2: quote of yours at you and have you describe it. 567 00:30:46,960 --> 00:30:47,360 Speaker 1: Quote. 568 00:30:47,400 --> 00:30:50,400 Speaker 2: It's more valuable to consider why we aren't in a 569 00:30:50,520 --> 00:30:54,320 Speaker 2: US recession rather than nervously dreading one. 570 00:30:54,440 --> 00:30:57,600 Speaker 1: Explain again, that's the point of you know, staying in 571 00:30:57,600 --> 00:31:02,040 Speaker 1: the present. And I think the reason why we're not 572 00:31:02,320 --> 00:31:05,040 Speaker 1: is the fact that I think rate sensitivity is historically low, 573 00:31:05,200 --> 00:31:08,320 Speaker 1: the fact that rate sens intustrate sensitivity for the US 574 00:31:08,360 --> 00:31:10,480 Speaker 1: economy is historically low. So you can actually have five 575 00:31:10,520 --> 00:31:13,360 Speaker 1: percent interust rates and the consumer doesn't stop because we're 576 00:31:13,680 --> 00:31:17,480 Speaker 1: not fully adjusting for how strong the household finances are. 577 00:31:17,720 --> 00:31:20,120 Speaker 1: But more important than that, based on I think more 578 00:31:20,160 --> 00:31:24,600 Speaker 1: recent conversations, I would argue, maybe you've already had a 579 00:31:24,600 --> 00:31:27,960 Speaker 1: recession and the only indicator that hasn't cracked yet is 580 00:31:28,000 --> 00:31:30,320 Speaker 1: the labor market, and that's what everybody is sort of 581 00:31:30,360 --> 00:31:34,080 Speaker 1: focused on now. And my view there is also sort 582 00:31:34,120 --> 00:31:37,400 Speaker 1: of contentious because I don't expect the labor market to crack. 583 00:31:37,680 --> 00:31:41,480 Speaker 1: I actually believe the labor market is in a secular tightness. 584 00:31:42,600 --> 00:31:48,320 Speaker 1: Let me explain. In the past, recessions have basically destroyed demand. 585 00:31:49,200 --> 00:31:54,320 Speaker 1: You've seen job losses in goods producing sectors, manufacturing, auto construction. 586 00:31:55,680 --> 00:31:59,959 Speaker 1: Job openings take years to recover. The pandemic was different 587 00:32:00,480 --> 00:32:04,560 Speaker 1: because the disruption happened in labor supply and on the 588 00:32:04,560 --> 00:32:07,200 Speaker 1: demand side, we actually created a huge positive demand shock. 589 00:32:07,960 --> 00:32:11,560 Speaker 1: So it's complete reverse of what we've ever experienced. So 590 00:32:11,600 --> 00:32:14,840 Speaker 1: you've seen a positive demand shock when labor supply got hit, 591 00:32:15,800 --> 00:32:18,200 Speaker 1: and now you've seen a situation where you still have 592 00:32:18,280 --> 00:32:22,080 Speaker 1: high job openings and the service sector, which comes up 593 00:32:22,080 --> 00:32:25,520 Speaker 1: with eighty percent of the jobs, is still looking to hire. 594 00:32:26,280 --> 00:32:27,720 Speaker 1: So how are you going to see the unemployment reygo 595 00:32:27,720 --> 00:32:29,640 Speaker 1: from three and a half percent to five percent in 596 00:32:29,640 --> 00:32:33,120 Speaker 1: that dynamic. Let me give you specific examples. Last year 597 00:32:33,480 --> 00:32:36,520 Speaker 1: bad year for single family housing overall, you know, conditions 598 00:32:36,520 --> 00:32:40,000 Speaker 1: were pretty poor for housing. Construction employment last year was 599 00:32:40,000 --> 00:32:43,120 Speaker 1: a record. There's still a shortage of construction workers. Job 600 00:32:43,160 --> 00:32:45,760 Speaker 1: openings in the construction industry today are twice what they 601 00:32:45,760 --> 00:32:49,160 Speaker 1: were doing the mid two thousands boom. If you think 602 00:32:49,200 --> 00:32:52,200 Speaker 1: about construction specifically, since the construction activity peaked in mid 603 00:32:52,200 --> 00:32:56,480 Speaker 1: two thousand and six, it took eighteen months for unemployment 604 00:32:56,480 --> 00:32:59,840 Speaker 1: in the construction industry to go up. Today, the order 605 00:33:00,080 --> 00:33:03,120 Speaker 1: clo is bigger, it's gonna take more time. The labor 606 00:33:03,120 --> 00:33:06,560 Speaker 1: shortage is worse because you've got early retirements and lower immigration, 607 00:33:07,160 --> 00:33:09,600 Speaker 1: and so I would argue you can see the economy weaken, 608 00:33:09,720 --> 00:33:13,080 Speaker 1: even the hazard market weaken, without an increase in joblessness 609 00:33:13,760 --> 00:33:16,040 Speaker 1: across the board. The only sector of the economy that 610 00:33:16,120 --> 00:33:19,720 Speaker 1: overhired was tech, right, and that's where you're seeing layoffs. 611 00:33:19,720 --> 00:33:23,160 Speaker 1: But if the construction unemployment doesn't pick up for the 612 00:33:23,160 --> 00:33:25,600 Speaker 1: reasons that I've outlined, you've got auto demand that remains 613 00:33:25,680 --> 00:33:28,640 Speaker 1: robust they're not letting go of people. Manufacturing seems to 614 00:33:28,680 --> 00:33:31,280 Speaker 1: be bottoming with ism where it is right now. So 615 00:33:31,320 --> 00:33:33,440 Speaker 1: who's actually going to let go of workers here? 616 00:33:34,120 --> 00:33:37,080 Speaker 2: Nobody? So let's talk about some of the factors that 617 00:33:37,640 --> 00:33:43,120 Speaker 2: are driving that labor scarcity. You mentioned immigration. Legal immigration 618 00:33:43,400 --> 00:33:48,920 Speaker 2: has been trending lower since the Gulf War. In two 619 00:33:49,000 --> 00:33:52,600 Speaker 2: thousand and three, we change the rules as to who 620 00:33:52,600 --> 00:33:55,280 Speaker 2: could stay in the country following coming here for college. 621 00:33:55,680 --> 00:34:01,120 Speaker 2: We basically eliminated a lot of the most capable, most 622 00:34:01,160 --> 00:34:07,880 Speaker 2: qualified immigrants. That's twenty years in the making. You mentioned COVID, 623 00:34:08,640 --> 00:34:12,160 Speaker 2: A lot of people still suffering from long COVID disability 624 00:34:12,239 --> 00:34:15,640 Speaker 2: has been on and upward trends for twenty years. And 625 00:34:15,760 --> 00:34:20,520 Speaker 2: on the mail side of the labor force participation rate 626 00:34:20,600 --> 00:34:24,920 Speaker 2: that's been trending down for decades. Also, why would anyone 627 00:34:24,960 --> 00:34:28,759 Speaker 2: imagine we're going to have access labor supply anytime soon 628 00:34:28,800 --> 00:34:30,000 Speaker 2: in the United States? 629 00:34:30,440 --> 00:34:32,759 Speaker 1: So I think you're seeing improving immigration trends, not just 630 00:34:32,800 --> 00:34:34,239 Speaker 1: in the US, with globally, and I think that's a 631 00:34:34,239 --> 00:34:36,279 Speaker 1: structural team that we should pay more attention. 632 00:34:36,000 --> 00:34:38,799 Speaker 2: To improving immigration trends. Does that mean we're going to 633 00:34:38,800 --> 00:34:42,800 Speaker 2: see more legal immigrants in the United States by substantial numbers. 634 00:34:43,520 --> 00:34:45,400 Speaker 1: I mean, it's very difficult to quantify, but I think 635 00:34:45,440 --> 00:34:48,360 Speaker 1: it's a trend, a structural trend globally, not just in 636 00:34:48,400 --> 00:34:51,879 Speaker 1: the US. Like even countries that are not historically very 637 00:34:51,880 --> 00:34:54,680 Speaker 1: friendly to immigration realized for a demographic standpoint, they need 638 00:34:54,680 --> 00:34:56,480 Speaker 1: to open up, and so we're going to see that. 639 00:34:56,600 --> 00:34:58,759 Speaker 1: So again, for me, it's like on the margin, what 640 00:34:58,760 --> 00:35:01,440 Speaker 1: can happen in the future that well, positively surprise and 641 00:35:01,560 --> 00:35:04,279 Speaker 1: negatively surprised. But I think in a world right now 642 00:35:04,320 --> 00:35:06,680 Speaker 1: where everybody's asking it's so easy to think about what's 643 00:35:06,680 --> 00:35:09,080 Speaker 1: wrong with the world, Barry, it's more difficult to think 644 00:35:09,080 --> 00:35:12,160 Speaker 1: about what's right with the world. And usually when you 645 00:35:12,160 --> 00:35:14,000 Speaker 1: ask that question, people shift in their seats because they're 646 00:35:14,000 --> 00:35:15,520 Speaker 1: not used to think about what's right with the world. 647 00:35:15,560 --> 00:35:18,239 Speaker 1: It's more difficult to point out oftentimes. But I think 648 00:35:18,280 --> 00:35:20,080 Speaker 1: immigration is one of those trends that's what's right with 649 00:35:20,120 --> 00:35:21,799 Speaker 1: the world. Because if you look at just working as 650 00:35:21,800 --> 00:35:23,719 Speaker 1: population growth in the US can be sixty basis points 651 00:35:23,719 --> 00:35:26,960 Speaker 1: this year, this decade, But the real upside is that 652 00:35:27,040 --> 00:35:30,120 Speaker 1: it come from productivity. And and so I say, I 653 00:35:30,120 --> 00:35:34,040 Speaker 1: still think immigration is at a sort of do some 654 00:35:35,000 --> 00:35:38,200 Speaker 1: improve from here, I should say, going forward on the 655 00:35:38,239 --> 00:35:42,760 Speaker 1: on the labor side, and then we still have record 656 00:35:42,760 --> 00:35:45,719 Speaker 1: employment in the US, right, Like you know, we've had 657 00:35:45,760 --> 00:35:49,919 Speaker 1: the primates participation rate recover, were suddenly realizing that early 658 00:35:50,000 --> 00:35:52,839 Speaker 1: retirements wasn't a thing, and you know, people are coming 659 00:35:52,880 --> 00:35:56,720 Speaker 1: back to the labor before. So it's very difficult given this, 660 00:35:56,760 --> 00:35:58,480 Speaker 1: which is why I'm saying I think we can actually 661 00:35:58,480 --> 00:36:01,680 Speaker 1: have a secular tightness in the labor market. The concern 662 00:36:02,320 --> 00:36:07,919 Speaker 1: amongst investors is that they fear stackflation, and I don't 663 00:36:07,960 --> 00:36:11,720 Speaker 1: see a future that's stackflationary. A stackflationary future would destroy 664 00:36:11,760 --> 00:36:14,520 Speaker 1: your fixed income and equity portfolios. Right. The future that 665 00:36:14,560 --> 00:36:18,759 Speaker 1: I'm seeing is one of productivity lead growth, and this 666 00:36:18,800 --> 00:36:21,800 Speaker 1: is the look back period. That's important because when you 667 00:36:21,840 --> 00:36:23,839 Speaker 1: think about dead ceiling, you think about two hundred and eleven. 668 00:36:24,080 --> 00:36:27,200 Speaker 1: When you think about the regional banking crisis, you THINKBO 669 00:36:27,239 --> 00:36:29,719 Speaker 1: two hundred eight, you think about inflation thing about seventies, 670 00:36:30,160 --> 00:36:34,080 Speaker 1: So we don't have memory of anything that remotely, you know, 671 00:36:34,160 --> 00:36:36,800 Speaker 1: resembles a productivity lead growth era. But that was the 672 00:36:36,840 --> 00:36:39,440 Speaker 1: nineteen fifties, So you could have secular tightness in the 673 00:36:39,520 --> 00:36:41,719 Speaker 1: labor market. The AI boom is coming at the right 674 00:36:41,719 --> 00:36:46,359 Speaker 1: time where you can see wages profits rising simultaneously, where 675 00:36:46,360 --> 00:36:49,359 Speaker 1: inflation is relatively contained. Because even if wages that were 676 00:36:49,360 --> 00:36:51,360 Speaker 1: growing at four four and a half percent, if activity 677 00:36:51,440 --> 00:36:54,439 Speaker 1: grows at two percent, your overall infiction pictures not that bad. 678 00:36:54,440 --> 00:36:56,960 Speaker 1: You know, labor costs aren't going to crush your margins. 679 00:36:57,160 --> 00:37:00,959 Speaker 1: So I think the real, you know, possibility is one 680 00:37:01,120 --> 00:37:04,320 Speaker 1: that the future is not stackflinationary, but one of productivity 681 00:37:04,360 --> 00:37:07,640 Speaker 1: lead growth, which is extremely bullish for nominal growth in equities. 682 00:37:08,239 --> 00:37:12,080 Speaker 2: Huh, really quite fascinating. So let's talk a little bit 683 00:37:12,600 --> 00:37:17,320 Speaker 2: about some of the other ways you find interesting ideas 684 00:37:17,360 --> 00:37:20,600 Speaker 2: and get a sense of what's going on in the 685 00:37:20,680 --> 00:37:24,760 Speaker 2: here and now. Tell us a little bit about the 686 00:37:24,800 --> 00:37:27,279 Speaker 2: one on ones you have and the dinner salons you 687 00:37:27,320 --> 00:37:29,359 Speaker 2: have and what comes from those. 688 00:37:29,920 --> 00:37:32,920 Speaker 1: So we do about ten dinners a year in different cities, 689 00:37:32,960 --> 00:37:35,600 Speaker 1: and I travel according to what's happening in the world. 690 00:37:35,640 --> 00:37:37,920 Speaker 1: So that's more timely and interesting from a conversational standpoint 691 00:37:37,960 --> 00:37:41,120 Speaker 1: and benefits the whole community. Tongue in cheek, I call 692 00:37:41,200 --> 00:37:44,239 Speaker 1: these dinners the most interesting dinner in the world. So 693 00:37:44,280 --> 00:37:48,040 Speaker 1: I really set expectations very high. I found the best 694 00:37:48,239 --> 00:37:51,719 Speaker 1: gathering at about ten people. Everybody's requested to bring a 695 00:37:51,800 --> 00:37:54,200 Speaker 1: chart to discuss. It could be a chart, a chart, 696 00:37:54,880 --> 00:37:59,000 Speaker 1: it could be a stock It could be something that 697 00:37:59,680 --> 00:38:02,400 Speaker 1: they are interested in and they'd like to share with 698 00:38:02,400 --> 00:38:03,680 Speaker 1: the group. It could be a picture of your dog. 699 00:38:03,960 --> 00:38:05,720 Speaker 1: I really don't care, but you have to become prepared. 700 00:38:06,280 --> 00:38:08,840 Speaker 1: I feel like when people are thoughtful about what they 701 00:38:08,880 --> 00:38:11,759 Speaker 1: want to come and share, it's more interesting than just 702 00:38:11,960 --> 00:38:17,279 Speaker 1: rambling conversation. I make it. Make sure that we've got 703 00:38:17,320 --> 00:38:21,600 Speaker 1: certain rules, no egos, no business cards, no, you know, 704 00:38:21,800 --> 00:38:24,120 Speaker 1: try to really set the tone. 705 00:38:23,960 --> 00:38:27,480 Speaker 2: And that really limits who can participate. You've cut it, 706 00:38:27,719 --> 00:38:29,600 Speaker 2: You've cut it down radically. 707 00:38:29,400 --> 00:38:33,120 Speaker 1: You know, So really be very intimate and it's not 708 00:38:33,280 --> 00:38:36,920 Speaker 1: me pitching something. I'm more curious and just facilitating conversation, 709 00:38:37,040 --> 00:38:39,400 Speaker 1: learning from everybody. And the last rule is no one 710 00:38:39,440 --> 00:38:42,360 Speaker 1: leaves without a hug, you know. So it's ten people, 711 00:38:42,480 --> 00:38:47,040 Speaker 1: usually CIOs, portfolio managers from different sort of hedge funds, 712 00:38:47,040 --> 00:38:50,719 Speaker 1: long olyfunds, family offices, you know, pension CIOs. So it 713 00:38:50,719 --> 00:38:53,480 Speaker 1: really varies again based on what I think is topical 714 00:38:53,520 --> 00:38:57,759 Speaker 1: and interesting, you know. So we do those eighty ten 715 00:38:57,800 --> 00:39:00,480 Speaker 1: times a year and then we'll do bread first, which 716 00:39:00,520 --> 00:39:02,640 Speaker 1: are more easier to organize, and I tongue in cheek, 717 00:39:02,640 --> 00:39:07,200 Speaker 1: I call them the breakfast, the moderately interesting breakfast, because 718 00:39:07,200 --> 00:39:09,839 Speaker 1: again it's early in the morning, you haven't had your 719 00:39:09,840 --> 00:39:14,080 Speaker 1: coffee black sleep, so just moderately interesting ideas are enough 720 00:39:14,480 --> 00:39:16,600 Speaker 1: to share with each other. 721 00:39:16,960 --> 00:39:21,040 Speaker 2: Huh, that's interesting. I'll tell you the two. So we've 722 00:39:21,040 --> 00:39:24,359 Speaker 2: been hosting these dinner salons for the past, going back 723 00:39:24,400 --> 00:39:27,879 Speaker 2: to the financial crisis, and the two interesting things I've 724 00:39:27,960 --> 00:39:30,480 Speaker 2: kind of learned. The first is it's a little bit 725 00:39:30,640 --> 00:39:33,520 Speaker 2: like you're right about the size eight to ten is 726 00:39:33,560 --> 00:39:36,800 Speaker 2: as big as you get as you want, and even 727 00:39:36,920 --> 00:39:40,319 Speaker 2: there you still end up with these side conversations, and 728 00:39:40,360 --> 00:39:43,680 Speaker 2: you want everybody talking about the same subject in the 729 00:39:43,719 --> 00:39:47,239 Speaker 2: middle of the table, not three groups of two, three, four. 730 00:39:47,680 --> 00:39:50,160 Speaker 1: So I have a rule, no side conversations. 731 00:39:49,760 --> 00:39:53,919 Speaker 2: No side We have the same rule. And then we 732 00:39:54,000 --> 00:39:56,600 Speaker 2: did something I don't remember when this was. It was 733 00:39:56,640 --> 00:39:59,440 Speaker 2: a couple of years ago, and I try and remember 734 00:39:59,480 --> 00:40:03,319 Speaker 2: to do it every dinner, but it's really fascinating. At 735 00:40:03,320 --> 00:40:06,560 Speaker 2: the end of the dinner, I want everybody to recommend 736 00:40:06,600 --> 00:40:08,960 Speaker 2: the most interesting book they've read over the past year, 737 00:40:09,520 --> 00:40:15,440 Speaker 2: and you get some fantastic, eclectic, wildly unexpected book recommendations 738 00:40:15,440 --> 00:40:18,560 Speaker 2: from people, because I think that's all people want is 739 00:40:19,120 --> 00:40:21,480 Speaker 2: give me a really interesting book to read, and I'm 740 00:40:21,520 --> 00:40:25,080 Speaker 2: happy for thirty forty hours. You've just made me happy 741 00:40:25,080 --> 00:40:29,080 Speaker 2: with that. So you hold these You mentioned after the 742 00:40:29,440 --> 00:40:34,080 Speaker 2: China first quarter you did something in Singapore. If there's 743 00:40:34,120 --> 00:40:36,040 Speaker 2: a big FED meeting coming up, do you do that 744 00:40:36,120 --> 00:40:37,719 Speaker 2: in DC? Do you do that in New York? Where 745 00:40:37,719 --> 00:40:38,839 Speaker 2: would you hold something like that? 746 00:40:39,360 --> 00:40:41,120 Speaker 1: I found New York is the best place for like 747 00:40:41,280 --> 00:40:42,839 Speaker 1: FED centric conversations. 748 00:40:43,280 --> 00:40:43,919 Speaker 2: Why is that? 749 00:40:44,280 --> 00:40:45,759 Speaker 1: I don't know, It's just part of the culture. You know. 750 00:40:45,760 --> 00:40:48,359 Speaker 1: The macro guys are very obsessed with They're all here, yeah, 751 00:40:48,680 --> 00:40:50,920 Speaker 1: the one. They're all here also pay right close attention 752 00:40:50,960 --> 00:40:52,400 Speaker 1: to what the FED is saying, what the FED is doing, 753 00:40:52,600 --> 00:40:54,680 Speaker 1: your rates and effects matter, you know, matters a lot. 754 00:40:55,239 --> 00:40:57,640 Speaker 1: And so every city actually has its own interesting like 755 00:40:57,680 --> 00:41:01,160 Speaker 1: Hong Kong Dinners, we write China centric poor is very 756 00:41:02,080 --> 00:41:04,400 Speaker 1: pure macro because you've got a good Asian pulse, but 757 00:41:04,440 --> 00:41:07,320 Speaker 1: you also have some funds there that are really plugged 758 00:41:07,320 --> 00:41:10,000 Speaker 1: into what's happening in the US and Europe and the 759 00:41:10,080 --> 00:41:12,480 Speaker 1: europe The London Dinners will be a mixture, you know, 760 00:41:13,320 --> 00:41:16,520 Speaker 1: still annoyed with Brexit and EU policy and other sort 761 00:41:16,520 --> 00:41:17,879 Speaker 1: of interesting themes come up from there. 762 00:41:17,960 --> 00:41:21,640 Speaker 2: Well, unforced eras get everybody upset, right, It's just why 763 00:41:21,719 --> 00:41:23,960 Speaker 2: did you do that? That was silly? Let me ask 764 00:41:24,000 --> 00:41:26,840 Speaker 2: you about Singapore on my list of places to go 765 00:41:27,000 --> 00:41:31,280 Speaker 2: never been. I have been told from a wide variety 766 00:41:31,280 --> 00:41:35,560 Speaker 2: of people that it is absolutely the best food destination 767 00:41:35,840 --> 00:41:36,360 Speaker 2: in Asia. 768 00:41:37,320 --> 00:41:39,080 Speaker 1: I'm not a foodie, so I can't say if it's 769 00:41:39,080 --> 00:41:41,319 Speaker 1: the best food destination. It's certainly a city that I love. 770 00:41:41,560 --> 00:41:44,359 Speaker 1: Mm hm. Just it's such a especially from a macro 771 00:41:44,400 --> 00:41:49,279 Speaker 1: community standpoint, like you've got everybody there walking distance. It's 772 00:41:49,320 --> 00:41:52,200 Speaker 1: just fun. And I think what I've learned from my 773 00:41:52,280 --> 00:41:56,640 Speaker 1: Singapore conversations again because it's East and west good mixture 774 00:41:57,200 --> 00:41:59,880 Speaker 1: is probably some of the best conversations I've had in 775 00:42:00,719 --> 00:42:02,120 Speaker 1: around the world in Singapore. 776 00:42:02,320 --> 00:42:06,160 Speaker 2: Yeah, what where else besides London? Do you do you 777 00:42:06,239 --> 00:42:07,760 Speaker 2: like to host these in Europe? 778 00:42:08,920 --> 00:42:10,200 Speaker 1: Uh? Just London so far? 779 00:42:10,400 --> 00:42:10,600 Speaker 2: Really? 780 00:42:10,680 --> 00:42:14,279 Speaker 1: Yeah? I mean, so it's London, New York, Miami, Hong Kong, Singapore. 781 00:42:15,480 --> 00:42:17,760 Speaker 2: What do you think in Miami? A city I'm always 782 00:42:17,800 --> 00:42:21,120 Speaker 2: I'm always every time I go to Miami. I want 783 00:42:21,120 --> 00:42:24,960 Speaker 2: to like it, and Miami always manages to disappoint me somehow, 784 00:42:24,960 --> 00:42:30,960 Speaker 2: including Michelin star rated restaurants that won't serve decaf after dinner. 785 00:42:31,760 --> 00:42:33,759 Speaker 1: I'm not that opinionated, you know. I mean, I don't, 786 00:42:33,920 --> 00:42:36,080 Speaker 1: I don't. I mean I don't have a strong judgment 787 00:42:36,120 --> 00:42:39,759 Speaker 1: on cities and people and and so I go and 788 00:42:39,840 --> 00:42:42,040 Speaker 1: usually again I've got I've got young children, so I'm 789 00:42:42,080 --> 00:42:46,319 Speaker 1: usually going for like a day, three days, aldays, you know. 790 00:42:46,440 --> 00:42:49,400 Speaker 1: So I'm just going, you know, meeting clients who are 791 00:42:49,400 --> 00:42:52,480 Speaker 1: also friends and doing the dinner and coming back. So 792 00:42:52,480 --> 00:42:55,800 Speaker 1: I'm not usually spending a lot of time in Miami 793 00:42:55,960 --> 00:42:59,120 Speaker 1: checking out the city, the food scene. I love windwind Walls. 794 00:42:59,160 --> 00:43:01,400 Speaker 1: One of my favorite people is in Miami, Peter Tunney, 795 00:43:01,760 --> 00:43:03,880 Speaker 1: We'll have to spend time with. So I feel like 796 00:43:03,880 --> 00:43:07,040 Speaker 1: in every city, I've got someone deep that I connect 797 00:43:07,120 --> 00:43:09,759 Speaker 1: with or something about that place I say that I'm 798 00:43:09,840 --> 00:43:13,280 Speaker 1: dying to visit and hosted dinner is actually Boston. Because 799 00:43:13,320 --> 00:43:16,920 Speaker 1: of my love for Ralph wald Emerson, I haven't visited it. 800 00:43:16,920 --> 00:43:18,560 Speaker 1: I just want to go and be a tribute to 801 00:43:18,600 --> 00:43:21,359 Speaker 1: him and Colegia Brown actually as well. Who's Boston? Who 802 00:43:21,400 --> 00:43:22,520 Speaker 1: was living in Boston for very long. 803 00:43:22,680 --> 00:43:25,520 Speaker 2: I was gonna recommend some restaurants in Boston. 804 00:43:25,160 --> 00:43:27,719 Speaker 1: But they must have a round table. That's the other rule. 805 00:43:27,920 --> 00:43:31,040 Speaker 1: I only do roundtables in a private room. 806 00:43:31,440 --> 00:43:34,680 Speaker 2: Well, the private room, otherwise you can't hear. But there 807 00:43:34,680 --> 00:43:36,920 Speaker 2: are a lot of places where you end up with 808 00:43:37,040 --> 00:43:41,080 Speaker 2: a rectangle. But it's hard. It's hard, right that lends 809 00:43:41,120 --> 00:43:42,279 Speaker 2: itself to those side coms. 810 00:43:42,360 --> 00:43:42,760 Speaker 1: Exactly. 811 00:43:43,320 --> 00:43:49,880 Speaker 2: So, without revealing any confidences, and I'm assuming everything is, 812 00:43:51,360 --> 00:43:54,520 Speaker 2: you know, off the record private, you're not repeating the 813 00:43:54,640 --> 00:43:57,000 Speaker 2: last salon you held. Tell us about some of the 814 00:43:57,000 --> 00:44:00,560 Speaker 2: conversations that took place. Who said what, and I mean 815 00:44:00,719 --> 00:44:04,360 Speaker 2: this economist, this PM without naming names, what sort of 816 00:44:04,360 --> 00:44:05,120 Speaker 2: topics came up. 817 00:44:05,160 --> 00:44:07,560 Speaker 1: I'll tell you what surprised me because the last dinner 818 00:44:07,600 --> 00:44:13,239 Speaker 1: we did was in Singapore, and I was surprised at 819 00:44:13,480 --> 00:44:19,240 Speaker 1: the man of conversation time spent discussing the EU's economy 820 00:44:19,600 --> 00:44:22,640 Speaker 1: and the consensus about a recession. 821 00:44:22,480 --> 00:44:24,399 Speaker 2: Which has been going on for eighteen months now. 822 00:44:24,440 --> 00:44:26,680 Speaker 1: Not something that I would expect in Singapore. Oh really, 823 00:44:26,760 --> 00:44:30,440 Speaker 1: you know so it almost felt as though news here 824 00:44:31,040 --> 00:44:35,640 Speaker 1: was infecting there in terms of the fact that it's 825 00:44:35,880 --> 00:44:41,240 Speaker 1: inevitable or it's ever present. It's almost like a foregone conclusion, right, 826 00:44:41,360 --> 00:44:44,280 Speaker 1: So that was something that was unexpected. But again because 827 00:44:45,520 --> 00:44:47,359 Speaker 1: those views are also coming from people that I love 828 00:44:47,400 --> 00:44:50,760 Speaker 1: and respect, and so that makes me think twice about 829 00:44:50,760 --> 00:44:52,839 Speaker 1: my view and makes me go back and do more 830 00:44:52,880 --> 00:44:55,120 Speaker 1: work on what am I missing and what are they 831 00:44:55,200 --> 00:44:59,840 Speaker 1: getting right? And so's a So that was my lesson. 832 00:44:59,880 --> 00:45:03,040 Speaker 1: It force me to thing deeper and I've come back looking, 833 00:45:03,239 --> 00:45:05,399 Speaker 1: you know, so focus on My focus on the labor 834 00:45:05,400 --> 00:45:07,600 Speaker 1: market was party as a function of mute ending that 835 00:45:07,640 --> 00:45:10,680 Speaker 1: dinner and hearing that from the community to make sure 836 00:45:10,680 --> 00:45:12,319 Speaker 1: that what am I missing on the labor market? You know, 837 00:45:12,440 --> 00:45:14,520 Speaker 1: how can I get more robust in my analysis the 838 00:45:14,600 --> 00:45:17,439 Speaker 1: labor market? And I've come away thinking that actually, yeah, 839 00:45:17,640 --> 00:45:19,920 Speaker 1: you know, I still stand by my view that the 840 00:45:19,960 --> 00:45:25,040 Speaker 1: liber market will remain diet, secular, fashion, one crack the 841 00:45:25,120 --> 00:45:27,719 Speaker 1: way people expect. And now it's you know, my job 842 00:45:27,760 --> 00:45:29,799 Speaker 1: to share that with the community and get feedback. And 843 00:45:29,880 --> 00:45:32,120 Speaker 1: so that's kind of how the process works, the research 844 00:45:32,239 --> 00:45:33,880 Speaker 1: idea discovery flywheel works. 845 00:45:34,280 --> 00:45:36,719 Speaker 2: So you mentioned something earlier I want to circle back 846 00:45:36,760 --> 00:45:41,720 Speaker 2: to talking about the expectation of recession, and you said 847 00:45:42,320 --> 00:45:45,920 Speaker 2: that there is a tendency for people to ignore good 848 00:45:45,960 --> 00:45:49,279 Speaker 2: news and focus on bad news. Let me throw this 849 00:45:49,360 --> 00:45:55,480 Speaker 2: out there. From an evolutionary perspective, isn't threats and security 850 00:45:55,600 --> 00:46:00,719 Speaker 2: risks and bad news an existential risk versus is good news? 851 00:46:00,800 --> 00:46:02,600 Speaker 2: Is just hey, we're all doing a little better. 852 00:46:03,280 --> 00:46:08,080 Speaker 1: From a spiritual perspective, right, I would say, I'm I'm 853 00:46:08,160 --> 00:46:12,520 Speaker 1: born to be grateful, Okay, so I always see the 854 00:46:12,560 --> 00:46:13,760 Speaker 1: bright side of things. 855 00:46:14,200 --> 00:46:18,440 Speaker 2: I'm with you. I'm a glass half full guy. Also 856 00:46:18,800 --> 00:46:21,759 Speaker 2: mathematically half of zero zero, so there's no such thing 857 00:46:21,800 --> 00:46:26,760 Speaker 2: as a half empty glass. But you know, the Morgan 858 00:46:26,800 --> 00:46:30,560 Speaker 2: Housel wrote this really interesting piece that said, following the 859 00:46:30,600 --> 00:46:33,560 Speaker 2: first flight of Kitty Hawk, it took newspapers twenty years 860 00:46:34,040 --> 00:46:38,120 Speaker 2: to start talking about flight, but the first instant there's 861 00:46:38,200 --> 00:46:45,560 Speaker 2: any sort of trouble, it's headline news. My curiosity is, 862 00:46:46,120 --> 00:46:52,520 Speaker 2: how Darwinian is this? How much of your spirituality is 863 00:46:52,560 --> 00:46:58,800 Speaker 2: not the traditional state of human psyche? We are seem 864 00:46:59,040 --> 00:47:04,400 Speaker 2: like we were built to over anticipate threats. 865 00:47:04,840 --> 00:47:08,160 Speaker 1: Perhaps my philosophy or not is simply the more we 866 00:47:08,200 --> 00:47:12,040 Speaker 1: look at others, the more neglectful we've become looking at ourselves. 867 00:47:12,239 --> 00:47:15,160 Speaker 2: So let's talk about that, because some of some of 868 00:47:15,200 --> 00:47:19,560 Speaker 2: your thoughts on knowing yourself? How could you be a 869 00:47:19,560 --> 00:47:23,160 Speaker 2: good investor if you don't understand yourself? Let let's let's 870 00:47:23,560 --> 00:47:26,759 Speaker 2: let's delve into that. How important is self awareness and 871 00:47:26,800 --> 00:47:30,919 Speaker 2: self enlightenment in managing capital and risk? 872 00:47:31,120 --> 00:47:33,560 Speaker 1: I don't know what enlightenment, but self awareness certainly is 873 00:47:33,600 --> 00:47:34,840 Speaker 1: I think very important. 874 00:47:34,960 --> 00:47:37,120 Speaker 2: Is there that much of a distinction? Or am I 875 00:47:37,200 --> 00:47:40,799 Speaker 2: am I using overly broad terms like I think of 876 00:47:40,840 --> 00:47:44,960 Speaker 2: self enlightenment and self awareness as part of the same spectrum. 877 00:47:44,560 --> 00:47:49,080 Speaker 1: Right, I think awareness is important? Right? What's the motivation? 878 00:47:49,280 --> 00:47:51,600 Speaker 1: Why are you in this business? Just asking a simple 879 00:47:51,680 --> 00:47:53,360 Speaker 1: questions like why do you care so much about investing? 880 00:47:53,960 --> 00:47:54,640 Speaker 2: You want to ask me? 881 00:47:55,920 --> 00:47:59,359 Speaker 1: Or just general yeah, just diving deeper into a person, right, 882 00:47:59,360 --> 00:48:01,319 Speaker 1: why do you care some aout investing? What is it 883 00:48:01,480 --> 00:48:04,440 Speaker 1: doing for you? You know? Like for example, you I think 884 00:48:04,480 --> 00:48:07,279 Speaker 1: I've read somewhere recently or I heard that you don't 885 00:48:07,280 --> 00:48:10,600 Speaker 1: know why you're drinking until you stop drinking, Okay, right, 886 00:48:10,760 --> 00:48:13,160 Speaker 1: so that's fair. You don't know why you're trading until 887 00:48:13,160 --> 00:48:15,719 Speaker 1: you stop trading. So like what is our underlying motivators? 888 00:48:15,840 --> 00:48:18,520 Speaker 1: You know? In the industry, and a lot of people 889 00:48:18,520 --> 00:48:20,920 Speaker 1: struggle with ego and identity, and you know, like, so, 890 00:48:20,920 --> 00:48:22,840 Speaker 1: what are your underlying motivators? You're just geting to know 891 00:48:22,880 --> 00:48:26,400 Speaker 1: who you are while you're doing what you're doing. You know, 892 00:48:26,400 --> 00:48:28,960 Speaker 1: how do you become more flexible in your thinking? Adaptable? 893 00:48:29,440 --> 00:48:31,120 Speaker 1: I often say the biggest risk you need to manage 894 00:48:31,160 --> 00:48:33,920 Speaker 1: is yourself. It's not a position, it's not what the 895 00:48:33,960 --> 00:48:36,600 Speaker 1: Fed is saying, it's not a political event. It's yourself 896 00:48:36,600 --> 00:48:39,719 Speaker 1: because you're going to react to a particular news story 897 00:48:39,760 --> 00:48:41,520 Speaker 1: or particular event. Right, So, the biggest risk you need 898 00:48:41,520 --> 00:48:43,359 Speaker 1: to manage yourself. So if you don't know yourself, it's 899 00:48:43,360 --> 00:48:45,200 Speaker 1: pretty it's pretty difficult. 900 00:48:45,880 --> 00:48:49,360 Speaker 2: One of the comments you had had written about was 901 00:48:49,800 --> 00:48:53,480 Speaker 2: the obsession we have with things that we can't control. 902 00:48:53,840 --> 00:48:56,319 Speaker 2: You can't control the economy, we can't control inflash, we 903 00:48:56,320 --> 00:48:58,960 Speaker 2: can't control what the FED does, we can't control what 904 00:48:59,040 --> 00:49:03,760 Speaker 2: Congress does. But to your points, you can control yourself 905 00:49:03,800 --> 00:49:07,759 Speaker 2: and your own reaction. Given that, are we spending too 906 00:49:07,800 --> 00:49:11,600 Speaker 2: much time focusing on news when we really should be 907 00:49:11,680 --> 00:49:16,400 Speaker 2: focusing more on things that are within our p number 908 00:49:16,640 --> 00:49:21,120 Speaker 2: of being able to manage, modify, and control. 909 00:49:21,880 --> 00:49:24,399 Speaker 1: Perhaps, But again it depends on what you're doing. Right. 910 00:49:24,440 --> 00:49:27,000 Speaker 1: So I certainly do that. I can't speak to other people, 911 00:49:27,239 --> 00:49:29,840 Speaker 1: but not the luxury of doing that, because that's partly 912 00:49:29,880 --> 00:49:31,919 Speaker 1: why I get to do what I do, is because 913 00:49:31,960 --> 00:49:35,120 Speaker 1: I can zoom out, I can disconnect to come back 914 00:49:35,160 --> 00:49:39,000 Speaker 1: with certain reflective, deep refreshing thoughts that will sort of 915 00:49:39,040 --> 00:49:41,879 Speaker 1: help the community, the client base in a particular way. 916 00:49:42,200 --> 00:49:46,080 Speaker 1: But obviously if you're macro PM you can't disconnect. You know, 917 00:49:46,280 --> 00:49:48,160 Speaker 1: if you're a CIO of a pension fund, You're always 918 00:49:48,160 --> 00:49:53,520 Speaker 1: thinking about your employees and your portfolio and the band sponsors. 919 00:49:53,880 --> 00:49:57,080 Speaker 1: So I have a luxury, I think, barry, to design 920 00:49:57,080 --> 00:49:59,279 Speaker 1: my life set in a particular way that gives me 921 00:49:59,320 --> 00:50:03,919 Speaker 1: an edge that I appreciate that not everybody does. 922 00:50:04,719 --> 00:50:06,920 Speaker 2: All right, So let me throw you a curveball question. 923 00:50:07,440 --> 00:50:11,080 Speaker 2: I got to ask, you write all the time, why 924 00:50:11,280 --> 00:50:14,759 Speaker 2: write a book? Tell us what motivated you to turn 925 00:50:14,840 --> 00:50:18,400 Speaker 2: stray reflections into a bound, printed book. 926 00:50:19,080 --> 00:50:22,360 Speaker 1: So I didn't write the book. What actually happened was, 927 00:50:22,360 --> 00:50:25,280 Speaker 1: like I mentioned earlier, I wrote from the very beginning, 928 00:50:25,320 --> 00:50:27,279 Speaker 1: from a very personal space. So at the end of 929 00:50:27,320 --> 00:50:30,120 Speaker 1: every issue there'd be a personal reflection. It could be 930 00:50:30,200 --> 00:50:32,720 Speaker 1: my daughter being born, my grandmother dying, meeting a friend 931 00:50:32,760 --> 00:50:36,080 Speaker 1: reading a book some travel experience, so I'd always made 932 00:50:36,080 --> 00:50:39,440 Speaker 1: sure I ended on a personal note. I realized when 933 00:50:39,480 --> 00:50:41,759 Speaker 1: I started writing there was a lot of reservations, will 934 00:50:41,800 --> 00:50:44,040 Speaker 1: I have something meaningful to say on a regular basis? 935 00:50:44,800 --> 00:50:47,040 Speaker 1: And something Roomy said struck with me, and he said, 936 00:50:47,440 --> 00:50:50,279 Speaker 1: words are just a pretext. What connects one person to 937 00:50:50,280 --> 00:50:53,320 Speaker 1: another is that inner bond, not words. So I realized, 938 00:50:53,320 --> 00:50:55,239 Speaker 1: I want to write from a very personal space. I 939 00:50:55,280 --> 00:50:57,440 Speaker 1: want to write from the heart. There's too much brain intelligence, 940 00:50:57,680 --> 00:51:00,399 Speaker 1: you know, in our industry, Like, let's connect a person level. 941 00:51:01,440 --> 00:51:03,560 Speaker 1: So the book is simply a collection of all those 942 00:51:03,600 --> 00:51:07,440 Speaker 1: personal reflections that I've been writing since the beginning of 943 00:51:07,440 --> 00:51:10,839 Speaker 1: the publication. So I didn't write a book separately. It 944 00:51:10,920 --> 00:51:13,840 Speaker 1: was you know, I held this conference in twenty eighteen 945 00:51:13,920 --> 00:51:15,520 Speaker 1: in the desert, and I was trying to think of 946 00:51:15,560 --> 00:51:19,480 Speaker 1: a way to give a thoughtful gift, and this idea 947 00:51:19,520 --> 00:51:22,600 Speaker 1: came about. So we just assembled all the reflections into 948 00:51:22,600 --> 00:51:24,839 Speaker 1: a book that you can just order on Amazon. But 949 00:51:24,880 --> 00:51:26,600 Speaker 1: back then we just printed it and gifted it to 950 00:51:26,640 --> 00:51:29,279 Speaker 1: all our clients, and there's a lot of people would 951 00:51:29,280 --> 00:51:31,360 Speaker 1: ask for it, and I'm glad that it's just available 952 00:51:31,360 --> 00:51:33,080 Speaker 1: for anybody to sort of pick it up or for 953 00:51:33,120 --> 00:51:35,160 Speaker 1: me to keep gifting it. I'd much rather meet a 954 00:51:35,160 --> 00:51:37,880 Speaker 1: client and instead of giving them a presentation about housing 955 00:51:37,960 --> 00:51:39,680 Speaker 1: or this or that, just leave a copy of my 956 00:51:39,719 --> 00:51:40,359 Speaker 1: book on the desk. 957 00:51:40,680 --> 00:51:43,840 Speaker 2: Huh. Really interesting. So we only have you for a 958 00:51:43,880 --> 00:51:47,440 Speaker 2: little while longer. Let me jump to my favorite questions 959 00:51:47,440 --> 00:51:50,759 Speaker 2: that we ask all of our guests, starting with tell 960 00:51:50,840 --> 00:51:54,080 Speaker 2: us what you're paying attention to these days in terms 961 00:51:54,080 --> 00:51:56,759 Speaker 2: of entertainment? What are you listening to in terms of 962 00:51:56,800 --> 00:52:00,480 Speaker 2: podcast or are there any Netflix or Amazon shows that 963 00:52:00,560 --> 00:52:03,640 Speaker 2: have caught your attention? What's entertaining the family? 964 00:52:04,600 --> 00:52:06,840 Speaker 1: I actually don't get bored to feel the need to 965 00:52:06,840 --> 00:52:09,520 Speaker 1: be entertained, So I actually don't listen to music or 966 00:52:09,600 --> 00:52:13,279 Speaker 1: watch movies. I've got three young daughters, and I love 967 00:52:13,320 --> 00:52:14,160 Speaker 1: spending time with them. 968 00:52:14,280 --> 00:52:17,680 Speaker 2: Do they watch TV? Do they watch listen to music? 969 00:52:18,680 --> 00:52:21,959 Speaker 1: They watch cartoons? So we'll have a movie time every 970 00:52:21,960 --> 00:52:26,120 Speaker 1: weekend with them, So they'll watch some children's movie and 971 00:52:26,160 --> 00:52:27,560 Speaker 1: I'm just present with them. 972 00:52:27,719 --> 00:52:28,959 Speaker 2: You're along for the ride. 973 00:52:29,000 --> 00:52:29,680 Speaker 1: So so. 974 00:52:32,000 --> 00:52:35,920 Speaker 2: Okay, so Pixar, Disney, all the usual suspects. 975 00:52:36,400 --> 00:52:38,759 Speaker 1: But I find myself doing you know, one of my 976 00:52:38,760 --> 00:52:40,719 Speaker 1: goals last year, for example, Barry was I want to 977 00:52:40,719 --> 00:52:42,680 Speaker 1: work fewer hours and get more done. So that's when 978 00:52:42,680 --> 00:52:46,719 Speaker 1: I started cutting out distractions right again, deep work is 979 00:52:46,760 --> 00:52:49,360 Speaker 1: something that I really believe in, and so I would say, 980 00:52:49,600 --> 00:52:51,719 Speaker 1: if I have any doubt, I'm actually listening to a 981 00:52:51,760 --> 00:52:55,080 Speaker 1: book as opposed to watching a movie or listening to music. 982 00:52:55,120 --> 00:52:57,680 Speaker 1: And I'm a big audible fan. Again, with young girls, 983 00:52:57,719 --> 00:52:59,239 Speaker 1: it's more difficult to like sit and pick up a 984 00:52:59,239 --> 00:53:01,919 Speaker 1: bookcause they jumping on you. So you're driving, when you're 985 00:53:01,960 --> 00:53:04,439 Speaker 1: cleaning or just going for a walk, you can listen 986 00:53:04,480 --> 00:53:07,440 Speaker 1: to a book. And something that listened to recently was 987 00:53:08,360 --> 00:53:12,880 Speaker 1: Screw Tape Letters by C. S. Lewis read by John Cleese, 988 00:53:13,040 --> 00:53:15,960 Speaker 1: which is a masterpiece. I don't know if you're familiar 989 00:53:15,960 --> 00:53:20,240 Speaker 1: with the book, but it's basically a senior devil writing 990 00:53:20,239 --> 00:53:23,640 Speaker 1: a letter to a junior devil talking about how to 991 00:53:23,760 --> 00:53:27,520 Speaker 1: corrupt the patient, which is humans, and keep him away 992 00:53:27,520 --> 00:53:30,719 Speaker 1: from the enemy, which is God. And even though people 993 00:53:30,760 --> 00:53:32,920 Speaker 1: think that The Fourth Turning is the most important book 994 00:53:32,960 --> 00:53:34,920 Speaker 1: of our time, I would say C. S. Lewis the 995 00:53:35,040 --> 00:53:37,200 Speaker 1: Screw Tape Letters is the most important book of our time. 996 00:53:37,280 --> 00:53:40,439 Speaker 1: The letter it explains a lot with what's going on. 997 00:53:41,000 --> 00:53:43,840 Speaker 2: If you like that. Have you ever read Mark Twain's 998 00:53:44,040 --> 00:53:49,160 Speaker 2: Letters from Earth? No, it's literally that the Devil comes 999 00:53:49,160 --> 00:53:51,560 Speaker 2: to Earth and or a demon comes to Earth, and 1000 00:53:51,560 --> 00:53:56,840 Speaker 2: it's writing letters back to a devil explaining what's going 1001 00:53:56,880 --> 00:53:59,960 Speaker 2: on with the humans and why they're so hard to corrupt. 1002 00:54:00,760 --> 00:54:04,440 Speaker 2: Of course they're already corrupted. It's really quite fascinating. I 1003 00:54:04,480 --> 00:54:07,360 Speaker 2: haven't read it in a long time, but you've given me. 1004 00:54:07,560 --> 00:54:09,239 Speaker 2: We're going to circle back to books in a bit. 1005 00:54:10,040 --> 00:54:12,640 Speaker 2: Let's talk about your mentors who helped shape your career 1006 00:54:12,760 --> 00:54:14,800 Speaker 2: and turn you into the person you are today. 1007 00:54:15,360 --> 00:54:17,080 Speaker 1: In the twenties, I searched for a mentor and I 1008 00:54:17,120 --> 00:54:20,640 Speaker 1: couldn't find one, So I spent my twenties learning and dreaming. 1009 00:54:21,200 --> 00:54:23,440 Speaker 1: In the book that got me to dream was The Alchemist. 1010 00:54:23,480 --> 00:54:24,359 Speaker 1: But I only don't like. 1011 00:54:24,800 --> 00:54:28,640 Speaker 2: It's not that I don't like it, it's that the 1012 00:54:28,680 --> 00:54:32,440 Speaker 2: books that are parables that sort of rely on magic 1013 00:54:33,120 --> 00:54:36,160 Speaker 2: to reach their conclusion I find annoying. 1014 00:54:36,440 --> 00:54:38,120 Speaker 1: The concept that resonated with me in the book was 1015 00:54:38,120 --> 00:54:40,400 Speaker 1: this idea of the personal legend. So I've spent my 1016 00:54:40,400 --> 00:54:43,399 Speaker 1: twenties dreaming that I'm going to unfold my personal legends. 1017 00:54:43,400 --> 00:54:45,760 Speaker 1: So for me, the twenties were spent learning and dreaming. 1018 00:54:46,080 --> 00:54:48,040 Speaker 1: I would say when I launched Fair Affections, you know 1019 00:54:48,080 --> 00:54:50,360 Speaker 1: the first five years that I was very lucky to 1020 00:54:50,360 --> 00:54:53,520 Speaker 1: meet someone called Steve Drobney out of Santa Monica who 1021 00:54:53,600 --> 00:54:55,680 Speaker 1: runs Clocked tour group. Every time I was thought of 1022 00:54:55,760 --> 00:54:57,799 Speaker 1: quitting in the first few years because I couldn't figure 1023 00:54:57,800 --> 00:55:00,279 Speaker 1: out the business model, I wasn't making enough money, he 1024 00:55:00,320 --> 00:55:01,840 Speaker 1: was on the other side of the phone saying, just 1025 00:55:01,920 --> 00:55:04,640 Speaker 1: hang in there. You know, a path would open up. 1026 00:55:05,360 --> 00:55:07,799 Speaker 1: And I remember his words. He said, Joe, this will 1027 00:55:07,840 --> 00:55:10,239 Speaker 1: be your only job for the rest of your life. 1028 00:55:10,800 --> 00:55:15,840 Speaker 1: Be patient and wise words and I realized, you know 1029 00:55:15,840 --> 00:55:20,640 Speaker 1: what actually surviving is succeeding and the universe opened its path. 1030 00:55:20,719 --> 00:55:23,840 Speaker 1: And so he was influential and remains a very close friend. 1031 00:55:24,280 --> 00:55:26,719 Speaker 1: And I would say in the last five years, the 1032 00:55:26,760 --> 00:55:30,279 Speaker 1: most impact that I've had is from a coaching relationship. 1033 00:55:30,400 --> 00:55:32,279 Speaker 1: And I speak with my coach every week and she's 1034 00:55:32,360 --> 00:55:33,239 Speaker 1: indispensable to me. 1035 00:55:33,520 --> 00:55:37,960 Speaker 2: Huh, that's really that's really interesting. The idea that you're 1036 00:55:38,000 --> 00:55:40,319 Speaker 2: not ready for this and the universe will open up 1037 00:55:40,320 --> 00:55:45,960 Speaker 2: to you when you are is frustrating prospectively, but when 1038 00:55:46,000 --> 00:55:48,200 Speaker 2: you're looking backwards, it's like Oh that turned out to 1039 00:55:48,200 --> 00:55:51,120 Speaker 2: be pretty Uh. You hate it in the advance, but 1040 00:55:51,239 --> 00:55:55,120 Speaker 2: looking backwards, it's like, maybe it's a coincidence. But that 1041 00:55:55,239 --> 00:55:57,480 Speaker 2: seemed to come along at the exact right time, didn't it. 1042 00:55:57,800 --> 00:55:59,280 Speaker 1: Absolutely that's been my experience. 1043 00:55:59,480 --> 00:56:03,120 Speaker 2: So we've mentioned two books so far, three books, Letters 1044 00:56:03,120 --> 00:56:07,160 Speaker 2: from Earth, the Alchemist, and the C. S Lewis Book. 1045 00:56:07,560 --> 00:56:09,480 Speaker 2: Tell us some other books you're reading. What are some 1046 00:56:09,520 --> 00:56:10,640 Speaker 2: of your all time favorites. 1047 00:56:11,160 --> 00:56:15,440 Speaker 1: I love everything written by Ralph wald Emerson, C. S. Lewis, 1048 00:56:15,480 --> 00:56:18,359 Speaker 1: as well as Roomy, who I'm a big fan of. 1049 00:56:19,840 --> 00:56:24,600 Speaker 1: What I'm reading more recently is actually something John Authors recommended. 1050 00:56:24,640 --> 00:56:26,120 Speaker 1: I was having a conversation with him and I was 1051 00:56:26,160 --> 00:56:29,960 Speaker 1: asking for advice on writing and the craft, and he 1052 00:56:30,040 --> 00:56:32,840 Speaker 1: suggested that the most influential person in his life was 1053 00:56:32,880 --> 00:56:35,920 Speaker 1: Professor Readman from Columbia, and he's written a bunch of books. 1054 00:56:35,920 --> 00:56:38,120 Speaker 1: So I went and looked through his books and the 1055 00:56:38,120 --> 00:56:40,160 Speaker 1: one that really appealed to me was Letters to a 1056 00:56:40,160 --> 00:56:44,200 Speaker 1: Young Journalist. And I'm reading that and I'm fascinated because 1057 00:56:44,200 --> 00:56:47,960 Speaker 1: again I look at what I do is writing, and 1058 00:56:48,000 --> 00:56:50,440 Speaker 1: I want to read improve that craft to be, you know, 1059 00:56:50,480 --> 00:56:52,600 Speaker 1: a creative thinker, and looking at the world and observing 1060 00:56:52,600 --> 00:56:53,280 Speaker 1: things differently. 1061 00:56:53,480 --> 00:56:56,239 Speaker 2: So Roomy, give me a book of Roomy that. 1062 00:56:56,800 --> 00:57:00,520 Speaker 1: The mus Nui. The muth Nui is the the big 1063 00:57:00,560 --> 00:57:04,319 Speaker 1: sort of collection of poems that he's written, would be 1064 00:57:04,360 --> 00:57:07,560 Speaker 1: the one that Reynald Nicholson has the best translation in 1065 00:57:07,600 --> 00:57:11,880 Speaker 1: my opinion. Okay, it's anything that Reynold Nicholson has translated 1066 00:57:12,000 --> 00:57:13,440 Speaker 1: room Me would be the best, all right. 1067 00:57:13,719 --> 00:57:17,160 Speaker 2: And by the way, you know, there's only two secrets 1068 00:57:17,200 --> 00:57:20,720 Speaker 2: to good writing, right you're aware of this, no reveal. 1069 00:57:22,040 --> 00:57:25,560 Speaker 2: I'm not sharing anything that hasn't been revealed many times. First, 1070 00:57:25,880 --> 00:57:29,480 Speaker 2: read really good writing. You're already doing that. And Second, 1071 00:57:30,040 --> 00:57:34,360 Speaker 2: write regularly and relentlessly. And the more you write, the 1072 00:57:34,360 --> 00:57:37,160 Speaker 2: better you get. It's just a muscle that has to 1073 00:57:37,160 --> 00:57:40,640 Speaker 2: be exercised. I hate that metaphor, but it's true. If 1074 00:57:40,680 --> 00:57:44,400 Speaker 2: you write regularly, you'll find you just get especially if 1075 00:57:44,440 --> 00:57:47,160 Speaker 2: you have access to a decent editor. Also, you'll just 1076 00:57:47,240 --> 00:57:50,880 Speaker 2: start to get better and better and better. I've watched 1077 00:57:51,000 --> 00:57:55,360 Speaker 2: this arc with people over and over again, and every 1078 00:57:55,440 --> 00:57:57,640 Speaker 2: now and then someone will say, oh, I hate my 1079 00:57:57,720 --> 00:58:00,560 Speaker 2: early stuff, but now I'm pretty comfort was it? But 1080 00:58:00,840 --> 00:58:04,760 Speaker 2: that's the path. You have to travel, that route. 1081 00:58:04,520 --> 00:58:07,600 Speaker 1: As someone who has struggled with the imposter syndrome. I 1082 00:58:07,600 --> 00:58:11,560 Speaker 1: think what really helped me alongside was reading the book 1083 00:58:11,680 --> 00:58:14,120 Speaker 1: The War of Art by Steven Pressfield, and he talks 1084 00:58:14,160 --> 00:58:18,160 Speaker 1: about turning pro and so, you know, an amateur waits 1085 00:58:18,200 --> 00:58:20,440 Speaker 1: for inspiration and then he goes to the room and 1086 00:58:20,440 --> 00:58:23,920 Speaker 1: starts writing. The pro takes his craft seriously and shows 1087 00:58:24,000 --> 00:58:28,480 Speaker 1: up and exactly, and this, this concept of turning pro, 1088 00:58:28,880 --> 00:58:32,640 Speaker 1: I'm a professional, made a big difference, just mentally psychologically 1089 00:58:32,680 --> 00:58:36,480 Speaker 1: that you know, take it seriously. That made a huge difference. 1090 00:58:36,840 --> 00:58:40,160 Speaker 2: My buddy David Nottig and I have this ongoing debate 1091 00:58:40,760 --> 00:58:45,720 Speaker 2: about imposter syndrome, which is a problem for him, and 1092 00:58:46,000 --> 00:58:51,080 Speaker 2: I have just no understanding of it. My defense is 1093 00:58:51,080 --> 00:58:56,360 Speaker 2: that I'm oblivious. He says, I'm a sociopath and therefore, 1094 00:58:56,480 --> 00:59:02,320 Speaker 2: but I don't really feel like a sociopath. Although sociopaths 1095 00:59:02,360 --> 00:59:05,600 Speaker 2: probably don't feel like sociopaths. But I think I have 1096 00:59:05,640 --> 00:59:10,000 Speaker 2: a pretty decent defense on that. So our last two questions, 1097 00:59:10,840 --> 00:59:13,280 Speaker 2: A recent college grad came up to you and said, 1098 00:59:13,320 --> 00:59:17,240 Speaker 2: I'm thinking about a career in finance, writing a newsletter 1099 00:59:18,240 --> 00:59:23,440 Speaker 2: or a macro advisory paper for investors. What sort of advice. 1100 00:59:23,480 --> 00:59:24,240 Speaker 2: Would you give them? 1101 00:59:25,440 --> 00:59:29,160 Speaker 1: Roomy jumps to mind, and he says, let the beauty 1102 00:59:29,200 --> 00:59:31,600 Speaker 1: of what you love be what you do. There are 1103 00:59:31,640 --> 00:59:34,960 Speaker 1: a thousand ways to kneel and kiss the ground. That's 1104 00:59:35,000 --> 00:59:38,280 Speaker 1: the first thing. The other thing I'd say also comes 1105 00:59:38,320 --> 00:59:40,400 Speaker 1: from roomy, which is be with those who help your being. 1106 00:59:40,920 --> 00:59:42,240 Speaker 1: So surround yourself with good people. 1107 00:59:42,880 --> 00:59:46,640 Speaker 2: To say the very least, and our final question, what 1108 00:59:46,720 --> 00:59:51,840 Speaker 2: do you know about the world of macro analysis, investing, 1109 00:59:52,640 --> 00:59:58,000 Speaker 2: economic data, etc. Today That you wish you knew twenty 1110 00:59:58,120 --> 01:00:01,160 Speaker 2: years or so ago when you were first getting started. 1111 01:00:02,760 --> 01:00:04,280 Speaker 1: The world is not the way to tell you it is. 1112 01:00:05,720 --> 01:00:09,080 Speaker 1: That's a classic opening line from The Money Game, And 1113 01:00:09,760 --> 01:00:12,120 Speaker 1: I wish I knew that the world is not the 1114 01:00:12,120 --> 01:00:13,000 Speaker 1: way they tell you it is. 1115 01:00:14,200 --> 01:00:18,200 Speaker 2: Adam Smith The Money Game another classic book that is 1116 01:00:18,320 --> 01:00:21,680 Speaker 2: absolutely worth worth reading. Jawad, thank you so much for 1117 01:00:21,760 --> 01:00:26,000 Speaker 2: being so generous with your time. This was absolutely fascinating. 1118 01:00:26,440 --> 01:00:30,280 Speaker 2: We have been speaking with Joadman. He is the editor 1119 01:00:30,360 --> 01:00:36,200 Speaker 2: and publisher of Stray Reflections, a macro advisory research commentary. 1120 01:00:37,040 --> 01:00:38,920 Speaker 2: I would be remiss if I did not thank the 1121 01:00:38,960 --> 01:00:42,640 Speaker 2: crack team that helps put these conversations together each week. 1122 01:00:43,040 --> 01:00:47,400 Speaker 2: Paris Wald is my producer. Sean Russo is my researcher. 1123 01:00:48,000 --> 01:00:51,240 Speaker 2: Rob Bragg is my audio engineer. Attika v Albron is 1124 01:00:51,280 --> 01:00:55,960 Speaker 2: our project manager. I'm Barry Ritoltz. You've been listening to 1125 01:00:56,080 --> 01:01:02,760 Speaker 2: Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.