WEBVTT - Anthropic, Google Discuss Multibillion-Dollar Cloud Deal

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in San Francisco.

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic and Google discussing a deal for cloud computing services

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 3>valued in the high tens of billions of dollars plus.

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 3>We breakdown earnings, Netflix and Texas Instruments in focus while

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.959
<v Speaker 3>we await Tesla's results after the closing Bell and Hot

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 3>on the heels of AT and T zone earnings, we

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 3>discuss with the company's CEO, John Stanky. Let's get to

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 3>our top story overnight, Bloomberg breaking the story that Anthropic

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 3>is in talks with Alphabets, specifically Google, for cloud computing

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 3>capacity high tens.

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Of billions of dollars. Tap user in the mix.

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 3>When we broke the story, alphabet Chez jumped in after

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>market Amazon fell. This is where we're trading right now

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Wednesday's session.

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 2>I broke that story. We're blooming both. Rachel Mets Let's

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 2>get out to her.

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 3>Actually, Rachel like, the details are quite simple to understand

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 3>early talks, and they're around capacity.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 2>But let's recap what we.

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 4>Know Yeah, so, as you said, the two companies have

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 4>been discussing a plan for Enthropic to use Google's tensor

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 4>processing units TPUs. These are chips that are are can

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 4>be used for a lot of things, but they also

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 4>can be used for EA workloads and Nanthropic, I think

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 4>it's important to remember, is already a customer of Google's

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 4>for its cloud service, and also Google is an investor

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 4>in Anthropic, and Aanthrotic is a similar deal with Amazon too,

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 4>So that's why you sort of see these these mixed reactions.

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 3>There has been a lot of reaction to our reporting.

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Later in the program, we're going to speaker Intelligence about

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 3>their take on it. Anthropic have been busy of late, right.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 3>We've reported that Dario ami Day did this kind of

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 3>tour of the Middle East seeking both money and compute capacity.

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 3>The compute capacity bit is where people are trying to

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.399
<v Speaker 3>understand this, like is it that just Anthropic really needs

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 3>as much capacity as it can get, or is this

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 3>a story about how actually Google is kind of becoming

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 3>the better partner for Anthropic beyond an Amazon.

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a couple of things that could be

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 4>happening here. One is that yes, building the kind of

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 4>AI models that Anthropic is building is extremely compute intensive,

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 4>and you can't just use like any cloud capacity you

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 4>could find anywhere, and you can't just use any ships.

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 4>You have to use certain ships that are going to

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 4>work well for the kinds of large language models they're

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 4>building and the kinds of models that they are serving

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 4>to people. So it seems like a vote confidence potentially

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 4>for Google and for its chips. I mean, hardly any

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 4>companies beyond Video AMD maybe one or two others have

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 4>chips that people are willing to be using for these

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 4>kinds of AI workloads. It also could make people a

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 4>little nervous about what it sets about Amazon and its

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 4>ability to provide the services that a company like Antropic needs.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Bloom both racial mets, thank you very much. Let's get

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 3>to the earning stories, starting with Texas Instruments in stockfell

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 3>the most in three months after it gave a lackluster

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.839
<v Speaker 3>forecast for the current quarter. Bloomberg's chips reporter Ian King

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 3>is with us actually probably more simple story than we expected.

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 3>We got a lens into the health of analog devices.

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Texas Instruments is analog chips. You covered the earnings blow

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 3>by blow. What do we need to know about this?

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 5>So the first off, the numbers not too bad. Fourteen

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 5>percent growth for most companies will be fine projecting something

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 5>in the region of eleven percent this current quarter. But

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 5>what they said was more important. What they said was

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 5>things are coming back. Everything's okay, but just not at

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 5>the pace that we had been expecting. There's still some

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 5>uncertainty out there. This is macro related. Companies aren't investing

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 5>in their factories perhaps as quickly as we had hoped.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 2>And really they.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 5>Were sort of painting this picture of a kind of

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 5>an anemic kind of return to growth for the whole industry.

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 3>When I was reviewing your story, the CEO said that

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 3>overall the semi conductor market recovery is continuing. That seems

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 3>a little bit in congruous with the market's reaction to

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 3>what's going on the socks down five percent, but also

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of you know what's specific to them.

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, what they're projecting is basically seasonal, Right, what would

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 5>happen normally if everything is equal in the fourth quarter.

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 5>The problem is with that is that if we're in

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 5>this recovery period, if we're in this bounce back from

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 5>this inventory correction that we've suffered. Things should be growing

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 5>quicker than that. People should be rushing to stock up,

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 5>people should be rushing to build new things, and they're not.

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg, se and King, thank you very much.

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 3>We actually just had some breaking news at the top

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 3>of the show, and it is moved shares of Google.

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 2>You can see there on the screen.

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 3>The company ran an algorithm on its Willow quantum computing

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 3>chip that can be repeated on similar platforms and outperform

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 3>classical supercomputers. A breakthrough, it said, clear as a path

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 3>for useful applications of quantum technology within five years. This

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 3>was detailed in a paper published Wednesday in the science

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 3>journal Nature. And you can see there on the screen

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 3>the right hand side of the chart. When those headlines hit,

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet shares, who had given up the gain they'd seen

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.679
<v Speaker 3>from our reporting on Anthropic, suddenly jumped in the session

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 3>to a gain of around two percent. We will continue

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 3>to track that story and alphabet shares throughout the show. Okay,

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 3>back to earnings. Another steep share drop. Netflix disappointed investors

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 3>with its results. The streaming giant blamed a tax dispute

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 3>with Brazil for.

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 2>A cut to its third quarter earnings.

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's get more with Bloomberg's media editor Felix Gillette. This

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 3>tax issue. Like yesterday, I went on television all day

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 3>long saying, maybe there'll be a foreign currency benefit to

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 3>Netflix's earnings. We'll learn about advertising, but actually this tax

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 3>issue is the main story.

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Just explain it.

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Ah.

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 6>This is a long ago in dispute that Netflix has

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 6>warned about in violence before. They didn't factor it into

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 6>the forecast. They ended up having to pay several hundred

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 6>million dollars more to Brazil. They're saying it's a one

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 6>time deal, it's not going to be material impact moving forward.

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 6>They're trying to steer the attention back to the growth.

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 6>You know, seventeen point five percent growth in sales for

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 6>the quarter, and you know profit growth also up.

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 3>You know, we were talking Felix about the idea that

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Netflix wants to be judged by its sort of traditional

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 3>financial metrics. Those were quite good generally speaking, right.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, I mean a fine at this point. You know,

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 6>I think investors were looking for more than fine. They

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 6>were looking for a complete blowout quarter, in part because

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, they had such a strong slate of program

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 6>in the third quarter. You know, Wednesday new episodes, Quid Game,

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 6>new episodes, k Pop Demon Hunters. So at this point, yeah,

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 6>the programming looked good, the growth and sales look good.

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 2>But investors one and one.

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Felix Jellette really appreciate your time.

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. A.

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.679
<v Speaker 3>Yoko Yoshioka is a portfolio consulting director at the Wealth

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Enhancement Group, which holds some of the major Magnificent seven

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 3>names Texas Instruments and I think we can also talk

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 3>a little bit about Netflix. That's where I quite like

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 3>to start earning. Season in technology can bring all kinds

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 3>of beautiful stories. Did you have a tax dispute with

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Brazil on your Bingo card? For Netflix would tell us

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 3>about the world of streaming.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.559
<v Speaker 7>I did not have Brazil tax issues on my Bingo card.

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 7>But I think the Netflix earnings were actually pretty decent.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 7>You know, we forget that Netflix has actually come a

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 7>long way from a free cash flow growth perspective. They

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 7>were only generating about one point six billion about two

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 7>and a half years ago, and now they're generating close

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 7>to eight billion dollars in free cash flow, and that's

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 7>slated to go to eleven billion dollars so we'd like

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 7>to focus on that metric versus the Brazilian tax issue.

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, team, let's leave the shares up, Ayoka, we're showing

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 3>shares on the screen. This stocks down almost ten percent,

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 3>on track for its biggest drop since April twenty twenty two.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 3>What was the big picture story about the health of

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 3>streamers and streaming here and when Netflix sits in that landscape?

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 7>Sure, I think from a consumer standpoint, you know, Netflix

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 7>is one of those go to programs that consumers are

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 7>going to continue to go to. I think that, you know,

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 7>for Netflix, the content you mentioned has been very solid,

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 7>and even if the macro environment is a little shaky

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 7>out there, I think Netflix will continue to see subscriber

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 7>growth and that's what we'd like to see over time.

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 3>But Yoko, let's get back to our top story today. Overnight,

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Rachel Davey and I broke the story that Google is

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 3>in early talks with Anthropic for a cloud computing deal

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 3>capacity in the high tens of billions of dollars. When

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 3>we broke that story, Alphabet shares really jumped in after market.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 3>They've given up some of that gain in the market

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 3>open this morning, and Amazon fell wealth enhancement has some exposure,

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 3>particularly to Alphabet. What is your reaction to that reporting

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 3>and what does it signal to you for those companies involved.

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think in general, the sort of clue to

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 7>me is just the infrastructure buildout is still in its

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 7>early phases, right. You know, we've heard so many announcements

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 7>over the last several months, and yet here we are

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 7>with another one. And just when you thought you weren't

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 7>going to get another announcement related to AI infrastructure buildouts,

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 7>you here we are Google and Anthropic. I think that

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 7>the race is clearly on and we'll have to see

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 7>who's really going to win, But the build out is

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 7>sort of still in its early phases.

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 3>The cloud computing market, as we've always understood it and

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 3>talked about it is AWS number one player, Google Cloud

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 3>number three player. In the specifics of this story, both

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 3>of those companies as it relates to AI workloads have

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 3>some questions to answer here. Right, So Amazon is also

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 3>a significant investor in Anthropic. Our reporting says that Anthropic

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 3>wants to use TPUs. What are you learning about the

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 3>competitive nature of Alphabet's cloud offering or Google's cloud offering

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 3>versus Amazon's in the AI domain.

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 7>Sure, so, I think we have to really dig into

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 7>this in terms of, you know, what are the TPUs

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 7>offering in terms of optimizing workflows that GPUs aren't, and

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 7>how is this better suited for you know, Google's sort

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 7>of overall workflow, and how they're going to be using

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 7>AI through Gmail and Google Maps and a lot of

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 7>their applications that they have in house. And then how

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 7>does that fit related to Amazon and how you know,

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 7>some of the algorithms are working for Amazon's you know,

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 7>suggestions for retail as well as advertising. I think there's

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 7>still a lot to dig into here in terms of

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 7>how this is all going to work out.

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Texas Instruments is worth lingering on. I think, you know,

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 3>sometimes it's seen as almost like a crystal ball of

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 3>what all kinds of end markets around the world will

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 3>do coming up next because of how many analog chips

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 3>go into all kinds of things.

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 2>What was your read on the print there?

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 8>Sure?

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 7>So, I think in general, the you know, as Ian said,

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 7>the overall quarter and earnings were actually pretty decent fourteen

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 7>percent growth. But I think the bread through into industrial markets,

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 7>into autumn motive, into some of the consumer electronics that

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 7>are more basic really shows that we're not in a

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:10.319
<v Speaker 7>macro environment that is growing gangbusters. So outside of all

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.239
<v Speaker 7>of the AI investments that we're seeing in the economy,

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 7>we're not seeing that sort of economic growth takeoff as

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 7>much as I think people had hoped for.

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 2>We're in it.

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 3>This is it technology earning season, my super Bowl. I

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 3>don't know if it's your super Bowl. What was it

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 3>that we were expecting to hear and what do you

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 3>need to hear from the technology sector specifically the mag

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 3>seven I suppose to keep the direction of travel that

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 3>we have seen in equity markets.

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 7>Sure, so next week will be the big week for

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 7>all of this, including a FED meeting to cap it

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 7>all off too. So I think for us, we're always

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 7>going to be looking at commentary around CAPEX spend. I mean,

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 7>this is what really set it off years ago, and

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 7>we're going to continue to see whether or not that

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 7>spend continues from the hyperscalers or whether or not they

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 7>need to, you know, take a little bit of a pause.

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 7>But I think we're going to continue to see that spend.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we're seeing announcements left and right, and so

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 7>we'd like to kind of dig into that during earning season.

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Do you expect that tariff specifically or any other Trump

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 3>administration policy will play out on the calls or in

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 3>the statements in.

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 7>The tech side. Maybe a little bit, but I don't

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 7>think it's going to be as prominent as some of

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 7>the consumer names have talked about with with tariffs and goods.

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 7>I think it's going to be a less of an issue,

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 7>you know. I think we've we've seen all of this

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 7>talk about exporting that has had a little bit more

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 7>of an impact, and the sort of tit for tat

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 7>with China that's probably going to be a little bit

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 7>more of an impact. But overall, I really do think

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 7>that investors are going to be focused on general CAPPAC

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 7>spend ROI around AI and you know how that's playing out.

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 3>O Yoka, Yoshioka, the Wealth Enhancement Group really appreciate you

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 3>rolling with the use of the day and a big

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 3>tech earning season coming up. At and T CEO John

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Stankey joins us to talk about the company's earnings and

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 3>it was a big one. Investors still making up their minds.

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 3>That's next. This is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome to our Bloomberg

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 3>TV and radio audiences. Worldwide. We bring in AT and

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 3>T CEO John Stanky, the company reporting results this morning

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 3>that showed higher than expected subscriber growth, though some analysts

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 3>noting customer churn and average revenue per user showing signs

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 3>of strain.

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 2>John, it's great to have you back with us. You

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 2>know the story. Thanks for having You're welcome. It's like

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 2>a simple story.

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, the data from the quarter is very clear

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 3>there was an element of promotion and marketing and deals

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 3>that drove it.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 2>But how would you summarize it?

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 9>Look, we had really strong growth, as you indicated, and

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 9>we're really comfortable with our growth. As I think you're

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 9>probably aware, we've been focusing on customers that want to

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 9>buy both wireless and broadband from us, and when we

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 9>can do that, even if it's promotional, that's a good

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 9>customer to pick up because they have great lifetime values

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 9>and over time they'll churn less and they'll address that

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 9>very issue that you alluded to, which is the increasing

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 9>churn in the industry. And we kind of anticipate as

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 9>we acquire these customers, we're going to see a little

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 9>bit of hardpoop pressure, partly because we obviously give them

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 9>a better price for their loyalty, and over time we

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 9>move them up on the continuumus services we sell, so

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 9>excuse me, buy and largs.

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 8>We feel really good about it.

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh, John, I don't know.

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 3>If you have some water there with you, Let me

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 3>give you a second, just to take a quick drink

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 3>if you need it. Of course in the quarter, and

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 3>we've discussed this with a number of the carriers. It

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 3>was iPhone set team. You know, I was there at

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Kupatino Apple Park on the day.

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Of its release.

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Can you give us a real term sense, even if

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 3>it's from the promotion perspective, of how big a fact

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 3>of the iPhone seventeen was for you?

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think it's not a huge factor, but clearly

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 9>there was a little bit of suppressed activity after the

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 9>last iPhone cycle a year ago. Maybe some folks anticipated

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 9>it was going to be a little bit larger customers

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 9>were seeing if it was really frame breaking and change

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 9>and concluded possibly that it wasn't and delayed waiting for

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 9>the next cycle. And I think, you know, you can

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 9>only suppress that activity for so long, and now the

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 9>new device comes out, people see what it is. So

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 9>there has been an increase over last year and maybe

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 9>some other previous years. It's not a record breaking cycle,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 9>but it's strong and we're seeing that as a result.

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 9>But I don't think it's anything dramatically out of pattern,

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 9>given the suppression we've seen in the market, and we

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 9>were very effective at working through at four hundred thousan

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 9>in over four hundred thousand postpai vone netads. It shows

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 9>we can compete in that space and do well with it.

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 3>If you're joining us on Bloomberg Television Radio, we're speaking

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 3>to AT and Tco John Stanky final on the iPhone seventeen.

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Will it be more of a factor in the three

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 3>month period that ends in December?

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 9>The holidays, well, the holiday season moving through the fourth

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.959
<v Speaker 9>quarter is always a peak season for everybody in the industry.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 9>I expect that's going to continue to be the case

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 9>this year. I don't see anything what we've had over

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 9>the first couple of weeks of the introduction to suggest

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 9>we're going to see a step function change from current

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 9>rate and pace. So all of our forward guidance that

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 9>we've given expects that it's going to be competitive, that

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 9>we're going to compete and continue to earn our fair

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 9>share of service revenues on those converged customers I talked about,

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 9>and I expect that it'll be as rambunctious in the

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 9>industry as it has been and we'll do just fine.

0:17:58.480 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 2>John.

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 3>If I turn on my division and watch a show

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 3>that has ads or a scroll on any given social

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 3>media timeline, I keep seeing AT and T talking about

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 3>itself as a home internet provider. I know that's been

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 3>a priority. Have you any evidence that that push has

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 3>been a success and that you have positioned AT and

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 3>T in that domain?

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 9>Well, I'm glad you're seeing those mean we must be

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 9>getting our right market and targets out there, and I

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 9>think this quarter was an excellent example of it. We

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 9>had our best broadband gain on our strategic products and

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 9>services fixed, wireless and fiber that we've had in eight years,

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 9>and so over five hundred and fifty thousand ADS on

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 9>those strategic products and a net gain of over two

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 9>hundred and thirty thousand of broadband total. It's the best

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 9>we've done in eight years. I think that's a good,

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 9>strong indication that it's working, especially when you consider the

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 9>industry has been rife with examples of our competitors adjusting

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 9>their offers trying to do different things to stem the

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 9>momentum we've had. So I feel really good about where

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 9>we're going on that front, and to the effect, we

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 9>can add that with wireless subscribers, which we're showing that

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 9>we can do over fifty percent of the time when

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 9>somebody buys our fixed wireless product and we're over forty

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 9>one percent penetrated on our fiber base. That's a winning

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 9>combination economically, and what kind of differentiates us from everybody

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 9>else in the industry.

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, shares a down a touch more than one percent,

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 3>which in the grand scheme of today is modest, is

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 3>a decline. The back and forth you had with the

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 3>analyst was, yes, churn is up and arpus are down,

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 3>but you seem not to be concerned about that. Why

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 3>Why is that not the metrics by which we should

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 3>should look to progress?

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, part of it, I think ed as well, as

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 9>we've got a little bit of churn going on in

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 9>the industry from CEO changeouts and there's a little uncertainty

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 9>around what the competitive posture is going to and then

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 9>you look at the data points you just reference, and

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 9>we're the first to report, and people are asking what's

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 9>going to happen when we hear from everybody else, And

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 9>my answering your question is, we're going to talk about

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 9>the fact that we're focused on putting customers together with

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 9>wireless and broadband, and part of that dynamic is go

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 9>penetrate segments that we've not been successful at penetrating or

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 9>as successful.

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 8>So when we go to value.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 9>Segments that were maybe a little under shared in, you're

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 9>going to naturally have a little bit less arpoo or

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 9>average revenue per user when you pick that customer up,

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 9>and when you combine wireless and broadband together, you may

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 9>be giving initially a little bit better deal to do that,

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 9>but that's designed into the plan. We want to grow

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 9>and aggregate service revenues, which we've demonstrated that we can

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 9>do that. We indicated we're going to see some strengthening

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 9>of that as we move through the year from where

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 9>we were this quarter. And I'm okay with a little

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 9>bit lower urpoo if we actually execute on the consolidated

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 9>customer strategy and are more successful and penetrating some of

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 9>these segments that we haven't been as active in.

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 3>John Stankey at and t CEO, it's great to have

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 3>you back here on Bloomberg Tech.

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. Okay.

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, ARM could be on the way to providing

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 3>full chips because customers demand faster pass to market.

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>We have more on that next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 3>ARM is exploring an expansion into producing full complete chips

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 3>as AI customers seek faster routes to marketsfo Jason Child

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.719
<v Speaker 3>discuss the plans with Bloomberg Tech's Tom McKenzie in London.

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 10>We're actually exploring building full chips and the reason why

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 10>is we are actually having customers in this AI cycle

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 10>basically asking us can you help us be able to

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 10>get products to market faster, which means instead of us

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 10>just taking an ip from you, can you actually just

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 10>really help us design the chip.

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 2>So it's something we're exploring. Coming up.

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Netflix drops as a tax dispute with Brazil cuts into

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 3>its earnings, which on the whole were pretty good, but

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 3>that is quite a drop on track, in fact, for

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 3>his biggest drop in a couple of years. We will

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 3>have more in that story with a key analyst and

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 3>some of the sound from the earnings call coming up next.

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 2>What a day, What a show? Stay with us.

0:22:47.800 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. One

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 3>of our top earning stories is Netflix stock down significantly

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 3>ten percent, putting it on track for its biggest drop

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 3>since April of twenty twenty two.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 2>The story isn't the one we were expecting.

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Necessarily, a tax dispute with Brazil hit the company in

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 3>the quarter. But Netflix the streamer has been saying for

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 3>quite a long time, judge us by traditional financial metrics,

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Please Wall Street look beyond the content, look beyond the

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 3>subscribe account, which they don't disclose in the same way anymore.

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 3>There's still a lot to talk about when it comes

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 3>to Netflix. So let's get to Alisha Reese Webbush, Senior

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 3>VP of Equity Research, and let's start with what is

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the headline. The Brazil tax dispute idiosyncratic to the quarter

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 3>and Netflix itself, let alone the sort of broader streaming landscape.

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 2>What did you make of that?

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 11>Well, they took the tax from twenty twenty two to present,

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 11>and so if you look at it on a holistic basis,

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 11>it was over three hundred basis points impacted to operating

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 11>margin in the quarter. So that's why there was such

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 11>a huge miss. But if you look forward. If you

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.479
<v Speaker 11>extrapolate that, it's only going to be about twenty basis

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 11>points hit annually going forward. So there's a pretty big

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 11>difference having had to take that over that long period

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 11>of time. The legislation in Brazil, you know, it was

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 11>unclear and made them, you know, think and many other companies,

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 11>not just Netflix think that they didn't need to pay

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 11>that up until recently, so they had to kind of

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 11>back back pay that or at least set aside the

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 11>money for that, you know, again idiosyncratic. As you say,

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 11>there are a lot of other interesting highlights and maybe

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 11>some disappointments on the revenue line given the cap pop

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 11>demon Hunters phenomenon.

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, So so dig into some of those disappointments,

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 3>you know, is that you disappointed in this sense you

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 3>had higher expectations.

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 11>Slightly higher expectations. The thing is that Netflix is trading

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 11>at such a higher it was trading at such a

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 11>high multiple. Netflix has to continually knock it out of

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 11>the park, and revenue was in line roughly, and the

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 11>fourth quarter guidance didn't impress, you know, extravagantly as Netflix

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 11>typically does. And that's one of the big reasons I

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 11>think the stock's trading down. That being said, I think

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 11>there's still plenty that you could pick out of the

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 11>earnings call and the shareholder letter. They're very exciting for

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 11>the future, you.

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 3>Know, Like I've been super fixated on programming. I've been

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 3>watching Black Rabbit, which interesting piece of television. Despite the

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of spend and commitment to the slate, the free

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 3>cash flow figures were really interesting. Like what do you

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 3>make of the balance between like committing to content but

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 3>also those traditional financial metrics.

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, yeah, the free cash flow is so impressive. They

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 11>pulled back on the content spend just a little bit.

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.239
<v Speaker 11>I think they didn't need to spend quite as much,

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 11>and they don't need to in the fourth quarter, just

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 11>given the slate that they already have and how sticky

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 11>it already is. I think the most important thing, though,

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 11>is to really dig into the advertising opportunity right now

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 11>in the third quarter. I think the thing that made

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 11>the u CAN region not quite as exciting as it

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 11>typically would be is that Netflix, while they're getting a

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 11>lot of advertisers and they're getting all the bookings and

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 11>their CPMs have probably leveled off. From all the data

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 11>we've gathered, what it looks like is that their ad

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 11>delivery rates are just so incredibly low that they're not

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 11>booking all of it. You have a lot of people

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 11>on the ad tier. You just need to give them

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 11>a little bit more ads to really get that revenue

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 11>to ramp up. In the fourth quarter, you have more

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:54.719
<v Speaker 11>live events and they can issue ads across all tiers,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 11>and so they'll start to pick up on that in

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 11>the fourth quarter and certainly through twenty twenty six.

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm the generation, the lost generation where you

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 3>had to have ads when you watch shows on television,

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 3>So you know, I'm trying to process that look. Bloomberg

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 3>and others reported that Netflix is one of the companies

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 3>circling for a part of Warner Brothers Discovery. Ted Surrandos

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 3>addressed this idea of M and A on the call.

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Listen to what he said.

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 12>We've been very clear in the past that we have

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 12>no interest in owning legacy media networks, so there is

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 12>no change there. But in general, we believe that we

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 12>can be and we will be choosy. We have a

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 12>great business. We're predominantly focused on growing organically, investing aggressively

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 12>and responsibly into the growth, and returning access cash flow

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 12>to shareholders through our shot to share repurchase.

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Your interpretation of what Ted Sarandos was saying.

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 11>Look, ten years ago, HBO was the top content that

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 11>everyone wanted, and Netflix was did not shy away retastings,

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 11>did not shy away from saying that that was what

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 11>they were shooting for. Netflix was shooting to be like

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 11>HBO Max or HBO at the time. They've since surpassed

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 11>them their leagues ahead. Now that being said, you know,

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 11>Warner Brothers still has some really excellent content, and if

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 11>Netflix has an opportunity to kick the tires and see

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 11>if they can get a piece of that and not

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 11>the legacy media piece, sure of course they're going to

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 11>look at it. And if they can get it for

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 11>a good price, of course they will. However, they're not

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 11>the only ones looking at it, and they're certainly the

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 11>only one who's looking at it just piecemeal and trying

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 11>to take the best bits and not the rest of it.

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 11>So I don't think they're going to be as competitive

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 11>as the other bidders in you know, looking at this ultimately.

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 11>You know what Ted also said that was really important

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 11>is that they don't need to use M and A

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 11>to reach their targets. They don't need to do that

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 11>to reach all of their you know, their growth group

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 11>of goals, and so you know, it would be a

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 11>nice It's a nice to have, not a must have

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 11>for Netflix.

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Alicia Reese Webbush, thank you very much. Okay, let's stick

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 3>with the earning story. Tesla will report its results after

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 3>the closing bell. Let's get the preview. Bloomber's Cray Trudel

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 3>our Global Auto Zer joins us the quarter gone was

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 3>record breaking, a number that I don't think many of

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 3>us saw coming in terms of delivering evs to customers.

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 3>But as you know, it came with the asterisk that

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 3>it was against the expiring of a federal tax credit

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 3>in the United States. Is that the story tonight with

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Tesla or is there something much bigger here that we're

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 3>bracing for.

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I think there may be some possibility that we

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 13>get some surprise about, you know, maybe some of the

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 13>costs that it took to achieve those results. And because

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 13>I think, you know, we heard Tesla itself executives on

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 13>the call a quarter ago kind of saying contradictory things.

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 13>Right of you know, we've we've got a fair amount

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 13>of demand, and yet we do have some incentives on

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 13>offer on top of the seventy five hundred dollars tax credit,

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 13>and you know, sort of go out and buy your

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 13>Tesla now before it's too late.

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 13>The big question though, I think, and the big point

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 13>of emphasis for everybody is going to be do we

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 13>hear elon, you know say again, you know what, Yes,

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 13>we may be in for a few rough quarters because

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 13>of these credits going away, and just how tough the

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 13>sledding is going to be, particularly in the US market.

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 13>And also I think, you know, outside of the US,

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 13>we are just seeing Chinese manufacturers really give Tesla a

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 13>run for its money.

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 2>And how how concerning is that? Really?

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Quick Craig is tonight's earning score a precursor for the

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 3>compensation package vote on November sixth.

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 13>It does feel like a topic that will be difficult

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 13>to completely ignore, even if if with any other CEO

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 13>they would shy away from addressing the issue of their

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:10.479
<v Speaker 13>own you know, payday, and yet I would expect it

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 13>absolutely to come up.

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 2>There's so much anticipation for this next month.

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 3>We're going to be running the blog on the Bloomberg termino.

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 3>I think online as well, either way, you know where

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 3>to find us. Bloomberg's Creatrudel, thank you very much. Meta

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 3>is set to see on almost thirty billion dollar financing

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 3>package for its data center site in rural Louisiana, marking

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 3>the final step for the largest private capital deal on record.

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Blue Out Capital and Meta will split ownership of the

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 3>data center site, with the tech giant retaining just twenty

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 3>percent of it. That's according to sources. Blue Out co

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 3>CEO Mark Libschultz sat down with Bloomberg's Danny Berger to

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 3>discuss the challenges of getting this still done.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 14>It was difficult to i'd say innovate together with Meta.

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 14>That is to say, it's new, it's groundbreaking. As you observe,

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 14>it's a scale no one has dealt with. But Meta

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 14>is an incredibly innovative company, right, So this is this

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 14>is a beautiful marriage of a deeply innovative company meets

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 14>this sort of need for innovative capital solutions, which certainly

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 14>we think of as our calling card in blue Owel.

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 14>And so together we're able to craft something really bespoke

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 14>at a scale that nobody has seen before. And that

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 14>is exciting, and you know they have a great team

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 14>there you know the CFO Susan Lee and the team

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 14>top Todd Hesse and Michael Hart. They're really good at

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 14>what they do, and working together, we're able to do

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 14>something that really worked for them and creates a great

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 14>investment for us.

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 15>There's a lot of the excitement around AI, and I

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 15>think a lot of players would also look at Meta

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 15>as a counterparty and also be excited by that.

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 2>How competitive was this deal?

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 14>So I do think at the end of the day,

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 14>partnerships will define this industry for the foreseeable future, and

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 14>that it's because it isn't just about capital. I mean, yes,

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 14>capital is a necessary and important component, and in quantums.

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 8>That people are not used to. But it isn't just capital.

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 14>It's capital married with knowledge, capital married with skills to

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 14>be able to craft a solution. It's not just a

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 14>generic building. You have to picture the magnitude of what

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 14>we're all talking about.

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 14>This is a two gigawatt complex, So just to frame that,

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 14>that's more than a big city in America consumes in

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 14>power in one site. This is the largest data center

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 14>complex being built as far as you know, in the

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.479
<v Speaker 14>world today. But remember it's bigger than the one we

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 14>announced three weeks ago, the Borderplex project. That's twenty two

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 14>billion dollars, which is bigger than the one we had

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 14>before that, which is Abilene, Texas, which is fifteen billion

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 14>through phases.

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 8>One and two. All of those are blue all solutions.

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.959
<v Speaker 14>All of them are different because in the case of

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 14>say Abilene, you have Cruse so who's a fantastic developer partner.

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 14>So there we're partnered to a developer and putting together

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 14>that massive and successful project for Oracle. In Borderplex, we're

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 14>building it internally. We have our own business called Stack

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 14>thousand people captive that does the development's very complex projects.

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 8>So Stack is developing Blue Owl as the capital partner

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 8>the Borderplex project.

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 14>Here Meta is going to build and going to operate

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:29.439
<v Speaker 14>the data centers themselves. So it's three different flavors, all

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 14>of them require a different customized solution, all of which

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 14>require really deep knowledge on the one hand, and really

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 14>deep access to capital. And we have uniquely brought those

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 14>two together, and so I think people know if they

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 14>come to us, we can deliver all the capital, one

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 14>stop shop with the knowledge you need to do it right.

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 15>So as the deals get bigger and bigger again, this

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.439
<v Speaker 15>one twenty seven billion dollars. How do you make sure,

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.240
<v Speaker 15>just given the sheer size of it, that Blue Owl

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 15>as a whole is an overly dependent and exposed to

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 15>be just this individual deal or these aid deals you're making.

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, well, so people that here at blue outl like

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 14>our business is built on risk management, diversification.

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 8>In fact, our old business is about downside protection.

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 14>So it actually comes natural for us to be thinking about,

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 14>you know, where are all the different pockets of risk

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 14>and how do we manage them? Now very importantly in

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 14>this space different from most others. You to remember, we're

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 14>dealing with the companies that are the biggest companies in

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 14>the world, with the best credit ratings in the world.

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 14>So there is a different question when it comes to concentration,

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 14>you know. That is to say, having a lot of

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 14>exposure to Microsoft, a lot of exposure to Meta, a

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 14>lot of exposure to Amazon.

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 8>Those are pretty darn good exposures.

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Blue Out co CEO market Libschaltz, along with Gleenberg's Danny Berger,

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 3>in other Meta used the tech giant is cutting roughly

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 3>six hundred positions from its AI unit to move more

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:58.760
<v Speaker 3>quickly in the AI race. The cuts won't affect Meta

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 3>is newly formed lab unit, though the company says it

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 3>will continue to hire for ai eforts, and some of

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:09.399
<v Speaker 3>those hires in the hundreds of millions of dollars when

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 3>it comes to comp okay, Coming up, Apple faces a

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 3>few wrinkles and its plans for a giant foldable iPad.

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 2>We're more on the Bloomberg exclusive. Next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Samsung and Google have launched a new mixed reality headset,

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 3>a precursor to smart glasses that the companies say are

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 3>coming pretty soon. Bloomberg's consumer tech reporter Sam Kelly joins us. Now,

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 3>tell me about this project. It's a first step, right,

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 3>But you've been able to get an insight into Samsung

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 3>and Google's mixed reality capabilities.

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 4>That's right.

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, so Samsung's been working on this for quite a while,

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 16>or directly compete with Apple's Vision Pro headset. You know,

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 16>it works very similar you put it on. There are

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 16>two different main areas ways to sort of engage with

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 16>the device. One is sort of a pass through experience

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 16>where you kind of see your home screen apps in

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:13.959
<v Speaker 16>front of you, using gestures to point and touch your

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 16>fingers together, almost like pinching to open up apps and

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 16>experience things that way. You can also have a more

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:25.240
<v Speaker 16>immersive experience, such as you know, watching Netflix or watching

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 16>an NBA game where you feel like you're immersed. They're also,

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 16>you know, because Google is involved too, you can experience

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 16>Google Maps in a certain way where you're on street

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 16>view and kind of go into different restaurants. And of

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 16>course the big thing here is AI. AI hasn't really

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 16>had a major place on headsets before, and now you

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 16>can communicate with Gemini, ask it questions. If you're watching

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 16>a movie, you could circle an actor's face and say,

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 16>who's this actor? Where do I know him from? So

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 16>that adds a new layer to headsets in general.

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn our attentions to Apple.

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg has some reporting around Apple's plan for a foldable iPad.

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 2>Quickly it's hit some snags. What do we know?

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 16>Yes, so Apple's been working on this for a while.

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 16>Was projected to come out in twenty twenty eight. Now

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 16>Bloomberg is hearing that will be pushed back to twenty

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 16>twenty nine or even beyond. So the concept is just

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 16>an iPad that will it opens up, It folds kind

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 16>of look more like a Macwok whenfolded, but some challenges

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 16>around the engineering related to the display, also related to

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 16>the weight.

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 8>You know, to keep these things.

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 16>Light is a big challenge now Apple's trying to make

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 16>it lighter. It also comes at a time when Apple's

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 16>trying to you know, drum up sales around iPad and

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 16>also just bring new innovation into its product lines.

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 8>In general.

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing it experiment.

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 16>The iPhone Air just came out recently too, so new

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 16>form factors, but we might have to wait a little

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 16>bit longer.

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg, Sam Kelly, thank you very much. Let's get some

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 3>more news in talking tech. First up, China's demanding some

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 3>US chip FIRN submit sensitive data about their sales as

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 3>part of a probe of American suppliers. Companies have been

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 3>asked to provide further details, including costs, profits, customer names,

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 3>and transaction details. Plus SpaceX CEO Elon Musk took ain

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 3>at NASA's interim administrator Sean Duffy. Must took to X

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 3>to insult Duffy, criticizing his proposal of folding NASA into

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the Department of Transportation and potentially staying on as the

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:28.359
<v Speaker 3>administrator instead of fintech billionaire Jared isaacmanb An Only Fan

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 3>CEO Kylie Blair says the platform has paid out more

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 3>than twenty five billion dollars to its content creators since

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 3>it was founded. She spoke with Bloomberg's Caroline Hide at

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:39.760
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg Tech conference in London.

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 17>We've paid out twenty five billion to creators since twenty sixteen.

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 17>So there's not very many tech companies that can talk

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 17>about creating wealth for others rather than just profiteering essentially.

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 17>And so for us as a company, that makes us

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 17>very proud. And we talk to our content creators and

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 17>we understand the difference that it's made to their lives,

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 17>the way that they continue to challenge themselves, or build

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 17>their fan base, or try something new, be a bit disruptive,

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 17>be a bit you know, reinvent themselves in some way.

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 17>And so for us as a business, providing a platform

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 17>and enabling creators to have the tools to do that

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:16.959
<v Speaker 17>and to connect with their global fan base is really

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 17>the thing that makes us very proud.

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Coming up more on Google and Unpropposite and thropics talks

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 3>that could be worth tens of billions.

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Open AI and build its first AI powered web browser,

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 3>trying to take on Google in that new front. The browser,

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 3>called chat gpt Atlas, is designed to be a more

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 3>personalized web experience and also feel tasked, such as booking

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 3>flights or editing documents on a user's behalf back to

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 3>our top story sources saying and Thropic and Googling discussions

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 3>for a potential deal that would have Google providing cloud

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 3>computing services to Anthropic high tens of billions of dollars.

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Mandep seeing a Bloomberg Intelligent wrote Google's expanded Anthropic deal

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 3>may speed TPU commercialization and cloud growth, echoing Oracle's multi

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 3>year Open AI partnership that's driving its infrastructure revenue toward

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and six billion by twenty thirty. Let's get

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 3>to bi's Anna rag Rana, who's joining us from Chicago.

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 3>What is your take here in your thesis on what

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 3>this reporting about Anthropic and Google represents.

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 18>See there are two aspects of it. Nthropic has been

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 18>working closely with Amazon Web Services. It also has an

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:33.399
<v Speaker 18>investment from Google, so it is logical that they will

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 18>be using some cloud capacity from Google as well. But

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:38.800
<v Speaker 18>the big question is whether this, you know, talks a

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 18>little bit about awus's infrastructure, or this is just a

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 18>matter of looking for capacity at this point because everybody

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 18>is constrained. Microsoft recently signed some new deals with a

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:52.800
<v Speaker 18>couple of neoclouds, which gives us some insight that there

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 18>may be more of an issue of they're not being

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 18>able to build infrastructure as the demand is coming in.

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 18>And that's no different than what's happening with you know,

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 18>open AI also, so it could be just a capacity issue.

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 18>Longer term, we anticipate all large language models to work

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 18>with almost every hyperscale cloud provider that's out there because

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 18>of the size of you know, the expectations whence this

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 18>gets to the enterprise level.

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 2>So that let's linger on that last point.

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 3>We'd reported just last week that Anthropic executives are doing

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 3>this tour of the Middle East to secure money, but

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 3>also just like more capacity as a case study. Like

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people react to our reporting with a

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 3>lack of understanding of how Anthropic can need that much capacity,

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:39.360
<v Speaker 3>like is it justified?

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, I mean if you look at the economic projections

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 18>or the growth projections for both these vendors, whether it's

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 18>Opening I or entropic. I mean, we are just in

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:51.800
<v Speaker 18>a very early innings of enterprise applications being built using

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 18>some of these models, so we have this is a

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 18>multi year trend. The big question obviously is whether the

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 18>GPUs that they are getting from aw US are they

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 18>good enough or not. That will find out over time.

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 18>I can't make that prediction today whether you're going to

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 18>Google only for tech reasons, but if you look at

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 18>what even Microsoft is doing, you know they have allowed

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 18>Opening Eye to go out and sign deals with Oracle

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 18>with you know, other New York clouds, or Vive be

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 18>one of them. So you know everybody is going and

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 18>trying to find capacity right now, and that's the state

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:23.240
<v Speaker 18>we are in at this point.

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:28.319
<v Speaker 3>One source did tell me that the talks are about TPUs,

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 3>but we'll keep reporting and we'll get the analysis from

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 3>blooming Intelligence and ANAA Rana thank you very much. Indeed,

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 3>that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. A

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of breaking news, a lot of it originating from

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's newsroom, but we are like right in the thick

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 3>of earning season, so recap on the podcast. You know

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:47.839
<v Speaker 3>where to find it on the Bloomberg terminal as well

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 3>as online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart. I appreciate all

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 3>of you that tune in live every single day, but

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 3>I know so many of you listen to this show

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 3>in the form of a podcast, whether it's here in

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 3>sid can Alley or beyond.

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Have a great week. This is Bloomberg Tech