WEBVTT - Preparing For Negative Interest rates: Fiduciary CIO

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel Podcast. I'm Paul Swinge you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahmas. Each day we

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for you

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and your money. Whether at the grocery store or the

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple podcast

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as at

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. All right, here's multiple choice question for

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you on this Monday. Do you want to buy a

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>US Steepener gold, US equities or we work? If you

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>get a pre I p O. Luckily we're gonna have

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a manage gonna answer that question. That's Hans Olsen, chief

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>investment officer a Fittisciary Trust with seventy eight million dollars

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in assets under management. So cross asked that that was

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>your multiple choice question, which would you buy in ranking order?

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>We work gold, we work pre IPO, A Steepener gold

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.959
<v Speaker 1>or US equities. Well, I'd have to do probably can

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I get to pain by the way? Yeah? Okay, Well

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that says a lot in then they have seven billion

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars of assets under management. He has to buy everything

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>out there. So so why like it's my way of

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to see, like, where is their actual value right now? Yeah? Yeah,

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:11.839
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to find a lot of value any place

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. And perhaps the areas that we find it

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>mostly would be in places like uh Europe, even the UK,

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>which is really a non consensus trade for sure. But

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>in the US, um you know, the earning scrowthon is there,

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the multiples are expanding. It's been pretty tough. We're overweight

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>US equities for sure. We've tried to rotate more into

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the low volatility types of names as a way to

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>do it responsibly. But but I have to say, Alex,

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the environment right now is is not great for people

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>putting new money to work. We're speaking with Hans Olsen,

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer Fidishary Trust. Hans, just let's start maybe

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>just with your economic outlook. I mean, the U S

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.559
<v Speaker 1>seems pretty solid, but we see some weird news. Alex

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and I we were talking about earlier out of Germany

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>earlier today. So how do you view the kind of

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the U S economy? Yeah, so the US company. If

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we if I were to color code the US economy

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>with green being growth, yellow warning you know, danger, and

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>red recession I think we're probably going from green to

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>light green at the moment. So, whether it's the hard

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>data the soft data, we see a collection of of

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>surveys that all point to continued growth in the US

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>slower than what it's been, but continuing to grow. Is

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>your call on say U at UK equities and European equities,

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is that based on a Brexit thing? Or is that

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>literally is that a value trade? Well, I think in

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the in the UK, both in the UK and Europe,

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you put the politics aside for a moment. If you

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>look at things like valuation and earnings growth, they're better,

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>They're more compelling than they are here in the United States.

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>It just happened to be wrapped in the difficult wrapper

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of the politics. You know, our core assumption is that

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps Brexit won't be anywhere near as bad as people think. Um,

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the statistics since the end of UM,

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>since the since the vote back in two thousand sixteen,

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the one economy that has really defied expectations and the

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>popular narrative has been the UK economy, both in terms

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of growth, inflation and the like. And uh, I'm not

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>so sure about what we couldn't see that continue to

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>happen even post Brexit. There will be some hiccups for sure,

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not sure it will be as devastating as

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>people are are are postulating. So as you think about

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>your global portfolio, where are you kind of in the allocation?

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>How much risk are you taking these days? Um with

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio. Yeah, so that's a good question because it's

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>really um an exercise in nuance increasingly UM So when

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the US equity market, as I've said, we've we've been

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>rotating exposures, and where we have added exposure has been

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to more of the low volatility names, right, trying to

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>stay away from any value biases. But but those companies

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>with dividends uh and have less of an attachment to

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the overall market, so the data is lower to that

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of the market. On the credit side, you know, we

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>have for some time been shorter in duration. We're lengthening

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>out the duration because I think there is a real

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>possible ability that in the next part of the cycle,

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>amazingly enough, the US we'll see negative interest rates. And

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that we've been doing is we've been

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>pivoting up into higher quality credits to in an attempt

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to get some sort of carry um, So it's kind

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of a belt and suspenders type of exercise. So what

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say to that is that you're not alone.

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And what I mean by that is that low volatility

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>stocks have now inherently become more volatile because there's so

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>much ment now money into it for the reasons that

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you said. You can make the same argument for going

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>up the safety curve when it comes to an investment grade,

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and many argue that we're way overbought when it comes

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>to the long end. So how do you deal with that?

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you say? Yeah, yeah, I think it all

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>depends upon what your benchmark duration is, right. So we're

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not going out thirty years or twenty years. We're

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>really trying to stay right on the benchmark, and for

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>us that's probably going to be around four years five years, UM,

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>whereas we were two to three years before. So we've

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we've lengked the note. And you're right, there's a lot

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of money in movement. Money is trying to find a home.

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Especially we're back to the Tina principle right where there

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is no alternative equities. Um. So it's it's not a

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>perfect trade, but I think it's a trade and certainly

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>over the the the adject that we've seen over the

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>last week or so, those low ball names that we've

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>invested and have held up quite well relatively, you know,

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>they've they've outperformed by about three hundred basis points, which

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is not bad in an environment like that. So, Hans,

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you what do you expect to hear out

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of Jackson Hole at the end of this week. A

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of market participants think it's a very very important

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>time for Chairman Pal to articulate kind of how he

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>views the FED over the next you know, several quarters. Yeah, yeah,

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the tell is going to be

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Actually what there was a white paper that the I

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>m F released and it reads something like a guide

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to deeply negative interest rates to fight Recession. It's it's

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of it's eighty five page white paper that is

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the that lays out the fund the foundations and the

0:05:55.120 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals about how to position the concept of negative interest rates.

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, particularly in the United States, and you're already

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of the FED governors talk about it um

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's not so unusual and that zero bound is

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>really just a number. I think we'll start to see

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>more of that conversation tumble out of Jackson hole without

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a doubt, and we're sort of setting ourselves up for

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the next cycle for I think higher probability of negative

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, which when you think about the US in

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the US, when you think about it in the reserve currency,

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>never never, but but a reserve like currency, the Swiss

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>franc they have negative interest rates. The entire German sovereign

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>curve is below zero um. And you know, we have

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>what sixteen seventeen trillion dollars worth of negative yielding debt

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of both the sovereign and corporate variety in Europe. But

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>does that bring up M M T. And I say

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that because I've been talking about this black Bock paper

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>all morning and probably boring Paul at this point, which

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is basically they talked about just that helicopter money. You're

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>going to have to have coordinated monetary and physical policy

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to get stuff done in the next recession.

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that basically what you think we're headed for?

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>To sailing and observations there. Number one, I think we've

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>come to the limits of monetary policy, and that's why

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we're hearing about you know, the ideas of

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>another tax cut being floated this morning. And the other

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>thing is that, uh, you know, when we're running trillion

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar plus uh deficits, which is what we're doing, especially

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>at this point in the cycle, when we're talking about

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>more tax cuts and we are talking about negative interest

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>rates even considering them, that is actually you know, modern

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>monetary theory, perhaps dressed up a little bit differently, but

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that's effectively it. So I think we're kind of there

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in many respects, and that's a really uncomfortable um um

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>thought to ponder. Interesting. Hans Aulsen, thank you so much

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Hans is chief investment officer for Fiduciary Trust,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>joining us here on our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Let's

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>turn our attention now to gold that come out of

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the commodity is up about year to date. So is

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that just a move by investors for a safe haven

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>asthmet asset, is there's something else driving the commodity to

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>get those answers? We welcome Joe Cavatoni, Managing Director of

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the World Gold Council US joints us here in our

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interact the Broker Studio. So Joe, thanks so much

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for being here give us a sense of what is

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>driving gold here. So far, it's great to be here.

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>What's driving gold in two thousand eighteen into nineteen has

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>been pretty much risk and uncertainty, market risk and uncertainty,

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a client or an investors inability to understand where really

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the direction of the markets is going to go, and

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hearing regular and ongoing updates of large systemic issues that

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>give them caution and concern. If it is talks about

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>implementation of potential tariffs, if there's concerns around negotiations with China,

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>whether there's a hard or soft exit, and Brexit, all

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of these factors are all playing in now. Added as

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of laid has been an increased concern, particularly in the

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>US market, over negative real rates or is that even

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>feasible or possible, so the rate moves, the dovish stance

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>of the FED all factoring in gold as an asset

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is a global asset. So while we're seeing big risk

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>factors that are taking place in developed markets around the world,

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe even the emerging markets, you're also seeing a shift

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>as well globally around the dollarization and monetary policy that's

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>leading central banks to be buyers so we're seeing investors

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>taking risk positions that are careful, and we're also seeing

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>central banks shifting their monetary policy to address it. So

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 1>I was coming gold back in the olden days two

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>nine for a few years. So I was part of

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>all that conversation of what we see gold hit two

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and if I have thought we'd hit negative rates

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>UH in many many countries and that we could see

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it in the US, I would expect it easy goal

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>to be what does it tell you that we're not?

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>What does it tell us that we're not? What I

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>think we need to understand is that the demand cycle

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for gold is driven and importantly needs to be understood

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and driven by strategic factors. So what I think we

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>need to be careful and cautious of is momentum and

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>short term opportunity costs move the price fast and actually

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in large percentage amounts. On a given day. We're almost

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>down one percent today. Let's not get caught up in that.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>What I'd say is going back to your two thousand

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>nine timeline, and actually goal goes even further back some

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>five thousand years. I was talking about what I think

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is important for people to understand is that in this

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>wave of demand increasing that we're seeing. This looks to

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>be investors taking a strategic position, overweight in their commodity

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>bucket and positioning for longer term systemic issues. So the

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>financial risk the longer term, it's going to be a slow, methodical,

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.959
<v Speaker 1>continual increase in demand. Potentially, so will we get I'm

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>not entirely sure, but what we're seeing today are signals

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>telling us that gold as a relevant asset is going

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to continue to remain very high. Our conversations, again with

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors in particular, are about how much gold should

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I have in my portfolio, not this question of do

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I have a need for it in my portfolio. It's

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>being found more and more prevalent in the conversations with

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors. What are the e t f s doing

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>with gold and how are they impacting the gold market?

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>The e t f s are proving to be exactly

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>what we know them to be, an exceptional vehicle for

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>investors to make a decision to invest in the precious

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>metal itself. They can own the gold through the exchange

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>traded fund, not only in the US market, which we

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 1>all know a lot about. But what we're seeing are

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 1>you K investors, German investors in particular, driving enormous amounts

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of demand. So a year to date, about nine percent

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of net new assets have flown into e T s.

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>With price appreciation, that pool is up to nearly one

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion in overall holdings in e TF. So we're

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing investors saying I need to make a strategic decision.

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to own gold as a commodity or as

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a precious metal or in a particular investment bucket, divorcing

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>themselves from concerning whether it's a commodity or it's not,

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>simply saying it's a core allocation of my portfolio. So

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the e T s are enabling people to get it done.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Volumes are transparent, which is helpful and actually significant. So

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>if you need to buy, as an institution large percentages

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of gold over a course of a day, you're going

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to be able to get it done. Now, one last

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>point that I'll make is that in the US, while

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we know that there are institutional flows that are going

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>into the exchange traded funds, don't overlook the amount of

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>retail investment that goes into these et s as well.

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking at the big wires or you're looking

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>at the large platforms in the US. They all have

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>available on them some mechanism to exchange traded funds to

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>get access to gold, and there's plenty of choices today too.

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>What happens if the dollar doesn't depreciate. I think that

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you need to understand that the dollar is one only

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>one factor. Remember, gold as a global asset is impacted

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>by demand in China and India, which makes up nearly

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 1>It's driven by European geo political risk or or or

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>economic concerns in those markets. So it's an important factor,

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's not the only factor to take into consideration.

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>So the dollar has been kind of flatlining, right, But

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>where are we going with gold? We're seeing a noticeable

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>appreciation in the price. Why because the other factors are

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>kicking in again, stepping away from tactical short term concerning

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>issues which are important to understand, but understanding that financial

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>market and the risks that come along with that will

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>be driving long term. So just real, real quick, Joe,

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned central bank buying. Just give us a sense

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of how that works, what and just how it plays out. Basically,

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>they're buying the bullion outright in the bullying market. They

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>go into the OTC markets or the dealer market in

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the European arena, for example, and ultimately they're they're continuing

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's now a nineteen year trend that we've

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>seen in terms of increased the levels of of gold

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>being added to the portfolio for monetary policy. So they're

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>buying the real stuff. They're buying the real stuff. Absolutely.

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe Cavitoni, thanks so much for joining us. Joe's a

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Managing director for the World Council uh US talking to

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>us all things about go get it, getting us updated

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>on gold and it's a nice chart for the year

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at that. Boy in. One part of the economy

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that remains very strong is the consumer um and let's

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>how the consumer is doing, particularly millennials and the younger

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>demos in terms of buying homes and getting mortgages and

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>all that fun stuff. With that, we welcome Vishaal gark.

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>He is a founder and CEO Better dot Com. He

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Rochelle,

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. I wonder if you

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>could just give us just a brief description of what

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Better dot Com is what are you guys doing. Uh,

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much Paul and Lisa for having me better.

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Dot com is revolutionizing access to homeownership UH for millennials,

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're doing it by making the entire process better, faster, cheaper,

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>so you can get a better mortgage and by doing that,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you can get a better house. Uh. You can save

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>up to three thousand dollars or more on a typical

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>three thousand dollar house uh in just upfront fees because

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't charge any commissions and we don't charge any

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>origination fees. And on top of that, UH, you can

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>save some money on your rate. So an average consumer

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>will save as much as a year on a three

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar mortgage of compared to your tradition mortgage banks or

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>mortgage brokers. Because we take the commissions out of the process,

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we've automated a huge chunk of the process. We made

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>everything much, much, much of it better. How do you

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>make money? Uh? We make money mostly by uh packaging

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the loans and having investors who uh we have thirty

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>two investors on our platform with about seven billion dollars

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of demand. A lot of the largest financial institutions in

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the country who actually want to have mortgages that are

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>not originated by a commission loan officer or mortgage broker,

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>because those typically tend to perform much much better, and

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>so they pay us a premium for their mortgages and

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that's how we pay the bills. UM. You know, today

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we just announced that we raise a hundred and sixty

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>million dollars from some great investors American Express City Bank,

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Ally Bank UH, the Health Plan of Ontario Pinebroke investors,

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of that. You know, when it comes

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>down to is all of those banks and major investors

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>are investing in us UH for the reason that I

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>started the me five years ago. So five years ago,

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>my wife was pregnant with our second child. We were

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>shopping for houses just people do, UH, and it was

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>just a really tough process to get a mortgage. My

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>wife worked at a big bank and even there, it

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>took our sixty days to get a mortgage approval, and

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we lost the house that we were going to buy

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to an all cash buyer who actually even paid less

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 1>than we did. And UH, I thought that was fundamentally unfair.

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Like branch visits, facts machines going at Kinko's, and like

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>literally UH sending my Social Security number and all these

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>documents over on security email had cost us the home

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that we want to buy. So it's like, we're gonna

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>make this better. Seventy of Americans need a mortgage to

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>buy a home. And how is this thing that everywhere

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone uses? How is this industry that's fifteen trillion dollars

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>in size exists as if the Internet was never invented.

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Do millenns buy homes? They do? Their home ownership rate

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is half of that of traditional UH generations before, like

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the baby movers and like so on average, you know

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of that those earlier generations were able to buy a home.

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Right now millennials about thirty five percent of them own

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a home, So there's this massive demand for them coming

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>people like that. Do you think a lot of it

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>has to do with challenges with student loans? Um They

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>have a ton of student loans, so instead of spending

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the first fifteen years of their working lives saving up

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>money to get a down payment to buy a home,

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>they're paying off the loans for college. But there are

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>all these products that are out there that your traditional

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>mortgage broker doesn't know. Products by Fannie made that enable

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>first time home buyers to put as little as three

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>percent down to buy a home. And over half of

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>our customer base, particularly for those buying a home, is millennials,

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and the average is thirty eight. And a lot of

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>them are just they they want, they're they're getting, they're

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>having kids, they're putting down roots. Um, they want to

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>have a play room that they can actually paint the

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:11.239
<v Speaker 1>way the color they want. And so we see a

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of millennials entering. They're actually the largest group of

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>home buyers this year. So as we've seen rates fall,

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>what kind of activity have you noticed? We have seen

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>demand go through the roof. Our business is up over

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>from the year before. We're on track to do over

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>five billion of mortgages this year and almost fifteen billion

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>or so next year. And it's an amazing time to

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>buy because rates being as low as they are, lower

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>than they've ever been in the past, means lower rates,

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>higher affordability. Higher affordability means you can buy a better

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>house for the same amount of money. Remember, a lot

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of people are renting, but when you're renting, you're just

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>paying your landlords mortgage. Exactly. Homeownership. Homeownership that's kind of

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>been it's the issue about the millennials kind of being

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>underrepresented in home ownership, but the potentially upside there for

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the housing market. Shall garg founder and CEO Better dot

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Com joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio,

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much better rhetor coming out of the

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>White House about trade. Let's see where the action is

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>with small Stock returned to Bloomberg Stocks editor Dave Wilson, Dave,

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>what are you looking at this morning? Well, I'm looking

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>at smaller companies doing a bit better than larger ones,

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>at least for the moment. The Russell two thousand index

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>up one point three percent. In the S and P

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>five hundreds up one point two percent. Now one of

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the Russell's biggest games belongs to Empire Resorts, whose ticker

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>is n Y and why the casino owner has climbed

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent after its Malaysian majority owner offered to buy

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the shares it doesn't already hold. Uh Saws ticker s

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.719
<v Speaker 1>O n O is at a twelve and half percent.

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>The maker of audio equipment was raised that Raymond James

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to the firm's top ratings. Strong By and tanker stocks

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>are higher after dry Ships chairman and CEO Georgia Economu,

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>agreed to buy the shares of his company that he

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>doesn't already own. Nordic American Tankers ticker and A T

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>has risen eight percent, and t K Tankers ticker t

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>n K has advanced six and a half percent. Now

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>A one of the Russell's steepest drops belongs to Revlon

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>ticker r e V. The cosmetics maker has fallen about

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>four and a half percent after gaining more than fifteen

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>percent on Thursday and Friday. The earlier advance followed our

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>report that Revlon hired Goldman Sachs to look at strategic alternatives.

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomber Stocks editor Davals and thank you so much. Well,

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the tech companies are back down in Washington. This time

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they're they're testifying in support of a Trump administration effort

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to potentially punish France for enacting a three percent tax

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>on global tech companies. To get the latest, we welcome

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Laura Davison laaras Congressional tax reporter for Bloomberg News, joining

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Washington, d C. Laura, thanks

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. So again, we got the

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies in front of Washington, but a little

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>bit different tack today. What are they trying to get across? Yeah,

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>so they're really concerned about this, Uh, this tax that France,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>France has passed that would target largely large US companies Google, Amazon, Facebook, um,

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and and so the Trump administration has said, yes, we

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>are concerned about this. And you really see a kind

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of for the first time, h tech companies and the

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration really being in lockstep on an issue. Um

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>what could happen from this? Uh? The administration is looking

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>at some sort of retaliatory and measure against France to

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of set a precedent of look, don't go after

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>our tech companies to raise revenue for your country. Uh.

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Tech companies concerned that they could be taxed not only

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>from France, but that other countries could follow suit Spain,

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand for example, and they could be suddenly hit

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>from for little taxes from from countries all over the world.

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm calling tech versus Tannin's because one of

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the things is wine that Trump has threatened to tax

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of all wine coming from France and Europe. But in

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>all reality, like, what could we actually do to retaliate?

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's a couple of different things. One would be tariffs,

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and it could be on French wine or or other

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>sorts of French products. Know, the percent tariff on wine

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>would be uh, you know, that would be a goold measure,

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>but there's lots of you know, either smaller tariffs are

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>targeting a broad base of French exports. The other thing

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is there is a section in the tax code that

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>actually would allow the US government to basically double the

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>tax on French citizens and French companies operating in the US.

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So there's a several different things that are legal within

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the scope of the possible that that the U s

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>could do to try to get friends France to back

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>down from this. So, Laura, how important or how much

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of a financial risk or is this tax to some

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of these big tech companies. So we haven't heard any

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of specific numbers yet they're saying will cost millions

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to comply. A representative from Amazon said that their profit

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>margins are usually less than three percent, so this three

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>percent tax from France would wipe out some of their

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:14.120
<v Speaker 1>profit margins on those transactions. So it's at least kind

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of on a an anecdotally, it would be both expensive

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to to be able to track all this to comply

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>with the tax as well as it could wipe out

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>um to profits, profitability, or result in higher prices for consumers.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So play this out for me. So tech goes to

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the d C. They're like, we hate this, this is bad.

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Everyone in the US is like, totally, we don't want

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>France attack at taxes. This is terrible. Then what happens.

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 1>So what the US is trying to do is to

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>get France to back away from this tax and focus

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>more on this big global conversation that's happening with a

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred thirty companies led by you know, G seven, G

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty to come up with some way to tax Uh.

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Basically issue is that companies no longer you know, makings

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and earned profits in one country. With the digital economy,

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>things cross borders all the time and it's really hard

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>to to say which come which country can tax which profits.

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>So they're trying to have this big multilateral discussion UM

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to come up with some rules that everyone in the

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>world basically can agree on. That's what the US wants,

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and that's what they're trying to urge France and others

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>who want to go off on their own to do. So, Laura,

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>what just give us a sense a little bit of

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>backstory here. What was France really thinking here with this tax?

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Was it simply a money grab for them? Well personally

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that and and there's a lot of anger in Europe

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>at American at American tech companies who they feel are

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't paying taxes, that they are using um tax savants

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to to avoid paying what they should be owe. And

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 1>they said, look, you know, if if the you know,

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Government isn't gonna address this, if there

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>isn't some sort of global consensus, we just want to

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>move quickly and make sure that we're uh, you know,

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>getting a portion, you know, and being a first mover

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>on this, they're able to grab a bigger piece of

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the pie than they would have if they you know,

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>did this in coordination with all the other countries. So

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>what's the counter to that? I mean, that sounds somewhat reasonable.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>It does, though, mean then the then the answer is, uh,

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially for France where US is a close ally,

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, what are the negotiations like if you know

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>there are extremes tariffs, you know, how long can they

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>can they withstand those? Or you know, if if every

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>other country has agreed to this other set of principles,

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, could that be something that that France uh

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>signs onto. This is really uh France kind of took

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a bold step kind of, I think, with the other countries,

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>assuming that they would be willing to movee back down

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>on this if there was a larger consensus on something

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that would be agreeable. Laura Davison, thank you so much

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Lars Congressional tax reporter for Bloomberg News,

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from Washington, d C. Thanks

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. M Paul Sweeney, I'm on

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Bramoy. It's I'm on

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa Bramoy. It's one before the podcast. You

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.