Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.
Speaker 2: I'm strong and and he armstrong and Yetty.
Speaker 3: Is very clearly a cognitive decline. That's what I'm referring to.
Speaker 3: It makes me uncomfortable.
Speaker 1: You are, no. I think it's so amazing. It's so
Speaker 1: amazing to me.
Speaker 3: That that try and figure out an answer cognitive decline.
Speaker 3: You can tell me that what I was suggesting was
Speaker 3: I think.
Speaker 1: That you were mocking his stutter.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think you were mocking his stutter. And I
Speaker 4: think you have absolutely no standing to diagnose somebody's cognitive decline.
Speaker 4: I would think that somebody in the Prumpt family would
Speaker 4: be more sensitive to people who do do not have
Speaker 4: medical licenses diagnosing your politicians from afar. Plenty of people
Speaker 4: have diagnosed your from afar, and I'm sure it offends you.
Speaker 2: So that's Jake Tapper on CNN at the height of
Speaker 2: mainstream media pretending Joe Biden wasn't senile up until the
Speaker 2: moment of that debate when everybody flipped and.
Speaker 5: A gas that anybody would suggest that he's losing it
Speaker 5: cognitively while at the time seventy four percent of Americans
Speaker 5: said he's too old soon to be eighty eight percent
Speaker 5: or whatever it was. And what a great illustration of
Speaker 5: how nutty or media classes.
Speaker 2: All right, and once again leaning on the stage, he's
Speaker 2: got a stutter, quite acting like he's senile. He has
Speaker 2: a stutter. Anyway, that same Jack Jake Tapper has a
Speaker 2: new book coming out next week called Original Sin, President
Speaker 2: Biden's Decline, its cover up, and his disastrous choice to
Speaker 2: run again. So it's kind of funny given that clip
Speaker 2: we just played that he's going to be a hind
Speaker 2: side source on the Original Sid and the book cover
Speaker 2: is Joe Biden looking very old with hands over his
Speaker 2: eyes in the famous you know, monkey see monkey do
Speaker 2: sort of you know, hiding reality thing with Come on,
Speaker 2: so you you, as part of the media that was
Speaker 2: covering this up, are going to go with that cover
Speaker 2: covering it up.
Speaker 5: And aggressively attacking anybody who suggested that which was plainly
Speaker 5: true was true.
Speaker 2: Well, and that and this picture is to me indicates
Speaker 2: the whole you know, we were all covering our eyes,
Speaker 2: hiding reality.
Speaker 5: Somebody was hiding somebody was hiding reality from themselves with
Speaker 5: their own hands.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you were. It's too much and his book unless
Speaker 2: his book lays out in detail how I can't believe
Speaker 2: I did this. I got so far down the road
Speaker 2: of Trump derangement syndrome that I didn't admit what was
Speaker 2: before my own eyes, that Joe Biden was cognitively, you know,
Speaker 2: declining and rapidly. But I doubt that that's what he's
Speaker 2: gonna say.
Speaker 5: Well, right, and I have long advocated the position that
Speaker 5: when your dog finally comes, you don't kick it. Okay,
Speaker 5: if somebody comes over ideologically or realizes your arguments were right,
Speaker 5: you welcome them and you work together. On the other hand,
Speaker 5: there are some transitions that are so egregious, and they
Speaker 5: were so savage about attacking us earlier.
Speaker 2: You've got to explain yourself. I mean, it's just that's
Speaker 2: the only decent thing to do.
Speaker 5: No, I'm not going to pretend that only months ago
Speaker 5: you were suggesting it was a vicious and inappropriate thing
Speaker 5: to say.
Speaker 1: The president seems to be losing it.
Speaker 2: Come on, Jake, here's my favorite funny thing of the day.
Speaker 2: So Elon Musk is gonna sit in on the first
Speaker 2: cabinet meeting, which is kind of interesting. It's usually only
Speaker 2: for official cabinet meet and Mark Halpern writes, it's an
Speaker 2: opportunity to see where Musk is seated at today's cabinet meeting,
Speaker 2: how Trump treats him, and if he gets a speaking role.
Speaker 2: I mean, is he is he situated in such a
Speaker 2: way that he gets as much speaking time as the
Speaker 2: Secretary of Defense or Health and Human Services or whatever.
Speaker 2: It's kind of interesting. But we all know about Elon
Speaker 2: putting out the directive that you have. You got to
Speaker 2: come up with five things you did last week to
Speaker 2: justify your job, and if you don't do that, I'll
Speaker 2: consider that this year resignation or something like that. So
Speaker 2: somebody had replied to it, Oh, I'm working from home
Speaker 2: because i'm ill and my iPad just fell. Luckily did
Speaker 2: not fall all the way to the round and break,
Speaker 2: because that would have made me very unhappy. Somebody replied
Speaker 2: to Elon, because you're supposed to, like, originally, you're supposed
Speaker 2: to tweet back at him, like he was going to
Speaker 2: read two million tweets about what you did last week
Speaker 2: and determined whether or not that was good. Then it
Speaker 2: became I guess yesterday you're supposed to send that information
Speaker 2: to your department head and then they're supposed to work
Speaker 2: it out anyhow.
Speaker 5: And and Trump's statements on the topic have been funny.
Speaker 1: I just he doesn't care.
Speaker 2: I can't actually read this because it's way too filthy.
Speaker 2: I probably should have saved it for the podcast because
Speaker 2: it's very, very filthy, but I'll give you the gist
Speaker 2: of it. Somebody responded to Elon, I wanted to email
Speaker 2: you what I did last week in detail. Please let
Speaker 2: me know if you need any more information, I asked
Speaker 2: a giant D. I mean that sort of stuff. I
Speaker 2: got blanked by a blank. Oh no, I blanked someone
Speaker 2: else's blank. And that's really, really, really filthy.
Speaker 1: Congratulations, but we're.
Speaker 2: Thinking more work related. And then the last one being
Speaker 2: I decided to blank myself with your BS and it worked. Sincerely,
Speaker 2: go f yourself. So they said that to Elon. Elon's
Speaker 2: reply was I said five. That's only four?
Speaker 5: Oh god?
Speaker 1: Oh and you know.
Speaker 5: The one of the interesting, not like crazy, important subplots
Speaker 5: to all this is how long will those two alpha
Speaker 5: dogs Trump in Musk continue to get along and work together?
Speaker 5: And I was sure they'd have a crack up fairly quickly.
Speaker 5: But this is a great, you know, glimpse into the relationship.
Speaker 5: Elon uncorks this. You gotta have five things you did
Speaker 5: or you're fired, and Trump asked about it is given
Speaker 5: all sorts of silly answers like, well, I guess you
Speaker 5: need to or you're well in effect, if you don't,
Speaker 5: you might be fired.
Speaker 1: Obviously, there's no enforcement mechanism. He didn't approve this, but.
Speaker 5: Either behind the scenes he's telling Elon, hey, rein it
Speaker 5: in or run it by me or something first, or
Speaker 5: he kind of likes the chaos the attention.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think in general, Trump loves chaos and attention. Yeah,
Speaker 2: there's some theory out there. I think we got a
Speaker 2: clip about it. But somebody's got the theory that it's
Speaker 2: brilliant that Trump has made Elon the lightning rod for
Speaker 2: you know, oh my god, what has Elon done now?
Speaker 2: Every day instead of oh my god, what has Trump
Speaker 2: done now? And there is a lot of that. I've
Speaker 2: been mentioning this for a couple of weeks. I feel
Speaker 2: like I now hear Elon's name more than Trump's name
Speaker 2: every single day.
Speaker 5: Yeah, whether it was intentional or not, I don't know,
Speaker 5: but that seems to be the effect it's having. Speaking
Speaker 5: of the comings and goings of Joe Biden and others
Speaker 5: and politics. I was going to call this feature atte
Speaker 5: something like do you remember why we voted them out?
Speaker 5: But I'll just hit at least one or two of
Speaker 5: the stories. In the final weeks of the Biden administration,
Speaker 5: the EPA awarded a lucrative environmental justice grant to a
Speaker 5: left wing nonprofit whose CEO, Latricia Adams, personally applied for
Speaker 5: the taxpayer funding while simultaneously serving as a member of
Speaker 5: a top White House Advisory Council on the environment. The
Speaker 5: Biden EPA announced in December on the Way Out the
Speaker 5: Door it had selected Young, Gifted and Green to receive
Speaker 5: a twenty million dollar grant under its so called Environmental
Speaker 5: and Climate Justice Community Change Program. And the beauty, horror,
Speaker 5: but beauty of the green energy scam and the whole
Speaker 5: climate change scam is you tell me if you can
Speaker 5: think of anything that would not fall under the Environmental
Speaker 5: and Climate Justice Community Change Program, A man, this fits
Speaker 5: in perfectly with what I was saying in a while
Speaker 5: back about how if I could relive my life, I
Speaker 5: would dedicate it to trying to figure out how to
Speaker 5: get in on this government money.
Speaker 2: Just as like a game, you come up with stuff
Speaker 2: like that.
Speaker 5: There's so much money slashing around, you know, you go
Speaker 5: full green energy, climate change, you know, whatever the hot
Speaker 5: thing is, and just I don't know, come up with
Speaker 5: a project or a commission or a board. Oh yeah,
Speaker 5: you got to have an organization with a name like
Speaker 5: Young Gifted in Green. Yeah, and then they just hand
Speaker 5: you taxpayer moneies. The EPA dished out one hundred and
Speaker 5: five grants totally one point six billion dollars as part
Speaker 5: of the program nationwide.
Speaker 1: You got that.
Speaker 5: Kamala Harris signs with top Hollywood talent agency CIA. Let's
Speaker 5: a creative Argent Artists Agency CIA. I know you're listening.
Speaker 5: You a for Los Angeles or perhaps via podcast? You
Speaker 5: signed her for what? Well? They're going to represent Harris
Speaker 5: in all areas, focusing on speaking, engagements and publishing for
Speaker 5: which of her talents? You know what, though, it's funny,
Speaker 5: I'm going to undermine myself. If I found out that
Speaker 5: dope was speaking somewhere near me, I'd go How could
Speaker 5: you not to go see her? You know, world's biggest
Speaker 5: word salad bar in action. How could you resist that?
Speaker 5: That'd be fun. I love this story. They're calling it
Speaker 5: poetic justice. The Obama Library is being seriously delayed building
Speaker 5: this thing over discrimination lawsuits, environmental injunctions, allegations of enrichment
Speaker 5: and double dealing, the fact that there are great complaints
Speaker 5: that there's not enough racial equity, and the contracting. They're
Speaker 5: disrupting too many trees and migratory bird paths along Lake
Speaker 5: Michigan and.
Speaker 2: Chicago.
Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, I don't know precisely where I should uh oh,
Speaker 5: Hyde Park, Harrold.
Speaker 1: Anyway, it's it's a nice location in Chicago.
Speaker 5: But yeah, it's all being held up by the very
Speaker 5: sort of wool crap that Obama ushered so much into
Speaker 5: the American you know, political slash economic system.
Speaker 2: Hey, if you're the sort of person that ever throws
Speaker 2: a little money around with your opinion on which NBA
Speaker 2: player is going to do, what whatever you had on
Speaker 2: Luka Doncic last night for the Lakers you were under,
Speaker 2: I'm guessing take a look at that. For tonight for
Speaker 2: Prize Picks.
Speaker 5: He went wild jack and Prize Picks is the place,
Speaker 5: and now went up to a thousand times your money.
Speaker 5: Prize Picks is the best place to get real money
Speaker 5: sports action.
Speaker 1: Join.
Speaker 2: Over ten million users sign up.
Speaker 5: Today Prize Picks because you're you're picking at least two
Speaker 5: players and saying more or less to their stat projections.
Speaker 5: Prize Picks invented the flex play, which means you can
Speaker 5: still cash out even if your lineup is not perfect.
Speaker 5: You can double your money even if one of your
Speaker 5: picks does not hit. I love this line.
Speaker 2: Turn your sports opinions into real money all season long.
Speaker 2: It takes less than sixty seconds to get your opinions
Speaker 2: down so you can turn them into money and.
Speaker 5: Download the Prize Picks aff today. Use that code Armstrong.
Speaker 5: You get fifty dollars instantly after you play your first
Speaker 5: five dollars lineup. That's right, you don't have to win.
Speaker 5: You get the bonus automatically just for playing five dollars.
Speaker 2: Prize Picks. Run your game.
Speaker 1: Remember the code Armstrong.
Speaker 2: I love that guy bless the elon with the filth
Speaker 2: and he says, that was only four things I asked
Speaker 2: for five We got more on the way. Stay here.
Speaker 1: Well, guys.
Speaker 5: Due to the bird flu, egg production has hit a
Speaker 5: nine year low.
Speaker 1: Yeah, thankfully, I just saw an ad for a new
Speaker 1: product that I think should help.
Speaker 5: Take a look at this bird flu got you grouped
Speaker 5: up this winter introducing the only medicine on the market
Speaker 5: made especially for birds.
Speaker 2: They're a flu.
Speaker 4: Just listen to some happy customers.
Speaker 5: My sinuses and stop my runny beak.
Speaker 1: I've never flown higher.
Speaker 5: And my wife says that stopped snoring.
Speaker 2: For birds or people.
Speaker 1: Whatever.
Speaker 2: The FDA is gone, like they're mocking the importance of
Speaker 2: bird flu there, which I may have.
Speaker 5: That's some sort of suggesting that the recent DOGE efforts
Speaker 5: have ended any regulation of medications.
Speaker 1: That's not not true.
Speaker 2: Right exactly, My thirteen year old got his physical or
Speaker 2: check up or I don't really call it, some sort
Speaker 2: of mandatory thing you have to get at roughly that age.
Speaker 1: Make sure they're code it right or you'll have to
Speaker 1: go back and do it again right.
Speaker 2: And I don't even remember if it's mandatory for the
Speaker 2: school or mandatory for your insurance. It's one of the two,
Speaker 2: probably a school perhaps. Anyway, it was mostly questions, mostly
Speaker 2: talking to your kid more than like physically measuring you.
Speaker 2: Isn't it physical supposed to be measuring various things?
Speaker 5: Yeah, some I suppose heart and lungs are working all right.
Speaker 2: The rest is details, right, blood pressure, weight, you know,
Speaker 2: all that sort of stuff. Maybe some blood samples. What's
Speaker 2: what the whole asking you about your home life thing?
Speaker 1: What is that physical?
Speaker 5: Well, yeah, that's an interesting other question. I've never heard
Speaker 5: of them doing just routine blood work on kids.
Speaker 2: No, you know they didn't do blood work. But okay,
Speaker 2: so the physical should be very short.
Speaker 5: You're thirteen years old. This is what you isse is
Speaker 5: your blood pressure? Let's check your reflexes.
Speaker 2: Okay? What's with all the questions? I don't like that.
Speaker 2: None of your freaking business. None of your freaking business.
Speaker 1: What are some of the questions?
Speaker 2: I remember I meant originally And I don't know if
Speaker 2: this changed or if they just know me, but I
Speaker 2: mean when I was there with his brother, was do
Speaker 2: you have any guns? Though, I'm like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 2: you don't ask that question. That is none of your business.
Speaker 2: What are you doing?
Speaker 1: Yep?
Speaker 2: How many hours of Team Miss Jack? How many hours
Speaker 2: of TV do you watch?
Speaker 4: What?
Speaker 5: I don't What are you asking my kid? And they
Speaker 5: don't want you in the room, by the way, they
Speaker 5: take your kid away and ask them all these questions,
Speaker 5: what is that that's not a physical, that is some
Speaker 5: sort of something else. Maybe you think it's okay, but
Speaker 5: it's not a physical all right, Well, they would answer,
Speaker 5: we're looking out for the kid's health. Overall health. It's
Speaker 5: an important factor. Screen time science has shown that Jack science.
Speaker 2: I don't like it. I don't like it at all.
Speaker 2: I don't like the government coming up with guidelines for
Speaker 2: a bunch of these things, and then you asking my
Speaker 2: kid about it away from me and then making determinations.
Speaker 2: F you do not like it a bit. You measure
Speaker 2: his height, his weight, his blood pressure, his reflexes. I'll
Speaker 2: deal with the rest of it. It fits in with
Speaker 2: the thing we were talking about last hour. There's more
Speaker 2: and more attempting to separate parents from children going on
Speaker 2: in our nation, top to bottom, left to right, all
Speaker 2: round for some reason.
Speaker 1: Well I knows, I mentioned earlier.
Speaker 5: First circuit just came out with a ruling said no,
Speaker 5: the parents have no right to know about their eleven
Speaker 5: year old changing gender at school. Horrifying ruling. Can't wait
Speaker 5: to see it overturned. It had better be.
Speaker 2: It's also some of thee and I've never liked this.
Speaker 2: You take the worst possible situations out there and assume
Speaker 2: that could be everybody. So you deal with everybody like
Speaker 2: the worst possible situations. So if you got some kid
Speaker 2: who's being beaten by their parents, you're trying to figure
Speaker 2: that out. Be you treat everybody else in the same way.
Speaker 2: It's like, well, when the kids were born, when they
Speaker 2: were very born, and they made me leave the room
Speaker 2: so they can talk to mom about whether or not
Speaker 2: she's free to talk with you know, that sort of thing,
Speaker 2: at one of the best moments of your life. You're
Speaker 2: treating us like that. It's just what the hell? Wow,
Speaker 2: I hate that sort of thing.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's troubling, it's intrusive. It was unimagined history of
Speaker 5: America not very long ago, right, right? Don't you love progressivism?
Speaker 2: Well? And most people, I guess are just so compliant.
Speaker 2: It's as well, they asked, I suppose I better answer.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 2: You don't have to answer those questions, you do.
Speaker 5: The automatic submission to authority is absolutely a pretty serious
Speaker 5: issue in modern America, especially because the authorities have realized
Speaker 5: that you're submissive to them and have rubbed their hands
Speaker 5: together with glee and thought, what.
Speaker 1: Can we accomplish us you're in the Brave New World.
Speaker 2: Well, I think, as you know if you listen to
Speaker 2: the podcast yesterday, I think a lot of modern technology
Speaker 2: and screen time and all that sort of stuff is awful.
Speaker 2: And I have stricter rules than most of my kids'
Speaker 2: friends do. But I don't think the school needs to
Speaker 2: ask about it all make those determinations. Sure, I don't
Speaker 2: like that a bit. Do you agree or disagree? Tax
Speaker 2: line four one five two nine five KFTC. Does your
Speaker 2: dad yell at you a lot? Nobody yells on the
Speaker 2: radio all the time. He's scary. That's probably true, Armstrong
Speaker 2: and Getty.
Speaker 7: There are over one hundred people from across the intelligence
Speaker 7: community that they all will be terminated and their security
Speaker 7: clearances will be revoked. When you see what these people
Speaker 7: were saying, and thanks to Chris Ruffo for putting.
Speaker 2: It all out online.
Speaker 7: They were brazen in using an NSA platform intended for
Speaker 7: professional use to conduct this kind of really, really horrific behavior.
Speaker 7: And they were brazen in doing this because when was
Speaker 7: the last time anyone was really held accountable?
Speaker 5: That is Tolzy Gabberd talking about the fact that one
Speaker 5: hundred or so NSA employees were engaged in extremely second
Speaker 5: actually graphic talk, especially about being transgender and their new
Speaker 5: parts and what they like to do to each other
Speaker 5: and what have done to them, and just craziness. Anyway,
Speaker 5: speaking of strong drunette cuties in American government, I give you,
Speaker 5: Secretary of Homeland Security.
Speaker 1: Is that what Christine Holman is?
Speaker 5: Yes, yes, indeed, hide your dogs, here comes Christineome.
Speaker 8: We are putting in place and enforcing the Alien Registration Act,
Speaker 8: which is using every single tool that we have at
Speaker 8: our disposal to do exactly what President Trump promised the
Speaker 8: American people. The Alien Registration Act says that within thirty
Speaker 8: days of being in this country illegally, someone must register
Speaker 8: with the federal government. They will be fingerprinted, they must
Speaker 8: announce that they are here, and if they do so,
Speaker 8: they can avoid criminal charges and fines, and we will
Speaker 8: help them relocate right back to their home country. And
Speaker 8: what this does is provide them opportunity to come back
Speaker 8: someday and to be a part of the American dream.
Speaker 8: If they don't register, they're breaking the federal law which
Speaker 8: has always been in place. We're just going to start
Speaker 8: enforcing it to make sure that these aliens go back
Speaker 8: home and when they want to be an American, then
Speaker 8: they can come and visit us again.
Speaker 5: I like her throwing in the law that has always
Speaker 5: been in place. We're just going to start enforcing it
Speaker 5: right right, And I can already hear the left bellowing
Speaker 5: that this is unprecedented.
Speaker 1: Actually it is precedented.
Speaker 5: Number one, the laws in place, and number two, this
Speaker 5: sort of thing has been done multiple times through our history,
Speaker 5: where Okay, if you're in the country, you got to register.
Speaker 5: We want to know who you are, where you came from,
Speaker 5: where you live, get your fingerprints, and then we're going
Speaker 5: to figure out what to do with you. Because maybe
Speaker 5: you've just committed a civil offense. But if you fail
Speaker 5: to register, now you've committed a criminal offense. Enforcement. I'll
Speaker 5: be damned. No live long enough to see it. Nobody
Speaker 5: runs on I want to change the laws. I want
Speaker 5: to change the law so that people can come here. Partly,
Speaker 5: anybody can walk into this country and stay here. That's
Speaker 5: what I want the law to be. Nobody runs on that.
Speaker 2: Because it'd be so incredibly unpopular.
Speaker 5: Oh no, no, you'd be hooted out of the process. Yeah,
Speaker 5: and yet that's what we have. So getting from Bizarro
Speaker 5: Land where we are to Saineville, where I'd love to live.
Speaker 5: It's gonna be a little uncomfortable for some people, but hallelojah,
Speaker 5: it's being done. Speaking of immigration type stuff, let's see
Speaker 5: what order do we want to do this in. Why
Speaker 5: don't we hit the gold card clip number seventy. This
Speaker 5: is Lucas Tomlinson on Fox News.
Speaker 9: President Trump's introducing the Gold card, and we're not talking
Speaker 9: about AMEX here, but a potential opportunity for wealthy foreign
Speaker 9: investors to get visas to buy their way into American citizenship.
Speaker 9: And as you mentioned, Inslee, it comes with a heft
Speaker 9: deep price tag.
Speaker 6: We're there to be selling a gold card. You have
Speaker 6: a Green card, This is a goal card. We're going
Speaker 6: to be putting a price on that card of about
Speaker 6: five million dollars and that's going to give you Green
Speaker 6: card privileges.
Speaker 1: Plus it's going to be.
Speaker 6: A rep to citizenship and wealthy people will be coming
Speaker 6: into our country by buying this card. They'll be wealthy,
Speaker 6: and they'll be successful, and they'll be spending a lot
Speaker 6: of money and paying a lot of taxes and employing
Speaker 6: a lot of people.
Speaker 9: Now Trump's plan will replace the EB five program. The
Speaker 9: President's Commerce Secretary, Howard Lovene called the EB five program
Speaker 9: full of nonsense, make believe in fraud.
Speaker 2: Do other countries do that? Can I become a citizen
Speaker 2: of France if I pony up a certain number of
Speaker 2: millions of dollars?
Speaker 5: I don't know that, but the first part of the question, yes, yeah, absolutely,
Speaker 5: there are countries that say, look, if you can invest
Speaker 5: in the country and you know, pay a fee to
Speaker 5: cover blah blah blah. Yeah, absolutely, you're welcome. This the
Speaker 5: EB five he's talking about. I'm not an expert on this,
Speaker 5: but this sort of thing has always existed. If you
Speaker 5: are going to come to the country and invest a
Speaker 5: certain amount, then you are welcome. Trump's just raising it
Speaker 5: to five million dollars and as they said, gotten rid
Speaker 5: of a lot of the dumb crap in the in
Speaker 5: the rules. But you get to be and he said
Speaker 5: other benefits like Trump shoes, maybe Trump steaks, Trump water,
Speaker 5: all of it.
Speaker 2: Maybe some of those cards.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and they drop off the gift basket NFTs.
Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, so you know, I could look into the particulars,
Speaker 5: but who knows. There's probably some wacky stuff in there,
Speaker 5: but I don't care. Much more concerned about nine million
Speaker 5: people flooding into the country during the god for sake
Speaker 5: and four years of the Biden administration, including many gang
Speaker 5: members and that sort of thing. Tom Holman, who's in
Speaker 5: charge of a lot of this stuff for the administration,
Speaker 5: has been talking about immigration, obviously, and he's exactly the
Speaker 5: right man for the job. He's talking about the the
Speaker 5: far left objecting to what's been going on. And there's
Speaker 5: a report on I think it was Fox News last
Speaker 5: night about how activists in LA for instance, are actively
Speaker 5: interfering with ices doing what they're trying to do. They
Speaker 5: are warning illegals, they are shouting through bullhorns, don't open
Speaker 5: the door, don't open the door when the ice goes
Speaker 5: to art a hotel, for instance. Just unbelievable. But again,
Speaker 5: this is a huge percentage of.
Speaker 1: Americans agree with what's going on.
Speaker 5: Here's Tom Holman rather talking about the crazy left and
Speaker 5: clips seventy three.
Speaker 2: Michael, look, I know about docs.
Speaker 10: I got a Governor Youngkin has assign a state trooper
Speaker 10: to my home twenty four to seven. I have a
Speaker 10: Mark Carr outside my door right now. I got a
Speaker 10: security detail. The left has lost her mind, is all
Speaker 10: of a sudden, the ones who enforced all the bad
Speaker 10: guys and want who break them all the victims.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, said next clip, Michael, we.
Speaker 10: Are prioritizing public saint they trusts, child predators, rapists, murderers.
Speaker 10: These are the worst and the worst walking around your communities.
Speaker 10: And you would think any elected mayor, any elected governor,
Speaker 10: any elected city councilwoman would want public safety trusts remove
Speaker 10: from their communities.
Speaker 2: They're no more responsibility of.
Speaker 10: The taxpayers, the voters they expect to save the community.
Speaker 10: So I hope people are waking up to these far
Speaker 10: left nuts who want to push back against ice from
Speaker 10: what we're doing.
Speaker 2: Him. End of that, Tom, you are a nut. If
Speaker 2: you're if you're trying to protect known criminals who are
Speaker 2: here illegally, you're nuts.
Speaker 5: I mean, you're, you're, you're whatever your ideology is is
Speaker 5: so blinded you to just common sense. I don't know
Speaker 5: how do I have a conversation with you. And if
Speaker 5: you're just against rounding up non criminal illegal aliens because you.
Speaker 2: Think you know, I'll steal man.
Speaker 5: The argument is, they say these days, because we have
Speaker 5: sent the message as a country over and over again,
Speaker 5: come in. We need the workers, and we will get
Speaker 5: you a job and sign you on to public benefits.
Speaker 5: And also, don't worry sneak across the border if you can. Therefore,
Speaker 5: we shouldn't be rounding these people up because we invited them.
Speaker 5: You've got to make that case, all right, But that's
Speaker 5: acting like it's abhorrent to round up rapists, right, Well,
Speaker 5: that's a policy decision, and he gets back to what
Speaker 5: I was saying earlier then argue, we need to change
Speaker 5: the law. Yes, have Congress change a law that if
Speaker 5: you've been here X number of days, years whatever, doing
Speaker 5: whatever job you don't have, there's no kicking you out.
Speaker 2: Change the law. But there's not public opinion on your
Speaker 2: side for that, right.
Speaker 5: Right, Speaking of public opinion and the immigration that sort
Speaker 5: of thing, Jason Riley with a really interesting column recently.
Speaker 5: I don't think we're going to get rid of the
Speaker 5: anchor baby thing, and he goes into depth on a
Speaker 5: lot of.
Speaker 1: The precedents the Court presidents.
Speaker 5: It might take the Supreme Court ruling on it, but
Speaker 5: in looking through the history of the Fourteenth Amendment, I
Speaker 5: hadn't heard some of this stuff about not only Supreme
Speaker 5: Court decisions but laws adopted by Congress, and it had
Speaker 5: to do with well, it's generally agreed that the birthrate
Speaker 5: citizenship rule excludes the children of foreign ambassadors and foreign
Speaker 5: enemies who are occupying the country, and it used to
Speaker 5: include Indian children too, Native American children, and the Trump
Speaker 5: administration some of its supporters say that Congress never intended
Speaker 5: for the children of people here illegally to be on
Speaker 5: the list of automatic citizens. But lawmakers living in the
Speaker 5: late eighteen hundreds may have disagreed. Then they go into
Speaker 5: the fourteenth Amendment. Slaves in their offspring. That's easy, everybody
Speaker 5: gets that. But not all slaves were here legally. Although
Speaker 5: the US banned the importation of slaves in eighteen eight,
Speaker 5: an illegal international slave trade continued for decades.
Speaker 1: A lot of people what I have to.
Speaker 2: Do with whether or not it's a good idea though,
Speaker 2: Now for a you know, some citizen of some country
Speaker 2: to fly here to have their baby and their baby's
Speaker 2: a citizen.
Speaker 5: Well, again, you would have to specifically either clarify the
Speaker 5: constitution or pass the law that passes the Supreme Court.
Speaker 5: Because people on my side of things lean on the
Speaker 5: under the jurisdiction of the United States or its territories
Speaker 5: in the fourteenth Amendment and somebody who sneaks into the country,
Speaker 5: we don't know who they are, but that is like,
Speaker 5: that really matches the illegally imported under the table slaves
Speaker 5: and the court's rule that.
Speaker 1: No, it doesn't matter what their.
Speaker 5: Legal status was, if they were born here, they are citizens,
Speaker 5: whether they were secret or imported for labor or whatever,
Speaker 5: and they would have to overturn that tradition. And Jason Gay,
Speaker 5: who's a terrific Conservatives, common sense guy, smart guy, says
Speaker 5: he just thinks it's unl likely because of the whole
Speaker 5: history of the thing. Now I'm not saying he's right
Speaker 5: necessarily or that's the way it ought to go, but
Speaker 5: it's going to be a heavier lift than i'd realized.
Speaker 2: It. Being a heavy lift is different than whether it's
Speaker 2: a good idea or not.
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, exactly. And it seems like a good idea. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 5: I would agree. I mean, you'd think we could clarify
Speaker 5: this sort of thing fairly easily. As we've mentioned before,
Speaker 5: Tim Sander, for a good friend of the Armstrong and
Speaker 5: Getty Show, constitutional attorney, lawyer, advocate, etc. Thinks we should
Speaker 5: amend the Constitution more if it needs it. It's funny
Speaker 5: we're all super hesitant to do that, which, on the
Speaker 5: one hand I kind of appreciate because it speaks to
Speaker 5: our valuing of the Constitution as something.
Speaker 2: And I don't think that's it permanent and great. I
Speaker 2: don't think that's why we do it. I think we
Speaker 2: resist it the same way resist changing the tax code.
Speaker 2: We just resist changing things that have been a certain way. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I wish it was reverence for the Constitution. I think
Speaker 2: it's just the text code has always been this way.
Speaker 5: So and yet the radicals who are willing to change
Speaker 5: will teach your eleven year old that they're a different
Speaker 5: sex and then keep it secret from you.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So I don't know. Maybe conservatives have to embrace
Speaker 1: more change. I don't know.
Speaker 2: We got a ton of texts about the conversation I
Speaker 2: had about doctors asking your kids questions and all that
Speaker 2: sort of stuff. Might get to that an hour four.
Speaker 2: Revisit the conversation.
Speaker 5: Later this hour, which is like next America's hottest sports controversy.
Speaker 2: Oh boy, how whether you're.
Speaker 5: A sports fan or not, you should weigh in, You
Speaker 5: should have a hot take, then you should clap back
Speaker 5: then you should own somebody.
Speaker 2: I will, I will weigh in strongly yes and emotionally.
Speaker 2: All that's on the way. Boy, I really touched a
Speaker 2: nerve with my little rant about how a physical for
Speaker 2: your kid is really just a series of questions prying
Speaker 2: into your home life and not what we thought of
Speaker 2: physical was. We'll get to some of those texts in
Speaker 2: our four.
Speaker 5: I love that idea we ought to bring back that
Speaker 5: proposed new outrageous rule in California about protecting your own too,
Speaker 5: because it's you know, it's a similar awful, awful philosophy.
Speaker 5: Stay tuned four hour for If you don't get our four,
Speaker 5: grab it via podcast. Subscribe to Armstrong and Getty on demand.
Speaker 5: Can't wait to hear that hottest controversy in sports. We're
Speaker 5: gonna get into it like this, Michael hit it.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, dude, you.
Speaker 11: Know baby, there's a special play, the play I use
Speaker 11: when I can't get to wait, can't wait to get
Speaker 11: into your end zone?
Speaker 10: What?
Speaker 11: Oh yeah, I'm one you out away from your love you,
Speaker 11: and there's only one way to get that.
Speaker 1: Snab me the ball, snam me the ball. You know
Speaker 1: what we're doing.
Speaker 5: Do the tush push the push that's right, the toush push.
Speaker 5: The Philadelphia Eagles invented it.
Speaker 1: And perfected it.
Speaker 5: It's that play where they snapped the quarterback to ball.
Speaker 5: Then the behemoths in front line up with the behemoths
Speaker 5: with their giant asses, and the behemoths, who.
Speaker 1: Are normally over there and over there.
Speaker 5: Get behind the quarterback and they just all shove them
Speaker 5: into the end zone. And all the rest of the
Speaker 5: teams are like, you can turn off the music. All
Speaker 5: the rest of the teams are like, hey, this, this
Speaker 5: this sucks. There's no way to stop this, and and
Speaker 5: and and and they're trying to say people might get hurt.
Speaker 2: You know that there could be more injuries, But it's
Speaker 2: not that at all.
Speaker 5: The problem with it, and I don't know if it's
Speaker 5: a problem or not, is but if you're on the
Speaker 5: one yard line, you have scored a touchdown with the
Speaker 5: tushbush because it's practically impossible.
Speaker 2: To start you need a first down.
Speaker 5: Well right, yeah, exactly, so in a weird way, it
Speaker 5: distorts the field. The only way you can stop it
Speaker 5: is if you start the defense simultaneously or slightly before
Speaker 5: the offense. The only problem being is the offense knows
Speaker 5: when they're going to snap the ball, So they're always
Speaker 5: going to get off the ball faster than you.
Speaker 1: Well, if you had can't.
Speaker 2: Yeah, wouldn't Newton say that if you had bigger asses,
Speaker 2: it wouldn't make any difference if they got your Your
Speaker 2: asses can't be moved by their asses.
Speaker 5: Newton, great physicist, terrible football coach. What he fails to
Speaker 5: consider is that the minute on a defense like clustered
Speaker 5: all of their be b a myths in the middle,
Speaker 5: they would fake the tush push and toss it outside
Speaker 5: and they would waltz into the end zone.
Speaker 1: There you go and for a cup of coffee.
Speaker 5: And I'm not an expert on this, but I remember
Speaker 5: it as a kid, for a cup of coffee. You
Speaker 5: could not push your own player into the end zone.
Speaker 5: You could be in front of them blocking, but you
Speaker 5: couldn't behind them pushing. And so the other NFL coaches
Speaker 5: are trying to get this squashed. I don't know if
Speaker 5: they will or not. I don't actually care.
Speaker 6: No.
Speaker 5: Oh. The other part that's a problem is the referees
Speaker 5: find it almost completely impossible to figure out when a
Speaker 5: guy is down, Oh, how far he made the ball?
Speaker 1: Kansas City Chiefs Buffalo bills. Please.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what I wondered about.
Speaker 1: The whole the infamous call.
Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, anyway, So that's the hot controversy in sports,
Speaker 5: the charmingly named push push.
Speaker 2: But that's not what they call it themselves. It's the
Speaker 2: jam it up there or something or other.
Speaker 5: Oh stop it, what are you with the NSA? You're
Speaker 5: on some NSA chatboard with your explicit sex talk. I
Speaker 5: won't have it. One more topic that I think we
Speaker 5: have time to squeeze and barely is the ass kissing
Speaker 5: of Trump has gotten hilarious. There are congress people who
Speaker 5: are quite literally sponsoring bills in the House of Representative
Speaker 5: to carve Trump's face on Mount Rushmore.
Speaker 2: No they aren't to, Yes.
Speaker 5: They are actually on the floor of Congress. Rename Dulles
Speaker 5: Airport Trump Airport, turn the President's birthday into a new
Speaker 5: federal holiday. There's this guy, Randy Ogles in Tennessee who's
Speaker 5: like the king of this.
Speaker 2: They're called messaging bills.
Speaker 5: They have little chance of becoming law, but they score
Speaker 5: political points, whether with your constituents or the president.
Speaker 1: And let's see what is some of the other ones.
Speaker 5: But it's really really funny because it's just clearly kissing
Speaker 5: Trump's ass. And the other one I wanted to mention
Speaker 5: is Trump has shared an AI generated video depicting his
Speaker 5: resort like vision for the future of Gaza, featuring a
Speaker 5: gigantic golden statue of himself, as well as images of
Speaker 5: him lounging shirtless poolside with Benjamin Netting Yahoo.
Speaker 2: I saw that. I can't be believe he put that
Speaker 2: out on his own truth. Trump is doing it himself. Yeah,
Speaker 2: something unprecedented. If you miss an hour, gets the podcast
Speaker 2: Armstrong and Getty on demand Armstrong and Getty