WEBVTT - Cybersecurity Threats, Crypto News & Digital Marketing

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power. CALLI

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:12.039
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Emily j I'm Caroline Hyde in New York. This is

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. Coming up. In the next hour, we explore

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>the latest sanctions that the Biden administration is levying a Russia.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>This country inches forward to a possible invasion of Ukraine,

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.639
<v Speaker 1>classic tensions heightened, how Russia could also use cyber attacks

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to retaliate for those sanctions. Plus the revolving down in

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Washington between those in crypto when those tasked with policing

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it some surprising number of people who have been making

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.639
<v Speaker 1>the move from crypto to government and vice versa. And

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in nearly two decades, there will

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>be no new call a duty next year. Well, that

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>means the gaming industry, and that's why the gaming world

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is going crazy off elden Ring and my fans a

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Game of Thrones might be intrigued as well. We'll get

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.199
<v Speaker 1>to all of that good stuff in a moment, but first, well,

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it was another pretty bleak day on the market, particularly

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for your long technology, but most pretty good to has

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the update for us, Yeah, a risk off day in

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the market's read on the screen, which is interesting given

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that we had a pretty big sell off yesterday. That

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>usually means you have a pretty strong rebound. But even

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>though we opened in the green, we weren't able to

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>hold those games. You can see that right behind me

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five hundred closing down one percent, but like

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you said, Caroline, a lot of that pain showing up

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in the NASDAC down almost to all which shy three

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>percent two point six percent. What's important to keep in

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>mind here is that big tech, although at least those records,

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it also leads the declines, and that's really what you're

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing seeing. One of the only sectors in the green

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>today was of course energy, which brings me once again

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to those geopolitical tensions. You can see that's what weighed

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the stock market down but actually fed into commodities, and

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you can see that Brent crude getting closer and closer

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to that one dollar. There's a barrel that is going

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to be significant when we talk about inflation feeding back

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>into what actually weighs on those tech stocks. Let's talk

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>about technicals though, because that absolutely plays into this dynamic.

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>You actually saw the SMP close into correction territory yesterday.

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So once again, Caroline, the assumption here is that you're

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>going to see a bounce back. Pretty normally, when the

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred drops ten from its all time peak,

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you do see a pretty strong bounce back. Yet we

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are not there. We are now down eleven from its

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>peak earlier this year. There was some green on the screen,

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.519
<v Speaker 1>though a little pockets, and when it comes once again,

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it comes to geopolitical tensions. Traditionally in those kind of

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>safe haven moves, you tend to go to big tech.

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But today that green on the screen happened to me

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and cybersecurity stocks a little bit of a last miss

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>self when it comes to CrowdStrike, vm Ware and fort neet,

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>but Paulo Alto once again actually gaining some pretty blockbuster

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>earnings there at the end of the day, when you're

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about geopolitical risk, when you're talking about invasion risk,

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and of course cyber tax on Ukraine, what better play

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>than those defense stocks, And right now, that's the purpose

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity is playing right now on the stock market. Pretty

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>such a great round up, really tying together all of

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the headwinds and tail winds in the market in their

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>own moment, and I want to talk more about those

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>headwinds and precisely the sanctions that we were just talking about,

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration once again opping the anti in that respect,

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we want to bring in of course, Blue WEG's Washington correspondent.

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>He's not in Washington, so New York, Amory Horden. The

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>reason your hero is because you had a really great

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>exclusive interview. But first and foremost, bring us up to

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>speed with well where we are in terms of sanctions.

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>They seem to be ramping up slowly. Yeah, the Biden

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>administration today is going to be sanctioning nord Stream too

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and the individuals that are part of nord Stream two.

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is, I have to say, is a pretty

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>aggressive step. This is something that the US has really

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>held back from doing. And this isn't just now that

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the Germans say we're going to wait for that certification,

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>because remind us nor Stream to the gas pipeline between

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Germany and Russia, right, and this is something Putin wants

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>eleven billion dollars. He can start to not go through

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine as much for those gas, but instead use another

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>pipeline direct clean into Europe, the heart of Europe. And

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>now even though the Germany says they're going to wait

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to potentially certify it with the US putting sanctions on

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and that means that certification may never come through. But

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the Ukrainian Foreign minister who I sat down and said

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 1>this is very welcome. They've been against north Stream too

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for years. But he said more sanctions are needed to

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>take lessen. It sends a strong message to put In,

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 1>but it still doesn't stop him. So it means we

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>need more sanctions, we need the second wave and then

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>probably the third way until it gets clear to him

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that he shouldn't make any step further. Dmitro phuleb there

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's heading back to Kiev. Now we should know

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Kiev now, Caroline and Ukraine as a whole. It's a

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>state of emergency. The separatists have asked Putin to send

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in troops. So it does feel like things are really

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.119
<v Speaker 1>starting to escalate, starting to escalate, and also not only

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in physical form, but also in cyber form as well.

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>There was another cyber attack on Ukraine's key sort of

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure to and including the foreign minister his website, so

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that all these ministry as were attacked. This was the

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>second cyber attack that's happened in about a week. But

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>this has happened to Ukraine a number of times. One

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest ones was in when literally everyone's power

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>went out in the country, or maybe three hundred thousand

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>consumers right, it felt like a lot at the time.

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But they've attacked cyber attacks have been at banks, the

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>metro a number of issues. And I asked him about

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this and he said they have been working for to

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>really fortify it and make it a little bit more robust.

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But I was curious about if you're going tipped for

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>toe or tip for tat with poutin tote to toe

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to sanctions trying to deter him any

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of his conversations have Western leaders said they would also

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>issue cyber attacks on Russia and he said, no, that

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>hasn't come up yet. We'll see how cyber wolf haes

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>stoughts to be factored in a little bit more. I'm

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>reholding such a great interview. Go onto dot com and

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>seek it out because it was a great conversation. But

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we want to, of course discuss a little bit more

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>about what's been happening with several of the Ukrainian government

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and banking websites not functioning due to distributed to not

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of service attacks d d US. This comes after Ukraine

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>said just last week that of course it suffered its

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>worst cyber attack also targeting banking and government websites is

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and Marie was just telling us, let's dig into it.

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Fowler, he's a senior vice president for Strategic Engagements

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>and Threats for dark Trace. He also spent fifteen years

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>working at the CIA as its global cyber operations. You're

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a man who is in the know on these things.

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Just talk to us about the level of threat that

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>distributed denial of service attacks have on Ukraine. How impactful

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>are they? Carolina and great to be here, So, you know,

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:38.799
<v Speaker 1>these distributed denial service attacks really go at basically flooding

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a network or a website with traffic so that they're unusable,

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>they're overloaded, and they really don't function, and they can

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>be disruptive kind of at that, you know, if I'm

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a consumer trying to get to a specific website, and

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they can really frustrate kind of the the Internet connectivity

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of a specific website. But in terms of like broader,

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>more disruptive attacks, I think those are still to come. Okay,

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>still to come and still to come level DoPT Ukraine

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>or do you start to think that here in the

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>United States, with sanctions being upped by the Biden administration,

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>we could to see infrastructure as we've seen before, or

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps websites and the like start to be attacked as well.

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Great question. I think the easy answers both. You're going

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to see them ratchet up. You're gonna see the Russians

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>ratche up, ratchet up cyber attacks within Ukraine, potentially moving

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>into ransomware, data theft, data encryption to further cripple organizations

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and businesses, as well as potentially move into critical infrastructure

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>as a as a higher escalation point. As for the

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>U S and the West, as harsher and harsher sanctions

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and more economic damage is done on Russia, you will

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>see them. I think I want you an attempt to

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>respond in kind in terms of economic disruption, thinking financial institutions,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>banks maybe potentially tightening and or more damage to the

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>supply chain through either their own actions or proxies such

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>as cyber criminal groups or in ransomware actors. Yeah, to

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that point, when you are looking at the data, when

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to see when you're understanding where these attacks

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>are coming from, how do you discern whether it's indeed

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>from the government, whether or need it's more using other

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>actors at their will. How you can ensure that you're

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>joining the dolts in a sophisticated manner. No, your attribution

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>within cyberspace and who the actor actually was is incredibly difficult.

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So I was very pleased to see what the earlier

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>version of the denial of service attacks. The US government

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>come out fairly quickly to identify the Russians as the actor,

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>as the attackers in that space, and I think assessed

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>attribution is really important, that it is done as quickly

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>as possible, and that Russians, where there is evidence, can

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>be held accountable. But I think they will absolutely be

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>leaning on proxy organizations, potentially new ransomware groups we haven't

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>heard of before. You're gonna see more activity within that

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>space as the Russians either provide more state directed you know, actions,

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 1>or are increasing not only trying to blind ive but

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of turned the shackles, you know, released that the

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>shackles a bit in terms of those ransomware groups operating

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>out of their backyard as it were, Marcus, I mean,

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously this is I'm asking you to talk your book

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But have we seen an uptick in

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>demand for cyber protection? Are we seeing the defenses being fortified?

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Are we ready for the fight to be perfectly frank So,

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say one of the silver linings of the

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>increasing ransomware over the last two years is absolutely seeing

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the private industry, especially prioritized cybersecurity more directly right and

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>really start to put more resources, personnel, you know, advanced

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>emerging technologies into that space. And I think that the

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>US government has as well, right and as well as

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>as mother Western allies, recognizing the increased threat, have they

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>done enough, you know, as quickly? I think you we

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't a bit of a race condition against what will

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>be a spike in in cyber attacks and getting the

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>right pieces in place to properly defend right. It's kind

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of what that that old adage of you go to

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>war with the army you have, not the army you'd

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>wish you'd built and resourced and prioritized appropriately. Moist the

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>way Marcus Fowler really interesting. We thank you so much

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>as VP of Dark Trace. Let's just take a moment

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to think about, well, the future of marketing from Palaton

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook or US. We now know it meta. The

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>world is seeing its shares of brands facing kind of

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a post pandemic marketing challenge. More I want to bring

0:10:57.720 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in on the back of its earnings and also it's

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>forward looking thinking on all of this. The marketing firm

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>sat to Global, the CEO and co founder and chairman

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>David Steinberg's with us also, of course, as I say,

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>pushing to a fourth court of sales number that beat

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>estimates under thirty five million. Talk to us first and

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>foremost about your numbers first, David and the growth that

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing. Are we seeing continued demand and knowledge need

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in the marketing space. Yah? So, first of all, thank

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you for having me, Caroline. I appreciate it. It's great

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>to be here. Uh So, in SATA, what we're really

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing is what I think a lot of organizations are seeing.

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.719
<v Speaker 1>There's a tremendous amount of disruption in the ecosystem. Is

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>most marketers are moving from analog marketing to digital marketing.

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And as a lot of the very large tech players

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>are sort of trying to consolidate control. Apple got rid

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of their tracking mechanism called the I d f A.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Google is eliminating their cross app tracking, They're eliminating the

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>third party cookie. Platforms like at A Global, which do

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 1>not use any of those to resolve to an identity,

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>have been able to grow fairly dramatically. I mean, I

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>think that we grew the business when normalized for the

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>presidential election by thirty two percent in the fourth quarter,

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and we grew earnings for the year by over sixty

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of that is coming from this

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>big disruption in the marketplace where organizations are trying to

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to navigate those changes, and Zeta Global

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>is a bespoke platform to help them do so. And obviously,

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>feeling that you've got enough confidence in your growth strategy

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that from a full year revenue of about four fifty

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>eight million, you're looking to get that into an excess

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of a billion dollars in annual revenue over the next

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>well up to talk to us about the kind of

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>companies that are coming to at the moment. So it's

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a great question. Obviously, not only did we roll out

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>our plan to get to over a billion year in

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>revenue and plus operating margins, we fairly dramatically increased our

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>guidance for two as well. Uh, you know, we're seeing

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>very large enterprises. In fact, thirty four percent of the

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Fortune one hundred today use the Zata marketing platform who

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>are trying to get to consumers in a way that

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>is very cost efficient. And our platform is not just digital,

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it is built to be efficient in the way the

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 1>marketing operates. And we've been able to really scale very

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>very quickly with our clients. And so, how how do I,

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>as a client wanting to get in front of the

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>right use of the right demographic, the right timing, how

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>do I do that in a cost efficient way at

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the moment, because I feel that there's a lawful lot

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>of wall of money is being spent on the likes

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of Instagram, on the likes of TikTok. But is it

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>really being that efficient to your perspective, Yeah, so a

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of it isn't right. So the old joke is,

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, marketers would say, I know that of my

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>marketing is a waste of money. I just do not

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>know which half the beauty of the data marketing platform,

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>combined with our data cloud, which has over two hundred

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and thirty million opted in US individuals alone, is we

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>can weed out the individuals that do not have a

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>propensity to want to buy our clients products, and we

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>know exactly when they're in market, so we're able to

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>hit them at the precise time with the precise message,

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and we're able to pull out of that marketing funnel

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the fifty percent of customers who would not be credit

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>approved and or have a propensity to want to buy

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that product. So just by removing them, you're able to

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>massively increase the efficiency. And then by using our data

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>cloud where you're interacting with these two hundred and twenty

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>million opted in US individuals, were able to know when

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they're in market for particular products and services and specifically

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>target them when their thinking about the products. So those

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>two things allow us to be very efficient with our

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>enterprise client's budgets. Said opted in, how are we in

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of general trend lines, how many people are going

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to be wanting to to opt in? How many people

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>see the quid pro quo and say I'm in, I

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted I want to be targeted that little bit more efficiently. Yeah, listen,

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we we came about this in a very different approach

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>from most companies so we have acquired a large number

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of technology platforms that power publishers. In an exchange for

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the publisher getting our software platforms at no cost and

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the consumer being able to use those tools at no cost,

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we simply ask them to opt in. In return, we

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>guarantee the consumer we will never sell their data to

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>anybody at any price at any time. We simply use

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that data to build intent based scores on what does

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the consumer intend to do next? Do they intend to

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>buy a particular credit card, do they want a blue

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>car of a particular model, are they going to churn

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>off a wireless platform? And we use that data to

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>build the curriculum of contact on behalf of our enterprise

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>clients to help them lower churn or create customers more efficiently.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So by always keeping the consumers data private, we get

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot more consumers who are willing to opt into

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the platform and work with us because they know their

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>data is never going to be sold. Here's hoping we

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>get stalked a little bit less by ads for things

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we've only just purchased. So thank you very much. Indeed,

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a global CEO and co founder and chairman David Steinberg.

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you making the time for us when he's just

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>released his earnings and indeed a serial entrepreneur, they're so

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>great findings. Now we're going to talk about it called

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a Duty being delayed. It's the first time the franchise

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>will be without an annual main line release in nearly

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>two decades. It's all according to people familiar with the plan.

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Now we want to talk to our expert and all

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of this, Bloomberg's Jason Schreyer for more on the reasoning

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>behind it. It feels as though what the previous release

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>just didn't live up to expectations. Yeah, that's exactly what happened.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>So Call of Duty, um it has been an annual release,

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>has come out every fall since two thousand and five.

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is pretty stunning. It's a it's a big change.

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And just for a little context, is the last time

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we did not have a Call of Duty UM, I

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>believe was the beginning of the first Obama administration, So no, sorry,

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of George W. Bush's second term. So yeah,

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>so we're talking about a very long time. And yes,

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>so the previous year's last year's Call of Duty game underperformed,

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>which led activism Exacts to start thinking, hey, maybe we

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 1>need to rethink this whole release schedule thing. Maybe gave

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>some of these titles a little bit more breathing real Okay,

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>so maybe a little bit more desire working up our

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>appetite for the latest release. But it also comes at

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>a time that there's a lot of change and Activision

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 1>of course, notably that they're being boored. Could it be

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with that, Yeah, I mean, I'm sure

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>there's some There's been some conversations there another about how

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft will react. But you know what, I think, legally,

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>even though they've announced the acquisition, the Microsoft is buying Activision, um,

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it is not quite closed. They need to go through

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>regulatory approval, which is expected to be finished by the

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>next summer at the at the latest, summer three at

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>the latest. So until then, Activision is legally required to

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>just continue operating autonomously. And I'm sure they're in conversations

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft exects all the time. They are still making

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>their own calls. And I think this was more about

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the health of the College Duty franchise than it was

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>about Microsoft coming in and wanting to make some changes

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and talked to us. Therefore about maybe some of the

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>independent changes they're making ahead of the sale from an

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>executive shake up perspective, because they were once the acquirer,

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly of the maker of candy Crush. And then there's

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>some executive chan that yes again, um that was actually

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 1>just today is that king to make a mechanic? Car

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Sta announce that their president and chief creative officer both departing.

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Um again, who knows if that is really related to

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the Microsoft exposition or if, as they said, they want

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to go spend more time with their family. I mean,

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>we all know what what that typically means and exact speak. Um.

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But again, I just don't think that, Um, well, it's

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>possible of these folks saw the writing on the wall

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, you know what, Microsoft is going to

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>make some changes anyway, we better might as well get

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>out of here early. I do not think that Microsoft

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is actually getting involved too much just yet. Okay, lastly,

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>like talk to us a little bit about where is

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>hot right now? So if we're going to have to

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 1>wait for Activision to release Call a Duty, there is

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>another game that everyone seem to be talking about. Elden Ring. Yeah,

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>alden Ring comes out on Friday today. The review embargo

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>lifts a bunch of criticism just hit. Last I checked,

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it was tracking to be um one of the if

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>not the best reviewed games of all times. Um So,

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>which is the game a lot of what was the

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>winner before UM I should check? I think, uh the

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>legend of Zelda Breuss of the while it was a

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>top one, Mario Odyssey was another chop one um let.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>As I checked on the Open Critic, which is a

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>review aggregation site, it has a ninety six out of

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a hundred, which is by far the biggest game of

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the year, and I think one of the biggest games ever.

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so this game, UM, it's getting a lot

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of heights, largely because it's a crossover between George R.

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Martin UM. George R. Martin was the writer of the

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Game of Thrones series UM and from Software, which is

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>a Japanese developer that, as you tell them, absolutely the

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>loved among a lot of gamers for its series Dark

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Souls UM, which is known as like a really interesting, mysterious,

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>difficult um action action RPG series. And so the game

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>combined the two and it really just takes a lot

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>of smart ideas from a lot of other games. And uh,

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it's really brilliant. I've been a whole an of it

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>over the past week. Jason, you're doing your reporting for us.

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>We thank you. Jason Schreyer, He's always so smart on

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>all things gaming. So go check out the latest. Meanwhile,

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>coming up, despite while supply chain issues and shipping delays,

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it didn't seem to slow down over stock, which is

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>reported about than expected fourth quarter earnings. We're gonna be

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>breaking down all of the numbers when it comes to

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you're purchasing a big ticket items for the CEO Jonathan Johnson.

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>But also remember there for ay into blockchain. He's been

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a big proponent of the technology and looks as though

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>his early investments there seemed to still be bearing fruit.

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly people liking the stock on a key investment in

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the financial exchange area. So stick with us of that

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>conversation from beautiful sunny New York. This has been back.

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology. I'm Caroline High in New York.

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to some market moves today because we've

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>seen tech in particular under pressure, particularly amid the rhymesing

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>tensions between Russia and Ukraine. Why let's talk to run Blastelica,

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>who's with us of course over in Chicago and run

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>is it is it theoretically risk off or is it

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 1>more a rising rates environment that means in tech feels

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the pressure the most. Well, we're really seeing both of

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>those factors coming to play at the same time right now.

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>We already have we've long had concerns about the prospect

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 1>of rising interest rates and inflation fed policy, and then

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on top of that we had this new geopolitical tension

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's just another reason for investors be a little

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>bit more cautious about the growth side of the market.

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's another reason why we've seen people just pull

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>back from tech and a pretty broad based fashion. I'm

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>looking at a child and now it's like one hundred

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>from us all time high. I mean, that's basically heading

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>into bear territory now as we saw the SPI in

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>a technical correction level. Ryan talked to us about what

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>analysts are saying, because on the one side, you've got

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sacks sort of talk calling about a regime change

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing, particularly in the hedge funds area selling

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>out a big tech but Morgan Stanley sort of looking

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>at maybe the silver lining the opportunities therein absolutely so

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley came out with some Daddy yesterday that looks

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at a fund ownership from major technology stocks, and it

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 1>found that when it comes to names like Apple and Microsoft,

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>these are under owned relative to their weight in the

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred, which the firm interprets as a positive signal.

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps people have communities for so much there's maybe a

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>little bit room on the upside from here. Therefore, are

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you likely to see a bounce? Are we likely to

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>hend head to a bad territory? Are we thinking that

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in this rising tension with Russian Ukraine and we're really

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in for more pain to come? Everyone I've spoken with

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.719
<v Speaker 1>expects a lot more volatility in the space, and certainly

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>no one is ruling out the potential for additional aside

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>from here. But when it comes to these major names

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>like your Apples and Microsoft and Amazon and so forth,

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>people continue just to really see very strong long term

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>growth potential here, strong earnings power, and those are factories

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that do have people continuing to be a fan of them,

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>even if in the short term there is a potential

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for further volatility and downside and questioning evaluations. Ryan, we

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. When Ryan Lastelica stays warm over

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in cold Chicago, and let's talk about sort of the

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>down day that we had on the overall markets, but

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the companies outperformed. One of them was Overstock, in fact,

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>surging in terms of its share price, announcing better than

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>expected fourth quarter earnings, as well as navigating, of course,

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the ongoing headwinds that are supply chain issues, labor issues, inflation,

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>re isssues. Let's talk about how you managed to navigate that,

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 1>and also a little bit of blockchain to see of

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Overstocks with us Jonathan Johnson, Jonathan, congrats on the numbers

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and and talk to us a little bit about how

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you've managed to ensure the inventories where you need it,

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that supply is where you need it when the rest

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of the world is really struggling with it. Yeah, we

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>had another great quarters, our seventh consecutive quarter of profits,

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>second consecutive year of market share growth. We have a

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>vast and distributed supply chain, uh so, over three thousand

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>partners that have goods for us. We have always had

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>goods in inventory. We're very good at forecasting for our

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>for our carriers where demand will be, so we weren't

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>hit with ship again two years ago, and we weren't

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 1>hit with any delivery problems this past year. And of

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>course supply chain is tough, but we think our distributed

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>asset light model really helps us navigate a well. And

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>do you see any easing all some of those pressures

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>in general in the industry. I think the bottlenecks and

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>kinson the supply chain probably will last for the bulk

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of uh that that supply chain is pretty stressed, and

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>so any small kink in it tends to be amplified

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>more than it normally would. We think our system works well,

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly well in times of high demand and low supply.

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>What about inflationary pressures as well? Because people come to

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you for value, is that going to be a headwind

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>tailwind for you? As we start to see people worrying

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>about the price point, people do come to us and

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>recognize us for smart value, which means, you know, the

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>best product they can get for their dollar. Of course,

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>there are inflationary headwinds for everyone, whether it's labor or

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>goods or you know, gasoline prices. We've done a nice

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>job being able to absorb those with our suppliers and

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>pass as little of those as possible onto the onto

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>our customers. Our customers when they come to over stock,

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>she expects a great deal for her dollar, and we're

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>still able to deliver that. I'm interested when you say gasoline,

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>because an awful lot of people would say, actually, it's

0:26:57.840 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>it's the delivery, it's the trucking. Is that sort of

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 1>choke point that has been difficult? How are you finding

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we look at geopolitical tension, we look

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>at oil prices heading towards a hundred dollars? Is that

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 1>something you just braceful that little bit more? How do

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you lean on your suppliers in that respect? Well, you know,

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we we have to lean on them. We work closely

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>with you know, the ups s and the Fedexes of

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the world, which are the last mild delivery from our

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>suppliers warehouses. Uh, it's it's a difficult thing to manage.

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>We've got a great supply chain team than the nagies,

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>each of those relationships really well. Just looking at your

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>share price obviously doing incredibly well on the day, but

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>has been under pressure over the year. How are you

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of talking to investors at the moment they're feeling

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that you're getting caught up in an evaluation question mark

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in the time where we start to look at rate

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.239
<v Speaker 1>hikes and issues like that, or what what do you

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>make of the valuation of your business? Well, as I

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>mentioned on our call today, we have a board off

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>rise to share we purchase amount we think our stock

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>is undervalued today. Uh, we've been in a a company

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>black out BRAOD since the first of December. That's been

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the bulk. When when the time when the price has

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>gone down, I think we're in a good position to

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>exercise our buy back. Should that be the right thing

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to do? Interesting, so making the most of it yourself.

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you're a man who's known for being front

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of the pack when it comes to dream homes, but

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>also a man who's really understood and got to grips

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and blockchain before many did and before it became the

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>catchual term that we would love to make out the

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>way further afield in crypto than we actually are. I'm

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>interested in Medici ventures, of course, that was originally the

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the business that you had making investments in

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.959
<v Speaker 1>some of the blockchain technology. You've doubled down in that

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>T zero talk to us about why this is a

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>spinoff of yours and said well, a company that you're

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in a minority stake in, and Piper Satellite analysts really

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>liking the new funding round that T zero has been getting.

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Remind this what T zero does and why it's additive

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to your business. So T zero is blockchain meets capital markets.

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>It's UH. It's a registered alternative trading system or exchange

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>UH that uses blockchain to settle trades more quickly. It's

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>able to deal in cryptocurrencies and n f t s

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and security tokens and the normally traded NMS securities UH.

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>This week, T zero announced that it received a significant

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:34.239
<v Speaker 1>minority investment from ICE, the parent company to the New

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchange, among others, and that the former chief

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>strategy officer at Ice would become the new CEO at

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>T zero. We think this is a great omen for

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the future as markets moved to the century. We think

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they're going to use blockchain. We think you're gonna be

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>able to trade you know, crypto and stock and n

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>f t s all in one place. T zero is

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>set up for that to have Ice on the cap table.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And David goon is the is the CEO. I just

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>think bothes really really well, well, how long will you

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>will overstall Cremaine a key investor. What is your feel

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>forward looking plan in this respect? So we have interests

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>investments in twenty one different blockchain companies. About a year

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>ago we formed a limited partnership and helling On Ventures,

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a venture capital firm, is the general partner

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:38.719
<v Speaker 1>of that fund and it manages or oversees those uh

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty one companies, including T zero. Hellyan was instrumental in

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>closing this deal with David Goon and Ice and so,

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>uh we're letting Hellian manage the exits and how those

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>things work within that fund. But I see a long,

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>strong future for T zero, really fascinating and being able

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the consumer and indeed the rock Chane

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Well were you all at the same time Overstock CEO

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Johnson stay well in Salt Lake City. Meanwhile, coming

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>up Crypto and Washington is a relationship between the industry

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Hill all that transparent we're talking about, well

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the swapping of talent from one to the other as

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and is of course time now for our Crypto report,

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and we want to dive into the relationship between crypto

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and Capitol Hill because well, sen since I was getting

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>more entangled people increasingly moving between jobs and crypto and

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the government agencies that actually police that very industry. Well,

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>there's therefore the potential for conflicts of interest. They seem

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to be growing and could it potentially undermine efforts to

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>really regulate the sector. There's been a deep dive done

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>by my colleague and Bloomberg, Allison Verse Brill, and you

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>join me now, Allison, to really talk about the data

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>being crunched by the Tech Transparency Project. What do they

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>make of the amount that she has scale of the

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>revolving duel between Capital Hillen CRYPTI. So they characterized this

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>as as really an explosion and an activity in recent years.

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Um you know, I talked to them a little bit

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>about when they started analyzing this data and they said,

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was slow to start, and now we're

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing more and more of it. And I can tell

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you from personal experience having covered this now for a

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of months that on a near regular basis, I'm

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>getting announcements about first mal shifts, you know, individuals moving

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>from jobs at the White House, regulators UH into companies

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>like Finance, coin Base, um or or groups that lobby

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>or represent them at law firms. Do is there a date,

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there a time? Is there a tipping point that

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in started this move? Do you think so? You know,

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I talked to the director of the Tech Transparency Project

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and she said they started looking at that as far

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>back as UM but that there wasn't really a you know,

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>grow in this until and that we've just started to

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>see that increase since then. And I can also say

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that the infrastructure bill that was passed last year contained

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>some provisions of crypto industry didn't didn't like all that much,

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's definitely spurred some some activities, some moves, uh

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, also on the lobbying side. So seeing a

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of that going back to that time when it

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>was that particular bill that took I mean, a lawful

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people by surprise that they suddenly were really

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>doubling down on the crypto space. And we did a

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of number crunching then about the sheer lack of

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>lobbying and the money that is spent by other industry

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>groups visa VI crypto, and it was just paled into

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>in comparison. They had hardly anyone up on Capitol Hill

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>fighting for them. Is that now really changing, and what

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>are the concerns being highlighted by this particular bit of reporting.

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's definitely changing. We're seeing, um, you know, we're

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing superpacks that are designated just to crypto. We're seeing um,

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, companies like coin base and and others beating

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>up their lobbying height, hiring more outside firms. Um. So

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in general, we're just seeing a lot more money flooding

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>into Washington. And that was really one of the concerns

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that was raised in this report. They said, you know,

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>having this greater flow of former regulators into the industry

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or vice versa, you know, could have potentially impact the

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>regulatory process um and prevent the rules from being as

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>tight as they should be. And for full disclosure, my

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:31.839
<v Speaker 1>husband is a senior manager over at coin base, so

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>when I highlight that fact, But I'm interested in whether

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this is unique or not. I mean, is this kind

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>of what happens. Crypto is so unique because of the

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>sheer scale of money that was being made and I

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>can imagine that an awful lot of you know, money,

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 1>once we put to work to ensure that the industry,

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>they will believe and survives. But what about a revolving

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>door between Capitol Hill and other industry groups, other lobbying areas.

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>UM this, I will say, this is one area where

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>crypto is definitely not unique. We see that at in

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>all different types of sectors. We see it in banking,

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>we see it in tax um. I think pretty timely actually,

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we saw a pair of lawmakers, including Senator Liz Warren,

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:13.479
<v Speaker 1>asking for an investigation into sort of the a flow

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of officials from large accounting firms into the I R

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>S and Treasury and back and how that impacts tax rules. UM. So,

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:23.919
<v Speaker 1>definitely a common trend all across different sectors. I think

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the one difference is that this is now a growing

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>trend in crypto, which is such a new industry, and

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it really reflects that it's gaining more maturity and it's

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting more influence in Washington as investment. Thank

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being us the insights on that

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>revolving deal. We thank you. What it will take is

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>not just simply putting simple bandages and putting in programs,

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:58.760
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. It's about fundamentally, um redesigning the culture

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that exists with thee. The old way of doing things

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>is no longer the way of the future. The data

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.919
<v Speaker 1>shows that individuals from the historically excluded communities are having

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a different experience. That it also starts with the data,

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and that will help us think about strategies and solutions.

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We have to address some of the root problems. At

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the moment, what we do is play like diversity musical chairs,

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>and at the end of the day, we have to

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>expand the actual cool of that talent itself by addressing

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 1>educational equities and other systemic variants. Some of the d

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I experts from Uber to Spotify to Snapchat talking about

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>really tackling discrimination in the tech industry and well as

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the key goals of my next guest to

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Twilio is out with its own annual Impact and d

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I report just today talking about how business leaders and

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>corporations need to think about doing good overall. CEO Jeff

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Lawson and say is joining us now, And I mean

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>so focused are you on this that you're taking time

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 1>out of your well deserved break. So we appreciate that, Jeff,

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm interested about really the findings what business responsibility

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 1>means to you at Twilio. Now, Yeah, thank you go,

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And I mean it's um really interesting when I think

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>about the contract, the social contract between our society and companies.

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that companies make our society better, and

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:17.879
<v Speaker 1>that's why we allow things like a piece of paper

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>files from the state of Delaware or in Dublin can

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>own property and earn the contracts and all sorts of

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting things. And historically we've said, well, it makes society

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 1>better because you know, increases production and increases jobs and

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>things like that, and companies big process. But I actually

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>think now society is asking more from that contract. We

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a tilio have this belief that our existence should make

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>communities around us and society overall stronger because we exist.

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>And that's a multifaceted aspect of this contract that I

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>think goes well beyond what you know, the last generation

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>of business leaders thought that it was really just about

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>making a profit. It's also a lot about the data.

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>How you ensure that you are gaining true diversity, How

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>indeed you ask saying that pay equality is coming about,

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>how are you tracking the impact that you make from

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>an environmental perspective, a social perspective, a governance perspective. Well,

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously we try to track our impact along all those aspects.

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we do it not to have like

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the number to show now we are transparent about the

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>impact that we're having, but we actually use Like when

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you think about d E I A lot of companies

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think about, oh, this data, we have to put it

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>out there to to to to prove something to the world. Um,

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 1>what we think about it is the data is necessary,

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>but you use the data to move, not prove. You

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 1>use the data to impact your activities and to drive

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 1>how you're building the company, to make a company that

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:40.439
<v Speaker 1>is ever more inclusive and ever more diverse. And that's

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>how we think about using data. Okay, So can you

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>give us an example. I mean, I know that you've

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 1>been in particular helping certain non for profits organizations sort

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of and align themselves with you and with other businesses.

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Is that can you give us like exact data of

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.240
<v Speaker 1>how you're doing it. I'll give you another example. And business,

0:38:58.239 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 1>what do we do? We set goals and we put

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>our mind to which eating them. So when the vaccine

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for COVID came out last year, we set a goal

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to help vaccinate a billion people worldwide and we and

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>we put to work our product, our technology, we put

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>to work our people and their volunteer time and the

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 1>resources are funding from the company. And as a result

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of that, already just a year in we have already

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>helped to vaccinate three fifty million people and that is

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge number, but we've just started a third of

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the way hey to our goal of a billion. But

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we did that by partnering with organizations who are on

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:33.959
<v Speaker 1>the ground, like Dovey, who is out there trying to

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>vaccinate people in poorer countries that don't have readily access

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to the vaccine. And so we donated ten million dollars

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to gather were the second largest corporation to donate to

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that cause um And so I'm very proud of what

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Toyo has done. And it's just another example of how

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>we set goals and we use data to move to

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>get outcomes that we want as opposed to just to

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 1>try and prove something. Do you have that it sort

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of disrupts from within? And are you leading my example

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in some way? And how you seeing other companies embrace

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 1>what you often use your own tools to do the

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 1>same sort of thing. You know, the opposite of trying

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to have a monopoly on doing good. We actually want

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to open source any idea that we have and help

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>other people to do good as well. You know, one

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of the last pages of our impact report that we

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:18.879
<v Speaker 1>released today actually says our lessons learned in this past year,

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and it talks about some of the things that you know,

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 1>mistakes we've made and learned from it and hopes that

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 1>other people can do that. Another example is we started

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a program called we Pledge one Percent. It's a program

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>for our employees to pledge one percent of their time,

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>their income, or their totally out equity to do good

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in the world for nonprofits. And we help them to

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>execute that by giving them ideas, help them donate the

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 1>equity effects that they want to do. And we've open

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>sourcens and invited any other company who wants to bring

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>this program to their employees as well. And so far

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got dozens of companies including at Lastian and Zoom

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and many others who have actually brought this program to

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>their employees well. And now we've got tens of thousands

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of employees at of variety of different companies, all participating

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>by giving one percent of their resource just to do good. Interestingly,

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>do you think that it sets you apart from a

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>talent perspective, and you're getting that feedback that people are

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>coming to Twilio because of this or is this sort

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of an added benefit quote unquote if you know what

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean. Well, we've made impact a really integral part

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of our business. At some companies, you know, doing good

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>as a cost center or we got to donate to

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>this so we don't look bad in the press. Right

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>at Twilio, that's not how we think about it all.

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>We think of it as a virtuous cycle. The more

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 1>good we do in the world, the more of that

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to engage our employees and build great awareness

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and like high esteem for our company. That will attract

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>more customers, that will attract more employees that will then

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 1>help us build a stronger company that then can allow

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>us to do more in the world. And that is

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a nice virtuous cycle. And that's why Toyo dot org

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 1>at at our company is not a cost center. It's

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 1>actually a business unit, and it actually does business to

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>get our product into the hands of nonprofits who could

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>be using our product to do good at great discount.

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 1>And then we partner with those organizations make them successful

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and that allows us to them do more good in

0:41:57.640 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the world and I think that's a new model that

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm very proud of having really elevate that. And just briefly,

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I've got about a minute left. When you are looking

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>at billion people vaccinated? Is this very much on the

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets focus? Because I'm thinking of our academs who

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:10.480
<v Speaker 1>are in the Union in New York. Potentially you're not

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:12.760
<v Speaker 1>needing people to be vaccinated to go out to restaurants

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and the like. Well, you know, think about it. A

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of this is in emerging countries where there isn't

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>as easy access to vaccines. And we're very happy to

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>partner with a number of organizations sort of doing amazing

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>work like Save the Children's another great organization with something

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to educate the world on the safety of these vaccines.

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 1>But even here in the United States and other wealthier countries,

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you still see vaccine hesitancy. We still have a huge

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 1>effort to mobilize and get even the US population vaccinated,

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're still not done, obviously, And so I see

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>this as a as an effort that truly spends the world.

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Lawson, so great to speak with you. Thank you.

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Go back to your break now, really appreciate the time.

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Trilio CEO. Meanwhile, what does it for this edition of

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>bloom Bag Technology? Join us tomorrow. We're gonna be joining

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 1>John Woo, the president of Ava Labs, to talk about

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 1>well earnings of crypto. It's the bring back