WEBVTT - The Problems With Private Equity

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, peeps, and welcome to woo k F Daily

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>with Meet your Girl Danielle Moody, recording from the Home Bunker. Folks.

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, ever so often I get pretty excited to

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>have conversations about things that, guess what, I don't really

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>know about And why do I think that that's important? One,

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to continue to be students and

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>learn about issues that affect our daily lives. And also

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>one to just you know, I want to share with

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you all of the ways in which I am learning

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>over time how much like we are being screwed in

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>so many different ways, and it's actually really wild. So

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>on today's show, I sit down with Brendan Blue, who

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is the author of the book Plunder Private Equities Plan

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to Pillage America. And Brendan and I, you know, I

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>tell him at the start of the interview, I said, look,

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, give me a one oh one class in

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>private equity. And you know, he gives a wonderful description

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and low down of fifty thousand foot view of what

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>private equity is. But then we talk about the ways

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that private equity has been essentially targeting low income and

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>black and brown communities and basically, I don't even know

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>what to say, Like pillage is absolutely the right word

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that Brendan uses to describe his book, and that is

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they are. They are private equity are vultures

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that go into low income communities. They take over services

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and industries that are desperately needed by people with little income.

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>They then basically turn those businesses and services into trash,

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>cause a lot of harm. And then because they are

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>private equity firms, guess who doesn't have the ability to

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>sue the people. And so it's just another way in

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>which we think. For instance, when you're putting, let's say

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a loved one in a nursing home, and you think

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that if something goes wrong, if they were to slip,

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>if they were to God forbid die, that then you

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>can go ahead and sue that nursing home. Well, that

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>nursing home has now been bought over by a private

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>e equity firm that has no liability whatsoever, and also

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>don't need to tell you that it's been bought by

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>private equity firm. They did this after the foreclosure crisis, right,

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>go in and gobble up a bunch of low income housing,

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>drive up the costs like, it's just this interview was

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>so eye opening and just so disturbing. So I hope

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that you gain as much insight and information as I did.

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Coming up next, my conversation with Brendan Blue, the author

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of Plunder Private Equities Plan to Pillage America. Folks, I

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>am very excited to welcome to ook at Daily Brendan Blue,

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>who is the author of Plunder Private Equities Plan to

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Pillage America. You basically are the authority on private equity,

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and I want to understand because I will tell my

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>listeners it was like I was the kid that I

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>think that was took statistics because I had to took

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>economics because I had to because of my because of

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>my degree in politics, not because I understood anything about

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>business or math. So please Brandon, give us a fifty

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand foot view, a one oh one explainer on what

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>private equity is.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you so much for having me, and I

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate the chance to answer this question because I

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't know the answer to it before I started this project.

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>So I was in the exact same boat as you were.

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 2>And I should give a standard disclaimer. I work for

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the government, but I'm speaking in a purely personal capacity.

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 2>So what is private equity? Private equity is a term

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 2>that I'm sure you've heard of. I'm sure most of

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 2>your listeners have heard of, but if we're honest, probably

0:04:57.839 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of us don't actually know what it is.

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 2>The basic idea behind private equity is very simple. So

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 2>private equity firms use a little bit of their own money,

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.799
<v Speaker 2>some investor money, and a whole lot of borrowed money

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 2>to buy up companies. They then try to make financial

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 2>or operational changes to those companies with the aim of

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 2>selling it for a profit a few years later. So

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 2>that is a very simple idea, and yet it has

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 2>had extraordinary consequences for the entire economy. Last year or

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty two, I don't think we've gotten the

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 2>statistics for twenty twenty three. Yet private equity firms spent

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 2>over a trillion dollars buying up companies in the United States,

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 2>and for comparison, the entire US GDP is about twenty

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 2>five trillion dollars. So we're talking about a not insubstantial

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 2>part of the economy. You know, if you you know,

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 2>went to the veterinarian, went to the obg yn decided

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, needed to get an ambi or needed to

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 2>rent an apartment, there is a good chance that you

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 2>ultimately paid a private equity firm. And just as you

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.799
<v Speaker 2>are seeing bad consequences in veterinary care, in medical care,

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 2>in the housing market, at least part of those problems,

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 2>I would argue are the consequence of private equity and

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 2>the unique problems that that business model has, which I'm

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 2>happy to get into.

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about this for a moment, because there

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of things that are coming to mind,

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think that one of them is a lawsuit

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 1>that I'm remembering that came up following the height of

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, where nursing homes in New York where I

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>am were found to have, oh, I don't know, covered

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>up the number the number of deaths of COVID related

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>deaths in New York in the nursing homes. Then come

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to find out, like a little bit down in the article,

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is that these nursing homes were being run by private

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>equity firms and not by who we thought that they

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>were going to be. And so when I think about

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>private equity, I think about the fine print that we

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>all just kind of scroll down, whether it's I'm purchasing

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>something or I'm looking at my credit card statement that

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>says do you agree, and I'm like yes, because I

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have the seven days it's going to take me

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>nor the degrees in order to understand what I'm agreeing

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to in the fine print. And so talk to us

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>how it is that these private equity firms can buy

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>up places that we use on a regular basis, services

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>companies that are providing services that we use on a

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>daily basis, But we don't actually know that the people

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>who are in charge know what the hell that they're

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>doing other than making money.

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a great question, and it's a complicated question. The

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 2>answer is complicated. So let's talk about the example that

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 2>you started with, which is nursing homes. So there's no

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 2>good or no definitive sort of statistics on this, but

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 2>I've seen estimates that private equity firms own between ten

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 2>and fifteen percent of the entire nursing home industry, and

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 2>the consequences have been often disastrous. According to one study,

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 2>there have been tens of thousands of premature deaths at

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 2>nursing homes because of private equity ownership. We've seen lots

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 2>of anecdotal cases of private equity firms buying up a business,

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 2>buying up a nursing home, and then patient care suffering

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 2>health complaints, rising complaints about rodents and vermin and nursing

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 2>homes and people dying. The basic problem that we've got

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 2>is it is very hard to hold private equity firms

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 2>responsible for the consequences of their actions. And I think

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 2>this is an important point because it helps to explain

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 2>why private equity firms are different than many other kinds

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 2>of companies. So if a nursing home was owned by

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 2>a public company and somebody dies there, the family of

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 2>that resident or the state of that resident could generally

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 2>sue the parent company would be very easy to figure

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 2>out who owns it, and be very easy comparatively to

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 2>hold them responsible. That's not necessarily true for private equity

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 2>firms because of their ownership structures, where they advise what

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 2>are called funds that are owned by quote unquote limited

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 2>partners that then own assets through several shell companies. It

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 2>can be hard to figure out, even to your point,

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 2>whether a private equity firm owns a business, and then

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>even if you can figure that out, to hold them

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 2>legally responsible for the actions of that business. And so

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 2>you have a business model where private equity firms can

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 2>often benefit if things go well at a nursing home,

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 2>at any other kind of business, walk away legally or

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 2>financially if things go poorly and at the risk of

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 2>going on for a long time for your fairly you know,

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 2>straightforward question. You mentioned the fine print. One of the

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 2>things that I think private equity firms have been extraordinarily

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 2>good at is identifying the fine print that's going to

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>benefit them the most. So to stick on the example

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 2>of nursing homes, yeah, private equity firms were have often

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 2>put in forced arbitration clauses into contracts to be admitted

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 2>into a nursing home. So if you go to a

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 2>nursing home, they would, you know, require you to sign

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 2>agreement saying you couldn't you know, bring a suit if somebody,

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, if something happens to you at this nursing home.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 2>There was rulemaking under the Obama administration to try to

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 2>throw that get that away that was enjoying. The Trump

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 2>administration did a significantly less ambitious rule all, which is

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 2>to say that I think oftentimes private equity executives aren't

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 2>necessarily that good at running a business, but they are

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 2>really good at identifying and developing the fine print that

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So now I want to go into your book where

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you talk about, you know, the pillaging that is happening

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in you know, in America by private equity firms. What

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>do you mean by that?

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Is?

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it that one we don't really understand what it

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is that we're consuming and who we're consuming it from. Right,

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we as consumers don't have the ability then if something

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>were to go wrong. Let's stick with the nursing home.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>If a loved one were to prematurely pass away, that

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>there is no real recourse that we can take. But

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know that when we placed our loved one

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>into this facility, right, we just assumed that they knew

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>how to provide care, that it was going to be

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the best care that we could afford, and that if

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>something terrible were to happen then they would be held liable.

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's kind of all of the above. So I

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 2>think let me give the general answer and then I'll

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 2>get into the specifics. So when I talk about the

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 2>flaws of the private equity business model, I really am

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>talking about three things. One is that private equity firms

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 2>tend to buy up businesses and hold them for just

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 2>a few years. And you know, if you own a

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 2>business for just a few years, that changes your perspective

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 2>on it. It changes whether you're going to invest in

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 2>your employees and your infrastructure, if you're going to treat

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 2>your customers and your patients. Well, that's problem one. Problem

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 2>two is that private equity firms tend to load up

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>companies with a lot of debt and extract ourn fees.

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 2>And so you might have a business that was functional,

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 2>a functional nursing home, functional, you know, doctors clinic, but

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 2>suddenly there's so much debt that the business has to

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 2>pay off, has to service, that it can't invest in

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 2>its future, in its operations, in its employees. And then

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 2>the third thing is what we were just talking about,

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 2>and which you alluded to in your question, which is

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 2>insulation from liability, where private equity firms can typically capture

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 2>the financial upside if things go well and then walk

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 2>away if they don't. And let me give you sort

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 2>of one concrete example here, which is one that it

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 2>really sticks with me I've used many times, is the

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>private equity acquisition of Friendlies, which was this diner chain

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 2>in the northeast.

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I have one. I had one growing up in

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>my community. It's actually still there. Please, oh kindy good?

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well so, unfortunately it is one of the rare

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 2>ones that is still there because I believe in two

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>thousand and seven, Sun Capital bought up the diner chain,

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 2>executed a bunch of fairly standard tactics in the private

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 2>equity playbook, executed layoffs and so forth, ultimately pushed the

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 2>company into bankrupt But in bankruptcy, it was able to

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 2>execute this really weird tactic where it sold the company

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 2>from itself to itself, which sounds like something that only

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 2>lawyers can make up, but it was this complicated transaction

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 2>sells itself from itself to itself emerges from bankruptcy. And

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 2>the reason that it does that is by executing this transaction,

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 2>it's able to push the pension obligations that it had

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 2>to employees and retirees onto what's called the pension Benefit

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Guarantee Corporation, which is this separate, quasi governmental organization, and

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 2>suddenly the private equity firm was able to continue to

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 2>control this business without any of those obligations that it

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 2>had to employees into retirees. And I think that's an

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 2>example of where private equity firms again may or may

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 2>not be that great at running a business. Like I said, many,

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 2>if not most friendlies diners unfortunately have cleared do now,

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 2>but are really good at understanding sort of the gaps

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 2>or sort of holes in the law that allow them

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 2>to essentially capture benefit when things go well, walk away

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 2>when things go poorly. So tell me.

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>What position does so a company ideally then that is

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>being acquired by a private equity firm, needs to be

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in dire straits, right.

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a good question. Oftentimes that's the case. But the

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 2>interesting thing is, oftentimes healthy companies get sold to private

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 2>equity firms and sometimes that works well. You know, success

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 2>builds on success. The private equity firm sells the business.

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Often it succeeds wonderfully, but oftentimes it doesn't. There's a

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 2>really interesting study out there that says that companies that

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 2>are bought by private equity firms are ten times as

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 2>likely to go bankrupt as companies that aren't. And the

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 2>interesting thing is that the economists that did that study

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 2>controlled for exactly the question that you were asking, which

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 2>is our private equity firms just buying up distressed businesses?

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 2>And they looked at a comparative set of businesses, you know,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 2>of various levels of size and health and so forth,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 2>and said, no, this, this is robust sort of across

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 2>the kinds of businesses that private equity firms buy. So

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 2>it's not just that private equity firms, you know, sort

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 2>of are attracted to sort of the most failing companies.

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 2>It's that private equity ownership at least sometimes can cause

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 2>those businesses to fail.

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So you're not here as you're in your government capacity.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>But let me ask you this question. Then where does

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>government come in Because if it is seemingly right, like

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we're told, oh, the private well let's say this. Republicans

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>tell us that the privatization of everything is going to

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>be what saves us all, and we all know that

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>not to be true. All Their whole idea is to

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>shrink government. Government is big. Government is bad, It controls

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>your life. YadA YadA, YadA. You shrink it, you get

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>rid of that, You privatize everything, and everyone wins, except

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone doesn't win. It's the people that are the shareholders.

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It is the CEOs that win everyone else who are

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>workers of the working class, which I believe is everyone

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.880
<v Speaker 1>else doesn't. And so I ask, then where does government

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>come in to regulate these entities that are actually not

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>providing anything other than benefits to themselves to make more

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>money and to do so without having any risk whatsoever.

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.719
<v Speaker 2>And the interesting thing is private equity firms are in

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 2>some places actually taking over the role of government, at

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 2>least in some services. So KKR did a bunch of

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 2>joint partnerships or several joint partnerships to take over municipal

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:51.239
<v Speaker 2>water services. Private equity firms have gotten extremely interested in

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>the higher education business, investing in for profit colleges, and

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 2>have also taken over increasing parts of our prison system,

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 2>buying up businesses like prison healthcare companies, prison commissaries and cafeterias,

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 2>and prison phone companies. So it's an interesting intersection where

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 2>private equity firms are actually somewhat taking over some aspects

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 2>that we traditionally deserve for government in terms of what

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 2>the government role should be. I think it ultimately goes

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 2>back to the basic problems that I was talking about,

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 2>where private equity firms invest for the short term load

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 2>companies up with a lot of debt and fees insulate

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 2>themselves from liability. If you can solve those problems, private

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 2>equity can become a much less destructive. It can become

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 2>a productive part of our financial system. The question is

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 2>how do you get there? And I've laid out there

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of things that can be done at

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 2>the federal level in terms of regulation at the SEC

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and Treasury Department, Federal Reserve, and so forth, you know,

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of in the weeds, banking regulation and so forth.

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.959
<v Speaker 2>But there's also a lot that states and localities can

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 2>do here to reign in or ban sort of the

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 2>most abusive tactics that private equity firms engage in. So

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that understandably, activists often look to the federal

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 2>government to provide the answer here, but there's actually a

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 2>lot that can be done right in our own communities

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 2>to try to protect local businesses and prevent them from

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 2>being pillaged.

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because honestly, when I think about it, I

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and I you know, your book is really helpful in

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>terms of helping regular people understand what is happening. But

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.479
<v Speaker 1>even in just the businesses that you laid out that

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>private equity has taken control of. Are what's the word

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that I want to use that I'm struggling to use,

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, are the shit ones? Are the ones that

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>absolutely take advantage of people. When you're talking about prison, healthcare,

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about municipalities and their water system. The

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>only thing that came to my mind was Jackson, Mississippi,

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and Flint, Michigan and other places where you go in again,

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is why I asked about is it the

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that they look for places businesses and cities and

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>areas that are already problem areas right, which largely are

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>those areas in businesses and in communities that have a

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>high population of black and brown people. Do you know

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.719
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying? And so there seems to be this

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>affinity for these entities to go after populations and places

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that they can abuse and that people won't notice.

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 2>You know. One of the things that sort of surprised

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 2>me in researching this, and I think it gets to

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 2>your question, is I always sort of assume that if

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 2>you're in the business of making money, you go to

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 2>businesses that service wealthy people because that's where your money is. No, exactly,

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 2>and oftentimes private equity firms I think are attracted to

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 2>the exact opposite. You know, we mentioned prison services and

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 2>for profit colleges and so forth. I'd add mobile home

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 2>parks to that. Where private equity firms have found real

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 2>success in large part because you have captive audiences in

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 2>some places literally captive audiences that don't have an alternative.

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 2>And so in those situations, some firms have found real

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 2>success by raising prices cutting the quality of care because

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 2>they know that there really is an alternative for the clientele.

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 2>So I think, I think it's a really interesting or

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, concerning issue in that the people who are

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 2>often affected the most by this business model or the

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 2>flaws of the business model are the ones that are

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 2>least able to do something about it.

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Private equity needs to be regulated, and so I'm confused,

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>I guess in where where the benefit is. So you

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>use the you know, the Obama administration versus the Trump administration,

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.959
<v Speaker 1>and let's look at those two because the fact is

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>right that you know, Obama, whom I love, did not

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>do well in terms of dealing with the banking crisis,

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of providing those people that caused a series

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of foreclosures around this country for people to lose their

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>jobs and all of these things, and given out to

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>banks that were too big to fail, right, given out

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to industry too big to fail, right, put the burden

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>on the people. Then you have Donald Trump, right, who

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 1>could care less about the people and is all about

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>cutting deals and favors for his friends and you know,

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and tax cuts and the like. What I'm saying is

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's not a real, seeming big difference between who

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is doing right by the people as it pertains to

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>private equity, to corporations and the regulations that are necessary

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so that people consumers know what they're getting into and

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>also have the ability to understand how they're being tanken

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>advantage of It's like there, it doesn't seem to be

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other. And you tell me that

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong. An administration or party that doesn't get some

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>type of advantage right, because the advantage obviously for them

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is either money or what have you. I just I'm

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>confused about who is actually fighting for the people.

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, the interesting thing is, or maybe it's the unsurprising thing,

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 2>is the people that are fighting for the people are

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 2>the people by the people. Where I've seen sort of

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 2>the biggest success in terms of reining in or sort

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 2>of addressing the problem of the private equity business model

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 2>has come from activists who have focused on very specific issues.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, when you talk about private equity and the abstract,

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 2>not only is it often kind of boring, it's kind

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 2>of overwhelming, you know, it seems like a problem too

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 2>big to sort of tackle. Had on, where I think

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 2>there's been real success has been looking at specific issues.

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 2>So we were talking about prisons earlier. The advocacy work

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 2>done terrain in the cost of prison phone calls done

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 2>by a handful of activities, right, Yeah, enormously successful, you know,

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 2>as you know, you know, started with sort of local

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 2>legislation in cities, then there was state level legislation. Finally

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 2>legislation was passed in Congress to address this, which is

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 2>just extraordinary growth and success. So that's one area. I think.

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Nursing homes have been another area of success in that

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 2>for the first time there's federal rulemaking to establish minimum

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 2>nursing home staffing criteria. You know, that's the work of

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 2>activists to make this happen. So I think, you know,

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be overly optimistic or pollyanni ish

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 2>about this, but I do think that when people pick

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 2>specific issues where private equity is active and stick with it,

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.959
<v Speaker 2>I think they can succeed, because we've seen examples of

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 2>success in the recent past.

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, tell me this is last question for you, brandan,

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>what would sweeping change look like as opposed to siloed

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>change industry by industry.

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 2>So I think it ultimately boils down to I've mentioned

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 2>those basic problems with the business model. I think if

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 2>you had to pick one, it would probably be this

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 2>insulation from liability that private equity firms can often direct

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the operations of businesses but walk away if things go badly.

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 2>If you can change that and hold private equity firms

0:25:56.240 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 2>responsible for the consequences of their actions, then you're going

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 2>to have a situation where private equity firms have to

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 2>act responsibly because if they don't, they're going to lose

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of money. Congress could take action on that.

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Regulators can to a certain extent, but I think a

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of that action is going to happen in city

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 2>councils and in state legislatures over the next few years,

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 2>and if there's the energy to do that, I think

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 2>sort of the worst excesses of the private equity business model.

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Can get curbed well, Brendan, I thank you so much

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>one for the one oh one class in private Equity

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and for this book. Folks. The book is entitled Plunder

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Private Equities Plan to Pillage America. I think it is

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>absolutely worth the read and understanding all of the ways

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know, unbeknownst to many of us, were being

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>taken advantage of and what we can do to stop it. Brennan,

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, really appreciate you.

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>That is it for me today. Dear friends on woke

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>app as always Power to the people and to all

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the people. Power yet woke and stay woke as fuck.

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>M