1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:03,400 Speaker 1: Welcome to today's edition of the Klay, Travis and Buck 2 00:00:03,440 --> 00:00:07,400 Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast O. Wellcome back in. I hope all 3 00:00:07,400 --> 00:00:10,720 Speaker 1: of you are having fantastic Thursdays wherever you may be 4 00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:14,720 Speaker 1: across this great country. We've got a lot to discuss, 5 00:00:15,600 --> 00:00:20,560 Speaker 1: but let's go ahead and bring our good friend who 6 00:00:20,600 --> 00:00:26,400 Speaker 1: has done an incredible job bringing everything and making sense 7 00:00:26,640 --> 00:00:32,760 Speaker 1: of the larger world. Andy, thank you for goodness trying 8 00:00:32,800 --> 00:00:35,720 Speaker 1: to make sense of this world. Let's start right here. 9 00:00:36,400 --> 00:00:40,880 Speaker 1: Andy McCarthy is with us. You are an incredible guy 10 00:00:40,880 --> 00:00:43,479 Speaker 1: who has seen all sorts of craziness over the years. 11 00:00:44,280 --> 00:00:49,680 Speaker 1: Let's start with the latest with Hunter Biden. Have you 12 00:00:49,840 --> 00:00:55,120 Speaker 1: ever seen a situation where people come out and say, hey, 13 00:00:55,400 --> 00:00:59,480 Speaker 1: we're going to go and try to get this out 14 00:01:00,480 --> 00:01:04,920 Speaker 1: in the larger community. Right like you're basically saying, hey, 15 00:01:05,480 --> 00:01:09,600 Speaker 1: we're going to try and indict him, and as a result, 16 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:12,720 Speaker 1: we're going to do this over the last several weeks. 17 00:01:13,200 --> 00:01:14,480 Speaker 1: What's going on here. 18 00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:20,440 Speaker 2: I think plays that this is a pattern with this prosecutor, 19 00:01:21,840 --> 00:01:25,119 Speaker 2: A term I used loosely because every prosecutor I've ever 20 00:01:26,200 --> 00:01:29,559 Speaker 2: either been or known or worked with, they were trying 21 00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:31,800 Speaker 2: to make cases, and this guy has been trying for 22 00:01:31,840 --> 00:01:35,040 Speaker 2: five years to disappear a case. So that's that's kind 23 00:01:35,040 --> 00:01:38,240 Speaker 2: of new in my experience. But I think the pattern 24 00:01:38,280 --> 00:01:44,080 Speaker 2: with this guy is that he gets cornered, so he 25 00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:45,920 Speaker 2: says what he thinks he needs to say to get 26 00:01:45,920 --> 00:01:48,200 Speaker 2: out of the room. I think that's what he did 27 00:01:48,240 --> 00:01:50,760 Speaker 2: with the you know, when he gave the con job 28 00:01:50,880 --> 00:01:54,520 Speaker 2: for the whistleblower agents, when he told them that these 29 00:01:54,560 --> 00:01:58,880 Speaker 2: bad Biden appointed prosecutors were blocking him from bringing charges 30 00:01:58,920 --> 00:02:04,560 Speaker 2: in Los Angeles and Washington, when, like anybody who knows 31 00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:08,560 Speaker 2: anything about the Justice Department knows, one US attorney can't 32 00:02:08,560 --> 00:02:11,679 Speaker 2: stop another US attorney from bringing charges. Those kind of 33 00:02:11,720 --> 00:02:13,680 Speaker 2: turf battles happen all the time you go in the 34 00:02:13,760 --> 00:02:16,840 Speaker 2: Justice Department. The Attorney General makes a ruling, And if 35 00:02:16,880 --> 00:02:20,640 Speaker 2: Merrick Garland wanted the Biden's charge or Hunter Biden charge, 36 00:02:20,840 --> 00:02:24,080 Speaker 2: he would have just ordered the US attorney in Los 37 00:02:24,120 --> 00:02:28,400 Speaker 2: Angeles to Washington to work with wife, right, So, you know, 38 00:02:28,680 --> 00:02:31,160 Speaker 2: he says what he needs to say to get out 39 00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:35,600 Speaker 2: of uncomfortable situations. Everybody should understand when he said yesterday 40 00:02:36,040 --> 00:02:41,000 Speaker 2: wife that he may indict Hunter Biden in the next 41 00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:43,920 Speaker 2: two weeks, it wasn't because he wanted to put that 42 00:02:44,040 --> 00:02:47,560 Speaker 2: information out. It was because the judge put his feet 43 00:02:47,639 --> 00:02:50,880 Speaker 2: to the fire. The judge gave him. The judge was afraid, 44 00:02:51,520 --> 00:02:54,880 Speaker 2: having had this guy once before tried to pull the 45 00:02:54,919 --> 00:02:59,600 Speaker 2: wall over her eyes. She was afraid. Basically, he was 46 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:01,720 Speaker 2: just gonna lay low in the tall graphs and let 47 00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:04,880 Speaker 2: the case peter out. And the Statute of limitations runs 48 00:03:04,880 --> 00:03:07,360 Speaker 2: at the end of the month. So she ordered him 49 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:11,200 Speaker 2: by September sixth to give her a status report of 50 00:03:11,240 --> 00:03:13,639 Speaker 2: what was going to have of where they were at 51 00:03:13,680 --> 00:03:16,280 Speaker 2: with the case. And I think he went in and 52 00:03:16,360 --> 00:03:18,800 Speaker 2: basically said what he had to say to get out 53 00:03:18,840 --> 00:03:21,880 Speaker 2: of the room, which is, you know, the statute of 54 00:03:21,919 --> 00:03:24,480 Speaker 2: limitations runs by the twenty ninth, and we expect to 55 00:03:24,480 --> 00:03:26,760 Speaker 2: indict by then. Doesn't mean he has indict. It's not 56 00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:31,000 Speaker 2: an enforceable commitment. But my point to people is this 57 00:03:31,080 --> 00:03:33,120 Speaker 2: is the lay up case of all time. It's the 58 00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:35,520 Speaker 2: easiest case of all time. It would take about ten 59 00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:38,640 Speaker 2: to fifteen minutes to present this to a grand jury. 60 00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:43,520 Speaker 2: It's a one paragraph indictment, So why plan to indict 61 00:03:43,720 --> 00:03:47,760 Speaker 2: after five years? Why not say indict? You know, you 62 00:03:47,800 --> 00:03:50,240 Speaker 2: wouldn't give a status report to the court, you wouldn't 63 00:03:50,240 --> 00:03:52,080 Speaker 2: have to do anything. You'd just come in wave the 64 00:03:52,360 --> 00:03:55,400 Speaker 2: one paragraph indictment and says, here, I've done it. Why 65 00:03:55,520 --> 00:03:56,960 Speaker 2: keep talking about this aft? 66 00:03:56,960 --> 00:03:59,520 Speaker 3: Well, Andy, what what happens though? If your inclination on 67 00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:04,440 Speaker 3: this is correct? And he just kind of says, whoopsie 68 00:04:04,760 --> 00:04:07,240 Speaker 3: didn't get it in in time. Too complicated before that 69 00:04:07,320 --> 00:04:10,720 Speaker 3: statute of limitations? Does he face any actual sanctions? I mean, 70 00:04:10,720 --> 00:04:12,360 Speaker 3: can the judge do anything? 71 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:12,760 Speaker 1: Really? 72 00:04:14,840 --> 00:04:18,799 Speaker 2: I don't see how buck, because you know, it's black 73 00:04:18,880 --> 00:04:23,760 Speaker 2: letter constitutional law that a court cannot order a prosecutor 74 00:04:23,800 --> 00:04:27,279 Speaker 2: to charge someone. So all she did what she could 75 00:04:27,279 --> 00:04:31,279 Speaker 2: do because she is now the judge of the cases before, 76 00:04:32,080 --> 00:04:34,920 Speaker 2: because I guess wife probably now feels like he made 77 00:04:34,920 --> 00:04:37,680 Speaker 2: the mistake of filing actual documents in front of her 78 00:04:37,880 --> 00:04:41,080 Speaker 2: six weeks ago. So now the case has a judge 79 00:04:41,440 --> 00:04:44,599 Speaker 2: and she's being diligent. So she's asking him for a 80 00:04:44,640 --> 00:04:47,680 Speaker 2: status report, but she can't forwarce him to charge. And look, 81 00:04:48,279 --> 00:04:52,479 Speaker 2: you know, if he could be sanctioned her like irresponsibly 82 00:04:52,600 --> 00:04:55,360 Speaker 2: letting a case go, how about what's gone on for 83 00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:57,760 Speaker 2: the last five years. I mean, he's now he's so 84 00:04:57,920 --> 00:05:01,280 Speaker 2: destroyed this case that, for example, well, if you wanted 85 00:05:01,279 --> 00:05:03,920 Speaker 2: to try to make a case based on, say the 86 00:05:03,960 --> 00:05:08,240 Speaker 2: bribery evidence we're hearing about during the Obama administration when 87 00:05:08,240 --> 00:05:12,440 Speaker 2: Biden was vice president. Those charges are gone now every 88 00:05:12,800 --> 00:05:15,440 Speaker 2: you know, I think I'm sure I've told you guys 89 00:05:15,440 --> 00:05:17,880 Speaker 2: this before, and you know this anyhow, But it's a 90 00:05:17,960 --> 00:05:21,320 Speaker 2: five year statue of limitations for most federal crimes, six 91 00:05:21,440 --> 00:05:25,240 Speaker 2: years on text. Everything prior to twenty seventeen is gone. 92 00:05:26,640 --> 00:05:32,960 Speaker 1: Have have you seen the grand jury ever get basically 93 00:05:33,520 --> 00:05:37,800 Speaker 1: be told in public in the same way before we 94 00:05:37,960 --> 00:05:40,880 Speaker 1: ever grant the jury? And do you think it's possible 95 00:05:40,880 --> 00:05:44,159 Speaker 1: that they just make the decide the decision not to 96 00:05:44,320 --> 00:05:48,320 Speaker 1: even bring any kind of charge, Like could they put 97 00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:52,800 Speaker 1: this in front of the jury and fail in terms 98 00:05:52,839 --> 00:05:56,080 Speaker 1: of where they might put this? Is that possible to. 99 00:05:57,480 --> 00:06:01,039 Speaker 2: Well, you know, first of all, we should reader there 100 00:06:01,120 --> 00:06:04,120 Speaker 2: is no grand jury at this point. Nothing he has 101 00:06:04,200 --> 00:06:07,039 Speaker 2: filed but the papers that he filed six weeks ago 102 00:06:07,120 --> 00:06:09,440 Speaker 2: in court. The idea was the case was going to 103 00:06:09,480 --> 00:06:12,120 Speaker 2: go away, so Hunter was waiving his right to be 104 00:06:12,640 --> 00:06:15,120 Speaker 2: First of all, there was no reason to indict because 105 00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:18,080 Speaker 2: it was misdemeanor charges, which the US attorney could bring 106 00:06:18,120 --> 00:06:21,120 Speaker 2: without a grand jury. And the diversion agreement on the 107 00:06:21,160 --> 00:06:24,640 Speaker 2: gun doesn't require a grand jury either, So as far 108 00:06:24,680 --> 00:06:27,240 Speaker 2: as we know, there is no grand jury, right, it's 109 00:06:27,279 --> 00:06:30,080 Speaker 2: never been brought to a grand jury. If you're asking, like, 110 00:06:30,960 --> 00:06:33,360 Speaker 2: could you have a situation where he presented the case 111 00:06:33,440 --> 00:06:35,320 Speaker 2: so poorly that he got what's none as a no 112 00:06:35,440 --> 00:06:38,360 Speaker 2: true bill where the grand jury refused to indict, that 113 00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:41,279 Speaker 2: could happen. But this is such a slam dun't play. 114 00:06:41,480 --> 00:06:44,680 Speaker 2: I just I mean, the god made a false statement 115 00:06:44,800 --> 00:06:47,599 Speaker 2: on the form. And I think the only thing that 116 00:06:47,640 --> 00:06:50,400 Speaker 2: people are not aware of because I was sort of 117 00:06:50,400 --> 00:06:52,719 Speaker 2: struck by this in the last month looking closely at this, 118 00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:55,799 Speaker 2: I think there's two guns. I don't think it's one gun, 119 00:06:56,880 --> 00:07:00,000 Speaker 2: because if you remember the form that he filled out 120 00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:03,080 Speaker 2: that he lied about his drug usage on that was 121 00:07:03,120 --> 00:07:06,480 Speaker 2: in connection with a revolver. And if you looked at 122 00:07:06,480 --> 00:07:10,400 Speaker 2: the pictures that the New York Post has reported of 123 00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:13,080 Speaker 2: the gun that he was waving around with the prosecute 124 00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:17,440 Speaker 2: with the prostitute a couple of days after, he thought 125 00:07:17,480 --> 00:07:21,200 Speaker 2: the revolver is not a revolver. It looks like a clock. 126 00:07:22,000 --> 00:07:25,680 Speaker 2: So I think there's more than one gun. Andy just 127 00:07:25,800 --> 00:07:29,160 Speaker 2: knows that he wasn't eligible for diversion on that under 128 00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:31,640 Speaker 2: the Justice Department rules. So the whole thing is just 129 00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:32,160 Speaker 2: a croc. 130 00:07:32,440 --> 00:07:34,440 Speaker 3: So it sounds like you think he's just going to run. 131 00:07:34,520 --> 00:07:36,120 Speaker 3: He's going to run the clock out on this too, 132 00:07:36,120 --> 00:07:38,440 Speaker 3: which would be amazing and one of the most egregious 133 00:07:38,440 --> 00:07:41,240 Speaker 3: and obvious miscarriages of justice that we've seen in a 134 00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:43,480 Speaker 3: long time. I want to ask you, because this was 135 00:07:43,520 --> 00:07:45,480 Speaker 3: breaking news just at the top of the hour or so, 136 00:07:45,960 --> 00:07:49,320 Speaker 3: just a few moments ago, the former president Donald Trump 137 00:07:49,920 --> 00:07:52,640 Speaker 3: is tell his legal team is telling a judge that 138 00:07:52,680 --> 00:07:55,080 Speaker 3: they're going to move his they want to move his 139 00:07:55,200 --> 00:07:57,520 Speaker 3: Georgia case to federal court, and that he will invoke 140 00:07:57,600 --> 00:08:01,600 Speaker 3: immunity protection for federal officials. There's some complexity here, Andy, 141 00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:03,480 Speaker 3: can you break down is this going to happen? 142 00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:05,040 Speaker 1: Is it a big deal? How do you see it 143 00:08:05,080 --> 00:08:05,960 Speaker 1: playing out in Georgia? 144 00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:11,480 Speaker 2: Yeah? I think already buck that Mark Meadows as lawyers 145 00:08:11,520 --> 00:08:13,840 Speaker 2: have moved for that, and I think they have the 146 00:08:13,840 --> 00:08:16,320 Speaker 2: better of the argument that the case has to go 147 00:08:16,360 --> 00:08:20,840 Speaker 2: to federal court. The removal doctrine basically is to prevent 148 00:08:20,920 --> 00:08:29,560 Speaker 2: the states from interfering with the legitimate activities of federal officials. 149 00:08:29,640 --> 00:08:32,000 Speaker 2: A lot of what Meadows has been accused of in 150 00:08:32,040 --> 00:08:34,520 Speaker 2: that indictment, which is a peculiar indictment because I don't 151 00:08:34,520 --> 00:08:38,120 Speaker 2: think it actually charges a crime, certainly with respect to Meadows, 152 00:08:38,559 --> 00:08:41,960 Speaker 2: but you know, he's charged with things like arranging meetings 153 00:08:41,960 --> 00:08:44,960 Speaker 2: for the president, you know, getting a phone number for 154 00:08:45,000 --> 00:08:47,199 Speaker 2: the president, all things that would be within the ambit 155 00:08:47,280 --> 00:08:51,120 Speaker 2: of the chief of staff's job. So if you allowed 156 00:08:52,559 --> 00:08:55,320 Speaker 2: the states to use their criminal laws to prevent the 157 00:08:55,360 --> 00:08:59,560 Speaker 2: federal government from doing its legitimate work, then you could 158 00:09:00,040 --> 00:09:02,800 Speaker 2: and the state could basically cancel out the federal government. 159 00:09:02,920 --> 00:09:06,840 Speaker 2: So for that reason, the removal doctrine and the statute 160 00:09:06,840 --> 00:09:10,440 Speaker 2: that pertains to it allows a case to be moved 161 00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:13,400 Speaker 2: to federal court for trial. Doesn't mean that the case 162 00:09:13,440 --> 00:09:16,160 Speaker 2: goes away and it would still be prosecuted by the state, 163 00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:19,400 Speaker 2: but the forum would be federal court. So I think 164 00:09:19,440 --> 00:09:21,600 Speaker 2: they've got a very good chance of moving this. I'd 165 00:09:21,600 --> 00:09:24,360 Speaker 2: be stunned, in fact, if the court's rule that it 166 00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:27,400 Speaker 2: doesn't get removed, and I think the whole case gets removed. 167 00:09:27,400 --> 00:09:29,480 Speaker 2: I don't think it's just the federal officials. I believe 168 00:09:29,520 --> 00:09:32,840 Speaker 2: the whole case would get removed to a federal judge, 169 00:09:33,160 --> 00:09:36,880 Speaker 2: and then what Trump is going to argue is that 170 00:09:37,360 --> 00:09:41,760 Speaker 2: when federal officials are carrying out their official duties, you 171 00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:44,839 Speaker 2: don't have to agree with them, but if they're doing 172 00:09:44,880 --> 00:09:48,760 Speaker 2: things which are plausibly within the ambit of their official duties, 173 00:09:49,040 --> 00:09:54,720 Speaker 2: they have immunity from stay prosecution. And I think it's 174 00:09:54,760 --> 00:09:58,240 Speaker 2: going to be a weightier argument than people think. I've said, 175 00:09:58,320 --> 00:10:02,120 Speaker 2: I don't think this racket hearing case, where there's racketeering 176 00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:05,360 Speaker 2: charge that Fanny willis brought, I don't think it's actually 177 00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:11,320 Speaker 2: a crime because the only objective that she unifies all 178 00:10:11,400 --> 00:10:14,160 Speaker 2: the nineteen defendants with is that they wanted to keep 179 00:10:14,200 --> 00:10:16,679 Speaker 2: Trump in office, which is not a crime. You know, 180 00:10:16,720 --> 00:10:19,120 Speaker 2: if it were, when people like Al Gore or Stacey 181 00:10:19,160 --> 00:10:22,720 Speaker 2: Abrams would be in jail. Right. You can agree to 182 00:10:22,760 --> 00:10:25,920 Speaker 2: a legitimate objective and commit crimes in the course of 183 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:29,120 Speaker 2: of trying to obtain it, But you can't have a 184 00:10:29,160 --> 00:10:32,400 Speaker 2: conspiracy unless the people. The thing that the people agree 185 00:10:32,440 --> 00:10:35,320 Speaker 2: to do is a crime. And she's trying to paper 186 00:10:35,360 --> 00:10:38,280 Speaker 2: that over by calling it a rico. But a rico 187 00:10:38,559 --> 00:10:42,400 Speaker 2: a racketeering organization is something like a mafia family where 188 00:10:42,440 --> 00:10:45,520 Speaker 2: everybody in it wants to be a member of it 189 00:10:45,880 --> 00:10:49,600 Speaker 2: and sustain its existence, because that's how you obtain money 190 00:10:49,640 --> 00:10:52,760 Speaker 2: and power. This thing was I don't think there was 191 00:10:52,800 --> 00:10:55,480 Speaker 2: an agreement here at all, but to the extent that 192 00:10:55,520 --> 00:10:58,640 Speaker 2: there was some kind of an enterprise here, it was 193 00:10:58,720 --> 00:11:01,040 Speaker 2: going to end one way of the other on January 194 00:11:01,080 --> 00:11:03,800 Speaker 2: twentieth of twenty twenty one. Either Trump was going to 195 00:11:03,800 --> 00:11:05,559 Speaker 2: be in office or out of office, and that was 196 00:11:05,600 --> 00:11:07,400 Speaker 2: going to be the end of the so called enterprise. 197 00:11:08,120 --> 00:11:11,000 Speaker 2: I did Rico cases for a long time. I don't 198 00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:11,800 Speaker 2: think that's a rico. 199 00:11:13,080 --> 00:11:15,000 Speaker 1: Do you think if you had to break this down, 200 00:11:15,040 --> 00:11:18,920 Speaker 1: given we've got four different major, you know, charges that 201 00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:21,840 Speaker 1: are out there right now, how many of them will 202 00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:26,200 Speaker 1: be complete by the time, in your mind, we get 203 00:11:26,240 --> 00:11:32,920 Speaker 1: to the actual election, presuming that we actually see him 204 00:11:33,400 --> 00:11:35,240 Speaker 1: as the nominee. 205 00:11:35,559 --> 00:11:39,640 Speaker 2: Well, the most important person in that equation is always 206 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:42,800 Speaker 2: the judge. Play So it seems to me that this 207 00:11:42,960 --> 00:11:45,480 Speaker 2: judge in Washington is adamant that she wants to get 208 00:11:45,480 --> 00:11:49,040 Speaker 2: to trial, and unless there's some kind of appellate intervention, 209 00:11:49,960 --> 00:11:52,680 Speaker 2: and it's very hard in the federal system to force 210 00:11:52,720 --> 00:11:55,160 Speaker 2: the trial judge to allow an appeal before the trial, 211 00:11:55,559 --> 00:11:57,520 Speaker 2: I think that one's got the best chance of going 212 00:11:57,520 --> 00:11:59,960 Speaker 2: to trial, even though it should not go to try 213 00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:03,480 Speaker 2: on March fourth. I think that's a gross violation of 214 00:12:03,520 --> 00:12:06,400 Speaker 2: Trump's two process rights to try to make them go 215 00:12:06,600 --> 00:12:09,800 Speaker 2: to be ready for that trial on March fourth, when 216 00:12:09,840 --> 00:12:13,760 Speaker 2: the prosecutor before bringing the charges and guided him in 217 00:12:13,800 --> 00:12:16,680 Speaker 2: a different jurisdiction a thousand miles away. On another case, 218 00:12:16,679 --> 00:12:18,320 Speaker 2: that takes a lot of time to get prepared for. 219 00:12:19,600 --> 00:12:22,720 Speaker 2: The other case that has a chance of going to 220 00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:26,440 Speaker 2: trial I think is the classified documents case. But that 221 00:12:26,760 --> 00:12:32,000 Speaker 2: is complicated because of the classified information issues, and it's 222 00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:34,600 Speaker 2: got provisions in the law that allow you to appeal 223 00:12:34,640 --> 00:12:37,880 Speaker 2: prior to trial. My experience with that stuff is that 224 00:12:37,880 --> 00:12:40,680 Speaker 2: that takes a lot of time. It's those cases. Even 225 00:12:40,679 --> 00:12:43,160 Speaker 2: if the judge the judge's schedule at the trial in May, 226 00:12:44,200 --> 00:12:46,040 Speaker 2: you know, even if she really wants to get it 227 00:12:46,080 --> 00:12:47,880 Speaker 2: to trial, it may be difficult to do. But I 228 00:12:48,120 --> 00:12:50,800 Speaker 2: do think the Washington one is probably going to go 229 00:12:50,800 --> 00:12:51,199 Speaker 2: to trial. 230 00:12:51,440 --> 00:12:54,679 Speaker 1: What about New York Anny, I don't think. 231 00:12:54,520 --> 00:12:58,079 Speaker 2: Brad really wants to bring that case. He's signaling fuck 232 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:02,960 Speaker 2: that he's content to let the Feds go first and 233 00:13:03,000 --> 00:13:06,240 Speaker 2: he doesn't want to interfere with them. So I don't 234 00:13:06,280 --> 00:13:09,480 Speaker 2: know that he's going to be a factor. And as 235 00:13:09,520 --> 00:13:12,640 Speaker 2: the Sanny willis, you know, two of these defendants say 236 00:13:12,880 --> 00:13:15,239 Speaker 2: they say they're going to trial with them in October. 237 00:13:15,280 --> 00:13:18,280 Speaker 2: I'll believe it when I see it. And if the 238 00:13:18,320 --> 00:13:20,319 Speaker 2: case gets removed, that could put it on a very 239 00:13:20,360 --> 00:13:23,360 Speaker 2: different and flow track. She's saying it will take four 240 00:13:23,360 --> 00:13:26,319 Speaker 2: months to try. You know, it's very hard to schedule 241 00:13:26,360 --> 00:13:28,440 Speaker 2: a case that's going to take four months to trial, 242 00:13:28,600 --> 00:13:32,000 Speaker 2: especially you've got to get nineteen sets of defense lawyers 243 00:13:32,000 --> 00:13:35,120 Speaker 2: and the prosecutors and the judge clear four months of 244 00:13:35,160 --> 00:13:38,320 Speaker 2: their calendar to try a case. Those are very very 245 00:13:38,320 --> 00:13:39,600 Speaker 2: hard to get scheduled. 246 00:13:40,080 --> 00:13:43,000 Speaker 1: So if you were setting it in an over under here, 247 00:13:43,040 --> 00:13:46,439 Speaker 1: given that there's four different cases out there that are 248 00:13:46,920 --> 00:13:49,880 Speaker 1: taking place right now, how many of them do you 249 00:13:49,920 --> 00:13:52,360 Speaker 1: think it would be done? I said one. I might 250 00:13:52,440 --> 00:13:55,800 Speaker 1: now be thinking one or one and a half you 251 00:13:55,880 --> 00:14:01,360 Speaker 1: had earlier the situation where you were talking, I think 252 00:14:01,400 --> 00:14:03,800 Speaker 1: people are saying, oh, they're gonna get four done. You're 253 00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:06,560 Speaker 1: gonna think about everything there. What would you say the 254 00:14:06,600 --> 00:14:07,640 Speaker 1: over under is? 255 00:14:08,600 --> 00:14:11,160 Speaker 2: I say, because it's the first day of football season, 256 00:14:11,240 --> 00:14:13,599 Speaker 2: you're making me do over and under which I appreciate. 257 00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:17,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, who do you have for the game coming up tonight? 258 00:14:19,720 --> 00:14:25,080 Speaker 2: My guys aren't play until Monday night. So uh but 259 00:14:25,160 --> 00:14:25,840 Speaker 2: I'm telling. 260 00:14:25,640 --> 00:14:28,440 Speaker 1: You, by the way, that you need to take the 261 00:14:27,560 --> 00:14:31,320 Speaker 1: uh the the situation when you look at at everything 262 00:14:31,400 --> 00:14:33,920 Speaker 1: going on. I said one and a half. And by 263 00:14:33,960 --> 00:14:37,200 Speaker 1: the way, because we're now going on all over Detroit, 264 00:14:37,240 --> 00:14:39,240 Speaker 1: I'm gonna go out and say, I'm gonna go with 265 00:14:39,320 --> 00:14:41,400 Speaker 1: that side. But how would you break it? One and 266 00:14:41,400 --> 00:14:48,320 Speaker 1: a half? Uh under under? So you think one is 267 00:14:48,360 --> 00:14:49,560 Speaker 1: gonna end up being the number? 268 00:14:50,440 --> 00:14:56,920 Speaker 4: Yep, I've said two. Yeah, I think said that's gonna 269 00:14:56,920 --> 00:15:00,760 Speaker 4: be four. Andy, I'm sorry, we got to go. 270 00:15:01,680 --> 00:15:03,600 Speaker 3: If Trump gets convicted in d C, do you think 271 00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:05,360 Speaker 3: they actually might try to put him in a prison cell? 272 00:15:08,440 --> 00:15:11,800 Speaker 2: Well, you know, if you'd ask me like eighteen months 273 00:15:11,800 --> 00:15:14,200 Speaker 2: ago that I would I think they'd indict him, I 274 00:15:14,240 --> 00:15:16,640 Speaker 2: would have said no. So at this point I'm afraid 275 00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:19,240 Speaker 2: to say anything is inconceivable. I think it would be 276 00:15:19,360 --> 00:15:23,920 Speaker 2: terrible for the country if an American president were. 277 00:15:23,760 --> 00:15:24,440 Speaker 1: Put in jail. 278 00:15:25,720 --> 00:15:27,640 Speaker 2: I just think that would be awful, and I hope 279 00:15:27,680 --> 00:15:29,880 Speaker 2: it doesn't happen, and I think he'd have a lot 280 00:15:29,920 --> 00:15:33,040 Speaker 2: of appeals. So hopefully that they'd be able to string 281 00:15:33,080 --> 00:15:34,480 Speaker 2: that out that it would. I think it'd be very 282 00:15:34,480 --> 00:15:37,240 Speaker 2: bad for the country. And I think Democrats don't understand 283 00:15:37,320 --> 00:15:41,200 Speaker 2: what fire they're playing with. I mean, they they impeach 284 00:15:41,280 --> 00:15:44,880 Speaker 2: him for incitement to insurrection. I wonder if they realized that, 285 00:15:45,240 --> 00:15:49,440 Speaker 2: you know, some of what they're doing is the social 286 00:15:49,560 --> 00:15:50,560 Speaker 2: unrest that's going to arise. 287 00:15:50,720 --> 00:15:53,120 Speaker 1: It's volatile. Yeah, it really is. 288 00:15:54,200 --> 00:15:56,080 Speaker 3: Thank you so much, any McCarthy. Everybody look from on 289 00:15:56,160 --> 00:15:59,040 Speaker 3: Fox News. One of the best in the biz and 290 00:15:59,080 --> 00:16:00,800 Speaker 3: one of the best feelings after stepping out of a 291 00:16:00,800 --> 00:16:03,960 Speaker 3: shower is wrapping yourself in a cozy and absorbent towel. 292 00:16:04,000 --> 00:16:06,840 Speaker 3: It's true, you don't want one of those flimsier, scratchy towels. 293 00:16:07,480 --> 00:16:10,040 Speaker 3: He wants a luxurious comfort of a My Pillow towel 294 00:16:10,080 --> 00:16:13,000 Speaker 3: made with us a cotton and you're in luck. He 295 00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:15,040 Speaker 3: goes right now. They're on sale at fifty percent off 296 00:16:15,040 --> 00:16:18,520 Speaker 3: regular prices. The My Pillow Towel set comes with a 297 00:16:18,560 --> 00:16:21,000 Speaker 3: two bath, two hand towel and two watscloth set, typically 298 00:16:21,080 --> 00:16:24,320 Speaker 3: retailing for seventy nine ninety eight. Find this offer online 299 00:16:24,760 --> 00:16:27,560 Speaker 3: at MyPillow dot com. Click on the radio lister Special 300 00:16:27,560 --> 00:16:29,840 Speaker 3: Square get fifty percent off the six piece towel set. 301 00:16:29,960 --> 00:16:32,080 Speaker 3: Enter our names as your promo code Clay and Buck 302 00:16:32,320 --> 00:16:35,360 Speaker 3: or call eight hundred seventy nine two three two six nine. 303 00:16:35,480 --> 00:16:38,200 Speaker 3: That's eight hundred seventy nine two three two sixty nine. 304 00:16:38,360 --> 00:16:40,080 Speaker 3: Look forward to getting out of your next shower with 305 00:16:40,160 --> 00:16:43,000 Speaker 3: my Pillow towels. Go to my pillow dot com. Use 306 00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:47,360 Speaker 3: our name Clayan Buck for your towel set today. Clay 307 00:16:47,480 --> 00:16:52,640 Speaker 3: Travis and Buck Sexton chuck up a win for Team Reality. 308 00:16:52,800 --> 00:16:54,720 Speaker 3: Welcome back eight hundred two eight two two a ah 309 00:16:54,760 --> 00:16:57,360 Speaker 3: two and those lines will take some of your calls. 310 00:16:58,120 --> 00:17:04,920 Speaker 3: And Governor Ron Santis weighed in on the sentences against 311 00:17:04,960 --> 00:17:08,440 Speaker 3: the Proud Boys, talked about pardons, commutations, want to get 312 00:17:08,480 --> 00:17:15,679 Speaker 3: to that. Also, the Senator from Ohio, JD Vance talking 313 00:17:15,720 --> 00:17:19,119 Speaker 3: about a federal law which I do not think Democrats 314 00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:21,560 Speaker 3: will go along with, but I like it anyway, that 315 00:17:21,600 --> 00:17:24,560 Speaker 3: would ban federal mask mandates. Essentially, no more federal mask 316 00:17:24,600 --> 00:17:27,159 Speaker 3: mandates and no more Oh but the experts. 317 00:17:27,200 --> 00:17:29,720 Speaker 1: We're just just letting the experts. 318 00:17:29,160 --> 00:17:31,600 Speaker 3: Make the decision. No, it's the federal government. The federal 319 00:17:31,640 --> 00:17:35,040 Speaker 3: government's force is being used to do this. And no 320 00:17:35,160 --> 00:17:38,800 Speaker 3: more relying on federal agencies for the idiocy and the 321 00:17:38,920 --> 00:17:42,480 Speaker 3: scientific illiteracy of mask mandates. We're not going to do 322 00:17:42,520 --> 00:17:46,000 Speaker 3: it anymore. So we can get into some of that 323 00:17:46,560 --> 00:17:49,160 Speaker 3: which I think is very very important stuff. I'll take also, 324 00:17:49,240 --> 00:17:54,000 Speaker 3: take some of your calls and yeah, we got a 325 00:17:54,040 --> 00:17:56,520 Speaker 3: lot of show coming your way. Innovation Refunds, my friends, 326 00:17:56,560 --> 00:18:00,000 Speaker 3: they have been helping small businesses get a tax refunds 327 00:18:00,040 --> 00:18:02,879 Speaker 3: for the Employee Retention Credit, or the ERC as it's 328 00:18:02,920 --> 00:18:05,119 Speaker 3: often referred to. This is not a loan, but a 329 00:18:05,200 --> 00:18:08,000 Speaker 3: refund of your taxes from the IRS. The paperwork to 330 00:18:08,040 --> 00:18:12,119 Speaker 3: file is complex, complicated, and requires some expertise. Innovation Refunds 331 00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:15,840 Speaker 3: is dedicated to helping business owners navigate the process. Innovation 332 00:18:15,960 --> 00:18:19,080 Speaker 3: Refund's own research shows that many small businesses who have 333 00:18:19,160 --> 00:18:22,080 Speaker 3: had five to five hundred full time employees in twenty 334 00:18:22,080 --> 00:18:24,879 Speaker 3: twenty or twenty twenty one may well be eligible for 335 00:18:24,920 --> 00:18:28,800 Speaker 3: an ERC tax deduction. If your business face challenges during 336 00:18:28,800 --> 00:18:30,919 Speaker 3: that period, like so many did, you may well be 337 00:18:31,000 --> 00:18:34,760 Speaker 3: eligible for a substantial refund too. Innovation Refunds works with 338 00:18:34,800 --> 00:18:38,320 Speaker 3: an independent network of tax professionals and will share information 339 00:18:38,400 --> 00:18:40,840 Speaker 3: with them to evaluate and process your claims. Terms and 340 00:18:40,840 --> 00:18:44,920 Speaker 3: conditions apply. Go to Innovation Refunds dot com. That's Innovation 341 00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:47,280 Speaker 3: Refunds dot com, or call them to see if you qualify. 342 00:18:47,359 --> 00:18:50,200 Speaker 3: There's no upfront charge. They don't get paid unless you 343 00:18:50,240 --> 00:18:54,000 Speaker 3: get paid. Innovation Refunds one eight four to three refund 344 00:18:54,000 --> 00:18:57,200 Speaker 3: Refunds is the phone number that's one eight four to 345 00:18:57,240 --> 00:19:00,000 Speaker 3: three Refunds, and of course the website is Innovation Refufs. 346 00:19:01,440 --> 00:19:03,240 Speaker 1: Welcome back in. I hope all of you are having 347 00:19:03,280 --> 00:19:06,679 Speaker 1: fantastic Thursdays where you may be across this great country. 348 00:19:06,800 --> 00:19:10,639 Speaker 1: You heard us going through and discussing with Andy McCarthy 349 00:19:10,760 --> 00:19:16,440 Speaker 1: everything surrounding the four different felonies that Trump is facing, 350 00:19:16,680 --> 00:19:22,600 Speaker 1: and certainly the question of how many of those charges 351 00:19:22,680 --> 00:19:26,119 Speaker 1: are going to actually get decided before we get to 352 00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:28,919 Speaker 1: the actual election in the event that Trump is the 353 00:19:28,960 --> 00:19:32,400 Speaker 1: nominee is one of the big questions. And it was interesting. 354 00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:35,480 Speaker 1: Andy has a lot of opinions, buck, but he was 355 00:19:35,560 --> 00:19:39,000 Speaker 1: really kind of tiptoeing around whether he wanted that number 356 00:19:39,400 --> 00:19:42,479 Speaker 1: to be one, one and a half or two, and 357 00:19:42,520 --> 00:19:44,240 Speaker 1: that means a lot. By the way, I'm on the 358 00:19:44,320 --> 00:19:47,880 Speaker 1: lions going against the chiefs. For those of you out there, 359 00:19:47,920 --> 00:19:50,320 Speaker 1: that's the big game with the NFL starting backup, and 360 00:19:50,359 --> 00:19:53,080 Speaker 1: I know Andy and many of you out there are fans, 361 00:19:53,119 --> 00:19:55,080 Speaker 1: so I'm gonna take the Lions as the underdog. 362 00:19:55,160 --> 00:20:00,320 Speaker 3: But so you were vociferous. Let me see here there 363 00:20:00,359 --> 00:20:04,399 Speaker 3: will be On August sixteenth, you said a zero percent 364 00:20:04,560 --> 00:20:07,240 Speaker 3: chance that any of the trials will happen. 365 00:20:07,560 --> 00:20:09,720 Speaker 1: I think I said, if we'll go look at the 366 00:20:09,880 --> 00:20:11,920 Speaker 1: I think I said there was not we're keeping the 367 00:20:11,920 --> 00:20:15,000 Speaker 1: board now, buddy, we're keeping the check. Go check the 368 00:20:15,520 --> 00:20:17,840 Speaker 1: go check the audio. I think I said because that 369 00:20:18,080 --> 00:20:20,639 Speaker 1: was when all of the story was, Oh, they're going 370 00:20:20,720 --> 00:20:22,800 Speaker 1: to have four. I think I said there's a zero 371 00:20:22,920 --> 00:20:25,640 Speaker 1: percent chance that all four would happen. And I think 372 00:20:25,680 --> 00:20:26,840 Speaker 1: I said I would go one. 373 00:20:27,520 --> 00:20:27,639 Speaker 2: Uh. 374 00:20:27,840 --> 00:20:30,520 Speaker 1: If I were looking at it right now, I might 375 00:20:30,600 --> 00:20:33,040 Speaker 1: go one and a half, or I would stick at one. 376 00:20:33,640 --> 00:20:35,639 Speaker 1: I still feel pretty good about the majority, but we 377 00:20:35,680 --> 00:20:37,960 Speaker 1: need to go check the go check the audio. I 378 00:20:38,040 --> 00:20:40,679 Speaker 1: was in Tampa, but I think I said zero percent 379 00:20:40,800 --> 00:20:43,359 Speaker 1: all four would happen, because that was when we were. 380 00:20:44,320 --> 00:20:48,200 Speaker 3: Said changed his mind twenty four hours. I still think 381 00:20:48,200 --> 00:20:51,320 Speaker 3: it's I think it's going to be two. Although it's interesting, Andy, 382 00:20:51,400 --> 00:20:53,320 Speaker 3: I hadn't even really I hadn't considered this, to be 383 00:20:53,400 --> 00:20:56,680 Speaker 3: honest with everybody, that Bragg might just say, yeah, actually, 384 00:20:56,840 --> 00:20:58,879 Speaker 3: you know, I got the headlines. I don't really need 385 00:20:58,960 --> 00:21:02,480 Speaker 3: to bring this case. It's ridict the Feds will finish 386 00:21:02,480 --> 00:21:05,760 Speaker 3: the job essentially. I mean, I hadn't really considered that. 387 00:21:06,240 --> 00:21:09,280 Speaker 3: But the DC case is happening, my friends, The DC 388 00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:11,280 Speaker 3: case is happening. That's the one that I thought all 389 00:21:11,280 --> 00:21:15,360 Speaker 3: along to the judge Chuckkin, She's gonna make this thing 390 00:21:15,400 --> 00:21:19,000 Speaker 3: go down. It's gonna happens unless he says, an appeals 391 00:21:19,000 --> 00:21:21,119 Speaker 3: court steps in in advance of trial. 392 00:21:21,200 --> 00:21:23,960 Speaker 1: But I mean, that's a really tough burden that you're 393 00:21:23,960 --> 00:21:26,520 Speaker 1: going to meet there saying that this is where trial 394 00:21:27,200 --> 00:21:32,000 Speaker 1: if Joe Biden actually wanted to be what he claimed 395 00:21:32,000 --> 00:21:34,600 Speaker 1: he was going to be in twenty twenty four, and look, 396 00:21:34,800 --> 00:21:37,120 Speaker 1: you just heard the discussion. It sounds like any McCarthy 397 00:21:37,200 --> 00:21:39,879 Speaker 1: doesn't believe that any real charges are still going to 398 00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:46,639 Speaker 1: be brought against Hunter. But this is where if Joe 399 00:21:46,640 --> 00:21:50,280 Speaker 1: Biden said, I'm going to go ahead and I'm going 400 00:21:50,359 --> 00:21:55,200 Speaker 1: to give a pass to Trump and simultaneously I'm going 401 00:21:55,240 --> 00:21:58,639 Speaker 1: to give that same pass to my son, that would 402 00:21:58,640 --> 00:22:02,399 Speaker 1: be a way for Biden to ride off into the 403 00:22:02,480 --> 00:22:06,480 Speaker 1: sunset and argue that he actually was doing the best 404 00:22:06,520 --> 00:22:09,080 Speaker 1: thing for the country in the same way that you 405 00:22:09,080 --> 00:22:11,760 Speaker 1: would have seen happen back in nineteen seventy six with 406 00:22:11,880 --> 00:22:15,199 Speaker 1: Gerald Ford as it pertained, sorry before the seventy sixth election, 407 00:22:15,320 --> 00:22:17,879 Speaker 1: but having to do with everything associated with Nixon. 408 00:22:18,080 --> 00:22:19,800 Speaker 3: Do you think by the end of this month, we'll 409 00:22:19,840 --> 00:22:22,479 Speaker 3: either find out that the gun charge has been has 410 00:22:22,520 --> 00:22:26,080 Speaker 3: effectively lapsed because of the statute against Hunter, or they'll 411 00:22:26,119 --> 00:22:29,480 Speaker 3: just reinstate a diversion program and effectively give him what 412 00:22:29,640 --> 00:22:32,359 Speaker 3: Judge Norra Aika prevented the first time around, they just 413 00:22:32,400 --> 00:22:33,800 Speaker 3: do it a second time. Or do you think they're 414 00:22:33,800 --> 00:22:36,879 Speaker 3: actually going to bring an indictment against the president's son 415 00:22:37,040 --> 00:22:39,000 Speaker 3: that could send him to prison in an election year. 416 00:22:39,240 --> 00:22:41,560 Speaker 1: Well, so this is what I think is weird. I 417 00:22:41,640 --> 00:22:45,959 Speaker 1: don't remember it being public in this way. It feels 418 00:22:45,960 --> 00:22:49,040 Speaker 1: to me like a threat. It feels to me like 419 00:22:49,160 --> 00:22:54,520 Speaker 1: you are attempting, meaning the government and everything surrounding these ideas. 420 00:22:54,600 --> 00:22:57,200 Speaker 1: I just don't hear very many people say, oh, we're 421 00:22:57,320 --> 00:23:02,000 Speaker 1: going to charge you before September twenty ninth. It feels 422 00:23:02,080 --> 00:23:05,919 Speaker 1: like a argument you would make in an effort to 423 00:23:06,000 --> 00:23:11,040 Speaker 1: try to win a some sort of agreement where they're 424 00:23:11,040 --> 00:23:14,840 Speaker 1: giving up something right like you're threatening, but there's actually 425 00:23:15,440 --> 00:23:18,199 Speaker 1: not the real threat to follow through. That's my concern. 426 00:23:18,240 --> 00:23:20,920 Speaker 1: There should be charges. This is not complicated to his point. 427 00:23:21,720 --> 00:23:23,960 Speaker 1: This is as simple of a case as you can 428 00:23:24,000 --> 00:23:28,439 Speaker 1: possibly imagine. He definitely lied on those forms, and as 429 00:23:28,520 --> 00:23:31,840 Speaker 1: Andy pointed out, he may well have lied on multiple 430 00:23:32,200 --> 00:23:35,679 Speaker 1: different guns, not just one, which is as easy of 431 00:23:35,720 --> 00:23:38,439 Speaker 1: a case as could possibly exist out there. Now they 432 00:23:38,520 --> 00:23:41,080 Speaker 1: have to figure out where it is. Is this gonna 433 00:23:41,119 --> 00:23:44,199 Speaker 1: be DC, is this gonna be California? There has to 434 00:23:44,280 --> 00:23:47,040 Speaker 1: be charges brought in the case, But that to me 435 00:23:47,280 --> 00:23:49,600 Speaker 1: is the is the big challenge kind of going forward. 436 00:23:49,680 --> 00:23:51,920 Speaker 3: I'm telling you, I've that we're going on now two 437 00:23:52,000 --> 00:23:54,639 Speaker 3: years of this. Hunter's not seeing the inside of a 438 00:23:54,640 --> 00:23:58,320 Speaker 3: prison cell. Hunter's gonna skape, telling you he's gonna skate. 439 00:23:58,600 --> 00:24:01,679 Speaker 1: My concern con certain is they could almost rig the 440 00:24:01,800 --> 00:24:05,960 Speaker 1: system and not get a charge. It's usually if you 441 00:24:06,160 --> 00:24:10,359 Speaker 1: try to bring a grand jury charges the grand jury, 442 00:24:10,560 --> 00:24:12,880 Speaker 1: the phrase is what they'd always indict a ham sandwich, 443 00:24:12,920 --> 00:24:15,960 Speaker 1: That's always what said. My concern is they could almost 444 00:24:16,119 --> 00:24:21,160 Speaker 1: tank that in intentionally and avoid having to bring anything 445 00:24:21,880 --> 00:24:24,639 Speaker 1: against Hunter. In other words, do such a bad job 446 00:24:25,119 --> 00:24:27,520 Speaker 1: that they may not even be able to get charges brought. 447 00:24:28,680 --> 00:24:30,400 Speaker 3: But why just I mean, to the point that we're 448 00:24:30,400 --> 00:24:32,480 Speaker 3: talking about any about nothing happens if they just don't 449 00:24:32,480 --> 00:24:34,479 Speaker 3: bring the charge, They're just not going to bring the chargemen. 450 00:24:34,600 --> 00:24:36,640 Speaker 1: That's what I think. I'm with any on this one. 451 00:24:36,680 --> 00:24:39,119 Speaker 3: I think this is just going to turn into yeah, 452 00:24:39,200 --> 00:24:41,719 Speaker 3: you know, complexity, YadA YadA, what are you gonna do it? 453 00:24:41,760 --> 00:24:43,480 Speaker 1: Well, I think it gets hard if they're gonna say 454 00:24:43,520 --> 00:24:47,200 Speaker 1: we're going to bring charges by December, by September twenty ninth, 455 00:24:47,520 --> 00:24:49,440 Speaker 1: and that's not what is that twenty days from now? 456 00:24:49,480 --> 00:24:53,720 Speaker 3: Basically, maybe they force them into a diversion program, but 457 00:24:53,840 --> 00:24:54,880 Speaker 3: that's just a redo. 458 00:24:55,520 --> 00:24:57,880 Speaker 1: All that is is a redo of. 459 00:24:57,800 --> 00:25:01,480 Speaker 3: The unbelievable sweetheart deals they tried to get through with 460 00:25:01,600 --> 00:25:03,840 Speaker 3: nor I mean Clay. The reason the nor that Judge 461 00:25:03,880 --> 00:25:06,440 Speaker 3: nor Aca deal fell apart, and she's the one who 462 00:25:06,440 --> 00:25:08,200 Speaker 3: made it fall apart, and Clay's been giving her high 463 00:25:08,240 --> 00:25:09,600 Speaker 3: fives about that ever since. 464 00:25:10,800 --> 00:25:11,280 Speaker 1: Rightly so. 465 00:25:12,280 --> 00:25:14,240 Speaker 3: The reason it fell apart was that the deal was 466 00:25:14,320 --> 00:25:19,480 Speaker 3: so grotesquely favorable that they tried to hide how favorable 467 00:25:19,520 --> 00:25:22,440 Speaker 3: the deal was, so now they're just gonna do another 468 00:25:22,560 --> 00:25:26,080 Speaker 3: version of that deal on similar terms and say that, oh, yeah, 469 00:25:26,119 --> 00:25:26,960 Speaker 3: we revisited it or. 470 00:25:27,000 --> 00:25:29,000 Speaker 1: Whatever, you know, and eventually it's what are you going 471 00:25:29,040 --> 00:25:29,639 Speaker 1: to do about it? 472 00:25:29,800 --> 00:25:32,560 Speaker 3: Trump's been indicted four times, Hunter hasn't been indicted, you know, 473 00:25:32,600 --> 00:25:33,000 Speaker 3: deal with it. 474 00:25:33,040 --> 00:25:37,200 Speaker 1: That's going to be their attitude. Yeah, and uh, We're 475 00:25:37,240 --> 00:25:40,240 Speaker 1: gonna have to see what happens, because I keep hoping 476 00:25:40,880 --> 00:25:44,840 Speaker 1: that the pressure has become so significant thanks to the 477 00:25:44,880 --> 00:25:48,000 Speaker 1: Republicans taking control of the House, that there is going 478 00:25:48,040 --> 00:25:53,520 Speaker 1: to be some sort of consequence, consequential outcome here. But 479 00:25:53,600 --> 00:25:56,080 Speaker 1: you have no faith, Yeah, well, I mean no faith. 480 00:25:56,560 --> 00:25:59,160 Speaker 1: The fact that we have even gotten here I take 481 00:25:59,200 --> 00:26:02,920 Speaker 1: as a very good sign because but for this judge 482 00:26:03,440 --> 00:26:07,359 Speaker 1: actually pointing out what an incredible rig job this case was, 483 00:26:07,600 --> 00:26:11,920 Speaker 1: and the IRS employees coming forward and testifying under oath 484 00:26:11,960 --> 00:26:16,080 Speaker 1: and saying that the fix was in. But for that occurring, 485 00:26:16,600 --> 00:26:19,640 Speaker 1: this story would already be over, and anybody who tried 486 00:26:19,640 --> 00:26:21,720 Speaker 1: to bring it up, they would say, oh, there's nothing there, 487 00:26:21,760 --> 00:26:24,000 Speaker 1: this has already been resolved. Let's move on. It's not 488 00:26:24,040 --> 00:26:28,679 Speaker 1: a serious issue. At least, it's still lingering, even if 489 00:26:29,080 --> 00:26:32,680 Speaker 1: there is significant concern I think legitimate. I think that's 490 00:26:32,720 --> 00:26:35,359 Speaker 1: fair to question whether any true justice is going to 491 00:26:35,359 --> 00:26:35,840 Speaker 1: be applied. 492 00:26:36,119 --> 00:26:38,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, if they were to try to, if I was 493 00:26:39,000 --> 00:26:41,280 Speaker 3: Hunter's legal team, I would say, we either get a 494 00:26:41,280 --> 00:26:46,119 Speaker 3: diversion where you get no prison time. I wonder if 495 00:26:46,119 --> 00:26:49,280 Speaker 3: he would take a felony plea, given that that felony 496 00:26:49,280 --> 00:26:51,399 Speaker 3: plea would last on his record for a grand total 497 00:26:51,440 --> 00:26:55,639 Speaker 3: of one year, and then his dad would pardon him obviously, 498 00:26:56,160 --> 00:26:58,640 Speaker 3: So that's one way that So, you know, as long 499 00:26:58,680 --> 00:27:00,879 Speaker 3: as he's not going to prison, I think he doesn't 500 00:27:00,880 --> 00:27:04,480 Speaker 3: really care, and he you know, for this usually there's 501 00:27:04,480 --> 00:27:05,920 Speaker 3: a lot of things that should have sent him to prison, 502 00:27:05,920 --> 00:27:07,520 Speaker 3: but he's not going to go to prison. And that's 503 00:27:07,560 --> 00:27:10,119 Speaker 3: always been the contention here because short of that, I 504 00:27:10,119 --> 00:27:11,920 Speaker 3: think people will say it's not that big a deal, 505 00:27:11,920 --> 00:27:14,119 Speaker 3: they'll forget about it. But if I'm Hunter, I would 506 00:27:14,119 --> 00:27:16,720 Speaker 3: just say bring it. You want to take this to trial, 507 00:27:17,000 --> 00:27:19,600 Speaker 3: I'll delay. I'll say tell the judge that I want 508 00:27:19,600 --> 00:27:21,840 Speaker 3: more time. They took five years to investigate this, I 509 00:27:21,880 --> 00:27:24,119 Speaker 3: need some time with my team to prepare our defense. 510 00:27:24,160 --> 00:27:26,119 Speaker 3: Blah blah. You know, delay it as much if you 511 00:27:26,160 --> 00:27:30,439 Speaker 3: can delay it until next summer then you could delay 512 00:27:30,520 --> 00:27:33,680 Speaker 3: sentencing until after. The whole point is his dad's gonna 513 00:27:33,680 --> 00:27:35,680 Speaker 3: bail him out eventually, one way or the other, because 514 00:27:35,680 --> 00:27:38,080 Speaker 3: his dad will be president in November. Even if he 515 00:27:38,119 --> 00:27:40,000 Speaker 3: loses the election, and he's gonna it's gonna be the 516 00:27:40,000 --> 00:27:40,320 Speaker 3: whole thing. 517 00:27:40,359 --> 00:27:43,640 Speaker 1: They bring charges at the end of September, it's very 518 00:27:43,760 --> 00:27:46,800 Speaker 1: likely that he will be able to withstand that case 519 00:27:47,160 --> 00:27:50,880 Speaker 1: until the election already happens. There won't be a full conclusion. Now. 520 00:27:50,960 --> 00:27:53,080 Speaker 1: Then the challenge becomes, though, Buck, And you're right, I 521 00:27:53,160 --> 00:27:55,280 Speaker 1: think if Biden were to lose, he would go ahead 522 00:27:55,640 --> 00:27:59,160 Speaker 1: and give give the the the ability for his son 523 00:27:59,520 --> 00:28:01,800 Speaker 1: to walk free and win or win. 524 00:28:02,720 --> 00:28:02,840 Speaker 2: Right. 525 00:28:03,600 --> 00:28:09,400 Speaker 1: But basically you're talking about both sides trying to avoid 526 00:28:09,520 --> 00:28:12,600 Speaker 1: going to prison, right. I mean, that's the reality that 527 00:28:12,640 --> 00:28:17,320 Speaker 1: we would find ourselves in. Now, what a ridiculous situation. 528 00:28:17,359 --> 00:28:18,359 Speaker 1: This is so crazy. 529 00:28:18,560 --> 00:28:21,879 Speaker 3: I can't even if you had like been, you know, 530 00:28:22,359 --> 00:28:26,159 Speaker 3: drop from the sky into the politics of today and 531 00:28:26,200 --> 00:28:29,199 Speaker 3: you're listening to a radio show that's focused primarily on 532 00:28:29,240 --> 00:28:34,000 Speaker 3: American politics, and we're talking about who from the you 533 00:28:34,000 --> 00:28:37,280 Speaker 3: know leading basically, who from the two most powerful political 534 00:28:37,320 --> 00:28:40,680 Speaker 3: families might be going to prison in an election year. 535 00:28:40,760 --> 00:28:43,600 Speaker 3: It would all sound completely insane, and this is where 536 00:28:43,600 --> 00:28:45,920 Speaker 3: we are. It does take some getting used. 537 00:28:45,760 --> 00:28:49,640 Speaker 1: To, yes. And by the way, if he were actually 538 00:28:49,680 --> 00:28:51,840 Speaker 1: trying to unite Americans, I think we've talked about this 539 00:28:51,880 --> 00:28:54,280 Speaker 1: on the show, and I think it's right he would decide, Hey, 540 00:28:54,280 --> 00:28:56,200 Speaker 1: I'm going to pardon Trump and I'm going to pardon 541 00:28:56,280 --> 00:28:59,920 Speaker 1: my son. And I'm talking, by the way, about about 542 00:29:00,160 --> 00:29:03,160 Speaker 1: Joe Biden, clearly, and if he did that, I think 543 00:29:03,200 --> 00:29:06,280 Speaker 1: it's the only way that he could get past the 544 00:29:06,320 --> 00:29:09,160 Speaker 1: idea of pardoning his son. Now, I may say he 545 00:29:09,160 --> 00:29:11,480 Speaker 1: doesn't care if he wins election. He's eighty two years 546 00:29:11,520 --> 00:29:13,840 Speaker 1: old and he's probably not going to fulfill the term anyway. 547 00:29:13,880 --> 00:29:16,400 Speaker 1: He's going to protect his son. But what a crazy 548 00:29:16,400 --> 00:29:19,719 Speaker 1: place we're in that we could legitimately be saying, on 549 00:29:19,760 --> 00:29:22,720 Speaker 1: its most basic level, whether you could go to prison 550 00:29:22,800 --> 00:29:25,680 Speaker 1: or not is a function of who wins the presidential election. 551 00:29:26,840 --> 00:29:30,240 Speaker 1: Notwithstanding that Joe Biden might be willing to go ahead 552 00:29:30,280 --> 00:29:33,680 Speaker 1: and part in Hunter, no matter what, this is crazy. 553 00:29:33,760 --> 00:29:36,000 Speaker 1: This is not a good position to find you're in 554 00:29:36,080 --> 00:29:40,600 Speaker 1: and find yourself, and ultimately it represents the failure and 555 00:29:40,720 --> 00:29:44,400 Speaker 1: the foundational lie that Joe Biden told everybody which was 556 00:29:44,480 --> 00:29:47,440 Speaker 1: he was going to bring everybody together. Really, the only 557 00:29:47,480 --> 00:29:50,840 Speaker 1: thing Joe Biden's brought together is everybody, whether it's a Republican, 558 00:29:50,880 --> 00:29:54,160 Speaker 1: Democrat or independent, is now in agreement that Joe Biden 559 00:29:54,280 --> 00:29:57,280 Speaker 1: isn't able to do the job. Very few things better 560 00:29:57,320 --> 00:29:59,720 Speaker 1: than laughing with family and loved ones, watching old movies 561 00:29:59,760 --> 00:30:02,040 Speaker 1: you were corded on camquarterers back in the day, Flipping 562 00:30:02,080 --> 00:30:05,880 Speaker 1: through old photo albums priceless material. If your families old 563 00:30:05,920 --> 00:30:08,400 Speaker 1: movies and photos are stored away on videotape per super 564 00:30:08,440 --> 00:30:11,400 Speaker 1: eight film, time to unlock those laughs, get them digitized. 565 00:30:11,440 --> 00:30:14,000 Speaker 1: You can do that with Legacy Box. They special in 566 00:30:14,080 --> 00:30:17,520 Speaker 1: digitally transferring all those memories onto digital files easy to 567 00:30:17,560 --> 00:30:21,520 Speaker 1: watch on your phone, smart TV, or computer. Legacy Box 568 00:30:21,560 --> 00:30:24,440 Speaker 1: facilities in Tennessee, this is my home state, my mom's 569 00:30:24,440 --> 00:30:26,960 Speaker 1: hometown at Chattanooga, have the best state of the art 570 00:30:26,960 --> 00:30:30,200 Speaker 1: equipment and teams of technicians that know how to carefully 571 00:30:30,200 --> 00:30:35,000 Speaker 1: transfer and preserve your precious memories. When you ship your tapes, films, 572 00:30:35,000 --> 00:30:37,640 Speaker 1: and photos, they treat them as though they were their own. 573 00:30:37,720 --> 00:30:40,120 Speaker 1: Both Buck and I have done this so much fun 574 00:30:40,160 --> 00:30:43,760 Speaker 1: getting the files back like opening a time capsule. Get 575 00:30:43,800 --> 00:30:48,120 Speaker 1: started today. Go online to legacybox dot com slash Clay 576 00:30:48,560 --> 00:30:52,400 Speaker 1: get fifty percent fifty five percent off pricing going on 577 00:30:52,720 --> 00:30:56,000 Speaker 1: right now. The whole process takes less than a month. 578 00:30:56,080 --> 00:30:59,280 Speaker 1: You'll be glad that you did it. Legacybox dot com 579 00:30:59,320 --> 00:31:04,240 Speaker 1: slash Clay for fifty five percent off. Sunday hang with 580 00:31:04,360 --> 00:31:06,520 Speaker 1: Clay and Buck a new podcast. 581 00:31:06,680 --> 00:31:09,000 Speaker 3: Find it on the iHeart app or wherever you get 582 00:31:09,040 --> 00:31:11,960 Speaker 3: your podcasts. Close it up shop here on Clay and 583 00:31:12,080 --> 00:31:14,000 Speaker 3: Buck for the day. Make sure you sign up to 584 00:31:14,000 --> 00:31:16,880 Speaker 3: be a Clay Endbuck VIP. Please do to Clayandbuck dot 585 00:31:16,920 --> 00:31:20,400 Speaker 3: com to get that going and you'll get exclusive behind 586 00:31:20,440 --> 00:31:23,320 Speaker 3: the scenes access to some video and other cool things 587 00:31:23,360 --> 00:31:29,280 Speaker 3: like the VIP email list and yeah, this is something 588 00:31:29,320 --> 00:31:31,760 Speaker 3: you should definitely check out. Also subscribe to Clay and 589 00:31:31,800 --> 00:31:36,960 Speaker 3: Buck podcast. You can do that by downloading the iHeartMedia app, 590 00:31:36,960 --> 00:31:38,840 Speaker 3: which I highly recommend you do. 591 00:31:40,360 --> 00:31:42,480 Speaker 1: Let's say, what have we got here? 592 00:31:43,200 --> 00:31:43,560 Speaker 2: Bob? 593 00:31:43,600 --> 00:31:44,120 Speaker 1: We got these? 594 00:31:44,120 --> 00:31:49,080 Speaker 3: Call still up guys, Bob in Pennsylvania on viveate Bob, 595 00:31:49,120 --> 00:31:50,360 Speaker 3: what have you got for us? 596 00:31:50,920 --> 00:31:51,120 Speaker 2: Hi? 597 00:31:51,320 --> 00:31:54,080 Speaker 5: I was calling. I think you were asking earlier about 598 00:31:54,080 --> 00:31:57,720 Speaker 5: why rom Swami was running for president If he thinks 599 00:31:57,760 --> 00:31:59,440 Speaker 5: Trump can do as good a job or he can 600 00:31:59,440 --> 00:32:03,040 Speaker 5: only do his job is what Trump does. My opinion 601 00:32:03,120 --> 00:32:06,280 Speaker 5: is that rum Swami is running and not saying anything 602 00:32:06,320 --> 00:32:10,080 Speaker 5: against Trump because he's hedging on the possibility that Trump 603 00:32:10,120 --> 00:32:13,400 Speaker 5: can't run for president, and he doesn't say anything against 604 00:32:13,440 --> 00:32:15,640 Speaker 5: Trump because then he can take all the Trump voters 605 00:32:15,640 --> 00:32:17,560 Speaker 5: as ow h. 606 00:32:19,440 --> 00:32:23,120 Speaker 1: I understand the argument. I think the chance is that 607 00:32:23,200 --> 00:32:26,640 Speaker 1: Trump is not going to be able to run are 608 00:32:26,760 --> 00:32:31,200 Speaker 1: virtually zero. So if I were trying to sketch out 609 00:32:31,200 --> 00:32:34,560 Speaker 1: what I think the vague is doing, it is that 610 00:32:35,080 --> 00:32:40,160 Speaker 1: for people who are like Trump but don't want necessarily 611 00:32:40,200 --> 00:32:43,040 Speaker 1: to go all in on Trump, he basically is just 612 00:32:43,240 --> 00:32:50,840 Speaker 1: crowding out DeSantis, Nicky Haley, Tim Scott, Mike Pence, any 613 00:32:50,880 --> 00:32:54,240 Speaker 1: of those guys that are running against Trump. In some way, 614 00:32:54,760 --> 00:32:57,800 Speaker 1: he is locking in more of the Trump support. Does 615 00:32:57,840 --> 00:32:59,640 Speaker 1: that make sense? Like he just is making it more 616 00:32:59,680 --> 00:33:02,000 Speaker 1: different cult for there to be somebody competing head to 617 00:33:02,000 --> 00:33:02,760 Speaker 1: head against Trump. 618 00:33:04,240 --> 00:33:06,480 Speaker 5: Yep, right, things he could be hedging his bet on 619 00:33:06,560 --> 00:33:07,480 Speaker 5: being a vice president. 620 00:33:07,760 --> 00:33:10,600 Speaker 1: Oh wow, I think I think that's true. We see that, 621 00:33:10,920 --> 00:33:11,920 Speaker 1: We see that one for sure. 622 00:33:11,920 --> 00:33:14,840 Speaker 3: I think he's I think he recognizes that vice president 623 00:33:14,920 --> 00:33:17,000 Speaker 3: or perhaps you know, a very senior role in a 624 00:33:17,040 --> 00:33:22,320 Speaker 3: Trump administration. Gordon in Colorado, Gordon, what have you got? 625 00:33:23,000 --> 00:33:28,200 Speaker 1: Gordon? Gordon may well have vanished? Okay, David in what 626 00:33:28,400 --> 00:33:31,160 Speaker 1: actually this was? H is he still up? 627 00:33:31,200 --> 00:33:33,880 Speaker 3: Okay, forget it. Let's go to VIP email. Sorry I'm calling. 628 00:33:33,920 --> 00:33:36,479 Speaker 3: I'm calling for calls that have that have dropped out. Uh, 629 00:33:36,560 --> 00:33:39,080 Speaker 3: Steven writes Clay and Bach being a couple of history nerds, 630 00:33:39,080 --> 00:33:41,360 Speaker 3: here are a couple of books you might like. Away 631 00:33:41,440 --> 00:33:44,920 Speaker 3: All Boats by Kenneth Dodson. It's a historical fiction following 632 00:33:44,920 --> 00:33:51,360 Speaker 3: the happenings on UH attack transport ships. Brave Men by 633 00:33:51,440 --> 00:33:55,480 Speaker 3: Ernie Pyle. Ernie Pyle was a World War Two correspondent. 634 00:33:55,720 --> 00:33:59,000 Speaker 3: Book travels Europe from June nineteen forty three to nineteen 635 00:33:59,000 --> 00:34:02,520 Speaker 3: forty four. In Joy Clay, Rea Good tells what is 636 00:34:02,520 --> 00:34:04,760 Speaker 3: Clay reading these days? Now that you're done with your 637 00:34:04,760 --> 00:34:06,600 Speaker 3: book tour, you get to read fun things? 638 00:34:06,920 --> 00:34:09,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, no doubt. I'm actually trying to decide. I'm going 639 00:34:09,719 --> 00:34:13,720 Speaker 1: through right now all of I tweet about this because 640 00:34:13,760 --> 00:34:15,960 Speaker 1: it's been a while since I just went and read 641 00:34:16,640 --> 00:34:21,640 Speaker 1: total page turner fiction fun, and so I'm now reading 642 00:34:21,680 --> 00:34:24,680 Speaker 1: all these fun murder mysteries right now, so that is 643 00:34:24,760 --> 00:34:27,399 Speaker 1: what that's what I'm rolling through. I used to love 644 00:34:27,480 --> 00:34:30,200 Speaker 1: to read those back in the day when I was 645 00:34:30,239 --> 00:34:34,040 Speaker 1: a kid, and by kid, I mean you know, young, teenage, whatever, 646 00:34:34,440 --> 00:34:37,239 Speaker 1: And I tend to read more nonfiction now, but I've 647 00:34:37,280 --> 00:34:41,040 Speaker 1: gotten more and more into fiction, so I can't even 648 00:34:41,040 --> 00:34:42,719 Speaker 1: remember the name of the book that I'm reading right now, 649 00:34:42,719 --> 00:34:43,760 Speaker 1: but it's a murder mystery. 650 00:34:44,600 --> 00:34:46,279 Speaker 3: And of course I am pilgrim going to the top 651 00:34:46,320 --> 00:34:48,279 Speaker 3: of your list, and I told you about that one recently. Yes, 652 00:34:48,280 --> 00:34:50,319 Speaker 3: thank you, will very much, very much enjoy. Gordon is 653 00:34:50,320 --> 00:34:52,560 Speaker 3: apparently there. And since we call this name out for 654 00:34:52,560 --> 00:34:56,680 Speaker 3: all of America to hear, Gordon, welcome, gentlemen. 655 00:34:58,480 --> 00:35:02,080 Speaker 6: If Hunter Biden doesn't get prosecuted for this gun violation, 656 00:35:02,880 --> 00:35:08,000 Speaker 6: what does it say for all the gun laws that 657 00:35:08,080 --> 00:35:09,360 Speaker 6: the Democrats have passed. 658 00:35:09,800 --> 00:35:13,800 Speaker 1: They're total hypocrites and they don't care. Yep, that's a 659 00:35:13,800 --> 00:35:16,839 Speaker 1: good point. I appreciate that the answer. Yeah, yeah, they're 660 00:35:16,840 --> 00:35:18,760 Speaker 1: gonna say. I mean the same thing that they're saying 661 00:35:18,840 --> 00:35:23,440 Speaker 1: now about about everything when it comes to Hunter. They 662 00:35:23,480 --> 00:35:26,719 Speaker 1: want everybody to get fully prosecuted if they happen to 663 00:35:26,719 --> 00:35:29,839 Speaker 1: be associated with January sixth in any way, right, you've 664 00:35:29,840 --> 00:35:32,600 Speaker 1: got to go to prison for years. But Hunter Biden, 665 00:35:32,680 --> 00:35:35,800 Speaker 1: who has been engaged in multiple felonies, which there is 666 00:35:35,960 --> 00:35:39,280 Speaker 1: clear evidence of, and there has been since the FBI 667 00:35:39,360 --> 00:35:43,280 Speaker 1: took possession of his laptop in what November of twenty nineteen. 668 00:35:43,840 --> 00:35:46,959 Speaker 1: The FBI is known for four years now that Hunter 669 00:35:47,000 --> 00:35:50,000 Speaker 1: Biden committed multiple felonies and they have done nothing. So 670 00:35:50,160 --> 00:35:51,840 Speaker 1: the answer is they're going to be hypocrites about it. 671 00:35:51,880 --> 00:35:53,680 Speaker 1: They're going to claim that we need to have stricter 672 00:35:53,760 --> 00:35:56,640 Speaker 1: gun laws for everybody. But I've been trying to tell 673 00:35:56,640 --> 00:35:59,920 Speaker 1: conservatives for a long time. We say, you guys have 674 00:36:00,120 --> 00:36:03,400 Speaker 1: double standards lives, and they say, correct, what are you 675 00:36:03,440 --> 00:36:05,520 Speaker 1: going to do about it? Yeah, that's where we are. 676 00:36:05,640 --> 00:36:07,600 Speaker 1: That's where we are with the gun charge with Hunter Biden, 677 00:36:07,680 --> 00:36:12,239 Speaker 1: for sure. Well at least we're saying here, But at 678 00:36:12,320 --> 00:36:15,000 Speaker 1: least we are holding the line and trying to defend 679 00:36:15,000 --> 00:36:17,160 Speaker 1: the Republic each and every day, doing what we can 680 00:36:17,200 --> 00:36:20,319 Speaker 1: because things are getting a little crazy out there. And 681 00:36:20,400 --> 00:36:25,920 Speaker 1: at least Joe Biden is the data reflecting anyway, slowly 682 00:36:26,040 --> 00:36:28,440 Speaker 1: losing more and more support. And I do think one 683 00:36:28,480 --> 00:36:30,560 Speaker 1: of the biggest parts of this CNN poll that came 684 00:36:30,600 --> 00:36:32,960 Speaker 1: out that we started discussing at the start of the 685 00:36:32,960 --> 00:36:36,319 Speaker 1: show is that there are more and more people who 686 00:36:36,400 --> 00:36:39,239 Speaker 1: believe that Joe Biden was sixty two percent. I believe 687 00:36:39,280 --> 00:36:42,520 Speaker 1: in the most recent recent poll was in fact engaging 688 00:36:42,560 --> 00:36:45,720 Speaker 1: in business practices that were a bit untoured with Hunter Biden. 689 00:36:45,760 --> 00:36:48,920 Speaker 1: That numbers continuing to grow, that's a good sign. Maybe 690 00:36:49,440 --> 00:36:51,759 Speaker 1: call your buddy Gavin Newsom. I want to see what 691 00:36:51,800 --> 00:36:54,200 Speaker 1: he's up to these days. He's the next the man 692 00:36:54,360 --> 00:36:54,560 Speaker 1: up