WEBVTT - Can We Trust David Stearns? | 625

0:00:00.030 --> 0:00:03.150
<v Speaker 1>Can we trust David Stearns? That is the question we

0:00:03.270 --> 0:00:05.809
<v Speaker 1>are attempting to answer in today's episode of the Mets

0:00:05.830 --> 0:00:08.070
<v Speaker 1>The Podcast. If you guys like talking about the New

0:00:08.090 --> 0:00:10.110
<v Speaker 1>York Mets or the content that you're seeing here, make

0:00:10.130 --> 0:00:12.329
<v Speaker 1>sure you are subscribed to our YouTube channel. And if

0:00:12.350 --> 0:00:15.020
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to us, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google, drop us

0:00:15.050 --> 0:00:17.500
<v Speaker 1>a ring, drop us a review, download and subscribe wherever

0:00:17.550 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. Big shout out to all our

0:00:19.780 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>members who get access to the episodes early on YouTube.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.100
<v Speaker 1>Just got to click the join button. We appreciate you guys.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>This is a little bit of playing into the fan

0:00:28.100 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>base one, I think.

0:00:29.500 --> 0:00:31.140
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit playing to the fan base, a

0:00:31.140 --> 0:00:33.590
<v Speaker 2>little bit of our play on the press conference last week.

0:00:33.909 --> 0:00:36.310
<v Speaker 2>Tim Britton wrote a great article on The Athletic last week, too.

0:00:36.330 --> 0:00:39.229
<v Speaker 2>This is just a nice moment to talk about this

0:00:39.270 --> 0:00:42.790
<v Speaker 2>because we have a lull right now of playoffs are happening.

0:00:42.810 --> 0:00:44.430
<v Speaker 1>It's very fun to watch. Lots going on.

0:00:44.870 --> 0:00:47.650
<v Speaker 2>We're kind of all teaming for the offseason, especially because

0:00:47.690 --> 0:00:50.050
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have a one-month chaos offseason before the

0:00:50.090 --> 0:00:53.770
<v Speaker 2>lockout begins. So the second it happens, it's going to happen.

0:00:53.790 --> 0:00:55.450
<v Speaker 2>There's going to be tons of player moves, way more

0:00:55.490 --> 0:00:59.090
<v Speaker 2>than we usually get for early November. So it's kind

0:00:59.110 --> 0:01:00.890
<v Speaker 2>of worth having this discussion because I think a lot

0:01:00.910 --> 0:01:02.690
<v Speaker 2>of Mets fans are questioning whether or not they should

0:01:02.730 --> 0:01:04.670
<v Speaker 2>have that trust at the moment. Yeah.

0:01:04.830 --> 0:01:09.070
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've seen what three, three seasons now with

0:01:09.110 --> 0:01:11.870
<v Speaker 1>David Stearns. Cause he came here in 2024 and there's

0:01:11.910 --> 0:01:13.930
<v Speaker 1>definitely been a lot of good. There's definitely been a

0:01:13.950 --> 0:01:17.090
<v Speaker 1>ton of bad, which feels like it probably outweighs all

0:01:17.110 --> 0:01:18.970
<v Speaker 1>the good. This is not going to be necessarily me

0:01:19.010 --> 0:01:22.170
<v Speaker 1>and James pleading for you guys to trust almighty David

0:01:22.190 --> 0:01:24.550
<v Speaker 1>Stearns and that he is boy genius and all this

0:01:24.590 --> 0:01:26.730
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. But I think it's more so trying to

0:01:26.780 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>look at him through a, unbiased lens and just, like,

0:01:30.780 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>unequivocally telling you, like, what moves were good, what moves

0:01:33.020 --> 0:01:35.620
<v Speaker 1>were bad, and what probably needs to change for this offseason.

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:37.620
<v Speaker 1>Because you can't keep doing the same thing. That's all

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think there's no doubt that in the

0:01:40.690 --> 0:01:43.590
<v Speaker 2>whole league he's probably under the most pressure of any executive.

0:01:43.750 --> 0:01:45.730
<v Speaker 2>I'd say he– I'm not saying that in the sense

0:01:45.750 --> 0:01:47.350
<v Speaker 2>of he has the hottest seat. He probably has one

0:01:47.370 --> 0:01:49.510
<v Speaker 2>of the hottest seats. But he just has the most–

0:01:49.810 --> 0:01:51.350
<v Speaker 2>he's got the most shit he's got to get right

0:01:51.430 --> 0:01:54.460
<v Speaker 2>in the near future because– There's just been a lot

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.540
<v Speaker 2>of change in the last year, and almost every single

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 2>replacement for longtime players was the incorrect decision. Not saying

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 2>that all the decisions of letting guys go were right

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:03.770
<v Speaker 2>or wrong.

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:05.140
<v Speaker 1>Some of them were. Some of them weren't.

0:02:05.630 --> 0:02:07.230
<v Speaker 2>But almost every single guy that was brought in to

0:02:07.290 --> 0:02:10.090
<v Speaker 2>replace those guys that left was completely incorrect. And then

0:02:10.110 --> 0:02:12.610
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of left right now with, as we told

0:02:12.650 --> 0:02:14.290
<v Speaker 2>you guys last episode, basically the Mets have like half

0:02:14.330 --> 0:02:15.220
<v Speaker 2>a baseball team right now.

0:02:15.230 --> 0:02:17.149
<v Speaker 1>And that's being generous. But that half is a good half.

0:02:17.460 --> 0:02:20.410
<v Speaker 2>Amazing half. That half is poor. It's a legit good core.

0:02:20.450 --> 0:02:22.470
<v Speaker 2>But for some reason, the things that David Stearns was

0:02:22.510 --> 0:02:25.010
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be the best at, which was filling out

0:02:25.050 --> 0:02:28.810
<v Speaker 2>these roster fringes, kind of doing well on the bargain shopping,

0:02:28.889 --> 0:02:30.820
<v Speaker 2>trying to avoid the middle tier that always seems to

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 2>fail this Mets organization, it's completely backfired every single time.

0:02:35.780 --> 0:02:39.450
<v Speaker 1>And also... the expensive guys too, outside of Juan Soto,

0:02:39.610 --> 0:02:42.270
<v Speaker 1>like the times where the Mets have spent money, they

0:02:42.389 --> 0:02:44.650
<v Speaker 1>kind of haven't worked either, which is kind of crazy.

0:02:44.770 --> 0:02:46.990
<v Speaker 1>It's been, it's been the middle. It's been the middle

0:02:47.030 --> 0:02:49.820
<v Speaker 1>of like that middle ish spending. And we'll, we'll go

0:02:49.860 --> 0:02:51.940
<v Speaker 1>through the years and we'll name some guys. And we're

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.419
<v Speaker 1>definitely gonna do a more in-depth thing on like most

0:02:54.460 --> 0:02:56.419
<v Speaker 1>of the moves that David Stearns has made, or actually

0:02:56.460 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>all the moves that David Stearns has made throughout his

0:02:58.340 --> 0:03:00.109
<v Speaker 1>tenure with the New York Mets. But when talking about

0:03:00.130 --> 0:03:04.990
<v Speaker 1>the 2026 version, I think it probably starts and stops

0:03:05.510 --> 0:03:07.850
<v Speaker 1>simply with Jorge Polanco. We could talk about him for

0:03:08.230 --> 0:03:11.490
<v Speaker 1>half an hour and how that was probably the move

0:03:11.710 --> 0:03:14.630
<v Speaker 1>that made the Mets as bad truly as they were.

0:03:14.790 --> 0:03:16.750
<v Speaker 1>Like if you could look at one move in particular.

0:03:17.350 --> 0:03:20.570
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a very fair critique that sometimes this

0:03:20.710 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Mets front office says like, this is our guy. We

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:25.579
<v Speaker 2>have to get our guy. But a lot of times

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.109
<v Speaker 2>it seems like that guy could be wildly incorrect.

0:03:28.430 --> 0:03:28.829
<v Speaker 1>It's bad.

0:03:29.430 --> 0:03:32.330
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like getting Jorge Polanco, like getting our guy, that

0:03:32.350 --> 0:03:33.869
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem like it was right. There was a piece

0:03:33.889 --> 0:03:36.730
<v Speaker 2>from the Britain article that started out with a stanza

0:03:36.770 --> 0:03:38.740
<v Speaker 2>that everyone get the athletic, and I think it was

0:03:38.780 --> 0:03:40.060
<v Speaker 2>a gift article, so it was free to everyone.

0:03:40.100 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Really just good. Tim Bird's a great writer. Good in-depth

0:03:41.980 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the whole Stern's tenure.

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.300
<v Speaker 2>One executive familiar with Stern said he relies on a

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 2>model about as much as any.

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Other modern head of baseball operations. It's good.

0:03:50.970 --> 0:03:53.770
<v Speaker 2>The executive pointed to the trade for Freddy Peralta as

0:03:53.990 --> 0:03:57.900
<v Speaker 2>one in which subjective ideas including Peralta's clubhouse energy, pushed

0:03:57.940 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the Mets to value the pitcher more than objective measures.

0:04:00.820 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 2>So this is something that I think David Stearns gets

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.710
<v Speaker 2>ridiculed for sometimes, like too much data, too much model. Like, no,

0:04:06.750 --> 0:04:09.950
<v Speaker 2>this was real life, pure sense. I think it just

0:04:09.990 --> 0:04:13.470
<v Speaker 2>maybe was incorrect because Freddy Peralta, he was a good pitcher,

0:04:13.490 --> 0:04:16.029
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't an ace. And then you push over the

0:04:16.050 --> 0:04:18.450
<v Speaker 2>top for clubhouse energy. He had great clubhouse energy, sucked

0:04:18.510 --> 0:04:18.830
<v Speaker 2>at pitching.

0:04:19.250 --> 0:04:20.890
<v Speaker 1>Sucked at pitching. It was horrible this year for the

0:04:20.930 --> 0:04:22.950
<v Speaker 1>New York Mets. And whether that was their fault, his fault,

0:04:22.970 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was, We can debate that for hours and hours,

0:04:25.660 --> 0:04:27.940
<v Speaker 1>but Freddie Peralta came here and was an absolute failure.

0:04:28.220 --> 0:04:31.310
<v Speaker 1>And then similarly, I think Jorge Polanco and Marcus Simeon

0:04:31.330 --> 0:04:33.230
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to be kind of similar guys like that

0:04:33.270 --> 0:04:37.370
<v Speaker 1>on the offensive side, where maybe overlooking some of the

0:04:37.430 --> 0:04:39.690
<v Speaker 1>things that have gone on over the last few years

0:04:39.750 --> 0:04:42.710
<v Speaker 1>and taking more of the intangible route of these guys

0:04:42.750 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and the things that they bring to the table outside

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of being a baseball player. And it was two of

0:04:47.420 --> 0:04:50.540
<v Speaker 1>the grossest overestimations that the Mets have ever made, where

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.980
<v Speaker 1>Jorge Polanco was knowing his injury history, something that we

0:04:54.020 --> 0:04:56.180
<v Speaker 1>talked about as soon as the move got made, we

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>were flabbergasted from how quick the move was made seemingly

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.230
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere. And to play a new position, we

0:05:04.290 --> 0:05:07.730
<v Speaker 1>were like, the math isn't really mathing. It's kind of

0:05:07.770 --> 0:05:10.010
<v Speaker 1>crazy to look at. And then Marcus Simeon too, like

0:05:10.029 --> 0:05:11.990
<v Speaker 1>we know we had to get off the Brandon Nimmo contract.

0:05:12.350 --> 0:05:15.430
<v Speaker 1>That was good process. The problem was that the contract

0:05:15.470 --> 0:05:17.529
<v Speaker 1>and the player that we took was one of the

0:05:17.550 --> 0:05:20.290
<v Speaker 1>worst in major league baseball this year and had almost

0:05:20.290 --> 0:05:23.150
<v Speaker 1>600 plate appearances. So The fact that, this is a

0:05:23.150 --> 0:05:25.690
<v Speaker 1>crazy sentence, but like the fact that Marcus Simeon, Jorge

0:05:25.730 --> 0:05:29.690
<v Speaker 1>Polanco combined for 600 plate appearances this year and had

0:05:29.710 --> 0:05:33.610
<v Speaker 1>an OPS, I think that probably starts with a five. That's, oh,

0:05:33.650 --> 0:05:35.450
<v Speaker 1>that's a spectacular failure. I don't even know if it

0:05:35.470 --> 0:05:37.100
<v Speaker 1>was a five. I think the OPS might actually start

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>with a four.

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.779
<v Speaker 2>But again, the same thing where it's like, that's, I

0:05:39.820 --> 0:05:41.220
<v Speaker 2>got to get my guy or I got to get

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.300
<v Speaker 2>off my guy. Like, here's the move I have to make.

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.220
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, why is that the move you have

0:05:45.260 --> 0:05:47.820
<v Speaker 2>to make? And even the one that's the most in

0:05:47.860 --> 0:05:50.500
<v Speaker 2>our faces right now, just because a decision needs needing

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 2>to be made soon in Bo Bichette The idea of

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:57.300
<v Speaker 2>giving Bo Bichette one of the absolute most player-friendly contracts

0:05:57.339 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 2>in the history of the sport to play a new

0:05:59.500 --> 0:06:02.190
<v Speaker 2>position as well, to be the guy who's replacing Pete Alonso,

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.650
<v Speaker 2>a completely different skill set, and a player that was

0:06:04.750 --> 0:06:07.330
<v Speaker 2>not simply just not consistent.

0:06:07.650 --> 0:06:08.770
<v Speaker 1>He was mostly consistent.

0:06:08.850 --> 0:06:11.510
<v Speaker 2>Two years ago, he had a horrific season, and one

0:06:11.570 --> 0:06:14.210
<v Speaker 2>that you saw signs on the wall that this could

0:06:14.250 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 2>happen again. This is in Bo Bichette's range of outcomes,

0:06:17.220 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 2>and he did that in the first year of the team,

0:06:19.180 --> 0:06:20.739
<v Speaker 2>and that was one of the big moves that sunk.

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:25.810
<v Speaker 2>Even even communication things. Like, we don't know how much

0:06:25.870 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 2>validity there ever was to this. It was alluded to

0:06:28.380 --> 0:06:30.380
<v Speaker 2>by Jeff Passan at the time, but the way they

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.460
<v Speaker 2>went after Devin Williams and how that may have felt

0:06:32.540 --> 0:06:35.540
<v Speaker 2>disrespectful to Edwin Diaz, if that's the case. Again, we

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 2>said it then. Edwin Diaz could have kicked rocks, and

0:06:37.820 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 2>he did. Now let's see if he continues to pitch

0:06:39.500 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 2>really well this postseason.

0:06:40.540 --> 0:06:41.620
<v Speaker 1>Looked pretty good in his one inning.

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.430
<v Speaker 2>Looked pretty good in the first inning package after a spell.

0:06:44.450 --> 0:06:45.930
<v Speaker 2>Whatever the Dodgers do when they send the guy to AAA,

0:06:45.950 --> 0:06:47.929
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know. They inject him with philosophy serum.

0:06:48.150 --> 0:06:50.950
<v Speaker 2>It's freaking crazy. Yeah, but... And then.

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>There's another thing, too. So Jared Seiler, baseball prospectus, he did.

0:06:54.580 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 2>A huge series ranking all 30 front offices. Don't want

0:06:58.940 --> 0:07:00.669
<v Speaker 2>to give away secret sauce. Not going to say where

0:07:00.690 --> 0:07:02.830
<v Speaker 2>the Mets were, but he said a big critique of

0:07:02.870 --> 0:07:03.980
<v Speaker 2>David Stearns and pointing it out.

0:07:03.990 --> 0:07:05.690
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, I didn't even realize this. Wait,

0:07:06.029 --> 0:07:08.050
<v Speaker 1>tell me and I'm going to beep it out. Okay.

0:07:08.270 --> 0:07:10.670
<v Speaker 2>It was number 10.

0:07:10.670 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay. That's actually, I'm surprised. I'm not going to tell

0:07:14.140 --> 0:07:15.540
<v Speaker 1>you which way I'm surprised. I'm just going to tell

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you I'm surprised.

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:16.710
<v Speaker 2>For sure.

0:07:16.740 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But reading through it, I think it made sense.

0:07:18.580 --> 0:07:21.940
<v Speaker 2>And again, get Baseball Perspectives memberships, amazing content over there.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Jared's a great writer, good podcaster.

0:07:24.660 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Something that he said, I didn't realize it, but then

0:07:26.380 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 2>looking back, I'm like, oh, this does happen all the time,

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>is that the Mets feel like they make these godfather

0:07:31.500 --> 0:07:33.490
<v Speaker 2>offers that are final cut.

0:07:33.570 --> 0:07:34.950
<v Speaker 1>This is the one. This is the deal. You're going

0:07:34.970 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to accept it.

0:07:35.790 --> 0:07:37.970
<v Speaker 2>And then a player takes it somewhere else and one-ups them.

0:07:38.090 --> 0:07:40.730
<v Speaker 2>And again, that comes back to communication between players and agents,

0:07:40.770 --> 0:07:42.050
<v Speaker 2>this thing that we talk about all the time in

0:07:42.070 --> 0:07:44.570
<v Speaker 2>the Mets world of being used as leverage to to

0:07:44.690 --> 0:07:47.130
<v Speaker 2>drive up contracts and just let the other team get

0:07:47.150 --> 0:07:48.790
<v Speaker 2>these players. Anyway, it feels like that does happen a

0:07:48.810 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 2>lot because this team, I mean, also it's hard to

0:07:51.620 --> 0:07:53.220
<v Speaker 2>look at the Mets and the Dodgers and unless you're

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.460
<v Speaker 2>getting so much more money, say, I'm going to choose

0:07:55.500 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the Mets. I'm going to choose the worst franchise, the

0:07:58.220 --> 0:08:00.860
<v Speaker 2>team that wins less consistently, the team with worse weather,

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:02.980
<v Speaker 2>worse quality of life for me as I moved there

0:08:03.020 --> 0:08:04.140
<v Speaker 2>with my family for a long time.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.380
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to beat the sunshine and rainbows. Honestly, it's

0:08:07.420 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>just as simple as that. Like if if I'm getting

0:08:10.300 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>handed this much from both, I'm going to pick the

0:08:12.780 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>one that's just got a little bit better things on

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the outside than New York city. You kind of have

0:08:16.700 --> 0:08:18.060
<v Speaker 1>to be a different beast to want to go to

0:08:18.100 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the New York Mets, which I guess is a little

0:08:19.820 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>bit different too. But I think another thing to talk

0:08:22.260 --> 0:08:25.100
<v Speaker 1>about too, like with just the 2026 season in general,

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and you mentioned it a little bit earlier is the

0:08:27.260 --> 0:08:29.660
<v Speaker 1>guys on the fringe too, have been really bad that

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the Mets have been bringing in this year. I counted.

0:08:32.420 --> 0:08:35.470
<v Speaker 1>So I think 27 different Mets took a plate appearance

0:08:35.510 --> 0:08:38.150
<v Speaker 1>for the New York Mets. And I think 13 of them,

0:08:38.190 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>according to baseball reference, had a negative war that's unfathomable

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.660
<v Speaker 1>like some of these guys took 16 plate appearances and

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.829
<v Speaker 1>were worth negative half a win i know that like

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.030
<v Speaker 1>negative half a win is relatively zero and zero the

0:08:53.050 --> 0:08:55.350
<v Speaker 1>semantics of all of it but just from a saying

0:08:55.410 --> 0:08:59.089
<v Speaker 1>it out loud standpoint that's crazy to me how do

0:08:59.110 --> 0:09:02.090
<v Speaker 1>you find that many bad players that get an opportunity

0:09:02.110 --> 0:09:03.370
<v Speaker 1>to play at the major league level.

0:09:03.900 --> 0:09:05.740
<v Speaker 2>The opportunity is the problem too. Like sure. There were

0:09:05.780 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 2>lots of injuries this year, but we didn't have the

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 2>necessary reinforcements that should be out of 40 men roster

0:09:11.300 --> 0:09:13.150
<v Speaker 2>to cover for those injuries. And then you could flip

0:09:13.170 --> 0:09:15.230
<v Speaker 2>the other side of this, that the Stern stands that

0:09:15.270 --> 0:09:15.930
<v Speaker 2>are still out there.

0:09:15.970 --> 0:09:17.770
<v Speaker 1>They would say when he took over this organization, this

0:09:17.790 --> 0:09:18.370
<v Speaker 1>part is true.

0:09:18.929 --> 0:09:22.530
<v Speaker 2>This team process wise was definitely in shambles still. We

0:09:22.550 --> 0:09:25.660
<v Speaker 2>got through, it was four executives in five years just

0:09:25.700 --> 0:09:28.140
<v Speaker 2>because of the, because of the triple threat in 2021,

0:09:28.140 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 2>which probably shouldn't be counted, but still is the case.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:30.380
<v Speaker 1>It did happen.

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 2>We had, Lots of turnover. We didn't have very modern processes.

0:09:33.460 --> 0:09:35.100
<v Speaker 2>We were getting there a little bit with Steve Cohen

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.100
<v Speaker 2>in the way. You know, some development was happening.

0:09:37.140 --> 0:09:38.860
<v Speaker 1>Some scouting was happening. Drafting was happening.

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.099
<v Speaker 2>But it does feel like those are the things that

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:43.660
<v Speaker 2>I'm so much more confident in this organization now. Like,

0:09:43.740 --> 0:09:46.300
<v Speaker 2>I am ready for this player development machine to start

0:09:46.340 --> 0:09:47.449
<v Speaker 2>churning out bodies.

0:09:47.470 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And we saw that this year.

0:09:48.450 --> 0:09:51.270
<v Speaker 2>Like, the fact that this core now has Benjamin Ewing

0:09:51.370 --> 0:09:54.930
<v Speaker 2>in it, I'm like, oh, building blocks, dudes. Like, having

0:09:54.970 --> 0:09:57.610
<v Speaker 2>those guys absolutely written in Sharpie for the next.

0:09:57.970 --> 0:09:59.890
<v Speaker 1>Five seasons is a huge deal.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 2>It can't go without saying that Benj was the first

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:03.719
<v Speaker 2>Stearns draft pick.

0:10:03.740 --> 0:10:05.819
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a relevant factor right here.

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.059
<v Speaker 2>Then McLean and the other side, how much better he got.

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:11.020
<v Speaker 2>Everything that's gone on with Christian Scott, that he's a

0:10:11.140 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 2>valuable mid-rotation piece now. This kind of stuff is there.

0:10:14.059 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 2>And again, that stuff takes time to build. I wish

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.100
<v Speaker 2>it would have existed two years ago, more so than now,

0:10:19.179 --> 0:10:20.300
<v Speaker 2>but hopefully it's all there this year.

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.580
<v Speaker 1>It's just, these things have to be bridged.

0:10:22.660 --> 0:10:24.900
<v Speaker 2>And I just, I still just can't believe how bad

0:10:24.940 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 2>of a major league baseball team building front office, David,

0:10:28.380 --> 0:10:30.460
<v Speaker 2>David Stearns, executive David Stearns has been.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:31.100
<v Speaker 1>Over the last two years.

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:31.460
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:31.500 --> 0:10:36.210
<v Speaker 1>Because his combinations also packaged in with some of the horrible,

0:10:36.230 --> 0:10:39.270
<v Speaker 1>horrible players that came from the previous regime as well. Like,

0:10:39.450 --> 0:10:41.530
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's, it's tough when you're committing 20 plus

0:10:41.570 --> 0:10:43.730
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year to Sean Mania and he was

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.340
<v Speaker 1>Not good. It's tough when you're committing that money to

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.830
<v Speaker 1>Kodai Senga from the old regime, and he was one

0:10:48.850 --> 0:10:50.949
<v Speaker 1>of the worst pitchers in the entire league. Well, he

0:10:50.970 --> 0:10:52.910
<v Speaker 1>re-upped Minaya himself. That was him?

0:10:52.929 --> 0:10:57.170
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was after 24. We gave him that extension. Oh,

0:10:57.210 --> 0:10:57.630
<v Speaker 2>my God.

0:10:57.670 --> 0:11:01.339
<v Speaker 1>He did. Oh, my God. That's what I'm saying. I

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was trying to give him benefit of the doubt. That's bad.

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.300
<v Speaker 2>The thing that's funny, too, is that a lot of

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 2>these moves that would be critical of, like in the moment,

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 2>I was like, hmm. You know what I mean? But

0:11:09.820 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of them, and we admit in the moment, too,

0:11:11.700 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>felt sound process-wise. Like, Devin Williams felt very sound process-wise.

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.210
<v Speaker 1>Fuck you. Don't put me in that category. In that moment,

0:11:19.230 --> 0:11:21.210
<v Speaker 1>I was more negative than you were. That's not true.

0:11:21.250 --> 0:11:23.189
<v Speaker 2>What are you talking about? No, you were trying to

0:11:23.250 --> 0:11:25.370
<v Speaker 2>be positive because you figured he was a set-up guy

0:11:25.390 --> 0:11:26.950
<v Speaker 2>for Edwin Diaz. And I came on here and told

0:11:26.970 --> 0:11:28.370
<v Speaker 2>you exactly. One, I have a pit in my stomach

0:11:28.390 --> 0:11:29.709
<v Speaker 2>about this. I know I should like it, but I

0:11:29.770 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 2>don't like it. And it was the head versus the heart.

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.020
<v Speaker 1>Rewatch that. And I was like, this means Edwin Diaz

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.930
<v Speaker 1>is 100% God. Devin Williams sucks. I hate him.

0:11:38.690 --> 0:11:42.550
<v Speaker 2>But again, if you're looking pure process-wise, that contract for

0:11:42.570 --> 0:11:45.570
<v Speaker 2>that quality of that kind of stuff you get feels good.

0:11:46.010 --> 0:11:48.390
<v Speaker 1>Like Bo Bichette, we were like, this feels odd. The

0:11:48.500 --> 0:11:51.410
<v Speaker 1>Bo one we were not a fan of. I think

0:11:51.550 --> 0:11:54.220
<v Speaker 1>I saw the clip the other day of us, I think,

0:11:54.300 --> 0:11:58.260
<v Speaker 1>live reacting in podcast to Bo Bichette being signed. I

0:11:58.280 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>was like, look at your phone. Look at your phone.

0:11:59.660 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, because it.

0:12:00.420 --> 0:12:02.429
<v Speaker 1>Was on the wind-up. Look at the wind-up. What are

0:12:02.490 --> 0:12:04.750
<v Speaker 1>we doing? Why do we do that? Same thing with

0:12:04.770 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Jorge Polanco.

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:06.939
<v Speaker 2>Again, maybe it was just the time of day because

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 2>it was Saturday at 9 a.m. and it was in

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.980
<v Speaker 2>between our friends' night before wedding party and wedding party.

0:12:12.059 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 2>But we were both like, what just happened? Even the

0:12:14.940 --> 0:12:16.330
<v Speaker 2>showman and I were like, I think this is good.

0:12:16.350 --> 0:12:17.850
<v Speaker 1>It feels okay.

0:12:17.890 --> 0:12:20.790
<v Speaker 2>But some of this feels like a lot of these

0:12:20.830 --> 0:12:24.970
<v Speaker 2>major league roster moves, again, are bad. This isn't unfair,

0:12:25.030 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 2>but those are things that look way more clear to

0:12:27.220 --> 0:12:27.670
<v Speaker 2>the public.

0:12:28.059 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, it's just.

0:12:29.929 --> 0:12:33.470
<v Speaker 2>And evaluating underlying processes. That's where the boy genius comes in.

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:34.940
<v Speaker 1>That's where people start to be like, he thinks he's

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>smarter than everybody else because you see some of these

0:12:37.059 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>things that it feels like from 1,000 feet away, 10

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.020
<v Speaker 1>feet away, feel like the wrong thing to do at times.

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.020
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the biggest thing is you have to be

0:12:45.059 --> 0:12:46.780
<v Speaker 2>prepared for uncapped downside scenarios.

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:47.660
<v Speaker 1>You just got to be ready for it.

0:12:47.660 --> 0:12:48.420
<v Speaker 2>They weren't ready.

0:12:48.740 --> 0:12:51.670
<v Speaker 1>They weren't ready for that. That was this offseason and

0:12:51.730 --> 0:12:55.130
<v Speaker 1>last offseason he was talking about, it was about the defense, right?

0:12:55.170 --> 0:12:55.660
<v Speaker 1>What was it?

0:12:55.970 --> 0:12:56.890
<v Speaker 2>What was his line for defense?

0:12:57.350 --> 0:12:58.270
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh, run prevention.

0:12:58.330 --> 0:13:00.710
<v Speaker 2>How'd you forget run prevention? Someone's screaming at you right now.

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:02.020
<v Speaker 2>How could you forget run prevention?

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.820
<v Speaker 1>First off, I woke up 20 minutes ago, so my

0:13:04.860 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>brain is clear. Don't advertise that. Why?

0:13:07.140 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 2>It's fine.

0:13:07.660 --> 0:13:09.340
<v Speaker 1>Everyone knows I wake up like a piece of shit.

0:13:09.540 --> 0:13:10.219
<v Speaker 2>Like, it's okay.

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>But two, I'm really just trying to black everything out

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.089
<v Speaker 1>of my brain from this past year. It's just what

0:13:17.150 --> 0:13:21.310
<v Speaker 1>a disgrace of a season the Mets had. And we're still, like,

0:13:21.710 --> 0:13:23.450
<v Speaker 1>one of the ten best scorers in the league, and

0:13:23.470 --> 0:13:25.710
<v Speaker 1>that's not even our take. That's a take that national

0:13:25.730 --> 0:13:27.050
<v Speaker 1>baseball writers are also having.

0:13:27.580 --> 0:13:29.719
<v Speaker 2>The same National Baseball Riders that were giving Davis Stern

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>so much credit for remaking the team last offseason. That's

0:13:32.179 --> 0:13:34.510
<v Speaker 2>where our Dark Horse World Series pick, but those people

0:13:34.550 --> 0:13:35.670
<v Speaker 2>will not have you remember that.

0:13:35.770 --> 0:13:36.330
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not.

0:13:36.370 --> 0:13:38.810
<v Speaker 2>I mean, also, like, think about fringes of the other years.

0:13:38.830 --> 0:13:41.730
<v Speaker 2>It's like the Jose Siri trade. Let's go to 2025, yeah.

0:13:42.130 --> 0:13:42.709
<v Speaker 2>Jose Siri.

0:13:42.809 --> 0:13:49.910
<v Speaker 1>Why'd we trade for Jose Siri? Big swings and good defense.

0:13:50.550 --> 0:13:51.250
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess.

0:13:51.309 --> 0:13:53.410
<v Speaker 1>Even just, like, looking at that trade. He was okay

0:13:53.429 --> 0:13:55.850
<v Speaker 1>with the Angels this year. He was okay with the

0:13:55.910 --> 0:13:56.830
<v Speaker 1>Angels this year, I guess.

0:13:56.929 --> 0:13:59.469
<v Speaker 2>I mean, would he have, like, a hairline fracture and

0:13:59.490 --> 0:14:00.709
<v Speaker 2>let him out for, like, six months and then he

0:14:00.730 --> 0:14:01.870
<v Speaker 2>got cut immediately? Yeah.

0:14:01.970 --> 0:14:04.730
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we could also– I guess, like, it's worth noting, too,

0:14:05.110 --> 0:14:06.630
<v Speaker 1>we haven't talked about, like, some of the guys that

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.580
<v Speaker 1>just let go as well last year. Like, the Pete

0:14:12.860 --> 0:14:15.820
<v Speaker 1>contract in the conversation is, like, way more nuanced than

0:14:15.860 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>people make it. I wish Pete Alonzo was back. So

0:14:19.220 --> 0:14:20.859
<v Speaker 1>do you. I don't think that there's a Mets fan

0:14:20.900 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>on the planet that's like, I did not want Pete

0:14:22.700 --> 0:14:25.330
<v Speaker 1>Alonzo back. The problem was that the Pete Alonzo contract

0:14:25.350 --> 0:14:28.590
<v Speaker 1>that he was offered is fucking insane. It was. You

0:14:28.610 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>could see the Baltimore Orioles when you commit $ 155 million

0:14:33.030 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to a dude who plays first base. It's like it

0:14:35.060 --> 0:14:37.020
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really turn out well. Look at all the massive

0:14:37.060 --> 0:14:39.060
<v Speaker 1>contracts that have happened to first basemen over the history

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:43.100
<v Speaker 1>of baseball. They don't really age particularly gracefully, and I'm

0:14:43.140 --> 0:14:44.660
<v Speaker 1>talking about some of the best players to ever play

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.340
<v Speaker 1>the game like Albert Pujols and guys like Mark Teixeira.

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.100
<v Speaker 1>There's just guys that did not really play as well

0:14:49.140 --> 0:14:51.700
<v Speaker 1>once they got these big monies and got older. That

0:14:51.740 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>was the problem with Pete Alonzo. I think as the player,

0:14:54.140 --> 0:14:56.380
<v Speaker 1>of course we want him back. He's the man. I

0:14:56.420 --> 0:14:58.860
<v Speaker 1>love Pete. It was the money, but that's, again, the

0:14:58.900 --> 0:15:02.950
<v Speaker 1>process versus different things. But then you give this money

0:15:03.010 --> 0:15:07.070
<v Speaker 1>to Bobachette and Jorge Polanco and these guys, and you're like, well,

0:15:07.470 --> 0:15:09.230
<v Speaker 1>probably would have rather just had Pete at that point.

0:15:09.250 --> 0:15:11.250
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying the whole difference is the fact that

0:15:11.270 --> 0:15:13.390
<v Speaker 2>the Mets didn't replace well. If the Mets made the

0:15:13.430 --> 0:15:16.630
<v Speaker 2>playoffs this year, if the Mets won 91 games and

0:15:16.650 --> 0:15:18.369
<v Speaker 2>we're just like in hot pursuit with the Phillies and

0:15:18.390 --> 0:15:18.830
<v Speaker 2>the Braves.

0:15:18.850 --> 0:15:19.550
<v Speaker 1>And it was fun time.

0:15:19.590 --> 0:15:21.490
<v Speaker 2>They're possibly playing an LDS right now. None of these

0:15:21.530 --> 0:15:24.170
<v Speaker 2>conversations will be happening. We'd be like, look, look what

0:15:24.190 --> 0:15:25.890
<v Speaker 2>boy genius did. Look how we remade the core in

0:15:25.970 --> 0:15:27.910
<v Speaker 2>one shot, but he didn't. It's not how it happened.

0:15:28.010 --> 0:15:30.260
<v Speaker 2>And to share his interesting comp that came to me

0:15:30.340 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 2>after like in the last few weeks, actually, I mean,

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:34.380
<v Speaker 2>Mark shares the.

0:15:34.340 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>News right now. We haven't talked about that. I just

0:15:35.860 --> 0:15:37.420
<v Speaker 1>brought that up. Like out of nowhere.

0:15:37.770 --> 0:15:39.290
<v Speaker 2>I talked about that literally with my uncle at the

0:15:39.310 --> 0:15:41.750
<v Speaker 2>Yankee game last week. I checked out Mark Teixeira's baseball

0:15:41.790 --> 0:15:44.170
<v Speaker 2>reference recently just because he's in the news right now.

0:15:44.220 --> 0:15:44.700
<v Speaker 2>Just a little.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:45.620
<v Speaker 1>Just a little bit.

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to remember Mark Teixeira as a player. And

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.540
<v Speaker 2>he just stopped playing good baseball when he turned 34

0:15:49.540 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 2>years old. It was over. He had one more pretty

0:15:52.140 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 2>good season at 35, and he showed up the next year,

0:15:54.740 --> 0:15:55.540
<v Speaker 2>and it was over.

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.370
<v Speaker 1>He was like, I'm done. See you guys later. 36

0:15:57.370 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>years old.

0:15:57.950 --> 0:16:01.590
<v Speaker 2>Mark Teixeira retired. Mark Teixeira was almost a 50-win player

0:16:01.630 --> 0:16:03.110
<v Speaker 2>for his career. He didn't even try to keep playing

0:16:03.170 --> 0:16:05.860
<v Speaker 2>after that. But that's not saying that Pete Wilk, fall

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.460
<v Speaker 2>apart when he gets to be that age. That also

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.100
<v Speaker 2>is the time that his contract's up. So the Orioles

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.820
<v Speaker 2>might work right up until the wall. It's just, we

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.180
<v Speaker 2>can't keep rehashing these conversations. It's the same exact thing

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 2>with the Brandon Nimmo. Like wasn't good, wasn't bad process

0:16:18.260 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 2>to get off that contract. It was good process. It

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:21.980
<v Speaker 2>was just what you got for it because it seemed

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.580
<v Speaker 2>like it was telegraphed. If Pete Alonso would have accepted

0:16:24.620 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 2>a three-year deals with fourth year vesting options, possibly the

0:16:27.980 --> 0:16:29.900
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to go to a fourth year. Yeah. He could

0:16:29.940 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 2>have actually still been a Met this year, but the

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.790
<v Speaker 2>Orioles offered five, blew him out of the water. No

0:16:33.830 --> 0:16:36.250
<v Speaker 2>one made rebuttal offers because that was so much bigger

0:16:36.270 --> 0:16:37.190
<v Speaker 2>than everyone else's offer.

0:16:37.210 --> 0:16:38.790
<v Speaker 1>It happened. He got paid like Kyle Schwarber.

0:16:39.470 --> 0:16:42.130
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Kyle Schwarber's older, too, and the Mets offered

0:16:42.150 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Schwarber a big contract. People forget on Kyle Schwarber

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.740
<v Speaker 2>the Mets were last year as well. This team just sucked,

0:16:48.820 --> 0:16:50.580
<v Speaker 2>and a big reason why it sucked was because David

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.330
<v Speaker 2>Stearns didn't have replacements ready for the big sweeping moves

0:16:53.370 --> 0:16:56.250
<v Speaker 2>that he intended to make and possibly telegraphed.

0:16:56.550 --> 0:16:58.490
<v Speaker 1>And then we can also talk about the 2025 season

0:16:58.530 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>since that was the other failure, too, where shockingly, so

0:17:02.020 --> 0:17:05.150
<v Speaker 1>many good things actually happened this year and they still

0:17:05.190 --> 0:17:07.310
<v Speaker 1>didn't make the playoffs, which is kind of crazy. Like

0:17:07.330 --> 0:17:10.030
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, and I guess this plays into 2026 too,

0:17:10.230 --> 0:17:12.090
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the Mets were able to take Clay Holmes,

0:17:12.290 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>who was a reliever, who had peaks of being elite

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.380
<v Speaker 1>and also valleys of being like pretty tough at times

0:17:17.420 --> 0:17:20.619
<v Speaker 1>for the Yankees, turned him into a, Damn good starting pitcher.

0:17:21.100 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Major win for the organization. That's pretty sick. Even, remember

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Griffin Canning? Picked him up off the scrap. He was free.

0:17:27.740 --> 0:17:29.859
<v Speaker 1>He was fantastic. Gave us nearly 80 innings of a

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.430
<v Speaker 1>sub-4 ERA. Like, there were so many things that happened

0:17:33.470 --> 0:17:37.270
<v Speaker 1>with this organization where you're like, wow, look at David

0:17:37.290 --> 0:17:40.370
<v Speaker 1>Stearns doing his thing. And then you get Frankie Montas.

0:17:40.570 --> 0:17:43.020
<v Speaker 1>And what do you know? What's the thing that David

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:44.980
<v Speaker 1>Stearns did with Frankie Montas that he did with Jorge

0:17:45.020 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Polanco and some of these other crazy moves, James? Jump

0:17:47.460 --> 0:17:47.780
<v Speaker 1>the gun.

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.500
<v Speaker 2>Frankie Matz was Jorge Polanco. That was the exact same.

0:17:50.980 --> 0:17:52.740
<v Speaker 2>I think, I feel like if we look back, those

0:17:52.790 --> 0:17:56.109
<v Speaker 2>guys may have been signed the same week. It's possible. Like, theoretically,

0:17:56.150 --> 0:17:58.149
<v Speaker 2>but one year apart. Like, it was the exact same timing.

0:17:58.170 --> 0:17:59.750
<v Speaker 2>It was the exact same feeling of like, oh, now

0:17:59.770 --> 0:18:02.730
<v Speaker 2>you're jumping for a lockout in December. We can't sign

0:18:02.810 --> 0:18:05.210
<v Speaker 2>guys then. We can't sign guys that week, right? Around

0:18:05.230 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 2>two weeks before Christmas anymore. But it kind of was that. Like,

0:18:07.820 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 2>you're going to jump the market for the guy who,

0:18:10.020 --> 0:18:13.379
<v Speaker 2>if everything goes right, is a three for, like, slightly

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.330
<v Speaker 2>over market value with an extra year. Like, this is,

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:17.500
<v Speaker 2>You're getting into a bidding war and a competition for

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 2>this when, on the flip side, you have a team

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 2>like the Padres, a guy like A.J.

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Preller.

0:18:20.859 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to give him too much credit for

0:18:21.980 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 2>this because I think this is purely due to their

0:18:24.660 --> 0:18:28.220
<v Speaker 2>circumstance over the last few years where you don't really

0:18:28.270 --> 0:18:30.990
<v Speaker 2>have certainty financially, so you're waiting until the end of

0:18:31.010 --> 0:18:34.030
<v Speaker 2>the offseason. You get Nick Pavetta, who there's arguments about

0:18:34.050 --> 0:18:36.390
<v Speaker 2>who Nick Pavetta is as a pitcher. For $ 14 million,

0:18:36.750 --> 0:18:39.630
<v Speaker 2>he's phenomenal, and you get him for nothing in March.

0:18:40.990 --> 0:18:42.850
<v Speaker 2>And then same thing with Ty France. He's a spring

0:18:42.910 --> 0:18:45.590
<v Speaker 2>training invitation, someone the Mets allegedly kicked the tires on.

0:18:45.609 --> 0:18:48.859
<v Speaker 2>We already paid Jorge Polanco $ 40 million. Boy, Ty France

0:18:48.900 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 2>has had success. I mean, again, process-wise, if you would

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.060
<v Speaker 2>have just gone to the regular season last year with

0:18:54.100 --> 0:18:56.550
<v Speaker 2>Ty France and signed him for 5 mil on March 11th,

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Mets fans would have had pitchforks, but then it probably

0:18:59.540 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 2>would have worked out. Like, Ty France is right now

0:19:01.900 --> 0:19:04.719
<v Speaker 2>a critical player in a playoff run. He's just, but

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 2>that sometimes, good things go to them who wait. Good

0:19:07.770 --> 0:19:08.730
<v Speaker 2>things come to those who wait.

0:19:08.750 --> 0:19:09.350
<v Speaker 1>It's the patience.

0:19:09.450 --> 0:19:14.490
<v Speaker 2>And Another fair critique of David Stearns, and this is

0:19:14.530 --> 0:19:18.660
<v Speaker 2>where Joe from MassSpeak was dead on, but accidentally, not

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>knowing really seemingly how to work with the massive deep

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.220
<v Speaker 2>pockets of Steve Cohen. No clue. And those are the

0:19:25.260 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 2>contracts that have, over the last three years, have consistently

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.850
<v Speaker 2>done in David Stearns. It's the Montas, the Polanco, trying

0:19:31.890 --> 0:19:33.750
<v Speaker 2>to jump the market on a guy who you've now

0:19:33.770 --> 0:19:35.010
<v Speaker 2>evaluated as being your guy.

0:19:35.090 --> 0:19:36.690
<v Speaker 1>I can get better than market value for this guy.

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Seemingly not ever taking into account how injury-prone those exact

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.510
<v Speaker 2>players are, specifically Jorge Polanco and Frankie Matos. And then

0:19:44.530 --> 0:19:46.550
<v Speaker 2>you have $ 20 million in dead caps just sitting on

0:19:46.590 --> 0:19:47.670
<v Speaker 2>your roster with nothing to do.

0:19:48.070 --> 0:19:50.850
<v Speaker 1>It does feel like at times, and I... I guess

0:19:51.770 --> 0:19:54.070
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out more this year now with Falvey being

0:19:54.090 --> 0:19:55.869
<v Speaker 1>in the organization, some of the other guys, but it

0:19:55.910 --> 0:19:58.130
<v Speaker 1>feels like David Stearns at times is a little bit

0:19:58.150 --> 0:20:00.430
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum and gets to have his guys and

0:20:00.470 --> 0:20:02.950
<v Speaker 1>there's his guys and they're going to go until forever

0:20:03.060 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and ever and ever until you finally can't. Like even

0:20:06.590 --> 0:20:09.900
<v Speaker 1>some of the fringe guys that were getting so many opportunities.

0:20:09.940 --> 0:20:12.100
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's talk about 2024 for a second. Like

0:20:12.140 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>remember how much Joey Wendell and Zach short and those

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>guys were getting run like early in the year. And

0:20:17.700 --> 0:20:20.220
<v Speaker 1>you're like, they can't be the options. I'm not even

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>vouching that Jose Iglesias should have been up earlier. It's

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.959
<v Speaker 1>just like, these were the guys that you brought in

0:20:25.980 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and were like going to be on the 2024 Mets.

0:20:27.270 --> 0:20:29.550
<v Speaker 1>They're going to make an impact this year. You couldn't

0:20:29.570 --> 0:20:30.510
<v Speaker 1>possibly think that ever.

0:20:31.109 --> 0:20:33.090
<v Speaker 2>It's even funny to think about like the, the step

0:20:33.130 --> 0:20:35.689
<v Speaker 2>lather that we've taken like in a reverse direction.

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Such a reverse direction.

0:20:37.820 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Like, miracle run to the NLCS, signed Juan Soto, missed

0:20:41.340 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs on the last day of the season.

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.109
<v Speaker 1>Catastrophe season. Don't you know that's Juan Soto's fault? Why

0:20:46.150 --> 0:20:47.690
<v Speaker 1>is that the order this has gone in? Like, that

0:20:47.750 --> 0:20:48.830
<v Speaker 1>absolutely sucks.

0:20:48.850 --> 0:20:51.030
<v Speaker 2>Like, we just got dragged in the mud for that

0:20:51.070 --> 0:20:52.330
<v Speaker 2>to be the way this whole thing went down.

0:20:52.930 --> 0:20:54.609
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just look at the players. Look at the

0:20:54.630 --> 0:20:57.810
<v Speaker 1>players that have played for this team. Like, Francisco Lindor,

0:20:57.830 --> 0:20:59.510
<v Speaker 1>I know, had a down season this year, but he's

0:20:59.530 --> 0:21:01.460
<v Speaker 1>shown up. Like, when he's been there, he's shown up.

0:21:01.490 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can complain about the cumulative two

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.930
<v Speaker 1>seasons that Francisco Lindor's had. If you're complaining about Juan

0:21:06.950 --> 0:21:08.810
<v Speaker 1>Soto's season, you're a moron, so we're not even going

0:21:08.830 --> 0:21:11.950
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that much longer. The fringe guys haven't

0:21:11.970 --> 0:21:14.179
<v Speaker 1>stepped up at all. The fact that Alvarez's growth has

0:21:14.220 --> 0:21:16.619
<v Speaker 1>completely halted, I think, hurt this team a lot. I

0:21:16.660 --> 0:21:19.619
<v Speaker 1>think the fact that Brett Beatty kind of gave you

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.220
<v Speaker 1>nothing again this year absolutely hurts. Mark Vientos, as much

0:21:22.260 --> 0:21:25.179
<v Speaker 1>as I love to dog him, there was shine about him.

0:21:25.220 --> 0:21:28.380
<v Speaker 1>I think I saw the queen of Mets Twitter, Diana,

0:21:28.420 --> 0:21:30.770
<v Speaker 1>tweeting out about how this was like the day that

0:21:30.790 --> 0:21:34.409
<v Speaker 1>I think Passan was like Mark Vientos, budding star, like

0:21:34.470 --> 0:21:37.689
<v Speaker 1>after he hit the home run on Christopher Sanchez. No,

0:21:37.850 --> 0:21:41.270
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Christopher Sanchez, not LA yet. When

0:21:41.290 --> 0:21:42.030
<v Speaker 1>he hit the home run.

0:21:42.750 --> 0:21:45.050
<v Speaker 2>Did you just get a crazy notification through your computer?

0:21:45.450 --> 0:21:47.350
<v Speaker 1>Did I get a crazy notification through my computer?

0:21:47.590 --> 0:21:49.070
<v Speaker 2>I just got an insane noise. I thought it came

0:21:49.109 --> 0:21:51.100
<v Speaker 2>from your end. No, not me. I got nothing.

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Where'd that come from?

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 2>That baseball reference is giving me something crazy. Whatever.

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:58.340
<v Speaker 1>No worries. Regardless, there have been guys that I think

0:21:58.359 --> 0:21:59.700
<v Speaker 1>they thought were going to be a part of this core,

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>especially after what had happened in seasons, and then they

0:22:02.310 --> 0:22:06.950
<v Speaker 1>took major step backs. That's another problem with this. The

0:22:07.010 --> 0:22:11.010
<v Speaker 1>right guys are showing up. Everybody else is kind of like, eh, 50-50,

0:22:11.130 --> 0:22:13.050
<v Speaker 1>flip a coin. That's what we're saying, too.

0:22:13.130 --> 0:22:16.650
<v Speaker 2>Again, this core is actually in place. I don't know

0:22:16.790 --> 0:22:19.570
<v Speaker 2>if some people want shreds of positivity right now. It's like, again,

0:22:20.270 --> 0:22:25.970
<v Speaker 2>Having Soto, Lindor, Benj, Ewing, McClain, Scott heading into next year, like, damn,

0:22:25.990 --> 0:22:26.530
<v Speaker 2>those are dudes.

0:22:26.590 --> 0:22:27.030
<v Speaker 1>We got dudes.

0:22:27.090 --> 0:22:31.030
<v Speaker 2>Some homegrown superstars that we signed. Guys, the fact that

0:22:31.050 --> 0:22:33.170
<v Speaker 2>the fringe of this roster is so piss poor, all

0:22:33.190 --> 0:22:36.210
<v Speaker 2>of those middling contracts we've signed, not a single one's

0:22:36.250 --> 0:22:40.510
<v Speaker 2>worked out. It's awful. Like, it really is crazy and

0:22:40.550 --> 0:22:42.340
<v Speaker 2>ridiculous to look at this roster right now when it

0:22:42.430 --> 0:22:44.460
<v Speaker 2>kind of has to be remade again.

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>In some way, somehow. I don't know how you can

0:22:47.220 --> 0:22:49.100
<v Speaker 1>clean out a team like he did and do it again.

0:22:49.700 --> 0:22:54.470
<v Speaker 2>Not even counting bullpen, you need like five new regulars,

0:22:54.530 --> 0:23:00.230
<v Speaker 2>including like regular position players and rotation caliber starting pitchers.

0:23:00.250 --> 0:23:02.550
<v Speaker 1>You need all of that. Like to make Mets fans

0:23:02.609 --> 0:23:04.959
<v Speaker 1>feel okay, and I'm going to combine this all together here.

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to be the Joe Famasa Piqua versus

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the people who listen to Mets stuff. It's going to

0:23:09.340 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>be all Mets fans here. Got to address first base.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.590
<v Speaker 1>Got to address second base. That's two positions on the infield.

0:23:16.619 --> 0:23:18.619
<v Speaker 1>50-50 on third base. And I'll tell you this, I

0:23:18.660 --> 0:23:20.070
<v Speaker 1>think there are some Mets fans who are right to

0:23:20.090 --> 0:23:22.190
<v Speaker 1>be like, Bo Bichette, I don't feel great about at

0:23:22.250 --> 0:23:25.950
<v Speaker 1>third base. I'll say this, I think that those two positions,

0:23:25.990 --> 0:23:29.619
<v Speaker 1>first base and second base, will not be very widely addressed. Oh,

0:23:29.730 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so either. But I think from a

0:23:32.660 --> 0:23:35.330
<v Speaker 1>conceptual standpoint, you can be like, We should probably need

0:23:35.350 --> 0:23:37.730
<v Speaker 1>to get better at those positions. I think that's fair.

0:23:37.750 --> 0:23:41.430
<v Speaker 1>Need better baseball players. Need better baseball players. And then

0:23:41.609 --> 0:23:45.070
<v Speaker 1>we still need a DH. One of the easiest positions

0:23:45.090 --> 0:23:47.030
<v Speaker 1>to fill in all of Major League Baseball. Mets are like,

0:23:47.430 --> 0:23:50.010
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Throw anybody out there. I kind of

0:23:50.030 --> 0:23:51.230
<v Speaker 1>wish we had someone that could mash.

0:23:51.910 --> 0:23:52.850
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe Polanco.

0:23:53.410 --> 0:23:55.590
<v Speaker 1>Get that heel back. Oh, yeah, good hitter. Get that

0:23:55.609 --> 0:23:57.820
<v Speaker 1>heel healthy. Think we ever see him play again? I

0:23:59.740 --> 0:24:00.420
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to try.

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I think they're damn well going to try and make

0:24:01.820 --> 0:24:05.890
<v Speaker 2>him play again. At least he was in... the clubhouse

0:24:05.910 --> 0:24:08.070
<v Speaker 2>and in the dugout the whole end of the season. Yeah,

0:24:08.090 --> 0:24:10.010
<v Speaker 2>but he's not dogging it. It doesn't seem like his

0:24:10.070 --> 0:24:11.990
<v Speaker 2>teammates have turned on him. So the fact that if

0:24:12.010 --> 0:24:13.950
<v Speaker 2>he has a good attitude, I feel like there's going

0:24:13.970 --> 0:24:16.690
<v Speaker 2>to be some Jorge Polanco played appearances in 2027.

0:24:16.690 --> 0:24:18.250
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the loosest. I'll bring that one.

0:24:18.270 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 2>But even, like, we have to still obligatory mention, like,

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:22.940
<v Speaker 2>how bad, just because I just want to cover bases here.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 2>This isn't even good in the timeline of the episode.

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.860
<v Speaker 2>How bad the 2025 trade deadline was, too. Like, that's

0:24:27.900 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 2>something that needs to be recognized and, like, bad. David

0:24:31.700 --> 0:24:34.369
<v Speaker 2>Stern's conversations. I think half of that, Kind of wasn't

0:24:34.410 --> 0:24:35.970
<v Speaker 2>his fault. I think some of it kind of was.

0:24:36.050 --> 0:24:38.450
<v Speaker 2>Like the Ryan Helsey thing. Ryan Helsey forgetting how to pitch.

0:24:38.910 --> 0:24:41.850
<v Speaker 1>Bad break. Bad break. Although knowing that he was tipping

0:24:41.890 --> 0:24:45.139
<v Speaker 1>pitches and then it seemed like they didn't fix it.

0:24:45.970 --> 0:24:50.100
<v Speaker 2>And then giving him this monster entrance and then he

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 2>can't handle it. Then you have to undo the entrance music.

0:24:52.380 --> 0:24:54.220
<v Speaker 2>Then you reboot the entrance music in the sixth inning.

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Then you undo it again because he continues to suck.

0:24:56.020 --> 0:24:57.659
<v Speaker 2>The whole thing was just a fucking catastrophe. And then

0:24:58.140 --> 0:25:01.650
<v Speaker 2>talking about process-wise, like understanding when guys possibly can't. do

0:25:01.730 --> 0:25:03.250
<v Speaker 2>it in New York, then you go out for all

0:25:03.270 --> 0:25:04.730
<v Speaker 2>these guys you think can do it in New York, again,

0:25:04.850 --> 0:25:07.310
<v Speaker 2>back to trying to get your guy's argument, going over

0:25:07.950 --> 0:25:10.540
<v Speaker 2>market kind of heavily, putting more pressure on players than

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:15.820
<v Speaker 2>there already was anyway, and Machette, Polanco, yeah, it's, God,

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:16.540
<v Speaker 2>it's fucking rough.

0:25:16.940 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even just seeing, like, how Paul Blackburn's been

0:25:18.820 --> 0:25:21.270
<v Speaker 1>great in a relief role, it's kind of frustrating, even

0:25:21.290 --> 0:25:23.129
<v Speaker 1>though I fucking hate him, but, like... Phenomenal in a

0:25:23.150 --> 0:25:25.290
<v Speaker 1>relief role, I mean, he has spinal fluid leak. One

0:25:25.310 --> 0:25:26.929
<v Speaker 1>of the things that he, like, hated about the Mets,

0:25:26.950 --> 0:25:29.490
<v Speaker 1>he was like, he's kind of just jerking me around

0:25:29.570 --> 0:25:30.790
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know if I'm a starter I don't

0:25:30.810 --> 0:25:32.410
<v Speaker 1>know if I'm a reliever did that happen to somebody

0:25:32.450 --> 0:25:34.010
<v Speaker 1>in 2026 this year James.

0:25:34.330 --> 0:25:37.410
<v Speaker 2>Back to communication not really treating the team or being

0:25:37.450 --> 0:25:39.260
<v Speaker 2>on the same page with coaches and stuff like that

0:25:39.340 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 2>and like again shreds of hope coming into the season

0:25:42.500 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 2>having pure coaching consistency whether or not that we as

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.220
<v Speaker 2>Mets fans like those coaches don't like those coaches at

0:25:49.260 --> 0:25:51.860
<v Speaker 2>least the fact that there's consistency last year it felt

0:25:51.900 --> 0:25:55.340
<v Speaker 2>like as you were changing everything player wise also changing

0:25:55.380 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 2>everything coaching wise it's just We made the joke last

0:25:58.859 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 2>spring training. They're doing icebreakers. They're introducing themselves. And it's

0:26:02.260 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 2>a spring training where half the team wasn't there because

0:26:04.060 --> 0:26:05.550
<v Speaker 2>of the World Baseball Classic.

0:26:06.090 --> 0:26:08.690
<v Speaker 1>The whole thing was so disjointed. And it was being

0:26:08.730 --> 0:26:11.330
<v Speaker 1>led by someone who was incapable of being a Major

0:26:11.350 --> 0:26:14.770
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball manager in Carlos Mendoza, as well as being

0:26:14.810 --> 0:26:17.390
<v Speaker 1>given the worst situation ever for a guy who can't

0:26:17.430 --> 0:26:19.970
<v Speaker 1>handle it. He was like a little ant under the

0:26:20.070 --> 0:26:21.990
<v Speaker 1>magnifying glass. It's just like, how hot can it get

0:26:22.170 --> 0:26:23.530
<v Speaker 1>on you before you actually die?

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.260
<v Speaker 2>And, like, partially fair criticism, but the player had a

0:26:26.300 --> 0:26:28.070
<v Speaker 2>bit of a wonky spring training as well due to

0:26:28.090 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 2>the injury.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Like, Francisco Lindor.

0:26:29.310 --> 0:26:31.139
<v Speaker 2>Had to be a guy who was a uniting factor

0:26:31.180 --> 0:26:33.730
<v Speaker 2>in that. Whether or not he succeeded in that or

0:26:33.770 --> 0:26:35.290
<v Speaker 2>failed in that, I don't know how quickly this team

0:26:35.330 --> 0:26:37.129
<v Speaker 2>came together. Also, not an easy thing to put on

0:26:37.170 --> 0:26:39.629
<v Speaker 2>a player's plate when they're trying to rehab themselves from

0:26:39.670 --> 0:26:42.889
<v Speaker 2>a serious injury that possibly could have impacted them the

0:26:42.910 --> 0:26:45.629
<v Speaker 2>whole season, the broken handmaid bone, and followed by another injury. Like,

0:26:45.690 --> 0:26:48.930
<v Speaker 2>it just, the whole thing was wacky, weird, not so good.

0:26:49.230 --> 0:26:52.550
<v Speaker 2>But should we give, I don't know, five minutes of,

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 2>like some good things, like... Hopium?

0:26:56.140 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Some light hopium.

0:26:57.340 --> 0:26:59.140
<v Speaker 2>Getting back better than you gave up for the Freddie

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Peralta trade, I think is good.

0:27:00.940 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Yes, definitely good. That showed good process.

0:27:03.180 --> 0:27:04.610
<v Speaker 2>Lots of people around the league are like, I would

0:27:04.630 --> 0:27:07.730
<v Speaker 2>rather have Millie and Petrae, Gary Gilhill, and.

0:27:08.090 --> 0:27:11.190
<v Speaker 1>Aiden Smith. Aiden Smith than Jet Williams and Brandon Sprote

0:27:11.210 --> 0:27:11.550
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:27:11.750 --> 0:27:12.230
<v Speaker 2>Totally fair.

0:27:12.570 --> 0:27:16.620
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Sprote's looking... lost on another. I honestly can't believe

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:18.260
<v Speaker 1>that the Brewers can't make him even to a decent

0:27:18.300 --> 0:27:20.100
<v Speaker 1>reliever right now, which is kind of crazy. And then

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.580
<v Speaker 1>Jet Williams, bad season. Not a good year. Sad for Jet.

0:27:23.619 --> 0:27:24.050
<v Speaker 2>Love Jet.

0:27:24.550 --> 0:27:25.230
<v Speaker 1>Very bad season.

0:27:25.330 --> 0:27:28.609
<v Speaker 2>Similarly, you trade a rental in Clay Holmes for Jefferson Rojas,

0:27:28.690 --> 0:27:30.590
<v Speaker 2>one of the top prospects in the Cubs organization.

0:27:31.090 --> 0:27:32.590
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson Rojas goes.

0:27:32.410 --> 0:27:34.930
<v Speaker 2>Ballistic for the few months that he's in your organization. Now,

0:27:35.190 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 2>added to the 40-man roster, you have a player, a

0:27:37.410 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 2>young player, going to be 22 years old next season

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.940
<v Speaker 2>who looks like a potential impact major leaguer at positions

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 2>of need immediately.

0:27:44.190 --> 0:27:47.989
<v Speaker 1>Again, that's how you can save a lost season. Those

0:27:48.030 --> 0:27:50.709
<v Speaker 1>are good things right there. Other good things. They've drafted

0:27:50.750 --> 0:27:53.270
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. In the David Stearns era, the drafting's been

0:27:53.950 --> 0:27:57.450
<v Speaker 1>quite exceptional. Like Mitch Voigt being our first-round pick last year,

0:27:57.590 --> 0:27:59.859
<v Speaker 1>already one of our five best prospects, a guy who's

0:27:59.880 --> 0:28:01.889
<v Speaker 1>going to be a fringe top 100 going into the season,

0:28:02.190 --> 0:28:04.380
<v Speaker 1>probably cracks it if he continues to play shortstop like

0:28:04.390 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>he has and hit like he has. That was a

0:28:06.619 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>guy that the Mets are getting immense value for at

0:28:08.820 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the number 38 pick when their financial situation has given

0:28:12.220 --> 0:28:15.400
<v Speaker 1>them all the disadvantages in the draft. Every single draft

0:28:15.420 --> 0:28:18.139
<v Speaker 1>disadvantage possible, including signing Bo Bichette last year to a

0:28:18.180 --> 0:28:21.139
<v Speaker 1>one-year contract that hopefully he opts into after the comments

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that he made.

0:28:21.740 --> 0:28:24.790
<v Speaker 2>But I wonder if the Mets go hard after the QO.

0:28:24.910 --> 0:28:27.010
<v Speaker 2>I've been arguing with people about this recently for QO

0:28:27.030 --> 0:28:29.350
<v Speaker 2>guys this year. I don't know who's going to have

0:28:29.390 --> 0:28:31.350
<v Speaker 2>them yet, of course. Looking at the board, I don't

0:28:31.369 --> 0:28:33.409
<v Speaker 2>know how elite of players will have them. Adrian Morejon

0:28:33.430 --> 0:28:34.670
<v Speaker 2>is a guy who I think will have it. Trevor

0:28:34.690 --> 0:28:36.090
<v Speaker 2>Rodgers is a guy who I think will have it.

0:28:36.090 --> 0:28:39.260
<v Speaker 2>I think the Mets will be shopping in that mid-rotation

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 2>pitcher bucket again. And I do wonder if they could

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:44.700
<v Speaker 2>have miracles with their draft this year, if Carson Bench

0:28:44.740 --> 0:28:46.580
<v Speaker 2>can possibly siphon Rookie of the Year, which I still

0:28:46.620 --> 0:28:49.140
<v Speaker 2>don't think is likely, if you can win the lottery.

0:28:49.870 --> 0:28:51.770
<v Speaker 2>When I say win the lottery, maintain a top six

0:28:51.810 --> 0:28:53.950
<v Speaker 2>pick and not get a dock ten spots and lose

0:28:53.990 --> 0:28:56.210
<v Speaker 2>that draft pool money. I do wonder if this year

0:28:56.230 --> 0:28:57.830
<v Speaker 2>the Mets have to pull back the reins and be like,

0:28:57.850 --> 0:28:59.530
<v Speaker 2>all right, we can't sign a QO guy this year.

0:28:59.550 --> 0:29:03.260
<v Speaker 2>We actually have to have a possible franchise-altering draft class.

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.260
<v Speaker 1>Probably can't. Probably can't sign a QO guy this year.

0:29:07.140 --> 0:29:09.959
<v Speaker 2>And also, don't you have to really prioritize anything you

0:29:09.980 --> 0:29:11.540
<v Speaker 2>think is going to make this major league team better?

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.380
<v Speaker 1>Hasn't this front office done that year over year? Yeah,

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you just go get Tarek Skubal.

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 2>But if I'm saying, if you end up missing Tarek Skubal,

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 2>then where do you shop? I mean, if I'm Tarek Skubal,

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:24.790
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, who's going to contest? Someone get close to

0:29:24.830 --> 0:29:26.890
<v Speaker 2>this offer? Can anybody get close to this Mets offer, please?

0:29:26.910 --> 0:29:27.930
<v Speaker 1>It probably will be the Dodgers.

0:29:28.770 --> 0:29:30.610
<v Speaker 2>It possibly will be the Dodgers. I don't know. Maybe

0:29:30.630 --> 0:29:32.770
<v Speaker 2>the Cubs finally sack up and admit how much money

0:29:32.790 --> 0:29:34.170
<v Speaker 2>they have and how much they need a guy like that.

0:29:35.210 --> 0:29:38.230
<v Speaker 1>They will never. The Ricketts, never. That's not happening.

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so either, but those are decisions that

0:29:40.620 --> 0:29:41.180
<v Speaker 2>will need to be made.

0:29:41.500 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Of the guys who will get a QO, I'm not

0:29:43.100 --> 0:29:44.700
<v Speaker 1>particularly interested in almost any of them.

0:29:45.940 --> 0:29:47.620
<v Speaker 2>We have to see who's going to be. I think

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.620
<v Speaker 2>the Mets will be interested in both Rodgers and Marjon.

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:51.540
<v Speaker 2>I think they both will get QOs. I'm not sure

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.860
<v Speaker 2>who in that pitching bucket. Unless they wind up making trades.

0:29:54.900 --> 0:29:57.260
<v Speaker 2>We did some 40-man stuff the other day. Are you

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:02.260
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to pair... Wenninger, and I don't

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:03.959
<v Speaker 2>know if they want to trade Ryan.

0:30:03.980 --> 0:30:06.700
<v Speaker 1>Logan Gilbert's probably going to be available. Logan Gilbert will

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.850
<v Speaker 1>be available. Tyler Glass now will be available. Bylo Nicodolo

0:30:09.870 --> 0:30:13.090
<v Speaker 1>will be available. Will Joe Ryan ever be available? Joe

0:30:13.130 --> 0:30:13.710
<v Speaker 1>Ryan's probably.

0:30:13.810 --> 0:30:15.690
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it seems like the ownership group is now

0:30:15.730 --> 0:30:17.570
<v Speaker 2>committed to saying they want to maintain.

0:30:17.630 --> 0:30:18.490
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Falvey's here.

0:30:18.550 --> 0:30:20.790
<v Speaker 2>Falvey was, I think, part of that front office that

0:30:21.150 --> 0:30:22.630
<v Speaker 2>traded for Joe Ryan when that trade happened.

0:30:22.650 --> 0:30:23.490
<v Speaker 1>I wish Pablo Lopez was healthy.

0:30:23.910 --> 0:30:26.380
<v Speaker 2>Kill for Pablo Lopez. He's too much of a leader

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 2>in that team. He's the guy there. That's a weird situation, again,

0:30:29.500 --> 0:30:33.660
<v Speaker 2>where a pitcher is a leader. Also, some shreds of positivity.

0:30:34.090 --> 0:30:36.530
<v Speaker 2>We saw legit bullpen options emerge at the end of

0:30:36.550 --> 0:30:39.510
<v Speaker 2>the season. They traded almost every single reliever, and they

0:30:39.550 --> 0:30:42.570
<v Speaker 2>got relievers out of thin air. That's supposed to be

0:30:42.590 --> 0:30:44.130
<v Speaker 2>what we thought would be happening in year three for

0:30:44.150 --> 0:30:48.250
<v Speaker 2>this regime. Almost every guy we traded pitched poorly for

0:30:48.270 --> 0:30:49.510
<v Speaker 2>the other teams that they went to.

0:30:50.010 --> 0:30:52.270
<v Speaker 1>Except one of them. Except one big one. Except one

0:30:52.290 --> 0:30:54.270
<v Speaker 1>of them. But almost every single guy that we got

0:30:54.330 --> 0:30:58.060
<v Speaker 1>rid of performed horrendously in the second half. Terribly.

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.310
<v Speaker 2>We couldn't be looking at a thing. We thought this

0:31:00.350 --> 0:31:02.490
<v Speaker 2>was going to happen last year before the late December,

0:31:02.530 --> 0:31:04.510
<v Speaker 2>early January flurries, that we were just going to trust

0:31:04.530 --> 0:31:07.990
<v Speaker 2>young players, work around the core, and then probably still

0:31:08.070 --> 0:31:10.170
<v Speaker 2>have enough talent because of how good our top is

0:31:10.210 --> 0:31:11.970
<v Speaker 2>and how good our young players are to still be

0:31:11.990 --> 0:31:14.630
<v Speaker 2>able to sneak towards a 90-win projection, which is what

0:31:14.690 --> 0:31:16.570
<v Speaker 2>it felt like last year, again, once all those moves happened.

0:31:16.590 --> 0:31:18.130
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know what's going to happen this offseason.

0:31:18.410 --> 0:31:20.850
<v Speaker 2>I think I still trust David Stearns a relative amount.

0:31:20.970 --> 0:31:22.690
<v Speaker 2>I understand if you guys don't, I will not tell

0:31:22.730 --> 0:31:22.969
<v Speaker 2>you to.

0:31:23.620 --> 0:31:27.739
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say I'm going to be the differentiator here.

0:31:27.940 --> 0:31:29.459
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust him right now. He's got to earn

0:31:29.510 --> 0:31:32.030
<v Speaker 1>my trust back. That's totally fair. I don't think that

0:31:32.110 --> 0:31:34.590
<v Speaker 1>I can go to sleep at night feeling good saying

0:31:34.630 --> 0:31:40.310
<v Speaker 1>I trust David Stearns based on, again, when everyone around

0:31:40.330 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you feels like it's a crazy decision and then it

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>ends up being a crazy decision, I'm like, is he

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:45.540
<v Speaker 1>an idiot?

0:31:47.500 --> 0:31:49.180
<v Speaker 2>What I mostly trust are the things that are happening

0:31:49.260 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 2>in the organization that They've been put in place.

0:31:52.020 --> 0:31:54.890
<v Speaker 1>That I trust. I just don't know if I trust decision-making,

0:31:55.010 --> 0:31:59.110
<v Speaker 1>which I know like 90% of his job. That's a fun...

0:31:59.210 --> 0:32:00.430
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Yes.

0:32:01.030 --> 0:32:03.410
<v Speaker 2>You think Major League roster is 90% of the president,

0:32:03.470 --> 0:32:04.130
<v Speaker 2>the po-po's job?

0:32:04.570 --> 0:32:06.970
<v Speaker 1>I think if that's what gets you fired, that is

0:32:07.010 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the majority of your job. And Major League performance is

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>what gets you fired.

0:32:10.620 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 2>What's kept and not fired is probably all these underlying

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 2>things right now.

0:32:13.140 --> 0:32:16.580
<v Speaker 1>Steve Cohen? Yeah. That's the other variable in some of

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:17.660
<v Speaker 1>these moves that we're talking about.

0:32:17.700 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Like.

0:32:18.860 --> 0:32:21.860
<v Speaker 1>Does Steve meddle? Does he meddle? I think that he

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>meddles differently. I think that there was meddling with Carlos Mendoza.

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I really do. I don't think that anybody on the

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:32.739
<v Speaker 1>planet who's ever truly been inside a baseball organization could

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>have ever done what they did to Carlos Mendoza. That's

0:32:34.940 --> 0:32:37.610
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that I'll give him as a positive

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.870
<v Speaker 1>towards him as a manager was he got did so

0:32:40.930 --> 0:32:44.370
<v Speaker 1>dirty this year with how they fired all his friends

0:32:44.390 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>who were like, figure it out. asshole. Good luck.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:47.460 --> 0:32:49.540
<v Speaker 1>Good luck. Let's see how you do. And then he failed.

0:32:49.860 --> 0:32:52.260
<v Speaker 1>And then they kept him around for way longer than

0:32:52.300 --> 0:32:55.140
<v Speaker 1>he should have once he was miserably failing. And then

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it basically took the Mets having a nationally embarrassing game

0:32:58.220 --> 0:33:00.100
<v Speaker 1>to be like, you know, we can finally let him go.

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.420
<v Speaker 1>That to me felt like a little bit of Steve

0:33:02.460 --> 0:33:06.380
<v Speaker 1>Cohen meddling. I don't know. It's interesting. You know, he

0:33:06.420 --> 0:33:08.630
<v Speaker 1>meddled for Pete Alonzo one off season, but then didn't.

0:33:08.870 --> 0:33:11.930
<v Speaker 1>So it's another thing to talk about, which is confusing

0:33:11.990 --> 0:33:14.650
<v Speaker 1>about the logistics sometimes of how this fan base talks

0:33:14.690 --> 0:33:15.570
<v Speaker 1>about the organization.

0:33:16.170 --> 0:33:18.370
<v Speaker 2>Steve Cohen gets credit for Juan Solo, but not blamed

0:33:18.390 --> 0:33:22.350
<v Speaker 2>for Boba Shett. Yeah. That's very pick and choosy. Those

0:33:22.390 --> 0:33:24.770
<v Speaker 2>feel like similar conceptual contracts.

0:33:25.030 --> 0:33:29.330
<v Speaker 1>Especially because that was, what, within 24 hours of Kyle

0:33:29.350 --> 0:33:31.870
<v Speaker 1>Tucker seeming like he was going to sign with the

0:33:31.910 --> 0:33:34.110
<v Speaker 1>New York Mets, Steve Cohen being shocked to find out

0:33:34.150 --> 0:33:36.170
<v Speaker 1>that he didn't, and then all of a sudden, Boba

0:33:36.190 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Shett's on this team? 24? You mean 11 hours? Yeah,

0:33:40.220 --> 0:33:43.060
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're saying. Within the same day, basically.

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:46.300
<v Speaker 1>And Bo Bichette's a name that I think Steve Cohen

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:46.700
<v Speaker 1>would know.

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Also, you need a guy, you need a bat, you

0:33:51.460 --> 0:33:52.260
<v Speaker 2>need to fill that spot.

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And he doesn't really fit the mold of David Stern's

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>players at all, Bo Bichette. Not in slightly.

0:33:58.660 --> 0:34:01.660
<v Speaker 2>And again, that contract, the players' union will stamp that

0:34:01.700 --> 0:34:02.580
<v Speaker 2>contract to the wall.

0:34:02.700 --> 0:34:04.380
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the greatest of all time.

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:05.420
<v Speaker 2>Unbelievable.

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:07.950
<v Speaker 1>The guy who hit free agency first, what was it,

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Kurt Flood? Is that his name? Yeah, fought for it.

0:34:11.140 --> 0:34:13.569
<v Speaker 1>That's the greatest one, and then Bo Bichette's number two.

0:34:14.250 --> 0:34:16.290
<v Speaker 2>Kurt Flood had to fight for free agency. He never

0:34:16.370 --> 0:34:20.609
<v Speaker 2>really destroyed the reserve clause. Got ridiculed for it. Ended

0:34:20.630 --> 0:34:22.430
<v Speaker 2>up living in Amsterdam for a while because they just

0:34:22.489 --> 0:34:24.009
<v Speaker 2>got baseball blackballed. What?

0:34:24.070 --> 0:34:25.549
<v Speaker 1>And then Catfish Haunter got.

0:34:25.469 --> 0:34:27.790
<v Speaker 2>To reap the rewards of it. There we go. And

0:34:27.810 --> 0:34:29.630
<v Speaker 2>who was that pitcher on the Angels? What was his name?

0:34:30.310 --> 0:34:31.669
<v Speaker 2>The other first real free agent.

0:34:32.450 --> 0:34:35.390
<v Speaker 1>Frank Tanana. No. Okay.

0:34:35.430 --> 0:34:37.089
<v Speaker 2>He was nice, but he had a short-lived prime. What

0:34:37.110 --> 0:34:39.229
<v Speaker 2>the hell was his name? What was this guy's name?

0:34:40.050 --> 0:34:41.830
<v Speaker 1>No. AI's ass.

0:34:41.850 --> 0:34:42.410
<v Speaker 2>Stop Google.

0:34:42.430 --> 0:34:44.030
<v Speaker 1>Stop giving me the AI stuff. Gemini?

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.899
<v Speaker 2>No, maybe it wasn't the Angels.

0:34:47.940 --> 0:34:48.430
<v Speaker 1>I'll figure it out.

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:53.220
<v Speaker 2>I'll get it later today. It's going to cry my gears. But, yeah,

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:53.670
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:34:54.150 --> 0:34:56.910
<v Speaker 1>Do you trust David Stearns? No. All you guys out there?

0:34:57.310 --> 0:34:58.969
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't right now. He's got to earn

0:34:58.989 --> 0:35:01.690
<v Speaker 1>that trust. Fair. Fool me once, shame on me. Fool

0:35:01.710 --> 0:35:04.410
<v Speaker 1>me twice, shame on you. Fool me, can't get fooled again.

0:35:04.670 --> 0:35:06.370
<v Speaker 1>Let us know in the comments what you guys are thinking.

0:35:06.410 --> 0:35:08.910
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe to Mets Up over on YouTube. You can follow

0:35:08.950 --> 0:35:12.250
<v Speaker 1>James on social media at James Shiano. It was Andy Messerschmidt.

0:35:12.270 --> 0:35:14.370
<v Speaker 1>That was the one I couldn't remember. It's a good name, Messerschmidt.

0:35:14.390 --> 0:35:18.050
<v Speaker 1>You don't see Messerschmidt in the league anymore. Dodgers, not Angels. Damn.

0:35:18.090 --> 0:35:20.980
<v Speaker 1>Although we got a Wiesenberger. We got a Wiesenberger. He

0:35:21.020 --> 0:35:21.980
<v Speaker 1>was in the Angels' earliest career.

0:35:22.020 --> 0:35:22.540
<v Speaker 2>That's what it was.

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:23.259
<v Speaker 1>All right, there we go.

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Good recall.

0:35:23.860 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Good recall. I'm Giraffe Nick Mark. You can follow me there.

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.049
<v Speaker 1>And that's it. Can't trust David Stearns. We'll see you

0:35:29.070 --> 0:35:31.149
<v Speaker 1>guys next time. Bye. Later, guys. Go Mets.