WEBVTT - Measles: The Cancer Killer?

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought I knew what I needed to know about

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>what happens when you get measles. You get a fever

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and a rash. Maybe you get very sick. If you're

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>really unlucky, you die. But chances are you get measles,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you get better, and that's the end of it as

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it happens.

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 2>I was wrong.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I did not know what I needed to know about measles,

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>because a recent discovery has blown open our whole idea

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of what the measles virus does to our bodies.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 3>The world thought that measles was done being discovered, and

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 3>then boom, all of a sudden, there's this new idea

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 3>of something that really had massive, massive consequences on humans

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 3>that we didn't even realize.

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jacob Goldstein and this is Incubation, a show about viruses.

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Today on the show, how measles attacks your immune system

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and how researchers are trying to use measles to cure cancer.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>My guest for the first half of today's show is

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Michael Minna. He's an epidemiologist slash immunologist slash physician, and

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of a measles superfan. He did a lot

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of work we'll talk about today while he was a

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>professor at Harvard. He's now chief scientific officer at a

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>company called Emed. We started by talking about a surprising

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that happened after the measles vaccine was introduced in

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen sixties. As more and more kids were vaccinated

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>against measles, the rate at which kids were dying of

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>infectious disease went down way more than anybody expected. It

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>went down so much that it couldn't be explained by

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>measles alone.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 3>After the vaccine was introduced, we saw market reductions in

0:01:54.560 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 3>childhood mortality overall following the vaccine, which drove a a

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of questions. Why did that happen? Is it the

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 3>vaccine actually acting directly to somehow prevent other infections, or

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>is there something else at play?

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>Even if zero people died of measles, Even if zero

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>children died of measles, you wouldn't get that large of

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a reduction immortality, Right, some weird thing is going.

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 4>On, that's exactly right.

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.519
<v Speaker 1>Weird good thing, weird usually.

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 3>That's right, A very weird good thing was going on.

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So now we have this interesting kind of happy mystery

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in a way, Why are so few children dying of

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>infectious disease after the rollout of the measles vaccine. What

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>do you do to try and figure out what's going on?

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 3>We said, well, maybe it's because measles had detrimental effects

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 3>on somebody's immune memory that might be putting them at

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 3>risk for other stuff, other infections, And so what we

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 3>did was we said, well, if that's the case, then

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 3>if we look at a lot of data, we map

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 3>the numbers of cases of measles to the numbers of

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 3>deaths from other things besides measles from year to year.

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 3>And what we found was profoundly predictive. Is if you

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 3>asked what were the number of measles cases in nineteen

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 3>forty nine and what were the numbers of deaths from

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 3>non measles infections from nineteen forty nine, nineteen fifty and

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 3>nineteen fifty one. When you occrued all three years, it

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 3>became extraordinarily predictive of how many children would die over

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the next three years of non measles infectious related deaths.

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>So, just to be clear, what you found is that

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>when there's a measle's outbreak in one year, the rate

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>at which kids died from other infectious diseases went up

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in the next few years.

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly right.

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>So you used in your answer just there this phrase

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that I just want to spend a moment on immune memory.

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>What is immune memory.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Immune memory is very similar to our regular memory. All

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 3>of our body is memories, whether it be muscle memory,

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 3>brain memory, or immune memory is stored in cells. The

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 3>way that immune memory works is when you bump up

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 3>against a pathogen, as let's say, a virus like measles

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>or coronavirus, whatever it might be, your body actually sees it,

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 3>it recognizes that virus, it learns from it, and it

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 3>actually remembers it in B cells and T cells and

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 3>plasma cells. And that's how our immune system works in

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 3>terms of developing immune memory and utilizing it to combat

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 3>infections that we see in the future.

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Is what you're finding that in some way measles is

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:53.239
<v Speaker 1>attacking the kid's immune memory. Is that the hypothesis that follows.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly the hypothesis that follows. For example, if if

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 3>a six year old got measles, then maybe that measles

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 3>infection could destroy some of the immune memory the defenses

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 3>that that child gained over the last six years and therefore,

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 3>when they are seven or eight years old, are actually

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 3>more vulnerable than they otherwise would have been to those

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 3>infections that they gained the immunity to when they were

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 3>two or three.

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So, okay, you have this hypothesis, how do you test it?

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you investigate what's really going on?

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 3>There's a long, rich history of how to predict where

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 3>measles is going to go next. It's actually famous for

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 3>how predictive it is because it is so infectious that

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 3>you just need to know how many people are vaccinated

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>in a community, and if there's any measles anywhere in

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 3>the region, you can expect that pretty soon at below

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 3>certain levels, there's going to be an outbreak.

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Below certain levels of vaccination.

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 3>That's right, and that's why measles is considered the canary

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 3>and the coal mine for vaccine rates. Literally the thing

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 3>that pops up on the radar when you say who's

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 3>what communities are having trouble vaccinating their population, and boom,

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>if you see measles, you know they're having trouble vaccinating

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 3>their populations. And so what we can do is we

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 3>can leverage everything we know about measles epidemiology to help

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 3>identify where might outbreaks happen, And that's exactly what Rick

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 3>de Swart and his team did. They are in the Netherlands.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 3>He's at Erasmus which is in Rotterdam, and so he

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 3>was able to say, hey, right in our backyard, there's

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 3>a community that for religious reasons, they chose not to

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 3>vaccinate their children against measles. So they said, well, if

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to get a vaccine, would you be

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 3>interested or willing to have us just draw a little

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 3>sample of blood from your kids today and should measles

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 3>catch up to them in the future, could we come

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>back and draw another sample of blood.

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>You have the before measles blood samples, and you have

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>from the same children the after measles blood samples. We

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>have everything ready to go. What happened there was a.

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Big outbreak, and almost immediately we start seeing that we

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 3>can measure all of these antibodies in the blood samples.

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 3>And then when we actually look at the blood samples

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 3>from right before the kids got measles to those same

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 3>kids blood samples that they collected after, we saw market

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 3>reductions not just in a couple antibodies, but some kids

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 3>lost eighty percent of all of the diversity of their

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 3>antibodies that existed in that blood sample before they got measles,

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>and we compared it. We said, well, maybe that's normal.

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 3>So we looked at kids who had gotten vaccinated for measles.

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 3>We look the kids who just had no infections, and

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 3>what we saw was the average person with from any

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 3>two time points, there'd be like five percent difference in

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 3>their overall antibody repertoire. But the measles kids, the kids

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 3>who got measles lost anywhere from twenty percent to eighty

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 3>percent of their whole immunological memory pool. This is the

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:12.679
<v Speaker 3>whole lifetime of immune memory protection that they've spent years

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 3>building up and building up, just poof wiped away because

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 3>of this measles infection and these kids. What that means

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 3>is now, across millions and millions of kids who were

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 3>before the vaccines, almost every child got measles. And so

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 3>at that scale, when you have so many people getting

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 3>measles and this effect happening, which we call immunological amnesia,

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 3>essentially they forgot their body, forgot because of the infection

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 3>the immune memories that they formed before the infection. What

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 3>that means is that you have all of these kids

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 3>that are more susceptible to other infectious diseases. So most

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 3>most kids would survive. But it turned out that of

0:08:55.480 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 3>those kids who did die from other things, about half

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 3>of those deaths could be attributed to the immune amnesia

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 3>associated with measles.

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Is there something particularly insidious if that happens at a

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>population level? If you imagine a group of people in

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>the absence of a vaccine entirely, where it's like, not

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>only is each kid more vulnerable, but because all the

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>other kids are more vulnerable, everybody is more vulnerable. Is

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>there something like that that happens?

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 3>I am so happy you asked that question.

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>You're welcome.

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 3>So yes, it is. It's a much much harder thing

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 3>to measure.

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's sort of like the reverse of herd

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>immunity in some weird broad spectrum way, right.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 3>So what's so interesting that you bring that up? Because

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 3>before my measles work, I was working on influenza and

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 3>its impacts on other bacterial infections, And during my PhD,

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 3>I coined a term called generalized herd effects, and I

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 3>explicitly didn't call it herd immuni because maybe it's not

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 3>going to reduce things but maybe you could exacerbate things.

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, how about herd vulnerability? I want the opposite. What's

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of herding units?

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly. Herd vulnerability is a great term, and so

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 3>the idea there as well. If you have a pathogen

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 3>that's impacting your susceptibility to a lot of other pathogens,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 3>you could, you know, create a herd vulnerability because of

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 3>infections of that initial pathogen. And on the contrary, if

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 3>you figure out a vaccine against that initial pathogen, like

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 3>the measles vaccine, you create massive benefits in getting rid

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 3>of that herd vulnerability.

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So what's going on on a cellular level?

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 3>As far as we know, measles is unique in its class.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 3>It's actually it's an amazing story. So if you give

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 3>me forty seconds to describe it, I.

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Will, Oh, go, you got a minute if you need it.

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 3>So, every virus has a receptor that it binds to

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 3>and needs to latch onto on a cell. For measles,

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 3>it's this molecule that's called CD one fifty, or it's

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 3>called SLAM. SLAM stands for a signaling of Lymphocyte activation molecule,

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 3>and it's when somebody gets a measles infection. The virus

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 3>comes into somebody's lungs and we have these cool dendritic cells.

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 3>And dendritic cells are like these cells of big arms,

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 3>and they go out and reach pathogens that they that

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 3>they know shouldn't be there, and they capture them and

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 3>bring them in and then they shuttle them into the

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 3>lymphoid system, which is where all of our immune cells are.

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 3>And so normally what would happen is the dendritic cells

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 3>would say, hey, immune system, you know, here's a pathogen,

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 3>take it and develop immune memory against it, and so

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 3>it literally hands it off to B cells and T cells.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 3>In this case, when the dendritic cell does exactly that

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 3>same process, it hands off Measles virus to B cells

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 3>and T cells. And this is a big mistake because

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 3>now you have a virus that, instead of being handed

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 3>off to a B and T cell and having that

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 3>B and T cell you know, ingested and learn from it,

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 3>the measles flips on its receptor utilization and grabs City

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 3>one fifty or slam these molecules on the outside of

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 3>the B cells and the T cells, and it actually

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 3>invades them like a trojan horse.

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Aha. So It's like a like a trick, right, Like

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>measles is there acting like a normal virus until it

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>gets to the B cells in the T cells in

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the immune system. And normally the B cells in the

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>T cells would destroy measles, would destroy the virus. But

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in that case, this doesn't happen, right, So what does happen?

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 3>It's in the cushy lymphoid system and it's just full

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 3>of food and it just replicates like crazy inside the

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 3>immune system, all the while sell by cell destroying the

0:12:56.400 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 3>valuable immune memory is stored inside each of those that

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 3>it's destroying.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>That is very compelling that it's like a virological horror

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>movie inside your body.

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 3>It absolutely is. And what we see when we see

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 3>the prototypic measles rash, which is like dots all over

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 3>a child's body, red dots, it is truly the tip

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 3>of the iceberg in terms of where the damage is

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 3>being done. The real damage inside a child is much

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 3>much deeper and much much more profound in terms of,

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, destroying a huge, huge population of very important

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 3>cells inside of our body.

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you sort of step back and think about

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this idea that measles not only gives you measles but

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>makes you vulnerable to lots of other infectious diseases. Does

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it make you think differently about virus? Is about the

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>immune system? Like where do you land?

0:13:54.920 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Measles brings together for me mathematics, biology, ecology and evolution

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 3>and vaccinology, and I love bringing those pieces together, and

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 3>it gives you a very deep appreciation for the delicate

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 3>balance we have between infectious diseases, immunity, cancer, and autoimmune disease,

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 3>and how those all interplay with each other. You know,

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 3>the world thought that measles was done being discovered, and

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 3>then boom, all of a sudden, there's this new idea

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 3>of something that really had massive, massive consequences on humans

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 3>that we didn't even realize. And so it drives this

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 3>renewed excitement around measles vaccination and the importance of it.

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 3>It's not just a cool finding. It hopefully helps us

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 3>move further and further towards eradication of the virus altogether.

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>It was great to talk with you. Thank you so

0:14:58.520 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>much for your time.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much.

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a lot of fun. Michael Minna is Chief

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Science Officer at EMED Digital Healthcare. He was previously a

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>professor at the Harvard School of Public Health. When we

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>come back using measles to fight cancer, going back all

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the way to the eighteen hundreds, which was before anybody

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>even knew what a virus really was, there have been

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>occasional reports of cancer patients who get some kind of

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>viral infection and then go into remission from cancer, and

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>at a certain level this makes sense. Viruses are highly

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>evolved to enter and destroy cells. Normally we think of

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>this as a bad thing, but if a virus is

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>entering and destroying cancer cells, this inter a cell and

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>destroy it property might be a very good thing. By

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties, researchers were actively trying to figure out

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>how to use viruses to treat cancer. But then new

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>kinds of cancer drugs were discovered, basically chemotherapy, and researchers

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>got less interested in that virus cancer link. My guest

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>for this half of the show is Stephen Russell. Stephen

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>has spent his career trying to use viruses to cure cancer,

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and as you'll hear, he and other researchers in the

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>field have made real progress. When Stephen was starting his

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>career in the nineteen eighties, he was interested in using

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>retroviruses as possible cancer treatments. Then he told me he

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>turned his attention to measles.

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, measles became the next love.

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>You fell in love with measles? Yeah, of course, why'd

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you fall in love with measles?

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Well? All viruses are quite beautiful, I have to say,

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and the life cycles are extraordinarily elegant. But measles I

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 2>could do things with. I knew that there was a

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 2>very remarkable case of a boy with a retro orbital

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 2>Burkitt lymphoma, a very aggressive lymphoma that was sort of

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 2>bulging his eye out, And he went to a clinic

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 2>and was told, well, come back in a couple of

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 2>weeks and we'll start the therapy. And he came back

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 2>in a couple of weeks and the tumor had just resolved.

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 2>But in the meantime he'd had a severe measles infection. Huh,

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 2>And so it looked like it was pretty certain that

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 2>the measles infection had driven this response.

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>That he had Burko lymphoma also caused by a virus. Right,

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the first tumor we knew was caused by a virus

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Epstein by yeah, so go on, I apologize.

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, I looking at measles, it seemed to tick

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of boxes. But there was this whole history

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 2>of the development of a vaccine strain of measles, and

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 2>measles had been the vaccine had been created by taking

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 2>a virus from the throat of a patient with measles.

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 2>He was an eleven year old boy at the time,

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 2>David Edmonstone in nineteen fifty four, and then growing that

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 2>virus on cancer cells in tissue culture, and the virus

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 2>had quired the ability to propagate efficiently in cancer cells,

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 2>but it lost the ability to cause measles.

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And wait, I just just to be clear, this was

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>just they weren't trying when they were doing this to

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>fight cancer. They were just trying to develop a measles vaccine.

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>They were just saying, we're going to grow this measles

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>in culture over time and make it be attenuator, make

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it be weaker. And it adapted in such a way

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>that it preferred to infect tumor cells and not to

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>infect non tumor.

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Cells because of the way they adapted it. Because remember

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 2>that the cells that they were growing in the lab

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 2>that they could put the measles virus on were basically

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 2>cancer cells.

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>And is that just because those are easy cells to grow?

0:18:58.119 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Because they liked to propagate.

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's very, very difficult to grow non cancerous cells. Yeah.

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like the problem with cancer, right, it just loves

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to divide.

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah. So they put this virus on the cells

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 2>in culture, and the virus had actually adapted and it

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 2>had learned to use a receptor that is more abundant

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 2>on cancer cells than on normal cells, and it was

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 2>losing all sorts of things that it needed in order

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to cause disease because it didn't need them to be

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 2>able to propagate the cancer cells. So it spontaneously attenuated

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 2>through a lot of mutations that arose in the viral genome.

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 2>And so there it was and had been given to

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 2>billions of people, and it looked like it was fairly

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 2>well adapted to test in human studies against cancer.

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>The measles virus used in the vaccine didn't make people sick,

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>and it tended to attack cancer cells. So Stephen started

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.959
<v Speaker 1>using that form of the virus in studies to see

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>if measles could treat cancer. Eventually, he landed on a

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of cancer called multiple myeloma that can take hold

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in the bone marrow and suppress the immune system. And

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>there was one multiple myeloma patient in particular who had

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a huge effect on how Stephen thought about using measles

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to fight cancer. The patient's name was Stacy.

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Rholtz, So Stacy. She had multiple myeloma. She had been

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>on treatment for ten years, on and off, but probably

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 2>more on and off treatment for the first ten years

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 2>of her diagnosis, because every time she stopped the treatment,

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 2>or even if she continued on it, the disease would

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 2>come back, and then she needs switch to something else.

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 2>She had a large tumor on her forehead that was

0:20:56.200 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 2>destroying the underlying bone and compressing her brain. She had

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 2>four other solid tumors, and then her bone marrow was

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 2>diffusely infiltrated with myeloma and it was moving fast, and

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 2>she was out of treatment options at the time. I mean,

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 2>there was nothing.

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>She was going to die soon.

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 2>She was going to die, yeah, and she had three

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 2>children still at school and everything to play for. She

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>was fifty years old at the time. We'd moved up

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>through every dose level that FDA had negotiated with us,

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 2>based on a starting dose level of a million, we'd

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 2>gone up to just tenfold short of a billion.

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Like, how much did she get compared to how much

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>somebody gets when they get the measles vaxing.

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 2>It's about ten million doses of vaccine.

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay for this one person, So she's getting quite a lot.

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And what happens.

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Well as with other patients, she had a reaction to

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 2>the infusion of virus. So she got the virus infused.

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 2>She felt fine for a couple of hours, and then

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 2>she started shivering and shaking and her temperature rose and

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 2>she felt pretty unwell overnight, but by the following morning

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 2>it had settled down.

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And is that essentially like a response to a massive infection.

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>She's essentially has this massive infection.

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's similar to that, although it wasn't causing measles

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 2>in her so it was it was more the body

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 2>reacting to the foreign stuff in the blood and a

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 2>very kind of rapid reaction. That settled down and then

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 2>she left hospital, went home and after a few days

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 2>she started noticing that the tumor on her forehead she

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 2>and her family had named it Evan, and this tumor Evan,

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 2>started to shrink and actually melted away. And you know,

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 2>we conducted thorough evaluates on her intervals thereafter and we

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 2>were staggered to see that she went into a complete

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 2>disease remission. She felt fantastic. You know. We thought at

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the time, Okay, we've got it. This is the way

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 2>to cure multiple myeloma. And so we gave it to

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.439
<v Speaker 2>a lot of other multiple myeloma patients and it didn't

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 2>work nearly so well. There were some partial responses, but

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.479
<v Speaker 2>there was really nothing as dramatic as Stacy. So we

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 2>studied Stacy pretty intensively to try and understand what was

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 2>special about her because that would be the key to

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the success of virotherapy. I mean, what we knew from

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Stacy as Wow, this can actually happen. You can give

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 2>a virus systemically nothing else, and you can get a

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 2>dramatic resolution of tumor at all sites. So the studies

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 2>that we did on Stacy showed that number one, she

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 2>had no anti measles antibody detectable. She had, however, been

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 2>vaccinated as a child and then she had lost her

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 2>immunity and she'd been revaccinated after her first stem cell transplant.

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 2>The immunity had come back, and she'd lost it again

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 2>after the second stem cell transplant. Huh, So she had

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 2>no antibodies to block the virus from getting to the target.

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 1>So basically her immune system was the same as the

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 1>immune system of a person who has never had measles

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and not been vaccinated for measles.

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Not quite, because we looked at her tea cells, the

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 2>cells that come into the tumor and attack the virus

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 2>infected cells, and she had a very high level of

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 2>anti measles tea cells.

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>As it turned out, this was a perfect combination. Stacy

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't have any antibodies, so the measles virus was free

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to go into her body and infect her tumor cells.

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>But she did have anti measles T cells, so once

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the measles infected the tumor cells, those T cells could

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>attack her tumor cells. So now she had both the

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>measles virus and her own T cells attacking and destroying

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the tumor. Stephen told me he learned a lot from

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Stacy's case and it helped him figure out how to

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>move forward with his research.

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so there are two pathways that we took. One

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 2>was to switch to a different virus that people do

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 2>not have prior exposure to, and so we started working

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 2>with the sicular stomatitis virus VSV, which causes naturally a

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 2>blistering illness in cattle. Uh huh.

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's one way to get around the immunity

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to measles problem. Right, You're using a virus that most

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>people don't get and are therefore not immune to.

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 2>Is that going it's going, it's going well. Where you know,

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 2>it's not in every cancer that we see anything, but

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.719
<v Speaker 2>the results that we have at the moment are looking

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 2>very promising in certain indications. The other approach we took

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 2>was to stealth measles virus so that it would still

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.959
<v Speaker 2>be measles virus. It would still be that vaccine strain,

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 2>but it would have a new coat huh, that was

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 2>no longer recognizable by circulating antibodies. And so we would

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 2>in that situation we would have a virus we could

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 2>give systemically that would penetrate the tumor and that would

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 2>then be subject to attack by these T cells that

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 2>exist in people who've been measles immunized. Well, does it

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 2>work in mice?

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it's a start.

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 2>We haven't taken that one into human clinical tests.

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Yet, let's talk for a minute about using viruses to

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>treat cancer more broadly. Right, people have been trying other

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>viruses to treat other cancers. What's the state of the

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>field more generally?

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 2>There has been incremental progress and there are viruses that

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 2>are looking very promising in brain cancer injected into the brain,

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 2>tumor in bladder cancer instilled into the bladder. And I

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 2>think many ongoing programs which show great promise. So I'm

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 2>still a complete believer in the capability of viruses to

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 2>really bring a transformation in the approach to cancer therapy.

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's coming soon, but not everybody agrees

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 2>with me.

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate your time so much. It was great to tell.

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 2>With you, great talking with you too. Thank you very much.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Russell founded the Department of Molecular Medicine at the

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Mayo Clinic. He is currently the CEO of Viriad, a

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>company that is trying to use viruses to treat cancer.

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.719
<v Speaker 1>One last thing, Stephen told me that he's still in

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>touch with Stacy Airholtz, the patient who had multiple myeloma

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and went into complete remission after being treated with measles.

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 2>Stacy A. Holtz is you know, a guiding light for me.

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm friends with her, I'm in contact with her on

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 2>a regular basis, and she's got grandkids. She's having a

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 2>happy life. She's a very positive woman.

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to both of our guests today, Michael Minna and

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Russell. Next week on the show, I talked to

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a scientist who discovered an entirely new kind of virus,

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and it turns out this virus is everywhere.

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 4>Boiling Springs Lake, deep Sea Sediment's Harrian air sample, monkey feces,

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 4>dragonfly guts, soil, just outside the lab at Portland State University,

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 4>basically anywhere that we have looked, we found these Cruci viruses.

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Incubation is a co production of Pushkin Industries and Ruby

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Studio at iHeartMedia. It's produced by Kate Ferby and Brittany Cronin.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>The show is edited by Lacy Roberts. It's mastered by

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Bruguer, fact checking by Joseph Fridman. Our executive producers

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>are Lacey Roberts and Matt Romano. I'm Jacob Goldstein. Thanks

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for listening.