WEBVTT - The Earnings Crunch Is Getting Real

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Searched Bloomberg clovel News. Well, Katie, I mentioned some of

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the virus headlines, but we do like to do an

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>update about where things stand. With numbers cases passed in

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>the globe, about two hundred twenty three million deaths have

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>exceeded six four point six million. More than five point

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>six three billion doses of the vaccine have been administered.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's check in now, as we do each and every week,

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>with Dr Ian lust Beder, clinical Professor of Medicine at

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>n y U Langnes Medical Center. He joins us on

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New York City. Dr LUs Beder, How

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are you on this Friday afternoon? Great Tim and Katie,

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Happy Friday. Lots of COVID news every day, it seems, yeah,

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And look, I think it's fair to say we're going

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to continue to be doing this Friday check in with

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>you and focusing on COVID for quite a while, because

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like we continue to get relentless news

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>about the spread of the delta variant. And I do

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>wonder to what extent you think that the President's vaccine

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>mandate that he announced yesterday for companies with more than

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>one employees have to get vaccinated or face weekly tests,

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to what extent do you think that will put an

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>end to the spread of the virus? You know, I

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>think there are are a few challenges with the with

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine mandate. On On the good side, or the

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>good news is that at least sevent of Americans have

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>had at least one vaccine, over fifty have had two vaccines. Um,

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we also know that vaccines really have been very helpful

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in reducing severe disease, and you know, masks are certainly

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>helpful as well, So we definitely are making some progress.

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>The challenge really is how to get um everyone on board,

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's going to be very difficult. I'm

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>not sure the vaccine mandate UM is going to be

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that helpful for several reasons. One is, by the time

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>this sort of set up in a regulatory fashion and

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially enforced, it's going to be a number

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of months down the line, and probably this delta wave

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing will likely be over sometime in the

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>next few months. UM, So you're sort of risking political

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>capital and and uh, maybe polarization for really an unclear benefit.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think a number of people may feel that,

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, letting um, having businesses incentivized too for the

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>health of their own employees, maybe the best thing local

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>districts and businesses really decide. I think the idea of

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>vaccination is very helpful. Uh. The challenges will you alienate people?

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>There are some studies that suggest of the about you know,

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty five to repercent of unvaccinated population, at that thirty

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of them say the reason they're not doing it is

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they don't trust the government. The other percent is concerned

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>about side effects. So I think we need credibility. I

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>think we need to reassure people to some degree about

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>side effects and reassure people that there are no ulterior

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>motives to slowly kind of chip away at that population

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that's been somewhat resistant. I'm not sure mandates are going

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to be, how effective it's going to be, and how

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>long it will take to really get that in place.

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And so that's an interesting point about the holdouts that

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are still unvaccinated that you know, in your view, reassurance

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>would work better. But I'm curious, you know, let's talk

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>about carrots and sticks, because this vaccine mandate clearly it's

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a stick. And Tim and I were just talking about

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>airlines imposing fines on maskless passengers. I'm curious, how, in

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>your view, are we going to see more things like this,

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>like penalties and fines when it comes to getting people

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to mask up or get vas versus uh, you know,

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the administration or companies actually taking a more reassuring route.

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think scientific data is always helpful, and

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, we don't have randomized control trials.

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've been battling this for two years or

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 1>more um and we don't really have randomized control trials

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>about masks. And so when we talk about kids or

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the benefits of masks and schools and so forth.

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>We over the past two years could have done really

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>big studies and made some determinations. So I think we're

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>relying on data from another number of other countries, and

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>many of them don't even require masks. But I think

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>individual businesses can do um set guidelines for what they want,

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and an airline if they publish this is, you know,

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>our requirements, you have to show your vaccine card or

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>wear a mask during the flight. I think it's really

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>within their right to do it. I think it would

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>be more helpful if we had these studies already up

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>so we can show people how effective it is. But

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly within the right to do it, and I

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>think for short flights for a couple of hours, it's

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.119
<v Speaker 1>very reasonable to do. You know, when you're talking about

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>people on five or six hour flights to remain master

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>or kids, that's going to be tough to enforce in

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a you know, six hour flight. What

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>about when it comes to the role that school boards

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and in school districts take, because we learned yesterday at

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles is saying that all students twelve and older

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>must be fully vaccinated by January ten. Uh, students need

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of vaccines already. There are vaccine requirements at

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>different ages, for for different schooling. I'm wondering why you

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>make of this one, Dr LUs Better completely right, you know, Tim,

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>We even mandate, which I disagree with, hepatitis B vaccines

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.679
<v Speaker 1>before you know, kids really start school. That's to reduce

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the incidents of potentially sexually transmitted disease. And you know

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>these it can be twelve years before a kid or

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>more before kids are even exposed. So I do think, um, uh,

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it is reasonable to require vaccines or a number of

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>vaccines required before school. But I think if we had

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>safety data, more safety data, and more efficacy data, people

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>would be a lot happier to be on board with that,

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think we need to accumulate that and really

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>reassure people. It should, over time, really reduce COVID in

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the schools, but I think parents would want to be

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>reassured about it. You know again, I think a lot

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of COVID is going to be over before all this

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>gets enforced over the next few months. Dr Ian LUs Beda,

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>we unfortunately have to leave it there. Thank you so

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:37.679
<v Speaker 1>much as you do each and every week for joining

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>us on this Friday. Dr LUs Beta is clinical professor

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of medicine at n y U Langnes Medical Center. He

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from New York City. You're

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, it is

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the big story of the day when it comes to

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>tech companies and indeed Apple stock taking ahead as a

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>result of court ordering that Apple can no longer force

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>developers to use in app purchases. This the culmination of

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the Apple Epic games battle with us. Now for the

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>latest is Mark German, technology reporter at Bloomberg News. He

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from Los Angeles. Mark, how

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>big of a deal is this for Apple? This is

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a multibillion dollar per year deals for Apple. This set

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>up major changes to the app store will where Apple

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>will have to allow all apps, including games, to steer

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>or have the option to steer users to complete transactions

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>outside of the inept purchase ecosystem, which would save developers

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and obviously take that out of Apple's pocket. Mark, what

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>does that look like for a user? For somebody who

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>has been making an app purchases. How how much of

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a burden is going to be put on the user

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to actually go somewhere else to make this payment. Is

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it just gonna be easier to pay Apple. So there's

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a big question that remains. Will Apple require developers to

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>offer both in app purchase and allow them to also

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>steer at the same time, So our developer is going

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to be allowed to steer users without offering I a P.

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>In the past, Apple has made these concessions while silver

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>quiring I P to give the user choice. I'd imagine

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be the case, and I'd imagine there's

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>still going to be some users who are going to

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>use I a P for the convenience. And there's also

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be some developers who are not going to

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>build external payment systems that could cost them a few

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>percentage points and a bunch of convenience as well. And

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>so Mark, let's broaden this out here, because you said

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a multibillion dollar a year deal for Apple.

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a bunch of money. But what does it mean

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>for the other tech giants out there? I mean, is

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>this just the start of a wave of antitrust actions

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>against some of these tech giants or what are you expecting? Yeah,

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think what we want to say is here that

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>this is probably going to impact Google's ruling. Right there

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 1>is Google trotal epic going. You know, it's going to

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>be happening across the next year into and it's going

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to be very important for UH, you know, the ruling

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and there to take something to account this Apple ruling.

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure this impact Amazon or Facebook, but definitely

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>look for the seven impact from the Facebook or the

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Google situation next year. One thing that is interesting to

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>see is the way that companies that have made UH

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>or pushed back against what Apple has been doing for years. Spotify,

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, higher by more than two percent. Netflix on

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a daylight today, where the broader market is lower, is

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>higher today by more than a percentage point. What does

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it mean for those companies that have long complained about

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>this what they call its hole on the app store highway?

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>This has already been done already, right like Apple last

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>week that it would allow Netflix and Spotify and other

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>media apps to bypass this. So there's no news here

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>for those developers. The stock still live in higher though

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why it clear really the traders aren't

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>reading our articles. This already happened a week ago, So

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>no difference, no difference for these companies. It's just the

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>gaming companies that are affected because Apple exempted gaming. No, no,

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no difference. Apple already did this a week ago.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>There's no difference. No differences is that it's for games. Okay,

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>that is very helpful context Hopefully up traders on the

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>terminal click. But I do I am curious, Mark. We

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>know that Apple is going to appeal this decision. Do

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they have any shot? And I mean, how far could

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>this go? You know, I don't know. I just spoke

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to their general counsel who was noncommittal on appealing the decision.

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's unclear yet. They say this is a resounding victory,

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>a giant victory, and they're very happy with the ruling.

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's unclear what they're gonna do. They probably knew

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>they were going to have to do this anyways, that's

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>why they did it last week. Just in the last

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>forty five seconds we have with you, Mark, do you

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's I mean, what does your gut tell you

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>about Apple saying this is a victory? I mean, I

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>think they're right they were ruled to not being a novel.

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>They were ruled to not having anti trust issues. They

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>simply have to expand a decision they made a week

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>ago to games. They already did it for spotifying Netflix,

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>so there's not a lot happening here. They're also going

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to get about I don't know, four or five million

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars with an m from for lost revenue. It's like

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a tiny amount of money for the company Mark whom

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>cooked by a new car, right, just a little bit

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of money. So yeah, overall it's a big one for Apple.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Mark German, it's always great to chat everything Apple with you.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate you taking the time, Mark German, technology

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg News. He joins us on the phone

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>from Los Angeles. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well,

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Poulti Group, the paint maker Sherwin Williams, and also the

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>paint maker PPG Industries all slashing their outlooks this week

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>as a result of higher input costs and inflationary pressures.

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Brooke Sutherland is Bloomberg Opinion columnist and she writes about

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 1>it for bloom Opinion. Also joining us is Bloomberg Business

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>We Get in Control Webber. He's on the access line

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>from Brooklyn, Joel. I thought that these issues were transitory.

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I keep hearing about these higher prices being transitory, and

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering to what extent it's going to continue, Uh,

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a challenge to these industrial companies. Depends who

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to, I think, um, because I think the

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>companies themselves, Um. And this goes just beyond industrials too.

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying that they don't always think it's gonna

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>be transitory. Um. But what I thought was significant about

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>this is just how quickly things are beginning to change.

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And and Brooke does a great job of outlining this

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in our story. Um that you know what we saw

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months ago. It's really quickly changed and

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that. Um, we'll continue to see that and earning.

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So so Brooke walk us through what's changed and how

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it's manifesting itself in the data. I mean, I think

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you really summed it up well. But it's just been

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>so quick. I mean, you have to remember it was

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>just July that we heard from a lot of these

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>companies giving their most recent earnings updates, and things are

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>just moving so quickly, um, you know, particularly with with

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the raw material inflations, but then also with

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>some of these shortages that are just really getting to

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the point where manufacturers cannot find a way around them.

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>But I thought one striking data point was PPG, which

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>is a paintmaker, said that raw material inflation was running

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>seventy million dollars higher in the third corder than what

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it anticipated in July. And keep in mind it was

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>already factoring in a pretty significant headwind from rising costs

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in July. And so you know that really just studs

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>underscores that business moving faster than anticipated and not getting better.

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And so for transitory or not, I mean, how much

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>pricing power do these industrial companies like PPG, like Sherwan

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Williams actually have. I mean, are they able to pass

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>at least some of these costs to their customers? Are

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they just having to eat this themselves? Now, they do

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>have a good amount of seeing power, and I would

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>say even more so in this current period. You're not

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>really hearing about any pushback to price increases yet with

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the keyword being yet, but they are being, you know,

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>generally able to push through pretty significant price increases to

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>try to keep up with the rising costs. And I

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's because customers understand what's happening. I mean, all

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is look at the headlines and

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>see reports everywhere about you know, various different kinds of

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>inflation and shortages, and so customers understand. But there is

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a breaking point to this. So what is it that's

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that What is it that's driving the cost increases? Brooke?

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Is it any one thing more than another.

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>We've heard so much about container shipping prices going up.

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>We've also heard about raw material prices going up. There is,

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of course the cost of getting employees off the sidelines

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and making sure they're coming into work. And we've talked

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to CEO after CEO who said that they've had to

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>raise price, raise wages as a result of that. What

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is it that's driving these price increases and these these

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>higher input costs. I think it's everything that you just mentioned,

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think you know that's what makes so difficult,

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and that it's not just one thing, it's not one

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>product that you can't find right now that you're having

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to pay up for it. It's almost everything. Um. And

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>then you know, with logistics costs rising, labor costs rising,

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>raw material costs rising, you're you're really starting to feel

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the pinch. And one comment I thought was really interesting

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>was we did a video interview with the Union Pacific

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>CEO with a team of Bloomberg reporters and editors, and

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>he was talking about inflation pressures from janitorial services between

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>their office buildings and people who mow their laws and

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>their employee healthcare costs. This is a railroad. Those are

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:38.359
<v Speaker 1>that's not its main business. But these are major companies

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that employ you know, hundreds, if not thousands of people,

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and they rely on a lot of these ancillary services.

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And so there are the big ones that we talked about,

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>raw materials, labor, logistics, but there are also these other

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of backed or inflationary pressures that these companies have

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to deal with, even if it's not their primary industry

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>or business. So do you just not mow the lawn? Brook?

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that the big takeaway there? Maybe? I mean, I

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>guess save some water, right, I don't know, maybe you

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>can say a few pennies there, But I mean I

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>think you know, these companies have been incredibly creative about

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>managing supply chain pressures UM and and coming up with

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>ways to keep costs down. I mean, I'm talking about

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>re routing ships, but also redesigning products. UM. You know,

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I talked as a Honeywall supply chain chief a few

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, and and they've redesigned some of their sensors

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to get around the semiconductor shortage. But there is only

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>so much of that that you can do, especially when

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>things are moving as quickly as they are right now.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's the period that we're getting into,

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and you might really start to see these supply chain

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>challenges and inflation and raw materials and logistics really start

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to take a bite out of earnings in the third quarter.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So when you when you're talking to the CEOs that

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you talked to and and sort of attempting to understand

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>where where things are aheaded Brook, I'm really curious, is

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>this are they viewing this is like, you know, the

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>new normal, which you know is going to be September

0:16:56.480 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and now is maybe January and if that if right?

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Or are they just recognizing that we're entering a new

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>dynamic and these are really permanent changes in that that

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the sooner that they come to more permanent solutions, the better.

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:13.479
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's a bit of a moving target.

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think people were optimistic, um, you know,

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in sort of the earlier part of the summer, that

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these headwinds would clear or at least not

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>be quite as strong as what we're seeing right now

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in the fall, and that is obviously not the case.

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, g E put out a statement earlier this

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>seek talking about pressures that it's tating it's health care

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>business from uh limited availability of workers and parts, and

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't expect you know, the operating environment to get

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>much easier until you know, the midpoint of two and

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>so we are talking about a pretty significant timeline here.

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I will say, you know, a lot of the manufacturing

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>CEOs who have been in this business for a while,

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>they have seen raw material inflation go up and down

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>significantly over the course of their careers, and most of

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>them would tell you some of those price increases are

0:17:57.800 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to be permanent, that there will be

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>some actility they're um tied to you know, weather events,

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>tied to the reopening effects on the economy. But I

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>think what's really sticky in manufacturing is wages. Once you

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>increase wages, it is hard to take those back down. Um.

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, I think that that is where

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>they're getting a little bit nervous. I guess in terms

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of how this plays out over the long term. Well,

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to build on that, because that's what's fascinating

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to me that if we did see uh, companies really

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>have to raise their wages, that's how inflation kind of

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>gets built in. So, I mean, how have these companies

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>been approaching that? I mean, have they been offering sort

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of one time perks. Are you actually starting to see

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>some of these companies uh, sort of capitulate and actually

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>boost wages. You are seeing them wages wages. I mean,

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess they will say there's a little bit of

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>a divide between, you know, the companies that complain about

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>labor shortages and the companies that are willing to rage wages.

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, um, you know where you're not quite some

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of the companies that really go out of their way

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to make their workers like they're part of the community.

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>They try to treat them like human beings, They pay

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>them good wages. They're not complaining as much about labor shortageance.

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>They're still feeling the pain here. But you know, I

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>do think there is a little bit of that in

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>terms of, you know, what kind of culture do you

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>want to create? Because we also did just come out

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>of the other side of a pandemic heater. We have

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>e s G is a big phenomenon, and you have

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>investors getting, you know, increasingly attuned into what do workers

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>want um and so I think that's definitely part of

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the narrative here. Brooks Outherland is Bloomberg Opinion columnists. She

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>covers industrials and more. Also joining us Bloomberg Business Week

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>editor Joel Weber. He's on the access line from Brooklyn,

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>and big thank you to both of you for taking

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the time. Check out Brooks article available at Bloomberg dot

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>com and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. It's called

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the earnings Crunch is Getting Real. This is Bloomberg Business

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. Well. One way that lawmakers proposed to

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>pay for the one trillion dollar infrastructure buil the Senator

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>approved last month is by imposing tax reporting requirements for

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency brokers. It's the way that stockbrokers report their customer

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sales to the I r S. It could open the

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>way for tighter regulation of cryptocurrency, and that's something that

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration is moving toward as it also pushes

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for tax compliance. Let's get into it with Dnnelle Dixon,

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO and executive director at Stellar Development Foundation, a nonprofit

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>organization that uses blockchain to unlock the world's economic potential

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>by making money more fluid, markets more open, and people

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>more empowered. Denniel joins us on the phone from California. Adult,

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>It's great to have you on the show. Uh, this

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>was a very contentious part of the infrastructure bill, and

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm wondering, I'm wondering what your thoughts are on it. Yeah,

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it certainly became so it was really fun for us

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to see the influence that we could have from the

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>blockchain and crypto space. Uh, and for us just to

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>really engage with policymakers. But in the end, I mean

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>the languages with the languages, so it didn't change, but

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it was really fun to be able to engage and

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to to try to really create that educational opportunity I

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>run with these policy makers and so donell this bill.

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I know it was roundly criticized by the crypto industry

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>for being too broad. Can so can you walk us

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>through exactly what was the language that got crypto advocates

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>so upset? I mean, what was the biggest point of

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 1>contention there? Yeah, so, I think it was the definition

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of broker. So that was defined as any person who,

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>for consideration, is responsible for regulator regularly providing any service

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>effectuating transfers of digital assets on behalf of another person.

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And so the argument and the concern was that there

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>are many players in the space that run, for example,

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>validators that just validate transactions on uh, working on blockchains,

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>but they don't actually have access to any informations that

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>traditional brokers would, and they don't act as brokers. Uh.

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>So there was just concerned that this was very, very

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>broad language with technology that's very new and maybe not

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>widely understood. If you could write the regulation or write

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the legislation, what would you want it to say. It's

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a great question. I think that the regulation itself should

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>just have exclusions in it at the very least to

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about these that they think about blockchain more itself

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>as infrastructure, and think about these providers that are allowing

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and helping these transactions just to progress that they actually

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>are excluded from the bill, for example, like validators and

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>folks who run notes. There was language that was proposed

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>that we were comfortable with and that we actually you

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>know that that it didn't ultimately make it through UM,

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>but it would really just be excluding and making clear

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's not actually trying to go after these true

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure providers that are just helping blockchain to operate. And

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so we've seen some efforts to try to change the language.

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Last month, there actually was an amendment that would change

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the reporting rules, but that was blocked by the Senate.

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious, what's the pass forward from here. Well,

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that this actually created a really great opportunity

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for us because it showed that, first of all, there

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is this large constituency that policy makers are willing to

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>engage with and listen to. And I think that the

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>pass forward is to create those open dialogues before you

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>get to the language of the bill. I think that

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>it's crucial to engage with long lawmakers to discuss this,

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the use cases and the roles for different participants and

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.959
<v Speaker 1>that's bringing industry experts and policy makers together, and so

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're really focused on doing. Now. Which policymakers

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>can you single out for us that that really seemed

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to get it well? I think that there are many.

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't single out any particular prob Like, you know,

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>we actually had some that supportive language that we wanted

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to bring to the table. But most importantly, I think

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it's that when you actually understand how the technology operates

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and what we're trying to do here, I think that

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you'll understand that the definition of broker doesn't

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>and shouldn't cover some of these players that don't have

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>access to that type of information and frankly have no

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>relationships to any of the participants who are making these transactions.

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's really it's it's all the senators

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and the members of how the House that we need

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to really engage with, but it's also the regulatory agencies

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that were really focused on participating with and engaging with.

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I think some of them understand what the technology does,

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>but they don't have a knowledge of what the use

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>cases can do and what it can and the value

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that that can bring to their constituents. So it's a

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of work for us to do in the US,

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:32.959
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's actually really good work. And I

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, once we demonstrate that excluding their

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>own constituents from this really useful and valuable services that

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>are offered through blockchain, they're going to want to be

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>a part of it and there, and we're going to

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to help them to get there. And so

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Dannell's stepping back a little bit. It definitely feels over

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the past few months that regulators have started to circle crypto,

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the US Congress with the Infrastructure bill or

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>just the SEC this week cracking down on coin Base

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and really investigating their proposed lending product. I'm curious, what

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>do you think is on the radar next? And we

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>have just about thirty seconds here. Well, I think that

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of a lot of focus right now

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is on the decentralized finance space, and so I think

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see we just have to provide

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot more education around that. I want us to

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to demonstrate the value of this technology neutral

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>opportunity that we have and that's made in the open

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and valuable to everyone. So I think we need to

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>focus on a lot of different areas. But that's I

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>think that the next target space. Daniel Dixon is CEO

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and executive director of Stellar Development Foundations. She joins us

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from California. Stellar Development Foundation is a

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit organization that uses blockchain to unlock the world's economic

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>potential by making money more fluid, markets more open, and

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>people more empowered. Journal now, but you let me drive?

0:25:55.880 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no no, all right, please the vel I

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want to drive. Drive baby question. This is the

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Drive to the Close community. Thanks, we'll drying us down

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Yes, indeed, it is time for the

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Drive to the Close. We are just about ten minutes

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>away from the market closed on this shortened of trading week.

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>It's Friday, September one. We are seeing red across the

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>board right now. Stops taking into a leg lower as

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we do get to the end of the session. Let's

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>get into it though with Ryan Dietrich, chief market strategist

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>at LPL Financially, joins us on the phone from Charlotte,

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina. Ryan, great to have you back on the show.

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Really glad to have you on a daylight today where

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>we are expecting to see a fifth day of consecutive

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>declines on the SMP five hundred, and I'm wondering, from

0:26:55.000 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a technical analysis perspective, what signal that's sending you. Yeah, Tim,

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me back. But you're right, guys, we're

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at again a five day losing streak. But I

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>was just looking into it. Is it something to really

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>be worried about? Now here's what you need to know.

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>The last five days the SMPS down about one point

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>four percent. All right, that's the smallest five day losing

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>streaks since one way back in um October of And

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you think about it like this. Last year we saw

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty five single days with the worst return than we've

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>seen the previous five days. So put a bow on this. Yes,

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>down five days in a row is gonna be the headlines.

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But to us it looks like a normal consolidation. That

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>it is September, the worst months of the year. You know,

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 1>there's there's some different factors there, but after more four

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>percent rally off those lows since March, maybe just some

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>seasonal weakness is happening. And again it's relatively contained. We're

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>not overly right now. So this guy is not falling.

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Keep things into perspective. Is that what you're saying. Yeah,

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we've been trying to say that for a while. I think,

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there's always scary things to look at.

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and trust me, the worries are out there.

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>You've got the delta concerns, the recent obviously economic data

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is not doing that great. What's going on with Washington?

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>What's going on to said, we understand a lot of

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the concerns, um, but the bottom line is just look

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 1>at those earning season. We just had record earning season. Um.

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, earnings are up twenty six above the peak

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 1>back in en So yes, stocks are close to all

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>time highs. Earnings are also at all time highs and

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>growing still really really nicely. So there's worries, don't get

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>us wrong, but you know, this bull market looks alive

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and well, but it's in it with you feel like

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a broken record saying this market is one higher because

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy is still strong. Um, we still feel that way,

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and we still think there's time to go with this

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>bull market. So Ryan, we're coming off of a record

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>earning season. We also saw record p p I this morning.

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at the Producer Price Index

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>for the prior month, it was way above forecasts out

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a series high. How are you thinking about inflation here?

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>How does that factor in to what you're saying this

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>still strong economy. Yeah, Katie, I mean that's a great

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>question because clearly that's the headline. If you look at

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the core pp I was a little bit lower, but

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>still things are more expensive. I mean it's five dollars

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>get a gallon of milk, at least three dollars to

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>fill you know, per per gallon to fill up your car.

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So people are feeling that there's no doubt about it.

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>But when we look at what's the market saying, is

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the market truly worried about inflation? And when we see

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.719
<v Speaker 1>things like the tenure yield well off the one seventy

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>one level from you know, back in late March, we

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>see copper well off, the highs, lumber off the highs,

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>break evens are well off their recent highs from a

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>few months ago, it's inflation is there, but it doesn't

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>appear like the market is extremely worried. It's hard for

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>us to be goal just flatline bucks an ounce and

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>not be soaring. If the market was worried about inflation,

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and I just want to cut you. I just want

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to cut you off there because you you gave us

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of data and which I just want to

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>know the single signal that those things you just mentioned said,

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>what are they? Yeah, the market is not as worried

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>about inflation as I think the as a media, A

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are the likelihood that inflation terms of

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies style spiral the stock market, and I'm sorry,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>just the market in general. Market participants are not voting

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>on that. When you see a tenure yieldsill over on

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>one thirty, it's hard for us to believe that. And

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>so Ryan, I'm glad that you brought up break evens

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and they they've definitely cooled a little bit from their

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, decade plus highs. If we look at tenure

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>break evens, the long term inflation outlook, though, it looks

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of sticky. I mean, it's not at the very

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>peak anymore, but it's really just bounced back and forth

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in this range. I wish I could show our listeners

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a chart because it is amazing. I mean, what does

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that say to you that, Okay, maybe we're not seeing

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>an inflationary spiral. But it seems to suggest that inflations

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to stick around at an elevated level for

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>at least a while. Excellent point. You know, we had

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.479
<v Speaker 1>barely two percent in inflation for like the whole decade,

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>right then COVID happened and the economy came back, all

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain issues. It's likely that we'll see you know,

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe three or three and a half percent inflation for

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a year or two. I mean, that's not historically abnormal inflation,

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>just when we lived in a two percent inflation world

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>for so long. It's clearly higher, but again it's not

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that inflation that we saw in the late seventies and

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>early eighties. So I think it's a very key concept.

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned break even. It's a little interesting. Let's go

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>around the globe here. Break evens over in Germany and

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Europe are actually breaking up to some of the highest

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>levels UK I think the thirteen year high, Germany's multi

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>year highs as well. So there are some more inflationary

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>expectations starting to show up across the seas over in Europe.

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Now what exactly does all that mean? Listen, that's to

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>be a more difficult conversation. But we're seeing more inflationary

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>worries overseas, we're just not quite seeing them here in

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the US. So you said that we'll see three to

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>three point five percent inflation for for a year or two.

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that transitory to you? A year or two? Uh? Well,

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>not a good question. We all thought transitory in the beginning,

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>like three of six months. But I think we've all

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>are transitory means to sticking around a little bit more.

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>But when you had the worst you know, recession of

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>our lifetime and the way the economy opened up with

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues, um, you know, it just it's still

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>feels to us like a little bit higher inflation is okay.

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>But again it's it's just not that runaway. And maybe

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that is the new I hate to say this is

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a new normal, but maybe you know three three and

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>happened three to three and a half inflation for a

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of years is is a little more normal. And

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>again that's kind of a long term average of inflation

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it. I mean, you look at

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>unemployment and inflation, the misery index, right, um, you know

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right around ten percent. That's actually the long term

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>average of where inflation and unemployment have been historically going

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>back fifty years, so it's um a lot of ways

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to look at it. But again, inflation, just to us,

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is not quite the concern, and if it was, we

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>don't need to stock market me doing this good and

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't think you know, those commodities and industrial medals

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>are probably a lot higher if the market were truly

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>worried about inflation. Okay, so inflation maybe it's not a concern.

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you position your portfolio around on that? I mean,

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>are you going into more duration sensitive sectors or what

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>looks attractive to you right now? Yeah? Well, on the yeah,

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>on the fixed income side of things, we we have

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>shortened up duration. We think there is likely coming higher rates.

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>We've got the tenure yield we think can be up

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>around one seventy five by the end of this year.

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Of course, i'll impact bonds which trade inversely with with

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>higher rates, So we like mortgage backed securities which are

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>not quite as impacted by higher rates. Um. Now that's

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income side of things. But on the other side,

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and we do like the cyclicals, the financials, industrials, materials,

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the early cycle plays along with small caps. Historically early

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>economic cycle of growth do better, fully aware they started

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the year off gangbusters. In the last three or four

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>months have struggled, But we really do think we could

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>see another fourth quarter rally like we did last year

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in some of those areas. Do not forget last year, guys,

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the rustle two thousand small caps in twenty five percent,

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>an all time record fourth quarter last year. To me,

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>small caps have just been consolidating um most of this year,

0:33:57.920 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and we think that that that leadership from the cypical

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>value area likely will take the baton before all is

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>sudden done. Ryan Dietrich, chief market strategist at LPL Financial.

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to leave it there. Thank you so

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.479
<v Speaker 1>much for taking the time. We really appreciate you joining

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Charlotte, North Carolina's Thanks for

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News