WEBVTT - Meet the UN's First Special Rapporteur on Environmental Defenders

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Last year's Conference of the Parties, the UN's annual Climate Summit,

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>where global leaders come together to commit to certain actions

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>required to tackle the climate crisis, was held in the

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>United Arab Emirates, one of the world's major oil producers.

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>It was presided over by the president of the country's

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>national oil company. There were many many stories about the

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>obvious conflicts of interest there, including stories that rent on

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>our website at drilled Dot Media. But another issue that

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>came up, which had come up the year before in

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Egypt as well, was the limited role that climate activists

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>were allowed to play at this COP As they were

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in Egypt, protesters at last year's COP were cordoned off

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to a special designated area, far away from anyone who

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>might be bothered by them. One young protester managed to

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>bust into the main proceedings and make a bit of

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>a fuss, but otherwise protesters were largely unseen. This year's

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>COP will be in another oil state, Azerbaijan. Again, the

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.839
<v Speaker 1>country's national oil company will be deeply involved, and again

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>protesters are likely not to be tolerated, which begs the

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>question should protection of protest itself be a topic at COP?

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Can we get real climate action absent real democracy. With

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>all of that going on, it seemed like a good

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>time to bring you this interview that our reporter in France,

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Anna Pugel Mazzini did with Michel Forced, the world's first

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>UN special rapperture on environmental defenders. It's good timing because

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Forced released today a scathing report on what he's seeing

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>happen in the UK. If you missed our episode on that,

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it came out last week, go and listen to it.

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>The UK has moved really quickly to suppress protest and

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>even to suppress what protesters are allowed to say in

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>their own defense in court. Forced is not having it.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll link to that report in the show notes. The

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>position was created under something called the Our host Convention.

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>It's called that because it was adopted in the Danish

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>city of Our Hosts. Its official title is the UN

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision Making

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and Access to Justice and Environmental Matters. It falls under

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the United Nations Economic Convention for Europe and it's been

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>ratified by forty eight states, including the European Union. As

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you'll hear in this interview, Force points out that because

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a convention. There are actual teeth to it, which

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>makes things kind of interesting. Specifically, this new position of

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>his and the convention that supports it creates a pathway

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for citizens to voice issues that they have with a

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>development that will affect them. It also requires that they

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>be informed about those developments. So whether it's a building project,

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a mine, oil drilling, really anything that will materially impact

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>their environment, they need to be informed about it and

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:26.679
<v Speaker 1>they need to be able to express their opinions on it.

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>It also says that it's not enough for people to

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 1>be able to voice their displeasure with a particular project,

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they also need to have a legal pathway to do

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>something about it. In this interview, Anna asked Force how

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that commitment jives with the increased repression of climate protests

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that we've been seeing around Europe, what he and his

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>office might be able to do about that repression, and

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>how he thinks cop should address the rights of environmental activists.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>They got into all that and a lot more. I

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to enjoy this conversation. I'm Ami Westerville

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're listening to Drilled. After the break, Reporter Anna

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Poujol Mazzini in conversation with Michelle Forced stay with us.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Michelle, First, thank you so much for taking the

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 2>time for this interview. So could you start by introducing

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 2>yourself and telling me a bit more about your role

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 2>as special Rapture.

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so thank you for the invitation. As you know,

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 3>I've been recently appointed to a due more data which

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 3>has been created by steps that are party to the

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Orus Convention, which is a very interesting convention ratified by

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 3>forty eight states including THEU, based on three pillars. The

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 3>first success to information, meaning that in any country which

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 3>is part of the convention, when there is a project

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 3>that would affect the environment, then those who might be

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 3>affected should be a informed by the state in any

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 3>language that is accessible to the public. The second pillar,

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 3>which is complimentary to the first, is the obligation for

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 3>states but to also consulted Communities. Families are people who

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 3>are affected by this projector and they would have a

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 3>right to say anything on the project, including the right

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 3>to say no. It doesn't mean that they could block

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 3>the project. At least the would express themselves and say

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 3>that they don't agree with the projector. And the last pillar,

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 3>which is very irrelevant for the time being is access

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 3>to justice, access to environmental justice, meaning that people have

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 3>a writer to go to quote and then to challenge

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 3>any decison made by the state or the company when

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.679
<v Speaker 3>it affects their environment. So the Moundate is mostly directed

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 3>to countries that are multitude the Aras convention. But the

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 3>beauty of the Moundate, if I may say so, is

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>that when it's come to companies that operate a broader

0:05:55.200 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 3>like companies doing extractive industries or anything that ven and

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 3>they have their headquarters in one of the countries which

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 3>is part of to our convention, and operated a broader

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 3>and then do harm to defend us are broader like

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 3>a company based in Madrid working on time oil and

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 3>work in Peru or Columbia and then deforesting, affecting communities

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 3>in these people. Then those defenders could have access to

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 3>my mound data and that they would speak not to

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 3>the data but to the company itself. So we have

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 3>plenty of cases currently coming to the MOUND data from Africa,

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 3>from Alta in America and also from Asia involving companies

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 3>are based in France, in UK, in Switzerland, Norway, other countries.

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 3>So that's very new mandata very interesting and we need

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 3>to promote the mon date because most of the defenders,

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 3>most of the climate activists or environmental defenders don't even

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 3>know that they are defenders and that there are currently

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 3>mechanisms that could support them or defend them when they

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 3>are currently facing threats. And the reason why states have

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 3>decided to create this new mound data is presidesly because

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 3>they see that in many parts of the world, those

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 3>who are the most targeted, the most pressure climate activists.

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 3>And of course you know the data provided by global

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 3>witness and frontline defenders and others, and you see that

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 3>currently it's only the tip of the iceberg.

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 2>So you're the first raperture for the protection of environmental

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 2>defenders and the position was only created last year. But

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 2>as you say, we know that climate and land defenders

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>have been criminalized and even killed for decades. So could

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 2>you talk a bit more about what prompted the creation

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 2>of this role at this particular time.

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 3>As I said, precisely because the state's part to the

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 3>convention have been made away on the need to do more.

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 3>So there is a strong component on prevention in my

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 3>mound data and I'm trying to develop with my team

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 3>also with the support of followers and angiosa and you

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 3>measure to prevent those attacks to occur. The difference between

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 3>this mandata and other UN mandata is that while other

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>mandates have been created by a resolution adopted by the

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Council in Geneva by the UN Rights Council, this man

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 3>data has been created within the legally binding instrumental the Convention,

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 3>which has huge implications in the mances to come or

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 3>you have to come. The fact that there is a

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 3>mandate created and illegally buying instrumanda as huge implications for stats,

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 3>but so for companies because companies that are currently in

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 3>one of the countries that are partic to the Convention

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 3>also legally binding binded by this by this new human data.

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 2>And so the fact that the mandate is legally binding,

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 2>what does that give you the tools to do to

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 2>protect environmental defenders?

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 3>It gets more more pressure to the man data where

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm speaking with ministers traveling two countries, where I'm sending

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 3>allegation letters to countries doing that. Then the fact that

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 3>defenders are being threatened or under attack. Then the fact

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 3>that the mandate is granted legally reinforces the dialogue with

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the state because they know that it does. It may

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 3>have implications like, for instance, if one state would not

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 3>fulfill the recommendations expressed by the mound data, then there

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 3>would be also possibilities for the other parties to the

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 3>convention to request withdrawal from the states from the convention,

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 3>which in terms of international diplomacy have quite a number

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 3>of implications. Could imagine uk on France being expelled from

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 3>one of the most relevant convention on environment that would

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 3>be complicated for them to face things. And similarly, the

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 3>fact that we are currently in Europe adopting new measures

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 3>new legally binding instrument like the Due Diligence arective would

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 3>also have implications for companies that are based in Europe

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 3>instead would have the obligations to oversee the behavior of

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 3>companies proud like lact Totally Nagen France, or companies from

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 3>UK or from other countries Operator and Brew. So it's

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 3>too early now to say, but I'm confident that the

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 3>more we developed together with lawyers the methods of worker

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 3>and we will see the results in aram of states.

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 2>Could you maybe give us an overview on what the

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 2>situation looks like today in the world for environmental defenders

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 2>and how it's evolved in the past years.

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you know that in the past, I also had

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 3>another more data. I used to be the UN Special

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 3>appoct on defenders, and when I started with this mondate,

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 3>it was in twenty fourteen. I invited hundreds of defenders

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 3>to meet with me in broad consultations in all five continents,

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 3>and I was struck by the fact that the people

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 3>that came to me where the most at weaks were

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 3>precisely environmental defenders. And that's why I decided to develop

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 3>and to present a report in twenty sixteen to the

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 3>UN Rance Council on Environmental Defenders to set to state,

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 3>that's the situation that you are facing, and why is

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 3>it that you don't respond properly to the needs expressed

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 3>by those defenders. You have created mechanism tools to protect them,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 3>but nonetheless we see that there is an increasing number

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 3>of killings of those defenders. And then states under the

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 3>leadership of Norway decided to adopt a new resolution on

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>advantage defenders, which rather a couple of years later, and

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 3>there was a way to pave the way for other

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 3>states and for the you and for the Lifeline project

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 3>to create new tools and modalities to protect advantage unders.

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 3>But nonetheless we see that the situation is quite quite

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 3>complicated so now and that's why having this new MAOUN data,

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to do the same, that is to organize constultations.

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 3>But broadly, I would say that the situation has not improved.

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 3>And it's sort of like a battle in which you

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 3>see that the more effective the tools are to protect

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 3>defenders and the more difficult that the situation is becoming

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 3>because states are developed and compared are developing new so

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 3>new new forms of in citius attacks against against enrountered

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 3>defenders and climate activists.

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 2>So when you're talking about the situation getting worse for

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 2>environmental activists and states and other actors developing new tools,

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 2>could you talk a bit more about what that looks like.

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I mean, if you if you read the reports

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 3>by Global Witness, they would tell you the data of

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 3>killings or attacks against defenders is increasing now, it's not diminishing,

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 3>despite the fact that we have developed new new measures

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 3>and the new forms of attacks in citius attacks have

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.719
<v Speaker 3>been developed by by state using different form of criminalization,

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 3>campaigns of feilification against climate activists and environmental defenders, new

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 3>forms of attacks, using like anti terrorist laws to target

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 3>those who are simply going to the street to protest

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 3>against the inaction of states on climata And that's something

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 3>which unfolt need for works in fact, and you see

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 3>that the reaction of the public to those new forms

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 3>of moradiation is not a big support absolutely.

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I've heard you talk in other interviews about

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 2>also this sort of battle of narratives and the violence,

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 2>particularly in France that's used by the government and the

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 2>media against environmental activists. So I'm really interested to get

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 2>into that a bit more. What would you say is

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 2>driving this increase in the criminalization of environmental defenders, particularly

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:45.359
<v Speaker 2>in Europe, which your mandate mostly covers. Are there special

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 2>interest or interest groups lobbying for these changes?

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, when I was appointed D two, in fact

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 3>I started October twenty two, I decided to travel to

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 3>EU countriesa just to present them on data, because it's

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 3>not well known and we need to promote the MOUND data.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 3>And I've been invited to quite a number of EU

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 3>capitals to meet with governments, meeting with ministers, trying to

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 3>seek supports of political packing and sometimes funding for the

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 3>mound data and at each every occasion traveling to those countries,

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 3>I've been also inviting climate activists and defenders to come

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 3>to me to meet with me. I've been asking organizations

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 3>to set up meetings to discuss the situation in countries,

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 3>to see what is the level of attacks in countries.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 3>And I've been impressed by the fact that what came

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 3>first was civil disobedienza and climate activism. In fact that

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 3>meeting with Greenpeace, meeting with other organizations, then the reservation

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 3>in France or other countries who they had similar organizations.

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 3>They all came to me saying that we see that

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 3>currently there is a huge pressure on us. The judicial

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 3>system does not respond adequately properly to our needs. We

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 3>are sentenced to more and more he finds or penalties

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 3>or prisons, fines, We are targeted by the police and

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 3>sometimes very violently, like in France but also in Germany,

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 3>and we don't see a big support from the media.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 3>The media only reporting on actions taken, but they never

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 3>speak on the causes of the action. That is why

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 3>we are going to the street to demonstrata and they

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 3>only say that we are blocking access to road, putting

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 3>in danger other peoples. Blocking the access to hospitals is

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 3>not true blocking access to airports, but they don't report

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 3>properly on why we ask climate activists go to the

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 3>street to claim for a better response from the state

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 3>and what we see currently and daily the increasing climate

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 3>crisis and biodiversity crisis, and that's why I've decided to

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 3>organize that was in July a first meeting inviting twenty

0:15:55.240 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 3>seven climate activists from seventeen countries to meet with me

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 3>one day, and the idea was to share information and

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 3>to read different experiencies coming from from different countries. I

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>also invited lawyers and their lawyers to come to the

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 3>meeting and to explain why they have been not able

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 3>to provide a very effective support to this climate activista.

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 3>And the idea of this first workshop was to prepare

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 3>a sort of a guidance tool for states to see

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 3>whether or not we could find a sort of harmonization

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 3>inside eucontrisa on how states are responding to the new

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 3>news form of mobilization, because what we currently see is

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 3>that what happens in France is different from what happens

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 3>in Germany or UK or in Norway or Switzerland, which

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 3>is not part of the EU, but we're somewhere also

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 3>from from Switzerland and even in countries, and we see

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 3>that the response coming from the judgical system is not

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 3>the same. If you demonstrate in parent or in to

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Los or in Bordeaux, then if you are brought to justice,

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 3>you go to quota and you receive different sentences from

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 3>the same The system doesn't have that sort of harmonization

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 3>of the response to climate activism. Having also been monitoring

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 3>trials in courts in different countries to see how the

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 3>judges would respond to the needs expressed by the people

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 3>to explain the causes of the action and to use

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 3>also the criminal code in different ways, and to be honest,

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 3>are really struck by the fact that the judges don't

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 3>really respond to the needs in some countriesm like in

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Franza or Switzerland, or Germany or Norway. Then you see

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 3>that judges would decide to sentence, but nonetheless to lift

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 3>the sentence, expressing that they have understood the cause and

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 3>why people have decide to break the law continually for

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 3>the cause. But nonetheless what is not relevant is that

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 3>in a continent or in a group of countries like

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 3>the EU, the response coming from from the juditual system

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 3>is different, which is not acceptable. In fact that currently

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 3>UK and Germany are the two countries that are the

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 3>most difficult for climatativist and those who are using civil disobedience,

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 3>and it has in those countries, but also in other

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 3>countries the terrent effect I meaning that people are sentenced

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 3>to heavy fines and so they would decide not to

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 3>continue the action, They would decide to withdraw from the organizations.

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 3>So it works from the side of the government. The

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 3>more important defines are penalties, then the more people who

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 3>decide to withdraw from organizations and would not decide to

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 3>continue the fight.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 2>That's so interesting. I mean, I wonder what has changed,

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 2>at least in Europe in the past few years to

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 2>pave the way for that increased criminalization and repression of

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 2>environmental activists. And I wonder if you're if you've heard

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 2>of particular political groups or interest groups or sort of

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 2>companies pushing for that repression in order to protect their interest. Well.

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 3>In fact, the reason why we see such an increasing

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 3>number of forms of orbilization in Europe is that young

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 3>people are currently the most active and see that the

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 3>future is endangered in fact, and that's why they're going

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 3>to Sweet to demonstrate and using civil disobedience as a

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 3>re action. But on the other side, the reaction from

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 3>the States is quite is quite different. I don't I

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 3>don't know, but probably companies would talk for each other

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 3>in fact, that's that's clear. And I know that governments

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 3>are currently also discussing what's happening in that country. Is

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 3>a comparing situation, comparing the response from the dulcy system

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 3>to those new forms of mobilization. But we don't have

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 3>concrete elements to elaborate on LISA. We know that some

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 3>companies are putting pressure in UK on the government. We

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 3>know that companies are putting pressure in France, like Total

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Energy and others on the governments to respond to the

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 3>attacks coming from those activists against all those companies. But

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 3>we cannot confirm that there are currently sort of European

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 3>mobilization from companies or a network companies that would decide

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 3>to lobby in Europe, in the u R, at that

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 3>national level, at domestic level against those new activism. What

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 3>I see is that on the media you see more

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 3>CONTRIISA people using those new forms of orviization in blocking

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 3>the streets, throwing paints in museums or blocking access to

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 3>two roads, and they see that it draws the attention

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 3>of the public and the media. But at the same

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 3>time they complain that the media do not report pop adequately.

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 3>They will explain the causes. So it's sort of a

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 3>battle which is ongoing in countries in Europe and we

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 3>need to monitor. And that's the road that the model has,

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 3>to monitor the situation and then to report back to

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 3>states and to provide guidance to states to better respond them.

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 3>In my workshop in Paris in July, I also invited

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 3>that a few activists coming from outside the EU to

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 3>see whether or not it's limited in the EU. And

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 3>in fact, we have people coming from Georgia, for instance,

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 3>from Serbia, which are not party to the EU but

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 3>close to the EU, and those countries will tell us

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 3>that it's not the case in the countries in fact.

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 3>So currently that's very limited to EU countries in fact,

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 3>so we need to understand why.

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 2>So when you say this, this seems to be limited

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 2>in new countries, is that the civil disobedience techniques or

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 2>is that the sort of repressive strategy is used by

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 2>states or both.

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 3>Both, Because yeah. Of course, the using civil disobedience is

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 3>a form of action that is used mostly in new countries.

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 3>While in Denmark, for instance, I was struck by the

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 3>fact of traveling to Denmark, I think organized a meeting

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 3>with climate activists in Denmark. The first thing that they

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 3>asked me that was to leave my computer and my

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 3>telephone outside of the room because they say we are

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 3>under surveillance and were taped in fact, and that's the

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 3>first time for many years that have seen that in Europe.

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 3>In fat people asking me to put my telephone outside

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 3>of the room, and when they came to parties to

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 3>my meeting they say the same who decide to leave

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 3>all telephone outside of the room?

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Wow? And so I find it so interesting. Norway a

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 2>country which is also seeing a lot of time activism

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of civil basibiliens, but not as heavy

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 2>handed a response to it. Would you say that's currently

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the country that's best respecting the right of environmental defenders

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 2>within your amende.

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 3>I would say yes, but it needs to be confirmed

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 3>it was only a workshop. I've also been traveling to

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Norway to also meet with them, and I was struck

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 3>by the fact that the situation is quite different from

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 3>other countries in near you, but does to be to

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 3>be confirmed by a more comprehensive analysis. And that's why

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 3>I also have requested the full Amzal Rights Agency. The

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 3>fraud based in Vienna are doing studies to study the

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 3>legal systems in medic countries and then there are also

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 3>doing interviews with beneficial EASA to say where not the

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 3>law is respected in the countries. So from I would

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 3>also be looking at our current state of legislations in

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 3>new countrisa on civil disobedience to see that we need

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 3>to harmonize legislations. This is interesting. Is one of the

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 3>agencies that reports to the EU, to the Council, to

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 3>the Commission and to the Tallement in fact, and that

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 3>the role is to guide also the EU institutions on

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 3>how to put pressure on states to better respect than

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 3>the Charter in fact. So a study coming from the

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 3>front will also be a way to complement my own

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 3>empedic analysis of the situation, a more scientific observation of

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 3>what's happening in EU countries.

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 2>So, since your office was created almost a year ago, now,

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 2>what are some of the complaints that you've received? Do

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 2>you have sort of figures do you have examples of

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the complaints people come to you with.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 3>The practices that with you and special apports. The communications

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 3>are kept confidential until they get the become public in fact,

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 3>so when I receive a complaint or communication coming from

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 3>from a defender, then I'm discussing the side with the

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 3>staff while looking to receiving additional information with double shape

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 3>information to make sure that we are not malipedated and

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 3>the demand that is relevant. And then when we're sure

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 3>that the complaint is relevant for the more data, then

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 3>we send a communication official communication to the data and

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 3>state have sixty days to reply to my communication in writing,

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 3>and then my communication and the response of the data

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 3>becomes public on the website. So if you go to

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 3>the website of my man Data, you will see a

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 3>few public communications. The idea of those communications is to

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 3>prevent other attacks to occur. That if we deal with

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 3>an attack, then stay have a duty not to applicate

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 3>or to repeat the attacks the communities. So the idea

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 3>is to make sure that those communications will be a

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 3>way to prevent attacks. So just have a look. I

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 3>will send you the link to those communications. So currently

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 3>we civilian communication coming from Climate Activista complaining that they

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 3>are been arrested but to justice that the justicism doesn't

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 3>fulfill the Internet subligation of the states and that state

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 3>have identified convention that they don't respect. We see also

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 3>receiving a communication coming from defenders in Latin America having

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 3>been attacked by companies based in one of the countries

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 3>that is particude the Health Convention. So we are currently yes,

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 3>discussing with states, discussing with companies on how we should

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 3>follow up on those communications to make sure that things

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 3>would not offer and not be worse for defenders. So

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 3>different types of communications were also cases like in the

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Balkans or Sutral Regia of broad communicy multil blood community

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 3>GISA claiming that their rights to be properly consulted or

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 3>to be heard has not been respected by the STATA.

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 3>And when it's come to big project like MEGADAMSA, we

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 3>have a case of megadam in what countries in Sutra

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Relagia and then communities have been affected. So it's more

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 3>a sort of a more broad communication coming from a

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 3>group of defenders rather than communication coming from one single individual.

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 2>For the people who will be listening to the podcast,

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 2>what are some of the cases that you're now allowed

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 2>to talk about.

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I would have a few cases of climate activist like words.

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 3>In France, there was a case of a journalist have

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 3>been accused of taking part to an action and then

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 3>being assimilated to people who are using sipit disabedions was

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.360
<v Speaker 3>it was a journalist and then it was arrested by

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 3>the police, and then after my letter was sent to

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 3>the government, then the government decided to leave the charges

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 3>against him. So that's one of the cases.

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Are there's a big question I think surrounding the impact

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 2>that your office can have, and as you say, you

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 2>can work with countries that have signed the convention, or

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 2>when companies that are headquarters in countries that have signed

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 2>the convention work in other countries. So, since the brand

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.479
<v Speaker 2>of the violence occurs in countries outside of Europe, and

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 2>especially against indigenous communities, and since the US and Canada,

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 2>which are home to a lot of ecocidal multinationals, are

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 2>not part of the convention, how can your office ensure

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 2>the protection of these environmental defenders? And so what can

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 2>you do, if anything, with regards to nations that are

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 2>not part of the convention, or with regards to multinational companies.

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 3>That's precisely if the limitation of the munday in Faifa.

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 3>When companies based in Canada, or in China, or in

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Russia or in the US and are doing harm to

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 3>defend us to communities to induce people, I can do

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 3>nothing when I receive a complaint coming content because the

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 3>thing that my mondate would be relevanda. Then simply forwarding

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 3>to my communication to other modate holders and we have

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 3>a good level of communication with other reporters. I would

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 3>also report and forward information to the circuit rate of

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the Scusial Agreement, which is similar to as Convention but

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 3>relevant for the AMERICASA. I would also decide to forward

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 3>the information received to the African raporter on defenders, so

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 3>we have a network of defenders. And if I'm not

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 3>able to take a case, then would refer to the

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 3>case to other reporters and similarly some of them would

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 3>decide to would pressure on states to do joint communication

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 3>with me. That I could also decide to do a

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 3>joint communication to a states with the Commission for Emerals

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 3>of the Counciler and she also admnuications refers cases to

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 3>me because he's traveling a lot countries inside the Council

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 3>of Europe. And when she sees that she is approached

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 3>by communities or defenders, then she said there is a

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 3>man data which returned to you, and that briefly the

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 3>case to you, and then the staff aren't communicating on

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 3>the case.

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Do you talk very quickly about the difference between the

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Aras Convention and the Escazio Agreements.

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Both our international agreement. They are based on the same pilaza,

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 3>the three pilars access to information, public participation, access to

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 3>and other justice. So we have the same grounds in fact,

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 3>and they pay SISA. But the main difference is that

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 3>the Old Convention is a universal convention, meaning that all

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 3>states outside of Europe could also ratify the convention, which

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 3>is the case for one country in Africa, Guinea Bissau

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 3>has decided to join the Old Convention. We are currently

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 3>also discussing with other countries in Africa to join the convention,

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 3>while the Escausal Agreement is a regional agreement only for

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Latin America or for the Americas as a whole in fact.

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Now and the other difference is that although the two

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 3>agreements and convention have also a strong component on the

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 3>protection of defenders. The Arts convernment has decided to establish

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 3>a man data of a social partur while it's not

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 3>the case for the eskazoog Rementa. And currently yeah, we

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 3>are discussing with the Eskazoo Agreement secret area, which is

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 3>based in Chile. They monitor the way this mondat is

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 3>effective or not, and then they may also decide to

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 3>establish original mand data under the Eskazugrimna to also promote

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.959
<v Speaker 3>and protect the defenders in the region. So that's more

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 3>or less the main difference where we are working in

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 3>fact very closely together.

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 2>You've talked a bit about the climate activist tactics of

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 2>civil disobedience in the Europe region, and so I think

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 2>a big, big question is the question of non violence. Right, So,

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 2>according to the convention, environmental defenders are only protected if

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 2>they are non violent. But given the climate emergency and

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 2>the lack of back that peaceful protests have had in

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 2>the past decades, we can see that the methods of

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 2>environmental activists are evolving to sometimes include sabotage and material destruction.

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 2>We're also increasingly seeing states and the media portray these

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 2>activists as violent and dangerous, even in cases where that's

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 2>not true. So how do you ensure those activists are

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 2>protected and what level of material violence is considered legitimate?

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 2>How do you handle the increasing use of sabotage as

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 2>a necessary strategy to stop ecocidal projects.

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you're right, and the question of violence is at

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the heart of the more data to the v with

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 3>the UA. In fact, that's a question which has been

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 3>debated since decades by the UN and by number of states.

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 3>And you know that in nineteen ninety eight states that

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 3>the UN have decided to adopt a UN Declaration on

0:32:56.480 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Humans Defenders and precisely the close off violence was very

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 3>largely discussed by states when adopting this declaration and can

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 3>only be recognized as a defender someone who is not

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 3>using violence. And in my past Monday, that'd been that

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 3>admeduication is confronted by the decision is that violence or not?

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 3>And it's each time an adopt decision, a case by

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 3>case decision. And for me, since I've been working on

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 3>defenders for so many years together with the stuff with

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 3>the stuff who, I've adopted a clear definition of the violence.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Violence cannot be against persons or against individuals life unescence.

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 3>If you go to a rally or demonstration in sueism,

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 3>you are throwing stones to police officers. That for me

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 3>violence those people I excluded from from protection. They are

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 3>throwing both of cocktails to buildings or that's for me

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 3>violence I could not recognize. I mean, I don't challenge

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 3>the legislimacy of the cause, but they are not recognized

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 3>by me as being humanity defenders. Someone who is responding

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 3>to the to the violence by the police. That's something

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 3>we see different. If you are in a demonstration and

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 3>you are all of a sudden surrounded by police officers

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.760
<v Speaker 3>that would decide to beat you violently, and you would

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.240
<v Speaker 3>defend yourself in fact, kick the knee of the police

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 3>on Yeah, defending yourself, that for me is not violence.

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 3>In fact, then that's self defenser and those people could

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 3>be recognized as being defenders. And so that's the limitation

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 3>in terms of physical violence. In fact, now when it's

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.760
<v Speaker 3>come to violence to property, also a very different approach,

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 3>and I would not take as defender someone who is

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 3>deliberately using sabotage as a form of action. For me,

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 3>that's that's clearly a limitation, But which is something really

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 3>completely to describe. That's that's private property. If you would

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 3>break the door of a private property to to do

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 3>a civil disobedience activity, then for me, that would not

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 3>be violence. In fact, that would be a way to

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 3>simply open the door too, in a symbolic place, doing

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 3>an action which is which will respond to the definition

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 3>of civil disobedient.

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Some so tresspassing or breaking down a door to get

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 2>to private property to protest against a project in a

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 2>symbolic way is not considered the violence. But because you are.

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Not destroying, in fact, you are not destroying, you are trespassing.

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 3>In fact, you are in fact destroying the door maybe

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 3>or the barrier. But then you enter a field or

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 3>a place in which you decide to publicly use using

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 3>a civil disobedience. But it's not it's not it's not

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 3>violence for me. While destroying a property, like destroying a

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 3>basine like in also that's for me, it's not. I mean,

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 3>I would not say it's not acceptable. But those people

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 3>could not be recognized as being a defense in factor.

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So in this particular case, so if you're mentioning

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 2>the megabasins and the water defenders in France, so.

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 4>Those activists who purposely decide to sabotage the installation of

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 4>a basin.

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 2>That's they don't come under your mandate. No, clearly no, no,

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 2>How do you come to that conclusion? Is that something

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:46.959
<v Speaker 2>that you're sort of still thinking about and that could

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 2>be evolving at some point given the lack of climate

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:58.720
<v Speaker 2>action through peaceful means like is sabotage always out of question?

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 3>As as I said, we are monitoring on a case

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 3>by case discussion with the staff, but for the time being,

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 3>what we call sabotage is something which is not permitted

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 3>under the mondate indact I would I would not admit,

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 3>but of course we could. We could further discuss with

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 3>the stuff. We will see the forms of action, the

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 3>new forms of action taken by activists. But for me,

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 3>that's clearly currently a strong barrier and I don't want

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 3>to currently enter either discussion with the groups to discuss

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 3>the validity or legitimacy or sabotage. That would be too

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 3>complicate for me. I need to be careful because that's

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:41.839
<v Speaker 3>a new mond aid in fact, so I don't want

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 3>to humper the development of the mound data by taking

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.800
<v Speaker 3>too premature lead decisions that would then have an impact

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 3>and the state would decide to abolish the mandate because

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 3>they would see that I'm going too far and then

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm also boundaries. In fact, the bad reason created by

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 3>the resolution that creates my MOND data in twenty twenty

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 3>one when the master.

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Was created there.

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 3>So my role is to explore, if I may say so,

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 3>the boundary results on the data, but not to overlap

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 3>the boundaries. In fact, so exploring may also being able

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 3>to expand progressively the boundar is. But if I'm going

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 3>too fast and I see the danger that state we decide,

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:25.320
<v Speaker 3>oh it's too dangerous, then we albuish the MOND data

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:28.320
<v Speaker 3>would be a disaster for cliinet activities.

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 2>In fact, it's probably a question that you're dealing with

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 2>on a near daily basis, which would be like, how

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 2>can I include as many environmental actually this as I

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 2>can to protect as many of them without antagonizing states

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 2>and multinational companies who might be putting pressure on states

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 2>and make my mandate irrelevant.

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Right, So if you take the case in France, we

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 3>describe the case of the journalist, you know, the case

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 3>in fact, there was a group of of activits that

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 3>enter I don't know, eh term, whether whether they store

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 3>grains yeah, they broke the door. They entered the building

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 3>and they opened the sack of grain, and the grain

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean came to the floor, but nothing the thing

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they did not destroy. It was a sabotage.

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 3>In fact, they simply wanted to show that both grains

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:21.359
<v Speaker 3>are genetic, grains are dangerous for the future. And that's

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 3>what they did, in fact, simply that they decide to

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 3>burn their grains, but simply to open the sack to

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 3>show what was in fact the purpose of the action.

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 3>And from me, the breaking the door, opening the sack

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:36.399
<v Speaker 3>was not for me violence. In fact, it's way way

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 3>for them to express the form of action.

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 2>In fact, okay, even though that could technically be considered

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:45.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, material destruction.

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 3>And the company was decided to to shoe the activisty

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 3>society because they say that it was a destruction of

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 3>private property. But if it would go, if I'd been

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 3>invited to the court, I would have to explain what

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 3>is really diserblit. And so my concern is that in

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 3>fact that the courts do not really understand what is

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 3>civilis obin.

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Some what are the what are the tactics being used

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 2>against environmental defenders? I heard you mentioned in an interview

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 2>with French media blasts that police forces seem to be

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 2>copying one another's methods in dealing with climate protests. Could

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 2>you expand on.

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 3>That, Yes, I mean that's against that's something which is empetic.

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 3>In fact that I don't have evidences on this, but

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:41.320
<v Speaker 3>when I see simply the images on TV of police

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 3>forces using the same techniques that are working in one

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 3>country and then copy pasting countries, I see that in fact,

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 3>that there is a discussion with the police. France is

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 3>the countries we had the most violence response by the

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 3>police compared to other countries in Europe. But if you

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.959
<v Speaker 3>see remember what they call in Germany this penguin hunt.

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 2>In fact there, okay, that's that's when police officers twist

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the risk of activists.

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Like the penguins in fact.

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, okay, yeah, so.

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 3>They twist the armor. It's very painful. In fact, then

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 3>for me it amounts to torture. In fact, now that's

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 3>very dangerous and very effective because people, the young people

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:23.839
<v Speaker 3>who are joined, but it puts outside the demonstration say

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 3>it's too dangerous, it's too too painful. To me, I

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 3>would not do that again in fact now, so the

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:32.280
<v Speaker 3>punishment is effective in fact, and it has been developed

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 3>in Germany. And then you see that in other countries

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 3>they are using the same technique to simply take people

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 3>out of the street where they block access to airports,

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 3>use them same technics. So I would say that there

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 3>is a form of application. But police officers know pretty

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 3>well what is working in other countries. Fortunately they don't

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 3>copy paste what's happening in France in fact there because

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:55.919
<v Speaker 3>that would be too dangerous for other EU countries. In fact,

0:41:55.920 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 3>down using tigers beating violently in a people who are

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:03.879
<v Speaker 3>simply not even taking part to demonstration, but simply being

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 3>industry and like tourists, or simply observing a demonstration. That's

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:10.280
<v Speaker 3>something which is for me horrendous.

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 2>What we're seeing now in our reporting is that climate

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 2>activists have always been targeted for you know, decades. They've

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 2>been targeted by states and interest groups and companies every

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 2>time they've tried to every time they've tried to stop

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 2>or prevent more climate damage. But what we seem to

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 2>be seeing now is that a lot of Western countries

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 2>that are considered democracies are also clamping down on climate activism.

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 2>And I'm wondering to what extent do you think that

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 2>clam downs on climate activism in Western countries give license

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 2>to people seeking to restrict environmental activism in places with

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 2>histories of human rights abuse and horror systems of accountability.

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's for me about the biggest problem that we

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 3>have to face with the French government. In fact, the

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 3>problem is the coherence between international action of the French

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:14.800
<v Speaker 3>government and what's happening at domestic level. In fact, we

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 3>see that France and the develop more everyday are putting

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 3>huge money to support to activists and defenders and civic

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:26.280
<v Speaker 3>space in many countries and asking the embassies in countries

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 3>also to invite defenders and activists to meet with them.

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 3>They provide funding also to activity to groups in those countries,

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 3>but at the same time, at domestic level they are

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 3>treating people who are going to the street in a

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 3>very violent way. So it's not in fact coherent, and

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:49.439
<v Speaker 3>I see that speaking to other governments in Africa or

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Latin America. Then when they discuss with the embassies, they

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 3>sometimes refer to the fact that look at the picture

0:43:57.120 --> 0:44:00.800
<v Speaker 3>that we are seeing in achieves on how you respond

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 3>to demonstration in your country. Why are you criticizing us

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 3>in fact? And that's something which has also an impact

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:11.879
<v Speaker 3>on the image of a country like France at international level.

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 3>And that's also explain why in some countries we see

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 3>a strong resistance, a strong reaction against against France. And

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm also looking at how put in other dictators also

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 3>referring to a situation in France to simply say what's

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 3>happening in our country is not different from what's happening

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 3>in Franza. So you see that it's also impact. And

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 3>I remember Putting also with a smile, discussing with Macrome

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:45.239
<v Speaker 3>on the fact that when the Yellow Vestas were demonstrating

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 3>influence and I was saying, look at us, how you

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 3>respond and are you criticizing us in fact? Then of

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 3>course they are not killing a defense in Fluenza. But

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 3>at the same time they are using also very severe

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 3>forms of violence.

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, that's that's fascinating and terrifying at the

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:03.399
<v Speaker 2>same time.

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:06.320
<v Speaker 3>I remember I had in the past a discussion with

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the French ambassador to Honduras. I don't want to give

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 3>the name or the period, in fact that it was

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 3>when I was seen by Monday between twenty fourteen and

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty traveling to Hondurasa and discussing with the ambassador.

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 3>That is likely what he said. In fact, at that

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 3>time there was a very violent demonstration in Honduras and

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 3>when he tried to explain to the Minister of Tailor

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Home Affairs that sometimes the police should behave differently. Then

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 3>immediately there was a response from the Minister to the

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 3>ambassador saying, guy, look at what's happening in France.

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 2>Wow, yeah, I had to heard so on the repression.

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:49.760
<v Speaker 2>And again I'm thinking, I'm thinking, particularly about what happened

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 2>in France after Sainsolin. Your statements on the use of

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 2>force by police had been very strong worded. I was

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 2>surprised by how strong word did they work for an

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 2>office link to the UN And how effective do you

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 2>think the condemnation of human bodies and special rapertures can

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 2>really be importing injustice? How much of the determine can it?

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Can it really be if there's no sort of enforcement

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 2>mechanisms or actual punishment to go with it.

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 3>First of and I would say that my reaction was

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:33.919
<v Speaker 3>very strong, but I was not the only one having

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 3>this reaction coming from internationalization. So we had a similar

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 3>reaction coming from the Commission for Emails of the Council

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 3>of Europe, so contending Police Valencia the response of the police.

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 3>You also had a statement by the new UN a

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 3>High Commissioner for Human Rights on France at the opening

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 3>of one other session of the Council, using the same

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 3>strong words against, not not against, but to point out

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 3>the fire that France was one of the countries which

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:04.920
<v Speaker 3>is currently the most violence against people who are trying

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 3>to demonstrate it. So we mean I was not alone.

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:11.800
<v Speaker 3>It was like we had discussions with the UN on

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:15.720
<v Speaker 3>how to react, and other reporters also sent a formal

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:18.800
<v Speaker 3>communication to France, a group of reporters which is public,

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:21.880
<v Speaker 3>also containing the violence response by the police or the

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 3>demonstrations in Saint Zolina. So it was like a sort

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 3>of a joint action by different organizations, good pressure in France.

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 3>So you could say that it doesn't work. In fact,

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:35.280
<v Speaker 3>that you mean if you read the response by the

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 3>French Minister of Interior or Damana saying that this guy

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 3>commenting police violence from his office in New York while

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:45.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm based in palist in fact, and it's a sort

0:47:45.280 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 3>of show off position saying we don't care when he's

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:52.360
<v Speaker 3>saying in fact, but when you speak with the internal system,

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 3>with the Ministry of an Affairs, with the Ministry of Justice,

0:47:56.360 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 3>you see that is an impact in fact, because they

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 3>know that at the end of the day, France will

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:05.240
<v Speaker 3>be called before the u NA at different educations. For instance.

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is what we call the Universal Peridical Review.

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 3>It's a new a new mechanism at the UNA by

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 3>which all states have to come to the UNA and

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 3>to explain the situation of human rights in the country.

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:22.919
<v Speaker 3>And then they received communication recommendations coming from other states

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:27.719
<v Speaker 3>and France every four years, and also to respond to

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 3>questions coming from from from from other countries on what's

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:34.240
<v Speaker 3>happening in France. So it has an impact because they

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 3>don't want to hear strong coloration coming from other states,

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:40.840
<v Speaker 3>because it's an impact also on the reputation of France.

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 3>So I'm sure that the publicly again that's a response

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 3>of the minister, But at the same time instructions have

0:48:49.239 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 3>been given to ambassadors to monitor what's happening at the

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 3>u N to prepare the next time the next phase

0:48:55.880 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 3>of France examination before the UN mass concerned. So I'm

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 3>sure it has an impact. I'm not able to measure

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 3>the level end of the impact, but I'm sure that

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 3>it has a positive impact. Some public statements from the

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 3>UN and from the consider of Europe on France have

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 3>an impact because France is one of the five countries

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 3>members of the Security consider of the UN. So they

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 3>have also a duty and obligations to be coherent, which

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 3>is not the case so far, but they have an

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:24.880
<v Speaker 3>abligation to do that.

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's talk about the situation in France in more detail.

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 2>So can you tell me from your perspective what the

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:40.759
<v Speaker 2>situation has looked like in France recently when it comes

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 2>to the rights and the protection of environmental defenders.

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:48.799
<v Speaker 3>I would say two different situations. Some then at the

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:52.280
<v Speaker 3>level of the Orders Convention. In addition to the mandate

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 3>of special portter, you also what we call the complaints Committee.

0:49:56.360 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 3>The complaints committee is there to look at how France

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 3>would comply with all the profession of the Convention, and

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:04.160
<v Speaker 3>anyone has the possibility to put a complaint before the

0:50:04.200 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 3>complaints Committee. It's more broadly on lack of access to

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 3>information or lack of public participation. And currently, if you

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 3>look at the website of the Complaints Committee. You would

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:23.239
<v Speaker 3>see that there are currently complaints being put forward by

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 3>groups like France or by green Peace or by others

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Lay and others. Again the fact that France would not

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:36.399
<v Speaker 3>comply with all provisions of the older convention. So that's

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:40.360
<v Speaker 3>for the broad approach on what's how France is approaching

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 3>environmental just the defenders in France. It's not individual cases,

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:45.879
<v Speaker 3>but it could. It gives you a good a good

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:48.240
<v Speaker 3>idea on what's happening at the level of the complaints

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 3>with the main provisional convention now to come to to

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 3>to activists and to defend themselves, that is individuals orders.

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean since I've been appointed, I've been approached by

0:50:59.800 --> 0:51:02.839
<v Speaker 3>men groups in fact in different places in France, from

0:51:03.120 --> 0:51:05.920
<v Speaker 3>the Brittany to to Lose in the south of France,

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 3>from the north of France to Strasbourg on different topics

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 3>related to unbandle situations or climate division. In fact, people

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 3>who are demonstrating against a new issallation or a new project,

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:23.840
<v Speaker 3>up to people who are simply trying to block and

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:27.279
<v Speaker 3>access to airports or to roads because they want to

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:31.120
<v Speaker 3>publicly explore them their opinion on the inaction of the

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 3>government on climate, so different types of situations and what

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:38.799
<v Speaker 3>I've been seeing and sometimes monitoring myself because I've been

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:41.400
<v Speaker 3>also traveling to meet with them and to see situations,

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 3>monaturing demonstrations, monitoring trials in court or so that's the

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 3>situation is not improving currently. And as we say it

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 3>from the biginning, the sometimes concerted campaigns of vilgifigation by

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:57.400
<v Speaker 3>public officials are also a great impact that is very

0:51:57.480 --> 0:52:01.600
<v Speaker 3>unfortunate on the public opinion. And you're a minister and

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 3>then a prime minister and then public officials and members

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 3>of parliament calling those people eco terrorist or simply terrorists

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:14.799
<v Speaker 3>or compared them to talibans or to volent actions. Then

0:52:14.840 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 3>it's not only people who are under pressure by the

0:52:18.040 --> 0:52:20.560
<v Speaker 3>cause for with their fighting, which I mean will have

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 3>a poll on this in the coming months. Is to

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:26.799
<v Speaker 3>see the imparct of public vealifation by public officials on

0:52:27.080 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 3>the way the French opinion might be manipulated on climata.

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:36.239
<v Speaker 3>But it has clearly an impact on the way that

0:52:36.280 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 3>the population is perceiving those for the activism. So the

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:44.360
<v Speaker 3>situation is not for me a model influenza from the

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 3>response of the police, which is one of the most

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 3>violence in Europe and the response of the judgical system

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:53.840
<v Speaker 3>which is not corregent at all. We have an issue

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:58.399
<v Speaker 3>influencer with climate activism and civil disobedience, and.

0:52:58.360 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 5>In that in that way, I mean you talk you

0:53:03.120 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 5>talked about climate activists being stigmatized by the media and

0:53:06.600 --> 0:53:11.839
<v Speaker 5>also by by ministers and our police force using.

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:16.279
<v Speaker 2>A disproportionate amount of course on protesters. Is there a

0:53:16.600 --> 0:53:19.799
<v Speaker 2>French exception in that way when it comes to the

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:23.799
<v Speaker 2>oppression of climate activism, How does it compare to other

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 2>countries in Europe?

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, when it's come to campaigns or fulification or criminalization.

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 3>That's not only in France. In fact, you have the

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:34.200
<v Speaker 3>same level of if you if you look at Germany.

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 3>I was also in Austria in a sort of official visit.

0:53:37.320 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 3>Then I heard one of the ministry in Austria you

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 3>also the world eco terrorista to qualify people who are

0:53:43.760 --> 0:53:46.640
<v Speaker 3>simply going to the street, people who were other times

0:53:46.719 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 3>throwing pains or the monument. In fact, in Austria, but

0:53:50.000 --> 0:53:52.960
<v Speaker 3>you see that in UK that are the same. In

0:53:53.000 --> 0:53:55.479
<v Speaker 3>Spain you have the same. In Italy you're the same.

0:53:56.000 --> 0:54:02.839
<v Speaker 3>In all ucuntrivisa. Those campaigns of stigmatics and verification also, yeah,

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:05.600
<v Speaker 3>at the same same level. In fact, now the main

0:54:05.640 --> 0:54:07.800
<v Speaker 3>difference is from us in the response of the police,

0:54:08.040 --> 0:54:12.600
<v Speaker 3>but in terms of the way politicians are perceiving climacti vista,

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 3>we have the same the same problem in a country

0:54:15.560 --> 0:54:18.440
<v Speaker 3>with the exception of Norway, again which not EU, but

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the country in Europe.

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:24.759
<v Speaker 2>What what's difference about how the police responds to kind

0:54:24.760 --> 0:54:27.120
<v Speaker 2>of activism in France? What sets them apart?

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean simply the level of violence, the level of violence,

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:33.839
<v Speaker 3>which is not the case in the UK, Whether they

0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:37.880
<v Speaker 3>have a strong tradition of not being so violencer, not

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:41.160
<v Speaker 3>using the same the same methods in Germany, that's the case,

0:54:41.280 --> 0:54:43.600
<v Speaker 3>despite the fact that in the past the German police

0:54:43.640 --> 0:54:47.919
<v Speaker 3>has been very violent, but nowadays it's different now in fact,

0:54:48.080 --> 0:54:52.400
<v Speaker 3>using as we said, these new forms of violence against

0:54:52.440 --> 0:54:55.880
<v Speaker 3>the demonstration, using this hundriff. They said that, but you

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:59.200
<v Speaker 3>don't have strong cheer guards or bettings by the police

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:02.760
<v Speaker 3>using also bullets against against people who are the most racing,

0:55:03.120 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 3>which is unique influence and not a model for other countries.

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:12.160
<v Speaker 2>What do you think explains that? What? Why is the

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:15.800
<v Speaker 2>French police more violent than its neighbors.

0:55:16.360 --> 0:55:20.120
<v Speaker 3>It was interesting to hear, especially is discussing the difference

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:22.440
<v Speaker 3>between the French police and other police. In fact, and

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 3>in the past, there has been a group established by

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 3>the EU inviting police officers to come together to discuss

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:32.120
<v Speaker 3>methods of work reaction to different forms of the motuation.

0:55:32.840 --> 0:55:36.040
<v Speaker 3>And France decided not to participate to this group of

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 3>discussions simply because they said that we have our own

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:42.840
<v Speaker 3>preciliar way of doing it and we don't want to

0:55:42.880 --> 0:55:46.560
<v Speaker 3>learn from others, so they simply refuse to discuss with others,

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:51.040
<v Speaker 3>while others coming together decided to adopt new modalities of

0:55:51.120 --> 0:55:54.440
<v Speaker 3>action and to take the best from the best of

0:55:54.480 --> 0:55:57.280
<v Speaker 3>the police officers in other countries, and France was different

0:55:57.400 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 3>decided not to put to take part into those discussions.

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:02.200
<v Speaker 3>So I don't have the name of the group of discussions,

0:56:02.200 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 3>but if you look into Google you would sign this.

0:56:05.560 --> 0:56:09.240
<v Speaker 3>And if you listen to specialists of the police in France,

0:56:09.280 --> 0:56:13.160
<v Speaker 3>I will also explain that ware situation by which France

0:56:13.640 --> 0:56:19.080
<v Speaker 3>woul decided to go alone, saying we have own efficient tradition.

0:56:20.080 --> 0:56:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay wow. And in terms of so you're saying, they're

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:31.200
<v Speaker 2>also quite unique in the amount and the strength of

0:56:31.280 --> 0:56:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the weapons they're using against protesters, right, like rubber belts,

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:36.160
<v Speaker 2>like grenard.

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:42.959
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, tools that they're using which are not used

0:56:43.000 --> 0:56:48.520
<v Speaker 3>at all by other governments, and those methods are used

0:56:48.800 --> 0:56:53.360
<v Speaker 3>in countries in Africa, sometimes in Latin America using sometimes

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:58.760
<v Speaker 3>little weapons to target demonstration. But yeah, that's that's unique

0:56:58.920 --> 0:57:01.799
<v Speaker 3>in Europe and which is not only for me but

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:04.239
<v Speaker 3>for the UNA a great matter of concern.

0:57:06.320 --> 0:57:10.759
<v Speaker 2>I like to go back to October twenty twenty two,

0:57:11.239 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 2>so you've just sort of started, as you and special

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 2>rapperature on environmental defenders, there's the first major protest against

0:57:25.680 --> 0:57:30.520
<v Speaker 2>water basins in some sort and our Interior Minister Gerald

0:57:30.560 --> 0:57:38.000
<v Speaker 2>d'ermenon labels climate activists, eco terrorists. How do you feel?

0:57:38.920 --> 0:57:41.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I feel not well at all because I

0:57:42.200 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 3>still had with me the image of what is terrorists

0:57:44.800 --> 0:57:48.920
<v Speaker 3>In fact, now people who have been brutally killed in

0:57:48.960 --> 0:57:52.360
<v Speaker 3>France by by terrorists, and comparing people who are simply

0:57:52.520 --> 0:57:55.520
<v Speaker 3>and non violently going to the street to demonstrate for

0:57:55.560 --> 0:57:58.600
<v Speaker 3>a better future for our planet to terrorist but for

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:02.040
<v Speaker 3>me difficult to understand. And yeah, that's that's a pity

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:04.440
<v Speaker 3>that I mean, as we say in France, a minister

0:58:04.600 --> 0:58:05.600
<v Speaker 3>should not say.

0:58:05.360 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 2>That, right, I mean, especially you're as a French person

0:58:09.840 --> 0:58:12.280
<v Speaker 2>as well, sort of having you know that that memory

0:58:12.320 --> 0:58:16.160
<v Speaker 2>of twenty fifteen and actual terrorism being.

0:58:16.040 --> 0:58:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Exactly ye same same. When I hear what I hear

0:58:20.560 --> 0:58:24.400
<v Speaker 3>other ministers other countries compare them to to Talibans, and

0:58:24.560 --> 0:58:27.800
<v Speaker 3>you look at the situation of Talibans in Afghanistan and

0:58:27.880 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 3>how they treat women and other people, I mean, I mean, well,

0:58:33.880 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 3>what does it mean to compare climate activists to talibans

0:58:38.480 --> 0:58:40.760
<v Speaker 3>or even because I'm not youre not young, but I've

0:58:40.760 --> 0:58:43.920
<v Speaker 3>also heard the ministers in other countries compare them to

0:58:43.920 --> 0:58:49.000
<v Speaker 3>to green crags like in Camboja and Camboja that's a

0:58:49.040 --> 0:58:52.120
<v Speaker 3>general cider two million people being being killed by the

0:58:52.120 --> 0:58:57.160
<v Speaker 3>government and comparing and comparing innocent people simply going to

0:58:57.200 --> 0:59:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the streets non violently to green prayers. That's difficult to

0:59:01.600 --> 0:59:06.240
<v Speaker 3>rationally to understand why someone educated at the level of

0:59:06.280 --> 0:59:09.919
<v Speaker 3>a minister could go public with those statements. I mean,

0:59:10.040 --> 0:59:13.160
<v Speaker 3>that's simply not easy to understand for me and for

0:59:13.840 --> 0:59:14.600
<v Speaker 3>others in fact.

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:23.720
<v Speaker 2>And so sticking to that topic of defamation campaigns you

0:59:23.840 --> 0:59:30.160
<v Speaker 2>mentioned you mentioned in another interview that as you and

0:59:30.200 --> 0:59:35.280
<v Speaker 2>special aperture. You were particularly targeted by French politicians for

0:59:35.840 --> 0:59:40.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it was probably denouncing what had happened in Sainzolin,

0:59:40.360 --> 0:59:42.360
<v Speaker 2>but that people were sort of calling in to question

0:59:42.480 --> 0:59:42.960
<v Speaker 2>your office.

0:59:43.560 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was. I was not targeted. I was simply

0:59:45.880 --> 0:59:49.400
<v Speaker 3>mocked by a minister and by others saying saying by that,

0:59:49.440 --> 0:59:51.320
<v Speaker 3>what is it that this guy based in New York

0:59:51.440 --> 0:59:54.600
<v Speaker 3>would comment simply on the basis of videos what was

0:59:54.680 --> 0:59:58.560
<v Speaker 3>happening in Sanzolin. But it was not really a campaign

0:59:58.600 --> 1:00:01.440
<v Speaker 3>of deformation or campaign against me. In fact, that simply

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:04.920
<v Speaker 3>a minister mocking me. At the same time, he was

1:00:04.960 --> 1:00:06.880
<v Speaker 3>not there as well, he was not was in his

1:00:06.960 --> 1:00:11.400
<v Speaker 3>office as his minister also looking at videos of what's

1:00:11.400 --> 1:00:14.120
<v Speaker 3>happening in Santolin. So he was so commented from from

1:00:14.120 --> 1:00:17.360
<v Speaker 3>his office while he was commenting from my office. In fact, now,

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:19.320
<v Speaker 3>so's to compare.

1:00:20.280 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Is that a first for you as a UN special

1:00:24.000 --> 1:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>rapperture being mocked by a government minister. I mean that's okay,

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:33.480
<v Speaker 2>because that seems like quite a great length to go

1:00:33.640 --> 1:00:35.280
<v Speaker 2>to to discredit the U.

1:00:35.400 --> 1:00:38.320
<v Speaker 3>N No, that's that's a that's a I would not

1:00:38.320 --> 1:00:41.520
<v Speaker 3>say a common practice. But I've been also in the past,

1:00:41.680 --> 1:00:43.720
<v Speaker 3>but in other countries in fact, like for instance the

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:47.480
<v Speaker 3>case of Azerbaijan doing an official visit to as a Baijan.

1:00:47.640 --> 1:00:49.680
<v Speaker 3>But it's need to compare as a Bijan in France.

1:00:49.720 --> 1:00:53.800
<v Speaker 3>In fact, that the vice president of Azerbaijan saying that

1:00:53.880 --> 1:00:58.240
<v Speaker 3>mister Frank should be of Armenian origin because he was

1:00:58.280 --> 1:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>so violent against our country. And of course I'm not

1:01:02.000 --> 1:01:05.080
<v Speaker 3>at all Armenian. But hearing a vice president trying to

1:01:05.080 --> 1:01:08.400
<v Speaker 3>defame me by by, I mean, that's interesting to compare

1:01:08.680 --> 1:01:12.040
<v Speaker 3>reaction by Azabeijian and reaction by by a French ministry.

1:01:12.080 --> 1:01:16.040
<v Speaker 3>In fact, we're the same, the same in Columbia, Honduras, Peru.

1:01:16.080 --> 1:01:18.840
<v Speaker 3>And that's when you are going public on what's happening

1:01:18.840 --> 1:01:21.720
<v Speaker 3>in the country as a un official and then you

1:01:21.760 --> 1:01:24.160
<v Speaker 3>are used to receive that sort of response.

1:01:24.880 --> 1:01:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, after the water protests at Samsonin you and other

1:01:32.680 --> 1:01:36.520
<v Speaker 2>officials came together to say that the the response of

1:01:36.600 --> 1:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the state and the police had been largely disproportionate. How

1:01:41.280 --> 1:01:43.640
<v Speaker 2>how did you come to that conclusion. Can you tell

1:01:43.680 --> 1:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>me a bit more about what happened at Sainsulin from

1:01:46.720 --> 1:01:48.760
<v Speaker 2>your perspective.

1:01:48.760 --> 1:01:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes, simply, I mean I decided to interview witnesses, eyewitnesses

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:56.240
<v Speaker 3>and journalists. Also people who were there had a meeting

1:01:56.320 --> 1:01:59.280
<v Speaker 3>with members of the EU Parliament when Sancholin or so

1:01:59.400 --> 1:02:02.520
<v Speaker 3>to discuss with and what's happening. Also looked at that

1:02:02.640 --> 1:02:05.320
<v Speaker 3>many videos from from the media on the on the

1:02:05.360 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 3>response of the police, on the violence, and when I

1:02:08.320 --> 1:02:11.600
<v Speaker 3>decided to comment and say that it was disproposality, it

1:02:11.680 --> 1:02:15.880
<v Speaker 3>was based on my interviews and my monitoring of videos,

1:02:16.600 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 3>and I remember very well one of the videos showing

1:02:19.800 --> 1:02:26.360
<v Speaker 3>a high rank official Geordan Francis uh looking from the

1:02:26.400 --> 1:02:30.240
<v Speaker 3>form the from the hill saying their from gas to

1:02:30.360 --> 1:02:33.520
<v Speaker 3>the wrong part of the demonstration, while people who are

1:02:33.520 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>targeted were not the people who were violent, but I

1:02:36.000 --> 1:02:38.400
<v Speaker 3>mean it was it was, yeah, not well prepared.

1:02:39.240 --> 1:02:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I've heard you speak about the FNSUL before and sort

1:02:43.400 --> 1:02:47.800
<v Speaker 2>of also their actions to impede freedom of speech of

1:02:48.040 --> 1:02:53.920
<v Speaker 2>climate activists. Can you talk a bit about the political

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:58.720
<v Speaker 2>and corporate interests that you're seeing behind the violence against

1:02:58.760 --> 1:03:00.480
<v Speaker 2>climate activists in France.

1:03:01.040 --> 1:03:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes. What I meant praising the situation of the FNESR

1:03:04.160 --> 1:03:06.840
<v Speaker 3>and France is that it's difficult to understand that when

1:03:06.840 --> 1:03:10.800
<v Speaker 3>you compare to two types of action using the same

1:03:10.960 --> 1:03:14.400
<v Speaker 3>methods to see that climate activists would be immediate putting

1:03:14.360 --> 1:03:16.480
<v Speaker 3>in question by the police or by the DIDY system

1:03:17.000 --> 1:03:20.560
<v Speaker 3>being brought to justice. While when it comes to big

1:03:20.600 --> 1:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>interest like the FESUL close to the big farmers in France,

1:03:24.600 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 3>everything they do, they I mean, there's no consequences at all.

1:03:28.560 --> 1:03:32.400
<v Speaker 2>When when the finest so which is the largest sort

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:35.280
<v Speaker 2>of one of the largest unions of farmers in France

1:03:35.440 --> 1:03:38.680
<v Speaker 2>and sort of which is also protecting the interest of

1:03:38.960 --> 1:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>commercial and huge agriculture agro business, and they've conducted quite

1:03:45.040 --> 1:03:46.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of I mean, they've been linked to a

1:03:46.480 --> 1:03:50.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of actions in France of attack against climate activists

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:52.240
<v Speaker 2>and journalists, but also.

1:03:52.040 --> 1:03:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Attacks against against public buildings. In fact, I would not

1:03:54.640 --> 1:03:56.240
<v Speaker 3>say that in It, I could say that English.

1:03:56.240 --> 1:04:02.880
<v Speaker 2>But the yeah, like launching like sort of sending like

1:04:03.360 --> 1:04:04.480
<v Speaker 2>houses compounds.

1:04:04.560 --> 1:04:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, allowed launching passive compounds before public officials or before

1:04:09.400 --> 1:04:14.240
<v Speaker 3>big buildings and no consequences at all. The municipality that

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:17.480
<v Speaker 3>would clean the building, would clean the streets, and no

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:22.440
<v Speaker 3>consequences at all for these demonstrations, while other activists using

1:04:22.680 --> 1:04:26.080
<v Speaker 3>less severe forms of faction would be immediately arrested by

1:04:26.080 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 3>the police and bulk to justice. So the different type

1:04:28.920 --> 1:04:31.720
<v Speaker 3>of corporation, and that's that's something which is striking in

1:04:31.760 --> 1:04:34.040
<v Speaker 3>the country like France. I could not say that from

1:04:34.120 --> 1:04:36.480
<v Speaker 3>other countries because I'd be able to monitor that in

1:04:36.520 --> 1:04:40.280
<v Speaker 3>other countries. But in France that the case, some commercial

1:04:40.320 --> 1:04:44.840
<v Speaker 3>interest or some have an impact on the way the

1:04:44.920 --> 1:04:49.240
<v Speaker 3>French officials are reacting to the mobilization of climate with vism,

1:04:49.920 --> 1:04:52.480
<v Speaker 3>and that because because they see that in the case

1:04:52.520 --> 1:04:55.960
<v Speaker 3>of the megabazines, if the system would not allow anymore

1:04:56.480 --> 1:04:59.760
<v Speaker 3>thegabacines to be to be constructed or built, then it

1:04:59.920 --> 1:05:02.240
<v Speaker 3>was an impact on the agriculture in France.

1:05:03.000 --> 1:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Just the last question, you mentioned COP at the beginning

1:05:07.080 --> 1:05:13.240
<v Speaker 2>of this interview. Do you expect the persecution of climate

1:05:13.280 --> 1:05:19.000
<v Speaker 2>protesters to come up at COP or do you plan

1:05:19.120 --> 1:05:20.720
<v Speaker 2>to push for that to happen.

1:05:22.520 --> 1:05:24.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I mean, we don't expect during the COP

1:05:24.720 --> 1:05:28.480
<v Speaker 3>climative is to be to be punished or to be persecuted.

1:05:28.720 --> 1:05:30.920
<v Speaker 3>What we expect is that many of them would not

1:05:31.040 --> 1:05:34.360
<v Speaker 3>be allowed to travel to Dubai for obvious reasons. It

1:05:34.440 --> 1:05:37.000
<v Speaker 3>was also the case in Shaman shake in Egypt the

1:05:37.080 --> 1:05:40.280
<v Speaker 3>last time, so that's one of the first but the

1:05:40.320 --> 1:05:43.080
<v Speaker 3>main concern that I have together with the Group of

1:05:43.120 --> 1:05:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Engios is that climate action is not only a matter

1:05:47.800 --> 1:05:50.800
<v Speaker 3>for golf Mansa, and it should be also a matter

1:05:50.840 --> 1:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>of discussion with the population and especially those who are

1:05:54.560 --> 1:06:00.320
<v Speaker 3>affected by climate pack climate change. And although we see

1:06:00.320 --> 1:06:05.040
<v Speaker 3>that in May countries in Europe, organizations are invited to

1:06:05.120 --> 1:06:10.120
<v Speaker 3>discuss with the government on the negotiation coming to during

1:06:10.160 --> 1:06:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the COPPA, it's not the case for many countries in

1:06:12.920 --> 1:06:17.320
<v Speaker 3>fact now and what we want to achieve is the

1:06:17.400 --> 1:06:21.840
<v Speaker 3>better understanding on why is it important for all governments

1:06:22.200 --> 1:06:25.920
<v Speaker 3>to invite to the table those who are affected by

1:06:26.000 --> 1:06:29.640
<v Speaker 3>a climate change and not only to invite them to

1:06:29.720 --> 1:06:32.840
<v Speaker 3>be part of formal leader delegation and to have one

1:06:32.920 --> 1:06:36.640
<v Speaker 3>or two of them alibi in the delegation, but to

1:06:36.680 --> 1:06:40.320
<v Speaker 3>discuss more in detail the outcome document proud to the

1:06:40.360 --> 1:06:43.440
<v Speaker 3>conference and then after the conference when it comes to

1:06:43.480 --> 1:06:47.240
<v Speaker 3>the implication and the inaction in the countries.

1:06:48.400 --> 1:06:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I guess to come back to the

1:06:53.440 --> 1:06:59.960
<v Speaker 2>protection of environmental defenders. In what ways could these international

1:07:00.040 --> 1:07:05.400
<v Speaker 2>climate negotiations be leveraged for the protection of protests. I mean,

1:07:05.440 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 2>we know that this is always mentioned at coups, but

1:07:09.120 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 2>will you push for some sort of like official inclusion

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>and commitments, for example, particularly in the context of the

1:07:16.920 --> 1:07:19.200
<v Speaker 2>UAE hosting the Cup.

1:07:20.320 --> 1:07:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, since the Paris Agreement, we see that climate defenders

1:07:24.440 --> 1:07:28.200
<v Speaker 3>romant devers are mentioned in the outcome documents were simply

1:07:28.440 --> 1:07:32.120
<v Speaker 3>mentioned in the first part of the DOCUMENTA, but in

1:07:32.160 --> 1:07:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the operative part, which contains decisions by the KOPPA, they

1:07:35.920 --> 1:07:38.800
<v Speaker 3>are never in fact mentioned. So what we need to

1:07:39.160 --> 1:07:43.040
<v Speaker 3>achieve is more concrete commitments by STATSA, not going to

1:07:43.120 --> 1:07:47.760
<v Speaker 3>include strong wording on defenders in the outcome documents, but

1:07:47.960 --> 1:07:52.080
<v Speaker 3>concrete commitments by STATSA to do more on defenders. Because

1:07:52.080 --> 1:07:55.000
<v Speaker 3>we see and that's how we started the interview that

1:07:55.080 --> 1:07:58.360
<v Speaker 3>in so many contweisas they are the most TWISKA and

1:07:58.520 --> 1:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>in the context of the meetings, that's a place where

1:08:02.400 --> 1:08:05.360
<v Speaker 3>those things are to be discussed, but not only discuster

1:08:06.880 --> 1:08:11.080
<v Speaker 3>or concretely, discussions should lead to concrete decisions by states

1:08:11.400 --> 1:08:15.040
<v Speaker 3>to better protect defenders but also to prevent the attacks

1:08:15.040 --> 1:08:18.320
<v Speaker 3>in fact worker in countries. So we are working together

1:08:18.360 --> 1:08:22.360
<v Speaker 3>with a group of endios on different options possibilities to

1:08:22.439 --> 1:08:23.240
<v Speaker 3>achieve that goal.

1:08:23.479 --> 1:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that's something that you're going to push at

1:08:26.520 --> 1:08:32.640
<v Speaker 2>the next negotiations. Yes, brilliant. Thank you so much for

1:08:32.840 --> 1:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>taking all that time to speak to me. I know

1:08:35.360 --> 1:08:38.240
<v Speaker 2>that was a long interview, that there are so many

1:08:38.240 --> 1:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>things to talk about. Is there anything that I didn't

1:08:41.040 --> 1:08:43.080
<v Speaker 2>ask you about that you'd like to say?

1:08:44.000 --> 1:08:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Maybe? I just would like to maybe to briefly comment

1:08:47.200 --> 1:08:50.320
<v Speaker 3>on my definition of civil disobedience, which is something that

1:08:50.320 --> 1:08:53.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to promote when I'm managing a TRY in

1:08:53.360 --> 1:08:56.640
<v Speaker 3>France or I TRY in Germany in fact, so that

1:08:56.880 --> 1:09:00.200
<v Speaker 3>judges will understand that cevie disobedience in fact is coord

1:09:00.640 --> 1:09:05.640
<v Speaker 3>by international emails law, and they sometimes ignore that is

1:09:05.680 --> 1:09:09.920
<v Speaker 3>the case. You have clearly definition, but curlier statement by

1:09:09.920 --> 1:09:13.960
<v Speaker 3>the Emails Committee you and Humans Committee commenting on public

1:09:14.000 --> 1:09:17.519
<v Speaker 3>demonstration and saying that civil the business is covered by

1:09:17.600 --> 1:09:21.559
<v Speaker 3>Article twenty one of the Internal Covenant on Civilian Particular Rights,

1:09:21.600 --> 1:09:25.800
<v Speaker 3>and for me, civil obidiness respond to four criterion. Fact time,

1:09:26.280 --> 1:09:30.679
<v Speaker 3>it should be first public, It's not be in one

1:09:30.760 --> 1:09:33.439
<v Speaker 3>apartment or a flat. It should be public just to

1:09:33.520 --> 1:09:36.639
<v Speaker 3>show that there's the cause behind it. The second element

1:09:37.240 --> 1:09:41.680
<v Speaker 3>is that the people who are participating to civil disobilience

1:09:41.880 --> 1:09:46.960
<v Speaker 3>activities should understand that they're breaking the law, prepared to

1:09:47.040 --> 1:09:52.479
<v Speaker 3>face a trial before the just system. The third demand

1:09:52.800 --> 1:09:56.480
<v Speaker 3>it should be non violent and we have largely discussed

1:09:56.960 --> 1:10:01.240
<v Speaker 3>my approach to violencer. And the last elementa it should

1:10:01.280 --> 1:10:06.040
<v Speaker 3>be to fight for a causa, that is to abolish law,

1:10:06.280 --> 1:10:09.599
<v Speaker 3>to abolish of practicer, to abolish a civil sot of

1:10:09.600 --> 1:10:12.559
<v Speaker 3>a public policy which might be dangerous or contrary to

1:10:12.920 --> 1:10:18.800
<v Speaker 3>huven resstandarza. And when those four elements are contained in

1:10:18.920 --> 1:10:21.639
<v Speaker 3>an action of civil evins for meda and they should

1:10:21.640 --> 1:10:24.559
<v Speaker 3>not be punished by the law, but justice system should

1:10:24.640 --> 1:10:28.320
<v Speaker 3>understand that it's covered by internally very slow and that's

1:10:28.320 --> 1:10:30.280
<v Speaker 3>the case the correction and that's a pity.

1:10:32.920 --> 1:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this time. Big thanks to Anna for

1:10:35.400 --> 1:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>bringing us this interview. She'll be back soon with an

1:10:38.320 --> 1:10:41.879
<v Speaker 1>episode on how climate protest is being repressed in France,

1:10:42.120 --> 1:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so stay tuned for that. Drilled is an original Critical

1:10:46.080 --> 1:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Frequency production. This episode was written and reported by Anna

1:10:50.200 --> 1:10:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Poujol Mazzini. Our senior editor for this season is Aline Brown.

1:10:55.200 --> 1:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Our senior producer is Martin saltz Ostwick, who also does

1:10:58.760 --> 1:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>our sound design. Mixing and mastering by Peter Duff. Mood

1:11:03.240 --> 1:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>an Yan is our fact checker. Our artwork is by

1:11:06.200 --> 1:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt Fleming. Our first Amendment attorney is James Wheaton. The

1:11:10.360 --> 1:11:13.599
<v Speaker 1>show was created by me Amy Westervelt. You can find

1:11:13.600 --> 1:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>related videos, photos, and print stories for this series, along

1:11:17.360 --> 1:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>with all of the documentation we have to go along

1:11:19.800 --> 1:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>with it, at Drilled dot Media. You can also sign

1:11:23.320 --> 1:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>up there for our weekly newsletter. We round up the

1:11:26.000 --> 1:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>top five stories on climate that you should be reading

1:11:28.439 --> 1:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>each week and include some analysis of various trends. It

1:11:33.040 --> 1:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>never takes more than ten minutes to read, and people

1:11:35.439 --> 1:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>tell us it helps them stay on top of climate

1:11:38.200 --> 1:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>info without getting overwhelmed by the fire hose of stories.

1:11:43.520 --> 1:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>You can also find us on Twitter at we Are

1:11:45.760 --> 1:11:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Drilled and on LinkedIn under drilled Media. If you'd like

1:11:49.520 --> 1:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to support the podcast, leaving us a rating or a

1:11:52.720 --> 1:11:56.479
<v Speaker 1>review actually really helps us find new listeners. You can

1:11:56.479 --> 1:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>also support us financially by becoming a subscriber, either to

1:12:00.160 --> 1:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the newsletter or to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or Patreon.

1:12:05.080 --> 1:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Paid subscribers get access to add free episodes, early release episodes,

1:12:09.479 --> 1:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and bonus content. Thanks for listening, and we'll see you

1:12:13.800 --> 1:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>next time.