WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Homebuilder Sentiment, Natural Gas Outlook, Connie Chung

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio, Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 2>How do you think the FED is looking at tariffs?

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 2>The uncertainty of terriffs.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a look at the sectors and how they.

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Performed a lot of investors getting whipsaled every day by news.

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>Events, breaking market headlines, and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Could we see a market disruption of market events?

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>So people just too exuberant out there?

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 3>You see some so called low quality stocks driving this

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 3>short term rally.

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio, YouTube,

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Originals.

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 2>On today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 2>business story is impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries are analysts covered worldwide.

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll look at the outlook for US oil and

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 2>natural guests heading into the twenty twenty six and why

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 2>it's well positioned to benefit from SAR structural demand.

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Plus, we speak with award winning journalist Connie Chung on

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 3>the changes she is seeing in the media landscape.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>The first perspective, homeowners in twenty twenty five were boxed

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 2>out by high borring cost and limited inventory, keeping affordability

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 2>near record lows. That's according to the latest research from

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 3>That pressure is now reshaping twenty twenty six as builders

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 3>look to ramp up construction to meet pent up demand

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 3>while still moving cautiously because of financing costs, labor shortages,

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 3>and of course, uncertain economic growth.

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 2>For more, I spoke with Drew reading Bloomberg Intelligence US

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>home building analyst. I first asked Drew if lower interest

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 2>rates will help the home building sector.

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 4>So we actually think that twenty twenty six is going

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 4>to be another challenging year from a fundamental perspective for

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 4>the builders. If you think about the weakness that we've

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 4>had in demand over the last several quarters, it leaves

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 4>much of the group coming into the year with backlogs

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 4>that are down anywhere from ten to forty percent, and

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 4>that's ultimately what translates into revenue over the next called

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 4>it three to nine months. In addition, I think you're

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 4>going to see further pricing pressure as builders look to

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 4>adjust prices to meet market demand. So we're going to

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 4>have further base price reductions, and I think builders are

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 4>going to have to continue to lean on incentives because

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 4>it's something that home shoppers have become accustomed to, and

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, they're looking for deals when they're out there

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 4>in the market. So, you know, slow top line growth,

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 4>and I think that incentive dynamic is also going to

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 4>continue to pressure gross margins as we get into next year.

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, on the on the.

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Positive side, we do have lower rates, so I do

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 4>think that orders can grow next year. You know, we're

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 4>looking at a six and a quarter rate call it

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 4>right now last year, room as one hundred basis points

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 4>higher heading into the spring. So lower rates and community

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 4>count growth could support orders, but I think that revenue

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 4>and margins are going to be down this year.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 2>What's the relationship historically drew between new housing and existing

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 2>home sales.

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 4>So the new home market is historically about fifteen percent

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 4>of overall housing trands action, so a much smaller piece

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 4>of the market. You know, they've they've performed vastly differently

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 4>over the last couple of years. If you look at

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 4>the existing home market, we've been bumping along a four

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 4>million annualized run rate of home sales for about three

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 4>years now, and that's about twenty percent below normalized levels.

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 4>So there's been a lot of pressure because the mortgage

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 4>rate lock in effect affordability. We have seen an improvement

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 4>in demand in the resale market as rates have come down.

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, we're looking at purchase applications, which is the

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 4>most high frequency data point that we have. So we

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 4>have seen some improvement and we think, you know, looking

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 4>into twenty twenty six, you could see growth in the

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 4>resale market anywhere from five to ten percent call it,

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 4>but keep in mind that's off a historically low level.

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 2>What's the Has the tariffs impacted the new home building market?

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking lumber and all the other materials used in

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 2>building a home. Is that god an impact on the profitability?

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, good question. To this point, it really hasn't.

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 4>We've heard from a number of builders who haven't seen

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 4>much of a increase in twenty twenty five. I think

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 4>you could see as you get into twenty twenty six

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 4>that become more of a problem. You know, we did

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 4>an analysis that looked at all the tariffs that have

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 4>come through in it and you know, it shows that

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 4>there could be a ten thousand dollars cost increase per

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 4>home as it relates to tariffs. Now, when you think

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 4>about who's likely to feel that the most, it probably

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 4>won't be the large single family production builders. They've got

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of scale, they've got a lot of leverage,

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 4>and they've had success in pushing back against their suppliers.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 4>I think you're more likely to see the pinch among

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 4>smaller private home builders who just don't have that scale

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 4>and ability to push back. So to this point it

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 4>hasn't had a bigger impact, but I think that's something

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 4>you need to watch as we look in the next year.

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Are they still building like crazy down there in Florida

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 2>and Texas and Tennessee and those kinds of states.

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's a good question.

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, during the pandemic, that's where a lot of

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 4>people were flocking to there was a lot of construction

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 4>down there. If you look at inventory levels now in

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 4>the South, they're actually at the highest level on record.

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 4>So that's where we're seeing a lot of the weakness

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 4>in the new home market. There's so much inventory, builders

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 4>have had to get increasingly aggressive on prices, you know,

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 4>to move inventory. A lot of incentives in the market,

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 4>a lot of base price reduction. So that's really where

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 4>we've seen the weakness, and if you can trast that

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 4>to some of the stronger markets, it's really a tale

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 4>of a couple of regions. You have the Midwest and

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 4>the Northeast, which tend not to be boom markets. We

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 4>didn't see the same type of inventory growth there, and

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 4>you're seeing a lot more price stability. On the other hand,

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned the South, but you also have the West

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 4>where there was a lot of inventory growth and we're

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 4>seeing similar price and pressure.

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>So is there still a housing shortage in this country?

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 2>And if so, how does it right itself?

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, another good question and the one that's frequently debated.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 4>Just to take a step back, you'll hear estimates of

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 4>anywhere to you know, a million to five million unit

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 4>housing shortage. But I think, you know, I think it's

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 4>a more complex answer that the shortage, so called shortage,

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 4>is probably more at lower price points. So there's a

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 4>mismatch between where there's theoretically demand, which would be at

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 4>lower price points, and what's available out there in the market.

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 4>So it's really a affordability problem that's holding things back

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 4>and how do we get I mean, the government has

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 4>talked of about all sorts of things in order to

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 4>boost production and help builders to build more homes at

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 4>reasonable prices. Whether it's you know, dangling carrots in front

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 4>of local municipalities to get them to reduce their regulations,

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 4>you know, whether it's trying to knock down the price

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 4>of building materials.

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of different things.

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 4>But I don't really think that there's necessarily any one

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 4>single silver bullet that's going to solve this problem. I

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 4>think at the end of the day, you have home

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 4>prices that are up, you know, more than fifty percent

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 4>since twenty nineteen, and I think we need to let

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 4>kind of the basic laws of supply demands kind of

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 4>take course in order to write that our.

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Drew Writing, Bloomberg Intelligence, US home building analyst.

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 2>We move next to the consumer hardline space, focusing on

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 2>the retail sector for durable, non consumable goods like electronics, appliances, tools,

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 2>and sporting goods.

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.679
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence recently put out its twenty twenty six outlook

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 3>for consumer hardlines in North America, and according to BI

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 3>revenue gains should extend into twenty twenty six for most

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 3>consumer hardlines retailers.

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 5>For more.

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Guest hosts Isabelle, Leah and I were joined by Lindsay

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Dutch Bloomberg Intelligence Consumer hardline senior analysts. We first asked

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Lindsay to talk to us about her expectations for hardline

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 2>retailers in twenty twenty six.

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 6>I think if you look at, you know, the guidance

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 6>for the rest of the year, I think a lot

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 6>of these big hardline companies are baking in a lot

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 6>of uncertainty with the consumer. But the reality is that

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 6>if we look back, you know, to performance to date

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 6>and results to date, results have you know, largely been

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 6>better than expected, and a lot of these retailers are

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 6>sort of tracking to the upper half of their guidance

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 6>range for the year because that consumer has stayed pretty

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 6>pretty resilient. You know, we see strength, you know, continuing

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 6>to come from that higher income consumer, while the lower

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 6>income might be you know, continuing to pull back a

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 6>little bit. And if you think about companies like Best Buy,

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 6>All To Beauty, Williams, Sonoma, dick Sboarding Goods, you know

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 6>they are bringing you know, premium products, new products, exclusive

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 6>products to that consumer and the consumers are willing to

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 6>pay up for that.

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 7>What was the one trend that shocked you this year?

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 7>Now that you look back.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 6>I think a lot of the trends have been a

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 6>continuation of what we've been seeing. I think, you know,

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 6>if we go back to late twenty twenty two, that

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 6>is when the first pullback in that discretionary spend has been.

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 6>But this is the first year that we've seen more newness,

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 6>and newness is really a key driver to getting consumers

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 6>in the store and to fueling transactions. So the best

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 6>retailers are getting both transaction and ticket growth. But I

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 6>think those innovation pipelines that maybe we're you know, settled

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 6>down a bit during COVID, they've picked up again and

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 6>bring more newness is driving those transactions.

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 2>How promotional do you think retailers will be in twenty

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty six to kind of drive the consumer to the

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 2>store or to the mouse to click.

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 6>So promotions are very important to bring shoppers to the store,

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, especially for someone like a best Buy. You know,

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 6>promotions are very key, especially around holiday. We seen that

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 6>promotions are about flat, you know, in twenty five versus

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 6>twenty four, and I would sort of expect a continuation

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 6>of that in twenty six unless we see a huge

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 6>spike in demand, in which case the retailers might be

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 6>able to pull back on that promotional lever a little bit.

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 6>But this year so far it's been about flat. You

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 6>do see companies like a William's Sonoma very select promotions.

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 6>This has been a strategy coming out of COVID. They

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 6>sort of have stuck with it. They're even sticking with it,

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 6>you know, through this season going into next year. Pottery

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 6>Barn was a big focus for them. You know, they

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 6>need a rebound in that brand and growth is slowly

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 6>coming back, but they are staying steadfast in keeping those

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 6>promotions very limited.

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 7>I was going through your notes and then I read

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 7>that many retailers are resuming or accelerating brick and mortar

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 7>expansion plants because this leads to installing online sales. And

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 7>that's just kind of the reverse trend that I was expecting.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 7>But you made a point that gen Z shows a

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 7>strong preference for in person shopping. Can you talk to

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 7>us more about that and how each generation is different.

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 6>Sure, Yeah, in store shopping is definitely back, and just

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 6>meeting the consumer where they are so retailers I think

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 6>are more focused on all channels, whether I'd said whether

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 6>they have an app, they're online site, their brick and

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 6>mortar stores, but brick and mortar as a whole. You know,

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 6>we are seeing more openings than closings, and that has

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 6>been a trend for the past couple of years. But

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 6>when we think about sort of the retail real estate market,

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 6>the demand has been solid coming out of COVID and

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 6>so vacancy is starting to get low and there's really

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 6>no new properties being built. So these retail are looking

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 6>to expand, which is great for their businesses. You know,

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 6>they really have to work hard to do so and

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 6>find good space to open stores because there's just not

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 6>that much of it. But best Buy has talked about

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 6>gen Z's preference for instore shopping, so has Alta Beauty,

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 6>and so we're definitely seeing that across the board, but

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 6>especially that younger generation.

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 2>There's plenty of retail space on Lexington Avenue and fifty

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 2>eighth Street. Man hen Lindsay John from the Highlands rights

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 2>in and you want to ask about Alta Beauty, ELF Beauty,

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 2>So for how does that category look.

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 6>For twenty twenty six, So demand has showed a strengthening

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 6>sort of in the back half of twenty five. I

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 6>think that momentum can continue into twenty six. I think

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 6>for Alta in particular, they have done a great job,

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 6>you know, bringing elevating their assort and bringing on.

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 7>Exclusives and that has really helped them.

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 6>Comps are going to get tougher next year and they

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 6>need to continue to drive growth and I think for them,

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 6>you know, leaning into their salon services could be a

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 6>key way to do that. Leaning into wellness is a

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 6>key way to do that. There's multiple levers that they

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 6>can pull. The categories that are showing the most strength

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 6>is really fragrance and skincare, and we would expect that

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 6>demand to continue into next year.

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Lindsay Dutch, Bloomberg Intelligence Consumer Hardline Senior Analyst.

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, twenty twenty six should be a big year

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 3>for natural guest producers. We'll explain why you're.

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in depth

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 2>research and data on two thousand companies and one hundred

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 2>and thirty industries.

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 3>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via bi go on the terminal.

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm Scarlet Foo and I'm.

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Paul Sweeney, and this is Bloomberg.

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlet Foo and Paul Sweeney

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 2>The US continued to strong oil and gas production in

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five, with crude output near record levels and

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 2>export growth.

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 3>One sector that performed particularly well is liquefied natural gas,

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 3>and that is set to continue into twenty twenty six.

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 3>According to BI natural Gas Exposed, E andp's financial performance

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 3>will gain momentum next year as winter fully kicks in

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 3>and raises US gas benchmarks.

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 2>For more on this, we were joined by Vincent Piazza,

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence senior equity research analyst. First ask Vincent what

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the outlook is for natural guests demand in twenty twenty six.

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 8>From our perspective, we are definitely more constructive on natural

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 8>gas commodity relative to oil, and there are three key

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 8>drivers for natural gas in twenty twenty six. Number One,

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:50.319
<v Speaker 8>we have structural demand growth and that's from LNG exports

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 8>and also pipeline exports down into Mexico. We have what

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 8>the other presenter hinted at was AI demand growth. That's

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 8>also a strong structural a growth driver for twenty twenty six.

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 8>The demand side is really quite clear. It's really the

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 8>production side that is running a little hotter this year

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 8>versus last year, and that is our biggest risk to

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 8>our twenty twenty six call. That's the first key driver.

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 8>The second key driver is relatively robust free cash flow

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 8>yields as balances tightened. So there is a great deal

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 8>of cash flow sloshing around for this group. That gives

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 8>them a great deal of optionality. And where we think

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 8>that optionality is going to be targeted, aside from base

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 8>and supplemental dividends, is really and a natural gas m

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 8>and a lagged oil M and A. We think that

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 8>turns in twenty twenty six. We saw the first real

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 8>big hint of that in twenty twenty four and twenty

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 8>twenty five when Expand Energy was created via the Seminal

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:05.479
<v Speaker 8>Acquisition Company between Chesapeak and Southwestern Energy. That created a goliath,

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 8>the largest natural gas operator, natural gas producer, independent producer

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 8>in the lower forty eight. We think that'll drive incremental

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 8>M and A. Because the biggest central theme for us

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 8>in twenty twenty six is concentration via consolidation, we think

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 8>that continues for the natural gas operators as it did

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 8>for the oil centric names in twenty twenty five.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 2>What are the folks down there in domestic production? What

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 2>do they do with oil around these prices here?

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 5>They don't grow.

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 8>We think production has peaked. We think you will see

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 8>a change in sentiment as we see more focus on

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 8>natural gas relative to oil. What is interesting for the

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 8>natural gas producers. As you produce less liquids, so less crude,

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 8>you also produce a fewer molecules of what's called associated gas.

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 8>That's great for the natural gas guys because that means

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 8>balance is titaned. So when you think about relative prices,

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 8>that's a net benefit for the natural gas producers relative

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 8>to the oil producers. Since associated gases roughly call it

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 8>one third of total production of natural gas, So lower

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 8>oil actually good for natural gas.

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Which nat gas players are best positioned. I know Bloomberg

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence doesn't do by holed sell on individual companies, but

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 3>surely there are some that are more attractive than others.

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, absolutely so. Again on this central theme of concentration

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 8>via consolidation, expand has really gone out there and created

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 8>a dominant player into the central basins EQT as well.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 8>Those are the two key names for twenty twenty six,

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 8>given their size and relative importance in the market, not

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 8>only in the lowerst Basin of Appalachia in the northeast,

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 8>but also near Seaborn export markets around the Gulf around

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 8>Haynesville as well. So expand EQT those are two names

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 8>that we have focus ideas out for twenty twenty six.

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 8>You can take a look at that on the terminal

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 8>within the Bloomberg ecosystem.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Nice, what's the OPEC plus do in these days? Do

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 2>we really how much do we care about those folks?

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 2>If we're a net exporter.

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 8>These days, they are still the dominant player, the dominant

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 8>governor of oil markets. They will still drive twenty twenty

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 8>six supply balances. From the demand side, we think we

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 8>are past that peak peak growth of demand here in

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 8>the US, we pumped out roughly thirteen point six million

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 8>barrels per day. We think we're past a peak there

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 8>as well. In fact, the other central theme that we

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 8>talked about for the oil players is really capital discipline.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 8>You're going to hear a lot more of that, similar

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 8>to what we talked about in twenty twenty four and

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty five. Investors, what your guys are telling people,

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 8>Paul Scarlett is we don't want to see the production.

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 8>We don't want to see a higher spending. What we

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 8>really want to see is that free cashload coming back

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 8>to the investor base. All that sung capital during the

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 8>initial stage of the growth in shale. We are now

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 8>at a maturity phase. We want to see those higher dividends.

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 8>We want to see the based dividends. We want to

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 8>see supplemental growth in dividends with buybacks taking a little

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 8>more of a backseat. In order to clean up any

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 8>equity issues via m and A market our.

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Vincent Piazza, Bloomberg Intelligence senior equity research analyst.

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Staying with energy, we now look at how one of

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 2>the nation's largest utility companies is faring.

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Excellent Corporation primarily engages in the generation of electricity from nuclear,

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 3>fossil fuels, hydro electric and renewables. For one of the

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 3>company's recent data center boom and some of the challenges

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 3>in managing a large energy grid, we spoke to Callan Butler,

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Excellent.

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 9>We're critical to the development of AI data centers and

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 9>large load quantum and we take that responsibility very serious.

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 9>And from a standpoint of building that infrastructure, protecting that grid,

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 9>it's going to be the backbone of all this. We

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 9>always say that the energy sector is five percent of

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 9>the GDP, but we power the next ninety five and

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 9>we take that very seriously.

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 3>You take it seriously. So walk us through some of

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 3>the plans you're making, how you're preparing for this transition,

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 3>for this increase in demand.

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, thank you, Scarlett. What we have done, We've done

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 9>a few things. Is one understanding for your listener's excellent.

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 9>We are truly a transmission and distribution company, you know,

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 9>proud to have six utilities operating the electric gas side

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 9>through the pipes and wires. So, having said that, being

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 9>the backbone of that, we're encouraging those data centers and

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 9>large developers to come into the states in which we operate,

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 9>and we put together a comprehensive plan to get them online,

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 9>up and running sooner rather than later. Speed is everything

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 9>for them, and so what it takes is a coordinated effort,

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 9>and we've worked very hard to move upstream to get

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 9>them online so they can do what they do, which

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 9>is on the technology side. Now, as we do that,

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 9>we have to keep in mind, first and foremost the

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 9>affordability factor for all of our communities, and that's where

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 9>we're working with them to identify sites that are more

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 9>ready to put their equipment and their technology in place.

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 2>We had a couple of governor races in New Jersey

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 2>and in Virginia and affordability was one of the big issues.

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 2>And in New Jersey, see the governor elect who actually won,

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 2>one of our number one issues was bringing down electric

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 2>utility bills. So this is an issue I we got

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 2>to fund, we got to I guess, create and develop

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 2>these data centers, but we've got to do it in

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 2>a way that it doesn't cause everybody's power bills to

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 2>go up. How do you think about that transition, Paul.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 9>You're absolutely right. It was a race in both New

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.719
<v Speaker 9>Jersey and Virginia an issue, and we believe it's going

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 9>to be an issue in the twenty twenty six elections

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 9>because of affordability, pocketbook issues are going to be key.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 9>So let me tell you what we're doing from excellent perspective.

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 9>We are protecting our residential customers. You know, we serve

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 9>almost eleven million customers. So as as important as it

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 9>is for data center development, it's more important for me

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 9>to protect the other customers in this process. So we've

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 9>come up with what we consider a rather innovative solution

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 9>in creating a tear up a transmission security agreement. So

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 9>what that does is we require a letter of credit

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 9>or a cash deposit from these large developers speculating are

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 9>identifying what thir ten year revenue projections or cost projections

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 9>coming back to our utility is, and anytime that they

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 9>do not meet eighty percent of that load projections or

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 9>cash projections, we draw down from that deposit. And what

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 9>it does it protects the other customers on the systems

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 9>for the investments that we're making. So we're being very

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 9>intentional about protecting the other users on the system because

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 9>when it's done right, it should reduce the costs for everyone,

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 9>but when it's done haphazardly or piecemeal, it can have

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 9>ramifications that everyone else has impacted. But what you're seeing

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 9>not just from the capital investment, you're seeing the supply

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 9>costs go up. Supply costs are going up because of

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 9>the increased demand, and we have inadequate generation on the

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 9>system to do that. You use New Jersey as an example.

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 9>Let me give you a real example of what happened

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 9>to New Jersey customers.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 5>Last year.

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 9>New Jersey customers average residential customers bill rose thirty four

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 9>dollars because they were reconciling our bill, our bill, our cost,

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 9>the demand. The transmission and distribution part went down four dollars,

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.479
<v Speaker 9>but the bill still went up thirty four. That's how

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 9>important it is to get this supply stack right to

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 9>help lower all customers bills.

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Kelvin, let me ask you about nuclear, because the government

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 3>announced it plans to buy and own up to ten

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 3>large new nuclear reactors that could be paid for using

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Japan's pledge to fund five hundred and fifty billion dollars

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 3>of investments in the US. Of course, this is part

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 3>of a push to meet surging demand for electricity, and

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 3>nuclear is increasingly seen as a solution to this need.

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 7>What's your take.

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 9>I think it's critical. I truly believe in a all

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 9>of the above approach and that nuclear base load generation

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 9>is going to be critical to us meeting this effort.

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 9>As you know, again, we've always taken an approach that

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 9>every electron matters to help on affordability, and that's why

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 9>it's so critical. I use an example, the Crane Center

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 9>that's coming back online in Pennsylvania. That's critical because it's

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 9>new generation coming back online. Microsoft is paying for it,

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 9>and that billion dollar loan is exactly what we need

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 9>to encourage reopening of these former facilities to get more

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 9>electrons back on. And that was one of the best

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 9>operating nuclear plants prior to its shuttering.

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Calvin Butler, CEO of Excellent Coming Up, we

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 3>go inside Walmart's masterclass and reputation rehab plus an honest

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 3>conversation with renowned news journalist Connie Chung.

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 2>research and data on two thousand companies and one hundred

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 2>and thirty industries.

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 3>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via bi go on the terminal.

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm Scarlett Foo and I'm Paul Sweeney and this.

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Is This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlet Foo and Paul

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 2>Walmart was once criticized for its treatment of workers as

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 2>well as its negative impact on communities, but its reputation

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 2>has been rehabilitated under CEO Doug McMillan.

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 3>That's the subject of a recent Bloomberg opinion piece titled

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Inside Walmart's Masterclass and reputation Rehab. For more, we're joined

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 3>by the author of the piece, Bloomberg Opinion Colmus Beth Kohen.

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 10>It's hard to think about this now, but a decade ago,

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 10>Walmart was one of the most reviled companies in America.

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 10>It was being criticized for paying its employees low wages,

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 10>for wiping out mom and pop retailers, for basically creating

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 10>a culture of disposable consumerism. So it really was getting

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 10>hit from a lot of different angles. And rather than

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 10>just ignore the bad press or hire an army of

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 10>pr people, it decided to do something about it. And

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 10>Doug McMillan decided, we're going to invest in our people

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 10>and two point seven billion dollars over a couple of years,

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 10>and we now know this really paid off.

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, for Doug McMillan, I mean to me,

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 2>after reading your article, this could be one of his

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 2>as he's stepping down, could be one of his lasting

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 2>legacies at the company.

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 10>I really think so. I think that you know, he's

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 10>been at the company now more than a decade. I

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 10>think this will be amongst the most enduring things that

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 10>he has done.

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 5>I think this.

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 10>I'm not sure that the company would be in the

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 10>place it's at today if he had not really addressed this.

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 3>And let's be clear about what exactly he did with

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 3>that two point seven sharing dollars. Pay increases, there is training,

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 3>and really just attracting a better quality worker.

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and the way he did this was right. It

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 10>was pay increases, but more than anything else, it was

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 10>creating not low paying jobs, but a career.

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 10>There was now a path for people who started at

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 10>Walmart to move up the ranks and that was really important,

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 10>right to attracting more ambitious and employees to getting them

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 10>to stay. And I think that that shifted the whole

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 10>culture of the company.

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 2>So what's the company saying about AI? Because there's a

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of answer just in the overall economy about what

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 2>the impact AI will have upon jobs. One could look

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 2>at big box stores as an industry that might be

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 2>at risk because they do employ so many People's what

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 2>does Walmart say.

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 10>Walmart's taken a very different approach, I think than some

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 10>other big employers, and it has embraced ay. Let's be clear,

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 10>like there's a AI is through embedded throughout the company,

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 10>but it has not used AIE to have some of

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.360
<v Speaker 10>these mass layoffs that were justify some of these mass

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 10>layoffs that we've seen at other companies. And I think

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 10>part of that is this history, Like it knows how

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 10>important these entry level workers are and that they need

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 10>a path, they need this workforce to sort of grow

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 10>the company. So it said AI will change every job.

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 10>It knows that, but it is trying to get every

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 10>worker through to the other side, so whether that's retraining,

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 10>finding new rules, rules for them. So it's just a

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 10>very different outlook, I think than what we're hearing from others.

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 3>And you've noted as well that the last ten years

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 3>at Walmart has led to tremendous return for shareholders, but

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 3>also it's become a case study at Harvard Business School

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.959
<v Speaker 3>on how to on how an experiment on paying your

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 3>workers war or investing your workers can pay off.

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely. I mean, we you mentioned this at the beginning,

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 10>but Wall Street hated this plant. I mean, the company

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 10>lost tremendous value, tremendous value when they announced it, and

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 10>now you know, we have the receipts a decade later,

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 10>and the I think the market gap has tripled. The

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 10>stock has returned more than four hundred percent. So they

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 10>really took a gamble on this and stuck with it,

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 10>and it really it has paid off for them.

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean every time I look at the dees screen

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 2>for on the Bloomberg terminal for Walmart had just blown

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 2>away by the fact that they have two point one

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 2>million employees. What's the retention of those employees. I'm wondering

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 2>if there's like I would think in the warehouses that

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 2>might be really really high. I'm not sure about the stores.

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 2>How is retention sure?

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 10>So they've actually increased retention by ten percent since twenty

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 10>fifteen when they started this plan. And another thing is

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 10>that they've some of the more management level roles. Seventy

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 10>five percent of those are hired from with it. So

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 10>this pipeline is really critical for them. And so that's

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 10>why I think that they are so focused on creating

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 10>a place where people stay.

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 5>That's key.

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 3>And you only have to look at the outgoing CEO

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 3>and the NTO, right, Both Doug McMillan and John Ferner,

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 3>the successor, are Walmart lifers. They started off as hourly workers.

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 10>There, right, they know the importance of that and having

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 10>worked their way up. That needs to be something that continues.

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 2>There is this something that you think the new CEO

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:52.719
<v Speaker 2>is as committed to as the prior CEO.

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 10>I would think so because he has the same background.

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I think he knows the importance of emerging technologies.

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 10>He's really focused on that. But I think because of

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 10>his history and he's worked very closely with McMillan for

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 10>a long time, so they must be aligned on this.

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Beth Kwitt Bloomberg Opinion Calmness. We move

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 2>next to the interview we had this year with award

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 2>winning journalist and news anchor Connie Chung.

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Connie was a first woman to co anchor the CBS

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Evening News, the flagship news broadcast on CBS. She was

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 3>also the first Asian American to anchor any news program

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 3>on CBS, NBC, and ABC. Both were milestones and broadcast

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 3>television history. Connie Chung was also out with a memoir

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 3>this year titled Connie.

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 2>We began our conversation with the changing landscape of the

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 2>news business and whether journalism should be treated more like

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 2>a public good rather than a profit driven business.

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 11>With a question when I first started at CBS News

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 11>in nineteen seventy one. It was owned by William Paley yep,

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 11>and he believed so strongly that the news division should

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 11>be autonomous. We could spend as much money as it

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 11>took to cover the news, and it was for the

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:09.719
<v Speaker 11>public good. But then what happened at CBS equally happened

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 11>at NBC and ABC. Greedy owners took over, bought the companies,

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 11>and made the bottom line the ultimate goal. We lost

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 11>all our obligation to be objective and be truthful, and

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 11>all they wanted was money. And I am just mortified

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 11>that to this day I see it at CBS, money drove,

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 11>the greed drove the fact that it was sold to

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 11>David Ellison and Larry Ellison and they're unattention. I mean,

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 11>they're not paying any attention to the old rules of journalism.

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Well is one could argue just over the last twenty

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty five years that the divide in this country and

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 2>the the divide in the in the media coverage has

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 2>been so stark and become maybe maybe even more stark.

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 2>How do you make what do you make of that?

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 2>The bias that may or may not be in the

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 2>news business these days? Who that it is Okay, how

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 2>do you view it?

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 4>How do you help?

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 2>How's it changed?

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 11>Maybe I'm horrified, horrified with anyone who says on television,

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 11>who purports to be an anchor or a news reporter, say,

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 11>I think I don't care what you think. All I

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 11>want is the facts. And I think everyone out there,

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 11>because I've been across the country just in this last year,

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 11>and people just want the facts. I think the only

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 11>saving grace is actually local news. Local news still just

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 11>primarily provides the facts and.

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 3>The weather right and sports. With big tech comes, of course,

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence. How do you make the case for why

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 3>companies should not replace news reporters news anchors with AI

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 3>generated and presented news where they could focus on presumably

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 3>the facts.

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 11>It's fake two, it's all fake news and we cannot

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 11>depend on it. The social media has truly destroyed our

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 11>reporting ability in many ways because nothing is fact checked,

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 11>and I fear that AI would not be fact checked.

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 11>We can't depend on it. I can see the value

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 11>of AI. For instance, if a doctor wants to look

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 11>up research and figure out what a person's ailment is,

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 11>he or she no longer has to go through volumes

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 11>and volumes of medical literature. AI can find it in

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 11>a second, and there are so many good benefits. But

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 11>I think AI has no place in news.

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't.

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I don't know what happened to truth. I

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 11>believe that truth ruled when I was working in television.

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 11>News was ancient, an ancient.

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:21.240
<v Speaker 2>How about even though you have white hair palms?

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 11>You know I have white hair too, Just color it right.

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 2>I understand. I understand what's also changed. It seems like

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 2>initiatives not just in media, but across corporate America, in society,

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 2>the diversity, equality, inclusion, those that movement, if you will,

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 2>or that that seems to have lost its momentum. And

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:44.280
<v Speaker 2>is that a concern for the newsroom?

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 11>Do you think it died with this administration? It's become

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 11>non existent and forced upon us. I would not have

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.760
<v Speaker 11>had a career had it not been for the nineteen

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:02.320
<v Speaker 11>sixty four civil rights law which created the Equal Employment

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 11>Opportunities Commission. My sister in law, Lynpovich, who was a

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 11>researcher at Newsweek, filed a class action lawsuit with the

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:18.240
<v Speaker 11>other women. Because they were not allowed to move beyond

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 11>the research stage, they could not be reporters, they could

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 11>not be writers. They could not be editors period, full stop.

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 11>And I was thanks to Lynn and the women's movement

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 11>and the black movement at the time in the sixties

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:40.879
<v Speaker 11>and seventies when I started, I would not have had

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 11>my first job at CBS News covering Watergate, covering a

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 11>presidential campaign, the losing campaign of George mcgovernor in nineteen

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 11>seventy two, And I would not have covered Nelson Rockefeller

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 11>when he was vice president after he took over Ford

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 11>took over from Nixon. We are seeing a replay of

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 11>Nixon and Watergate. But during Watergate, at least Congress had

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 11>a backbone. Members of Congress like Center Barry Goldwater went

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 11>to Nixon and said, You're not gonna You're not gonna survive.

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah. No, It's a clear contrast to what we

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 3>have on Capitol Hill today. Speaking of water eight, Connie,

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 3>there is a famous photo of you at a House

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 3>Judiciary Committee hearing on Watergate, and it's you, a young

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 3>Asian woman in a sea of white men. Do you

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 3>think female news reporters in twenty twenty five case the

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 3>same challenges that you did in the seventies through nineties.

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 11>It really hasn't changed that's surpressing. No, I know, I'm sorry,

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 11>but it hasn't changed for men who still dominate. Not

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.919
<v Speaker 11>that not that there's anything wrong with being a man, Paul.

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, so far, so good, so far, so good,

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 2>So far, so good. You mean what, just you know,

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 2>we all work together, we'll all get along happy in

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 2>here in this little studio.

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 11>Okay, Well, that's good.

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 3>We control what we can control, right, that's right.

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well despite management. But yeah, it was in the

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:25.439
<v Speaker 11>nineteen seventies. But even today there's a dominance of white males.

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 5>And the.

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 11>It's not a level of parody we do. We are

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 11>not seeing that. And in terms of this administration and

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 11>its determination to kill DEI I'm I'm hoping that we

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 11>the people will not stand for it.

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to award winning journalists and news anchor Connie Chunk.

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 2>That's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio,

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 2>providing in depth research and data on two thousand companies

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 2>and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 3>And remember you can access Bloomberg Intelligence b I go

0:37:57.640 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 3>on the terminal. I'm Scarlett Foo.

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Paul Switt. Me stay with us today's top

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 2>stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.