Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunch. Kavanaugh's accuser thinks that
Speaker 1: she can destroy his reputation without showing up to testify.
Speaker 1: Will this mean that Kavanaugh gets through or are the
Speaker 1: Democrats gonna pull a last minute trick. Also, some elements
Speaker 1: of the deep state don't want the deep classification that
Speaker 1: Trump has ordered to go through. What happens if they
Speaker 1: decide to disobey the Commander in chief's order for declassification.
Speaker 1: That and much more coming up on The buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: This is the buck Sexton Show where the mission or
Speaker 1: mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: American break, You're a great American Again the buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show begins and buck Sexton, No, this woman is to
Speaker 1: be believed, and you can believe Dr Ford. This was
Speaker 1: attempted rape. And this is a woman who exhibits Dr
Speaker 1: Ford courage but the classic signs of post traumatic stress.
Speaker 1: I believe her. Listen, First of all, anybody who comes
Speaker 1: forward at this point um to to to be prepared
Speaker 1: to testify in the United States Senate against someone who
Speaker 1: is being nominated to one of the most powerful positions
Speaker 1: in the United States government. That takes an extraordinary amount
Speaker 1: of courage. Not only do women like Dr Ford who
Speaker 1: bravely comes forward need to be heard, but they need
Speaker 1: to be believed. They need to be believed. Let me
Speaker 1: just say right at the outset, I believe Dr Ford.
Speaker 1: I believe the survivor here. There's every reason to believe her.
Speaker 1: She has come forward courageously and bravely. Welcome to buck
Speaker 1: section show, folks. Democrats rushing to judgment in favor of
Speaker 1: the accuser. Of course, no surprise there. We've expected as
Speaker 1: much all along. They they have shown themselves to be
Speaker 1: the the swampy ist of swamp creatures, really really sewer creatures.
Speaker 1: The Democrats are have been so low and degrading in
Speaker 1: this entire confirmation process for Kavanaugh um And And as
Speaker 1: I've been saying, it's because they have an edifice of evil,
Speaker 1: the abortion industry in this country, that they will protect
Speaker 1: at all costs Politically. For them, this is a an
Speaker 1: issue that they will not budge from um And that
Speaker 1: they're willing to do anything and everything they can to
Speaker 1: make sure that Roe v. Wade, which is the closest
Speaker 1: thing that the left has to a political sacrament as
Speaker 1: twisted as it is to think of it in that way.
Speaker 1: Uh is protected by the way. I'm not the only
Speaker 1: one who who thinks this. We even usually I would
Speaker 1: go into an extended mockery of his preposterously bad both
Speaker 1: delivery and analysis on TV. But David Gergen has said
Speaker 1: as much about the Kabina attack Plate three. This vital
Speaker 1: last step about who's going to investigate is crucial to
Speaker 1: the outcome. What's most important for the country here, Anderson,
Speaker 1: is when this is all said and done, if Judge
Speaker 1: Kavanaugh was going on the Supreme Court and it's going
Speaker 1: to tip the balance of the court for years to come, UH,
Speaker 1: it's really essential that he go forward without a big
Speaker 1: cloud over him. To have Judge Kavanaugh go up there
Speaker 1: and join Clarence Thomas, you have two people who've been
Speaker 1: accused of sexual harassment on the court deciding whether Roe v.
Speaker 1: Wade should be sustained or not and pressing not to rule.
Speaker 1: That is not a helpful situation. It's about Roe v. Wade.
Speaker 1: He's just gonna come out and say it. And notice
Speaker 1: Clarence Thomas was accused of saying some inappropriate stuff by
Speaker 1: a woman who was If you go back and look
Speaker 1: at the hearing not credible. A Democrat controlled said it
Speaker 1: voted Clarence Thomas through folks because because he didn't think
Speaker 1: his life should be ruined because of some allegations of
Speaker 1: some inappropriate comments. Never touched anybody, never attacked anybody, never
Speaker 1: did anything like so to even put him in the
Speaker 1: same discussion, I mean, I think Clarence Thomas was innocent
Speaker 1: as well, but to put him the same discussion as
Speaker 1: these Cavita allegations just shows you that they're just sloppy folks.
Speaker 1: This is just all smear. It's mud slinging, it's attacks,
Speaker 1: it's vile, it's transparently self serving. This is what the
Speaker 1: Democrats do. This is who they are. And they're all saying, oh,
Speaker 1: she's Dr Ford is so credible, Oh she's so credible.
Speaker 1: Play too. We have Dr Ford's credible allegation. She has
Speaker 1: enough to gain here, the receipts were there, the story
Speaker 1: is credible. I don't think anyone doesn't believe her. I
Speaker 1: have every reason to believe that she's gonna show that
Speaker 1: she's a very credible witness and their story is very credible.
Speaker 1: I believe Dr Ford as I referred to her, because
Speaker 1: she makes a very credible case. This is a situation
Speaker 1: where you have serious and credible allegations of rape. They're
Speaker 1: not credible allegations of rape. First of all, the woman
Speaker 1: was not raped. No one thinks she was raped. They
Speaker 1: claim that it may have been an attempted rape, but
Speaker 1: a rape actually involves a physical process here of some
Speaker 1: kind that we don't need to discuss on air. But
Speaker 1: no one says that is what happened. She may have
Speaker 1: been may have been growthed, but there are there are
Speaker 1: legal definitions for what would actually constitute rape, and that
Speaker 1: has never been alleged. But you see, who needs the
Speaker 1: law when they've got they've got a man's life to ruin.
Speaker 1: I mean, none of it matters, right, Oh, it's just
Speaker 1: all it's just all about it and all out to
Speaker 1: the last man and woman. Defense of Row. For the left,
Speaker 1: that's what this is. And because that's what this is,
Speaker 1: they don't care how foolish they look, how dishonest they are,
Speaker 1: how disgusting they are, and all the things that they
Speaker 1: have to do to try to take down Kavanaugh in
Speaker 1: their minds are justified, absolutely justified. To call this allegation
Speaker 1: credible is an insult to credible allegations of sexual assault
Speaker 1: all across the country. She doesn't remember where it happened,
Speaker 1: She doesn't remember when it happened. She won't now show
Speaker 1: up and and testify or answer any questions about it.
Speaker 1: She sent a letter said she didn't want to come forward,
Speaker 1: but had a polygraph run just in case she ended
Speaker 1: up having to come forward. The Democrats think we're so
Speaker 1: dumb that the only people that supposed they knew about
Speaker 1: this were Democrat congresswomen in this case fine Stein, and
Speaker 1: also the one out in California's name, I forget, and
Speaker 1: and there's someone on their staff just happened to leak
Speaker 1: it at the most opportune time. If the whole game
Speaker 1: is delay, that's what they're going for here, folks. If
Speaker 1: the game wasn't delay, we would have be a slightly
Speaker 1: different conversation, right. If they really thought they could get Kavanaugh,
Speaker 1: that would be something else. They would have been working
Speaker 1: feverishly for the last six weeks to get the information
Speaker 1: out right away and to try to hold these huge hearings. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: they're not. They're they're not gonna get him because he
Speaker 1: didn't do it. I do not believe that Kavanaugh did
Speaker 1: this and I do not believe that he's guilty of anything.
Speaker 1: And everyone who has come out to speak in his
Speaker 1: favor is just completely and utterly shocked by this thing.
Speaker 1: And you got on the other side of the people saying,
Speaker 1: essentially there's no such thing as due process anymore. If
Speaker 1: a woman accuses you of something, you're guilty. That's what
Speaker 1: the Democrats are saying. That's their position on this. A
Speaker 1: woman should be believed. She what about the Duke Cross case.
Speaker 1: Should that woman have been believed she went on to
Speaker 1: kill somebody, by the way, because they did not press
Speaker 1: false charge, false allegation charges against her, which they always
Speaker 1: should bring in rape cases when it's clear somebody has
Speaker 1: made it up, in lied, which by the way, disproportionately
Speaker 1: happens in sexual assault cases compared to other violent crimes.
Speaker 1: Just a fact. The Duke la Cross case completely, I
Speaker 1: mean sorry, uv, a case completely made up, totally made up.
Speaker 1: But that woman had a right to be believed, the
Speaker 1: one woman who made those allegations against that fraternity. You
Speaker 1: know how many times do we have to go through
Speaker 1: Towana Brawley. She have a right to be believed. Now now,
Speaker 1: now you get in a day oh, buck, what do
Speaker 1: you do. You're getting this dangerous territory? Are you saying
Speaker 1: that you know you are you undermining the real No,
Speaker 1: of course not every red blooded American male I know
Speaker 1: right now was listening to this across the country would
Speaker 1: lay down his life to defend not just the honor
Speaker 1: of a woman who was being attacked in this way
Speaker 1: that he knew, but any woman a stranger, all right.
Speaker 1: That's what real men would do. Real men are horrified
Speaker 1: bisexual assault. They're horrified by the notion that any man
Speaker 1: would force himself upon a woman, would threaten old woman,
Speaker 1: would do any would lay a hand on a woman,
Speaker 1: never mind lay a hand on her for this specifically
Speaker 1: to sexually abuse her, and would take it upon on
Speaker 1: himself to visit violence upon those who would do such
Speaker 1: a thing to a woman. So that's the perspective that
Speaker 1: I come at this from, and that's the one that
Speaker 1: I know that the people, the men of of all
Speaker 1: ages listening to this across the country, that's how they
Speaker 1: feel about this. And so we feel insulted that we
Speaker 1: have to always say, oh, but you know what the
Speaker 1: sexual assault is. We're not saying sexual assault is not bad.
Speaker 1: We're just saying we don't believe this one. Of course,
Speaker 1: we think sexual assault is terrible, so it's a heinous crime,
Speaker 1: it's a felony. People go to prison for decades, as
Speaker 1: they should. But what Kavanaugh is alleged you have done here.
Speaker 1: There's just their facts, aren't there, folks. And that's why
Speaker 1: you're seeing all these games of the media that the
Speaker 1: timeline is so clear cut. They want to try to
Speaker 1: push this until after the midterms and the hope that
Speaker 1: they'll take the Senate and they'll steal back a Supreme
Speaker 1: Court seat they thought was stolen from them by McConnell
Speaker 1: because he would not put Merrick Garland up for a vote.
Speaker 1: And you have fake news, false reporting out there about
Speaker 1: how they you know that they're gonna make her face
Speaker 1: her accuser in court. That's not true. They've said they
Speaker 1: they have offered for Professor Ford to have her testify
Speaker 1: behind closed doors, to have her testify out in the
Speaker 1: open if she wants to have her uh, just doing
Speaker 1: a phone interview with members of the Judiciary Committee. Won't
Speaker 1: do any of it. Won't do any of it until
Speaker 1: the FBI conducts an investigation, she says via her lawyer.
Speaker 1: Oh Okay, So now this accuser who's dredging up this
Speaker 1: thirty five year old memory, now she comes forward to say, well,
Speaker 1: the United States Senate has to work on my schedule.
Speaker 1: I me, the accuser of Kavanaugh, get to tell the
Speaker 1: Senate how they do their business. This person thinks that
Speaker 1: she has that she has the right to have a
Speaker 1: a veto power over the Supreme over the next Supreme
Speaker 1: Court justice of the United States, Folks, that's what that's
Speaker 1: what's being given to her by the media, by the
Speaker 1: devil her, and she seems to gladly take it. Remember,
Speaker 1: the entire motivation here for her to come forward was political.
Speaker 1: She's known about this allegation for entire adult life. She's
Speaker 1: only coming out now to say it because this guy
Speaker 1: was going to become a Supreme Court nominee. And she's
Speaker 1: a progressive and an activist and a Bernie and I'm
Speaker 1: sure Hillary lover she is a partisan in this process.
Speaker 1: And that matters because her motivation for coming forward is
Speaker 1: in fact partisan. She's not coming forward because oh I
Speaker 1: just want to I want to raise awareness about sexual
Speaker 1: assault and I can't I can't stand that this man,
Speaker 1: you know, had gotten away with it. No, No, she's
Speaker 1: coming forward because he was going to become a Supreme
Speaker 1: Court nominee and she wants to stop him. Now when
Speaker 1: somebody's approaching it from that perspective, with that thought process,
Speaker 1: doesn't it seem at least fair to the situation to say,
Speaker 1: maybe the motivation here is what's really driving the story.
Speaker 1: Maybe the desire to divert two derail this nomination of
Speaker 1: Justice Kavanaugh is in fact the entire motivation behind this,
Speaker 1: and she figured that she was in a position to
Speaker 1: tell this story. Maybe she believes that maybe it's so essential,
Speaker 1: or maybe she thinks that the defense of Roe v.
Speaker 1: Wade is so critical that her mind has allowed her
Speaker 1: to think that this really happened. I can't begin to
Speaker 1: tell you what's going on inside of inside of her
Speaker 1: mind right now, but I do know that this notion
Speaker 1: that there's going to be an FBI investigation. Oh, in
Speaker 1: the media, they're all playing these games to the FBI
Speaker 1: investor gids. Every Supreme Court cominity. The FBI does a
Speaker 1: background check, which is a routine process of gathering information
Speaker 1: talking to a few people about somebody. The FBI doesn't
Speaker 1: chase down a random allegation of criminal conduct from thirty
Speaker 1: years ago as part of the background investigation. And people
Speaker 1: say they will okay, you know how the FBI would
Speaker 1: chase that down. They'd say, well, we don't have enough
Speaker 1: to go on here, so we'll included in the file,
Speaker 1: which is what they've already done. The FBI has come
Speaker 1: out and said, after I was getting all these people
Speaker 1: last night they were yelling at me on Twitter and
Speaker 1: all these different libs running around hair on fire about this,
Speaker 1: the FBI said, this is a political question. The FBI
Speaker 1: doesn't have jurisdiction to investigate this as a criminal matter,
Speaker 1: and local law enforcement wouldn't investigate it because it's past
Speaker 1: the statute of limitations. And the reason that's there's a
Speaker 1: statute of limitations is that when you get beyond a
Speaker 1: certain time period, it's impossible for somebody to fairly defend himself.
Speaker 1: The reason a statute of limitations for most crimes, not
Speaker 1: all crimes specifically, exists, folks, is for reasons like this,
Speaker 1: so that the state or a politically motivated entity can't
Speaker 1: just come after you with an allegation and ruin your life.
Speaker 1: You know, Oh, they tell a compelling story, Well, but
Speaker 1: this happened twenty years ago. I can't you know, my
Speaker 1: witnesses have died or you know what, I can't defend
Speaker 1: myself U against us. Oh well, they told the compelling story.
Speaker 1: They convince the jury. You're going to prison now, but
Speaker 1: there's no evidence. Yeah, but people believe that person. That's
Speaker 1: why we have a statute of limitation. Is actually very important,
Speaker 1: goes back to English common law. Right, there's a reason
Speaker 1: why we have this. Uh, I'm just getting started here.
Speaker 1: I'm is this who we a little more of this
Speaker 1: FBI backer Inn investigation thing, and then I'll talk to
Speaker 1: you about just some more of the politics at play here.
Speaker 1: But we got to hold the line on this. The
Speaker 1: GOP must hold the line on Kavanaugh. Meaning shoulders shoulder,
Speaker 1: shields high. It means they they better be in this
Speaker 1: fight to win this fight, because this is just a
Speaker 1: political hit through and through. If I get new information
Speaker 1: that changes my mind, I'll be the first one to
Speaker 1: let you know. But right now, this is dirty, it's underhanded.
Speaker 1: I do not believe her. We'll be right back, I say, can.
Speaker 1: It's truly too bad that no one called her or
Speaker 1: called her lawyer. Of my understanding is she got emails
Speaker 1: and This is a woman, and I really believe who
Speaker 1: has been profoundly impacted by this. Now, I can't say
Speaker 1: everything is truthful. I don't know, but I do know that, um,
Speaker 1: you had to contact her lawyers. Well, they've contacted her lawyers,
Speaker 1: and her lawyers have tried to set all these special
Speaker 1: terms for whils when she'll show up her house. She'll
Speaker 1: show up or it's not gonna fly. You don't get
Speaker 1: a demand and FBI investigation. The FBI has already said
Speaker 1: there's nothing for us to investigate. So you know this, folks,
Speaker 1: it's all about delay. It's all about delay. I mean,
Speaker 1: I was willing to hear this out and I was
Speaker 1: fine with you know, I agree with what the President
Speaker 1: was saying. Okay, she's made this allegation, let's go here
Speaker 1: and talk. I didn't really believe her then, but I
Speaker 1: really don't believe her now. I mean, if you will
Speaker 1: make this allegation and not show up, then there's there's
Speaker 1: ill intent at work here. I am very very confident
Speaker 1: of that, and I really do believe that. So you know,
Speaker 1: keep keep that, my friends, uh in mind here, and
Speaker 1: just remember something else too, The way that the Democrats
Speaker 1: are reacting now they act like they've had this Oh
Speaker 1: there's this me to record and all this. But rape
Speaker 1: has always been a terrible crime. It's always been wrong.
Speaker 1: The Democrats had a credibly accused rapist. You know, they
Speaker 1: used the term sexual assault very broadly, and they you know,
Speaker 1: sexual assault can be you know, grabbing a woman's behind
Speaker 1: for a second, or it could be a terrible you know,
Speaker 1: first degree felony rape. Right, there's a whole span of
Speaker 1: crimes one need a broad Rick was on the record
Speaker 1: incredibly accused Bill Clinton of rape. Here's what she had
Speaker 1: to say about how the Democrats reacted to her play fifteen.
Speaker 1: It makes me go back to nineteen ninety nine when
Speaker 1: Diane Feinstein, along with every other Democrat refused to read
Speaker 1: my deposition to the Independent Council. They wouldn't have nothing
Speaker 1: to do with it. Uh. That just shows you the
Speaker 1: difference and the double standard that existed back then and
Speaker 1: still does today. The double standard is the Democrats want
Speaker 1: to win. They will do anything to win. They will
Speaker 1: play as dirty as they have to. And there is
Speaker 1: no principle here of defending women in general. That's just nonsense.
Speaker 1: There is nothing that they have, There's nothing that has
Speaker 1: changed about anything other than right now, they have a
Speaker 1: Supreme Court seat in the balance that could tip the
Speaker 1: court away from them getting some of their favorite little
Speaker 1: policy things through that they can't get through the legislature.
Speaker 1: And they are acting like panicked children as a result
Speaker 1: of it. And for the people that have so little
Speaker 1: respect for our institutions as we see here to always
Speaker 1: be lecturing all the rest of us about at our institutions.
Speaker 1: It's it's it's rather astonishing, isn't it. Now They always say, oh,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, look what he's done. He's he's eroding our
Speaker 1: institutions of government. Meanwhile, they have turned the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: nomination process into a complete circus, and they've done it
Speaker 1: with somebody as qualified and mainstream and worthy as anyone
Speaker 1: you could ever possibly find. The Democrats have no respect
Speaker 1: for due process and no respect for government process. They
Speaker 1: just think that whatever they have to do to staff
Speaker 1: to stop Kavanaugh is inherently justified. And that's why they're
Speaker 1: acting in this way, and they should be ashamed. But
Speaker 1: I promise you they won't be more on this coming up,
Speaker 1: and also talking about the declassifications that are on the way.
Speaker 1: Why should we participate in a victimization of someone who
Speaker 1: has encouraged to come forward, and she is under absolutely
Speaker 1: no of like nation to participate in a smearing. Guess
Speaker 1: who's perpetuating all of these kinds of actions. It's some
Speaker 1: men in this country. And I just want to say,
Speaker 1: to the men of this country, just shut up and
Speaker 1: step up. So that was a U. S. Senator, folks
Speaker 1: telling the men of this country to shut up. Is
Speaker 1: is feminism a form of hysteria on the left? It
Speaker 1: seems like it is. You know, is is left wing
Speaker 1: feminism a form of hysteria? I just want to know,
Speaker 1: because a lot of people that are that are holding
Speaker 1: themselves up as prominent voices of a kind of you know,
Speaker 1: hashtag me too feminism right now are willing to completely
Speaker 1: dispense with due process, willing to say things that are unjust,
Speaker 1: willing to destroy a man without giving him any opportunity
Speaker 1: to not not face his accuser of and just have
Speaker 1: somebody test the credibility of the allegations. He is supposed
Speaker 1: he is supposed to suffer consequences without having any recourse whatsoever.
Speaker 1: That's what the Democrats want for Kavanaugh. That's what they
Speaker 1: say is justice. This is why you really don't want
Speaker 1: these people in charge. By the way, Mazie heron No
Speaker 1: sen Rono went went further play seven. She has come
Speaker 1: forward with information that ought to be investigated by the FBI,
Speaker 1: and when Dr testified, I think she expected a modicum
Speaker 1: of a fair kind of a situation. You know, I
Speaker 1: think he's appalling and I am totally disappointed that all
Speaker 1: these people who have can come forward to say, oh,
Speaker 1: we should hear from her, and now that she's expecting
Speaker 1: a monicum of fairness, so she's not re victimized or
Speaker 1: now saying wo, if she doesn't want to testify, we
Speaker 1: should just go ahead. That is additional callousness from my
Speaker 1: colleagues that I am totally appalled by. I think herono
Speaker 1: is is she certainly sounds like an idiot. I don't
Speaker 1: know if she is an idiot. I don't know enough
Speaker 1: about her. But everything she just said there was idiocy,
Speaker 1: very very dumb um and not true. Maybe that's even
Speaker 1: more important lies where all those fact checkers, where's all
Speaker 1: the truth facts? First? Not apples but bananas, Not bananas
Speaker 1: but apples? Over at CNN, where are they right now?
Speaker 1: A modicum of fairness? They have offered the Senate Committee
Speaker 1: Judiciary Committee has offered to have Professor Ford testify in
Speaker 1: open hearings, in a closed hearing behind closed doors, or
Speaker 1: even Justice staffers, or just to be on the phone
Speaker 1: with people on the on the committee to ask her
Speaker 1: questions about this, and she won't do a no. She
Speaker 1: she thinks that she gets to dictate the schedule of
Speaker 1: the Senate and it just so happens. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: it's all a coincidence. How dumb do they think we are?
Speaker 1: These people are pathetic. The Democrats right now they are
Speaker 1: trying to stall this thing, to stop this cabinet nomination,
Speaker 1: are pathetic. It's so transparent, it's so obvious what they
Speaker 1: are doing. It's so clear how they're playing this game.
Speaker 1: It really is. Pardon me, my voice is still a
Speaker 1: little shot because I've had a cold last few days,
Speaker 1: but it is so clear to me, it's clear to
Speaker 1: all of us. And that's why they keep saying things
Speaker 1: that are so disprovable, so obviously either irrelevant or dumb,
Speaker 1: or because they're scrambling, folks, they're scrambling. They talked about
Speaker 1: this this polygraph notion, like that's supposed to prove something
Speaker 1: play eight. She has taken a polygraph. She's a credible person.
Speaker 1: These are serious allegations. I think it's amazing that she
Speaker 1: passed that polygraph. In fact, I would love it if
Speaker 1: maybe Judge Kavanaugh wants to get on the We call
Speaker 1: it being in on the box. We are immediately questioning
Speaker 1: her credibility despite the fact that she has passed the
Speaker 1: polygraph test. We're questioning her credibility because she cannot remember
Speaker 1: where this assault that is seered into her brain that
Speaker 1: she says she remembers exactly who did it, how it happened,
Speaker 1: where his hands went, all of it, but not where
Speaker 1: it happened, where his hands went, yes, where they were
Speaker 1: physically located at the time. No, are we allowed to
Speaker 1: ask were she black out drunk at the time, because
Speaker 1: that would explain why she wouldn't remember where she was.
Speaker 1: But it also means that how would you know who
Speaker 1: it was? But we we we were not allowed. Chris
Speaker 1: Lee's over at CNN and really kind of gave away
Speaker 1: the game here. He said, you know, it's it's dangerous ground.
Speaker 1: He's some CNN hack. It's dangerous ground to try to
Speaker 1: ask any questions here. For for Republicans, Okay, So now
Speaker 1: the truth is the truth is is dangerous ground that
Speaker 1: that's interesting and by the way, that's what we're that
Speaker 1: is how the other side used this polygraph. Polygraph is
Speaker 1: useless if somebody believes what they're saying is true, that's
Speaker 1: just a fact. Do I think that Professor Ford maybe
Speaker 1: really does believe in our heart of hearts that that
Speaker 1: Judge Kavanaugh did this to her? Sure? Do I think
Speaker 1: that he did it to or No? I think she
Speaker 1: believes it. I think she maybe, you know, I have
Speaker 1: some problems. I think she might have some so mission.
Speaker 1: But look, we we know that she's had to seek
Speaker 1: counseling and therapy, which I do not put down. By
Speaker 1: the way, anybody needs counsel of therapy should go do it.
Speaker 1: But she may have some mental health concerns that she
Speaker 1: has to work through. You know that that we're not
Speaker 1: We don't know anything about anything because she won't show
Speaker 1: up and talk about it. And the whole thing is
Speaker 1: all just so obviously orchestrated, and they're trying so hard
Speaker 1: to make it sound like it's not. Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: do I think judge Judge Kavanaugh did this? No, I
Speaker 1: do not. I do not believe his accuser is correct.
Speaker 1: Could she be a little either, could she misremember or
Speaker 1: maybe even be delusional. Yeah, that's possible to I don't know,
Speaker 1: but I don't believe her. So that's where I stand
Speaker 1: on this one. Folks. We've got more. I want to
Speaker 1: play for you a piece of video that we just found.
Speaker 1: It shows Brett Kavanaugh back in getting back to what
Speaker 1: Joe Jackson was saying a few moments ago about what
Speaker 1: happened at Georgetown Prep, what happened during the high school
Speaker 1: days of Brett Cavanaugh. And here's Brett Cavanaugh talking about
Speaker 1: this video that's been unearthed by our team just the
Speaker 1: last few minutes. Unfortunately, we had it. We had a
Speaker 1: good saying that we've we've held firm to the to
Speaker 1: this day, as the Dean was reminding me before before
Speaker 1: the talk, which is what happens at Georgetown Prep stays
Speaker 1: at Georgetown Prep. That's been a good thing for all
Speaker 1: of us. I under obviously, susan not a conclusive you know,
Speaker 1: a piece of video that says you know that he
Speaker 1: did anything, but it is it does speak to uh
Speaker 1: this notion that perhaps you know there are there are
Speaker 1: portions of his childhood that he would rather not come
Speaker 1: to light. I suppose. So is CNN Jim Acosta a
Speaker 1: moron or just humorless or maybe both. That's how desperate
Speaker 1: they are over at CNN to playcate their audience of
Speaker 1: brainwashed liberal an income poops, They're gonna play a clip
Speaker 1: of Kavanaugh giving a speech at a school where he's
Speaker 1: trying to be funny. It was a joke. He's playing
Speaker 1: off of the Vegas slogan, what happens in Vegas days
Speaker 1: in Vegas. But but cav but but there you had
Speaker 1: Acosta acting like Cavanaugh, uh is repressing memories, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe the kind of memories of the allegation that just
Speaker 1: came out this past week. You know, you get a
Speaker 1: Costa doing this armchair psychiatrist garbage, and it's just crazy, folks.
Speaker 1: It is just crazy that that Acosta would do this,
Speaker 1: and yea, yeah, here we are. By the way, it
Speaker 1: wasn't even in the full context. So you heard him
Speaker 1: played out there what happens in Georgetown Preps days at
Speaker 1: Georgetown prepp Here is what the actual full context of
Speaker 1: that Kavanaugh speech was playten By coincidence, three classmates of
Speaker 1: mine at George Town on Prep. We're graduates of this
Speaker 1: law school in and are really really good friends of mine.
Speaker 1: Might been well done or Ago and film Merkel and
Speaker 1: they were good friends of mine, uh then and are
Speaker 1: still good friends of mine as we can as recently
Speaker 1: as this weekend when we're all on email together. But
Speaker 1: fortunately we had it. We had a good saying that
Speaker 1: we've we've held firm to the to this day. As
Speaker 1: the dean was reminding me before before the talk, which
Speaker 1: is what happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep.
Speaker 1: That's been a good thing for all of us. I've
Speaker 1: been so he's talking to Yale Law School. And as
Speaker 1: you know, whenever you give one of these speeches, and
Speaker 1: I sometimes have to go to different places in the
Speaker 1: country and give speeches. But if you're listening this you
Speaker 1: want send me an email and people are like, wow,
Speaker 1: we can really get you. Come out and give a speech. Yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: we'll talk about it. Send me a message on Facebook.
Speaker 1: It's that easy. People are like, hey, come speak to
Speaker 1: my thing. I'm like, well, let's talk. You know, we'll
Speaker 1: discuss um. But Cabinal was giving a speech at Yale
Speaker 1: Law School. You like that shameless plug by the way.
Speaker 1: I love doing like because then I got to actually
Speaker 1: meet the team in person, um the capitals giving a
Speaker 1: speech at Yell Law School and he's trying to be
Speaker 1: funny and he's talking about old friends and he's making
Speaker 1: a little joke here, and that then gets aired on
Speaker 1: CNN like it's almost a confession or something like, Oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, did you see what Kavanall said. I mean,
Speaker 1: it certainly opens up the possibility of a depraved mind here.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think we need to take this very seriously.
Speaker 1: And I'm just sitting I'm like, I mean, they're just
Speaker 1: such CNN, such a bunch of buffoons on this whole issue.
Speaker 1: But they're not, you know, but foods can be well intentioned.
Speaker 1: The problem with CNN is there's no good faith over there.
Speaker 1: They they are the cable news hashtag resistance channel. They're
Speaker 1: not even really the channel for the Democratic Party and
Speaker 1: progressive left that's really MSNBC. CNN exists to take down Trump, now,
Speaker 1: That's what it exists to do. And because of that,
Speaker 1: because of that mindset and that reality, they will say
Speaker 1: things like what a Costa just did there where they
Speaker 1: look like a bunch of look like idiots. They really
Speaker 1: do look like they're are incompetent. But it's not incompetence.
Speaker 1: It's malice. It's worse than incompetence. And that's coming coming
Speaker 1: out in many ways with the whole Kavanaugh thing. And
Speaker 1: I got ato debate last night with a friend of mine.
Speaker 1: Actually we're talking about whether they whether the Democrats, whether
Speaker 1: they're uniquely vicious when it comes to Trump or not.
Speaker 1: And I was saying, well, the viciousness that they've shown
Speaker 1: towards Kavanaugh, well shows either they'll do anything to destroy
Speaker 1: anybody that's important in terms of their war on you know,
Speaker 1: liberal war on you know, individual rights, on the Constitution,
Speaker 1: everything else. They'll do whatever they have to do. I mean,
Speaker 1: they'll play as dirty as they have to play. So
Speaker 1: it's not that their tactics against Trump or any dirty
Speaker 1: or just that Trump gets them more aggravated because he
Speaker 1: gives them more to work with it a lot of ways,
Speaker 1: but they still can't seem to beat him. So I
Speaker 1: think Trump elevates their frustration. But the same sinister tactics
Speaker 1: that they will use against Trump, they'll use against Cavanaugh,
Speaker 1: these against other people too. Some really Democrats are if
Speaker 1: not equal opportunity haters certainly willing to fight as dirty.
Speaker 1: They're willing to throw low blows against anybody. And that's
Speaker 1: what Cavanaugh is a reminder of it. That's why you've
Speaker 1: had I think a lot of conservatives who are never
Speaker 1: Trumpers finally having a moment here of of comedy and
Speaker 1: and you know, togetherness on this issue because they realize
Speaker 1: a whole lot of second, maybe the left really is crazy.
Speaker 1: You know, I think they have some of them, some
Speaker 1: of the never Trumpers have forgotten that maybe the maybe
Speaker 1: the left really is the primary ideological foe. And we
Speaker 1: should come together with our Trump supporting colleagues here and
Speaker 1: and friends and neighbors and stand for a conservative on
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court like Cavanaugh. Folks, I'm just gonna say
Speaker 1: this now too. I don't even know how great Cavanaugh
Speaker 1: is gonna be on the bench. He does line up
Speaker 1: a lot with John Roberts, who, as you know, great pedigree.
Speaker 1: But he's the one who kept Obamacare alive, and basically
Speaker 1: because he didn't want the Supreme Court to save the
Speaker 1: American people from their political decisions. That was that was
Speaker 1: really the reasoning. I mean, they completely contorted logic and
Speaker 1: language in order to keep Obamacare alives. I don't even
Speaker 1: think Kavanaugh is gonna be so true liberals all the time.
Speaker 1: I don't think he's even worth this level of freak
Speaker 1: out from them, but you know they're freaking out about it.
Speaker 1: By the way, a Costa not only does he have
Speaker 1: no sense of humor um, but he is willing to
Speaker 1: put the You know, he's a guy who has really
Speaker 1: made his name by just being so anti Trump, and
Speaker 1: you know he's he's a pundit without the brains to
Speaker 1: actually come up with his own material, right, So he
Speaker 1: just goes out there and he's he's a reporter who's
Speaker 1: trying to make score points against administration, but he's not
Speaker 1: willing to really engage an open argument. I mean, the
Speaker 1: Costa never goes out to debate anybody. You've noticed that.
Speaker 1: He just wants to be a reporter who gets to
Speaker 1: say whatever he wants. He won't actually engage with the
Speaker 1: other side, but he's in. He went out and interviewed
Speaker 1: a Ford professor Ford uh friend and order named Samantha Gary,
Speaker 1: and somehow thought that this was relevant to the discussion
Speaker 1: around Capita. Not that Kavanaugh did anything wrong, but that
Speaker 1: there are other people that maybe acted in a way
Speaker 1: that was inappropriate towards you know, their female peers played two.
Speaker 1: It's not the first time I've heard anything like that
Speaker 1: in terms of the community of women that I know,
Speaker 1: and not regarding him, but those sorts of things went
Speaker 1: a lot. You know. One of the things that's been
Speaker 1: surprising to me as I've gotten involved in this in
Speaker 1: the last couple of days is how many women of
Speaker 1: my class have come forward to me in this the
Speaker 1: last few days and said I had similar experiences in
Speaker 1: high school and this hits me very deeply. And but
Speaker 1: with other boys in our community, and and we all
Speaker 1: feel that if we were in her shoes, we'd want
Speaker 1: to be taken seriously as well. She's being taken seriously.
Speaker 1: She's the one that's un serious in that you won't
Speaker 1: show up. Okay, I'm sorry. I will not stand for this.
Speaker 1: No one is is negating her because she's a woman.
Speaker 1: This isn't sexism. This is you can't destroy a man
Speaker 1: with a stealth letter. Basically, not you know, based on
Speaker 1: something happened thirty years ago. Not show up, not after
Speaker 1: stand up for what you said, and that that's just
Speaker 1: not gonna fly. But notice how what They've really done
Speaker 1: here is try to stack the deck against Kavanaugh by
Speaker 1: having somebody who is from his you know, from his area,
Speaker 1: maybe doing growing up to say effectively, there was like
Speaker 1: a rape culture going on in you know, in this
Speaker 1: high school. They said that about campuses too. By the way,
Speaker 1: it's a lie about contemporary college campus. There's not a
Speaker 1: rape culture. That is a false. That is a lie.
Speaker 1: But okay, we're there, guys. Were there young men, you know,
Speaker 1: sixteen seventeen eighteen who transgressed against women in this period
Speaker 1: of time in the in the early eighties, in the
Speaker 1: d C area, in elite private schools. Yeah, I'm sure
Speaker 1: that has nothing to do with Brett Kapita. That's like saying,
Speaker 1: you know, Buck grew up in New York in the
Speaker 1: nineteen nineties and there was a lot of crime in
Speaker 1: which there was a lot of crime, a lot of
Speaker 1: violent crime in New York. And in fact, a lot
Speaker 1: of my peers, a lot of people I knew, would
Speaker 1: carry knives sell drugs. It sounds crazy, I know, but
Speaker 1: it's true, a lot of selling and drugs. So if
Speaker 1: somebody ever accused me of selling drugs, would it be
Speaker 1: relevant that there were other people in New York City
Speaker 1: that that I knew of who sold drugs. No, it
Speaker 1: is not relevant because I never sold drugs ever, ever,
Speaker 1: ever a day in my life. Right. But if somebody
Speaker 1: accused me of doing that and said, oh, but but
Speaker 1: you know you knew of people in New York City
Speaker 1: that's sold drugs, that is a non sequitur. That doesn't
Speaker 1: mean anything. And that's what they're doing here. It's just
Speaker 1: a smear tactic, folks. It's just it's grotesque. But they're
Speaker 1: desperate and with that desperation comes viciousness and the pathetic,
Speaker 1: the pathetic chord in an effort to takedown Kavanaugh, I
Speaker 1: want to do the switch gears. I know we've talked
Speaker 1: a lot about Kavanaugh um this week, and certainly, Sarah,
Speaker 1: I do want to talk to you more about a
Speaker 1: few things coming up. A project Very Toss has some
Speaker 1: deep state audio we're gonna play for you. We also
Speaker 1: have some more specifics on my interview with the president.
Speaker 1: Can read you from some of the transcript. We're able
Speaker 1: to print the transcript today, and I'll give you a
Speaker 1: little more of insight, a little bit of a behind
Speaker 1: the scenes into the my forty five minutes with the
Speaker 1: President United States. Just happened yesterday. We broke huge news
Speaker 1: with the UH Jeff Sessions. I felt kind of bad
Speaker 1: for Jeff Sessions, but you know, it's news, and we
Speaker 1: gotta print the we gotta print the interview. And this
Speaker 1: the President saying it, not me um talking about that. Also,
Speaker 1: some major U s Citi is more than half close
Speaker 1: to half in a bunch cases, more than half in
Speaker 1: l A don't speak English at home. What does that
Speaker 1: mean for our culture? Uh? These are all discussions we've
Speaker 1: got coming up. The FBI says home title half is
Speaker 1: one of the fastest growing crimes out there, So brace
Speaker 1: yourselves because having your credit card stolen is nothing compared
Speaker 1: to the hell you're in for if identity thieves managed
Speaker 1: to take control of your home's title. Folks, if you
Speaker 1: haven't heard about home title theft, it is a growing crime.
Speaker 1: It's a real problem out there, and the downside of
Speaker 1: this can be huge. Think of all the money, all
Speaker 1: the time you've spent trying to pay down your mortgage. Right,
Speaker 1: you've got equity in your home. Well, if the bad
Speaker 1: guys are able to replace you with an alias online,
Speaker 1: it's not hard to do. I've seen it done. They
Speaker 1: can use your home's title to take out loans and
Speaker 1: then you get stuck with the payments. They just get
Speaker 1: the cash from alone. Don't let this happen to you.
Speaker 1: For just pennies a day, Home title Lock protects my
Speaker 1: most viable asset, my family's home registered now for a
Speaker 1: free analysis and it's a hundred dollar value, folks, and
Speaker 1: see if your home's title is safe. Go to home
Speaker 1: title lock dot com. Again, that's home title lock dot com.
Speaker 1: I think the President has probably felt this has gone
Speaker 1: are enough as far as waiting for the FBI the
Speaker 1: Justice Department to release the fiser applications. I've read the applications.
Speaker 1: I've gone down to the Justice Department, and I think
Speaker 1: objective people looking at this, whether they support President Trump
Speaker 1: or not, will see that the fiser warrant defiser application
Speaker 1: was not an honest one, not anywhere near enough. Was
Speaker 1: a closed to the court. The court. Really I was
Speaker 1: treated badly, But the result of that is the abuse
Speaker 1: of power by the Justice Department against a presidential campaign,
Speaker 1: unprecedented in American is welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show, folks.
Speaker 1: I I do think we are heading for a showdown.
Speaker 1: Over declassification here, and this this is going to get
Speaker 1: very interesting. You have people who seem to believe that
Speaker 1: they are above that they can work for the president
Speaker 1: but be above presidential directive. They think that they can
Speaker 1: work for the President of the United States but not
Speaker 1: actually have to be subject act two lawful orders that
Speaker 1: he that he gives within his constitutional authority. And you
Speaker 1: have you know, the d O j FBI in the
Speaker 1: Office of Director of National Intelligence O D and I
Speaker 1: all at least having some murmurs, uh that they're gonna
Speaker 1: try to just give him documents that are still redacted,
Speaker 1: that are still over redacted. And people are saying that
Speaker 1: this is going to open up some kind of a
Speaker 1: war between the president and the officials that won't okay
Speaker 1: this information. We had we the former CIA director on
Speaker 1: air Brennan saying, I know we talked about this yesterday
Speaker 1: on the show, but saying that people have a duty
Speaker 1: to ignore the president's order here. I mean, You've got
Speaker 1: two big problems that are coming to the forefront as
Speaker 1: a result of all this. One is this means that
Speaker 1: there are people who really do believe that the chain
Speaker 1: of command does not apply to them. I mean, the
Speaker 1: hashtag resistance. These people are our saboteurs within the government.
Speaker 1: They have this notion that just because they've seen enough
Speaker 1: you know, propaganda online about Russia or or the you know,
Speaker 1: the or some of them were the ones that made
Speaker 1: the propaganda about Russia, but they think that the president
Speaker 1: doesn't really get to exercise his full authority. This reminds
Speaker 1: me of when I was interviewing Lissa Milano and she
Speaker 1: said the president shouldn't be able to appoint a Supreme
Speaker 1: Court nominee while he's under investigation. And I said, well,
Speaker 1: other presidents under investigation have done that, and that would
Speaker 1: be like saying the presidents under investigation. So he's no
Speaker 1: longer the president. He has this authority in the Constitution,
Speaker 1: in our founding document case closed. And he has declassification
Speaker 1: authority too because he is the chief of the executive branch.
Speaker 1: How can somebody else within the executive branch chain of
Speaker 1: command say that, no, no, you can't release this. This
Speaker 1: I say, this is not classified. That at the end
Speaker 1: of the day, if the prey and it says this
Speaker 1: is the information belongs to the executive branch. If a
Speaker 1: president says this isn't classified, it's not classified. In fact,
Speaker 1: friends of mine that have worked in the different public
Speaker 1: and press, you know, the press shops of the various agencies,
Speaker 1: will tell you that they have to deal with something
Speaker 1: called real time declassification, which is a kind of tongue
Speaker 1: in cheek way of saying, well, the President just talked
Speaker 1: about it, so it's not classified anymore. That happens. Now
Speaker 1: that's not an official process, but it is a recognition
Speaker 1: of the fact that the presidents at the top of
Speaker 1: the command chain here, right, So who are these other
Speaker 1: people who are gonna step up and say, oh, no,
Speaker 1: you can't do that. It's just it shows such a
Speaker 1: a lack of understanding of what the role of the
Speaker 1: president is and also the people that work within the
Speaker 1: executive branch, and and it just shows you that they, uh,
Speaker 1: they come with this notion that they shouldn't be held accountable.
Speaker 1: They really seem to believe that they are able two
Speaker 1: just decide they're going to defy a presidential directive. Now,
Speaker 1: I don't know, they would have to get fired. You
Speaker 1: know that that's where this would all head if they
Speaker 1: refused to do with the president have to start firing
Speaker 1: people just like Sally Yates. Look it's not unthinkable Sally
Speaker 1: Yates refused to do her job. She just refused to
Speaker 1: do it. Okay, So, given that Sally Yates didn't want
Speaker 1: to do her job, I wouldn't be surprised if there's
Speaker 1: some folks that FBI d o jare some others who
Speaker 1: are also unwilling to do their job. But so that
Speaker 1: this one problem is just the lack of respect for
Speaker 1: chain of command for the office of the presidency and
Speaker 1: these people thinking from what we've seen so far, we
Speaker 1: don't know where they're gonna go. Um, but these people
Speaker 1: seem to think that they're deep state. I know the
Speaker 1: President doesn't like that phrase. We'll talk more about that.
Speaker 1: Uh there, bureaucratic supremacy is something that should be celebrated,
Speaker 1: and that they are you know, they're more they're more
Speaker 1: fit to determine what gets shared with the public and
Speaker 1: the presidents. Okay, So that's one big problem. The other
Speaker 1: problem is what the heck is with these people that
Speaker 1: don't want us to get this information. There's so much
Speaker 1: and oh my gosh, in Congress, they're trying so hard.
Speaker 1: Oh this is so reckless, this is terrible. Why would
Speaker 1: the president ever do this? Uh? You know, they're saying
Speaker 1: that the big story you here now is that they're
Speaker 1: they're claiming that this means that we will no longer
Speaker 1: be in a position to get intelligence shared with us
Speaker 1: from different places, or there'll be people that won't share.
Speaker 1: Here's what I say to that, folks, there is a
Speaker 1: presidency at stake over the outcome of all of this,
Speaker 1: all right. They don't get to tell us that Russia
Speaker 1: undermined our institutions, that this is the most important and
Speaker 1: critical threat to to our democracy, which I always love
Speaker 1: to say, uh, you know, in the last fifty years
Speaker 1: or whatever time frame they want to give you. They
Speaker 1: don't get to hype up this as the most important
Speaker 1: story in the country really therefore in the world for
Speaker 1: eighteen months and then and of course Donald Trump impossible collusion,
Speaker 1: the Rustan investigation is that's all tied together. They don't
Speaker 1: get to do that and then turn around and say, well,
Speaker 1: you know, we don't really we don't really need to
Speaker 1: know stuff. We don't really need to be um getting
Speaker 1: the truth on this stuff. We'd rather just have the
Speaker 1: investigation grind on. You know, there's there there, there's there's
Speaker 1: a recurring theme here whether it's the Kavanaugh hearings, or
Speaker 1: the declassification of information relating to Trump in Russia and
Speaker 1: how the Russia investigation got started. What we're Page and
Speaker 1: Struck and others up to at the d o J.
Speaker 1: And the recurrent theme is that the left Democrats are
Speaker 1: very good at abusing process for political ends because the
Speaker 1: leftist mind is comfortable with bureaucracy, because the whole notion
Speaker 1: of a bureaucraus. She actually goes back and you can
Speaker 1: look at the origins of American progressivism and some of
Speaker 1: the borrowed ideas that American progressivism has from uh Bismarck
Speaker 1: and some of the that German era state or that
Speaker 1: that that time period of Germany. Even a Bismarck, we wanted, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, veterans to have welfare payments and or you know,
Speaker 1: veterans to have pension payments, I should say, in national
Speaker 1: healthcare and all this stuff. You know, there there's cross
Speaker 1: over these ideas. The left believes in an elevated bureaucracy
Speaker 1: of people that are highly intelligent, highly adept that will
Speaker 1: administer the wonderful government. Because I love the government to
Speaker 1: all the rest of us. This is a very leftist
Speaker 1: idea very American an American progressivism picked up on this
Speaker 1: in the early twentieth century and ran with it. As
Speaker 1: we know, bureaucracy is really the enemy of freedom. Now,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that you can have no bureaucracy just
Speaker 1: like you can have no you can have no government either.
Speaker 1: But bureaucrats are a constant concern for those of us
Speaker 1: who privilege and and uh cherish liberty, and the leftists
Speaker 1: because their status, always have a greater preference for bureaucracy,
Speaker 1: but also have a greater comfort with it and are
Speaker 1: willing to use it to try to achieve political ends.
Speaker 1: They know that in the big mass and the flabby
Speaker 1: folds of bureaucracy, any debate can get lost. You know.
Speaker 1: They know that they can slow it down, they can
Speaker 1: change the news cycle by relying on on bureaucratic wrangling.
Speaker 1: And and that's so that that is absolutely a a
Speaker 1: concern here, um. And they just don't want us to
Speaker 1: get to the truth. They're saying that, you know, we
Speaker 1: we can't release this information because it's going to result
Speaker 1: in less information sharing for us. But this is about
Speaker 1: a presidency, folks, What do we really care more about
Speaker 1: the possible the the theoretical damage to intelligence sharing, the
Speaker 1: theoretical damage to uh, you know, our sources and methods,
Speaker 1: which I believe will even be redacted in this request
Speaker 1: that Trump has. They just want to keep stuff out
Speaker 1: of there that they know, uh, if it comes out,
Speaker 1: it's going to make their whole storyline look really bad.
Speaker 1: And that's why you get journalists and democrats, isn't an
Speaker 1: interesting Journalists and Democrats are the ones who are opposed
Speaker 1: to the release of this information. You know, I remember
Speaker 1: that some of the same journalists that were, you know,
Speaker 1: cheering the wiki leaks releases of stuff from the Iraq
Speaker 1: war are very opposed to this over, very very opposed
Speaker 1: to this information getting out there. It's just it's pure politics, folks.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is what we have. Ah. The media
Speaker 1: has become a reflection of the tribalism of American politics,
Speaker 1: but the media is kind of a hyper concentrated version
Speaker 1: of it. And what you see is is people doing
Speaker 1: everything that they can to root for a team, to
Speaker 1: push for a team, and Team Trump Russia collusion is
Speaker 1: something that of the media is a part of and
Speaker 1: they know that if all of a sudden we have
Speaker 1: to come to a reckoning over uh, the f behind
Speaker 1: the d o J working with the media. So you
Speaker 1: have really the unholy alliance here of the bureaucracy with
Speaker 1: the uh, you know, the media. Um. I was want
Speaker 1: to you know, fourth Estate, fifth column. I always want
Speaker 1: to say the fourth Estate, and it's the fifth column,
Speaker 1: but the fourth State is a fifth column. But that
Speaker 1: alliance is what got this whole Russia collusion thing going.
Speaker 1: And and this was really in a sense there this
Speaker 1: was their failsafe. I mean, the progressives failsafe was, well,
Speaker 1: even if we can't win an election, we can have
Speaker 1: the media and the permanent bureaucracy work together to undo
Speaker 1: the results of an election. And I don't believe that
Speaker 1: any any Republican other than Trump would be able to
Speaker 1: as much as sometimes he gives them more to work with.
Speaker 1: You know, the Lester whole interview was a disaster, and
Speaker 1: there's been things, but I don't think anybody other than
Speaker 1: Trump will be able to fight through this. I think
Speaker 1: that they would just wear them down. Um they you know,
Speaker 1: anybody from the kind of Bush approach to gop ism
Speaker 1: would be too concerned with the the loss of of
Speaker 1: public esteem, would be would be too concerned with how
Speaker 1: they just you know, are getting hammered in the press
Speaker 1: all the time. Um. Trump has said that the declassified
Speaker 1: information that's gonna come out with this Russia probe exposes
Speaker 1: bad things. It's gonna expose bad things, and there's more
Speaker 1: to come beyond that. And and you know, we we've
Speaker 1: extended this discussion out such a long time, so many
Speaker 1: months we've been talking about the Russia collusion thing. I
Speaker 1: think people should just be be forced to, uh, to remember,
Speaker 1: especially on the other side, that we've gone so far
Speaker 1: from what they promised we'd find and are actually all
Speaker 1: the way in the other direction. They said we find
Speaker 1: that Trump was a trader, and what we found is
Speaker 1: that Trump is a patriot, and there were traders. They
Speaker 1: just all happen to be Democrats. Whether you're a startup
Speaker 1: company or a huge, fortunate, one hundred massive corporation, you
Speaker 1: need to make sure that the people that you're hiring
Speaker 1: are who they say they are, right. The people you're
Speaker 1: bringing in have no criminal background, no problems there whatsoever.
Speaker 1: Aren't people that have been involved in lots of nasty lawsuits? Right.
Speaker 1: You want vetting and background screening done right, and you
Speaker 1: want it done by a company you can trust and
Speaker 1: that you can get in on the phone any time
Speaker 1: you need to. Okay, that's Global Verification Network. This is
Speaker 1: a veteran owned and operated company. I know and trust
Speaker 1: the CEO. These are people that when you reach out
Speaker 1: and you've got a question about anything that's coming up
Speaker 1: in the background check process, they will make sure they
Speaker 1: walk you through it and they'll also get clear and
Speaker 1: efficient answers for each in every case, whether you're a
Speaker 1: huge company or small, you want Global Verification Network for
Speaker 1: your background investigation needs, go to my g VN dot
Speaker 1: com and tell them Buck Sex Incent you my GVN
Speaker 1: dot com. Some pretty stunning statistics today, folks. This courtesy
Speaker 1: of the Washington Examiner. Nearly half in the top five U. S.
Speaker 1: Cities don't speak English at home. Uh Instead they speak
Speaker 1: their native language. This is according to Census Bureau data
Speaker 1: that looks at the impact of immigration policy over the
Speaker 1: last decade. Sixty seven million people in this country do
Speaker 1: not speak English at home. That is nearly double in
Speaker 1: twenty seven years as a share of the population twenty
Speaker 1: one point eight percent. This according to the Center for
Speaker 1: Immigration Studies, twenty one point eight percent of US residents
Speaker 1: speak a foreign language at home, which is about double
Speaker 1: what it was in America's five largest cities. Forty eight
Speaker 1: percent of residents now speak a language other than English.
Speaker 1: New York, It's in Houston, Los Angeles, It's Chicago, it's Phoenix.
Speaker 1: It's thirty eight percent. Uh. You know this is the
Speaker 1: findings come out, as Washingtons Ever says here as more
Speaker 1: and more reports emerge about people getting in debates over
Speaker 1: speaking English. Right people want to be able to speak English,
Speaker 1: or others say that they shouldn't have speaking We should
Speaker 1: have a national language, folks. And this should not be
Speaker 1: a controversial thing to say at all. Those who like
Speaker 1: to hearken back to, you know, when when they had
Speaker 1: when they think it's not actually true, but when they
Speaker 1: think that we had this wide open door immigration policy, uh,
Speaker 1: should understand that, Yeah, you didn't have to have perfect
Speaker 1: English when you came here, but there was gonna be
Speaker 1: no choice. If you were going to be successful, You're
Speaker 1: going to have to learn English. You're gonna have to
Speaker 1: speak English. And language is right after rule of law
Speaker 1: and and an understanding of the law. Languages is a
Speaker 1: foundational element of culture. So and language language affects the
Speaker 1: way we think, it affects the way we act. I mean,
Speaker 1: language is essential and that we have the cultural connections
Speaker 1: we do. I mean, why is it that, as an American,
Speaker 1: if you get on a plane and you go to Australia,
Speaker 1: it'll feel very, you know, very much like America to you.
Speaker 1: But if you get on a plane and you were
Speaker 1: to go to you know, uh say Honduras, or if
Speaker 1: you were to go to France, you know, you'd say, okay,
Speaker 1: well there's some stuff that reminds me of my culture,
Speaker 1: but it's very different, right. I mean, language is going
Speaker 1: to be among the very, uh the most noticeable, most
Speaker 1: important differences between our culture and other cultures. And it's
Speaker 1: really what binds us together as a people. Um. And
Speaker 1: while people will look at this, a lot of liberals
Speaker 1: and leftists will look at this, these statistics and they'll say, well,
Speaker 1: it's not bad, and you know, diversity is a mirror
Speaker 1: go strength, and we're a melting pot and all this stuff.
Speaker 1: The truth is it's gonna be harder and harder for
Speaker 1: us to have a shared political culture and a and
Speaker 1: a shared understanding of what this country is if we
Speaker 1: can't even share a language to speak about this country. Now,
Speaker 1: I understand, speaking it at home doesn't mean that people
Speaker 1: can't speak the language at all. It doesn't mean that
Speaker 1: I'm not This is not telling us, uh, that people
Speaker 1: don't speak English at all. It's it's saying that at
Speaker 1: home they choose a different language. But that also can
Speaker 1: have you know that that there's some upside of that.
Speaker 1: Being bilingual would certainly have its advantages or trilingual or whatever.
Speaker 1: Some people speak in eight languages, but you need to
Speaker 1: have at least complete English proficiency. And if you look
Speaker 1: at the explosion of e s L English as a
Speaker 1: second language, training and a lot of schools, uh, the
Speaker 1: fact that matters that you have people who are not
Speaker 1: proficient in English and large numbers who are foreign born
Speaker 1: and in this country, uh, and you have a lot
Speaker 1: of people who well a lot of native born Americans
Speaker 1: are gonna need some help with their their language skills
Speaker 1: as well. But this, this is not encouraging for the
Speaker 1: future of our cultural unity. I And it also just
Speaker 1: shows you what a vast increase in the foreign born
Speaker 1: population there is, right. And people born in this country
Speaker 1: of American parents speak English. I mean, if your parents
Speaker 1: are from here and they're born here, and you're born here,
Speaker 1: you grow up overwhelmingly speaking English. Not saying everybody, but
Speaker 1: overwhelmingly that's going to be the case. So on the
Speaker 1: there there's the cultural disconnect that this raises, the cultural
Speaker 1: disconnect that I think is concerning. And then beyond that,
Speaker 1: you have the issue of what is our immigration policy
Speaker 1: really looking like? I mean, how many people have we
Speaker 1: brought into the country from abroad? And this this gives
Speaker 1: you a sense of it. I mean, when we have
Speaker 1: basically half of the biggest US cities, more than half
Speaker 1: in Los Angeles, people not speaking English at home, we
Speaker 1: are looking culturally fractured. And we also get a sense
Speaker 1: of the scale of immigration, including a legal immigration. We're
Speaker 1: talking about Los Angeles, You've got a lot of illegal immigration. Uh,
Speaker 1: and it's pretty staggering. The numbers are incredibly high. So
Speaker 1: you know this, this I think should should get some attention.
Speaker 1: And you know, the the real long term challenge for
Speaker 1: the real long term challenges as I see it, for
Speaker 1: this country. Yeah, eventually China might be a military and
Speaker 1: economic threat. Right now it's a challenger, it's not really
Speaker 1: much of a threat um But the real long term
Speaker 1: challenges are our debt are the fight against stat ism
Speaker 1: and socialism and cultural unity, American culture being something that
Speaker 1: we are able to sustain and replicate because this is
Speaker 1: you know, not to get too philosophical here, folks, but
Speaker 1: you know there's a country is an idea, and when
Speaker 1: it ceases to be a shared idea, bad things happen.
Speaker 1: For decades, credit cards have been telling us buy it
Speaker 1: now and pay for it later with interest, despite your
Speaker 1: best intentions, that interest can get out of control fast.
Speaker 1: With lending Club, you can consolidate your debt or payoff
Speaker 1: credit cards with one fixed monthly payment. Since two thousand
Speaker 1: and seven, lending Club has helped millions of people regain
Speaker 1: control of their finances with affordable, fixed rate personal loans.
Speaker 1: No trips to a bank, no high interest credit cards.
Speaker 1: Just go to lending club dot com, tell them about
Speaker 1: yourself and how much you want to borrow, pick the
Speaker 1: terms that are right for you, and if you're approved,
Speaker 1: your loan is automatically deposited into your bank account in
Speaker 1: as little as a few days. Lending Club is the
Speaker 1: number one peer to peer lending platform with over thirty
Speaker 1: five billion loans issued. Go to lending club dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck check your rate in minutes and borrow up
Speaker 1: to forty thou dollars. That's lending club dot com slash
Speaker 1: buck lending club dot com slash buck all loans made
Speaker 1: by web bank member f d i C Equal Housing Lender.
Speaker 1: What I worked everything everything there. You have a State
Speaker 1: Department employee filmed as part of an undercover investigation by
Speaker 1: Project Very Toss of the Resistance inside of government, folks.
Speaker 1: It's it is a very real thing. Um. The State
Speaker 1: Department is a is a hotbed of this. I've known
Speaker 1: this all along. I have friends here in d C
Speaker 1: that I've spoken to who say that the stories that
Speaker 1: you've may be read or that you've heard me talk
Speaker 1: about here on the show, of people in the State
Speaker 1: Department who cry at their desks because they're so upset
Speaker 1: that Hillary lost the election, who wait in their cars
Speaker 1: in fear and won't go into it, won't go into
Speaker 1: the office because they're so worried about what it means
Speaker 1: to work in foreign policy in Trump's America. Those people
Speaker 1: are real. That is happening. And this is where I think,
Speaker 1: you know, we've been talking a lot about about d
Speaker 1: O j FBI, but the problem of anti trumpers who
Speaker 1: will use their offices in some way or another to
Speaker 1: try and either blunt or reverse administration policy, and who
Speaker 1: will work against the president in whatever way they can,
Speaker 1: whether it's leaking to the press, telling you know, unflattering stories. Uh,
Speaker 1: that is a federal government wide problem. That's except for
Speaker 1: the military. Military loves Trump, no surprise, But the rest
Speaker 1: of the federal government is Look, it's it's full of
Speaker 1: of you know, bureaucrats who went to liberal arts colleges
Speaker 1: and are bitter that they're not making more money and
Speaker 1: no one listens to them. I mean that that's you
Speaker 1: get a lot of that really talking about the State
Speaker 1: Department Calmerce some of these other places. Uh, State de
Speaker 1: Farmer's bad. But it's not just there. I mean we
Speaker 1: got also a we got a whole bunch of clips
Speaker 1: and this is all from Project Very Toss. You know,
Speaker 1: James o'keep's outfit. Uh, you've got a a D O
Speaker 1: J employee played twenty six. So since a lot of
Speaker 1: your coworkers are like an employers, more leftists, are they
Speaker 1: trying to do anything? Um? Yeah, I mean I want
Speaker 1: to describe unless regulars. Yeah, A lot of lawyers which
Speaker 1: is like what is the most radical Okay, what are
Speaker 1: they doing anything to like fight against Trump? Um? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean a lot of us talking about it. So
Speaker 1: most of them are like vaguely politically involved. They might
Speaker 1: support candidates into fundraisers and some of the canvas okay um.
Speaker 1: And then there's a lot of talk at work about
Speaker 1: how we can resist human side, I wouldst Shaman side.
Speaker 1: So by the way, that that that is again from
Speaker 1: resistance from the inside. You heard that right, people are
Speaker 1: resisting from the inside. And uh they're calling this the
Speaker 1: Deep State series project, very tous Deep State series. And
Speaker 1: you had Democrats that that one guy we started off
Speaker 1: with at the State Department says he organizes for the
Speaker 1: Democratic Socialists of America during work. Uh. So that that's
Speaker 1: an interesting one, isn't it. You know, on on work
Speaker 1: time he's doing this stuff. But this Deep State series
Speaker 1: was was I opening. I think for a lot of
Speaker 1: folks who believe that there is a that it's exaggerated
Speaker 1: that there are all these people that hate Trump in
Speaker 1: the government, that there's got to be something that's more.
Speaker 1: You know that there's gonna be this this greater nuance
Speaker 1: or I don't know, they just don't want to believe it. Oh,
Speaker 1: we got an A J. Jess person too. Let's throw
Speaker 1: let's throw that that agency in the mix to play.
Speaker 1: Do you have any friends that are to work there?
Speaker 1: Screw him over? They do it kind of like Nixon
Speaker 1: type of thing, is like is there rest is just
Speaker 1: your friend or is it like a bunch of people people?
Speaker 1: And uh are you say they were giving you? They
Speaker 1: were giving you like they were given you early information
Speaker 1: to help. So they were leaking information to you to
Speaker 1: help on be able to help on the outside, to
Speaker 1: help on the outside, and then you were able to
Speaker 1: howard that to lawyers yeah, y or reporters, Yeah. Leaking
Speaker 1: information trying to get stories out there to to hurt
Speaker 1: the administration. That that's what they're doing. You know, folks,
Speaker 1: if somebody really has a problem with a particular administration
Speaker 1: with the president, I'll tell you this right now. When
Speaker 1: I was at CIA and what I was going to
Speaker 1: be doing as a as a CIA analyst was writing
Speaker 1: very focused and complicated analytic products for Barack Obama. I
Speaker 1: did my very best, and I was really working Afghanistan
Speaker 1: for the time that I was in the agency. When
Speaker 1: Obama was in office, I did my very best on
Speaker 1: all the work that I did. It never would have
Speaker 1: even occurred to me that on an issue as serious
Speaker 1: as national security, defending the nation and intelligence for the
Speaker 1: commander in chief, that I would let politics play even
Speaker 1: the slightest bit of a role in my thinking. That
Speaker 1: all set, I did have a level of discomfort with
Speaker 1: continue to work for administration. That was I thought at
Speaker 1: odds with American national security interests around the world. And
Speaker 1: you know what I did. I left. I left. I
Speaker 1: didn't try to play any games and leak stuff to
Speaker 1: the press. I didn't, you know, slow roll my day
Speaker 1: to day. I didn't try to half acid or you know,
Speaker 1: act like it doesn't really matter anything like that. I decided, Okay,
Speaker 1: I've had enough. I'm gonna go do something else now
Speaker 1: because I don't want the you know, the pinnacle of
Speaker 1: my time at the agency under the Bush administration was
Speaker 1: when I actually got in the Oval office and got
Speaker 1: to talk to the President about some very important, very
Speaker 1: high level stuff. I mean, when you're an analyst getting
Speaker 1: into the getting in to see the president and getting
Speaker 1: twenty minutes or so with him. Maybe it's more like
Speaker 1: fifteen felt like a year, but that was you know,
Speaker 1: you were at the very pinnacle of what what was
Speaker 1: possible really in the in the analytic side of the
Speaker 1: profession um. And and I just didn't see myself getting
Speaker 1: to show up and talk to Obama after he had
Speaker 1: read whatever he read on his iPad and have him
Speaker 1: care about what I said. And I just knew that
Speaker 1: we wouldn't have an aligned vision for U S. National
Speaker 1: security on some things. On counter terrorism, I gotta say
Speaker 1: Obama was, you know, he was very drone happy. I mean,
Speaker 1: he was running around a lot of drone stuff, and
Speaker 1: obviously the whole Big Laden raid, which was one of
Speaker 1: the biggest I think one of the biggest breaks he
Speaker 1: got in his whole presidency. Uh So, on those things
Speaker 1: we could agree, but on a lot of other areas
Speaker 1: you didn't agree. And what I'm just trying to say
Speaker 1: is I was either going to stay and do the
Speaker 1: job or go and not do the job. You know,
Speaker 1: you either stay and man the post or you resign.
Speaker 1: You don't get to stay in the post and then
Speaker 1: be a subversive. I think that's dishonorable. I think that
Speaker 1: should be uh, that should face really strident criticism, and
Speaker 1: it's low and it's nasty, and it goes to show
Speaker 1: you that there is a lack, a really systemic lack
Speaker 1: of respect for the office of the presidency from these
Speaker 1: individuals that are coming out now and or not coming out,
Speaker 1: that are being outed by Project very toss and and
Speaker 1: all the things that, um, you know that they've they've
Speaker 1: been talking about here with resisting from the inside, you know,
Speaker 1: the deep states. I would telling you, I gotta say that,
Speaker 1: you know, the president doesn't like the deep state as
Speaker 1: a term, alright, that came up in her interview yesterday.
Speaker 1: Which he's smart, he he is. Even people I know
Speaker 1: who don't like this president will admit that he is
Speaker 1: a branding genius. That his ability to market ideas to
Speaker 1: market people. Um. And look you see this in media too.
Speaker 1: All it takes is the president. All it takes is
Speaker 1: the President to say that somebody is a good guy
Speaker 1: and doing good work, you know, publicly, and all of
Speaker 1: a sudden their book is a bestseller. There. You know,
Speaker 1: he has a huge bully pulpit now, um, but he
Speaker 1: also knows when he knows how to talk about somebody
Speaker 1: or how to push somebody's work out there so that
Speaker 1: it's going to get a lot of attention. Um, I
Speaker 1: think that this president understands that saying deep state would
Speaker 1: be open, It would open him up to a lot
Speaker 1: of the you know, oh, he's just like Alex Jones
Speaker 1: or something Baris theorism, and that's so. So I get it.
Speaker 1: That all said, analytically, I disagree with the president on
Speaker 1: the notion that there that this doesn't qualify as a
Speaker 1: or rather shouldn't. I disagree with them. I would go
Speaker 1: to a different direction. He's not saying it because of
Speaker 1: the optics, and I get that, and I respect that.
Speaker 1: I'm saying it though, because I think it's I think
Speaker 1: that if you're looking at this on just a factual basis,
Speaker 1: when you have people that are inside a government that
Speaker 1: are trying to frustrate core aims and goals of that government,
Speaker 1: if you don't call it a deep state, I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't know exactly what you're gonna call it, but
Speaker 1: you're definitely gonna find yourself very frustrated with what the
Speaker 1: outcome is. And the deep state, so far, I think
Speaker 1: is is unable fortunately to get the kind of traction
Speaker 1: against the President that they've tried. The closest thing they've
Speaker 1: gotten is the Russia Inclusion investigation. I think that's all
Speaker 1: gonna get that's gonna come to an end relatively soon.
Speaker 1: I mean, I can't say very soon, but you know,
Speaker 1: they're they're going to run out of team with eventually,
Speaker 1: they're not going to be able to keep this up
Speaker 1: and continue. So we'll see, my friends. I mean, I
Speaker 1: I gotta give credit. I gotta give credit to O'Keefe
Speaker 1: for doing this kind of work. It's one thing that
Speaker 1: I don't know i'd be able to do. I don't
Speaker 1: think I could do the Hey, I'm just like a
Speaker 1: guy hanging out talking to you about some things, and
Speaker 1: like maybe we've got a video camera on me somewhere,
Speaker 1: but you know, the hidden camera stuff. I'm not. I'm
Speaker 1: not built for that. And people say, oh, Buck, you
Speaker 1: were a spy, Yeah I was. I was really a
Speaker 1: policy guy, policy guy who got out as closely could
Speaker 1: to the front lines and tried to help and did
Speaker 1: some bad guy finding, that's what I'll call it. I
Speaker 1: was good at that too. I was a good bird
Speaker 1: dog for the the door kickers, you know, for the
Speaker 1: actual snake eaters. I was, and I got along very
Speaker 1: well with all them too. We we always had a
Speaker 1: good rapport. Something used to call me junior because they
Speaker 1: assumed that I was a junior. I'm not. My older
Speaker 1: brother is a junior. I'm not actually a junior, but
Speaker 1: they referred to me as junior um also because I
Speaker 1: was very young. And the more elite guys tend to be,
Speaker 1: at least in my experience, the more elite units, the
Speaker 1: tier one units, you know, Delta and Special Forces, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, you name it, Seal Team six, they they
Speaker 1: tended to be in their you know, in their thirties. Uh.
Speaker 1: In my experience, they tend to be a little a
Speaker 1: little bit older because they got to spend some time
Speaker 1: in the units before they can actually get through selection
Speaker 1: and all the other stuff. So, you know, there's that.
Speaker 1: I just I want to keep focusing in when we
Speaker 1: can on on the deep state and trying to bring
Speaker 1: this into a place where there's a really high public
Speaker 1: awareness of just how left wing a lot of the
Speaker 1: federal bureaucracy has become, and just what a problem this
Speaker 1: is for the Trump administration and what it means going
Speaker 1: forward for because there will be another by the way,
Speaker 1: there's gonna be another big league, folks. I can assure
Speaker 1: were you of that there will be a bombshell leak
Speaker 1: from some federal agency about something at some point to
Speaker 1: try to take Trump Trump down, probably with regardless of
Speaker 1: that elections, but it's it's gonna happen. You will see
Speaker 1: you will see leaking from government employees, mark my words.
Speaker 1: You'll see leaking going into meant to take down Trump.
Speaker 1: That will make your head spin. Um. And we have
Speaker 1: not gotten to the bottom of the leaks that have
Speaker 1: already happened, things like the General Flinn phone call. There's
Speaker 1: been a very I think lackluster effort from the authorities
Speaker 1: that are in place, and I can't explain why. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's another thing that probably Trump would would criticize Jeff
Speaker 1: Sessions for, you know, it's tough to criticize the present
Speaker 1: for though the economy. Economy is doing very well, as
Speaker 1: we are well aware. And I had somebody last night
Speaker 1: who would know things. Maybe it was a U. S.
Speaker 1: Senator that I just happened to be having a drink with.
Speaker 1: Uh tell me that he thinks GDP could be as
Speaker 1: highs five percent if we didn't have these headwinds from
Speaker 1: the trade war. But what a bunch of college kids
Speaker 1: say when you asked about the economy. Might surprise you.
Speaker 1: We got a little quick trip through that courtesy campus
Speaker 1: reform coming up. I'm kind of follows the campus reform. Today,
Speaker 1: we're at Michigan State University talking to students about President
Speaker 1: Obama's comments saying that President Trump does not deserve credit
Speaker 1: for how well the economy is doing. What students had
Speaker 1: to say, Let's find out. President Obama gave a speech
Speaker 1: this week in Illinois talking about how it's wrong for
Speaker 1: Trump to take credit for how well the economy is
Speaker 1: doing because it's still his economy. What are your thoughts
Speaker 1: on that comment. Um, he's been out for long enough
Speaker 1: now that it's not on him anymore. It's more on
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. So I guess he's a little bit in
Speaker 1: the wrong. I would probably, unfortunately side with Trump for
Speaker 1: this one. Um. I think that he has done like
Speaker 1: a lot for the economy. Um that Obama didn't do
Speaker 1: such a well good job on but um, yeah, so
Speaker 1: I guess I'll sign with Trump on that one. But
Speaker 1: I feel like once the president's done, they hand it off.
Speaker 1: I feel like all presidents do this. They'll just sort
Speaker 1: of take credit for something that's happening. Down the line,
Speaker 1: I think the underlying fundamentals are likely still largely Obama.
Speaker 1: But in terms of confidence and changing people's attitudes, I
Speaker 1: would say that's mostly Trump. I kind of feel like
Speaker 1: everything is just like like just not the market. The
Speaker 1: market is going way up. I mean, I just haven't
Speaker 1: really kept up with that, so I wouldn't really really
Speaker 1: know too much because of all the things I have
Speaker 1: issues with, the economy is not really one of them.
Speaker 1: It's more like foreign relations and just like public appeal
Speaker 1: and things like that. So of all, I don't really
Speaker 1: think that he's probably one of the things. I think
Speaker 1: he's doing decently well at. He's a businessman. I think
Speaker 1: that's his his strong suit with his tweets and stuff
Speaker 1: I find very offensive because I'm a girl, so in
Speaker 1: a lot of them Oregon stuff stuff. But economically, like
Speaker 1: I feel like he's really helping us. Looks like a
Speaker 1: bunch of random college kids at Michigan State. Hat tip
Speaker 1: campus reform for that one. Looks like those college kids
Speaker 1: understand the economy a lot better than most of the
Speaker 1: mainstream journalists I see on TV or Obama's economy still
Speaker 1: nor it's Obama who's in charge of the economy, even
Speaker 1: though he's not in charge of anything. I guess he's
Speaker 1: in charge of Netflix now part of Netflix. Uh No,
Speaker 1: it is not the Obama economy. That is an inaccurate
Speaker 1: thing for for them to say. And you know, the
Speaker 1: quickest way to shut down this argument is to say,
Speaker 1: if the economy were crappy, does anybody think the Democrats
Speaker 1: would be saying it's not Trump's fault, it's Obama for
Speaker 1: all the bad spending policy and think No, they would
Speaker 1: immediately pile on Trump, say that he's a buffoon, he
Speaker 1: doesn't know anything and uh and and they would use
Speaker 1: this as a major way to to go after the
Speaker 1: president and say that he's inept. And there's all kinds
Speaker 1: of reasons why you know, you should vote for Democrats
Speaker 1: because they're gonna give you free everything, lots and lots
Speaker 1: of free stuff. Who's gonna pay for the free stuff?
Speaker 1: Like whatever? Like a Kazio Cortez will tell you that,
Speaker 1: like like whatever, Like where does the twenty trillion that
Speaker 1: like I need for the healthcare thing? Like I don't
Speaker 1: even know? Because social justice and stuff. Ah, this is
Speaker 1: what this is what the other side. This is what
Speaker 1: the other side promises you. But this is this is
Speaker 1: why I have some some hope for the mid terms,
Speaker 1: because the economy is so strong and Democrats are in
Speaker 1: really such a weak position in terms of their criticism
Speaker 1: of where the economy is right now and all of
Speaker 1: that that I think that we may have a slightly
Speaker 1: surprising result ahead. I think that there is a there's
Speaker 1: at least some shot um. But the issue is going
Speaker 1: to be our people complacent, our conservatives. Are Republicans going
Speaker 1: to be complacent because things are so good that they
Speaker 1: will be you know, immediately or or they'll fall back
Speaker 1: on that. Well, you know, I don't have to worry
Speaker 1: about this. I don't have to worry about this because
Speaker 1: the president, you know, he's got this. No guys, and
Speaker 1: we we really do need to show up. And people
Speaker 1: need to make sure that they are pushing for their
Speaker 1: Republican candidates because the agenda comes to a screeching halt otherwise,
Speaker 1: big our three coming up teams stay with me. We
Speaker 1: have an attorney general. I'm disappointed in the attorney for
Speaker 1: many reasons, and you understand, we are looking at lots
Speaker 1: of different things. I have a great cabinet, we have
Speaker 1: the greatest economy ever, in the history of our country.
Speaker 1: President today answering some questions from folks before he jumped
Speaker 1: on board his his chopper. Get with the chopper. Uh
Speaker 1: and he did. He didn't fact get to get to
Speaker 1: the chopper, but he spoke a little bitout Jeff Sessions there,
Speaker 1: you know yesterday, as as you all know, I was
Speaker 1: in the I was in the Oval office for quite
Speaker 1: a while, about forty five minutes. And now I'm able
Speaker 1: to tell you because we released the transcript. It's been
Speaker 1: out all day and we had I think three links
Speaker 1: up on the Drudge Report today of that interview. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just look, we were able to break a lot
Speaker 1: of news. It was a very timely interview and covered
Speaker 1: so much territory. And I think it's because the President
Speaker 1: understood that I wasn't there to do anything other than
Speaker 1: here with the President United States thinks and what he's
Speaker 1: gonna do on a whole host of issues. It wasn't
Speaker 1: playing any games. I'm open about the fact that I
Speaker 1: support his administration. I'm I'm a pundit, also known as
Speaker 1: an honest journalist as opposed to a just journalist who
Speaker 1: pretends not to have ideas. Uh. So you know, we
Speaker 1: were sitting there and had a really good conversation. One
Speaker 1: cool little note is that the President had I've never
Speaker 1: seen this before, I heard this mention before, but he
Speaker 1: had little forty fives on his embroidered on his cuff
Speaker 1: links or not his cuff links, on his cuff themselves,
Speaker 1: which I thought was pretty cool, you know, like a boss,
Speaker 1: because he is the boss of the free world sort of.
Speaker 1: But on on Sessions, this has been a tough one
Speaker 1: for me. You guys all know that Jeff Sessions. I
Speaker 1: got a soft spot. He's the only cabinet official who's
Speaker 1: called into this show three or four times. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, Jeff Sessions, for whatever reason, you know, he's
Speaker 1: been he's been a buddy and uh and I've always
Speaker 1: appreciated that because you know, he listens to the show
Speaker 1: a little bit and he appreciates what we do here.
Speaker 1: So I like the Attorney General and he's a good guy.
Speaker 1: He's a good man. I think a lot of that's
Speaker 1: gotten lost because he just didn't realize what he was
Speaker 1: in for with this whole Russia collusion thing. I really
Speaker 1: don't think that he was he was prepared for what
Speaker 1: he's up against. But when I asked him about this,
Speaker 1: and this is this is from the transcript. Now, we
Speaker 1: tape the Trump interview, but because of some of the
Speaker 1: we audio taped it, but because of some of the
Speaker 1: agreements that we had before and and it has to
Speaker 1: do now with with enhanced UH security in the White
Speaker 1: House in terms of you know, information security, UH what
Speaker 1: we we agreed to, we would tape it so we
Speaker 1: could transcribe it exactly, and so I can tell you
Speaker 1: some of the more important parts of it. But if
Speaker 1: you want to read the whole thing, it's up on
Speaker 1: the Hill dot com right now. But on the Attorney General,
Speaker 1: I said, Mr President, why haven't you placier attorney general?
Speaker 1: Given all the things you've said and everything else that's
Speaker 1: come out of about his actions or inactions. President Trump,
Speaker 1: I'm so sad over Jeff Sessions because he came to me.
Speaker 1: He was the first senator that endorsed me, and he
Speaker 1: wanted to be Attorney General. And I didn't see it,
Speaker 1: but he came very strongly. He really wanted to be
Speaker 1: and I let him be. And then he went through
Speaker 1: the nominating process and he did very poorly. I mean,
Speaker 1: he was mixed up and confused, and people that worked
Speaker 1: for him, you know, a long time in the Senate
Speaker 1: were not nice to him. But he was giving very
Speaker 1: confusing answers, answers that should have been easily answered, and
Speaker 1: that was a rough time for him. And he won
Speaker 1: by one vote. I believe, yes, he won by just
Speaker 1: one vote. Then President Trump went on um then he
Speaker 1: gets in and probably because of the experience that he
Speaker 1: had going through the nominating when he asked in the
Speaker 1: first question about Hillary Clint or something, he said, I
Speaker 1: recused myself. I recused myself. And now it turned out
Speaker 1: he didn't have to recuse himself. Actually, the FBI reported
Speaker 1: shortly there after any reason for him to recuse himself.
Speaker 1: And it's very sad what happened. In the meantime. I
Speaker 1: don't have an attorney general, folks, I don't have an
Speaker 1: attorney general. That is what the President told us on
Speaker 1: the record in the Oval Office yesterday. Jeff Session is
Speaker 1: a good man, and I know he's an honorable man,
Speaker 1: but I know he's also got pride. And if the
Speaker 1: President United States really doesn't feel like you're doing the job,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised if Jeff Sessions decided that he
Speaker 1: had had enough sooner than later, and I mean very soon,
Speaker 1: by the way. At that point I I interjected, I
Speaker 1: didn't interrupt it, said, are we gonna get a wall? Mr? President?
Speaker 1: He said, Okay, let me finish this. We'll see what happens.
Speaker 1: A lot of people have asked me to do that,
Speaker 1: and I guess I study history and I just want
Speaker 1: to leave things alone. But it was very unfair what
Speaker 1: he did. And my worrist enemies, I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: are on the other side of me very disappointed. So
Speaker 1: we'll see how it goes with Jeff. I'm very disappointed
Speaker 1: in Jeff. And then he said, so we have started
Speaker 1: the wall. We got one point six billion dollars, we
Speaker 1: got another one point six we fixed a lot of
Speaker 1: existing We've started an eighty mile stretch. The entire Democrat
Speaker 1: life is uh to try and make sure we don't
Speaker 1: have a wall, not because we don't need it, but
Speaker 1: because we do. So, you know, he went into the
Speaker 1: wall and and he's telling me that, you know, he
Speaker 1: needs more votes in the Senate. But I just don't think,
Speaker 1: you know, guys, I I think that we got to
Speaker 1: hold the president to account on this one. You know,
Speaker 1: they're not going to do a shotdown. They've already got
Speaker 1: a budget deal. They got a budget deal before. They
Speaker 1: haven't gone to the mat over the wall. And I
Speaker 1: just feel like this is not a promise that's being kept.
Speaker 1: I really gotta be honest with you. Look, he's kept
Speaker 1: a lot of other promises. And I think the President
Speaker 1: would if if Congress went along, or if if Republicans
Speaker 1: had the votes, it's a better way of saying it,
Speaker 1: he would build the wall. I don't think he's been
Speaker 1: false in saying that. I just think that he is, uh,
Speaker 1: his hands are so what tied. But he he also
Speaker 1: could have pushed a little bit harder. He could have
Speaker 1: pushed a little bit harder on all this. Um. Here's
Speaker 1: here's what he said about it. He said, we started
Speaker 1: the wall. The entire Democrat life is to try and
Speaker 1: make sure we don't have a wall, not because we
Speaker 1: don't need it, but because we do. Um, but because
Speaker 1: that was a promise that I made and they want
Speaker 1: to try to make sure I don't deliver on that promise.
Speaker 1: And we have a majority of one in the Senate
Speaker 1: because we have the filibuster, which we shouldn't. You can't
Speaker 1: get ten votes in other words, Buck, we got a
Speaker 1: majority of one. We got to get to sixty, so
Speaker 1: ten Democrats are controlling the Senate. We shouldn't have the
Speaker 1: filibuster rule. The first thing that Chuck Schumer would do
Speaker 1: if he ever took control of the Senate is get
Speaker 1: rid of the filibuster rule. And for whatever reason and
Speaker 1: nobody can explain it, they just won't do it, which
Speaker 1: means we need to get nine more Republicans. So it's
Speaker 1: a very tough thing even though we need it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean like he's basically saying, if if you guys
Speaker 1: don't get me to sixty, there's not gonna be a wall.
Speaker 1: And I gotta say that that's as far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 1: pretty close to saying there's not gonna be a wall
Speaker 1: because we're not gonna get the sixty center votes. In fact,
Speaker 1: if we hold the Senate, I think we'd be in
Speaker 1: pretty in pretty good shape to that end. Sitting there
Speaker 1: talking to the President and the other guys, the whole
Speaker 1: thing was really it felt a little surreal, and not
Speaker 1: just because I was in the Oval office. I've been
Speaker 1: there before, as you know, I've told you about that,
Speaker 1: as I've run intelligence briefings, which is very very different.
Speaker 1: That's you sit down and it's a you know, you
Speaker 1: you're presenting on a specific issue and the answer and
Speaker 1: then you answer questions. I mean, being in the Oval
Speaker 1: Office in the capacity ivan before, it's almost like the
Speaker 1: president's interviewing you, or at least the President's the one
Speaker 1: asking the questions. So now the role was was reversed
Speaker 1: in that regard. I was the one asking the questions. Uh.
Speaker 1: And it was just the fact that Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: sitting there behind the resolute desk in the Oval Office.
Speaker 1: I you know, you folks, you know it's real. You
Speaker 1: know it's a thing, but when you are experiencing it,
Speaker 1: there is a party that goes, is this real? Is
Speaker 1: this really happening? The Donald Trump? This guy that I mean,
Speaker 1: I know, I grew up. I grew up knowing Donald
Speaker 1: Trump from Trump Tatwell. Actually I knew the family, as
Speaker 1: I've told you a little bit. Ivanka wasn't around the
Speaker 1: White House yesterday, so I didn't get a chance to
Speaker 1: see here. Um, but you know, we knew the Trump
Speaker 1: family a little bit and the Trump buildings. And he
Speaker 1: was in home alone too for those of you, because
Speaker 1: he owned the Plaza hotel. At one point he was
Speaker 1: at home alone too in the plaza. You know, he's
Speaker 1: just like he was a celebrity, he was a playboy,
Speaker 1: he was a uh you know, uh, construction magnate. All
Speaker 1: this stuff and and the fact that he's the president
Speaker 1: United States. Now, if if you had written this in
Speaker 1: a screenplay twenty years ago, people would have said you
Speaker 1: were like, it was too silly. There's no way, uh
Speaker 1: and yet way, uh way, that was what happened yesterday.
Speaker 1: I was sitting there and think to myself, Um, this
Speaker 1: guy he really not And to keep in mind, not
Speaker 1: only is he the president, but he's a president that
Speaker 1: I think is doing a great job. Right. It's it's
Speaker 1: one thing to have the it's one thing to be
Speaker 1: in the role. It's one thing to have the job
Speaker 1: in any capacity. I mean that alone is pretty remarkable,
Speaker 1: but this goes well beyond that. It's not just that
Speaker 1: he has the job. It's that he is executing at
Speaker 1: a high level in this job. And you know, it's
Speaker 1: pretty pretty incredible. But on the holding holding the House
Speaker 1: and holding the Senate. We got a question out. My
Speaker 1: colleague John Solomon asked him the following, do you still
Speaker 1: feel good. Remember this is back to the exact transcript
Speaker 1: that we've transcribed from the recording we made of this,
Speaker 1: but we were not allowed to share the audio recording publicly.
Speaker 1: Do you still feel good about a red wave? Do
Speaker 1: you think you could pull that off? President Trump? I
Speaker 1: think we probably have the greatest economy and history. So
Speaker 1: they've tried many narratives with me. You know, I took
Speaker 1: that test when I got my last physical, and the
Speaker 1: doctor said, that's one of the highest scores we've ever seen.
Speaker 1: I did that not because I wanted, but I did it.
Speaker 1: I was always good at testing. But if there's anything
Speaker 1: great about me, it's stability. And I'm a good manager.
Speaker 1: I've always been a good manager. But you know, I
Speaker 1: have a vision. And I had just beaten seventeen because
Speaker 1: actually it was eighteen, including Gilmore Um he was governor
Speaker 1: of Virginia. And I just beaten seventeen people, including the
Speaker 1: Bush dynasty. Then I beat Hillary Clinton dynasty. You can
Speaker 1: give me credit for Bernie Sanders and all because I
Speaker 1: was part of it. But you know, so I beat
Speaker 1: the Bush dynasty, the Clinton dynasty, seventeen people, and I
Speaker 1: never left center stage once. You can check I never
Speaker 1: left center stage meeting. I had leading Republican primaries from
Speaker 1: day one, and I had I went through four, fourteen
Speaker 1: or twelve debates before Hillary. Um. So, by the way,
Speaker 1: when you start asking me questions, maybe someday and I say, hm,
Speaker 1: I don't know those answers, I may say, well it's
Speaker 1: time to hang it up. Okay. But the opposite, and
Speaker 1: I will say, the narrative, the different narratives they've tried,
Speaker 1: all different narratives they tried that, they try that he's dictator,
Speaker 1: he's a fascist. One of them did uh, one of
Speaker 1: them did say he's losing it, and the next they
Speaker 1: went into he's the most I'm just folks, this is
Speaker 1: what he said. So I know it sounds like I'm
Speaker 1: this is what he says. I'm reading the president's exact words.
Speaker 1: To me, he's the most brilliant mind. He's taking over
Speaker 1: the country. He's a fascist, he's a dictator, and he's
Speaker 1: gonna make the eight years into life. Okay, I said,
Speaker 1: wait a minute. Last week, I was incompetent and now, um,
Speaker 1: you know, taking over the world. Okay, it's incredible, it's sick.
Speaker 1: But the various narratives that they do are just so bad,
Speaker 1: they're so bad for the country, and there's such opposites
Speaker 1: in a sense um end quote. So I mean that's all.
Speaker 1: That's all the president there. And by the way, you know,
Speaker 1: he mentioned people that are saying that he is going
Speaker 1: to be a fascist, and I always hear people say, oh, no,
Speaker 1: that's not true. He's he's not claiming that if there's
Speaker 1: anything fascistic about you know, or rather that no one
Speaker 1: claims that the president is really a fascist. I mean
Speaker 1: they just say that it's kind of well, that's not
Speaker 1: exactly accurate. Um, I can I can certainly think of
Speaker 1: one person who clearly believes that the president is uh
Speaker 1: is something akin to a fascist. I will tell you
Speaker 1: who that imbecile that ain't antipatriotic, slovenly disgrace to humanity
Speaker 1: is right after the break. You know what I'm gonna
Speaker 1: do tonight, I'm gonna get the conversation started over at
Speaker 1: snippy dot com. I'm gonna post something on my interview
Speaker 1: with the president there. I'll just give you a little
Speaker 1: bit of a backstory you haven't heard elsewhere. Because I
Speaker 1: want us to have a place where we can go
Speaker 1: and talk and chat it's totally free to sign up,
Speaker 1: and unlike these other social media giants that are out
Speaker 1: there right, Snippy is just getting going, just getting started.
Speaker 1: But they're creating a space for conversation. That's not a
Speaker 1: safe space. It's a free space, okay. They want you
Speaker 1: to be able to engage how you want, when you want,
Speaker 1: and share whatever's on your mind. You can share photos,
Speaker 1: you can post, you can follow writers there. Snippy dot
Speaker 1: com ease a social media platform without agenda or bias,
Speaker 1: No left wing monitors, none of this partisan nonsense, no
Speaker 1: shadow banning. All this stuff you're seeing from all these
Speaker 1: other huge social media companies. Snippy dot com doesn't have
Speaker 1: any of that. So team go check it out for
Speaker 1: yourself again. Snippy dot com sign up totally free. Totally
Speaker 1: free to sign up your account at snippy dot com.
Speaker 1: Germany in the thirties was one of the most intelligent
Speaker 1: societies on Earth. They were cultured, they read more books
Speaker 1: than any other country, they were well educated. Um they
Speaker 1: were a liberal democracy. The popular vote in ninety two
Speaker 1: was won by the liberal left parties Killer One with
Speaker 1: only of the vote, and then they had a national
Speaker 1: emergency where their parliament was burned down with it through
Speaker 1: some sort of act of terrorism, and that was used
Speaker 1: as an excuse to do X, Y or Z. Less
Speaker 1: than two weeks ago, this man who sits in the
Speaker 1: Oval office suggested that the license of this very network
Speaker 1: that we are sitting here in the studio today should
Speaker 1: be we should consider what to do. Should they Should
Speaker 1: NBC still have a license to broadcast Michael Moore? Everybody
Speaker 1: is a dishonest propagandist, or maybe you could say he's
Speaker 1: an honest propagandist, because he at least admits that what
Speaker 1: he does is is hyperpartisan. So that's why I would
Speaker 1: I would amend that UM. But I think that his
Speaker 1: view of the country is UH is borderline deranged. UH.
Speaker 1: And sure enough he goes immediately to the Trump Hitler comparison.
Speaker 1: This is becoming something that only stupid people or people
Speaker 1: who think their audiences are stupid can continue to say.
Speaker 1: You know, having spent time in the Oval with the
Speaker 1: President yesterday, I mean, this man is he's so far
Speaker 1: and I've known this just from all the things that
Speaker 1: he's doing and all the people around him that I
Speaker 1: that I know and talked to a regular basis, He's
Speaker 1: so far from a fascist. You know. Trump maybe sometimes
Speaker 1: likes to go the media a little bit and he
Speaker 1: talks about their broadcast license, but he hasn't actually taken
Speaker 1: any action against the media. That's even in the same
Speaker 1: universe of aggression to what Obama did. I mean, Obama
Speaker 1: was cracking down on leaks and was willing to throw
Speaker 1: the press on the funeral pyre of the First Amendment
Speaker 1: along with it. And there were very few old noticed.
Speaker 1: There were no hashtag George W. Bush resistance fighters inside
Speaker 1: of the federal government when Obama was in office. There
Speaker 1: was no one at the d o J the FBI
Speaker 1: leaking very damaging and illegally leaking very damaging information to
Speaker 1: try to hurt Obama. But to make sure that that
Speaker 1: wouldn't happen, Obama went on this jihad of sorts against leakers,
Speaker 1: and that included the most aggressive tactics against the press
Speaker 1: we've seen in a hundred years, and also the most
Speaker 1: Espionage Act prosecutions of all time, in fact, more than
Speaker 1: every administration before him. Come bind. Okay, So they're talking
Speaker 1: about Trump as a fascist on this and I just
Speaker 1: sit sit there and I think, you know what, what idiocy?
Speaker 1: You know, can we at least have a series. If
Speaker 1: people want to talk to me about single payer, I'm game.
Speaker 1: I'll talk single payer all day. Terrible idea, way too expensive,
Speaker 1: going to ruin the country, but at least it's a
Speaker 1: real idea, and at least they want to do it
Speaker 1: because they think that it will mean we all have
Speaker 1: better healthcare. They're totally wrong. They'll destroy the country, but
Speaker 1: they think we'll all have better health care. Saying that
Speaker 1: Trump is a fascist is just is just stupidity dressed
Speaker 1: up as analysis. It is not worth discussing. And you
Speaker 1: know Trump also, I can tell you this from being
Speaker 1: with him yesterday. Um. You know, he and I tried
Speaker 1: to give you this sense of it. He really does
Speaker 1: love this country. He really does think that America is
Speaker 1: a very very special place, and he wants to everything
Speaker 1: he can to help all of his fellow Americans. And
Speaker 1: I think that that's that that comes across and that
Speaker 1: there are a lot of people who when they think
Speaker 1: about what the president, what the President's why he resonates
Speaker 1: so well with the crowd, It's because he seems like
Speaker 1: one of us in a way that you can't fake. Um.
Speaker 1: And he's also, by the way, very concerned with what's
Speaker 1: going on in North Carolina. I mean he has a
Speaker 1: he can be very paternal when he wants to be
Speaker 1: play you know what. He can show his emotion, he
Speaker 1: can show his connection and still be the manager in
Speaker 1: chief and uh be the guy that can get aid
Speaker 1: where it's need to play a team help from Congress
Speaker 1: in all fairness, and we're ready and they're ready to
Speaker 1: do whatever we have to do to make this perfect.
Speaker 1: And that being unfortunately, the money will be a lot,
Speaker 1: but it's gonna come as fast as you need. It's
Speaker 1: gonna take care of everybody. Hurricane Florence was one of
Speaker 1: the most power full storms ever to hit the Carolina
Speaker 1: is one of the most powerful and devastating storms ever
Speaker 1: to hit our country. To the families who have lost
Speaker 1: loved ones, America grieves with you, and our hearts break
Speaker 1: for you. God bless you. We will never forget your lost,
Speaker 1: We will never leave your side where with you all
Speaker 1: the way. And to all those impacted by this terrible storm,
Speaker 1: our entire American family is with you and ready to help,
Speaker 1: and you will recover. That's our president. That is President
Speaker 1: Donald J. Trump. I mean, he he really does understand
Speaker 1: the role that he's supposed to play it and people
Speaker 1: would they say when they talk about does he sound presidential? Yeah,
Speaker 1: it doesn't sound presidential all the time, but he always
Speaker 1: understands that he is the president, and he always understands
Speaker 1: what the stakes are and what he's there to do.
Speaker 1: So it was it was a problement yesterday. You get
Speaker 1: to sit down and talk to man. I look forward
Speaker 1: to getting to know him better with with further interviews.
Speaker 1: And it also just fires me up to fight against
Speaker 1: the lies of people like Michael Moore who are trying
Speaker 1: to tear down this president. But not on my watch, industry,
Speaker 1: and I agree with you, Whippy has not shied away
Speaker 1: from those issues. Almost world Um introduced a character that
Speaker 1: had two moms and also two dads. They have the
Speaker 1: autistic UM puppet, they have the HIV positive get So
Speaker 1: I can see your point and that when they really
Speaker 1: want to come out and have a gay I think
Speaker 1: they should at this point because kids, um, they identify
Speaker 1: their gender identity at least by two, and by four
Speaker 1: or five start understanding their sexuality. So maybe that's a
Speaker 1: place where oh boy, folks, of course, we we have
Speaker 1: to now have political discussions on television about what we
Speaker 1: should do with the reality of Ernie and Bert's sexuality
Speaker 1: or Burt and Ernie. Uh. Sesame Street characters are now
Speaker 1: part of wokeness. That's right. You can't watch Sesame Street
Speaker 1: without being told that there has to be a lot
Speaker 1: of social justice thrown into the mix. Here's what happened
Speaker 1: this week. The reason this is being talked about. Sesame
Speaker 1: Street writer Mark Saltzman UH said that his comments that
Speaker 1: he wrote Ernie and Burt as a gay couple based
Speaker 1: on his own same sex relationship were misinterpreted. This according
Speaker 1: the Post, as a writer, you just bring what you
Speaker 1: know into your work. Somehow in the uproar that turn
Speaker 1: into Burden Ernie being gay. There is a difference. There
Speaker 1: are two guys who love each other, that's who they are, uh,
Speaker 1: but they are not necessarily gay. According to this year,
Speaker 1: um Sesame Workshop released a statement saying that Burden Ernie
Speaker 1: do not have sexual orientations. Quote as we have alway said,
Speaker 1: Burton Ernie are best friends. They were created to teach
Speaker 1: preschoolers that people could be good friends with those who
Speaker 1: are very different from themselves, even though they are identified
Speaker 1: as male characters and may possess many human traits as
Speaker 1: most characters, as most sesame puppets do, they remain puppets
Speaker 1: and do not have a sexual orientation. Yeah that's right, folks.
Speaker 1: Sesame Street needed to remind the woke left that no, no,
Speaker 1: they're just puppets, folks. They're just puppets. They don't have genitalia,
Speaker 1: they cannot procreate, they don't have a sexual orientation, and
Speaker 1: they don't inherently have a backstory about their sexual orientation
Speaker 1: because their hand puppets. You can't really make fun of
Speaker 1: the Left, because the Left makes fun of itself so
Speaker 1: much without trying to. I will say that is it?
Speaker 1: Producer Mike burt Is, the one with the unibrow, right, correct,
Speaker 1: the big uni brown Right? Did you were you a
Speaker 1: sesame Street guy growing up? I was not? Not really.
Speaker 1: I wasn't really either, although I did. I did always
Speaker 1: kind of like the count one Pool, I was kind
Speaker 1: of you know what I mean that I was that
Speaker 1: guy and and Oscar the Grouch, but you know he
Speaker 1: lived in a trash can. That sounds that's kind of
Speaker 1: rough when you think about it. If I was a
Speaker 1: Sesame Street guy, I would be a big fan of
Speaker 1: the Cookie Monster. Yeah, I mean, look, they're they're pretty
Speaker 1: timeless characters me think about it. True. Um, but were
Speaker 1: you more of a Bert or an Ernie guy? Um?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I really didn't watch. I mean, I
Speaker 1: can't tell you either way which one what they're all about.
Speaker 1: Ernie was more silly and was the serious one like
Speaker 1: the Odd Couple. I'm definitely a Burt guy. Then. I
Speaker 1: always like Sam the Eagle a lot too. I'm i'm
Speaker 1: I will tell you that my when I worked in
Speaker 1: the governments, my avatar assigned to me unofficially by my
Speaker 1: colleagues was Sam the Eagle. I like that a lot.
Speaker 1: Which one was a sports fan and love the Bone
Speaker 1: and Ribby, that's the one I would like. There we go,
Speaker 1: well played producer Mike. Yeah know, I I think that
Speaker 1: you've got your own Sesame Street character there. It's called Mr.
Speaker 1: I Love America, So you know, it's it's just interestanting.
Speaker 1: They also had Thomas the Tank Engine. There was a
Speaker 1: big kerfuffle over that recently because they want a transgender
Speaker 1: character on Thomas the Tank Engine. You see this, This
Speaker 1: is another one now, Thomas the Tank trans If you go,
Speaker 1: if you go and you check this out, you'll see
Speaker 1: that they're trying to get Wait, oh no, the u
Speaker 1: N at one point wanted Thomas the Tank to be
Speaker 1: gender neutral. This is a British thing, I think, right,
Speaker 1: Thomas the Tank engine. I don't remember this one. This
Speaker 1: is like some communist agit prop. Do you even know
Speaker 1: what I'm talking about? Thomas the Tank anyone? I know
Speaker 1: what Thomas the Tank and Percy are for sure, from
Speaker 1: my from my niece and nephew. Oh you do know
Speaker 1: the trains? Okay? Yeah, man, I know, thank you, I
Speaker 1: know it's a rain. What is you know? Do you
Speaker 1: know what any mean? Be on that how to trans
Speaker 1: First of all, aren't all I mean, I'm just being
Speaker 1: seriously for a second, aren't all trains inherently gender neutral?
Speaker 1: Because they don't. Again, they don't have genitalia or x
Speaker 1: Y chromosomes or xx chromosomes. So I feel like they
Speaker 1: are gender neutral because they're inanimate objects that we put
Speaker 1: a face on so that they can talk. I'm getting
Speaker 1: too deep, I understand the rabbit hole going too deep,
Speaker 1: fair enough? Maybe I need to maybe to tell it
Speaker 1: that a little bit. But yeah, that's right. The left
Speaker 1: was upset because they were excited that Ernie and Burder gay,
Speaker 1: but they're not gay because their puppets. Thank you Sesame
Speaker 1: Street for clarifying that. And you know, maybe I'll do
Speaker 1: some if I had a really good impression of any
Speaker 1: of the muppets, I'd probably do some of it here
Speaker 1: on the show. You know, um isn't the Swedish chef
Speaker 1: themupet blue? Right? Yeah, the Swedish self is um Upet.
Speaker 1: But that's not Sesame Street. Is that Sesame Street? No? No,
Speaker 1: it's a m how about that? You need to him?
Speaker 1: No awful figures? Okay, what's going on? I can do
Speaker 1: so I can do some of them. I like that.
Speaker 1: You're putting me through my paces though. All right, we're
Speaker 1: gonna close and get to roll call. Stay with me,
Speaker 1: Team Buck. It's time for roll call. Alright, rod call.
Speaker 1: You know what that means. All of you get to
Speaker 1: tell me what time it is, as the kids say,
Speaker 1: Facebook dot com, slash buck sex and if you want
Speaker 1: to get into that action. Thank you for all the
Speaker 1: kind comments from you from y'all. That's right. I went there,
Speaker 1: y'all on the interview I have with President Trump. Forty
Speaker 1: five minutes, good time. It's very much enjoyed it learned
Speaker 1: a lot. I laughed, I cried. I uh, I didn't
Speaker 1: actually cry. I did laugh though, but it was really fun.
Speaker 1: It was really and just illuminating to spend that much
Speaker 1: time with the President of the United States. So there
Speaker 1: you have it, Um, let's get to it. Timothy Rites
Speaker 1: Shields high Buck. This assault on Brett Kavanaugh is a
Speaker 1: prima fasci case prima facie, and I hear people say
Speaker 1: that different ways case of why dueling should still be legal.
Speaker 1: I believe dueling was is a legitimate means of resolving disputes.
Speaker 1: It would certainly reduce the number of cowards in our society.
Speaker 1: Make dueling great again. Timothy Shields hie. Um, Timothy, I
Speaker 1: don't know how much to add to that one, my friend,
Speaker 1: other than interesting interesting thought. Alan rides Buck great coup
Speaker 1: on getting a forty five minute interview with Potus. I
Speaker 1: wonder if Ford and lawyers are bluffing about FBI investigation,
Speaker 1: figuring it wouldn't happen. What would happen if podas did
Speaker 1: allow the FBI to check on allegations. Do you think
Speaker 1: Ford would welcome it or find an excuse not to
Speaker 1: have it. Well, and as I've been saying, Alan, I
Speaker 1: don't really I don't think it's even possible to investigate this.
Speaker 1: You know, if somebody shows up, let's say, at a
Speaker 1: local law enforcement uh, you know, wherever you are across
Speaker 1: the country, and they tell the cops, hey, somebody, somebody
Speaker 1: punched me in the face thirty years ago. Let's just
Speaker 1: take sexual assault out of this for a moment, just
Speaker 1: to make it easier to discuss. Somebody punched me in
Speaker 1: the face thirty years ago, which is assault, which is illegal.
Speaker 1: But I have no proof and I can't tell you
Speaker 1: where it happened or when it happened. I mean, the
Speaker 1: police would would take your statement, but then there would
Speaker 1: be no further action on it, because what are they
Speaker 1: supposed to do Unless you can give them more details,
Speaker 1: they can't actually do anything. And never mind, what is
Speaker 1: the district attorney going to do with it. I can't
Speaker 1: bring charges. So I don't think that she wants an
Speaker 1: FBI investigation. What she really is hoping for is the
Speaker 1: fb I to reopen the background You know, there's a
Speaker 1: criminal investigation there, and there's background investigation and background check,
Speaker 1: and they want to make this a part of the
Speaker 1: background check. But there's no reason to make it part
Speaker 1: of the background check because it wouldn't change the outcome
Speaker 1: of it. So it's it's that there's no way you
Speaker 1: wouldn't get denied a clearance now because of what happened
Speaker 1: when you were seventeen. And now people say, well, what
Speaker 1: if you lied about it? Well you could say that
Speaker 1: about anything. So I mean, there's folks, there's so much desperation,
Speaker 1: so much desperation out there about trying to stop Kavanaugh
Speaker 1: from getting into the Supreme Court. That's that's all this
Speaker 1: really is, as we all know. Kimberly writes, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: just want to say that woman is a liar. I
Speaker 1: was grabbed off my front porch back in four long story,
Speaker 1: but I got away from him. I've never forgotten anything
Speaker 1: about it. Nothing. If something traumatic like that happens, you
Speaker 1: don't forget. Well, you know, I can tell you this, Kim,
Speaker 1: I do not believe, and I know that people. You know,
Speaker 1: how can you say that? I just don't believe that
Speaker 1: you would forget the place where it happened. That I
Speaker 1: don't believe. Uh, you know, the month maybe getting or
Speaker 1: the day maybe getting a little hazy, that's one thing,
Speaker 1: But you don't remember where this happened. I just think
Speaker 1: that that's not credible. Kathy is up next here. Kathy writes,
Speaker 1: Hey Buck, I was wondering if the statements by Dr
Speaker 1: Ford's lawyer that our client and family have received death
Speaker 1: threats are valid and if there's any way to verify this. Conservatives, Christians,
Speaker 1: and constitutionalists usually don't do this outrageous threat making behavior.
Speaker 1: Usually is the forte of the left shields high Kathy
Speaker 1: from Ohio. You know, Kathy, the left is crazier than
Speaker 1: the right, But I have to I have to keep
Speaker 1: it real. There are certainly people on the right as well,
Speaker 1: especially when it involves anything that they think touches on
Speaker 1: Trump's world, who could get very, very nasty too. So
Speaker 1: I'm not surprised that there would be threats against her,
Speaker 1: and I am willing to bet she's not surprised that
Speaker 1: there are threats against her. Um it would be a
Speaker 1: lot worse if this were a conservative coming out against
Speaker 1: a very liberal judge that might tip the court one
Speaker 1: way or the other. So in general, Cathy, I agree
Speaker 1: with you in this case, though there are there are
Speaker 1: we We've got to always be honest. There are bad
Speaker 1: people on the right to there are crazies who will
Speaker 1: threaten people on the right to they're just aren't as
Speaker 1: many of them. Alice rites, thanks for sharing your experience
Speaker 1: at the White House today. Because of the way you
Speaker 1: include your audience I think many of us felt like
Speaker 1: we went to the Oval office right beside you. I
Speaker 1: look forward to hearing more about your visit as protocol allows. Also,
Speaker 1: on vegan chocolate, it's actually delicious. I'm as far from
Speaker 1: vegan as as possible to be, but I would served
Speaker 1: some and thought it was extraordinary. So that's one point
Speaker 1: for the vegans, just one. But heck, it's chocolate, so
Speaker 1: it's kind of a big point. Alice, absolutely accurate all
Speaker 1: the way around here. You know, I, first of all,
Speaker 1: thank you so much. It's really high praise. That's all.
Speaker 1: I praise Nicolas Cage Saturday Night Live. Anybody anybody, Well,
Speaker 1: it's high praise to say that you felt like I
Speaker 1: was able to bring you into the old Bow and
Speaker 1: that was really my intention. And as for vegan chocolate,
Speaker 1: I will have to take your word for it. I'm
Speaker 1: excited for when my my brother's muffin company is fully
Speaker 1: fully national and also it's uh able to I'm able
Speaker 1: to tell you more about it. It's getting into now.
Speaker 1: I think well over a thousand stores. I need to
Speaker 1: check on the numbers, but it's definitely in hundreds of stores.
Speaker 1: Because if you like baked good products, his his stuff
Speaker 1: is the best. I mean the muffins. I have one
Speaker 1: every single day. I start every day with one of
Speaker 1: my brother's muffins, Susie's s O. O z Y his muffins,
Speaker 1: which some of you will have if you have a
Speaker 1: Wegman's near you or there's some other stores. I know
Speaker 1: that they're in Kroger's. I believe they're in now. Um.
Speaker 1: I started with black Rifle coffee and Susie's muffins every day.
Speaker 1: That's what I do. Um. And chocolate is amazing. And
Speaker 1: I have a talk with Stash Alice. It's a true story.
Speaker 1: I have a stash and Ms Molly makes fun of
Speaker 1: me because I like to have this little corner of
Speaker 1: one of the cupboards where I just keep all my
Speaker 1: different chocolate and I have lots of different kinds of chocolate.
Speaker 1: It's my weakness. I mean that is, chocolate is my
Speaker 1: thing that I allow myself my vice. You know, would
Speaker 1: I be able to see my abdominal muscles. If I
Speaker 1: had stopped eating chocolate altogether, probably not, but I'd be
Speaker 1: closer to it. So there's that. Um let's see. Julie writes, uh, hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: just want to offer some solidarity in the whole Obama
Speaker 1: whistling thing. I too had speech issues as a child
Speaker 1: with R and S. I had to go to speech therapy,
Speaker 1: and to this day, I'm very sensitive to any lisping
Speaker 1: or whistling with S. No, I never made it a
Speaker 1: habit to listen to Obama. I've never noticed a whistling
Speaker 1: issue from him. You're not crazy. Have a great night, Julie. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you, Julie. And you know, see, you understand what
Speaker 1: it's like to go through speech therapy and have to
Speaker 1: be in that whole process. It's it's not not an
Speaker 1: easy thing at all, um, but obviously well well worth
Speaker 1: it too to overcome that, um, that issue, that hurdle
Speaker 1: at a young at a young age. Uh. And as
Speaker 1: for Obama, you know, guys, I haven't been able to
Speaker 1: go listen to that clip yet, but let's just assume
Speaker 1: that I will. Okay, I will, because a lot of
Speaker 1: you wrote to me and you're like, how could you not,
Speaker 1: I get it, I get it, you think, Obama whistles
Speaker 1: Keith Right. Senator fine Stein told their Chinese operative driver
Speaker 1: about the balls letter huh over some Chai tea while
Speaker 1: at Seattle's own Comic Comy coffee shop. The driver then
Speaker 1: Sentator Hillary's new basement server, wow, Keith, all right man,
Speaker 1: Thanks Keith. I'm not really sure what you're going for,
Speaker 1: but I like the enthusiasm. Brittany Rights, Hey, Bucks started
Speaker 1: watching Jack Ryan. It's great. In the first episode, the
Speaker 1: main character gets hit in the face and I yelled,
Speaker 1: Buck no. Uh. My boyfriend looked at me and did
Speaker 1: a slow headshake. It was hilarious. Thank you for all
Speaker 1: you do well, Thank you, Brittany. Yes, I'd like to
Speaker 1: think there are some similarities between myself and Jack Ryan,
Speaker 1: played by John Krasinski. Uh. Look, if I could just
Speaker 1: there'll be a lot more similarities with me and Krasinski.
Speaker 1: If I could spend about three months not working fourteen
Speaker 1: hours a day and go to the gym and eat
Speaker 1: right and grow out of beard, then then you'd be like, yeah,
Speaker 1: bucking Krasinski. Okay, maybe six months in the gym, but
Speaker 1: bucking Krasinski. Very very, very similar characters. Uh. Andrea writes, Hey,
Speaker 1: I'm a musician and theater director and have lots of
Speaker 1: experience with theater driven music, So if you need help
Speaker 1: with your special music for special episodes, I'm here and
Speaker 1: I'm in the swamp. To Andrew, Why Andrew, thank you
Speaker 1: so much. That's very kind of you. I am currently
Speaker 1: talking to some folks about the best ways. I know
Speaker 1: I keep saying this, but it's true, the best ways
Speaker 1: to bring back some of those history shows. Um, and
Speaker 1: and I'm working on it, and that's the most I
Speaker 1: can say about that right now. But thank you very
Speaker 1: much for the for the kind offer. Uh and writes, uh,
Speaker 1: whole a lot of second. Here we go, Buck, a Charleston,
Speaker 1: South Carolina listener checking back in, made it through evacuation
Speaker 1: and returning home just fine. Charleston dodged a bullet, We
Speaker 1: had no damage in our area. But those Democrats, man,
Speaker 1: why is it they accused the president being a dictator
Speaker 1: and disregarding the constitution, then expecting to solve legislative issues himself.
Speaker 1: Expect the federal government runover states rights. They are the
Speaker 1: ones disregarding their constitutional obligations and wanting the president to
Speaker 1: be a dictator Dude, we're living in the upside down,
Speaker 1: that's true, and we are kind of living the upside
Speaker 1: down these days. I can't disagree with you there, um,
Speaker 1: but I'm glad you're okay made it back. And Charleston
Speaker 1: is a city I am really fond of Charleston, Savannah. Um,
Speaker 1: you know, these are these are great places to visit,
Speaker 1: some cities that I've really had had good times when
Speaker 1: I've had the good fortune to be able to go
Speaker 1: and check them out. That's gonna be a team for
Speaker 1: today here in the Freedom Hunt. Thank you so much
Speaker 1: for joining and hanging out. I hope that you will
Speaker 1: tell somebody about the show. That is how I end
Speaker 1: the show every day, because it really does mean a
Speaker 1: lot to me. Be're like, hey, do you listen to podcasts?
Speaker 1: If the answers yes, listen to the Buck Sexton Show,
Speaker 1: go on iTunes, or go on I Heart and listen
Speaker 1: to the Buck Sexton Show on the I Heart app.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Um. I was gonna tell you
Speaker 1: that the next next week I'm gonna be out in Vegas,
Speaker 1: but it's actually the week after that, so that's coming up.
Speaker 1: I'll have some cool stories for you. But until tomorrow.
Speaker 1: My friends, shei'ls high team. How do I start my
Speaker 1: day every day the right way, the patriotic way, the
Speaker 1: delicious way. Black Rifle Coffee. Black Rifle Coffee is the
Speaker 1: best coffee you're gonna get anywhere. And unlike a lot
Speaker 1: of those comic coffee brands, they're not trying to get
Speaker 1: everybody to pretend that they all want to get some
Speaker 1: kind of socialist healthcare system going or any of that
Speaker 1: other political nonsense. Black Rifle just wants to give you
Speaker 1: the best coffee you can get anywhere. Just go to
Speaker 1: Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck. Okay, go on
Speaker 1: that site. You'll see for yourself. They've got great blends,
Speaker 1: delicious coffees, and they also will give you fifteen percent
Speaker 1: off if you go to my sites. You're getting a
Speaker 1: great deal and you're supporting a veteran owned and patriotic
Speaker 1: company that honestly, everybody that I have tried in my
Speaker 1: office at the Hill just wants to drink Black Rifle now,
Speaker 1: every single one of them. Go to Black Rifle Coffee
Speaker 1: dot Com slash Buck again, Black Rifle Coffee dot Com
Speaker 1: slash buck and sign up for the coffee or die
Speaker 1: Revolution