Speaker 1: Team. Welcome to the Freedom Hunt Tuesday edition of The
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show. Appreciate you being here with me. We
Speaker 1: have the Gruten resignation from the NFL, the continued Southwest
Speaker 1: Airlines debacle. Is it about a protest or is it
Speaker 1: just logistics issues? Oh well, we'll get into all of that.
Speaker 1: And we've also got a story out of Virginia and
Speaker 1: had to to the Delhi Wire forward about a possible
Speaker 1: sexual assault against a young girl covered up because involved
Speaker 1: a trans individual who used the trans policy when it
Speaker 1: comes to bathrooms in a school. We'll give you the
Speaker 1: details the explanation of that coming up here in a minute.
Speaker 1: We also got Kamala Harris incredibly uncomfortable trying to deal
Speaker 1: with other humans, other people. She does not She does
Speaker 1: not have the common touch that much. We've for some time,
Speaker 1: but you know, when running a business, HR issues can
Speaker 1: kill you. Wrongful termination suits, minimum rage requirements, labor regulations,
Speaker 1: and HR manager salaries aren't cheap. An average of seventy
Speaker 1: thousand dollars a year. Bambi spelled Bambee was created specifically
Speaker 1: for small business. You can get a dedicated to HR
Speaker 1: manager craft HR policy and maintain your compliance all for
Speaker 1: just ninety nine dollars a month. With Bamby, you can
Speaker 1: change HR from your biggest liability to your biggest strength.
Speaker 1: Your dedicated HR manager is available by phone, email, or
Speaker 1: real time chat. From onboarding determinations. They customize your policies
Speaker 1: to fit your business and help you manage your employees
Speaker 1: day today, all for just ninety nine dollars a month,
Speaker 1: month a month, no hidden fees. Cancel. Anytime you didn't
Speaker 1: start your business because you wanted to spend time on
Speaker 1: HR compliance, Let Bambi help get your free HR audit today.
Speaker 1: Go check it out. Okay, I'm not a big professional
Speaker 1: sports guy, as you know. If you listen to this podcast,
Speaker 1: you could even say, in general, I don't care very
Speaker 1: much about professional sports. That doesn't mean I don't enjoy
Speaker 1: watching from time to time. But for me, the role
Speaker 1: that professional sports plays in my life would be a
Speaker 1: lot like the role that video games plays in other
Speaker 1: people's lives. It's an enjoyable thing in moderation that you
Speaker 1: don't want to spend too much time doing. That's just
Speaker 1: my opinion. But occasionally a story does pop up, a
Speaker 1: situation does come about where you have some real crossover
Speaker 1: and you have a broader issue that all of us
Speaker 1: can see is worth understanding and discussing. Here's a situation.
Speaker 1: John Gruden, even I knew who this guy was, stepped
Speaker 1: down as the Raiders head coach just yesterday after The
Speaker 1: New York Times reported that the coach made racist, misogynistic
Speaker 1: and homophobic comments at a bunch of different people. So
Speaker 1: this is the emails have been obtained by the New
Speaker 1: York Times. So here's what's going on. There was apparently
Speaker 1: some kind of a an investigation into uh, you know,
Speaker 1: NFL practices, commentary, behind the scenes, things like that, and
Speaker 1: a whole lot of private emails have now been scoured
Speaker 1: over and they've gone into people's hands who were looking
Speaker 1: at this kind of stuff. And there's a it's over
Speaker 1: a seven year period ending in twenty and eighteen. Gruden
Speaker 1: was criticizing Goodell, the commissioner, and other people. And here's look.
Speaker 1: He said stuff that you know, you shouldn't say. It
Speaker 1: depends on what comment exactly we're talking about here, but
Speaker 1: he said things that were unwise, that were not in
Speaker 1: good taste. But I would say this as well, this
Speaker 1: notion that all private commentary that that if you had
Speaker 1: the if you had access to everything that a person
Speaker 1: had ever written or said that you could still think
Speaker 1: that they would get up, they would get a pass,
Speaker 1: they'd be able to get away from the woke mob
Speaker 1: coming for them. I just think that's absurd. I think
Speaker 1: it's not reality. I think everybody needs to understand that
Speaker 1: this is something that if you were to yourself have
Speaker 1: your emails in the hands of somebody looking or your
Speaker 1: text messages looking to ruin you or destroy you, there
Speaker 1: would be real problems for you. I mean pretty much
Speaker 1: anybody I think says or text or emails something at
Speaker 1: some point in time that they don't think would be
Speaker 1: good to have out loud. And look, there are varying
Speaker 1: degrees of bad here, I would say for the things
Speaker 1: that Gruden wrote. But this guy had one hundred million
Speaker 1: dollar contract over ten years to coach the Raiders and
Speaker 1: that's now all gone and he has resigned effectively in disgrace,
Speaker 1: and it's because of things that he said that he
Speaker 1: thought were private that have now come out. Now there's
Speaker 1: a few lessons here, I mean one of them would
Speaker 1: be you, really, anytime you text or write anything, you
Speaker 1: should start to think of it as could this end
Speaker 1: up publish somewhere. Even if you're a private person. You
Speaker 1: just don't know. And I know that's it's a difficult
Speaker 1: way to live our lives. It's a difficult way for
Speaker 1: us to think about these things. But it's it's safe
Speaker 1: practice if you can, if you can do it, if
Speaker 1: you can have that discipline. Clearly mister Gruden did not
Speaker 1: think of it that way. But also I have to wonder,
Speaker 1: so what happens to him now? I mean, these were
Speaker 1: comments that he made privately to individuals who were not
Speaker 1: offended by them. He made comments that were offensive. Is
Speaker 1: this policing what an individual privately believes at some level?
Speaker 1: I mean, he wasn't He was writing from a private
Speaker 1: email address, so his emails, as I understand it, got
Speaker 1: caught up in this investigation. He was not using company
Speaker 1: servers or or using things that somebody would be generally
Speaker 1: in a you know, day to day sense, more careful about.
Speaker 1: And now he's done. Now he's finished. Because he said
Speaker 1: the wrong things. He offended groups that will demand and
Speaker 1: they already have that he be punished severely for this.
Speaker 1: I wish we did not live in a country where
Speaker 1: this was the case, where you would lose your job,
Speaker 1: your livelihood because of things that you said that you
Speaker 1: believe were private, that did not actually harm anyone, that
Speaker 1: were not directed at anybody who felt harmed by it,
Speaker 1: but that you're just not allowed to use certain language
Speaker 1: or have certain beliefs, even in private, because if it
Speaker 1: comes out publicly, you'll be ruined. It's a shame, But
Speaker 1: it does seem like that is where we are as
Speaker 1: a country, and that's the reality that we all face here.
Speaker 1: So I am not somebody who cares very much about
Speaker 1: professional sports to bring this full circle as you already no,
Speaker 1: but I am someone who feels like we now the
Speaker 1: wokeness has just gotten to be a true psychological plague
Speaker 1: in this country, and no one's allowed to No one's
Speaker 1: allowed to say, hey, that was an intemperate moment. That
Speaker 1: was a I said something dumb. I'm sorry, I shouldn't
Speaker 1: have written that that was and everyone goes, Okay, you
Speaker 1: know you're not a bad person. You don't hate such
Speaker 1: and such individual or group of people or whatever. You
Speaker 1: just said something that you were not supposed to say
Speaker 1: and then move on from there. No, now it has
Speaker 1: to be your ruin. You're destroyed forever all right. Now
Speaker 1: we have the Southwest Airlines situation. And this is really
Speaker 1: interesting because there have been people who have come out
Speaker 1: and said that there is oh and I should mention
Speaker 1: the Texas State Executive Order now from Governor Rabbitt that
Speaker 1: there can be no vaccine mandates of any kind in
Speaker 1: the state of Texas. It's kind of what I was
Speaker 1: trying to advocate for with a different governor a while
Speaker 1: ago when there was the conscience opt out that was
Speaker 1: being discussed in the state of South Dakota. But corporate
Speaker 1: interests prevailed there, as they tend to do in that state.
Speaker 1: With that individual. Here we have Governor Abbott stepping up
Speaker 1: and trying to do a little bit more about the situation,
Speaker 1: and we'll address that. I'll address that in a second,
Speaker 1: because first we have all these cancelations. Here's a situation.
Speaker 1: Southwest Airlines, courting The Daily Mail, top executive says operations
Speaker 1: are pretty well back to normal after the company was
Speaker 1: forced to cancel more than twenty three hundred flights over
Speaker 1: the holiday weekend, which it claims was the result of
Speaker 1: FAA delay programs in Florida. Southwest CEO Gary Kelly apologized
Speaker 1: to frustrated passengers. He was on Good Morning America. He was,
Speaker 1: He denied the chaost was caused by pilots upset over
Speaker 1: the vaccine mandates. As of nine am Easter Time Tuesday,
Speaker 1: Southwest had canceled eighty seven flights, or two percent of
Speaker 1: its daily operations, and delayed more than two one hundred
Speaker 1: and forty. Federal Aviation Administration acknowledge delays in parts of Florida,
Speaker 1: but pushback against Southwest air Traffic Control explanation it just
Speaker 1: but the airline behind on Friday, Kelly said. The FAA
Speaker 1: said Sunday some airlines were experiencing problems because planes and
Speaker 1: crews were out of position. So who do we believe here?
Speaker 1: I mean, I find it very hard to believe that
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, one airline has two thousand flights
Speaker 1: canceled in what is it, twenty three hundred flights canceled
Speaker 1: in a forty eight hour period, just because because of
Speaker 1: problems that still don't seem like they're able to be discussed.
Speaker 1: But if these were pilots who were deciding on their own,
Speaker 1: but in a collective action, right, so this wasn't a
Speaker 1: part of the plan. Here wasn't to use the union
Speaker 1: because there it's technically illegal, right, you can't actually strike
Speaker 1: if you're a pilot in the union in this way.
Speaker 1: So they didn't actually go through that, They didn't go
Speaker 1: through that situation. Instead, they just did it on their own.
Speaker 1: Assuming that's true, it would continue. Well, we'll have to
Speaker 1: see what are the possibilities here play this one out.
Speaker 1: You know that the apparatus of control absolutely does not
Speaker 1: want people to realize that if they push back enough
Speaker 1: and effectively enough, there could in fact be an end
Speaker 1: to some of these mandates. That companies won't be able
Speaker 1: to do the bidding of the Biden administration, not without
Speaker 1: paying a price that's too high for them. So they
Speaker 1: want to avoid people coming to that recognition. So what's
Speaker 1: one way to do that, Well, to pretend that that's
Speaker 1: not what's happened here and to say that that was
Speaker 1: never the case, just to lie about it. That's one option,
Speaker 1: which I know a lot of people on the right believe.
Speaker 1: Certainly seems like that's a likely scenario. Another option is
Speaker 1: that there was a collective direct action here by pilots
Speaker 1: and perhaps and others at Southwest Airlines that now has
Speaker 1: been nipped in the bud. That now has been shut
Speaker 1: down by Southwest executives who went out and reached out
Speaker 1: to you know, the bosses, basically reached out to the
Speaker 1: different pilots and said you're out. One more day, you're gone.
Speaker 1: And maybe that I'm just saying, these are the possibilities.
Speaker 1: That's certainly possible. And then the third possibility here is
Speaker 1: that somehow this just happened to occur and it is
Speaker 1: just a fluke and it has nothing to do with
Speaker 1: the mandate of actually mandate, and all these pilots just
Speaker 1: happened to be out at the same time on the
Speaker 1: same day or whatever they're saying. It was some some
Speaker 1: issue with air traffic control, which that just doesn't sound
Speaker 1: realistic at all. Why didn't affect all the other flights?
Speaker 1: Then all the other airlines some were having some delays,
Speaker 1: but this amount of delay. So those are the options
Speaker 1: as I see them, and I find it very hard
Speaker 1: to believe that this just occurred. I'm finding it very
Speaker 1: hard to believe that this was just a thing that
Speaker 1: happened and there was nothing to do with a vaccine mandate.
Speaker 1: But I do worry that they will crush this. And
Speaker 1: then once again the Fauciite incrementalism will feel like it's unstoppable.
Speaker 1: And what we're heading for, and I think you know
Speaker 1: this as well as I do. What we're heading for
Speaker 1: is this winter, there will be a mandate for you
Speaker 1: to fly, a vaccine mandate for you to fly on
Speaker 1: domestic flights. And they'll do it right before probably Thanksgiving
Speaker 1: or maybe right before Christmas, because they know that that's
Speaker 1: the time of year when a lot of people who
Speaker 1: don't even fly very often will be flying to see
Speaker 1: their families. And they'll say, sorry, you gotta do it.
Speaker 1: That's what the science demands. That's what they'll say. That's
Speaker 1: what they'll do. And I think we can all understand
Speaker 1: why that's troublesome to say the least, and something we
Speaker 1: should fight back against. But I'm just not really sure
Speaker 1: if we're going to be able to do it effectively enough.
Speaker 1: We'll come back to this in a moment. The Tunneled
Speaker 1: Towers Foundation helps us keep our commitment to never forget over.
Speaker 1: This year, the foundation honored GoldStar and fallen first responder
Speaker 1: families with young children and catastrophically injured veterans and first
Speaker 1: responders with two hundred mortgage free homes. Chairman and CEO
Speaker 1: Frank Siller paid tribute to the fallen by walking from
Speaker 1: the Pentagon to Shanksill and then on to Ground zero.
Speaker 1: This is more than five hundred miles. We went through
Speaker 1: six states over forty two days starting in August, all
Speaker 1: the way through nine to eleven. There were towers of
Speaker 1: light shining at the Pentagon and Shanks for memorials. In
Speaker 1: remembrance on Veterans Day, the names we lost in the
Speaker 1: War on Terror will also be said out loud, do
Speaker 1: good and help America to never forget, never forget our heroes.
Speaker 1: Donate eleven dollars a month to tunnel to towers at
Speaker 1: t twot dot org. That's t the number two t
Speaker 1: dot org. T twot dot org. So Texas has an
Speaker 1: anti mandate mandate. That's where we are now, thanks to
Speaker 1: the Governor of Texas. And this is gonna raise a
Speaker 1: lot of interesting issues. Legal challenges are coming for the
Speaker 1: of course. Here's the situation. This from the Washington Post.
Speaker 1: Texas Governor Greg Abbott. Oh, whoops, well, we don't have
Speaker 1: to use the Post. We'll use somebody else here. Texas
Speaker 1: Governor Greg Abbott bans any COVID vaccine mandate including for
Speaker 1: private employers. This Texas Tribune banning any entity, including private business,
Speaker 1: from requiring vaccination for employees or customers. Abbott also called
Speaker 1: on legislature to pass a law at the same effect,
Speaker 1: promising to rescind the executive order once that happened. The
Speaker 1: legislature is in this year's third special legislative session, which
Speaker 1: which ends October nineteenth, so he's saying the order mark,
Speaker 1: or rather this piece is saying the order marks a
Speaker 1: significant reversal after Abbott previously gave private businesses the choice
Speaker 1: to mandate vaccines for workers, so he stepped it up
Speaker 1: in response to the federal government's overreach. He has stepped
Speaker 1: it up and said that he believes this is the
Speaker 1: right the right move, especially given the fact that Biden
Speaker 1: administrations coming for everybody now, at least everybody with over
Speaker 1: one hundred employees. If you remember that previous mandate that
Speaker 1: they had and or rather roll out that they had,
Speaker 1: they haven't really instituted it yet. So this will be
Speaker 1: interesting because you do have some people on the right,
Speaker 1: including Dan Crenshaw here, remember a congress former Navy seal,
Speaker 1: who don't like the way Abbot is going about this.
Speaker 1: Look I hate that we have to play this game. Right,
Speaker 1: this isn't the right way to govern. Go to go
Speaker 1: from mandate to mandate against a mandate, it's not the
Speaker 1: right way to govern. I still generally believe in this
Speaker 1: whole freedom of association principle, where you can associate with
Speaker 1: people you want to associate with as an employer, as
Speaker 1: an employee. But here's the thing. The federal government already
Speaker 1: took that first step, and they're still in the process
Speaker 1: of writing the rule under OSHA that would require businesses
Speaker 1: to vaccinate their employees or have them fired. Right, this
Speaker 1: is an absurd rule. This is such an overreach, it's unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: And so these reactions are seeing from the states are well,
Speaker 1: they're a reaction to that overstep in the first place.
Speaker 1: I think he is accurate, but I would disagree with
Speaker 1: his sense that this is something we have to be
Speaker 1: that we should be concerned when states stand up for
Speaker 1: individual freedom. I actually think that that is a role
Speaker 1: the states should play against the federal government, especially in
Speaker 1: moments of overreach. And this idea, this takes me back
Speaker 1: to the conservatism, if you will, the mainstream conservatism of
Speaker 1: the nineties and the early two thousands where people would assume, oh,
Speaker 1: we'll just keep the government out of it, and then
Speaker 1: that's the best that's the best outcome. Well, that's not
Speaker 1: how it works. Right now. Anywhere, the government, whether it's
Speaker 1: at the state or local or federal level, has all
Speaker 1: kinds of regulations about business, about commerce that are in effect.
Speaker 1: So there is no protection of the sacred neutral space
Speaker 1: of commerce that is going on right now. That's a fantasy, right,
Speaker 1: We can't do that because you know, we shouldn't be
Speaker 1: mandating against a mandate. There are all kinds of mandates
Speaker 1: in place. Just look at look at the regulations that
Speaker 1: exist even in the state of Texas for businesses to
Speaker 1: operate safely for the taxes that are taken from them
Speaker 1: for the licensing there. I could sit here and just
Speaker 1: read through thousands of pages probably of different regulations and
Speaker 1: mandates and things that exist that affect businesses right now
Speaker 1: in the state of Texas, in any state. So it's
Speaker 1: a question of should a state use its power to
Speaker 1: protect individual freedom and autonomy. That's not tyranny, that's protecting freedom. Conservatives,
Speaker 1: I think, or people on the right in general, can
Speaker 1: get this a little bit confused. They think we're protecting
Speaker 1: the sacred neutral space. You see this in the realm
Speaker 1: of education as well, where we had thought, oh, we'll
Speaker 1: just teach history, not history that likes America or hates America,
Speaker 1: just teach history. Well, history is not mathematics. There's always
Speaker 1: going to be some narrative, and so you might want
Speaker 1: to be actually involved in understanding what the narrative is
Speaker 1: that children are being taught. You might want to be
Speaker 1: involved in learning what it is that kids are being
Speaker 1: brainwashed with and try to push it away from hating
Speaker 1: America toward a fuller better understanding of this country that
Speaker 1: understands the blessings and the incredible nation that has been
Speaker 1: bequeathed to us by our forefathers. But see, we thought
Speaker 1: we could have a neutral space. That's not really a
Speaker 1: thing that exists, and we think we can have a
Speaker 1: totally free market. Maybe if we just avoid government overreach
Speaker 1: that is also a thing that does not exist. I tried,
Speaker 1: some of you, remember, I tried to get at least
Speaker 1: one state to go and start taking affirmative steps, start
Speaker 1: taking action in defense or freedom instead of being passive
Speaker 1: and waiting for the faucy steamroller to crush everybody in
Speaker 1: every state. And what do the federal government do. They
Speaker 1: revvd up the faucy steamroller, just like I said they would.
Speaker 1: And now Governor Abbott has realized this and goes, okay, well,
Speaker 1: let's have a state mandate against the mandate. You might say, well,
Speaker 1: buck the federal government, supremacy clause, all the stuff. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's take it to the courts. But at least then
Speaker 1: you're giving some cover for people in that state to
Speaker 1: avoid getting the shots. He friends, time is everything here.
Speaker 1: Time is everything. If the shot gets into the arms
Speaker 1: of people who don't want it, that's done. Now they've
Speaker 1: bent the NAT they've gotten the shot. So delay is
Speaker 1: your friend here. Using the process to protect freedom is
Speaker 1: your friend. At some level, we have to start understanding
Speaker 1: tactics because the other side abuses the system for tactical
Speaker 1: advantage all the time. Notice I'm not saying break the system,
Speaker 1: but let's use it for our States have tremendous power
Speaker 1: over individuals, and when you look at their health, tremendous
Speaker 1: power left to them. Right, the federal government really doesn't.
Speaker 1: But states under quarantine authority and under all kinds of regulations,
Speaker 1: I mean, the states can do a lot of things.
Speaker 1: If they choose to and if they choose to protect
Speaker 1: individual freedom from a vaccine, that is a thing to
Speaker 1: be celebrated. It's not a thing to sit around and say, oh,
Speaker 1: but that's too much government. Oh it's it's too much
Speaker 1: government when it comes to defending freedom. But those same people,
Speaker 1: you'll notice, aren't saying, well, we should we should have
Speaker 1: you know, no rules about how businesses conduct themselves other
Speaker 1: than just the enforcement of basic contracts with each other.
Speaker 1: No regulations whatsoever about you know, how long people can work,
Speaker 1: or minimum wage or anything else. Right, why don't we
Speaker 1: have minimum wage laws in these states? You might say, oh, buckle,
Speaker 1: that's an infringement. Okay, but I like to live in
Speaker 1: the real world, and the real world you can either
Speaker 1: use power to protect the individuals and they're freedom, or
Speaker 1: you can allow the authoritarian left to crush them under
Speaker 1: the Fauci steamroller. That's really where the debate is right now.
Speaker 1: So I think Governor Abbott is doing the right thing,
Speaker 1: even if he does get overruled. Now, I want to
Speaker 1: tell you about this piece in than Delhi Wire. This
Speaker 1: was stunning. Luke Rosiak is the author here Dliwire dot
Speaker 1: com and hat tip to Luke Rosiac for this one.
Speaker 1: On June twenty second, Scott Smith was arrested at a
Speaker 1: Loudon County, Virginia school board meeting, a meeting that was
Speaker 1: ultimately deemed an unlawful assembly after many attendees vocally opposed
Speaker 1: a policy on transgender students. What people did not know
Speaker 1: is that weeks prior, on May twenty eighth, Smith says
Speaker 1: a boy allegedly wearing a skirt entered a girl's bathroom
Speaker 1: at nearby stone Bridge High School, where he sexually assaulted
Speaker 1: Smith's ninth grade daughter. Juvenile records are sealed, but Smith's attorney,
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Lancaster, told The Daily Wire that a boy was
Speaker 1: charged with two counts of forcible sodomy, one count of
Speaker 1: anal sonomy, one count of forcible fallatio related to an
Speaker 1: incident that day at that school. If someone would have
Speaker 1: sat and listened for thirty seconds to what Scott had said,
Speaker 1: they would have been mortified and heartbroken, Scott's attorney said.
Speaker 1: As a result of the viral video showing his arret,
Speaker 1: Smith became the poster child for the National School Board
Speaker 1: Association had since suggested could be a form of domestic terrorism,
Speaker 1: a white blue collar mail who showed up to harangue
Speaker 1: obscure public servants on his local school board. If someone
Speaker 1: would have sat and listened for thirty seconds, they would
Speaker 1: have I read that to a second ago would have
Speaker 1: been mortified and heartbroken. Minutes before Smith's arrest, the Loudon
Speaker 1: County Public Schools superintendent lectured the public that concerns about
Speaker 1: the transgender policy were misplaced because the school system had
Speaker 1: no record of any assault occurring in any school bathroom.
Speaker 1: And quote, friends, this is what you get with the
Speaker 1: woke left. They humiliated his father whose daughter was sexually assaulted.
Speaker 1: They humiliated him for trying to speak out about the
Speaker 1: sexual assault. And then you had school officials pretending that
Speaker 1: there had never been a sexual assault by a trans individual,
Speaker 1: a trans teenager, using the policies, using this, you know,
Speaker 1: using this trans bathroom situation in order to have easy
Speaker 1: access to an assault a young girl. This is what
Speaker 1: wokeness does to people. It corrupts and corrodes their soul.
Speaker 1: It destroys their sense of basic morality and decency. The
Speaker 1: cause becomes more important than the than the individuals that
Speaker 1: are destroyed or harmed by it. You know, they don't
Speaker 1: care what the end result is. They care that they
Speaker 1: are for any individual, they care what they're getting as
Speaker 1: a collective. And so because this went against the narrative,
Speaker 1: they covered it up, because this was a story that
Speaker 1: did not go along with the we all have a
Speaker 1: there's a trans agenda here for bathroom use policy that
Speaker 1: is just totally fine and there's no concerns and anyone
Speaker 1: who has any issues with this is a bigot. That's
Speaker 1: the narrative. Turns out that's not true. We've known that's
Speaker 1: not true. Now we have proof, and they're willing to
Speaker 1: cover up the sexual assault of a young girl in
Speaker 1: order to get their way when it comes to policy.
Speaker 1: This is the Left that you're dealing with. Do not
Speaker 1: forget it. They are They're insidious. They're insidious. They will
Speaker 1: do evil things and think themselves brave in the process,
Speaker 1: think that they're making the better decision. It's a noble
Speaker 1: a noble evil that they believe they do by covering
Speaker 1: up a story like this, or by making sure that
Speaker 1: people don't jump to the wrong conclusions about the entire
Speaker 1: trans agenda because of one incident. Yes, the Left likes
Speaker 1: to make those kinds of calculations for you. I say,
Speaker 1: we should all be exposed to the truth and be
Speaker 1: able to speak the truth. And that's the society that
Speaker 1: we should live in. Anyway. Hatch up the Deli Wire
Speaker 1: for their reporting on this one. Really incredible, harrowing, well
Speaker 1: harrowing story. Good journalism by Luca Rosiak here. Oh and
Speaker 1: I'd mentioned this just to close us out today. Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: if you haven't seen the video where she's pretending to
Speaker 1: be a normal, nice person with kids. They hired child
Speaker 1: actors so it could all look so so nice and
Speaker 1: normal when Kamas talking about, oh my gosh, when you
Speaker 1: see the craters on the moon, it's just amazing to
Speaker 1: see the craters on the moon, and the kids are
Speaker 1: all yay. But the kids are actors, and Kamala is
Speaker 1: just not likable. And the Democrats are gonna try and
Speaker 1: try because the Democrat elites, the Democrats who write big
Speaker 1: checks to NGOs and live in mansions and live in
Speaker 1: you know, brownstones in Brooklyn or haciendas in Malibu or whatever,
Speaker 1: they think that this is their candidate. They just have
Speaker 1: to find the way to sell her to the American
Speaker 1: people for the next election and it's not gonna work.
Speaker 1: It's not gonna work that much, I can tell you.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna close out the show today with that, my friends,
Speaker 1: thanks for being here for our new subscribers. Appreciate you
Speaker 1: joining Team buck hashtag team Buck back with you tomorrow.
Speaker 1: She'll tie