WEBVTT - Steven Romick on Portfolio Investments (Podcast)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>M This is mesters in Business with very renaults on

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Bluebird Radio this weekend. On the podcast, I have a

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>special and fascinating guest. His name is Steve Romick. He

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is the managing partner at First Specific Advisors, a shop

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.799
<v Speaker 1>in l A that runs about twenty six billion dollars

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in assets. He has also run the Crescent Funds since

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's about eleven billion dollars UH, and the numbers on

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that fund are really quite astonishing. One of the reasons

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I first wanted to start doing podcasts and interviews of

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>asset managers was because of people like Steve Romick. You know,

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not on the cover of magazines, you don't see

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>him on television all the time. But here's a guy

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>running real money, a substantial amount of assets, with a

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>fantastic long term track record, and he is not a

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>household name. I think the average forget the average investor,

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the average professional probably doesn't know who Steve Romick is.

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's too bad because folks like this really allow

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you to learn an important lesson about how to manage risk,

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>how to take advantage of opportunities, what you should be

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking about as a portfolio manager, as an investor. Really

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>just a fascinating guy with a really interesting history. I

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>found our conversation to be really intriguing, and I think

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you will also so. With no further ado, First Specific

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Advisors Steve Romick. This is mesters in business with very

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>results on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest this week is

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Steve Romick. He is the managing partner of First Specific Advisors,

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a shot that runs over twenty six billion dollars in equity,

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>fixed income, and alternative strategies. He was the Morning Star

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>US Allocation Fund Manager of the Year. He also manages

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the eleven billion dollar f p A Crescent Fund, which

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>he has been running sinceince inception in Steve Romick, Welcome

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg. Thank you, Barry. So let's go back to

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the early days of your career. You began as an

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>analyst in tell us what industry you were covering. I

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.519
<v Speaker 1>I started out as a generalist. I I actually started

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>as a generalist to who knew nothing about everything. I

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>was on my way to law school and I met

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>a gentleman through my father, who decided that he wanted

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to bring somebody into his shop who didn't know anything

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>because he's he quoted it at the time. He was

0:02:55.720 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>tired of unlearning NBAS and he put me up in

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>his office, pushed a desk right up next to his

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and said, you're going to see what we know, how

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>this works, and what we do. And he did every

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>time we called a company. He had the Manethond with him,

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and I learned, you know, early on. But the industry

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that I focused on to the greatest degree in the

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in my earliest years in the mid eighties, you know,

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 1>where it was the bank and thrift industry, when there

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>were you know, almost tripled the number of banks and

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>thrifts the United States, and there was a massive assolidation

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>trend that that he identified that was likely to occur,

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>which of course did occur. And he had me spending

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time, you know, analyzing these companies and

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>inputting you know, hundreds of banks and thrifts into d base,

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>something we don't really use today anymore. And spent a

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of time analyzing this businesses. And then I just

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>took it from there and and continued you need that breath,

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and spent a lot of time looking, you know, at

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the capital structure as well to stressed

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that and stressed that. In addition, so you mentioned d base,

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>how different were the tools that you used in the

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties and the techniques that were mainstays in financial

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>analysis then versus today. How radically has the world of

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>analytical research changed? Well, I think that the the I

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know that the process is any different, but the

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>tools that you can use to to get the information

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>that one needs to make a robust decision, you know,

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>are are better. I mean, it's just it's just easier,

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, to get that information, which makes the world,

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, candidly more competitive today than it was was

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>back then. Not only is there more money slashing around

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the system system, not only are there more people doing it,

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, but they can get that information a lot

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>more easily. I mean, back then I had to get

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>on the phone and call a company and call them

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 1>for local information, to get the the the phone number

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of the headquarters or whatever company's headquarters it was, and

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>try and get in contact with investor relations, if there

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>even was an invest in relations department. More often than not,

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I was just trying to get in a hold of

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the somebody in the finance department to get them to

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>send me an andy report and to to seek information

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>on the competition, to seek information as relates to industry data.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was just all much much harder to

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>come by it. It required a lot more grount work

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>just to get information. Now that information is available your

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>fingertip fingertips, you know, on the web. And in addition,

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you you have so many great resources that exist today

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>for people looking at businesses. The world's become much smaller.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>You have podcasts like this, You've got Value Investors Club,

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>vic et cetera. Interesting, So you're working as an analyst

0:05:56.160 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>covering everything generally. How did you decide to become a

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager? And what was that transition? Like? I think

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that that's a great question because I think that everybody

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>who is reasonably good at this and is confident in

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>their capabilities it, at some point they want to to

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>reach out and and touch the money themselves. List that,

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, somebody else make that an investment decision. So

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it started out with my my personal account inside of

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the firm and investing that and you know, finding some

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you know failure early to realize you know, my miss

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, what not to do. And then as I

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>got better over time, I thought that that it was

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>might be something that I want to do in terms

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of manage and entire portfolio. As it began to really

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>develop a philosophy as to how I'd like to to

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>manage money, and I was very fortunate to have a

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>mentor who helped pushed me in that direction and became

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>one of my my early investors. Really intriguing. So you

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>founded Crescent Management. How did you launch this business? How

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>did you get it off the ground, Where did you

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>find clients? And what did the business look like in

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>those early years when we started this, it was I

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>had a partner at the time who both of us

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>had worked for. Our mentor's name was James Nathan was

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>by Jeff Nathan, and he he you know, basically arranged

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>marriage where he decided that we'd be better off building

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>our own business, and it was an opportunity for us.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>He allowed us to do that while we remained, as

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, consultative analysts for once of a better description

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>with his firm. So he could you know, have his

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>cake and need it too, if you will. So it

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>was it was mutually beneficial and early clients really came

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>from his relationships. He could put us in business and

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I owed that, you know, all to him. We we

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't really have. We didn't have I mean, at that

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>point in time, we you know, we launched with maybe

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it was I have to go back and think about

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>many millions it was, but maybe it was ten million

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars in total between the separate accounts and and and

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the mutual fund. And it gradually grew from there. When

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you launched, was it all equity, was it equity fist

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>income or was it unconstrained and you know, including alternatives

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and non publicly traded options, it was it was unconstrained

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>within the public security markets. So they did not include

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>anything that was in the private sector, whether it be

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>private credit or the odd private equity investment that we

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>might make today. Uh, and today we would continue to

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>be largely public security investors. But philosophically, at that point

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in time, I liked the idea that I was able

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to invest money in a way that could deliver high

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>risk ADJI becturies. I believe they could deliver high risk

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>just it returns to my client based by investing across

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the capital structure. We had come out of the you know,

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the was coming out of the recession at that point,

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in time and the Drexel Burnham blow up, and there

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was lots of opportunity in junk bond land, and I

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.719
<v Speaker 1>learned that I could get a way to return in

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the debt markets that was as good as the equity

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>markets with with with more downside protection, and I could

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>use that as a tool in my portfolio. And if

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I could do that, I felt that are my clients

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>would would benefit because the portfolio could deliver higher risk

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>just to returns. And volatility is a is a measure

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of risk is I think a bit silly, and because

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just things can move around a lot, and the

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>temperature outside today in Los Angeles does nothing, doesn't reflect

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>what the temperature might be tomorrow. It's just gonna it's

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna move around. So when it comes to investing, though,

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in the average person, this goes for many professional investors,

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I think of volatility does weigh on on them, and

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it does precipitate action. Stocks to go up a lot,

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>they need to get in. They stocks to go down

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot, people will panic out. And this is I'm

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>not making a universal statement, but it's it's all too

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>often true. And I found in dealing with individual clients

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a very It was very much true. And I felt

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>that managing a product that could mute that which which

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 1>was not the goal, It was just the byproduct of

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>my of my process was was something that that could

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>be a reasonable business. And clearly it became a reasonable business.

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>When did Crescent become part of f p A and

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>what was that transition? Like that was in and the

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>transition was was actually a very difficult transition for for

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>tragic reasons. I um my partner and I split up.

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 1>He took separate accounts and I took the mut of

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>fun and we brought the assets over two for Specific Advisors.

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.599
<v Speaker 1>I realized that I didn't want to deal with the

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>back office. I didn't wanted to deal with the marketing.

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to focus on investing and all the

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 1>nuts and bolts of the business side of things. I

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 1>wanted to leave to and organization that could have my

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>back if you will, and and and provide that peace

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of mind that I can just focus. And so I

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>joined for Specific Advisors and I was friends with I

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>had there were these this investment group that I was

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>part of at the time through my again my mentor

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that were guys who were older guys I mean younger

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 1>than I am now, who would sit down and and

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about businesses, investments every every couple of months, and

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they get together for a dinner and you have to

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>bring your best idea and you chat about it, and

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 1>they let me come and be a fly on the

0:11:57.840 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 1>wall because I clearly had nothing to add at that

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>one in time. And one of those gentlemen was Bob Rodriguez,

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 1>who was portfolio manager at First Specific Advisors at the time,

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and we became friendly and I sought out, sought him

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>out and others regularly to to bounce ideas off of

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and compare notes and different businesses, and and Bob knew

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 1>I was looking to find a home and he was

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>kind enough to to allow me in her discussions the

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>First Specific Advisors, which was run by George Michlus at

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the time, who was a well known investor and featured

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in John Train's book The Money Masters that volume one.

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And I spent a lot of time with George, who

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I knew perfectly through mutual friends, and it just seemed

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>like a very very good fit. And I came into

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>ft A and ninety six midn and and the early

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>ninety six and ten days after I joined George Michlus

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>was scheduled at dinner at my home that night and

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>went cycling first and and uh had a bike accident

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and died. That is tragic and really just robbed you

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>of the ability to work with him for all those

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>future years. So so it really kind of shows you

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>just how random life can be. And and it ties

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>into the question I was about to ask you, which

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is you've had one of the longest tenures in the

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund business. You've been running the FPA Cresting Funds

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>since its inception. What is the secret to this longevity? Oh,

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I thank you. You have to enjoy what you do

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost, and and I do. I mean if

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I people ask me when I'm going to retire, and

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I have no plans to do that because I enjoy

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>coming to the office every day. I enjoy reading about businesses.

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy learning. I mean, this is a You're in

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a constant state of learning. The world is so different

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>today than it was in the company and industries you

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>know have have have evolved, and it forces you to

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to continue to to study and you you never perfect this.

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a it's a constant process of self improvement.

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>And I've as I look around me, and I think

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what keeps me young. And so I've really have

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>no intention of stopping this in anytime since. So that's

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the first, you know, key to that longevity.

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think second is just that we happen to

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>create a product that that, for better or worse, is

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>different than the typical product. I mean, sometimes we will

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>look like the typical mutual fund. We will we will

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>look very ordinary, you know, for sometimes longer periods of time,

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>because there isn't a lot of opportunity and and say

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that in the debt market says there hasn't been over

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the last number of years because we've not been interested

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in and buying high old bond without the without the

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>high part of the yield, because there hasn't been much yield.

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So we end up with just more inequities than we

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>have have historically. And so but we do have that opportunity,

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that flexibility to to operate with great breath, whether or

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>not we we take advantage of it at all points

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in time or not, it's that opportunity does exist. I

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>think that makes us a little bit different than than

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the typical one. And it doesn't make us the right

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>investment for for everyone, but we we've kind of come

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in each day, myself and my my partners in the

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>fund now because one of the things that's also allowed

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>me this longevity is to to have terrific partners in

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Brian Selmo and Mark Landecker, who are wonderful partners, and

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>wonderful analysts and wonderful portfolio managers and and thoughtful and

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>kind people with lots of integrity who make it fun

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to to come in each day. And so having that

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of support around you, along with our analyst team

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and support of of of the organization for specific advisors,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>makes it, you know, makes it makes it enjoyable. Let's

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about what it was like managing

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>all those assets in the midst of the worst pandemic

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in a century. UM heading into the end of you

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>were running more than a third cash in the funds.

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>What was the thinking then, Well, we've always managed a

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of cash in the in the in the portfolio,

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and that takes pretty high it is. It was certainly

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>above average, and it wasn't that we we identified the

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a recession is about to come as a result of

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a of a pandemic in the world would would literally

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>stop in many in many industries. But it was really

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>more a function of you know, cash being a byproduct

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of our investment products process. If we find an investment

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we like, we buy it. If not, cash ens up

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>as a residual. And we were more comfortable only more

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>cash in the past than we are today because at

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a point in time cash yielded five percent back into

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands and mid doos, and we have

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>more concerned today being that that inflation might be perspectively

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>higher given the amount of depth that's pennisuing, the amount

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of paper money that's been printed and cast would be

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>worth a lot less in an inflation or environment. So

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>when we came into this recession and in in into

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic in early two thousand, we had that cash

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>game just as a by product of that, and we

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>thought we were actually more protected with the cash we were,

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>But the investment part of the portfolio, you know, was

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was kind of lye hit pretty hard

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>by the by the pandemic, that right, yeah, the but

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it was it was it was some of the businesses

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that we owned were people you know throughout you know,

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>for dead for for a period of time. We owned

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>companies like like A I G. That started the year

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>at around fifty and at the end of two going

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>into twenty, it peaked mid fifties and an intra day

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>in the in the third fourth week of March when

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty, it was trading down at you know, under

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>seventeen dollars a share with book value, you know, being up,

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, closer to where the price was at the

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year, So huge, huge discount, and people

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>believed that, you know, the the company was clearly on

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>its way out, you know of existence, and you know,

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we didn't believe that, and you know, we had took

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to to increase our position. But it was

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>still I mean it admittedly discomfiting at that point in time,

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>not only for us because who likes to see their

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.239
<v Speaker 1>their stocks dropped up and dropped that much, but um

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it certainly for our for our investor base. But the

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, we we understood that that many

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of these business we all it was just it was

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>just a blip. It was the price at a point

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in time with fear you know hitting you know, hitting

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the market, and it wasn't the that these businesses weren't

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>going to do well once we got through to the

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>other side, and business is like a I G. You know,

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be fine, and it's it's it's businesses

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 1>like like Mary I. Businesses truly stopped. And we were

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>buying you know, Marriott as as the stock was coming down,

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you buy a stock at eighty and

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>then it goes you know, it goes into the sixties.

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not the again, the most comfortable thing

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to watch happen. But we're very confident that as we

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>got through the pandemic, people once again would would travel,

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they would get on airplanes, they would go to hotels

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and and a company like Marriott, you know that is

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, more asset light than you know, some other

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>hotel businesses would would perform, you know, quite well. So,

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, buying something at at sixty I'm sorry, at eighty,

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, as it as it dropped down, as it

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>dropped down, um in another from there. You know, again,

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>as I said, it was discomforting. But at the same time,

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you look where it is today, where it's a hundred

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and forty plus. We clearly weren't wrong, but it took

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a market at that point in time, as it took

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those businesses down down with it. So

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we took advantage of the opportunity it is at that

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>point in time and increased our invested exposure by about

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>ten percentage points and pulled down some of that cash

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you were referencing. So I don't want listeners to think

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>this is hindsight bias or you know, after the fact,

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>re reinventing history. March there was an article in the

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>New York Times by Jeff Sohmer Uh and remember this

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>is deep into the collapse, about a week before the

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>market bottomed, and he described getting a note from you

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>saying you had begun to start buying stocks and felt

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>that if even if markets fell further, you were going

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>to continue to buy because you thought things had suddenly

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>become very attractive price wise, and that you said you

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>were acting rationally and not bravely. Um, and you're looking

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>at five to seven years. Tell us a little bit

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>about the reaction to that Times column about you buying

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>right into the teeth of the collapse. Reaction from whom, Barry,

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>from whoever, from investors, from you know, any I found

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>any time I see someone go against the dominant trends

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:17.719
<v Speaker 1>stake out a contrarian point. The general pushback is ranges

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>from this guy is an idiot to this guy's crazy.

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Were you getting sort of hey, what are you doing?

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.239
<v Speaker 1>From clients? We got, we got the spectrum, We got

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>both right. I mean, but you've been doing this long

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>enough and your track record is good enough that one

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>would hope longstanding clients would say, I don't know, but

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>because you've been right before. What what was the what

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>was the pushback? Like the the pushback from some people

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.719
<v Speaker 1>was your your portfolio took a mark We didn't expect

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>it to take a mark um like it has, and

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna go and, uh, give our money to

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody else. That was respect from some On the other hand,

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>we had those investors who increase their their capital commitment,

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, to us and and decided that what we

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>were doing was the right thing because they did by

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>into the argument you just made that, Hey, with these

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>guys have been doing this a long time. They've lived

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>through various cycles. They lived through the Internet bubble, they

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>lived through the the you know, junk bond, you know,

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>blow ups in in in in the early two thousand's

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>when when the world comes were there and we're able

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage. They lived through the Great Financial Crisis

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and and they these guys know what they're doing. I'd

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>rather them do it then then you know, somebody else.

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>And so we did have you know, fortunately those people

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. On the other hand, there was more of

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the former admitted lay than a lotter. You know, people

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>send to vote with their feet. And this goes back

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to that volatility argument that people get, you know, get

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a little panicked at these points in times, and we

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>just tried to be thoughtful and act rationally. And the

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, if we do the right thing,

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the business will take care of itself. Whether it will

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>be you know, whether we're smaller or were larger, it's

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>not going to change what we do every day when

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>we come in here. It's not gonna do and it's

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to change our lives. So it's very important

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>for us to always be mindful of what the world

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>will look like five to seven years, you know, down

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the road, and make sure that we we have analyzed

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the businesses that we own or the assets were buying

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the bonds that were buying you know, well, such that

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>we have invested with some kind of margin of safety,

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and we've tried to anticipate you know, downside. I mean downside,

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>not just mark to market some might occur, wage are

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>far less important. But but really considering what the absolute

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:34.479
<v Speaker 1>downside is, what is that you know, what could really

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>happen that could create a permanent impairment of capital. So

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>before we get granular and really dive into what you

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>were buying, I want to ask you what made you

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>realize that the sell off in was a short term

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>sell off and not the start of a more serious,

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>longer term bear market. Was it valuation? Was it a

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>variety of factors? You obviously had the right answer. What

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>was the thinking behind it? Oh? I didn't know. I mean,

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, just full disclosure. We had no

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>idea it's gonna be shorter long. I mean, we I

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>came to that article you're referencing in the New York Times.

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Was was you know, as you stated, you know, like

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking about where the world's gonna be down the

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>road five to seven years. I didn't know how long

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>is it was gonna last? But if I invest trying

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to anticipate what's going to happen in the next you know,

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a few months, six months, year, or whatever the case

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>may be. It's just it's gonna take my eye arm,

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, my off the ball, our team's eye off

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and not allow us to to to buy

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>things that otherwise might buy we'd always find some reason

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that that it might be a little bit cheaper. So

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>so let me get specific, then, Um, since you were

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking five to seven years, what did you accumulate at

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of that first quarter in the beginning of

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter, what what specific sectors or stops. You know,

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we bought a number of businesses in the in the

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>travel industry and including you know, Bookings, dot Com and Marriott.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>We bought businesses that were impacted you know by you know,

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>you know directly, you know, by COVID. We added to

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>some of our financial services businesses you know, you know,

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a I G give us an example that we felt

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that would certainly get through you to the other side.

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And we added you know, businesses that that uh, you

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 1>know last year that where where people were capitulating because

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the consumer is gonna be weak. Businesses like like richemonts

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Um you know, for example. And then we we also

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>took advantage of other businesses that were less cyclical, uh,

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that that had the the opportunity to to perform well

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what, you know, what the economy you know,

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was doing. But but we're just we're being negatively impacted,

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, by the market when they were throwing the

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>baby out with the bathwater as well. So we own

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in the portfolio and their positions is that that you know,

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>grew within the portfolio while we were when the market

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>was going down, companies like Facebook and Alphabet etcetera. And

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I know you like to run with a little bit

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>of cash in the portfolio. Did you ever fully deploy

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that capital? Did you become fully invested? No? We we

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 1>we didn't. We put the cap We we took ten

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>points that you know, the capitol and put that to

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>work and and the market rallied you know from there,

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh, we didn't you know, put it all to work.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, in hindsight, obviously you know you were one

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>wishes they had, but you know, we didn't know how

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>long that opportunities and exists. We wanted to make sure

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we continue the ability to buy down, no doubt about it.

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>What else were you doing to manage the portfolio through

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the course of the pandemic, meaning how are you approaching

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>dealing with clients, dealing with buying opportunities, considering risk? How

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>did the pandemic affect the way you thought about running

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the funds. We had lots of conversations, you know about

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this and and internally amongst my partners and probably the

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>most grounded of the three of us. I would give

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>a hat tip to my partner Mark Landecker, who really

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>was the most centered of us, because I'm not gonna

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>tell you that it wasn't disconcerting watching you know, these

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the stock prices dropped, you know, as I did, even

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>after having lived through you know, multiple multiple downturns, and

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>we they left, you know, more of the speaking of

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>clients to me, which you know I had the history

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>with them and allowed them to to do a greater

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>degree focus more on on on the portfolio and not

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>have the static from from having clients whisper in your ear.

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're the portfolio is going down. I'm scared.

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, what are we going to do? What are

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you going to do? What am I going to do?

0:27:56.080 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>It it insulates them from hearing the this reactions of

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the investors, and so I took more of that on

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>on the front line. And because you have to to

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>be a good investor, you really do have to have,

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>as we discussed, that longer term focus and and find

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>ways to to minimize the static in your life. And

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's how we operated together. You know, the

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>three of us really intriguing. So given the big run

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>up from from before the drop from February, we're up

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>about from the Nader, We're up about se Are you

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>still as fully invested as you were last year? How

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>are you looking at the markets today after after this recovery. Well,

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no question that things have gotten price here. But

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>every time you put coupital to work, kept to ask

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>yourself or even maintain your exposure. You know, what's like

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>could have happen over the next five to seven years

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of these businesses, of these assets that we own and

0:28:55.240 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>are thought process is continues to always be focused on

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>on looking out down the road. And if one starts

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>with that, yeah we have we we then have to

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>end with what is the alternative Today's where are we

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>end up? Including what if you bonds don't offer much

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of an alternative, and you're not getting any kind of

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, yield there we kind of think about as

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>more as return free risk. Uh, the high yield part

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of the market, or the investment grade part of the

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>corporate debt market just isn't isn't attractive, and you know,

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we wish it was. We took between a little bit

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of capital work, you know, in the space last year,

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>but the opportunity to exists you know, for very long

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and and so much of that corporate debt is not

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>only lower yielding, but it's also also um relatively. We

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>covenant to to a lot of that debt of debt,

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>so more of the leverage tilts towards the to the

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>borrower and away from the lender. And so we don't

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>we look today in that same situation because yields are

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>lower still, and it begs the question, and I think

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a fair question, why we would you be as invested,

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>were slightly less invested, in fairness, But that's more noise

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in the portfolio, you know, than we were you know,

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>last year this time. But why do we stay invested?

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Because again, the alternative isn't great and we think that

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get good rates of return over the

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>next number of years. You know, from this portfolio of

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>assets that we own. That doesn't mean that they're not

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.959
<v Speaker 1>going to stocks aren't going to trade down in the interim.

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>They very well might. But when we look at the

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>way the government has has has printed you know, money,

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>governments or sovereigns have printed money, and you know, and

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and as I pointed out earlier, just the amount of

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>depth that's been created, we just think that you know,

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you could be you could talk towards an environment where

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it's more inflationary and rates can remain lower for longer

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>because the government imperative is to keep them as low

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>as as that interest expense as low as it can be,

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>which means keeping rates as low as possible. At any

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>point in time. You know, the system can you know,

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>governments can lose control of it. But we consider what

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the alternatives are. Stocks still make more sense. Now we

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>are finding more opportunities outside the United States, and we

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>think that there's better opportunity and businesses that are domiciled,

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, on for foreign surres. And so our portfolio

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of equities has tilted in the last couple of years

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>more overseas than it has been or has ever been

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>historically in the position size of about doubled for a

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>few years back for for that which we've on outside

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of the US, and and now percent of our portfolio

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is domiciled elsewhere. Let's talk a little bit about that

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Crescent Funds. It has been ranked as the best risk

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>adjusted returns of all allocation mutual funds with at least

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars in assets under management among those managed

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>by the same manager since inception, which I would imagine

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is a fairly exclusive club. Are you familiar all with

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>who else is similarly situated to you in terms of

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>running a fund since inception and actually running a billion

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>or more dollars? I'm not. Actually, I don't really pay

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention to to that. So so I

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>want to go over the funds objectives, which is to quote,

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>generate equity like returns over the long term while taking

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>less risk than the market and avoiding permanent impairment of capital. Hey,

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants to do this. You're one of the few

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>who actually have. Tell us how you manage to accomplish that. Well,

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we invest across the capital structure with this goal of

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>delivering attractive risk of just returns on stock stress and distress,

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>corporate bonds and private credit, occasional preferred stock, etcetera. When

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to stock, X will own both the more

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>commercial and the evergreens. That is, they you know, a commercial,

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>call them the dollar bills trig into discounts. And those

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>companies whose businesses should you know, on the other hand,

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that are more evergreen, that businesses should be solidly better

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>at decade from now. It's really a function of price

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and risk reward that will dictate which direction we go

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>uh for these evergreens versus these more commercial opportunities. But

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we try every day to try to know the better

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>businesses in the world and own them. Should the average

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>trade down for one reason or another, we'll be there

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>too to pick them up. And what we also own

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>these lesser quality but still growing businesses if their stock

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>prices offer attractive upside relative to the downside. And then

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have our dead investments where we all

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we care about is getting our principle backing maturity, but

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, also generated in equity return along the way

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that really speaks, you know, to more to our philosophy.

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>And then and then our our process is guided by

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>by thoughtful research of the underlying opportunity as we as

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>we really try to ascertain the value of the business

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.239
<v Speaker 1>or the asset. And that's kind of by a lot

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of reading, many conversations with the management competitors, industry experts

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. And then you know, we'll go about

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and build our our financial models. And our models don't

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, suggest what you know, what might happen in

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the coming quarter or even in two thousand two, but

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 1>over the next few years. We want to have a

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>view as to what the business might look like in

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a low base and high case, and we want the

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>investment in that business, that equity to to that we're

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be buying in that business to be attractive in

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the base case and have that upside optionality on the

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in the high case and and not you know, get

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>too badly in the low case. So we really try

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and create these these these boundaries, these governors as we

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>look at each of the individual investments in the portfolio.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm trying to figure out how to describe your

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.959
<v Speaker 1>style of investing, and it's it's pretty challenging. I'm looking

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and some of the holdings in in your top ten.

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So you have Alphabet and Facebook on the one hand,

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 1>but on the other hand you mentioned a I G

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 1>and City Group. Is this value as this growth. It's

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:15.359
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty hard to put you into a style box. Yeah,

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a problem with style boxes because

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the we don't make a great distinction between growth and value.

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Show me the growth investor that argues what they bought

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is in a value. But but then also you can

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>just stick a company that trades it forty times earnings,

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but if it's growing thirty percent a year for the

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>next five years and into that five year period, it's

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>with trading ten eleven times earnings and there about. So

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to us, value investing is just to invest with an

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>appropriate margin of safety, buying a business or an asset

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>at a discount. In the past that that margin of

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>safety might have meant protection you came from the balance

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>sheet and the more in the most traditional Graham and

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Dotty and you know kind of definition you know, buying

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>blow book value, blow net networking capital. You know, the

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>business might have not earning assets, it could be monetized,

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Today it you know, for us more luckly

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>means the protection you know that that has to come

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>from the quality of the business. You can get sucked

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:13.240
<v Speaker 1>into what you think is a margin of safety because

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the you've got these you know, what appears to be

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a strong wood bay, You've got you know, hidden assets,

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>but the business isn't good at the end of the day,

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the you're you're you're probably gonna have a challenge, I

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>mean takes here as an example, there are a lot

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.399
<v Speaker 1>of value investors who owned it believing that management could

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 1>turn the business around, but if not, they were protected

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>by lots of great real estate as well some powerful

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>brands like ken More Incraftment. However, as we now know,

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>management wasn't successful and much of their great asset base

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>was mortgage or sold off. With that count what was

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>then reinvested back in the business. And then you know

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>when it's the time that it came to a point

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in time where people realized ex posts that that they

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 1>were they were burning the timber from the house. So

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 1>to us in a traditional value investments, you know are

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>are you know, often mediocostolical businesses that were temporary out

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of favor and offered to message the opportunity to return

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to more normal own earnings. But many of those businesses

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have been disrupted by new technologies and and didn't offer

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the margin of safety they once did. So we're very

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>mindful of whatever we own, it really does have to

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 1>be growing, doesn't have to have have go go growth.

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>We own a couple of cement companies that are global

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>franchises that that we think cements are going to be

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>here for a long long time. Now. They're not you know,

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>go go growth businesses, certainly, but you know, those are

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>businesses that we think that that offered attractive risk of

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 1>just returns over the over the next number of years.

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:42.359
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned you know, Google and Facebook, but even

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>those investments were initiated at points in time when there

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>was bad news surrounding them. Google back in two thousand

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and eleven, when there was feared that they're advertising you know,

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>business was going to be impaired, which is bulk of

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the revenues, because we impaired because of a recession as

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the world was beginning to unwine, as as as what

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>was happening in Cyprus was infecting you know, Europe, in Greece,

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know the rest of Europe. Uh and UM the

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>stock traded and the stock traded down. Facebook traded down

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a few years back because of the Cambridge analytical scandal

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and people were worried about about it. It's business prospects

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's not about it, you know, entry into into

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>two very good you know, businesses that we've owned ever since.

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:28.439
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned you buy some non public distress debt.

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Are you purchasing anything on the non public side of equities?

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>So yes, we do. We do own um some privates

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in the portfolio, but they're very small because we're public

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>fund and we're responsible for returning capital to our investors

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>when they when they wanted back. But on occasion, we

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>make investments in certain private investments opportunities, um you know,

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Epic Games is an example. We also have various private

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>credit UH in the positions in the portfolio that we've

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>made over the years. In the last decade, we've put

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, eight hundred million or so out you know

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 1>in UH in private credit that have delivered returns of

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, give or take to the fund. And these

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>are secured first lean asset based loans that you know,

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.439
<v Speaker 1>are something different than not a lot of mutual funds.

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Do Again, I don't want to suggest that this is

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>that these are the engines in the portfolio. These are

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.399
<v Speaker 1>our investments that that end up on the periphery again

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>because of the of their i liquid nature and and

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we are a public fund. So last

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 1>question about the funds. You're located in Los Angeles. A

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of what you're covering seems to originate on the

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>East Coast, in New York or in Silicon Valley. How

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:53.320
<v Speaker 1>does being located in l A affects your worldview? I've

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 1>never really thought about l A affecting my my world

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:59.839
<v Speaker 1>view until you just ask that question. I do think

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>at you know, just in general, the world has gotten

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>has gotten smaller because of the information it's available your

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>finger and tips, so, you know, across the internet. Uh,

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>and that certainly has made it easier. But living in

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, I don't know has affected my my world

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>view too to any great degree. I don't know if

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I would think differently if I was, you know, living

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago or New York. I haven't really thought about

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 1>it bearer to be honest, of how that's my view

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>has been impacted by living here. Hey, that's a fair answer.

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to get a sense of your philosophy

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and and how where you're situated might somehow filter into it.

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So we talked a little bit about fixed income and

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>especially in the high yield world where you're taking a

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of risk for almost no reward. What do you

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 1>think about the state of inflation here that seems to

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have been a giant topic the past couple of months.

0:40:55.320 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Does this affect the way you invest i noticed you

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>guys don't really make much of inflation forecast. What's the

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>impact of inflation on your thought process? We think that

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>with the way the stewards of of of of capital

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>at the sovereign level have been acting in the last

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>number of years, really took great degree since the Great

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Financial Crisis, there is there is this financial alchemy that's

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>going on that people hope that that that the academics

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 1>that have it all figured out, that they're going to

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>get engineer this soft landing and and and be able

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to control the inflation in a way that and drive

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>growth at the same time. That is going to all

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>end perfectly, And it thinks tend not to be quite

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>so perfect out there in the world, and and the

0:41:57.280 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 1>we've learned to expect the unexpected, and we don't know

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.879
<v Speaker 1>what is going to happen. We don't know whether they'll

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>be inflation or how much inflation there might end up being.

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 1>We think that there's reasonable prospects of it, you know, certainly,

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:12.760
<v Speaker 1>but you might there be a deflationary path to inflation.

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>That could be the way we get there. Where the

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 1>where the knee jerk responses to continue to to print more,

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>borrow more, and in stimulate, stimulate with a with a

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>wanton disregard for for the future ramifications of what it

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 1>might mean to feed our currencies, you know, or or

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>or the economies, or or inflation down the road. But

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for that near term bump as these policy makers

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and academics are really thinking about what's happening right now,

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is they as they seek to be re elected or reappointed.

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So we don't know what's going to happen, but we

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>create a range of outcomes, and we think that as

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 1>we look at them, it's more appropriate to be more

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:59.760
<v Speaker 1>invested than not if you're looking out where the world's

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be, you know, five ten years since. So

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that raises really interesting issue. You refer to the response

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>from the fiscal response from governments and the monetary response

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 1>from central banks. Are they in the process of changing

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 1>what bear markets are gonna look like going forward. And

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:22.800
<v Speaker 1>what I mean by that is, have investors learned to

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>anticipate fiscal and monetary stimulus. I think the world is

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly trying to do that. We hear at first specific advisors. No,

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 1>we can't anticipate. We just try and create a portfolio

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>that's robust to multiple outcomes, that doesn't go too hard

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>one direction or another, believing that that we really have

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the capability of identifying what the macro environment will look

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a look like perspectively, there's just way too many moving parts.

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you put me in a room with the

0:43:57.400 --> 0:43:59.879
<v Speaker 1>with with John Maynard Keynes, I'm gonna, you know, come

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>out of you know Kinsian economists, right, I'm gonna be

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a believer, you know, same with you To put me

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in there with a monitorist the supply side or you

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 1>know who or whatever, it's just there's these guys have

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>all the arguments down and and I'm just not, you know,

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>well versed enough, and I don't believe that that anybody

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>really has that capability. And in fact, if you were

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to go back and and look at at the projections

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 1>made by economists for just the coming year for what

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:32.240
<v Speaker 1>GDP was going to be. They're they're rarely rights. Somebody

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>gets it right, but nobody's right consistently, and sometimes they're

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:39.320
<v Speaker 1>they're wildly wrong. And you look at at people like

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Alan Greenspan, who didn't think that we were, you know,

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in a recession in the early you know, in the

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 1>early part of the those you know, or or Bernankey this,

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 1>they didn't expect the great financial quss. These things weren't anticipated,

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and so we don't hang our hat on on listening

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to them or trying to anticipate what might be a

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of things might be, more things might be than

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>will be. And so we just try and put our

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>heads down and and believe that that you know what

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:13.960
<v Speaker 1>down down the road that you know, Google is still

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:16.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a good business. And we're not paying even

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 1>today at current prices that you know, if you adjust

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for the cash you you you adjust for their non

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>earning assets, their moonshots, and and the stock is not

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 1>so horribly expensive. It certainly isn't as cheap as it

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:31.880
<v Speaker 1>was on an adjusted basis. We bought it back in eleven.

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>It was in the early early low rather teams multiple

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 1>adjusted earnings, but these are companies where comfortable owning you

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>know through this. So that's kind of interesting. What what

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>other investment opportunities today are you excited about? You mentioned overseas,

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that x US developed? Is that emerging markets? What

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is catching your eye in the present environment? You know,

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we we it it's more it's more developed economies. Of

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>there's some emerging markets in and it's not any one

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 1>company or one industry you know specifically, there's just uh,

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:12.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a host of different you know businesses that we own,

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you know outside the United States. There's some businesses that

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>we own you know inside the US that are less

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:22.359
<v Speaker 1>economically sensitive as well that that that make their way

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:26.760
<v Speaker 1>into into the portfolio that are again give an example

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of a more commercial opportunity. We've owned for you know

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>since last year. Um and it didn't go down because

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic. It went down for for idiosyncratic reasons.

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a I don't want any time I mentioned idea,

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't want it to suggest this is like our

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 1>favorite idea or the only idea. This is just to

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 1>be meant to be emblematic of of of of philosophy

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 1>and process. But we own you know, first Energy which

0:46:50.880 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is a pure play regulated transmission distribution utility with one

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>of the largest networks in the US, I mean six

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 1>million customers across five stay. It's you know, starting Ohio

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 1>and kind of moving east towards the mid Atlantic. Now

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:07.759
<v Speaker 1>it's core utility business is better than average, which means

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>which does you know you can be determined as a

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>higher than average you know r OE, it's got um

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>more regulated transmission distribution stance is rather than the more

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>risky business of non regulated independent power production. And for

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the most part they're in regulatorily friendly states with lower

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:30.759
<v Speaker 1>than average competition. So we also you know, looking like

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the utility industry just just as an idea, just as

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 1>a as a construct, because we think there should be

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 1>underlying demand for increased transmission and grid modernization over the

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>next number of years. So but you know, the utility

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 1>industry is is you know, the index trades about times earning,

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you know thereabouts. But this company, you know, last year,

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, they have got some bad news and Q

0:47:58.000 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, First Energy got caught up in a brimary

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>scan that alleged you know, illegal campaign contributions following around

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:06.879
<v Speaker 1>sixty million dollars to the former Ohio Speaker of the House,

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in the hopes of passing a bill that provided some

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, subsidies for nuclear business. You know that isn't

0:48:13.719 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>if they don't even own anymore. And as a result,

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know what, you know, how the government

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>might or in the regulators might come at them. It

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:26.359
<v Speaker 1>causes stock to drop by almost half from the February high,

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and that cleaned off about thirteen billion dollars of market value.

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you were to adjust it for the declining

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:36.359
<v Speaker 1>utility index because that had gone down, you know at

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that point of about eight percent as well along with

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the the um you know, coming down with the pandemic,

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that would just basically means about ten to eleven billion

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:51.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars of value you know, was taken out adjusted for

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the decline in those utility indicries. And so we are

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>workers really centered on two things like one, how good

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 1>is the business and to you know, what what the

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 1>penalties be. And so we the work that we did,

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the business and common conversations with competitors,

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 1>industry experts and utility unless give us a comfort level

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that the business was advertising as good as we thought

0:49:14.640 --> 0:49:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it was. And that with respect to the the fine

0:49:18.920 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that was likely to occur, we felt it would end

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 1>up being manageable. So there are federal sentencing guidelines that

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 1>are fairly you know, formula formulaic, and so we used

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>history as a precedent and looking at lots of different

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of fines have been paid in the past, and there's

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a base cave fine, and then there is a a

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>culpability multiple that gets attached to that. So we did

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 1>as we triangulated these these other fines and and and

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:47.879
<v Speaker 1>the multiple kind of looked at that maybe they find

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:50.720
<v Speaker 1>into being someplace a hundred and fifty to four million dollars.

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember I just said that the business and declined

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:56.640
<v Speaker 1>thirteen billion, maybe ten to eleven billion adjusted, you know,

0:49:56.800 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 1>relative to futility index. So even in a ast case

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>scenario of a billion dollars, it's still, you know, just

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:06.279
<v Speaker 1>one tenth of what the stock price declined that that

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:10.040
<v Speaker 1>had been been seen by its shareholders. UM are born

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 1>by its shareholders, and so we felt pretty comfortable UM

0:50:14.920 --> 0:50:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that the adjusting for our base case fines and and

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the stock trading back to a market multiple in the

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:23.320
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years. Again looking down the road that

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:25.799
<v Speaker 1>buying the business at eleven times earnings with a five

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:29.640
<v Speaker 1>percent dividing yield was pretty attractive relative to the the

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 1>utility index that was training at nine twenty times earnings

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:36.720
<v Speaker 1>with with a just a few percent you know, dividing yields.

0:50:36.760 --> 0:50:38.879
<v Speaker 1>And so as you got through the scandal, we thought

0:50:38.920 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the stock that was trading in the high twenties, you know,

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:43.759
<v Speaker 1>could end up being you know, trading in some place

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in the you know, in the low forties to low fifties.

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And what's it looked like today? I mean, the same

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:51.440
<v Speaker 1>story still applies. Is still in the midst of this.

0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:53.640
<v Speaker 1>The stock price has moved up, you know, from the

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:59.839
<v Speaker 1>high twenties to the higher thirties, and the the opportunity

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:02.919
<v Speaker 1>still exists for that same upside. Nothing's really changed there

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in the in the process of of working through the

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the whatever's gonna happen regulatorily or with the fines,

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>we just don't know where it stands. You know, today

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to know two we know, but as

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 1>we looked down the road, we it's going to be settled.

0:51:21.160 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Just like I argued before that people would travel again,

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 1>people would stay in hotels again, and Marriott, you know,

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 1>would not have an occupancy that was was was going

0:51:29.320 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to be, you know, close to zero for a period

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of time. You're gonna end up with a more normal environment,

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, for First Energy you know, you know, and

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and in all its markets in Ohio, Pennsylvania, you know, etcetera.

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 1>That's really intriguing. So marginal safety clearly a key part

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of your investment approach. I'm gonna assume nothing in change

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that philosophy. So that leads me to the question, what

0:51:58.880 --> 0:52:03.359
<v Speaker 1>is your takeaway him your experience during the pandemic? What's

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the lesson that investors should have learned last year? Investors?

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, every time you know they should learn this,

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it says, it's the lat same lesson, right is thinking

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:16.320
<v Speaker 1>what the world looks like down the road, Not what

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 1>dom I look like in the next six months, three months,

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>even a year or two, but what's it like down

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the road. I mean, if you're buying a business, you

0:52:24.840 --> 0:52:26.719
<v Speaker 1>should care about it twice the day you buy it

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in the day you sell it. So if you're not

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:30.839
<v Speaker 1>going to sell that business for five ten years, why

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:32.399
<v Speaker 1>do you care if the stock is up or down

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple No doubt about that. Our last

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 1>question of this segment. I want to throw you a

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a curve ball. I asked you earlier

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:44.439
<v Speaker 1>about l A. I was kind of surprised to learn

0:52:44.840 --> 0:52:49.399
<v Speaker 1>your surfer. Tell us a little bit about that hobby. Oh,

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I've got lots of hobbies. I'm you know, I'm a

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm a I'm a jack of many trades and master

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of none. I'm I. I enjoy it Like I swam

0:52:57.719 --> 0:53:00.759
<v Speaker 1>competitively through college. I've always enjoyed, you know, the water.

0:53:00.880 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy swimming in a pool, enjoy him in the ocean.

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:07.399
<v Speaker 1>And and I never I used to lifeguard the beach.

0:53:07.760 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a summer job when I was in college, and

0:53:10.200 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and and learn to surf. And as I said, I'm

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 1>not very good. But it's nothing like being out there

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:17.359
<v Speaker 1>in the water and a dolphins swimming around you. It's pretty.

0:53:17.400 --> 0:53:19.800
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty peaceful. And to you know, pick up a

0:53:19.880 --> 0:53:22.239
<v Speaker 1>wave and and maybe have a dolphin writing it with you,

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:24.600
<v Speaker 1>which has happened on just one occasion of my life.

0:53:24.640 --> 0:53:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But I keep trying to trying to repeat that is

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty um you know, beautiful you know, spiritual experience.

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:33.359
<v Speaker 1>For me, I find it incredibly peaceful, and I spend

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 1>more time now, you know, um surfing behind a boat,

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, and on a lake because I don't have

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:41.719
<v Speaker 1>to compete for waves. And that's been you know, it's

0:53:41.760 --> 0:53:44.399
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of fun. I don't know if you've

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:48.840
<v Speaker 1>seen the videos of all the young Great Whites that

0:53:49.080 --> 0:53:53.319
<v Speaker 1>like to go surfing with surfers in a very um,

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 1>non aggressive way. Apparently it's different when they're larger or

0:53:57.680 --> 0:54:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and older, but when they're young, they seem to be

0:54:00.200 --> 0:54:02.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty chill. Some of the videos I've seen on YouTube

0:54:02.960 --> 0:54:07.719
<v Speaker 1>taken from drones are just astonishing. Oh yeah, there they

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:11.080
<v Speaker 1>really are, and there and they are. It's it's disconcerting,

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you know. And if they I'll all compete in in ocean,

0:54:14.320 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, swim races, uh, you know, once or twice

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a year. And I remember once watching one of those

0:54:20.320 --> 0:54:22.759
<v Speaker 1>drone videos of a Great White kind of underneath the

0:54:23.239 --> 0:54:26.839
<v Speaker 1>underneath the crowd of swimmers, you know, kind of off

0:54:26.920 --> 0:54:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the South Bay her most in Manhattan Beach and a race,

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm I just thought to myself, I'm like that,

0:54:33.200 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I would do myself. I just

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:38.439
<v Speaker 1>try to push that out of my mind. I don't

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 1>care if it's a big great white or a small

0:54:40.080 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>great white. Berry great white is a great white, I'm

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be real thrilled to see. I'm gonna i'm

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna push back against you on that. If if the

0:54:47.800 --> 0:54:50.399
<v Speaker 1>choice is a big great white or a small great white,

0:54:50.760 --> 0:54:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the small, younger one. They really

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:56.920
<v Speaker 1>seem to be so. By the way, if if people

0:54:56.960 --> 0:55:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are still listening at this point, go to YouTube, Google this.

0:55:01.320 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 1>It's astonishing. They're not like a hundred yards away, They're

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 1>inches away there. It's almost like their dolphins playing with

0:55:09.840 --> 0:55:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the swimmers and surfers. It's really amazing to see. But

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that said, you know, it's a little frightening if you're

0:55:17.360 --> 0:55:20.920
<v Speaker 1>out there on a regular basis. Barry, I'm gonna go

0:55:21.080 --> 0:55:23.839
<v Speaker 1>on record is saying that I'm not going to spend

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time determining how big that great white is. Okay,

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:31.239
<v Speaker 1>that's that's fair enough. Let me um, I know I

0:55:31.280 --> 0:55:33.359
<v Speaker 1>only have you for a certain amount of time. Let

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:36.239
<v Speaker 1>me jump to some of my favorite questions that we

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:39.760
<v Speaker 1>ask all of our guests that are not surfing related,

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and and start with tell us what you're streaming these days?

0:55:43.320 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Give us your favorite Netflix or Amazon Prime or or

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 1>even podcast you're listening to. I don't. I don't actually

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:54.800
<v Speaker 1>listen to a lot of podcasts. They don't do a

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:56.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of streaming other than what you know, more more

0:55:56.800 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 1>entertainment related to streaming. I tend to when I'm in

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the gym working out, and you know, on my stationary

0:56:02.000 --> 0:56:04.040
<v Speaker 1>bike could do a lot of cycling, you know. I

0:56:04.200 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I tend to, you know, throw on a documentary and

0:56:07.560 --> 0:56:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and something that with subtitles and and just kind of

0:56:10.920 --> 0:56:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I watch it and it could be on a host

0:56:12.719 --> 0:56:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of different topics. I love music and and and frequently

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it ends up being something related related to that. I

0:56:18.960 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 1>spend more time, you know, you know, reading nonfiction um

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and and try and really drive a lot of throughput

0:56:27.560 --> 0:56:29.640
<v Speaker 1>there to the best of my ability, I said, the

0:56:29.680 --> 0:56:31.279
<v Speaker 1>best of my ability. Of some books just end up

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:33.680
<v Speaker 1>being a little bit a little bit denser than others.

0:56:33.760 --> 0:56:37.759
<v Speaker 1>And I find myself sometimes, you know, struggling through to

0:56:38.239 --> 0:56:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to get onto the next book. So we're gonna come

0:56:40.719 --> 0:56:42.920
<v Speaker 1>back to books in a minute. But now I want

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to ask you tell us about your mentors who helped

0:56:46.680 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>shape your career. Well, the one person really, you know,

0:56:50.640 --> 0:56:54.280
<v Speaker 1>shaped my career, I mentioned earlier is is James Nathan

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>goes by Jeff and he was my my first boss,

0:56:57.600 --> 0:57:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's the one who entered uced me to a

0:57:00.920 --> 0:57:03.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, you know, early on when I was

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:08.040
<v Speaker 1>just starting out my early twenties, where I was able

0:57:08.120 --> 0:57:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to sit down with you know, his good friend, you know,

0:57:11.480 --> 0:57:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Lee Cooperman and asked him questions and learn from learn

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:19.080
<v Speaker 1>from him, and and have him, you know, be at

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the Tilodine Annual Meeting, introduced Henry Singleton and have dinner

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:25.720
<v Speaker 1>with him afterwards, and talked about experience investing in Tilodine

0:57:26.200 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, back in the day, and that that really

0:57:30.120 --> 0:57:33.960
<v Speaker 1>was incredibly educational. And then I remember once he he

0:57:34.560 --> 0:57:38.439
<v Speaker 1>had me, we drove down to Laguna Beach to visit

0:57:38.480 --> 0:57:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy who I had never heard of. I just

0:57:40.080 --> 0:57:44.800
<v Speaker 1>couldn't google somebody back then. And and again I hadn't

0:57:44.800 --> 0:57:47.320
<v Speaker 1>been in the business that long at this point in time.

0:57:47.360 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And I sit down at the lobby bar of the

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:53.760
<v Speaker 1>ritz Ritz Hotel in down in in Laguna Beach and

0:57:53.800 --> 0:57:55.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a guy who shows up with an ascot and

0:57:55.960 --> 0:57:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like Paisley pajama bottoms, and it was it

0:57:59.360 --> 0:58:01.520
<v Speaker 1>was I've never seen anybody dressed like that, and it

0:58:01.680 --> 0:58:04.080
<v Speaker 1>was Sir John Templeton, and I was able to have

0:58:04.520 --> 0:58:08.200
<v Speaker 1>tea with you know, Sir John Templeton and listened to

0:58:08.320 --> 0:58:11.840
<v Speaker 1>his life experiences and talking about investing and to be

0:58:11.920 --> 0:58:14.840
<v Speaker 1>thrown into that kind of a world at at a

0:58:15.280 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 1>at a very young age, is is um made me

0:58:19.200 --> 0:58:22.880
<v Speaker 1>incredibly you know, made me recognize its incredibly fortunate to

0:58:22.960 --> 0:58:25.160
<v Speaker 1>say the very least. I want to circle back to

0:58:25.280 --> 0:58:30.520
<v Speaker 1>something that you mentioned in in my earlier question, which

0:58:30.640 --> 0:58:33.320
<v Speaker 1>is you said you tend to listen to music related

0:58:33.560 --> 0:58:37.120
<v Speaker 1>or watch music related um streaming. You you want to

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:40.520
<v Speaker 1>give us any examples. I mean, I'll listen. I'm gonna

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:42.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to like I mean, on a podcast, listen to

0:58:42.400 --> 0:58:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the something called song exploder. So I love I love

0:58:46.880 --> 0:58:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the I love the the etymology of the song I like.

0:58:50.560 --> 0:58:52.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, reading the Wall Street Journal, uh, you know

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:55.280
<v Speaker 1>column that it really breaks down the forgot what the

0:58:55.640 --> 0:58:59.440
<v Speaker 1>title of that column is. It comes a typically yeah, um,

0:58:59.520 --> 0:59:03.080
<v Speaker 1>if you like if you like songsploder, um, have you

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:07.440
<v Speaker 1>played with? It's on YouTube something called Polyphonic No, what's that?

0:59:07.960 --> 0:59:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's just a guy who puts videos up discussing

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:19.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of the musicology of specific songs and bands and artists,

0:59:19.840 --> 0:59:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and you might find it kind of fascinating. If you're

0:59:24.040 --> 0:59:28.280
<v Speaker 1>an all intrigued by why John Bonham of Zeppelin instead

0:59:28.320 --> 0:59:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of tracking the bass player tracked the lead guitarist and

0:59:31.200 --> 0:59:33.760
<v Speaker 1>what that did to their music and a whole bunch

0:59:33.800 --> 0:59:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of other crazy stuff like that, then you're gonna then

0:59:38.800 --> 0:59:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm also incited to being a frustrating surfer. I'm also

0:59:41.800 --> 0:59:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a frustrated guitarist. Alright, So you're gonna get a You're

0:59:45.040 --> 0:59:47.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a huge kick out of this polyphonic on

0:59:47.400 --> 0:59:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you on YouTube. So now let's talk about everybody's favorite question.

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 1>What are your some of your favorite books? What are

0:59:55.560 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you reading right now? Well, I have I mentioned the

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you know times struggling to get through books and and

1:00:01.920 --> 1:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the reason and it says it's fresh in my mind

1:00:04.720 --> 1:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>because sitting on my night table and I'm about three

1:00:07.400 --> 1:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>carters away through it is is Walter Rysenson's book Gene

1:00:10.760 --> 1:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Editor and Jennifer DOWDNA and it's just it's it's a

1:00:14.120 --> 1:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit dense because you really try and as I'm

1:00:16.240 --> 1:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>really trying to understand the Yeah, I have a whole

1:00:20.440 --> 1:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>list of books that are tied to two healthcare UM

1:00:24.200 --> 1:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and health tech medtech and in the history of of biotech,

1:00:28.920 --> 1:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just trying to get up again a better

1:00:30.280 --> 1:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>understanding of that is an industry. And so I really

1:00:35.200 --> 1:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>enjoy reading nonfiction to try and inform my view of

1:00:38.760 --> 1:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the world. So that's one that I'm reading now. But

1:00:41.960 --> 1:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>um it's called a Codebreaker. And but I I read

1:00:46.880 --> 1:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these books that that try and inform

1:00:48.920 --> 1:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>my view, and it include like The Outsiders by William

1:00:51.960 --> 1:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Fordbike which is you know, eight you know CEO profiles

1:00:55.800 --> 1:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that include you know, John Malone and Henry Singleton, Tom

1:00:58.680 --> 1:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Murphy of Caps City has warm off it and it

1:01:01.000 --> 1:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>really just you know, reading about these people and what

1:01:03.080 --> 1:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>they what they've what they accomplished historically in their businesses

1:01:06.600 --> 1:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and helps some form of view as I speak to

1:01:08.520 --> 1:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>managements today. I you know, one of my favorite books

1:01:11.400 --> 1:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of all time, it really is run Turnout's Book to

1:01:13.840 --> 1:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>War Brooks, because it's an expansive history of of finance

1:01:18.080 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and of a couple of world wars and and a

1:01:21.440 --> 1:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a Jewish family that uh, you know made its way

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>from Germany to England to the United States. And I

1:01:27.800 --> 1:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>find that you know, incredibly interesting as well. And sometimes

1:01:31.120 --> 1:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you you you you you you read the books or

1:01:34.120 --> 1:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I read the books and I kind of you know,

1:01:35.640 --> 1:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>what did I learned? What are my takeaways? And you know,

1:01:37.840 --> 1:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like I read Twilight in the Desert twenty years ago

1:01:39.840 --> 1:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and they had the belief that from reading Matt Simmons

1:01:42.480 --> 1:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>book that that that we're going to have a problem

1:01:45.160 --> 1:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>with uh of providing energy to the world with with

1:01:51.040 --> 1:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>because fossil fuels were harder to come by as it

1:01:54.200 --> 1:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>relates to oil specifically, and you know, like clearly that

1:01:57.880 --> 1:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't come the past. We you know, a couple of

1:01:59.680 --> 1:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>things of happened since and as you have to you know,

1:02:02.400 --> 1:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>be willing to to adapt. I mean, we had obviously

1:02:04.960 --> 1:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a big increase in renewables, but you also had the

1:02:07.640 --> 1:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the oil sands and and tight shelp informations

1:02:10.400 --> 1:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that have created a lot more oil out there than

1:02:13.240 --> 1:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>than people have expected. Meanwhile, you have falso had the

1:02:16.200 --> 1:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>rise of you that we have the rise of electric

1:02:19.360 --> 1:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>vehicles and such that that are going to put a

1:02:21.520 --> 1:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>crimp in future demand. So if you have to adapt

1:02:24.840 --> 1:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>in you know, um to two changes in the world.

1:02:27.160 --> 1:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And spent a lot of time reading about health tech,

1:02:30.840 --> 1:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, which includes this at medtech and biotech, because

1:02:33.600 --> 1:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe that some of the great businesses you know,

1:02:36.040 --> 1:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately will be creative the next twenty years. We're going

1:02:38.040 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to come out of that. We mapped the human genom

1:02:40.160 --> 1:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago, but it was like identifying the parts

1:02:44.080 --> 1:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to a car. For the last couple of decades, we've

1:02:46.800 --> 1:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we've trying to figure out how those and how the

1:02:49.520 --> 1:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>parts of the car work individually and and in integrated fashion.

1:02:53.280 --> 1:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And just now we're really beginning to see some of

1:02:55.960 --> 1:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the fruits of that, and we're gonna see a lot

1:02:57.720 --> 1:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>more in the future. Really really interesting. What sort of

1:03:01.880 --> 1:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>advice would you give to a recent college grad who

1:03:04.560 --> 1:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>was interested in pursuing a career in asset management. I

1:03:09.040 --> 1:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that I would say the same thing I've

1:03:11.440 --> 1:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I've related earners in terms of having that that longer

1:03:14.440 --> 1:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>term view and whatever you do, whatever decision you make,

1:03:19.160 --> 1:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>make sure that you're making the decisions with a kind

1:03:22.480 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of a five to ten year you know, seven to

1:03:25.240 --> 1:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>ten you're rolling you know timeframe. It's going to allow

1:03:28.800 --> 1:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you to make better decisions today. It's going to you know,

1:03:32.880 --> 1:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be more willing to absorb some of the

1:03:37.360 --> 1:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>bumps in the road, you know today, if you understand that,

1:03:40.920 --> 1:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be better off in the future, in the

1:03:43.080 --> 1:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>future for it. And I would say in addition, you know,

1:03:46.200 --> 1:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>do something you enjoy and make sure you're good at

1:03:48.040 --> 1:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it and work really hard. Um. The the last thing

1:03:53.560 --> 1:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I would probably leave somebody with is is um is

1:03:58.840 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>do well by doing good. If I think that one

1:04:01.720 --> 1:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of the things we realize, you know today, in in

1:04:04.880 --> 1:04:07.919
<v Speaker 1>in the world, that it's not an uncomplicated place. There's

1:04:07.920 --> 1:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who have who have been mistreated,

1:04:11.280 --> 1:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the years, and we can we can

1:04:14.040 --> 1:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>try and make the world a little bit better. So

1:04:15.720 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>if you can do that while you're investing, you know,

1:04:18.040 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>all the better still. And our final question, what do

1:04:21.400 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know about the world of investing today that you

1:04:24.960 --> 1:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>wish you knew when you were first getting started back

1:04:28.000 --> 1:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties. Yeah, I really wish i'd better anticipated

1:04:32.520 --> 1:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the world of disruptive change. The technological innovation that has

1:04:36.520 --> 1:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>taken places has up beend to the economics of so

1:04:39.880 --> 1:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>many different industries. And whether it be online retail you know,

1:04:43.800 --> 1:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>which has changed the economics of brick and mortar retail

1:04:46.800 --> 1:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>or streaming video content and video and demand destroying video

1:04:50.200 --> 1:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>rental and forever changing movie theaters. Um or single cell

1:04:54.600 --> 1:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>genomics that have developed on the back of of having

1:04:58.960 --> 1:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>mapped the human gentlemen, creating new therapeutics, you know, outmoding

1:05:02.800 --> 1:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>what's been accepted today, to or renewable energy solutions that

1:05:05.520 --> 1:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>are gradually displacing fossil fuels. Now we've we've successfully avoided

1:05:09.400 --> 1:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>most of the disrupted industries. But that's like growing that.

1:05:12.480 --> 1:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>You know that our boat didn't sink, it's not supposed

1:05:14.680 --> 1:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to sink. We would have enhanced our performance. Have we

1:05:18.240 --> 1:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>been more willing to pay up at least a multiple

1:05:20.760 --> 1:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>turner two to own some of the better businesses in

1:05:22.560 --> 1:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the world whose paradigms are are more winner take all

1:05:25.880 --> 1:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>our winner take most. So we didn't buy Amazon. We

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we thought we were doing pretty good by by not

1:05:31.560 --> 1:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>by selling our retail out you know, more than a

1:05:33.520 --> 1:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>decade ago. But we just didn't buy you know, Amazon,

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>even though we looked at it. We just didn't look

1:05:39.600 --> 1:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>at it closely enough. And that has to solidly go

1:05:41.960 --> 1:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>into the mistake bucket. So that's what I wish I

1:05:44.880 --> 1:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>knew thirty years ago. Really quite fascinating. Steve, thank you

1:05:49.680 --> 1:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>for being so generous with your time. We have been

1:05:52.920 --> 1:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Steve Remick. He is the managing partner of

1:05:56.440 --> 1:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>First Specific Advisors and asset manager running uh over twenty

1:06:00.600 --> 1:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars in various assets. If you enjoy this conversation,

1:06:05.280 --> 1:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>check out any of our prior four hundred such interviews.

1:06:08.720 --> 1:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>You can find those wherever you feed your podcast fix iTunes, Spotify,

1:06:14.680 --> 1:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Google Podcasts, etcetera. We love your comments, feedback and suggestions

1:06:19.640 --> 1:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>right to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net.

1:06:24.000 --> 1:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>You can sign up for my daily reading list at

1:06:27.200 --> 1:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Rid Halts dot com. Check out my weekly column at

1:06:30.720 --> 1:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com slash Opinion. Follow me on Twitter at

1:06:34.600 --> 1:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Rid Halts. I would be remiss if I did not

1:06:37.200 --> 1:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>thank the crack team that helps put these conversations together

1:06:40.960 --> 1:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>each week. Tim Harrow is my audio engineer, Latika val

1:06:45.640 --> 1:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Brond is my project manager. Paris Walt is my producer.

1:06:50.400 --> 1:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael Batnick is my head of research. I'm Barry Rihlts.

1:06:54.640 --> 1:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Master's in Business on Bloomberg Radio.