WEBVTT - Array Deal Gives Pfizer Deep Cancer Expertise: Fazeli

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast. I'm Paul swing you

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahmawitz. Each day we

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for you

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and your money. Whether at the grocery store or the

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>trading floor. Find a Bloomberg penl podcast on Apple podcast

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as at

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. I'm joined by Alex Steele here today,

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>sitting in for Lisa Brahmowitz. Boy, I'll tell you it

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is good thing to be a healthcare m n a banker.

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>There's always a deal in that space. Today Fires are

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>announcing that it is acquiring Array bio Farmer for ten

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>point six billion dollars. To get the latest, we welcome

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>a good friends, Sam Fizzelli. Sam is the director of

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>European Research for Bloomberg Intelligence, but his day job is

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the best pharmaceutical and healthcare analysts on

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the street. He joins us from our London studio. Sam,

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Um boy, this price

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>tag is just monstrous. Does this make sense to you

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this deal that Fires is doing. Thank you, Paul, Yes,

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and good morning to both of you. UM. So you know,

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the visors balance sheets pretty strong. UM. The growth profile

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of the company going past the current patent experty for

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Lyrica is um. You know, they like it to be

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>stronger than perhaps some of us think it is. We

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>always thought they would do M A and A. What

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the price tag is a billion here, a billion there?

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>What's what's that amongst friends? Right? But they're they're buying

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>what I would consider to be one of the pre

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>eminent UM drug developers amongst the biotechs. If you think

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>about the number of drugs that this company is responsible

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.559
<v Speaker 1>for in terms of what's going out there and deals

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>they've done, so we calculate about eight point four times

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty three sales. There's no profits to talk about just yet.

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Three sales. But but those are those are sales that

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>are not the you know, they have reasonable probability of

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>actually happening. The products have already on the market, and

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they're they've got some good data in hand. And then

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>end um it is at the top end of the

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>range that we've looked at, but it's not the most

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>expensive UM. But you know, that is what it is.

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>My very exam so to that point, though, I feel

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>like getting on drugs that will were getting in the

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>pattern for drugs that will wind up cutting chemotherapy is

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be super super hot in the market. Do we

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>expect in the company to come in and try and

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>shot full of fires are out? Yeah? I don't think so.

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't This kind of thing doesn't usually happen when

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you have two managements that have agreed and there's a

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>big price tag out there already, it just doesn't happen.

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've never really seen it in biotech, So

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I expect not so say what what is so special

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>about Array that would cause fires? Or to step up

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and pay this price. So they describe three pillars of

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>value and we basically responded to that already, you know, react,

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>which is the kind of thing that we've seen. UM.

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>The there's a product on the market, or two products

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on the market, and there's ample opportunity for expanding that

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>each other's products UM and those revenues, you know, it

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 1>could easily be a billion or plus if they keep

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>expanding it and fight as I can, because they have

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>very deep pockets. UM. The company has several products that

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>have been licensed to other companies where the potential for

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>royalties are are meaningful. And then of course they have

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of scientists who have been creating these drugs

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and and we don't know exactly what they've got in

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the preclinical hands in Boulder, Colorado, but there was some

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>hints that Fiser gave us over the call. We just

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>listened to um which makes it sounds as if there's

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>other products obviously expected to come along. But they've been

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a very productive team, so they would not split that

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>several times they were asked this question. They would not

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>split the value that they've ascribed to each other. Those

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>three pillars have just told you. So, how does explain

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to me how in the biotech world this works? Because normally,

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in a different industry, if you make an acquisition, there's

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be some synergy costs you can get out

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of it that's gonna be a big thing. And then

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of when it's gonna be creative to earnings, and

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>then how you sort of meld the operations and what

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the cultures at, et cetera. Is it like a different

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>scenario in a biotech world. Yeah, I mean, Alex, that's

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a very good question. At the end of the day, here,

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>what you're buying is knowledge and the ability and the

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>long history of these people developing these sort of drugs.

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Not that Fiser hasn't got them themselves, but here's here's

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of scientists, they said, about a hundred scientists

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>R and D people based in Colorado. They've said they're

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>going to keep the current structure of a RAY in

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>place to continue allowing it to be innovative and and

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, pump up, pump out these drugs, and

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and they're go into pipers Finders pipeline as opposed to

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>having to be licensed out because the company is too

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>small develop everything. So in these cases, it's really not

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>about cast savings. So say, if I'm a Fiser shareholder, UM,

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>am I concern? What do I read into a transaction

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>like this that g Fiser doesn't have its own pipeline.

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's R and D. Isn't that good or that

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>successful that it forces them to go out and buy um,

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you know products. Yeah, No, I don't think that's fair. Um,

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's more about um. You know,

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in the pharmaceutical business, it's all about shots on goal

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>because once you take that shot, you don't actually know

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>whether it's going to go in or not. So you've

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>got to have a number of opportunities running at the

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>same time to see which one actually comes to fruition.

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>They have a number of drugs that are that are

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>looking interesting and exciting, and you know, it's two steps forward,

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>one step back with pharma. So you've got to expand

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the range that you've got access to and then make

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>sure that you have the wherewithal to do it. Which

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>fires it does? I just asked the dumb question here,

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>so like, literally, is it possible that there's a drug

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that could reduce the need for chemo? Like is that real?

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Because that's amazing. Yeah. No, absolutely, And you know what

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I was told years ago, there's no dumb questions, So

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>there are there totally a but and certainly this is

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>not dumb at all because there's that's exactly where pharmaceutical

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>industry wants to go and cancer patients want to go.

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's important to realize that there's a little

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of a slogan slogan that's going on there too,

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>because these aren't drugs that are that are side effect free.

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just a different to chemo. They may not include,

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>know the usual things that chemo has got going with

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it is the hair loss and the vomiting, and you

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>know none of these things are nice, right uh? And

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you know a blood blood accounts going down and really

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>feeling fatigued, and who wants to be fatigued when you're

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to get treated? Right? So, but these drugs do

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>have their own side effects, let's not let's not forget that.

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>And this is a triple combination they're using for colorectal

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>cancer going forward, right, Sam fas Ali, thank you so

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>much for breaking down this deal for us. Sam as

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the director of Research European Research for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>us from the London studio, we'll trade tensions between China

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>and the U. S cant need a summer, putting even

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>more focus on the G twenty meeting coming up later

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this month. To get the latest on the trade discussions

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>between US and China. We welcome Leland Miller's CEO of

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the China Basebook International, joining us here in our Bloomberg

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker studio. Len and thanks so much for being

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>with us. From your perspective, what is the latest with

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the US and China? Are things kind of off again

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>on again? Where are we I think that nothing has

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally changed since President Trump uh levied the last set

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of tariffs a number of weeks ago. Now, if you

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>read the headlines, it looks like we're descending into true gloom.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese are preparing for the long fight. President Trump

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is getting excited about the idea of going big on

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>tariffs into it's a political winner. Uh. Nobody can get along.

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>We're attacking their technology companies. So there's a lot of

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>reasons why people think that this is disintegrating and that

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the deal is being taken off the table has already

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>taken I don't think that's the case. As a matter

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of fact. I think that if President she re engages

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>at G twenty, which we expect him to do, then

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the press it and is prepared to punt full tariffs

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and restart the talks. And I think that that's actually

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>where we're heading right now. Why would you do that?

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>In that Trump said, if you don't do this, I'm

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna love you tariffs on you. So why would you

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>then look like he's caving. Well, none of this is

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>optimal for Shi jun Ping, but you have to look

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>at the downside on this. So right now, Uh, they're

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at the potential of their being tariffs on all

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>five dred billion of Chinese imports. In addition to the

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that Huawei, which is arguably the most if not

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the most important SSO's in China, is on

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>deathwatch because of what the Commerce Department has been doing

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 1>to it and what the White House has been doing

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>to it. So right now, none of this is optimal.

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But it was also not optimal to send Leo hu

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>uh the night that Trump was was announcing tariffs. It

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>was a body blow to the Chinese. It looked bad.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time they're measuring the circumstances as

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>being you know, what is the best we can get

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 1>out of this, and the best they can get out

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of this is get a deal with Trump on trade

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>so that they're not worrying about this for the for

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a twenty So does the what's going on in Hong Kong?

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Does that impact President she and and how he might

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>be perceiving these negotiations. That's kind of a body blow

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>again or a black guy to President She with what

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>happened in Hong Kong. Is that is that cann influence

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the trade discussions. You know, it might Um, all of

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>this has to come down to the fact whether she

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>can look strong while engaging with President Trump. Now, President

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump could have put out the olive branch to President She. Instead,

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>he he basically said, if you don't come and meet

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>with me, I'm gonna be really mean to you, and

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna we're gonna crush you. That doesn't make things

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>easy for the Chinese. At the same time, there's a

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of hysterics going on right now,

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and she jumping has to look at this. You know,

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>how do I not look weak but at the same

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>time engage enough to get all these irons off the

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>fire so that I can concentrate on the domestic economy. Uh,

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese economy under the type of tariff pressure we're

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>talking about, will have a much harder time later this year.

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think President She is balancing the pros and

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>cons making sure he has a consensus in the leadership.

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think that that they are inclined to go forward. See,

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what I don't understand is that I feel like

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the rhetoric is, uh, it's both. It's

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>so important for both of them. Therefore, they're going to

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>have to do that. Um in essence, if g accepts

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're gonna be tariffs un China no

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>matter what, and then President Trump's gonna ramp up the

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>tariffs no matter what. He neutralizes Trump. Well, I think

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that in President She's mine if he can get signals

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>on the U. S side that the tariffs are going

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to come off in a deal. So, first of all,

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in order to continue the talks, President She would have

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to get some pledges from President Trump. First, is Huawei

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>is part of the deal. Second, that we're gonna be

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 1>start peeling these tariffs off and you're not gonna put

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>more tariffs on while we continue to talk. So they

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>create a new timeline. This is agonizing for for for

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>trade and China watchers, but this is the way the

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>things work. And if he can get an understanding that

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were very close before they were nineties

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of the way there. This idea that they

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>had they didn't get most of it finalized is wrong.

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>They're very close. They have to back to where they

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>were before, and if they do that, then they're very

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>close for President She getting a deal that will pull

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>off most probably not all, but most of the of

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the terrorists. They have now no more tariffs, a respite

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>for for Huawei, a reprieve for Huawei. These are big things.

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So these are things that they cannot underestimate. Uh and

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and and walk away from out of mere pride. So

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Leland just talking about President she how strong is his

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>position in China today? It's it has been remarkable that

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>there has been pushback against she in the state media,

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>among dissidents. I don't think his his position is in

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>any way threatened, but it is remarkable that he is

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>getting flak for for his handling of the trade, ward

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>handling of the economy. Now this makes it even more

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>important he doesn't look weak going forward. But I don't

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>think there's a question. While while this is not a

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>one person to solitary and dictatorship of any kind, he

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is the leader of China. He guides policy. And while

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>he needs to make sure that he is not deeply

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>offending the this Paulpiro Standing Committee, he still runs the show.

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is his this is his show to run

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of trade. And if he thinks he can

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>he can negotiate with President Trump, you know they're best

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>friends after all, uh, then then he'll move forward on

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this so Um John author's Boomberg Opinion Columnists writes a

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>lot about Dorek magnus book Red Flags. I don't know

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>if you've if you've read that yet, but he talks

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>about why She's China is in jeopardy and a lot

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of the conversations surrounding the book is really interesting in

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that Maw and Deng both had their own models for

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>communist China, but that g has a totally different one

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and that that's going to affect all these kind of

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>trade decisions and arguments. Um, would you agree in that

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't look back at the last hundred years of

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>China growth and extrapolate that to the next hundred. Is

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're in a whole new growth kind of paradigm.

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that true? I think She's challenges are enormous, and

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>he made it much more difficult for himself when he

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>not only named himself president for life, but then he

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>ensconced it formally like this could have been the back

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>background of everything. Everyone knows she's not going anywhere, but

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>he made sure to make a public public issue of it.

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>When he did that, he tied his fortunes in very

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>closely with out of the Chinese economy and that of

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>China generally, so that anything bad that apps the Chinese economy,

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>who do you have to blame Chi Jinping? Who do

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you if if China undergoes problems, who do you have

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to blame? Chi Jinping? So he has made his life

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>much more difficult. I don't think he's going anywhere. I

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>do think that the pressures on him are going to

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>be immense in the next few years, with the with

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the with the economy, even under the best set of circumstances.

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, this will be tough, and we could emerge

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>from this a few years from now with more of

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a consensus based leadership, which she's still there, but not

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>with as much control depending on things how things end

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>up in the next eighteen months. How how would you

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 1>characterize the Chinese economy right now? Is it a six

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 1>at six and percent grower or something less than that?

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not growing at six percent? You know, the GDP

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>numbers are always uh political narratives put but put into

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a number. Uh that said, you know, we have we

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>have data coming in right now, and we're we're we're

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be announcing next week. But what I would say

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is watch very closely to what the Chinese are saying.

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of talk this week from Beijing about

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>how they have all these options in terms of stimulus

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>if they need them. And one of the things that

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 1>we've made very clear in the past is that when

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese are talking a lot about all the options

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>they have, they typically have already started utilizing. Okay, So

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's that's where we're going, and we'll

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to talk a little bit more of this

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a few days. Good. We'll have you back for that,

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>because I think that's one of the underpinnings of the

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>negotiations and the assumptions is how strong is China's economy.

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh the stronger dis presumably the tough to tougher stance

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they can take with the U S. Well. What I

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>find really interesting though, and it's going to go to

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>ubs uh and to have them using a bond deal

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>over the Chinese pig. Statement from Paul Donovan either Chief

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Economists is that we talk different languages, like the West

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>end China are just they talk different languages, they have

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>different priorities and like that to me is like a

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>whole big rainbow, uh in or not rainbow, but like

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>big cloud as to how the conversation must be going

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to trade exactly. Leland Miller, CEO of

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the China Bag Book International, thank you some much for

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>joining us and breaking down the ongoing trade discussions. Well,

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>this week is Central bank week. We've got the FED,

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got the Bank of Japan, the Bank of England

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>all meeting and of course the f O m c

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>uh Well, FED Chairman Pal speaking on Wednesday, so clearly

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the markets are focusing on that. To get a sense

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of what we might expect, we welcome our next guest,

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt Mailey, Managing director and equity strategist at Miller Tebec

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>based in Newton, Massachusetts. Matt, thanks so much for joining us.

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>What do you expect to hear from FED Chairman Pal

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>this week? Well, to be honest with you, I think

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the market is gonna be a little disappointed. I think

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED chairman will be a little less devish than

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>people are expecting. Um no, no, no, less dovish and

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it has been. There's no question they've made a a

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>change to a more tubbish tone, but their actions I

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>just think in the past, especially in the past ten years,

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>where you know central bank acuidity has been so important

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to the markets. Uh, they have they haven't acted until

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a more significant move both in the UH

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in the economy and UH in the economic data and

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in the in the markets. Uh. The Fed's a little

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>bit more market dependent than they than they admit to.

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>They are very data dependent, but they're also market dependent.

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>So how is the market actually position for this because

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a huge run up and utilities evaluation is super high,

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Yet their utilities and defensives for a reason. So like

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>what's the positioning resk here? Well, you know, if if

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they do uh uh signal a definitive uh change in

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>their in their actions by actually saying that they're going

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to raise cuts pretty much no matter what uh in July. Uh,

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna have a lot of people uh caught offsides.

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Not only the utility stocks very strong, but you know,

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>consumer staples another defensive group has been very strong, and

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that the people will start to shift out

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of that and go into some of them uh more

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>growthy names. Obviously a technology et cetera. When we've seen

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the semiconductor stock kind of roll over recently, they could

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>bounce back. UM, I don't necessarily think that's going to

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>happen again. I'm more cautious than I think a lot

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of people are. But the thing that really concerns mean

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>most is that the stock market is definitely pricing in

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the a FED move to a much more doublish stance

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>because it's not moving higher due to a better economy

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>or better earnings. As we've seen that a lot of

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>estimates for both economic growth and estimates for the SMP

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>have come down in the last two weeks. Not move up.

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't be amazing if if the JJ Powell came out

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, Okay, guys, we're gonna cut this many

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>times at this date and that's what we're gonna do.

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Take care of see you later, And was like, so,

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>no question, he won't make it that quite that definitive.

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>But if he you know, they usually tell you, you know,

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>really telegraphic well in advance. So how he portrays, uh,

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>how the July meeting is gonna go, it's gonna be

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>very important. So Matt, if in fact they FED is

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>not quite as dublish as maybe the market is currently discounting,

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>how do you play it right here? Well, Uh, you know,

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard to number one. I do think like

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I said that that the with earnings estimates coming down,

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the consensus earning as earnings estimates, the economy is slowing

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I think raising a little bit of

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>cash and and and by and if you want to

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>put more more money to work by those defensive groups

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>with buy them on weakness. You look at the overbought

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>condition of the consumer staples which have been very obviously

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>very strong. They've made new all time highs. Same with

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the utilities. But of the consumer staples names, I think

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>and it would be the good ones. But most importantly,

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>if we do get another leg lower, which would not

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>be the worst thing in the world. I mean, you know,

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we're only down seven percent. That's a normal and healthy

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>move in any market, much less one that's being evolved

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in a trade war. Uh. When you get that kind

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of down much like we got in December, and I'm

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>not calling for decline like we got in the fourth

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>quarter of last year. But you get something down in

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the correction terry of ten or twelve, and you've got

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>some money on the sidelines. You can put that to

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>work in your favorite names at really good prices. But

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>if you're prepared in advance, you can take advantage of it.

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have that cash on the sidelines, you

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>won't be able to. How else are you gonna hedge

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for derivatives or anything along those lines too, Well,

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>people can certainly do that. Uh. The one thing I

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, that I worry about that is that the

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>VIX is a little high given how much the market

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>is rallying, So that makes the hedging a little bit

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>more expensive than it was, you know, say a couple

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, you know, in April um. But you can

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly play, you know by especially in the spy the

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>SMP five, d uh et F. The options in that

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>market are are are very very liquid, and you can

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>get in and out of them very quickly. Matt Milly,

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Matt is managing director and equity

0:19:51.920 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>strategist for Miller Tebec based up in Massachusetts. Yeah. Well,

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the troubles continue at Deutsche Bank. The stock is down

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>over over the past twelve months. Bloomberg News reported this

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>morning that the bank is considering exiting the US equity

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>trading business. To get the latest on all things, Deutsche

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Bank returned to y'ellman own Ian y'aman is a senior

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>financial writer for Bloomberg News, joining us on the phone. Y'alman,

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. My first question is

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>when I saw that news about exiting the US equities

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>trading businesses, how can an investment bank be a global

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>bank without trading US equities? So what's going on there?

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>It cannot us ask the right question. I mean, um,

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this is this is very unusual. And you know, they

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>keep coming up with new restructuring plans and at the

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>end and none of them work, and they keep coming

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>back to new another plan. But um, it's very radical.

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Yet it's it's very it's it's kind of harmful because

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you are in Messing bank, as you said,

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>you have to be in equities, and you have to

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>be in the US in equities because you know, the

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>most I POS happened here. You know, other kind of

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>stuck related in messing banking deals. Even M and A

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is really connected to the ability to sort of connect

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>with these companies um in in every way. So it's

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very unusual. You know, even after the big financial crisis,

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the European banks that you know a lot of them

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>that collapse only Royal Bank of Scotland and and Credit

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>act Cole sort of got out of equities business altogether. Um.

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean German says, uh, Dogia Bank is going to

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>continue maybe in Europe, but still not being in the US.

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>That's really gonna hurt their mess banking even further. So

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't it doesn't look like a very great, amazing

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>way out. Nano's reaction was really unimpressed. Also, Endroyte Bank

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>h so so such and said that Georgia banks plan

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is not aggressive enough. You also have CMC Markets saying

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're well behind the curve, RBC saying that bad

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Bank is not going to do anything to rewrite the company.

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if doing what they need to do isn't

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>good enough, but then doing something that's good enough to

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>destroy the company, Like, what is the answer? I mean,

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know we can talk about bad Bank, but first

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the answer of what why is it not aggressive enough?

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Because every analyst report that I've ever read in the

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>last you know, for god two years now, it's basically

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>they need to they need to cut costs they have

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>they have too much cost and and it's not only

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>really getting out of businesses, it's really they have they

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>have too many people in the back office, they have

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>too many people doing things. Their technologies is out of them,

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>so they can do the businesses with fewer people. And

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and the bank has constantly announced job cuts which they

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>cannot deliver. I mean, and I've written this many many,

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>many many times over the last two or three years,

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is that they keep getting targets for reduction of staff

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>levels and they can never hit those targets. Um. Every

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>other bank in the world, you know, in their their peers,

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody cut a long time ago, and pretty quick, even

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>if it's if it took a little longer for some

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>of the European banks because they have tougher you know,

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>um labor laws. Still they've done it. I mean, Dortge

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Bank has really been bad reducing staff and and thus

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they cannot make a profit. Um so getting rid of

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a business like equities, but you're also cutting the revenue instead.

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>If you managed to cut the cost of that business

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and continue to to get the revenue, then you would

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>actually start making profit on it. But that's where they

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>have really lacked. And that's what the analysts keeps constantly

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that they need to cut the slack um in

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>their in their employee levels. Also reported this morning that

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Dortchem would consider putting a lot of their troubled assets

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>into a bad bank. What are those assets? I mean,

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting at this stage because you know, we

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>had bad banks after the two thousand eight crisis, UM,

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and then you know Dotcha Bank and a couple other

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Europeans also did them after the European sovereign death crisis. UM.

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>These were legacy things that you know, we're really no

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>longer good. They sort of you know, they were all

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>written down, but to just sort of separate them from

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the the main core business and show that the investors,

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, what really was the core business was making

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>as profit and revenue. UM. But at this stage banks

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have them. So I'm not sure what is gonna

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>put in there. Level three assets, which is sort of

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to value, UM, things that that they sort of

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>have to use their internal models to value. That means

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>they're not liquid. That's one place. But even there, they

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>only had twenty five billion euros of level three assets

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the last time I looked that was the first quarter

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of this year. UM. Their tongue fifty billion. I don't

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>know where they're going to come up with you know, derivatives,

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>more derivatives that need to be put there. The issue

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is and I was reading an animal, so just before

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you call it is um. You know, if they if

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>these things are not losing money, then it doesn't matter

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>whether they're on a bad bank, good bank, it doesn't

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>matter what it's called. If they're actually losing money and

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 1>there's still more right down to be made, then that's

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>tough because ROACHA doesn't have extra capital to take those

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>right so I don't know what they mean how they're

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 1>going to really do the bad bank work. Interesting. Y'amen

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>on Iran, Thank you so much for joining us. Thanks

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney, Lisa Bramo. It's I'm on Twitter at

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Bramo. It's one before the podcast. You can always

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio