WEBVTT - Edward Slingerland on Intoxication & Civilization

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Ethan Nadelman, and this is Psychoactive, a production

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio and Protozoa Pictures. Psychoactive is the

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>show where we talk about all things drugs. But any

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of view is expressed here do not represent those of

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Media, Protozoa Pictures, or their executives and employees. Indeed,

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>heat as an inveterate contrarian, I can tell you they

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>may not even represent my own and nothing contained in

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this show should be used as medical advice or encouragement

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to use any type of drugs. Hello, Psychoactive listeners. So

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you one of the most frequent comments or

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>suggestions I've gotten from friends and other listeners since I

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>started the podcast over a year ago was what about alcohol?

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>What about booze? You haven't done any episodes on that,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's got to be, you know, in some respects,

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>one of the you know, biggest drugs of them all.

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I thought the best way to have a

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:13.639
<v Speaker 1>first episode that addresses the issue of alcohol would be

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>with Professor Edward Slingerland, who published a book last year

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>called Drunk. The subtitle is How We sit, danced, and

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>stumbled our way to Civilization. Now. Edward is the Distinguished

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>University's Scholar and Professor of Philosophy at the University of

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>British Columbia and Canada, with adject deployments in Asian studies

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and psychology, and he's a co director of the Center

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Study of Human Evolution, Cognition and Culture and

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>director of the Database of Religious History. He's also a sinologist,

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>which means he's not an expert in sinus as he's

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>an expert in china um and that's a lot of

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>his more academic writing, although this is quite an academic

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>book in its own way as well. So I just

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>thought he would be a wonderful interest. Edward, thank you

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining me on Psychoactive. Thanks for having me.

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So what would be the elevator? Pitch the basic argument

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of your book in a few sentences. We've long been

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>told that our taste for alcohol and other chemical intoxicants

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is an evolutionary mistake, and that's not the case. And

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in fact, there are a host of both individual and

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>social benefits to intoxican use, and these benefits have paid

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>for the obvious costs. So so alcohol consumption is costly,

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's bad for our bodies. It can lead to

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of social ills, um. But the taste for

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>alcohol has remained in our both genetic and cultural repertoire

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>because of these various individual and social benefits that have

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>been trucial in allowing human beings to make the transition

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>from small scale hunter gatherer societies to these large civilizations

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that we live in now. And so, you know, far

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>from being a byproduct or a mistake, intoxication has been

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>at the center of civilization, um for as long as

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>as human beings have been doing anything in an organized

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>fashion as a species. Let me go say the audience,

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:21.279
<v Speaker 1>stead of all the books I've read, uh for this podcast,

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this has to be easily the most enjoyable read. It's

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>not just scholarly and thoughtful, but it's written with an

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>incredible sense of humor and a dry witticisms, and it's

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>just a pleasure. And one of those little lines that

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Edward uses at the beginning is he says people like

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to masturbate. They also like to get drunk and eat twinkies,

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>not typically all at the same time, but that's a

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>matter of personal preference. So why Edward, why is that

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>line right at the top of your book. Well, first

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of all, that line was written at probably about point

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>oh eight blood alcohol content. So I had been working

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>on the book proposal. I had written ten versions of it,

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, and my every time my agent would send

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it back and she's just like boring. Zache read to

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it and she and she was right. So I had, Um,

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had all the science and it all history.

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>The arguments were there, but it was a very kind

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of plotting aid to B two. See, you know this

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is a puzzle. This is why it's interesting. Um, it

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't draw you in. And I realized, oh, you know what,

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I haven't taken my own advice in the book, which

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is that if you need a creative insight or you

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>need something new, you need to drink a little bit.

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So I was on a conference trip. This was pretty pandemic,

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and I had a couple of hours before I was

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>meeting my colleagues for dinner. So I took my laptop

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>down to the hotel bar and ordered myself a Negroni

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And by the end of that Negroni, it felt like

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I was taking dictation. So that line came to me,

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and then the rest of that what's now pages one

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to two of the book just appeared in my head

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and I just wrote it down. You know, I needed

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>something to draw people in and get them hooked. You know,

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I start with masturbation and junk food, just because the

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>standard story has been that, you know, alcohol is just

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>like those things, It's just like these other vices. It's

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a kind of evolutionary mistake. And the main motive for

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>writing Drunk was to point out that that's not the case.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Our our taste for alcohol and other chemical intoxicants is

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>actually qualitatively different from vices like junk food or masturbation.

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's important to realize that because we can't understand

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>um why it's been so central to civilization with without

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>realizing that that dis analogy, right, I think you you

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>make the analogy partially in the context of saying, there

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>are two major theories about why alcohol has been so

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>prevalent and survived for thousands of years among humankind, notwithstanding

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>its abundant negative consequences. And you see, there's a hijack

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>theory and a hangover theory, and you kind of disabuse

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>readers of both, so say a little more about that.

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So hijack theories argue that alcohol is just the ethanol

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>molecule just happens to hijack a reward network that evolved

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for other reasons, and so that's where masturbation comes in.

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Masturbations a classic example of the hijack. So um evolution

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>gives us this awesome reward, the orgasm, for the thing

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that it most wants us to do, which is pass

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>on copies of our genes to the next generation. So

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the adaptive target of the orgasm is reproductive sex, and

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>yet humans and other organisms have figured out all sorts

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of wildly nonreproductive ways to get that reward. So that's

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a classic hijack. We're getting the reward even though we're

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>not doing the thing it's supposed to be. For the

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>reason evolution lets us get away with that is because

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not very costly. Despite what you might have been

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>told when you were younger, masturbation doesn't cause you to

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:17.559
<v Speaker 1>go blind. It's pretty physiologically negligible in terms of its cost,

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and the basic system works right. Um evolution is not

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>into perfection, it's into a broke don't fix it. So

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>this is it works well enough um the other type.

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's the dominant story. If you open a psych

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>one on one textbook. It's going to tell you that's

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>why we we like to drink this this hijack theory.

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Um mismatches are a different type of evolutionary mistakes. So

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>this is where something was adaptive in our evolutionary past

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>but is not adaptive now, and that's where the twinkies

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>come in. So junk food is a classic example of this.

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So having a taste for sugar and fat and wanting

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to gorge on sugar and fat when we come across

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it has historically been a very adaptive trait in humans

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>because those things were in short supply and you should

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>gorge on them when you find them. It really only

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>becomes a problem quite very recently in history when we

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>live in these affluent industrial societies where we have access

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to twinkies and junk food and all sorts of bad things,

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's very costly, So unlike masturbation, it's actually very

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>bad physiologically. It's to obesity and diabetes and all these problems.

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's a very recent problem and it's still not universal,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 1>so there's still plenty of places in the world where

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.319
<v Speaker 1>getting enough calories is a challenge. So here's a case

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>where um it's it is costly, but it's so recent

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and geographically localized that evolution hasn't had time to deal

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>with it. So when it comes to alcohol, the problem

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is it's not like either one of those things. So

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it did evolve for a good reason, but now things

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>have changed and it's it's not adaptive. So unlike masturbation,

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>alcohol is very costly physiologically, it's physiologically dangerous, it's economically costly.

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Unlike junk food, it's ancient. We've been producing and consuming

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>alcohol all over the world, um for you know, probably

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>at least twenty thousand years, probably much longer. So it's

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>an ancient problem. So evolutions had plenty of time to

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>deal with it, um if it were actually a mismatched

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>type of mistake. And so UM I argue in the

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>book that given the ubiquity and the costliness and the

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>ancientness of our taste for alcohol, there's got to be

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>something else going on. There have to be some adaptive

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>benefits that are paying for the costs, and so probably

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of the book is dedicated to walking readers

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>through both you know, what the challenges are that we

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>face as species, as humans and then how alcohol might

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>be giving us these adaptive benefits. Right, So, in the book,

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you make this fascinating set of arguments about

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>why alcohol and how alcohol has been essential in human evolution,

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and then bring it up to the present day, which

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to later. And you also want to say,

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>we could not have civilization without intoxications. And now without

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>understanding the evolutionary dynamics of intoxic in use, we cannot

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>even begin to think clearly or effectively about the role

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in toxic cannon should play in our lives today. So

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>when you say, you know, we could not have civilization

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>without intoxication, it's a bold statement. Say more about that, well,

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's one sense in which, quite literally, intoxication probably

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>gave rise to civilization. So so one thing I'm trying

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to flip on its head in the book is the

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>standard story that I had learned, which is that our

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>production of alcohol is kind of a mistake. So it's

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>an evolutionary mistake that we like to drink. And then

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we make alcoholic beverages is a kind

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of byproduct of civilization and agriculture. So the standard story is,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we got agriculture, we started civilization and then

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>at some point are you know, excess production. We decided

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to play around with a little bit and discovered we

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>could make beer and wine and things like that. Um.

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>When I started to look at the archaeological record, when

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I started doing the research for the book, I realized

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that the it's almost certainly the case that it's the

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 1>other way around. So in the book I talked about

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this beer before bread hypothesis. So if we want to

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Fertile Crescent, so the mid East where

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>probably where agriculture first started, we see these hunter gatherers

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>coming together, building this massive religious architecture. We don't know

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>what it's for, exactly what they did there, having these feasts,

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So we have the remains of feasts and then drinking liquids,

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and they have these big vats that held liquids, and

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe they were drinking sparkling water, but it's really unlikely. Um.

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>We don't have direct chemical evidence from the one site

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that I talked about in the book, Gobeck Late Tepe,

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>but we know that people were making beer in the region. Um,

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>we have evidence from thirteen thousand years ago. So this

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is the Psyche Cobeck Late Tepe is ten tend to

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve thousand years old, way before agriculture we did. We

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have agriculture yet in that region, and yet hunter

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>gatherers are coming together and and brewing beer. And so

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that, um, what motivated hunter gatherers to

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>then start settling down and cultivating crops and making them

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>more productive was the desire to make more and better beer,

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>not to make bread. It wasn't for nutrition, it was

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>for psychoactive reasons. And then you know, I look at

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>evidence from other parts of the world that wherever you look,

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the first cultivated plants were chosen for

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>their psychoactive properties, not for a new trition. And so

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a sense in which quite literally the desire to

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>get intoxicated gave rise to civilization. It's what caused hunter

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>gatherers to settle down in the first place. You know,

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you reminded me, Edward. You know, when I've over the

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>decades as I've been speaking around the world around drug

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>policy or reform, and I put, you know, oftimes make

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>the point that there's, you know, almost never been a

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>drug free society and human history, UM, which is a

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>relatively few exceptions, and that if you look about it,

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>whether you're looking at alcohol, you know you have basically

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 1>hunter gatherer tribes living in remote areas, oftentimes with no

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>contact with other societies, who somehow figure out alcohol. And

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it seems like you have cultures figuring this out independently,

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and somewhat the same thing happens with some of the

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic plants, and so it sounds like that's partially what

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you're saying that. So why why do you think the

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:54.599
<v Speaker 1>agricultural hypothesis that alcohol came with agriculture became so dominant?

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, wasn't there enough evidence even before these theories

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of the agricultural impetus for for alcohol. I don't know

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>if we had some of this data. So we didn't. Um,

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have sites like go Beckley Teppe back then. Um,

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have some of this more recent work. We

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>have evidence now and very this is very recent of

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>beer making thirteen thousand years ago in present day Israel.

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think partly it was we didn't have the data.

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>We didn't we hadn't discovered some of these sites. But

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I also think it's um, it's part of this broader prejudice.

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Or kind of weird. Um. I call it a kind

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of neo pured in blind spot in scholarship. So you

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>see it in religious studies. So that's my my PhDs

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and religious studies. And let's say we're talking about ritual Um,

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we talked about you know, synchrony and singing and music

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and maybe sleep deprivation or how people are using pain

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, painful activities and rituals to enhance their their

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>mood or feeling of bonding. And what no one ever

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>talks about out is these people are often high as

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>hell when they're doing this. Yeah, and so um, it's

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this weird blind spot where we're fine talking about piercing

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and scarification and sleep deprivation, but you want to start

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about psychedelics or about alcohol use, and people get

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>really oddly queasy. I talked in the book about some

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of the seminal figures in religious studies. So merch Aliata,

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>who wrote this classic big book on shamanism. Um, you

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>know he's got this whatever, seven eight page book on shamanism,

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think he mentions chemical and toxicans two or

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>three times, and always in a negative way. Um, you

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>know this is kind of fake shamanism is when you're

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>using psychedelics. So there's just it's a weird lacuna in scholarship,

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think it has to do with this kind

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of this odd puritanism where we don't like to talk

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about chemical on toxicans. I mean, at one point you

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>make the argument fact that it's those societies which most

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>integrated alcohol, including getting raucously drunk, that ended up being

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the more successful ones. Now I was wondering, as I'm

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>reading your book, do you actually have a decent control

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>group that you're comparing all this too and making that statement.

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But you provide a lot of good examples of that.

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of control groups, UM, the control group

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is the extinct cultures that we don't know about because

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>they didn't they lost the competition. I mean, that's one

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of the connections of this book with my earlier work.

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>So I did UM in cognitive science Evolution of Religion.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I was involved in a large research group that was

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to explain, you know, what this mysterious thing we do,

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>which is religion. So you look all over the world

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and you see people worshiping invisible beings and you know,

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>piercing themselves and do engaging in these painful rituals and

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>cutting off the foreskin of their penis and um, refraining

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>from eating delicious poor and shellfish, and and building these massive,

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>useless monuments. So um. You know what really got me

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>thinking about religion in this way was the first Emperor

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of Chin's tomb. I don't know those people were familiar

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>with this terra cotta army they discovered in China's as

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the person who unified China. Um massive fake army made

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>out of terra cotta, individually made, each soldier carrying real weapons,

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and then lots of real wealth was thrown in the ground.

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Gold and these labor bronze vessels, Horses were killed, people

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>were killed and thrown in the pit, and then they

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>buried it all in the grounds for this dead guy

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in the afterlife. And I remember when I first kind

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of learned about that site and realized how much of

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the gross national product of the state of Chin went

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>into that tomb. You know, I thought this was a

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>period when these these states were in brutal competition with

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>one another. Why isn't the case that there was a

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>state as powerful as Chin, But instead of building a

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.959
<v Speaker 1>fake terra cotta army. They built a real army, and

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>instead of throwing all this wealth in the ground, they

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>used the labor to you know, build more effective city

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>walls and do practical things. Why did they not outcompete

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.959
<v Speaker 1>this culture that was throwing all this wealth in the ground.

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And the answer has to be there has to be

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>some adaptive benefits to doing that kind of crazy stuff. Um.

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, we explored how these kind of

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>costly displays and um sacrifices helped to build solidarity and

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and get people past cooperation problems. And I think the

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>same is true of alcohol. You know, an ancient sumer,

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it's estimated they took half of their grain and turned

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it into beer. So they're taking really nutritious stuff that

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>could make into bread and turning it into a liquid neurotoxin. Essentially,

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you would think that groups that didn't do that would

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>out compete groups that did um, that just kept all

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>their grain for nutrition. And yet that's not the case,

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>because we see that the cultures that survive use psychoactives

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>in this way, So it's got to be doing something

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>for us. Well, let me just stop you one second.

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember hearing reading that if you look in American history,

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the period when we had the highest levels of alcohol

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>consumption in American history. We're back at the origins in

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>the late at late eighteenth century, early nineteenth century. But

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that also one of the factors was that it was

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>that turning alcohol into grain was a good way of

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>preserving it, a good way of transporting it. So that

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, yes, there are these arguments for drinking and

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>then all this, and and there's the arguments about it

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>being safer than water when water was impure, but also

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>easier to preserve and to transport. So how do those

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 1>things figure into all this? So those are kind of

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in the mix of the various mismatch theories. So one

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of the mismatch theories is the dirty water hypoth This

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>so um, you know, contaminated water has been a problem

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for most of our history. Is a species. If you

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>take contaminated water and fermented into beer, it becomes possible.

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's one of the mismatch theories is that it was,

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, our taste for alcohol was adaptive in our

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary paths because it helped us hydrate in situations where

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the water was contaminated. Um. The problem with that theory

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is that there are lots of ways to to fix

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>contaminated water, including just boiling it. And boiling it is

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot easier than turning it into beer, um, and

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the downsides of you know, the negative physiological

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>impacts that beer it could have. Another of the theories

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is calorie storage. The problem again, problem with this one

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>is we think while you turn into beer and it

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>lasts for a really long time, that's actually not true. Um.

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>That's true now because we have hops and other ways

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:58.479
<v Speaker 1>to preserve beers, but most historically made beer is actually

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>spoiled quite quickly. Like chea cha beer made out of

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>maize in South America, I think has to be consumed

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>within two or three days. Um, So it actually doesn't

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>last that long. When you're thinking about the American frontier,

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>what you have in mind is distilled spirits, and that

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is a really good way to preserve things. Distilled spirits

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>last for a really long time. They're relatively easy to

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>transport because you're packing a lot of ethanol in a

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>small package. Um. But distilled spirits are relatively recent thing too.

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>As I point out in the book, they're really in Europe,

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>really only seventeen hundreds that we had these. But yeah,

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>once you get distilled spirits, you can now preserve your

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>grains in a way that um is not only long lasting,

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>but compact and easy to transport and trade. And so

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>alcohol really becomes a different type of thing once we

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>figure out distillation. But that can't be part of the

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>story if we're talking about, you know, some behavior that

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>started twenty tho years ago. We'll be talking more after

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>we hear this ad part of the way you also

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>frame this thing, and this gets into i think a

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>little more. The meat of the argument is you frame

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 1>some of this is a struggle between two Greek gods,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>between Apollo on the one hand and Dionysius on the

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>other hand. So lay that out for our audience. Yeah,

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>so Apolo. One way to look at this is Apollo

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is the god of the prefrontal cortex. So I talked

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the prefrontal cortex plays a big role in my book.

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>It's really important part of the human being, right, whether

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>it's very physiologically expensive. We wouldn't have it if it

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't doing something important. You need it to control your behavior,

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you need it to be ordered. So you know, a

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Paulo is the god of order, kind of doing things

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the right way, symmetry control, you know, it's about control,

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and the PFC is the center of cognitive control of

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>executive functions. What allows you to um suppress desires or

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>um stay focused on a task and not get distracted.

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It's what allows you to persevere in the face of

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, tiredness or boredom. It's everything that a four

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>year old doesn't have, UM, but that a successful adult

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>has to have. And civilizations need this. We couldn't build

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>civilization without this kind of UM, perseverance, focus, self control,

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>and that's all the realm of Apollo. The friends of

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Apollo chemically are stimulants, so things like caffeine and nicotine,

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, they strengthen our ability to focus and stay

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>on task. But the Greeks, you know, and the Greeks

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>thought Apollo was really important, but they also worshiped Dionysius,

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and so UM. You know, Dionysius is the the god

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that comes out when we thrown the PFC or turn

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it down a few notches. Dionysus is more like our

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>childlike cells um, so creative, trusting, open to new experience,

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>willing to try anything, engaged in play. Kids are like this,

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and adults can be like that temporarily when they essentially

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>reverse uh cognitive maturation and go turn the PFC down

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.239
<v Speaker 1>and go back to being like like they were when

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>they were little. And what's interesting the reason I find

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Dionysius useful in the book is the Greeks worshiped Dionysius

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is a god and recognize the importance of both Apollo

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and Dionysis, But there were a lot were more worried

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>about Dionysius than a followed. He's Um, dionys is a

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit scary. Um. He's worshiped as a god, but

0:24:54.520 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>they're wary of him. And it's I think significant, and

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that the gifts that that Dionysius can give you can

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>go wrong if you're not careful. They're often two sided.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>So Dionysus is the one who gave for instance, Midas

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the Golden Touch, which didn't work out very well for him. Um.

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>So they respected and worshiped Dionysius, but they also saw

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the dangers there, and I think that's the right attitude

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:28.679
<v Speaker 1>to have. Tour Chemical intoxicans in general and alcohol in particular,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>is respecting its power, seeing that it's important part of

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>our lives, but also being aware that I can turn

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>you into an animal like like Dionysus. Good you know it.

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Recently did an episode with a German writer, normanal Or

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>what a book called Blitz about how the German army

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>was so successful, especially in the Blitzkrieg over Belgian, Netherlands

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and France, because of the use of meth amphetamy and

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in all their drug use. There's almost no discussion of

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the role of alcohol um in modern day the value

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>from modern day armies. So say more about the war

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>fighting abilities of of uh, you know, alcohol and why

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>alcohol was seen as a friend to that more than

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>an enemy. Well, the crucial thing to get soldiers to

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>fight effectively and your army to be cohesive and effective

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is getting people to trust each other. Right. I argue

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>in the book that one of the central features of

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>human life, especially in larger scale societies, is the fact

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>that we have to overcome these cooperation dilemmas. They go

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>by various names prisoners dilemma, tragedy of the commons, but

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the common structure is we we all do best if

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>we trust each other and and if we don't pursue

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>our im mediate selfish self interest. If we can do that,

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 1>we actually all end up better in the end. I

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>mean this happens all the time in life, mundane situations

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>like helping your friend and move a couch when he's moving. Um,

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you kind of the most dramatic example is war. Right,

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>You're literally sacrificing the most important thing your life for

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>these other people. And so UM, armies are effective to

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>the degree to which they can form these cohesive groups

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that trust one another and operate well together as a

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>as a unit. And and how do you do that?

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>You look at one an army attacking another army, especially

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 1>in the pre modern period, UM, the first thing that

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind is like ant armies fighting, or you know,

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>you see humans cooperating on a scale that looks like

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>social insects and sacrificing themselves in a way that looks

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>like social insects. We know how social insects pull that off.

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>It's because they're all genetically the same. They all they're

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>basically one big superorganism. It's puzzling how primates pull that off,

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:52.719
<v Speaker 1>because we are not one big superorganism. Um, we're individual

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>primates with primate biology, and yet we behave like social

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>insects sometimes, and the key to that is things like religion,

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So religions doing some of that work. But another really

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>crucial um cultural technology that we use to forge individuals

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>into cohesive trusting units is alcohol and other intoxicans. So

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we get drunk together, we are down regulating

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>our PFC, so we um we're less able to lie. So,

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, lying or trying to trick another person into

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>trusting you when you're not really trustworthy is a really

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:35.199
<v Speaker 1>cognitively demanding task because at the same time, you have

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep in your mind both what the truth is,

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>which you know to be the truth, and then the

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>fake thing you're telling this person. You've got to make

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>all your facial expressions and emotional reactions fit the fake thing,

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and you have to suppress any that that applied to

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the real thing that you don't want them to know about.

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really very PFC heavy task. If you hit the

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>PFC with some methanol, it really impairs your ability to

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>do that. And so you bring people together, you get

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>them impaired cognitively so that they can't lie, they or

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it's harder for them to lie or act in an

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>untrustworthy way. Your simultaneously boosting endorphins and sarahtonin these kind

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of social bonding hormones that make you feel good about

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.479
<v Speaker 1>yourself but also make you feel good about others and

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>feel connected to others. This is how you forge individuals

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>into super organisms, and at least temporarily, and so you

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>can see why throughout history militaries have used this technique

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for for forging individuals into units and then also giving them.

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, the other thing alcohol does is make you reckless, um,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and that that's you need a little recklessness if you're

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be fighting against other people. So it reduces

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>um magdola response, it reduces fear, reduces stress, um. The

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think militaries have always seen as crucial, and I

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's really only changed recently when warfares become more technical.

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So alcohol was crucial when we were picking up swords

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and rushing into battle to fight other people. Um, It's

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>less helpful when I'm sitting in a control room trying

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to pilot a drone. So I think that's one of

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the reasons that we don't see it as much in

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>modern armies, just because the nature of warfare has really

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is interesting right, because I firstually you

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>have this great line in the book that those who

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>puked together stay together. I guess that's in some sense

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of good some nation what you just said. But I'm

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the Navy Seals. I think you mentioned them

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in the book, and that's you know, one of the

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>great military elite military units in the US in the world,

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>but just recently has been the news because of all

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the abuses. And that's obviously one where you know, the

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>commanders want their you know, their Navy Seals not just

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to survive all sorts of brutal forms of training. They

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>want them to get drunk to bond. But then the

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>question is all of that somehow linked to some of

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the abusive stuff we've also seen there or not? Yeah, yeah,

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>so they you know, the Navy Seals are on an

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>organization that's not sitting in a control room by autting

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>drones right there doing really physical, dangerous stuff that looks

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more like more traditional types of warfare. And so, um,

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I tell that story about this this Navy Seal commander

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>who after training would take all the group out and

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>get them really drunk, and there's a level of intoxication

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that you get in UM business meetings or treaty meetings

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that's more moderate, and that's you know, dealing with this

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of building trust thing. There's a level of inebriation,

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>especially once you get distilled spirits, where it's going beyond

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>UM so much intoxication per se and becoming more of

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a costly signal UM. It's almost like you know, scarifying

0:31:56.880 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>yourself or doing something painful. It's the fact that you're

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>hurting yourself and you know you're gonna be really in

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>bad shape the next morning, but we're all doing it

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>together and we're all doing it voluntarily. That shows that

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you're one of the group. So it becomes a kind

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of hazing. It's a it's a form of hazing really

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and you can see how that both could be useful

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in building UM a sense of belonging and a sense

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of group bonding, but could very easily tip over into abuse.

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And so that's the nice edge that you're walking when

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>when you're using these type of hazing techniques which all

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>cultures have used. I mean, there's all sorts of initiation

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>rituals that you know often involve huge quantities of intoxic

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>ins and then often physical pain or danger or fear

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to get people to bond, and it's a it's a

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>delicate balance to get enough of that so the bonding

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>happens without tipping over into abuse or arm. Groups that

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>don't use intoxicans, either because they don't have them they

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>live in an extreme environment where it's hard to make them,

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>or they banned them for religious theological reasons, tend to

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>substitute other practices that get you to the same place. UM.

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>So I talk about the Pentecostals who don't drink, but

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>they have these prayer sessions where they work themselves up

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>into these frenzies where they start you know, falling the

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>floor and start speaking in tongues, or they handle snakes,

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>so they have the same effect and kind of down

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>regulating the PFC and and boosting some of these feel

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>good hormones. So groups can use that instead. It's just

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's really you know, I think, as I may

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>put it this way in the book, is it's kind

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of a hassle, Like staying up all night singing and

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>dancing is really time consuming and difficult. Um And so

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a good reason that most cultures are like, yeah,

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we could do that, but why don't instead we just

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>sit around and drink beer. So there's different routes to

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that state. But then non chemical and toxican ones um

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>are much more time consuming. Well, you know when you

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>were when you were both when I was reading your

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 1>book and then again when you were telling the story

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 1>about how you came up with that opening line about

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>masturbation and such, you know, into the influence of a

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 1>fairly high amount of alcohol. But it made me think

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of some of the books that are out there. I mean,

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a book called The Thirsty Muse about

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the use of alcohol by famous you know, literary writers.

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a book called Opium and the Romantic Imagination about

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>how famous writers you know used opium. Uh, there's a

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>book called Cigarettes Are Sublime. And of course you have

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>all the Silicon Valley folks and Nobel Prize winners, you know,

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 1>who claimed that their psychedelic experience helped ride on the

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 1>insight that resulted in they're creating, you know, zillion dollar

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>companies are winning a Nobel Prize, and sometimes sometimes cannabis

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>gets credit like that. I was just hanging with a

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine who was one of the leading scholars

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of international relations in the world, and he credits you know,

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>his occasional cannabis used to being this thing that's given

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>him some of his best insights in flections. So yeah, yeah,

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Now I talked in the book about this, you know,

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the there's all over the world throughout history there's a

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>connection between chemical and toxic ins and creative types. So artists, poets, shamans,

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, people who were coming up with new stuff

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and and I talked about why that's not a myth.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Evolution faced this design trade off where it needed us

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a PFC so we could get to work

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>on time and focus to things. Um, but it also

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>needed us to be creative and trusting and they give

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you things and um. And one way at dealt with

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that trade off was by slow walking the maturation of

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the PFC. So that's the last part of the brain

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to mature. UM. It doesn't fully mature until you're in

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>your mid twenties. So it's really the last part of

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a human to mature. And that keeps kids, you know,

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>flexible and creative and able to learn new things and curious.

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>There's good, both indirect and direct evidence that chemical and

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>toxic ins are a solution to this design trade off.

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>We we have to have a PFC, but with these

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>substances we can turn it down when we want to

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and get back to a more childlike state of creativity.

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>UM and being able to see new possibilities and so UM.

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a very good reason that artists and poets and

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>anyone but anyone who needs a new insight. So you know,

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I talked about my talk. I gave it Google one

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Google campuses, and I was talking about at

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>some point, alcohol and creativity. The study had just come

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>out showing that if you've got people about point oh

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>eight B A C, they solve lateral thinking tasks better.

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And they said, well, we know, we're taking you on

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>our tour. And so the first place they took me

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>on their tour was this whiskey room. They said, when

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>they're working on a problem and they hit a wall

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they can't figure it out, instead of drinking more coffee

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>or smoking nicotine and sitting in front of their computers

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and working pulling all nighters, they stop and they go

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to the whiskey room and they pour themselves a little

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of scotch, and they sit and bean bag chairs

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and they just chat. And that's how they tend to

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>um get past these problems because what they need is

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>an insight and and alcohol is helping with that, especially

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>audience that you mentioned something called in that context the

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Bomber peak. Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah yeah. So they asked

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>me if I had ever heard of this concept, and

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this is, UM, I think it's probably apocryphal, but um,

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>we could find out. We could contact Steve Bomber. But supposedly,

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Steve Bomber, the former CEO of Microsoft and

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>great coder, um discovered that his coding ability peaked at

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this very narrow blood alcohol content, like very specific and

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>narrow blood alcohol content, and so supposedly he would keep

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.399
<v Speaker 1>himself hooked up to an alcohol I V to just

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>be right at that whatever point, you know, zero seven

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>eight seven that he found was the best way to code.

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 1>And it gets at this idea that there's an optimal

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>level of inebriation where you're still sober enough to remember

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>what the problem is you're trying to solve, and you know,

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 1>still you have your faculties intact, but you're loosened up

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>enough that you're you're flexible, you're creative, you're doing new stuff,

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and humans you know, humans know this, and consciously you're

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:46.399
<v Speaker 1>unconsciously we use chemical intoxicants too, as an aid, as

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>a tool, as a kind of mind hack when we

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>need divergent creativity or we need lateral thinking. Although you know,

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you when I was working on my dissertation,

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I would occasionally go out of dinner with a friends.

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would have a drink or two with dinner,

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and then I'd have like a double espresso in the evening, Okay,

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And I racically saw it as my speed bowl. It

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>was my speed and I worked on two, three, four

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in the morning and the ideas would be flowing in.

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Might be a little looser in my writing, but I'd

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>have the energy that You make a fair bit also

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of the genetic arguments, and you talk about the Asian

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>flushing syndrome infect the numerous places in your book explain

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 1>why that's significant. So one counter argument, so you know,

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I say, well, look, our taste for alcohol is ancient,

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and if it were only a costly mistake, evolution would

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:44.760
<v Speaker 1>have done something about it by now. One counter argument

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:49.240
<v Speaker 1>is that sometimes evolution can't fix a problem. Something really

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 1>is a mistake, and it really is a problem. But

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 1>evolution can't fix it. And there are two reasons that

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>could be the case. One is what's called path dependence.

0:39:57.360 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm using intentional language here, but this is all

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in process, but previous choices constrained later choices. And so

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>a good example of a mistake like this is the

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>human back. We have all these back problems because are

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 1>our backs are terrible for for walking up right. You

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>would never design a bipedal organism with a back like ours,

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>But evolution didn't have the luxury of designing us from scratch.

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>It was taking a tree living primate and gradually hacking

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it to to walk up right. Um, so that's a

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>path dependence problem. You just you get stuck in a

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>certain value and designed space and you can't get out

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>of it. Another possibility is just that the right variation

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:43.359
<v Speaker 1>hasn't come along yet, so selection can only act on

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>variation that exists. And so it's possible that alcohols is ancient,

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>costly mistake and genetic evolution would love to solve it,

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>but it just hasn't had a solution yet. And so

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 1>this is where this is why the Asian flushing syndrome

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 1>plays such an important role in the book, because this

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>is the solution to the problem. Um, so you know

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>why do people like to drink? What? Because it makes

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>us feel good? While the question is why does evolution

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 1>allow it to make us feel good? And clearly it

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to. It can make us feel bad if

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 1>we consume alcohol, and that's what this syndrome does, so

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a What's interesting is this is a set of

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>two mutations to two separate mutations, and they're not linked,

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>so they're clearly getting selected for for some function, and

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they interrupt our ability to metabolize ethanol. If you consume

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 1>any alcohol, it makes you flush, it makes you nauseous,

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>it makes it gives you heart palputations. Basically, Um, if

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>you have this genetic syndrome, drinking doesn't make you feel good.

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 1>It makes you feel bad. And it actually is so

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>effective and discouraging alcohol consumption that a chemical that mimics

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>its effects is used to treat alcoholism quite effectively. So

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a silver bullet. If our taste for intoxication

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is a genetic mistake. The solution exists in the gene pool.

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not the case that evolution hasn't come up with

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a variation yet. Because essentially it's allowing people to get

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>mildly inebriated, but once you drink too much, it's you

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>feel bad. They can't even really drink enough to get inebriated. Um,

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they can drink enough to get um. Some of the

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>benefits that are supported to some of these mismatch benefits, right,

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe micronutrients, But yeah, they don't. They certainly don't. They're

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.799
<v Speaker 1>protected from alcoholism, for instance, because they just don't like

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to drink that much. And this gene complex, it's estimated

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it evolved seven to ten thousand years ago and around

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:47.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of where modern day Shanghai is, probably at the

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>same time as the creation of rice agriculture, so it

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:55.879
<v Speaker 1>seems to be some adaptation to rice agriculture, and it's

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>possible that it's protective against tuberculosis, could be one of

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the functions. It's also protective against fungal poisoning, so it

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>could be, you know, an adaptation to dealing with storing

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>grain and wet conditions. But in any case, it hasn't spread.

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 1>So this solution to the problem of alcohol has existed

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>for probably ten thousand years, and yet it's remained in

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this relatively geographically constrained area and hasn't spread very far.

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>And that's not what you would predict if alcohol was

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>just a costly mistake. This would be like if you

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>had a gene that caused people to not like twinkies

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and love you know, Brussels sprouts and eating their greens.

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 1>If twinkies were a scourge that goes back twenty thousand years,

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 1>that gene would would spread pretty quickly. Um So, to me,

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 1>this is a very clear case of where you have

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this supposed problem, you have a very clear solution quote unquote,

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>and yet the solution doesn't spread. So that suggests that

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:02.319
<v Speaker 1>the problem isn't just a album, right, There must be

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>adaptive benefits that are coming along with it. M hm.

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 1>So you say about alcohol, on the one hand, you

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>see alcohol is more like a pharmacological hand grenade. You

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 1>also describe it as the king of intoxicainst and the

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>perfect drug. Now you've talked about some of this, but

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the pharmacological hand grenade is that a good feature? Yeah,

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it probably is is a feature and not a buck.

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 1>So this is a This phrase comes from Stephen Brown.

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:37.320
<v Speaker 1>The Journal with Stephen Brown. He's the one who coined

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 1>the term pharmacological hand grenade UM, and he compares that

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>with lasers. You know, the LSD or cocaine is like

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a laser. It's going in and doing a very specific

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>things to the brain. Alcohols um pressing several different regions

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>of the brain while it's simultaneously rapping up sarahtonin and

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 1>doorphins and so giving. It's a stimulant in various way.

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Is this seems to be this mix of effects seems

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a feature of alcohol. UM. I think if

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I could revise the book, I wouldn't call alcohol the

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>perfect drug. I would call it the least bad drug.

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>UM in the sense that it's not perfect. But if

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you gave a cultural engineering team some design specs, you know,

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you said, look, we need we need it intoxican because

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:31.799
<v Speaker 1>we want to down regulate the PFC, we want to

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>up regulate these hormones. It's got to be easy to make.

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:39.240
<v Speaker 1>You should be able to make it out of anything.

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>It should be easy to discover. It should have consistent

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:48.280
<v Speaker 1>cognitive effects across individuals. It should have a short half life.

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>There's got to be a mechanism in the body to

0:45:51.160 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 1>break it down and get it out pretty quickly, so

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>you can get back to normal quickly. It's got to

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>be easy to dose if you gave them this whole

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 1>list of things you need. Did alcohols pretty much the

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>ideal solution to these problems. But it's not ideal. I mean,

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>alcohol would be the perfect drug, I think, if it

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 1>did everything that it does, but it wasn't physically addictive

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't so physiologically harmful. Let's take a break

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>here and go to an ad. A lot of the

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:39.040
<v Speaker 1>books about the benefits of moderate drinking and bonding, but

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it's also in part about the benefits right of getting

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 1>drunk um both historically. You know, you talk about the

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Vikings and they're great drunk fests, and how much massive

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:52.919
<v Speaker 1>about alflaking. You get how incredibly successful they were for many,

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:55.800
<v Speaker 1>many centuries um, and you bring it up to the present.

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:59.280
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that's an important role that alcohol plays,

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 1>like assist friendships. The guys I've been friends with since

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 1>college forty years ago, you know, are the ones I've

0:47:05.440 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>probably got the drunkest with, and those are the ones

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>where it kind of got in, you know, the the

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 1>inhibitions you have as a young man in your twenties

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 1>about sharing very intimate stuff. I mean, we broke through

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about stuff like that in a way that bonded us. Unfortunately,

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:21.279
<v Speaker 1>none of us actually shouldn't say one of us Will

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:23.560
<v Speaker 1>already showed signs of it and eventually did become an

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 1>alcoholic and died of his alcoholism in his fifties. Um,

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the one British member of our of this,

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:30.799
<v Speaker 1>but all the others it was I think a really

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 1>very substantial in that benefits. Yeah. One of the anecdotes

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that I ended up taking out of the book, UM

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was about that. So it was a good friend of mine,

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 1>very old friend of mine who um I had a

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:43.879
<v Speaker 1>bit of a falling out with. We were going through

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a tough period and the breakthrough was this was actually

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:51.359
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic, so it was remote. It was over

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 1>zoom um. But we got really really drunk unzoomed together

0:47:57.200 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and he was finally, you know, we got to a

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:02.480
<v Speaker 1>level of in abriation where he could tell me what

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>he was so angry about, and I was in a

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>receptive state of mind where I could, you know, grasp

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>why he was upset and apologize sincerely, you know, and

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>really feel sorry. And you know, we were able to

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 1>share emotions I think you know, particularly men um use

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:24.400
<v Speaker 1>this in their friendships because it's not for whatever reason,

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a genuine genetic gender difference or if it's

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:32.360
<v Speaker 1>just because of cultural norms. Um, sharing emotions is not

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>something we tend to do. Hell, you know, you do

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:36.919
<v Speaker 1>make me think that. You know, I have to say

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 1>alcohol play that pivotal role from me in my twenties. Um,

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:42.360
<v Speaker 1>but once I got into my thirties and forties, it

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>was displaced in that regard by M D m A. Okay,

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean in M d A just pivotal in terms

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of being able to talk about things that are difficult

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, being able to listen to things that

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 1>are difficult to listen about. Um. Now my can't do

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>with the frequency of alcohol, which then again maybe a

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 1>benefit in some regards. But it's an interesting thing that

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:05.799
<v Speaker 1>alcohol and m D m A do share in comic times. Yeah,

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and and for similar physiological reasons right there, Um they're ramping.

0:49:10.000 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, M D M A is a stimulant, but

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's got that Um it's it's flooding you with serotonin,

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 1>right You're just feeling so good, Um that it's it

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>has a similar kind of expansive. You get that similar

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:27.360
<v Speaker 1>type of expansiveness that you get can get with alcohol,

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but in a much more targeted way. Um so yeah,

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the I think in a in a

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of healthy grown up life, we'd understand what what

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:44.279
<v Speaker 1>various chemical intoxicants are good for and what their various

0:49:44.320 --> 0:49:48.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, downsides or dangers are, and figure out a

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:51.399
<v Speaker 1>strategy for using them when appropriate. And I think those

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of us who are thoughtful and knowledgele with this managed

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to do an individual level the the great challenges on

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the societal level, which brings us more fully into the present,

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:03.319
<v Speaker 1>which we've alluded to and come to occasionally. But you know,

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>there's two things going on your book about the present time.

0:50:06.840 --> 0:50:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one is you're basically offering a fundamental challenge

0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to the kind of neo prohibitionist uh you know thinking

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and mindset that's out there. And you know, you you

0:50:17.280 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>reference the the study that came out in the British

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>journal The Lancet in eighteen, the punchline of which was

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the safest level of drinking is none, and you dismissed,

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:29.239
<v Speaker 1>don't know, called it terrible or stupid or something like that,

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>with which I thoroughly agree. And it's notable that a

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:33.239
<v Speaker 1>new study just came out of the Lancet in the

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:37.239
<v Speaker 1>last few months in which they acknowledge the potential benefits

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of moderate drinking, especially among older people, only among zero

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:47.319
<v Speaker 1>benefit if you're under forty. Yeah. And then I see that,

0:50:47.440 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're an American living in Canada now, and

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I see that the Center for a Substance Abuse and

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Addiction in Canada just came out of recommendations in September,

0:50:56.719 --> 0:51:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically saying, you know, not that drink down

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 1>almost to the floor. I mean a very not fully prohibitionists,

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 1>but quasi prohibitionist stake. And so you express your exasperation

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>about all of that, and you know, it's pulling out

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of the office part and all that. But

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:15.839
<v Speaker 1>then there's the flip side, and it's your last chapter, right,

0:51:15.880 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>which I think you called distillation and isolation, and this

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is just talking about all the harms of alcohol and

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:24.319
<v Speaker 1>what's wrong with alcohol and the fact that we've now

0:51:24.360 --> 0:51:26.879
<v Speaker 1>moved not just from being winded but to distilled liquors.

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And part of me was thinking, okay, you know, still

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:30.520
<v Speaker 1>just trying to cover his ass here, he's already done

0:51:30.520 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a celebration of alcohol, you know, but but and so.

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:38.319
<v Speaker 1>But then you make an argument about how distillation and

0:51:38.400 --> 0:51:42.560
<v Speaker 1>isolation may have changed the game, and that maybe even

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that old um I can't remember as the hijacker hangover

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:47.560
<v Speaker 1>theory may have some application that we haven't quite yet

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:50.200
<v Speaker 1>figured out in terms of the future distilled liquors. So

0:51:50.480 --> 0:51:53.840
<v Speaker 1>lay that out about isolation and distillation and the problems

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:58.240
<v Speaker 1>there um for our listeners. Yeah, so the distillation first.

0:51:58.800 --> 0:52:03.720
<v Speaker 1>So for almost all of our history with alcohol, we've

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:09.319
<v Speaker 1>been drinking naturally fermented beverages, and alcoholic beverages come with

0:52:09.400 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a kind of built in safety feature, which is that

0:52:12.080 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 1>they just can't get much stronger than a certain level

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:18.360
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the easter producing alcohol and at a

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:21.160
<v Speaker 1>certain point they poison themselves. They are more resistant than

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the bacteria are, right, So they're they're engaging in biological

0:52:24.840 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 1>warfare against these bacteria that are that are very susceptible

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to alcohol. They're tougher, but they're not infinitely tough. And

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>we've been breeding east to get tougher and tougher so

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:39.239
<v Speaker 1>we can make stronger and stronger beers and wines. But

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 1>for most of our evolutionary history, the alcohol content of

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of these beverages was capped at a pretty low level.

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:51.359
<v Speaker 1>So the beers we were drinking, we're coming in about

0:52:51.360 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 1>two to three percent ABV, and fruit wines a bit higher,

0:52:55.640 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but probably eight nine maybe ten pc a BV. So

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 1>those are relatively safe delivery vehicles for ethanol. They're delivering

0:53:06.640 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>ethanol to our bodies at a rate that we can

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:13.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of deal with. And especially like if you're drinking

0:53:13.160 --> 0:53:16.319
<v Speaker 1>at two to three pc a b V beer and

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you're a fully grown adult, you can drink that all

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 1>day long and never get beyond point eight or so

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 1>b a c. But what were those Vikings drinking at

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 1>those festival as a line you had from Sunday story

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:31.319
<v Speaker 1>and they died with a cup in their hands or something. Yeah,

0:53:31.360 --> 0:53:34.360
<v Speaker 1>they were drinking meat, they were drinking meds um that

0:53:34.400 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 1>we're getting up to slightly higher alcohol level, and they

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:41.520
<v Speaker 1>were just heroically drinking massive quantities of it. I mean,

0:53:41.520 --> 0:53:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it is physically possible, it's just challenging. You've got to

0:53:44.520 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 1>basically be drinking constantly to get really drunk on things

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 1>like that. Then, relatively recently so um in Europe, not

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:56.920
<v Speaker 1>until the sixteen hundreds or seventeen hundreds, which in you know,

0:53:56.960 --> 0:54:00.839
<v Speaker 1>the story I'm telling is basically, yesterday, we figure out

0:54:00.840 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>how to disable the safety feature of naturally fermented beverages

0:54:05.960 --> 0:54:09.080
<v Speaker 1>by distilling them. Um, so we pull the alcohol off

0:54:09.440 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and we could then produce these incredibly concentrated distilled liquors. So, um,

0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can get vodkas that come in in

0:54:17.480 --> 0:54:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the nineties in terms of a BV percentage, and so

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:23.760
<v Speaker 1>part of my argument is this is a novel form

0:54:23.840 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of alcohol that's so much more powerful it really should

0:54:27.520 --> 0:54:30.960
<v Speaker 1>be considered a different drug, and it's much much more dangerous.

0:54:31.080 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 1>You can, um, you know, the sweet spot, let's say

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is point oh eight b a c Uh. You're drinking

0:54:38.400 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 1>two to three percent beer. You can drink that at

0:54:40.640 --> 0:54:42.759
<v Speaker 1>a moderate pace all day long and kind of stay

0:54:42.800 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 1>at point away. You're doing shots of vodka, you just

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:49.799
<v Speaker 1>blow right past point oh eight into levels where you're

0:54:49.840 --> 0:54:54.840
<v Speaker 1>blacking out and you know, potentially killing yourself, um quite quickly.

0:54:55.080 --> 0:54:57.799
<v Speaker 1>So we now have access to a much much more

0:54:57.880 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 1>powerful form of alcohol that's order of magnitudes more powerful

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:05.239
<v Speaker 1>than anything we've had to deal with before. Um. So

0:55:05.280 --> 0:55:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that's distillation. Isolation refers to the fact that historically our

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 1>alcohol consumption has always been social. Having private access to

0:55:15.640 --> 0:55:20.400
<v Speaker 1>alcohol is almost unheard of in most societies, and every

0:55:20.440 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>society that I know of that uses alcohol surrounds its

0:55:24.560 --> 0:55:31.280
<v Speaker 1>consumption with various formal and informal rituals that help individuals

0:55:31.280 --> 0:55:34.319
<v Speaker 1>to control their consumption. So I talked about, you know,

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the Greek Symposium wine party, where the symposi arc was

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:41.280
<v Speaker 1>in charge of mixing you know, the wine to water ratio,

0:55:41.400 --> 0:55:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and you only drank when the thing got passed around

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:46.440
<v Speaker 1>by the symposi arc so they could control the pace

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of drinking. In Chinese banquets, you don't drink it will.

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:53.160
<v Speaker 1>You can only drink when someone makes a toast, and

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:56.439
<v Speaker 1>then whoever is in charge of making toasts is um

0:55:56.520 --> 0:56:00.640
<v Speaker 1>strictly at least traditionally regulated by ritual. So these are

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:05.040
<v Speaker 1>all ways we control alcohol consumption, and even in what

0:56:05.200 --> 0:56:10.279
<v Speaker 1>seemed like completely unstructured modern situations. So you go to

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the pub with your friends if you're typically drinking in rounds,

0:56:13.920 --> 0:56:16.959
<v Speaker 1>so you know, if you drink too quickly, you've gotta

0:56:17.000 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>wait toward your next drink until we're all done. And

0:56:20.080 --> 0:56:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the bar keep could not make eye contact with you

0:56:23.120 --> 0:56:25.160
<v Speaker 1>if they're worried about how quickly you're drinking. There's all

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:28.719
<v Speaker 1>these ways when we're drinking in groups that we can

0:56:28.760 --> 0:56:31.920
<v Speaker 1>moderate each other's behavior. Once you can go to a

0:56:32.040 --> 0:56:35.480
<v Speaker 1>drive through liquor store and load up your SUV with

0:56:35.560 --> 0:56:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a case of vodka and drive at home and have

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:42.239
<v Speaker 1>all this, you know, enough alcohol in your house to

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:46.160
<v Speaker 1>kill a village full of people, and you're alone, and

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you can just consume that whenever you want. That's a

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:54.279
<v Speaker 1>really new, evolutionarily novel situation, and a quite dangerous one

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:59.120
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think we're well equipped to moderate our

0:56:59.160 --> 0:57:04.840
<v Speaker 1>alcohol concer emption by ourselves. We need social help. Um

0:57:04.960 --> 0:57:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think you know a natural experiment that showed

0:57:07.840 --> 0:57:10.719
<v Speaker 1>this is the pandemic. You know, it's it's a great

0:57:10.760 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 1>natural experiment. Hey, let's see what happens if we don't

0:57:13.320 --> 0:57:16.680
<v Speaker 1>let people leave the house anymore, but we still give

0:57:16.720 --> 0:57:19.840
<v Speaker 1>them as much alcohol as they want. What's going to happen?

0:57:19.880 --> 0:57:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And what happened was people problem drinking became really, really serious.

0:57:25.400 --> 0:57:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And I know a lot of people who are still

0:57:27.200 --> 0:57:30.280
<v Speaker 1>struggling with with the aftermath of that, trying to get

0:57:30.280 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 1>back to sustainable levels of consumption. After indulging. Yeah, I

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:38.080
<v Speaker 1>mean you quote the aforementioned Dwight Heath once again, the

0:57:38.240 --> 0:57:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Brown University anthropologist is talking about one of the greatest

0:57:41.640 --> 0:57:45.919
<v Speaker 1>indicators of a problem drinking is drinking alone. Yeah, right,

0:57:45.920 --> 0:57:47.920
<v Speaker 1>more than almost anything else. And you also make the

0:57:47.960 --> 0:57:52.000
<v Speaker 1>point that America is particularly bad in this regard. I mean,

0:57:52.000 --> 0:57:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you contrast the Southern European drinking culture, which you know,

0:57:55.440 --> 0:57:58.360
<v Speaker 1>drinking you know, wine and beer with food, and you

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:01.240
<v Speaker 1>with the Northern drinking, which is more about drinking to

0:58:01.320 --> 0:58:04.600
<v Speaker 1>get drunk, you know, the skin and Eving countries, Russia, Denmarkets, etcetera.

0:58:05.120 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 1>But then you say America seems to do it even

0:58:07.680 --> 0:58:12.400
<v Speaker 1>more problematically in the Northern Europeans. Yeah. Well, it's because

0:58:12.440 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we've got two separate problems, well maybe three separate problems.

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 1>One is that we're northern drinking culture. So you know,

0:58:18.680 --> 0:58:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this is where you're drinking to get drunk. You're drinking

0:58:22.160 --> 0:58:27.400
<v Speaker 1>primarily distilled spirits. Um, you're often drinking and unisex groups.

0:58:27.600 --> 0:58:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So a bunch of dudes get drunk together, a bunch

0:58:30.080 --> 0:58:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of women getting drunk together. You're drinking two with the

0:58:33.240 --> 0:58:35.640
<v Speaker 1>purpose of getting drunk, and the goal is to be

0:58:35.760 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 1>visibly drunk. There's something wrong with you if you're not

0:58:38.320 --> 0:58:41.800
<v Speaker 1>visibly drunk as opposed to Southern cultures where we're being

0:58:41.960 --> 0:58:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, really visibly intoxicated. Is kind of shameful. Um.

0:58:46.360 --> 0:58:49.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not not something you want to do in public. Um.

0:58:49.400 --> 0:58:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's unhealthy. So we've inherited that northern drinking culture.

0:58:53.800 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, we have a more serious isolation

0:58:57.200 --> 0:59:00.480
<v Speaker 1>problem because it's more common in America going to live

0:59:00.520 --> 0:59:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in suburbs where, um, you don't have a local that

0:59:04.120 --> 0:59:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you go to, you know, on your walk back from

0:59:06.680 --> 0:59:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the tube, you get in your car at your office

0:59:10.760 --> 0:59:14.160
<v Speaker 1>park and you drive home to your house and you're

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:17.920
<v Speaker 1>drinking alone or most you know, with your family around,

0:59:18.040 --> 0:59:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but not socially in the way you do in Europe

0:59:21.880 --> 0:59:24.320
<v Speaker 1>or in major cities in in the U s where

0:59:24.360 --> 0:59:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you have you know, a pub, a local that you're

0:59:26.640 --> 0:59:30.760
<v Speaker 1>going to. Um. So there's the isolation problem. It's higher

0:59:30.760 --> 0:59:34.439
<v Speaker 1>in the States. Um. And then on top of all that,

0:59:34.680 --> 0:59:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you have this weird Christian culture of the Puritans. You know,

0:59:39.920 --> 0:59:43.280
<v Speaker 1>these are the first ones that came over right where

0:59:43.320 --> 0:59:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they demonize alcohol and therefore have this kind of love

0:59:49.240 --> 0:59:54.360
<v Speaker 1>hate relationship with it. Um. You know, I quote this anthropologist,

0:59:54.440 --> 0:59:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Janet Curzan. It's got a great book about um us

0:59:57.680 --> 1:00:00.880
<v Speaker 1>drinking culture and the problems with it. We're she's, you know,

1:00:01.240 --> 1:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>as an anthropologist in the American South, she noticed that

1:00:05.520 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>she would go to the liquor store because they have

1:00:08.440 --> 1:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>liquor stores and they Baptist drink. But people she had

1:00:11.960 --> 1:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>been at church wouldn't make eye contact with her in

1:00:14.480 --> 1:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the liquor store, and she'd like, you know, try to

1:00:16.520 --> 1:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>wave to them, and they'd like look the other way

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and pretend they didn't know her. She was like, let's

1:00:20.960 --> 1:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>this is weird. And then a friend of her said,

1:00:23.840 --> 1:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you don't say hello to someone in the

1:00:25.880 --> 1:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>liquor store, UM, in the same way you wouldn't if

1:00:28.640 --> 1:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you were you know, if I ran into you in

1:00:30.360 --> 1:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a porn store, we wouldn't be like, hey, what are

1:00:32.320 --> 1:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you getting? It's shameful to be seen there is shameful UM.

1:00:37.920 --> 1:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's just a weird attitude to have towards alcohol.

1:00:41.160 --> 1:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>And so you pile all that on top of each

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>other and you get a really pathological drinking culture. M hm.

1:00:49.040 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, just making me think of a couple of

1:00:50.720 --> 1:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the counter examples UM historically, right, so one you talked

1:00:54.000 --> 1:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>about briefly as the Mornings, who maybe not at their origins,

1:00:57.480 --> 1:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know, shortly after the origins, basically are you know,

1:01:00.560 --> 1:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>no inebriants. And I guess I'll point out that, you know,

1:01:03.280 --> 1:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>there's Mormon tea made from a you know, plant that's

1:01:05.880 --> 1:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of feder in it, but I mean basically coffee, alcohol,

1:01:09.000 --> 1:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>all that sort of stuff. Yet a very successful um culture.

1:01:13.080 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And then the second one is Islam, which is banned

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>alcohol but been tolerant of other ones um and the

1:01:19.440 --> 1:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Ottoman Empire was, you know, a very successful and powerful

1:01:23.080 --> 1:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>empire for centuries. So is it just that, in fact,

1:01:26.880 --> 1:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>drinking was always going on and just didn't talk about

1:01:29.160 --> 1:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>it like in the South, or was it something else

1:01:32.120 --> 1:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that enabled them to be so successful. We're drinking was

1:01:34.560 --> 1:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>not playing a big role in their culture. So I

1:01:37.040 --> 1:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>think what's happening with with Mormonism And and scholars have

1:01:40.880 --> 1:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>argued this is the case with Islam too. So in

1:01:43.640 --> 1:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the case of Islam, they're surrounded by these Mediterranean wine

1:01:47.360 --> 1:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>drinking cultures and they need to distinguish themselves, and one

1:01:52.360 --> 1:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of the ways they do it is through these kind

1:01:55.040 --> 1:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of costly displays. So So this is one of the

1:01:59.680 --> 1:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>feature years of successful religions is that they make you

1:02:03.160 --> 1:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>do counter productive from a practical standpoint, costly things to

1:02:08.880 --> 1:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>show that you really believe in the belief system that

1:02:12.320 --> 1:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you're professing you believe in, and also you do things

1:02:15.760 --> 1:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that distinguish you from non members. And so I think

1:02:19.840 --> 1:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Mormon ban on alcohol and caffeine is more

1:02:25.040 --> 1:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like the kind of you know, Mormon underwear and the

1:02:28.160 --> 1:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>other things they do that distinguishes them from people around them.

1:02:31.640 --> 1:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a very clever, costly demand on adherents. It enhances

1:02:38.280 --> 1:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>your sense that you are a group different from the

1:02:40.680 --> 1:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>groups around you. But it's it's not directly functionally a

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>response to the problem of alcohol. It's a group marking device.

1:02:49.240 --> 1:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So you're in the end of this book basically saying

1:02:51.800 --> 1:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the still liquors are a real threat. You're a big

1:02:55.920 --> 1:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>fan of the office party. You point out how you know,

1:02:58.600 --> 1:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you and your buddies having some rinks and a lounge

1:03:00.960 --> 1:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>help you get all sorts of research brands to come

1:03:02.840 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>up with great ideas and to bond and to you know,

1:03:05.400 --> 1:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of moderate the competition among people and

1:03:08.080 --> 1:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>increase the uh the collaboration but are you basically saying

1:03:12.080 --> 1:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that when you're having office parties, I don't put the

1:03:14.160 --> 1:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>distilled liquor out there. Yeah, and sure, or be worried,

1:03:18.120 --> 1:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>but be more worried about it. So, in terms of

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>practical considerations, one of the ways writing this book, doing

1:03:24.880 --> 1:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the research for it has changed my behavior is I

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>appreciate beer a lot more. Um. I never was a

1:03:31.360 --> 1:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>beer drinker. I'm I'm wine drinker and and and Scotch

1:03:35.400 --> 1:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and various distilled liquors. Um, but I've come to see

1:03:40.240 --> 1:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of beer and as kind of a delivery

1:03:44.760 --> 1:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>device for ethanol, a way to deliver ethanol to your

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>brain and your friends brains at a sustainable pace. And um,

1:03:54.640 --> 1:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it's changed my behavior. So I had this welcome thing

1:03:58.000 --> 1:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>for some new post docs in this product drink that

1:04:00.360 --> 1:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I run, And you know, I made the conscious decision

1:04:03.920 --> 1:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to instead of you know, ordering rounds of cocktails for people,

1:04:07.360 --> 1:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>are getting bottles of wine for the table. Um, I

1:04:10.280 --> 1:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>got pictures of beer. And I don't really like beer

1:04:14.800 --> 1:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>as much as I like those other things. But but

1:04:17.160 --> 1:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, this is actually a more safe

1:04:19.800 --> 1:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and sustainable social truck. Um. So yeah, I would say

1:04:23.880 --> 1:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>be worried about um distilled liquors. I know this is

1:04:26.560 --> 1:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the case. I think in Germany and some other European

1:04:29.080 --> 1:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>countries there's different ages when you can legally drink distilled

1:04:33.160 --> 1:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>spirits as opposed to beer and wine. Um, you can

1:04:36.040 --> 1:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>drink beer and wine younger, and I think that makes

1:04:38.360 --> 1:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense. Yeah, it makes me wonder with

1:04:42.280 --> 1:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>these new you know, these canned cocktails that are coming

1:04:45.000 --> 1:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>out now, which I think the alcohol content is equivalent

1:04:47.560 --> 1:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to be or wine, and whether that's going to land

1:04:50.240 --> 1:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>up making them more like beer and wine than it

1:04:52.560 --> 1:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is like drinking shots of something. Yeah, but it's and

1:04:57.080 --> 1:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>competing with beer now. Yeah, and if you're you know,

1:04:59.760 --> 1:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and nearing something that's deliberately low a b v um,

1:05:04.920 --> 1:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a sustainable strategy. Mm hmmm. Well we're

1:05:08.640 --> 1:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>just so just to finish off here a little bit

1:05:10.400 --> 1:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>more about your own evolution. Um. I mean, so you know,

1:05:13.960 --> 1:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you're you're a sinologist, you learned Chinese, you're writing these,

1:05:16.880 --> 1:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, brilliant academic books about ancient China or I

1:05:19.640 --> 1:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>don't call it ancient, but China long time ago. And

1:05:22.440 --> 1:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>then you had a great gause of a care your

1:05:25.560 --> 1:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>first of your crossover books before Drunk called trying not

1:05:29.840 --> 1:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to Try? About early Chinese philosophers, you know, talking and

1:05:34.600 --> 1:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>writing about an effortless way of being in the world,

1:05:38.200 --> 1:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which they called way. Did that in any way cause

1:05:42.960 --> 1:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you to open up to write this book about drunk?

1:05:44.920 --> 1:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Or what was the impetus that was directly? It was directly,

1:05:48.280 --> 1:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it was directly related. Um. So yeah, my my colleagues

1:05:51.360 --> 1:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>are a bit puzzled while I have suddenly written this

1:05:53.280 --> 1:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>book about alcohol. Um, but you know, and trying not

1:05:56.680 --> 1:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to try. I explore this tension in early Chinese is

1:06:00.240 --> 1:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>thought that they want you to get into this state

1:06:03.800 --> 1:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>called way or effortless action. Um, this spontaneous state. You're creative,

1:06:10.000 --> 1:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you're in the zone, you're you lose the sense of

1:06:13.320 --> 1:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>yourself as an agent, and everything works out, you solve problems,

1:06:17.760 --> 1:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>People trust you and like you at this charisma, and

1:06:21.920 --> 1:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and so they want you to get into this state.

1:06:24.200 --> 1:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>The problem is there's this paradox I call it the

1:06:27.240 --> 1:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>paradox of way or the you know, the version in

1:06:30.600 --> 1:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the title of the book. How do you how do

1:06:32.160 --> 1:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you try not to try? It's directly paradoxical. So if

1:06:36.840 --> 1:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, hey, relax, stop trying. Um, the part

1:06:40.440 --> 1:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of the brain that I'm activating is your prefrontal cortex.

1:06:44.080 --> 1:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm lighting up your prefrontal cortex by asking you to

1:06:47.120 --> 1:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>do something agentic, and yet that's the part of the

1:06:51.080 --> 1:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>brain we're trying to shut down, so it's directly counterproductive.

1:06:55.520 --> 1:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>The early Chinese came up with various strategies to get

1:06:58.840 --> 1:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>around that, essentially giving you stuff to do to distract you,

1:07:03.200 --> 1:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, like do this ritual or sit in meditation.

1:07:06.720 --> 1:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>But in the course of writing, especially with the trade

1:07:09.080 --> 1:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>version of that book, UM, I was talking about this

1:07:11.960 --> 1:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>story from the really Daoist text where they compare a

1:07:16.040 --> 1:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>drunken person to the Daoist sage, and and they're clearly

1:07:20.720 --> 1:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>using it just as an analogy, so you should be

1:07:23.520 --> 1:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>drunk on heaven and not drunk on alcohol. But it

1:07:27.000 --> 1:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>did cause a little light bolb to go off my head,

1:07:30.400 --> 1:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and and I thought, well, you know what, you know,

1:07:32.560 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>if you have cultures that are aware that spontaneity is

1:07:35.720 --> 1:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>valuable for certain goals creativity, trust, and yet is also

1:07:41.400 --> 1:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>aware that it's paradoxical to to ask people to consciously

1:07:45.800 --> 1:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>become spontaneous, what a great work around to find a

1:07:50.520 --> 1:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>chemical substance that you could take that will do the

1:07:53.400 --> 1:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>job for you. So you know, it's directly paradoxical to

1:07:57.120 --> 1:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>try to use your mind to shut down your mind.

1:08:00.240 --> 1:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not paradoxical to drink a substance that you know,

1:08:04.280 --> 1:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>completely outside of your control was doing that job for you.

1:08:07.800 --> 1:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>So I started to get interested in the idea that

1:08:10.720 --> 1:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>UM cultures have figured out that you could use chemical

1:08:15.160 --> 1:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>intoxicants as this cultural tool to solve the paradox of

1:08:20.960 --> 1:08:23.559
<v Speaker 1>how how you can try not to try So, so

1:08:23.680 --> 1:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that that directly led to UM my interest in writing

1:08:27.120 --> 1:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>this book. I'm curious, you know, your book. I'm curious

1:08:30.280 --> 1:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>about the reactions you've got into it, not least in

1:08:33.240 --> 1:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the community of alcohol and jog researchers. I didn't do

1:08:36.240 --> 1:08:38.879
<v Speaker 1>any thorough search, but I'm wondering how it's been received

1:08:38.920 --> 1:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and evaluated by all of the people getting funded to

1:08:42.320 --> 1:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>look at the problems with alcohol and all of those

1:08:45.200 --> 1:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>alcohol researchers and public health and all that. Yeah, so

1:08:48.960 --> 1:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it's UM surprisingly positive across the board. You know, I'm

1:08:54.479 --> 1:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an alcohol specialist by original training, but I

1:08:57.800 --> 1:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>am a good researchers. You know, I did my homework.

1:09:01.680 --> 1:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I really spent a long time doing the research for

1:09:04.760 --> 1:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the book, and I reached out to a lot of

1:09:08.240 --> 1:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>these specialists in the field. I'm still you know, there's

1:09:10.840 --> 1:09:13.479
<v Speaker 1>still a kind of you want to think of it

1:09:13.520 --> 1:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>as medicalized wing UM. I mean, most of the professional

1:09:17.880 --> 1:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>academic publications on alcohol or a medicalized lens, you know,

1:09:22.920 --> 1:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it's treating it as a physical problem, physiological impact. Those

1:09:27.800 --> 1:09:31.879
<v Speaker 1>people aren't convinced. UM. And you know, I still, actually

1:09:31.920 --> 1:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>one colleague I really respect Randy NeSSI, who's UM kind

1:09:35.400 --> 1:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of the founder of evolutionary medicine. UM remained unconvinced by

1:09:40.160 --> 1:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>my argument. So there are people who aren't convinced. And

1:09:43.360 --> 1:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>I do get um kicked back from people who say, hey,

1:09:47.439 --> 1:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>how can you be celebrating alcohol when it's so damaging

1:09:51.439 --> 1:09:55.479
<v Speaker 1>and you know, alcoholism such as serious scourge and UM,

1:09:55.520 --> 1:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>but I think I did you know? So that last

1:09:57.800 --> 1:10:01.599
<v Speaker 1>chapter about the dangers of alcohol isn't just an ask

1:10:01.680 --> 1:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>covering add on. It's at the heart of the book.

1:10:05.120 --> 1:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the whole the whole premise of the book

1:10:07.479 --> 1:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>is this is a really dangerous, harmful substance that cultures

1:10:12.680 --> 1:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>have always been ambivalent about, So why do we still

1:10:16.360 --> 1:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>use it? Um So, the dangers and the potential downsides

1:10:21.360 --> 1:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of alcohol are are motivating force in the argument from

1:10:25.920 --> 1:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning, I think, um So, I think people

1:10:28.920 --> 1:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>see that as well, and see that. Um Now, even

1:10:32.120 --> 1:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>though I'm talking about the benefits of alcohol, it's really

1:10:35.960 --> 1:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>just kind of to sit in a corrective space alongside

1:10:39.600 --> 1:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of this. You know, twenty shelves of books about alcoholism

1:10:43.920 --> 1:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and the dangerous of alcohol. Um, we do need a

1:10:46.720 --> 1:10:49.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a counterbalance looking at the positive functions.

1:10:50.280 --> 1:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, have any of the big beer wine companies

1:10:53.800 --> 1:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>invited you and offered you fat honor arium to come

1:10:56.520 --> 1:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>keynote their annual conferences or something, And if so, have

1:11:00.160 --> 1:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you acceptive taking money from them or not? Yeah, I'm

1:11:05.320 --> 1:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>actually doing my first one like that in October at

1:11:10.240 --> 1:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the World World Average Association. I think it's a beer

1:11:14.640 --> 1:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>producers organization. And I don't feel bad at all because

1:11:19.040 --> 1:11:22.519
<v Speaker 1>I think that actually I think they need help and

1:11:22.520 --> 1:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>they should get help. Um. I think they've been him

1:11:25.400 --> 1:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this defensive crouch where you know, they've kind of accepted

1:11:29.920 --> 1:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this story that they're peddling something that's no different from

1:11:34.160 --> 1:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>nicotine or pornography or cocaine, And you know accepted. Yeah,

1:11:40.280 --> 1:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's bad, and but it's a vice that

1:11:42.760 --> 1:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>people want and so and I don't think they have

1:11:45.720 --> 1:11:49.519
<v Speaker 1>to be so defensive. I actually especially beer makers, because

1:11:49.600 --> 1:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>beer is the best, the safest form of alcohol. So

1:11:52.880 --> 1:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a case where my interest intellectually kind of

1:11:56.280 --> 1:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>overlap with the interests of an industry. I think we

1:11:59.400 --> 1:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>need to change the public discourse on this. So yeah,

1:12:03.040 --> 1:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I am. I'm actually doing my first big address to

1:12:06.880 --> 1:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>an industry organization, and I think the beverage industry is

1:12:09.880 --> 1:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>slowly waking up to my book and realizing, oh, here's

1:12:12.800 --> 1:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>some positive arguments for alcohol. And I don't see any

1:12:15.920 --> 1:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>problem with with talking to them about it because I

1:12:19.200 --> 1:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>believe in it personally. Well, listen, I I think your

1:12:23.439 --> 1:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>book was wonderful. As I said, there are a few

1:12:25.320 --> 1:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>books I've enjoyed reading more and prepping for this thing.

1:12:27.960 --> 1:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the book is important culturally. I hope it

1:12:30.920 --> 1:12:33.639
<v Speaker 1>really does get out there. I saw you tweeting recently

1:12:33.640 --> 1:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>had just been translated into Korean, so hopefully this has

1:12:37.200 --> 1:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a really substantial global reach. And you know, I hope

1:12:40.920 --> 1:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't leave the field because you're really saying something

1:12:44.040 --> 1:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that's very important. So Thank you ever so much for

1:12:47.080 --> 1:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>writing this and for taking the time to talk with

1:12:48.960 --> 1:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>me and with and our listeners on Psychoactive. No great,

1:12:53.000 --> 1:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. It was a lot of fun.

1:13:02.200 --> 1:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're enjoying Psychoactive, please tell your friends about it,

1:13:06.280 --> 1:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>or you can write us a review at Apple Podcasts

1:13:08.600 --> 1:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. We love to hear

1:13:11.400 --> 1:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>from our listeners. If you'd like to share your own stories,

1:13:14.520 --> 1:13:17.639
<v Speaker 1>comments and ideas, then leave us a message at one

1:13:17.880 --> 1:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>eight three three seven seven nine sixty that's eight three

1:13:23.439 --> 1:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>three psycho zero, or you can email us at Psychoactive

1:13:28.000 --> 1:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>at protozoa dot com or find me on Twitter at

1:13:31.160 --> 1:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Ethan natal Man. You can also find contact information in

1:13:34.600 --> 1:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>our show notes. Psychoactive is a production of I Heart

1:13:38.200 --> 1:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Radio and Protozoa Pictures. It's hosted by me Ethan Naedelman.

1:13:42.840 --> 1:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>It's produced by Noham Osband and Josh Stain. The executive

1:13:46.320 --> 1:13:50.519
<v Speaker 1>producers are Dylan Golden, Ari Handel, Elizabeth Geesus and Darren

1:13:50.520 --> 1:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Aronofsky from Protozoa Pictures, Alex Williams and Matt Frederick from

1:13:54.280 --> 1:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio, and me Ethan Nadelman. Our music is

1:13:58.200 --> 1:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>by Ari Blucien and Special Things to a bios f

1:14:02.600 --> 1:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Bianca Grimshaw and Robert BP. Next week I'll be talking

1:14:17.280 --> 1:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>with Boris Jordan's founder and head of cure Leaf, one

1:14:20.760 --> 1:14:24.599
<v Speaker 1>of the world's biggest marijuana businesses. This is my fifth

1:14:24.680 --> 1:14:28.639
<v Speaker 1>company I've built, and my formula has always never build

1:14:28.640 --> 1:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a company to sell it. Build a company to compete

1:14:31.760 --> 1:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and be best in class. And that's what I'm doing,

1:14:34.280 --> 1:14:36.479
<v Speaker 1>and I hope I'm successful. But I can tell you

1:14:36.520 --> 1:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>one thing. I'm not building cure Leaf to sell it

1:14:38.920 --> 1:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to a tobacco company. I'm building cure Leaves to be

1:14:41.960 --> 1:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a competitive in this world. Subscribe to Cycleactive now, see it,

1:14:45.840 --> 1:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>don't miss it.