Speaker 1: After the international backlash Russia faced over the atrocities in Buccha,
Speaker 1: Russian soldiers are now using mobile crematoriums in an effort
Speaker 1: to erase any evidence of their war crimes by disposing
Speaker 1: of the corpses of the innocent civilians they have killed.
Speaker 1: And the Mariopal mayor making this haunting comparison quote, the
Speaker 1: world has not seen the scale of a tragedy like
Speaker 1: in Mariople since the Nazi concentration camps. The Russian fascists
Speaker 1: turned our whole city into a death camp unquote. And
Speaker 1: here spokesman John Kirby on where this is headed. Because
Speaker 1: they're gonna be able to concentrate their efforts now in
Speaker 1: a smaller geographical area, an area that they have been
Speaker 1: fighting over now for eight years, we would expect that
Speaker 1: the violence is only going to get worse. The fighting
Speaker 1: is going to get more intense as they, as the Russians,
Speaker 1: now try to redouble their efforts in a very much
Speaker 1: smaller area of Ukraine. So so we're very concerned about
Speaker 1: this development. We're watching it. So Jake Tapern CNN with
Speaker 1: the mobile crematoriums trying to cover up the atrocities the
Speaker 1: Russian soldiers are committing and then John Kirby, spokesman at
Speaker 1: the Pentagon, they're saying things are going to get worse.
Speaker 1: It's hard to imagine how they could. Um, So let's
Speaker 1: bring in David Ignatius to start their columnist the Washington
Speaker 1: Post covering foreign affairs. David, Welcome to the Armstrong and
Speaker 1: Getty Show. Appreciate you joining us today. Thanks thanks for
Speaker 1: having me watching these pictures and videos. Just absolutely amazing.
Speaker 1: Can things get worse? Well, at first, as you say,
Speaker 1: they're there, as a Secretary Lincoln put it there, they're
Speaker 1: punching that got It's really uh hard horrified to see
Speaker 1: what the Russian invaders have done. They were pushed out
Speaker 1: of the north where they left this trail of gruesomely
Speaker 1: kill bodies that we've been seeing. And they're now regrouping
Speaker 1: to attack from the east and the south in the
Speaker 1: Black Sea, the c of as of and it's just
Speaker 1: John Kirby, the Pentagon spokesman, said, they'll concentrate their firepower
Speaker 1: and if anything, it will be even a nasty or
Speaker 1: more concentrated um as they as they focus on that
Speaker 1: sector of Ukraine. UM. I've been trying to think and
Speaker 1: to write a column today for the Washington Post about
Speaker 1: how to think about the Round two that's about to begin.
Speaker 1: The Round one was was bloody, horrifying, but it had
Speaker 1: real success by the Ukrainian alterat, I mean, credible courage
Speaker 1: and pushing the Russians back. What's Around two going to
Speaker 1: be like and what kinds of assistance should the United
Speaker 1: States and its allies be thinking about offering Ukrainians for
Speaker 1: this sect and round. I think it needs to be
Speaker 1: a different mix of weapons, more armor. With the Ukrainians
Speaker 1: have shown that their military is tough. They can use
Speaker 1: the armor that's sent in old Soviet tanks and armored
Speaker 1: personal carriers from Eastern European countries. They could use long
Speaker 1: range missiles to attack the Soviets in their rear basing
Speaker 1: areas Soviets, excuse me, Russians, uh so um. I hope
Speaker 1: that in this period before Round two begins, people are
Speaker 1: thinking carefully about how to help the Ukrainians do as
Speaker 1: well as they can against the onspot that's about to begin. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So we were just talking a little bit ago. How
Speaker 1: um it sounded like a big number when I heard
Speaker 1: out the White House earlier this week that we had
Speaker 1: given two billion dollars worth of military aid before they
Speaker 1: started in a billion cents for a total of three billion.
Speaker 1: But then I was just reading earlier today that at
Speaker 1: the height of the Iraq War we were pumping in
Speaker 1: nine billion dollars of you know, weaponry a month at
Speaker 1: the time when we thought, you know, Iraq was important
Speaker 1: enough for that level of money. So I don't I
Speaker 1: don't know where we go money wise in Ukraine and
Speaker 1: all that sort of stuff. But looking at your column today,
Speaker 1: has Putin's brutality finally hit a wall in Ukraine. Um,
Speaker 1: And a lot of talk about the investigating the crimes.
Speaker 1: These are war crimes obviously, Is there is there any
Speaker 1: hope of anybody being held to account for any of
Speaker 1: this stuff? Well, the answer is yes, there's some hope,
Speaker 1: but it's going to take years. Um. We know from
Speaker 1: war crimes investigations that followed the Balkan Wars where there
Speaker 1: were trustees committed Remember Benita is one famous name of
Speaker 1: a town. Whether we're just terrible maskers that people can
Speaker 1: be identified, commanders who authorized killings and then tracked down
Speaker 1: and that happened and people were brought It's proud in
Speaker 1: the Hague for war crimes. Um in that case, you
Speaker 1: had the clear winners who were able to enforce the laws.
Speaker 1: Whether we'll have that situation here remains to be seen.
Speaker 1: But I counted my column a number of investigations that
Speaker 1: are already other way. The International Criminal Court, not recognized
Speaker 1: by the United States but recognized by most countries, has
Speaker 1: already begun an investigation. France has three investigations underway about
Speaker 1: war crimes against its own citizens. The Ukrainian Prosecutor General
Speaker 1: has fifty thousand investigators gathering evidence right now. And then
Speaker 1: you have all of the social media and journalistic record
Speaker 1: that's been compiled. That's what we've been seeing obviously in
Speaker 1: and it's amazing that when the Russians tried to deny
Speaker 1: that they'd ever killed all those people whose bodies we've
Speaker 1: seen in the terrible videos and no, no, no, it
Speaker 1: didn't happen. He's see you can see the corpses are moving.
Speaker 1: People have gone back through the video imagery and show
Speaker 1: him that the Russian claims that the video images were
Speaker 1: false are incorrect, that they've gone literally pixel by pixels
Speaker 1: the show this, the Russian claims are false, these images
Speaker 1: are real. And then they shout overhead Riconstance film that
Speaker 1: was shot commercially back in mid March, that that show
Speaker 1: the bodies already in the streets in But just so
Speaker 1: yes is the answer. I do have some hope that
Speaker 1: the evidence and the venue for prosecution will be there
Speaker 1: to bring people to account. Um, getting back to what
Speaker 1: you said a little bit ago, really got my attention.
Speaker 1: This whole round two thing. I wasn't aware that, you know,
Speaker 1: around had ended and a new round is starting in. Um.
Speaker 1: General Milliy got everybody's attention the other day when he
Speaker 1: said this is going to be measured in years. That
Speaker 1: certainly got got my attention. He said, I don't think decade,
Speaker 1: not sure decades with the plural, but certainly in years.
Speaker 1: So he expects this the last a very long time.
Speaker 1: How do you foresee this playing out from now going forward?
Speaker 1: So I think it probably will last. It will be protracted.
Speaker 1: That's the phrase that the Nation Security Adviser Jack Sullivan used,
Speaker 1: and Milly was amplifying that. Um, we have to remember
Speaker 1: that this war really has already been going on for
Speaker 1: eight years. Good point. The war in the East began
Speaker 1: in and it's been continuous. It's involved Russian and Ukrainian
Speaker 1: regular altar units for those eight years. So in a sense,
Speaker 1: you know, we're it's a continuing war. The next phase
Speaker 1: will be the decisive battle for control of this eastern region.
Speaker 1: And mostly I don't think the Russians will will try
Speaker 1: to create a kind of zone from the eastern region
Speaker 1: almost the dumb Boss across the south through Mario full
Speaker 1: City that they've shattered all the way down to Odessa,
Speaker 1: past Crimea, that they'll control all of the Black Sea
Speaker 1: access to Ukraine. Ukraine will will be landlocked in effect,
Speaker 1: and that that's the Russian goal. And and so it's
Speaker 1: going to be a pitched battle. I think part of
Speaker 1: what Generalinois is saying is that even if they succeed
Speaker 1: in doing that, they face an intense resistance. I mean,
Speaker 1: people in Ukraine. When I visited Ukraine in light January,
Speaker 1: just before the war began, even Russian speaking Ukrainians hated
Speaker 1: the Russians. It's amazing how Putinous alienated the population of
Speaker 1: that country, which he imagines, you know, loves Russia's it
Speaker 1: feels part of the greater Russian nation. Do you think
Speaker 1: he actually believes that stuff? Do you think he actually
Speaker 1: believes that stuff? I do he I think he believed
Speaker 1: it deeper. I think it's part of his self mystification
Speaker 1: that led this war. You have to ask how did
Speaker 1: Putin make such a huge mistake? And I think the
Speaker 1: only answers that he truly believed it. You read his
Speaker 1: essays and they almost you know, it's almost a religious
Speaker 1: mission for him. So he did believe it. But he's
Speaker 1: gonna he's gonna face protracted, prolonged resistance in any areas
Speaker 1: that he conquers. So the Russians are facing war like
Speaker 1: what we faced in Vietnam, and we remember how that
Speaker 1: just dragged us and a little warlike the Russians face
Speaker 1: in Afghanistan finally drove him out after ten years, or
Speaker 1: like we face in Afghanistan drove us out of after
Speaker 1: twenty years. So it's hard to win those wars if
Speaker 1: you're an unpopular occupying force, and that's who. As we
Speaker 1: think about round two that's about to begin, it'll be
Speaker 1: back kind of war. It's gonna be nasty, it probably
Speaker 1: will be prolonged. At some point, Putin may decide, as
Speaker 1: as we did in Afghanistan, this simply is an warmed
Speaker 1: the cost and choose an alternative path. But right now,
Speaker 1: everybody body I talked to the Pentagon says he is
Speaker 1: determined to give it in round to the hardest shot
Speaker 1: he can. I know you are doing some writing, and
Speaker 1: I heard you talking about this early on, about how
Speaker 1: how into this story and in support of the Ukrainians
Speaker 1: the Europeans have been and obviously I've seen that in
Speaker 1: the United States. Do we have the the ability to
Speaker 1: to to not lose our attention? You know, we go
Speaker 1: from story to story to story pretty quickly. Um, are
Speaker 1: we gonna be able to stay focused on this over
Speaker 1: the timeline we're just describing, So that's the right question
Speaker 1: to ask. America, I think is famously impatient in supporting allies.
Speaker 1: In this case, it's the Ukrainians who are doing the fighting.
Speaker 1: We have a supermotivated partner. We didn't have that in
Speaker 1: that gas stand, but we sure do a Ukraine. They're
Speaker 1: fighting with incredible bravery, tenacity, and we also have lots
Speaker 1: of other allies. Ukraine is surrounded by European countries that
Speaker 1: have really found their heart. The Germans other countries often
Speaker 1: kind of sat on their hands when it came to
Speaker 1: confrontations with Russia. Not here that they're they're stepping up there,
Speaker 1: providing weapons, in some cases more aggressively than we are. Poland,
Speaker 1: which neighbors Ukraine, sees itself as being a prospective future
Speaker 1: target of Russia, is absolutely supporting the Ukrainians providing uh weapons, supplies,
Speaker 1: safe haven for refugees were streaming out of Ukraine. But
Speaker 1: that's that's true of many European countries. So I think
Speaker 1: the staying power on the side of the West is significant.
Speaker 1: And that's another thing that Putin has to fit. The
Speaker 1: factor in he doesn't have who's allies Belarus and and
Speaker 1: China sort of. The China China support has been lukewarm
Speaker 1: at best, so Prudent faces a non attractive campaign as
Speaker 1: he as he begins around two. But again he'll go
Speaker 1: at it. I think initially what everything is David David Ignacious, Columnists,
Speaker 1: Washington Post. I'm a big fan. Thanks for coming on today.
Speaker 1: It's a pleasure. It's tough to talk about. It's good
Speaker 1: to have the chance after about you bet, I'd say
Speaker 1: it's tough to talk about, it's tough to watch, it's
Speaker 1: tough to see the pictures. It's just it's I've said this, God,
Speaker 1: how What have I said this a thousand times in
Speaker 1: the last six weeks. I can't believe this is actually
Speaker 1: occurring in my lifetime. Frequently on One More Thing podcast, Jack,
Speaker 1: this is roughly the equivalent of carrying around two hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty four slices of bacon in your body. Well wait,
Speaker 1: wait a minute, regular, what bacon ways of measurement that
Speaker 1: we all use? The Armstrong and Getting podcast cheer it
Speaker 1: on the I heart app, wherever you listen to podcast