WEBVTT - The 36-Year Cancer Fight That Led To A Nobel Prize

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. We

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are broadcasting from the Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studios and it

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>is a pleasure to welcome the most recent recipient of

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the Nobel Prize in Medicine. James Patrick Allison, perhaps better

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>known as Dr Jim Allison, joins us here in our

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>eleven Trio studios. Dr Allison, thank you very much for

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>being here and congratulations on your Nobel Prize. And I'm

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you could just describe before you tell us

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>about how you play the harmonica, and you know you've

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>got a musical side that I think it's pretty interesting.

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>When did you learn that you had won the Nobel

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Prize along with your counterpart in Japan? Yesterday morning? My

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>son called me about five thirty and so, Dad, you

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>did it, you know, And and uh, I thought, what

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 1>what I was just waking up, you know. And then

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>uh then a call came in from Sweden after that

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, confirming it. So it's rather than

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:39.559
<v Speaker 1>nice that my son was first though. Tell me, uh, well,

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>congratulations again, Dr Alison. Can you just give us a

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>sense of how hard it was to do the research

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and persevere with it when a lot of people thought

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that your field of immuno oncology was voodoo science. Yeah

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was you know, voodoo or snake oil

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>or various terms were used. You know, I just didn't

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>pay much attention to that was just background noise. I

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>focused on really understanding mechanisms of how the immune system

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>worked until I had the details down and could just

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>knew exactly what I thought, at least exactly what we

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>needed to do. So what is this amano oncology. Well,

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's using your immune system, either targeting it or

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in my case, just unleashing it to attack cancer cells.

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Because you've got these cells called T cells that go

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>all around your body and they're kind of the soldiers

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of the immune system and they recognize things that ought

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>not to be their virus infected cells or cancer cells

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, recognize them Um, it's a wonderfully complex and

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting process that I've been working on since nine two,

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, it's it's just a beautiful thing,

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and we finally learned how to manipulate it, to direct

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it to ourselves to actually attack cancer. Dr Allison as

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the professor and also Chair of Immunology and Executive Director

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of Immunotherapy at the MD Anderson Cancer Center, can you, uh,

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe describe how your discovery can not only apply to

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>specific cancers that people may have, but for the whole

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>understanding of how to fight cancer when it's diagnosed. Yes, well, well,

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>this this approach is radically different from most approaches to

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>cancer theory, which target the cancer cell. This has the

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 1>therapy itself has nothing to do with the cancer cell

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>at all. It has to do with manipulating the immune

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>system just generally, so potentially it could work against any

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of cancer, at least when I conceived of this

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in the mid nineties, that was the idea. Since you're

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>not treating cancer, you're treating the immune system, it could

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>work against anything, and it turned out that that was

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.839
<v Speaker 1>not quite right. But but it works very well well

0:03:55.880 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>against melanoma, for example, Patients that just get a a

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>single round of treatment with with the drug I developed,

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're live ten years. I mean they're basically cured.

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Their live ten years after therapy and when added to

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a second drug that that Hanjo played a major role

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in discovering. The response rates about sixty and we don't

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>know how long they're going. But it's been approved by

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the FDA now not only for melanoma, but for lung cancer,

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>kidney cancer, bladder cancer, Hodgkinson and Foma, had neck cancer,

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and the list goes on and on, merken cell cancering, um,

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, so it is broadly applicable. But unfortunately, what

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>we've learned in the last few years since these approval

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>started coming in is there are cancers that don't response.

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a clear blastoma and pancreatic cancer, and the response

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>rates and other cancers are um. You know, it's not everybody.

0:04:53.720 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It's somewhere or in combinations up to our job now

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>hours to get that up as close to a percent

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>as we can and in as many kinds of cancer.

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's the goal of the minotherapy platform and INMDI

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Anderson that that run together with Dr pad biny Sharma,

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>who's an oncologist that yes, yes, Dr Allison, I'm wondering,

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>You've been working on this particular type of cancer treatment

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>for nearly four decades, and over that time, I'm wondering,

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like we are much closer to a

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>fundamental breakthrough to make cancer less fatal? Yes, I think

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we're are, and i think we're already there in some

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>kinds of cancer. As I said, six melanoma patients. When

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we started this work, the median survival after diagnosis of

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>metastatic melanoma was eleven months. It was basically a death sentence,

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and there were no drugs that had ever had any

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>impact on that at all until we came along. And now,

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>like I said, twenty percent of people alive ten years

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>after treatment, and you know even more when you're using combinations.

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>So uh, but there's you know, so this is a

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>fundamental shift and how to treat cancer. Again, you don't

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>treat the cancer, You treat the immune system and unleash

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it to go after the cancer on its own. And

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>so this is going to be I would predict, not

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>not replace chemotherapy and radiation and things like that, but together.

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the unique thing about immunotherapy is that it can

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>be used together with these other kinds of therapy to

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>improve their their efficacy. And the one thing that one

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>key thing that the immune therapy is offered that the

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>others don't is that once you've got a T cell,

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>you've got it for the rest of your life. Just

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>real quick, Which companies you're working on to develop actual applications?

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot several companies, but key and helping us developers

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a little company called Meta Acts. It's since been by

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Bristol Myers squib so we do a lot of work

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>with them, but we also work with a number of

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>other companies. Dr jam Melissa, congratulations, Thank you so much

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Truly a pleasure to speak with you

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for what you do. A lot of

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>people I know are very grateful. Dr Jim Allison, Professor

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in Chair of Immunology at the MD Anderson Cancer Center

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in Houston, also the winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine,

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much and really an inspiration with respect

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the perseverance for nearly four decades on something that a

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people dismissed. Really a pleasure having you here.

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>We are broadcasting from the Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studios. This

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is the time we talk about trade. And indeed, after

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's public airing of the details of the U S

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>m C A much more and much more. Yes, you

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>have new concessions for US farmers, new rules for digital commerce,

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and rules for US content for automobiles. Here to help

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>us understand the trade agreement is Duncan Would, director of

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the Mexico Institute at the Wilson Center, and he joins

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>us now from Washington. Do you see Duncan Wood, thank

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you very much for being with us. What can you

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>tell us about the details of this agreement and what

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>do you believe the ramifications of the agreement will be

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>for all three of the economies Mexico, the United States,

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and Canada. Well, let's say, yeah, that's a pretty big question,

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>considering the economy is to combine, their trade is more

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>than fort of one point four billion trillion dollars UM.

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>But what I can say is that I was happy

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to see a continuation of general principles of NaSTA UM

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in this new agreement. I think that we have actually

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>ensured that the free trade environment in North America will

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>continue pretty much across the board. UM. There are some

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>areas where the Trump administration was successful in in winning

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>concessions from his partners. Now to say that, obviously, you know,

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>we talked a lot about the dairy industry in Canada,

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but we've also talked about the weakening of Chapter eleven

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>investor they dispute mechanisms UM and you know, and also

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we've we've seen you know, this insistence on higher regional

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>content in the auto sector as well as um A

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>content a minimum content level of forty percent coming from

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>factories where works makes sixteen an hour or more. So,

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that perhaps the most interesting element

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of all of this is to say that business is

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>going to accept it. Business is going to celebrate the

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 1>fact that they now have legal certainty that investments can

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>continue in the region, and they're going to work with

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the rules of the of the new agreement to try

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>to deepen the integration that we've already seen in North America.

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So I take it as a positive step forward. It's

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>far from perfect as an agreement, but which free trade

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>agreement is um and you know, this is one thing

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that I think that you know, as we read be

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the text and great. So we're finding that despite all

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of the little irritance that are still there, um, and

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>some precedents that have been set which are uncomfortable for

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>free traders. It's a step in the right direction, all right.

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I'm struggling with is does this agreement

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>move more toward freer trade with fewer barriers or more

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>towards sort of more protectionist approach. And I'm thinking in

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 1>particular the sixteen dollars an hour provision, which will effectively

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>either forced Mexico to dramatically increase pay or else produce

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>things in the US more. Yeah. I mean that you've

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>identified one of the clearest examples of a less free

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>trade approach. UM. And uh, you know, I think that

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the thing that will stand out for for

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. UM. We also have to recognize

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that the you know, the this new agreement doesn't resolve

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>the problems over Section to Study two on aluminum feel. Um,

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really resolve the dispute over the potential application

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of Section two study to on or the automobile sector.

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Because whilst Canada and Mexico have carved out UM an

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>exemption from that up to two points six million vehicles

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a year UM, that they're still going to be subject

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to it, which you know goes against the principles of

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>free trade. However, you know, on the positive side, I

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>would say this, what we've seen is we've seen a

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 1>modernization of a of an agreement that you know, is

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>more than two decades old, that was considered to be

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>an old Lady of free trade agreement. We've included new

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>issues so that the new agreement applies to areas of

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>digital trade, intellectual property. You know, there's some interesting work

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>there on on financial services, and so these are I mean,

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it looks much more like a twenty first century free

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>trade agreement than the NAFTA did, and I would say

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that that extends the reach of free trade in the

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>North American region. Can this agreement or parts of this

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>agreement be used in future negotiations with China? I think

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly. Um. What's what's behind a lot of the year,

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>at least some of the language that's been there, um.

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the most obvious stand out here is that

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is the question of currency manipulation. There was no reason

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to include currency manipulation provisions in a NAFTA. Biggest neither

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Canada nor Mexico engage in that kind of behavior. But

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>clearly the United States wanted to establish a precedent whereby

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>they could take this language to any potential um future

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>free tech trade deal. And you know, the Japanese have

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>already um signals that they're nervous about that, they know

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that that's coming to their for their their negotiations with

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States. And of course this set the president

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>for China in particular, Dungan, I'm struck by the fact

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that you think that disagreement will be good for US

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>energy companies. Can you explain? Yeah, I think that it

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is that it's good for US energy companies because, first

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>of all, Mexico was excluded from the original provisions energy

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>provisions of the NAFTA UM and you know it, it's

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically required that it was excluded from the free trade

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of of of oil and gas because Mexico's system at

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the time was a closed system UM. Since two thousands thirteen,

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Mexico has opened up its oil and gas sector. Mexico

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>now has a market oriented energy sector and that has

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>been under threat with the With the new government's coming

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>into power in December in Mexico, the government of Andersman,

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>while lops Overdorf, who was opposed to private investment in

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the oil and gas sector. But what this treaty ensures

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>is two things. One that there will continue to be

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the free trade in molecules and electrons across the North

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>American space. And to that Chapter eleven um provisions in

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in other words, investor states dispute settlement mechanisms will apply

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>continue to apply to the energy sector, in particular to

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas. And so that gives a lot of

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the investors American companies that are invested in Mexico, that

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>gives them legal certainty which they wouldn't have had otherwise.

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Duncan Wood, thank you so much for joining us and

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>for analyzing uh the agreement to in such a short

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>period of time to give us such a deep insight.

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Duncan Wood is director of the Mexico Institute at the

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Wilson Center in Washington, d C. The topic now is

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>student loans and helping us here to understand this is

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Coughlin. He is the president of consumer Lending at

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Citizens Bank. Brendon, thanks very much for coming in. Maybe

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>just set this stage, because you know, I keep hearing

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of numbers like one and a half trillion

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars in student loan debt. But the student loan market

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>includes private debt, it also includes debt that in many

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>cases is guaranteed by the federal government. Can you explain

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace and what we're facing. Yeah, absolutely, and thanks

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for having me here today for what's I think one

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of the country's biggest challenges. The student loan um that

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>did just cross one point five trillion. It's growing at

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>about twice the pace of inflation, and projections put it

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>out at three trillion um in in just another ten years.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So just a very alarming situation that we're dealing with

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>here that the country is going to be living with

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. You are right, when you get

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a new loan to go first to go to school,

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>about of the time that that loan is issued by

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the federal government through a variety of programs, and about

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of the time it's issued by a bank

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>which has full underwriting UH and an assessment of your

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>ability to repay, versus the federal government, which which has

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>very very limited underwriting. So you just put out a

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>survey where you talked to a number of younger individuals

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in America about their student debt loads. Regret is sort

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of laced into every result of this survey, just to

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>regret that they incurred so much debt. I'm just wondering,

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>apart from going over some of the details of the

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>actual survey, what could they have done to ameliorate some

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of these uh regrets. Yeah, you know, this is it's

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it's highly emotional when when you're entering school and the

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>discussion between parents and children often is not detailed enough,

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and folks don't understand what they're truly signing up for,

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're not having the hard conversation of return on investment.

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And as you make your choices, whether it's which school

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>or how much you're gonna pay, or how to pay

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>for it, and really all of it comes back to

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that doing your homework and being more prepared so you

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>make these decisions eyes wide open um going into school.

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>How many smaller or I guess for profit universities do

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you think would shutter if people did more of this

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of risk reward but benefit analysis. Yeah, there's certainly

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a handful of decent for profit schools, but but by

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and large, many of them would be in real, real challenge.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>If you looked at the return on investment on some

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of these, and and did an assessment of the tuition

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you'd pay versus the um the salary, and the graduation

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>rates coming out. And keep in mind the graduation rate

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>across the entire country, including four year public and private institutions,

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>is right around fifty. So most of our issue in

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the country is that these kids are not matriculating to graduation. UM.

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>When you do get to graduation, you have a much

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>higher success rate of um of of of getting a

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>good job, but it's particularly exacerbated in the for profit sector.

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>For sure. There was a report there is a report

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>from the Brookings Institute about student loans, and one of

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>their conclusions is that by three forty percent of borrowers

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>made default on their student loans. We're talking about five

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty billion dollars in unpaid debt. Does that

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>make sense to you? Well, so, the data, as as

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>we kicked off here, with most of the debt being

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>issued by the federal government, the data is not um

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>readily publicly available UM to digest in a way that

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>makes that easily answerable. But that does seem consistent with

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>all the information I've heard UM and and in the

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>federal portfolios, customers are considered performing even if they're on

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a um A plan to repay, which could be as

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>little as a five dollar a month payment. So if

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 1>you owe seven hundred and you're paying five dollars a

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>month from from a statistical perspective, that's not considered um

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in default. But you know, that's pretty darn close to

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>default in my book. So we've got a lot of

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>customers out there in the marketplace and the federal program

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that are not paying back. You know, if you juxtapose

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that against the banks, our default rate is about two

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>percent as a as an industry, Citizens is at below

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>one percent. So it's a very very stark difference between

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 1>bank loans and government loans. All right, I want to

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>get this more clear. So Brendan, you're the president of

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Letting It Citizens Bank. We know that student loans

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>have become an increasing problem as its surges in the

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>total outstanding and people talk about how to drag on

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Basically, these young people have so much debt

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>they can't save anything, and they can't spend on a house,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're they're postponing their family formations and not

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>having kids because they're really expensive. Um. One thing that

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering from you, how does a private organization play

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in this space ace and profit from this space at

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 1>a time when there is such this this huge weight

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>out there that is sort of weighing down everything. Yeah. Look,

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we we can't control the entire environment. Obviously. The biggest

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>issue here is the ever increasing tuition costs across the country,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's going faster than inflation. So the only place

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that families are finding their way to pay for it

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is either you know, postponing retirement or or taking out debt.

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>What we can do is is inside of the framework

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of a bank. We've done a couple of things, so

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>we put a more affordable option out there than most

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of the government programs, at least the ones that aren't subsidized.

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>So when you go to school, we will give you

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a rate that's better, and we will underwrite you to

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>make sure we think you have a reasonably good chance

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to pay the bank back, which is good for us

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in the student hold on second, I want to want

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to press you on that. So in other words, you decide,

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>is this person competent? Are they studying something that's actually

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>going to give them some leg up when they go

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>try to apply for a job. Are those some of

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the things that you look at. We don't. We don't

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>look at their their intended degree. Um, there's a lot

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of risk of redlining and unfair treatment on things like that.

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.479
<v Speaker 1>But we do look at their income. Their parents are

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>typically co signing, which is forcing this conversation and the

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>family and the household around is this the right decision

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>for us? We both have some skin in the game.

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's make sure so all those things lead to a

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>better and more informed decision, which dramatically improves the ability

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to repay for the student at the end of it.

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 1>We've also introduced a refinance program when you come out

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of school, which uh most folks surprisingly don't even know

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>about yet, um and spending the market for five or

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>six years. When you get out of school, if you

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>get a job, the first thing you should do is

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>look to trade in your old student loans because you

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>got underwritten when you're eighteen, living with your parents with

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>no credit score, and now you're gainfully employed, you've built

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>some credit and hopefully you're on the way to moving

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>out for mom and dad. Right, your profile could not

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>be more different than when you got that loan, and

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 1>we've been saving students about two and fifty dollars a

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>month on their student loan debt, which gets back to

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>your question around accelerating your ability to buy a home, household, formation,

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>getting married, having kids. Now, that refinancing that you just

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>spoke about, and I give you about twenty seconds here,

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that refinancing could be for private student debt, but it

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>can also be for public for federal student debt. Right.

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>That's that's exactly correct. Consumers make no distinction between the two,

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and um, we we will refinance either one of them

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is in most of the industry that's in this business

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>will as well. You know, one of the stats the

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>survey put out was about sixty percent of students have

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>buyer's remorse on their decisions. So either they wish they

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>went to a less expensive school or in some cases

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they wish they didn't go to school at all. So

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>once you've made that decision, it is what it is,

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 1>but you can take control of your finances, refinance it

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and make it more affordable for you. Brendan Coughlin, thank

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being here. Brendan Coughland is President

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of Consumer deposits and lending for Citizens Bank in Providence,

0:21:47.600 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Rode Island. The leader of Italy's Five Star movement, Luigi

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>de Mayo, has warned that Italy's government will not retreat

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>quote a millimeter from its spending plans amid pressures from

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the European Union. Here to tell us more is Alberto Gallo,

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 1>partner portfolio manager for Algebras Macro Credit fund at Algebras,

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's also a Bloomberg opinion column this and he

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>joins us, Now, Alberto, what if you make of Mr

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Demio's statement? It looks a lot like the altitude the

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>type of posture that the former finance minister in Greece,

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, Mr Barro Farkas had versus Europe, so very confrontational. Um.

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And it is the opposite to his coalition partner Saldini

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 1>from the Northern League. So you have a government with

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>two parties. One has been voted in the south of

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the country. Um. The other one has been voted in

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the north, which is reached sure and more industrial. Um.

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You know. Mr Demira has been falling behind in contensus

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>since the coalition started in Italy, while Mr Sylvenia has

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>been gaining, so I think this is a competition to

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>raise the voice against Europe, to try to gain back

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>some votes. There is an internal dynamic between Mr. Demia Mr.

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Slvina are trying to raise for more consensus. However, the

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the business components of the country

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>are feeling the pain. As you know, yield go up

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and investment drives up. So we you know, we think

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>that Indian Mrs Slvinia will win more consensus and this

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>could bring a more rational stand to the government to

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the debate with Europe. So I guess you know, there's

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the internal the deliberations about the votes that the Five

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Star Party could pick up. These are there's the external

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>factor here, which is exactly as you're mentioning Albert Alberto,

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the yields rising and if you look at ten year

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Italian yields now rising to the highest since March. I'm wondering,

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>from your vantage point, are yields poised to go much higher?

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>In part because the European Union is fed up with

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the Italian drama and it's withdrawing from its stimulus program. Anyway,

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this is it's hard to understand and predict the dynamic

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of every tweet. You know, of every statement generally the

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>consensus and you know very well this from the US

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>administration as well. I have no idea what you're talking about.

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Other too, the consensus is very very short. You know,

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>US investors have gone into emerging market, but no one,

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>no one likes Europe. So there is a contents tous

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>saying that Yales would go to for four or five percent.

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, the two point four percent number for

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the budget deficitit is just point one percent higher than

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>last year. So you know last year we have two

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>point three percent def that Italy has a current account surplus,

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>which means that you know, the dest it comes from

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>interest costs UM. There's there's more experts than imports UM.

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And there's eight trillion of savings that Italians have and

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>around seventy percent of bonds are held either by the

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>bank compitily through easyb purchases or by tellent institutions. So

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>really here the government is making an effort at creating

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>financial volatility, trying to gain contensus from public opinion, trying

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>to portray the EU as a as an enemy, and

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this before in other countries. Having said that

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the coalition is fragile um, it's not stable, and you

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 1>could see a point where the Northern supporters of Mr

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Slbini say this is enough. You know, you're damaging our business.

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.719
<v Speaker 1>You need to break up from Mr Demand who has

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>been promising effectively free income to uh to be unemployed

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and very high spending which are unrealizable. And you can

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.719
<v Speaker 1>see that from the latest declaration of success. You know

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Mr Slovini is absent, so he's not taking a position

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in favor of uh in in in extreme favor of

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the budget is taking a much more moderate position. So

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be clearly stumble latility. But if you look

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>through that, there's potentially attractive opportunities also in other parts

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>of Europe, not necessarily in equally, but other parts that

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>are widening, that are falling in sympathy with with Italy.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>You look at Spain, for example, or the UK, well

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you have you have bond yield adjusted for currency in

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the UK or in Spain, which are wider than many

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. You know, if you look at the Barclays bonds,

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>subbortinated bonds are wider than Ecuador. If you look at

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the Spanish banks, you know they're wider than uh stub

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>story and African sovereigns. So there is a structural short

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. Um, you don't need Europe to have extremely

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>high growth, you just need Europe not to break up

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>too and you get paid very well for that for that.

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Alberto Guello, thank you so much for being with us,

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and really interesting to think that even if Italy perhaps

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is not a buy right now given the political uncertainty,

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the relative widening of other areas in Europe do offer

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>some opportunities. Alberto Gaello, Partner and portfolio manager for the

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Algebras Macro Credit Fund at Algebras Investments. Thanks for listening

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud or whatever

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 1>one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.