WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off September 19th, 2022 (Ep. 598)

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Leading off starts right now on a happy Monday to

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:21.799
<v Speaker 1>all of you peanuts and crackerjacks and everybody out here

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that is still grinding some fantasy baseball into your playoffs.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>The final stretch of Roto, It's all on the line

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and we are here to help you. I'm Chris Well.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>She could find me on Twitter at is it Welsh

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and joining me today is Andrew Seifter on Twitter Andrew

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>underscore Sifer. What's up, buddy? How are we doing? Play?

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:39.639
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 3>We went in but like you said, grinding and out

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 3>to the end in my oldest home league, and it's

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 3>a Roto league, and I'm up by ten points in

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 3>the standings right now, which feels great, except that I

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 3>am on pace to breeze past my innings cap and

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 3>my games playing cap. So I'm just going to be

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 3>sweating out that last week of the season seeing if

0:00:58.200 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 3>anybody can catch.

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Me, hoping that they can't do anything. Is that a

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>move where if you pass your innings cap, will you

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>still pick up starting pitchers to take them off of

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the wire so your opponent cannot you know, have good options?

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I will use any tool at my disposal. You

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 3>know another thing, this is a Yahoo leak that you

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 3>can do is the day that you're gonna go over

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 3>your innings cap. You can go as far over it

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 3>as you want that day. So I will often pick

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 3>up like six starting pitchers on the final day of

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 3>my innings cap and go over in style.

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So gamesmanship. You're definitely gonna play gamesmanship at the end there,

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>whether you're picking up and taking guys out the wire

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>when you can't start them final day. Hey, whatever you

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta do to win. If you're not cheating, that's not

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>quite cheating. You're not winning. You're not trying to win.

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what they in the rules.

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 2>If you're losing.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, you gotta like a fudget a little bit if

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:55.559
<v Speaker 1>you need to Walkie says, I'm in a two week

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>championship matchup against a guy with no fab. I feel

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>like this is an advanta that I might misuse and

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>screw myself out of winning. There's definitely always that thing

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>where like you get up and then you're like should

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I bench everybody? But then you start talking yourself into

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>like the fear of could this happen in that? And

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you just have to play it out. And sometimes

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the biggest advantage is a curse, at least to you mentally.

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's a grind, man, It's the fantasy baseball grind.

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Someone actually said to me this morning, They're like, baseball

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>still going on. Like, yeah, it's still going on. This

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>is what it's all about. This is why it is

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>special in so many hearts. I mean, you know, football

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>does own the space fantasy, but baseball is it's really

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>its own ecosystem and its world. It's longer, it's a

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>much bigger grind, and they all feel good to win.

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>There's something about winning a baseball championship though in fantasy

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that holds just that little bit of weight for how

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>much whether it is playoffs or roto, with how much

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>work that was put in on a daily grind, the

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>payoff is pretty good. Andrew.

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, it's the hardest earned championship in sports, a fantasy

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 3>baseball championship. And you know, I have to say being

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 3>in the industry has sort of helped me in terms

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 3>of my lack of regret about mistakes, because you know,

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 3>now I feel more like I want to give other

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 3>people good advice, so I don't hate myself as much

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>when I mess up my own teams.

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Because we will, because we will. I had a matchup

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>yesterday where I had de Gram and Strider going and

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I still didn't win, and I still lost right at

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the end because of a blow up earlier in the week.

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm still reeling from that. But we got lots

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of news and notes for you as we moved through

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>here getting a set for the day. And how about

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge hit homers number fifty eight and fifty nine

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is part of a four to five game with the

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Yankees top the Brewers twelve to eight on Sunday, and

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we are going into if I remember correctly, we are

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>going into the final two weeks. But this week one

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>homer away from sixty for Judge and then what is

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it two? Because Maris is sixty one? So what are

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we two homers from tying that or three homers from

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>breaking it? And then we're two homers away for pool Holes.

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>This could be a big week. This has the potential

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to be a really big week. I have a I

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like the pool Holest thing is going to happen.

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like both a sixty and the pool Holes

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>thing are both going to happen this week.

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Andrew, how exciting would that be. Yeah.

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 3>I you know, I write the weekly Waiver Wire column

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 3>at Fantasy Pros and I actually made Albert Poohols my

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 3>number one headliner pickup of the week. And I just

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 3>love the fact that we are here in late September,

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 3>in the twilight of his career and we can still

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 3>in good conscience recommend him as a must add player.

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, especially with theoretically we would expect him to get

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>all the playing time moving forward. We'll talk about a

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>couple year waiver any other guys you have here in

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of minutes, But Aaron Judge making about

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge just phenomenal stuff kind of hit that sixty

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>marker unless anything crazy happens. And you know, if the

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>debate will just continue on if there is a debate

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>as far as Judge versus Otani and all this stuff.

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>But everyone's going to hit their markers, which I think

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>is going to make it the most interesting. Everything will

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>hit its fun marker of like Judge is. I mean,

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I went, honestly, I wouldn't be surprised of Judge as

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty five by the end of this and the O

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>there's two more weeks. Judge is gonna be over that

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty marker, and then you're gonna have you know, Tawny

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have done what he's done, and then we'll just you know,

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would say we let the the baseball

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>gods decide, but unfortunately we're gonna let writers decide and

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how that goes, and we know how that

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>plays out. But Aaron Judge number fifty eight and fifty nine,

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and Aaron Judge, I do believe should be crowned the

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>home run champion even of Fantasy pros on our board,

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>because I believe five more than the next person. It

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>would take a miracle for our crew to pass Aaron

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Judge at this point. Pretty incredible. Speaking of incredible, Jacob

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>de Gram struck out thirteen was given a no decision

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>after allowing three runs then five plus against the Pirates.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>J Gram's had a little bit of that last couple

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>games in that like runs are starting to stack up

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>a tiny bit becoming a little bit more hittable, while

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>also not it's like that one thing that opens him up,

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>because he's still striking out double digits at almost every

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 1>other start. But he's had a couple of these multi

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>run performances as he ends out the year, but you know,

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 1>he's still looking elite and still looking like a theoretical

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>number one sp next year if anyone has the Gutsandrew.

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, you know, he just ran into the unstoppable

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 3>O'Neal Cruz, so that was his problem. But yeah, I

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 3>mean he's you know, of course, Cruz struck out in

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 3>two of his other at bats, but he did send

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 3>one over the fence against a Gram, and that's that's

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of par for the course, right, It's, uh, ninety

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 3>percent of the time the Gram will dominate, but then

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 3>O'Neal Cruz, it just takes that one, you know, huge

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 3>exit velocity smack and it puts a dent in that era.

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so this is a stat. Mayor actually tagged me

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and wonkey and it's pretty incredible. This is from Kevin Gorman,

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>pg H and the tweet was mets age. Jacob de

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>grom Is allowed a hit to a leadoff batter in

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the first inning twice during the twenty twenty two seasons.

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Let me repeat that has allowed a hit to the

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>leadoff batter in the first inning only twice his whole season,

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>both to Oneal Cruz. ONeill singled to lead off the

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>second game of a double hitter on September seventh at

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>P and C and doubled today which was yesterday in

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the leadoff spot in city field with a one hundred

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and eleven EV. So just a fun ONEO Cruise Jacob

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>de Grom combination, as you were kind of alluding to,

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that is maybe part of his kryptonite, as making consistent

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>contact is o'neo Cruz's kryptonite. Jacob de Gram's is high high.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>EV's really really strong, guys. So Jacob de Gram with

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>thirteen if I asked you this before, like where you're

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>going to place da Grom next season at? Like, I

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like I can stack on top of asking this

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>as he looks healthy, he strikes out everybody, Like what

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>level of sp do you think he will be for you?

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean he's number one for me.

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>He'll be number one good good, Good for you for

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>joining the club.

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 3>As long as as long as he's healthy, you know,

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 3>as long as the reports in next next spring are

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 3>all positive, I think he has to be number one.

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, I just thought of something and I

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>want to take it back. This is bad hostsmanship here

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>because Walk brought this up saying, you know, I saw

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox on Twitter saying Devers should go, they should

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>let Devers go and Boston should sign them, blah blah blah.

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So I saw somebody post this in We've got a

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>whole Patreon and group me stuff at my end this

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>league side, and someone in a group me room said,

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is Judges season this year the greatest walk season of

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>all time? And I thought that was such a great question.

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And the only retort I saw someone say was maybe

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a Rod do you think this is the greatest walk

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>season in baseball history with what Aaron Judge is doing?

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Because I don't remember the walk year of a Rod,

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>but I don't imagine it was like this.

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:46.719
<v Speaker 3>It's really hard to say. I need to see a

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 3>list of walk heres. But I also question whether anything's

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 3>really a walk here when you're with the Yankees, because

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 3>if the Yankees decide that they don't want you to walk,

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 3>they can they can keep you where you are.

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I agree, except that, like someone asked Judge about this

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>like a couple of weeks ago, and like he's still

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, I don't think they're gonna sign me.

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're going to pay up. I don't

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like he seemed really negative about it. But I mean,

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, I guess we can't

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>call it a walk here unless he does go and

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>sign with somebody. But like, it's the greatest walk into

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>free agent year I think we've ever seen. It's just

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>an insane.

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, when you're trying to make an impression on the

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 3>team with endless money, having the walkier of all walk

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 3>heers is probably a good business strategy.

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good point. Saniel Contra allowed one run on Sunday

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and a complete game victory over the Nets. It was

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>his fifth complete game of the season. No other team

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>has three, even has three andrew saniel Contra. Pretty dang good.

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean this is like a throwback, you know,

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 3>if Judge is a throwback to like the steroid era

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 3>with the home runs, you know, Al Kantara with the

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 3>complete games of the throwback to like the fifties or something.

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we just don't see that very much in

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 3>today's game anymore. So, you know, I've taking little shots

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 3>at him in the past about the strikeout rate and

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 3>things like that, but that's kind of what you need

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 3>to get those complete games, because if you're striking out

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 3>double digit guys every game. You're going through a lot

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 3>more pitches, higher pitch counts. You're not gonna make it

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 3>through nine.

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, look get to Grom. I mean, like you only

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>have so much margin for error where it's like you

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>strike out thirteen, you also give up a couple of runs.

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>You're not making a past a six like to the

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>six you have to be, like you have to be

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 1>a really high end pitcher for that even to happen.

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>You're probably going at best to the fifth on al Contra,

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I haven't looked here the Cy Young.

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>He is currently minus four hundred on DraftKings. The next

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>closest is Julio Urrias at plus six hundred, so more

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up according to betters than the al side of

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Justin Verlander who's minus three seventy and Dylan C's plus

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>three ninety, so nothing more locked up on the say

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Young race and Sandio Contra just wanted to point that

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>out to everybody, but LUs Ringifo, Man's there been anybody

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>hotter than the least from Guifo this last month? What

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a way to go into next year for fantasy Ringuifo

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>two for four two homers three rby on Sunday, Angels

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>were able to win five to one. And he has

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>established himself from a potential platoonish type of player to

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>what looks like in everyday role and hitting in predominant spots,

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>hitting a lot of three and he has kind of

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>led to the call he's kind of beefed up. I

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>remember when he was a fun prospect to tout because

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of stolen bases and everything, and Ringifo probably still one

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of those players that is not highly owned in dead

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, deadish leagues. His ownership percent is probably still

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>going to look low because of the amount of dead

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>league's Andrew.

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think that's a fair point that he's

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 3>going beyond platoon player, but he still has pretty dramatic splits.

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's just state it for the record.

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he has ten home runs in one hundred

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 3>and thirty seven at bats against left handers, hitting three

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 3>thirty six against righty's two forty six five homers in

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and eighty one at bats, so for the

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 3>season as a whole, and you know, as we get

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 3>to the offseason. Right now, he's clearly really hot. But

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 3>as we get to the offseason, we start pouring over

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 3>the data and everything, I feel like there'll still be

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 3>some questions about that. But if he's got an everyday job,

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, right now, he's just he's like completely on fire.

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 2>So you got to ride it.

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Two seventy five batting average, fifteen homers, six stolen bases

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>on Yahoo alone, qualifies at four different positions, if you

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>want to think about that. Over the last month, hitting

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>two ninety two with six homers, of stolen base, fourteen RBI,

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>twelve runs, and has been moved between Yeah, I mean,

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing he's been. He's been in the leadoff spot

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the last three games. He's been in the leadoff spot

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.839
<v Speaker 1>where he has two of three games with multi hit

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>He's hit out of five. I know, I've seen him

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>out of three and four. I mean, you know, with

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a team that's had like Jared Walsh everything, I know

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>there's some questions, but I think he's going to be

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a mainstay for this team. He's the new He's the

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>new what they wanted David Fletcher to be. And I

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to be a mainstay that hits at

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the top of the lineup, who's showing power and has

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>some stolen bases regardless of the splits. Just kind of

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting guy. I don't want to throw him into that

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>like Fantasy League winner or anything like that, but just

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>free production at the end is what was key for

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>him and key for you guys. And then Rob field

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Evers went four for six to three RBI on Sunday,

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>leading the Red Sox to a thirteen to three blowout

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>victory over the Royals. And Spencer Strider got ten strikeouts

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>over six innings on Sunday to win over the Phillies.

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>And I think Striyder is going to be a fantastically

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>fun person to talk about in the offseason about how

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you rank him. Do you have any initial thoughts about

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>where Strider's going to be as far as SP's go

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for you, because I've done my sp ranks and Striyder's

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be quite high.

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I haven't done any re ranks in the

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 3>last couple of weeks, but I gotta feel like he's

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 3>going to be definitely top twenty and potentially, you know,

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 3>top twelve.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's why I think, I think, I think is

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>an easy way to say it. On the injury front,

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Luis Savarino expected to return on Wednesday. He's going to

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>start against the Pirates, so that's good. Yankees manager Aaron

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Boone said on Sunday that Harrison Bader is likely to

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>be activated for the Tuesday series against the Pirates, so

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe some cheap stolen bases if he's sitting out there.

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And Tyler glass Now for the Rays, had two perfect

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>innings on Sunday in a minor league rehab start over

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in tripa A. I don't know if there's much production

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>or much to be had about him coming back. I

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>love that he's coming back, but I don't think it

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>means much more for next year because he'll be limited.

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of glass Now, glass Now and Bader could potentially

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>be on this What do you got on any pickups?

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>You have the Waiver Wire article that people can check out.

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You talked about pool holes kind of being a leading off.

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Any other guys that we should be looking at this week.

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, I didn't have Beata in there, but I

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 3>would definitely recommend him as a pickup.

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 2>I feel like he's always.

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Kind of sneaky, valuable, kind of like a Romo and

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Loreano type who can give you a bit of power

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 3>and a bit of speed. But because he doesn't really

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 3>stand out in any one category, he sort of flies

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 3>under the radar a little bit. But especially with the Yankees,

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the run production opportunities should be really good

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 3>as long as he's getting regular playing time.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>So I do like him to pick up.

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Not so sure about Glass now, but he's, like you said,

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 3>a good story, Nicolodolo. He's still only fifty one percent roster,

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 3>at least he was as of as of Friday, and

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 3>he's just been on a roll lately. He's facing the

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox tomorrow, so it's kind of a tough assignment.

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 3>But he's just been so good lately that I don't

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 3>have a problem using him at all, especially if you

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 3>need a little boost in the strikeout department and then

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 3>if you need a boost in the stolen based apartment.

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Even better than Harrison Vader is Bobba Thompson, who's still

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 3>not very highly rostered.

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 2>And I get it.

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 3>He has a lot of swing and miss to his game,

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 3>like not, there's no power in the batting average is

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 3>probably not going to be great, although we can leg

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 3>out some infield hits potentially, but the speed is just

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 3>off the charts. I mean, he's the kind of guy

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 3>that can single handedly win you head to head matchup

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 3>in the stolen based category just by having him in

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 3>your lineup.

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff, And you guys go and check. Is that

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>on your Twitter that people can find a quick easy link.

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's well, actually it's it's under.

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 2>My profile at Fantasy pro.

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 3>So if you just google Andrew Seifer and Fantasy pros,

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 3>that'll pop right up.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Here's one thing, so Wonky put together found some of

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the seasons. So I put I went to the seasons

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're just going to do two of them in

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>place of a trivia question or this day in baseball.

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But we were talking about walkers and Walkee found a

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>list of the big walk years. Number one was a

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Rod in two thousand, Bonds in nineteen ninety two, we

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>had Beltie in two thousand and four, a Rod in

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven, and Zach Granki in two thousand.

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Actually I don't see the date, but I'm guessing the

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Granky was the cy youngest year. So on the a

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Rod front, a Rod in two thousand, in his final

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>his walk here from Seattle where he goes to the Rangers,

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>had forty one homers one hundred and thirty two RBI,

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>fifteen stolen bases, hitting three sixteen, it's a pretty good year.

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not sixty homers like Judge in two thousand and seven,

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I think is the more applicable year, two thousand and

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>seven with the Yankees, but it looks like he re

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 1>signed and he had fifty four homers, one hundred and

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty six RBI, and twenty four stolen bases while hitting

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>three fourteen. Those are the two a rod walkiars. The

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>very Bonds year was going from Pittsburgh to the San

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Giants, and that year in nineteen ninety two, Bonds

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>hit thirty four homers and stole thirty nine bases while

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>hitting three eleven with a four fifty six OBP. So

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are any of those seasons better than what Judges doing

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this year?

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 2>Probably not.

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you can't really compare, you know, those Alex

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Rodriguez statistics to what Aaron Judge is doing right now.

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 3>You have to compare the player to the players in

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 3>the same year. That's the only way that you can

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 3>look at it. We know that things change in terms

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 3>of ballparks, things change in terms of performance enhancing drugs,

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 3>things change in terms of pitcher quality and depth in

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 3>terms of the baseball itself, There's so many different factors,

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 3>and really the only way to account for all that

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 3>is just to compare the player to their own league

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 3>mates at that given year, and Judge is just so

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 3>far in front of everybody else in the home run department.

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 2>It truly is incredible.

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting way to take it. I mean, even

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>if you do just go do like categorical stats and stuff,

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you can maybe make an argument on the two thousand

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and seven A Rod year with the stolen bases and

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the homers, but judges and the RBI look crazy. But

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Judges a potential to eclipse one hundred and forty RBI. Here,

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>he's hitting a higher batting average than a Rod did.

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be over sixty, and he's going to become

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>close to twenty stolen bases. I think it's the best

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>categorical walk year in history. It is close, though, because

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that one A Rod year is there, I

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't probably throw bonds in there. There's some interesting one, but.

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 3>The Belcher one really got me laughing because I totally

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 3>remember that it was so it was the classic walk

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 3>here he was the classic player that, like you know,

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 3>could could just be extra motivated to get that money.

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'll give you the stats. What year was that.

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it was two thousand and four.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, here it is. Yeah, because in two thousand

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>and four with the Dodgers, he hit forty eight homers

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>while hitting three thirty four. He had seven stolen bases,

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty one RBI, one hundred and four runs,

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and he never came.

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 2>Within What did he do the next season?

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>The next season, the first season in Seattle, he had

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 1>nineteen homers and hit two twenty five. He hit one

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ten points lower, and he had twenty nine

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>less stolen bases, and he never came within twelve homers

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in his career. Of those forty eight he actually only

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>eclipsed thirty four more times. This was in two thousand

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and four, when he was twenty five. His entire career,

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>which he played till thirty nine, he only hit thirty

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>homers four more times that entire career after the forty eight.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 2>And it's no hate.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 3>He had a very solid career, but that one year

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 3>was just off the charts.

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, wonder why they're off the charts. All right, let's

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>go to SAT heroes. Martin Maldonado four to four with

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a homer, four RBIs with four runs yesterday. That categorically

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 1>will help you if you were looking for some runs

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>going into your championship from the catcher spot. Eloy Jmenez

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>three for four, a homer, three RBIs, couple runs. Aliset

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Wan Gifa, who we talked about, had two homers, three RBI,

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>two runs, Oswaldo Cabrera three for four two one homer,

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>two RBI, two runs. Juan Soto had a homer off

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Nelson. He went three for four. He needed that.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Jan Gomes a homer three RBI, Tyron Taylor three for

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>four with a homer, Christian Bettencourt had a home run,

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and Colton Wong one homer, three RBI. Do you think

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>of that group, is there a big, massive win of

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a pickup. Do you think oswald Cabrera, Betton Court, Wong.

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Is there somebody that you've kind of latched onto which

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a helper for the last two weeks?

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, I did just pick up Betton Court this morning

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 3>in a league. I think if you're trying to fill

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 3>out catcher games, and a lot of times people fall

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 3>behind in that category. So if you're in a daily

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 3>lineups league and you can just pick him up for today,

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 3>for example, because a lot of teams are off today

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 3>and he's playing. So that's the kind of micromanaging that

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 3>you need to do down the stretch in a lot

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 3>of leaks. But in terms of just an overall pickup,

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I would say Osuilo Cabrera is pretty interesting. I mean,

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 3>this guy went twenty twenty in double A last year

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 3>and he's getting every day playing time right now for

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 3>the Yankees. So there's a lot of moving parts there.

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, depending who comes off the il, maybe the

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 3>playing time drives up. But if it's not, I mean,

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 3>he's got the raw skills and the really favorable hitting environment,

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 3>so that's intriguing.

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>On the pitching side, you Darvis struck out eight over six.

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>He has been very, very consistent on this back half

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of the year, really helping people out. Joe Ryan five

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts seven and two thirds only give up three hits.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Samuel Contra we said went complete games, striking out seven striders,

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 1>struck out ten over six, and Andrew Heeney struck out

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:51.719
<v Speaker 1>four over eight, which actually That's interesting because of one

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of the bets today actually was a Heini one, so

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that must be incorrect. Off to fix that because Heini

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>had eight strikeouts, zero's Mark Matthias and Jakeswinsky oh for

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>four with four k's Riley Green had three strikeouts, Gunnard

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Henderson three strikeouts, Big Old Rookie set there CJ Crown, Hunter, Renfro,

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Aristide Zechino, Seth Brown, Matt Olsen, Chris Taylor all oh

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for four with three strikeouts. On the pitcher side, Chris

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Bubach two and two thirds, five earned runs, he walked three.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Drew Hutchinson gave up six earned runs, kN Walde Chuck

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>gave up five, and Glenn Otto gave up four. You know,

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>if you were actually dealing with any of those players,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>God bless you. If you were maybe ken Walde Chuck,

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I think turn any of those.

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, long term, if you were doing it in the

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 1>fantasy playoffs, like Drew Hutchinson, probably should not have been

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>a player that anybody was messing around with, you know,

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>just going out on a limb here.

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 3>But if you're trying to get wins, it's probably not

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 3>the best option right now.

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with that, over to the home run board.

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Kat Fox and El Skel are in a head to

0:22:57.560 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>head dog fight. I don't again, I don't have a

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to press them for the final week to

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>get us some art by the way, so we can

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>get it like every day, because I think that'll be fun.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>They've just slacked on it on the back end. But

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Cat Fox is up to fifty four. The leader had

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike Trout yesterday did not go, but l Scale had

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Judge up to fifty three. So it is a fifty

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>four to fifty three head to head match up Helpless

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in Miami and Highcubby both at fifty one and d

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Blum at fifty. The contest is tight and at the top.

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>You guys have only got two weeks left here Cat

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Fox and l Scale one homer between each other, So

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>get that bad boy stuff going here over to our

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>friends over at bet MGM use the promo code leading

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>off and you guys can get a one thousand dollars

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>risk up to a one thousand dollars risk free bet.

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 1>All you got to do is go over, download the app,

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>get hooked up tape in the promo code, and bet away.

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>You can get your free bets. Again, I've told you

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>guys before. They also they give a lot of free

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 1>bets away a lot of rewards. I would say bet

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>MGM might be one of the better reward program books.

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And I've used many of them, from you know, DraftKings,

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the Fan Duel to Caesars and I really really like

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that one. So go and check them out today, use

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a promo code leading off, get hooked up and make

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>some of those bets. So I realized why I had

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that because on my betting pros board it still had yesterday,

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>so that is why that was not updated. So let

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>me go through and I'm gonna give you some of

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the top bets here. And the number one bet of

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the day is Gunner Henderson over one total base minus

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>one ninety on DraftKings. So Gunner Henderson, who just had

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of strikeouts the other day, he's the

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>number one as far as any of them go. But

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it is minus one ninety, which is a pretty big

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>number to bet. So if you're gonna bet it, you're

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna want to put it together with something else.

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>If you want an even money play, you can go

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike Trout one and a half total base is over.

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>He's projected at two and a half and that is

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>over on DraftKings as well, so you can play both

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of those for even money over. On the strikeout front,

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the number one strikeout play today is Max Scherzer. It

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>is only at five and a hat so check us out.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a five and a half. He's projected at eight

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and on Draft Kings it is minus one fifty five.

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>You can play that. That is a pretty dang good

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>number that we usually don't see, especially on sureser five

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and a half something the books know that we don't,

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>which seems a little fishy. And the plus money play

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>is Kyle Wright against Washington. He's projected at six, it's

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. You get plus one twenty five

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>all of these on DraftKings, baby, So what do you

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>think here? You got Mike Trout, You've got Gunner Henderson

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>on total bases, and you've got Kyle Wright and Max

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Scherzer on strikeouts. Kyle Wright and Mike Trout the plus

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>money plays anything.

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 3>You like, Well, I think you nailed it on that

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Scherzer one. I think you have to go with that,

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 3>But you know, the Trout one is interesting as well.

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 3>You know he is facing Logan Gilbert who's been pitching

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 3>well lately, but Trout has just been really great down

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 3>the stretch this season, and we know how good he

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 3>is when he's healthy and going strong.

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 2>So he's a guy I'm always happy to bet on.

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And everybody's pointing out in the chat like the reason

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it's lower we saw I want to point out we

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>saw this exact same thing with We've seen it with

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Ja Gram and we saw it with Justin Verlander. He's

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>coming back. You got you can call pitch counts, but

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>my only argument is, like guys like Verlander and stuff,

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and even there's there's not a lot of pitch count stuff,

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and normally a guy coming off an injury, this would

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be a bet I wouldn't do because of exactly what

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys are pointing out. But Surezier, I give the

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>pass for Sureser and Verlander. I will always give the

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>pass for in this type of an instance because A

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>they can do it in three innings and B they're

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>guys that are just going to go longer into the

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>season at this point. So I get, I get the

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>concerns everyone might have, but that's a guy I'm willing

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to go with.

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 3>You tried telling Max Schurzer to come out of the

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 3>game exactly.

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh, I don't think so. Also, it's you can

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of play it like it's minus one fifty five.

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>That's not great. You don't want that type of juice

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>on those type of bets, but like you can still

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>play it and feel relatively good about it. And the

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 1>mic trout one even at one and a half. I

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know, these are some good bets. I kind of

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>dig these today. And let's go over and talk about

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>some home run calls. Well in that Bad Boy DFS

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is out there. It's a short slate today. I'm just

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 1>pointing out for everybody. I guess I don't mean to

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>like jump over it or anything like that, but there's

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>some OK matchups. You got Logan Gilbert at nine to

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>nine over on FanDuel today, Duress Musen against it, but

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it's against the Astros, which you don't particularly like. There's

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot of runs in that Baltimore Detroit side.

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Wright up against Washington. Kyle Wright is ten to

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>one over on over on FanDuel. If you wanted to

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>put him out there, And there were some obviously some

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>big implied runs on the Dodgers and then the Giants

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Rockies game has an over eleven total run implied total

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>according to Fantasy Labs, So you might be able to

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>stack some of those guys. Wilmer Flores is cheap at

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the three spot. Jonathan Daza you could throw out there.

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>So look at the top of the lineup on some

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of these shorter slates, and you have to play around

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>with some of the pitchers, you know, maybe throw out

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a sunny Gray, Maybe throw out that I'm meanto Kyle Wright,

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>though he'll probably be highly played, but home run calls

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>a stranger Seichtter. What you got to get on the

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:07.360
<v Speaker 1>board here?

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I wanted to jump in on that Dodgers lineup

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 3>against Meryll Kelly. I see our colleague Mike Mayor already

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 3>has Mookie Betts called, so I will I will pivot

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 3>off of that and go with Freddie Freeman.

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, well I was gonna go. I'm going with Mookie.

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm I can't. Mayor always takes this from me every time.

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Credit to him for getting there early. Mookie is a

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>BVP play on Meryll today. He's got a couple I

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 1>think three career homers. He's got a great batting average

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>over three fifty plus career wise on on MARYL. Kelly

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Diamondbacks, and I'm gonna join Mayor on it

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>because again what am I playing for? So you've got

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Freeman I and Mayor have Mookie Betts, Wonkey is going

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>with Matt Olsen today and of course Joe has got

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge as he always does friends he always always does.

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And that is it. That is it for the show.

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Andrew would anything to play. You got the article going out?

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I know you've got everything else anything new?

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, it's Waiver Wire every We got one more

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 3>left actually after so there's the one from Saturday and

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 3>then there'll be one more next weekend to get people

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 3>over the finish line. Doing a lot of fantasy football

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 3>stuff right now on my own podcast, the Rest of

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Season Rankings Podcast with my co host Bart Wheeler, and

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 3>we're doing rest of season rankings at our website ROS

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 3>rankings dot com.

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Cool stuff if you guys want. On the prospect side,

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it just did an episode this past weekend of Prospect

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>one with James Anderson from roadte Wire talking about some

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the top statistical finishes from the minor leagues. I'll

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>be doing another one breaking down the Arizona Fall rosters

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that are coming up and of course over in this league,

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>rocking two episodes as we continue out the grind. Actually

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>next week we're going to be doing a early twenty

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty three early mock draft as a look for next season.

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>If people are into that, follow me on Twitter at

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is it the Welsh. Follow Andrew on Twitter at Andrew

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Underscore Seifer. Thank you guys for hanging out as always.

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>We will be back again tomorrow right here and leading

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>off or Andrew, I'm the Welsh. Goodbye friends, Lock it up,

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>go lock those ships up now.