WEBVTT - From Biotech to Asset Management with Sunaina Sinha

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Masters in

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Business with Barry Ritholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 2>This week on the podcast, yet another extra special guest,

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Is There any Other Kind? Sanana Sinha is the global

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 2>head of Private Capital Advisory Group for Raymond James. The

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 2>Raymond James platform manages one point six trillion dollars in

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 2>total assets and advises on a whole lot more. Sanana

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>had stood up her own private capital group, Siebel Capital,

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>which was acquired by Raymond James, and she's been there

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 2>for the past three and a half years. She works

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 2>as an advisor for a number of LPs and gps

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>and pretty much everybody in between. If you're at all

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 2>interested in the growth in private equity, in private capital

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 2>and how this sector of the investment world is changing

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 2>and where it might go, I think you'll find this

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 2>to be a fascinating conversation. Sanana has a unique perch

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 2>in the world of not only venture and an angel investing,

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 2>but most especially private equity and private capital. I found

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 2>this conversation to be fascinating, and I think you will also.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 2>With no further ado, my conversation with Raymond James Sanana Sinha.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Sanana Sinha, Welcome to Bloomberg.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much for having me very well.

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for coming. So I was delving

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 2>through your background, and I had a first ask BS

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 2>in Management science and a master's in engineering and in

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 2>chemical engineering from Stanford where you were a Mayfield Fellow,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 2>and then an NBA from Harvard. What was the original

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 2>career plan.

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, the original career plan very much was to go

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 3>into the biotech industry, which is what I did after

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 3>I graduated from Stanford. Hence the masters and chemical engineering,

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 3>which was an unusual masterress to get after doing the

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 3>undergraduate in industrial engineering which was then relabeled as Management

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Sciences and Engineering at Stanford, but it allowed me to

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 3>go into the healthcare vertical. Straight out of Stanford, I

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 3>worked for two small and medium sized businesses owned by

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 3>the same investor group and cut my teeth on those

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 3>and then realized as a result of that experience, firsually

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 3>was phenomenal experience. I was working directly with the CEO

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 3>and president of both companies, but I realized that the

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>biotech vertical was not my playing field for the long term.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Hence the NBA at Harvard to find another career path,

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 3>and that led me into asset management.

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>So the really interesting thing I for reasons between Stanford

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 2>and the fact that you're here via San Francisco. I

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 2>just assumed you were living out there, but you're not.

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 2>You're London based. Tell me how did you end up

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 2>picking Stanford? How did you end up in California?

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, I grew up all over the world. They

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 3>call people like me third culture kids. They were born

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 3>in one place. So born in India, grew up in

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 3>many other places and then land up in another place altogether.

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, when you say many other places, what I often

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 2>hear is, you know, India to London, to Boston, New York, California.

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 2>You seem to have traveled a little where else. Tell

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>me where you grew up.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 3>So, my dad was a diplomat for the World Bank.

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 3>I grew up in Nigeria, in Legos, in Harari, Zimbabwe,

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 3>and then in Hanoi, Vietnam. I applied to universities from

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 3>colleges in the US and also in the UK. From Hanoi,

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 3>there were no places to take the SAT in Vietnam

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 3>back then, so we flew to Bangkok. My dad flew

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 3>me to BANKOK to take my SAT ones, and then

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 3>we flew back a few weeks later to take the

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>SAT twos, and I flew back again to do interviews,

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 3>and I was blessed enough to get into a number

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 3>of great US IVY leagues, but ended up choosing Stanford

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 3>because even then Berry I knew I was an entrepreneur

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 3>at heart. I wanted to build businesses, scale businesses, and

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 3>help other people scale their businesses. And Stanford had that

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 3>rag magic between entrepreneurship and technology and the nexus of

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 3>starting to grow things, which is what I wanted to

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 3>learn most.

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 2>We always pay attention to regions where there is a

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 2>pool of capital, a world class educational institution, and a

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 2>private sector that can combine all three. There's no doubt

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley and Stanford is one of the leading places.

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 2>So if that's what you wanted to do, you certainly picked. Well,

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>how did you end up back in London as where

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>you wanted to live?

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So I had the most incredible experience at Stanford.

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Ended up working in the Bay Area straight after that,

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 3>still very close ties to Stanford, was still teaching a

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 3>class there over even after graduation and working with a

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 3>bunch of professors out there at the time. When it

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 3>came to picking where I wanted to do my MBA again,

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I had the choice between the Stanford of the East

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 3>as I call Harvard Business School, but also to go

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 3>back to Stanford, and I knew that if I didn't leave,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 3>then I may never leave the Barrier. It's such a

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 3>special place and such a special bastion, an ecosystem of

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.679
<v Speaker 3>entrepreneurship and technology and growth and ideas. Made the decision

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 3>to leave just to try something new at that point,

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 3>went to Harvard for my MBA, and then had made

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 3>the choice at that point to switch out of biotech

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 3>and interviewed with a whole bunch of firms and ended

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 3>up getting into the hedge fund world, doing capital raising

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 3>for two large hedge funds, and one of them, Brevan Howard,

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 3>would was headquartered in London. So moved over to London

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 3>back in two thousand and nine, and the rest is history.

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 3>Have been a resident of London. My family would argue

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 3>with you Berry and argue with anybody who asked them

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 3>that I live on a plane, because I managed a

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 3>global business over seven offices, six of which happened to

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 3>be in the US. So I'm Stateside a lot and

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 3>also traveled the rest of Europe, but home very much

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 3>is London to so.

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to rewind a little bit. I don't want

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 2>to skip that middle experience. So you were at a

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 2>couple of hedge funds. You were Bridgewater, which is headquartered

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.679
<v Speaker 2>in Greenwich, Connecticut, and you were at Brevin Howard, which

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 2>was which is still headquartered in London. In either of

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 2>those cases, you weren't working as an investor, right you

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 2>were a research and analyst capital raiser. How did those

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 2>experiences at Bridgewater and Brevien Howard affect how you look

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 2>at the world of investing? Clearly two superstar funds that

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 2>have put together a really impressive long term track record.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely when it comes to any asset management business, very

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 3>two things important. Make smart investment decisions and have investors

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 3>to back you to do them right. And so I

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 3>knew I had to master in one of those those streams,

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 3>and the stream I picked was I do the capital

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 3>raising too. That enables the asset management industry engine to turn.

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 3>And both Bridgewater and Brevin Howard were incredible training grounds

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 3>to teach you just how to do that, but secondly,

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 3>how to cover investors systematically, and how to think about

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 3>the world in a holistic way and what levers drive

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 3>what others. Both for macro hedge funds as you know,

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 3>and understanding how macro markets work, how they interplay with

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 3>each other is incredibly important. I use that day to

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 3>day when I speak to my private equity clients today.

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I use it all the time when it comes to

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 3>understanding how markets are going to affect different types of investors.

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 3>How does the oil price impact my sovereign wealth fund investors,

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 3>How does what's happening with rates impact endowments and pension plans.

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 3>All of it is incredibly interlinked. And it's that interlinkage

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 3>that macro thinking really teaches.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 2>You, huh, really intriguing. So it's kind of interesting that

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 2>you're in private equity. You spend time in the world

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>of hedge funds, but you also made a number of

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 2>venture investments going back to the early twenty tens. Tell

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 2>us a little bit about how you sort of got

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 2>involved in seed and angel investing, very early stage venture investing.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, we all have to decide what our gifts

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 3>are to offer in the world. What of the gifts

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 3>I have to offer is how do you help businesses growth,

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 3>hack and get to the next level of scale. I

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 3>did that with two businesses early on in the early

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty tens, as you say, I bought a business called

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Barkres fitness boutique in the UK doing something new for

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 3>women by women. Grew that over a course of six

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 3>or seven years, very successful business, and sold that to

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 3>a private equity back Strategic. Did that again with a

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 3>business called Mindful Chef, a healthy recipe box business that

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 3>grew like gangbusters, especially over the COVID years, and sold

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 3>that to n Eslay as well. And now I'm chairperson

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 3>of the board of a publicly listed company called SFC Energy.

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 3>They do clean energy fuel cells and being able to

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 3>steer entrepreneurs and enable them to realize their vision and

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 3>think tactically as well as strategically as to how to

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 3>get there to help them do that, That's very much

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 3>something that helps me come alive every single day.

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 2>So let's expand on that. Most people, I would imagine

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 2>think of angel investing very different than private equity investing.

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 2>One is you're betting on a team, You're betting on

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 2>a founder and some innovative new idea where there may

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 2>not even be a market for that sort of thing.

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Yet as opposed to taking existing company and management team

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 2>and product and saying here's how to level up, here's

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>how to make this more productive, efficient and really reach

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 2>your potential. What's the overlap or what skills you bring

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 2>from one to the other.

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think the most important skill I bring is

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 3>the fact that I've started my own business, grown it

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.839
<v Speaker 3>from scratch, and sold it to a fortune three hundred.

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 3>So I've seen all legs of this journey.

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>So not just an investor, but an operator.

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 3>An operator, and a grower of her own business. So

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 3>that's the first thing. The second thing is you are

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 3>absolutely right buried. The muscle it takes to grow from

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 3>zero to ten a revenue or zero to ten of

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 3>ibadah is very different from the journey that takes ten

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 3>from ten to one hundred and one hundred to a billion.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 3>These are different muscles, and these are different levers in

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 3>the business but also levers in mindset. I've done zero

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 3>to ten quite a few times. So in my angel

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 3>investing businesses, it was very much that hey, how do

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 3>we get from zero to ten of ibadah? That takes

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 3>a certain amount of nimbleness, hunger, agility, scrappiness, and I

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 3>love that. Having done that myself, I know what that

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 3>feels like. I can relate to the entrepreneurs. I can

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 3>help them duck and weave through whatever's coming at them.

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm sensing the word pivot coming.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to use it because you used it already,

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 3>but you've got to be able to figure out what

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 3>I call the incomings. If life is throwing a lot

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 3>at you, the market throws a lot at you, and

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 3>what are you going to ignore and deflect? And what

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 3>are you going to say? Okay, that's the signal from

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 3>this noise. That's where I double click. That takes a

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 3>pattern recognition that I have. Now that said, over the

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 3>last few years, once I've sold my business to Raymond James,

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing that second leg of the journey. How do

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 3>you something that's established, growing, proven, and really scale it.

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 3>And that's the same thing I'm doing with the public

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 3>board seat at SFC, helping that management team and that

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>board take an existing business of his business is doing,

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, close to one hundred and fifteen million dollars

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 3>of revenue, you know, very profitable, growing organically thirty percent

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 3>year and year. How do you take that and scale

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 3>that to the next level? How do you make that

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>a billion dollar business? So now I'm trying my hand

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 3>at that second leg of the journey, but that first

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 3>leg of zero to ten that I've done a few

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 3>times over, and I think I've got real value to

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 3>add to entrepreneurs there.

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 2>So let me roll even further back. You launch Seable

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Capital in twenty eleven. What made you decide I'm going

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 2>to throw out a whole new company that's focused on

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 2>was it venture or private equity?

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 3>At the beginning, it was focused both on private equity

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 3>and hedge funds, But within a year and a half

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 3>I retired all our hedge fund business because I could

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 3>see the capital inflows going into the private markets opportunity.

0:11:58.240 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 3>That was the right call to make. As you think

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 3>about the last decade, the influence into private equity have

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 3>been phenomenal, and we've been a great beneficiary of that,

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 3>of that flaw and that movement. But in the early days,

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 3>what enabled me to start, or what gave me the

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 3>conviction to start, was really the belief that build it

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 3>and they will come, and if they don't come, at

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 3>least you're enjoying the journey for yourself. I knew I

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 3>loved capital raising. I knew I could do that effectively,

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 3>and I could do that for a handful of clients.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 3>And my goal very much was, let me give this

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 3>a shot, and if it doesn't work, I'll go out

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 3>and get the job again. I was in my early thirties.

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 3>I didn't have a mortgage, I didn't have kids, I

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 3>had very few liabilities. It was a risk, it was

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 3>a calculated one, and I'm very glad I took it

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 3>because it worked out beautifully. But it's not for the

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 3>feint of heart, that's for sure. Being an entrepreneur isn't anyway.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 3>But being an entrepreneur in an industry like financial services,

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 3>where there's these old and very incumbent eight hundred pound

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 3>gorillas are all around you is certainly.

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Not, to say the very least. You went to Stanford.

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 2>You were an adjunct professor, visiting guest professor.

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 3>I was a guest lecturer with engineering.

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but you're also on the advisory board for the

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Stanford Institute of Economic Policy and Research. Tell us a

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 2>little bit about what you do there and how that

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 2>ties into your day job.

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 3>As you know, I love macro and I love thinking

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 3>about how policy and macro movements around markets around the

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 3>world really impact what's happening in the ground reality for

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 3>businesses that are run all over the world. The SEEPER,

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 3>as it's called, the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy and Research,

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 3>is an incredible congregation of leading economists, Nobel laureates, policy

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 3>advisors from all walks of life across Stanford around the

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 3>world who joined the Institute to look at the big

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 3>problems facing the world today and think about how do

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 3>you solve them, how do you come at them. It

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 3>could be from looking at how social security reform, or

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 3>look at homelessness in California, or thinking about the age

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 3>issue in Japan. They could look at any number of

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 3>issues globally and parse it using the world's leading experts

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 3>and actually research how to come out at the other

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 3>side of it. Some of the most powerful research that

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I've encountered at sipor being on that board, I'll give

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 3>you one that really astounded me. One of the researchers there,

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Nick Bloom, has done some of the most definitive research

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 3>on flexible working and how it impacts productivity, retention, and

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 3>how it's very much here to stay or should be

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 3>very much flies in the face of how some Wall

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:36.239
<v Speaker 3>Street banks think about the return to work. Fascinating empirical

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 3>evidence there that he's collected. Another piece of research there

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 3>that I'll quickly mention is work on labor force participation

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 3>by women dipping in the summer months as kids come

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 3>out to school. Interesting on how.

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 2>It's very seasonal, very seasonal.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 3>What do we do about that that costs the US

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 3>United States GDP growth in the summer months. Fascinating the

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 3>interlinkages between women, our education policy, labor force productivity, and

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 3>again ultimately the growth of the economy.

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 2>So early in the twenty tens, you were doing some

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 2>angel investing. Tell us what you were looking for, either

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 2>in sectors or technologies. What attracted you to the angel space.

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 3>What attracted me to that angel space was that I

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 3>was building my business and had skills in learnings I

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 3>wanted to share. But more importantly, when I looked for

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 3>businesses and entrepreneurs to back, it came down to two

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 3>very important criteria. The first is people, people people. I

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 3>learned that during my Mayfield Fellows Program journey at Stanford

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 3>where that was drilled into us. It starts with the people.

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 3>It ends with the people. And secondly, the companies and

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 3>the products they were building had to do good and

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 3>do well right that they had to have a positive

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 3>impact on the community that they operated in. So if

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 3>you think about the recipe food business that was all

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 3>about healthy eating, the fitness business was all about an

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 3>exercise program that's efficiently designed for women's bodies. You think

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 3>about the clean energy business that I am now a

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 3>chair on the board of that is all about clean

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 3>energy fuel sell alternatives to diesel generators and to polluting

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 3>generator types. So that's kind of the thematic that I

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 3>lean into the most really interesting.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 2>So you very easily could have either set this up

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 2>as a VC fund or affiliated yourself with a venture group.

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>What are the advantages to being an individual making single

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 2>decision investments into a startup?

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I think the biggest advantage is that there's full alignment

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 3>because you're not operating with OPM other people's money. It

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 3>is your money, it's your skin in the game. The

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 3>alignment of interest is one thing that you learn in

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 3>private equity and all private markets investing that it's all

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 3>about alignment of interest. You can't exit these things unless

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 3>you grow value and you're in sync with the founders

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 3>and with the management teams because they're private businesses. So

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 3>you've got to figure out if you have that match

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 3>an alignment of both economic interest but also vision and

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 3>execution forte into the next three to five year journey.

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 3>That's the minimum amount of amount of time you'll be

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 3>together for. So that's why I think doing it as

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 3>an individual always gave me much more reward and also

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 3>quite frankly, economic success than doing it as a fund investor.

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 3>The other thing I'd add is that I found very

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 3>early on that professionally speaking, in terms of my day job, Berry,

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 3>what was I really good at. I was really good

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 3>at the capital markets function. I was really good at

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 3>the capital raising, liquidity organization started side of the business,

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 3>and that's what Sibil Capital did. So I knew that

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 3>was going to be my day to day jam and

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 3>on the board of some of these companies I would

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 3>be able to go and add the value of how

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 3>to grow their business.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about your day job.

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 2>You set up Seeble Capital in London, right, that's where

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 2>you found it. So before we get into the advisory

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 2>services you provide, I'm a big angli phile. I love London,

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>but there's such a difference between how they operate the

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 2>economy and especially the financial sector. Let's talk a little

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>bit about that. What's it like being Is it even

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 2>by coastal your ny you know you're nylon producer, Jilan.

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 2>That's right. How different is the UK finance from the US?

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>And start the startup mentality? It seems that failure is

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 2>not a dirty word in the US. I don't get

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.479
<v Speaker 2>that same vibe from Europe. Tell us a little bit

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 2>about the differences.

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 3>You're absolutely right, operating in the UK and in Europe

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 3>at large and the US are fundamentally different. Having been

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 3>at Stanford worked in the Bay Area, I then went

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 3>to Harvard and worked in the Boston ecosystem. Came out

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 3>of New York. London was a bit of an adjustment,

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.479
<v Speaker 3>I will tell you that because the startup ecosystem, especially

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 3>in the early twenty tens, there was nowhere near what

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 3>it was in San Francisco and the area.

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 2>And I mean that's a well established mature, if you

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 2>could say, mature startup cragian, but it is in the

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 2>same with Boston and New York one.

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Hundred percent and so starting SABIL Capital in London ended

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 3>up being both a blessing and a curse. Why was

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 3>it blessing? It was a blessing because there was not

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 3>that many startups there period. There was not that many

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 3>new entrepreneurs starting financial services companies, and so it made

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 3>us very unique and able to differentiate ourselves in the

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 3>UK and European market very quickly. There were not that

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 3>many new entrants, and we use that to our advantage

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 3>and often still do. Although the market has definitely come

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 3>a long way, there are still divergences and how uneasey

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 3>of doing business. But it became very clear to me

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Bery very quickly on we would have to diversify our

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 3>business to be US focused, and so we opened our

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 3>first office in New York few years after we started,

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 3>and we've been heavily focused on the US private equity

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 3>clients and US institutional investors. Have done so from day one,

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 3>knowing that actually the US market is much deeper and

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 3>much larger than UK or Europe could ever be. But

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 3>also the speed of doing business varies quite dramatically.

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 2>So we've talked about the startup and angel world, let's

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 2>talk about the advisory work you do for private equity,

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 2>both in London and the US. I keep coming back

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 2>to there seems to be such a difference between how

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 2>companies operate there and how companies operate here. Every now

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 2>and then a European company comes to the US and succeeds,

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 2>but more often than not they have a hard time adjusting.

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 2>And I imagine the same as true vice versa when

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.479
<v Speaker 2>a US company goes to the UK, at least outside

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 2>of finance. Finance seems to have found a foothold in

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Europe from the US. Why the big cultural difference is

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 2>what is it about the psychology there and here that

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 2>creates such a different business and investing environment.

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that it depends on what type of investing

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 3>you do. At its heart, private equity is about builo

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 3>sell high right. It's a long only strategy in the

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 3>private markets. So you got to buy a business and

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 3>you've got to know that you have to add value

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 3>and make it larger, better, stronger, and then sell it on.

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 3>So number of the clients we have are pure play

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 3>regional focused. So we have a German private Egrey client,

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 3>we have a Benelux private Aqua client, we have a

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 3>NORDICX private equity client. We've got UK clients and they

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 3>are experts in understanding what needs to happen to grow

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 3>their businesses and their companies that they're buying and selling

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 3>in their target market. They know the customer base, they

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 3>know how to impact the value drivers i e. On

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 3>the talent acquisition side, on the add on Bolton strategy side.

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 3>They know how to do that in their regional markets

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 3>incredibly well.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.479
<v Speaker 2>And I just want to interrupt and say, is it

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 2>that different from Germany to the Netherlands, to Sweden to

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 2>the UK? Like completely Like in the United States, New

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 2>York is in Florida, Florida's in Texas. Texas is in California.

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 2>But you could hop from one place to another, and

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 2>it's not so different that you can adjust to the

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>regional We more or less speak kind of the same

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 2>language throughout the country. Maybe there are some dialects and differences,

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 2>but you know the general gestalt of California, New York, Texas. Yeah,

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the politics may be different, but the business seems to

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 2>be the same. That's not true when you're a visit.

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 3>It depends on the size of businesses you're buying. Right,

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 3>If you're buying businesses that are up to say ten

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 3>or twenty million dollars or euros of EBIDAB, then it

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 3>really matters that you're a regional champion, right that you

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 3>understand how a German business can scale in that end

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 3>of the market versus how a Nordic business will scale.

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 3>So they're having regional footholds and expertise really matters. But

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 3>when you're doing larger businesses and we have clients that

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 3>are pan regional, that are your P and PAN European

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 3>buyout players, or there are global buyout players that do

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 3>global deals US and Europe, but they do them for

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 3>larger businesses, and larger businesses often tend to have global

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 3>customers because by definition, you've got to make sure you've

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 3>diversified your revenue out So it depends on what scale

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 3>of business you're doing. But even if you are the

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 3>largest private equity funds out there, they will have local

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 3>offices if they know they need to operate in the

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Italian market, they'll have presence in Milan, or they'll have

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 3>Italian experts in house that know how to operate and

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 3>buy businesses in Milan, or they'll have sector experts if

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 3>because a software business in Italy is going to be

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 3>very similar to software business in Texas. It might the

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 3>operating environment might change, but the characteristics of business and

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 3>how you drive value in that business will often be

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 3>very similar. So you've got to make sure you're either

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 3>a sector or a regional expert, and that often depends

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 3>on the size of business you buy.

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 2>So you've lived in Africa, You've lived in India, you've

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 2>lived in Vietnam, been to Thailand and all over Asia.

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Have you thought of expanding to some of these other

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 2>continents or is it just US and Europe.

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 3>We do cover Asian and Middle Eastern investors in my

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 3>business prolifically and have done from almost the first day

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 3>of inception. You cannot ignore the rest of the world.

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 3>As you know, the sovereign wealth funds and the institutions

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 3>in the Middle East are big movers in the market today,

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 3>and that's today. I started covering Middle Eastern institutions when

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 3>I first opened the doors of the business now fourteen

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 3>years ago. And fourteen years ago people were like, I

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 3>don't know if I need to go over there. It's

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 3>a huge investment of time and air my airfare and

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 3>so forth. Well, now everyone's saying I wish I'd built

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 3>those relationships long ago, because relationships die hard in those

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 3>markets Asia and Middle East, and those relationships I've had

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 3>and my team has had for a long time.

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.479
<v Speaker 2>Huh. So let's talk a little bit about valuation in

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 2>the public markets. Hard to say, fourth quarter twenty twenty four,

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 2>US markets aren't at the very least fully priced, if

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 2>not richly priced. When we look at the UK, when

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 2>we look at Europe much much less expensive, we see

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of companies trading at book value, not the

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 2>same growth level that we see in the US. Does

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 2>that valuation difference in the public markets extend to private

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 2>markets as well?

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 3>So, firstly, let's comment on the public market side, that

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 3>is characterized very much. That valuation gap is characterized by

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 3>the depth of the markets. The US capital markets vibrant,

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 3>incredibly dynamic, incredible fragmentation of investors, deep rich market where

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 3>you can do business on the capital market size presseemously.

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 2>And I would add, plus all these giant mega tech

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 2>companies that certainly have rich valuations in skew, whether it's

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 2>a Nazaq one hundred or the S and P five hundred. Yes,

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's a handful of them. Overseas, Taiwan Semiconductor, asmathroography,

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 2>you can name SAP, you can name like a handful,

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 2>but most of the big ones are here, which certainly

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the valuation on the public side, what do you see

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 2>on the private side.

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 3>On the private side, we see a similar valuation gap

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 3>that and I'll just finish the public market side. The

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 3>UK and the European capital markets just don't have the

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 3>same depth, which is why you see the valuation, missed pricing.

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 2>So you think it's more than just the tech companies.

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 3>It's the structure, it's structural, there's not that many participants.

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 3>It's also legal and regulatory. Right in the UK, there

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 3>was a move away from holding UK assets by the

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 3>UK pension plans that suck the liquidity out of the

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 3>UK markets, hence the valuation gap. So there's also regulatory

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 3>angles that are at play there on the private markets,

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.239
<v Speaker 3>though I've got to agree with you entirely, there is

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:49.199
<v Speaker 3>evaluation arbitrage even in the private markets that the European

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 3>buyout specialists are able to buy companies at better value

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 3>in Europe and scale them into global businesses and sell

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 3>them at global valuations or US market valuation. It comes

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 3>down to selling time. So some of the biggest best

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 3>private equity household names that you know, whether it's a

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Blackstone or an Apax or a Clayton, Dubley and Rice

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 3>have headquarters both sides of the pond because there's so

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 3>much value to be harvested by buying smartly in Europe

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 3>and an advantage quite honestly evaluation arbitrage that you can

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 3>play all day long, and many of them do so

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 3>very successfully.

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 2>So you're advising a lot of players in the private

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 2>equity market. Is it general partners gps the funds that

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 2>are essentially running Are they LPs and investors or do

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 2>you advise across the whole space.

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 3>We sit in between the gps and their LPs when

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 3>it comes to and we will raise everything from a

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 3>small for us would be a two hundred and fifteen

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 3>million dollar fund and our largest client to raise twenty

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 3>seven billion in their flask fund, okay, and everybody in between.

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 3>In the last year alone, we raised north of four

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 3>billion of new capital commitments for our clients and are

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 3>very prolific at ensuring that private equity general partners raise

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 3>the capital they need to go off and buy businesses

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 3>and build the ecosystems around each of their businesses. So

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 3>we sit right in between general partners and limited partners.

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Got a team of over sixty people or seven offices,

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 3>raising capital for our clients but also intermediating in the

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.719
<v Speaker 3>liquidity side of the equation in private markets. As you know,

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 3>in the public markets, the second resistance market is much

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 3>larger than the primarysurance market. In private markets today it's flipped.

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 2>But that means explain what you mean by that, Why

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 2>is that? How is that flipped?

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, in private markets today there is a one point

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 3>six trillion dollars new capital raising engine that hums along annually.

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 3>That's how much capital is raised across private market funds

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 3>in a twelve month rolling cycle.

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 2>And to just put a little flesh on that, go

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 2>back to before you launched Sebral, private equity was a

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollars now ten twelve trillion, and it's projected to

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.719
<v Speaker 2>go up to twenty something trillion. Absolutely, so this has

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 2>certainly been ramping up rapidly, and your timing was quite

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 2>for two to say you get twenty eleven.

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, very lucky to have launched then, but you're absolutely right.

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 3>But the secondaries market in private markets is only one

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 3>hundred and forty hundred and fifty billion dollars in size,

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 3>but growing rapidly. That market, when we first did our

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 3>first secondaries transactions as a firm in twenty twelve, was

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 3>only twenty billion, a drop in the bucket. Today it's

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and fifty billion, still small compared to the

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.959
<v Speaker 3>size of the primary private equity market. But these investors

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 3>want liquidity too, Berry, you could help something eight years,

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 3>nine years, ten years, you want out? Who do you

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 3>go to? You've got to call a market maker like

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 3>ourselves who can make an advice on that position in

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 3>the secondaries private equity market to get you liquidity. Can

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I get you a one fun fact?

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Sure?

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 3>The average age of a private equity fund sixteen point

0:29:59.600 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 3>two year.

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's crazy.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 3>It says ten on the tin. It's ten with two

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 3>one year extensions, so up to twelve. But the average

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 3>vehicle is around for average is around for sixteen point

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 3>two years. Hence the need for the secondary's market to

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 3>provide liquidity for investors who want out.

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 2>So, just for the lay listener, I want to do

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 2>a little definitional work here. So for when we talk

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 2>about a ten year fund, you're putting money into a

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 2>private equity fund. Over the course of that decade, they're

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 2>making various investments. There's no guarantee in year eleven that

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 2>all of those investments have found an exit, so there'll

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 2>be a series of extensions, and even after those extensions,

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 2>all right, the fund is arguably inactive, but we're trying

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 2>to find an exit for this. A secondary market is

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 2>one way that can take place. It gets people who

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 2>are in that liquid and hopefully at a discount. For

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the buyers who come in and say we'll take this

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 2>at X price, We'll give them liquidly, and then it's

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 2>year one for us, not year twelve. So there are

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 2>different timelines. Is that fair explained?

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 3>It? Very, very beautifully. The only new ones I'd add

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 3>to that is that that liquidity can be asked for

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 3>by both the limited partner so i e. The investor

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 3>and the fund itself. And we get asked by pension plans,

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 3>endowmas foundations, family offices saying hey, we've held this portfolio

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 3>now for eight years, nine years, it's getting along in

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 3>the tooth. Or actually my predecessor made these investments. I'm

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the new CIO. Can you sell this stuff for me,

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't like it anymore, or I've actually realized the

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 3>gains I thought I would realize much sooner than I expected.

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Can you sell this on for me? All reasons to

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 3>seek liquidity on the limited partner site, and we do

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 3>that all day every day. Actually, I've done one hundred

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 3>and sixty three transactions in that space alone in the

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 3>last decade. And we also organize a liquidity when the

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 3>general partner asks us. Sometimes a general partner will say, actually,

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.479
<v Speaker 3>can can you help organize liquidity for a company that

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 3>needs to be sold out of the fund because the

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 3>fund is reaching its end of life. The fund needs

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 3>to sell some companies, but I general partner want to

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 3>hold on to it longer, so pull it out of

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 3>the fund and put it in its own fund. And

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 3>that is called the continuation vehicle space. And that's something

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 3>we do all day every day. As well.

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 2>We've been experiencing something here in the US that I

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 2>find kind of fascinating, and I'm giving you a perch.

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm really curious as to what you see in the

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 2>UK and Europe or the rest of the world. Over

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the past decade, there has been, for lack of a

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 2>better word, a democratization of private equity and private debt.

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 2>You used to need twenty or ten million dollars to

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 2>participate in this. I think you can get into a

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 2>number of places for a quarter million, one hundred thousand

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 2>dollars less, very less. So this has you know, when

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 2>I look around at Blackstone and Carlisle and so many

0:32:55.560 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 2>of the big pe firms in the US, they have

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 2>set up parallel funds where you know, there's really practically

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 2>no minimum. Is this trend something that's us focused? Are

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 2>you seeing this in the UK and Europe? Tell us

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about private equity for everybody.

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, the entrance of private wealth into private markets, but

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 3>private equity in particular has been the single biggest innovation

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 3>and movement of capital from LP investors into private markets

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 3>in the last five years. It's been happening. It's started

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 3>off over the last decade, but it's really over the

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 3>last three to five years we've seen an acceleration. And

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 3>here's the most important fact that as ultra high networth

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 3>and high net worth individuals build out their portfolios, they're

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 3>putting equities, they're putting bonds, and they're putting alternatives, and

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 3>alternatives being led by private markets. The average investor in

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 3>private wealth is under allocated to private equity by three

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 3>to five x three to five hundred percent. That is

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 3>a huge number. And so the growth of private wealth

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 3>as an investor in private markets has absolutely exploded over

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 3>the last two years and will continue to do so

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 3>in over the next decade or so. And it's a

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 3>global phenomena. Of course, the US led the way, and

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 3>certainly the forty Act regulation of allowing semi liquid evergreen

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 3>products and individuals to invest on those was a huge

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 3>game change when it came to private wealth's interest in alternatives.

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing the same thing in Europe. We're seeing the

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 3>same thing in Asia that individuals who have a certain

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 3>net worth are saying, I want a bit of private

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 3>equity in my portfolio, how do I go out to

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 3>get it? And more and more sponsors are saying, well,

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to create solutions for you to access my

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 3>funds and product and my alpha through accessible channels.

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 2>So in the US, when this really began to get

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 2>popular in the twenty tens, one of the big drivers

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 2>was zero interest rates, this ZIP policy where when bonds

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 2>are yielding you know, two two and a half percent

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 2>that side of the portfolio really wasn't producing anything, and

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 2>people started looking around, Hey, where can I get better

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 2>yield private debt? Private equity stepped into that and really

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 2>filled that gap, especially for institutional investors. So I look

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 2>around the world and we had, you know, rates that

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:32.439
<v Speaker 2>were zero for a decade. How significant was that as

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 2>a driver? And then what does it mean now that

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 2>rates are you know, appreciably higher than they were in

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the twenty tens.

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 3>There's no doubt that rates being low helped investors seek

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 3>yield and seek alpha in different markets, including in private markets.

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 3>But also it helped private equity do deals right, leverage,

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 3>biot requise leverage, and when rates were so low, they

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 3>leverage when it was cheap and easily accessible, and they

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 3>used it for that decade of boom that we had

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 3>until rates started going up. Now that roads have gone up,

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 3>but they are coming back down, we can always discuss

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 3>what neutral looks like. What we have is now investors

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 3>seeking where do I invest that I can still find

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 3>value in given how expensive the public markets are? Right

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 3>you think about the forward pe of the public markets today,

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 3>where do I still get relative value? Where I can

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 3>buy at sensible multiples and sell at higher ones private markets.

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 3>So it's a diversification strategy. And secondly, it's an incredibly

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 3>important way for investors to say that as I think

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 3>about a balanced portfolio, I want to seek investments in

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 3>folks who really know how to add value to businesses

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 3>over a period of time, So they'll do that only

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 3>in general partners who have a track record, and that

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 3>track record is often anywhere between fifteen to twenty two

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 3>to twenty three percent net IRRs, and that track record

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 3>really matters. So you have to be able to return

0:36:56.239 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 3>money over the neutral rate, otherwise are not going to

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 3>be viable. Even the best private credit funds will return

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 3>high single digits or low teens type of returns, which

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 3>is very much a good diversifier and an addition to

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 3>private wealth portfolios.

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things I noticed whenever I see

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a private debt or a private credit it used to

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 2>be liboard. Now at SOFRA, it's not a fixed rate,

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 2>it's a variable rate plus some markup beyond that. So

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of raises the question low interest rates first sent

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:34.720
<v Speaker 2>people exploring this aspect of private markets and private credit

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and debt. Do higher rates really have a negative impact,

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 2>or you're still getting whatever the SOFA rate is plus

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 2>five six seven percent.

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 3>Yes, for sure you're going to get a if you're

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 3>comparing to SOFA, you're definitely going to get a return

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 3>normalization which did happen when rates were in twenty two

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 3>to twenty three, less deals got done because at higher

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 3>rates private equity funds had a difficult time brawing. You know,

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 3>the debt markets were shut, so deal value values came down.

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 3>If you look at the M and A volumes that

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 3>at most of the major investment banks, including at raymag Jes,

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 3>volumes came down. Now they're on their way back up.

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 3>But your point is a salient one. How does it

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 3>impact returns? You have to be able to show if

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 3>you're doing private equity buyouts, you've got to be able

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 3>to show that you can do fifteen points over for

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 3>so far.

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, fifteen that's a big number, ten.

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 3>To fifteen points. If you are a mid market private

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 3>equity house, you are returning twenty percent net IRRs. That's

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of what you have to show fund on fund

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 3>and that's interesting. That's why you're added to a portfolio

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.439
<v Speaker 3>if you're a private debt strategy. Obviously, not private debt

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 3>will be more like low teens type of numbers. Somewhere

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.439
<v Speaker 3>they're ten to thirteen percent net range. But even that

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 3>is value add when you think about a debt strategy

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 3>that you know, because even in public market debts, you're

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 3>not able to find that type of yield. So as

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 3>rates come down, as money gets pushed out of t bills,

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 3>gets pushed out of money market accounts and starts to

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 3>seek yields again, private markets become interesting to a lot

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 3>of players.

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Huh, really interesting. You mentioned the transaction numbers slid down

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 2>and then came back up again. Does that impact the

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 2>secondaries you've done? You guys have done over two hundred

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 2>secondaries and fundraising transactions. That's a pretty big number for

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 2>a relatively short period of time. How have you seen

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 2>the volumes on secondaries affected by swinging interest rates?

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:29.720
<v Speaker 3>So there was a dip in the secondaries of markets

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 3>transacting volumes in twenty twenty three, in particular, as rates

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 3>were high and investors didn't know what impact that had

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 3>on valuation. If you remember first half of twenty twenty three,

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 3>the world froze because you had fed raising interest rates

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 3>and all other central banks you had Ukraine and Russia.

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 3>You had Silicon Valley Bank and then you had Credit Swiss,

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 3>so everybody was deer in headlines, going what on earth

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 3>is going on? Volumes came down that year in secondaries

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 3>market as well as an M and A. Now those

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 3>volumes have gone up this year. Twenty twenty four will

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 3>be another high water mark for the secondary's market in

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 3>terms of transacted volumes. And that's because as the private

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 3>markets grow, the need for liquidity and a liquidity solution

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 3>over the period of that ten to fifteen year old

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 3>becomes all the more pertinent for both limited partners and

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 3>general partners. So now regardless of what the rates are doing,

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 3>you have investors saying, you know what, every year or

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 3>every two years, I'm going to sell in the secondaries

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 3>market and move that cash into other more opportunistic situations,

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:35.439
<v Speaker 3>back into a program that will reield me a higher

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 3>return because I've made what I needed to make out

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 3>of this portfolio. That's become programmatic amongst many institutional investors.

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 2>So I love the word opportunistic. When in the public markets,

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 2>when we get those dislocations and people use the word freeze.

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 2>In public markets, we use the word panic because they

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 2>have the liquidity to engage in bad behavior. It definitely

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 2>creates opportunities. When you see in the private markets people

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 2>polling back and freezing, do you end up seeing the

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 2>same sort of Hey, this is a substantial discount. I

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 2>want to participate in this.

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 3>You're absolutely right, Berry. It all comes down to the

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 3>discount and other willing sellers sellers at the price. There's

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 3>always a price. I'll give you one anecdote. One fund

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 3>interest we sold traded at eight and a half cents

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 3>on the dollar, eight and a half real There was

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 3>a seller who said, get me any price I want out.

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to hold this anymore. Okay, this was

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm going back to twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, But there

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 3>was a buyer at eight and a half percent of

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 3>anav of net ascid value. Great, you have all the

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 3>cushion in the world, and you look like a genius

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 3>when you do your markups the next quarter.

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 2>Even in the worst of the financial crisis, bad mortgages

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 2>pools of bad mortgages, right, they were selling for thirty

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 2>five forty cents seemed like a huge deal. Ninety two

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 2>and a half percent off ninety one and a half

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 2>percent off. That's unbelievable.

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 3>That was in an Asian manager in twenty thirteen. But

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 3>I will say the average discount these days, the best

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 3>private equity fund managers do not trade at discounts. They

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.320
<v Speaker 3>close it close to their net asset values. They trade

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 3>close to par. But the average discount when it comes

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 3>to the average buyout fund is somewhere in the four

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 3>to eight percent range for the average private equity buyout fund.

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 3>If you hold venture, especially if it's got a lot

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 3>of fintech in it, these days, that's going at thirty

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 3>to fifty percent discount because it's really hard to value

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.479
<v Speaker 3>that stuff. As you know, venture and growth is often

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.319
<v Speaker 3>valued that it's last rounds valuation. Well, if your last

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 3>round was back in the boomyrrors and all you've done

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 3>is try to tread water and maybe raise some debt,

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 3>you don't have a valid print. So we are seeing

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot more spread a bit asport is very wide

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 3>in the venture and growth world right now when it

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 3>comes to buyouts, especially mid market large cap buyout at

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:47.320
<v Speaker 3>or close to par in the nineties.

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:51.839
<v Speaker 2>Huh. Really interesting. So you mentioned deal flow has ticked up.

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming that'll continue into next year. What are some

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 2>of the challenges and headwinds that are out there that

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 2>could be something an investor in the space should be

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 2>aware of.

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.319
<v Speaker 3>I think the one that's most salient, that we track

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:08.840
<v Speaker 3>most closely bury is the fact that because the math

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.959
<v Speaker 3>broke at the investor level in n twenty to early

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, we're still playing catch up on that. What

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:17.759
<v Speaker 3>does that even mean. It means that the exit activity

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:20.800
<v Speaker 3>the M and A volumes, the ability to sell companies

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 3>and return cash to institutional investors really slowed down from

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 3>summer twenty two onwards, as we had inflation, as we

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 3>had Ukraine, as we had some of the macro.

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Challenges, plus a pretty public market at the same time.

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:36.760
<v Speaker 3>And a very ugly public market. So at that point,

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 3>institutional investors stopped seeing very much cash back from their

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 3>private equity portfolios. They were still having to pay into

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 3>those capital calls that were being made by their private

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 3>equity clients because the contribution still kept coming in saying

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 3>I want to do a new deal, I want to

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:53.760
<v Speaker 3>do an add on. Here's some management fees and expenses

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 3>you need to fund. But the cash back froze. Now

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 3>we're starting to come out of that now, but that

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 3>math is still nowhere near where it needs to be.

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I e.

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 3>The private equity industry needs to return a lot more

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 3>cash back to its investors. The capital markets need to

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 3>open because some of the largest private equity funds you

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 3>have out there need to list some of those businesses,

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 3>and we haven't seen the IPO window open the US

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 3>or Europe in the last year in a meaningful and

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:23.320
<v Speaker 3>sustainable way. We need all of that math to write

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 3>in itself before institutional investors kind of come back to

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 3>their normal levels of allocating to private equity. Where institutions

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:32.799
<v Speaker 3>have pulled back, private wealth has stepped in. We had

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 3>that discussion, but the institutional investor has pulled back. The

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 3>average pension plan, the average endownment, the average foundation, the

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:43.760
<v Speaker 3>average insurance company, if they used to do one hundred

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 3>dollars per fund investment last time around, this go around,

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 3>there are seventy five to eighty percent of that only,

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 3>So for them to come back to the one hundred dollars,

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 3>we need the private equity industry to sell companies and

0:44:56.719 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 3>return cash back to them. It's getting better twenty f better.

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Amberinet volumes that twenty twenty three was, but is it

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 3>back to what it was in twenty one. No, sir,

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 3>we're not back there yet. You know.

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 2>It kind of reminds me of what happened in the

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 2>automobile market during the pandemic. When you're not making a

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of new cars, it means a few years later

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:16.800
<v Speaker 2>there are not a lot of used cars for sale.

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like it's the same situation where you have a

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two slow down twenty twenty five, where the

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 2>exits am I oversimplifying that.

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 3>I picked a really interesting and analogy, and I like

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 3>it because that is what is happening. And now we're

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 3>at the point where a lot of companies that were

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:37.320
<v Speaker 3>bought in the twenty twenty one era need to be sold.

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 3>And some of our clients have been prolific at returning

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:42.759
<v Speaker 3>that capital back. In fact, I've done a great job

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty four of exiting those businesses and returning

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:48.719
<v Speaker 3>cash back to investors. Others not so much. Others need

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 3>to pick up the speed on that. And as an industry,

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:52.719
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the entirety of the industry, let

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 3>me give you some numbers. The average returns that investors

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 3>get cash back that they used to distributions as a

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 3>percentage of the total value held in private equities generally

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:08.839
<v Speaker 3>around twenty four percent. In twenty three, that number dip

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:12.839
<v Speaker 3>to only eleven percent. So far in twenty four we're

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 3>back to about fourteen percent, but we're not back to

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty four.

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:20.839
<v Speaker 2>So when we're not talking about returns, we're talking about.

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Exit activity as a percentage of the net asset value.

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 2>So fourteen percent exit as opposed to almost a quarter

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 2>a big difference.

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, historical average of twenty four percent. The institutional investor

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 3>does not like that math. They like to have their

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 3>cash back come back to normal levels because that's the

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 3>cash back that then recycle into new investment.

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 2>They see other opportunities. So I asked you the negative question,

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 2>what are the challenges? Let me flip it. What are

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 2>the tailwinds? What are some of the positive things you

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:50.800
<v Speaker 2>see coming forward for the private markets.

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I think that as you see the increase in regulation

0:46:55.800 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 3>around public market listings, more and more companies around the world, US,

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 3>in Europe and beyond want to remain private because they

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:07.319
<v Speaker 3>see the benefits of being under private equity ownership, the

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 3>value add the access to resources, the ability to have

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:14.280
<v Speaker 3>capital at hand, to grow faster is a very valuable playbook.

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 3>So I expect that the private equity industry will continue

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:21.360
<v Speaker 3>to grow at the very rapid expansion rate that they've enjoyed.

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 3>The other point I'll say is that this is a

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 3>really interesting return driving environment for private equity. Valuations in

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 3>the private markets remain very sensible, and there's a great

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:38.839
<v Speaker 3>arbitrage between US and Europe. The Europe divergence, as they're

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:41.439
<v Speaker 3>calling it these days, is real. So when it comes

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:46.399
<v Speaker 3>to saying, hey, I'm going to globalize my company's revenue chain,

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:49.760
<v Speaker 3>how do you do that? That's an interesting playbook, especially

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:52.840
<v Speaker 3>in the political environment we're in, and private equity is

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 3>very well positioned to figure that out. The third thing

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 3>we've already touched on, which is private wealth is a

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.360
<v Speaker 3>game change for private markets. Is a game change in

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 3>terms of the capital inflows that's coming in, and we're

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 3>still at the early innings of that. It would change

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:10.760
<v Speaker 3>private equity for good, and I think it's very exciting

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 3>to see that gather pace and to be at the

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 3>forefront of that at Raymond James, which is one of

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:19.240
<v Speaker 3>the largest wire platforms global private wealth platforms in the world.

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about your time at

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:25.839
<v Speaker 2>Raymond James. First, you stand up your own firm see bowl,

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and now you're at a fortune five hundred bank and

0:48:29.600 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 2>advisory firm. That's got to be a culture shock. Tell

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 2>us a little bit about what that transition was like.

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 3>On paper, it is a culture shock, but during diligence,

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Raymond James approached me within within offer to acquire the business,

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 3>and we spend months getting to know each other to

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 3>ensure that the culture fit would work. Because if that

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:52.799
<v Speaker 3>didn't work, the key ASCID you were buying, which is

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 3>talent and financial services, was going to walk. And so

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 3>my boss, now who is the person who acquired Sabiel Jimbo,

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 3>and I spent a lot of time getting to know

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 3>each other and ensuring that him and I could work

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 3>together well and effectively, and that the cultural alignment and

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:11.920
<v Speaker 3>entrepreneurial DNA would stay intact when they acquired the firm.

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Now I've been part of Raymond James three and a

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 3>half years. I can safely say that the honeymoon's over,

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:21.719
<v Speaker 3>but also say that the culture fit has been a

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 3>real hit. Raymond James has a very affable community oriented

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 3>a very low ego type of culture as in general,

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:32.400
<v Speaker 3>and I've found the same thing in the capital markets

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 3>business and it's been actually one of my upside surprises

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:38.280
<v Speaker 3>of joining Raymond James on the culture side. You wouldn't

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 3>know it if you looked at the paper announcement that

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:43.600
<v Speaker 3>a Fortune three hundred was buying a small boutique and you.

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:47.839
<v Speaker 2>Go from small boutique to a trillion dollar platform. How

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 2>has that changed how you operate, not just globally, but

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:54.880
<v Speaker 2>the sort of companies you advise, the sort of funds

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 2>that you're working with. What has been the upside for

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 2>you being on this billion plus dollar platform.

0:50:02.000 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 3>There'd be two things that point to The first is,

0:50:04.320 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 3>almost overnight, the largest private equity funds in the world

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 3>started hiring us, same team, same people, same services. All

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:15.760
<v Speaker 3>that change was the logo of the boutique got replaced

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:17.280
<v Speaker 3>with the logo of a Fortune three.

0:50:17.200 --> 0:50:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Hundred plus Fortune three hundred is a giant. You know

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 2>that there's thousands and thousands of banks and funds, only

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 2>a couple hundred companies attain that haft size. And no,

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:34.839
<v Speaker 2>it's not just the boutique, it's everything around it. You

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 2>can tap into a giant network of experts.

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 3>And one of my clients said, listen, no one gets

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:41.359
<v Speaker 3>fired for hiring a fortune three hundred. Now you are

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:45.760
<v Speaker 3>part of one, and it changed our game overnight. Overnight

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:49.279
<v Speaker 3>we started assigning ten twenty thirty billion dollar funds and

0:50:49.320 --> 0:50:52.120
<v Speaker 3>that was incredibly exciting. So do what we love to do,

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:54.320
<v Speaker 3>but to do it for some of the biggest players

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:57.840
<v Speaker 3>in the markets is very exciting. The second one is

0:50:57.880 --> 0:51:00.680
<v Speaker 3>that we were able to figure out and a veil

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 3>of and offer the synergy with our private wealth partners

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:06.960
<v Speaker 3>at Raymond James very quickly, and for that, I'll always

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:09.359
<v Speaker 3>be thankful to the leadership of the firm because they

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 3>saw the opportunity and they made that happen, and that's

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 3>been a huge value add to our clients.

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I can I can imagine, all right, So I only

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:20.680
<v Speaker 2>have you for a handful of minutes left Before I

0:51:20.760 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 2>get to my favorite questions that I ask all my guests,

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 2>I have a couple of curve balls I have to

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 2>throw you, starting with you're a certified somalier from the

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Court of Master Somaliers. Tell us a little bit about

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:39.400
<v Speaker 2>your enthusiasm for wine and what led you into that.

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 3>So I started teaching a wine class at Stanford for

0:51:44.200 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 3>one yearit of credit. In my junior year, I was

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:50.239
<v Speaker 3>part of living in the French House there where I

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:51.959
<v Speaker 3>was member of the staff, and I had to teach

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:54.120
<v Speaker 3>a class that had something to do with France. I said,

0:51:54.160 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 3>France and wine.

0:51:55.080 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense even though you were less than an

0:51:58.040 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 2>hour from Napa Valley.

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 3>And guess who my teachers were. I would get guest

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 3>speakers and wine makers from Napa and Sonoma to come

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 3>and my pitch to them was, hey, you get to teach,

0:52:08.400 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 3>You get to talk to and teach wine to an

0:52:10.640 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 3>impressionable young audience that can go on and become loyal customers.

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 3>That they loved it. They would come down and do

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:20.720
<v Speaker 3>a talk on wine, and we do a small wine tas, maybe.

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Bring some a couple of bottles shirted.

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:27.040
<v Speaker 3>It was voted Stanford's most popular class. It would often

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 3>shut down the Stanford systems during sign up day, and

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 3>even after I graduated from Stanford, I kept teaching that

0:52:34.480 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 3>wine class for close to three years. After graduation. When

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:41.719
<v Speaker 3>I went to Harvard for my MBA Harvard College, one

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:45.520
<v Speaker 3>of the houses their residential houses there, asked me to

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 3>come teach a wine seminar for them. Which I did,

0:52:47.640 --> 0:52:50.319
<v Speaker 3>which was again a roaring success. And then I moved

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:52.880
<v Speaker 3>to London. And when I moved to London, I said, well,

0:52:52.920 --> 0:52:55.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm not teaching anything here. I guess I'm going to

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:57.920
<v Speaker 3>lose all this wine knowledge. Let me put it to

0:52:58.000 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 3>the test. And I decided to take the Court of

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Masters Sommelier's test. It was a three day test. I

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:07.880
<v Speaker 3>don't think I've crammed that hard for anything in my life.

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 3>It was I had a blind tasting of ten wines.

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:14.920
<v Speaker 3>It had a service test, had theory papers. It was

0:53:14.960 --> 0:53:18.320
<v Speaker 3>incredibly intense, but lo and behold, I ended up passing,

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:21.279
<v Speaker 3>and here we are. It's a lifetime qualification. I still

0:53:21.280 --> 0:53:23.600
<v Speaker 3>have it with pride and honor, although I don't use

0:53:23.600 --> 0:53:25.720
<v Speaker 3>it as much anymore now being a mom of three.

0:53:25.880 --> 0:53:28.719
<v Speaker 2>So I was going to ask your London base. It's

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 2>a short train ride to France, to Germany to Italy.

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:36.000
<v Speaker 2>There are some great wines in that area. How often

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:41.120
<v Speaker 2>do you get to go to local wineries and sample

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the wares.

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I love tasting wine, and so I have joined a

0:53:45.080 --> 0:53:49.880
<v Speaker 3>wine club in London, which I love. I used to

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:52.879
<v Speaker 3>take part in blind wine tasting competitions less so now

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:57.839
<v Speaker 3>so any opportunity I can to enjoy and experiment and

0:53:57.880 --> 0:54:01.120
<v Speaker 3>try new wines. I do so, you absolutely right. Europe

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:04.440
<v Speaker 3>is a bastion of wine making, and so if I

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:06.879
<v Speaker 3>go to board meetings in Germany, or if I head

0:54:06.880 --> 0:54:10.800
<v Speaker 3>off for a weekend in Spain, it's all about diving

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:14.000
<v Speaker 3>deep into the local wine. I recently went for dinner

0:54:14.040 --> 0:54:18.319
<v Speaker 3>with about ten twelve friends to a lovely restaurant in

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:22.320
<v Speaker 3>near Barcelona and Spain, and there was a wine tasting

0:54:22.360 --> 0:54:25.360
<v Speaker 3>core of repairing there for all Spanish wines, and we

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:27.680
<v Speaker 3>did that together and learn more about Spanish wines than

0:54:27.680 --> 0:54:30.239
<v Speaker 3>we ever thought we would know. That's the kind of

0:54:30.239 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 3>thing that I do now as a passionate hobby.

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Huh. Really really interesting? All right, So all have you

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:38.359
<v Speaker 2>for a few more minutes. Let's jump to our favorite questions.

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Tell us what's keeping you entertained these days? What are

0:54:41.960 --> 0:54:44.800
<v Speaker 2>you either watching or listening to? What are you streaming.

0:54:46.040 --> 0:54:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Watching? I have to say I tend to watch in

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:53.960
<v Speaker 3>limited doses these days, given life and travel and children.

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:59.280
<v Speaker 3>But I love The Diplomat on Netflix. Fascinating again geopolitics.

0:55:00.400 --> 0:55:04.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm absolutely interested in the new spy thriller that Paramount

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:07.120
<v Speaker 3>has out called The Agency. I've watched a couple of episodes.

0:55:07.160 --> 0:55:12.000
<v Speaker 3>It's trending well so far. I love listening to a

0:55:12.080 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 3>number of podcasts. My go to list will be Andrew

0:55:15.760 --> 0:55:21.319
<v Speaker 3>Humeman Love. He's a Stanford professor wright the healthcare Yes,

0:55:21.360 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 3>he loves that. He talks about health wellness protocols. Super fascinating.

0:55:25.120 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I try to dive into his stuff as much as

0:55:27.040 --> 0:55:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I possibly can. They're long, though, so sometimes it takes

0:55:30.600 --> 0:55:34.959
<v Speaker 3>a few iterations. I'll often listen to the news via podcasts,

0:55:35.080 --> 0:55:39.800
<v Speaker 3>whether it's Bloomberg, CNBC. That's often part of my regular rota,

0:55:40.920 --> 0:55:43.960
<v Speaker 3>and more than any of the others. I am a

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:47.759
<v Speaker 3>huge believer in preventative mental health. I meditate every day,

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:51.200
<v Speaker 3>go to an annual meditation course, so I'm often listening

0:55:51.200 --> 0:55:55.120
<v Speaker 3>to talks around meditation, around mental health. How do you

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:58.360
<v Speaker 3>deepen your meditation practice. That's a huge part of my

0:55:59.040 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 3>repository as well.

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 2>And while we're on streaming entertainment, if you like the

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Diplomat and The Agency, let me suggest the Lioness oh

0:56:09.239 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 2>on Parami about intelligence agencies and how they infiltrate terrorist groups.

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Really fascinating, very cool. I just finished the first season

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:20.520
<v Speaker 2>and I'm looking you need a break because it's like

0:56:21.280 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 2>very tense and wow, we're about to start the second

0:56:25.080 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 2>So tell us about your mentors who helped shape your career.

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I am lucky enough to have been picked up by

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:38.959
<v Speaker 3>a wonderful professor Stanford called Professor Tom Cosnick. Tom took

0:56:39.000 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 3>me on at the tenor age of nineteen or twenty,

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:44.680
<v Speaker 3>and he took me under his wing, made me a

0:56:44.719 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 3>research fellow. He's the one that enabled me to guest

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:50.919
<v Speaker 3>lecture at Stanford. I wrote case studies that are still

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:54.120
<v Speaker 3>used in the teaching curriculum there under him, and he's

0:56:54.160 --> 0:56:59.680
<v Speaker 3>been a tremendous mentor and supporter very early on and forever.

0:56:59.760 --> 0:57:05.440
<v Speaker 3>Thing to him for his coaching and mentorship over the years. Similarly,

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:08.400
<v Speaker 3>is a wonderful professor at Standford called Professor Tina Selig.

0:57:08.800 --> 0:57:10.880
<v Speaker 3>She gave me one of the best piece of advice

0:57:11.080 --> 0:57:14.840
<v Speaker 3>I think any young career professional, but certainly a woman,

0:57:14.880 --> 0:57:17.520
<v Speaker 3>could have received. She said to me, you can have

0:57:17.640 --> 0:57:20.160
<v Speaker 3>it all, just not at once. And that has stuck

0:57:20.200 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 3>with me forever since. And it's been true in many

0:57:23.080 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 3>walks of life, as I've had my children, as I've

0:57:25.400 --> 0:57:27.520
<v Speaker 3>grown my businesses, as I do what I do on

0:57:27.520 --> 0:57:30.240
<v Speaker 3>a daily basis. So those are the two that stand

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:33.640
<v Speaker 3>out both at Stanford. Both influential in the way they

0:57:33.680 --> 0:57:36.560
<v Speaker 3>mentored me, but also what they imparted in me.

0:57:37.320 --> 0:57:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting. Let's talk about books. What are some of

0:57:41.080 --> 0:57:42.800
<v Speaker 2>your favorites and what are you reading right now?

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:48.320
<v Speaker 3>I love the book The Big Leap by Gray Hendrix.

0:57:48.960 --> 0:57:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Everyone should pick it up. It's a quick read. It

0:57:51.760 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 3>talks about upper limits, how we set upper limits unconsciously

0:57:57.160 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 3>in our lives. He starts off with this great research

0:58:00.240 --> 0:58:03.720
<v Speaker 3>about how most lottery winners after five years, most of

0:58:03.800 --> 0:58:06.680
<v Speaker 3>them end up being broke, really unhappy.

0:58:06.600 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Broke, divorce, suicide. It's terrible.

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 3>It's terrible. Why we've just been coming to all these riches.

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:15.920
<v Speaker 3>The mind has a reset point that brings you down

0:58:16.040 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 3>into what you're used to feeling and the kind of

0:58:18.640 --> 0:58:21.160
<v Speaker 3>mental space you're used to inhabiting. How do you break

0:58:21.160 --> 0:58:23.360
<v Speaker 3>out of that and increase your upper limits so you

0:58:23.400 --> 0:58:25.760
<v Speaker 3>can continue to scale in your life and in your career,

0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:29.240
<v Speaker 3>in your personal life and so on. Fascinating quick read.

0:58:29.480 --> 0:58:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Big Leap by Gay Hendrix Highly recommended. I'm reading a

0:58:34.160 --> 0:58:36.600
<v Speaker 3>book right now. I'm only about thirty pages into it.

0:58:36.640 --> 0:58:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Called the Mind Matters. Back to my thematic about mental

0:58:40.760 --> 0:58:44.400
<v Speaker 3>and understanding how the mind works and mental health. Mind

0:58:44.400 --> 0:58:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Matters is by a professor who talks about how the

0:58:48.040 --> 0:58:51.439
<v Speaker 3>mind can often visualize things into reality. So you hear

0:58:51.520 --> 0:58:55.000
<v Speaker 3>this phrase called manifestation a lot. This is a neuroscientist

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 3>studying what that means in terms of how the brain

0:58:58.160 --> 0:59:01.480
<v Speaker 3>fires to try to make things into reality for us.

0:59:01.800 --> 0:59:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Fascinating thirty five pages or so. So far so early innings,

0:59:05.320 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 3>but it's gone.

0:59:05.840 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, really interesting. And our final two questions, what sort

0:59:10.360 --> 0:59:12.880
<v Speaker 2>of advice would you give to a recent college grad

0:59:13.440 --> 0:59:18.480
<v Speaker 2>interested in a career in private markets or finance.

0:59:19.680 --> 0:59:23.200
<v Speaker 3>My number one piece of advice to anybody entering finance

0:59:23.480 --> 0:59:28.000
<v Speaker 3>is play the long game. Too many young people, I'm

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:30.320
<v Speaker 3>sure that you come across, Berry, that I come across,

0:59:30.640 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 3>are all about the short term hits and the short

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:35.160
<v Speaker 3>term wins. If it doesn't work out, they move on

0:59:35.280 --> 0:59:36.800
<v Speaker 3>and they try to make it work somewhere else, and

0:59:36.800 --> 0:59:40.240
<v Speaker 3>they move on again. A rolling stone gathers no moss,

0:59:40.400 --> 0:59:43.760
<v Speaker 3>and especially in finance, it's a world that ends up

0:59:43.800 --> 0:59:48.240
<v Speaker 3>being one, maybe two degrees of separation. It's a world

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:51.520
<v Speaker 3>in which relationships still really, really matter, and you have

0:59:51.600 --> 0:59:54.560
<v Speaker 3>to cultivate them. Thinking about a ten to twenty year

0:59:54.640 --> 0:59:57.160
<v Speaker 3>career in mind, not what can this person do for

0:59:57.200 --> 0:59:59.680
<v Speaker 3>me today, or this week, or this month or immediately.

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 3>And that is I think one of the most profound

1:00:02.880 --> 1:00:05.560
<v Speaker 3>pieces of advice I leaned into early in my career.

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Looking at every human being as a long term investment

1:00:08.800 --> 1:00:12.520
<v Speaker 3>of time and energy, not looking for quick paybacks, same

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:15.760
<v Speaker 3>with investment investing in private equity, but certainly true when

1:00:15.800 --> 1:00:16.480
<v Speaker 3>it comes to people.

1:00:17.040 --> 1:00:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting and our final question, what do you know

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:23.520
<v Speaker 2>about the world of private equity today? You wish you

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>knew twenty plus years ago when you were first starting out.

1:00:28.000 --> 1:00:30.400
<v Speaker 3>What I know now that I wish I knew back

1:00:30.440 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 3>then is that the market will change and adapt even

1:00:36.120 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 3>faster and more furiously than you ever thought possible. Did

1:00:39.680 --> 1:00:42.720
<v Speaker 3>we see the trillions of dollars in the private equity

1:00:42.800 --> 1:00:43.680
<v Speaker 3>primary market?

1:00:43.720 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>No?

1:00:44.440 --> 1:00:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Did I see the secondary's market growing to one hundred

1:00:47.120 --> 1:00:50.880
<v Speaker 3>and fifty billion on its way to a trillion dollars itself, No,

1:00:51.640 --> 1:00:56.240
<v Speaker 3>So the growth will far outpace your wildest dreams, both

1:00:56.240 --> 1:00:59.200
<v Speaker 3>in your own industry but also in the finance world

1:00:59.200 --> 1:01:01.800
<v Speaker 3>around you. Think about twenty years ago, had you and

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:05.000
<v Speaker 3>I ever envisioned the mag seven and the trends we're

1:01:05.000 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 3>seeing in technology and how markets would be at the

1:01:07.880 --> 1:01:10.720
<v Speaker 3>levels they are today, not even in our wildest dreams.

1:01:11.200 --> 1:01:13.240
<v Speaker 3>So as I think about the next twenty years, I

1:01:13.320 --> 1:01:13.840
<v Speaker 3>keep that in.

1:01:13.800 --> 1:01:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Mind really really interesting. Thank you, Sanana for being so

1:01:17.760 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>generous with your time we have been speaking with. Sanna

1:01:21.040 --> 1:01:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Sinhachi is the global head of the Private Capital Advisory

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Group for Raymond James. If you enjoy this conversation, well,

1:01:29.240 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 2>be sure and check out any of the previous five

1:01:31.800 --> 1:01:34.760
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty we've done over the past ten and

1:01:34.760 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 2>a half years. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify,

1:01:39.040 --> 1:01:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg YouTube, wherever you find your favorite podcasts. And be

1:01:44.120 --> 1:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>sure and check out my new podcast At the Money,

1:01:47.440 --> 1:01:52.840
<v Speaker 2>short ten minute conversations with experts about topics affecting your money,

1:01:53.120 --> 1:01:56.840
<v Speaker 2>earning it, spending it, and most importantly, investing it At

1:01:56.840 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 2>the Money, in the Masters in Business, feed or wherever

1:02:00.440 --> 1:02:03.600
<v Speaker 2>you find your favorite podcasts. I would be remiss if

1:02:03.640 --> 1:02:05.440
<v Speaker 2>I did not thank the Cracked team who helps us

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:09.480
<v Speaker 2>put these conversations together each week. John Wasserman is my

1:02:09.560 --> 1:02:13.800
<v Speaker 2>audio engineer. Anna Luke is my producer. Sean Russo is

1:02:13.840 --> 1:02:16.920
<v Speaker 2>my researcher. Sage Bauman is the head of podcasts here

1:02:16.960 --> 1:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>at Bloomberg. I'm Barry Ritolts. You've been listening to Masters

1:02:21.120 --> 1:02:26.360
<v Speaker 2>in Business on Bloomberg Radio.