WEBVTT - Chuck's Commentary - Trump Makes Headlines… but No Movement +

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Happy Monday. Welcome to another episode of the Chuck Podcast.

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you I have a little extra

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>bouncing my step because we just had a weekend of

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>meaningful football. Okay, I am a college football fanatic. I

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>love these first two weeks where college football gets center stage.

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Week zero. Literally, I'll watch anything. I watch some fcs,

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I will watch all of it. Kansas State Iowa State,

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, was the best game of the day. But

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Stanford Hawaii, right, you got to go all day long.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just nice to have football back. So that put

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>me in a good mood after what was an excruciating

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>time dropping off my youngest at college. I don't want

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to go through the specifics. It's not fair to him.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But let's just say that this is it's as hard

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>as everybody will tell you that it is. And then

0:00:55.080 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>some if you've this was my second time, you know,

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 1>it's funny when you know you still have another child

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>at home, there's sort of one set of emotions. When

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>suddenly it's empty, it's a whole new set of emotions.

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>So but I will I will spare you some of that.

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>But let's just say that a good distraction from my

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>glumness and me missing my son. Is the start of

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>college football season, that's for sure, and which sort of

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>brings me here we are. We're in August. I know

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>some of you think college football shouldn't start in August.

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>It should start, you know, first of September. But here

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>we are. That's what it is. And it gets me

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to my theme that I want to jump in on.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>By the way, my guest later today. The guest is

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Martin of Politico, and Jonathan and I have known

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>each other longer than this century. I it goes past

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the twenty first. We've been friends, colleagues, and then some

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>going back to the nineties. We regularly have conversations and

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we put them on camera and put them on tape,

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's essentially what my Monday episode with him is.

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So I hope, I know if you're a political junkie,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you will enjoy the conversation. And if you like you're

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a little taste of college football on the side, I

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>think you'll also enjoy it as well. But we hit

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the gambit. We were all over the place, whether it's Trump,

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the Democrats, whether it's the primary calendar in

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight elections in twenty five, the midterms in twenty

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>six we covered the entire tapestry of things, But let

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>me get started. One of the topics I actually did

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation with him on was in reaction to

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to what I want to talk about today. Because for

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>most of my thirty five years here in Washington, I

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>got here in nineteen ninety. August has always been the

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>slowest month of the year, right, slower even than December,

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>right because December, yes it's slow, but we're we've got

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>so many obligations, right, you know, August is the slowest

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>month of the year. Congress leaves town, the White House

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>throttles back. Trust me, as a traffic there's no traffic

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in Washington unless there's a Nats game, even right now,

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>especially if the Nets playing the Phillies are Mets these days.

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, that's literally the only traffic you run into.

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And the rule of thumb about August was simple, don't

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>watch anything new until September, when everyone is paying attention again,

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>when all parents are, the kids back at school, et cetera.

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>August really was always used for regrouping. Presidents took vacations.

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>That didn't mean stuff didn't there was a lot of

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>important stuff what happened in August. I think I said

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>this to you before. I actually have always done a

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>July vacation. I've learned to do that lately, more so

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>than August, because for me, August there is always a

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>lot more happening in August than people realize. So August

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>for me is about preparing for September in many ways.

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's sort of made August even more

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting at times because it was so baked in that

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you didn't do anything planned, that you knew if something

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>happened in August it was unplanned, and that it was

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a bigger story than you realized. Bill Clinton thought he

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>was in the clear in August of ninety eight, and

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the Mona, the Lewinsky grand jury test about he had

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and five. George W. Bush thought he

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>could vacation in Crawford. Then he had Hurricane Katrina, which

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>turned August into a political catastrophe. But it was these

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 1>are semi unplanned events, right, and in some ways you

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>were encouraged to try to keep your head down in August.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Donald Trump's never bought into that idea. For him,

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>there is no regrouping. There is no resting. August is

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>no different than April, than May, than December than June. Right,

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's all the same. And of course this

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>August has been anything but sleeping. We've had two high

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 1>profile summits, a federal takeover the DC Police Department, the

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>government buying a stake in Intel, a new redistricting order

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>in Texas, a response in California, a manufactured Epstein file.

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I'm leaving a few things out. We had

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of motion in August. But you know what

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have. We didn't have a lot of movement

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>right where things stood between Ukraine and Russian July they

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>still stand today. The summits produced nothing, but there was

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a big TV show. The takeover DC policing has been performative.

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Troops are deployed in all the wrong neighborhoods South Park

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Head right. For what it's worth, I've been driving around

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>town and wherever you would think that what Donald Trump's

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>stated goal is. He's not been. He's not been. I've

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>not seen him in parts of town that aren't tourist attractions.

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like being anchored in the ocean while the boat

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>rocks back and forth. Right, there's plenty of turbulence, but

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>no forward direction. And at some point that motion without

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>movement simply makes everybody seasick. So take the redistrict find

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in Texas. Trump's order was met with such resistance that

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>had triggered a nationwide scramble. Everyone's trying to outgain the

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>other side for partisan advantage. Democrats are justifying their actions

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>by pointing to Republicans, Republicans point to Democrats, and the

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>result is a complete abandonment of the Democratic princes bull

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>of fair representation. That's motion with real consequences, but it's

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the kind that corrodes institutions rather than strengthens them. And

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>ultimately the goal for both parties is to fight to

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 1>a draw, which is motion without movement. Let's look at

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein file gambit. Trump managed to stage a faux

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.239
<v Speaker 1>revelation by saying this was this is actually like unpack

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>what he did with Epstein here. Right. You know, if

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you believe there are all these files that should be

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>released and aren't being released, you should really be angry

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>by what he did. Right, Because Trump managed to stage

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a faux revelation by sending his old personal lawyer to

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>interviewed Gallaine Maxwell. Of course, before the interview they made

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>sure to publicly dangle the possibility of clemency, so it

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of obviously had an impact under testimony. Right then,

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, they released the transcript that surprise seemed to

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>clear Trump manufactured theater through it through right here, we

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>had a convicted fallon begging for a pardon, coach through

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>her answers, presented to the public as if she were

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a credible witness, chum in the water, created headlines, got

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>people talking, but advance nothing, motion, not movement. I am

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>really curious to see if those that say they care

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>about the Epstein files on the right view this Gallaine

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Maxwell transcript as something that's worthless or worth something. I

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of think it's totally worthless, right, I mean, at

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>what point did the transcript which he says, hey, let

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>me add something, and it's this extra It's almost like

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>her lawyer said, hey, you didn't clear Trump enough. You

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>need to make sure you clear Trump more. Or let's

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the John Bolton prosecution threat. What was the

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>point of that Not to win a conviction. The point

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is to send a message criticized Trump and the government

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>will be weaponized against you. That's why cash Ptel at

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the FBI now makes JEdgar Hoover look like a statesman.

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's why the sudden firing of Trump loyalists Billing

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Long at the IRS is extra suspicious because there's only

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>one of two reasons Billy Long was fired. Either he

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't go far enough on something, or he was willing

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to go too far, and Scott Besson stepped in. Either way,

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>something that stinks to high Heaven. Here. Let's just say

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm old enough to remember when House Republicans used to

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>care about abuse at the IRS or and they would

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>spend all sorts of of time trying to I mean,

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Jim Jordan, I think, became a household figure by going

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>after a bureaucrat at the IRS. And here we have

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>really suspicious activity at the IRS. I would say, don't

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>hold your breath for James Comer to start issuing subpoenas

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>for testimony from Treasury to find out what's actually happened

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in the IRS, to find out what actually happened with

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Billy Long. Something smells, but don't count on your congressional oversight, folks,

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to actually care. And it's not confined to Washington. Virginia,

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice has been working to elevate the

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>transgender school issue again fight Republicans believe helps them politically.

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But here's the federal government being used to try to

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>prop up a campaign in Virginia. This is what you're

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>going to see, right, We're starting to see, right, the

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>power of the federal government. Trump will use this power

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to politically try to maneuver things in his favor. And

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>by the way, if you're wondering, like all this mortgage

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>fraud stuff, right, they sort of this has been one

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of the more interesting sort of manufactured crises that they've created,

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>which is to scour the financial disclosures of home ownership

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and of real estate of selective political opponents. Letitia James

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Adam shift. We're now seeing it with the Fed governor.

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And I will just tell you a basic rule of thumb.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>If Roger Stone, which is a longtime Trump dark arts

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>on and off again advisor, he hypes these two things

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>more than anything. Right, Well, when his own is involved

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in something, you know it's not on the up and

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>up right. This guy is as crooked as they come

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to political dark arts. He arguably invented

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 1>the modern version of it in many ways, and his

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 1>obsession with this tells me how manufactured that is. So still,

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it's part of a bigger pattern, right, constant motion, not

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of movement. Every day, one of these stories

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>takes over every day the boat rocks again. Trump's first

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>term he did the same thing. But there were people

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>inside government who did try to study the ship. Not anymore.

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's Bessin on the economy, maybe Ruby on Ukraine.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I do wonder if you didn't have Bessin

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>on the economy, we'd probably already be in a recession

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>with the tear of craziness. And if you didn't have

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Rubio there, Ukraine would already have lost its sovereignty to Russia.

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But outside of that, everyone else is enabling this chaos.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is I mean, my gosh, the FBI

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is not a true I mean, this is so deeply

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>damaging to the repation of the FBI. What Cash Betel

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is doing. I mean, you know what American is going

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to believe anything coming out of the FBI right now?

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>It all feels And if I were a rank and

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>file a BI agent, I'd be just appalled. This is terrible. Say,

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>what's happening to the core rank and file at Border Patrol, DHS,

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>your average National Guard. You know, remember these people are

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>following orders and they're they're really it's it's what Trump

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is doing to these folks. What's happening to these agencies.

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>This is doing long term damage where it's just trust

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>will erode for everybody. But it also brings me to

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy because this is the real danger. What happens

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>when things get worse with this economy, and they're going

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to get worse, right, You've heard it from Mark Xandy.

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I just heard it from one of Trump's most loyal

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>economic advisor, Steve Moore, who's certainly more bullish than most,

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but has some concerns about this economy. Things are getting worse.

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, now just give you everybody hates the airport anecdote,

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but I was at the airport killing some time. Ordered

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 1>a couple eggs and the men you said three seventy

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>five per egg, so you know, two eggs. Waiter said, actually,

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>we just had to We just raised them. The price

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>changed and it's six dollars per egg now. And he

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>went through this whole reason. He was like apologizing. He goes,

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, are you sure you want to order eggs?

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Or do you want to just order one egg? And

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it was just, you know, look, it's an anecdotal, but

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you're hearing it. I told you about stringflation already taking

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>place of Trader Joe's. We know others of you have

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>been when I weighed in on that. I've been hearing

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>from other folks on this. I mean, the cost of

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>living has gone up. There's not a single streaming service

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that has is deciding to charge less for entertainment, and

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in fact, everybody seems to be charging more, even as

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>there's weird consolidation Disney, Hulu and ESPN. I thought, We're

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>all under the same umbrella, and somehow I'm going to

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>be paying more, not less. Right, we all see that coming.

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>All of that impacts the pocketbook, all of it. So

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>here we are, we have, jobs are scarcer. The next

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>jobs report, next couple of jobs report are going to

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>be very very telling. Inflation is still rising. Stagflation in

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the spring of twenty six is a real potential problem.

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And what happens when that happens, Right, what's the federal government?

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>How's Trump going to try to distract from all of this.

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he can, because lived experience is

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>just that you feel it at the grocery store. You'll

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>feel it at the gas pump. You'll feel it when

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 1>ren hikes outpaced paychecks. You'll feel it when the soul

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>called booming economy doesn't match the reality of your own

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>household budget. Stocks may be going up in a handful

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 1>of stocks that are betting on AI, but all those

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>bets on AI are about eliminating your job. That's what's

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>scary out there for people. So when the economy does

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>sour in twenty six, Trump's going to panic. So what

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are we going to see. We're going to see more

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>boltons probably, you know, if you're a nominee in a

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>race that's on the edge and you're going up against Trump,

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>whether you're an independent, Democrat, whatever, don't be surprised if

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 1>an allegation, you know, gets instead of a piece of

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>oppo research, they just use it. They have a US

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>attorney make an announcement to make it seem more real. Right,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we know those that's all coming. There'll be

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>more abuse of the irs, more abuse of the DOJ

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and the FBI, there'll be a lot more distraction retribution.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>All of it will be motion, but no movement, right,

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>no movement. And in the end, that's the Trump's strategy.

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>The boat must always be rocking motion for its own sake,

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and when you squeal, when you get seasick, he leans

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>into it. That was true in his first term. It's

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>more true now with no guardrails left. The question is

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>how much of this will the country tolerate When the

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>trains aren't running on time, when the rocking boat isn't

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>going anywhere, how long before people simply want off? Well,

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we found out in twenty twenty, right this strategy made

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>people literally sick and they wanted out. And that's to me,

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the real risk that's out there, because right now all

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>this motion is just leaving us a drift economically, certainly,

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>leaving us a drift politically certainly, leaving us a drift

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to America's place in the world. We're exhausted,

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we're seasick, and we're likely worse off than when we started.

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So I have a few other things that I wanted

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to I wanted folks that I just sort of think

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of them as little notebook blips but I have to

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you the reaction to the latest episode of South Park.

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>And I know a lot of people, a lot of

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the South Park ride ups always focused about writing it

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>up through the prism of their anti trumpness. But to me,

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>this most recent episode was more brilliant in its satire

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>against Silicon Valley right and against AI and sort of

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the techridy, you know, as he became Well literally, I'm

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>watching that episode and the next morning I'm going to

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>read you the following story about Elon Musk and this

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is I thought it was part of the south Park parody.

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk announced he wants to simulate software companies like

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft using only artificial intelligence. He's even got a name

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for the new venture, macro Hard. Do you get it?

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft macro Hard. I literally, I'm reading this story. I'm like, wait,

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>wait a bite, waite. Is this a ketamine fueled idea

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that came out of South Park or is this actually

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a real idea? And the fact that there are all

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>these people that enable Musk around him, you know at

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>this point, like I know, there's a fine line between

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>genius and crazy, and you throw a little kenemine into it,

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and God only knows what that does. But I'm sorry

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>macro Hard versus my I mean it was it is?

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it life imitating art imitating life at this point anyway,

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>I just you just can't see. Sometimes it's impossible to

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>parry to parody reality when the reality itself feels completely

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>like a parody. One of the other pieces of seasickness

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that folks scott was this, you know, sort of the

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>random you know campaign that Trump, I guess launched last

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>week saying you wanted to get rid of mail and voting.

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I did want to point out some polling information that

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>if let's say, states, do I mean we know he

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is running, if he tells a state governor and a

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>state legislature that is that is controlled by Trump, the

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump machine, which is, you know, say your Missouri's, you're Indiana's,

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>places like that right everywhere where he's been able to

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in Texas, where he's being able to order people essentially

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to do his bidding on redistricting and stuff, he probably

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>can order the getting rid of mail in ballots in

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>some of these states. But I have a feeling the

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>only way voters are going to accept that is if

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you extend early voting and in person early voting, and

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>so you know if you told me. And what's interesting is,

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you were actually looking for a way

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to sort of eliminate this fight over mail in ballots

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>and if you just wanted to limit them to the

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>military ballots, this is what the public would tolerate, right,

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>which is eighty four percent. This is a Pew pole

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that came out this week Centers for American Trends panel poll.

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>So it's a panel survey. It's not random sample, but

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting what the public. These were the most popular

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>voting reform proposals. One requiring electronic voting machines to print

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a paper backup of a voter's ballot. Eighty four percent

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 1>favored that. Requiring all voters to show government issued voto

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>or ID. That's eighty three percent. Support making early and

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 1>in person voting Okay, not mail voting, early and in

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>person voting available for at least two weeks prior to

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the election. That has eighty percent favorability making election day

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>a federal holiday as seventy four percent. Everything else started

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to get more polarizing. I mean, Trump has effectively polarized

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea of mail in ballots. When again this was

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>an invention of the Republicans, right. It was all frankly,

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>in my home state of Florida, they encouraged mail in

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>ballots because of the snowbirds, and the snowbirds were wealthier

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>and more Republican leaning. So it was an incentivized by

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the Republican lawmakers to make it easier convenience voting for

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the snowbirds who didn't have to fly back to the

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>state of Florida in time to make it for their

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>five months and twenty nine days or actually, no, excuse me,

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>six months and six months plus one day, so that

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>they could avoid paying stay and income tax. But I

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 1>think that is a if you do see an effort

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>that actually does. I think the only way that voter

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the public would tolerate getting rid of mail in ballots

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is if you extend early in person voting. And I'll

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>tell you you cannot. If we try to have everybody

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>vote on election day and election day only, there'd be

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we would have lines that would probably last

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>past midnight in quite a few states. So it is

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it is we have. You cannot process everybody. You cannot

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>process one hundred and fifty million ballots in one twenty

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>four hour period. Okay, one hundred years ago when we

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>were you know, half of that population even less so.

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if you ever wanted, you know, in

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century elections, some you know, some states held

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>their presidential electoral vote election to decide which way the

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>electoral votes go in, like in October. There was no

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>one day. Different states would hold it on different days.

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.239
<v Speaker 1>So this is anyway, The point is is that I

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>there is you could see if there was, if you

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to try to reach out to a voter who

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>was bought into Donald Trump's manufactured threats about mail in ballots.

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>The easiest way to sort of get around it is

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to propose longer in early, in person, in person situation.

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>And then finally, I want to close with this because

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it's my favorite. It was my favorite thing I read

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>all week, and it comes from a newsletter out of

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the Dispatch by Scott Lindselcombe. It's very economics focused. It's

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite newsletters. People ask me all the time,

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you read? I always forget to mention Scott,

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>but he had this great lead the other day and

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a great word that I will be using a lot,

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and it summarizes what happens to debate online better than

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>anything else. He said this, he writes this easily. One

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of the worst and most cynical plays in modern politics

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is the practice of nut picking. What does he mean

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 1>by nut picking? Partisans will treat the loopy utterance of

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>some random member of the other political team as broadly

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>representative of the entire movement, thereby seeking to discredit it

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's saner and stronger players, and to reassure their

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>comrades that everyone on the other side is a wackadoodle freak,

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>not worth engaging, etc. The practice of nut picking is

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>widespread on both sides of the aisle, especially on social media,

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and typically related to culture, war issues, family, race, gender, crime, etc.

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>That arouse strong feelings and push people's buttons. Don't you

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>feel satisfied now that there is now a word for

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this nonsense? When you see it like that whole conversation

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>about the genes was this back and forth between nut

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>pickers Right there, You could just feel that there was

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to attack others' political positions based on an

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>outlanders position that somebody took that has no connection to anybody,

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>but somebody wants to make you think it does. Anyway,

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>The point is I just love this phrase. It so

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>applies to political debate today. This is what has replaced

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>actual political debate. This is what the conversation is on

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>cable news quite a bit nutpicking. Literally, a segment is

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>created based on nut picking. So let's just say, let's

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>stop not can we You know, friends don't let friends

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>not pick. Maybe we can. Maybe there's some better ways

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to phrase this. I would love to hear from you

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and what's your favorite or worst versions of nutpicking are?

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And with that, we'll sneak in a break for those

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of you listening to the entire episode in one fell swoop,

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll sneak in a break and bring in Jonathan Martin.

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>The rest of you will be getting the mail back.

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do a little ass Chuck, ask Chuck.

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 1>We got a decent number of questions today. I don't

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>know how many I'll get through. I think I'll try

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to get through or maybe five. We'll see how long

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>I ramble on here. Question one here, This comes from

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Lebanon, Pennsylvania, Swing State. Very appreciated. Can you explain

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>how a vice presidential pick can boost or hurt a

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>campaign with some examples of both. Also, do you think

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that if Gored picked Graham Bob Graham over Joe Lieberman

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand, he beats Bush? Well, that's u A.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly something many of US Floridians believe. Right, was

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Bob Graham worth five hundred and thirty eight votes? Right?

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Bush won by five hundred and thirty seven votes? Officially

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Was Bob Graham worth five hundred and thirty eight votes?

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>The answer is yes? Right? The point is do running

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>mates matter? Well, if an election is decided by five

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty eight seven votes, having that person from

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the home state probably is worth something. Right? Is it

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a half a percentage point? Is it a whole percentage point?

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it too? You could? I don't think we've had

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>enough instances to prove it. Does John Kennedy carry Texas

0:24:56.119 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>without obj right? Now? Michael Ducaccas had Lloyd Benson, a

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Texas Senator, on trying to do the same Massachusetts Texas

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>pairing was trying to invoke Kennedy Johnson with do Coccas Benson,

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>George H. W. Bush Kerry Texas. So you know it

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is It's one of those things that I think is

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily overrated, right, which is, I do think you're better

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>off picking a running mate to help you with a

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>state or help you with an image issue, right, So

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>as much, you know, let's take your two thousand example,

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I do believe Bob Graham on the ticket is better

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>than Joe Lieberman for carrying Florida. But Joe Lieberman. Getting

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Lieberman was a way for Al Gore to separate

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>from Bill Clinton on a character level in a way

0:25:56.600 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that served Gore well. I think when you look at

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the Gore surge, it really begins the naming of Lieberman

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that he was his own person. He

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>was separating himself from Clinton. It was seen as you know,

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the biggest critic of Bill Clinton's morality in the Democratic

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Party at that time was seen as Joe Lieberman. So

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that created that and it you know, and boy did

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton hate those headlines. And I know there are

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>some that will argue that Gore should have wrapped his

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>arms around Clinton even more, right, And the one Democrat

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 1>who did wrap his arms around Bill Clinton was a

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Democrat named Jade Dickie in the fourth District of Arkansas.

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>He was a Democratic incumbent. He wanted Bill Clinton's help,

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and Jay Dickey won reelection, and Bill Clinton made sure

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody knew that the one place he did campaign he

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was an asset, not a liability. Obviously that was Arkansas.

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But still we could And yet George W. Bush is essential.

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was running against Bill Clinton's character the

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>entire campaign, right. His tagline was I'm going to restore

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>honor and integrity into the White House. He wasn't running

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>against Al Gore. He was running against Bill Clinton, miche Lewinsky,

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and he was running against sort of are you exhausted

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 1>from this? Not saying whether he should be, he did not.

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, he separated himself from all the impeachment nut

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>jobs and all of that stuff. But he was running

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>on character and Gore taking character off the table. Suddenly

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>even that race out. So and then you throw in

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the kiss, right, which said, hey, look at this marriage.

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Now the irony is of course Bill and Hillary Clinton

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>are still together, Alan Tipper or not, so you know,

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I you know, irony is what it is. But at

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the time, so you know, Lieberman did help. Collectively, it

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 1>helped reinforce a message. Right, It's about reinforcing a message right,

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton, picking Al Gore was reinforcing a youthful message.

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Now there was also a tactical reason he picked out

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Gore in it. At the time Ross Perot. When he

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>picked out Gore, Ross Parou was the leader in the

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>presidential race, it looked like an even three way race,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that this was going to be an electoral college knife fight.

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And in an electoral college to knife fight in the

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>early nineties, the Democrats benefit from a Southern strategy, so

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>going with an all Southern ticket would have allowed them

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and it would open the door. And you basically, you know,

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic vote being largely African American in many of

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>these Southern states, the Democratic floor is thirty eight thirty

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent in many of those states versus the Republican

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>floor if you're splitting it with pro Now par ends

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>up dropping out then getting back in, and Bush essentially

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>consolidated enough vote where where only I think Clinton did

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>carry Georgia, does Cary, Arkansas, it does carry Tennessee. So

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>he certainly overperformed in the southern states having an all

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Southern ticket, But that was so I could make a

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>both practical case and it reinforced this hey young change message, right,

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's one of those things where you

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>can argue both sides. Now, Kamala Harris, I don't think

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>did a single thing for Joe Biden, right, I don't

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>know if it hurt them. I don't know if it

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>helped them. And I would love to know what val

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Deming's been enough to help find three percentage you know,

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>three percentage points in Florida. I don't know, right, we can't.

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. That's that's why it's impossible to sit here

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know, can can these running mates help

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in a specific way? You know, did Vance add anything

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to the numbers in Ohio? For Trump? I'd argue no,

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. Advance was an asset. In fact,

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that maybe he brought more problems, potential

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>problems to the ticket than he did a good upside

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of course financially though for Trump, Vance was a huge

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>upside because Silicon Valley wanted Advance and they gave Advance

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto community and they all came in heavy.

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So it so, I guess the question over VP picks

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>are it's what do you need from your VP pick?

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you need a state? Do you need to unite

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a faction of your hardy right. Reagan picked Bush not

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for a state, but to bring the moderates into the fold,

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the forward wing of the party. It

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>was originally going to be Reagan Ford in nineteen eighty,

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and it instead became Reagan Bush. So it is. There

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>are examples of when it works or examples when it doesn't.

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>It's still usually like ninety five percent of the of

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the equation is the top of the ticket in a

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>super close race. That's when you can look at examples

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of the bottom of Look. I think Sarah Palin helped

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>McCain lose by less than he would have lost by.

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, McCain wanted Lieberman, Gore. Obama Biden I think

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>beats McCain Lieberman by a bigger margin because the base

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Republican Party, particularly the pro life community, would

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>have probably sat on their hands. And I think that

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Obama probably wins Georgia. He already won North

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Carolina that here, and he probably gets awfully close in

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>like a place like Mississippi or South Carolina. When I

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>say awfully close, like within five points, I think it

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>becomes because I think that was what McCain was warned about,

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>which is, be careful if you pick a Democrat, particularly

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>an abortion issue, back in two thousand and eight. So

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd argue that Sarah Palin helped McCain. I think Sarah

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Palin saved Georgia for the Republicans in that electoral So

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the point is is, I think you can you can

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>look at it through one eye and make one case,

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>look at it through the other eye. Again, it's still

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety five percent about the top of the ticket, but

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in a super close selection, everything matters, all right. Next question, Hey, Chuck,

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a recent college grad who now is the time

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to read for pleasure? Again? Do you have a book

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>suggestion or two? I'd love a suggestion for a non

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>political book if you have one. I'm from Michigan, where

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>people are already canvassing for Jocelyn Benson at the local

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>farmers market Mike dug and billboards are all over the place,

0:31:57.480 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and my phone is blowing up with political texts. I

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>want some thing non political to read. Well, I'll tell

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you this stuff that I've I guess it's look. I'll

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>admit I'm mostly a history and nerd. I if you're

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>tired of the political side of things. But you want

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>some nonfiction, I would recommend a few of these business biographies.

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>You're from Michigan, I actually think you'd enjoy the memoir

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of Leiah Coca, who was the former chairman of Chrysler,

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>because the coolest part of it is learning about Lei.

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Coca was the father of the Mustang. He's from soup

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to nuts, and the book helps you understand the history

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of the auto industry in Michigan. So that might be

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's an easy read. Look, Leah, on one hand,

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a way back in time, so it's a forty

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>five year old book, all right. So I apologize for going,

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but I was just trying to think of things that

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>might can you know that might be of interest to you,

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you something about the history of your state out

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that If you're a baseball fan, there's a couple of

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>books that I that I've really enjoyed over the years

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that are historical in nature. A history of the of

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the Negro leagues. It was called only the Ball Was White,

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was. It is a history of the legendary

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>black players and all black professional teams. It's more than

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>just a book about baseball. More than just a book

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>about uh, racial justice. It's also a history of the country. Right,

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a history of that and so a purely entertainment book.

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're a basketball fan, uh history of the A

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>B A, which was the league, you know, the sort

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of it was the fun league of basketball. Right. The

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>ABA gives three point shot. Right. If you like today's

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>modern NBA, you have the a BA to thank, Right.

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>The dunk contest began in the a BA, three point

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>shot all those things all began in the A B A.

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>It's an oral history called loose Ball, and it is

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>just fabulous. There's Bob Costas, cameos, all sorts of fascinating

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>figures from that era. And it also is culturally a

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>great history of the nineteen seventies, the good and the

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>bad and everything in between. It's great, there are and

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it triggered two other oral histories. I'm a big fan

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:24.439
<v Speaker 1>of oral histories. They're just I just enjoy them quite

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>a bit. One is on the history of SNL by

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom Shales and the History of SNL, which was done

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was for the fortieth anniversary at the

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>time by Tom Shales and Andrew Miller and James, excuse me,

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and James and Jim Miller, who's somebody I've known a

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>long time, sort of in the history of the TV business.

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>They also did the History of ESPN, which also was

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 1>a fun, little oral history of sort of ESPN's early

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>days in the late seventies and eighties and all the

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>different near misses for esp and both positive and negative.

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So those were fun and oral histories that they're very

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>thick books, but oral histories you can read fast. And

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for some fiction older Karl Hyason is

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. His new stuff's too political. It

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>won't give you the break that you're looking for. So

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea whether I gave you good ideas

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>or not, whether it's anything that will entertain you there.

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And I apologize for giving you older books, because all

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the new stuff that I read is all history and

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>politics these days. All right. Next question, it's from Jim

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in Tobahana, Pennsylvania. But he says, go Buffalo bills. Do

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>you anticipate there may be any modifications in the post

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Trump era to limit executive power? Well, I hope so,

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think anybody runs for president of a

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>major party nomination and then comes in and limits their

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>own power. Right, they'll say it. Joe Biden said he

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>would support, for instance, uh decreasing executive authority on the

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>More Powers Act and things like that. But did he

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:14.399
<v Speaker 1>do it right? Did it actually happen. I think it's

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>going to take an outsider breaking up both parties for

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a for a term or something like that that runs

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>on this and runs on sort of constitutional restoration of

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the of the checks and balances. But I don't know

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>if the public is ready for a message like that yet.

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I wish it were. I think this is desperately needed.

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 1>I think we're we're you know. I think this redistricting

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>knife fight that we're seeing between you know, best exemplified

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>by Texas and California, is a primal scream for a

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>constitutional convention. We really need to refresh the rules of

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>our democracy and rebuild some things here. Some of it

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>needs to be refreshed, some of it needs to be renewed,

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>and some of it needs to be subtracted. An attitude, right,

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>but we have a mess in our hands. It is

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:09.240
<v Speaker 1>created the conditions that allow for somebody to hijack the government,

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>and that's what's been happened, right, it's, you know, a

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>cult of personality, reanimated a dying political party and was

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 1>able to shape it into his own vision. And it

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is he has recreated a political machine without it without

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>an ideology. If anything, it's just a cult of personality.

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:32.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you've ever read the history of Tammany

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Hall or any of these party machines. Trump is trying

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to essentially bring it back, bring back the political machine,

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>if you will, and Democrats might be you know, my

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>fear is that in reaction, Democrats sort of start behaving

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like machine party themselves, right, and they're doing it now,

0:37:54.239 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>rallying around a bad idea like redistricting in California. You know,

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 1>when you're answer to disenfranchising voters in Texas is to

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>disenfranchised voters in California. And you want to be the

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>constitutional party, You want to be the adult in the room.

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think there will be an appetite by some

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to try to limit to try to sort of Trump

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>proof the presidency after he leaves, But a lot of

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it depends on who replaces him and how he's replaced.

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'll make this the final question here. This

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>comes from Marcus R. President Trump is attack pressured and

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 1>threatened federal employees, colleges, media organizations, corporations, foreign countries, state governments,

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>FESA holders, legal immigrants, and others with little to no

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>resistance or consequences. His attacks are often based on dubious

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>assertions or outright lies. It seems like he already has

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the power of a king. What would stop him from

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>issuing an executive order stating that the Democratic Party is

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:54.439
<v Speaker 1>a terrorist organization and all Democratic leaders have the choice

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of switching to the Republican Party or be arrested. Based

0:38:57.120 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>on the previous responses from the Democratic Party leaders to

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump's power grabs, it seems like they would fall apart,

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:04.439
<v Speaker 1>like what toilet paper if that happened? Thank you? Well, look,

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you get at sort of the dilemma that I think

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the Trump resistance is running into. How do you push

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 1>back on this and do you use any means necessary

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>or do you try to continue to follow some form

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of principles so that you can win the argument the

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 1>right way? And maybe it's easy for me to say,

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, ends justifies the means, Well, you know this

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is not going to end well, and I still don't

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>believe it ends well. If Donald Trump is able to

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>successfully radicalize both parties, that's troubling and that's my fear here.

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And yet you're not wrong. I think the real problem

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and the real reason why Trump is getting away with

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>more this term than he did the last term, is

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're missing Republicans with spines. There were quite a

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 1>few Republicans that had working spines in the twenty seven

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.320
<v Speaker 1>seen in twenty eighteen. There are no elected Republicans left

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>with a spine outside of Lisa Murkowski, right, I think

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 1>she's it. Maybe Spencer Cox in Utah, maybe so, maybe

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the governor of Vermont has a spine, and Bill Scott.

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, right, there's no Republican pushback

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>because the Republican pushback gave the Democratic pushback legitimacy. Right,

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>It gave cover to corporate leaders to feel as if

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 1>they were being above politics by pushing back. And you know,

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump basically crying bias and partisanship at every criticism has

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>effectively neutered critics, the non political critics, and now the

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are alone in criticizing, right. It's a that's a

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:54.319
<v Speaker 1>I guess to catch twenty two if you want to

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>use that metaphor. But it certainly, I think is a

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>problem that the real, I mean, the real failure of

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>accountability on Trump is his own party, right you know

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrats can only do so much here, they

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>were more The reason there was successful pushback of Trump

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen is that it was bipartisan. It was coming

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>from a multiple corners, you know, obviously more from one

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>spot than the other. But you know, I don't see

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>any new List Cheney's walking through that door. I don't

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>see any new Bob Corker's walking through that door. I

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>don't see any new Jeff Flake's walking through that door.

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's I think that's I think that's why it

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>feels like the Democrats don't know what to do. It

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is also a party that's just a mess right now.

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've seen it. It's you know this is

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>this goes back to and my last substack got into this,

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>but you know it, the party was so convinced that

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>demographs were on their side. It's almost as if they

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>decided they didn't need to have to worry about what

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 1>voters thought of them because the demographics were going to

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>overcome any messaging problems that they would have. But you know,

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>when you lose two and a half million voter registrations

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in four years while the other party gains two and

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a half million voter registrations, right, You've lost. You've lost

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the plot on this front. I think it's I'm shocked

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:30.279
<v Speaker 1>that there has not been a bigger house cleaning of

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:34.879
<v Speaker 1>democratic leadership. I'm shocked that there's not been more innovative

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 1>ideas try you know more. I'm shocked at the at

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the you know, I think the reason Gavin Newsom has

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:44.959
<v Speaker 1>sort of filled the void for the moment is nobody

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 1>else is filling the void. But I'm not sure that's

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the answer. But maybe I'm wrong, Maybe I'm the one

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that's out of touch. But I think that if the

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>answer to an undemomocratic, unconstitutional movement is not to throw

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>away democratic principles and throw away constitutional ideals, I just

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>think the long term consequences of that it sort of

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it accelerates our decline and accelerates the possibility

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that would lose the republic. I think you got to

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>give the voters something to fight for. If everything is

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>becomes purely transactional, which in some ways the Democrats are

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 1>accepting that premise, right, if you accept the premise that

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 1>this is the only rule that matters, you know that

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that is how that is how democracies crumble, right, That's

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially what Turkey is. Yeah, it's a democracy sort of,

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, but it's just that sort of. And by

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the way, everything's gotten worse than Turkey everything, so it

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been good for them to be this sort of

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>democratic authoritarianism that they've been under, which is kind of

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:09.919
<v Speaker 1>what Trump's trying to create, right, authoritarianism with democratic sort

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 1>of support, if you will, smalldy. But I think you're

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 1>right to be concerned about what Trump will do. I

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 1>just you know, I do think that lived experience will

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>still trump everything else, and if everybody's paying more to

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>get by, it does. I don't know how many indictments

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:35.879
<v Speaker 1>or proclamations he can put out. I don't know if

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he can win that, you know, if he can overcome

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that obstacle. All right with that, I hope do you?

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>This is for some of you, the last week before

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the big big September push. For others, it's a back

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to school week for quite a few, particularly on the

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:56.319
<v Speaker 1>university level classes. If it didn't start last week. Just

0:44:56.360 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>about everything else starts this week, So with that, I

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 1>will take a rest for forty eight hours and see

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>you on Wednesday. M m hmmm mm hmm