WEBVTT - Republicans' Secret Impeachment Weapon

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>The second full day of President Trump's impeachment trial has

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>just concluded, and Senator Ted Cruze has come straight from

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the Capitol to our studio here to help give us

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>all a behind the scenes look into what this means

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>for the president and the country. This is Verdict with

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz. Welcome back to Verdict with Ted Cruz. I'm

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael Knowles. I am joined by the Senator himself, clearly

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a glutton for punishment, not sleeping at all this week,

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>going straight from the impeachment trial to the studio, right

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 1>back to the Capitol. Well, Michael, I'm thrilled that it's

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>at least eleven PM and not three in the morning

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>like it was last night. This is an early night.

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>It's been twenty two hours now the impeachment trial, and

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we've still got a distance to go. But but we're

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>making progress. You know what I want to do before

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>we get into what happened today, because I think some

0:00:55.600 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>significant things happened today. We're twenty two hours in. I

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>think the vast majority of Americans have completely tuned out

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this impeachment. They are simply not paying attention. What is

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it that the House Democrats are accusing President Trump? Of

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>having done what is at the core of this whole

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>impeachment trial. So the House Democrats voted out two articles

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of impeachment. The first one is something they're calling abusive power.

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>The second one they're calling obstruction of Congress. Neither one

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of those is a crime. Neither one of those I

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>believe is an impeachable offense. But what do those refer

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to specifically? So abusive powers where they focused most of

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>their time, And what they're arguing is that the president

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>delayed military aid to Ukraine. Now, Ukraine, as a country

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, used to be part of the Soviet Union,

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>broke off. It's now separate democracy, it's a friend, it's

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>an ally. Remember back in twenty fourteen when Obama was president,

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Russia invaded Ukraine invaded what's what's called Crimea, and Russian

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and Ukraine have been in real tension. The Ukrainians don't

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>like that. The Russians have had a bad history of

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>riding in with tanks and invading their country, and so

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we've given them military aid. And what the Democrats are

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>arguing is the President delayed that military aid in exchange

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>for asking Ukraine to launch two investigations, one an investigation

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>into whether Ukraine had interfered in the twenty sixteen presidential election,

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the election between Trump and Hillary. Okay, and two an

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>investigation into Barisma, which is a Ukrainian natural gas company

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that on whose board Hunter Biden, Joe Biden's son sat.

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>They'd paid Biden a whole lot of money and it

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was not for his expertise in Ukrainian natural gas. Well,

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that is certainly true, right, So this is what people

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>referred to as the quid pro quo. Yes, that Trump

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was withholding military aid and he wasn't going to release

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:03.399
<v Speaker 1>the aid until they launched an investigation into the bidens

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>because he is afraid that he's going to run against

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden twenty twenty. And they've spent almost every minute

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of the last twenty two hours trying to prove those

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>two points. Okay, here's the problem. Number one, temporarily delaying

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>military aid is not illegal, and it's not an impeachable offense.

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Presidents have done that over and over and over again

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of foreign aid. You see temporary delays that

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>are put into place. But number two, asking a foreign

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>country to engage in an investigation is not illegal on

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>its face. And it's not an impeachable offense that that's

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>what there's And in fact, the President admits he asked

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine to engage in these investigations. So it's it's really

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of stunning. They're standing up there arguing over and

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>over again the President wanted Ukraine to investigate, and Trump

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>has said on live TV over and over again, yes,

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I wanted Ukraine to investigate. We've seen the transcript from

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>this phone call with the President of Ukraine right this

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was released. I know most people's eyes glaze over when

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>when everyone gets into the weeds over what he did

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>with Ukraine and is that impeachable and on and on

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and on. But I think we all basically agree on

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the facts of the case, which is they withheld the AID,

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>then they release the aid. President Trump did ask for

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>an investigation by Ukraine into this corruption. And I guess

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 1>what doesn't make sense to me is they impeach the

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>president for this except Ukraine got the AID and we

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>never got an investigation into the corruption. Well, and it's

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>even you're right on both of those points, but but

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>but even more broadly so, so it's the narrative from

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the House Democrats has changed. You remember there was for

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months we were hearing over and over

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>again the phrase quit pro quo. Right, quit pro quo

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is a sort of phrase. Look, most people don't know

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>quit pro quo means. It's a Latin phrase. It sounds

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of scary. Quit pro quos are not illegal. This

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>would surprise anyone who's turning on the six o'clock news,

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>because the media we're breathlessly saying, oh my god, this

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>may have been a quid pro quo. So Quid pro

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>quo is Latin for an exchange of something of value

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 1>for something else of value. It means literally, this for

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>that right, I give you this, you give me that.

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it would take a Yale graduate to to

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>really dive down on the Latin transfer. You know what

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's my Roman heritage, that's where it comes from.

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>But look, quid pro quos in foreign policy, we do

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>every single day that they're not only not illegal, that's

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the bread and butter of foreign policy. I'll give

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 1>you an example. Nicholas Maduro is the dictator of Venezuela.

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we have sanctions, economic sanctions in place against Venezuela.

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>We have said if if Maduro steps down, we'll lift

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>those sanctions. That's a quid pro quo. It's out and

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's open. We're lifting sanctions if Maduro steps down. You

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>look at Obama's a rand nuclear deal. That was a

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>quid pro quo. Obama gave over one hundred billion dollars

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to Iran in exchange for a promise not to develop

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons. Now that's a promise they weren't keeping, and

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>they use the money to try to kill Americans. But

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that was a quick pro quote, right, So all of

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>this focus on was this a quid pro quote misses

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the point. The question is whether it was done with

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>corrupt intent, and that all comes down to whether these investigations,

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>whether the President had a valid reason to ask U

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>Crane to engage in these investigations and to withhold the

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>aid either or both. But the real peace. If the

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>President had a valid reason, the legitimate reason to ask

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>U Crane to engage in the investigations, then everything the

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>House is saying, everything the House Democrats are saying, is nonsense.

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And what is interesting now two days into it is

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they've devoted virtually every moment to trying to prove that

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>he asked for the investigations, which he admits, which we

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>already know this is something which we and almost zero

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to proving that asking for the investigations was illegitimate or inappropriate. Well,

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>this is what I want to get to. So you've

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>now had to sit through twenty two hours of this

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>because there were three groups here, right There's there were

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the House Democrats. They're being led by Adam Schiff and

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>they're the people who are pushing impeachment. There's President Trump's

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>legal team, the White House Counsel and his lawyer, and

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>they're the ones defending the president. Then there's the jury

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>because this is a trial, and this is a special

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>jury because the jury is you, guys, the senators are

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the jury in the impeachment trial. You've been listening to this,

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and let me correct you briefly and something. Yes, the

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>senators of the jury, but oddly enough we're also the judges.

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's a strange dynamic under the Constitution. The hundred

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>senators decide every question of law and every question of fact.

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's not a jury like you know, if you

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>turn on Law and Order, it's not a jury like

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that you think about it. A jury is not supposed

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to know anything about the case. Is not supposed to know.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>The defendant is not supposed to know the prosecutor is

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to have conversations in this case senators. Look,

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Senators deal with the president, deal with the president all

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the time. The Framers knew that when the Constitution gave

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>impeachment to the Senate, they knew fully well senators would

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>be dealing with players, would be involved, would be speaking

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to the public. And so actually, I will point out

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that the President did tweet out this very podcast today,

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>so obviously there is some relationships. Sure, But you know,

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting when Bill Clinton had an impeachment trial, there

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>was actually an objection. So one of the people in

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the trial referred to the senators as jurors, and they

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>raise an objection and Chief Justice William Rehnquist, who's the

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Chief Justice, sustain the objection and said, you're right, you're

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>not jurors, your senators. And it's a different responsibility under

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the country because it's because not to get even more

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>complicated here, but there is a fourth role, which is

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, head of

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court, is presiding over impeachment, but he's not

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>quite a normal judge, and the jury is not quite

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a normal jury. And that is because an impeachment trial

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is unlike other kinds of trials very much so. Now

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you've spent twenty two hours listening to these two arguments

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>from the House Democrats. And let me say, by the way,

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to lock a hundred senators in a room and to

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>prevent all of them from speaking. Look, I gotta say,

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>every one of us is suffering DTS. There's a reason

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm launching a damn podcast in the middle of this.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't not talk for that long. It's so about

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>medical treatments. Well, you know, they used to say that

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the most dangerous place in Washington, DC was between Chuck

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Schumer and a television camera. Now I think have we

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>actually don't know, because no one's ever survived that experience.

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>It's true, we need more investigation. I'm actually thinking, having

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>watched the House Democrats case for impeachment, I think the

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>most dangerous place might be between Adam Schiff and a camera,

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>because he's the one leading that case. And I just

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>want to hear your thoughts on how each side is

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>presenting their case. The House Democrats pushing impeachment, the White

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>House lawyers defending the president. So yesterday we had procedural

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fights all day long. Half the time was the House Democrats,

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>half the time was President Trump's lawyers. I thought they

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>both did fine. I thought they both presented their case.

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>When you and I talk last night, I shared my

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>views that I think I think the White House lawyers

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>need to focus less on process and more on substance,

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>more on demonstrating why the president is innocent, why the

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>conduct that he admits to is not illegal, is not inappropriate,

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and is perfectly legitimate and justified for a president to

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>investigate corruption and to ask a foreign government to investigate corruption.

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>That they need to make more of the affirmative case.

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So you've argued a lot of high profile cases. So

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying is maybe we're missing a little bit

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of the thirty thousand foot view. We're missing a little

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of the big picture from the White House. You

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>can get lost in the weeds, and it's easy to

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>do it, and I don't want that to happen to

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the American people. They just see a lot of bickering

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't make a whole lot of sense. The underlying

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>If you want to understand this, case, in one sentence,

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:25.599
<v Speaker 1>can the president investigate corruption? Yes or no? Okay? And

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are saying, no, you can't investigate corruption. That

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't ask Ukraine to investigate Barisma, this natural gas

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>company because Joe Biden, his son was making millions of

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 1>dollars from him, and that is nuts. That's not a

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>very good argument. Any president has the authority to investigate corruption,

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>but has the responsibility to investigate corruption, And so I

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>think we need to be talking more about the substance.

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>So today though President Trump's lawyers didn't get to talk

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>at all, so we're an opening argument. Day was all

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>day long, nothing but House Democrats the Adam shifts show.

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>That's not easy to say three times. By the way,

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>there's some slips that come in there sometimes. But they

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>were presenting their case, and as I said, it's all

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>focused on proving things that everyone agrees to. How did

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>they do in the sense of the political theater. Do

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you think, if you're just judging this from the effectiveness

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of their objectives, that the House Democrats are making a

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>good argument? Look, I think for I think most partisans

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>stayed where they are. In other words, if you hate

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>President Trump and think he's the embodiment of evil. You

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>probably thought today was a wonderful day because it featured

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>ten hours of House Democrats describing how horrible Donald Trump is.

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>If you think, if you think the President has done

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a good job and we've gotten good results, and you're

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>tired of House Democrats just attacking the president all day long,

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>then today was really hard to listen to. And it

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>was made worse by the fact that it was incredibly repetitive.

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>So yesterday, when we were having procedural arguments, the House

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Democrats basically gave their opening argument right, and then today

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they turned around and gave the same thing. So they

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>keep making the same points and playing the same clips

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and reading the same quotes over and over and over again.

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And we've got two more days of opening arguments. We're

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna spend all day long tomorrow, all day long the

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>next day with them making them. Did anything new happen

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the Democrats case, I think the single

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing and I think I think the House Democrats

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>made a strategic mistake, which is they opened the door

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to Hunter Biden testify. Now here's why Adam Schiff got

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>up and he argued in his opening argument. He based

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>their whole case on the proposition that the two investigations

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that the President asked for were sham investigations. I want

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to read you a little bit from what Adam Schiff said.

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>He said he said that he the President wanted Ukraine

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to launch investigations quote that were completely without merit, that

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>were sham investigations that he later says, the allegations are

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>untrue and they've quote been widely debunked patent lee false.

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's the central question, that these investigations are untrue. Now,

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>let's take Barisma, which is the most important of the investigation. Okay, Barisma,

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>big natural gas company, has had major problems with corruption.

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow when we talk, we're gonna talk a little bit

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>more about the evidence on Barisma that that the White

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>House lawyers have laid out and the media doesn't want

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. I want to drill down. We'll do

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it tomorrow because it's going to take a lot of time,

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>but I want to drill down into Barisma and Hunter Biden. Yes.

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>To me, that seems like the whole heart of this

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>impeachment question. It is the whole ball of wax. Now

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats look in the House. House Republicans wanted to

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>call Hunter Biden as a witness, and Adam Schiff said no,

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>said we're not allowing you. And it was interesting yesterday

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Adam Schiff said, if you have a trial and don't

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>allow the defendant to put on evidence of innocence, it's

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>not a fair trial, right, And it was you know,

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it was all I could do not to laugh out loud,

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>because that's what they did in the House, because they

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>base their whole case on arguing that asking for an

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>investigation into Barisma is false and completely without merit. It

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>raises not just as relevant, but but as central to

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the defense. Okay, what evidence was there that this was

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>real corruption that needed to be investigated? And even beyond

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because I think when you get into this

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian company and this relative of Joe Biden, it's easy

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to get lost in it. I just wonder, if you're

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>investigating the question of whether Trump should or should not

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>have asked for this investigation, whether that's an impeachable offense,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the most important person to talk to and get

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>testimony from would be Hunter Biden to ask him. And

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I don't know as a fact that

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it was corrupt. There's a lot of indication that it

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>could well have been, but the House Democrats have had

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>zero interest in asking, and they run around with their

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>hair on fire if you even suggest that anyone would ask,

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>much less ask Joe Biden. You know, hey, Joe, why

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>why was your son getting paid a million bucks a

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>year by a gas company? We didn't know anything about gas?

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, this is not subtle and sophisticated, right,

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>But if the House Democrats are going to stop that,

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they do not want Hunter Biden to testify. Obviously, Joe

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Biden is right now the front runner in the twenty

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty Democratic presidential race, so they really don't want Hunter

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden to testify last time I checked. Although I do

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>have to say I kind of wonder if Bernie and

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warred and klobuch Are are secretly rooting rooting for

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe and Hunter to testified, but they haven't indicated that

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they have not yet. However, they could give a little

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>support to their Republican colleagues, because last time I checked,

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it is your political party that controls the Senate. So

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>can the Republicans in the Senate make Hunter Biden testify

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>before the Senate. Absolutely, it takes fifty one votes, fifty

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>one Republicans, we can call Hunter Biden. Now, the way

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>it works actually is the parties call the witnesses. So

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>what it would mean, as President Trump's lawyers, if they

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>want to call Hunter Biden, I've been saying for months,

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>we ought to call Hunter Biden. Why. Look the prosecutors

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the House Democrats, they had seventeen witnesses in the House.

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>They built the prosecution side in what was basically a

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 1>kangaroo court where you say only prosecution witnesses, and we

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>don't allow the White House to call witnesses. So you've

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>got seventeen witnesses for the anti Trump pro impeachment side,

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>and you've got zero witnesses. The president had not been

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 1>able to call a single witness. Now, if the president

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>could call one, I'm pretty sure it would be Hunter Biden.

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>If the president could call too, it might be Hunter

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden and the so called whistleblower. If you could call three,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>my guess is Joe Biden might be number three on that.

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>We can call those witnesses or any others, and it

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just takes fifty one votes. We have fifty three Republicans.

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you simply have Republicans saying, you know what,

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>we want to have a fair trial. One side has

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>had all their witnesses. The other side, the defendant, the accused,

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>has had zero witnesses. That's not fair. So is it

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>going to happen? I mean, is the White House going

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to call Hunter Biden to testify? So it's up in

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the air. The fight we had yesterday as we adopted

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>basically the same scheduling order the Clinton impeachment trial had,

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.479
<v Speaker 1>which is we'll go through opening arguments and questions from

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>senators first, and then we'll decide whether additional witnesses are needed.

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And so the House Democrats they want to call a

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>bunch of additional witnesses. The big one they're focusing on

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is John Bolton. John Bolton was the National security advisor

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>to President Trump. They think they're going to get some

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>dirt on Trump out of John bull that that is

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>their big focus. Next week, the Senator is going to

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>vote whether we're going to have additional witnesses or not.

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's going to make a big difference because you know,

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the things you and I were talking about

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a little earlier is how long is this thing going

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to last, I really want to know that because I

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>don't live in Washington, DC, so I got to make

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>some plans. Well, the vote next week on witnesses will

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>make a massive difference. Okay. If fifty one Senators vote

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>next week we don't need any more witnesses, We've got

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>all the evidence we need, then the trial will end

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>next week, we'll move to final judgment, and if and

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>when that happens, the president will be acquitted because because

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the House Democrats haven't proven their case. Okay. On the

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>other hand, if fifty one senators vote that we do

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>need additional witnesses, then it's Katie bar the door. Then

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>this thing could easily last weeks or even months. You

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>could see six, seven, eight, nine weeks, because if you

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>go down in additional witnesses, you're you're opening the door

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to litigation, to assertion of privileges, to all sorts of delays.

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>We could be sitting here here months from now with

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment trial still going on if we call additional

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>witness But if you call additional witnesses, then we might

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>finally hear from Hunter Biden. Now my question on this though,

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is and by the way, if we do call additional witnesses.

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm very confident we'll call Hunter Biden. But if you

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>call Hunter Biden, or rather if the White House calls

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it Hunter Biden to testify before the Senate, can't Hunter

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Biden just say I don't want to answer your questions.

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I plead the fifth and I'm not gonna I'm not

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>going to say anything, so he can and if we

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>call Hunter Biden, he will almost certainly plead the fifth.

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Now here's the interesting thing. There's a federal statue that

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>gives the Senate the authority to grant him what's called

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>transactional immunity, which means we can force him to testify. Now,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>he can't be prosecuted for anything he testifies to, Okay,

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>but you can find out, you can get his testimony,

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's something the Senate can do, grant him immunity.

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And I got to say that idea. You want to

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>talk about something to terrify forty seven Democrats in the Senate,

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>It is the fact that the Senate could grant Hunter

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Biden immunity and hear his testimony about whether, in fact,

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>there was corruption from Joe Biden. And let's be clear,

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>this is not about lac Hunter Biden. It's a guy

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>who's led a troubled life. This is not about him.

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the question about whether his dad abused his power. So,

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in other words, I just want to be very clear

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>about this. Hunter Biden could be called to testify and

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>he could say I don't want to testify. I plead

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the fifth And if he's going to be held responsible

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>for anything he did, then it ends there. However, the

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Senate can give him immunity so he won't be held

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>responsible for any crimes he commits. And no reporter in

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington knows this or understands this. But the Senate can

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>force Hunter Biden to testify. You can, and I'll give

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>an example. Take a criminal case. This is something prosecutors

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>do all the time. Let's say you have a criminal

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>case and you have, say, you know, some drug dealers

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that that that you're investigating, and you've got say a

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>low level guy, a drug dealer. You'll see prosecutors that

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>will give that drug dealer immunity to flip on the

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>higher ups and to make them testify. Give them immunity

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to flip on the higher ups. It's the same basic principle.

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Immunity is not always a good thing, because it means

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you can be forced to testify or be put in

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>jail if you don't. That is a lot of leverage.

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you, Senator, I have not heard

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that anywhere else. I had no idea that the Senate

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>could make unter Biden testament. What reporters don't want to

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. Reporters don't want to talk about barism

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>at all. They don't want to talk about the evidence

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>of corruption that I mean, I mean, they're that and

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in fact, you know it's even funnier than that. So

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the Joe Biden campaign is sending out angry letters to

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>media reporters saying, whenever you mentioned the allegations of corruption,

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you must state on air these are false and have

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>been disproven. In what other instance are so called reporters

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>becoming an advocate? Look, I don't know if there was

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>corruption or not. I do know that there's prima facia

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>evidence something, and I know one way to find out.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>At a minimum. The House Democrats don't even want to

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>ask the questions, and we ought to ask the questions.

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Now are we going to have additional witnesses? I don't know.

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Next week when we vote on it. All, forty seven

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Democrats will vote yes. The question is are there going

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to be four Republicans that vote yes? Maybe? I think

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I could name a few Republicans who might be likely too.

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>There are three who have spoken publicly about being open

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to it. It's not clear if there's a fourth. It's

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>not clear if those three will vote right. If we

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>have additional witnesses, We're going on for a long time.

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>But that means we may get John Bolton in, but

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get Hunter Biden. We may get other witnesses too.

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>This is the best argument I've heard so far for

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>dragging this thing onward. Obviously, we've got a whole lot

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>more to get to. We will be getting into Hunter Biden,

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Bizma and corruption in Ukraine specifically tomorrow, because I know

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty much nothing about it and you know pretty much

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>everything about it. So I want to I want to

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>hear that. Obviously, people need to subscribe and leave a

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>five star review. Please to this show. It is Verdict

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>with Ted Cruz and we are now up on Apple podcasts.

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>We are on YouTube or on Spotify. We are everywhere

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. One thing we want we want

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to do in these shows because there is so much

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to cover. Is take your questions from the mail bags.

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So we have a few of these today that came

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>out after our first episode. In just our remaining one

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>or two minutes here, let's try to get through a

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of them, all right, from timmy Senator Cruise, who

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>fell asleep? Twenty two hours of testimony? Who fell asleep?

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>So there's been some reporting that accused Jim Rish of

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>falling asleep. I didn't see that. I got to admit it.

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Points I kind of feel like all of us fell asleep.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Did you mean it was? I didn't formally not off,

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I will say so Jim's defense and his press spokesperson

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>said he was closing his eyes and listening contemplatively. I

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've tried that with Heidi at home. I'm

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>not sure that the story always that's not a great excuse, no,

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>but but I gotta admit last night, so I will say,

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>when we were there at two in the morning, I

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 1>was asking Chuck Grassley. Yeah, you know, Iowa farmer, eighty

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>six years old. Chuck is an early bird. And I

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>asked Chuck last night, I said, all right, what time

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>do you get up each morning, and Chuck said four Now.

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>He said he didn't get it. I didn't ask him

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>what time he got up to day, but he said,

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I won't get up at four am. When he was

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>there at two. He was still at the senator for it.

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>But Buddy, it was you know, look, we met, we

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>stayed awake. I'm not sure much of America did. But

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>but the hundred senators by and large name that almost

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you're pleading the fifth This brings up the

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>immunity arguments. I don't We'll have to get into that tomorrow.

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>La final question from Carl do you think senator that

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>they will try to impeach President Trump again if this

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>one fails. I think they'll certainly be Democrats that want to.

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>They could easily. I don't think Pelosi wants to. So

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>one of the interesting things you look, a year ago,

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi was saying, don't impeach Trump. A partisan impeachment doesn't work.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Pelosi thinks impeachment. I think she thought it

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>was going to backfire. I think she thinks it's backfired now.

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>And basically the far left that hates Trump dragged her

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>into doing this. So I was having a conversation with

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the other Republican senators today, he was saying,

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>why are they doing this now? Why didn't they do

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>this in June or July? And that was my comment

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to him, is I think Pelosi thinks this is a

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>political loser and she wants to get it over with.

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>So will the extreme left one will try to impeach

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump over and over and over again. Yes, but I'd

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if the House goes out in this road.

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>It didn't even occur to me that they could try

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>to impeach him again. I mean, I guess there have

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>been a whole bunch of excuses for impeachment since the beginning.

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Six out of seven of the House Democrat impeachment managers

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>actual supported impeachment before we knew anything about the current

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>excuse to impeach. A lot of these Democrats called for

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>impeaching Trump within days of his being elected, before he'd

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>been sworn in. So this has nothing to do with Ukraine.

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>This has to do with Trump derangement, center right, and

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to continue regardless. And yet somewhere at the

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>heart of all this that nobody's talking about in the

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>press are not covering, is this incident, this corruption in Ukraine,

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the question of Beisma, the question of Hunter Biden, we

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>will have to get into. By the way, the Obama

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 1>administration wouldn't investigate it. The Obama Justice Department wouldn't investigate it.

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>There was no accountability. And I got to say, when

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm back home in Texas, the frustration about folks in

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the prior administration who abused power and were never held accountable.

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>That frustration is massive, and and and and it still

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:52.719
<v Speaker 1>needs to be dealt. Are they going to be held

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>accountable from the past administration book? I hope so they

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>haven't been so far, and and and they need to

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>be Law needs to be enforced fairly, regardless of party,

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Which means the whole democratic argument that just because Joe

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>brock Biden as vice president you can't investigate when there's

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>enormous evidence of corruption, that that's a pretty bogus argument.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty weak argument. I think hopefully we'll be

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>able to just dismantle it tomorrow night. We've got to

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>We've got to get you ready to go back on

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the hill and listen to another ten hours of impeachment

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>debate in this trial. Senator, thank you as always Seemanyanna.

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Verdict with Ted Cruz. I'm Michael Knowles. We'll

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>see tomorrow. This episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz is

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>being brought to you by Jobs, Freedom and Security Pack,

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a political action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations,

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and candidates across the country. In twenty twenty two, Jobs

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Freedom and Security Pack plans to donate to conservative candidates

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>running for Congress and help their Publican Party across the nation.