WEBVTT - 2009 Predictions Score Card

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technologies with

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello there, everybody,

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff. My name is Chris Poulette. I

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>am the tech editor here at how stuff works dot com.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me, as usual as he was just

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>about a year ago, is Jonathan Strickland, a senior writer.

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I predict that this podcast will go smoothly. Well, let's

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.279
<v Speaker 1>see how that prediction did. About a year ago, we

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>were actually uh talking about our predictions for two thousand

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 1>nine and what we thought was going to happen in

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>technology over the course of a year. That was kind

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of surprising because you know, that was the end of

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>our first It wasn't even a full year we've been podcasting. Nope,

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's been about six months. So who knew that we

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>would would still be here? Yeah, of I know most

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of our listeners in Well, yeah, we thought we would

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>look over the list of predictions we made and see

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>how we did. Um, so let's I'm gonna start with

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>one of Chris's predictions. Uh, we actually made up this

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>list and uh we kind of did a cursory glance

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and gave a yea or nay as to whether or

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>not each one had come true. But I think that

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>some of these are open for debate. So but the

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>first one I don't think is which was that Chris

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 1>predicted that Steve Jobs would name a successor at Apple. Uh.

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.559
<v Speaker 1>He he kind of waffled on whether or not Steve

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Jobs would actually step down officially from Apple. And because

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>remember this was back when we knew that Jobs was

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>something was going on with his health, he had not

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>quite he had not officially made his um announcement about

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>taking leave. I think at that point, ye, it was

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Yeah, it does right, well, I mean

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>because it was we knew something was up. We knew

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>something was up. There were a lot of there's a

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of conjecture at the time that he was possibly

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>having a remission with his cancer issues that he had

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>had years before. And so Chris predicted that Steve Jobs would,

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in order to uh to be diligent in his duties

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>as CEO of Apple, name a successor, which has not happened.

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's an X in that column. Let me

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>just make a big X, all right, you know, you

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to use the red marker for that. I

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.119
<v Speaker 1>know I didn't have to. Um, okay, well we'll stick

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>with Apple. And one of Jonathan's the uh he predicted

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Mac desktop computer would go away and it's

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 1>still there. Yes it is. Yeah, that that one I was. Um,

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I was not right. There are new Imax out and

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 1>they are beautiful and uh well, honestly though you had

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>you had reasonable reason to believe that, because I mean

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>netbooks and notebooks and all kinds of mobile computing devices,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>is even smartphones. They've been hot, flying off the shelves,

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>and one might think that, you know, Apple, which is

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>known for doing such crazy things as eliminating the floppy

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>disk drive FROMMA, might go so far as to get

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>rid of the desktop machine entirely. And I think, I think, um,

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think people have made a good point and that

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of legitimate reasons why you might

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>want a larger desktop unit as opposed to a laptop

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>or other mobile computing device, including things like if you're

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>doing video editing or or any kind of media work. Um,

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you probably want a nice large screen to work with,

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and laptops just don't have that. I mean, once you

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>get to a point where you have a nice large

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>screen with a laptop, it's not no longer a laptop.

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just too big. And while you can use some

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>devices where you can maybe hook up a second screen

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to a laptop or other mobile computing device, uh that's

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>not ideal really. I mean, you could plug it into

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a dock and run a nice big monitor off of it.

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is a lot of the uh uh,

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the processors that you see in desktop computers are just

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>take too much power um to use in a laptop

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>computer when you're not hooked up to a power source. Um.

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you're out on the road. I mean, that's

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that people expect is to have

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a nice long battery life. Well, if you have a

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>super heavy duty processor and it that's the battery life's

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of just you know, it's gonna drop dramatically because

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that processor is using so much power. So I think

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that that niche is still around for a little while longer,

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>although I I you know, I think laptops are out

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>selling you know, both Windows and Mac laptops are out

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>selling the desktops these days. Yeah, so we'll we'll keep

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>an eye on it. I mean, I don't think the

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>desktop form factor is going away quite as quickly as

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>I imagined back a year ago. Uh, let's move to

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the next one. Um, hey, we gotta we got a

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>ringer here. So Chris predicted that there would be rumors

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>about the next gadget from Apple sometime in two thousand nine.

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Now the softball. But but no, not not entirely a softball,

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>because we're not talking about an update to a gadget, right,

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>We're not talking about a new kind of iPhone or whatever.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about a totally new gadget. And you nailed

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it because the Apple tablet became the rumor of two

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine. Uh, and I mean the non existent Apple tablet, right,

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it may very well carry over to be the rumor

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand ten. The way we're going now, I mean,

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 1>you keep on hearing things about people saying, oh, the

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple tablet has been delayed. Look, Apple never announced the tablet.

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>At least as as of the recording of this podcast,

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple has not announced any plans for a tablet device. Now,

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of evidence, circumstantial evidence that points to

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 1>them developing a tablet. But if you haven't announced it,

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>and you haven't given a release date. You can't say

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that the project has been delayed from an official standpoint

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>because there was no date to overshoot. So I think, uh,

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna have to keep our eyes open

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>see if this rumored device shows up. But yep, that's

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a win in your column. So let me just put

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a big X mark next to this. Wow, I guess

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I should have chosen a different shape and color because

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be really confusing when I'm all done. Alright, Um,

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so you actually get an X here for no Apple netbook.

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>There is not an Apple netbook, right, which again not

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>a huge prediction, because Apple executives had gone so far

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>as to specifically say they were not interested in developing

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a netbook because for them to develop a netbook that

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>would meet the price point of your average netbooks, it

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>would require them to, uh to not live up to

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>their standards that they had established for their products, and

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>so there was no way they could develop a product

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>at that price point that was not a piece of crap.

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty much a direct quote. Alright. Alright, so net

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we had a web office launches and goes head to

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>head with Google Docs, mm hmmm, which where does that go?

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Because there is a version of Office for the web,

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's not out. Yeah, it's still in beta. So

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say this is gray. So I'm gonna mark

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this with a big red X right here and there

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we go. Three red x is so far. So they

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>they mean different things. But that's okay. I will remember

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.239
<v Speaker 1>that when we get to the end. A little concerned

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>about this style. Um, oh, here's here's a win for you. Um,

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got to win. This is a partial win. Well okay, Yeah,

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Windows seven it's out, and you predicted last year that

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>it was going to have a Microsoft was gonna have

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a hard time convincing people to adopt it after um

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the uh success. It hadn't with Windows Vista. It hung

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in the initial don't. It's a very very Douglas Adams

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of way of putting it now So so really,

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>what I was saying was that because Windows Vista was

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>considered by many people to be a failure, it's not

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>necessarily even even through the whole I would say, through

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole life cycle of the product, many people, not

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily Microsoft, but other people would consider the product to

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>be a failure. And um, and I said that that

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>would make people more reluctant to adopt Windows seven because

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it's an unknown quantity. Well, the reviews for Windows seven

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>have been very positive. People have rushed out to purchase

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>new Windows seven computers, So in that case, I was

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>not correct. But what I was really thinking, i'd like

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to think since a year later and I can't really remember,

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>but I was really thinking about things like corporations, you know,

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>big companies, would they would they adopt Windows seven machines

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>or would they wait and stick stick with Windows XP

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>machines until they absolutely had to upgrade? And that's seems

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to be the case. It seems like a lot of

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>corporations are have learned a lesson from Windows Vista and

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>have decided that, you know, they've got legacy systems that

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>run on XP that may not run on Windows seven,

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and they want to They don't want to get burned,

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>so they want to make sure that Windows seven is

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a stable environment before moving to it, which is why

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I consider this a partial win. I think, uh, I

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>think from a consumer standpoint, no, there's been no no

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>perception problem with Windows seven, But from from a uh

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>like a commercial standpoint with businesses, I think there still is. Yeah. Actually, uh,

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I have worked for a company that was large enough

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to the point where they were reluctant to install the

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>next version of the operating system until they felt it

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>was complete. For example, when an XP came out, they

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>decided to upgrade two Windows two thousand from so because

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they wanted about a mistake. Well to see that's thing

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 1>they had all finally all the patches in place, did it?

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>But Windows two thousand was awful? Well okay, well you

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>have that. I mean, they were very large companies are

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>often reluctant to move up as a result. And there's

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>there's another factor that plays into it too, the recession,

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>because people don't want to spend the money to upgrade

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the software when XP is doing okay, sure them. So

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that that I mean, there has been. It hasn't been

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>selling as well as Microsoft had hoped, at least after

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 1>that first initial rush, although I think it's been somewhat steady. Um.

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's as bad as everybody thought it

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be, either a lot of people were saying

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be you know anyway, all right,

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>so let's move on. You predicted that the Xbox seven

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty would be announced at E three ha ha, it

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>was not not correct. X Microsoft has not mentioned anything

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>about the successor to the Xbox three sixty. Uh in fact,

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>project and at all, which is the next really big

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>innovative can troll interface for the Xbox three sixty That

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>was that was being marketed specifically as a three sixty product,

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>which kind of suggests that they have plans for for

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a few more years of three sixty life before moving

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>on to the next system, although not necessarily could turn

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>out the natal really is the first step to a

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>news system, but we'll have to keep our eyes open.

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Next okay, next, um oh here, look another checkbox in

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the wind column. I'll just put a big check but

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 1>that one. Yeah, okay. The Google OS is out. Yeah,

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the web based operating system. I said that there would

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Google would come out with a web based operating system.

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And now we have Chromos. Now, granted, Chromos is not

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>available for purchase until next year, so but you know

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's definitely and there's developer copies. If you're a developer,

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you can get your hands on one, and you can

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you can create applications for the Chromos. But yeah, it's

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>not it's not on any commercial netbooks yet, which that's

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the main market for that our netbooks. So you said

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>that would be a quiet year for Nintendo. At most

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you said there'd be a new peripheral announced. I think

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty safe to say that it was a pretty

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>quiet year for Nintendo. Another softball except I mean, we

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>even saw that WE sales for the first time lagged

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>behind PS three sales in September. Yeah, so I mean

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that's big news for Nintendo. Not good news, but it

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely was a quiet year. I if you talk about peripherals,

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say that maybe the WE Motion Plus it's

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>probably the closest to a new peripheral. Yeah, well, I

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>mean anything big. Of course, they had the the balance board,

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>which was the last one, and that was for the

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>end of last year because and then plus was really

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>more of an enhancement than an actual new perisher. Alright,

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>moving on, unless you have that you know, new uh

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>golf club thing that you clip on for the tyger

0:12:56.280 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Woods game chase after the SUV. Al Right, so let's

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>move on. Um oh, look, another win for Jonathan another

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>big check mark. He predicted that phone sales would take off, well,

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>actually would would push Android up to new heights and hey,

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>look a bunch of Android phones. Yeah. So when Android

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>first came out in the United States, it was only

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>available on one hand set for the longest time. It's

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the HTCG one, which I am looking at right now

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>because that happens to be my phone. Well, now there

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>are a whole bunch of them. Yeah, and once it

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>once it moved to Horizon, I was thinking, Okay, now

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Android really come on, come into its own because Verizon

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is in the United States the largest cell phone carrier.

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, hey, what do you know a prediction that

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I got spot on. Now. Granted, the only other option

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>at that point would have been for Android to kind

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of wither and die, which I guess could have also happened,

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>but fortunately did not. So moving on, let's see here

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>um work on the PS four and the end of

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>PS three. So I guess this is that Sony would

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>announce that the successor to the PS three was in

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the works and that the they were going to slowly

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>phase out the PS three. No, no, I think you

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 1>actually pointed out that I was being a little uh uh. Yeah.

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>To to end, the PSS said that that they they

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>see a ten year lifespan in their consoles, which yeah,

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>which means that we're halfway through. We still have another

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>half to go. Okay, but they did uh end of

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>life the older style PS three in favor of the

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>new slimmer mark. I will, I will put a medium

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>sized X mark. I'm just trying to salvage I'm still

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>wrong and there we go. Okay, so oh well, UM,

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. This is sort of a maybe. Yeah,

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this one I make or break year for Blue ray,

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>which is what's been for the last several years. What

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>what again? This was gonna be one of those where

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought that two thousand nine would be the year

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>when either Blue ray sales would finally start picking up

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and really give life to the format, or they would

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>they would just falter so much that people would start

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to companies would start to abandon the format, like movie

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>studios would just stop producing disks because the profit margin

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be great enough. Um. I'd say that there's been

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>incremental improvement, especially once the PS three's price dropped. I

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's really helped Blue ray quite a bit. But

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's not the meteoric rise that I

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>was thinking would need to happen in two thousand nine.

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna say that that's just gonna be a

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>small check mark right here, all right, and let's say, oh,

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that means I gotta read the next one. So the

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Linux community will make a big move in operating system adoption. Well,

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we saw some pretty high profile Linux distributions come out,

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and people who are Linux users really like them. I

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>just don't know how many people adopted Linux. Yeah, I

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>still think, Um, you know, honestly, I think a lot

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of people are confused. People who are who aren't really

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>tech eas are a little bit confused by all the

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>different distributions. I mean, they don't necessarily understand works. There's

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>usually just one current version of any particular operating system,

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like if you if you talk about mac os, yes

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>there are multiple versions, but there's only one current version,

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>like one specific one that's that's that's being updated right now. Um.

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Whereas we talk about Lenox, hundreds of distributions. So and

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what I meant about how Lenox works. They don't

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>understand necessarily that it's supported by a whole community of

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>people that is not really owned by anybody. Uh you know,

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it's owned by everybody but you know, I do think

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it probably gained some ground, and I heard many, many

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>positive things. But yes, I'm afraid, Uh, I don't. I

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen anything that suggests that the new versions of

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Linux released this year have caused a surge in the

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>number of Linux users. Ex. Oh, hey, look at this,

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>cloud computing becomes a household term. Three checkmarks. Oh yeah,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a smaller check mark, maybe three small check Well. No,

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it has become a much more favorite term, whether it's

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>household term. Yeah, I don't think necessarily that Jane, average

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Jane housewife is talking about cloud computing, um, but she

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 1>probably uses it. Yeah, So cloud computing I think, got

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot more uh noticed this past year, both for

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>good and bad reasons, for things like think about like

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>when when Gmail went down and Google Apps went down.

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>That that made the news and people started thinking, oh,

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>can I trust my documents to things like Google Docs

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>because if the server goes down, how do I access

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>my information? Well, that actually brought a lot of attention

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to cloud computing. Not positive attention necessarily, but it did

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>raise questions in people's minds about is this the right

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>way to go? Does it make sense? Is my data secure?

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it ivan can Uh is it really better than

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>storing things on a on a local media storage device? Um?

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think uh. I think it's definitely in more

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>minds now than it was this time last year. And

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>here's one that's related to that one of yours that

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine would be the year of the netbook.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a that's a big big X

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>right there, meaning that of course that you got that

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So this is a big right red X here,

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh yeah, that's what that one means. So anyway, Yeah,

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say the netbooks definitely are are here to stay.

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean they they're more popular this year than they

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>were last year. I wrote an article recently where I

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>saw that within the second quarter of two thousand and eight,

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>netbook sales accounted for around I think five percent. I think,

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>if I recall correctly, around five of all mobile computer sales,

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's say quarter in two thousand nine it was

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>closer to that's a pretty big jump. So I think

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you could say this was the year of the netbook. Now.

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not people like netbooks, I think that's still

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>up for debate, because I'm not sure everyone knows what

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>they're getting into when they buy one. But they definitely

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>were very popular, I think mainly because of their price

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>point and because they're so mobile. Um so Facebook, you

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>predicted that they would put the uh do the fatal

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>move on my Space and they a. My Space is

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>bleeding pretty badly, but they don't seem to be completely dead.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>My Space is not dead, but I would argue this

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is still a a moderately sized check mark in my college.

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>No no no, no, yeah, I mean they dealt them some

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>serious damage this year because my Space is still around. Sure,

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think I think my Space is slowly turning

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>into more of a content site and less of a

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>social networking site, especially now that it looks like my

0:19:56.440 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Space is going to adopt Facebook Connect as part of

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>their system, so that you would be able to do

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>things like link to band pages on my Space through

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.959
<v Speaker 1>your Facebook account, because that's really what my Space has

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of become. It's become like the place for bands

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and band pages. That's something that my Space does really

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>well that Facebook does not do really well. Unfortunately for

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>my Space. Facebook does pretty much everything else better than

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>my Space does. Yeah, yeah, I agree, all right, So

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>let's see Twitter may go away. Huh. Let me check

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter account and see if Chris got that right. Alright,

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>let's see. Oh I think I'm sorry, this is gonna

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:41.479
<v Speaker 1>be at least seven x is. Well, you know, I

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>have to and in my defense, I have to point

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>out that, you know, Twitter has, as far as I know,

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 1>still no business model. It's still not making money at

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>least not generating revenue. Yes, but it has many, many

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>people now who have more than a million followers on it. So, um,

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 1>I still don't know that it's going to survive on

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>its own forever. But I think now I think it's

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>around this stay. Eventually, something is gonna have to happen

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for Twitter to be able to stay around. But uh, yeah,

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nine it was there was a one

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar valuation on Twitter. Now, whether or not that

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>would ever actually stand up if you did an I

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>P O or anything, I don't I doubt it. But um,

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it does say that Twitter is extremely valuable and yet

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>makes no money. Uh. We we can keep going, keep going,

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Come on, we can do this quickly. All right, we'll

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>do this quickly. Uh. Here's here's an easy one. Venture

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>capital drives up that would have to be a big

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>new right, and I'll just I'll just put a negative

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>big checkmark here. Yuh. Actually, uh, it's it's quite the opposite.

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot of venture capital, especially in the

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>latter half of the year, probably again sort of recession related,

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, people starting to fund companies. It was definitely

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>counterintuitive to me. I didn't think that venture capitalists would

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 1>fund more stuff during recession. But it turns out that

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have had really good ideas and

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>venture kevil has just got smarter about spending money. Yeah,

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a different it's a totally different, uh environment than

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it was in two thousand nine. But people are still

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>investing and people are still making money. Alright, so let's

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>see where it was the next one to see the

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>next big company to breakout will be, Um, well, you

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>know what ACES is doing. Well, I don't think it's

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the next big company yet. No, Actually I think HTC.

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, you know, I never even thought

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>about that, but yeah, HTC, that was a company I

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>had never even heard of before the g One hit.

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I was interested in the g one because of the

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Android operating system, but I had no clue who HTC

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was before that, and now you see so many handsets

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.199
<v Speaker 1>and they're even you know, net netbook computers coming out

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>with HCC brand on them. Yeah. I think both of

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>them actually had a similar past in that they made

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff for other people and then started branding their own.

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>And uh, HTC is being known for a for their

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>quality and I don't know. Uh, let's see, next one

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you had was a big jump in green tech. Well, yeah,

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that was that was a I feel almost horrible about

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 1>giving myself such a massive check mark for this one

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>because it was a gimme. But yeah, I think that board.

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually uh yeah, I'm gonna you know what, I'm

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>just I'm just gonna put check in a little plus corner,

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>all right. So let's see the HDTVs have hit their

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>price peak and will stagnate and drop not so much.

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's I've seen a drop in prices, but

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I think there are more I feel, forgive me, cheapy

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>models out there than there used to be. Yeah, it's well,

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the it's the continual process we see with

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>all electronics. As more people adopted, the price drops. But

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that uh well not a problem, but

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the the trend is that as people start to adopt. UH,

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>companies spend more money and innovation, and they start to

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>uh come out with newer models that have newer features,

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and you get Internet capable computer television's not computers, internet

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>capable televisions, UH, three D TVs, all this kind of

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff that ends up driving the price back up again

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>for the high models. So you know, I'll give you, um,

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you an X for this because I think

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you thank you pretty much. You know, it's kind of

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>splaining the difference. So all right, and then you said

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>that Yahoo would be bought or would collapse. I mean

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they were on the ropes for a while. Yeah, but

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>they've recovered quite well. Yeah, because they do have they

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>are known as a content provider of swords, although I

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>don't you know, I don't think people think of them

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that way. But and they formed they formed the partnership

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>with Microsoft. So Microsoft will be assuming that this partnership

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>does in fact go through, because it's still one of

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>those things that seems tenuous in place. But Microsoft well

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 1>will be providing the search engine power for Yahoo. So

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeahoo did not go away, did not apps, did not

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>get bought out, but it did enter a partnership with Microsoft,

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 1>which I think saved the company because under this partnership, Yahoo,

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>for the first few years will be collecting the lion's

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>share of the revenue from from search results, so in

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.479
<v Speaker 1>search advertising, and I had I had predicted that Yeahoo

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>would stay independent, so we kind of split the difference there. So, UM,

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>tell you what, I'll just I'll put a check in

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>mine and an X in yours and uh and there

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 1>we go. All right, So, well that happens to be

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>all of of the predictions I made, but Chris made

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a few more because he was just in a Svengali nude.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna let's let's we're gonna burrow through the

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>rest of these. So Amazon will release the second kindle. Okay,

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's right. So let's see X They're best buy

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>goes into chapter eleven. No, best by still around, not

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>doing the best business ever, but it's still around. So

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>let's just put an expert wrong there. Um, next, we've got,

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>uh what A O L goes away? Well, you know

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is it it did split off talking about

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>selling you know, Time Warner finally getting out of that

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>A O L deal, which is weird. Because A O

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>L is the one that acquired Time Warner. But um

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't go away, so I'm sorry that's next.

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And then more magazines and newspapers go online. Only we

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot of that in two thousand nine. Of course,

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that was another kind of green tech gimme, so I'm

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>just gonna have to give you an X for that one. Um.

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Then we got DRM goes away. Boy, we wish, but

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the kindle too pretty much keeps that around. Let's put

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>an X there. And then we've got trade shows will decline,

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>which you know what, CUS was a little less um

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>uh crowded than it had been the previous year. I

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>was at E three as well, but unfortunately that was

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>my first E three, so I can't. Actually I think

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the three was heavier, had heavier attendance, but that was

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>because they went back to the older format. Well. One

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>thing too, is uh that games actually did better than

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the other parts of the tet. They didn't,

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>they weren't completely recession proof. Towards the end of the

0:26:57.920 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>year they really started the sales started to take a

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>hit it but uh, yeah, they did better than most

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>other technologies. So um yeah, I'm just gonna call that X.

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 1>So let me let me Tellward here and um, wow, gee,

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you all those check marks on your side. I know

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that's well, this is embarrassing. Um, I'm just gonna wait, wait, wait, wait,

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 1>they mean different, but I don't remember was this positive

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>or negative? You know what, We're just gonna have to

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>We're just gonna have to go buy x's and checks.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And it looks like I'm a winner this time. Guys,

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll get you next year. I'm sure you know. This

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is one of those things that I thought would be that.

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, I got in a mood where I was

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>making all these predictions. It's really hard. Tech is such

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a mercurial field. I mean stuff say that. I say

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that in our next podcast recording Session two thousand predictions.

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>It is. It is. We were gonna throw some at

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the end of this, but we're already over time, so

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get this one off. So's it's fun. I mean,

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously Jonathan walked away with it this year,

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>but who knows next year. If it turns out whoever

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is holding the marker is the winner, then we will

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>know that, Um that my my method works. So yeah,

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>let's we'll make predictions in our next podcast recording session

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and which may or may not come out before January one.

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>That's all right, because the beginning of the year, we'll

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>make the predictions before the beginning of the year. Gosh

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>darn it. So okay, all right, someone to look forward to. Well.

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>If any of you guys have any interesting predictions or questions,

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>comments suggestions for podcast topics, write us. Our email address

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>is text us at how stuff works dot com. We

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have articles on tons of the topics that we covered

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>today at how stuff works dot com. Go to the

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>website check it out. If you haven't ever visited, you

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>should really check it out because there's a lot of

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>really great information, not just about tech either, all sorts

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. And Chris and I will talk to you

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>again really soon for more on this and thousands of

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>other topics. Is it how stuff works dot com. And

0:28:58.120 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>be sure to check out the new tech stuff block

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>now on the house Stuffworks homepage, brought to you by

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are you