Speaker 1: Our two Sean Hannity show toll free. It is eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine to four one Sean. If you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. I'm not really
Speaker 1: sure why, although it's interesting as hell sometimes to watch
Speaker 1: President Trump with a state run legacy media mob. In
Speaker 1: these interviews, we played the Terry Moran interview. What a
Speaker 1: beatdown that was. We should pull that back up and
Speaker 1: remind people, but maybe we will. But I want to
Speaker 1: go to this past weekend Meet the Press Kristen Welkert,
Speaker 1: and it kind of surprises me anybody does any of
Speaker 1: these Sunday shows because nobody really watches. But the way
Speaker 1: this was reported in the press is he doesn't. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump doesn't. It doesn't says he doesn't know if he
Speaker 1: needs to uphold the constitution.
Speaker 2: Listen to the exchange.
Speaker 3: Your Secretary of State says, everyone who's here, citizens and
Speaker 3: non citizens, deserved to process. Do you agree, mister, I
Speaker 3: don't know.
Speaker 4: I'm not a lawyer.
Speaker 5: I don't know.
Speaker 3: Well, the Fifth Amendment, I don't know.
Speaker 6: It seems it might say that, But if you're talking
Speaker 6: about that, then we'd have to have a midian or
Speaker 6: two million or three million trials. We have thousands of
Speaker 6: people that are some murderers and some drug dealers and
Speaker 6: some of the worst people on earth. But it is
Speaker 6: some of the worst, most dangerous people on earth. And
Speaker 6: I was elected to get them the hell out of here,
Speaker 6: and the courts are holding me from doing it.
Speaker 3: But even given those numbers that you're talking about, don't
Speaker 3: you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States
Speaker 3: as present?
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 6: I have to respond by saying, again, I have brilliant
Speaker 6: lawyers that work for me, and they are going to
Speaker 6: obviously follow what the Supreme Court said. What you said
Speaker 6: is not what I heard. The Supreme Court said they
Speaker 6: have a different interpretation.
Speaker 2: It's exactly right. And if we're talking about the.
Speaker 1: Enemy Aliens Act or the Alien Enemies Act, it's very simple.
Speaker 1: We have four prior presidents invoke this Act and it
Speaker 1: was upheld constitutionally, and the court even went as far
Speaker 1: as to say that once a president makes that decision
Speaker 1: under his executive to already as commander in chief, that
Speaker 1: that is not even subject to judicial review. So the
Speaker 1: whole premise of the question is ridiculous, because the president's
Speaker 1: upholding the Constitution as a firm by the US Supreme Court. Anyway,
Speaker 1: here do we in on this a more. David Shown,
Speaker 1: former council for President Trump. Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal
Speaker 1: analysts and best selling author, Welcome both of you.
Speaker 2: Greg, start with you.
Speaker 1: I think the question in the context in which it
Speaker 1: was given, and then the headlines that ensued do not
Speaker 1: capture the president's answer.
Speaker 7: Nelly don't, and I don't think Kristin Welker understands due
Speaker 7: process and Trump is right about deportations and due process
Speaker 7: because deportations are not a criminal process under the meaning
Speaker 7: of the Bill of Rights in the Fifth Amendment, which
Speaker 7: guarantees due process. Because removal of people who are here
Speaker 7: illegally is different than an individual who is charged or
Speaker 7: convicted of crimes, they get due process. And the Supreme
Speaker 7: Court recently ruled that under the Alien Enemies Act, people
Speaker 7: are entitled to notice and a right to challenge removal.
Speaker 7: That's different than due process. It's a kind of due process,
Speaker 7: but it's dramatically different. And when you are talking about
Speaker 7: a deportation and the right of notice, that is done
Speaker 7: typically on an expedited basis, before an immigration judge who
Speaker 7: is not a part of the judicial branch. Their employees
Speaker 7: of the Department of Justice. So it's not the same
Speaker 7: as the standard due process that people are entitled to
Speaker 7: in a regular court of law when charged with a crime.
Speaker 7: Kristin Welker doesn't know that. She doesn't know what she
Speaker 7: doesn't know.
Speaker 1: And the one, by the way, isn't the very act
Speaker 1: of entering the country tree illegally.
Speaker 2: Render somebody?
Speaker 1: I mean, when do we bestow upon illegal immigrants the
Speaker 1: rights of American citizens.
Speaker 7: Well, if they're charged with a crime while here on
Speaker 7: American soil, they get due process the deportation expelling people
Speaker 7: here illegally, they're not charged with a crime, they're simply
Speaker 7: being evicted, and they get the chance to be notified,
Speaker 7: and they go for a before an immigration judge who says, yes,
Speaker 7: the documents here, you're here illegally, what do you have
Speaker 7: say for yourself, and then boom, you're gone. So that's
Speaker 7: not standard due process and Welker doesn't know it.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, there might be boom, you're gone, except you
Speaker 1: have activist judges and that might say, oh, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, you can come back in one hundred days
Speaker 1: from now, and we'll re examine this issue. And the
Speaker 1: odds of that person ever coming back next to.
Speaker 7: Zero, right, So you know, I think what's important is
Speaker 7: that the Supreme Court needs to better identify and clarify
Speaker 7: what it is they mean by all of this. And
Speaker 7: you know that.
Speaker 2: But didn't they do that in the Alien Enemies Act?
Speaker 1: Didn't It wasn't that the whole purpose of the forty
Speaker 1: eighth Supreme Court decision. You're the first one that pointed
Speaker 1: it out to me.
Speaker 8: Greg, that's right.
Speaker 7: And you know here you have a judge four days ago,
Speaker 7: Texas judge who ruled that Trump cannot use the Alien
Speaker 7: Enemies Act to expel violent members of a designated terrorist organization.
Speaker 7: The judge said, well, yes, they're an arm of the
Speaker 7: ven is winning government. But I hereby proclaim that this
Speaker 7: is not a predatory incursion under the meaning of the Act.
Speaker 7: The judge can't possibly know that he's incompetent because he
Speaker 7: has no access to the relevant intel or government information
Speaker 7: that the president does, which is why Sean the Supreme
Speaker 7: Court in nineteen forty eight said, whenever the president uses
Speaker 7: the Act, it is not reviewable by any judge. But
Speaker 7: this Texas judge, as many others, are simply ignoring the
Speaker 7: nation's highest court. And I think Supreme Court needs to
Speaker 7: be far more clear and deliberate about this subject.
Speaker 2: Let's get your take, David Shoan.
Speaker 5: First of all, I think the clip that you played
Speaker 5: is vitally important. You're right the headlines have been saying
Speaker 5: President says he doesn't have to doesn't know if you
Speaker 5: have to a beta constitution in no way, shape or form.
Speaker 5: Is that what President Trump said completely? Taking that of context,
Speaker 5: Your clip gives it the context. He was saying that
Speaker 5: he's not sure because he's not a lawyer about the
Speaker 5: degree of due process due to illegal aliens period, not
Speaker 5: that he doesn't have to abta Constitution. He's said over
Speaker 5: and over again.
Speaker 1: And I can add one thing, and he went a
Speaker 1: little further. What are we going to have millions and
Speaker 1: millions of trials in this country? What fourteen million illegals
Speaker 1: are going to go before a judge a trial? And
Speaker 1: who's going to pay for that? And we don't have
Speaker 1: the capacity to put that many people on trial or
Speaker 1: give them quote the due process when we know they're
Speaker 1: here illegally. Now, I do need to add one thing,
Speaker 1: and then I promise I won't to interrupt. And that
Speaker 1: is the news of the day, which is the administration
Speaker 1: is now offering one thousand dollars to every bidy illegal
Speaker 1: and a free plane ride who self deport, which that
Speaker 1: was an idea I had floated a long time ago
Speaker 1: on this program.
Speaker 5: Yes, it's really unbelievable, the classic Trump movies offering an incentive.
Speaker 5: Some of these folks were starting to self deport anyway
Speaker 5: because they were afraid something would be caught about them
Speaker 5: and so on. But you know, I think putting all
Speaker 5: this in context, all of this debate about the Alien
Speaker 5: Enemies Act is interesting because and I think they used
Speaker 5: it the idea of someone in administration to avoid judicial
Speaker 5: scrutiny and move through the system because it should be
Speaker 5: a political question, non justiciable. But remember, we do have
Speaker 5: statutes on the book that make people like Mackmud Khalil
Speaker 5: and others who have supported and advocated and endorsed terrorism
Speaker 5: and foreign terrorist organizations fully deportable. There's a statue right
Speaker 5: on a Tom Cotton actually pinpoint of this huck months ago.
Speaker 5: But you know, under eight USC. Eleven eighty two, you're
Speaker 5: denied entry if you encourage your member of support, endorse,
Speaker 5: encourage others to support a foreign terrorist organizations. And under eleven,
Speaker 5: twenty seven. You are deportable if you violated that section.
Speaker 5: These folks put out materials supporting Camas, encouraging others to
Speaker 5: do it, completely tearing down the Western way of life,
Speaker 5: that we are Westerners fighting for the total eradication of
Speaker 5: Western civilization, all of those kinds of things, document stamp
Speaker 5: by comas with approval and all that they're fully deportable.
Speaker 5: There's not a question. So people championing these causes and saying, well,
Speaker 5: it's the First Amendment issue. I've advocated for First Amendment
Speaker 5: rights my entire career. This is not a First Amendment issue.
Speaker 5: United States Supreme Court sent at twenty ten in holder
Speaker 5: providing material support to actions and words for terrorist organizations
Speaker 5: is not detected First Amendment conduct. So we're getting disinformation
Speaker 5: from Democrats in this and from the media quite frankly.
Speaker 1: Well, the other thing, Greg that's happening is Democrats have
Speaker 1: come to realize they lost this battle in terms of
Speaker 1: public opinion with the Brego Garcia, and the.
Speaker 2: Message has gone out.
Speaker 1: No more visits to Al Salvador, show, visits, performative art.
Speaker 1: Maybe I just have to take David Hoggs' you know,
Speaker 1: words and use it against the Democrats.
Speaker 2: They just right now they're sucking yeah.
Speaker 7: And in fact, I was amused today when I read
Speaker 7: that the Los Angeles County Sheriff Villa de Waeva has
Speaker 7: decided to forsake the Democratic Party and leave and join
Speaker 7: the Republican Party because he said of Democrats, you know, no,
Speaker 7: I'm not in favor of hate and division and purple
Speaker 7: hair and pronouns. I'm going to join the Republican Party
Speaker 7: that cares about family values and law and order. And so,
Speaker 7: you know, Democrats have painted themselves into a corner and
Speaker 7: they don't know how to get out, and they now
Speaker 7: have the image of caring more about terrorists and thugs
Speaker 7: and murderers and keeping them here in the United States
Speaker 7: instead of protecting the innocent victims of a crime who've
Speaker 7: been terrorized by individuals. And you know, that's what the
Speaker 7: Democratic Party stands for, and it's a losing proposition of
Speaker 7: the ballot box.
Speaker 1: Quick break right back Morole with David Showan Craig Jared
Speaker 1: on the other side and your calls eight hundred and
Speaker 1: ninety four one Shawn. As we continue, what do you
Speaker 1: do if that moment comes and somebody wants to bring
Speaker 1: harm to you and your family. Now, option one would
Speaker 1: be to get out of the situation without any confrontation.
Speaker 1: Sometimes that's not possible. Now you don't want to immediately
Speaker 1: go to the lethal option, then you might fund yourself
Speaker 1: in a legal quagmire that could last years. There is
Speaker 1: another interim option that is extraordinarily advanced technologically, which is
Speaker 1: why now hundreds and hundreds of law enforcement agencies and
Speaker 1: private security firms are now using the technology of Berner
Speaker 1: the less lethal launcher, and Berner now has their brand
Speaker 1: new cl which is their compact launcher. You can incapacitate
Speaker 1: any perpetrated thirty to forty minutes. It is their smallest
Speaker 1: launcher to date. It's four inches long, two smartphones thick,
Speaker 1: it's easy to conceal, carry on your body without attracting
Speaker 1: unnecessary attention, and it fires four hundred feet per second
Speaker 1: forty one jewels of force per square inch. And watch
Speaker 1: their videos and I think you will be impressed and
Speaker 1: over by the way all of their pistols are hand
Speaker 1: assembled by American workers in Fort Wayne, Indiana. And with
Speaker 1: Mother's Day approaching, well, it's the perfect gift for moms
Speaker 1: and daughters and maybe also dads when Father's Day comes,
Speaker 1: and if it's into a pursa bag and people will
Speaker 1: have protection anyway, take a look at their videos.
Speaker 2: Decide for yourself.
Speaker 1: This technology is changing the way self defense is taking
Speaker 1: place in this country. It's b y r na dot
Speaker 1: com uh slash hannity. Find the burner dealer near you
Speaker 1: or they'll melo directly to you. No, no background check,
Speaker 1: you don't need a license for it. B y r
Speaker 1: na dot com. Check it out today. All right, We
Speaker 1: continue now with Craig Jarrett and David Shoon. David Shoon, Uh,
Speaker 1: what about people like Khalil and he you know, another guy,
Speaker 1: a foreign student and the we saw what happened on
Speaker 1: Columbia's campus, for example, but other campuses around the country
Speaker 1: and virulent anti Semitism and and and yet that again
Speaker 1: the Democrats are championing that quo prohomas wing at college
Speaker 1: on college campuses, and champion in u using taxpayer dollars
Speaker 1: to pay for elite institutions. I mean, why is Harvard
Speaker 1: getting six hundred and fifty million dollars for fiscal year
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four when they have a fifty three billion
Speaker 1: dollar endowment and on one of these campuses, Colombia in particular.
Speaker 1: You know, students were being asked if they were a
Speaker 1: Zionists before they could pass certain areas where these encampments were.
Speaker 1: That's been widely reported. And then we're told by administrators
Speaker 1: that they should consider at home learning and not going
Speaker 1: to campus. That all went down as well after October seventh.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's shocking. I mean, it's very frightening for many
Speaker 5: Jewish students on campus today. But the hypocrisy behind this
Speaker 5: also is just shocking. Again. The Trump administration, the first
Speaker 5: administration in my memory at least that's really taking a
Speaker 5: stand against this stuff, actively fought against antisemitism on campus.
Speaker 5: And so we've seen now criticism from the Democratic side,
Speaker 5: these hypocrites who said and did nothing talked to that
Speaker 5: free speech when Jewish students were being marshaled, all off
Speaker 5: of campus, not allowed to go to class, buildings were
Speaker 5: being taken over and so on. Now they're attacking the
Speaker 5: Trump administration for going after that. You have Chuck Schumer
Speaker 5: saying that Trump is weaponizing anti Semitism. How dare he?
Speaker 5: And then he tries to cloak himself in promoter of
Speaker 5: credibility because he's Jewish, those Jewish voices for Palestine. They
Speaker 5: want nothing to do with Jews or Israel. The hypocrisy
Speaker 5: is just shocking. His administration is finally standing up to it. Also,
Speaker 5: we're filing I filed a number of lawsuits under the
Speaker 5: offices of the group called the National Jewish Advocacy Center
Speaker 5: challenging the conduct by these groups on campus. We see
Speaker 5: all of these things going on. This guy Khalil is
Speaker 5: deportable period. He will be deported, and so are many
Speaker 5: others like him. And he saw the guy last week
Speaker 5: released from jail while he's being deported in New England,
Speaker 5: and he holds a press conference. He's not afraid of anyone,
Speaker 5: and he wants to act like a hero. Nothing but
Speaker 5: a supporter of terrorism.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'll say it maybe at the bottom of
Speaker 1: this half hour, but I don't know if he saw
Speaker 1: David at Portnoy. But Barstools apparently has locations around the
Speaker 1: country and somebody wrote something virulently anti Semitic, and David
Speaker 1: Portnoy rightly, you know, went to social media. He was
Speaker 1: apoplectic and livid. Greg Jarrett. But there is this part
Speaker 1: of the Democratic Party that if they're they're not virulently
Speaker 1: openly anti Semitic.
Speaker 2: They're silent in the face of it.
Speaker 7: They are, and that's why I commend David for bringing
Speaker 7: this lawsuit under the Anti Terrorism Act against these defendant
Speaker 7: groups in New York City and particularly on the campus
Speaker 7: of Columbia who are aiding and abetting Hamas's continuing acts
Speaker 7: of terrorism. They're providing substantial, valuable assistance to Hamas. And
Speaker 7: as David argues, you know, Hamas relies on these propagandists
Speaker 7: in the US to do its bidding, spreading faults to it,
Speaker 7: instigating a culture of violence, fear, and you know, as
Speaker 7: David describes it, it's Hamas's grand strategy developing these campus
Speaker 7: foot soldiers at Columbia University in New York. They can
Speaker 7: and should be held liable under international law as accessories.
Speaker 7: Their practical assistance helps carry out acts of deadly terrorism.
Speaker 7: And hats off to David for using the law against them.
Speaker 1: All the very charter of a MOSS calls for the
Speaker 1: destruction of Israel anyway. Appreciate you both, David, Choan, thank you,
Speaker 1: Greg Jared, Thank you.
Speaker 7: Exposing government waste and abuse of your liberties every day.
Speaker 2: Sean Hannity is on right now.
Speaker 1: Twenty five now till the top of the hour, eight
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety four one Sean. If you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the programming, we have an announcement.
Speaker 1: We're going to be headed back on the road a
Speaker 1: couple of stops in Florida. We'll tell you about in
Speaker 1: a minute. Want to remind you about one great gift
Speaker 1: for mom this Mother's Day. It's the gift of a
Speaker 1: lifetime her memories digitized and perpetuity forever, thanks to our
Speaker 1: friends at legacybox dot com slash Hannity. Go there today
Speaker 1: and they have a Mother's Day sale going on. It
Speaker 1: is their best Mother's Day sale ever, sixty percent off.
Speaker 1: They're going to send you a box. You look at
Speaker 1: the box, you open the box. Then you go to
Speaker 1: your attic, you go to your basement, you go to
Speaker 1: your closets, you go to your garage, you have other
Speaker 1: family members do the same. You find every home movie,
Speaker 1: family movie, camquarder, tape, reel to reel, tape eight, whatever
Speaker 1: you have, whatever form, any photo, any negative that you have,
Speaker 1: put it in the box and their team of experts
Speaker 1: will hand digitize it. And it's the perfect way to
Speaker 1: protect mom's wedding videos, your baby tapes. You know every milestone,
Speaker 1: and here's the beauty of it. Maybe mom and Dad
Speaker 1: passed away, Maybe Grandma and Grandpa passed away. You'll get
Speaker 1: to see and hear from them again. How cool is that?
Speaker 1: And then know that your great great great great great
Speaker 1: great great brand kids will know what you look and
Speaker 1: sound like. That's a gift you. Once these things decay,
Speaker 1: you can no longer get them back. Do it now
Speaker 1: before it's too late. Sixty percent off. Great gift for
Speaker 1: mom My, best Mother's Day gift ever, Best sale ever
Speaker 1: Legacy box dot com slash Hannity sixty percent off for
Speaker 1: this limited time. Do it today Legacy box dot Com
Speaker 1: slash Hannity. All right, let's get to our busy telephones.
Speaker 1: Let's say hi to William Is in Utah. William High,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called?
Speaker 4: Yes, thanks for taking my call, Sean, I I've spoken before.
Speaker 4: I appreciate twenty five years of listening to you.
Speaker 2: Thank you, my friend.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but I just want to say about Congress in
Speaker 4: the Senate. You'll excuse my speech. I I'm trying. I've
Speaker 4: had a stroke, so I'm recovering.
Speaker 1: Oh, Wow, for somebody that's had a stroke. I've no
Speaker 1: people that have had strokes. They never talk again. Thank God,
Speaker 1: you're recovering. I bless you.
Speaker 4: Yeah, half to six months. But anyway, Congress in the Senate,
Speaker 4: I'm trying to get you know, your opinion there. I'm
Speaker 4: trying to get get in the theme of the place
Speaker 4: has been get to work, you know, get abaded back
Speaker 4: to the office. And I'm John's trying to see where
Speaker 4: Congress and the Senator are doing the same and leading
Speaker 4: by example.
Speaker 1: Well, let me let me update you because I interviewed
Speaker 1: last week both John Thune and Mike Johnson, and so
Speaker 1: I know where we are with the Reconciliation bill. This
Speaker 1: this is the only avenue we have and in terms
Speaker 1: of what we can and do now now, certainly the
Speaker 1: President by even threatening tariffs, that's going to result in
Speaker 1: we have over eight trillion in committed monies to build
Speaker 1: manufacturing out and bring manufacturing and high paying career jobs
Speaker 1: back to America.
Speaker 2: That's number one.
Speaker 1: The President's tax cuts as part of this reconciliation package,
Speaker 1: they will be made permanent. They'll be also including no
Speaker 1: tax on tips, social security, or overtime. That will also
Speaker 1: help the economy. They will be funding defense but also
Speaker 1: adding more money to defense, cutting They're cutting discretionary spending
Speaker 1: by about twenty twenty five percent, which we have to do.
Speaker 1: They're eliminating waste, fraud and abuse, which we have to do,
Speaker 1: and get rid of corruption. You factor in the president's
Speaker 1: energy dominance policies that will help make us wealthy again.
Speaker 1: And so the scheduled time frame to get this bill
Speaker 1: written and without getting too deep in the weeds, and
Speaker 1: get through the arcane and very arduous process known as reconciliation,
Speaker 1: where you don't need a cloture vote in the Senate,
Speaker 1: which is sixty votes, but you can pass with a
Speaker 1: simple majority. There are very specific items that you have
Speaker 1: to check off, and it has to be approved by
Speaker 1: the Senate parliamentarian and the House then has to go
Speaker 1: along with it. So it's complicated, but you know what
Speaker 1: they're getting there. It's their full time job. It's not
Speaker 1: going to be perfect. But the only other alternative is
Speaker 1: to live under Joe Biden's budget until October one, when
Speaker 1: of the next fiscal year starts, and that's not acceptable
Speaker 1: to me. Yeah, they're gonna and then they'll have money
Speaker 1: for the border. In this bill, they'll they'll have money
Speaker 1: set aside for deportations.
Speaker 2: I mean, they're doing a lot of good things in
Speaker 2: this bill.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, And I appreciate, love what he's doing. But
Speaker 4: I'm back to the Senate and I'm talking about the
Speaker 4: time frame as a war for July fourth. No, no,
Speaker 4: but I'm saying a work week. One Congress and the
Speaker 4: Senate together they work three day work weeks.
Speaker 1: Sean, Yeah, Now, well that's part of the problem, but
Speaker 1: also the markup of these bills. Remember you're dealing with
Speaker 1: thousands of pages, and again then you have to navigate
Speaker 1: it through this very difficult legal prism and the process
Speaker 1: known as reconciliation.
Speaker 2: So it's it's complicated.
Speaker 1: However, you know, look, today's date is that May fifth,
Speaker 1: when not that far away from the fourth of July,
Speaker 1: where it's about two months from now. I hope they
Speaker 1: get it done because twenty twenty six, I think is
Speaker 1: going to be totally decided based on the state of
Speaker 1: the economy. I believe those elections are going to be,
Speaker 1: you know, in large part about the economy, and because
Speaker 1: peace and prosperity always always drive elections. Listen, William, you please,
Speaker 1: you continue your great recovery. We're glad you checked in.
Speaker 1: God bless you and hoping you're feeling better and take
Speaker 1: good care of yourself. Okay, Tom in North Carolina? I
Speaker 1: hate Tom?
Speaker 2: How are you doing good?
Speaker 8: Doing pretty good? I'm a little upset with the Republicans,
Speaker 8: but you know that's normal. Ran Paul in particular, I
Speaker 8: heard him on your show when you did an interview
Speaker 8: with him last week, and this guy's a sucker man.
Speaker 8: He's talking about a CEO of one of these car
Speaker 8: companies taught him it's going to be five thousand dollars
Speaker 8: more car for a car that's built in America, that's
Speaker 8: built in Kentucky. That don't add up. It don't matter.
Speaker 8: If you're calculating, you know how to figure out what
Speaker 8: the tariffs is, which what he was talking about, which
Speaker 8: you could hire a kid to program a computer program
Speaker 8: for a couple hundred thousand dollars. He's talking about it.
Speaker 8: Lega's the Obamacare website. It's going to cost five hundred
Speaker 8: million dollars to figure out how much tariff's to pay
Speaker 8: or if he's talking about the parts, if we're important
Speaker 8: to parts at twenty five percent tariff and it's going
Speaker 8: to go up five thousand. That means you're using twenty
Speaker 8: thousand dollars worth of form that's not an America car.
Speaker 1: So the way that this is playing out is all
Speaker 1: these foreign car companies now just moving their manufacturing facilities
Speaker 1: here and they're getting their parts from here, and because
Speaker 1: they don't want to be subject to it now, the
Speaker 1: only other option is that we continue to go along
Speaker 1: with what the President inherited and what has been a
Speaker 1: consistent US policy for fifty sixty years, which is these
Speaker 1: countries unfairly tariff American products and shut out American markets,
Speaker 1: and we continue to get ripped off and abused and
Speaker 1: taken advantage of.
Speaker 2: Is there.
Speaker 1: I think it is already in many ways worked out
Speaker 1: better than I would have anticipated. I didn't anticipate eight
Speaker 1: trillion dollars in commitment and spending for manufacturing and factories
Speaker 1: and auto plants in America. I didn't factor that in
Speaker 1: when the President was first talking about that.
Speaker 2: But that money came in.
Speaker 1: Those commitments came in fast and furious, and you know,
Speaker 1: it just again, and nobody ever wants to hear the
Speaker 1: word be patient, just be patient, be patient. However, we
Speaker 1: really don't have any choice. It's gonna take time, and
Speaker 1: we did kind of get to a point of consensus
Speaker 1: by the end of the interview. If you've paid close attention,
Speaker 1: is he wants to see the President sign these trade deals,
Speaker 1: you know, as quickly as possible in the next month
Speaker 1: or two. And I believe that's probably a strong likelihood.
Speaker 1: And if the President does get that done for example,
Speaker 1: you know, I hear we're getting close with Great Britain
Speaker 1: and India and Korea and Japan and South and Taiwan
Speaker 1: and maybe Italy. You know, once we start, you know,
Speaker 1: once you start signing deal after deal after deal, and
Speaker 1: then you add the energy component to it, but that
Speaker 1: we can sell to our allies. I think you're looking
Speaker 1: at foundationally, and then you had the tax cuts to it.
Speaker 1: I think we're foundationally sound owned you to move into
Speaker 1: a period of great economic growth and hopefully prosperity for
Speaker 1: every America.
Speaker 2: I want every American to do well.
Speaker 1: The best thing that's happening is with all the deportations
Speaker 1: that will be taking place, that's less competition for jobs,
Speaker 1: which means job wages growth will go up. The more
Speaker 1: money people have, the more money people will paying taxes.
Speaker 1: The more money people pay in taxes, but it also
Speaker 1: means more money in their pockets. More money in their
Speaker 1: pockets means more money that they'll be spending, more homes
Speaker 1: that they'll be able to afford, more cars they'll be
Speaker 1: able to buy, and they won't have to worry about
Speaker 1: the price of eggs in the local grocery store. So okay,
Speaker 1: there's but there, you're basically turning on its head a
Speaker 1: system that has been designed to hurt us for sixty
Speaker 1: years and saying, well, if you take on that system
Speaker 1: that's going to hurt us, We're already being hurt. We've
Speaker 1: just accepted the fact that we're being hurt. And I
Speaker 1: think the President's saying it's time not to be hurt anymore,
Speaker 1: and that the playing field has to be leveled. And
Speaker 1: that's why I support I support the President's decision. But
Speaker 1: it can't happen soon enough for anybody. Trust me, been
Speaker 1: living under this, this horrible Biden economy for a long time.
Speaker 2: Appreciate you, man. Glad you're out there.
Speaker 1: Tom. That's a busy telephones Rudy in Illinois. Next Sean
Speaker 1: Hennity Show.
Speaker 9: Hi, his don just wanted to mention.
Speaker 1: And by the way, I had no idea that your
Speaker 1: governor was such a jackass. Good grief.
Speaker 9: Oh yes, yes, with that seventy two inch waistline, you know,
Speaker 9: I mean, who is he trying?
Speaker 7: A kid?
Speaker 2: But many too, I think he's getting better. Then. I'm
Speaker 2: glad to hear it.
Speaker 9: Yeah, that's good. I just wanted to say that Tom
Speaker 9: Holman has been talking about bringing back retired federal agents
Speaker 9: ICE agents who have to mandatorily retired at age fifty seven,
Speaker 9: so with twenty years experience, they have to have twenty
Speaker 9: years at fifty seven. But he's talking about bringing them
Speaker 9: back to do the processing of the illegal aliens for deportation.
Speaker 1: And I love that idea. I love the idea that
Speaker 1: they announced today. We have Christy Noman tonight about it.
Speaker 1: I mean, we're telling people will pay for your plane
Speaker 1: ticket to go home self deport We'll give you a
Speaker 1: thousand dollars and you still have will have an opportunity
Speaker 1: to enter the country again legally. If you don't self deport,
Speaker 1: you'll never have a chance to get back in exactly.
Speaker 9: And you know a lot of people don't realize, especially
Speaker 9: the mainstream media, that processing and deportation. Deportation is not
Speaker 9: just putting them on a plane. It's a whole set
Speaker 9: of legal documents that they have to sign and database
Speaker 9: techs and et cetera, et cetera before they're deported. And
Speaker 9: they do have the option to appear before an immigration judge. However,
Speaker 9: a lot of them don't have a good case, and
Speaker 9: the immigration judge is just going to say, where's your evidence?
Speaker 9: You know what, what proof do you have that you
Speaker 9: have the right to stay here.
Speaker 1: They're being very smart about this because they understand that
Speaker 1: even that one case that you're talking about is going
Speaker 1: to cost many, many more thousands than the thousand they'll
Speaker 1: give them in a plane ticket. It's going to the
Speaker 1: amount of money will spend on the healthcare system. I mean,
Speaker 1: look at all the billions and hundreds of billions spent
Speaker 1: over the years in California on illegal immigrant healthcare and
Speaker 1: all the other states. Now we see Texas, We're getting
Speaker 1: numbers from Texas that are just astronomical. We're paying for
Speaker 1: all of this, and it's education. It's impacting our healthcare system,
Speaker 1: our criminal justice system, it's hurting everything everything. Just get
Speaker 1: out of here, come into the country legally, now's your
Speaker 1: chance to self deport and you'll be able to retain
Speaker 1: a right to maybe come back legally one.
Speaker 2: Day if you want to.
Speaker 9: Three hundred percent, And that's the way it should be.
Speaker 9: And being a son of immigrants, my mom was an immigrant,
Speaker 9: my dad was born here. But I understand, and I
Speaker 9: grew up in the Chicago area and I've seen it
Speaker 9: all my life, the abuses, the fraud, the marriage fraud,
Speaker 9: you know, driving without insurance, driving without licenses, staff, all
Speaker 9: sorts of stuff. So you know, this is something that
Speaker 9: most people in Congress don't realize. They live in their
Speaker 9: ivory towers. But for the rest of us, nineteen percent
Speaker 9: people live out here. We have to suffer the consequences
Speaker 9: of their bad decisions.
Speaker 1: Look, it's simple. If you and I were to do this,
Speaker 1: we would be held accountable. All right, my friend, thanks
Speaker 1: for the call. Eight hundred nine one Shaw is a number.
Speaker 1: You want to be a part of the program, My
Speaker 1: Free State of Florida. Let's say hi to Eduardo Edwardo.
Speaker 1: You're on the Sean Henneredy Show.
Speaker 10: Hi, Hey Sean, it's great to hear from you. First
Speaker 10: time calling on this on your show. Here one hundred
Speaker 10: and seventy seven thousand jobs is great. We need to
Speaker 10: keep on as far as Congress. They need to make
Speaker 10: a push on this tax bill and other bills because
Speaker 10: otherwise they can overturn these in the future. And Ellie
Speaker 10: has like seventeen police helicopters. You can tell the economy
Speaker 10: is doing well when they got seventeen helicopters, police electors
Speaker 10: over there and come on of heres. I just saw
Speaker 10: her on Daily Mail with her husband, Doug. I'm off
Speaker 10: having dinner last night in mid tom You know the
Speaker 10: economy doing well?
Speaker 2: Is that the indication right there?
Speaker 9: There?
Speaker 8: You go?
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, Dougie, the Dougie there.
Speaker 2: Look, I.
Speaker 1: Can only tell you that the one thing that we
Speaker 1: want to revitalize is the American dream. The one thing
Speaker 1: we need to get back to is freedom. The one
Speaker 1: thing we need to start thinking anew is the size
Speaker 1: and scope and influence of government. I go through my
Speaker 1: laundry list of well, what is government doing so well?
Speaker 1: How did Obamacare promises work out?
Speaker 2: Not well? How did it work out with Social Security
Speaker 2: and Medicare? Not well?
Speaker 1: How's your educational system in your small town, your big
Speaker 1: city most places, it's not doing very well. How's it
Speaker 1: working out with law and order and safety and security
Speaker 1: in towns and cities that have adopted, you know, defund
Speaker 1: dismantled nobail laws, uh particularly well. So if we want
Speaker 1: to get back to constitutional order, we have got to
Speaker 1: cut back on this bureaucracy, and we have to alter
Speaker 1: our thinking away from somehow this belief system that too
Speaker 1: many Americans have that government is going to take care
Speaker 1: of your every need from the moment you're born to
Speaker 1: the day you die. No, in a free society, don't
Speaker 1: count on them. They're not trustworthy. They've proven themselves not trustworthy.
Speaker 1: You know what, Take advantage of the freedom and protect
Speaker 1: yourself and your family and provide for yourself and your family,
Speaker 1: and work your ass off. That's my best advice to everybody.
Speaker 1: All Right, when we come back, my interview with Secretary
Speaker 1: of State now NSA director Marco Rubio, and so much
Speaker 1: going on in the world is going to be a
Speaker 1: lot happening this week, and we'll give you a preview