Speaker 1: A couple things, just real quick, because we're going to
Speaker 1: move on. We have to talk about law fair and
Speaker 1: everything else.
Speaker 2: A couple things. Remember that you and I we do
Speaker 2: not decide elections. I wish we did.
Speaker 1: You were informed, I'm informed. The hardcore GOP voter does
Speaker 1: not decide elections. The independent voter does. It sucks the
Speaker 1: people who blow this way and that way. I'll vote
Speaker 1: for a Democrat, I'll vote for a republic. They're all
Speaker 1: over the map. These are the people who decide elections. Okay,
Speaker 1: so we have some pull numbers out and they're terrible.
Speaker 1: We have a midterm election coming up, and Trump has
Speaker 1: a sixty percent disapproval rating. He is being disapproved of.
Speaker 1: This is not by you and me said, don't email me,
Speaker 1: I love it. Stop talking about independence, immigration, Iraan economy, inflation.
Speaker 1: But okay, what's wrong with these people? Are they stupid?
Speaker 1: They're not stupid, They're just not informed. They don't have
Speaker 1: any idea about anything. They go whichever way the wind blows.
Speaker 1: They also feel very strongly about this. Sixty six percent
Speaker 1: of independence sixty six percent say that the Trump administration
Speaker 1: is not focused enough on domestic matters. All that's happening
Speaker 1: while Lindsey Graham goes on the news every single night
Speaker 1: and says stuff like this.
Speaker 3: Here's what I tell President Trump.
Speaker 2: Keep it up for a few more weeks.
Speaker 3: Take carg Island, where all of the resources they have
Speaker 3: to britis ol control that island. Let this regime down, avine.
Speaker 4: Is this going to though, Take carg Island? Is it
Speaker 4: going to involve US troops on the ground. Let me
Speaker 4: just read you something from the Atlantic does an assessment
Speaker 4: on that. They say US troops may well take carg Island.
Speaker 4: We believe their ability to do so, but only to
Speaker 4: endurea ballistic missile strikes, drone attacks, petrochemical smoke, all without
Speaker 4: a reliable means of obtaining logistical support. The result could
Speaker 4: be a grinding war of attrition. They talk about how
Speaker 4: far away they would be from recent.
Speaker 3: Sort of tired of all this armchair quarterback. And it's
Speaker 3: been amazing military operation. God bless the fallen.
Speaker 5: But it's a difference.
Speaker 3: Let me talk about trips on the I trust the Marines,
Speaker 3: not that guy. I trust the O DVE. We got
Speaker 3: two marine expeditionary units sailing to this island.
Speaker 4: We did AEO Jima.
Speaker 2: We can do this.
Speaker 1: We lost over six thousand marines on ego Jima. Lindsey
Speaker 1: Graham is going to get us destroyed in the midterms.
Speaker 1: Might want to call him, mister President. Tom shut his mouth.
Speaker 1: We'll move on.
Speaker 2: I love feeling great at the end of the day.
Speaker 2: That's really the difference.
Speaker 1: It's not in the morning when you wake up, good
Speaker 1: night sleep, bad nights sleep, whatever you had. You wake up,
Speaker 1: cup coffee, breakfast, You're all right. You're all right for
Speaker 1: a while. Do you hit that wall? So many people do.
Speaker 1: I did for a very long time. Three four in
Speaker 1: the afternoon, you're staring up at the clock.
Speaker 2: Oh my gosh. We you don't have to hit that wall.
Speaker 1: Fact, you can feel as good when you get home
Speaker 1: as you did when you left for the day with
Speaker 1: natural herbal supplements from Chalk. Natural herbal supplements from Chalk
Speaker 1: will change your life. They have changed my life. They
Speaker 1: have male vitality stacks for women, for men, female vitality
Speaker 1: stacks for women.
Speaker 2: Men.
Speaker 1: You want to get your testosterone levels through the roof,
Speaker 1: how about a twenty percent increase in ninety days. We're
Speaker 1: not just talking about you'll feel better. You are going
Speaker 1: to be better and you can save a bunch of money.
Speaker 1: Go to chalk dot com slash jessetv. Congratulations, Now that
Speaker 1: we'll talk about Democrats. First, we'll focus on them, although
Speaker 1: that's that's not where I'm actually going with this. We're
Speaker 1: gonna get to the GOP and fail your theater. But
Speaker 1: first we understand what the communists, what the Democrats want.
Speaker 1: It's very obvious to anybody who's paying attention the notion
Speaker 1: that they're just well meaning, just a little misguideed. Surely
Speaker 1: we've put such childish notions aside right now. The Communists
Speaker 1: in the United States of America are painfully aware of
Speaker 1: something I hope you have accepted. The mass importation of
Speaker 1: foreigners guarantees they will get power and hold power forever
Speaker 1: in this country. The mass importation of foreigners guarantees that
Speaker 1: if we mass deport foreigners, the Democrat party.
Speaker 2: Completely ceases to exist.
Speaker 1: And I'm not making that a stretch. Please understand that
Speaker 1: I don't mean Democrats are going to become the forty
Speaker 1: sixty party. Democrats are a twenty percent party in this
Speaker 1: country if we deport foreigners. And you may deny that,
Speaker 1: but Democrats know it full well. Why do you think
Speaker 1: they fight so hard to bring them here, keep them here,
Speaker 1: And why would they fight so hard art against having
Speaker 1: to show ID American citizenship to vote. It's such a
Speaker 1: simple concept. Eighty percent of Americans support it.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 1: Democrats know those numbers. So why would they take the
Speaker 1: twenty percent side of an eighty percent issue? Because if
Speaker 1: they relent on this issue, If they relent, they're done.
Speaker 2: Their very existence is at stake. Here's what they've been
Speaker 2: saying underneath the surface.
Speaker 6: The Save Act is a voter purge bill. Most of
Speaker 6: its core elements don't even talk about voter ID.
Speaker 7: The Save Act is a massive voter suppression bill that
Speaker 7: would make it very difficult for millions of Americans, especially
Speaker 7: women who have changed their name. Their name on their
Speaker 7: birth certificate no longer matches the name on their real
Speaker 7: ID or driver's license. It would cause chaos to voting
Speaker 7: and really strength the voting roles five or ten percent.
Speaker 8: His bill would make it more difficult for people who
Speaker 8: generate are not inclined to vote for him to vote.
Speaker 8: It would make it harder to get They have to
Speaker 8: show identification of some of the identifications passports or birth
Speaker 8: certificates that are hard to come up with and most
Speaker 8: difficult for people who are less likely to vote for Trump.
Speaker 9: This bill is about stopping groups from voting who tend
Speaker 9: to vote for Democrats. This is again about.
Speaker 10: Rigging the next election.
Speaker 11: Republicans will make it harder for you to vote because
Speaker 11: if this bill passes, you will need to show a
Speaker 11: photo ID and proof of citizenship in every single state,
Speaker 11: but a student ID won't count.
Speaker 3: I call it Jim Crow two point zero, and it
Speaker 3: is that it makes it more difficult most the thing
Speaker 3: that most Americans you be able to do them.
Speaker 4: Only American citizens can vote in American elections.
Speaker 12: Nobody's trying to change that.
Speaker 13: Non Citizen voting in federal elections is already it is
Speaker 13: a federal crime. If a non citizen illegally votes in
Speaker 13: a federal election, they could be prosecuted and even sentenced
Speaker 13: up to five years in prison. Who's going to commit
Speaker 13: this kind of fraud knowing that they could be in
Speaker 13: prison for five years.
Speaker 2: They're obvious. They come out and say it.
Speaker 1: They've imported so many foreigners now, especially in these blue districts.
Speaker 1: They feel comfortable saying things on television and that no
Speaker 1: politician in America in history Republican or Democrat would ever say.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think, how bnkers it is that Chris
Speaker 1: Murphy can go on television and say this and he
Speaker 1: doesn't have any fear.
Speaker 14: It has failed to deliver for the people we care
Speaker 14: about most, to the undocumented Americans that are in this country.
Speaker 2: Okay, we got it.
Speaker 1: Democrats are communists, They're demonic, they're evil trying to burn
Speaker 1: down the country.
Speaker 2: We got it. Now.
Speaker 1: You know, the other night, I was out of town
Speaker 1: with my wife, Bob out of town. We were an
Speaker 1: hour away, but my kid had a track meet and
Speaker 1: we were on the way to the track meet.
Speaker 2: We were hungry.
Speaker 1: Now, I wanted in an out burger. Telling you right now,
Speaker 1: I wanted in an outburger. That was my agenda. I
Speaker 1: knew there was an in and out burger coming up,
Speaker 1: and that's what I wanted. And I knew Ab the
Speaker 1: health freak. I knew she wasn't going to go for
Speaker 1: in and out burger. And it's a salad is something.
Speaker 1: I knew what I was going to get. But I
Speaker 1: also knew something else. Years ago, Bob had a bad
Speaker 1: experience at Applebee's.
Speaker 2: We don't have to get into the details. I like Applebee's.
Speaker 1: She had a bad experience, one of those experiences where
Speaker 1: she said, I'll never eat there again. Okay, So we're
Speaker 1: driving towards the track meet and I said I'm hungry,
Speaker 1: and she said I'm hungry too. And I said, well,
Speaker 1: we got two choices in this area.
Speaker 2: She said, what are they?
Speaker 1: I said, we got Applebee's or we got in and
Speaker 1: Out Burger. And she said, oh, well, I can't eat
Speaker 1: an Applebee's. Let's go to In and Out Burger. You see,
Speaker 1: what I did was wrong, deceitful. What I did was
Speaker 1: I gave her the illusion of choice.
Speaker 2: There was no choice. I knew there was no choice.
Speaker 1: The Republican Party, in many ways, exists to give you,
Speaker 1: the voter, me the voter, the illusion of choice. We
Speaker 1: know Democrats are demonic, communists and evil. We know they're
Speaker 1: trying to burn the country down, and so we want opposition.
Speaker 1: We want someone to stop the demons from burning the
Speaker 1: country down. I'm going to introduce you to three Republicans,
Speaker 1: and I want you to keep something in mind. All
Speaker 1: three of these Republicans are from red states. I could
Speaker 1: get elected in any one of these states if I
Speaker 1: ran for Senate and actually earned the Republican nomination. These
Speaker 1: states could elect anybody, this is who they send to
Speaker 1: the Senate.
Speaker 3: I'm the only candidate advocating a comprehensive approach that includes
Speaker 3: a long, hard earned pathway to citizenship. There's some people
Speaker 3: saying we need to limit legal immigration. To me, they're
Speaker 3: just looking at a different world than I am. We'll
Speaker 3: be down to two workers for every retiree in the
Speaker 3: next twenty years. We're going to need more legal immigration.
Speaker 15: Do you think that whatever you're working on will have
Speaker 15: to include a path to citizenship for Dreamers?
Speaker 2: I do.
Speaker 12: I've been pretty outspoken on that for even last September,
Speaker 12: Senator Tillis and I both put out a proposal to
Speaker 12: get citizenship for those individuals that are in the Doctor
Speaker 12: program or were eligible for the Doctor program.
Speaker 10: Doctor recipients must have a permanent legislative solution deserve nothing less.
Speaker 10: We need to take action and pass legislation that will
Speaker 10: unequivocally allow these young men and women to stay in
Speaker 10: the only home, in the only country they've known. In
Speaker 10: the past, I've supported a number of bills that would
Speaker 10: have allowed these individuals to remain in the United States
Speaker 10: without a fear, without fear of a court decision hanging
Speaker 10: in the balance. But each time partisan disagreements have prevented
Speaker 10: us from turning anything into law, Madam President, when it
Speaker 10: comes to immigration laws, Congress on a bipartisan basis never
Speaker 10: fails to fail.
Speaker 9: Do we need then, to anyone who's here illegally that
Speaker 9: hasn't committed a crime? Senator Curtis, should there be a
Speaker 9: path a citizenship? Is that what compassion means to you?
Speaker 9: Or should these people not be allowed to stay?
Speaker 14: Well, then let me ask you a question. Is there
Speaker 14: any law, any rule broken in our country where we
Speaker 14: don't have a consequence defined? So why don't we have
Speaker 14: a consequence defined when it comes to coming into this
Speaker 14: country without documentation? We continue to allow these people to
Speaker 14: be here, but we haven't defined what their consequence.
Speaker 9: Is, So that that's an action from from policymakers. Absolutely,
Speaker 9: all right, So what what would you say we need
Speaker 9: to do?
Speaker 2: Then? What's your answer to that? I guess it is
Speaker 2: like every other.
Speaker 14: So first of all, you have to define amnesty, But
Speaker 14: any other crime that's committed here in our country, we
Speaker 14: define what, we define what the punishment is, and we've
Speaker 14: we've failed to do that in this case.
Speaker 1: I misspoke. I said three Republicans. That's four South Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah,
Speaker 1: blood red states.
Speaker 2: Those are the senators they send. And those senators get
Speaker 2: to Washington, d C.
Speaker 1: Not to fight for you or me, not to fight
Speaker 1: against the demonic communists. They go there to control you,
Speaker 1: to control me. They go there to present you and
Speaker 1: me with the illusion of choice. And so I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: I'm not even gonna play the John Thune SoundBite about
Speaker 1: to save to reconciliation.
Speaker 2: We might do this, so we might.
Speaker 1: I'm tired of fail your theater because I understand the
Speaker 1: game now. I'm sure you understand the game now as well.
Speaker 1: I'm tired of the illusion of choice. I would like
Speaker 1: a real choice from now on.
Speaker 2: Pall. That may have made you uncomfortable, but I am right,
Speaker 2: all right.
Speaker 1: I have to blame cowboy Closstrum for something. You see,
Speaker 1: when I first started drinking coffee, I used to put
Speaker 1: the fruity little creamer things in there, the French vanilla
Speaker 1: or whatever, and I never felt manly about it. I
Speaker 1: always felt like it wasn't right. I felt like, this
Speaker 1: isn't what John Wayne would do. And so I made
Speaker 1: a decision. This years ago. I decided, you know what,
Speaker 1: I'm only gonna drink black coffee, just like John Wayne
Speaker 1: did and all the Cowboy movies. And I just cut
Speaker 1: myself off. No cream, no sugar, straight black coffee.
Speaker 2: It's good.
Speaker 1: And then I discovered cowboy colostrum. You see, it's not
Speaker 1: made to be put in your coffee, although you can.
Speaker 1: It's for your gut. It's heartburn, gut problems, it's for
Speaker 1: your gut. But I started putting a couple of scoops
Speaker 1: in my coffee and minus chocolate. It's delicious. And I've
Speaker 1: started to like it again. And I've stopped drinking black
Speaker 1: coffee because Cowboy colostrum is so delicious. Also, I don't
Speaker 1: get heartburn anymore. Cowboycolostrum dot com code JESSETV.
Speaker 2: You know what blesses me.
Speaker 1: I know there are so many things to complain about,
Speaker 1: and so many of those things are valid. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying they're not, but that so many of the evils
Speaker 1: of the COVID era they are in small ways, not
Speaker 1: in every way, but in small ways being righted.
Speaker 2: And one of those ways is this. The people who were.
Speaker 1: Attacked had their careers, had their lives attacked during COVID
Speaker 1: for being right. They were almost always the ones who
Speaker 1: were right. They're now the ones holding the power. They're
Speaker 1: now the ones who are trying to make things right,
Speaker 1: and that blesses me. One of those people who stands
Speaker 1: out maybe the most, is doctor j Batacharia and i
Speaker 1: h director and acting CDC director, Doctor j How many
Speaker 1: titles do you have on your business card at this
Speaker 1: point in time.
Speaker 6: It's a little it's a little crazy longing. A lot
Speaker 6: of mouths to Atlanta these days, Jesse. It's nice to
Speaker 6: be with you.
Speaker 1: No, it's great to it. In fact, I'm want to
Speaker 1: focus on that. I'm want to focus on something nerdy.
Speaker 2: What do you do now?
Speaker 1: Like what? Okay, you're in Atlanta? Why are you in Atlanta?
Speaker 1: More people are watching? Why are you not in Washington,
Speaker 1: d C?
Speaker 2: What? What? What are your roles? What do you do? Yeah?
Speaker 6: So the first the NIH what we do is we
Speaker 6: fund science. That's what we're supposed to do. Fund science
Speaker 6: that improves people's health. That that's the and that mostly
Speaker 6: takes place in Bethesda, Maryland, but it also takes place
Speaker 6: all across the country. Fund all the all the scientists
Speaker 6: around the country who work on geeky scientific projects. Uh,
Speaker 6: it got really political during the pandemic. But we're turning
Speaker 6: it all where I'm from that and focus on what's
Speaker 6: supposed to be focused on, which is science that improves
Speaker 6: people's health. That's in Bethesda, Maryland, near d C. And
Speaker 6: then the other job I have now is acting director
Speaker 6: of the Center for Disease Control, which is in Atlanta,
Speaker 6: and what it's supposed to do, and actually, you know,
Speaker 6: it has done a really great job over the many
Speaker 6: many years. What is uh boots on the ground for
Speaker 6: public health, like when there's a disease outbreak, when you
Speaker 6: know you want a tobacco cessation for you know, like
Speaker 6: helping people quit quit smoking or whatever. That's what the
Speaker 6: CDC's supposed to do. And it's had a long, great
Speaker 6: track record. A lot of public trust, as you said,
Speaker 6: got broken during the pandemic. I view my job primarily
Speaker 6: is to help these organizations rebuild the trust because they
Speaker 6: are great organizations. They have a long track record of
Speaker 6: success in their respective spheres, and I want them both
Speaker 6: to get back to that. And you know, it's been
Speaker 6: really fun to watch just in the last year a
Speaker 6: lot of people in both organizations embrace this idea that
Speaker 6: we can do better and will do better, and embrace
Speaker 6: the idea of making American healthy again.
Speaker 1: Okay, how does one go about that earning back that trust?
Speaker 1: Because you're right, we have to have it. The trust
Speaker 1: has to be there. The trust was violated by these organizations.
Speaker 1: Now you have to come in with the mop and
Speaker 1: the cleaning supplies and try to clean up the mess
Speaker 1: someone else left for you.
Speaker 6: Where do you begin, Well, I think first let's see
Speaker 6: what the endgame is. Right, So, the way that the
Speaker 6: organizations and public health and science regains trust by actually
Speaker 6: delivering on this promise of making American health. If we
Speaker 6: can find cures for diseases like sickle cellingia, which the
Speaker 6: NI actually has. If we can we can get treatments
Speaker 6: for cystic fibrosis, if we can make the lives of
Speaker 6: of of kids with autism better or prevent autism, if
Speaker 6: we can address the problems of Alzheimer's is if we can
Speaker 6: actually deliver on all of these promises that science can do,
Speaker 6: that will rebuild trust and for public health. If we
Speaker 6: can instead of being seen as like and I think
Speaker 6: this was part of the danger during the pandemic because
Speaker 6: it's sort of seen as like, Okay, they get to
Speaker 6: tell you whether it or a mask, or like tell
Speaker 6: you whether you must or must not take a vaccine. Instead,
Speaker 6: just become partners good, give good advice to you about
Speaker 6: like what does a scientific haven say. It doesn't say
Speaker 6: when it reflects when there's a scientific controversy, to reflect
Speaker 6: that controversy in our message and say, well, we're not
Speaker 6: sure being able to be humble partners of the American
Speaker 6: people in public health in ways that and empowers people
Speaker 6: to make their health better if we actually achieved after
Speaker 6: the American people, that's how you achieved trust.
Speaker 2: What's a Missouri versus Biden?
Speaker 6: Okay, that is a case that I was involved with
Speaker 6: in twenty twenty three, twenty twenty two. Maybe the state
Speaker 6: of Missouri reached out to me because what they had
Speaker 6: seen and I personally had seen it as well, is
Speaker 6: that a lot of a lot of social media would
Speaker 6: suppress different views about how to manage the pandemic.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 6: So I was a very big advocate for the idea
Speaker 6: of focused protection. The Great Barrington Decoration is something I
Speaker 6: wrote co wrote with. The idea was you protect older
Speaker 6: people better and you don't close schools lead You don't
Speaker 6: do lockdowns. You let people allow them to have regular
Speaker 6: lives that are her low risk while protecting older people better.
Speaker 6: And I noticed online there was actually quite difficult, Like
Speaker 6: I put messages up on Twitter. I joined Twitter for
Speaker 6: the first time twenty twenty one, and it was it
Speaker 6: was very, very evident that there was those messages being suppressed.
Speaker 6: It was also evident to me from looking around from
Speaker 6: my friends who were fellow dissidents that they could not
Speaker 6: get their message up. They were people with vaccine injured
Speaker 6: patients on Facebook who were just talking to each other
Speaker 6: vaccine injuries around around COVID vaccine that got their private
Speaker 6: message groups completely knocked offline. And the question is why,
Speaker 6: what's purpose is why would Facebook have any interest in
Speaker 6: doing that. The Missouri versus Biden case was a case
Speaker 6: brought by the Missouri Attorney General and then joined by
Speaker 6: the Louisiana Treny General, essentially arguing that the Biden administration
Speaker 6: had orchestrated essentially a widespread program to suppress free speech online.
Speaker 6: They would go and people like from the White in
Speaker 6: the White House, the CDC, even unfortunately the NIH to
Speaker 6: some degree, the surch and General's Office and also the
Speaker 6: State Department would go to social media companies and essentially
Speaker 6: tell them, if you don't take these people off, if
Speaker 6: you don't if you don't censor these people or these
Speaker 6: ideas anyways, then you were going to go after your company.
Speaker 6: That court case went to a circuit court who they
Speaker 6: that circuit court essentially what they found was that this
Speaker 6: was like a like an al Capone scheme jesse, where
Speaker 6: like you know, you know that, you know, the Alcophone
Speaker 6: will go to shoot some Chicago business. Say that's a
Speaker 6: nice business. You got there to be terrible something happened
Speaker 6: to it. That's the role that the government played when
Speaker 6: they would go and tell social media companies you got
Speaker 6: to censor these people or the sensor of these ideas
Speaker 6: went all the way to Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court, uh,
Speaker 6: we got to an injunction saying that the Governm's not
Speaker 6: allowed to do this. The Supreme Court then lifted that
Speaker 6: injunction in the decision that will shock me to my
Speaker 6: dying days, essentially saying that I and other people who
Speaker 6: had been censored did not have standing to sue that
Speaker 6: we were not allowed to be that. In fact, the
Speaker 6: State that the government could in fact go to these
Speaker 6: companies tell them as long as they told them to
Speaker 6: suppress ideas and not named particular people, then the government
Speaker 6: could get away with it. That's the upshot of what
Speaker 6: the government. And I was desponded Jesse that was like
Speaker 6: in twenty twenty four that the American First Amendment essentially
Speaker 6: was dead, because then if that's true, then what the
Speaker 6: government can do is go to any social media company
Speaker 6: that wants, say, suppress these ideas, and as long as
Speaker 6: it doesn't eaven any particular people, well then it's fine.
Speaker 6: It's fine, it doesn't violent the First Amendment. That's that's
Speaker 6: the misery versus Biden case. Really good news came out
Speaker 6: of it yesterday, though, which I suspect you're gonna tell
Speaker 6: people about there you go, okay, it's online, it's on
Speaker 6: the screen. We okay. Actually, one funny thing, when I
Speaker 6: became an ex director, I had to withdraw from the
Speaker 6: case and switch sides. I went from a plaint different case,
Speaker 6: arguing that actually for like three minutes, I was on
Speaker 6: both sides of the case because you know, and so
Speaker 6: now what's happened is that the core has reached a
Speaker 6: essentially a history consent decree where now the government agrees CDC,
Speaker 6: the State Department desagrees that it will not for ten years,
Speaker 6: it will not do this, will not do this, and
Speaker 6: if it is does this, it's going to be subject
Speaker 6: to like severe repercussions by the court, including the people
Speaker 6: that do this, that suppress and act in ways to
Speaker 6: threaten social media companies for the purpose of censorship. It's
Speaker 6: a historic consent degree my view, It's a loss for
Speaker 6: me now that I'm on the other side. But I've
Speaker 6: never been so happy to lose my life. Jesse, I
Speaker 6: gotta tell.
Speaker 1: You, congratulations on that loss, doctor j all right, I
Speaker 1: have to ask about and I know that there are
Speaker 1: going to be limits on what you can and can't say.
Speaker 1: I get that, But about the COVID origins, because it
Speaker 1: does actually matter. Did we pay for it, did it
Speaker 1: come from a lab? Was it a bowl of bat soup?
Speaker 1: There were just so many lies. Nobody could keep anything straight.
Speaker 1: And the Americans who have had their lives upended, in
Speaker 1: many cases ruined, deserve to have the truth about this
Speaker 1: whole affair.
Speaker 2: What is the truth?
Speaker 6: Well, I'll tell you so. On the one hand, there
Speaker 6: is still controversy among some the biological evidence by its
Speaker 6: shows toward a lab leak, and others say, oh no,
Speaker 6: that's not true, that there might be natural origins. It
Speaker 6: came out of a bat like a bat, and there
Speaker 6: was a natural origin. But if you look beyond just
Speaker 6: the scientific debate, I personally on the scientific side, I
Speaker 6: tend toward it came from a lab, that there was
Speaker 6: a lab accident, those lab experiments that led to this.
Speaker 6: But if you look beyond just simply the scientific fight
Speaker 6: and look at some of the forensic evidence, there was
Speaker 6: a proposal put out in twenty eighteen by a group
Speaker 6: called Eco Health Alliance that proposed work that very much
Speaker 6: looked like something that could lead to the creation of
Speaker 6: a virus like COVID, and they were working with They
Speaker 6: were working with the Chinese in Wuhan. It's not an accident.
Speaker 6: I think that the virus came out in the very
Speaker 6: city in China in the world that is the world's
Speaker 6: leading place on coronaviruses are stop conaviruss like exactly the
Speaker 6: kind of virus that COVID is. So I think to
Speaker 6: me it's if you take all the totality of evidence,
Speaker 6: it's beyond a shadow of a doubt that this was
Speaker 6: a lab leak in part done because because there was
Speaker 6: a whole program, a utopian program to end all pandemics
Speaker 6: by taking viruses in the wild, bringing them into the lab,
Speaker 6: making them more transmissible, in order to triage which viruses
Speaker 6: we should like build vaccines for early. It's a it's
Speaker 6: a crazy prog I mean, as I'm talking about it,
Speaker 6: I can see the look on your face saying, oh
Speaker 6: my god, why would anyone do this?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 6: The argument was, well, there's a trillion virus, trillions of
Speaker 6: viruses out there. We don't know which ones we have
Speaker 6: to prepare for. If we bring them in the lab
Speaker 6: and see how close they are to jumping into human populations,
Speaker 6: by making them more transmissible, we can prioritize and they
Speaker 6: make vaccines or whatever.
Speaker 2: Before.
Speaker 6: The problem is you can cause a Lablik and that
Speaker 6: can cause it global pandemic in the process of doing this.
Speaker 6: And the second is the countermeasures you make the vaccines
Speaker 6: or whatever you're testing on viruses there never being never
Speaker 6: infected a human, so you can't test if the vaccine
Speaker 6: works that you made, So you pretend to have a countermeasure.
Speaker 6: You know, and evolution is hard to predict, so you
Speaker 6: don't know what the viruses actually are going to make
Speaker 6: the leap, or what they'll look like when they do.
Speaker 6: It was a foolish program for pretending to prevent all pandemics,
Speaker 6: be ready for all pandemics, and in the process of
Speaker 6: doing so, we may have actually caused one. It's the
Speaker 6: single biggest example of scientific hubris. It's like the Frankenstein
Speaker 6: monsters that have come to come to life.
Speaker 1: That's saying something about scientific hubris. Doctor J I am
Speaker 1: happy you were there, my friend, Please come back soon.
Speaker 1: All right, Americans, I wish so many companies did it.
Speaker 1: I wish every company did it. And I am ashamed
Speaker 1: to admit to you that when I was younger, I
Speaker 1: never used to prioritize this at all. I never cared,
Speaker 1: ah whatever, just give me low prices. And now that
Speaker 1: I watch how much of our economy has been handed
Speaker 1: over to foreigners, I've really made it a priority in
Speaker 1: my life to shop with businesses who hire Americans. Pure
Speaker 1: Talk hires Americans, Veri's in at and T T Mobile.
Speaker 1: They can't wait to send those jobs overseas or bring
Speaker 1: foreigners here. Pay them pennies on the dollar while your
Speaker 1: son sits at home without a job. My cell phone
Speaker 1: company hires Americans. They'll charge you less for your cell
Speaker 1: phone service. They have wonderful people in customer service. They're
Speaker 1: led by a Vietnam veteran. You can keep your phone,
Speaker 1: you can keep your number. There's no reason not to switch. Hey,
Speaker 1: to put it like that, but there's not switch to
Speaker 1: pure Talk, Puretalk dot com, slash Jesse TV. Well, nobody
Speaker 1: ever goes to jail, right, But that's not necessarily true.
Speaker 2: There are some good.
Speaker 1: Things happening out there, and with all the crap happening,
Speaker 1: we should focus on the good things every now and then.
Speaker 1: Never hurts the stop and smell the roses. So Brandy's
Speaker 1: gonna help us through that. Joining me now, Brandy CRU's
Speaker 1: host of the Undivided podcast. Hey, Brandy, is anyone in
Speaker 1: Antifa going to jail?
Speaker 5: Well, yeah, at least nine people are going to jail,
Speaker 5: which I think is a good thing. Federal prison and
Speaker 5: federal prison hits different than state prison or county jail.
Speaker 5: So certainly, the defendants in the Antifa attack at a
Speaker 5: Texas ice facility. This is a historic conviction for the
Speaker 5: federal government It's the first such conviction after the federal
Speaker 5: government decided to label Antifa a terror or organization, and essentially,
Speaker 5: they're accused of carrying out what amounted to a terror attack.
Speaker 5: They shot an Alvarado police officer in the neck, attempted
Speaker 5: to kill him, obviously, set off explosive devices. They committed
Speaker 5: terrorist acts. They're being treated like terrorists in court.
Speaker 1: Brandy, can you give us a clue in on these
Speaker 1: Antifa freaks because most people are not as familiar with
Speaker 1: them as you are. Obviously we've heard of Antifa. We
Speaker 1: see the random mug shot with people with half shaved
Speaker 1: heads and of course rings in their nose and all
Speaker 1: the other weird crap these people do.
Speaker 2: But what do they want? Who are these people?
Speaker 5: Yeah, So I've been covering Antifa for a long time.
Speaker 5: I was a mainstream journalist. I was on TV in
Speaker 5: Seattle for about ten years. I was a radio reporter
Speaker 5: in Seattle before that. And so my experience with Antifa
Speaker 5: goes back to the Occupy days. And so twenty eleven
Speaker 5: twenty twelve, they were doing sittings on college campuses. They
Speaker 5: were vandalizing things. They didn't certainly didn't have the level
Speaker 5: of brazen violence that they have. Now they have definitely
Speaker 5: become more aggressive in their tactics over the years. So
Speaker 5: from Occupy into the BLM movement in Seattle, the Mayday
Speaker 5: riots in Seattle, and then into the summer of twenty
Speaker 5: twenty which results in the takeover of six square blocks
Speaker 5: of Seattle. I describe Antifa as an everybody wants to
Speaker 5: hand ring and say, oh, you can't. They're just it's
Speaker 5: a figment of your imagination. It's not. In fact, when
Speaker 5: I was in mainstream news, you know, a decade ago,
Speaker 5: it was very non controversial to call these people antifa.
Speaker 5: I was at a mainstream station. In our reporting, we
Speaker 5: would call them antifa, And now those same stations act
Speaker 5: like Antifa isn't a thing, because all of the sudden
Speaker 5: President Trump calls them antifa. Right, So I would say,
Speaker 5: if you want to try to define antifa, this is
Speaker 5: a group a loosely affiliated far left extremists that are
Speaker 5: anti government, anti law enforcement, and they seek to use
Speaker 5: violence intimidation to carry out their political and social agenda,
Speaker 5: whatever it might be. And as I alluded to, that
Speaker 5: ranges from you know, being anti capitalist, and so that's
Speaker 5: really what the occupied movement was about. During that time,
Speaker 5: they would carry out attacks on you know, banks, Nike stores,
Speaker 5: big businesses, things like that that they thought were indicative
Speaker 5: of capitalism. And then that has turned into an anti
Speaker 5: police animus, anti ice animus as you see. So anything
Speaker 5: they feel like fits their far left agenda, they will
Speaker 5: then organize and they will carry out violent acts in
Speaker 5: pursuit of that agenda.
Speaker 1: Okay, Brandy, help me understand this because as much as
Speaker 1: it pains me to give this group a compliment, as
Speaker 1: you mentioned, they've been around for a very long time,
Speaker 1: doing this stuff for a long time. The staying power
Speaker 1: is impressive. So who's paying for this, who's organizing this?
Speaker 1: You know, this isn't some random drugged out turd on
Speaker 1: the street corner.
Speaker 2: It's got to go deeper than that.
Speaker 5: Well, some of them are random drugged out turds on
Speaker 5: the street corner. I mean, I would say, and I
Speaker 5: always characterize Antifa as there are the I would say
Speaker 5: five to ten percent that are die hard for the cause.
Speaker 5: They will die for the cause, they will go to
Speaker 5: federal prison for the cause. The ring leader in the
Speaker 5: Texas case, you know, he was smirking after he was
Speaker 5: found guilty. Those are the die hard people who he
Speaker 5: always expected to either die doing what he was trying
Speaker 5: to do or to go to federal prison for the
Speaker 5: rest of his life for doing what he was trying
Speaker 5: to do. And then you had people in that Texas
Speaker 5: case who were convicted who were weeping in court. These
Speaker 5: are the people who I think represent about eighty percent
Speaker 5: of this faction. These are loaners, homeless people, people with
Speaker 5: mental health issues, people who are developmentally delayed, people who
Speaker 5: are homeless and will glob on for some sense of belonging.
Speaker 5: And they are very dangerous because I would say a
Speaker 5: lot of them are low IQ, but they are looking
Speaker 5: for belonging, and so they have a real mob mentality
Speaker 5: and they don't even really necessarily care what the riot
Speaker 5: is about or the action is about their followers and
Speaker 5: in the true sense of the word. But it's that
Speaker 5: ten to twenty percent faction of the true believers that
Speaker 5: we have to concern ourselves with. And when you say
Speaker 5: they have staying power, one of the things I want
Speaker 5: to point out what's so important about this conviction in Texas.
Speaker 5: One of the reasons they have staying power is because
Speaker 5: they have gotten away with it I mean, I have
Speaker 5: been assaulted by Antifa on numerous occasions. None of them
Speaker 5: have ever gone to jail. None of them have even
Speaker 5: ever gone to trial for the attacks on me, for
Speaker 5: the attacks on colleagues. They've been causing and sowing discord
Speaker 5: and chaos in Seattle for the better part of fifteen years.
Speaker 5: Very few of them have been arrested and prosecuted for
Speaker 5: that conduct. And it's because they're on the left, and
Speaker 5: we're in a state and a lot of the areas
Speaker 5: where Antifa is really really has a large presence, places
Speaker 5: like Portland, Oregon, Seattle, these are places where the political
Speaker 5: class isn't interest in going after them because they're really
Speaker 5: carrying out and defending the agenda of the political class.
Speaker 5: So that's one of the reasons why not only have
Speaker 5: they had such staying power, but their actions and their
Speaker 5: conduct has gotten increasingly violent over time, because they get
Speaker 5: away with a little thing. They get away with breaking windows,
Speaker 5: then they get away with assaulting and hurling things at
Speaker 5: police officers and reporters, and then they get away with
Speaker 5: blocking roads and bridges and access to an airport. And
Speaker 5: now all of a sudden, they think they can get
Speaker 5: away with murder. They can get away with attempted murder,
Speaker 5: they can get away with acts of terrorism. And under
Speaker 5: the Trump administration, I think showing that we see you
Speaker 5: for what you are, terrorists and we're going to treat
Speaker 5: you like terrorists in a court of law is a
Speaker 5: really significant development when it comes to fighting back against
Speaker 5: these far left factions.
Speaker 1: Have you noticed any change in their behavior or organization
Speaker 1: since the Trump administration designated them terrorists and since these
Speaker 1: people started going to trial, are they backing off at all?
Speaker 1: Has it worked so far?
Speaker 5: I mean, I think in some senses it has. I
Speaker 5: mean you still have the tried and true believers who
Speaker 5: they don't care if they're going to be tried as terrorists, right,
Speaker 5: They're going to continue. They might organize a little more
Speaker 5: secretly behind the scenes before they carry out a more
Speaker 5: well planned attack. But we saw it instantly Jesse over
Speaker 5: the summer. So, as you know, there was an occupation
Speaker 5: outside the ICE facility in Portland for three months or
Speaker 5: so over the summer, and rad at the tail end
Speaker 5: of that is when President Trump said they were going
Speaker 5: to be characterized as a domestic terror organization. Almost immediately,
Speaker 5: and I was consulting with some of my friends who
Speaker 5: were down there on the ground, like Katie Davis Core
Speaker 5: night after night. I mean she had been down there
Speaker 5: almost every night, and she said almost immediately they seemed
Speaker 5: less quick to violence. Where you know, before they would
Speaker 5: go out, they would get in the face of you know,
Speaker 5: independent journalists, they would assault them very brazenly with cameras everywhere,
Speaker 5: and then Portland police would never arrest them, of course.
Speaker 5: But when President Trump started to send ICE agents out
Speaker 5: to affect arrests, was on you know TV saying these
Speaker 5: are domestic terrorists, will treat them as such. There was
Speaker 5: an overnight difference in their conduct. Now I'm not saying
Speaker 5: it's made them less dangerous. You know, perhaps they go
Speaker 5: underground a little bit more, they plan and coordinate a
Speaker 5: little bit more before they come and carry out some
Speaker 5: sort of action and attack. In a sense that might
Speaker 5: make them even more dangerous. They might start acting more
Speaker 5: like true terrorists. But yeah, I mean in terms of
Speaker 5: the actual activity on the ground. I also think it
Speaker 5: has been awake up call for that eighty percent that
Speaker 5: aren't the true believers and that we're maybe looking for
Speaker 5: a sense of belonging and then they see that, Oh
Speaker 5: my gosh, these Antifa terrorists in Texas could go to
Speaker 5: federal prison for the rest of their lives. I'm not
Speaker 5: signing up for that.
Speaker 1: That's freaking good news, all right, Give me some bad news.
Speaker 1: Tell me about how bad the indoctrination is in the
Speaker 1: state of Washington, because the emails I get into my
Speaker 1: show about what people's kids are going through in that state.
Speaker 2: It's amazing.
Speaker 1: The state of Washington somehow flies under the radar as
Speaker 1: everyone dogs on California.
Speaker 5: I know, and it bothers me and I just want
Speaker 5: to go to the White House and knock on the
Speaker 5: window and be like, President Trump, please pay attention to us.
Speaker 5: We desperately need your help. I mean, I don't think
Speaker 5: there's a more unhinged state in the Union than Washington
Speaker 5: State when it comes to what's happening in public education.
Speaker 5: I mean, we do a story almost every day. We
Speaker 5: did a story on the Puall Washington School District a
Speaker 5: couple days ago where we got sent a picture from
Speaker 5: an art class that had all these up on the wall,
Speaker 5: all these insane depictions of President Trump. He was depicted
Speaker 5: as a pig, he was depicted as a member of
Speaker 5: the KKK. There was something that said assassination above him.
Speaker 5: He was depicted, you know, as this creepy McDonald's clown
Speaker 5: and all these things, And we had to reach out
Speaker 5: to the school and be like, why is this mural
Speaker 5: up in a public school setting? And then as soon
Speaker 5: as they found out that people knew about it, they
Speaker 5: took it down the next day. We've done stories that
Speaker 5: are far more sinister than that. One of the things
Speaker 5: happening in our public schools here is government sanctioned kidnapping
Speaker 5: and transing of children. Happens all the time. This is
Speaker 5: something that President Trump brought attention to during his State
Speaker 5: of the Union address. This is a disgusting web of
Speaker 5: anti family organizations that are seeking to tear apart the
Speaker 5: nuclear family. So one example we did it also has
Speaker 5: to do with the pew Wallup School District. There's a
Speaker 5: young girl named Eleanor. She's sixteen years old. She has
Speaker 5: been missing for three months. Her parents don't know if
Speaker 5: she's dead or alive, and this all stems back to her.
Speaker 5: She had some childhood trauma, as most kids who I
Speaker 5: to Faya's transgender these days do, they had some significant
Speaker 5: childhood trauma as a precursor. She sees her counselor at school.
Speaker 5: Counselor ends up connecting her to gender clinics, giving her
Speaker 5: a list of gender clinics that she can go to
Speaker 5: during the day. Parents had no idea this was going on.
Speaker 5: Parents had no idea. Eleanor thought she was Elliott. That
Speaker 5: continues to snowball. The school connects her with a group
Speaker 5: called Oasis, an outside organization for LGBTQ youth. That group
Speaker 5: connects her with an attorney, a taxpayer funded attorney that
Speaker 5: helps her take her parents who've never been accused of
Speaker 5: abuse to court to try to get placed in someone
Speaker 5: else's custody. The court ends up placing her in the
Speaker 5: custody of a homeless outreach advocate who she met on
Speaker 5: the street. This judge is a lesbian judge who's really
Speaker 5: into the LGBTQ stuff. So you see this whole web.
Speaker 5: And now Eleanor has been missing, family doesn't know where
Speaker 5: she is for three months, and under the by law
Speaker 5: in the state of Washington, there was a bill called
Speaker 5: fifty five ninety nine in the state of Washington. When
Speaker 5: I covered it at the time in twenty twenty three,
Speaker 5: I said it was the most dangerous law I had
Speaker 5: ever seen debated in Olympia. This bill allows the government
Speaker 5: to hide your child's location from you if your child
Speaker 5: thinks they're transgender. So in the state of Washington today,
Speaker 5: you can run away from home as a youth for
Speaker 5: two reasons and be protected from your parents if your
Speaker 5: parents are physically abusing you, which I think we can
Speaker 5: all understand, and two if you don't think your parents
Speaker 5: will support your desired gender. And if it's one of
Speaker 5: those two reasons, you can go to any shelter in
Speaker 5: the state of Washington by law, does not have to
Speaker 5: tell your parents where you are, doesn't even have to
Speaker 5: tell your parents if you're dead or alive.
Speaker 1: God have mercy, Yes, Brandy, come back soon, Come back soon.
Speaker 2: That was wonderful. Thank you.
Speaker 1: It was awful, but it was wonderful. Sixteen years old, man, deeply,
Speaker 1: deeply evil. Communists are of the devil. Remember that they
Speaker 1: are devil worshiping savages, and they have to be defeated.
Speaker 2: All right, it's.
Speaker 1: Time to lighten the mood. And there's something that I've
Speaker 1: always enjoyed, and I'm not totally sure why. I think
Speaker 1: I know why, but I'm talking about me here in
Speaker 1: my town In fact, I've lived in multiple towns like this,
Speaker 1: but in my town, my town's growing.
Speaker 2: It's right America. It's safe.
Speaker 1: It's kind of place people want to move, especially, people
Speaker 1: have kids, good schools, church on every corner, that kind
Speaker 1: of thing. And so they're they're building things. Obviously, there's
Speaker 1: everywhere you look, there's a new commercial building, there's a
Speaker 1: new subdivision that every every it seems like every square
Speaker 1: inch someone's building something on it. And I like that, right,
Speaker 1: I like prog rescue and build houses, restaurants. It's all
Speaker 1: fine for me. But there are these holdouts in my hometown.
Speaker 1: So there'll just be some house looks totally out of place.
Speaker 1: Now it's got stuff surrounding it. He's got to pasture
Speaker 1: out back with the few horses on it. And you know,
Speaker 1: I've never talked to the guy. You know, somebody has
Speaker 1: knocked on his door and offered him a huge sum
Speaker 1: of money.
Speaker 2: Hey, just sell us your house, sells your lamb, let
Speaker 2: us put it.
Speaker 1: You know, McDonald's an apartment complex on there, and I
Speaker 1: just pictured in my mind and he's all enough.
Speaker 2: I like it here, this is my place. You can
Speaker 2: build all around me.
Speaker 1: I'm not selling I don't know why. I've always liked that.
Speaker 1: I saw this story because these AI data farms, these
Speaker 1: data centers, they're they're all the rage now and they're
Speaker 1: gonna be the rage.
Speaker 2: And it's big money, big, big money. When I saw
Speaker 2: this story out of Kentucky and it made me smile,
Speaker 2: it's my way.
Speaker 16: I'll stay in hold and feed an Asian twenty six
Speaker 16: and doesn't mean anything.
Speaker 15: Some people might find it hard to understand how Delcia
Speaker 15: Bear can turn away a twenty six million dollar offer
Speaker 15: to buy some of her land until you spend a
Speaker 15: little time with her walking the dirt road she grew
Speaker 15: up on, and in the house her daddy built.
Speaker 16: My grandfather and great grandfather and a whole bunch of
Speaker 16: family has all lived here for years, paid taxes on it,
Speaker 16: fed a nation off of it, even raised wheat through
Speaker 16: the depression, and kept the breadlines up in the United
Speaker 16: States of America when people didn't have anything else.
Speaker 15: Delsia is one of dozens of landowners approached by an
Speaker 15: anonymous buyer, one of the major players in artificial intelligence,
Speaker 15: likely Google or Meta or Amazon, to purchase their land.
Speaker 15: The market value for land in Mason County is about
Speaker 15: six thousand dollars an acre. The realtor that came to
Speaker 15: her door last April offered her and her mother about
Speaker 15: ten times.
Speaker 16: That as long as I'm on this land, as long
Speaker 16: as it's feeding me, as long as it's taking care
Speaker 16: of me, there's nothing can destroy me. If I've got
Speaker 16: this land, I like it.
Speaker 2: I just do. I see them all