WEBVTT - 1136 | Mock Draft 3.0, Verlander Retiring, MLB Record Tied, More Headlines

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Tis League record bring.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 2>We will see you to.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 3>The Gunner Welcome hang out, Welcome to the Just Baseball Show.

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 3>It is Wednesday, July eighth. That's arm Lighton. I am

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Peter Rapple and today an absolutely loaded show. Unfortunately, Justin

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Berlander is retiring at the end of this season, so

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>we are going to you know, talk about his career,

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 3>how it has been and also he was just named

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 3>the Legend pick the American League All Star Team. We're

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 3>also going to talk about.

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 4>Tyler Tolbert and his twelve plate appearance hit streak, what

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 4>tying an MLB record, and the Royals offensive outburst Ryan

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 4>O'Hearn three homers, ten RBIs yesterday.

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 3>We're going to talk Zach Wheeler's dominance and our first

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>look at Brewers player Luis Laura. And we're going to

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 3>end it with Mock Draft three point zero with our

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 3>draft guy, Tyler Jennings. And it is all brought to

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 3>you by bet MGM. Time to pick them. Throughout the

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 3>World's Game, you can predict what will happen each day

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 3>for a chance to win bonus bets go for a

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 3>share of ten thousand dollars each day of the World's Game.

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 3>For each day of the tournament, you can predict what

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 3>will happen. If your total is the highest, you'll win

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 3>a share of bonus bets. How to get this offer

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 3>in three easy steps, So go to bet MGM and

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 3>enter the World's Game two hundred and fifty thousand dollars.

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Pick them free to play game. Answer questions each day

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 3>of the tournament to make predictions on what will happen,

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 3>and if you get the most picks right that day,

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 3>you'll win a share of bonus bets. Remember to use

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 3>code just Baseball before you make your first pick, because

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 3>if it loses, you'll get whatever you wagered on it

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 3>back in bonus bets. Arm We started off the day

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 3>with some unfortunate news, but when a guy of that

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 3>caliber retires, it's not really unfortunate because of course he's

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 3>getting to the end of his career and we get

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 3>to look back on the unbelievable career of Justin Verlander.

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 3>I remember, on I think it was our last mail bag,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Jack answered the question of something that he would change

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 3>from the twenty twenties decade, and it was a fully

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 3>healthy Justin Verlander. And at first I was like, ah,

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 3>but then you realize he was banged up for a

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of this decade and could have been on pace

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to rack up four thousand innings plus four thousand strikeouts

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 3>plus incredible career already, but what could have been I

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 3>am still thinking about that answer from Jack.

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 2>It's funny though, because at the same time, like he's

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 2>been forty years old since twenty twenty three, so like

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 2>his body is doing what most people's body us. I

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>think the craziest part about that, though, is in twenty

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 2>twenty two, at thirty nine years old, we see Justin

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Verlander come out and give you a one to seven

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 2>five ERA in one hundred and seventy five innings, And

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 2>when I think one of the more like I don't

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 2>want to say improbable signs because this is one of

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>the best to ever do it, but just one of

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 2>those side youngs that you're like, no way, he still

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 2>got that in the tank. And that was after missing

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 2>the entire season in twenty twenty one and only throwing

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 2>six innings in twenty twenty so you just never thought

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 2>this would was gonna come out. So you say, okay,

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 2>well he just missed a season and a half. It's

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 2>technically two seasons. But he was only going to rack

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 2>up so many numbers in twenty twenty because of the

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>shortened season. That's already a good amount of time missed.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 2>He comes back and does this, You're like, WHOA, this

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 2>might be like a Nolan Ryan thing. He's just gonna

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 2>he might just throw into his forties and keep having success.

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Even in twenty three he still saw like a really

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 2>serviceable season overall. But I think once once he got

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 2>to twenty twenty four and forty one years old, you

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>just tell you really started to feel it there. So

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I do just wonder though, like if we had with

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 2>how good he was in twenty twenty two, what would

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 2>have a full twenty twenty one season have looked like,

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Because and he won the cy Young the next year,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 2>So I do think about that from like getting closer

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 2>to three hundred wins any of those things, But I

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>still think he probably would have been a little bit short.

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 5>At the end of the day.

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 2>He's just been human since he turned forty and and

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 2>that's been I think the part that's it's funny with

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 2>him because he's just so much of his career has

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 2>just not been human. I remember watching the old Sports

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Center highlights and they're doing the game recaps and it

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 2>was you know, in the early I would say, before

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 2>even the twenty ten, two thousand and seven, two thousand

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>and two thousand and nine, and when a guy would

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 2>throw one hundred, it would have like the.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 5>On on the TV.

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 2>It would have like the fire almost like emoji wouldn't

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 2>be the word because emojis weren't even didn't exist, I

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 2>guess really, but like you have the fire icon there

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 2>with one hundred, and it would be like in the

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>recaps on Sports Center, he's still touching one hundred in

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 2>the seventh inning, and it was like it was like,

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 2>holy crap, this guy is different and back then throwing

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 2>two forty two hundred and fifty innings, like.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 5>It really is amazing. This is a guy that, you.

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Know, still throwing the ball technically you know today is

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 2>a guy that has been around long enough and his

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 2>pitch is such a high level too to have had those.

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 5>Two hundred and fifty inning seasons.

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Like he's kind of the last of not really a

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>dying breed, like a dead breed at this point.

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we call it a dying breed. I mean it

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 3>is dead. I mean this type of picture just likely

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.799
<v Speaker 3>will never see again. You won an MVP one Rookie

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 3>of the Year. He's a nine time All Star, three

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 3>time Cy Young Award winner, Triple Crown winner, two time

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 3>World Series Champion. My question to you is not is

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 3>he a Hall of Famer? Do you think he's an

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 3>easy first ballot Hall of favor because in my opinion,

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know anybody who wouldn't vote for him. So

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 3>my thought is he should be unanimous. But there are

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 3>been plenty of incredible players who worn't unanimous. We only

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 3>have one and his name is Marianna Rivera, so he's

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 3>probably not going to be unanimous. So I guess my question,

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 3>and it might be the easiest softball ever thrown. Is

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 3>is he a first ballot easy Hall of Famer?

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Then yeah, I think the question more becomes then like

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 2>how how high of a percentage is this that IM

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 2>going to bring in? And this is where it's so funny,

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>like when nine in change years from now, when I

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>can vote on the Hall of Fame, Like I have

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time to figure this out. But the

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 2>unanimous thing is so weird. I mean, we've talked about this.

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, if you're an obvious Hall of Famer. Everyone

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 2>should vote for the obvious hal of Famer, and if

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 2>that guy is that's everybody's vote, then he's unanimous.

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 5>And I know it's not fair to the.

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 2>People before him because of this weird, uh just just

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 2>kind of decision making process that we just kind of

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 2>created here. I think there should be more unanimous guys,

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 2>because if you I don't know how we're gonna like

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 2>to plan this out, it's like, oh, you're you're gonna

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 2>be the guy that doesn't vote for Verlander this year,

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 2>so we'll have like two or three so he's not unanimous.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Like what if like five other people think that they're

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 2>the guy that year and now he has like ninety

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 2>six percent of the vote and stead and she should

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 2>have more than that.

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 5>So like, but you go back and there's been guys

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 5>historically they're like, how the hell is it? Like how

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 5>did he not have one hundred percent of the vote.

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 5>There's like thirty forty fifty guys.

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 2>You could say that about we should fix that, Uh,

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 2>but no, I think he should be frankly unanimous. Like

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 2>what's the nitpick here? Like that he didn't win three

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred games. That's never gonna happen again. Never So I'm

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 2>not voting for him, no one, No one's gonna even

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 2>get close to two seventy.

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 5>He's a two sixty six.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's hope that he wins a few more games down

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the stretch here if he gets a two seventy. You

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 2>mentioned the MVP and whether you think a Pitcher should

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 2>win it or that one.

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 5>I don't. I don't care he won it. The three

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 5>s youngs.

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 2>The fact that he has won his cy Young's in

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 2>totally different parts of his career too, right, Like one

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 2>is in his prime, the is like what you would

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 2>think is.

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 5>Like the very end of the prime.

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 2>No way, he wins another, and then the other one

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 2>is like back from the dead, I still got it, and.

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>He wins it. There.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:14.119
<v Speaker 2>So that on top of the one, two, three, three

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 2>runner up finishes, which you could play hairs on on

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 2>so many cy Young Awards where it's like probably should

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>have won one or two of those, and then another

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>couple top three finishes, won the Rookie of the Year

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>as well. I mean, this is one of the more

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 2>decorated careers you're gonna see from Pitcher. He's had the peaks,

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 2>he's had the longevity, he's had the postseason performance, he's

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 2>done it all, and then he's even done the stuff

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 2>that very I few ever have to win the MVP.

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 2>He's done the two hundred and fifty innings, like everything

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 2>that you would reasonably want to see from this guy,

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 2>he's done it. He's done another two hundred and twenty

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 2>six innings in the postseason. It's it's just amazing stuff.

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, you can maybe nitpick if I so, just

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 2>know someone's gonna be like, he had a five six

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 2>three e AL in the World Series, what average is whatever?

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 2>You may nine starts in the World Series and he's

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 2>won a couple of them.

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 5>Just an amazing career and one of the best to

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 5>ever do it.

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 3>The one seven to five ERA is at thirty nine

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 3>years old, is it almost doesn't compute in my head

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 3>because I'm thinking about right now with Jacob Zarowski rocking

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 3>a one six to two ERA. He gave up three

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 3>earned runs to the Cardinals yesterday and I thought that

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 3>was a terrible start by him. He only struck out

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 3>nine over six innings, raising again his ERA to one

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 3>six to two. Verlander did that over one hundred and

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 3>seventy five innings at thirty nine years old. Incredible. What's

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 3>almost equally is incredible is this Tyler Tolbert hitch twelve

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 3>straight plate appearances with a hit. What and this comes

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 3>to us from Sarah Langs. Tyler Tolbert has a hit

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 3>in twelve consecutive plate appearance that ties the MLB record

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 3>consecutive hits in at bats twelve by Johnny Kling in

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 3>nineteen oh two, Pinky Higgins in ninete teen thirty eight,

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Walt Dropoh in nineteen fifty two, and Jose Miranda in

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four. I swear on them. I think Sarah

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 3>just made up the first three names. Johnny Kling, Walt Driplow,

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Piggy Higgins. Those seems like names you would make up

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 3>in MLB the Show just in order to be funny.

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 3>But Tyler Tolbert did it. Now. There were some infield

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 3>hits there. His tenth in particular was to Bobashett, and

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I feel like Bobachet could have made the play, but

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 3>that's baseball for you. There was a couple of home

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 3>runs sprinkled in, as you could see from the YouTube

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 3>compilation that podcast p put up.

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 5>There.

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 3>There was even one off a position. Sometimes you need

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of luck to get a hit in

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 3>twelve straight plan appearances. And I also want to talk

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 3>about the royals recent offensive outburst, but of course it's

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 3>led by Tolbert with twelve straight hits.

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 5>So why the sport's amazing.

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Also, like Jose Miranda, like battling, you know, to find opportunities.

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 5>Now, Tolbert has has a six, had a six.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Fifty two ops in twenty games in Triple A this year,

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 2>and in thirty two games now at the big league level,

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 2>he's slashing three ninety six, four thirty four, five forty two. Yeah,

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 2>like you said, a lot of good fortune in that stretch.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 2>But that's what makes us sport so fun is there's

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 2>so many different ways that you can reach the record books,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 2>and anybody can technically you get into the record books there, right,

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Like that's the fun part about it is you never

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>know who's gonna go on some crazy stretch with some

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 2>positive fortune, some just of being on a heater and

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 2>some other things in between, and you just never know

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 2>what you're gonna see at the ballfield, And I think

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 2>that makes it so so so much fun. I mean,

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 2>this guy's barely played Tilbert at the big league level

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and and just to have this stretches is really remarkable.

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 5>And speedy guys that put the ball in play, Like

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 5>sometimes you can just have these really cool uh, these cool.

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Heaters and yeah, I mean it helps when you're playing

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 2>the Mets, I will say, And that's definitely part of it.

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 2>But it's just been cool to see another guy in

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the record books with a bunch of names. You know,

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 2>it's a cool record when all the other names are

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 2>like the made up you know, Walt Dropo, whatever, and

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 2>he just.

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 5>Joins this group of guys you've never heard of in

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 5>your life.

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 2>So in his career entering July, Tolbert had twenty one

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 2>hits in twenty eight stolen bas He's had more hits

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 2>than stolen bases. What the way, speed up guy, speed

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 2>guy for you, but ends up getting some AB's here.

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 5>This is like their Jiraw Dyson.

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 2>But now they're letting him swing it a little bit

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 2>and it just goes on this unbelievable stretch that's incredible.

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 3>And what's also been incredible is this Royal's recent out

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 3>offensive outburst because it's not just Tolbert. The Royals have

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 3>scored thirty one runs in their past two games. Yes,

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 3>do the math, that's fifteen and a half runs per game.

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 3>They put up ten earned on Christopher Sanchez, and yes

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 3>they beat up the Mets, but they did it again

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Sanchez too. So this is just the hottest offensive baseball

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 3>over the last two games. But the reason we're bringing

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 3>it up is thirty one runs in two games. I

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 3>don't care who's on the mound. I really don't care.

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Code I Sega hasn't been that bad. I know, he

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 3>hasn't been that great this bad, I don't think. So.

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 3>It's been really cool to see. It's why we love baseballs,

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 3>that anything can happen on any given day, and a

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 3>team like the Royals, who came in as one of

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 3>the worst offenses in Major League Baseball, in a two

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 3>game stretch where one of those he's facing, Christopher Sanchez,

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 3>who's second in Cy Young odds on BETEBGM, puts up

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 3>a ted spot. I think it's awesome.

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 5>It's great.

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 2>And again the fact that it's somebody that entered the

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 2>month with more stolen bases than hits in his career,

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 2>like that's the least likely candidate possible. It's a guy

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 2>that's literally there for his legs doing it with the

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 2>bat for a little bit.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that the Royals could actually because we

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 3>see the Tigers they've clawed back Royals, what do you think.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 5>I just I don't see how.

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's nice to see them just like sparking

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 2>it a little bit, but they're sixteen games under.

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 5>I just I think it's gonna be too hard for them.

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, they're young.

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 2>You never know, but I just think also with that

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 2>bullpen too, and the way that opens trending, I mean,

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 2>they could have blown a couple of those.

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 5>Games with the Mets. It's just they kept scoring. I

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 5>just it seems tough.

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you've seen all those Mets stats online about them

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 3>scoring a certain amount of runs at home and never

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 3>losing with that, and you add that on to a

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 3>season like this. It's just been they spent three hundred

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 3>and fifty million dollars on this payroll arm and they're

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 3>setting records in the bad way.

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 2>The broadcast booth is awesome, though you had like you

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>had Keith Hernandez having like like an existential crisis while

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 2>they're giving up sixteen runs, talking about the end of

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 2>his bloodline. It was just it's it's the best booth.

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 2>And look, I think when the Mets are in these stretches,

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 2>you gotta switch over to the Mets broadcast booth, not

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 2>to do like the Eric Cartman, like you know, just

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:58.239
<v Speaker 2>drink the tears thing, like just because they it turns.

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 5>Into a podcast and you never know where it's gonna go.

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 2>And like got it was off the Rails the other

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 2>day and I was it was just really fun to

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 2>listen to.

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 3>They are pretty close to MLB's version of TNT with

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Shaq and Chuck.

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 2>And well, I may they start pushing the limits more

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 2>and more when the games get real ugly, but yeah,

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>it's it's really fun to listen to.

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 3>It's funny. They're probably the only booth and Major League

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Baseball that sees their numbers go up when they're losing.

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeaheah, because I'm tuning.

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 3>In another unbelievable performance Ryan O'Hearn yesterday of the Pittsburgh Pirates.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Three homers is one thing in its own right. Ten RBIs.

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 3>It is more rare to have a game with a

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 3>hitter having ten RBIs than it is to throw a

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 3>perfect game. There have been twenty four perfect games in

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 3>the history of baseball, only seventeen times as a player

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 3>recorded ten RBIs Paul skin even said afterwards is the

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 3>best performance he's seen as a member of the Pirates.

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 3>And this tweet comes to us from our Guy podcast.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 3>P Ryan o'harton last night became the first player to

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 3>drive in each of his team's first ten runs in

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 3>a game in MLB history. And we just brought up

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 3>on the latest show, Jack and I we were talking

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 3>about what the Pirates are going to do after the

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Connor Griffin injury. Because it's not just this. It sucks

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 3>with KG hitting the shelf. It's not just him. O'Neil

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Cruz is still on the IL. Spencer Horwitz is still

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 3>on the il. How is this Pirate's offense going to

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 3>stay afloat? Well, here's answer number one. Loudly, Ryan o'hurt says,

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 3>get on my back.

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 2>The eyes well, and I mean they still have the

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 2>firepower to whether the storm a little bit here.

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, when you.

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Look at what Brandon Lau has been able to do

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 2>for them this year, when you look at what Brian

0:16:58.000 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Reynolds has been able to do for you this year.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 5>If Ryan O'Hearn.

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I know that game brought his ops up to an

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 2>eight fifty, but if he's playing like that, it seems

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 2>like the complimentary guys are doing their job for the

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 2>most part. That's where now it swings back over though

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Paul skeens, you got to go be that ace again,

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, and and Brax and Ashcraft keep doing what

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 2>you're doing. I think it really is the other three.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Jared Jones deserves more grace because he's coming back from

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 2>from elbow surgery, so like he's settling back in, Like

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 2>Mitch Keller bro like, you can't be a five e

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 2>r A uh bubba Chandler. You've had ample time. Now

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 2>it's it's time to start seeing seeing it click at

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 2>the big league level for this team.

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 5>And then look, I think that.

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 2>No matter what, they got to go out and get

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 2>bullpen help and just hope the lineup gets healthy and

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 2>hope that the starting pitching does what it what it

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 2>should do, because every guy, like at Leverage is their era,

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 2>starts with a four. The Connor Griffin thing sucks is

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 2>you and I Before the episode that Jack, you and

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Jack talked about it, we're saying Connor Griffin changes this

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>team changes the lineup, change the defense, changes everything. But

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna have to figure it out without him. I

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 2>think just seeing him when he was back and seeing

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 2>what he could do for them is enough to say, Okay,

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 2>well in eight to ten weeks, we'll have him at

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the very end of the season and if we're in it,

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 2>like that's the sprint through the finish line and see

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 2>how it goes. But I think this team has shown

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 2>enough through the adversity that they should be added to right,

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm not saying that the Pirate should be mortgaging

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 2>in the future like crazy, but I think this team,

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 2>through the injuries, through the inconsistencies, through Paul Skein's worst

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 2>stretches a big leiguer have been able to weather the storm.

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 2>And then you're getting these pop performances from Ryan O'Hearn,

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Like you're getting O'Hearn doing this. Who knows Brian Reynolds

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 2>could put you on his back, Branda Laule could put

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 2>you on his back the way Nick and Zalez has

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 2>been swinging.

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 5>I think there's enough going on as Maerlean Valdez.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I agree Biggie in the comments, like has done enough

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 2>when he's been up here.

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 5>It's like that guy could be a spark.

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I think this team is showing you enough life. If

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you're you know, sitting and look at the front office

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 2>here and you're trying to make a decision, say hey,

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 2>we we should add you know, to the bullpen, and

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 2>we should try to push this team a little bit further.

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Jack said, because of these injuries, they might be early buyers,

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 3>Like they might be one of the first teams to

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 3>make a move. Right We've already seen the Cardians make

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 3>a move with Patrick Bailey. We don't expect you to

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 3>be that soon, clearly because we're now past that, but

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 3>definitely before the August third trade deadline. And I think

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 3>I agree with them, Like I think the Pirates are

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 3>gonna start to get after it because of the position

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 3>they're now in with kg O'Neil, Cruz and Horwitz on

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 3>the ail.

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think they should start using Carmen Maginsky

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 2>in like higher leverage.

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 5>It's all your other higher leverage arms.

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 3>Still no take Skins out of the rotation and put in.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, getting back in the Schien's a closer Magensky back

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 2>in the rotation that belongs. But now it's going to

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 2>be interesting. I think getting Horwitz back and Cruise back

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 2>is going to.

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 5>Help a lot.

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 2>And then you just you just count the days down

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 2>until you get Connor Griffin and hope that you're in

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 2>a decent position. But I think this team has shown

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 2>enough and performances like this from O'Hearn is enough to say, hey,

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 2>this team needs needs to buy despite the adversity.

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Before we move on, let's hear what Paul Skeins had

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 3>to say about Ryan O'Hearn's historic three homer Gameways.

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:19.239
<v Speaker 6>Like to see that performance from Riot, I mean, I

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 6>think it was kind of selfish, to be honest.

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Everybody else was getting on and.

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 5>You know, home runs are rally killers.

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 6>H you had a three run home run or a

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 6>Grand Slam, and it's just like what now, you know

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 6>there's nobody on, nobody, nobody can drive him in, So.

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 5>You know, good for him, I guess.

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 3>But uh, no, selfish, totally selfish for Rhino, hard to

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 3>clear the basis for everybody else. No, we went on

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 3>to say again in that interview, was the greatest performance

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 3>he's ever seen. He's obviously being sarcastic and another reason

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 3>why why I wanted to bring that clip up, not

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 3>only because I find it hilarious and I love schemes

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the sense of humor, but there were real people online

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 3>trash scenes and being like, how could you say that?

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 5>I hope, Yeah, we.

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Rub more than one brain cell together. Please please please,

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean that all missed comments section I've seen in

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 3>a long time. And when we're talking about the internet here, yeah.

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 5>I know, it's even low for the Internet.

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 2>The fun thing with with Skeens is like seeing his

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 2>because people always talk about, oh, like there's not much

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 2>personality there, is he going to not be that marketable star.

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Seeing his is like comedic side just kind of blossom

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 2>as he's gotten more comfortable in the big leagues and

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 2>more comfortable with the media. Has been really cool because

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 2>we always talked about it just feels like MLB gets

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 2>a star and they're just not marketable at all. I

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 2>think people sleep on the personality that Skeens brings to

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 2>the table, and like seeing some of the commercials and

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 2>stuff that he's doing. It's very deadpan humor, but it's

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 2>it is great and again I think he's he's a

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 2>really good leader and kind of potential face for the

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 2>league to be able to have fun like that.

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 3>I totally agree with you. So we still got to

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 3>talk about Zach Wheeler and how credible he is in

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 3>his performance yesterday, as well as our first look at

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 3>Luis Lara and then Mock Draft three point zero with

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Tyler Jennings. But before that podcast, p can we hear

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 3>from our friends at Hampton Farms Peanuts.

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Just Baseball's number one ranked peanut prospect is none other

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 2>than the Hampton Farms in shell peanut hit tool plus

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 2>plus that crack of the shell is elite power easy

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 2>plus seven grams of protein per serving makeup great source

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 2>of fiber in America's number one in shell brand. This

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 2>is a five tool snack future value eighty grade. Get

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the top peanut prospect in the produce aisle or twenty

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 2>five percent off at Hamptonfarms dot com with code just Baseball.

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 2>That's one word, just Baseball for twenty five percent off

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 2>at Hamptonfarms dot Com.

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 3>Polished off a few of those honey roasted peanuts this morning.

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 3>They're just so damn good. I gotta be careful, dude,

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 3>because they I could just fly through those bags. All right,

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 3>let's look at Zach Wheeler Zahel yesterday, seven innings, fourteen

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 3>punch outs, one run aloud, four hits, no walks, sees

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.719
<v Speaker 3>any rays down to two to two eight. And remember

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 3>it's hot in the middle of summer at Great American Ballpark,

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 3>where the ball is flying. Absolutely not. Wheeler was masterful.

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 3>You're seeing these hot this highlight montage and another reason

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 3>why I love Wheeler so much. It's not just the

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 3>postseason pedigree. It's not the electric stuff. It's the command

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 3>of the strike zone. Because when you watch J two

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 3>rul Muto's glove, when he sets up, he doesn't move

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 3>an inch. Zach Wheeler throws electric stuff wherever he wants,

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 3>whenever he wants, with any pitch that he wants to

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 3>go to. And he was pissed. He was pissed after Yeah,

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 3>at least it was about the All Stars.

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 5>I think heissed before he pitched, pissed before.

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 3>We hear from Zach Wheeler because I want to. I

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 3>want to hear from his mouth what he thinks about

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 3>getting stumbed from the All Star Game, or what do

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 3>you think about this performance?

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I think you saw how angry and kind of like

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 2>how much he wanted to prove in this outing that

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 2>he's an All Star and that he should be in

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 2>that game.

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 5>And I think that was the big part is and I.

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 2>Think this is this was like a microcosm of why

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Zach Wheeler is so good in the playoffs. Adrenaline does

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 2>not affect his command where he has the adrenaline just

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 2>injected into him from the postseason or in this case,

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 2>being angry and.

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 5>Prepared to prove to everybody that he deserved to be.

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 2>An All Star, like he stepped on that mound, he

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 2>told the rubber, more angry than usual, more fired up

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 2>than usual, and he can just harness that and use

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 2>it for good, where some guys will start to get

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 2>a radic and starts to spray a little bit and

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 2>lose the command. And I think it's the same reason

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 2>why he is so good in the playoffs is that

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 2>guy uses adrenaline is still able to lock that in

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 2>and focus and just execute and across his whole arsenal.

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 2>He was executing everything from the four seamer, this weeper,

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 2>the splitter, the sinker, even sprinkling in the cutter and curveball.

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:05.719
<v Speaker 2>The feel that he has to pitch when he's angry

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 2>or fired up is just incredible.

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 3>He is one of six pitchers with an ERA below

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 3>two four in over at least eighty innings, and he

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 3>said two two eight and only Jacob Izarowski is a

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 3>lower win Remember when he had a thoracic outlet syndrome

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 3>and we weren't sure what he was going to look

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 3>like when he came back, and now he's looking arguably

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 3>better than ever. I really do think because I remember

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 3>when we did our National League East predictions at the

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 3>beginning of the season, and I picked the Phillies to

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 3>win the division, and it was a belief that Zach

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Wheeler was going to return to relative for even I

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 3>didn't think so, and I think the debate was and

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 3>I think you and Jack both agree with this. If

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Wheeler did return to peak Wheeler, yes, I could see

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 3>the Phillies winning. It's just improbable because he is such

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 3>an X factor for this Phillies. Right, you go, Sanchez Wheeler, Lizardo,

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 3>dear God, you go Sanchez Lozardo Nola not as sexy,

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot worse, And that could be the difference between

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 3>the Phillies winning the division and not. And not only

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 3>were we seeing Zach Wheeler return to eighty percent, like

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I kind of thought he would. We're seeing him return

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 3>to peak Wheeler. I mean, we're just talking about Verlander

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 3>putting up that one one seven five era when he

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 3>was thirty nine years old. Wheeler is in quite thirty nine.

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 3>But it just speaks to the greatness of Zach Wheeler

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 3>that he just continues to do it at the highest level.

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 3>And I totally understand why he's upset that he's not

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 3>an All Star. I think the innings are probably getting

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 3>in the way. Right he did start the year hurt,

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 3>and the National League starting pitching staff is freaking loaded.

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we didn't even mention a guy like Kyle

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 3>Harrison yesterday who's having an unbelievable season. And then I

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 3>responded in our discord and I said, well, who are

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 3>you taking off? Because one thing to be a snub

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 3>and that's what annoys me. And I said this yesterday

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 3>about All Star snub discourse. I see people just listing

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 3>names that are awesome and saying they should be Ulstars. Well,

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 3>then do the extra step and take somebody off. Yeah,

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 3>so even still are them. I'm looking at the All

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Star pitchers in the National League and I say, okay,

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 3>we could take off Skeens for them. That's where we're at,

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 3>right because outside of Logan Web who I already took

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 3>off yesterday for Brax and Ashcraft, who's been a top

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 3>ten pitcher in baseball period by f war, then next

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 3>you'd take off Skeens. So I guess take off Skeens

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 3>for Wheeler if you feel like that.

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 2>And that's the hard part because I don't know that

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Wheelwer's numbers were still better. But if you take Skeens's

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 2>numbers through eighty eight, Inx pitched, which is right where

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Wheeler's at, Skeen's had a two eight sixty, alright, So

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:52.719
<v Speaker 2>it starts to close the gap a lot more. And

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 2>that's the tough part, is like I think Wheeler deserves

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 2>to be in there, but it is when we're working

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 2>with a half of a season, twenty innings matters a lot,

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 2>and that's the difficult part. And in some instances, like

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 2>it's it's more than twenty innings, it's like thirty saniel

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 2>contrasts to one hundred and twenty three innings this year,

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>so like it's it's forty innings almost between between them two.

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 2>But you know you've got thirty pitchers I think, or

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 2>more than that excuse, we have thirty seven pitchers, not

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 2>all of them All Stars obviously, but thirty seven pitchers

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 2>that have thrown one hundred innings this year already.

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 5>So that's the push and pull with it.

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 2>But I think Wheeler has been so dominant, and I think

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 2>the only reason that wheel are and one of the

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 2>main reasons why Wheelers being so vocal about this is

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 2>that it's in Philly, right and and he deserves to

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 2>be recognized there. He's only going to maybe pitch what

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 2>one more year after this. He's overcome so much he

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 2>deserves to be there. And I think the most frustrating

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 2>part for him is that, you know, usually the way

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 2>that they'll rectify the free agent like Injustice or excuse me,

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 2>the All Star Injustice, is that guys go down and

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 2>then you put in, you know, you late addition, the

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 2>guy that you know should have been in there. But

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 2>because it won't line up with Wheeler being available to pitch,

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>the league doesn't view him as a guy that is

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 2>eligible to be added into the All Star Game, even

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 2>just his recognition, and that seems to be where his

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 2>frustration lies.

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Right like Hazu's Zarto. I think that's a great point.

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Lizardo was just added, and who's had a better season?

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Hasus Zardo or Zach Wheeler? I mean, but Lizardo lines

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 3>up and he's had a good year in his own right.

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 3>So it is it really does suck because while I

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 3>think I can make an argument that based on just

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 3>these season numbers, maybe he would be slightly on the

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 3>outside looking in, I could also understand his frustration with

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 3>that point about it being in Philly, where he's at

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 3>in his career and how damn good he's been. And

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 3>again this start capitalized it and we heard from Zach

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Wheeler after the game podcast p Let's hear what Wheeler

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 3>has to say about getting Snubb from the All Star Game.

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 7>Now, I feel like that's kind of a reminder, you know,

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 7>for whoever needs to be reminded. So you know, it's it,

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 7>uh pisses me off, and you know it's it's kind

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 7>of bs. So you know, if maybe if I wasn't

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 7>necessarily right in there, I wouldn't be saying this. But

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 7>I feel like I've earned it. And just because I

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 7>pitch on a certain day doesn't I mean that I

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 7>get you know, I don't even know the right word.

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 7>But just because I pitch on a certain day, you know,

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 7>I can't pitch an All Star Game or even be there.

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Nothing he said there I disagree with well, and he

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 2>was saying to it kind of lines up with this bullpen.

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 2>So there's like a league rule that if you throw

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 2>within a certain amount of days, like you throw in

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 2>a game within a certain amount of days of the

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 2>All Star Game, that even if you said I'm good

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 2>to go, they won't let you throw.

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 5>And he's like, it lines up with my bullpen.

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I can throw in any I'm fine throwing an inning

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 2>and just just going and having fun out there, and

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 2>the league won't even allow that. So that's where it's

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 2>really interesting. There's definitely more, maybe there's more nuance to

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 2>it that I'm not aware of, but I think Wheelers

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 2>probably well informed on the topic and talk to his

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 2>agent whatever. And it's Quily still frustrated for good reason.

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 2>And of pictures with at least eighty innings thrown this year,

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 2>he's six in the r right. He trails only Chris

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 2>saile At, Hardo Rodriguez, Cam Switzler, Shohatani and Jacob Mesrowski.

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 2>So I get it, you know, and and I think

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:28.959
<v Speaker 2>it's it's it's a tough situation for him get out.

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 2>I think if it wasn't in Philly, I think you'd

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 2>have some frustration, but I think not to this degree.

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 5>And and he has every right to feel that way.

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 2>And what I don't get is, like when when we

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 2>had a snub or when someone had to be replaced,

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 2>why not we have this Legends nomination right that we

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 2>always do, which I get it, like I don't hate it,

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 2>But if you can do like the Legends nomination for

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Justin Verlander, why can't you when somebody gets hurt just say.

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Wheelers would have been the replacement. But since he

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 5>can't throw that day, he is not going to know.

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 2>He'll be like an honorary replacement. And then we're gonna

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 2>go to Lizardo, and Lizardo is going to actually take

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the role. So yes, you have two more All Stars

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 2>being named. Who cares you're throwing All Stars to honorary legends?

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Like if it's someone that specifically fits the criteria, and

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's a slippery slope because then you're like you

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 2>could start doing that with a bunch of people.

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 5>But it's really only a pitcher issue anyways.

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think if there was a clearcut guy that

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 2>was the obvious replacement, you should give him like the

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 2>honorary All Star like non and then have another replacement

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 2>behind him, Because I just don't see why we care

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 2>about you know, how many All Stars we have when

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 2>we're doing this, you know, Legends aspect as well.

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if them naming Bryce Harper another Philly as

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the Legends pick through wrench in there where it's like,

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 3>we already gave it to Harper, Are we going to

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 3>give another one of these picks to a different Philly?

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 3>And I get that in theory, But at the same time,

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Bryce Harper deserves to be an All Star this year

0:32:55.880 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Justin Verlander was a Legends pick, clearly doesn't. Harper's got

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 3>a nine hundred ops. He's been awesome. I think he's

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 3>been better than Matt Olson this year. Yeah, right, or

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 3>at least on par So, I don't think they have

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 3>to look at it as, oh, we gave Harper the nod.

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 3>You gave Harper the nod because he deserved it. You

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 3>could still give the Legends pick to Zack Wheeler, who

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 3>also deserves it. Yeah, right, because I think, you know,

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I talk about All Star discourse and I what annoys

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 3>me when you don't pull off his number whatever. But

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I can also understand when a guy just simply deserves it,

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 3>and Zach Wheeler simply deserves it. And I do think

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 3>that he has an argument over Paul Skeens, who will

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 3>be at the ULCER game, and we can't understand the

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 3>innings thing. And I still would give it to Skeens,

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 3>But can I hear the argument? Yes, which means they

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 3>got to find a way to get him in.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, what I would saying they pick and choose when

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 2>I kind of rewrite the rules, and like, this is

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 2>a great time to rewrite the rules.

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 5>Get Wheeler in there.

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, don't pretend like you're following your own rules. You

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 3>make a new one every year, So now we got

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 3>to follow the game. I'm pretty sure.

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I wasn't well informed when they first did the

0:33:58.680 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Legends thing.

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 5>I was like, that's a thing I didn't I didn't

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 5>even know that was a thing. They said, oh, legends

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 5>pick like here, Miguel.

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Cabrera or whoever it was. I was like, okay, they

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 2>started with Jeter. Like there's just times where I was like,

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I just I didn't whatever the first

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 2>time was, I had no idea it existed.

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 3>I swear they put in new rules for the All

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 3>Star Game or the Home Run Derby or just Major

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 3>League Baseball in general, in our terms and conditions when

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 3>we sign up for MLBtv, like and then they just

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 3>pull him up and it's like, you actually want to

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 3>agree to this. You agree to this, you support it,

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 3>you support it? All right. So we got one more

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 3>topic before we get to mock Draft three point zero,

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 3>and we're saving the fastest for last. Luis Laura I

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 3>posted on a X and our guy Buster only retweeted me.

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 3>Peter Vision had the Luis Laura rounding the bases on

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 3>a Bryce terrangue either single or double to center as

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 3>the fastest sprint speed of the season. Actually asked podcast

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Pete right after he hit it, and I said, can

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 3>we track the sprint speed? And he's like, it's not

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 3>available yet, and I was like, well, my eyes said

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 3>he was the fastest. Obviously, I have no real idea,

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 3>but I do trust Peter Vision, which.

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Is funny because I think he's like by like feet

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 2>per second. It's just like just above average.

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 5>He evolved so well.

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 3>The way his arms and legs were moving, it looked

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 3>robotic in a good way though, like a mooth robot

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 3>built for speed.

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 5>I love this guy well.

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we had him on the Top one hundred

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 2>list in like twenty twenty three when he was eighteen

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 2>years old, and you know, I'd rarely do that with

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 2>guys that have you not had a ton of a

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 2>body of work there, But this is a player. Since

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the first time I saw him, the instincts in the

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 2>feel for the game is is just ridiculous. And before

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 2>his debut ranked forty second on our Top one hundred list.

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 5>There was a span in twenty twenty.

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Four where he fell off of it, but it was

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 2>hard to properly assess him because he was pushed so aggressively.

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 2>And I think the Brewers they do that with the

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 2>guys that they love, and it's not comparing him to

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Chorio or Midday, but if they see that this is

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 2>going to be a good Major League baseball player, they

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 2>will push you quickly.

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 5>And that's exactly what they did with Laura.

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 5>He gets a high A when he was eighteen years

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:08.760
<v Speaker 5>old still and.

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 2>By the time he was in is I think still

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 2>nineteen years old, he was getting a taste of Double A.

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 5>So it's like, how do you properly assess a player

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 5>like that?

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 2>And at twenty one years old, here he is starting

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.240
<v Speaker 2>the season at Triple A, and here he is having

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 2>a power breakout where after never having hit more than

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 2>four homers in a season, you go to Nashville.

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 5>Nashal is one of the hardest places to hit.

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 2>I've talked about this on the call up and maybe

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 2>a little bit on here, and he's doubled already, more

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 2>than doubled his career high in homers. He's nine through

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 2>seventy eight games. This is a really good contact and

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 2>like speed in elite glove type of guy. So if

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 2>he's able to hit you ten to fifteen homers, holy crap.

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think just seeing that power uptick from him,

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 2>even if it's eight to ten, just the fact that

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna be able to split the gap so much

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 2>because he's walking more than he strikes out he's a

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 2>switch hitter, was enough for the Brewers to be like,

0:36:58.680 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 2>let's extend this guy.

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 5>And that's what they did before he even debuted.

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 2>And what I'm really excited about is you look at

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 2>what he brings to the Brewers roster here, because even

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 2>if he's not mashing right away, he's solid from both

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 2>sides of the plate. Like I said, he's added the thumb.

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.439
<v Speaker 2>He's a plus centerfielder. People that I've talked to around

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 2>the Brewers organizations say gold Glover. They think he can

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 2>win multiple gold Gloves. You have Garrett Mitchell of course

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 2>in centerfield, but also a guy that you you want

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 2>to make sure you can keep healthy and maybe again

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:31.760
<v Speaker 2>that you don't want to see left He see lefties

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 2>as much.

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:35.320
<v Speaker 5>So maybe Laura can can can take some of those matchups.

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 5>South Freelick has really struggled.

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 2>He could, He could give you plenty of value in

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 2>the corner out there's another lefty bat.

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 3>That was gonna be my next question. Do you think

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 3>they just start to phase south Freelick out of the

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 3>lineup here, because I mean his six P twenty six

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 3>ops is certainly not doing it for him. And it's

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 3>not like he's this all world defender either good defender,

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 3>but if Luis Lara can provide better defense Freelick with

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 3>a better bat, what are we talking about here?

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that's the thing is like I think the

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 2>floor honestly for Laura with his swing decisions being where

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 2>they're at, with the field to hit and everything.

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 5>As a switch hitter, it's.

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Gonna be something like sal So you'd pair that with

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 2>better defense and you're getting more value. So short answers, Yeah,

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know what their long term plan is

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 2>with Sally's still twenty six. Like he's given us a

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of really good stretches where you can see this

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 2>guy s it is a good major League baseball player.

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 2>But this is a Brewers team that can win the

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 2>World Series. So I think this gives them flexibility. You

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 2>talk about late game adjustments too. If you bring in

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the righty for Garrett Mitchell Freelick's not a good center fielder,

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 2>now you have somebody in Laura, like if you pinch it,

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 2>you love this spot. Vaughn was on the bench and

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:48.760
<v Speaker 2>you pinch it. You know, you pinch it for Mitchell

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 2>and you just love to deploy Von in that spot

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 2>or Sanchez or whatever. Now you have somebody else that

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:55.399
<v Speaker 2>can go slide over in a center field and play

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 2>it at a high level. And I think that is

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 2>huge for them too. So the flexibility that this gives

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Pat Murphy for the way that they can play platoons,

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 2>and what Laura brings to the table I think is huge,

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 2>and I think this allows the brus to hedge their weaknesses,

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 2>leverage their strengths, and deploy their righty you know, pinchhit

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 2>bats like Sanchez has been swinging it great, Vonn has

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 2>been swinging it great, and just continue to be able

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 2>to deploy them in different spots in that lineup, you know,

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 2>when the lefty reliever comes in if it's a game

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 2>that they're not starting.

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Good problem to have if you're Milwaukee and podcast people.

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Without further ado, let's talk to Tyler. The MLB Draft

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 3>is on Saturday, July eleventh. It is Wednesday, July eighth,

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 3>which means the most updated mock draft is live on

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 3>just baseball dot com. Mock Draft three point zero written

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 3>by Tyler Jennings and other you know, our great team

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 3>over at just baseball dot com covering the draft. Tyler,

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:53.399
<v Speaker 3>thanks so much for joining us. You know, I love

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 3>this part. We're getting real close to the White Sox

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 3>picking number one overall and then the rest of the draft.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess I want to start with what is the

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 3>biggest difference between Mock Draft two point zero, which came

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:10.720
<v Speaker 3>out in the beginning of June to now on July eighth.

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:13.280
<v Speaker 8>I would say the biggest thing is kind of hammering

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 8>out like more specific connections than what we had on

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 8>Mock two point zero, specifically like looking at what the

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 8>Orioles might do with like j Booth if he's there

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 8>at number seven, and kind of figuring out like some

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 8>of these top ten teams specifically in moving from there,

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 8>and then some of these other teams were just like,

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 8>maybe there's a better fit for like, you know, the

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 8>Brewers at twenty five. We had Cole pro Sec there

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 8>this this mock and he kind of just fits what

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 8>they look for perfectly.

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And plus they've.

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 8>Also picked out of the school he comes from comes

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 8>from Magnolia Heights. Cooper Pratt came from there, So it's

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:51.319
<v Speaker 8>kind of trying to put some connections together and go

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 8>from there.

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that I always think seems to happen

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 2>as the draft gets closer it's inevitable because of the

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 2>signing bonus and the go siating aspect of it, is

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 2>the slam dunk first overall pick never turns out to

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 2>be the slam dunk the closer the draft gets, and

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.720
<v Speaker 2>there's other variables, and that started to happen a little

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 2>while ago, but I just feel like a closer we've

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 2>gotten now, all of a sudden, Rock Schulawski now feels

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 2>like the less likely pick, which is silly, but it

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 2>just seems like when you look at all the conversation,

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, now it's like you're hearing more

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 2>about Grady Emerson a couple of different outlet's put Grady

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:26.359
<v Speaker 2>Emerson is the number one player in the class. You hear,

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 2>of course, like the murmurs of von Lackey and the

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 2>fact that he could potentially go number one. It's got

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to be one of the more exhausting parts of this cycle,

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 2>is or just every time of this year when we

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 2>go through the cycle, is just the smoke and mirrors

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 2>that usually comes with the number one pick when you

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 2>don't have the slam dunk of all slam dunks. How

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 2>much do you feel like all of this is smoking

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 2>mirrors as the draft gets closer, and how much do

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 2>you think this is actually a pretty wild and down

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 2>to the wire decision for you know, this White Sox

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 2>team to ultimately make because look, the Nationals did it

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 2>last year, Eli will no one was expecting that.

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, they'll say they made that decision like right after

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.799
<v Speaker 8>the clock was started too for the draft. So from

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 8>what I've been told, the White Sox probably will not

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 8>know who they're picking until like twelve thirty ish on

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 8>on Saturday, which I would say that's like a half

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 8>hour hour before the draft. I think it starts at

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 8>one thirties, so I wouldn't be shocked if it goes

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 8>past that. And you know, the biggest thing is is

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 8>trying to pick out what is smoking mirrors, you know,

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 8>Like you had mentioned, it's the exhausting part of this

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 8>is trying to figure out like which rumor makes the

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 8>most sense and which one's logical. Like we've mentioned this

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 8>on the draft previous show between me and Connor Monday Night.

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 8>But like von Lackey signing, you know, or at least

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 8>agreeing to an eight point five million dollar bonus, you know,

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:49.880
<v Speaker 8>before the combine or even a little bit after, I

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 8>don't feel like that's a thing anymore. I feel like

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 8>now it's kind of down to either Rock or Grady

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 8>at this point, and depending on who you prefer, I

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 8>think you're gonna get different answers, but it really just

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 8>comes down to who in the room prefers who, Like,

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:07.760
<v Speaker 8>do you prefer the guy with a potentially seventy glove

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 8>of a high floor and has a track record in

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 8>I understand it's a big ten, but like in college baseball,

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:17.360
<v Speaker 8>like that track record is really good, Or do you

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 8>prefer the guy with the upside from the left side

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 8>of the plate? Who you know they could you surp

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 8>Rock in the future. But I made the comparison the

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 8>other day where I think Rock has a greade better glove,

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 8>and I would say the Raw powers at least a

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 8>grade better as well. So like it's an interesting dynamic

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 8>to kind of think about, and I understand, Like you know,

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 8>I think there's only been two college short stuffs taking

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 8>number one overall in the past like fifty years.

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Or something like that. The last one was Dansby.

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 8>Rock just feels like the kind of guy to really

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 8>break that streak a little bit. And I think at

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 8>the same time, some of the rumors have been coming

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:58.879
<v Speaker 8>out now just been leverage play for the White Sox

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 8>to get Rock to take less. So it really is

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 8>just going to be a wild sort of scenario that's

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:07.439
<v Speaker 8>going to come right down to the wire. I feel

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 8>like on Saturday, the MLB.

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Draft is a little bit different than other sports drafts

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 3>because of slot value. Right, teams might go underslot in

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 3>order to save money to draft another guy down the

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 3>line where potentially they could splurge. I'm curious if the

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 3>impending lockout in twenty twenty seven is affecting those decisions,

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe even more than usual, because we've seen a lot

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:36.359
<v Speaker 3>of teams do it in the past. Right teams have

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 3>even gone way under slot at the number one overall pick.

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 3>I remember the Pirates with Henry Davis, and there have

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 3>been numerous other examples of that. Do you think that

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 3>this draft in particular is going to be more affected

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:51.800
<v Speaker 3>by the lockout or do you think it's just business

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 3>as usual because we don't really know what's going to

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 3>happen with the lockout anyway, Yeah, I.

0:44:57.160 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Feel like it's going to be more business as usual.

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 8>Because the more I thought about it, I kind of

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:05.840
<v Speaker 8>wonder like, obviously, when you look at it, player development

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 8>next year is going to be, you know, depending on

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 8>what happens, is going to be a either non existent

0:45:11.560 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 8>or it will be like the COVID year where we

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 8>kind of miss out on something. So it's it's interesting

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:20.760
<v Speaker 8>just talking around with some people as well. They don't

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 8>feel like it's gonna affect much. I know some of

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 8>the players have had their thoughts about, like, you know,

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 8>looking in the future, where how do how does high

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:32.840
<v Speaker 8>school you know, the demographic kind of fit into the

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 8>draft in the future, and how much does affect you know,

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 8>guys behind them. I think that's gonna be a conversation

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 8>half later on, but as of right now, I just

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 8>I'm not sure how much that's going to affect the

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 8>draft this year. But I know there'll be teams in

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:48.319
<v Speaker 8>the top five, top ten that are going to be

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 8>trying to underslot it their their first pick and then

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:53.360
<v Speaker 8>if they have a compick or you know, some of

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 8>those PPI picks at the end of the first round,

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 8>I can definitely see somebody trying to get fancy and

0:45:58.800 --> 0:45:59.799
<v Speaker 8>try and buy someone down.

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 2>That's where I think it gets interesting in this draft too,

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'm excited to talk, you know, further with it

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 2>about like about it all with you because like for

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 2>me and I think there's a lot of really talented

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 2>players and we're gonna get into some of them specifics,

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 2>because like Kay Townsend in this latest mock, going all

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the way up to nine is pretty exciting, but that

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:20.400
<v Speaker 2>that would presumably be like an UNDERSWAT deal right with

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 2>the Braves right handed from Mississippi. But my thing is,

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 2>at least for the way that I look at it,

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 2>it feels like and maybe you could draw the line

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe one or two players before or after based on

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 2>who you like, But this draft in particular, it just

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 2>seems like there's a bit of a drop off after

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the sixth or seventh pick, depending on how you look at.

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:43.399
<v Speaker 5>It, And at least for me, it feels that way.

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:45.839
<v Speaker 2>If that's the case, then a lot of teams may

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 2>want to try to make an UNDERSWAT deal happen from there,

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:50.360
<v Speaker 2>because it's like, hey, there's not that much of a

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:54.280
<v Speaker 2>difference between the fifteenth guy on our board and the

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 2>ninth guy on our board, per se, do you see

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:58.279
<v Speaker 2>it that way? Like do you see it as like

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:00.880
<v Speaker 2>top heavy and there's a there's a bit middle class

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 2>as it pertains to the first round, And do you

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 2>think that that affects team's ability to pull off an

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 2>UNDERSWAT deal, Because like the most common UNDERSWAT team is

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the athletics at eight, and I don't know if they're

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 2>like you can always pull off a deal for a

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:16.440
<v Speaker 2>guy that people really weren't expecting to be in that range,

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:18.240
<v Speaker 2>but it feels like it's a little bit more difficult

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 2>to have the leverage as a team if there's not

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:23.319
<v Speaker 2>kind of that slam dunk top ten or twelve type

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 2>of players that you're expecting.

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:29.439
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think, as like a whole, like we've done

0:47:29.480 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 8>a maybe the service to this class of like trying

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 8>to hype it up to be a lot more than

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 8>what it actually is, and that's not a shot to

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 8>any of the players in this class. But I think

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 8>you're correct in terms of there's a there's top heaviness here,

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:45.399
<v Speaker 8>and there's a clear you know, Tier A or first tier,

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:47.759
<v Speaker 8>and then it kind of just drops off a little

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:50.799
<v Speaker 8>bit after that. And you know, talking to scouts, they

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 8>don't believe there's a you know, depending on who you asked,

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:56.120
<v Speaker 8>there's not always going to be a full first round

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:58.880
<v Speaker 8>of write ups for them, So like there'll be like

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 8>twenty guys they put first round grades on, and then

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:03.479
<v Speaker 8>after that it's just like guys who you know will

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:05.479
<v Speaker 8>go in the first round. But we think they're second

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 8>rounders and so on and so forth. So I think

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 8>that's how this draft has kind of turned out to be,

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 8>and I think that's gonna definitely play a role on

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.640
<v Speaker 8>how teams operate on this So, like you can see,

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:19.959
<v Speaker 8>I'm gonna throw out example, like the Royals at six,

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 8>they had their secondary pick at thirty. You know, we

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:26.799
<v Speaker 8>had Drew Burris and trying to remember who else we had,

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:30.560
<v Speaker 8>we had Zion Rows at thirty, which looking back on

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 8>it probably not be the way to operate necessarily. I

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:36.840
<v Speaker 8>know they'll probably stick with a bat at six and

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 8>then try and and buy someone down at thirty. But

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 8>Zion Rose, i know, does have connections to the Royals

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:44.319
<v Speaker 8>at that pick, depending on if he gets there. No

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 8>idea if it will happen, but he has a lot

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 8>of suitors in the back end of the first round

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:51.399
<v Speaker 8>right now. But if they they happen to get like EJ.

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 8>Boof at six or even Jacob Lombard at six, you

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 8>know what happens? Then do they pay overslot six and

0:48:58.000 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 8>then try and buy you know, somebody at thirty to

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 8>try and get an underslot dealble to help kind of

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 8>maximize their bonus pool. There, so it's really interesting to

0:49:07.040 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 8>see what happens there. I think the Giants are another

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 8>team that like kind of fit that mold, where like

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:14.319
<v Speaker 8>they pick a floor, they pick it twenty nine. Do

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 8>they want a top three in this class? I absolutely

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:20.479
<v Speaker 8>think they do. Doesn't happen genuinely, no idea, so a lot.

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 8>I would say, after the Giants, it gets a little

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:26.880
<v Speaker 8>you know, kerfuffled a little bit. It's probably a good

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 8>way to describe it.

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:30.880
<v Speaker 2>There's there's a clear tier one A, right, which is

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:33.680
<v Speaker 2>of course going to be the Chilawski's, the Emerson's and

0:49:33.719 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 2>the Lackies of the world. And correct me if I'm wrong.

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:40.399
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that's kind of the one A from

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:44.320
<v Speaker 2>from there one B. How far down are you willing

0:49:44.360 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 2>to go? Like, because I feel like with the one

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 2>B still kind of putting them as.

0:49:47.920 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 5>Part of that that tier one. Of course you're.

0:49:49.960 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Gonna have Flora in there. I'm curious where you're at

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 2>at Lombard. It seems like he's a little bit more polarizing,

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:58.319
<v Speaker 2>but of course they're gonna have Flora Buris. And then

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:00.360
<v Speaker 2>that's where it gets interesting into like an EJ how

0:50:00.400 --> 0:50:04.239
<v Speaker 2>far do you extend this beyond like to encapsulate Tier one.

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:06.839
<v Speaker 2>How many players do you think would fit that, like

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 2>definitive tier one, even if it's a bee, because Tier

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:11.919
<v Speaker 2>one A is obviously going to be that queer cut

0:50:11.960 --> 0:50:12.960
<v Speaker 2>top three guys.

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I would say this, the question marks start coming

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 8>in after you know the seventh player on our board.

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:22.760
<v Speaker 8>So like going through it, you mentioned one A Rock, Lackey,

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:25.840
<v Speaker 8>and Emerson, one Bee, Flora, Buris Booth.

0:50:25.680 --> 0:50:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And Lombard.

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 8>I feel like it's probably the best way to describe

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:30.479
<v Speaker 8>it because you start kind of getting into some question

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 8>marks at eight. So like we have chrisy Copian at eight,

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:37.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, fantastic bat the ball skills, but injured all year,

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:40.799
<v Speaker 8>had a back issue. Supposedly according to when a Tech

0:50:40.840 --> 0:50:43.120
<v Speaker 8>SAgs guy, you played through a broken leg this year,

0:50:43.160 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 8>which is interesting to say the least. So there's some

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 8>question marks about healthcare. Celia Straschneider obviously insane athleticism, insane power,

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 8>but the hit tool really just leaves a lot more

0:50:56.120 --> 0:50:59.359
<v Speaker 8>to be desired. Tyler Bell has a shorter injury right

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:01.399
<v Speaker 8>health for it, I would say, is probably the next

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:03.880
<v Speaker 8>guy to put into like the one B tier if

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:06.759
<v Speaker 8>we want to expand it to five just as a

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 8>cashier with really good defense and power, but obviously the

0:51:10.400 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 8>hit tool kind of a little if he depending on

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 8>who you ask, but he's a catcher, he's not expected

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:18.800
<v Speaker 8>to have a fantastic hit tool, you know, So you know,

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:21.280
<v Speaker 8>I would definitely say that the seven to eight guys

0:51:22.400 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 8>throwing in hell for for one bee if we want to.

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:27.920
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of where like the Tier one ends.

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 3>For me, going to the end of the first round,

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:34.919
<v Speaker 3>from picks thirty through twenty one. A name that really

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:38.840
<v Speaker 3>jumped out at me because I think before the college

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:44.480
<v Speaker 3>baseball season started, Cam Flukey was potentially starting pitcher number one,

0:51:44.640 --> 0:51:47.319
<v Speaker 3>even ahead of a guy like Jackson Flora. He dealt

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:50.560
<v Speaker 3>with injuries, it wasn't his best season, but I still

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:52.680
<v Speaker 3>think that he has a ton of potential. And in

0:51:52.800 --> 0:51:56.040
<v Speaker 3>mock Draft two point zero he was going number twelve overall.

0:51:56.680 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 3>In mock Draft three point zero, he's all the way

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:01.840
<v Speaker 3>down to twenty nine and the Giants do have the

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 3>fourth pick and the twenty ninth is Jacob Lombard being

0:52:06.320 --> 0:52:09.440
<v Speaker 3>drafted at number four as a cost saving measure so

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:13.560
<v Speaker 3>they can go get Cam Fluky. Is it just that's

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 3>where Cam Flukey is going to land because he's sliding,

0:52:17.600 --> 0:52:18.399
<v Speaker 3>Like break that down.

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:20.839
<v Speaker 1>For me, it's a mix of both.

0:52:20.920 --> 0:52:23.000
<v Speaker 8>I feel like and with Lombard, I would say he's

0:52:23.000 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 8>closer to slot value at four than you know, being

0:52:26.440 --> 0:52:28.520
<v Speaker 8>an underslot guy. If he signs for under is probably

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 8>not gonna be a ton of savings. So and our process,

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:34.959
<v Speaker 8>you know, going through it was like, hey, Flukey's still

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:38.239
<v Speaker 8>available here, and the main reason is because you know,

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 8>obviously you mentioned the stretch fracture in the rib. You know,

0:52:41.280 --> 0:52:44.239
<v Speaker 8>saw him week one, he looked very solid and then

0:52:44.360 --> 0:52:46.759
<v Speaker 8>was out for eleven weeks because of the injury, and

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:48.839
<v Speaker 8>wasn't I don't want to say he wasn't crisp at

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 8>the end of the season, but it took him some

0:52:50.280 --> 0:52:52.600
<v Speaker 8>time to get back into form a little bit. And

0:52:53.800 --> 0:52:56.759
<v Speaker 8>you know, there's been some talk about like, you know,

0:52:57.600 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 8>is there anything plus in the profile thes like pitch wise,

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:03.879
<v Speaker 8>probably not. I would say fastball is probably closest, maybe

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 8>the curveball, but it's really polished and really really proven.

0:53:07.560 --> 0:53:09.440
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot of track record there. You know, he

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:12.400
<v Speaker 8>was going to be the first guy since I believe

0:53:12.480 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 8>either Louder or Burns to pitch two hundred and fifty

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 8>innings and be a first round pick. But that was

0:53:19.239 --> 0:53:22.440
<v Speaker 8>the biggest thing, was like just finding a suitor somewhere

0:53:22.480 --> 0:53:24.879
<v Speaker 8>in the teens or even twenties for him, because there's

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 8>a lot of helium guys kind of rising into the

0:53:27.080 --> 0:53:30.480
<v Speaker 8>teams right now, especially on the college pitching front, that

0:53:31.320 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 8>you depending on who you guys safe. You served Fluky

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 8>in some sense because of the fact that he just

0:53:35.800 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 8>wasn't pitching this year.

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 1>So in my opinion, at.

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:41.560
<v Speaker 8>The end of the day, he's going to be used

0:53:41.640 --> 0:53:45.439
<v Speaker 8>as like, say, in this scenario, Lombard doesn't sign for under,

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:48.239
<v Speaker 8>maybe you get Fluky at a discount of twenty nine

0:53:48.239 --> 0:53:50.800
<v Speaker 8>to kind of save you some some wiggle room, and

0:53:50.880 --> 0:53:52.800
<v Speaker 8>then if you're the Giants, kind of start aiming for

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 8>some higher priced guys later on to see, you know what,

0:53:56.120 --> 0:53:58.439
<v Speaker 8>can we kind of get out of this to pair

0:53:58.480 --> 0:54:01.759
<v Speaker 8>of these two together. So it's definitely a mix of both.

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 8>And I still feel like the Angels probably still knock

0:54:04.680 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 8>on his door try and wonder it's like, hey do

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 8>we what do we do here?

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Because it's still.

0:54:09.719 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 8>The angels like they still want to have a guy

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 8>that rises quickly through the system with in Polise, I

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 8>believe is the the scouting director is still there even

0:54:20.560 --> 0:54:23.879
<v Speaker 8>with Nastian being fired, So you know, I think that's

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:25.960
<v Speaker 8>an early spot for him. But it was just really

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 8>tough to find a suitor for him farther down with

0:54:28.719 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 8>all the rising guys in this class, and it just

0:54:31.640 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 8>felt like a match Bate and Haaven for the Giants

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:35.759
<v Speaker 8>to kind of go after this guy. And if you're

0:54:35.880 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 8>the Giants, you're happy in that scenario, right you don't

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:41.680
<v Speaker 8>have any upside really starting pitching wise in that system

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:42.080
<v Speaker 8>right now.

0:54:43.400 --> 0:54:45.399
<v Speaker 1>And to get a guy who, like you had.

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:47.560
<v Speaker 8>Mentioned the beginning of the year, preseason, number one arm

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:50.320
<v Speaker 8>in the country, I say you take out and Renova.

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 2>If you're Giants, I feel like every year we're going

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 2>to get the two way dream being sold to us

0:54:56.920 --> 0:55:00.640
<v Speaker 2>on somebody. That dream almost never starts, and if it does,

0:55:00.760 --> 0:55:04.759
<v Speaker 2>they put it on ice pretty quickly. But we're getting

0:55:04.760 --> 0:55:06.640
<v Speaker 2>the two way dream a little bit here with Jared

0:55:06.719 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 2>grindligger and super talented, obviously left handed pitcher and outfielder.

0:55:12.400 --> 0:55:14.759
<v Speaker 5>And you know, you look at there's a reason why.

0:55:14.760 --> 0:55:17.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, these are special athletes that people talk themselves

0:55:17.400 --> 0:55:18.920
<v Speaker 2>into with this and like I was just talking to

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 2>Bryce Eldridge before a game not too long ago, and yeah,

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:26.399
<v Speaker 2>I was just asking him like semi ton and tongue

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:29.239
<v Speaker 2>in cheek, like does the pitching aspect ever? You know,

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:30.959
<v Speaker 2>I help you in the box when you're thinking about

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:32.880
<v Speaker 2>just what you would throw yourself. He's like, that helped me,

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:34.640
<v Speaker 2>like it low way, but now it feels like so

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:38.200
<v Speaker 2>far away ago. I it doesn't even really feel like

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:40.360
<v Speaker 2>part of this, like part of my career. And I

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:42.279
<v Speaker 2>never pitched a high enough level to really be able

0:55:42.320 --> 0:55:44.239
<v Speaker 2>to to tap into that part of my brain. And

0:55:44.320 --> 0:55:45.719
<v Speaker 2>that was a guy that I thought had as good

0:55:45.760 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 2>of a chance as anybody because of the arsenal that

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:51.000
<v Speaker 2>he had on the mound as well, Like what are

0:55:51.040 --> 0:55:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the chances that Grindwigger can actually do this?

0:55:53.440 --> 0:55:56.680
<v Speaker 5>And is this gonna be baked into the eval?

0:55:57.080 --> 0:55:58.800
<v Speaker 2>What do you think most teams see him as I

0:55:58.840 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 2>think that's the fun part that's you usually split as

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:02.879
<v Speaker 2>like some teams will se him an outfielder, some teams

0:56:02.880 --> 0:56:04.080
<v Speaker 2>will seehm as a left tended pitcher.

0:56:05.200 --> 0:56:07.480
<v Speaker 5>I'm just curious what the assessment is there.

0:56:08.480 --> 0:56:12.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it was definitely considered and talking with Kylie mcdamuel

0:56:12.520 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 8>at the USA Complex in March. Here's the vibe that

0:56:17.120 --> 0:56:19.560
<v Speaker 8>I kind of get from him. Obviously, Grimlinger reclassed from

0:56:19.560 --> 0:56:22.440
<v Speaker 8>twenty seven to twenty six really late. He's going to

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:25.200
<v Speaker 8>be seventeen years and two months on Saturday when he

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:28.759
<v Speaker 8>gets drafted, and that gives you a lot of lead

0:56:28.840 --> 0:56:30.920
<v Speaker 8>time really with development pathways.

0:56:31.040 --> 0:56:31.200
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:56:31.719 --> 0:56:33.719
<v Speaker 8>The way that Kylie was explaining it to me was

0:56:33.840 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 8>the fact that, like, hey, there's a chance that you

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:40.080
<v Speaker 8>get stuck at the complex for two years and it

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:42.719
<v Speaker 8>kind of create your own path from there. Basically, like

0:56:44.200 --> 0:56:46.280
<v Speaker 8>depending on who you talk to, Like I've spoken to scouts,

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 8>you prefer the bat, some prefer the arm. So there's

0:56:48.600 --> 0:56:51.160
<v Speaker 8>not really definitive answer on like what he's going to

0:56:51.239 --> 0:56:52.880
<v Speaker 8>do right now. I think that really speaks to the

0:56:52.960 --> 0:56:54.839
<v Speaker 8>talent level on both sides of the ball for him,

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:58.320
<v Speaker 8>and the idea of putting him at the complex for

0:56:58.360 --> 0:57:00.759
<v Speaker 8>two years is like, hey, let's let's find out what

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:03.279
<v Speaker 8>we think you can be really good at, and if

0:57:03.320 --> 0:57:04.920
<v Speaker 8>you prove to us that you can be a legitimate

0:57:04.960 --> 0:57:07.120
<v Speaker 8>two way player, then we'll we'll develop you as such.

0:57:07.960 --> 0:57:09.839
<v Speaker 8>But if you happen to be better as one thing,

0:57:09.960 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 8>or the other. Then we're going to go that direction

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:15.680
<v Speaker 8>and go from there. So that's the that's kind of

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:19.720
<v Speaker 8>how we've gone through the process with grim Linger is uh,

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:23.800
<v Speaker 8>you know, we are gonna have him as a two

0:57:23.840 --> 0:57:26.760
<v Speaker 8>way prospect for now, but I think at the end

0:57:26.800 --> 0:57:28.680
<v Speaker 8>of the day, maybe he does just go to one.

0:57:28.800 --> 0:57:30.360
<v Speaker 8>But I think he's got the best chance of any

0:57:30.440 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 8>recent two way prospect at the amateur level to to

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 8>really be that two way guy. And you know, I've

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:40.680
<v Speaker 8>talked to it nauseam before, where like being a two

0:57:40.720 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 8>way is incredibly difficult. You mentioned Eldridge and having this

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 8>arsenal he had, and then he's a first round pick

0:57:46.200 --> 0:57:50.320
<v Speaker 8>as a bat and you know, show Hay is obviously

0:57:50.480 --> 0:57:52.520
<v Speaker 8>the cream of the crop. He's the guy that everybody

0:57:52.560 --> 0:57:55.560
<v Speaker 8>looks at when it comes to two way guys. But

0:57:55.760 --> 0:57:58.080
<v Speaker 8>being a legitimate two way at that kind of level,

0:57:58.160 --> 0:58:03.360
<v Speaker 8>like show A has, is just outlier stuff. It's generational stuff, really,

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:07.320
<v Speaker 8>and that really just puts into respect of how hard

0:58:07.320 --> 0:58:09.240
<v Speaker 8>it is to do that kind of thing. So we'll

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:11.200
<v Speaker 8>see what happens with Grimlinger, but I think at the

0:58:11.320 --> 0:58:14.440
<v Speaker 8>end of the day, like there is a legitimate chance

0:58:14.520 --> 0:58:16.800
<v Speaker 8>that he has the prowess to be a two way guy.

0:58:17.360 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 5>I remember Bubba Chandler.

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Also, they let him swing it a little bit like

0:58:21.040 --> 0:58:23.120
<v Speaker 2>at the Complex, and you know, you saw him leave

0:58:23.160 --> 0:58:24.040
<v Speaker 2>the yard a couple of times.

0:58:24.120 --> 0:58:26.360
<v Speaker 5>But it's like he's battling for his life in the box.

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:29.080
<v Speaker 2>So he's gonna have to work so hard to develop

0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:30.800
<v Speaker 2>as a hitter, and you're gonna take away from from

0:58:30.840 --> 0:58:32.760
<v Speaker 2>what can be you know, as a pitcher, which we've

0:58:32.760 --> 0:58:34.800
<v Speaker 2>seen so many flashes of what can be there.

0:58:34.880 --> 0:58:36.840
<v Speaker 5>So that was the biggest reason. I was curious too,

0:58:36.880 --> 0:58:38.880
<v Speaker 5>because you saw bub but at least.

0:58:38.720 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Get some runway at the complex, and it was like, hey,

0:58:41.160 --> 0:58:43.040
<v Speaker 2>you're not gonna get a ton, but show us something

0:58:43.120 --> 0:58:45.080
<v Speaker 2>quick and we'll see what can happen. But you have

0:58:45.200 --> 0:58:47.160
<v Speaker 2>him going to the Rockies. That makes a lot of

0:58:47.240 --> 0:58:49.280
<v Speaker 2>sense where they could have some more time there to

0:58:49.400 --> 0:58:50.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of see.

0:58:50.200 --> 0:58:50.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, what works.

0:58:52.680 --> 0:58:55.280
<v Speaker 3>And Jack Higlion, I feel like, is another good example

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:57.440
<v Speaker 3>of a two way guy. Came out of Florida and

0:58:57.480 --> 0:58:59.640
<v Speaker 3>he's throwing one hundred miles an hour. But you know

0:59:00.440 --> 0:59:02.760
<v Speaker 3>they drafted him, I guess technically is a two way player.

0:59:02.800 --> 0:59:04.480
<v Speaker 3>But then he started hitting bombs and now he's going

0:59:04.520 --> 0:59:06.200
<v Speaker 3>to be in the home run derby, which was just

0:59:06.320 --> 0:59:10.680
<v Speaker 3>announced today. Speaking about big lefties, there's another lefty at

0:59:10.680 --> 0:59:12.240
<v Speaker 3>the end of the first round you have going to

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 3>pick number thirty five, Brody Bamilla. I think that's how

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:21.280
<v Speaker 3>you pronounce his last name. Six foot nine, gigantic high

0:59:21.280 --> 0:59:24.120
<v Speaker 3>school pitcher who's been up to one hundred miles an

0:59:24.160 --> 0:59:27.280
<v Speaker 3>hour and he's been going viral online just because the

0:59:27.360 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 3>stuff pops off the screen. But people might be surprised

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:35.640
<v Speaker 3>to say he's not even going in the top thirty picks,

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:39.000
<v Speaker 3>even though there is all of this perceived potential. So

0:59:39.080 --> 0:59:41.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious if you could break down a guy that

0:59:41.440 --> 0:59:43.320
<v Speaker 3>has been getting a lot of buzz, at least in

0:59:43.440 --> 0:59:44.520
<v Speaker 3>social media circles.

0:59:45.760 --> 0:59:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the biggest thing for him.

0:59:47.400 --> 0:59:50.760
<v Speaker 8>And admittedly after we posted or like submitted this mod

0:59:51.040 --> 0:59:53.040
<v Speaker 8>it came out that he had a second UCL injury,

0:59:53.920 --> 0:59:57.320
<v Speaker 8>and being that young and having not only one but

0:59:57.440 --> 1:00:03.680
<v Speaker 8>two UCL syrageries at this juncture, it doesn't necessarily help

1:00:03.760 --> 1:00:05.880
<v Speaker 8>his case. You know, I understand like teams are not

1:00:06.760 --> 1:00:09.160
<v Speaker 8>as scared available injuries as they were back when, like

1:00:09.320 --> 1:00:12.800
<v Speaker 8>Mark Apell and trying to remember the guy who went

1:00:12.880 --> 1:00:14.880
<v Speaker 8>to the Astros at one and then signed with the

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:17.400
<v Speaker 8>Guardians the year after. I can't remember his name, but uh,

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:22.920
<v Speaker 8>oh Bratty Aikin, that's who it was. So like, obviously

1:00:23.000 --> 1:00:26.240
<v Speaker 8>that doesn't scare them as much, but the fact that

1:00:26.360 --> 1:00:29.520
<v Speaker 8>it's more than just one injury at this point, uh,

1:00:29.880 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 8>it kind of does speak volumes to how a how

1:00:33.280 --> 1:00:36.760
<v Speaker 8>volatile prep pitching is and pitching in general. But also

1:00:36.880 --> 1:00:41.400
<v Speaker 8>the same token, you know, injuries can be a death

1:00:41.400 --> 1:00:44.000
<v Speaker 8>sentence when it comes to stuff like this. Unfortunately, and

1:00:44.600 --> 1:00:45.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, as much as he hit one hundred, it

1:00:46.000 --> 1:00:50.000
<v Speaker 8>is eighty grade fastball. It's amazing, Like the power prowess

1:00:50.040 --> 1:00:54.880
<v Speaker 8>has always been there with that pitch. It never felt

1:00:55.000 --> 1:00:58.760
<v Speaker 8>like there was as much helium after the season ended

1:00:58.800 --> 1:01:00.360
<v Speaker 8>for him, and then it kind of came out as

1:01:00.520 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 8>the combine started coming along.

1:01:02.120 --> 1:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like, hey, he might be injured.

1:01:04.080 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 8>I remember getting a text from Brian Recca, who's done

1:01:06.240 --> 1:01:08.720
<v Speaker 8>a phenomenal job in the Northeast, where he's like, hey,

1:01:08.760 --> 1:01:10.000
<v Speaker 8>there's a potential injury here.

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Just heads up.

1:01:11.280 --> 1:01:13.560
<v Speaker 8>And then it comes out, you know, two days ago

1:01:13.720 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 8>that like, hey, he's now got an injury. Hasn't thrown

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 8>the ball since the season ended, so it's a it's

1:01:20.840 --> 1:01:23.680
<v Speaker 8>a tough blow, and I think when we kind of

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:26.480
<v Speaker 8>update this monk on Saturday morning for four point zero

1:01:26.480 --> 1:01:29.439
<v Speaker 8>in the final edition of this there's a non zero

1:01:29.560 --> 1:01:31.200
<v Speaker 8>chance that he might not even be on the mock,

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:34.800
<v Speaker 8>mainly because of that injury scare, which sucks because he's

1:01:34.840 --> 1:01:38.400
<v Speaker 8>a very talented kid. You know, he was dropping forty

1:01:38.440 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 8>points to twenty rebounds on the on the hardwood before

1:01:40.640 --> 1:01:42.400
<v Speaker 8>he went out and started throwing a hundred on the mountain.

1:01:42.480 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 8>So he's a very talented athlete for a kid his size,

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:47.880
<v Speaker 8>and wish him nothing but the best, but yeah, it's

1:01:48.000 --> 1:01:51.680
<v Speaker 8>it's definitely a h an injury nightmare unfortunately with him,

1:01:51.720 --> 1:01:56.160
<v Speaker 8>and just hope it all comes comes to fruition and

1:01:56.280 --> 1:01:58.440
<v Speaker 8>hopefully everything will be back to normals he comes back

1:01:58.440 --> 1:02:01.960
<v Speaker 8>from injury, but it's a it's a tough situation with him.

1:02:03.040 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 2>So Justin Lebron is probably one of the most if

1:02:05.600 --> 1:02:07.680
<v Speaker 2>not the most polarizing players in the draft, and I

1:02:07.760 --> 1:02:09.320
<v Speaker 2>want to start with him, but then I also want

1:02:09.360 --> 1:02:12.640
<v Speaker 2>to tee you up for like, in this mock, who's

1:02:12.720 --> 1:02:15.400
<v Speaker 2>the player that could potentially you know, and maybe this

1:02:15.600 --> 1:02:18.160
<v Speaker 2>is the answer that could go as high as a

1:02:18.280 --> 1:02:20.000
<v Speaker 2>certain point and as low as a certain point, like

1:02:20.040 --> 1:02:22.800
<v Speaker 2>who has the largest delta between the ceiling and the

1:02:22.840 --> 1:02:25.560
<v Speaker 2>floor of where they could be drafted. You have Lebron

1:02:25.680 --> 1:02:27.960
<v Speaker 2>going at seventeen, which I'd imagine is somewhere in the

1:02:28.040 --> 1:02:32.640
<v Speaker 2>middle of that. For him, the shortstop from Alabama has

1:02:32.680 --> 1:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>all the defensive tools to be spectacular there, but sometimes

1:02:35.080 --> 1:02:37.680
<v Speaker 2>struggles with the routine. Has the offensive ability to be

1:02:38.280 --> 1:02:42.120
<v Speaker 2>an impactful hitter, but you struggled in conference playing, struggles

1:02:42.160 --> 1:02:44.120
<v Speaker 2>with some swing and miss at points. So it's that

1:02:44.440 --> 1:02:48.920
<v Speaker 2>tools and excitement, but you know some concerns as well

1:02:49.000 --> 1:02:54.720
<v Speaker 2>to go with. That creates the classic volatile, polarizing player. Obviously,

1:02:54.760 --> 1:02:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the Astros never deterred by risk when it comes to

1:02:57.960 --> 1:03:00.880
<v Speaker 2>the draft, but they're also rarely picking even this high

1:03:01.160 --> 1:03:04.480
<v Speaker 2>at seventeen. I'll start with Lebron and you know, what

1:03:04.600 --> 1:03:07.440
<v Speaker 2>do you think his ceiling and floor is? Why do

1:03:07.520 --> 1:03:09.919
<v Speaker 2>you think you know the Astros are a good landing spot.

1:03:09.960 --> 1:03:12.720
<v Speaker 2>And then if he is not the most volatile of

1:03:13.160 --> 1:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>first round picks here in this mock draft, who's the

1:03:15.920 --> 1:03:17.720
<v Speaker 2>guy that you think could go as high as X

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:19.160
<v Speaker 2>pick and as well as why pick?

1:03:20.680 --> 1:03:22.600
<v Speaker 8>I definitely think it's going to be Lebron on both

1:03:22.720 --> 1:03:25.080
<v Speaker 8>questions there, or at least when it comes to like

1:03:25.480 --> 1:03:27.320
<v Speaker 8>he can go this high, but then his floor is

1:03:27.400 --> 1:03:30.480
<v Speaker 8>all the way down here in the biggest reason, like

1:03:30.560 --> 1:03:32.360
<v Speaker 8>you mentioned, the swing and miss has been a concern,

1:03:32.640 --> 1:03:35.520
<v Speaker 8>Like every single year, we've kind of looked at Lebron.

1:03:35.560 --> 1:03:37.360
<v Speaker 8>We're like, early in the season, like, hey, this looks

1:03:37.400 --> 1:03:39.800
<v Speaker 8>like a legitimate top five pick. We did it last

1:03:39.880 --> 1:03:41.720
<v Speaker 8>year and had him as the early one to one

1:03:41.760 --> 1:03:44.200
<v Speaker 8>a year and a half out, and then he kind

1:03:44.200 --> 1:03:46.480
<v Speaker 8>of fell off, and here comes Rock with an amazing season,

1:03:47.040 --> 1:03:50.560
<v Speaker 8>and now he did the same thing. And I think

1:03:50.640 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 8>even the defense has kind of fallen back just that

1:03:52.600 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 8>little bit. You know, me and Aaron were talking about

1:03:55.320 --> 1:03:57.480
<v Speaker 8>this the other week, where I still think he's very

1:03:57.600 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 8>much capable of playing shortstop. I think we on a

1:04:00.280 --> 1:04:04.680
<v Speaker 8>public scale underrate the development of defense at the pro

1:04:04.880 --> 1:04:08.320
<v Speaker 8>level because when we like, for example, Cole Emerson wasn't

1:04:08.360 --> 1:04:10.600
<v Speaker 8>necessarily a lockdown shortstop when he was drafted by the

1:04:10.680 --> 1:04:13.480
<v Speaker 8>Mariners in twenty three, he was kind of this guy

1:04:13.680 --> 1:04:15.800
<v Speaker 8>is like he has the tools to stick here, we're

1:04:15.880 --> 1:04:18.880
<v Speaker 8>not sold on it yet. And now he's a legitimate shortstop.

1:04:19.120 --> 1:04:21.560
<v Speaker 8>So I think there's a way you can clean up

1:04:21.560 --> 1:04:23.800
<v Speaker 8>the defense a little bit. He's got the athleticism and

1:04:23.960 --> 1:04:26.400
<v Speaker 8>the range in order to make it work. He was

1:04:26.480 --> 1:04:30.560
<v Speaker 8>just really playing backfooted and really just wasn't didn't look

1:04:30.600 --> 1:04:32.520
<v Speaker 8>as confident this year as he has in the past,

1:04:32.520 --> 1:04:34.600
<v Speaker 8>So I think that's going to be something to work on.

1:04:34.800 --> 1:04:39.000
<v Speaker 8>But swing and miss has never been good. Admittedly, like

1:04:39.360 --> 1:04:41.800
<v Speaker 8>he hammers fastballs. I'll give him credit where credits due.

1:04:41.920 --> 1:04:44.080
<v Speaker 8>Being able to delete fastballs on the top rail like

1:04:44.160 --> 1:04:46.600
<v Speaker 8>he has has been fantastic and you don't find that

1:04:46.720 --> 1:04:50.840
<v Speaker 8>often in an amateur prospect. But it just feels like

1:04:50.960 --> 1:04:53.160
<v Speaker 8>he's guessing it's spin a little bit, like it's a

1:04:53.240 --> 1:04:55.680
<v Speaker 8>mix of he doesn't recognize spin out of the hand

1:04:55.840 --> 1:04:58.240
<v Speaker 8>and also his batpath just has it going right over

1:04:58.360 --> 1:05:02.520
<v Speaker 8>these breaking balls and away. So I think at the

1:05:03.160 --> 1:05:04.640
<v Speaker 8>end of the day, he has the tools to be

1:05:04.680 --> 1:05:06.360
<v Speaker 8>a top ten pick in this class and even top

1:05:06.440 --> 1:05:10.640
<v Speaker 8>five if everything kind of materialized. But you know, you

1:05:10.720 --> 1:05:12.600
<v Speaker 8>look at the astros and go like, hey, they took

1:05:12.640 --> 1:05:14.680
<v Speaker 8>Bryce Matthews a couple years ago kind of the same.

1:05:15.400 --> 1:05:17.400
<v Speaker 8>I don't want to say the same exact mode of player,

1:05:17.480 --> 1:05:19.880
<v Speaker 8>but like the tools are pretty similar. You know, has

1:05:19.920 --> 1:05:22.720
<v Speaker 8>the questions with the hit tool. It's pretty big, right

1:05:22.760 --> 1:05:25.600
<v Speaker 8>handed power that can play short stop and has great athleticism.

1:05:25.840 --> 1:05:28.200
<v Speaker 8>So that's why it kind of made sense for us

1:05:28.240 --> 1:05:29.800
<v Speaker 8>to put him at Houston at seventeen.

1:05:30.280 --> 1:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Could he go lower than this?

1:05:31.840 --> 1:05:35.280
<v Speaker 8>I think he can kind of into the twenties, but

1:05:35.440 --> 1:05:37.840
<v Speaker 8>at the higher end of his spectrum, he could be

1:05:38.160 --> 1:05:41.760
<v Speaker 8>back into the top ten pick. So he's one of

1:05:41.800 --> 1:05:45.240
<v Speaker 8>the more confusing ones. Really in our conversations, was like,

1:05:45.920 --> 1:05:48.440
<v Speaker 8>where do we really pick them? But the fit just

1:05:48.520 --> 1:05:49.800
<v Speaker 8>felt perfect with Houston.

1:05:50.560 --> 1:05:53.280
<v Speaker 3>So I have two more questions. I want to ask

1:05:53.560 --> 1:05:58.040
<v Speaker 3>where kind of Jackson Flora were his ranges compared to

1:05:58.240 --> 1:06:02.160
<v Speaker 3>others starting pitching number one in previous draft classes. And

1:06:02.320 --> 1:06:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I have a theory to run by you about who

1:06:05.040 --> 1:06:07.400
<v Speaker 3>I think will end up going number one overall. But

1:06:07.520 --> 1:06:09.840
<v Speaker 3>let's real quick here from our friends at Hampton Farms,

1:06:09.920 --> 1:06:13.200
<v Speaker 3>all right, So I got two questions. One of them

1:06:13.280 --> 1:06:17.960
<v Speaker 3>again going back to the starting pitching conversation, Jackson Flora

1:06:18.360 --> 1:06:20.680
<v Speaker 3>is going at number five in the mock draft and

1:06:21.400 --> 1:06:24.280
<v Speaker 3>watching him at UCSB this year blowing one hundred miles

1:06:24.280 --> 1:06:28.040
<v Speaker 3>an hour feel for a breaking ball, the nasty kick change,

1:06:28.640 --> 1:06:32.920
<v Speaker 3>definitely a fantastic pitcher and a fantastic prospect. But I'm

1:06:33.000 --> 1:06:35.960
<v Speaker 3>curious if you can compare him to the top starting

1:06:36.000 --> 1:06:39.400
<v Speaker 3>pitchers in previous drafts, because in last year's draft, Kate

1:06:39.480 --> 1:06:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Anderson when number three overall and arm correct my if

1:06:42.960 --> 1:06:45.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm wrong, he hasn't allowed to hit all minor league season.

1:06:45.440 --> 1:06:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I think take the numbers like right, and then I

1:06:49.120 --> 1:06:51.480
<v Speaker 3>think the draft before right, it was Chase Burns, who

1:06:51.680 --> 1:06:53.600
<v Speaker 3>is already up with the majors competing for a cy

1:06:53.760 --> 1:06:56.560
<v Speaker 3>young Just comparing to those two and maybe drafts of

1:06:56.600 --> 1:07:00.080
<v Speaker 3>the past, where does Jackson Flora fall into.

1:07:01.320 --> 1:07:03.360
<v Speaker 8>Kind of towards the lower end of like the top

1:07:03.600 --> 1:07:05.080
<v Speaker 8>arms taken in previous drafts?

1:07:05.080 --> 1:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Admittedly like and it's not to say like Flora is

1:07:09.360 --> 1:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>bad or anything.

1:07:10.160 --> 1:07:12.720
<v Speaker 8>I just think when you look at the strings sudden

1:07:12.760 --> 1:07:16.360
<v Speaker 8>weaknesses of this class, weaknesses have been pitching, especially on

1:07:16.440 --> 1:07:19.920
<v Speaker 8>the college front, and with Flora there's some stuff to

1:07:20.000 --> 1:07:22.440
<v Speaker 8>really work on still, Like, yes, he throws a hundred,

1:07:22.560 --> 1:07:25.960
<v Speaker 8>but the fastball shape is not necessarily the greatest. He's

1:07:26.000 --> 1:07:28.080
<v Speaker 8>going to lose some vertical carry as he gets to

1:07:28.200 --> 1:07:31.840
<v Speaker 8>pro ball with the different baseballs, and he only I

1:07:31.880 --> 1:07:34.080
<v Speaker 8>think he averaged closer like seventeen or eighteen, So it

1:07:34.080 --> 1:07:38.120
<v Speaker 8>will probably level out like fifteen to sixteen IVV and

1:07:39.440 --> 1:07:41.480
<v Speaker 8>you know as much as one hundred as one hundred,

1:07:41.640 --> 1:07:43.400
<v Speaker 8>like once he loses vee a little bit, it might

1:07:43.800 --> 1:07:46.000
<v Speaker 8>hamper the effectiveness of the fastball. So we'll see what

1:07:46.040 --> 1:07:49.080
<v Speaker 8>happens there. But feel has been fantastic. He has two

1:07:49.120 --> 1:07:52.240
<v Speaker 8>incredible breaking balls and then also that kick change, which

1:07:52.880 --> 1:07:55.439
<v Speaker 8>you know, we'll we'll talk about this more in depth

1:07:55.480 --> 1:07:58.320
<v Speaker 8>probably on the live stream on Saturday. But he didn't

1:07:58.320 --> 1:08:01.120
<v Speaker 8>have a change up last year. He didn't he when

1:08:01.160 --> 1:08:04.280
<v Speaker 8>he threw like a variation of like a circle change

1:08:04.760 --> 1:08:07.600
<v Speaker 8>zero whiffs on the year. Uh, he probably threw like

1:08:07.880 --> 1:08:10.520
<v Speaker 8>ten of them. And this year it it comes in

1:08:10.640 --> 1:08:13.680
<v Speaker 8>to be his most successful swing and mispitch most successful

1:08:13.760 --> 1:08:15.880
<v Speaker 8>chase pitch, if I remember correctly, at like a forty

1:08:16.720 --> 1:08:18.560
<v Speaker 8>rate and like a fifty per chase rate. It was

1:08:18.640 --> 1:08:21.479
<v Speaker 8>ridiculous how good that pitch was this year. And I

1:08:21.520 --> 1:08:25.040
<v Speaker 8>think that really saves him from you know, falling down

1:08:25.080 --> 1:08:26.600
<v Speaker 8>the board a bit further than what he was. I

1:08:26.640 --> 1:08:29.800
<v Speaker 8>think his range starts around I would say two to three.

1:08:30.320 --> 1:08:33.320
<v Speaker 8>I don't necessarily know if his name's you know, been

1:08:35.280 --> 1:08:38.240
<v Speaker 8>pushed in with the White Sox, but he's been rumored

1:08:38.280 --> 1:08:40.120
<v Speaker 8>around like the Rays of Twins of like if they

1:08:40.200 --> 1:08:43.160
<v Speaker 8>want to be if they target and really fancy a

1:08:43.240 --> 1:08:45.479
<v Speaker 8>starting pitcher, they would they would be the places for him.

1:08:45.920 --> 1:08:49.080
<v Speaker 8>But I think for there's legitimacy with the fact that,

1:08:49.200 --> 1:08:51.040
<v Speaker 8>again they don't have a ton of starting pitching death

1:08:51.080 --> 1:08:51.920
<v Speaker 8>in that farm system.

1:08:51.920 --> 1:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>For the Giants, Pittsburgh is Pittsburgh.

1:08:54.720 --> 1:08:58.360
<v Speaker 8>They just know their their their strengths with development and

1:08:58.439 --> 1:09:00.000
<v Speaker 8>pitching has been that the past couple of years.

1:09:01.280 --> 1:09:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Royals also love him as well.

1:09:02.560 --> 1:09:04.559
<v Speaker 8>So I think you'll go anywhere from like two to three,

1:09:04.720 --> 1:09:08.400
<v Speaker 8>maybe down to like seven is probably his floor, but

1:09:08.479 --> 1:09:10.160
<v Speaker 8>I really find a hard time to see him even

1:09:10.200 --> 1:09:10.840
<v Speaker 8>go past six.

1:09:11.760 --> 1:09:13.639
<v Speaker 3>Arm you got another question and you're ready form a theory.

1:09:13.840 --> 1:09:14.960
<v Speaker 5>Now I'm ready for your theory.

1:09:15.360 --> 1:09:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So first of all, I want to preface it

1:09:18.320 --> 1:09:21.519
<v Speaker 3>with this, I'm a better and as a better I'm

1:09:21.560 --> 1:09:26.240
<v Speaker 3>looking for value. So I'm throwing both of you my theory,

1:09:26.680 --> 1:09:29.360
<v Speaker 3>and I understand it's not going to be perfect. I

1:09:29.520 --> 1:09:35.320
<v Speaker 3>expect hopefully constructive criticism, but I'm coming from the position

1:09:35.640 --> 1:09:38.960
<v Speaker 3>of this bet on BETMGM is plus five hundred, so

1:09:39.160 --> 1:09:42.240
<v Speaker 3>I think it is a more likely scenario than the

1:09:42.360 --> 1:09:47.080
<v Speaker 3>implied probability of sixteen point six seven percent. That's where

1:09:47.120 --> 1:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm coming from, where I see value at this pick,

1:09:50.920 --> 1:09:55.559
<v Speaker 3>and it gets into my theory of I think Chris

1:09:55.880 --> 1:10:00.600
<v Speaker 3>gets is also going to be looking for value the

1:10:00.680 --> 1:10:03.160
<v Speaker 3>GM of the White Sox in this draft. And you

1:10:03.280 --> 1:10:07.280
<v Speaker 3>said at the beginning that the rumor that von Lackey

1:10:07.400 --> 1:10:09.479
<v Speaker 3>was going to take eight and a half million dollars

1:10:10.600 --> 1:10:14.000
<v Speaker 3>is not maybe necessarily true. But can we agree that

1:10:14.160 --> 1:10:17.880
<v Speaker 3>he likely takes less money than it would to pay

1:10:18.080 --> 1:10:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Rock Chulaski or Grady Emerson, who, funny enough, are represented

1:10:23.160 --> 1:10:25.600
<v Speaker 3>by the same agency, so there's not really going to

1:10:25.680 --> 1:10:29.599
<v Speaker 3>be haggling in between agents. That agency likely has already

1:10:29.680 --> 1:10:33.400
<v Speaker 3>set their prices on Rock and Emerson. So can we

1:10:33.479 --> 1:10:36.400
<v Speaker 3>at least agree that by drafting von Lackey it would

1:10:36.400 --> 1:10:40.680
<v Speaker 3>be saving them money? Yes, yes, okay, good, So that's

1:10:40.880 --> 1:10:45.320
<v Speaker 3>point number one. I also think that the White Sox

1:10:45.760 --> 1:10:52.000
<v Speaker 3>are are drafting from a position of win now more

1:10:52.080 --> 1:10:54.800
<v Speaker 3>than maybe some other teams in previous drafts who have

1:10:54.880 --> 1:10:59.960
<v Speaker 3>gotten the number one overall pick, So drafting Grady Emerson

1:11:00.320 --> 1:11:04.799
<v Speaker 3>he could be the model's favorite player, but an eighteen

1:11:04.880 --> 1:11:07.280
<v Speaker 3>year old. The year after, they just drafted a high

1:11:07.280 --> 1:11:10.160
<v Speaker 3>school shortstop at number ten, And then it kind of

1:11:10.240 --> 1:11:13.519
<v Speaker 3>bleeds into my next point, just about drafting shortstops in general.

1:11:14.080 --> 1:11:16.160
<v Speaker 3>The White Sex are in an interesting position because a

1:11:16.240 --> 1:11:20.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of their key pieces are shortstops. In third basement,

1:11:20.880 --> 1:11:23.320
<v Speaker 3>you got Colson Montgomery at twenty four years old, with

1:11:23.479 --> 1:11:26.040
<v Speaker 3>plenty of years of arbitration, on pace to be the

1:11:26.120 --> 1:11:28.840
<v Speaker 3>first left handed shortstop to ever hit forty home runs

1:11:29.240 --> 1:11:32.120
<v Speaker 3>very very cheap. At third base, got Miguel Vargas, who

1:11:32.160 --> 1:11:35.000
<v Speaker 3>is just named an All Star. And at first base,

1:11:35.080 --> 1:11:36.800
<v Speaker 3>even if you were to move Vargas over there, you

1:11:36.880 --> 1:11:39.280
<v Speaker 3>got moon to Takomarakami, who they still have for another

1:11:39.320 --> 1:11:41.200
<v Speaker 3>year and a half. But then, on top of it,

1:11:41.520 --> 1:11:44.640
<v Speaker 3>their number one prospect is Caleb Bonamer, who I know

1:11:44.840 --> 1:11:50.519
<v Speaker 3>arm is brought up in multiple Knowlmilb reports on this

1:11:50.680 --> 1:11:54.400
<v Speaker 3>show as a guy who just continues to pillage baseballs.

1:11:54.479 --> 1:11:57.160
<v Speaker 3>And that's not even mentioning again, Billy Carlson, who they

1:11:57.240 --> 1:12:00.759
<v Speaker 3>drafted number ten overall last season. I see a White

1:12:00.840 --> 1:12:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Stocks team that shortstop or even third base is the

1:12:07.200 --> 1:12:11.240
<v Speaker 3>least of their needs throughout their entire organization. And then

1:12:11.280 --> 1:12:14.800
<v Speaker 3>I look at the catching position within their organization and

1:12:14.960 --> 1:12:19.719
<v Speaker 3>I see among their top thirty prospects, their best catching

1:12:19.840 --> 1:12:23.560
<v Speaker 3>prospect is not even above rookie ball. And then you

1:12:23.640 --> 1:12:27.000
<v Speaker 3>look at the catchers in house. Edgar Carrow has clearly

1:12:27.520 --> 1:12:30.479
<v Speaker 3>not gotten off to a good start at all. And

1:12:30.520 --> 1:12:32.960
<v Speaker 3>then you have Kyle Teal, who I still believe in.

1:12:33.200 --> 1:12:35.320
<v Speaker 3>I like Kyle Teal, armkes Kyle Teal. I think you

1:12:35.400 --> 1:12:37.800
<v Speaker 3>like Kyle Teal. We all like Kyle Teal, But just

1:12:37.880 --> 1:12:40.600
<v Speaker 3>looking at it right now, since he debuted, he has

1:12:40.640 --> 1:12:42.920
<v Speaker 3>not been a very good defensive catcher, and at least

1:12:42.960 --> 1:12:46.000
<v Speaker 3>now through this season he's struggling offensively. I still like him.

1:12:46.040 --> 1:12:48.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm not holding him against him, just kind of bringing

1:12:48.320 --> 1:12:50.800
<v Speaker 3>up that Kyle Teal is not the perfect catcher, like

1:12:50.920 --> 1:12:53.840
<v Speaker 3>let's say Colson Montgomery is at short or Miguel Vargas

1:12:53.920 --> 1:12:55.639
<v Speaker 3>is at third, Like if you were to pick between those,

1:12:56.960 --> 1:13:02.400
<v Speaker 3>there's two clearly playing better than the other. So Von

1:13:02.560 --> 1:13:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Lackey at plus five hundred, when you add up all

1:13:06.720 --> 1:13:09.280
<v Speaker 3>of these different things, where the White Sox are also

1:13:09.400 --> 1:13:12.120
<v Speaker 3>picking at pick forty one, do they go with a

1:13:12.320 --> 1:13:16.960
<v Speaker 3>catcher who, in my opinion, is rightfully. In that group

1:13:17.040 --> 1:13:19.720
<v Speaker 3>of three, I think Rock Scholaski and Grady Emerson are

1:13:19.880 --> 1:13:23.479
<v Speaker 3>probably better prospects, but I think Von Lackey is right there.

1:13:23.600 --> 1:13:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Because I'm no scout, I'm not pretending to be a

1:13:25.960 --> 1:13:29.680
<v Speaker 3>scout either, But when I watched Lackie and Rock this year,

1:13:30.160 --> 1:13:32.720
<v Speaker 3>I came away thinking Lacky is the better player. It's

1:13:32.760 --> 1:13:35.960
<v Speaker 3>one season. It was just this past year. Rock also

1:13:36.080 --> 1:13:39.040
<v Speaker 3>has a longer track record, and I don't watch high

1:13:39.040 --> 1:13:41.120
<v Speaker 3>school games. I'm not going to pretend to say that

1:13:41.200 --> 1:13:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I do. I've seen Grady Emerson highlights, looks awesome, but

1:13:44.479 --> 1:13:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I haven't seen him in person. I haven't seen him

1:13:46.920 --> 1:13:49.439
<v Speaker 3>throughout an entire game on TV like I've seen Rock

1:13:49.479 --> 1:13:52.160
<v Speaker 3>and Von Lackey. So that's when I go back to

1:13:52.280 --> 1:13:54.400
<v Speaker 3>the Von Lackey point. You got a catcher who at

1:13:54.439 --> 1:13:56.719
<v Speaker 3>four hundred with a thirteen hundred OHPS, who I believe

1:13:56.800 --> 1:13:59.760
<v Speaker 3>is going to be a better defender than Kyle t

1:14:00.600 --> 1:14:04.000
<v Speaker 3>and might make the Bigs a little bit quicker, who

1:14:04.080 --> 1:14:06.519
<v Speaker 3>knows maybe the same as Rock to again help the

1:14:06.600 --> 1:14:11.960
<v Speaker 3>White Sox win. So you factor in position cost and

1:14:12.160 --> 1:14:14.599
<v Speaker 3>the fact that Von Lackey is a damn good player.

1:14:15.680 --> 1:14:18.880
<v Speaker 3>I think at plus five hundred, the likelihood he gets

1:14:18.920 --> 1:14:22.280
<v Speaker 3>taken first overall is higher than sixteen point six seven percent.

1:14:22.880 --> 1:14:28.000
<v Speaker 8>Thoughts, I don't hate that, I really don't, and kind

1:14:28.000 --> 1:14:29.519
<v Speaker 8>of the three of your point because you mentioned the

1:14:29.600 --> 1:14:31.680
<v Speaker 8>idea of like, okay, he signs for under slot and

1:14:32.080 --> 1:14:34.519
<v Speaker 8>the White Soince historically the past couple of years have

1:14:35.200 --> 1:14:37.960
<v Speaker 8>targeted a high school guy at their second overall pick

1:14:39.360 --> 1:14:41.320
<v Speaker 8>or like their second round pick, rather where like they

1:14:41.400 --> 1:14:44.639
<v Speaker 8>took Caleb Bonamber two years ago, they took Jayden Fowski

1:14:44.800 --> 1:14:47.320
<v Speaker 8>last year, and Fauski looks like, you know, one of

1:14:47.360 --> 1:14:50.120
<v Speaker 8>the better I would say trade chips in that White

1:14:50.120 --> 1:14:54.320
<v Speaker 8>Sox system as well. So it totally makes sense in

1:14:54.479 --> 1:14:56.600
<v Speaker 8>terms of like looking at that and also considering the

1:14:57.160 --> 1:14:59.840
<v Speaker 8>the pipeline of talent in that farm system and looking

1:14:59.880 --> 1:15:01.720
<v Speaker 8>at the major league roster where like, yeah, this is

1:15:01.800 --> 1:15:04.720
<v Speaker 8>a team that's you know, they're picking one one, but

1:15:04.800 --> 1:15:08.560
<v Speaker 8>they're they're good, you know, they're they're they're on the

1:15:08.640 --> 1:15:11.360
<v Speaker 8>verge of I can't remember where they are in the standings.

1:15:11.400 --> 1:15:13.200
<v Speaker 8>I think they're they are in the wildcard spot, or

1:15:13.200 --> 1:15:15.439
<v Speaker 8>they're very close to one, or they're.

1:15:15.320 --> 1:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Leading the division.

1:15:16.240 --> 1:15:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, leading the division.

1:15:18.000 --> 1:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh, okay, Wow, I've paid attention to they will be

1:15:20.320 --> 1:15:20.599
<v Speaker 1>this year.

1:15:20.640 --> 1:15:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Apparently we'll give you're writing up a draft board of

1:15:25.080 --> 1:15:27.680
<v Speaker 3>three hundred names. I think we know where you're attached at.

1:15:27.880 --> 1:15:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Is that right now? Which is totally fine?

1:15:30.080 --> 1:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>That that is fair.

1:15:31.040 --> 1:15:33.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but like you know, I think that's a that's

1:15:33.200 --> 1:15:34.920
<v Speaker 8>a great way of looking at it. And and also

1:15:35.120 --> 1:15:39.040
<v Speaker 8>like I would say, like counterpoints like, yeah, Murricami's only

1:15:39.080 --> 1:15:40.840
<v Speaker 8>got a year and a half left, see what happens

1:15:40.840 --> 1:15:43.200
<v Speaker 8>from there. Maybe move Vargus over the first base when

1:15:43.400 --> 1:15:46.360
<v Speaker 8>like if they pick Rock, move Rock to shore stop

1:15:46.439 --> 1:15:50.800
<v Speaker 8>close in the third, and then when goes across I guess,

1:15:51.080 --> 1:15:56.280
<v Speaker 8>and then Bonemer Bonemer really depends on what happens there

1:15:56.360 --> 1:15:58.920
<v Speaker 8>is I guess it's a log jam. It is probably

1:15:58.920 --> 1:16:00.960
<v Speaker 8>the best way to describe it. And like, I don't

1:16:00.960 --> 1:16:02.800
<v Speaker 8>want to say it's a bad thing necessarily to have.

1:16:04.120 --> 1:16:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Having a lot of great players is a great thing

1:16:06.000 --> 1:16:08.439
<v Speaker 3>to have. I'm just saying for a position of need,

1:16:08.600 --> 1:16:11.439
<v Speaker 3>if they don't see the gap between Lackeye and Rock

1:16:11.479 --> 1:16:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Schlowski and Grady Emerson is that large and they can

1:16:14.120 --> 1:16:18.560
<v Speaker 3>save money on Lackey, That's where I think potentially we

1:16:18.680 --> 1:16:21.439
<v Speaker 3>could see him go number one overall, because again, this

1:16:21.560 --> 1:16:24.880
<v Speaker 3>is not a cost saving pick. It just so happens

1:16:24.920 --> 1:16:27.679
<v Speaker 3>to be a cost saving pick, and von Lackey is awesome.

1:16:28.000 --> 1:16:29.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious your thoughts on my theory.

1:16:29.840 --> 1:16:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I think a lot of times with the

1:16:33.160 --> 1:16:35.680
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to like log jam or perceived log jam,

1:16:36.240 --> 1:16:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the team's care as much as like

1:16:38.720 --> 1:16:41.320
<v Speaker 2>we do when we roster resource, like try to map

1:16:41.400 --> 1:16:45.360
<v Speaker 2>it out. That said, like, I'm sure there's a wrinkle

1:16:45.479 --> 1:16:49.519
<v Speaker 2>to it, but like Bonhamer, guy's gotta hit big league pitching,

1:16:49.560 --> 1:16:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Like all these guys have to hit big league pitching,

1:16:51.000 --> 1:16:52.760
<v Speaker 2>So you might as well have as many you know,

1:16:52.960 --> 1:16:55.760
<v Speaker 2>infielders as you possibly can and try to see who

1:16:55.800 --> 1:16:56.519
<v Speaker 2>can actually do it.

1:16:56.920 --> 1:16:58.560
<v Speaker 5>The biggest thing to me is, and I think this

1:16:58.680 --> 1:16:59.640
<v Speaker 5>is what it all comes down to.

1:17:00.080 --> 1:17:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Is like if it is really like splitting hairs in

1:17:02.920 --> 1:17:05.640
<v Speaker 2>the eyes of the White Sox between Lackey and Jelawski,

1:17:05.720 --> 1:17:08.120
<v Speaker 2>then it makes a lot of sense because I think

1:17:08.160 --> 1:17:09.640
<v Speaker 2>it won and I think Henry Davis is.

1:17:09.680 --> 1:17:10.760
<v Speaker 5>Kind of a cautionary tale.

1:17:10.960 --> 1:17:13.920
<v Speaker 2>You can't save money at one unless there's a really

1:17:14.000 --> 1:17:17.040
<v Speaker 2>specific reason why you're doing it. In terms of like

1:17:17.439 --> 1:17:19.360
<v Speaker 2>you don't see that much difference with the players, because

1:17:19.360 --> 1:17:21.439
<v Speaker 2>for me, it's like, how often do you get to

1:17:21.439 --> 1:17:24.960
<v Speaker 2>pick number one? Yeah, you can't get it wrong. You

1:17:25.320 --> 1:17:27.360
<v Speaker 2>have to get number one right. Like that's how you

1:17:27.479 --> 1:17:31.040
<v Speaker 2>lose jobs, is getting number one wrong. And so for me,

1:17:31.200 --> 1:17:34.280
<v Speaker 2>it's just the question then comes down to what are

1:17:34.320 --> 1:17:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the odds that Lackey and Jelaski are viewed in pretty

1:17:39.040 --> 1:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>much the same light? Tyler, you think but between these

1:17:42.080 --> 1:17:44.120
<v Speaker 2>two in the eyes of the White Sox, because I

1:17:44.120 --> 1:17:46.080
<v Speaker 2>think that's the only way that that that is possible,

1:17:46.240 --> 1:17:47.920
<v Speaker 2>and I think that is possible, But I just I

1:17:47.960 --> 1:17:50.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know how possible it is that they see these

1:17:50.040 --> 1:17:51.120
<v Speaker 2>two players in the same light.

1:17:52.200 --> 1:17:54.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Like I mentioned earlier, with that eight point five

1:17:54.320 --> 1:17:58.560
<v Speaker 8>million dollar rumor that Lackey had at the combine, I

1:17:58.920 --> 1:18:01.360
<v Speaker 8>am still very sure Name is involved in some way,

1:18:01.360 --> 1:18:03.040
<v Speaker 8>shape or for him in that war room and will

1:18:03.120 --> 1:18:06.479
<v Speaker 8>for the remainder of the week. But at the moment,

1:18:06.600 --> 1:18:09.240
<v Speaker 8>it just feels like Rock and Emerson heaven the ones

1:18:09.320 --> 1:18:12.000
<v Speaker 8>really brought up the most and I at least pressas

1:18:12.080 --> 1:18:14.320
<v Speaker 8>with this too, Like we mentioned money savings and everything

1:18:14.439 --> 1:18:16.720
<v Speaker 8>like that. You know, this is the first year where

1:18:16.720 --> 1:18:18.960
<v Speaker 8>we have an eleven million dollars signing bonus at one

1:18:19.000 --> 1:18:22.840
<v Speaker 8>to one, and the signing bonus record is still even

1:18:22.880 --> 1:18:24.760
<v Speaker 8>holiday from a year ago, which I believe was nine

1:18:24.800 --> 1:18:27.840
<v Speaker 8>point two five million. So I feel like, even then,

1:18:28.040 --> 1:18:31.519
<v Speaker 8>if if Rock signs, for example, for nine point five million,

1:18:31.600 --> 1:18:34.439
<v Speaker 8>he still gets the record and he saves the White

1:18:34.479 --> 1:18:36.799
<v Speaker 8>Sox at least two million dollars to go after somebody

1:18:36.840 --> 1:18:40.519
<v Speaker 8>at forty one, Whereas you know, obviously a Lacky does

1:18:40.560 --> 1:18:43.960
<v Speaker 8>sign for eight point five, he saves them three million

1:18:43.960 --> 1:18:45.960
<v Speaker 8>dollars and then can go big fish hunting at forty one.

1:18:46.080 --> 1:18:48.640
<v Speaker 8>So it's an interesting theory to kind of look at

1:18:48.640 --> 1:18:51.760
<v Speaker 8>it that way, where like, whoever they take it one

1:18:51.760 --> 1:18:54.120
<v Speaker 8>pint one is going to save them a significant love

1:18:54.200 --> 1:18:57.479
<v Speaker 8>summer change. But you're then kind of looking at it

1:18:57.560 --> 1:19:00.479
<v Speaker 8>from like, Okay, if we get the first ever ten

1:19:00.560 --> 1:19:03.880
<v Speaker 8>million dollar signee in the bonus pool era, you're saving

1:19:03.960 --> 1:19:05.880
<v Speaker 8>only a mill and a half compared to what some

1:19:05.960 --> 1:19:07.519
<v Speaker 8>of these other guys will bring to the table. So

1:19:07.560 --> 1:19:11.320
<v Speaker 8>I think it's a again, it's it's definitely possible. I

1:19:11.600 --> 1:19:14.280
<v Speaker 8>like the theory, Peter that you brought up, and I

1:19:14.360 --> 1:19:16.639
<v Speaker 8>think it's definitely something to keep on the back burners,

1:19:18.680 --> 1:19:20.800
<v Speaker 8>so we'll see what happens when it comes to the

1:19:20.960 --> 1:19:22.400
<v Speaker 8>draft day. I think at the end of the day,

1:19:22.479 --> 1:19:25.000
<v Speaker 8>like whoever they take, they it will be one of

1:19:25.080 --> 1:19:28.679
<v Speaker 8>these top three, and I think we'll get a decision

1:19:28.800 --> 1:19:30.600
<v Speaker 8>either an hour before the draft or.

1:19:31.000 --> 1:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Or might go right to the buzzer. We'll see what happens.

1:19:33.520 --> 1:19:36.599
<v Speaker 3>It really stems from the theory, at least, my belief

1:19:36.640 --> 1:19:38.960
<v Speaker 3>in von Lackey. It's not because I think there's something

1:19:39.040 --> 1:19:41.840
<v Speaker 3>wrong with Rock Schlawski at all. I think he breaks. Yeah,

1:19:41.880 --> 1:19:44.120
<v Speaker 3>I think he's gonna be an awesome player. I just

1:19:44.240 --> 1:19:46.920
<v Speaker 3>believe in von Lackey. Like again, I'm not much of

1:19:46.960 --> 1:19:49.280
<v Speaker 3>a scout. It's hard for me to notice, like when

1:19:49.320 --> 1:19:52.839
<v Speaker 3>a catcher is average to blow average to above average,

1:19:53.439 --> 1:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>But I believe in a catcher defensively when I see

1:19:56.120 --> 1:19:59.280
<v Speaker 3>him pop and I felt like I saw Kayden Bodine pop,

1:20:00.000 --> 1:20:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I feel like a dumb on lacky pop and his

1:20:02.400 --> 1:20:05.479
<v Speaker 3>ability to hit at the plate. I just feel like

1:20:05.520 --> 1:20:08.400
<v Speaker 3>if he was playing third base or shortstop, or he

1:20:08.560 --> 1:20:10.920
<v Speaker 3>was even a corner outfielder, he would still be a

1:20:11.000 --> 1:20:13.840
<v Speaker 3>middle of the first round bat so and then he

1:20:14.000 --> 1:20:16.799
<v Speaker 3>just so happens to be a really really athletic catcher,

1:20:17.080 --> 1:20:19.519
<v Speaker 3>a leader of men. Listening to what the Georgia Tech

1:20:19.560 --> 1:20:21.960
<v Speaker 3>guys said about him, you know, when their postgame press

1:20:22.120 --> 1:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>is like, this is a leader of men, and I

1:20:24.439 --> 1:20:26.599
<v Speaker 3>just feel like he would be a great selection at

1:20:26.680 --> 1:20:29.200
<v Speaker 3>number one overall. And then they just so happen to

1:20:29.280 --> 1:20:32.200
<v Speaker 3>save money, and then they just so happened to need

1:20:32.360 --> 1:20:35.200
<v Speaker 3>catchers more than shortstops in their basement. So that's where

1:20:35.240 --> 1:20:37.639
<v Speaker 3>the theory comes from. We will see. I cannot wait.

1:20:37.680 --> 1:20:39.760
<v Speaker 3>I also can't wait to read mock Draft four point zero,

1:20:39.960 --> 1:20:42.479
<v Speaker 3>which again will likely come out maybe July tenth, July

1:20:42.560 --> 1:20:46.360
<v Speaker 3>eleventh morning, of when can people expect that it's.

1:20:46.240 --> 1:20:49.880
<v Speaker 8>Probably going to be Saturday morning on a eleven. Just

1:20:50.040 --> 1:20:52.120
<v Speaker 8>that way we can try and get the most like

1:20:52.520 --> 1:20:55.720
<v Speaker 8>connections with rumors that are going around like last year.

1:20:55.800 --> 1:20:59.160
<v Speaker 8>Obviously did we get this right? No, but we had

1:20:59.439 --> 1:21:02.200
<v Speaker 8>we had been to like the Ashros. We're in agreement

1:21:02.280 --> 1:21:04.639
<v Speaker 8>with a prep player at twenty one. I was told

1:21:04.680 --> 1:21:07.040
<v Speaker 8>tape that's south the scene went with him on the

1:21:07.080 --> 1:21:08.720
<v Speaker 8>mock It turned out the being Xavor and Ninets and

1:21:08.720 --> 1:21:11.479
<v Speaker 8>sat the scene with the pick after so like, you know,

1:21:11.880 --> 1:21:13.760
<v Speaker 8>got it wrong, but like hey, that's usually the best

1:21:13.800 --> 1:21:15.679
<v Speaker 8>time when we kind of start figuring some stuff out,

1:21:15.800 --> 1:21:18.599
<v Speaker 8>so it'll probably be like a couple hours more draft

1:21:18.680 --> 1:21:21.840
<v Speaker 8>time on Saturday morning. But either which way, like this

1:21:22.200 --> 1:21:25.200
<v Speaker 8>this top three and thirteen board player like player board

1:21:25.280 --> 1:21:27.800
<v Speaker 8>here that I've been working on, hoping to have it

1:21:27.880 --> 1:21:30.080
<v Speaker 8>out tomorrow if not Friday morning, trying to get some

1:21:30.160 --> 1:21:32.519
<v Speaker 8>maritimes so people can look at which players they want

1:21:32.600 --> 1:21:35.400
<v Speaker 8>at their selections, and then Mock four point zero will

1:21:35.400 --> 1:21:36.320
<v Speaker 8>come out Saturday morning.

1:21:36.880 --> 1:21:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you so much Tyler for coming on. This

1:21:39.000 --> 1:21:41.599
<v Speaker 3>was a blast. I can't wait, you know, to talk

1:21:41.880 --> 1:21:44.560
<v Speaker 3>more draft stuff with you on the day of the

1:21:44.640 --> 1:21:46.439
<v Speaker 3>draft when you join our draft stroom, and it's going

1:21:46.520 --> 1:21:48.840
<v Speaker 3>to be a blast, and we'll definitely be checking out

1:21:48.880 --> 1:21:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Mock Draft four point zero, which again you can find

1:21:51.520 --> 1:21:55.240
<v Speaker 3>on Just baseball dot com for Tyler Jennings arm lighton,

1:21:55.400 --> 1:21:57.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm Peter Apple. The best way to support the Just

1:21:57.479 --> 1:22:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Baseball Show make sure you smash the like bundon ansubscribe

1:22:00.400 --> 1:22:02.680
<v Speaker 3>button And if you're listening to us on audio, best

1:22:02.720 --> 1:22:05.240
<v Speaker 3>way to sport is leaving a five star review. And

1:22:05.240 --> 1:22:07.000
<v Speaker 3>if you want to talk more draft stuff with us,

1:22:07.320 --> 1:22:09.640
<v Speaker 3>make sure to join our discord using the link in

1:22:09.720 --> 1:22:13.479
<v Speaker 3>the episode description for Tyler for Arum, I'm Peter, see

1:22:13.479 --> 1:22:15.639
<v Speaker 3>you tomorrow. With that, thank you, everybody,