WEBVTT - From the Vault: Animals Throwing Stuff, Part 1

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey a you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe McCormick, and today we are bringing you

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 2>an episode from the vault. Rob and I are out

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 2>this week, so we've got some classic episodes for you,

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 2>or at least classic from last year. This is Animals

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Throwing Stuff, Part one, the first part of a series

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 2>we did about throwing behavior and non human animals. We

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 2>did eventually end up talking about the emergence of throwing

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>as a human behavior as well. This one originally aired

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 2>on January third, twenty twenty three.

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:37.319
<v Speaker 1>We hope you.

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Enjoy Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe McCormick, and today we're going to be

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 2>kicking off a series of episodes about examples of throwing

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 2>in non human animals. We may also talk about the

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 2>evolution of throwing in humans as well, but this is

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 2>a subject I recently became interested in, specifically because of

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 2>a paper that was published in November twenty twenty two.

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Some of you might have seen science headlines going around

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>about this. There was a publication in the Journal plus

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 2>one about octopuses throwing objects, or at least potentially throwing objects.

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Whether or not it should count as debatable, and we'll

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>talk about some of the arguments for and against. But

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 2>octopuses at least allegedly throwing objects, potentially deliberately, and potentially

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>deliberately aiming those objects at other octopuses, though of course,

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>the exact nature of their motivations is somewhat mysterious. It's

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 2>hard to suss out exactly. And I thought it would

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>be good to to start off our series by looking

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>at this example that first got me interested in this,

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 2>and then maybe we can branch out to other examples

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 2>of throwing in the animal world in subsequent episodes.

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, I just assumed that your interest in this topic

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 1>was because you had become a father and you were

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>already feeling the pull. You already were longing to throw

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>ball with your child, which is something that I felt

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>when I became a father. I was like, well, I've

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>got to get a ball, right, I've got to get

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a mit. I have no other connection to baseball at all,

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>or softball or any of these sports, no attachment to them.

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't play them or watch them. But there's something

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>about throwing that must be done with the child.

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 2>I do like throwing a ball. I think I'm more

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 2>into like a tennis ball in the hand than a baseball.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>But that's a dog thing, that's for dogs. I guess

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that's true.

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Also, No, I'm not talking about with like the scoop,

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean the rollerball scoop. I mean tennis ball straight

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 2>in the hand. Okay, all right, but no, that's not

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the reason. And if I were to go with the

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 2>motor activities I've been thinking of more since becoming a father,

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 2>would be the act of knocking things over after they've

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 2>been set up. I think that's an interesting impulse that

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>we could study.

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, definitely.

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 2>But onto the octopus study. So this paper was by

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Peter Godfrey Smith, David Shiel, Stephanie Chancellor, Stefan Linquist, and

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Lawrence, and it was called in the Line of

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Fire Debris Throwing by Wild Octopuses, published published in Plus one,

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two. And so first I'm going to talk

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 2>about what the authors report and argue in this paper here,

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll talk about some context as well as

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 2>some criticism or differences in interpretation. Now, for background on

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 2>this subject, I think we can safely say that not

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of animals throw things at all. Throwing is

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 2>a relatively unique behavior, and the authors of this study say,

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 2>quote a throw can be distinguished from other phenomena by

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the ballistic motion of a manipulable object or material, where

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 2>ballistic describes free motion and momentum. So when I think

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 2>of throwing, I think of taking a free external object

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 2>or material, so not part of your own body, and

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 2>projecting it through the environment toward a target. Throwing is

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 2>so unique that it has sometimes been characterized as exclusively

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the domain of humans. But there are a number of

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 2>animal behaviors that I think should count as throwing. We'll

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 2>talk about them throughout the series. Some very clear examples

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 2>that I don't think anybody would really dispute, like the

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 2>throwing behaviors of primates like chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Right right, Yeah, there are plenty of examples of this

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>occurring both in the wild and in captive. Not to

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>say they're not interested. We may come back to some

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>of them, but yeah, they're very well documented.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and also some very interesting ones in like elephants

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 2>and mongooses and birds and so forth. Yeah, Now, if

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 2>you were to expand the definition of throwing to include

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 2>the projection of parts of the animal's own body or

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 2>substances produced by the animal's own body, then the number

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 2>of examples really expands. Then you get all kinds of things,

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Like you get spitting, which would include snakes. There's snakes

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 2>that project venom out of their mouths, out of their glands.

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 2>You have, of course, camels famously spit. All kinds of

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 2>animals spit. And then you also have examples like spiders

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 2>such as New World tarantulas. These spiders famously kind of

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 2>kick or shoot a little fibers known as irticating hairs

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 2>off of their bodies, and these are a defense mechanism

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>because the hairs can cause severe irritation to the skin

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 2>and mucous membranes of vertebrate animals that might threaten the spiders.

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I've always thought of this in the

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 2>context of like tarantula itching powder, Like it's just an irritant,

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 2>it's unpleasant, it gets on your skin, it causes itching,

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 2>makes you want to retreat. But apparently in some cases

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 2>of like the tarantulas, with more severe hairs. This can

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 2>even cause death in the cases of some small animals

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 2>when the hairs get in their mucous membranes.

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Tarantulas are fascinating. I'd be up for a return to

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the world of tarantulas again.

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 2>But there are other spider examples too. Some other spiders

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 2>are known to project or throw threads of silk produced

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 2>again by their own bodies at prey to capture them.

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 2>But I think we probably don't want to count substances

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 2>produced by an animal's own body for throwing, because that

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 2>seems like a kind of that's a different class of

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.679
<v Speaker 2>behavior than what we usually think about with throwing, because

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 2>when it comes out of the animal's own body, I

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 2>would think that usually tends to be an instinctual, defensive

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 2>or predation mechanism. That's something that's probably just a rote

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 2>behavioral program that exists. You know, it's evolutionarily coded into

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the animal's nervous system, so they just kind of do

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>it automatically. Whereas the throwing of free external objects found

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>in the nearby environment, I would argue that indicates a

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 2>very different kind of underlying mentality, a much more interesting

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.559
<v Speaker 2>and versatile type of tool use.

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Well. Of course, it's easy for us to say since

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>our bodies don't really produce weapons. It might be a

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>different scenario if human beings, say, produced and shed some

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>form of horn or antler, or I don't know, had

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>had some other you know, let your imagination go wild.

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But one might well imagine some sort of a humanoid

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>being that had some sort of evolved feature like this.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>That might blur the line. But I do agree, Yeah, certainly,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>with the human factor involved, humans are not really going

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to do much with anything that their own body produces.

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>They're going to have to turn to the things in

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the environment around them.

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it would be interesting if a human could like

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 2>cough up darts from their stomach on command. Now what now,

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to think how to make that plausible. Okay, Now,

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 2>imagine you've got an animal that has a sort of

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 2>gizzard and they keep gizzard stones down there, and when

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 2>they need a weapon, they just vomit up a gizzard

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>stone and then they can throw that there.

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>You go, surely somebody's had done something like that. Would

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that would be terrific. You have some sort of like

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a kaiju bird and one of its attacks is vomiting

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>stones at you and these stones could perhaps you know,

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>be used as some sort of a siege weapon.

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so that's the distinction between like an instinctual throwing

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 2>or projecting of part of your body or something that

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>comes out of your body versus throwing of things found

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 2>in the environment. Another distinction I would like to make

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>about throwing is the important difference between throwing away and

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 2>throwing at. For one example of this contained within one animal,

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I think you could possibly make the argument that the

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 2>ant lion might exhibit both types of throwing, because it

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 2>certainly at least does one. So the ant lion, at

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 2>one stage in its life cycle, it lives down at

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>the bottom of a pit that has steep sloped sides

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 2>with the sides are lined with sediment of a certain

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 2>grain size, and a prey insect falls in it can't

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>climb back out, and then the ant lion kicks sediment

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 2>or sand up at the insect, and the insect falls

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 2>down into its jaws and it eats them. And then

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 2>after it's done, it is typically known to fling the

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>body out of the pit by a similar motion to

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 2>what it used to fling the sand up at the

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 2>insect falling in now, I think you could definitely make

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the case that it shows throwing away behavior because it's

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 2>just rejecting the desiccated exoskeleton of the ant that it

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 2>has drained of delicious juices once it's done right. Yeah, absolutely,

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 2>But it may also display throwing at behavior, arguably because

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 2>as the ant is falling down, it will kick sand

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 2>up at the ant, and you could argue about whether

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 2>that's actually at the ant or whether it's just kind

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 2>of generic sand throwing behavior that because the real purpose,

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I think is not for it to land on the ant,

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 2>but to destabilize the walls of the pit and cause

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 2>them to avalanche downward, bringing the ant further toward the

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 2>bottom with the sand.

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I believe we talked about the ant line a

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 1>bit in our episode on the Sarlac, comparing the sarlacs

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>imagined biology to the ant lion's very real biology, and yeah,

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>they're fascinating little creatures.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 2>But the authors of this paper all so mentioned in

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>the background how in some cases throwing is a kind

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 2>of tool use that also sort of contains information. Like

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 2>a projectile can be not only aggressive and violent, but

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 2>it can be a communicative social tool between animals within

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 2>a social species, and that brings us to the example

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 2>of the octopuses, because one thing it's really important to

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 2>realize about octopuses is that they are, for the most part,

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 2>not social. They are incredibly antisocial as far as animals go.

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 2>With perhaps a few notable exceptions, octopuses generally do not

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 2>socialize with other octopuses. They don't flock together, they don't

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 2>form groups usually or have very complex social relationships. For

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 2>the most part, octopuses are solitary hunters, and when they

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 2>do encounter one another, they practice avoidance or sometimes outright violence.

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 2>They will fight one another and sometimes even cannibal one another.

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that seems to be the extent of octopus politics.

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 2>However, despite their usual antisocial nature, there is some previous

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 2>evidence that octopuses might be able to communicate with or

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 2>signal information to one another, and an example that the

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 2>author's pick here is one that has some of the

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 2>same authors as this study in question. It's by David Shield,

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Peter Godfrey Smith, and Matthew Lawrence, called Signal Use by

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Octopuses in Agonistic Interactions, published in Current Biology in twenty sixteen,

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 2>and this study looked at the same species as our

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 2>main study is going to be looking at here one

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 2>called Octopus tetricus, and this species can change color pigment.

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 2>It can change the color patterns on its skin in

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 2>a number of ways. And this report found a correlation

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 2>between color displays on this octopus's skin and intraspecific behaviors,

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 2>behaviors showing interactions between members of this species. The authors write, quote,

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 2>here we show by field observation that in a shallow

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>water octopus Octopus tetricus, a range of visible displays are

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 2>produced during agonistic interactions, and these displays correlate with the

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 2>outcome of those interactions. Interactions in which dark body color

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 2>by an approaching octopus was matched by similar color in

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 2>the reacting octopus were more likely to escalate to grappling darkness,

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 2>and an approaching octopus met by paler color in the

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 2>reacting octopus accompanied retreat of the paler octopus. So this

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>is interesting. It raises the possibility that even though these

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 2>octopuses are not very friendly with one another and they

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 2>don't really want to hang out and interact, they might

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>still be communicating. They might be using color displays to

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 2>at least communicate information about their intentions with one another,

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 2>and that could be beneficial to both parties because it

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 2>could help them avoid unnecessary violent cons Like if you

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 2>can change your color patterns to signal like I mean business,

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to back down, or okay, okay, I'm

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 2>not going to fight like that can help you avoid

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>a fight that would have happened otherwise.

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, this is of course a topic that's come

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>up recently on the show. In a couple other episodes,

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the Galapagos tortoise, about the showdowns between

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>these big males and how it is almost, if not exclusively,

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>non violent in that they just have these showdowns with

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>their neck who's the tallest, and whoever is the judge

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>would be the tallest wins, and there's no need for

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>actual violence to take place. It also reminds me of

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the episode I did with Joe Berger while you were

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>out talking about goats and rams getting into conflict over

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>mineral resources, and part of the issue there it does

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>come down to how goats deal with this sort of

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>conflict between each other, how rams deal with this sort

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of conflict with the each other. But then when you

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have goats and rams, there can be kind of a

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>communication breakdown. It's really interesting.

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean it makes you think about how

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>much apparent conflict and violence within the natural world actually

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 2>doesn't come to violence because animals are often looking for

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 2>a way to avoid a fight. They just want to

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 2>know who would win and like find a way to

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 2>sort it out without having to do the violence.

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Even in a lot of human combat, whether you're

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>dealing with individual level or more complex scenarios involving civilizations

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. You know, there's so many different ways.

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of posturing. But then there are also

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the fights or battles one might get into with the

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>intention of being stopped by others before the battle can

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>take place. Like, there's so many different things to consider though.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 2>I also want to come back to this example I

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 2>mentioned about the changing color patterns on these octopuses. I

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 2>think you could also have non communicative interpretations of this

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 2>as well. That's possible, but it's one good interpretation of

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 2>that might be that these animals are communicating with each other,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 2>they're sharing information, even though they're not really a social species. Now,

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 2>we also know that octopuses are able to manipulate objects

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 2>in their environments using the surprisingly deft touch of the

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 2>eight octopus arms, raising the specter always of possible tool

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>using intelligence and even maybe one day technological evolution in

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the octopus. And we've seen many great examples of this.

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 2>One that I always think of is in octopus nest

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 2>building behavior. Sometimes you'll find examples where an octopus will

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 2>be able to pull an object over the opening of

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 2>its den in order to essentially close the door, which

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>I love. But also this study mentions veined octopuses or

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 2>anti octopus marginatus, which they say, quote Carrie can carry

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 2>shelter in the form of nested coconut shell halves that

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 2>are then reassembled. You may have seen video of this.

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is this is remarkable footage, and I know

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>just the just look watching an octopus in the wild

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>or in captivity. It seems to have inspired many to

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine what it would be like if they actually use

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>tools and weapons. I was trying to remember where I

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>had specifically seen an image of an octopus with like

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a hatchet in one of its tentacles. I imagine this

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>was maybe an old Dungeons and Dragons illustration or something.

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>But I did an image search and I found that

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 1>numerous people have have painted some sort of a scenario

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in which an octopus is carrying a spear. I saw

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>one where there's like a spear wielding octopus battling a

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>samurai octopus. So there is something about the octopus arms

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>that we can't help but imagine them doing tully or

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>weapony things with them.

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 2>Not sure exactly why, but that reminds me of the

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 2>doomba meme where people would just like tape a knife

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>to the top of their roomba.

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I saw that one, but sounds dangerous.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, anyway, these two different threads we've been talking

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 2>about the use of materials or arguably tools from the

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 2>environment by octopuses and behavior that might constitute social signaling

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 2>between conspecifics. These two things come together in this twenty

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 2>twenty two study. So the animal in question in this

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 2>paper is the species Octopus tetricus, also known as the

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 2>gloomy octopus. Now why are they called the gloomy octopus? Well,

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 2>just look at their eyes. Some people think that these

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 2>animals have eyes that look perennially unhappy. I don't know

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 2>what I think about that. It's hard to it's hard

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 2>to read too much human emotion into octopus eyes. But

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 2>then again, I get to staring at this and I

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 2>don't know, maybe I do feel kind of the mood

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 2>coming down a little bit.

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe I mean I get kind of

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a calm vibe off of this particular octopus. It looks cozy.

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, they do like to be cozy. They like to

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.719
<v Speaker 2>hide in their dens. So, the gloomy octopus is a

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 2>medium sized benthic octopus. Benthic meaning they live on the

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 2>seafloor and they occupy the waters around Australia and New Zealand.

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 2>But the particular population of animals observed in this study

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 2>live in a special zone along the bottom of Jervis Bay, Australia,

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 2>which is the coast of New South Wales at south

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 2>of Sydney. And in this area along the bottom of

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Jervis Bay, many individuals of the gloomy octopus live in

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 2>very close proximity to one another, high density, especially four octopuses,

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 2>making dens sometimes just right smack next to one another. Now,

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.719
<v Speaker 2>is this a change? And they're normally solitary anti so nature,

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.239
<v Speaker 2>it does not seem like that. There's no indication that

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 2>these animals like being near one another. Instead, it's a

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 2>case of a lot of octopuses trying to cram into

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a spot that has both food abundance and excellent benthic

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 2>strata for making dens. So it's good real estate to

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 2>make homes in, and it's lots of great food, and

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 2>it's surrounded on all sides by terrible real estate, just

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of featureless mudflats, which sort of prevents these octopuses

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 2>from spreading out. So for a human analogy, imagine a

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of tiny island in the middle of the ocean

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 2>with tons of food on it, lots of great stuff there,

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 2>but it's just swarming with antisocial introverts who don't want

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 2>to talk to each other.

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I think I've had this experience on most road trips

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I've taken. You know, you find that one exit that

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>has that one chain coffee store that you need and

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>can depend on. And yeah, an alien observing you might say,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 1>look at all these people. They all love each Yes,

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>they love being around each other. Oh that's good.

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 2>So these spots in Jervis Bay have been nicknamed things

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 2>like Octolantis or Octopolis. Just a lot of these anti

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 2>social non buddies squeezing into a relatively small area. Naturally

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be some conflict here. The octopuses regularly

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 2>get in one another's space, and this leads to the

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 2>creatures poking and grappling, grabbing, generally harassing each other. Now,

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 2>it was in studying this Jervis Bay population of Tetricus

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 2>that the authors first observed what they called a throwing behavior.

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 2>And the team collected many hours of video footage from

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 2>emplaced cameras from a couple of different sessions. I think

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 2>there was some footage from twenty fifteen and from twenty sixteen,

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 2>and they write, quote, here we provide the first report

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:01.959
<v Speaker 2>for any octopus species of a behavior freaque at these aggregations.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 2>The throwing or projection of debris, both in social interactions

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 2>and in other contexts. Ballistic motion of manipulable objects is

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 2>possible through water, albeit against greater resistance than through air.

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 2>These throws by Octopus tetricus sometimes hit other octopuses. So

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 2>they are throwing debris, sometimes hitting other octopuses. And the

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 2>big question is are they doing it on purpose? Are

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 2>they targeting one another on purpose? And if they are,

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 2>is that a social signal of some kind?

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it's important to first just describe exactly what's

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 2>going on here. When an octopus is said to quote,

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 2>throw something, Octopuses do not throw the way humans do

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 2>by building momentum with an arm motion and then releasing,

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 2>or at least not most of the time. The team

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 2>apparently documented one case of an octopus throwing what looked

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 2>to be a bivalve shell by holding it in its arm,

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 2>quickly straightening the arm, and then releasing the shell. Instead,

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 2>what happens is most of the time the octopus would

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 2>throw by way of its siphon, and the siphon, also

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 2>called a funnel, is kind of a tube shaped organ

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 2>that octopuses used to swim. You can think of it

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 2>as an organic water jet. It's sort of a pump

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 2>that pumps water out the back and allows the octopus

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 2>to to by reaction, push its body forward.

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, so in these in these cases of an octopus throwing,

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>depending on what is being thrown, you could think of

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it as being like they've loaded their their biocannon, their

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>their fluid based biocanon with like say, a piece of

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>shell and are firing it. Or it's just kind of

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like loaded with debris.

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Yet well sort of I mean that is good, I think,

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 2>except actually what the cannon is loaded with is just

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 2>water as usual. It's more like they've loaded a cannon

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 2>and they have put the thing they want to throw

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 2>right in front of the cannon, so that when the

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 2>cannonball comes out, it hits the thing they want to throw,

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the cannonball just being water and propels it toward the target. Again,

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 2>assuming that these are targeted throws. We don't know that

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 2>for sure, but going with that for a minute. So

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a several step procedure. It goes like this. So

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 2>this octopus, Octopus tetricus, it will gather external material. And

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 2>there were three main types of material that the authors

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 2>observed being thrown in the study. One is shells, generally

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 2>mollusk shells, though like scallop shells, which also would be

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 2>the shells of things that the octopuses are eating. And

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 2>then the other one is algae and then finally silt

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 2>or sediment from the sea floor, so just you know,

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 2>mup sand, that kind of stuff.

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>This sounds like dirty Fighters. It sounds like the scene

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in so many movies, especially like Sword and Sandal movies,

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>where there's some sort of a gladiatorial combat going on,

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and what does the villain do. Oh, he's going to

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>get a little sand off the battleground floor throw it

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in the eyes.

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Of Except the gloomy octopuses are all dirty fighters. They

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 2>love to shoot this silt, so you scoop that up

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 2>in your arm, So they're actually using their arms for

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 2>this part, scooping up the thing whatever it is, shells, algae,

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 2>or silt, and then they hold it underneath the body.

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 2>They hold it underneath the body with your arms, and

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 2>then they position their siphon underneath the body, which is

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 2>not normally where it is. They kind of hook it

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 2>under so that it lines up behind this stuff, and

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 2>then they release the stuff with their arms at the

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 2>same time that they blast it with a jet of

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 2>water from the siphon, and then that jet of water

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>carries the sediment toward its target. So again, this is

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 2>very different than human throwing. I think for a rough analogy,

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 2>you'd have to imagine that you could throw a baseball

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 2>not by extending your arm rapidly and releasing it, but

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 2>by like holding the baseball in front of your face

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 2>and then suddenly releasing it from your hand and at

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 2>the same time blowing on it really hard to shoot

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 2>it off where you want it to go, and of

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 2>course in order to do this we need to have

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 2>far more lung capacity and diaphragm power than humans actually

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 2>do have. But just imagine you could briefly create like

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 2>a little jet engine exhaust port with your mouth. And

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 2>this is interesting because it reminds me of stories I've

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 2>read elsewhere of octopuses using directed siphon jets, but without

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 2>any material being propelled other than the water itself, Like

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 2>the main thing is something of their stories of octopuses

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 2>in captivity squirting their handlers with water from their siphon,

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 2>often in the context of the handler believing at least

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 2>that the octopus is annoyed with them or being defensive.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>And of course this is also reminiscent of squid using

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>their ink in various ways, though of course that would

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>would obviously be an example again of an animal using

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>something created by its own rather than in this case,

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>using something from their environment.

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly so, when the researchers watch the gloomy octopus

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 2>do this throwing of shells, weeds, and silt, some of

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 2>the instances were obviously cases of simple rejection behavior. The

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 2>throwing away. We talked about it earlier, and a great

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 2>example of this would be what they classified as eating

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 2>based throwing behavior. So sometimes the octopus is going to eat,

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, a bivalve or something. Maybe it eats a scallop,

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 2>and then it throws the shells away. When it's done,

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 2>it actually projects them away from the body. Other examples

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 2>of throwing away behavior would be the classification they call

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 2>den cleaning. The octopuses actually do tidy up their dens.

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 2>So they're going to try to make a little heidi

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 2>hole to settle into on the seafloor, and sometimes I

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 2>guess it gets dirty in there, so they want to

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 2>basically blast a bunch of stuff out of there. And

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 2>so they will do this with their dens to get

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 2>things out of the hole.

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you don't want your midden to get out of

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>control there with the bones of your many kills or

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the shells of your many kills.

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 2>Other times they showed apparent throwing behavior that the researcher

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 2>said was anomalist. There was no apparent reason. Maybe an

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 2>octopus is just kind of like rippling along. Nothing's really

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 2>going on. It's not eating, it's not in its den,

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 2>nothing else is around, but it just kind of throws

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 2>something that didn't happen a lot, but occasionally it did.

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 2>And then finally, the last category they said was what

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 2>they called interactive throwing. This is when the octopus was

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 2>interacting with another octopus or in a few cases, another

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 2>animal or object such as a fish or a camera.

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 2>And these are the ones that are really interesting because

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 2>in this case, the researcher said, it really looks like

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 2>not just throwing away behavior, but throwing at behavior. It

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>looks like the octopuses are intentionally throwing things to try

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:03.959
<v Speaker 2>to hit or discourage other octopuses in their vicinity. So

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 2>what proportion of throws are represented by these different categories. Well,

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 2>to read from their results, quote, over half of all throws,

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 2>or fifty three percent, occurred in interactive contexts, thirty six

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 2>percent in interactive, only seventeen percent in interactive mixed. And

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 2>that's where they're interacting with another octopus, but also something

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 2>else is going on, like maybe they also just finished sheeting,

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 2>or they're also cleaning out their den. Thirty two percent

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 2>occurred during den cleaning, only eight percent after eating, and

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 2>eight percent without a parent context. Oh, and this total

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 2>is more than one hundred percent due to rounding, but

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 2>they say that the material throw so. And then there's

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 2>another distinction they make throw interactive throwing, where they're basically

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 2>interacting with another octopus and they throw in that octopus's direction,

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 2>and then they make the distinction of, well, did the

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 2>stuff they threw actually hit the other octa to pus

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 2>on the footage they captured, and they said that the

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 2>material throne hit another octopus in seventeen cases that they documented.

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 2>In two other throws the material hit a fish and so.

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Co author David Shiel said speaking to the media, it

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 2>seems like there's a target and they're not throwing away,

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 2>they're throwing at But it is a difficult question, like

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 2>how can you prove that they are actually intending to

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 2>hit another octopus with this stuff when they do it.

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Of course, it's possible they're just accidentally or maybe inconsiderately

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 2>hitting one another with these waterjet payloads while they're doing

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 2>something else. Maybe we don't know why they're doing it,

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 2>and the researchers aren't sure that these throws are intentionally targeted,

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 2>but they argue that on balance, that is the more

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 2>likely interpretation, and that it possibly is some kind of

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 2>social signal, and they give a few arguments why they

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 2>think it is the more likely interpretation. So, for one thing,

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 2>you might imagine that interactive throws are targeted and social

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 2>if you notice some patterns, like patterns of differences between

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 2>interactive throws versus other types of throws. And the researchers did,

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 2>in fact document some differences specifically between throws that hit

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 2>another octopus and throws that did not. One difference was

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 2>which arms are the octopus using. I thought this was

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 2>really interesting because it wasn't exactly what I would have expected.

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.479
<v Speaker 2>But here's what they say. Okay, they say a total

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 2>of fourteen throws out of ninety eight that could be

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 2>assessed as anomalous arm throws, and these would be throws

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 2>using one of the side arms instead of just the

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 2>two front arms. They say, quote, anomalous arm throws were

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 2>more likely to hit other octopuses than L one R

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 2>one throws, and L one and R one are the

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 2>two frontal arms. So it seems like if you're just

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 2>cleaning out your den, there just kind of throwing stuff

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 2>wherever you use the front two arms, but way more

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 2>often if an octopus throws something and it hits a

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 2>different octopus, they're using their side arms. Isn't that kind

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 2>of strange?

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Hm?

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 2>And they found that the side arm throws were less

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 2>common overall, but more common if the material hit another octopus.

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 2>So something about this pattern of arm choice could indicate

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe a type of aiming behavior with hostile intentions. It's

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 2>hard to know for sure, but that is an interesting difference.

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 2>They also write quote in three cases of hits, a

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 2>thrower also altered their body orientation towards another octopus, but

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 2>these movements were very slight, and the effects of arm

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 2>choice other than L one R one were more marked. Okay,

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 2>so that's one difference between throws that hit other octopuses

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 2>and throws that down't. Second difference body patterns and throw vicar.

0:32:56.440 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 2>These octopuses, as we mentioned earlier, can change their external appearance,

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 2>and in fact, they might even change their external appearance

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 2>in order to signal to other octopuses, maybe to help

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 2>avoid aggressive encounters. And remember before, when an octopus displayed

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 2>a uniform dark coloration, that was usually a sign that

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 2>they were displaying kind of like dominant aggressive behavior, whereas

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe like turning paler might indicate that they were willing

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 2>to back away from a fight. The authors here found

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 2>that throws that hit another octopus more often took place

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 2>when the thrower was displaying a uniform and especially uniform

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 2>dark body color.

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Quote.

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 2>We noted that throws by octopuses displaying uniform body patterns,

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 2>especially uniform dark patterns, were more often thrown with high vigor. Further,

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 2>throws by octopuses displaying uniform body patterns also hit other

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 2>octopuses significantly more more often than those in other body patterns.

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 2>And then also they say, in addition, high vigor throws

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 2>more frequently hit another octopus. However, with that last point,

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 2>they want to clarify, and I think this is good

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 2>to point out. High vigor throws, of course, are because

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 2>they're higher vigor, meaning thrown harder, They go longer, and

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 2>they have a wider range, which could explain more frequent

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 2>hits even if they're not deliberately targeting somebody. Like a

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.399
<v Speaker 2>random throw that goes farther and spreads farther is more

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.760
<v Speaker 2>likely to hit something randomly than one that doesn't. Another

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 2>thing they noticed material chosen. When octopuses through something that

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 2>hit another octopus, it was way more likely to be

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:42.879
<v Speaker 2>silt as opposed to the other materials, which appeared more

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 2>often in other context. So maybe an octopus is eating

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 2>or cleaning its din, it's going to be more likely

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 2>to throw shells around. When an octopus gets gets into

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 2>an aggressive interaction with another octopus, it seems more likely

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 2>they will throw silt at them. Back to the dirty

0:34:59.160 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 2>fighter point.

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And there's something about, you know, the throwing

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>of the silt too that that I don't know a

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of this is just the human perspective and all,

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>but I know it makes me think of of things

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>like another trope from films, throwing a single pebble at

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a at a window pane to get somebody's attention. Oh yeah,

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, like you know where it's You know clearly

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>you're not you're actually trying to harm anyone, but you

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>want to. You're creating a message. You're you're you're sending

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>a signal, and in a different way. Uh, there is

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a difference between pelting somebody with sand and throwing a

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.919
<v Speaker 1>rock at them. Like even in the human scenario, these

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are two These are two acts with rather different messages.

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>If they were to happen, say at a beach between

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>two people.

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that that's correct, So I think the material may

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 2>make a difference there, though they did say that the

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 2>difference that they found in material choice was not statistically

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.240
<v Speaker 2>significant because they're dealing with the small number of samples here.

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:00.439
<v Speaker 2>There was a difference in the numbers, but it didn't

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 2>make statistical cut. Now. One thing, they did also observe

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 2>repeat offenders and aggressive patterns. They say some particular octopuses

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:14.720
<v Speaker 2>would repeatedly throw and strike another one again and again

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and again, and this kind of repeated hit behavior would

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:22.359
<v Speaker 2>seem to indicate a deliberate, targeted pattern more than an

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 2>accidental one. The authors also say quote hits in many

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 2>cases occurred within sequences of interactions that featured ongoing mild aggression,

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 2>including arm probes and momentary grappling. So they're saying we

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 2>saw throws that hit another octopus often win octopuses had

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 2>already been tussling.

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot, okay, and another way of stating it, some

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>octopuses might just be jerks.

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 2>One last thing, they say there were defensive behaviors. The

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 2>apparent victim of the throw often reacted by either holding

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 2>arms up to block the of material flying their way,

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 2>or by ducking and dodging out of the way, And

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 2>they said sometimes octopuses who had been hit altered their

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 2>behavior in some other way by say, like pausing or

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 2>halting or redirecting their movements. And this last point I

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 2>think is really important because the authors say, you know,

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 2>even if these throws are not actually socially intended, they

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.720
<v Speaker 2>do appear to have social effects, Like if they cause

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 2>redirected movement in the victim, that would seem to be

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 2>a socially relevant behavior. Even if you would I don't

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 2>know exactly what it would mean in this case though,

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 2>to say that they were not intended to be social

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 2>signals by the by the individual throwing.

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's so, I mean, it's it's an impossible task

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to try and do, to try and like put yourself

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:50.879
<v Speaker 1>in the mind of an octopus, but you can't help.

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>But wonder, coming back to some of what you said earlier, like,

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is it potentially indeed like a directed action where the octopus,

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in it's own own octopus way, is quote unquote thinking

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't like you, I want you to go away,

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>or something I will throw sand at you. Or is

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 1>it like the octopus is throwing sand while having a

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>certain hostility towards other octopuses or a particular octopus, and

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in doing so, these things kind of aligne and maybe

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>there's less intention there. I don't know.

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, I think that's a really good point, and

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 2>that comes up in one of I think the better

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 2>criticisms of the study that I want to get to

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 2>in just a minute. But just before I do that,

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I want to mention a few other things that the

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 2>authors highlight several things they did not see, and I

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 2>think it's worth paying attention to what these are. They say,

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 2>you know what, we never saw an octopus quote return fire,

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 2>So they never saw a throw hit initiate any kind

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 2>of violent retaliation by the target. That they did see

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the targets like it might make them sort of go

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 2>away or redirect their movements. They also say, and I

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 2>thought this was quite interesting, quote some throws in what

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 2>appear to be fairly intense interactions were not directed at

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:21.839
<v Speaker 2>another octopus but into empty space. So octopuses might be

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 2>tussling pretty strongly, like they're fighting each other, but then

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of that, you know, prolonged aggressive interaction,

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the octopus just kind of like throws some material, but

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 2>not at another octopus just throws something. It almost invites

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 2>comparisons of just like throwing things in a huff. But

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:43.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you could say that's what's going

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 2>on with an octopus.

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, no, you can't help but think that again

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:50.760
<v Speaker 1>putting the human lens over everything.

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 2>But anyway to come back with some criticisms of this

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 2>type of interpretation, I was reading an article in the

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:03.839
<v Speaker 2>Atlantic by Marina called everyone has an Octopus Opinion, And

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 2>this article collects some arguments that there might be less

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.280
<v Speaker 2>than meets the eye when it comes to the octopus

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 2>throwing footage and saying that the interpretation of socially targeted

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:19.959
<v Speaker 2>throwing might just simple simply be anthropomorphization. So a few

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:22.879
<v Speaker 2>things that are collected in this article. One is that

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 2>corn documents a dissenting opinion from an evolutionary biologist at

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco State University named Robin Crook, who questioned whether

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 2>this behavior really counts as quote throwing because of the

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 2>physical processes involved, noting, again, like we talked about earlier,

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:44.839
<v Speaker 2>that while octopuses will grasp things and pass them around

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 2>with their arms, they don't use their arms to throw

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the way we do. Instead, they use this siphon blasting maneuver,

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 2>which to Crook does not constitute throwing. I don't know

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.320
<v Speaker 2>if I would really like make this distinction. It seems

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 2>to me like the important part of throwing is like

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 2>the intentional ballistic projection behavior of objects from the environment,

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 2>not so much like the muscle movements you use to

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 2>do that. But I don't know what you think.

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean a lot of it's just going to

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>come down to body type, right, and what kind of

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:21.879
<v Speaker 1>tools you have to send stuff fly in at another creature. Really,

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I keep coming back to children and all of this.

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't can't wait for you to take everything in

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this episode with you when you start taking your child

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to the beach, because yeah, a human child is certainly

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>an education in all the ways that you can You

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>can send sand flying in the wrong directions as well

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>as various other objects. They can kick it, they can

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>throw it, they can shake it from the towels. It's wonderful.

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I have so much magic of that kind of look

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:57.399
<v Speaker 2>forward to. But no so so, Crook says. Another thing

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 2>is that you know, like we were talking about, there,

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 2>there are other contexts in which octopuses clearly show this

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of like siphon blasting behavior such as cleaning up

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:08.840
<v Speaker 2>their dens after a big meal, you know, blasting a

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 2>bunch of mollusk shells out, and Kirk argues that maybe

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 2>that's all that's happening in the footage that's examined in

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 2>this paper. Sometimes they're just blasting their dens out or

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 2>doing a behavior that they do when they blast their

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 2>dens out and hitting other octopuses by accident. In the

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 2>total footage, this article claims that only seventeen percent of

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 2>the throws actually hit another octopus, So a majority of

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 2>what we see either way is just throwing away behavior,

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 2>not throwing at. The question is whether this minority of

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 2>cases where it was interactive throwing, and especially the ones

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 2>where it looks like interactive throwing and it actually hit

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 2>the other animal, those are the minority we're looking at.

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 2>That's just seventeen percent of all the throws.

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I again come back to something you

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier about again, the octopus is generally a solitary creature,

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and this is a scenario in which they are living

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in close proximity to one another due to the restraints

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of the environment itself. So you could just simply look

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>at it, like, look, these octopuses are violent slobs, and

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>normally they're on their own being violent slabs, but now

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>they're forced to live together, and this is what happens

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:27.399
<v Speaker 1>when octopuses, I don't know, stop being polite and start

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:27.919
<v Speaker 1>getting real.

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, there are several things raised in this article, but

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:35.279
<v Speaker 2>one I thought was actually a pretty good point to

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 2>make was that even if the octopuses are trying to

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 2>hit one another with the throwing, so maybe you can say,

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 2>like half of the equation is true. Maybe it is

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:47.359
<v Speaker 2>targeted throwing. They are throwing at the other octopus. But

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 2>at the same time you could say it might still

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:54.360
<v Speaker 2>not be social octopus signaling exactly because in the words

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:59.359
<v Speaker 2>of Piero Amodio, a biologist who has specialized in octopuses

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Aton Dorn Zoological Station in Italy, it may be quote

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 2>used more broadly towards annoying or threatening stimuli. So maybe

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 2>it's not a thing about octopuses communicating with octopuses, but

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 2>it's just like something is bothering them, so they throw

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 2>they just squirt object, they squirt material at it. And

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 2>evidence for this would include octopuses were also observed in

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 2>a couple of instances in the study throwing debris at

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:30.320
<v Speaker 2>fish and at a camera emplacement in a couple of cases,

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 2>so it could be less intraspecific social signaling and more like,

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what that is, I don't like that

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 2>object in my space. Just squirt some dirt at it

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 2>for this objection, I think fair enough. Like in that case,

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it would definitely count as directed throwing. It

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 2>would be throwing at rather than throwing away. But this

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:53.720
<v Speaker 2>might limit what kinds of interpretations we could make about

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 2>the relationships between gloomy octopuses specifically. The article makes cites

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 2>one line argument that I thought was pretty interesting, and

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 2>this comes from Christian Nauroth, who is a researcher on

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:10.720
<v Speaker 2>the behavior of goats at the Research Institute for Farm

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Animal Biology in Germany. And the point that Naarrath makes

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 2>here talking about goats is that, yeah, even goats have

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 2>lots of mysteries about them. Quote, they sneeze when they're

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 2>spooked or frustrated, and there is actually nothing on how

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 2>often goats show this behavior, how often they use it

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 2>in which contexts they use it. And I thought that

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:36.359
<v Speaker 2>was really interesting because it, of course is especially hard

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 2>to figure out the motivation for animal behavior when you're

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 2>studying them in the wild as opposed to in the lab.

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 2>Like in the lab, you can strictly limit variables to

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 2>some degree, but in the natural environment there might be

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 2>thousands of variables to disentangle, and you might not even

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 2>recognize what some of them are. And the specific example

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 2>about Okay, so goats sometimes sneeze when they're spooked, but like,

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:02.240
<v Speaker 2>why do they do that? What exactly are they trying

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 2>to do with the sneezing. Is it a directed behavior

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:08.760
<v Speaker 2>or just a kind of tick or what? It reminds

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:13.760
<v Speaker 2>me of our recent discussion on the Galapagos marine iguana.

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Do they sort snort salt out of their salt glands

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 2>at an attacker defensively, like when something is approaching them,

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.840
<v Speaker 2>when a Charles Darwin is approaching them, as Charles Darwin

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 2>thought he observed. Or is the salt snorting not actually

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 2>correlated with defensive behavior? Is it not actually motivated by

0:46:33.600 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 2>defensive considerations at all? It's hard to tell.

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Again, it is so hard to step outside of

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the of the human lens here when trying to imagine

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 1>what any of these creatures are doing. Because some of

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>these things like we want to interpret them and think

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>about them as being deliberate actions as opposed to, say,

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:05.320
<v Speaker 1>in the human scenario, sort of incidental signalings of hostility

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that we might have, Like someone can look hostile on

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 1>say a bus, without actively thinking like, oh, I'm going

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to show everybody on this bus how I feel about them.

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Check out my hostility. Don't come near me or violence

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 1>happens next, like you could. That person could just genuinely

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>be and say a bad mood or be thinking about

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:28.359
<v Speaker 1>something that's bothering them, and their their posture, the way

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:31.439
<v Speaker 1>they their look, their expression on their face could take

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 1>on a hostile energy that would then be picked up

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on by other people.

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:38.400
<v Speaker 2>And that and that kind of ambiguity exists even within

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 2>our very finely tuned ability to suss out the motivations

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 2>of other humans. These are cron specifics. We're right in

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 2>that human meal you you know, we're used to that

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 2>when looking at another species. I mean, it's like several

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:55.240
<v Speaker 2>orders of magnitude more difficult to figure things out.

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, Because again, that same dude on the bus

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:00.879
<v Speaker 1>that you're thinking looks hostile, he could just be thinking

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>about a really cool episode of some TV show that

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:06.240
<v Speaker 1>he watched, you know, and that's just all you because

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you think, oh, somebody who looks weird on a bus

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 1>must have hostile intentions. They must have something negative going on,

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and they don't just have an intense look because they're

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out the plot of I don't know,

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:19.359
<v Speaker 1>some Netflix show.

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, I think when it comes to the ambiguity behind

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 2>animal behaviors, there might be other kinds of considerations that

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:28.719
<v Speaker 2>would come in, Like, Okay, is the marine iguana even

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 2>if you could show, wow, it does you know, snort

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 2>salt out of its salt glands more often when a

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 2>human is approaching it, That would show a correlation with

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 2>the proximity of a larger land animal. But it wouldn't.

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:43.759
<v Speaker 2>It wouldn't still wouldn't show it was defensive in some way.

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, maybe it's snorting like that because it's trying

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:50.280
<v Speaker 2>to I don't know, like clear some kind of gland

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:52.959
<v Speaker 2>blockage in case it needs to move quickly or something

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 2>like that. Maybe that's part of the kind of fight

0:48:54.440 --> 0:49:00.760
<v Speaker 2>or flight physiological internal regulation of the iguana's body. Who knows,

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm just speculating there, But you could imagine other things

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 2>for this octopus throwing behavior. Maybe the throwing is part

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 2>of something that's going on internally with the octopus that

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 2>is related to aggressive interactions with other octopuses, but is

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:20.319
<v Speaker 2>not about hitting them with the objects, though it's hard

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:24.840
<v Speaker 2>to figure out what that other purpose would be. Then again,

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:26.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe it is just about hitting them with the salt.

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that seems like a perfectly plausible explanation to me.

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Either way. A fascinating look here, another fascinating consideration of

0:49:34.600 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the world of the octopus. And this episode is also

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of a stealth goat episode too, since we got

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.399
<v Speaker 1>to get in a little bit of goat pondering here

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at the end.

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I like that. But we're going to be back with

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 2>more interesting examples of throwing behavior and animals, so these

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:50.800
<v Speaker 2>questions will continue.

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>That's right, so be sure to join us for the

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:57.399
<v Speaker 1>next one. Let's just remind everybody that's Stuff to Blow

0:49:57.440 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind. It publishes in the Stuff to Blow Your

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Mind podcast feed with our core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

0:50:04.719 --> 0:50:07.560
<v Speaker 1>On Wednesdays we do a short form artifact or monster

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>fact episode. On Mondays we do listener mail, and on

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Fridays we set aside most serious concerns to just talk

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:13.840
<v Speaker 1>about a weird film.

0:50:14.040 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Huge thanks to our audio producer Max Williams. If you

0:50:18.640 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 2>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

0:50:20.640 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 2>on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic

0:50:22.920 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 2>for the future, or just to say hello, you can

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 2>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:36.719
<v Speaker 2>dot com.

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:42.959
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:50:43.120 --> 0:50:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:03.160
<v Speaker 1>At times a p a podic magic