WEBVTT - Tyson Turns to Vegan Foods As It Seeks to Disrupt Itself

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg pim L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Well.

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>In the news today, Tyson food There poultry subsidiary has

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>been ordered to pay a two million dollar fine for

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>discharges from a Southwest Missouri plant that caused a fish

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>kill um and the company. The Arkansas based company said

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>that it was taking full responsibility for what it described

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>as an unfortunate mistake. And here to tell us more

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>about the company right now is Tom Hayes. He is

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the president and the chief executive of Tyson Foods and

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>he joins us here in our eleven three studios. Tom,

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for being with us. I referenced

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that that news item, but I also wanted to reference

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you actually took responsibility for the mistake.

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>That may not be something that major corporations do. They

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>typically will pay a fine, and that's the last to

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>hear of it. I want if you could describe this

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>but also in the context of taking responsibility, because I

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>also want to note that you have taken on the

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>pledge to cut greenhouse gas emissions by thirty percent by sure. Yeah,

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. You know, our strategy of Tyson

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is sustainably feed the world with the fastest growing protein brands.

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But with that comes a lot of responsibility. We know

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.119
<v Speaker 1>that the population is going to be you know whatever,

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the estimates are nine and a half billion people by

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and we have to be a part of the solution.

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>So absolutely, when there are things that go wrong in

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>our system, we will own them. We don't want them

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to go wrong, but sometimes we will. Got a big

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>system and we are focused on how we can do better.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So we've got a big continue improvement program. You know,

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we're transitioning from a company that has a heritage and

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>poultry to really a modern food company, so that comes

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of agility changes and things that are

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>focused on sustainability, making sure that we can, you know,

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>not only do the things we can do for our

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>shareholders to make money, but also do in a way

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that everybody on our team can be proud of. And

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>we can have a positive impact Tom modern food company.

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>What exactly does that mean? I mean, what's sort of

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the next step for Tyson? So I think of four

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>things when I think of modern food company. Firstly that

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned is sustainability. The second is transparency. You know,

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of trust with big food and

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>so we need to become more transparent. Uh. Certainly, as

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it relates to agility that I talked about, it's hard

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>for big companies and necessarily move quickly. A lot of

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>small food companies are really good at that. We are

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>working that agility into everything that we're doing. And then finally,

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>just the whole idea of being relevant that is something

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that we have to consistently be with our consumers. So

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.279
<v Speaker 1>we do spend a lot of money on brand building innovation.

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>We've got business models that are large, big brands three

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, three one billion dollar brands, and we have

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>small brands were really cultivating to be more relevant for

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>consumers today. All right, just to put it into some numbers, right,

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty five million chickens, nearly half a million pigs, a

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty thousand cattle a week. Right, this is big.

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>You also have stopped using the antibiotics and chickens. You've

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>also said that you've got this line of antibiotic free pork,

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>but you've also made an investment in a company that's

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>based in Memphis, and I wonder if you could tell

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>us about this because this is not anything really to

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>do with what you think of when you think of meat.

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So excellent question. Those business models. I talked about one

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of our ways that we are going to grow the

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>companies by investing in some new emerging models, uh, and

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously thinking about ways that we can disrupt ourselves. So

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of opportunities for companies to be disrupted.

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>We want to disrupt ourselves. So that investment you're talking

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>about is Memphis Meats actually based in Chicago, but they

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>have the Memphis Meats brand, and what they are doing

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is taking cells from animals, so not raising and then

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:15.839
<v Speaker 1>harvesting animals, taking cells and essentially culturing those into a

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>meat alternative. So it's very interesting technology. It's still very nascent.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>But we're also investing in companies like Beyond Meat so

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:27.239
<v Speaker 1>plant based protein, introducing our own lines of plant based protein.

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So it requires a lot of different solutions to be

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>sustainably feeding the world. And those are just some of

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the examples that we're entering into. Tom You also said

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>in a presentation last week UH that Tyson is planning

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to cut greenhouse gas emissions by thirty So if you

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>think about the stages UH in one and two, those

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>areas of our food production, what we control within our house, basically,

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>those are pretty easy for us to get to. The

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>things that are different culled are the things that are

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>really what are UM phase three, which is we're not

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>vertically integrated and cattle and not vertically integrated but for

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>a small amount on pork or hugs. So we have

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to work with cattleman and you know, producers to make

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a big change in the system. And so that's where

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>the majority that will come from is sort of getting

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>after those those UM emissions, and particularly i'd say as

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it relates to cattle. You have also been kind of

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>reshaping the company when it comes to what businesses you

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>want to be in and what businesses you don't want

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>to be in. For example, I believe like frozen some

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of the frozen food businesses are you going to sell

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>some give us an idea of the kinds of lines

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that you'd like to sell. Maybe it's the what is

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>it the frozen I can't remember frozen food assets. It

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the at some of it's on

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the block, right, this is the Van's Foods that business.

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>But you want to buy others? What what kinds of

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>bolt on acquisitions are you're looking for? So we're looking

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>for any time we can a new brand. That's again

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>going back to protein. So the protein is a tail

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>one that we're taking advantage of. Consumers are actively trying

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to get into their diet more and more. So it

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>would be assets that either have a brand that we

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>can take advantage of, a new capability, Uh do they

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>move us into a new geography, whether it's internationally or

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>here domestically, and so those are the that's the sort

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of filters we have. And so it would be companies

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>like we bought with Advanced Pierre, very Protein Centrick. Not

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily you know a lot of consumer brands, but they

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 1>have a very strong culture of driving profitable foods in

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace, whether it's branded or unbranded. And so assets

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.559
<v Speaker 1>like that the ones that we can continue to build

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>our brand portfolio. Those are the important ones. Thank you

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>so much. For joining us. Fascinating to hear how you're

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to disrupt yourselves. Uh, fascinating concept. As the world

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>expands and as more people look to protein filled meat alternatives.

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hayes, president and executive officer of Tyson Foods, which

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>is based in Springdale, Arizona, but he joins us here

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in our eleven three oh studios. Medical marijuana has been

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the hotter bets in the past few years,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and a company that specializes in it is filing the

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>first cannabis related US initial public offering, that is Chronos Group,

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and the chief executive officer joins us now, Michael Gorenstein.

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for being here. Michael, can you

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>just give us a sense of why you decided to

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>file this I p O, how much you plan to raise,

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and what brought you to the US. Sure, thanks for

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>having me so A big driver was spreading awareness. We've

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>actually been publicly traded in Canada for some time and

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of American investors have questions about the legality.

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's very surprised to hear that there are legal ways

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to get exposure of the industry and by going through

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the process with the NASDAC and and starting the trading yesterday.

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, a big big thing for US as being

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>able to help advance things, help explain to people that

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>there there is a market. There are federally legal avenues

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>where you're able to to invest in the companies that

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>are developing the intellectual property, that are building brands and

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>are are spreading global distribution without having the legal risk

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that you would otherwise have in the US to find

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for people what your company does. So really we we

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>do a number of things we look at as a

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>virtual cycle, but ultimately what we're doing is developing global distribution.

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>So right now we're across Germany, Israel, Canada, Australia, in

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the Cayman Islands. UH disruptive intellectual property and unlocking the

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>science behind cannabis that really hasn't been there because when

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you hang on when you say distribution, distribution of what

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like if I was to go to your company, what

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly how's your company divide it up? In what products

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>or services do you provide? So we directly will ship

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a number productly of forty three different skews that would

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>be available if you were to come to us. UH

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>varying ratios of cannabinoids, flower derivative products. We offer a

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>wide range depending on on what the therapeutic areas that

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for for helping. So why list in the US?

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think a big part of it is

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>accessing US capital, being able to uh, you know, to

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>get a foothold here, and ultimately we do believe that

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the US will be federally legal, and for US, it

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense to give American investors a

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>chance to get in early because when we come here,

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we do want that support and we don't want to

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>be sort of the foreign conquerors. We I grew up

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>in the US. Uh. Much much of our management team

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>moved to Canada from the US, and we certainly hope

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to keep more people from the US involved. You know,

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's sort of hard to distinguish, uh, you know,

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of the legal aspects of marijuana and how it

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>relates to medical versus recreational. And you know, we were

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 1>talking before about how you focus on medical and yet

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>do you get a lot of investors coming to you

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and sort of treating you in tandem with alcohol companies

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and trying to get in on the ground floor, uh

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>for something that will take off on a recreational level,

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and how do you sort of deal with that? So

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we do you know, we have we do have a

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>wholely owned license in British Columbia that will focus exclusively

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>on the recreational market. But we do try to educate

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>people on though, is the medical opportunity is huge and

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>if you look at a few things that might not

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily come top of mind, you start to understand that.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So first, the countries are much more likely to legalize

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>medical before they are recreational. It's just it's a much

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>easier argument. It's from policy perspective, makes more sense. Uh.

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>And so you've got a global medical market versus just

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the Canadian recreational market and just off sheer numbers, that's

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a very big difference. Uh. The second is thematically, there

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>are people that are moving away from from alcohol for

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>some health reasons, but it's not very drastic. And you've

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>seen in states where cannabis and legalized there's a trend.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>But a much bigger trend is what's going on with opioids.

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>The opioid epidemic. It's ripping across North America and really

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>across the world. And chronic pain is one of the

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 1>largest indications that we see for cannabis. So being able

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to provide UH medicine that doesn't have the same harmful

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>effects is something that we see as a as a

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>big catalyst. And finally, UH insurance coverage is something that

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen in the US. Everyone looked at Colorado

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, this wasn't a real industry. UH companies

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be profitable until recreational. How are you going to

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>compete with the guy on the corner that's just gonna

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>sell you a bag. If you've got to go to

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a doctor. Well, Germany there is full insurance coverage and

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>so you're able to go to your doctor and reimburse

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>like a true medicine. So that's part of why our

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>strategy is UH, you know, is being able to target

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>European markets. We have an exclusive distribution agreement with a

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>h three year old pharmaceutical company in Germany and gives

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>us access to twelve thousand pharmacies. I think the medicinal

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>market is is a very very great opportunity, and we

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>try to educate people and it's a form of social entrepreneurship.

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You're also doing good. Can you also just educate us

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and our listeners in you know maybe thirty seconds that

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>there is a very a wide variation of what is

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>available from cannabis. So for example, th HC is one,

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>c b D is another. A lot of acronyms here

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>at th h c V, which is what you're focused on.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Just describe if you cantata top leve level of you

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>what people need them to understand. Yeah, so a lot

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of the misconception about cannabis. You do hear people always

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 1>tell you they've had different effects that you know, makes

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>them tired, it wakes them up and makes them laugh,

0:12:56.280 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>makes them scared, cures cancer, cure as headaches. The analogy

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>there would be if I were to tell you, hey,

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you know pills are really good for making you sleep well?

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>What's inside of the pill. So cannabis is you can

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>think of it as a vessel. But depending on the

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>different genetics, there over a hundred different cannabinoids. There are

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>thousands of turpenes, and these work together synergistically to create

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>an entourage effect. So what the actual type of cannabis is,

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>what the cannabinoids are, is very very important to what

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>effect you'll get. Just really really really quick. Our opioids

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 1>more expensive that are used for pain killing than be cannaboid, uh,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>than the cannabis product in general. Yes, they are. I

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>just say that there's a recent study we were talking

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>about this offtline that was just published in the European

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Journal of Internal Medicine that the Israeli researchers have said

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that the efficacy of cannabis for cancer patients helps those

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>avoid their opioid dependency even before it starts. Thanks very

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Michael Gorenstein is the chief

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>executive of a Chrono, a group, and yes they are

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>trading in the United States. We got some data overnight

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>out of China showing that a gauge of demand for

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>factory made goods in the nation fell the most in

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>five years, much more than any economist survey by Bloomberg

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>had expected. Here to help us understand how much we

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>ought to pay attention to this is Leland Miller, chief

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>executive officer of China beige Book International in New York,

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and he joins us here in the studios. Leland, thank

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being here. So what did you

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>make of this read? Well, not much uh February data.

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>When you when you're talking about January in February and

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>China you've got the lunar New year, which means that

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>any comparison either between those two months or between January

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>February and the years before are are hard and any

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>any real conclusions about so we don't think that February

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>means much. Is there some expectation of a slowdown particularly

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in manufacturing this year? Sure was the fifty one to

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty uh noticeable drop? Not really should be worried about

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>February data regardless, Not really so. I think people have

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>been watching for a slowdown in China and so they

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>took note of this. But this is the trepidation the

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>market seems to be seemed to be feeling that that's

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>not warranted yet Leland, what's the big deal right now

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with China? Is it tariffs on things like aluminum foil?

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it steal tariffs? What's going on and what should

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>investors really be paying attention to? That's see, that's a

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>great question, and I don't think people are asking this enough.

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>They see the headlines on stealing aluminium tariffs and I think, well,

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this this is gonna just crush China. Well, it won't

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>be good for China. But but while we will be

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>dealing in the coming weeks with stealing aluminium tariffs and

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>whether President Trump is really gonna go big on them,

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the real question for China is the intellectual property theft

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>UH investor gaistion Section three oh one and whatever tariffs

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>they do on that. Now that's been backtracked a little

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>bit behind the scenes. It's still moving through UH the

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>inter agency process. But if scenario worst worst case scenario

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is that President Trump decides he's gonna he's gonna make

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a big move before the midterms, puts sectoral tariffs on

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>say consumer electronics, something giant like that, and you have

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely justifiable use of the term trade war. That is

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a big, big deal. It doesn't mean it's gonna happen,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>but the worst case scenario is an all out, big

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>time trade war. What do you hear from people who

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>are close to who are involved in these negotiations, Well,

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that the administration is having a very very difficult time

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>coming to consensus on this um. You know, you read

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>this in the media, but it's the reality behind the scenes.

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So one of the reasons that you don't have a

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>two thirty two announcement yet is that there's the president

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to do something big on stealing aluminium being the

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>stealings to steal it aluminium tariffs, right, he wants to

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>do something big. Uh. But at the same time, almost

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.959
<v Speaker 1>everyone's administration, every cabin official except a few uh as,

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>entire National Economic Council think that this this the still

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>aluminum tariffs, these global tariffs in a non targeted way

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>would be an awful idea. Similarly, section three oh one,

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the president wants to go big. Other people are saying, look,

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this is potentially problematic. Sorry, that's the intellectual property theft

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>uh tariffs uh. And and so there's this desire by

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the president to go big, and his even inside the

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump White House, there's a desire to tamp this down

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>because they realize that this could get out of control.

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And as a result, you've had this in action because

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there's an inability to come to consensus. This will end

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>sometime soon because you have deadlines on some of these

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>endings soon the steel aluminum terrorists, for instance, had to

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>be done by mid April or the authority goes away

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>just to go back to this intellectual property thing. In

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the worst case scenario for consumer how does this show up.

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Does this mean someone's iPhone becomes more expensive? Does this

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>mean you can't afford the via television? Tell us the

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>detail right, So you have first order effects and then

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you have second and third order effects. So the first

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>order effect. In the worst case scenario, which of course

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is not our baseline scenario right now, the President decides

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to go big on consumer electronics and says We're going

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to put a large tariff on everything coming out of China. Yes,

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>consumers will feel the brunt to that, but I think

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the bigger brunt will be the second thord or effects.

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>First of all, China will retaliate. They'll start nail, you know,

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>hammering our farmers, soybean exports, et cetera. At the same time,

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>businesses operating in China will have a very difficult time.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you're Bowing, if your Apple, if you're any

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of these other companies that are trying to make inroads,

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you're in big trouble because the Chinese will either react

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>immediately or you will have this cloud of uncertainty hanging

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 1>over you for the for the foreseeable future. Are there

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>any estimates for how much China's GDP will get reduced

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>if there is some sort of trade war, the question

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is is will will any reduction GDP ever get acknowledged

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>by the government. So maybe this will be without any

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>loss of GDP for the all right, fair enough. But

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I asked, though, is because people say,

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if China catches a cold, the emerging markets

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>get the flu. UH. People look at this as a

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 1>bell weather of one of the hottest trades UH, you know,

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in the past few years. So you know what's going

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to be the bleed out effect of a trade war.

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>So again, if you have this worst case scenario, UM,

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>you will have a substantial drop in GDP UM the

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese UH. You can talk about the Chinese economy being

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>more and more reliant on its own consumers internally, but

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that just hasn't happened yet. You know, you're still seeing

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>these enormous trade flows UM and and and that's the

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>way they wanted. And so if you have a problem

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>with UH, with with trade, and you have the US

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>clamping down and China clamping down back, you will have

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a problem in China. You will have a problem in

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. And UM's it's a little bit hard hard

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to quantify because you can't believe the GDP figures, but

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>you would certainly have something at least as serious as

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>what happened at the end of two fifteen early in

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of in terms of an economic crisis, Leland, what

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>books or journals would you recommend that people read if

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they want to educate themselves more deeply in how China

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>really works. You know, it's getting harder and harder because

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>if you if you saw the the announcement the Chinese

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>are banning like the letter N, the words shameless and

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 1>all these other other things. Um, you know, it's it's

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>getting hold hold. Maybe people don't know about Hell's help,

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>what happened well, and and and the other. The last

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, the censorship has been ramping up even more

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>than in the norm. And if you're seeing these almost

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>comical censorship of words from shameless was one of them.

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>There was a handful of other words that are hominem's

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>with leaders names. But the word the letter N was

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>was actually banned because that was supposed to signify uh

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>n is greater than two, which means she's terms were

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>she's new term, lifelong term is is greater than two,

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it's any equals infinity, whatever it might be. The Chinese

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:58.959
<v Speaker 1>were going overboard with that. It's got a lot of

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>media coverage lately, and it just shows you that getting

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>information out of China is much more difficult now than

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.719
<v Speaker 1>it was in past years. But I mean, is there

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>something that you could recommend, because I mean, even just

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to understand the structure of the of the country's politics,

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the party is actually above the government, right, not anymore

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>now it's all the same, right. Well, that's that's the idea.

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the party, the theory, the party above all.

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But the more these these things are all merging into

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this monolithic chi jin Ping uh force. Uh. That's that's

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>what China is now. You know. The mantra is China is,

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the party is chi Jinping. Is there any economic data

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>that you rely upon that is actually an accurate number

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>coming out of China? We look at everything because everything,

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 1>uh put some shades, some some flavor into the overall picture.

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But the reason we started China Bejing book back in

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and ten is we didn't believe this stuff.

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>We thought we had to get it ourselves. So not really,

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you very much for coming in

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>and joining us. Leland Miller Chief exec gtive of China

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>beige Book International. Go ahead and follow them on Twitter

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>at China beige Book. Seems like an increasing number of

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:26.479
<v Speaker 1>equity investors have sounded the all clear bell have dived

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>back into equities after the minor hiccup over the past

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. Here to take stock of what investors are

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>looking to do in their stock portfolios. As Scott Wren,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>senior Global Equity Strategist for the Wells Fargo Investment Institute

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in St. Louis, he joins us here in our eleven

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>three studios in New York. Scott, thank you so much

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>for being here. I was just this morning looking at

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>twelve months tea bells and looking at how you can

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>now get two percent yields on that, and I'm wondering,

0:22:55.480 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you tell your equity investors, your clients with

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>respect to how much money they should be holding in

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>cash right now. Well, Lisa, first of all, it's great

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to be here. It's been a while since I've been

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in studio. But you know, as far as our investors

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and and I think you can generalize this to most

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>retail investors who that's That's who I'm dealing with. Most

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of the time, UM, they've been under invested in stocks,

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they've been sitting on too much cash. Would they love

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to see five percent CE deals? Sure they would, We

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>probably all would, but you know that's probably not going

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 1>to happen anytime soon. These these interest rates are a

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 1>little higher, UM, but when we look out over the

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>course of the next few years, I still think that

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>stocks are going to be the outperformers there. So UM,

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, our fixed income um UH team has not

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>really started to recommend getting locked in here with these

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>slightly higher rates, but UM, we like stocks order bonds,

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>all right, So do you sell bonds in order to

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>deploy the cash that you might have into equities? Well,

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that that UM for one thing, PIM most

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of our clients still have cash, so they could just

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>step in and not do anything with their bond portfolio.

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>But I think, you know, you could argue that if

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>you're locked in in an intermediate type of duration and

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>you don't have any cash, you know, we want to

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>be in stock. So I mean, if if that's your

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>only choice and you do not have any cash, UM,

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we wouldn't mind lightning up on let's say,

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>high yield bonds. Something like that, and and moving some

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of that money into stocks. So, Scott, have you changed

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>any of your preferences within the equity universe over the

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 1>past few weeks, just as we kind of reassessed the

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>growth picture the yield picture. Well, I would like to

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>say that, you know, this was all skilled, but it

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>was probably a little luck to in the sectors that

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>we have been really leaning toward. UM. In terms of

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>domestic we've been leaning towards industrials and consumer discretionary and

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>financials and healthcare, and we like those. We had in

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 1>those for a while, but we like them prior to

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the change in the tax code, and then when the

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>tax code was changed, we even like them more. So.

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, what we want our clients doing is being assertive.

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>We want them leaning towards these sectors that are going

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to benefit from a continuation of this expansion, which I

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>think was probably UM drawn out for maybe another year

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>or two couple of years based on the new tax

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>uh tax reform. But what we don't want our clients

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>doing is getting defensive. There will be some time at

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>some point in the future to get defensive, but we've

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>been underweight staples, underweight utilities. We we like those positions. Um,

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and we like them more since the new tax code

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>went into effect. Scott. It's interesting that you say we

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't want them to get defensive. It suggests to

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>me that a number of clients have called you saying

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>is it time to get defensive? Is that the case?

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>That is the case? Lee, So you know, and I

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's safe to say that. Um. You know, when

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the when the market steadily goes up like it did

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>last year, my phone does not ring frequently. But when

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the market drops in you know, five or six trading days,

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>my phone rings constantly. And so, um, you know they're

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 1>they're um, uh, they're concerned. Um, they're fearful. Uh. Initially

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>they were a little fearful that they missed out. Some

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:24.919
<v Speaker 1>of them stepped in maybe a little closer to the

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>top than what they would like. But for the most part,

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>there are clients at on their side, on their hands. So, um,

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>some want to get defensive. We're trying to encourage them

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>not to do that. Scott. I want to steal something

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>from our colleague Tom Keane. The other day he talked

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>about the amount of time that investors spend worrying about

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>whether to get into a market can be something like

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>but when they pushed the panic button to get out,

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>that's something that maybe they spend five or ten percent

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>at the time. How do you educate someone to flip

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that equation. I think what we try to do him

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is is we try to look forward, of course, and

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to say, what is the economy going to do?

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 1>What is inflation going to do? What is the federal

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Reserve going to do? That's certainly we're focused on those

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>things right now. What are wages going to do? Because

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that's been a worry for the market. Um So,

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>if the forward outlook is good and and valuations are

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>not stretched, which I don't believe that they are right now,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>then we want our clients taking advantage of this volatility

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and and I think you're going to see more downside

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>volatility now do I think we're going to see the

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>two hun day moving average again? And the SMP fund

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>probably not certainly not impossible, but I think we will

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>probably test a little lower here. You know, we've wanted

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>our clients to have a plan to put the cash

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to work, and then when you have the opportunity, and

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the hardest things to do is then to

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>get them to pull the trigger and jump in there.

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's amazing to me that you've got that

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>many calls because of volatility. Wasn't that extreme, I mean,

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>aside from the VIX, but equities didn't sell off that much,

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just really quickly. Does this concern you with respect to

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>investors sentiment and just how judy people could get if say,

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the market does decline for an extended period of time.

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>It does. And you know, Lisa, when you look back

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and and uh um, and you say, well gee um.

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Over the over the last ninety years, the S and

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>P s had a ten percent pullback on average every

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>eleven months. We hadn't had one for two years. It

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>all happened in the course of a very short period

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>of time. That does uh. That does scare people. And

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>it is a concern because we had a number of

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>clients who were posing up to you know, better things

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.719
<v Speaker 1>happening in the stock market. We dropped ten percent very quickly,

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>they back away. It makes them nervous. I want to

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for being with us as always.

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.959
<v Speaker 1>Scott Wren is senior Global equity strategist for Wells Fargo

0:28:53.400 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Investment Institute. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa Abramo wits one. Before the podcast, you

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio