1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,840 Speaker 1: It's sponsorship time. But you know what, it's really great 2 00:00:02,880 --> 00:00:05,720 Speaker 1: when you get a sponsor that you already use. 3 00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:06,560 Speaker 2: And guess what. 4 00:00:06,720 --> 00:00:09,639 Speaker 1: Quint's is something that in the Todd household we already 5 00:00:09,680 --> 00:00:11,320 Speaker 1: go to. Why do we go to Quint's Because it's 6 00:00:11,320 --> 00:00:13,480 Speaker 1: a place you go where you can get some really 7 00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:17,279 Speaker 1: nice clothes without the really expensive prices. And one of 8 00:00:17,280 --> 00:00:19,640 Speaker 1: the things I've been going through is I've transitioned from 9 00:00:19,640 --> 00:00:22,720 Speaker 1: being mister cot and tie guy to wanting a little 10 00:00:22,760 --> 00:00:25,640 Speaker 1: more casual but to look nice doing it. Is I've 11 00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:27,240 Speaker 1: become mister quarter zip guy. 12 00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:27,880 Speaker 2: Well guess what. 13 00:00:28,040 --> 00:00:31,920 Speaker 1: Guess he's got amazing amounts of quarter zips. It is Quints. 14 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:36,000 Speaker 1: I have gotten quite a few already from there. The 15 00:00:36,040 --> 00:00:40,720 Speaker 1: stuff's really nice. They have Mongolian cashmere sweaters for fifty dollars. 16 00:00:40,840 --> 00:00:43,320 Speaker 1: I just know, hey, cashmere, that's pretty good. You don't 17 00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:46,400 Speaker 1: normally get that for fifty bucks or less. Italian wool 18 00:00:46,440 --> 00:00:49,279 Speaker 1: coats that look and feel like designer the stuff. I'll 19 00:00:49,280 --> 00:00:51,160 Speaker 1: be honest, right, you look at it online, you think, okay, 20 00:00:51,200 --> 00:00:52,680 Speaker 1: is this really as nice as it looks? Well, when 21 00:00:52,680 --> 00:00:54,600 Speaker 1: I got it, I was like, oh, this is real quality. 22 00:00:54,680 --> 00:00:57,080 Speaker 1: So yeah, I'm going to end up making sure I 23 00:00:57,120 --> 00:00:59,080 Speaker 1: take it to my dry cleaner so I don't screw 24 00:00:59,080 --> 00:01:02,160 Speaker 1: it up when I clean it. But I've been quite impressed. 25 00:01:02,160 --> 00:01:05,560 Speaker 1: In Hey, it's holiday season. It is impossible to shop 26 00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:08,760 Speaker 1: for us middle aged men. I know this well. Tell 27 00:01:08,800 --> 00:01:12,480 Speaker 1: your kids, tell your spouses, tell your partners. Try Quints. 28 00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:14,760 Speaker 1: Or if you're trying to figure out what to get 29 00:01:14,800 --> 00:01:17,839 Speaker 1: your adult child, what to get your mom or dad, 30 00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:20,080 Speaker 1: I'm telling you you're going to find something that is 31 00:01:20,120 --> 00:01:22,840 Speaker 1: going to be comfortable for them on Quints. So get 32 00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:26,600 Speaker 1: your wardrobe sorted and your gift list handled with Quints. 33 00:01:26,720 --> 00:01:27,160 Speaker 2: Don't wait. 34 00:01:27,240 --> 00:01:30,440 Speaker 1: Go to quints dot com slash chuck for free shipping 35 00:01:30,480 --> 00:01:32,759 Speaker 1: on your order and three hundred and sixty five day 36 00:01:32,800 --> 00:01:36,800 Speaker 1: returns now available in Canada as well. That's qui nce 37 00:01:37,319 --> 00:01:41,320 Speaker 1: dot com, slash chuck, free shipping and three hundred and 38 00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 1: sixty five day returns quints dot com slash chuck. Use 39 00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:52,640 Speaker 1: that code. Hello there, Happy Monday, and welcome to another 40 00:01:52,640 --> 00:01:54,000 Speaker 1: episode of the Chuck Podcast. 41 00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:55,400 Speaker 2: Of course, I have to open up. 42 00:01:56,840 --> 00:01:59,920 Speaker 1: To do a little representing here to say I'm relieved 43 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:03,640 Speaker 1: and surprised at the committee's decision with the University of 44 00:02:03,640 --> 00:02:07,680 Speaker 1: Miami and football is an understatement. I don't think any 45 00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:10,000 Speaker 1: of the sins that I've been identifying of this committee 46 00:02:10,560 --> 00:02:15,560 Speaker 1: should somehow be washed away. What they have done with 47 00:02:15,639 --> 00:02:19,160 Speaker 1: the SEC in Alabama is as suspicious as ever, and 48 00:02:19,240 --> 00:02:22,560 Speaker 1: I have I do not blame anger out of the 49 00:02:22,560 --> 00:02:26,600 Speaker 1: folks at Notre Dame. I think the strangest decision was 50 00:02:28,520 --> 00:02:33,600 Speaker 1: including Alabama. Actually the strangest decision was including Oklahoma. We 51 00:02:33,639 --> 00:02:35,800 Speaker 1: can have a longer discussion about that. And I have 52 00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:38,880 Speaker 1: still had a bunch of stuff to say about this. 53 00:02:39,440 --> 00:02:42,679 Speaker 1: I love the fact that now all these ESPA personalities 54 00:02:42,680 --> 00:02:44,400 Speaker 1: at CURTA. Herdstreet are saying we should get rid of 55 00:02:44,400 --> 00:02:47,920 Speaker 1: this TV show. Good luck getting your bosses to agree 56 00:02:47,960 --> 00:02:48,720 Speaker 1: to do the TV show. 57 00:02:48,760 --> 00:02:49,679 Speaker 2: But you are correct. 58 00:02:50,360 --> 00:03:00,360 Speaker 1: The college football ranking shows created this antagonism of fan bases, suspicion, conspiracy, theory, ease, 59 00:03:00,520 --> 00:03:05,080 Speaker 1: all of that, the behavior of the committee, the lack 60 00:03:05,120 --> 00:03:09,600 Speaker 1: of sort of consistency, the decision, all that business it. 61 00:03:09,840 --> 00:03:13,799 Speaker 1: You know, they have nobody to blame but themselves. I 62 00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:16,799 Speaker 1: had a friend of mine quickly text he said, well 63 00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:19,360 Speaker 1: all your whining worked, and I'm like, hey, don't encourage me. 64 00:03:20,680 --> 00:03:23,640 Speaker 1: There's a I hope that's not the case in a 65 00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:27,440 Speaker 1: weird way. I hope it wasn't outside agitators like myself 66 00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:30,880 Speaker 1: and others pointing out facts that they were unaware of. 67 00:03:30,960 --> 00:03:34,360 Speaker 1: I should hope they were. That they didn't need people 68 00:03:34,440 --> 00:03:39,240 Speaker 1: to point these things out, but to say that how 69 00:03:39,280 --> 00:03:44,200 Speaker 1: this went down and the it is going to do 70 00:03:44,280 --> 00:03:48,440 Speaker 1: nothing but encourage more activity like the activity a bunch 71 00:03:48,440 --> 00:03:51,680 Speaker 1: of US University of Miami partisans participate in over the 72 00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:55,920 Speaker 1: last few weeks. There will be more of that come 73 00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:58,240 Speaker 1: next year, until they finally get rid of this committee 74 00:03:58,280 --> 00:04:03,200 Speaker 1: and allow basics what happens on the field dictates everything 75 00:04:03,280 --> 00:04:06,840 Speaker 1: hard stop. But like I said, I'll have more to 76 00:04:06,840 --> 00:04:08,760 Speaker 1: say about college football. And for those of you who 77 00:04:08,760 --> 00:04:11,920 Speaker 1: don't care about sports or college football, or have written 78 00:04:11,920 --> 00:04:14,000 Speaker 1: off college football because you don't like how they've been 79 00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:17,280 Speaker 1: doing this for frankly one hundred years, they have never 80 00:04:17,279 --> 00:04:21,520 Speaker 1: gotten their postseason, right, I get it, I understand, and 81 00:04:21,600 --> 00:04:24,200 Speaker 1: I will put this at the end of this podcast. 82 00:04:24,320 --> 00:04:25,520 Speaker 1: Let me give you a rundown of what I got 83 00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:29,240 Speaker 1: going on today. We of course have got sort of 84 00:04:29,839 --> 00:04:31,760 Speaker 1: I want to go through a little bit of the 85 00:04:31,839 --> 00:04:37,440 Speaker 1: national of the of the new National Strategic Security Strategy 86 00:04:37,720 --> 00:04:41,719 Speaker 1: Memo that gets updated every year by whoever's in the presidency. 87 00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:45,120 Speaker 1: And to say there's a departure not surprising, but a 88 00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:50,800 Speaker 1: departure of of what role America should play in the 89 00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:54,840 Speaker 1: world is an understatement. Bottom line, the president of the 90 00:04:54,920 --> 00:04:57,640 Speaker 1: United States does not want to be the leader of 91 00:04:57,720 --> 00:05:03,520 Speaker 1: the free world, if you take the National Security Strategy 92 00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:08,520 Speaker 1: update seriously. I want to get into that a little 93 00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:11,520 Speaker 1: bit on this Trump pardon anger at Henry Quaar and 94 00:05:11,560 --> 00:05:14,360 Speaker 1: what it really tells us about how the pardon system. 95 00:05:14,040 --> 00:05:16,200 Speaker 2: Works in the Trump White House. But I want to 96 00:05:16,200 --> 00:05:16,919 Speaker 2: start with. 97 00:05:18,920 --> 00:05:23,400 Speaker 1: Sort of the news that wasn't That wasn't the headline, 98 00:05:23,480 --> 00:05:27,360 Speaker 1: but I think it's something that I wanted to spend 99 00:05:27,560 --> 00:05:29,839 Speaker 1: a few minutes focused on before I get to some 100 00:05:29,880 --> 00:05:32,440 Speaker 1: of the sort of you know, hot take headlines that 101 00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:32,840 Speaker 1: I know. 102 00:05:34,520 --> 00:05:35,359 Speaker 2: I want to dabble in. 103 00:05:35,400 --> 00:05:37,360 Speaker 1: I've got a few things, just sort of what I 104 00:05:37,360 --> 00:05:40,920 Speaker 1: would call a notebook item of news events that I 105 00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:44,360 Speaker 1: think folks need to be following more closely. But finally, 106 00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:47,279 Speaker 1: earlier this week, the Trump White House put out the 107 00:05:47,360 --> 00:05:50,520 Speaker 1: twenty twenty five National Security Strategy Memo, and. 108 00:05:50,480 --> 00:05:51,440 Speaker 2: Here's what it signals. 109 00:05:51,440 --> 00:05:56,240 Speaker 1: It signaled to a significant and explicit departure from the 110 00:05:56,279 --> 00:05:59,479 Speaker 1: long standing US foreign policy goal of actively spreading and 111 00:05:59,520 --> 00:06:05,120 Speaker 1: supporting democracy abroad. Here on the eve, you know, of 112 00:06:05,400 --> 00:06:11,080 Speaker 1: the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of our founding as 113 00:06:11,160 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 1: a small D democratic country as the sort of beacon 114 00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:18,640 Speaker 1: of democracy for the world, this is not the role 115 00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:22,600 Speaker 1: Donald Trump and the MAGA movement wants the United States 116 00:06:22,640 --> 00:06:27,119 Speaker 1: to play. The America First ideology is strewn all through 117 00:06:28,120 --> 00:06:33,320 Speaker 1: this document. It reorients US policy away from what's been 118 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:37,400 Speaker 1: a values based interventionism and toward a more strictly pragmatic 119 00:06:37,560 --> 00:06:42,920 Speaker 1: America First approach, defining core national security interests as sovereignty, 120 00:06:43,480 --> 00:06:47,760 Speaker 1: homeland defense, economic strength, and self reliance. No longer do 121 00:06:47,800 --> 00:06:51,240 Speaker 1: we believe in spreading our value, supporting our values, supporting 122 00:06:51,279 --> 00:06:56,159 Speaker 1: small D democracy when it's necessary. In fact, non interventionism. 123 00:06:56,160 --> 00:07:01,280 Speaker 1: The strategy explicitly criticizes past efforts to impose quote, democratic 124 00:07:01,360 --> 00:07:04,839 Speaker 1: or other social change that differs widely from their traditions 125 00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:08,320 Speaker 1: and histories. It's just a clear rejection of the post 126 00:07:08,320 --> 00:07:11,680 Speaker 1: Cold War consensus on democracy promotion in nation building. 127 00:07:11,760 --> 00:07:11,920 Speaker 2: Right. 128 00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:14,960 Speaker 1: This is where there was a strong, sort of broad 129 00:07:15,040 --> 00:07:20,720 Speaker 1: bipartisan consensus that the United States should always first and 130 00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:26,720 Speaker 1: foremost support freedom, support democracy when it is obviously how 131 00:07:26,800 --> 00:07:29,760 Speaker 1: much do you use military to do it? Look, those 132 00:07:29,840 --> 00:07:32,640 Speaker 1: are fair debates, but to no longer be in the 133 00:07:32,680 --> 00:07:35,040 Speaker 1: business of supporting it or promoting it seems to be 134 00:07:35,400 --> 00:07:38,920 Speaker 1: a big mistake. The strategy memo also generally favors accepting 135 00:07:38,920 --> 00:07:42,080 Speaker 1: countries as they are, which of course is a cherry 136 00:07:42,080 --> 00:07:44,160 Speaker 1: picked thing. I'll get to that in a minute. As 137 00:07:44,200 --> 00:07:45,920 Speaker 1: their leaders quote as they are in regions like the 138 00:07:45,920 --> 00:07:51,520 Speaker 1: Middle East, prioritizing stability and transactional cooperation over shared interests 139 00:07:52,160 --> 00:07:55,680 Speaker 1: on shared interest rather than talking about internal political reform. 140 00:07:55,720 --> 00:08:01,840 Speaker 1: Of course, we've seen the Vice President lecture Europe and 141 00:08:01,880 --> 00:08:05,480 Speaker 1: not accepting Europe at face value. We've seen the President 142 00:08:05,520 --> 00:08:08,080 Speaker 1: of the United States lecture Brazil on how it decided to 143 00:08:08,120 --> 00:08:11,880 Speaker 1: deal with Bolsonaro, not accepting Brazil at face values. 144 00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:15,520 Speaker 2: So this is this is clearly a. 145 00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:23,600 Speaker 1: Philosophy that they will only sometimes follow depending on their 146 00:08:23,640 --> 00:08:28,080 Speaker 1: personal relationships with said country or said leader. But for 147 00:08:28,120 --> 00:08:31,440 Speaker 1: the most part, real politic is not something that you 148 00:08:31,760 --> 00:08:35,640 Speaker 1: hear me criticize. I think sometimes you have to deal 149 00:08:35,679 --> 00:08:37,360 Speaker 1: with the countries that you have, you have to deal 150 00:08:37,360 --> 00:08:39,280 Speaker 1: with the leaders that you have, not necessarily the leaders 151 00:08:39,280 --> 00:08:42,920 Speaker 1: that you want. But there's a fine line. Right, So 152 00:08:43,040 --> 00:08:46,400 Speaker 1: for as far as this administration is concerned, they believe 153 00:08:46,400 --> 00:08:48,560 Speaker 1: foreign policy to be judged by what makes the United 154 00:08:48,600 --> 00:08:51,680 Speaker 1: States more powerful and prosperous period, not by the form 155 00:08:51,720 --> 00:08:54,920 Speaker 1: of government of its partners. So it means we'll have 156 00:08:55,000 --> 00:09:01,880 Speaker 1: closer cooperation with essentially undemocratic regimes haters. It is, there 157 00:09:01,960 --> 00:09:05,959 Speaker 1: is no more value judgment on who the United States 158 00:09:06,360 --> 00:09:10,040 Speaker 1: does business with or allies with, unless we've decide there's 159 00:09:10,040 --> 00:09:12,600 Speaker 1: a value judgment on who the US. So you right, 160 00:09:12,640 --> 00:09:16,800 Speaker 1: it's like under that scenario, why are we h why 161 00:09:16,840 --> 00:09:17,960 Speaker 1: are we blockading Cuba? 162 00:09:18,120 --> 00:09:20,520 Speaker 2: Right? Why why aren't we just dealing with Cuba as 163 00:09:20,520 --> 00:09:23,040 Speaker 2: it is? Right? It's great, we have. 164 00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:26,920 Speaker 1: Select this is there's there's a clearly not. 165 00:09:28,679 --> 00:09:29,960 Speaker 2: This is this is a a. 166 00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:34,760 Speaker 1: An aspirational document, not one that they plan on following 167 00:09:35,120 --> 00:09:39,360 Speaker 1: when it's inconvenient to their own beliefs. On this one, 168 00:09:41,240 --> 00:09:43,880 Speaker 1: what's interesting is that the document also took a shot 169 00:09:43,920 --> 00:09:46,960 Speaker 1: at Europe. It criticizes the European Union and e integration efforts, 170 00:09:47,160 --> 00:09:50,959 Speaker 1: claiming they have suppressed political liberty, prevented innovation, and fostered 171 00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:55,800 Speaker 1: Europe's decline. Basically, they're on the side of the Brigsteers, 172 00:09:56,360 --> 00:09:58,600 Speaker 1: and they're on the side of everybody that and on 173 00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:03,160 Speaker 1: mister Orbon who's all anti EU. This is a document 174 00:10:03,200 --> 00:10:05,760 Speaker 1: even though these many of these countries are choosing to 175 00:10:05,760 --> 00:10:10,199 Speaker 1: do this. So out of one mouth they're saying, we've 176 00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:14,600 Speaker 1: got we've got to judge by what the United States 177 00:10:14,640 --> 00:10:16,760 Speaker 1: makes a more powerful and prosperous not by the form 178 00:10:16,800 --> 00:10:20,080 Speaker 1: of government of its partners. And then the next prep, hey, 179 00:10:20,120 --> 00:10:22,679 Speaker 1: you Europe don't try to get together and have a 180 00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:28,320 Speaker 1: powerful EU. So obviously there is a political dynamic to this, 181 00:10:28,400 --> 00:10:32,760 Speaker 1: which is this administration is going to support other nationalist movements, right, 182 00:10:32,800 --> 00:10:36,280 Speaker 1: whether it's a nationalist movement with Nigel Faraj in the UK, 183 00:10:36,480 --> 00:10:40,520 Speaker 1: a nationalist movement in Hungary that is pretty clear, and 184 00:10:41,000 --> 00:10:44,200 Speaker 1: with the controversial political party and the political movement in 185 00:10:44,280 --> 00:10:49,040 Speaker 1: Germany that AfD. It explicitly signals support for quote patriotic 186 00:10:49,080 --> 00:10:52,960 Speaker 1: European parties often interpreted as far right nationalist parties, calls 187 00:10:52,960 --> 00:10:56,280 Speaker 1: for the US to cultivate resistance to Europe's current trajectory. 188 00:10:56,840 --> 00:11:00,480 Speaker 1: So again, on one side of their mouth, this security 189 00:11:00,480 --> 00:11:02,839 Speaker 1: strategy memo says, hey, the United States is going to 190 00:11:02,880 --> 00:11:05,520 Speaker 1: accept countries as it is. Then in its next breath, 191 00:11:05,520 --> 00:11:07,640 Speaker 1: when it comes to Europe, they're saying, we're going to 192 00:11:07,720 --> 00:11:11,240 Speaker 1: get involved in the internal politics of European countries on 193 00:11:11,280 --> 00:11:15,559 Speaker 1: the side of nationalists. Sorry, if you were looking for consistency, 194 00:11:15,600 --> 00:11:17,800 Speaker 1: you know, the Trump administration is not a place to go. 195 00:11:18,760 --> 00:11:22,480 Speaker 1: This would be a dramatic intervention into the internal politics 196 00:11:22,480 --> 00:11:25,920 Speaker 1: of key allies, and we would be disrupting NATO, disrupting 197 00:11:25,920 --> 00:11:33,480 Speaker 1: the EU, essentially America's most important cultural as well as 198 00:11:33,960 --> 00:11:38,079 Speaker 1: sort of traditional allies for the last one hundred years. 199 00:11:38,679 --> 00:11:42,640 Speaker 1: I mean to do this to Europe feels like just frankly, 200 00:11:43,040 --> 00:11:46,560 Speaker 1: a little bit of a troll rather than anything that 201 00:11:46,640 --> 00:11:49,120 Speaker 1: is in the best interests of the national security of 202 00:11:49,120 --> 00:11:54,720 Speaker 1: the United States. Now, there's still some soft power that 203 00:11:54,800 --> 00:12:00,640 Speaker 1: this memo that this strategy Memo does support. When discussing democracy, 204 00:12:00,679 --> 00:12:04,080 Speaker 1: the strategy member primarily focuses on defending and renewing American 205 00:12:04,120 --> 00:12:07,160 Speaker 1: principles at home, like limited government, the rule of law, 206 00:12:07,200 --> 00:12:11,160 Speaker 1: constitutional fidelity, and calling that the foundation of US strength. 207 00:12:12,080 --> 00:12:15,200 Speaker 1: And then it calls for respectful influence, stating that the 208 00:12:15,280 --> 00:12:18,080 Speaker 1: US will maintain its quote unrivaled soft power through which 209 00:12:18,120 --> 00:12:21,920 Speaker 1: we exercise positive influence throughout the world that furthers our interests, 210 00:12:22,120 --> 00:12:24,679 Speaker 1: but adds that the US will be quote respectful of 211 00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:28,800 Speaker 1: other countries, differing religions, cultures, and governing systems. Apparently except 212 00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:31,240 Speaker 1: when it comes to Europe. In the EU, it's a 213 00:12:31,320 --> 00:12:34,000 Speaker 1: key line that minimizes the impetus to push for political 214 00:12:34,160 --> 00:12:38,319 Speaker 1: change abroad. But the bottom line is this, This twenty 215 00:12:38,360 --> 00:12:41,800 Speaker 1: twenty five National Security Strategy memo effectively ends the era 216 00:12:42,160 --> 00:12:45,920 Speaker 1: of America wanting to be the leader of the free world. 217 00:12:47,000 --> 00:12:48,920 Speaker 1: You know, I've always said the presidency of the United 218 00:12:48,960 --> 00:12:53,280 Speaker 1: States is really three jobs in one. When you're running 219 00:12:53,280 --> 00:12:55,920 Speaker 1: as a political candidate, you're running to be leader. 220 00:12:55,640 --> 00:12:57,199 Speaker 2: Of your party. 221 00:12:57,360 --> 00:13:01,320 Speaker 1: You're running to be the actual president of the United 222 00:13:01,360 --> 00:13:03,320 Speaker 1: States and of the three hundred and thirty million people. 223 00:13:03,440 --> 00:13:07,200 Speaker 1: So that's sort of job too, right to essentially actually 224 00:13:07,280 --> 00:13:11,360 Speaker 1: execute the office. And then the third job is leader 225 00:13:11,360 --> 00:13:15,000 Speaker 1: of the free world. But as far as Donald Trump's concerned, 226 00:13:15,080 --> 00:13:17,760 Speaker 1: that is no longer a job he we know he 227 00:13:17,800 --> 00:13:21,560 Speaker 1: has never saw him See, he does not believe he 228 00:13:21,760 --> 00:13:25,280 Speaker 1: should be the promoter of democracy around the world, the 229 00:13:25,320 --> 00:13:27,920 Speaker 1: promoter of freedom around the world. He is you know, 230 00:13:27,960 --> 00:13:29,840 Speaker 1: this is not as if he says one thing and 231 00:13:29,880 --> 00:13:33,280 Speaker 1: does another on that issue. He has never said he 232 00:13:33,320 --> 00:13:36,960 Speaker 1: wants to do. That's what's been inconsistent is he says, hey, 233 00:13:36,960 --> 00:13:40,440 Speaker 1: we should be just dealing with countries as they are, right, 234 00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:43,160 Speaker 1: this is what the decision we've made about China and Russia, 235 00:13:43,600 --> 00:13:46,800 Speaker 1: rather than hope we can make change subtly with soft 236 00:13:46,840 --> 00:13:50,439 Speaker 1: power or at times hard power, except of course, when 237 00:13:50,480 --> 00:13:53,040 Speaker 1: he decides he doesn't like somebody or he doesn't like 238 00:13:53,080 --> 00:13:59,679 Speaker 1: a political movement. So it is like many an ideological 239 00:13:59,720 --> 00:14:02,880 Speaker 1: de declaration that Donald Trump has made. There are so 240 00:14:03,000 --> 00:14:06,600 Speaker 1: many holes that there is Swiss that it's sort of 241 00:14:06,640 --> 00:14:10,360 Speaker 1: like a declaration of Swiss cheese. And this National Security 242 00:14:10,400 --> 00:14:16,960 Speaker 1: Strategy memo in many ways does echo the broad sort 243 00:14:16,960 --> 00:14:20,480 Speaker 1: of definition of what somebody would describe as an isolationists 244 00:14:20,520 --> 00:14:24,920 Speaker 1: of America, first of sort of detaching the United States 245 00:14:24,920 --> 00:14:28,600 Speaker 1: from the world, very much articulating what the philosophy of 246 00:14:28,600 --> 00:14:32,440 Speaker 1: the Republican Party was before World War Two. The problem 247 00:14:32,560 --> 00:14:36,280 Speaker 1: is that is not how he actually executes the presidency right. 248 00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:39,360 Speaker 1: It is really there is no ideolize, there is no 249 00:14:39,600 --> 00:14:43,320 Speaker 1: Trump doctrine beyond what's good for Trump. Right, he gets 250 00:14:43,360 --> 00:14:45,880 Speaker 1: involved in a country. If somebody asks him to get involved, 251 00:14:46,360 --> 00:14:48,080 Speaker 1: he wants to be. You know, if he thinks there's 252 00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:51,760 Speaker 1: some benefit to him, he'll get involved. I mean, you know, 253 00:14:51,840 --> 00:14:55,120 Speaker 1: you there's when you look at the deal he cut 254 00:14:55,160 --> 00:14:59,040 Speaker 1: with Cutter to give them this NATO like defense agreement. 255 00:15:00,080 --> 00:15:02,560 Speaker 1: Does that happen without the airplane? I think we all 256 00:15:02,640 --> 00:15:03,960 Speaker 1: know the likely. 257 00:15:03,800 --> 00:15:04,480 Speaker 2: Answer to that. 258 00:15:05,280 --> 00:15:07,400 Speaker 1: And I just put that out there because this is 259 00:15:07,400 --> 00:15:10,360 Speaker 1: a huge departure, and I know that there is This 260 00:15:10,520 --> 00:15:12,320 Speaker 1: is not something that a lot of people are going 261 00:15:12,400 --> 00:15:14,280 Speaker 1: to vote on, but I will tell you this, this 262 00:15:14,360 --> 00:15:19,080 Speaker 1: makes us weaker, and this makes us less safe. There's 263 00:15:19,080 --> 00:15:20,520 Speaker 1: going to be a lot of people who feel let 264 00:15:20,560 --> 00:15:23,360 Speaker 1: down by the United States. Feels as if the United 265 00:15:23,400 --> 00:15:28,440 Speaker 1: States doesn't ever really care about freedom and democracy, no 266 00:15:28,480 --> 00:15:31,480 Speaker 1: longer cares about human rights. And there's always been a look, 267 00:15:31,520 --> 00:15:36,200 Speaker 1: we've we've always been better on human rights rhetoric than 268 00:15:36,280 --> 00:15:40,040 Speaker 1: we've been on trying to use our influence to improve 269 00:15:40,040 --> 00:15:45,960 Speaker 1: a situation. Because there's you know, you know, just what 270 00:15:46,240 --> 00:15:49,040 Speaker 1: should our military be used for? Okay, I think those 271 00:15:49,120 --> 00:15:52,480 Speaker 1: are those are bare debates, but this is a total 272 00:15:52,920 --> 00:15:57,400 Speaker 1: sort of washing our hands of the debate about what 273 00:15:57,960 --> 00:16:00,760 Speaker 1: you know, should would the world be off if we 274 00:16:00,960 --> 00:16:06,240 Speaker 1: all lived under a democracy, and if you, as leader, 275 00:16:06,320 --> 00:16:10,320 Speaker 1: as president of the United States, don't believe that, I 276 00:16:10,360 --> 00:16:10,800 Speaker 1: don't think. 277 00:16:10,720 --> 00:16:11,920 Speaker 2: You should represent America. 278 00:16:13,160 --> 00:16:17,320 Speaker 1: We're an idea. We are not an ethnic based anything. 279 00:16:17,920 --> 00:16:19,960 Speaker 1: I know that the President would like us to be, 280 00:16:20,120 --> 00:16:22,920 Speaker 1: but we are not. The whole point of this country 281 00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:26,880 Speaker 1: was to was an idea that anybody could be an 282 00:16:26,920 --> 00:16:30,640 Speaker 1: American if they believed in the idea of America, the 283 00:16:30,680 --> 00:16:35,280 Speaker 1: idea of freedom, the idea of democracy, didn't matter what 284 00:16:35,320 --> 00:16:39,480 Speaker 1: ethnicity you were, what religion you practiced. That ultimately, do 285 00:16:39,520 --> 00:16:44,640 Speaker 1: you believe in that core idea of individual liberty? And 286 00:16:46,080 --> 00:16:48,920 Speaker 1: what this memo sadly does is sort of reject that 287 00:16:49,640 --> 00:16:54,280 Speaker 1: and isn't interested in promoting it, which should make us, 288 00:16:54,840 --> 00:16:57,080 Speaker 1: should make you feel concerned that if we're not interested 289 00:16:57,120 --> 00:17:01,120 Speaker 1: in promoting it, then are we really interested in and 290 00:17:01,280 --> 00:17:04,119 Speaker 1: having it here at home? So look, I'm not going 291 00:17:04,160 --> 00:17:05,639 Speaker 1: to sit here and be one of these folks that 292 00:17:05,680 --> 00:17:09,679 Speaker 1: the democracy is about to crumble. I don't think it is. 293 00:17:09,720 --> 00:17:12,680 Speaker 1: I think our democracy is pretty well embedded in society, 294 00:17:12,680 --> 00:17:14,000 Speaker 1: and I just think it's going to be a lot 295 00:17:14,040 --> 00:17:17,959 Speaker 1: harder to destroy our democracy than some fear. But this 296 00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:22,399 Speaker 1: weekens the democracy. This erodes our credibility around the world 297 00:17:22,560 --> 00:17:25,800 Speaker 1: in ways that isn't going to get repaired with the 298 00:17:25,840 --> 00:17:30,760 Speaker 1: next president. This is generational damage and this retreat and 299 00:17:30,800 --> 00:17:33,840 Speaker 1: that's what make no mistake. This National Security Strategy Memo 300 00:17:34,200 --> 00:17:38,040 Speaker 1: is just a full retreat. Guess who loves this memo? 301 00:17:40,960 --> 00:17:48,200 Speaker 1: Vladimir Putin, He's ecstatic. And in fact, Donald Trump Junior 302 00:17:48,240 --> 00:17:50,639 Speaker 1: was in Cutter along with his buddy Tucker Carlson earlier 303 00:17:50,640 --> 00:17:53,520 Speaker 1: this week and he was asked during an event in 304 00:17:53,720 --> 00:17:56,480 Speaker 1: Cutter Donald Trump Junior if the US president could walk 305 00:17:56,520 --> 00:17:59,919 Speaker 1: away from Ukraine, and Junior said, I think he may, 306 00:18:00,840 --> 00:18:02,680 Speaker 1: and then he adds this, what's good about my father, 307 00:18:02,760 --> 00:18:05,560 Speaker 1: and what's unique about my father is you don't know 308 00:18:05,560 --> 00:18:07,800 Speaker 1: what he's going to do. The fact that he's not 309 00:18:07,840 --> 00:18:14,800 Speaker 1: predictable forces everyone to actually deal in an intellectually honest capacity. 310 00:18:14,840 --> 00:18:18,280 Speaker 1: There's a few things where Trump's unpredictability is helpful. In 311 00:18:18,320 --> 00:18:20,439 Speaker 1: the Middle East it has been, and I think in 312 00:18:20,520 --> 00:18:24,359 Speaker 1: dealing with some of those countries that's kind of the 313 00:18:24,400 --> 00:18:27,280 Speaker 1: way it goes. But guess who was happy about the 314 00:18:27,359 --> 00:18:33,439 Speaker 1: new National security memom. The Kremlin lauded this, saying that 315 00:18:33,480 --> 00:18:36,639 Speaker 1: the new directive stopped calling Russia a direct threat and 316 00:18:36,680 --> 00:18:41,400 Speaker 1: calling that a positive step, according to Reuters, So. 317 00:18:41,400 --> 00:18:41,880 Speaker 2: There you go. 318 00:18:43,320 --> 00:18:47,119 Speaker 1: We now have a new national security strategy philosophy that's 319 00:18:47,280 --> 00:18:50,600 Speaker 1: governing this executive branch and the decisions that are going 320 00:18:50,640 --> 00:18:53,440 Speaker 1: to be made at the State Department, at embassies around 321 00:18:53,480 --> 00:19:00,440 Speaker 1: the world, the CIA, the Pentagon. That do that make 322 00:19:00,520 --> 00:19:06,120 Speaker 1: two countries happier above all others, Russia and China? 323 00:19:06,240 --> 00:19:08,800 Speaker 2: Is that good for America? Is that good for democracy? 324 00:19:09,400 --> 00:19:10,399 Speaker 2: I think we know the answer. 325 00:19:13,920 --> 00:19:17,600 Speaker 1: Having good life insurance is incredibly important. I know from 326 00:19:17,640 --> 00:19:20,720 Speaker 1: personal experience. I was sixteen when my father passed away. 327 00:19:20,760 --> 00:19:23,159 Speaker 1: We didn't have any money. He didn't leave us in 328 00:19:23,200 --> 00:19:27,560 Speaker 1: the best shape. My mother single mother, now widow, myself 329 00:19:27,640 --> 00:19:29,439 Speaker 1: sixteen trying to figure out how am I going to 330 00:19:29,440 --> 00:19:32,600 Speaker 1: pay for college and lo and behold, my dad had 331 00:19:32,680 --> 00:19:35,879 Speaker 1: one life insurance policy that we found wasn't a lot, 332 00:19:36,200 --> 00:19:38,920 Speaker 1: but it was important at the time, and it's why 333 00:19:39,040 --> 00:19:42,280 Speaker 1: I was able to go to college. Little did he 334 00:19:42,359 --> 00:19:45,119 Speaker 1: know how important that would be in that moment. 335 00:19:45,880 --> 00:19:46,600 Speaker 2: Well, guess what. 336 00:19:46,880 --> 00:19:49,359 Speaker 1: That's why I am here to tell you about Etho's life. 337 00:19:49,800 --> 00:19:52,160 Speaker 1: They can provide you with peace of mind knowing your 338 00:19:52,200 --> 00:19:55,520 Speaker 1: family is protected even if the worst comes to pass. 339 00:19:55,880 --> 00:19:59,120 Speaker 1: Ethos is an online platform that makes getting life insurance 340 00:19:59,160 --> 00:20:02,240 Speaker 1: fast and easy, all designed to protect your family's future 341 00:20:02,280 --> 00:20:05,800 Speaker 1: in minutes, not months. There's no complicated process, and it's 342 00:20:05,960 --> 00:20:10,160 Speaker 1: one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam require you 343 00:20:10,240 --> 00:20:12,679 Speaker 1: just answer a few health questions online. You can get 344 00:20:12,720 --> 00:20:14,480 Speaker 1: a quote in as little as ten minutes, and you 345 00:20:14,480 --> 00:20:18,240 Speaker 1: can get same day coverage without ever leaving your home. 346 00:20:18,920 --> 00:20:20,800 Speaker 1: You can get up to three million dollars in coverage, 347 00:20:20,800 --> 00:20:22,879 Speaker 1: and some policies start as low as two dollars a 348 00:20:22,920 --> 00:20:26,200 Speaker 1: day that would be billed monthly. As of March twenty 349 00:20:26,240 --> 00:20:29,240 Speaker 1: twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number one no 350 00:20:29,359 --> 00:20:33,760 Speaker 1: medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect your family 351 00:20:34,240 --> 00:20:36,840 Speaker 1: with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free. 352 00:20:36,680 --> 00:20:39,040 Speaker 2: Quote at ethos dot com slash chuck. 353 00:20:39,359 --> 00:20:44,760 Speaker 1: So again, that's ethos dot com slash chuck. Application times 354 00:20:44,800 --> 00:20:47,479 Speaker 1: may vary and the rates themselves may vary as well, 355 00:20:47,680 --> 00:20:50,560 Speaker 1: but trust me, life insurance is something you should really 356 00:20:50,560 --> 00:20:53,199 Speaker 1: think about it, especially if you've got a growing family. 357 00:20:57,200 --> 00:20:59,359 Speaker 1: I want to pivot a little bit here, and that 358 00:20:59,520 --> 00:21:06,359 Speaker 1: is to the fascinating anger of Donald Trump at Henry Quaar, 359 00:21:06,760 --> 00:21:11,159 Speaker 1: the Democratic congressman who last week decided who got a 360 00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:14,679 Speaker 1: pardon from President Trump? And I told you on that 361 00:21:14,760 --> 00:21:18,159 Speaker 1: last episode, boy, nothing is done for free. So the 362 00:21:18,240 --> 00:21:21,120 Speaker 1: question is where did this come from? And what is 363 00:21:21,560 --> 00:21:25,200 Speaker 1: Quaar going to be giving in return? Well, apparently Donald 364 00:21:25,240 --> 00:21:28,720 Speaker 1: Trump expected something in return. So let me give you 365 00:21:28,720 --> 00:21:31,639 Speaker 1: a quick summary of sort of everything you need to 366 00:21:31,640 --> 00:21:36,680 Speaker 1: know about this Trump Quaar pardon controversy, because I actually 367 00:21:36,720 --> 00:21:41,000 Speaker 1: think this shows that basically Donald Trump is confessing a 368 00:21:41,080 --> 00:21:44,320 Speaker 1: crime right here, and it's and the crime is that 369 00:21:44,400 --> 00:21:47,520 Speaker 1: he is selling these pardons. Sometimes he's selling them for 370 00:21:47,560 --> 00:21:50,040 Speaker 1: actual money, and sometimes he's selling them for some sort 371 00:21:50,040 --> 00:21:53,840 Speaker 1: of political support. Well, let me go through this. So 372 00:21:53,920 --> 00:21:58,120 Speaker 1: here's the actual charges that Quai Are and his wife 373 00:21:58,119 --> 00:22:01,480 Speaker 1: are facing. They were indicted into four on a dozen 374 00:22:01,520 --> 00:22:05,520 Speaker 1: federal charges that included bribery, money laundering, and conspiracy. The 375 00:22:05,600 --> 00:22:09,800 Speaker 1: charges basically alleged that the couple accepted six hundred thousand 376 00:22:09,800 --> 00:22:13,280 Speaker 1: dollars in bribes from a Mexican bank and an Azerbaijani 377 00:22:13,320 --> 00:22:16,600 Speaker 1: oil and gas company in exchange for advancing interests. So 378 00:22:17,200 --> 00:22:19,080 Speaker 1: I told you that these are the types of crimes 379 00:22:19,080 --> 00:22:23,679 Speaker 1: Trump has been pardoning left and right right. Anybody that's 380 00:22:23,840 --> 00:22:28,480 Speaker 1: been accused of essentially using their having being bought off 381 00:22:28,520 --> 00:22:31,560 Speaker 1: for their influence is something Trump doesn't think is a crime. 382 00:22:33,119 --> 00:22:36,080 Speaker 1: Tells you something right there, right. So, on December third, 383 00:22:36,119 --> 00:22:38,439 Speaker 1: he granted a full and unconditional pardon to both Henry 384 00:22:38,560 --> 00:22:42,400 Speaker 1: and Emmelda Quar, both both the congressman and his wife, 385 00:22:43,200 --> 00:22:46,360 Speaker 1: and it effectively ended the federal prosecution before the schedule 386 00:22:46,800 --> 00:22:49,080 Speaker 1: April twenty twenty six trial, which could have been a 387 00:22:49,240 --> 00:22:52,560 Speaker 1: huge problem for his reel lift. And at the time, 388 00:22:53,440 --> 00:22:57,480 Speaker 1: Trump justified his pardon by saying he was reversing a 389 00:22:57,600 --> 00:23:01,159 Speaker 1: quote politically motivated prosecution, he claimed, and he claimed that 390 00:23:01,240 --> 00:23:03,680 Speaker 1: the Justice Department and President Biden had weaponized the system 391 00:23:03,680 --> 00:23:06,680 Speaker 1: against Quaar simply because the congressman had been a vocal 392 00:23:06,760 --> 00:23:11,119 Speaker 1: critic of Biden's border policies. He called Quair beloved and 393 00:23:11,240 --> 00:23:15,920 Speaker 1: said he was speaking the truth against open borders. Well 394 00:23:16,200 --> 00:23:20,119 Speaker 1: after receiving the pardon, Quaar publicly thanked Trump but firmly 395 00:23:20,160 --> 00:23:22,040 Speaker 1: stated he would not be switching parties and he would 396 00:23:22,080 --> 00:23:24,560 Speaker 1: run for reelection as a Democrat in the twenty eighth 397 00:23:24,600 --> 00:23:29,000 Speaker 1: congressional district in Texas. Well, that's exactly what he did 398 00:23:29,680 --> 00:23:33,000 Speaker 1: earlier or just before the weekend. He filed the paperwork 399 00:23:33,040 --> 00:23:35,000 Speaker 1: for his reelection bid as a Democrat on the same 400 00:23:35,080 --> 00:23:40,400 Speaker 1: day the pardon was announced, and then Trump went off right. 401 00:23:41,160 --> 00:23:43,760 Speaker 1: He was really angry. He reacted to the strong public 402 00:23:43,800 --> 00:23:47,320 Speaker 1: criticism just a few days after the pardon, specifically lashing 403 00:23:47,359 --> 00:23:49,480 Speaker 1: out at Quaar for running as a Democrat. The core 404 00:23:49,560 --> 00:23:51,600 Speaker 1: of his complaint was perceived as a quote. 405 00:23:51,760 --> 00:23:53,040 Speaker 2: Lack of loyalty. 406 00:23:54,040 --> 00:23:58,000 Speaker 1: Let me read you the full truth social post. Only 407 00:23:58,040 --> 00:24:00,440 Speaker 1: a short time after signing the pardon, this is true truth, 408 00:24:00,480 --> 00:24:03,000 Speaker 1: social Posts, Congressman Henry Quair announced that he will be 409 00:24:03,119 --> 00:24:06,119 Speaker 1: running for Congress again. He put running in quotes in 410 00:24:06,200 --> 00:24:08,680 Speaker 1: the great state of Texas parenthesesis state where I receive 411 00:24:08,720 --> 00:24:11,600 Speaker 1: the highest number of votes ever recorded. He loves to 412 00:24:11,680 --> 00:24:15,639 Speaker 1: throw these sort of sort of statistics that are kind 413 00:24:15,680 --> 00:24:19,640 Speaker 1: of meaningless pretty much because our population always grows, particularly 414 00:24:19,640 --> 00:24:21,560 Speaker 1: in the Sun Belt. Whoever wins these states each time 415 00:24:21,640 --> 00:24:23,600 Speaker 1: is getting the most number of votes that anybody's ever gotten. 416 00:24:23,640 --> 00:24:24,800 Speaker 2: But anyway, but I digress. 417 00:24:27,000 --> 00:24:29,560 Speaker 1: He's complaining that Quaer file for office as a Democrat, 418 00:24:29,600 --> 00:24:31,879 Speaker 1: continuing to work with the same radical left scum that 419 00:24:32,000 --> 00:24:34,200 Speaker 1: just weeks before wanted him and his wife to spend 420 00:24:34,240 --> 00:24:36,480 Speaker 1: the rest of their lives in prison. Such a lack 421 00:24:36,520 --> 00:24:39,760 Speaker 1: of loyalty. Loyalty is in all caps, something that Texas 422 00:24:39,880 --> 00:24:44,720 Speaker 1: voters and Henry's daughters will not like. Oh well, next time, 423 00:24:44,800 --> 00:24:46,399 Speaker 1: no more, mister nice guy. I never spoke to the 424 00:24:46,440 --> 00:24:48,520 Speaker 1: congressman and his wife or his daughters, but felt very 425 00:24:48,560 --> 00:24:50,679 Speaker 1: good about fighting for a family that was tormented by 426 00:24:50,760 --> 00:24:52,879 Speaker 1: very sick and to arrange people they were treated so badly. 427 00:24:55,760 --> 00:24:58,200 Speaker 2: So I don't. 428 00:24:59,560 --> 00:25:01,760 Speaker 1: This is clear to me that there's a lot more 429 00:25:01,920 --> 00:25:04,440 Speaker 1: reporting that we all need to do on this one. 430 00:25:05,920 --> 00:25:10,800 Speaker 1: Do we really think there was very little conversation between 431 00:25:11,240 --> 00:25:14,119 Speaker 1: members of Koar's family and the White House. There was 432 00:25:14,160 --> 00:25:19,000 Speaker 1: obviously some conversation. The President cited a letter from his daughters. 433 00:25:19,080 --> 00:25:21,000 Speaker 1: He said he was moved by the letter from his daughters. 434 00:25:23,359 --> 00:25:26,520 Speaker 1: But Trump, certainly it sounds like thought he was doing 435 00:25:26,640 --> 00:25:30,080 Speaker 1: this in exchange for something, and he's angry when the 436 00:25:30,200 --> 00:25:33,520 Speaker 1: something that he expected sounds like he expected either quair 437 00:25:33,560 --> 00:25:36,240 Speaker 1: or to switch parties. Filed a run as a Republican 438 00:25:36,560 --> 00:25:40,080 Speaker 1: or whatever. Right, he did it just before the filing deadline, 439 00:25:40,400 --> 00:25:44,120 Speaker 1: So you know, if you're looking for fishy smells here 440 00:25:44,200 --> 00:25:48,040 Speaker 1: that like, okay, is you know, is there something here 441 00:25:48,119 --> 00:25:49,520 Speaker 1: We're not being told right. 442 00:25:49,640 --> 00:25:50,240 Speaker 2: The timing of the. 443 00:25:50,280 --> 00:25:53,600 Speaker 1: Pardon is a tell, right just before the Texas filing deadline, 444 00:25:54,960 --> 00:26:02,800 Speaker 1: and then he lashes out after Quaar files as a Democrat. Methinks, 445 00:26:03,040 --> 00:26:05,720 Speaker 1: we don't have all the details of this story, but 446 00:26:06,160 --> 00:26:09,080 Speaker 1: the most important part of this is Trump's public reaction, 447 00:26:09,880 --> 00:26:14,200 Speaker 1: because again we sort of are shrugging our shoulders right 448 00:26:14,280 --> 00:26:18,520 Speaker 1: now collectively about what is happening nearly once a week, 449 00:26:18,960 --> 00:26:22,560 Speaker 1: which is Trump does a major pardon of somebody that 450 00:26:22,640 --> 00:26:26,280 Speaker 1: has no business getting a pardon, but who magically has 451 00:26:26,320 --> 00:26:29,560 Speaker 1: a connection to somebody close to the president former president 452 00:26:29,600 --> 00:26:32,920 Speaker 1: of Honduras, magically is close to Roger Stone right, the 453 00:26:33,640 --> 00:26:36,720 Speaker 1: guy with the crypto binance. He's magically in business with 454 00:26:36,800 --> 00:26:40,960 Speaker 1: the President's sons. And we quay are with somebody. You know, 455 00:26:41,119 --> 00:26:45,119 Speaker 1: this is part of Remember, he is already ordered Texas 456 00:26:45,200 --> 00:26:49,240 Speaker 1: Republicans to do the redistricting business. One of the places 457 00:26:49,320 --> 00:26:51,399 Speaker 1: they think they're going to make up ground is in 458 00:26:51,560 --> 00:26:55,680 Speaker 1: South Texas. He pardons Henry Quayar just days before the 459 00:26:55,760 --> 00:26:59,680 Speaker 1: filing deadline. Quaar decides to stick and run as a Democrat, 460 00:27:00,520 --> 00:27:02,920 Speaker 1: Perhaps looking at the polls and realizing that being a 461 00:27:02,960 --> 00:27:06,400 Speaker 1: Republican at twenty twenty six might not be the best decision, 462 00:27:06,520 --> 00:27:07,560 Speaker 1: even in South Texas. 463 00:27:07,680 --> 00:27:10,840 Speaker 2: Next cycle and Trump goes crazy. 464 00:27:13,080 --> 00:27:18,080 Speaker 1: Let's just say, I think we know that he uses 465 00:27:18,160 --> 00:27:20,439 Speaker 1: the pardon power to try to get what he wants. 466 00:27:21,119 --> 00:27:25,520 Speaker 1: Maybe it's business deals for his kids, maybe it's political support, 467 00:27:26,520 --> 00:27:29,800 Speaker 1: maybe it's something else. Maybe it's just simply to help 468 00:27:29,960 --> 00:27:33,720 Speaker 1: a friend get a payday, whether it's a Paulmanniford or 469 00:27:33,760 --> 00:27:36,680 Speaker 1: Roger Stone or whatever. By the way, it's very funny 470 00:27:36,720 --> 00:27:39,600 Speaker 1: today Roger Stone has other people out there trying to 471 00:27:39,640 --> 00:27:40,320 Speaker 1: claim he didn't. 472 00:27:41,920 --> 00:27:42,320 Speaker 2: He didn't. 473 00:27:42,960 --> 00:27:44,800 Speaker 1: They're not saying he didn't make money off the pardon, 474 00:27:44,880 --> 00:27:47,760 Speaker 1: but he wasn't paid to represent the president. I have 475 00:27:47,880 --> 00:27:51,760 Speaker 1: a feeling we know that there's some specificity in these 476 00:27:51,840 --> 00:27:58,679 Speaker 1: denials in order for them to not look totally crooked 477 00:27:58,960 --> 00:28:03,600 Speaker 1: in all of this. But anyway, I am I am 478 00:28:04,280 --> 00:28:08,159 Speaker 1: just I do not get why there's not more outrage 479 00:28:08,280 --> 00:28:13,200 Speaker 1: about the weekly sales. Weekly go look at this list 480 00:28:13,240 --> 00:28:21,360 Speaker 1: of pardons, and it's it's it's uh. It ain't making 481 00:28:21,400 --> 00:28:24,760 Speaker 1: America great again, that's for sure, but it is making crime. 482 00:28:26,359 --> 00:28:26,960 Speaker 2: Easy again. 483 00:28:27,240 --> 00:28:31,800 Speaker 1: And that especially white collar crime that alarm a lot 484 00:28:31,880 --> 00:28:33,760 Speaker 1: of people. And if you're going to wonder why the 485 00:28:33,800 --> 00:28:36,879 Speaker 1: pitchforks may come out for left and right, you know, 486 00:28:37,119 --> 00:28:39,480 Speaker 1: this is Donald Trump being on the side of the elites, 487 00:28:39,640 --> 00:28:42,520 Speaker 1: being on the side that rip off everyday people. Just 488 00:28:42,600 --> 00:28:46,360 Speaker 1: remember that, Just remember that of those that thought Trump 489 00:28:46,520 --> 00:28:48,760 Speaker 1: was going to be on your side, that he was 490 00:28:48,840 --> 00:28:53,560 Speaker 1: going to go get those elites. Instead he pardons those elites. 491 00:28:54,920 --> 00:28:56,680 Speaker 1: A few things, a few other things before we get 492 00:28:56,720 --> 00:29:01,960 Speaker 1: to the interview with Jared Bernstein. I I am fascinated 493 00:29:02,040 --> 00:29:04,800 Speaker 1: by the sixty minutes interview that Marjorie Taylor Green gave 494 00:29:06,080 --> 00:29:09,240 Speaker 1: on Sunday. I think the quote that is making the 495 00:29:09,360 --> 00:29:13,640 Speaker 1: rounds is fascinating, which let me just read it. I 496 00:29:13,720 --> 00:29:16,040 Speaker 1: watched many of my colleagues go from making fun of him, 497 00:29:16,400 --> 00:29:18,440 Speaker 1: making fun of how he talks, making fun of me 498 00:29:18,680 --> 00:29:21,160 Speaker 1: constantly for supporting him, to when he won the primary 499 00:29:21,200 --> 00:29:24,360 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four, they all started excuse my language, 500 00:29:24,440 --> 00:29:27,600 Speaker 1: Leslie referring to Leslie Stall kissing his ass, and decided 501 00:29:27,640 --> 00:29:29,160 Speaker 1: to put on a Maga hat for the first time. 502 00:29:30,160 --> 00:29:35,520 Speaker 1: Here's the thing, I am convinced that Marjorie Taylor Green 503 00:29:36,360 --> 00:29:38,600 Speaker 1: is coming about all of this, not as some sort 504 00:29:38,640 --> 00:29:41,760 Speaker 1: of act or as some sort of pivot. I think 505 00:29:41,800 --> 00:29:44,640 Speaker 1: this is somebody who was naive to how politics were. 506 00:29:45,520 --> 00:29:49,000 Speaker 1: She owned a jim, she lived in her own world, 507 00:29:49,760 --> 00:29:52,720 Speaker 1: didn't like what she saw, got caught up in the 508 00:29:52,760 --> 00:29:57,680 Speaker 1: Trump movement, maybe believed that he wasn't a bullshitter, believed 509 00:29:57,760 --> 00:30:03,000 Speaker 1: this bullshit is like realizing sort of it, and it's taken. 510 00:30:03,080 --> 00:30:05,000 Speaker 1: You know, it's sort of a little bit at a time, 511 00:30:05,040 --> 00:30:08,479 Speaker 1: because you know, she doesn't she does. You know, it's 512 00:30:08,720 --> 00:30:11,320 Speaker 1: almost as at first she thought, you know, this is 513 00:30:11,400 --> 00:30:15,800 Speaker 1: where I'm wondering, did she think political theater was the 514 00:30:15,840 --> 00:30:18,000 Speaker 1: way you were supposed to do this? And then she realized, 515 00:30:18,880 --> 00:30:21,080 Speaker 1: you know, she just got the wrong introduction to what 516 00:30:21,280 --> 00:30:24,160 Speaker 1: politics was. She only got the introduction through the prism 517 00:30:24,200 --> 00:30:29,640 Speaker 1: of Trump. But she actually thought these folks believed in something, 518 00:30:31,400 --> 00:30:33,280 Speaker 1: and she's found out the hard way that they don't 519 00:30:33,320 --> 00:30:34,120 Speaker 1: really believe. 520 00:30:33,920 --> 00:30:34,400 Speaker 2: What they say. 521 00:30:35,880 --> 00:30:39,760 Speaker 1: Let's just say I think she's I think she is 522 00:30:39,880 --> 00:30:43,680 Speaker 1: somebody that if she chooses to run for something, like 523 00:30:43,920 --> 00:30:47,560 Speaker 1: I said this before, John as suffer better, should be relieved. 524 00:30:47,600 --> 00:30:51,120 Speaker 1: She's not running for the Senate. But I you know, 525 00:30:51,440 --> 00:30:54,200 Speaker 1: I don't know whether she has this ambition. She may not, 526 00:30:55,120 --> 00:30:57,840 Speaker 1: she may just view this, but maybe you don't do 527 00:30:57,920 --> 00:31:00,360 Speaker 1: a sixty minutes interview if you don't have trying to 528 00:31:01,320 --> 00:31:04,520 Speaker 1: preserve yourself a place in the future somewhere. But what 529 00:31:04,640 --> 00:31:08,880 Speaker 1: if she's the pure, the real MAGA candidate in twenty 530 00:31:08,920 --> 00:31:14,560 Speaker 1: eight primary vance and that becomes the split. Does it 531 00:31:14,680 --> 00:31:18,480 Speaker 1: open the door for a third item too? Anyway, just 532 00:31:18,560 --> 00:31:20,600 Speaker 1: something to think about a few other things that I 533 00:31:20,680 --> 00:31:25,400 Speaker 1: wanted to that I wanted, one other aspect that I 534 00:31:25,440 --> 00:31:26,560 Speaker 1: wanted to get to, and then we'll get to the 535 00:31:26,600 --> 00:31:31,000 Speaker 1: interview with Jed Burnstein. The other story that's sort of 536 00:31:31,120 --> 00:31:35,520 Speaker 1: roiling Washington is the shocking unpopularity of all four congressional 537 00:31:35,600 --> 00:31:39,480 Speaker 1: leaders right now. And we've been in periods like this before. 538 00:31:41,120 --> 00:31:43,120 Speaker 1: After sort of the fall of Jim Wright in the 539 00:31:43,200 --> 00:31:47,920 Speaker 1: late eighties, there was a period between sort of the 540 00:31:48,000 --> 00:31:51,280 Speaker 1: Right speakership and the Gingrit speakership where just felt like 541 00:31:51,400 --> 00:31:55,520 Speaker 1: there was just not a lot of a lot of 542 00:31:55,560 --> 00:31:59,120 Speaker 1: great leadership on Capitol Hill and both parties were going 543 00:31:59,160 --> 00:32:01,760 Speaker 1: through a transition. And then you sort of got, you know, 544 00:32:01,920 --> 00:32:04,400 Speaker 1: you got that's that's when sort of get parting. Gingrid 545 00:32:04,440 --> 00:32:06,320 Speaker 1: stepped in and then they created some stability, and you 546 00:32:06,360 --> 00:32:10,040 Speaker 1: had Mitchell and Dole for a little bit. We went 547 00:32:10,120 --> 00:32:13,200 Speaker 1: through a period I think where when Dashel lost and 548 00:32:13,320 --> 00:32:16,120 Speaker 1: you had like a lot and frist and there was 549 00:32:16,160 --> 00:32:19,000 Speaker 1: a lot of unsteadiness congressional leadership there and sort of 550 00:32:19,040 --> 00:32:23,320 Speaker 1: the mid Ats, and then you got Uh sort of 551 00:32:23,560 --> 00:32:26,160 Speaker 1: some stability again, the rise of Pelosi on the left, 552 00:32:26,200 --> 00:32:28,760 Speaker 1: the rise of Bayner and the right, Mitch McConnell getting 553 00:32:29,840 --> 00:32:32,200 Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell and Harry Reid, and they sort of created 554 00:32:32,400 --> 00:32:33,959 Speaker 1: and now I think we're in another one those right, 555 00:32:34,200 --> 00:32:37,960 Speaker 1: we're sort of the Senate leaders have really not you know, 556 00:32:38,080 --> 00:32:42,360 Speaker 1: McConnell and Read have been replaced, but they but they're 557 00:32:42,520 --> 00:32:45,480 Speaker 1: but neither Schumer nor Thune has the same level of 558 00:32:45,520 --> 00:32:48,040 Speaker 1: credibility that either one of those two leaders had. UH 559 00:32:48,120 --> 00:32:50,640 Speaker 1: and Jeffreys and Johnson clearly don't have the same level 560 00:32:50,640 --> 00:32:55,480 Speaker 1: of credibility that their predecessors had Pelosi or McCarthy. And 561 00:32:55,600 --> 00:32:57,200 Speaker 1: I'm not sure any of these four are going to 562 00:32:57,240 --> 00:32:58,840 Speaker 1: gain it. Right, I think we're going to have to 563 00:32:58,880 --> 00:33:01,160 Speaker 1: go through this cycle, and you're going to see, right, 564 00:33:01,200 --> 00:33:03,200 Speaker 1: if Republicans lose the House, there's going to be a 565 00:33:03,240 --> 00:33:04,880 Speaker 1: new House leader, and I'll be honest, I think it's 566 00:33:04,920 --> 00:33:06,440 Speaker 1: going to be a free for all and that might 567 00:33:06,520 --> 00:33:10,480 Speaker 1: be healthy. They kind of need, you know, they're sort 568 00:33:10,520 --> 00:33:13,680 Speaker 1: of in some ways. Johnson was an outsider, but he 569 00:33:13,760 --> 00:33:16,720 Speaker 1: was an outsider sort of helped by insiders. I think 570 00:33:16,800 --> 00:33:19,840 Speaker 1: if you have a loss of control of the House, 571 00:33:19,880 --> 00:33:22,360 Speaker 1: that maybe you'll have a true ground swell and it'll 572 00:33:22,360 --> 00:33:25,560 Speaker 1: be interesting to see, you know, maybe there's maybe it's 573 00:33:25,560 --> 00:33:29,160 Speaker 1: an institutionalist like Tom Cole who's sort of of a 574 00:33:29,240 --> 00:33:31,440 Speaker 1: transitional figure, kind of the way John Thunne is I 575 00:33:31,480 --> 00:33:35,400 Speaker 1: think right now in center Republicans, but you have House 576 00:33:35,480 --> 00:33:40,400 Speaker 1: Democrats not crazy about you know, Jeffreys really feels very 577 00:33:40,720 --> 00:33:43,600 Speaker 1: uncomfortable in this position right now. I mean, I think 578 00:33:43,640 --> 00:33:46,960 Speaker 1: what's happening with New York City politics has him looking 579 00:33:47,000 --> 00:33:50,080 Speaker 1: over his left shoulder constantly. Chuck Schumer seems to be 580 00:33:50,120 --> 00:33:52,280 Speaker 1: worried about his left shoulder all the time as well. 581 00:33:52,960 --> 00:33:55,360 Speaker 1: He feels like he's kind of lost his touch as 582 00:33:55,400 --> 00:33:59,760 Speaker 1: sort of that electability guy. The point is, it's fascinating 583 00:33:59,800 --> 00:34:02,040 Speaker 1: to see the reason I think you have such anger 584 00:34:03,280 --> 00:34:07,360 Speaker 1: on Capitol Hill right now. And also I think some unpredictability. 585 00:34:07,440 --> 00:34:10,680 Speaker 1: I think this sort of weak leadership that you have 586 00:34:10,880 --> 00:34:14,319 Speaker 1: right now collectively means that there are more potential free 587 00:34:14,360 --> 00:34:18,000 Speaker 1: agents on issues out there than I think folks realize. 588 00:34:18,719 --> 00:34:19,560 Speaker 2: We'll see what happened. 589 00:34:19,600 --> 00:34:21,680 Speaker 1: I mean, we've already had a We've already had more 590 00:34:21,760 --> 00:34:25,160 Speaker 1: discharge petitions this House that I've seen in I think 591 00:34:25,239 --> 00:34:29,279 Speaker 1: the previous twenty years, and that you know, the more 592 00:34:29,360 --> 00:34:32,879 Speaker 1: discharge petitions you have, the more you have a leader 593 00:34:32,920 --> 00:34:36,040 Speaker 1: that doesn't have control of their own party. So you know, 594 00:34:36,080 --> 00:34:38,720 Speaker 1: if you told me you get some strange bedfellows getting 595 00:34:38,719 --> 00:34:42,760 Speaker 1: together on healthcare subsidies, strange bedfellows getting together on tariff policy, 596 00:34:43,200 --> 00:34:46,000 Speaker 1: I think all of that is possible because you have 597 00:34:47,080 --> 00:34:51,320 Speaker 1: right now Thune, Schumer, Jeffreys, and Johnson do not have. 598 00:34:51,800 --> 00:34:55,320 Speaker 1: You know, they can't rule by fear, right, none of 599 00:34:55,360 --> 00:34:57,560 Speaker 1: them can. I guess Trump can put some fear into 600 00:34:57,600 --> 00:34:59,600 Speaker 1: some of these folks, but I think the fear of 601 00:34:59,680 --> 00:35:02,520 Speaker 1: Trump is starting to fade, as we've seen with Marjorie 602 00:35:02,560 --> 00:35:05,239 Speaker 1: Taylor Green and others. And there isn't a lot of 603 00:35:06,600 --> 00:35:10,480 Speaker 1: respect for the political acumen of the quartet that I've. 604 00:35:10,400 --> 00:35:11,000 Speaker 2: Just talked about. 605 00:35:11,080 --> 00:35:14,800 Speaker 1: So it is I'll just say I feel like I 606 00:35:14,840 --> 00:35:21,560 Speaker 1: haven't seen this kind of collective congressional leader weakness really 607 00:35:21,760 --> 00:35:25,920 Speaker 1: since that sort of period in between Right and Gangridge, 608 00:35:26,200 --> 00:35:28,400 Speaker 1: and then I think the period in between sort of 609 00:35:28,840 --> 00:35:34,320 Speaker 1: the fall of Hastert and delay before sort of Pelosi 610 00:35:34,400 --> 00:35:36,959 Speaker 1: took over, and that whole sort of period of Lot 611 00:35:37,080 --> 00:35:40,880 Speaker 1: and Frist really before McConnell took over. So we're definitely 612 00:35:40,920 --> 00:35:45,520 Speaker 1: in a transition. I will be if you told me 613 00:35:45,640 --> 00:35:48,719 Speaker 1: we have four brand new leaders in January twenty twenty seven, 614 00:35:48,719 --> 00:35:52,920 Speaker 1: I wouldn't fully be surprised, but I definitely expect that 615 00:35:53,080 --> 00:35:56,480 Speaker 1: the four we have today that I think there's a 616 00:35:56,600 --> 00:35:59,040 Speaker 1: good chance none of the four are there by January 617 00:35:59,040 --> 00:36:01,279 Speaker 1: of twenty twenty nine. Part of it is, I think 618 00:36:01,320 --> 00:36:04,360 Speaker 1: the shelf life of congressional leader this day is getting 619 00:36:04,400 --> 00:36:09,160 Speaker 1: shorter and shorter, the impatience of political leaders, especially if 620 00:36:09,200 --> 00:36:11,880 Speaker 1: we're electing a different type of member of Congress and 621 00:36:11,960 --> 00:36:13,919 Speaker 1: a different type of senator who are more worried about 622 00:36:14,200 --> 00:36:17,319 Speaker 1: communicating with the base, communicating with the public than they 623 00:36:17,360 --> 00:36:21,680 Speaker 1: are with legislating. And if if we sort of are, 624 00:36:22,080 --> 00:36:26,880 Speaker 1: our Congress gets reoriented to more sort of media savvy 625 00:36:27,040 --> 00:36:30,960 Speaker 1: elected members rather than legislative savy members. It means I 626 00:36:31,040 --> 00:36:32,680 Speaker 1: think we're going to go through us. You know, we 627 00:36:33,160 --> 00:36:38,360 Speaker 1: may cycle through quite a few congressional leaders, because everybody's 628 00:36:38,400 --> 00:36:40,799 Speaker 1: kind of their own political leader and political party at 629 00:36:40,840 --> 00:36:44,560 Speaker 1: this point, right with with with how we're transitioning, particularly 630 00:36:44,560 --> 00:36:48,960 Speaker 1: this new generation of elected officials. And I think that's translated, 631 00:36:49,280 --> 00:36:52,880 Speaker 1: and it probably explains why the leaders themselves know that 632 00:36:53,040 --> 00:36:55,759 Speaker 1: they you know, they don't control the bully pulpit, They 633 00:36:55,800 --> 00:36:59,640 Speaker 1: don't really control the They don't they don't have that 634 00:36:59,800 --> 00:37:03,600 Speaker 1: much ability to prevent donors from giving money to some 635 00:37:03,719 --> 00:37:06,640 Speaker 1: of these folks, you know. The weakness of the political parties, 636 00:37:06,680 --> 00:37:10,320 Speaker 1: the weakness of the congressional leaders, it's all led to it. 637 00:37:10,520 --> 00:37:14,759 Speaker 1: It feels like a bit of instability in Congress right now. 638 00:37:15,840 --> 00:37:19,320 Speaker 1: And like I said, the possibility, I think we have 639 00:37:19,480 --> 00:37:25,919 Speaker 1: some we could see some strange runaway legislative compromises show 640 00:37:26,000 --> 00:37:28,560 Speaker 1: up in the next six months, simply due to this 641 00:37:28,960 --> 00:37:35,280 Speaker 1: week leadership that we're all experiencing. There's a reason results 642 00:37:35,360 --> 00:37:38,200 Speaker 1: matter more than promises, just like there's a reason Morgan 643 00:37:38,239 --> 00:37:41,520 Speaker 1: and Morgan is America's largest injury law firm. For the 644 00:37:41,640 --> 00:37:44,960 Speaker 1: last thirty five years, they've recovered twenty five billion dollars 645 00:37:45,040 --> 00:37:48,080 Speaker 1: for more than half a million clients. It includes cases 646 00:37:48,080 --> 00:37:51,600 Speaker 1: where insurance companies offered next to nothing, just hoping to 647 00:37:51,719 --> 00:37:54,239 Speaker 1: get away with paying as little as possible. Morgan and 648 00:37:54,280 --> 00:37:57,759 Speaker 1: Morgan fought back ended up winning millions. In fact, in Pennsylvania, 649 00:37:57,880 --> 00:38:01,000 Speaker 1: one client was awarded twenty six million dollars, which was 650 00:38:01,040 --> 00:38:04,480 Speaker 1: a staggering forty times the amount that the insurance company 651 00:38:04,520 --> 00:38:07,680 Speaker 1: originally offered. That original offer six hundred and fifty thousand 652 00:38:07,680 --> 00:38:10,520 Speaker 1: dollars twenty six million, six hundred and fifty thousand dollars. 653 00:38:10,600 --> 00:38:12,680 Speaker 1: So with more than a thousand lawyers across the country, 654 00:38:12,880 --> 00:38:15,480 Speaker 1: they know how to deliver for everyday people. If you're injured, 655 00:38:15,640 --> 00:38:18,160 Speaker 1: you need a lawyer. You need somebody to get your back. 656 00:38:18,600 --> 00:38:21,320 Speaker 1: Check out for the People dot com, Slash podcast or 657 00:38:21,800 --> 00:38:26,960 Speaker 1: Dow Pound Law Pound five two nine law on your 658 00:38:27,000 --> 00:38:29,560 Speaker 1: cell phone. And remember all law firms are not the same, 659 00:38:29,640 --> 00:38:31,759 Speaker 1: So check out Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free 660 00:38:32,080 --> 00:38:32,839 Speaker 1: unless they win. 661 00:38:37,239 --> 00:38:39,480 Speaker 2: Well. Of course, in promoting my Monday. 662 00:38:39,160 --> 00:38:42,560 Speaker 1: Podcast, I forgot about my favorite segment, which no, it's 663 00:38:42,640 --> 00:38:45,040 Speaker 1: not ranting about the college football playoff. My favorite segment 664 00:38:45,080 --> 00:38:47,400 Speaker 1: every Mondays, of course, it's the podcast time Machine. 665 00:38:55,640 --> 00:38:58,840 Speaker 2: My time Machine actually takes me. It's fascinating. 666 00:38:59,040 --> 00:39:02,920 Speaker 1: This week in dec is the anniversary of two key 667 00:39:03,000 --> 00:39:09,719 Speaker 1: events that triggered two things, the growth of China and 668 00:39:10,239 --> 00:39:12,920 Speaker 1: massive political realignment in the United States. 669 00:39:13,560 --> 00:39:15,080 Speaker 2: So let's go through it. 670 00:39:15,360 --> 00:39:17,279 Speaker 1: We're gonna step in the times that we're traveling through 671 00:39:17,360 --> 00:39:21,520 Speaker 1: three different Decembers nineteen seventy eight, two thousand and one, 672 00:39:22,400 --> 00:39:24,719 Speaker 1: and the December we're living in right now, December twenty 673 00:39:24,800 --> 00:39:27,120 Speaker 1: twenty five. And it's three moments that, when you take 674 00:39:27,160 --> 00:39:29,239 Speaker 1: them all together, tell the story of how the United 675 00:39:29,280 --> 00:39:32,200 Speaker 1: States made a monumental bet on China and how we 676 00:39:32,280 --> 00:39:34,880 Speaker 1: are now quietly admitting that the bet didn't pay off 677 00:39:34,920 --> 00:39:37,719 Speaker 1: the way we expected. And believe it or not, it's 678 00:39:37,719 --> 00:39:41,560 Speaker 1: a story that begins with optimism, it passes through triumpolism, 679 00:39:42,200 --> 00:39:46,080 Speaker 1: and ends with realism and maybe even resignation. Let's start 680 00:39:46,080 --> 00:39:49,719 Speaker 1: in December nineteen seventy eight, this week where Jimmy Carter 681 00:39:49,800 --> 00:39:53,840 Speaker 1: and Dan Chauping announced the normalization of diplomatic relations between 682 00:39:53,840 --> 00:39:56,400 Speaker 1: the United States and the People's Republic of China. The 683 00:39:56,560 --> 00:40:01,560 Speaker 1: formal switch from Taipei to Beijing official on January first 684 00:40:01,600 --> 00:40:05,200 Speaker 1: of that year, but we announced it in this week 685 00:40:05,239 --> 00:40:09,120 Speaker 1: in December nineteen seventy eight. On paper, this was a 686 00:40:09,200 --> 00:40:12,879 Speaker 1: Cold War realignment decision. In practice, it was the moment 687 00:40:12,920 --> 00:40:16,239 Speaker 1: the United States decided it could shape China's future by 688 00:40:16,320 --> 00:40:20,560 Speaker 1: opening the door. But it was not some Kumbaya moment. 689 00:40:20,880 --> 00:40:23,399 Speaker 1: The reactions at the time were all over the political map. 690 00:40:24,200 --> 00:40:26,600 Speaker 1: The Republican realists the kit at that time, it was 691 00:40:26,640 --> 00:40:30,400 Speaker 1: the Kissinger Scowcroft branch of the Republican Party applauded the 692 00:40:30,480 --> 00:40:34,600 Speaker 1: move Kissinger called the normalization quote an historic step toward 693 00:40:34,640 --> 00:40:38,359 Speaker 1: a stable war. This wing of the Republican Party sow 694 00:40:38,360 --> 00:40:40,920 Speaker 1: it as a three dimensional chess play, bring China closer 695 00:40:40,960 --> 00:40:45,680 Speaker 1: to Washington as a way to check Moscow. Meanwhile, the 696 00:40:45,760 --> 00:40:50,080 Speaker 1: Conservative Hawks were furious. Barry Goldwater said Carter had quote 697 00:40:50,120 --> 00:40:53,520 Speaker 1: abandoned a trusted ally in Taiwan with hardly a second thought. 698 00:40:53,960 --> 00:40:56,440 Speaker 1: Ronald Reagan, who was not yet the nominee for the 699 00:40:56,480 --> 00:40:59,680 Speaker 1: Republican Party but already the ideological leader of this part 700 00:40:59,719 --> 00:41:02,799 Speaker 1: of the conservative movement, accused Carter of quote selling out 701 00:41:02,840 --> 00:41:06,680 Speaker 1: our friends for a theory of diplomacy. Then you had 702 00:41:06,719 --> 00:41:11,200 Speaker 1: the democratic left, especially the human rights advocates Pat Darien, 703 00:41:11,280 --> 00:41:14,200 Speaker 1: Carter's own human rights chief privately warned that the move 704 00:41:14,239 --> 00:41:17,160 Speaker 1: sent a message that quote human rights is negotiable when 705 00:41:17,239 --> 00:41:21,120 Speaker 1: great powers are involved. The Congressional Black Caucus publicly asked 706 00:41:21,120 --> 00:41:23,439 Speaker 1: why human rights were the centerpiece of US policy towards 707 00:41:23,520 --> 00:41:27,400 Speaker 1: Latin America and South Africa, but not Beijing. And then 708 00:41:27,400 --> 00:41:29,600 Speaker 1: there was the business community. How do you think they reacted? 709 00:41:30,239 --> 00:41:35,320 Speaker 1: They were ecstatic, GM, Boeing, and ge all launched internal 710 00:41:35,360 --> 00:41:39,680 Speaker 1: studies immediately. Executive memos from the time read like prospectuses 711 00:41:39,840 --> 00:41:42,720 Speaker 1: for the next gold rush. One Fortune five hundred CEO 712 00:41:42,800 --> 00:41:45,000 Speaker 1: told The Washington Post at that time, China is the 713 00:41:45,080 --> 00:41:47,279 Speaker 1: last great untapped market on Earth. We need to be 714 00:41:47,400 --> 00:41:51,440 Speaker 1: there before the Europeans get there again. This was America 715 00:41:51,600 --> 00:41:54,719 Speaker 1: December nineteen seventy eight, So in nineteen seventy eight you 716 00:41:54,800 --> 00:41:57,479 Speaker 1: can already see the outlines of the emerging coalition foreign 717 00:41:57,520 --> 00:42:02,359 Speaker 1: policy realists plus Wall Street plus x Borders on one side, ideologues, 718 00:42:02,440 --> 00:42:05,960 Speaker 1: human rights AFTRICUS activists and manufacturing workers on the other. 719 00:42:07,480 --> 00:42:10,840 Speaker 1: The beginning of a realignment right normalization wasn't the beginning 720 00:42:10,880 --> 00:42:12,880 Speaker 1: of a debate about China, though, it was the beginning 721 00:42:12,920 --> 00:42:16,160 Speaker 1: of an American consensus about China. And this was the 722 00:42:16,280 --> 00:42:20,560 Speaker 1: consensus that was wrong. We now admit that we were wrong, 723 00:42:20,680 --> 00:42:23,040 Speaker 1: but everybody seemed to believe it at the time, and 724 00:42:23,120 --> 00:42:27,880 Speaker 1: the consensus was that engagement would moderate Beijing, reform its economy, 725 00:42:27,920 --> 00:42:32,680 Speaker 1: and eventually soften its politics. Essentially, democracy would come with 726 00:42:32,800 --> 00:42:36,479 Speaker 1: economic freedom. It's a great theory, and for a while 727 00:42:37,160 --> 00:42:41,000 Speaker 1: it seemed like it could work. Then let's fast forward 728 00:42:41,040 --> 00:42:44,800 Speaker 1: to another December anniversary, twenty three years later. This is 729 00:42:44,840 --> 00:42:48,640 Speaker 1: December eleventh, two thousand and one. China officially joins the 730 00:42:48,680 --> 00:42:53,000 Speaker 1: World Trade Organization. This is probably the biggest hinge moment 731 00:42:53,360 --> 00:42:56,759 Speaker 1: of modern globalization, and it's backed by another wave of 732 00:42:56,880 --> 00:43:00,640 Speaker 1: bipartisan optimism. Bill Clinton, who negotiated the terms in his 733 00:43:00,760 --> 00:43:03,319 Speaker 1: final year in office, had said earlier about China joining 734 00:43:03,360 --> 00:43:07,040 Speaker 1: the WTO. Quote, By joining the WTO, China's agreed to 735 00:43:07,080 --> 00:43:10,520 Speaker 1: play by the same global rules. This is a win 736 00:43:10,640 --> 00:43:11,160 Speaker 1: for America. 737 00:43:12,040 --> 00:43:12,560 Speaker 2: George W. 738 00:43:12,760 --> 00:43:16,560 Speaker 1: Bush, who inherited the process, echoed the thought. He said, quote, 739 00:43:17,520 --> 00:43:19,279 Speaker 1: A China that plays by the rules is a China 740 00:43:19,320 --> 00:43:22,640 Speaker 1: that contributes to stability. So when you hear people talk 741 00:43:22,640 --> 00:43:26,200 Speaker 1: about the UNI Party, it was on topics like this 742 00:43:26,360 --> 00:43:29,440 Speaker 1: that there was kind of a unified theory from the 743 00:43:29,560 --> 00:43:31,960 Speaker 1: center left in the center right on all things China. 744 00:43:32,640 --> 00:43:35,120 Speaker 1: Even Al Gore made the argument on the two thousand 745 00:43:35,200 --> 00:43:38,120 Speaker 1: campaign trail, he said trade with China encourages openess, transparency, 746 00:43:38,160 --> 00:43:43,600 Speaker 1: and reform. Well, in retrospect, what's striking isn't that Democrats 747 00:43:43,640 --> 00:43:45,520 Speaker 1: and Republicans agreed on China in two thousand and one. 748 00:43:45,640 --> 00:43:50,200 Speaker 1: It's how completely they agreed. There was really no there 749 00:43:50,320 --> 00:43:53,480 Speaker 1: wasn't there was no debate about this. This were a 750 00:43:53,520 --> 00:43:55,800 Speaker 1: lot of things Bush and Gore agreed upon. Right, it 751 00:43:55,880 --> 00:43:58,400 Speaker 1: was always the funniest election, Like there was a reason 752 00:43:58,440 --> 00:44:00,960 Speaker 1: I always thought that election was he said, actually a 753 00:44:01,160 --> 00:44:04,239 Speaker 1: tie because neither one of them made the case for 754 00:44:04,320 --> 00:44:06,879 Speaker 1: why the other was wrong, because they kind of said, hey, 755 00:44:06,960 --> 00:44:10,800 Speaker 1: I agree with him, so vote for May anyway. But 756 00:44:10,880 --> 00:44:12,840 Speaker 1: there were still some politics over this. The two thousand 757 00:44:12,920 --> 00:44:16,160 Speaker 1: debate over permanent normal Trade relations P and TR was 758 00:44:16,239 --> 00:44:19,279 Speaker 1: a pretty fierce domestic fight during the Clinton years. A 759 00:44:19,360 --> 00:44:22,080 Speaker 1: Flcio accused the administration of giving away the future of 760 00:44:22,080 --> 00:44:26,440 Speaker 1: American manufacturing. Pap Ucanan called the WATO vote the greatest 761 00:44:26,480 --> 00:44:29,480 Speaker 1: surrender of American economic sovereignty in our history. So again, 762 00:44:29,920 --> 00:44:32,759 Speaker 1: it's almost like the Sanders wing and the Trump wing right. 763 00:44:33,360 --> 00:44:36,160 Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi, she wasn't speaker at the time. She voted 764 00:44:36,160 --> 00:44:39,560 Speaker 1: against China p and tr Bertie Sanders warned he was 765 00:44:39,800 --> 00:44:43,560 Speaker 1: then just a House member, a socialist, but a House 766 00:44:43,600 --> 00:44:46,440 Speaker 1: member from Vermont. He said, corporate America may profit, but 767 00:44:46,520 --> 00:44:50,319 Speaker 1: American workers will suffer. He wasn't alone, Dick Epart then 768 00:44:50,360 --> 00:44:54,000 Speaker 1: the Congressional Democratic leader Jesse Jackson. Much of the Democratic 769 00:44:54,080 --> 00:44:56,560 Speaker 1: base did oppose it, so did a chunk of the 770 00:44:56,600 --> 00:44:59,879 Speaker 1: Republican populous wing, very much more of the Pap Buchanan crowd. 771 00:45:00,640 --> 00:45:03,919 Speaker 1: But the corporate coalition was overwhelming. Silicon Valley, Wall Street, 772 00:45:04,000 --> 00:45:08,319 Speaker 1: Big agg big retail manufacturers were looking for low cost labor. 773 00:45:08,480 --> 00:45:12,160 Speaker 1: Everybody saw China as an economic accelerate. And here's where 774 00:45:12,239 --> 00:45:15,600 Speaker 1: hindsight is pretty clarifying. We often talked about China Shock, 775 00:45:16,040 --> 00:45:18,640 Speaker 1: the wave of job losses that hit industrial communities into 776 00:45:18,640 --> 00:45:20,960 Speaker 1: two thousands. But what we don't talk about enough is 777 00:45:21,000 --> 00:45:24,360 Speaker 1: how bipartisan this decision was that allowed that shock to happen. 778 00:45:25,400 --> 00:45:26,600 Speaker 2: It was left and right. 779 00:45:26,680 --> 00:45:29,680 Speaker 1: When China joined the WTO the United States entered the 780 00:45:29,760 --> 00:45:33,960 Speaker 1: era of the China Price, the idea that everything steel, electronics, furniture, toys, 781 00:45:34,000 --> 00:45:37,760 Speaker 1: clothing would be cheaper if it came from China. Consumers 782 00:45:37,840 --> 00:45:43,560 Speaker 1: loved it, investors loved it, retailers loved it. But the 783 00:45:43,600 --> 00:45:47,600 Speaker 1: political bill that would come due about a decade later. 784 00:45:49,760 --> 00:45:51,640 Speaker 1: And this is where the two thousand election becomes such 785 00:45:51,680 --> 00:45:54,640 Speaker 1: an important pivot point. I think in this story because 786 00:45:54,719 --> 00:45:57,840 Speaker 1: it's the last time both presidential nominees fully embraced the 787 00:45:57,920 --> 00:46:00,840 Speaker 1: same form policy worldview, George W. 788 00:46:01,000 --> 00:46:03,520 Speaker 2: Bush and Al Gore. They disagreed on taxes. 789 00:46:03,680 --> 00:46:07,480 Speaker 1: On the Social Security lock box, that's the best Al 790 00:46:07,600 --> 00:46:11,799 Speaker 1: Gore I can do in a lock box, and they 791 00:46:11,880 --> 00:46:14,040 Speaker 1: disagreed on a few other things, but on China they 792 00:46:14,080 --> 00:46:17,400 Speaker 1: spoke with the same vocabulary. Bush said during the campaign, 793 00:46:17,440 --> 00:46:19,759 Speaker 1: the best way to encourage freedom in China has engaged China. 794 00:46:20,120 --> 00:46:23,280 Speaker 1: Gore said, we benefit when China follows global rules and trade. 795 00:46:23,719 --> 00:46:27,080 Speaker 1: Both supported normalization, both supported p and tr both supported 796 00:46:27,120 --> 00:46:28,360 Speaker 1: China and the wto. 797 00:46:29,480 --> 00:46:29,640 Speaker 2: Now. 798 00:46:29,680 --> 00:46:32,799 Speaker 1: Bush took a tougher rhetorical line on China, called China 799 00:46:32,880 --> 00:46:36,680 Speaker 1: quote a strategic competitor, not a strategic partner. But that 800 00:46:36,760 --> 00:46:39,760 Speaker 1: was tone now policy. Bush backed the same trade approach 801 00:46:39,840 --> 00:46:42,560 Speaker 1: that Clinton did, and Gore paid a political price for 802 00:46:42,640 --> 00:46:46,120 Speaker 1: embracing that consensus. Union leaders told them directly, China P 803 00:46:46,239 --> 00:46:50,120 Speaker 1: and TR was the final betrayal of Clintonism. Midwestern workers 804 00:46:50,160 --> 00:46:53,760 Speaker 1: didn't hear rules based trade system. They simply heard factory 805 00:46:53,920 --> 00:46:58,319 Speaker 1: moving to Guangzhou. The irony is at the political base 806 00:46:58,840 --> 00:47:02,040 Speaker 1: that would later revolt again globalization. The Trump burning populist 807 00:47:02,080 --> 00:47:05,080 Speaker 1: alignment was warning about it in real time, but in 808 00:47:05,160 --> 00:47:08,800 Speaker 1: two thousand neither movement was big enough in either party 809 00:47:09,520 --> 00:47:11,200 Speaker 1: to make either one of them. We had a little 810 00:47:11,239 --> 00:47:13,400 Speaker 1: bit of Nator talking about it as a third party candidate, 811 00:47:13,520 --> 00:47:15,239 Speaker 1: a little bit of Buchanan talking about it as a 812 00:47:15,280 --> 00:47:17,799 Speaker 1: third party candidate, but they got about one or two 813 00:47:17,800 --> 00:47:21,160 Speaker 1: percent total. So when China joined the WTO in December 814 00:47:21,200 --> 00:47:24,560 Speaker 1: twenty one, it wasn't a partisan victory. It was the 815 00:47:24,680 --> 00:47:28,240 Speaker 1: last gas, but the uniparty consensus unfeigned policy, the belief 816 00:47:28,320 --> 00:47:33,040 Speaker 1: that engaging China will liberalize China, not transform America. History, 817 00:47:33,080 --> 00:47:34,480 Speaker 1: of course, had other plans. 818 00:47:35,840 --> 00:47:36,560 Speaker 2: So I. 819 00:47:38,080 --> 00:47:39,680 Speaker 1: This is the point of our story where we ought 820 00:47:39,719 --> 00:47:42,320 Speaker 1: to talk about the thought experiment here. What if the 821 00:47:42,440 --> 00:47:48,080 Speaker 1: United States had blocked China's WTO entry? Okay, Well, economists 822 00:47:48,120 --> 00:47:50,680 Speaker 1: who studied the counterfactual say two things. China still probably 823 00:47:50,719 --> 00:47:54,600 Speaker 1: becomes a manufacturing superpower, just more gradually and probably more 824 00:47:54,640 --> 00:47:57,839 Speaker 1: dependent on Europe and Japan. The United States still loses 825 00:47:57,880 --> 00:48:00,560 Speaker 1: industrial jobs because that trend began in the night nineties, 826 00:48:00,600 --> 00:48:01,960 Speaker 1: five years before. 827 00:48:02,560 --> 00:48:06,440 Speaker 2: The WTO extension for China. 828 00:48:07,600 --> 00:48:11,799 Speaker 1: So what probably changes simply paced, not trajectory China twenty ten. 829 00:48:11,960 --> 00:48:15,640 Speaker 1: Factory to the world probably still exists. The political shockwaves 830 00:48:15,680 --> 00:48:19,000 Speaker 1: in places like Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania. Maybe they're softened a little, 831 00:48:19,760 --> 00:48:23,960 Speaker 1: or they're delayed, but they land, and maybe the populist 832 00:48:24,040 --> 00:48:29,399 Speaker 1: backlash arrives in say the midterms of twenty eighteen, rather 833 00:48:29,480 --> 00:48:32,640 Speaker 1: than in twenty ten, or maybe the backlash happens anyway, 834 00:48:32,640 --> 00:48:35,120 Speaker 1: because globalization was going to be bigger than any single vote. 835 00:48:35,160 --> 00:48:36,000 Speaker 2: The point is is that. 836 00:48:37,800 --> 00:48:42,759 Speaker 1: It's probably not clear that anything was going to stop 837 00:48:42,800 --> 00:48:46,040 Speaker 1: the rise of China, which is always the argument the 838 00:48:46,120 --> 00:48:49,399 Speaker 1: realists make. So the question was can we shape China? 839 00:48:50,440 --> 00:48:53,080 Speaker 1: So here we are in the present moment. I open 840 00:48:53,160 --> 00:48:58,400 Speaker 1: this podcast talking about the National Security Strategy Memo that 841 00:48:58,640 --> 00:49:03,719 Speaker 1: was just released by this emit stration, and this is 842 00:49:03,760 --> 00:49:07,600 Speaker 1: the first US government document that clearly admits the fifty 843 00:49:07,640 --> 00:49:10,680 Speaker 1: year bet on China didn't work out as expected. It 844 00:49:10,840 --> 00:49:13,120 Speaker 1: does not call for a new Cold War. It does 845 00:49:13,239 --> 00:49:15,759 Speaker 1: not frame China as an ideological enemy. It does not 846 00:49:15,880 --> 00:49:19,799 Speaker 1: talk about containing China or transforming China. Instead, the through 847 00:49:19,920 --> 00:49:24,360 Speaker 1: line of this Trump Security Strategy memo is simple, China's 848 00:49:24,400 --> 00:49:27,680 Speaker 1: a permanent strategic rival. We are not trying to hold 849 00:49:27,840 --> 00:49:30,440 Speaker 1: China back anymore. We are going to try to strengthen 850 00:49:30,520 --> 00:49:35,560 Speaker 1: ourselves and compete with China. The seventy eight bet was 851 00:49:35,600 --> 00:49:38,560 Speaker 1: that opening China will shape China. The two thousand and 852 00:49:38,600 --> 00:49:42,480 Speaker 1: one bet was that integrating China will moderate China. The 853 00:49:42,560 --> 00:49:45,359 Speaker 1: twenty twenty five memo now basically says China is now 854 00:49:45,400 --> 00:49:49,840 Speaker 1: fully integrated, fully powerful, fully assertive, and the task is 855 00:49:49,920 --> 00:49:53,120 Speaker 1: now to compete with it, not to change it. Essentially, 856 00:49:53,200 --> 00:49:57,040 Speaker 1: we're surrendering. So you see these themes throughout the document itself. 857 00:49:57,080 --> 00:50:01,239 Speaker 1: Rebuilding the US industrial base, securing supply Chaine in American technology, 858 00:50:01,800 --> 00:50:05,720 Speaker 1: the decoupling, if you will, stabilizing relations without illusions, preparing 859 00:50:05,760 --> 00:50:10,640 Speaker 1: for long term competition. It's not full disengagement. It seems 860 00:50:10,680 --> 00:50:17,160 Speaker 1: to be just simply acceptance, strategic acceptance. The United States 861 00:50:17,239 --> 00:50:20,200 Speaker 1: finally acknowledging the reality shaped by decisions made in those 862 00:50:20,239 --> 00:50:25,200 Speaker 1: two earlier Decembers Carter in nineteen seventy eight, which of 863 00:50:25,280 --> 00:50:28,359 Speaker 1: course was preceded by Nixon going to China right again, 864 00:50:28,560 --> 00:50:34,400 Speaker 1: a bipartisan move, and then China and the wto begun 865 00:50:34,480 --> 00:50:40,080 Speaker 1: by Clinton, executed and finished by Bush. So in seventy eighth, 866 00:50:40,120 --> 00:50:42,600 Speaker 1: the US made a geopolitical bet that engaging China will 867 00:50:42,600 --> 00:50:44,720 Speaker 1: help win the Cold War and encourage reform in Beijing. 868 00:50:46,320 --> 00:50:49,279 Speaker 1: Arguably it might have done that right. We might have 869 00:50:49,920 --> 00:50:55,120 Speaker 1: helping separate China might have made Russia's the Soviets life 870 00:50:55,520 --> 00:50:58,440 Speaker 1: a little more challenging, so that we can't say that 871 00:50:58,520 --> 00:51:02,799 Speaker 1: bet didn't work, since we did win the Cold War 872 00:51:02,840 --> 00:51:05,239 Speaker 1: against the Soviets. But by two thousand and one, the 873 00:51:05,320 --> 00:51:08,399 Speaker 1: United States made an economic bet that integrating China into 874 00:51:08,400 --> 00:51:11,759 Speaker 1: the global trading system would expand global prosperity and lock 875 00:51:11,960 --> 00:51:16,600 Speaker 1: China in to a rules based world where they might 876 00:51:17,320 --> 00:51:21,360 Speaker 1: start to become small d democratic. Well, both bets did 877 00:51:21,480 --> 00:51:24,760 Speaker 1: reshape China, but boy did they reshape the United States. 878 00:51:25,120 --> 00:51:29,080 Speaker 1: They reshaped us economically, politically, and socially. And here we 879 00:51:29,160 --> 00:51:32,560 Speaker 1: are in December of twenty twenty five. The question now 880 00:51:32,800 --> 00:51:36,000 Speaker 1: is not how we are going to change China confront China. 881 00:51:36,120 --> 00:51:38,719 Speaker 1: It is simply, now, how do we compete with China? 882 00:51:39,719 --> 00:51:44,120 Speaker 1: So we helped create China, we helped bring upon this competitor, 883 00:51:45,440 --> 00:51:49,240 Speaker 1: and now we're surrendering and hoping we can just stay 884 00:51:49,520 --> 00:51:55,400 Speaker 1: competitive with the new manufacturing King of a. 885 00:51:55,480 --> 00:52:02,000 Speaker 2: Hill, China. There's your time machine time Capsule of the week. 886 00:52:05,120 --> 00:52:07,719 Speaker 1: Do you hate hangovers? We'll say goodbye to hangovers. Out 887 00:52:07,760 --> 00:52:10,279 Speaker 1: of Office gives you the social buzz without the next 888 00:52:10,400 --> 00:52:12,680 Speaker 1: day regret. They're best selling. Out of Office gummies were 889 00:52:12,680 --> 00:52:15,560 Speaker 1: designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood, 890 00:52:15,680 --> 00:52:19,239 Speaker 1: and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five different strengths, you 891 00:52:19,280 --> 00:52:21,440 Speaker 1: can tailor the dose to fit your vibe. From a 892 00:52:21,560 --> 00:52:25,600 Speaker 1: gentle one point five milligram micro doose to their newest 893 00:52:25,760 --> 00:52:29,760 Speaker 1: fifteen milligram gummy for a more elevated experience. Their THHC 894 00:52:29,920 --> 00:52:33,239 Speaker 1: beverages and gummies are a modern, mindful alternative to a 895 00:52:33,280 --> 00:52:35,719 Speaker 1: glass of wine or a cocktail. And I'll tell you this, 896 00:52:36,040 --> 00:52:38,920 Speaker 1: I've given up booze. I don't like the hangovers. I 897 00:52:39,280 --> 00:52:42,600 Speaker 1: prefer the gummy experience. Soul is a wellness brand that 898 00:52:42,680 --> 00:52:46,160 Speaker 1: believes feeling good should be fun and easy. Soul specializes 899 00:52:46,239 --> 00:52:49,880 Speaker 1: in delicious HEMP derived THHC, and CBD products, all designed 900 00:52:49,920 --> 00:52:52,920 Speaker 1: to boost your mood and simply help you unwine. So 901 00:52:53,000 --> 00:52:55,239 Speaker 1: if you struggle to switch off at night, Soul also 902 00:52:55,320 --> 00:52:58,280 Speaker 1: has a variety of products specifically designed to just simply 903 00:52:58,360 --> 00:53:00,759 Speaker 1: help you get a better night's sleep, including their top 904 00:53:00,880 --> 00:53:04,960 Speaker 1: selling Sleepy gummies. It's a fan favorite for deep restorative sleep. 905 00:53:05,239 --> 00:53:07,400 Speaker 1: So bring on the good vibes and treat yourself to 906 00:53:07,480 --> 00:53:11,240 Speaker 1: Soul today. Right now, Soul is offering my audience thirty 907 00:53:11,280 --> 00:53:14,319 Speaker 1: percent off your entire order, So go to getsold dot 908 00:53:14,400 --> 00:53:18,280 Speaker 1: Com use the promo code toodcast. Don't forget that code 909 00:53:18,600 --> 00:53:23,200 Speaker 1: that's getsold dot Com promo code toodcast for thirty percent off. 910 00:53:27,040 --> 00:53:30,160 Speaker 1: All right, let me sneak at a few questions before 911 00:53:30,160 --> 00:53:35,719 Speaker 1: I get to college football, ask Chuck, all right. First 912 00:53:35,800 --> 00:53:40,000 Speaker 1: question comes from Shamee H from des Moin. I always says, hey, check, 913 00:53:40,040 --> 00:53:42,439 Speaker 1: congrats and Miami making the CFP head to head should 914 00:53:42,440 --> 00:53:45,200 Speaker 1: always count. I'm curious about the Iowa democrats hesitancy to 915 00:53:45,280 --> 00:53:48,160 Speaker 1: push for first in the nation status again, give them 916 00:53:48,160 --> 00:53:50,680 Speaker 1: the state's accessibility and engaged voters. Wouldn't it make more 917 00:53:50,719 --> 00:53:52,560 Speaker 1: sense for both parties to go along, go all in 918 00:53:52,640 --> 00:53:55,120 Speaker 1: together rather than play it safe. Also, could you someday 919 00:53:55,160 --> 00:53:58,440 Speaker 1: explain how Obama's influence reshaped or damage the dncbond just 920 00:53:58,480 --> 00:54:03,320 Speaker 1: backing Hillary, Shane he des moines, Iowa, look it is 921 00:54:03,640 --> 00:54:11,799 Speaker 1: there is this. I don't have a good answer on why. Well, 922 00:54:11,840 --> 00:54:14,040 Speaker 1: I could tell you why the National Democrats don't want 923 00:54:14,040 --> 00:54:17,000 Speaker 1: to be in Iowa. Right, there's first of all, one 924 00:54:17,239 --> 00:54:19,840 Speaker 1: is they don't they they believe the base of the 925 00:54:19,920 --> 00:54:23,239 Speaker 1: party is not there's no parts of the base of 926 00:54:23,280 --> 00:54:24,080 Speaker 1: the party in Iowa. 927 00:54:26,200 --> 00:54:29,080 Speaker 2: You know, Well that's a choice, right, you could choose 928 00:54:29,160 --> 00:54:29,680 Speaker 2: to believe that. 929 00:54:30,920 --> 00:54:33,320 Speaker 1: But there is a sense that Iowa doesn't look like 930 00:54:33,480 --> 00:54:36,480 Speaker 1: what Democratic leaders think the Democratic Party looks like. But 931 00:54:37,080 --> 00:54:39,480 Speaker 1: I would argue that's been part of the problem is 932 00:54:39,560 --> 00:54:43,720 Speaker 1: that the Democrats have been looking at organizing their party 933 00:54:43,760 --> 00:54:48,279 Speaker 1: through the through the prism of identity, rather than the 934 00:54:48,360 --> 00:54:51,080 Speaker 1: prism of ideology or policy. 935 00:54:52,239 --> 00:54:54,000 Speaker 2: Or frankly realism. 936 00:54:56,120 --> 00:54:59,640 Speaker 1: Given you know, if I were looking at the problem 937 00:54:59,640 --> 00:55:02,560 Speaker 1: the Demo Credit Party as it's communicating with rural America, 938 00:55:03,120 --> 00:55:04,960 Speaker 1: I'd look around and say, what's the best way to 939 00:55:05,080 --> 00:55:07,920 Speaker 1: do that? When's the last time Democrats did well in 940 00:55:08,000 --> 00:55:11,000 Speaker 1: the industrial Midwest and the agriculture Midwest. Oh, when I 941 00:55:11,280 --> 00:55:12,879 Speaker 1: was first in the nation and a guy that named 942 00:55:12,880 --> 00:55:17,280 Speaker 1: Barack Obama who was from the Midwest. Mind you always 943 00:55:17,320 --> 00:55:20,040 Speaker 1: thought that people underestimated the fact that being from the 944 00:55:20,080 --> 00:55:23,960 Speaker 1: Midwest was such an asset to him. You know, it's 945 00:55:24,000 --> 00:55:26,480 Speaker 1: not lost on me that the coastal nominees have been 946 00:55:26,880 --> 00:55:30,560 Speaker 1: have been the losers right right Delaware on the Atlantic coast. 947 00:55:31,880 --> 00:55:35,080 Speaker 1: You know, he won, but then it couldn't survive. Kamala 948 00:55:35,160 --> 00:55:40,560 Speaker 1: Harris coastal, John Kerry coastal, Hillary Clinton identifying as a 949 00:55:40,600 --> 00:55:44,360 Speaker 1: New Yorker coastal, she'd have been better off going to 950 00:55:44,440 --> 00:55:48,479 Speaker 1: Illinois to run for office, which is her original home state. 951 00:55:49,040 --> 00:55:53,560 Speaker 1: So I think the whole coastal elite issue, I think 952 00:55:53,640 --> 00:55:56,680 Speaker 1: is a real issue. You know, you look at Bill 953 00:55:56,719 --> 00:56:00,480 Speaker 1: Clinton deep South Arkansas. You look at Barack Obama right 954 00:56:00,560 --> 00:56:03,000 Speaker 1: in the middle of the country in the Midwest in Illinois. 955 00:56:04,760 --> 00:56:08,560 Speaker 1: Look at a Jimmy Carter deep South Georgia. I don't 956 00:56:08,600 --> 00:56:11,480 Speaker 1: think those things are accidents. You look at a guy 957 00:56:11,560 --> 00:56:14,480 Speaker 1: like Pete Bootaget's getting traction again a Midwesterner. 958 00:56:14,600 --> 00:56:18,000 Speaker 2: So I don't. 959 00:56:20,160 --> 00:56:21,839 Speaker 1: If you don't want to do Iowa because you don't 960 00:56:21,920 --> 00:56:23,920 Speaker 1: like the caucus process. And I do think this is 961 00:56:24,000 --> 00:56:28,480 Speaker 1: a tactical and mechanical critique, if you will, because two 962 00:56:28,560 --> 00:56:30,840 Speaker 1: cycles in a row, the Iowa Democrats couldn't tell us 963 00:56:30,840 --> 00:56:33,239 Speaker 1: who won the Iowa caucases. So I do think that 964 00:56:33,480 --> 00:56:37,120 Speaker 1: was a fair demerit. But just abandoning the Midwest as 965 00:56:37,160 --> 00:56:38,880 Speaker 1: first in the nation, I think it's been a mistake. 966 00:56:39,360 --> 00:56:41,760 Speaker 1: So if you're not going to do Iowa, fine, do Nebraska, 967 00:56:41,880 --> 00:56:45,440 Speaker 1: do Kansas, but pick a small rural state in the Midwest. 968 00:56:45,680 --> 00:56:48,560 Speaker 1: Just if you can't figure that out, you're not going 969 00:56:48,680 --> 00:56:53,479 Speaker 1: to be competitive long term for the presidency. I don't 970 00:56:53,520 --> 00:56:55,879 Speaker 1: think rural southern voters are the way in. I think 971 00:56:55,920 --> 00:57:00,080 Speaker 1: you begin in the rural Midwest. That's where you're I 972 00:57:00,120 --> 00:57:03,640 Speaker 1: could fully get rejected and asked for your question about 973 00:57:03,640 --> 00:57:07,680 Speaker 1: the DNC. They didn't prop up the DNC at all 974 00:57:07,760 --> 00:57:10,200 Speaker 1: when they first came in. This is yes, you are 975 00:57:10,719 --> 00:57:14,200 Speaker 1: referring to what I think the original sin of Obama 976 00:57:14,400 --> 00:57:17,520 Speaker 1: endorsing Hillary in twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen, which was 977 00:57:17,560 --> 00:57:20,040 Speaker 1: sort of not realizing that that isn't where half the 978 00:57:20,080 --> 00:57:22,840 Speaker 1: party wanted to go. But when it comes to the 979 00:57:22,960 --> 00:57:25,560 Speaker 1: DNC and the sort of party in general. You know, 980 00:57:25,600 --> 00:57:28,120 Speaker 1: they refused to sort of build the DNC at first. 981 00:57:28,120 --> 00:57:30,440 Speaker 1: They sort of built an alternative to the DNC called 982 00:57:30,560 --> 00:57:36,480 Speaker 1: Organizing for America, you know, and I think it was unfortunately. 983 00:57:36,520 --> 00:57:39,200 Speaker 1: I think he was surrounded by advisers who weren't big 984 00:57:39,280 --> 00:57:42,040 Speaker 1: fans of the DNC, and the DNC in eight was 985 00:57:42,400 --> 00:57:46,080 Speaker 1: quietly helping Hillary, right, she was sort of more of 986 00:57:46,160 --> 00:57:50,160 Speaker 1: the party stalwart. Obama and his team were the outsiders. 987 00:57:50,600 --> 00:57:54,280 Speaker 1: And I think the and I think the belief and 988 00:57:54,400 --> 00:58:01,360 Speaker 1: the brand of outsider that team Obama wanted to keep 989 00:58:01,480 --> 00:58:04,960 Speaker 1: even while they got to the White House, seemed to 990 00:58:05,080 --> 00:58:08,640 Speaker 1: convince them that they ought to build their own national 991 00:58:09,680 --> 00:58:14,560 Speaker 1: political organization. And they basically what was ofa right, what 992 00:58:14,800 --> 00:58:17,680 Speaker 1: was Obama for America became Organizing for America and it 993 00:58:17,800 --> 00:58:21,080 Speaker 1: was housed within the DNC. But all of the resources, 994 00:58:21,080 --> 00:58:23,520 Speaker 1: all of the efforts went to that it didn't really work. 995 00:58:23,600 --> 00:58:27,720 Speaker 1: It didn't become the powerful political organization to help support 996 00:58:27,800 --> 00:58:30,480 Speaker 1: his agenda, which is what it was pitched as that 997 00:58:30,640 --> 00:58:33,520 Speaker 1: this was going to be the continuation of the Obama 998 00:58:33,600 --> 00:58:35,520 Speaker 1: movement and these people would get engaged when he was 999 00:58:35,560 --> 00:58:38,560 Speaker 1: trying to you know, do big things past, big pieces 1000 00:58:38,600 --> 00:58:41,160 Speaker 1: of legislation, whether it's healthcare, whether it has to do 1001 00:58:41,240 --> 00:58:44,720 Speaker 1: the environment, et cetera. That didn't really work out so well. 1002 00:58:44,840 --> 00:58:47,400 Speaker 1: And then by the time, you know, the problem was 1003 00:58:47,960 --> 00:58:52,040 Speaker 1: the DNC is just a vehicle. They kind of starved 1004 00:58:52,120 --> 00:58:56,920 Speaker 1: that vehicle, and of course starving that vehicle meant very 1005 00:58:56,960 --> 00:58:59,800 Speaker 1: few resources to the states. Well, what happened by twenty 1006 00:59:00,280 --> 00:59:03,320 Speaker 1: They get wiped out of the state legislatures by twenty 1007 00:59:03,440 --> 00:59:07,640 Speaker 1: What does that mean? Republicans basically control redistricting for a 1008 00:59:07,720 --> 00:59:12,000 Speaker 1: decade and a half. Only recently have Democrats started to 1009 00:59:12,120 --> 00:59:15,520 Speaker 1: make up ground back in these state legislatures. So I 1010 00:59:15,640 --> 00:59:18,200 Speaker 1: do think that the Obama folks that came into the 1011 00:59:18,920 --> 00:59:22,000 Speaker 1: first term of that Obama White House were determined to 1012 00:59:22,000 --> 00:59:24,800 Speaker 1: build their own political structure, their own organization, sort of 1013 00:59:24,880 --> 00:59:28,040 Speaker 1: push aside the DNC, and it just turned out to 1014 00:59:28,080 --> 00:59:31,160 Speaker 1: be a logistical mistake. Look, the DNC, you make it 1015 00:59:31,240 --> 00:59:33,120 Speaker 1: whatever you are. But this idea they thought they were 1016 00:59:33,120 --> 00:59:35,160 Speaker 1: going to be elected president and be an outsider in 1017 00:59:35,200 --> 00:59:40,040 Speaker 1: the Democratic Party. Once you've become president, you've become leader 1018 00:59:40,120 --> 00:59:42,880 Speaker 1: of the party. You need to accept that role. And 1019 00:59:42,960 --> 00:59:45,400 Speaker 1: I would argue, for a couple of years. They didn't 1020 00:59:45,440 --> 00:59:47,200 Speaker 1: accept that role. They accept that they were leader of 1021 00:59:47,240 --> 00:59:49,040 Speaker 1: the free world. They accept that they were president of 1022 00:59:49,040 --> 00:59:50,680 Speaker 1: the United States, and they accepted that they were the 1023 00:59:51,200 --> 00:59:55,280 Speaker 1: biggest brand inside the Democratic coalition. But there were a 1024 00:59:55,360 --> 00:59:57,720 Speaker 1: lot of people whispering in Obama's ear that, hey, your 1025 00:59:57,760 --> 01:00:01,560 Speaker 1: brand and coalition's bigger than one party, So don't get 1026 01:00:01,640 --> 01:00:05,480 Speaker 1: too caught up in the DNC politics. And there's certainly 1027 01:00:05,560 --> 01:00:09,320 Speaker 1: some bureaucracy that comes with that. But that's what I 1028 01:00:09,440 --> 01:00:12,120 Speaker 1: mean when I you know, and sort of that attitude 1029 01:00:12,480 --> 01:00:15,880 Speaker 1: just sort of gutted the sort of infrastructure of the 1030 01:00:15,920 --> 01:00:18,200 Speaker 1: Democratic Party, both on the state level and on the 1031 01:00:18,320 --> 01:00:22,120 Speaker 1: national level, and it allowed it to atrophy for a 1032 01:00:22,160 --> 01:00:24,920 Speaker 1: good cycle or two. And it really you know, Hillary 1033 01:00:24,960 --> 01:00:28,000 Speaker 1: Clinton threw more money at it in sixteen, Joe Biden 1034 01:00:28,040 --> 01:00:30,840 Speaker 1: tried to throw more money at it in twenty. But 1035 01:00:31,080 --> 01:00:33,040 Speaker 1: I would argue that the reason it feels like a 1036 01:00:33,120 --> 01:00:37,560 Speaker 1: week link even today goes back to that initial decision 1037 01:00:37,600 --> 01:00:39,720 Speaker 1: in twenty oh nine when the team Obama came in. 1038 01:00:40,320 --> 01:00:43,880 Speaker 1: This big frankly now looks like a landslide compared to 1039 01:00:44,000 --> 01:00:46,920 Speaker 1: presidential elections. The couple we had before, and quite a 1040 01:00:46,960 --> 01:00:47,640 Speaker 1: few that we've had. 1041 01:00:47,560 --> 01:00:50,040 Speaker 2: After and they didn't. 1042 01:00:50,520 --> 01:00:54,080 Speaker 1: They didn't decide to build rebuild the Democratic Party in 1043 01:00:54,160 --> 01:00:57,200 Speaker 1: their image. They instead wanted to build their own sort 1044 01:00:57,240 --> 01:01:02,520 Speaker 1: of alternative independent committee in their own image. But by 1045 01:01:02,640 --> 01:01:08,280 Speaker 1: doing that, they starved the party itself of resources. All right, 1046 01:01:08,400 --> 01:01:11,080 Speaker 1: let me sneak in. I give you it was not 1047 01:01:11,200 --> 01:01:12,920 Speaker 1: a long question, but I gave you a couple of 1048 01:01:13,040 --> 01:01:15,360 Speaker 1: long answers there. Next question comes from Patrick from the 1049 01:01:15,440 --> 01:01:19,320 Speaker 1: Hague by way of Hertford, Connecticut. He says, and he says, Chuck, 1050 01:01:19,360 --> 01:01:21,320 Speaker 1: really appreciate the clarity and sharp analysis you bring to 1051 01:01:21,360 --> 01:01:22,000 Speaker 1: every episode. 1052 01:01:22,520 --> 01:01:25,080 Speaker 2: It's become my go to listen. Excellent. Hopefully I've got 1053 01:01:25,120 --> 01:01:26,840 Speaker 2: you worried about college football, not too. 1054 01:01:27,320 --> 01:01:29,240 Speaker 1: I've heard people say that Kamala Harris might actually make 1055 01:01:29,240 --> 01:01:31,000 Speaker 1: a stronger Supreme Court justice than president. 1056 01:01:31,440 --> 01:01:33,240 Speaker 2: I've been one of those people, and. 1057 01:01:33,320 --> 01:01:35,240 Speaker 1: It got me thinking, if one branch of government could 1058 01:01:35,280 --> 01:01:37,480 Speaker 1: draft a member from another, who would be the best fit, 1059 01:01:37,600 --> 01:01:39,840 Speaker 1: Which current justice would make a great member of Congress? 1060 01:01:40,080 --> 01:01:42,320 Speaker 1: And while plenty of members of Congress move into the 1061 01:01:42,400 --> 01:01:44,800 Speaker 1: executive branch, what about the reverse? And one are Elizabeth 1062 01:01:44,840 --> 01:01:47,480 Speaker 1: Warren's path to elected office. Curious to hear your thoughts. 1063 01:01:48,280 --> 01:01:53,280 Speaker 1: I think that's a fun exercise of who would be 1064 01:01:53,360 --> 01:01:57,520 Speaker 1: a good you know, I think John Roberts might be 1065 01:01:57,600 --> 01:02:02,040 Speaker 1: a pretty good Senate leader. He seems to be pretty 1066 01:02:02,080 --> 01:02:04,240 Speaker 1: good at sort of dealing with you know, probably a 1067 01:02:04,280 --> 01:02:08,640 Speaker 1: Senate Republican leader, pretty good at dealing with the ideological 1068 01:02:08,720 --> 01:02:12,160 Speaker 1: diversity of the rights, tries to create. 1069 01:02:11,880 --> 01:02:13,920 Speaker 2: A consensus, right if you know. 1070 01:02:14,200 --> 01:02:16,480 Speaker 1: I think I think in some ways you might be 1071 01:02:16,600 --> 01:02:18,800 Speaker 1: better as Senate Republican leader than he is as Chief 1072 01:02:18,960 --> 01:02:22,280 Speaker 1: Justice on that front. But I think he's definitely got 1073 01:02:22,960 --> 01:02:26,800 Speaker 1: a little bit of that skill set. I think Sonya 1074 01:02:26,880 --> 01:02:30,520 Speaker 1: Sotomayor would be a pretty good party leader. I don't 1075 01:02:30,560 --> 01:02:32,720 Speaker 1: know if she would be a good legislative leader. I 1076 01:02:32,760 --> 01:02:35,520 Speaker 1: think there's a difference, right, but I think she speaks 1077 01:02:35,520 --> 01:02:38,640 Speaker 1: with a lot of clarity, she speaks with a lot 1078 01:02:38,720 --> 01:02:43,680 Speaker 1: of passion, So I think sort of almost as a 1079 01:02:44,360 --> 01:02:48,560 Speaker 1: in that sense, I think you would see that the 1080 01:02:48,680 --> 01:02:50,680 Speaker 1: reason I'll tell you my theory of why I've always 1081 01:02:50,680 --> 01:02:54,479 Speaker 1: thought Kamala Harris won't. Frankly, probably, I think the first 1082 01:02:54,960 --> 01:02:56,920 Speaker 1: dream job, you know, if you talk about you get 1083 01:02:56,960 --> 01:03:00,280 Speaker 1: into politics, what are your dream jobs? I'm gonna vinced 1084 01:03:00,280 --> 01:03:02,320 Speaker 1: her first dream job was not president that it was 1085 01:03:02,640 --> 01:03:04,760 Speaker 1: either attorney general or Supreme Court. Why do I say 1086 01:03:04,800 --> 01:03:06,920 Speaker 1: that because the first office she chose to run for 1087 01:03:07,120 --> 01:03:10,960 Speaker 1: was prosecutor. You know, usually our want to be presidents. 1088 01:03:11,040 --> 01:03:13,880 Speaker 1: They're running, they're trying to fast track their way to Congress. 1089 01:03:14,800 --> 01:03:17,240 Speaker 1: Running for DA in San Francisco is not a fast 1090 01:03:17,320 --> 01:03:21,320 Speaker 1: track to Congress. That wasn't somebody that was her where 1091 01:03:21,360 --> 01:03:25,360 Speaker 1: whose first goal was to get to Washington. Usually my 1092 01:03:25,440 --> 01:03:28,800 Speaker 1: presidential wannabes, their first goal is to kt to Washington. However, 1093 01:03:29,160 --> 01:03:32,040 Speaker 1: Loung it dates right, and that wasn't her first goal, 1094 01:03:32,120 --> 01:03:34,040 Speaker 1: even as she went to school here in DC at 1095 01:03:34,080 --> 01:03:37,080 Speaker 1: Howard Right. So I've always looked at that and wondered, 1096 01:03:37,160 --> 01:03:39,400 Speaker 1: huh I think, and I buy it. I mean, I 1097 01:03:39,440 --> 01:03:42,240 Speaker 1: don't think it's BS. I do think she's animated by 1098 01:03:42,280 --> 01:03:46,440 Speaker 1: the law. I think she's animated by these things. And 1099 01:03:46,560 --> 01:03:49,160 Speaker 1: I think somebody whispered in her ear sometime, you know, 1100 01:03:49,240 --> 01:03:51,200 Speaker 1: when she got talked into it, because look at the 1101 01:03:51,240 --> 01:03:53,280 Speaker 1: next office she runs for it from DA, she runs 1102 01:03:53,320 --> 01:03:55,920 Speaker 1: for attorney general. Right, she doesn't immediately go to US 1103 01:03:55,960 --> 01:03:59,840 Speaker 1: Senate or something like that, and then she gets you know, 1104 01:04:00,160 --> 01:04:02,680 Speaker 1: runs for the Senate seat when it opens up and 1105 01:04:02,800 --> 01:04:04,360 Speaker 1: somebody whispers in her air, you know, you could be 1106 01:04:04,400 --> 01:04:07,400 Speaker 1: the first woman president. And I don't think, look, anybody, 1107 01:04:07,520 --> 01:04:09,840 Speaker 1: any human being, we all have a little bit of ego. 1108 01:04:10,280 --> 01:04:14,000 Speaker 1: Somebody whispers that in your ear and it's plausible. Maybe 1109 01:04:14,000 --> 01:04:17,200 Speaker 1: you don't stop hearing it, right, So that's where I've 1110 01:04:17,240 --> 01:04:22,480 Speaker 1: always come down on that. But look, I think I 1111 01:04:22,520 --> 01:04:25,080 Speaker 1: think James Langford would make a really good you know, 1112 01:04:25,120 --> 01:04:27,320 Speaker 1: if you're looking at like, and I'll be honest, I 1113 01:04:27,400 --> 01:04:31,600 Speaker 1: think we need an elected somebody who's run for office 1114 01:04:31,680 --> 01:04:33,440 Speaker 1: before ought to be in the Supreme Court. I think 1115 01:04:33,440 --> 01:04:35,680 Speaker 1: it's terrible that we haven't had anybody. I think you 1116 01:04:35,840 --> 01:04:39,400 Speaker 1: need that diversity of understanding that your rulings are going 1117 01:04:39,480 --> 01:04:42,480 Speaker 1: to play in the campaign trail. Sandra Dee O'Connor, I 1118 01:04:42,560 --> 01:04:46,240 Speaker 1: believe the last Supreme Court justice that ever ran that 1119 01:04:46,320 --> 01:04:48,600 Speaker 1: ever ran for office for anything, she ran for a 1120 01:04:48,640 --> 01:04:49,920 Speaker 1: state Senate seat in Arizona. 1121 01:04:51,640 --> 01:04:53,880 Speaker 2: I think that you know, what used to be. 1122 01:04:54,040 --> 01:04:58,080 Speaker 1: Fairly common for elected officials to get appointed to the 1123 01:04:58,120 --> 01:05:02,680 Speaker 1: Supreme Court, Bill Clinton, I think with semi serious and 1124 01:05:02,800 --> 01:05:06,120 Speaker 1: putting Mario Cuomo on the Supreme Court, I think I 1125 01:05:06,200 --> 01:05:09,000 Speaker 1: don't I think my guess is Mario Cuomo wish to 1126 01:05:09,000 --> 01:05:11,960 Speaker 1: see had said yes, considering he said no, read for 1127 01:05:12,040 --> 01:05:16,200 Speaker 1: re election and loss, but that would have been interesting. 1128 01:05:16,280 --> 01:05:18,400 Speaker 1: Bruce Babbitt was another one that he wanted to put there. 1129 01:05:19,000 --> 01:05:21,200 Speaker 1: The point is is that there's only so much you 1130 01:05:21,320 --> 01:05:25,800 Speaker 1: understand about how illegal ruling impacts their everyday lives of Americans. 1131 01:05:27,120 --> 01:05:29,760 Speaker 1: I think too many of these justices go from law 1132 01:05:29,840 --> 01:05:33,840 Speaker 1: school to a corporate you know, maybe law firm, maybe 1133 01:05:34,120 --> 01:05:38,400 Speaker 1: a clerkship, a judge's chambers, but they don't sort of 1134 01:05:38,480 --> 01:05:43,560 Speaker 1: interact with people as much. And I think having somebody 1135 01:05:43,720 --> 01:05:48,760 Speaker 1: on that court that has done that, I think would 1136 01:05:48,800 --> 01:05:50,720 Speaker 1: be I'd like more than just one person. But we 1137 01:05:50,800 --> 01:05:54,600 Speaker 1: don't even have one person on that and that's something 1138 01:05:54,640 --> 01:05:56,880 Speaker 1: that I think is missing. But I look at some 1139 01:05:56,920 --> 01:05:59,520 Speaker 1: of these elected officials, like I said, on the conservative 1140 01:05:59,560 --> 01:06:01,440 Speaker 1: side of the I think James Langford would make a 1141 01:06:01,480 --> 01:06:04,680 Speaker 1: fascinating Supreme Court. But I look for I'm looking for 1142 01:06:04,800 --> 01:06:07,840 Speaker 1: people who are intellects with a little bit of personal humility. 1143 01:06:07,880 --> 01:06:09,160 Speaker 2: So I want people like Jack. 1144 01:06:09,080 --> 01:06:13,640 Speaker 1: Red, Jim Langford, right, people like that, not the loud mouse. 1145 01:06:14,080 --> 01:06:17,480 Speaker 1: If you will, like you wouldn't, I don't think I 1146 01:06:17,560 --> 01:06:20,560 Speaker 1: think Ted Cruz intellectually would be interesting on the Supreme Court, 1147 01:06:20,840 --> 01:06:23,040 Speaker 1: but I think he would feel I think he would 1148 01:06:23,080 --> 01:06:26,560 Speaker 1: hate the job because of his inability to speak out right. 1149 01:06:26,600 --> 01:06:28,400 Speaker 2: I think that used to bother Scilly a little bit. 1150 01:06:28,440 --> 01:06:29,640 Speaker 2: I think he wanted to speak out more. 1151 01:06:29,640 --> 01:06:31,560 Speaker 1: I think it bothers so to my oar, she strikes 1152 01:06:31,600 --> 01:06:34,600 Speaker 1: me as somebody that would love to be speaking out more, 1153 01:06:34,720 --> 01:06:39,240 Speaker 1: but feels that the pageantry of the office itself doesn't 1154 01:06:39,280 --> 01:06:42,360 Speaker 1: call for it. I'd love to do a little bit 1155 01:06:42,440 --> 01:06:44,520 Speaker 1: more on your question down the road. Maybe you can 1156 01:06:44,560 --> 01:06:46,520 Speaker 1: come back with me with a few more of the 1157 01:06:46,640 --> 01:06:49,560 Speaker 1: fantasy sort of fantasy football politics. 1158 01:06:49,200 --> 01:06:51,960 Speaker 2: Questions like that. All right, one last question and then 1159 01:06:52,000 --> 01:06:54,600 Speaker 2: we'll get to my college football round up. 1160 01:06:54,640 --> 01:06:56,400 Speaker 1: Long time listening here in your podcast always reminds me 1161 01:06:56,440 --> 01:06:59,040 Speaker 1: of how much I enjoyed political science classes well great. 1162 01:06:59,440 --> 01:07:01,920 Speaker 1: In New Jersey, the party controlled county line was eliminated 1163 01:07:01,960 --> 01:07:03,920 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four after a lawsuit by now Senator 1164 01:07:03,920 --> 01:07:07,480 Speaker 1: Andy Kim, aiming to reduce the influence of party bosses 1165 01:07:07,520 --> 01:07:09,480 Speaker 1: given the lack of an open Democratic primary in twenty 1166 01:07:09,520 --> 01:07:11,200 Speaker 1: twenty four, do you think this could mark the beginning 1167 01:07:11,520 --> 01:07:14,160 Speaker 1: of a broader shift towards fair less party driven primary 1168 01:07:14,240 --> 01:07:18,680 Speaker 1: voting ghost Scarlet Knights. John Feldman, Well, John, I have 1169 01:07:18,760 --> 01:07:22,120 Speaker 1: a conversation coming up here with the a gentleman named 1170 01:07:22,160 --> 01:07:24,280 Speaker 1: Nick Troiano. It's not this episode's coming up in the 1171 01:07:24,320 --> 01:07:27,880 Speaker 1: next couple of episodes, and he's working on essentially get 1172 01:07:27,960 --> 01:07:30,600 Speaker 1: he believes. He wrote a book called The Primary Problem, 1173 01:07:31,000 --> 01:07:33,720 Speaker 1: and he believes that partisan primaries are at the root 1174 01:07:33,880 --> 01:07:36,360 Speaker 1: or the root cause of our polarization. They're the root 1175 01:07:36,440 --> 01:07:38,760 Speaker 1: cause of our inability for Congress to get anything done. 1176 01:07:39,520 --> 01:07:43,000 Speaker 1: And then if we can eliminate the partisan primary in general, 1177 01:07:43,120 --> 01:07:46,320 Speaker 1: forget this county line business and all this stuff, we 1178 01:07:46,400 --> 01:07:47,280 Speaker 1: would be in better shape. 1179 01:07:47,400 --> 01:07:48,000 Speaker 2: I could. 1180 01:07:49,040 --> 01:07:50,960 Speaker 1: I am very empathetic to this. I would love to 1181 01:07:51,000 --> 01:07:53,800 Speaker 1: get rid of partisan primaries. I would like all party primaries. 1182 01:07:54,280 --> 01:07:55,800 Speaker 1: I'd like to see that now I want to see. 1183 01:07:56,000 --> 01:07:59,440 Speaker 1: I think parties should still identify themselves. But I think 1184 01:08:00,040 --> 01:08:03,000 Speaker 1: I think it's weird that the taxpayers pay for an 1185 01:08:03,040 --> 01:08:05,680 Speaker 1: election that the only way I can participate in that 1186 01:08:05,760 --> 01:08:07,919 Speaker 1: election in a certain in some states is to join 1187 01:08:08,040 --> 01:08:11,280 Speaker 1: some private organization that to me strikes me as a 1188 01:08:11,320 --> 01:08:15,560 Speaker 1: poll tax and a violation of equal protection. I'd like 1189 01:08:15,640 --> 01:08:18,400 Speaker 1: to see some better lawyering. If you will on some 1190 01:08:18,520 --> 01:08:21,080 Speaker 1: of these issues when it comes to ballot access and 1191 01:08:22,000 --> 01:08:26,680 Speaker 1: these partisan primaries. But you know, given I do think 1192 01:08:26,800 --> 01:08:28,880 Speaker 1: we're headed in that direction, and I think part of 1193 01:08:28,920 --> 01:08:32,960 Speaker 1: it is because millennials and gen z do not like 1194 01:08:33,080 --> 01:08:36,120 Speaker 1: these old institutions that are called the Republican Party and 1195 01:08:36,160 --> 01:08:40,360 Speaker 1: the Democratic Party. And so the more those two sort 1196 01:08:40,400 --> 01:08:44,760 Speaker 1: of carcasses, if you will, semi dead carcasses on the 1197 01:08:44,800 --> 01:08:46,599 Speaker 1: side of the road, the donkey and the elephant there, 1198 01:08:46,840 --> 01:08:51,040 Speaker 1: the more they fight these changes to the process, I think, 1199 01:08:51,120 --> 01:08:55,320 Speaker 1: the more you'll see growing support to sort of blow 1200 01:08:55,439 --> 01:08:58,839 Speaker 1: up the party, the power of the political parties wherever, 1201 01:09:00,000 --> 01:09:10,960 Speaker 1: wherever it still exists, like Allah, New Jersey. All right, 1202 01:09:11,000 --> 01:09:17,360 Speaker 1: so that's let's talk some college football. Look, Miaey got it. 1203 01:09:18,560 --> 01:09:21,960 Speaker 1: I think Miami deserved to be in. But this entire 1204 01:09:22,040 --> 01:09:27,360 Speaker 1: process was a mess. There's no doubt that there is 1205 01:09:28,479 --> 01:09:29,320 Speaker 1: there is there. 1206 01:09:29,400 --> 01:09:31,560 Speaker 2: It is not clear what this. 1207 01:09:31,880 --> 01:09:35,120 Speaker 1: This whole committee is so subjective. The ridiculous TV show 1208 01:09:35,160 --> 01:09:37,839 Speaker 1: they put on every week, which is which creates content. 1209 01:09:39,200 --> 01:09:41,559 Speaker 1: You know, I'm in the content creation business myself. It's 1210 01:09:41,640 --> 01:09:44,760 Speaker 1: created plenty of content for me to be and moan about, right, 1211 01:09:46,479 --> 01:09:49,040 Speaker 1: but it misled a lot of schools that misled a 1212 01:09:49,040 --> 01:09:51,120 Speaker 1: lot of coaches, and there's some anger there. I saw 1213 01:09:51,160 --> 01:09:54,479 Speaker 1: that the athletic director of Notre Dame is really angry. 1214 01:09:54,560 --> 01:09:56,680 Speaker 1: They've decided not to be in a bowl game over this. 1215 01:09:57,240 --> 01:09:59,800 Speaker 1: I wonder if cooler heads will prevail after they get 1216 01:09:59,840 --> 01:10:00,439 Speaker 1: an night's sleep. 1217 01:10:00,520 --> 01:10:00,960 Speaker 2: But we'll see. 1218 01:10:02,080 --> 01:10:04,439 Speaker 1: I'm tapping on Sunday evening, so that's why I say 1219 01:10:04,479 --> 01:10:06,920 Speaker 1: a night's sleep. If you tell me Notre Dame changes, 1220 01:10:06,960 --> 01:10:09,320 Speaker 1: it's mine in the next twenty four hours. It wouldn't 1221 01:10:09,320 --> 01:10:11,800 Speaker 1: surprise me, because remember, Notre name gets to keep all 1222 01:10:11,800 --> 01:10:13,559 Speaker 1: that bowl money themselves. Are they really going to leave 1223 01:10:13,560 --> 01:10:16,000 Speaker 1: a couple million dollars on the table, even though you 1224 01:10:16,040 --> 01:10:18,240 Speaker 1: know a couple million pop tarts, right is what they'd 1225 01:10:18,280 --> 01:10:20,040 Speaker 1: be leaving on the table, because I guess it would 1226 01:10:20,040 --> 01:10:21,160 Speaker 1: have been Notre Dame in BYU and. 1227 01:10:21,160 --> 01:10:21,880 Speaker 2: The pop tarts bawl. 1228 01:10:23,320 --> 01:10:26,360 Speaker 1: So I'll be you know, every dollar counts, right, every 1229 01:10:26,400 --> 01:10:28,920 Speaker 1: dollar matters. I know that's a wealthy school, but when 1230 01:10:29,000 --> 01:10:32,439 Speaker 1: this day's of nil. Everybody's cash poor these days, so 1231 01:10:33,400 --> 01:10:37,120 Speaker 1: cooler heads could prevail there. But I understand their frustration. 1232 01:10:37,240 --> 01:10:40,240 Speaker 1: They were led to believe that that their metrics. You know, 1233 01:10:40,320 --> 01:10:43,040 Speaker 1: they were going to be kept ahead of Miami, but 1234 01:10:43,160 --> 01:10:47,479 Speaker 1: this consistently. The real outrage is how it's the bias 1235 01:10:47,720 --> 01:10:50,760 Speaker 1: that ESPN and this committee has with the SEC. Now, 1236 01:10:52,320 --> 01:10:55,320 Speaker 1: my brother in law, who's a big SEC fan, will say, 1237 01:10:55,520 --> 01:10:58,840 Speaker 1: it's not a bias. The SEC is the best. They 1238 01:10:58,840 --> 01:11:01,040 Speaker 1: should have an advantage, should be able to call the shots. 1239 01:11:03,120 --> 01:11:05,360 Speaker 1: I have no doubt that the SEC is going to 1240 01:11:05,439 --> 01:11:08,120 Speaker 1: have more teams in the College Football Playoff this year 1241 01:11:08,280 --> 01:11:10,120 Speaker 1: than the Big Ten or the AEC of the Big twelve. 1242 01:11:11,280 --> 01:11:14,360 Speaker 1: The problem is sort of this idea that a conference 1243 01:11:14,439 --> 01:11:16,559 Speaker 1: game in the SEC is hard, but a conference game. 1244 01:11:16,439 --> 01:11:17,280 Speaker 2: Anywhere else isn't. 1245 01:11:17,680 --> 01:11:20,679 Speaker 1: It's the sort of those lines of arrogance that trigger 1246 01:11:20,840 --> 01:11:25,160 Speaker 1: me on this conversation. Right, Oh my god, Alabama toughening 1247 01:11:25,240 --> 01:11:27,080 Speaker 1: it out in the Iron Bowl to a five and 1248 01:11:27,200 --> 01:11:30,080 Speaker 1: seven Auburn team. Well, Miami had to go to a 1249 01:11:30,360 --> 01:11:32,960 Speaker 1: thirty five year old, thirty five thirty five degree weather 1250 01:11:33,200 --> 01:11:36,840 Speaker 1: in Pittsburgh, something that's always very difficult for Miami. They 1251 01:11:36,880 --> 01:11:38,600 Speaker 1: go up there and open the can of you know 1252 01:11:38,680 --> 01:11:43,519 Speaker 1: what on the pitt Panthers. The point is and wherever 1253 01:11:43,600 --> 01:11:46,000 Speaker 1: Miami goes on the road in the ACC when they 1254 01:11:46,040 --> 01:11:48,880 Speaker 1: beat Miami they storm the field. The point being is 1255 01:11:49,080 --> 01:11:53,280 Speaker 1: every conference road game for a big brand is difficult, Right, 1256 01:11:53,560 --> 01:11:55,519 Speaker 1: It was difficult when Notre Dame went to Louisville and 1257 01:11:55,600 --> 01:11:58,400 Speaker 1: Louisville beats them, and they storm the field for that, Right, 1258 01:11:59,040 --> 01:12:01,519 Speaker 1: That same thing happens Alabama, right when they lose to 1259 01:12:01,600 --> 01:12:05,160 Speaker 1: one of their you know, to a Missouri or anybody 1260 01:12:05,200 --> 01:12:08,519 Speaker 1: other than really Georgia or LSU, there's a storming of 1261 01:12:08,560 --> 01:12:12,599 Speaker 1: the field, right. You know, you're to me, there's too 1262 01:12:12,640 --> 01:12:15,400 Speaker 1: much storming of the field. You know, you should preserve 1263 01:12:15,479 --> 01:12:18,120 Speaker 1: storming of the field for two things, winning a title 1264 01:12:18,520 --> 01:12:21,439 Speaker 1: and knocking off number one. Period, Like, we should have 1265 01:12:21,479 --> 01:12:24,160 Speaker 1: a rule we will not find you if you storm 1266 01:12:24,280 --> 01:12:25,799 Speaker 1: the court or the field when you knock. 1267 01:12:25,640 --> 01:12:28,439 Speaker 2: Off number one in your home. 1268 01:12:29,280 --> 01:12:31,479 Speaker 1: Other than that, there's no more storming of the courts. 1269 01:12:31,840 --> 01:12:33,880 Speaker 1: I mean, I've seen, you know, when Miami was in 1270 01:12:34,000 --> 01:12:37,760 Speaker 1: its low period in the ACC, there would still be 1271 01:12:37,920 --> 01:12:39,960 Speaker 1: these like storming of the fields and like you know, 1272 01:12:40,920 --> 01:12:45,280 Speaker 1: Raleigh or Blacksburg or you know, like, oh. 1273 01:12:45,200 --> 01:12:48,120 Speaker 2: We beat Miami. It's like, come on, we were down 1274 01:12:48,160 --> 01:12:48,559 Speaker 2: at the time. 1275 01:12:51,640 --> 01:12:55,719 Speaker 1: It's notable that every single team that lost a conference 1276 01:12:55,840 --> 01:13:01,320 Speaker 1: championship game dropped in the rankings except one Alabama. What 1277 01:13:01,479 --> 01:13:03,920 Speaker 1: I don't get is Alabama played eight quarters of football 1278 01:13:03,960 --> 01:13:06,960 Speaker 1: against Georgia. They played well for the first quarter and 1279 01:13:07,000 --> 01:13:09,960 Speaker 1: a half of the first game, and then they survived 1280 01:13:10,439 --> 01:13:12,120 Speaker 1: that game and were able to eke out a win, 1281 01:13:13,280 --> 01:13:16,439 Speaker 1: and then they got pummeled and the next time they 1282 01:13:16,479 --> 01:13:18,000 Speaker 1: played them. To me, you got to look at all 1283 01:13:18,040 --> 01:13:21,639 Speaker 1: eight quarters. There was a pattern there, right. They figured 1284 01:13:21,680 --> 01:13:24,599 Speaker 1: it out, you know, they as soon as they figured 1285 01:13:24,600 --> 01:13:28,240 Speaker 1: out Alabama's game plan, they shut them down. And how 1286 01:13:28,280 --> 01:13:32,599 Speaker 1: did Alabama pivot the next time they played Georgia? They didn't, 1287 01:13:33,560 --> 01:13:36,040 Speaker 1: and they and then they lose two of their last four. 1288 01:13:36,960 --> 01:13:41,639 Speaker 1: They accumulated a third loss. And I'm sorry, I don't 1289 01:13:41,640 --> 01:13:44,240 Speaker 1: see it as punishment that getting into the conference championship 1290 01:13:44,240 --> 01:13:46,920 Speaker 1: game and then losing. First of all, Alabama had one 1291 01:13:47,120 --> 01:13:49,160 Speaker 1: had an easy way to get into the playoff winning 1292 01:13:49,200 --> 01:13:49,400 Speaker 1: get in. 1293 01:13:50,600 --> 01:13:52,280 Speaker 2: That was not an option for Notre Dame. That was 1294 01:13:52,320 --> 01:13:53,360 Speaker 2: not an option for Miami. 1295 01:13:53,800 --> 01:13:56,680 Speaker 1: We can talk to the ACC and their ridiculous tiebreaker situations. 1296 01:13:57,080 --> 01:13:57,960 Speaker 2: Now it's for Notre Dame. 1297 01:13:58,720 --> 01:14:03,599 Speaker 1: I see that there's some reports that indicates that Notre 1298 01:14:03,680 --> 01:14:06,360 Speaker 1: Dame partisans think that this was the committee sending a 1299 01:14:06,400 --> 01:14:08,679 Speaker 1: message to Notre Dame that hey, you're not a member 1300 01:14:08,680 --> 01:14:12,599 Speaker 1: of a conference. And look, I don't think Notre dames 1301 01:14:12,600 --> 01:14:16,479 Speaker 1: wins over Navy and Pitt should count as much as 1302 01:14:16,760 --> 01:14:20,280 Speaker 1: Miami's went over Pitt, simply because Pitt said it wasn't 1303 01:14:20,320 --> 01:14:22,360 Speaker 1: taking that game as seriously against Notre Dame because it 1304 01:14:22,400 --> 01:14:25,519 Speaker 1: didn't count. Navy said the same thing, because it didn't count. 1305 01:14:25,560 --> 01:14:28,639 Speaker 1: They were fighting for a potential spot in the AAC 1306 01:14:28,800 --> 01:14:31,439 Speaker 1: Conference Championship game, or don't call me the AAC, the 1307 01:14:31,479 --> 01:14:35,919 Speaker 1: American Conference Championship Game. So I do think the resentment 1308 01:14:35,960 --> 01:14:37,800 Speaker 1: of them not being a conference, them not having a 1309 01:14:37,840 --> 01:14:41,760 Speaker 1: face of very tough schedule, was part of this, and 1310 01:14:41,840 --> 01:14:43,519 Speaker 1: at some point they were going to send a message. 1311 01:14:43,520 --> 01:14:45,400 Speaker 1: As much as I think that committee hates the AEC, 1312 01:14:45,880 --> 01:14:47,880 Speaker 1: I think they hate Notre Dame in the special treatment 1313 01:14:47,920 --> 01:14:49,800 Speaker 1: that they get more and in fact we end up 1314 01:14:49,800 --> 01:14:53,920 Speaker 1: discovering Notre Dame's Now we got to guarantee going forward 1315 01:14:55,600 --> 01:14:57,519 Speaker 1: if they are in the top twelve, no matter what 1316 01:14:57,680 --> 01:14:59,599 Speaker 1: number they are, but if they're ranked in the top 1317 01:14:59,640 --> 01:15:03,160 Speaker 1: twelve in a twelve team playoff, they get into the 1318 01:15:03,160 --> 01:15:06,000 Speaker 1: playoff no matter what. They have to automatically get in. 1319 01:15:06,080 --> 01:15:09,720 Speaker 1: Apparently they signed some memo understanding with the CFP. Are 1320 01:15:09,800 --> 01:15:14,240 Speaker 1: you fing kidding me? They have their own legal side 1321 01:15:14,320 --> 01:15:18,160 Speaker 1: deal to guarantee participation in the College Football Playoff in 1322 01:15:18,200 --> 01:15:19,080 Speaker 1: a way that no other. 1323 01:15:19,000 --> 01:15:19,799 Speaker 2: Conference has. 1324 01:15:21,920 --> 01:15:23,960 Speaker 1: Come on, Notre Dame, come join a conference, Come join 1325 01:15:24,000 --> 01:15:27,240 Speaker 1: the ACC. You'll still dominate, and you literally will get 1326 01:15:27,240 --> 01:15:30,200 Speaker 1: into the College Football Playoff every year. The extra game 1327 01:15:30,240 --> 01:15:32,960 Speaker 1: will help you. You still get to play Stanford every year. 1328 01:15:33,040 --> 01:15:36,240 Speaker 1: It's a conference game. Okay, Yes, you're going to be 1329 01:15:36,280 --> 01:15:39,360 Speaker 1: stuck playing Miami once in a while. That's good, not 1330 01:15:39,600 --> 01:15:42,920 Speaker 1: bad for both schools. The fact of the matter is 1331 01:15:43,200 --> 01:15:45,920 Speaker 1: the last time Notre Dame was truly a power was 1332 01:15:45,960 --> 01:15:48,639 Speaker 1: when Miami was truly a power. Miami and Notre Dame 1333 01:15:48,680 --> 01:15:51,599 Speaker 1: are good for each other, and they ought to. If 1334 01:15:51,640 --> 01:15:52,880 Speaker 1: I were Notre Dame, I'd embrace that. 1335 01:15:53,120 --> 01:15:53,600 Speaker 2: Come on in. 1336 01:15:54,280 --> 01:15:57,000 Speaker 1: Look, I don't love the ACC myself. I think that 1337 01:15:57,200 --> 01:15:59,280 Speaker 1: the leadership here they dodged a bullet. 1338 01:16:00,960 --> 01:16:03,519 Speaker 2: Do I think I know that the. 1339 01:16:05,080 --> 01:16:07,879 Speaker 1: The chair of this committee, the temporary chair of this committee, 1340 01:16:07,880 --> 01:16:11,400 Speaker 1: the Arkansas d said that the fact that the ACC 1341 01:16:11,520 --> 01:16:13,840 Speaker 1: could have been shut out was not a factor in 1342 01:16:14,080 --> 01:16:17,120 Speaker 1: putting Miami over Notre dame. I think it was an 1343 01:16:17,160 --> 01:16:20,479 Speaker 1: intangible I'm not going to be that naive I think they. 1344 01:16:20,840 --> 01:16:23,120 Speaker 1: I think if I were the CFP, i'd be worried 1345 01:16:23,120 --> 01:16:25,760 Speaker 1: about lawsuits. And if you're wondering why the group of 1346 01:16:25,840 --> 01:16:28,080 Speaker 1: five gets this slot and why they've worded it the 1347 01:16:28,120 --> 01:16:31,160 Speaker 1: way they did, why it's top five conference champions that 1348 01:16:31,200 --> 01:16:34,240 Speaker 1: they don't specify which conferences because they don't want an 1349 01:16:34,240 --> 01:16:37,360 Speaker 1: antitrust lawsuit. They don't want a lawsuit coming from the 1350 01:16:37,439 --> 01:16:41,639 Speaker 1: non Power five four conferences, and so that's called lawsuit prevention. 1351 01:16:41,760 --> 01:16:43,479 Speaker 1: They're like, no, no, no, no, We'll provide you a 1352 01:16:43,560 --> 01:16:47,160 Speaker 1: path to the playoff, and this is the path that 1353 01:16:47,240 --> 01:16:49,160 Speaker 1: they created. Is there a better way to do this? 1354 01:16:49,320 --> 01:16:51,920 Speaker 2: My god, there's probably seventy five thousand better ways to 1355 01:16:52,000 --> 01:16:56,360 Speaker 2: do this. I could. You know, there's a part of 1356 01:16:56,439 --> 01:16:56,640 Speaker 2: me that. 1357 01:16:56,680 --> 01:16:59,519 Speaker 1: Says, go to an eighteen playoff, but let the power 1358 01:16:59,800 --> 01:17:04,000 Speaker 1: Let the Power four conferences run their own four team tournaments, 1359 01:17:05,360 --> 01:17:08,040 Speaker 1: Have the group of five have their own the top 1360 01:17:08,120 --> 01:17:11,439 Speaker 1: four champions play. You know, you get one representative there, 1361 01:17:11,479 --> 01:17:13,760 Speaker 1: but it's kind of you play your way in, and 1362 01:17:13,960 --> 01:17:17,080 Speaker 1: you know the Power four conferences you play your way in, 1363 01:17:18,280 --> 01:17:20,240 Speaker 1: and you just do this as playing your way in. 1364 01:17:21,000 --> 01:17:23,160 Speaker 1: You've got to take the human beings out of this. 1365 01:17:23,680 --> 01:17:26,559 Speaker 1: You've got to take ESPN executives out of this. You've 1366 01:17:26,560 --> 01:17:29,160 Speaker 1: got to take athletic directors out of this. You've got 1367 01:17:29,240 --> 01:17:31,080 Speaker 1: to take conference folks out of this. 1368 01:17:32,040 --> 01:17:34,240 Speaker 2: Is it is fraught. 1369 01:17:35,000 --> 01:17:38,120 Speaker 1: There's too much money at stake and lawsuits glory coming, 1370 01:17:38,200 --> 01:17:41,839 Speaker 1: and you know it'll come congressional. You're gonna have federal intervention, 1371 01:17:42,000 --> 01:17:46,799 Speaker 1: and maybe there should be. But this is this committee 1372 01:17:46,880 --> 01:17:50,000 Speaker 1: as it's structured. Now, you've got to get the human 1373 01:17:50,120 --> 01:17:53,599 Speaker 1: element out of this. There is no committee to decide 1374 01:17:53,600 --> 01:17:55,960 Speaker 1: who makes the NFL playoffs. There's no committee who decides 1375 01:17:55,960 --> 01:17:58,400 Speaker 1: who makes the MOB playoffs. There's no committee who decides 1376 01:17:58,400 --> 01:18:02,120 Speaker 1: who makes the NBA layoffs. There's no Yes, there's a 1377 01:18:02,160 --> 01:18:05,920 Speaker 1: committee who decides the seating and the last sort of 1378 01:18:06,120 --> 01:18:09,760 Speaker 1: couple of teams in a sixty eight soon to be 1379 01:18:09,960 --> 01:18:13,120 Speaker 1: seventy six team thing, if you want to. You know, 1380 01:18:14,000 --> 01:18:18,439 Speaker 1: I'm fine for a committee to decide seating, but I'm 1381 01:18:18,520 --> 01:18:20,600 Speaker 1: not fine for a committee to decide who gets in 1382 01:18:20,680 --> 01:18:21,320 Speaker 1: and who gets out. 1383 01:18:23,400 --> 01:18:23,760 Speaker 2: I will. 1384 01:18:23,840 --> 01:18:26,920 Speaker 1: I have plenty of complaints about how ESPN is a 1385 01:18:27,040 --> 01:18:29,920 Speaker 1: terrible business partner for the ACC. I still think all 1386 01:18:30,000 --> 01:18:33,000 Speaker 1: of the issues at the ACC, they dodged a bullet here. 1387 01:18:33,200 --> 01:18:36,280 Speaker 1: This would have cost millions of dollars for everybody across 1388 01:18:36,360 --> 01:18:39,080 Speaker 1: the board without getting any piece of the CFP pie. 1389 01:18:40,720 --> 01:18:42,639 Speaker 1: The leadership of the ACEC still needs to be held 1390 01:18:42,640 --> 01:18:46,000 Speaker 1: account and university presence in the ACC. Those that are 1391 01:18:46,080 --> 01:18:48,720 Speaker 1: serious about spending all this money in football need to 1392 01:18:48,800 --> 01:18:51,160 Speaker 1: have a come to you know what meeting about the 1393 01:18:51,280 --> 01:18:54,680 Speaker 1: leadership of the ACEC. Because this was a debacle. They 1394 01:18:54,880 --> 01:19:00,320 Speaker 1: dodged a catastrophe. Okay, thanks to their own the other 1395 01:19:00,439 --> 01:19:02,800 Speaker 1: politics that sort of were all over the map with 1396 01:19:02,920 --> 01:19:08,680 Speaker 1: this committee, but this was there's so many there's like 1397 01:19:08,800 --> 01:19:12,160 Speaker 1: seventeen thousand other ways to do this, and yet they 1398 01:19:12,320 --> 01:19:13,640 Speaker 1: chose this way to do this. 1399 01:19:14,040 --> 01:19:18,400 Speaker 2: Right. I'd like to see Notre Dame men. 1400 01:19:18,800 --> 01:19:21,840 Speaker 1: I honestly, I think it's Oklahoma that doesn't belong if 1401 01:19:21,880 --> 01:19:23,679 Speaker 1: you were to ask me which one of these teams 1402 01:19:23,720 --> 01:19:26,799 Speaker 1: doesn't belong Oklahoma. But this is because of the stupid 1403 01:19:26,880 --> 01:19:30,519 Speaker 1: Weekly rate rankings show. They came out and after Oklahoma 1404 01:19:30,560 --> 01:19:32,720 Speaker 1: beat Alabama, they did this, But if you looked at 1405 01:19:33,160 --> 01:19:36,719 Speaker 1: Oklahoma's body of work, I don't think you'd have Oklahoma 1406 01:19:36,800 --> 01:19:36,920 Speaker 1: in this. 1407 01:19:37,360 --> 01:19:38,439 Speaker 2: In this I think they'd have been. 1408 01:19:38,400 --> 01:19:41,560 Speaker 1: Left out certainly, would you know, Yes, they've got the 1409 01:19:41,640 --> 01:19:45,200 Speaker 1: Alabama win. But that Alabama win is I think way overvalued. 1410 01:19:46,000 --> 01:19:49,000 Speaker 1: And if you look at Alabama's body of work, it's 1411 01:19:49,080 --> 01:19:52,840 Speaker 1: not the most impressive team. And then what do they 1412 01:19:52,880 --> 01:19:55,840 Speaker 1: do for Alabama? They hand them the rematch with Oklahoma 1413 01:19:55,880 --> 01:20:00,320 Speaker 1: and Norman. I'm sorry, what a ridiculous gift. Now, quickly 1414 01:20:00,360 --> 01:20:04,280 Speaker 1: talk about the bracket. I'm gonna be parochial here and 1415 01:20:04,320 --> 01:20:05,439 Speaker 1: talk about Miami's path. 1416 01:20:06,080 --> 01:20:06,799 Speaker 2: Uh, it's. 1417 01:20:09,479 --> 01:20:13,960 Speaker 1: Let's just say Miami's got the Miami. This is the way, 1418 01:20:14,360 --> 01:20:17,439 Speaker 1: you know, you talk to old school Miami football players. 1419 01:20:18,120 --> 01:20:20,000 Speaker 1: I'm friends with a few of them, or you know, 1420 01:20:20,160 --> 01:20:21,920 Speaker 1: sort of acquaintances with a few of them. Let me 1421 01:20:22,080 --> 01:20:25,559 Speaker 1: let me not oversell it. And they would say, hey, 1422 01:20:25,600 --> 01:20:28,479 Speaker 1: if you're gonna, you know, be tested, be tested all 1423 01:20:28,560 --> 01:20:29,719 Speaker 1: the way, tested by the best. 1424 01:20:29,840 --> 01:20:29,960 Speaker 2: Right. 1425 01:20:30,360 --> 01:20:32,920 Speaker 1: So they started Texas A and M. And if they 1426 01:20:33,040 --> 01:20:35,560 Speaker 1: win that they get to play Ohio State and the 1427 01:20:35,600 --> 01:20:38,599 Speaker 1: Cotton Bowl. And if they win that, they likely play 1428 01:20:39,960 --> 01:20:43,080 Speaker 1: the winner the winner of Georgia and Ole Miss, with 1429 01:20:43,160 --> 01:20:44,800 Speaker 1: the assumption being that Old Miss is going to play 1430 01:20:44,840 --> 01:20:49,160 Speaker 1: tu Lane. So in theory, Miami's path to a national 1431 01:20:49,280 --> 01:20:51,719 Speaker 1: championship game, which is would be in their home stadium. 1432 01:20:51,800 --> 01:20:54,479 Speaker 1: By the way, it's at hard Rock, would be in 1433 01:20:54,520 --> 01:20:57,680 Speaker 1: their home stadium. It would begin in College Station with 1434 01:20:57,760 --> 01:21:00,519 Speaker 1: Texas A and M. Then it's Ohio State on December 1435 01:21:00,600 --> 01:21:03,880 Speaker 1: thirty first, then it would be Georgia in the Fiesta Bow. 1436 01:21:05,200 --> 01:21:08,160 Speaker 1: Miami is OH for the State of Arizona. So once 1437 01:21:08,240 --> 01:21:12,280 Speaker 1: we get there, I'm going to be really skeptical of 1438 01:21:12,360 --> 01:21:15,040 Speaker 1: our chances just because for whatever reason, we're OH. Like 1439 01:21:15,080 --> 01:21:17,960 Speaker 1: I said, we're OH for the State of Arizona. But 1440 01:21:18,280 --> 01:21:22,040 Speaker 1: the reward if we survive that would be a national 1441 01:21:22,080 --> 01:21:25,040 Speaker 1: title game against either Indian or a Texas Tech. I 1442 01:21:25,080 --> 01:21:29,599 Speaker 1: would say this, man, you look at the various paths. 1443 01:21:29,640 --> 01:21:33,640 Speaker 1: I think both Ohio State and Georgia are jealous of 1444 01:21:33,680 --> 01:21:37,840 Speaker 1: Indiana and Texas Tech. I think Texas Tech, Boy, did 1445 01:21:37,880 --> 01:21:41,040 Speaker 1: they get a break? I'm not I don't get a look. 1446 01:21:41,120 --> 01:21:43,679 Speaker 1: Oregon's got a good record and they're in a good conference. 1447 01:21:45,040 --> 01:21:47,719 Speaker 2: I don't buy it. And then they get the easy 1448 01:21:47,760 --> 01:21:50,960 Speaker 2: game against James Madison. I think this is one. 1449 01:21:52,840 --> 01:21:56,599 Speaker 1: It'll be interesting if but I love Texas Tech. Here 1450 01:21:56,800 --> 01:21:58,519 Speaker 1: I may or may not have taken a future in 1451 01:21:58,600 --> 01:22:02,599 Speaker 1: Texas Tech. I think they are are totally undervalued going 1452 01:22:02,680 --> 01:22:05,439 Speaker 1: through this. But you gotta love the Texas Tech path 1453 01:22:06,600 --> 01:22:08,760 Speaker 1: for as tough as the path is for Georgia and 1454 01:22:08,800 --> 01:22:12,640 Speaker 1: Ohio State, I think, I mean, even Indiana didn't get 1455 01:22:12,680 --> 01:22:14,200 Speaker 1: the greatest path they have that they are going to 1456 01:22:14,240 --> 01:22:20,040 Speaker 1: get Alabama. Although if I'm right about Alabama, then maybe 1457 01:22:20,120 --> 01:22:25,600 Speaker 1: Indiana's getting catching a break. But it is a the 1458 01:22:25,760 --> 01:22:30,080 Speaker 1: path for Georgia, Ohio State, yes, Miami, and Texas A 1459 01:22:30,160 --> 01:22:36,040 Speaker 1: and M that feels like the brutal side of this bracket. Indiana, 1460 01:22:36,240 --> 01:22:40,920 Speaker 1: Texas Tech a little a little less where you get 1461 01:22:41,040 --> 01:22:44,360 Speaker 1: sort of a one dimensional Oklahoma team if you end 1462 01:22:44,479 --> 01:22:47,040 Speaker 1: up having to play them, An Alabama team that just 1463 01:22:47,120 --> 01:22:50,519 Speaker 1: doesn't strike any fear into anybody, and an Oregon team 1464 01:22:50,560 --> 01:22:52,360 Speaker 1: that does seems a little bit softer. 1465 01:22:53,000 --> 01:22:53,760 Speaker 2: It just does. 1466 01:22:55,120 --> 01:22:56,760 Speaker 1: I can't, I can't put my finger on it, but 1467 01:22:56,840 --> 01:22:58,880 Speaker 1: there's doesn't quite Maybe I'm wrong. 1468 01:22:59,640 --> 01:22:59,960 Speaker 2: Never mind. 1469 01:23:00,200 --> 01:23:01,960 Speaker 1: And by the way, one of the stats that blew 1470 01:23:02,000 --> 01:23:04,799 Speaker 1: me away, it's apparently half of the college football playoff 1471 01:23:05,760 --> 01:23:08,720 Speaker 1: teams have some have a coach either leaving, either a 1472 01:23:08,760 --> 01:23:12,559 Speaker 1: head coach leaving or coordinator leaving. That's astonishing. That's going 1473 01:23:12,640 --> 01:23:15,720 Speaker 1: to have an impact. So hopefully that's another thing that 1474 01:23:15,800 --> 01:23:16,320 Speaker 1: needs to happen. 1475 01:23:16,360 --> 01:23:18,760 Speaker 2: Here. Do they need to fix this calendar. 1476 01:23:18,880 --> 01:23:21,320 Speaker 1: If you will, sort of do what the NFL does, 1477 01:23:21,560 --> 01:23:24,840 Speaker 1: try to not allow coaching change, you know, try to 1478 01:23:24,920 --> 01:23:28,439 Speaker 1: create some gap between the playoff and coaching changes, because 1479 01:23:29,000 --> 01:23:33,320 Speaker 1: this is this this part of it is also kind 1480 01:23:33,360 --> 01:23:35,519 Speaker 1: of messy as well, and that's why you got to look. 1481 01:23:35,840 --> 01:23:38,599 Speaker 1: I think Miami's not gonna Miami has very few changes 1482 01:23:38,640 --> 01:23:40,680 Speaker 1: in their coaching staff, so I feel pretty good about that. 1483 01:23:41,080 --> 01:23:43,080 Speaker 1: I think Texas A and M has very few changes. 1484 01:23:43,120 --> 01:23:45,880 Speaker 1: Did it with Georgia, But Ohio State, I think they're 1485 01:23:45,960 --> 01:23:49,720 Speaker 1: losing an offensive coordinator to USF ole Miss, you know, 1486 01:23:49,840 --> 01:23:50,839 Speaker 1: the ole Miss situation. 1487 01:23:52,040 --> 01:23:53,320 Speaker 2: So it's going to be. 1488 01:23:55,479 --> 01:24:00,840 Speaker 1: After all this drama. I'm excited that that Miami, if 1489 01:24:00,880 --> 01:24:04,400 Speaker 1: they whatever, however far they go, they'll have had to 1490 01:24:04,520 --> 01:24:04,840 Speaker 1: earn it. 1491 01:24:05,240 --> 01:24:08,120 Speaker 2: Right. They do not have a soft path. 1492 01:24:08,640 --> 01:24:11,880 Speaker 1: To the National title game. But hey, just four more games, guys, 1493 01:24:12,479 --> 01:24:16,439 Speaker 1: four more games. Look, I think Miami will be competitive 1494 01:24:16,479 --> 01:24:18,880 Speaker 1: in every game they're in. They will have a chance 1495 01:24:18,920 --> 01:24:21,040 Speaker 1: in the fourth quarter, will win the game. The real 1496 01:24:21,200 --> 01:24:25,160 Speaker 1: question is what kind of fourth quarter decision making is 1497 01:24:25,320 --> 01:24:27,960 Speaker 1: going to be made by the offensive coordinator Shannon Dawson, 1498 01:24:28,040 --> 01:24:30,879 Speaker 1: by the head coach Mario Christopaul, and by the quarterback 1499 01:24:30,920 --> 01:24:34,800 Speaker 1: Carson Beck. If there's a question mark about Miami, it 1500 01:24:34,960 --> 01:24:37,559 Speaker 1: is going to be their decision making when a game 1501 01:24:37,680 --> 01:24:39,880 Speaker 1: is on the line, all three of those gentlemen, so 1502 01:24:40,160 --> 01:24:44,639 Speaker 1: that they will Miami goes as far as their ability 1503 01:24:44,680 --> 01:24:49,400 Speaker 1: to make key decisions, timely decisions in the fourth quarter. 1504 01:24:54,439 --> 01:24:57,160 Speaker 1: I'm looking forward to my first trip to College station. Yes, 1505 01:24:57,240 --> 01:25:00,439 Speaker 1: I'm figuring this out. I'm looking forward to it. I've 1506 01:25:00,479 --> 01:25:02,960 Speaker 1: been wanting an excuse to get the Bush forty ones 1507 01:25:03,000 --> 01:25:06,040 Speaker 1: library as well. So it's a two for a political 1508 01:25:06,120 --> 01:25:09,960 Speaker 1: and sports junkie, right, I get to go see the 1509 01:25:10,040 --> 01:25:13,919 Speaker 1: field that hosts the so called twelfth Man. Sorry Seattle, 1510 01:25:14,439 --> 01:25:16,960 Speaker 1: I think Texas, A and m did it first. The 1511 01:25:17,000 --> 01:25:20,360 Speaker 1: Bush forty one library down there is a nice little 1512 01:25:20,640 --> 01:25:24,400 Speaker 1: consolation prize too with our visit. All right, with that, 1513 01:25:25,280 --> 01:25:27,720 Speaker 1: I will continue my little sports updates. I promise you 1514 01:25:27,920 --> 01:25:31,920 Speaker 1: we got more college football that'll be fun. I'll start 1515 01:25:31,960 --> 01:25:35,000 Speaker 1: to turn my focus to my packers. That could start 1516 01:25:35,040 --> 01:25:37,360 Speaker 1: a knowing some of you, especially if you're Bears fans 1517 01:25:38,160 --> 01:25:43,599 Speaker 1: or Cowboys fans, but we'll see. And I'm weirdly really 1518 01:25:43,640 --> 01:25:46,400 Speaker 1: happy about a tiny little trade that the Nats did 1519 01:25:46,600 --> 01:25:50,320 Speaker 1: for a prospect catcher who I think is a really 1520 01:25:50,400 --> 01:25:55,200 Speaker 1: good prospect, a guy named Harry Ford. So I might 1521 01:25:55,240 --> 01:25:57,599 Speaker 1: even sneak a little bit of a hot stovely into 1522 01:25:57,640 --> 01:26:02,040 Speaker 1: some of these sports updates. So with that, uh, I'll 1523 01:26:02,080 --> 01:26:04,240 Speaker 1: see you in forty eight hours. Thanks for listening, and 1524 01:26:04,320 --> 01:26:09,960 Speaker 1: until I upload again, m h m hm